DRAFT 10-20-04 1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? Public Forum on Alternative...
-
Upload
shanna-willis -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of DRAFT 10-20-04 1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? Public Forum on Alternative...
DRAFT 10-20-04
1
What If… The Washington Region
Grew Differently?
Public Forum on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios
National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board
DRAFT10-20-04 2
Study of “What If” Scenarios
What if job and housing growth were
shifted? What if new roads or transit were built?
How would 2030 travel conditions
change?
Not looking at “how to,” just “what if.”
DRAFT10-20-04 3
Presentation Outline
Historical and Forecast Trends “What If” Scenarios: A Building Block
ApproachAlternative Land Use ScenariosWhat Do the Scenarios Tell Us?Next Study Phase
DRAFT10-20-04 4
Historical and Forecast Trends
DRAFT10-20-04 5
The Washington Region Approximately 3,000
square miles
Includes 4.5 million people and 2.8 million jobs
The National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (TPB) prepares a financially constrained, 30-year transportation plan for the region
DRAFT10-20-04 6
Growth 1970 - 2000
50%
87%
Population
Employment
Employment is Growing Faster than Population
Forecast Trends 2000 - 2030
36%
48%
Population
Employment
1970: 3 Million 2000: 4.5 Million
1970: 1.5 Million 2000: 2.8 Million
2000: 4.5 Million 2030: 6.2 Million
2000: 2.8 Million 2030: 4.2 Million
DRAFT10-20-04 7
Forecast Trends 2000 - 2030
37%
16%
Daily VehicleMiles Traveled
Freeway andArterial Lane
Miles
The Highway System Won’t Keep Pace
2000: 109 Million 2030: 150 Million
2000: 15,300 Miles 2030: 17,600 Miles
DRAFT10-20-04 8
Most Transportation Dollars Are Needed for Maintenance
Little money is available for new transportation projects
23%
77%
New Roads and Transit
Operations & Preservation
DRAFT10-20-04 9
Most of the Beltway Will Be Stop and GoEvening Highway Congestion 2000 and 2030
2 0 3 02 0 3 0Based on the 2003 CLRPBased on the 2003 CLRP
Congested Flow Congested Flow (Average Speed 30 to 50 mph)(Average Speed 30 to 50 mph)
Stop and Go Conditions Stop and Go Conditions (Average Speed < 30 mph)(Average Speed < 30 mph)
2000 2030
DRAFT10-20-04 10
Metro Platforms and Trains Will Be Packed
Morning Peak-Hour Transit Congestion: 2000 and 2030
Congested
Highly Congested2000 2030
DRAFT10-20-04 11
Looking at “What If” Scenarios:
A Building Block Approach
DRAFT10-20-04 12
What if current plans don’t change?
Regional Transportation Plan and Current Growth
Forecasts
Regional Transportation Plan - Projects with anticipated funding
Current Growth Forecasts - Jobs and households
1
DRAFT10-20-04 13
20%
52%
22%
Daily VehicleMiles of Travel
Miles of AMCongestion
Transit Trips
How would travel conditions change between 2010 and 2030?
Regional Transportation Plan and Current Growth Forecasts
2010: 125 Million 2030: 150 Million
2010: 1,700 Miles 2030: 2,600 Miles
2010: 1 Million 2030: 1.3 Million
DRAFT10-20-04 14
What if the capacity of the current transit system was maximized?
Regional Transportation Plan and Current Growth
Forecasts
“Enhanced Transit” Scenario
Longer trains, station improvements, expanded bus service, and more commuter trains to accommodate projected demand
1
2
DRAFT10-20-04 15
20%
52%
22%
19%
49%
32%
Daily VehicleMiles of Travel
Miles of AMCongestion
Transit Trips
How would travel conditions change between 2010 and 2030?
“Enhanced Transit” Scenario
Current Plan
Enhanced Transit2010: 125 Million
2010: 1 Million
2010: 1,700 Miles
DRAFT10-20-04 16
What if land use patterns also changed?
Regional Transportation Plan and Current Growth
Forecasts
“Enhanced Transit” Scenario
1
2
3Alternative Land Use Scenarios
3
DRAFT10-20-04 17
What are some of the key issues the land use scenarios might address?
DRAFT10-20-04 18
Issue #1: Job Growth is Outpacing Household Growth
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
The region must “import” workers from as far away as West Virginia and Pennsylvania
Forecast Job
GrowthForecast
Household Growth
Additional Households Needed to Balance Jobs
Growth 2010 – 2030 (Thousands)
Assumes 1.5 Workers/Household
DRAFT10-20-04 19
What if more people who worked here lived here?
VA
WV
Balt.Scenario #1:
“More Households” Increase household
growth to balance forecast job growth
Locate households in regional “Activity Clusters”
Regional Activity ClusterIncrease household growth by 200,000
Regional Transportation Plan and Current Growth Forecasts
More Households
“Enhanced Transit” Scenario
Regional Transportation Plan and Current Growth Forecasts
DRAFT10-20-04 20
19%
49%
32%
18%
43%
48%
Daily VehicleMiles of Travel
Miles of AMCongestion
Transit Trips
Baseline (Enhanced Transit)
More Households
2010: 125 Million
2010: 1 Million
2010: 1,700 Miles
Scenario #1: “More Households” How would travel conditions change between 2010 and 2030?
DRAFT10-20-04 21
18%
Daily VehicleMiles of Travel
Baseline (Enhanced Transit)
More Households
2010: 125 Million
Scenario #1: “More Households”
Even with 200,000 more households, daily vehicle miles of
travel would go down.
Plus…
DRAFT10-20-04 22
Scenario #1: More Households” Under Scenario #1, the average person would drive two miles less per day.
3%
-6%
Scenario #1
Baseline (Enhanced Transit)
Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel per Person
2010: 23.4 miles/ person
2030 Baseline: 24.2 miles/ person
2030 Scenario #1: 22.1 miles/ person
DRAFT10-20-04 23
Issue #2: Workers are Living Farther Away from Their Jobs
Inner jurisdictions – most job growth
Outer jurisdictions – lion’s share of household growth
Average commute – more than 30 minutes
DRAFT10-20-04 24
What if people lived closer to their jobs?
Regional Activity ClusterShift 84,000 households
Scenario #2A:
“Households In” Shift household growth
to inner jurisdictions (to get people closer to jobs)
Households In
“Enhanced Transit” Scenario
Regional Transportation Plan and Current Growth Forecasts
DRAFT10-20-04 25
19%
49%
32%
19%
39%
36%
Daily VehicleMiles of Travel
Miles of AMCongestion
Transit Trips
Baseline (Enhanced Transit)
Households In
2010: 125 Million
2010: 1 Million
2010: 1,700 Miles
Scenario #2A: “Households In” How would travel conditions change between 2010 and 2030?
DRAFT10-20-04 26
49%
39%
Miles of AMCongestion
Scenario 2A: “Households In” This scenario would have the biggest impact on morning congestion.
Baseline (Enhanced Transit)
Households In
2010: 1,700 Miles
DRAFT10-20-04 27
What if jobs were located closer to where
people live?
Regional Activity ClusterShift 82,000 jobs
Scenario #2B:
“Jobs Out” Shift job growth to outer
jurisdictions (to get jobs closer to new housing)
Jobs Out
“Enhanced Transit” Scenario
Regional Transportation Plan and Current Growth Forecasts
DRAFT10-20-04 28
19%
49%
32%
19%
25%
45%
Daily VehicleMiles of Travel
Miles of AMCongestion
Transit Trips
Scenario #2B: “Jobs Out” How would travel conditions change between 2010 and 2030?
Baseline (Enhanced Transit)
Jobs Out
2010: 125 Million
2010: 1 Million
2010: 1,700 Miles
DRAFT10-20-04 29
32%
25%Transit Trips
Scenario #2B: “Jobs Out” Transit use would not grow as quickly.(Not enough transit service in outer jurisdictions.)
Baseline (Enhanced Transit)
Jobs Out
2010: 1 Million
DRAFT10-20-04 30
49%
45%
Miles of AMCongestion
Scenario #2B: “Jobs Out” But the scenario still would slow the growth of congestion.
Baseline (Enhanced Transit)
Jobs Out
2010: 1,700 Miles
DRAFT10-20-04 31
20%
1%
West East
Issue #3: East-West Divide
Job Growth Rate 1990 – 2000
A 1999 Brookings Institution report highlighted disparities between the eastern and western
parts of the region
DRAFT10-20-04 32
Issue #3: East-West DivideWest-bound travel clogs the roads during morning rush hour
Average Commute Time
Morning Rush Hour
Up to 30 minutes
Up to 40 minutes
Over 40 minutes
DRAFT10-20-04 33
What if there were more development on the
eastern side of the region?
Regional Activity ClusterShift 57,000 households and 114,000 jobs
Scenario #3: “Region Undivided” Shift job and household
growth from West to East
Region Undivided
“Enhanced Transit” Scenario
Regional Transportation Plan and Current Growth Forecasts
DRAFT10-20-04 34
19%
49%
32%
18%
47%
38%
Daily VehicleMiles of Travel
Miles of AMCongestion
Transit Trips
Scenario #3: “Region Undivided” How would travel conditions change between 2010 and 2030?
Baseline (Enhanced Transit)Region Undivided
2010: 125 Million
2010: 1 Million
2010: 1,700 Miles
The trends are encouraging.
DRAFT10-20-04 35
Issue #4: Most Growth Located Outside Transit Station Areas
HouseholdGrowth2010 to2030
Inside Transit Station Areas
Outside Transit Station Areas
EmploymentGrowth2010 to2030
30%
70%
20%
80%
DRAFT10-20-04 36
What if people lived and worked closer to transit?
Metro Rail
Commuter Rail
Bus
Shift 125,000 households and 150,000 jobs
Scenario #4: “Transit Oriented” Locate job and household
growth around transit stations
Transit Oriented Development
“Enhanced Transit” Scenario
Regional Transportation Plan and Current Growth Forecasts
DRAFT10-20-04 37
49%
32%
18%
43%
37%
19%Daily VehicleMiles of Travel
Miles of AMCongestion
Transit Trips
Scenario #4: “Transit Oriented” How would travel conditions change between 2010 and 2030?
Baseline (Enhanced Transit)
Transit Oriented
2010: 125 Million
2010: 1 Million
2010: 1,700 Miles
Again, the trends are encouraging.
DRAFT 10-20-04
38
What do these scenarios tell us?
DRAFT10-20-04 39
The scenarios show some favorable trends.
Transit trips would increase.
The growth in morning
congestion would be slowed.
DRAFT10-20-04 40
Why aren’t the impacts
greater?
DRAFT10-20-04 41
Most jobs and housing for 2030 are already in place.
Households in 2000
Growth
by 2010
Growth
by 2030
Affected by scenarios
2030 Households
72%
13%
15%
Underway or in the pipeline
Already in place
(Of course, some of this might be rezoned or redeveloped in the future…)
DRAFT10-20-04 42
Scenario impacts may be small regionally, but large locally.
Before
After
DRAFT10-20-04 43
Significant change takes time.
Courtesy of WMATA
Scenarios only look out to 2030, but impacts may be greatest in 2040, 2050, and beyond
For example, just look at how long it took to get Metro in place . . .
DRAFT10-20-04 44
Is there a way to magnify
the impacts?
DRAFT10-20-04 45
= ?+New
roads, bridges, transit
Future stages of the study will include transportation scenarios…
The impacts might be greater if transportation improvements
were added.For example:
DRAFT10-20-04 46
Impacts might be even greater if we combined scenarios.
For example, what if we combined:• Scenario #3 (Region Undivided) • Scenario #4 (Transit Oriented Development) • and transportation improvements ?
+ = ?Future stages of the study will look at such combinations…
New roads, bridges, transit+
DRAFT10-20-04 47
Next Study Phase
Alternative transportation scenarios New rail lines? New bus routes? New roads? New bridges?
Combining transportation and land use scenarios
Regional Transportation Plan and Current Growth Forecasts
“Enhanced Transit” Scenario
Alternative Land Use Scenarios
1
2
3
Alternative Transportation
Scenarios4
5Combining Scenarios
DRAFT10-20-04 48
Discussion Questions
What did you think of the presentation?
What did you think of the scenarios?
What transportation scenarios should be looked at?
DRAFT 10-20-04
49
For more information, contact the Transportation Planning Board:
(202) 962-3200
www.mwcog.org/transportation