DRAFT Regional Energy Efficiency Strategy Public Workshop

DRAFTRegional Energy Efficiency Strategy

Public Workshop

September 2, 2009

Lisa Van de WaterAir Quality Specialist

2

Regional Energy Efficiency Strategy – the basics

• Long-range strategy to programmatically encourage & incentivize non-regulatory emissions reductions through energy efficiency

• Regional, coordinated approach to EE• Partnership with & leveraging of existing EE

programs (utilities, regional partners) to maximize efficiency & emissions reductions

3

Overview

• 2007 Ozone Plan – Dual-path Strategy

• Electricity Production & Consumption

• REES Components

• ARRA “kick-start”

• Review Schedule

• Questions & Comments

4

2007 Ozone Plan

• Attainment of 8-hour federal ozone standard

• Significant Challenges– Topography– Meteorology

• “Dual-path” strategy– Regulatory Measures– “Black-Box” – Fast Track Strategy

5

2007 Fast TrackEmission Reduction Measures

• Green Contracting• Green Fleets• Truck Replacement/Retrofit/Repower• Short Sea Shipping• High-Speed Rail• Alternative Energy• Energy Conservation – Efficiency• Heat Island Mitigation• Episodic/Regional Controls• Inland Ports

6

“Green” Clean Air Opportunity

• Need for non-regulatory emissions reductions

• AB 32 greenhouse gas reductions

• American Recovery & Reinvestment Act– Significant energy efficiency & renewable

energy dollars– Economic stimulus

7

Complexity of Electricity

• Production– What resource: fossil fuel or renewables– Where: local or imported– How clean: what are the byproducts– Cost: base load versus peak load

• Consumption– Who: sectors– When: off-peak or peak– For what: critical systems or household appliances

8



• Consumption– Who: sectors– When: off-peak or peak– For what: critical systems or household appliances

10



• Consumption– Who: sectors– For what: critical systems or household appliances– When: off-peak or peak

11

Electricity Use & Air Quality

NO x

SOx

Source: eGRID2007 Version 1.0, Year 2005 Summary Tables (created in 2008)

CAMX

*

CO2 712 lb/MWh

CH4 30 lb/GWh

N2O 8 lb/GWh

NOX 0.6 lb/MWh

SOX 0.5 lb/MWh

TX

1,324

18

15

0.8

3.2

12

Electricity Generation Resource Mix

Source: eGRID2007 Version 1.0, Year 2005 Summary Tables (created in 2008)

CAMX = 0.24%US = 0.01%

All Fossil FuelsCAMX – 56%

US – 72%

back

13

California Major Utilities' Resource Mix

2.0%1.0%3.0%2.0%3.0%1.8%Wind

1.0%<1%<1%0.0%1.0%0.2%Solar

3.0%4.0%<1%4.0%1.0%2.1%Small Hydro

3.0%<1%2.0%2.0%9.0%4.7%Geothermal

3.0%1.0%3.0%5.0%2.0%2.1%Biomass

12.0%6.0%8.0%13.0%16.0%10.9%Renewables

0.0%10.0%15.0%23.0%17.0%12.9%Nuclear

41.0%30.0%50.0%42.0%54.0%41.5%Natural Gas

47.0%6.0%10.0%19.0%5.0%19.0%Large Hydro

0.0%48.0%18.0%3.0%8.0%15.7%Coal

SMUDLADWPSDG&EPG&ESCEStatewideResource Type

SOURCE: CEC Website Data - 2006 http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/electricity_resource_mix_pie_charts/index.html

14




15

Base Load & Peak Load

Base

Intermediate

Peak

WinterPower Demand

Time of Day

Base

Intermediate

Peak

SummerPower Demand

Time of Day

16




17

CA Electricity Usage per Capita

18

CA Electricity Demand

19




20

Streetlight1%

Residential32%

Mining Construction

2%

Industry15%

Commercial Building

37%

Commercial Other

5%Ag Water Pump

8%

Source: CA Energy Commission, Energy Consumption Data Management System; 2007 All Utility Entities

California Electricity Consumption

21

Lodging4.9%

Misc.16.1%

Health6.8%

Retail14.7%

Refrigerated Warehouse

2.9%

Food Store8.8%

Unrefrigerated Warehouse

3.7%

School5.0%

College3.8%

Small Office7.1%

Large Office17.4%

Restaurant8.9%

Source: CA Energy Commission, California End-Use Survey, 2006

Commercial Electricity Use by Building Type

All Office 24.5%

22

Motors4.2%Air Compressors

0.3%

Process1.0%

Miscellaneous5.8%

Refrigeration13.4%

Cooking4.2%

Water Heating0.9%

Interior Lighting28.7%

Exterior Lighting5.8%

Office Equipment7.1%

Heating1.6%

Cooling14.9%

Ventilation11.9%

Source: CA Energy Commission, California End-Use Survey, 2006

Commercial Electricity Usage by End Use

Total Lighting

35%

Lighting Cooling

Refrigeration Ventilation

75%

23

Lighting8.8%

Laundry Appliances

6.7%

Home Electronics7.2%

Other Equipment2.5%

Other End Uses7.7%

Heating, Ventilation,

Cooling31.2%

Kitchen Appliances

26.7%

Water Heating9.1%

Source: End-Use Consumption of Electricity 2001, Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy

Residential End-Use Electricity Usage

24

Regional Energy Efficiency Strategy

• Outreach, Information & Education• Tools & Programs

– Residential, Commercial/Industrial, Local Government

– Programs for successful energy efficiency & green fleets programs

• Grants Program– Expand existing opportunities– New grant opportunities

25

Outreach, Education & Information

• Healthy Air Living

• Targeted Outreach– Local Government– Minority Small Business– Neighborhood Groups– Industrial Regulated Sources– Ag Regulated Sources

26

Outreach, Education & Information

• Comprehensive Energy Website

• Energy Efficiency Opportunities Analysis– Model after studies by McKinsey & Company

• Look at economics of Energy Efficiency & GHG abatement

• Focus on the regional scale

– Enlist help from • Valley Colleges & Universities• Regional energy efficiency experts

27

McKinsey & Company, December 2009

U.S. Energy Efficiency Supply Curve - 2020

Dollars per million BTU’s saved over

lifetime of measure.

80% of opportunity requires deploying

58% of upfront investment.

28

Tools & Programs

• Residential Programs– Categories of homes– Packaged retrofits– Efficient efficiency

• Commercial Programs– Energy audit– Retrofits– Simple work practices– Long-range strategies for sustainable efficiencies &

renewables

29

More Tools & Programs

• Industrial Programs– Processes & operations– Office efficiencies

• Municipal Programs– Energy policies– Implementation assistance

• Fleets– Fuel efficiency, fleet minimization– Alternative fuels

• CNG/LNG• Electric with solar recharge

30

Grants & Incentives

• Expand ERIP to include energy efficiency

• Broad spectrum of assistance• EE projects that improve air quality

– Technical assistance for grant applications

– Letters of support from AQ perspective

– Grant administration with partners

31

Partnerships

• Coordination is key– Message– Programs

• Next two years– SJVCEO– ARRA funds & projects– EE Opportunities Analysis

• Utility Partners – best way to reach multiple markets/customers so that efforts are not duplicated

32

“Kick Start” with ARRA

• EECBG Program for small jurisdictions– Regional application– Maximize dollars brought in & energy savings

• SEP funding through CEC– Municipal financing opportunities– Comprehensive Retrofit Program

• Residential• Commercial

• Other grant opportunities – $7.1 million, so far– Alternative fuels & vehicles– Renewable Energy

33

Implementation

• End of 2009 – submit ARRA applications to CEC & initiate programs

• February 2010 – EE & RE website• End of 2010 – Energy Efficiency

Opportunities Analysis• Ongoing – Outreach & Education; monitor

EE savings; monitor emissions reductions• 2011 & beyond – Expand programs &

grants opportunities

34

Review Schedule

• Fast Track Task Force – June 16

• Public Workshop – September 2nd

– Present draft– Comment period ends September 16th

– Revised draft

• Governing Board – November 5th

35

Comment Deadline

• 5:00 p.m. September 16, 2009• Contact: Lisa Van de Water• Mail: San Joaquin Valley APCD

1990 E Gettysburg AveFresno CA 93726

• Phone: (559) 230-6100• Fax: (559) 230-6064• Email:

[email protected]

Thank You

DRAFT Regional Energy Efficiency Strategy Public Workshop

Documents

Transcript of DRAFT Regional Energy Efficiency Strategy Public Workshop