Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments...
-
Upload
amber-georgina-mccoy -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
0
Transcript of Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments...
![Page 1: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Dr. Mukti L. Das
Seattle, WashingtonNovember 13-16, 2012
Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear
Deformation Shell
![Page 2: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Plates And Shell Theories
To idealize a structure as a mathematical model, there is a need for a structural element that has a small third dimension compared to other two dimensions.
This idealization resulted to various plates/shell theories that approximate equations of three dimensional quantum mechanics.
Two commonly used theories are, a) Kirchhoff-Love theory and
b) Mindlin - Reissner theory
In this presentation, all plates/shell theory will be referred as “Shell Theory”.
![Page 3: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Kirchhoff – Love Classical Shell Theory
This theory is an extension of Euler – Bernoulli beam theory. The following assumptions are made in this theory:
• Straight lines initially normal to the mid-surface remain straight and normal after deformation
• Thickness of shell remain unchanged during the deformation process
![Page 4: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Mindlin – Reissner Moderately Thick Shell Theory
This theory is based on following assumptions:
•Straight lines initially normal to the mid-surface remain straight but may not remain normal after deformation
•Thickness of shell remain unchanged during the deformation process
![Page 5: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Software Used
Kirchhoff – Love: GT STRUDL (SBHQ6)
Mindlin – Reissner: GT STRUDL (SBMITC, IPSQQ); ANSYS (SHELL43), STAAD (SHELL)
![Page 6: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Experiment with a 20′X20′ Fixed-Fixed Plate
Deflection at Plate Center
E= 3,605.0 ksi
Poisson= 0.3
Uniform load = 1.0 ksf
![Page 7: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Experiment with a 20′X20′ Fixed-Fixed Plate (cont’d)
Moment at Plate Center
![Page 8: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Experiment with a Benchmark Reference Cylinder
The article, “Consideration of Shear Deformation in the Analysis of Unsymmetrical Bending of Moderately Thick Shell of Revolution” published in the Transaction of 3rd SMiRT Conference, September 1975, is adopted as an experimental benchmark.
![Page 9: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Experiment with a Benchmark Reference Cylinder (Cont’d)
Diameter = 4 m
Height = 8 m
Internal Pressure = 1.0 Kg/cm2
E = 2.1 x 105 Kg/cm2
= 0.2
The reference used a cylinder with the following data to demonstrate the theory that was developed in the reference.
![Page 10: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Experiment with a Benchmark Reference Cylinder (Cont’d)
Fixed End Moment
![Page 11: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Experiment with a Benchmark Reference Cylinder (Cont’d)
Fixed End Moment
![Page 12: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Experiment with a Containment
Major Design Parameters for Typical Nuclear Plants
Diameter of Cylinder = 100′ – 130′ 147′
Thickness of Cylinder = 3′ 6″ – 3′ 9″ 3′ 9″
Thickness of Dome = 2′ 6″ – 3′ 6″ 3′ 3″
Thickness of Slab = 8′ 6″ – 10′ 6″ 3′ 3″ to 26′ 3″
Height of Cylinder = 100 ′ – 169′ 137′ 6″
Soil Class = Sand – Hard rock Loose sand ( Ks=48 k/ft3 )
Accidental Pressure = 60 psi – 200 psi 143 psi
Typical Power Plant Model in Study
![Page 13: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Geometry:
Slab Diameter =48.25 mCylinder Diameter =45.25 mCylinder Height =39.40m Total Height =59.00 mCylinder Thickness = 1.2 m (Constant)Dome Thickness =1.0 m (Constant)Base Mat Thickness = 1m, 2m, 4m, 8m & 12m (One Particular Thickness at a time)
Support:Soil Supported, Modeled as Winkler Spring
Loading:1) Self Weight2) Patch Load On Base Mat: 1379.46 kN/m2
(21.3mx21.3m)3) Accidental Internal Pressure: 1000 kN/m2 4) Wind Load of 7 kN/m2 (141 km/h)
Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)A Typical Containment Model for this Study
![Page 14: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)
Patch Load on the Base Mat
Patch Load:1379.46 kN/m² on21.34m X 21.34m
![Page 15: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)Mid Point Deflection of Base Mat due to Patch Load
![Page 16: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)Moment About X-Axis on a Mid Point Element of Base Mat due to Patch
Load
X
![Page 17: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)Moment about X-Axis at Elv 6.47 m due to Patch Load
X
![Page 18: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)
Deformed Shaped due to Accidental Internal Pressure
![Page 19: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)
Mid Point Deflection of Base Mat due to Accidental Internal Pressure
![Page 20: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)Moment About X-Axis on a Mid Point Element of Base Mat due to
Accidental Internal Pressure
X
![Page 21: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)
Moment about X-Axis at Elv 6.47 m due to Accidental Pressure
X
![Page 22: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)
Moments about X-Axis at Elv 30.1 m And 52.55 m due to Accidental Pressure
X
![Page 23: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)
Moment at Elev. 63.17m Due to Accidental Internal Pressure
X
![Page 24: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)Experiment with a Containment (Cont’d)
Moment about Y-Axis at Location “A” on Base Mat due to Wind Load
Wind Direction
Location A
Y
![Page 25: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Eigenvalue Analysis of 10′ Diameter Eigenvalue Analysis of 10′ Diameter Steel Plate With Fixed EdgeSteel Plate With Fixed Edge
![Page 26: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Eigenvalue Analysis of 10′ Diameter Eigenvalue Analysis of 10′ Diameter Steel Plate With Fixed EdgeSteel Plate With Fixed Edge
![Page 27: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Eigenvalue Analysis of ContainmentEigenvalue Analysis of ContainmentWith Fixed BaseWith Fixed Base
Dome: 1.0 mCylinder: 1.5 mMat Slab: 4.0 m
Dome: 2.0 mCylinder: 2.0 mMat Slab: 4.0 m
Dome: 4.0 mCylinder: 4.0 mMat Slab: 4.0 m
Dome: 1.00 mCylinder: 1.50 mMat Slab: 12.0 m
SBHQ6: 4.3 HzSBMITC: 4.3 HzSTAAD: 4.3 Hz
SBHQ6: 4.8 HzSBMITC: 4.8 HzSTAAD: 4.8 Hz
SBHQ6: 4.8 HzSBMITC: 4.8 Hz STAAD: 4.8 Hz
SBHQ6: 4.3 HzSBMITC: 4.3 HzSTAAD: 4.3 HZ
First Mode Mass Participation
SBHQ6: 66.1 %SBMITS: 60.7 %STAAD: 65.5 %
SBHQ6: 71.2 %SBMITC: 62.5 %STAAD: 69.4 %
SBHQ6: 70.7 %SBMITC: 61.4 %STAAD: 69.4 %
SBHQ6: 66.1 %SBMITC: 60.7 %STAAD: 65.5 %
First Mode Frequency
![Page 28: Dr. Mukti L. Das Seattle, Washington November 13-16, 2012 Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Containments Using Shear Deformation Shell.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062300/56649d945503460f94a7bed1/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)