Dr. Ren Anderson, NREL - National Renewable Energy Laboratory

34
Example Performance Targets and Efficiency Packages Greensburg, Kansas Dr. Ren Anderson, NREL Mixed Humid Climate Region NREL/PR-550-43944 A Stand-Alone Briefing Package

Transcript of Dr. Ren Anderson, NREL - National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Example Performance Targets and

Efficiency PackagesGreensburg, Kansas

Dr. Ren Anderson, NREL

Mixed Humid Climate Region

NREL/PR-550-43944A Stand-Alone Briefing Package

2

Coal produces about half of the

energy supplied by the

Electric Power Sector, it is responsible

for 81% of this sector’s CO2 emissions.

Architecture 2030

3

020406080

100120140160

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

Floor Area

Mill

ion

Btu

/Hou

seho

ld

(Site

)

2001 EIA RECS Survey Data

Size Matters: 2001 RECS Site Energy Consumption Data

2X!

4

Vintage Matters: 2001 RECS Primary Electric Data

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Pre-50's 50's 60's 70's 80's 90's

Vintage

Mill

ion

Btu

/Hou

seho

ld(P

rimar

y El

ectri

c)

1.6X!

2001 EIA RECS Survey Data

5

Home Energy Related Costs

Neutral Cost Point

Incremental, Energy Related MortgageCosts

Minimum Cost Point

“Least Cost”Curve

Source Energy Savings

All

Ener

gy R

elat

ed C

osts

, $

50%

MinimumCode

6

Specific Example: 2000ft2 New Home

2000 ft2, 16% window to floor area ratio

Design: Building Science Corporation

7(2000 ft2, 2-story, 16% window to floor area ratio), unconditioned basementIECC 2003

BEopt Beta 0.8.04

Energy Star

Greensburg, KansasMinimum Cost Target

Key Finding: Current Energy Codes Do Not Achieve Minimum

Cost

8(2000 ft2, 2-story, 16% window to floor area ratio), unconditioned basement

IECC 2003

BEopt Beta 0.8.04

Energy Star

Key Finding: There are LargePotential Energy Savings Near

the Minimum Cost Point

9(2000 ft2, 2-story, 16% window to floor area ratio), unconditioned basement

IECC 2003

BEopt Beta 0.8.04Energy Star

Key Finding: There are HugePotential Energy Savings at

Neutral Cost

10(2000 ft2, 2-story, 16% window to floor area ratio), unconditioned basement

IECC 2003 BEopt Beta 0.8.04

Energy Star

Key Finding: Onsite RenewablesPlay a Key Supporting Role!

11(2000 ft2, 2-story, 16% window to floor area ratio), unconditioned basement

IECC 2003 BEopt Beta 0.8.04

Energy Star

Key Finding: There is a 20%-30%Technology Gap to Achieve Net ZEH

12

Critical ZEH Technology Gaps•High R Wall Systems: Durable high R wall systems for cold, northern marine, and mixed climates, leading to development of an R-30 wall assembly with an incremental cost of $2/ft2-floor area relative to an R-19 2x6 wall.•Cold Climate DHW: DHW system with $2000 incremental system cost and 30% reduction in annual energy relative to a gas tankless hot water system with EF=0.8. •Cold Climate R10 Window Assembly: R10 window assembly with a minimum SHGC of 0.3 and cost of $20/ft2 (incremental cost of $4/ft2 of window area relative to current low e)•Very High Performance AC[1]: AC system with 30% reduction in annual energy use and an incremental cost increase of $1000 relative to a current SEER 18/EER 13.4 system with tight ducts in conditioned space.•MELs Reduction: 30% reduction in miscellaneous electric energy use with an incremental cost of $1000.[1] The AC performance goal is an overall system performance goal and includes savings from efficiency (improvements in COP), zoning, night cooling, evaporative cooling, heat recovery, and capacity modulation.

13

30% Savings Target: Greensburg

(2000 ft2, 2-story, 16% window to floor area ratio), unconditioned basement

IECC 2003

BEopt Beta 0.8.04

Energy Star

GreensburgTarget:

Minimum Cost

14

Example: Greensburg 30% Efficiency Package1

• 2x6 + R-19 batts (R14 wall assembly) • R40 ceiling assembly• R10 basement • .0002 SLA (4 ACH50)• Low e/low SHGC glazing (0.3 U-value, 0.37 SHGC)• 50% CFL Lighting• SEER 14 AC• AFUE 90+ furnace• Premium gas hot water, EF 0.61• Tight ducts (Mastic, 5% Leakage), R-8• BA QA (moisture control, …)

Estimated cost increase relative to standard home2,3: +$1.25-$2.00/ft2Notes:1. Equivalent packages may be substituted, based on specific builder preferences2. Does not include costs associated with builder/contractor training and changes inbusiness practices.3. Incremental costs evaluated relative to minimum IECC 2003

15

Greensburg

Estimated Incremental First Cost Relative to Standard Practice1

$4,000

Annual Amortized Cost 7%, 30Year mortgage2

$211

Estimated Annual Utility Bill Savings $723

Net Annual Savings $512

(2000 ft2, 2-story, 16% window to floor area ratio, unconditioned basement)

Estimated Annual Cost Savings: 30% Energy Savings Target

1Evaluated relative to minimum IECC 20032 Assumes 28% marginal tax bracket and includes present value of future replacementsof equipment over 30 year life of mortgage.

16IECC 2003 30% Savings

Estimated Annual Energy Savings by End Use: 30% Target

17

40% Savings Target: Greensburg

(2000 ft2, 2-story, 16% window to floor area ratio, unconditioned basement)IECC 2003

BEopt Beta 0.8.04

Energy Star

GreensburgTarget:

40% Savings

18

Example: Greensburg 40% Efficiency Package1

• 2x6 + R-21 batts (R15 wall assembly) • R50 ceiling assembly• R10 basement • .0002 SLA (4 ACH50)• Low e/low SHGC glazing, Argon Fill (0.28 U-value, 0.37 SHGC)• 80% CFL Lighting• SEER 18 AC• AFUE 90+ furnace• Premium gas hot water, EF 0.61• Tight ducts (Mastic, 5% Leakage), R-8• BA QA (moisture control, …)

Estimated cost increase relative to standard home2,3: +$3.00-$4.00/ft2Notes:1. Equivalent packages may be substituted, based on specific builder preferences2. Does not include costs associated with builder/contractor training and changes inbusiness practices.3. Incremental costs evaluated relative to minimum IECC 2003

19

Greensburg

Estimated Incremental First Cost Relative to Standard Practice1,2

$7,000

Annual Amortized Cost 7%, 30 Year mortgage3

$411

Annual Utility Bill Savings $919

Net Annual Savings $508

(2000 ft2, 2-story, 16% window to floor area ratio), unconditioned basement

Estimated Annual Costs: 40% Efficiency Target

1Evaluated relative to minimum IECC 2003. Cost does not include impact of $2000 tax credit.2Qualifies for federal new home tax credit3 Assumes 28% marginal tax bracket and includes present value of future replacementsof equipment over 30 year life of mortgage.

20IECC 2003 40% Savings

Estimated Annual Energy Savings by End Use: 40% Target

21

50% Savings Target: Greensburg

(2000 ft2, 2-story, 16% window to floor area ratio, unconditioned basement)IECC 2003

BEopt Beta 0.8.04

Energy Star

GreensburgTarget:

50% Savings

22

Example: Greensburg 50% Efficiency Package1

• 2x6 + R-19 batts+ foam sheathing (R22 wall assembly)• R50 ceiling assembly• R10 basement • .0001 SLA (2 ACH50)• Low e/low SHGC glazing, Argon Fill (0.28 U-value, 0.37 SHGC)• 80% CFL Lighting• SEER 18 AC• AFUE 90+ furnace• Gas tankless hot water, EF 0.8+• Tight ducts (Mastic, 5% Leakage), in conditioned space• Energy Star Appliances• BA QA (moisture control, …)

Estimated cost increase relative to standard home2,3: +$6.00-$8.00/ft2Notes:1. Equivalent packages may be substituted, based on specific builder preferences2. Does not include costs associated with builder/contractor training and changes inbusiness practices.3. Incremental costs evaluated relative to minimum IECC 2003

23

Greensburg

Estimated Incremental First Cost Relative to Standard Practice1,2

$13,000

Annual Amortized Cost 7%, 30Year mortgage3

$706

Annual Utility Bill Savings $1162

Net Annual Savings $456

(2000 ft2, 2-story, 16% window to floor area ratio), unconditioned basement

Estimated Annual Costs: 50% Efficiency Target

1Evaluated relative to minimum IECC 20032Qualifies for federal new home tax credit3 Assumes 28% marginal tax bracket and includes present value of future replacementsof equipment over 30 year life of mortgage.

24IECC 2003 50% Savings

Estimated Annual Energy Savings by End Use: 50% Target

25

Neutral Cost Point: Greensburg

(2000 ft2, 2-story, 16% window to floor area ratio, unconditioned basement)IECC 2003

BEopt Beta 0.8.04

Energy Star

GreensburgTarget:

Neutral Cost

26

Example: Greensburg Neutral Cost Package1

• R22 wall assembly (2x6 + R-19 batts+ foam sheathing)• R50 ceiling assembly• R10 basement • .0001 SLA (2 ACH50)• Low e/low SHGC glazing, Argon Fill (0.28 U-value, 0.37 SHGC)• 80% CFL Lighting• SEER 18 AC• AFUE 90+ furnace• Gas tankless hot water, EF 0.8+• Tight ducts (Mastic, 5% Leakage), in conditioned space• Energy Star Appliances• 1.5 kWDC PV System• BA QA (moisture control, …)

Estimated cost increase relative to standard home2,3: +$10.00-$13.00/ft2Notes:1. Equivalent packages may be substituted, based on specific builder preferences2. Does not include costs associated with builder/contractor training and changes inbusiness practices.3. Incremental costs evaluated relative to minimum IECC 2003

27

Greensburg

Estimated Incremental First Cost Relative to Standard Practice1,2

$25,000

Annual Amortized Cost 7%, 30Year mortgage3

$1386

Annual Utility Bill Savings $1386

Net Annual Savings $0

(2000 ft2, 2-story, 16% window to floor area ratio), unconditioned basement

Estimated Annual Costs: Neutral Cost Target

1Evaluated relative to minimum IECC 20032Qualifies for federal new home tax credit3 Assumes 28% marginal tax bracket and includes present value of future replacementsof equipment over 30 year life of mortgage.

IECC 2003 Neutral Cost

Estimated Annual Energy Savings by End Use: Neutral Cost Target

PV

28

29

Net Zero Energy Target: Greensburg

(2000 ft2, 2-story, 16% window to floor area ratio, unconditioned basement)

IECC 2003

BEopt Beta 0.8.04Energy Star

30

Example: Greensburg NZEH Package1

• R22 wall assembly (2x6 + R-19 batts+ foam sheathing)• R50 ceiling assembly• R10 basement • .0001 SLA (2 ACH50)• Low e/low SHGC glazing, Argon Fill (0.28 U-value, 0.37 SHGC)• 80% CFL Lighting• SEER 18 AC• AFUE 90+ furnace• Gas tankless hot water, EF 0.8+• Tight ducts (Mastic, 5% Leakage), in conditioned space• Energy Star Appliances• 7 kWDC PV System and solar hot water system• BA QA (moisture control, …)

Estimated cost increase relative to standard home2,3: +$35.00-$40.00/ft2Notes:1. Equivalent packages may be substituted, based on specific builder preferences2. Does not include costs associated with builder/contractor training and changes inbusiness practices.3. Incremental costs evaluated relative to minimum IECC 2003

31

Greensburg

Estimated Incremental First Cost Relative to Standard Practice1,2

$69,000

Annual Amortized Cost 7%, 30Year mortgage2

$4102

Annual Utility Bill Savings $2306

Net Annual Savings -$1796

(2000 ft2, 2-story, 16% window to floor area ratio), unconditioned basement

Estimated Annual Costs: Net Zero Energy Target

1Evaluated relative to minimum IECC 20032Qualifies for federal new home tax credit3 Assumes 28% marginal tax bracket and includes present value of future replacementsof equipment over 30 year life of mortgage.

32IECC 2003 NZEH

Estimated Annual Energy Savings by End Use: Net Zero Energy Target

PV

33

Cost of Energy Saving Upgrades

$0$10,000$20,000$30,000$40,000$50,000$60,000$70,000$80,000

30%Savings

40%Savings

50%Savings

60%Savings

Net ZeroEnergy

Savings Level

Incr

emen

tal

Co

st (

per

h

om

e)

34

This work has been authored by an employee or employees of the Midwest Research Institute under Contract No. DE-AC36-99GO10337 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes.