DOWNPULL FORCES ON VERTICAL-LIFT GATES - dtic.mil · 3 controlled by multiple-leaf, vertical-lift...
Transcript of DOWNPULL FORCES ON VERTICAL-LIFT GATES - dtic.mil · 3 controlled by multiple-leaf, vertical-lift...
it-' ~ r"./..rr 1 ,U~ ~: I i ~~RIVER LOW-SILL CONTROL STRUCTURE
DOWNPULL FORCES ON VERTICAL-LIFT GATES
Hydraulic Model Investigation
TECI-INICAL REPORT NO. 2-447
Report I
December 1956
Waterways Experiment: St:at:ion
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY Vicksburg, Mississippi
Report Documentation Page Form ApprovedOMB No. 0704-0188
Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering andmaintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, ArlingtonVA 22202-4302 Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if itdoes not display a currently valid OMB control number
1. REPORT DATE DEC 1956 2. REPORT TYPE
3. DATES COVERED 00-00-1956 to 00-00-1956
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Old River Low-sill Control Structure: Report 1: Downpull Forces onVertical-lift Gates: Hydraulic Model Investigation
5a. CONTRACT NUMBER
5b. GRANT NUMBER
5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER
5e. TASK NUMBER
5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,Waterway Experiment Station,3903 HallsFerry Road,Vicksburg,MS,39180
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONREPORT NUMBER
9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S)
11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S)
12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited
13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
14. ABSTRACT
15. SUBJECT TERMS
16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT Same as
Report (SAR)
18. NUMBEROF PAGES
109
19a. NAME OFRESPONSIBLE PERSON
a REPORT unclassified
b ABSTRACT unclassified
c THIS PAGE unclassified
Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18
' I iii
PREFACE
This report is one of a series describing results of model studies
performed in connection with the design of ,the Old River control struc
tures. The tests of the proposed spillway gates for the low-sill struc
ture reported herein were authorized by letter from the Mississippi River
Commission to the Waterways Experiment Station dated 6 April 1955, sub
ject, "Model Tests of Forces on Gates, Low Sill Structure, Old River
Control," and were conducted at the Waterways Experiment Station during
the period April-September 1955. Messrs. E. J. Williams, J. E. Sanders, F. B. Toffaleti, E. H. Eckler,
T. E. Stepan, and C. A. Mitchell of the Mississippi River Commission of
fice participated in the planning and direction of the model tests.
Personnel of the Hydraulics Division, Waterways Experiment Station, ac
tively engaged in the study were Messrs. F. R. Brown, T. E. Murphy,
C. J. Powell, and C. W. Brasfeild, assisted by Mr. James C. Sartor, a
student of Louisiana State University doing postgraduate work at the
Waterways Experiment Station.
PREFACE
SUMMARY
PART I: INTRODUCTION
CONTENTS
Description of Prototype Purpose of Study . . . • .
PART II: THE MODELS AND TEST PROCEDURE
Description of the Models . . • . • Method of Operation - Downpull Tests
PART III: TESTS AND RESULTS
PART IV: CONCLUSIONS
TABLE 1
PLATES 1-85
v
Page
iii
vii
1
1 5 6
6 9
10
16
vii
SUMMARY
Flow through Old River low-sill control structure will be regulated in eleven 44-ft-wide gate bays. The sill for the three center bays will be at elevation -5 ft msl while the sill for the other eight bays will be at elevation 10ft msl. Flow will be controlled by multiple-leaf, . vertical-lift gates, providing a damming height to elevation 67 ft msl. Each gate in the side bays will consist of three 19-ft-high leaves, while each of the three center bays will require three 19-ft-high leaves plus a 15-ft-high leaf. Model tests were made to determine the vertical forces to which the gate leaves will be subjected by the extreme range of headwater and tailwater elevations that may occur at the structure.
A 1:36-scale model of the low-sill structure was tested first and showed that both the 15- and 19-ft gate leaves would bounce violently under normal operating conditions, producing such destructive forces in the suspension system that the elimination of the conditions causing the bouncing assumed primary importance. A 1:60-scale model of one gate leaf was then installed in a glass-sided flume so that flow patterns around the leaf could be observed. These observations established that the bouncing was being caused by periodically fluctuating pressures as evidenced by the alternate formation of vortices off the top and bottom lips of the leaf. Operation of the lower two leaves in each gate bay fastened together and relocation of the air vents eliminated the bouncing. However, the necessity of operating two gate leaves fastened together imposed considerably increased loading on the hoisting apparatus since each leaf will weigh about 80,000 or 90,000 lb. The maximum applied downpull was found to be about 190,000 lb, which, when added to the dry weight of the two gate leaves, would result in a total hoist load of about 370,000 lb. In the model the maximum downpull was reduced by about 100,000 lb by installing a projecting cover plate over the upper horizontal girder, thereby preventing the nappe from impinging upon the lower girders. Wind effects and other unpredictables, however, justify the use of the higher downpull value in selecting the prototype design hoist load.
A brief series of tests performed in a 1:60-scale section model indicated that the maximum pressure differential between the upstream and downstream sides of the gates would be 38 ft of water for a design pool of 54 ft msl and a tailwater of 20 ft msl. If a cover plate is installed over the top girder a minimum pressure of -2 ft of water on the plate may be expected.
2500
Fig. 1. Plan of improvement
PLAN
LEVEE ENLARGEMENT
OVERBANK CONTROL STRUCTURE
LOW-SILL CONTROL STRUCTURE
INfLOW CHANNEL
OUTfLOW CHANNEL
NAVIGATION LOCK
NAVIGATION AND INfLOW CHANNEL
NAVIGATION AND OUTfLOW CHANNEL
CLOSURE DAM
CHANNEL STABILIZATION
SCALE IN FEET >OOO 7500 10,000
OlD RIVER LOW-SILL CONTROL STRUCTURE
DOWNFULL FORCES ON VERTICAL-LIFT GATES
Hydraulic Model Investigation
PART I: INTRODUCTION
1. The Atchafalaya River, a distributary of the Mississippi
through the short connecting channel of Old River, has been increasing
in capacity to such an extent as to threaten to divert the Mississippi
River through its much shorter and therefore steeper route to the Gulf
of Mexico. The following measures are proposed to control flow from the
Mississippi and prevent its capture by the Atchafalaya River: closing
off the existing Old River channel with a dam and navigation lockj con
necting the existing Mississippi River levees above and below Old Riverj
and constructing control structures in the existing Mississippi River
levee at a point about 10 miles above the mouth of Old River. The ele
ments of the control plan are shown on fig. 1. The proposed control
structures include a low-sill structure 548.5 ft long for the regulation
of normal flows and an overbank structure approximately 3393 ft long
having a sill elevation of 52 ft* for operation during flood flows. The
tests reported herein were concerned with the control gates for the low
sill structure, and constitute one phase of the model studies of this
structure.
Description of Prototype
2. The low-sill control structure will consist of eleven 44-ft
wide bays, numbered 1 to 11 from left to right looking downstream.
The center three bays will have a sill elevation of -5 ftj the four
bays on each side of the low center section will have a sill elevation
of +10ft (figs. 2 and 3). Flow through the structure is to be
* All elevations are referred to mean sea level.
Fig. 2. Low-sill control structure, looking upstream
( L-1 0
SECTION THROUGH BAY NO. 6
SECTION THROUGH BAY NO. 9
Fig . 3. Sections through operating bays
3
controlled by multiple- leaf, vertical-lift gates . The gate leaves will
be of plate girder construction with a skinplate on the upstream side .
The skinplate will extend beyond the upper and lower girders to prevent
impingement of flow on the structural members of the gate (see fig . 4) .
Fig. 4. Downstream side of gate leaf 3 (19 ft high) showing structural details
3. The arrangement of the gate leaves is shown on fig . 5. One
15-ft leaf is at the bottom position in the low· section of the weir with
three 19-ft leaves above it . The arrangement is the same for the higher
weir section except that the bottom 15-ft leaf is eliminated. It is
anticipated that any individual bay either will be operated with all
leaves removed or will be completely closed . Individual gate leaves
will be raised or lowered by means of a gantry crane on tracks on top
of the piers and as each leaf is removed it will be stored in slots
provided on top of the piers . It may be necessary to open or close
the gates under any of the possible flow conditions up to and including
a pool elevation of 67 ft . This means that it will be possible for all
except the top gate leaves to have water flowing both over and under
them during their removal .
LEAF NO. I
LEAF NO 2
LEAF NO. 3
BAY NO. 9
LEAF NO. 4
SECTION BAY NO. 6
OF SPILLWAY
3" ORAIN HOL£S
9'-0"
SECTION A-A
ll II II II II II II II II II II II
~ 111111111111111111111111.
11111111111111111111 ru. ~ 111111 II II II lllllllllflf
ta ~I II II II II ~ ...,
I~ Ill II ~ I~ Ill II .~
Ill II ~ ~~--~~~~--~ ....
U~ll~l~ll~~llll~l~l~ll~~·~ ~ I ~
~~==~~~~==~·~ Ill II II II II .:;
Ill II
~ Ill
a 111
~ Ill II
II
II
II II
rh II II
II
1 It Ill II II II II 1 ®-· ~ ~---rr-------------,1,·-®
~ Ill II
I~ Ill II II II II
.J
ELEVATION
NOTE: SECTION A-A TYPICAL FOR GATE LEAVES NO. 3 AND 4.
SCALE IN FEET 10 20
Fig. 5. Structural details of gate leaves
Purpose of Study
4. The gate downpull tests were initiated for the purpose of
determining the vertical forces to which the gate leaves will be sub
jected during severe operating conditions so that the suspension system
and hoist machinery can be designed for the maximum loading. Since the
possible range of headwater and tailwater elevations is extreme, it was
deemed necessary to explore this subject with a degree of accuracy that
could be obtained only by model tests.
5
6
PART II: THE MODELS AND TEST PROCEDURE
Description of the Models
5. A 1:36-scale comprehensive model of the low-sill control struc
ture, a 1:60-scale model of one gate leaf, and a 1:60-scale reproduction
of a gate bay, the two adjacent piers, and two gate leaves were used in
the study. True similarity between the models and the prototype was ob
tained by preserving geometric similarity in accordance with the Freudian
relationship which assumes gravity as the dominant flow factor. The re
sulting scale relationships are as follow:
Dimension
Length
Area
Velocity
Time
Pressure
Discharge
General
1 r
A r
= 1 2 r
v = 1 1/2 r r
T r
= 1 1/2 r
p = 1 r r
Q = 1 5/2 r r
1:36 Scale
1:36
1:1296
1:6
1:6
1:36
1:7776
1:60 Scale
1:60
1:3600
1:7-75
1:7.75
1:60
1:27885
6. All of the gate downpull tests were performed in the 1:36-scale
comprehensive model. Bay 6, the center bay in the low section of the
weir, and bay 9 in the high section of the weir were used for all of the
tests. Machined aluminum gate slots were installed in the sides of the
wooden piers flanking bays 6 and 9 so that the gate rollers would en
counter a negligible amount of friction. In these tests pool and tail
water elevations were set by means of staff gages on the abutments and
no effort was made to measure discharge.
7. The downpull measuring apparatus (fig. 6) consisted of two
pulleys mounted above the gate slots, two flexible brass cables supporting
the gate and passing up over the pulleys, a Hunter type spring scale
graduated to 0.1 lb at which the two cables terminated, and a hand winch
attached to the Hunter gage by means of a single cable of flexible brass
Fig . 6 . Gate leaf 4 being tested in bay 6 . The gate is at the position of maximum downpull
7
wire . A miniature turnbuckle was mounted in one of the cables support
ing the gate leaf so that the leaf could be leveled accurately when in
stalled in the slots . The pulleys, which were ball-bearing mounted, were
adjustable for both height and alignment so that they would be in line
with the hoisting cables and so that the two cables would subtend a min
imum angle where they were connected to the Hunter gage .
8. The 1 :60-scale model of a single l eaf was installed in an ex
isting glass -sided flume for visual study of flow patterns . ~is gate
leaf consisted of a block of wood equal in thickness and height to the
over-all dimensions of the gate leaf . The portions of the skinplate ex
tending beyond the upper and lower girders forming the gate lips were
fabricated of sheet metal. The model was one foot wide (60ft prototype)
and of uniform cross section; therefore it was not an exact reproduction
of a gate leaf but only of the cross section of the center portion of the
l eaf . This installation is shown on fig . 7.
8
Fig. 7. A section of the 15-ft -high gate leaf mounted in the glasssided flume . A vortex can be seen forming at the top lip of the gate
... 0~
JS" Of A 1'10'-'I"S
7.s•• 01~ HOLE
Fig. 8 . Piezometer locations and air vents
9· A simple, skel
etal, sheetmetal, 1 :60-
scale reproduction of two
gate leaves with a cover
plate over the top girder
was used for determination
of pressures upstream and
downstream from the gate
and on the top surface of
the cover plate . This
model reproduced bay 6 and
the piers on each side .
Details of the installa
tion and the location of
piezometers are shown on
fig . 8 .
9
Method of Operation - Downpull Tests
10. When a gate leaf was installed in the slots for testing it
was checked immediately for levelness and freedom from binding throughout
the range of operation. All tests were conducted with the gate leaves
closing and an initial downpull reading was taken either just as the
lower lip of the leaf came in contact with the nappe or with the leaf at
its highest position if the pool elevation was too high for the leaf to
clear the surface. Normally, downpull readings were taken at each 5-ft
interval of elevation thereafter except that an additional reading was
always taken at the point where the nappe just overtopped the leaf.
This was usually the position of maximum downpull and was caused by the
very thin nappe clinging to the edge of the top girder and falling on
the lower girders.
11. The openings at which bouncing occurred were noted and
operation was discontinued at those points. The term "bouncing" indi
cates rapid and destructive alternating vertical movement of the leaf
of up to 40 ft prototype. Frequently there was a tendency to bounce,
that is the leaf would bounce if initial oscillations were set up by
jiggling the supporting cables. Under certain flow conditions the down
pull readings fluctuated widely and rather rapidly at some particular
gate opening but the leaf could not be induced to bounce. In those
cases, maximum, minimum, and observed average readings were recorded.
Since it was very difficult to take these readings accurately, the data
recorded in such cases should be considered as approximate. The gate
leaves were always tested to the fully closed position except in those
cases where the weight of the leaf was not sufficient to cause complete
closure.
10
PART III: TESTS AND RESULTS
12. A series of 84 complete downpull tests was performed; the re
sults obtained are summarized in table 1. The program involved the
testing of a number of gate designs, operation of from one to three gate
bays, operation of individual as well as attached gate leaves, and opera
tion with a wide variety of headwater-tailwater combinations. Features
of the different designs are shown on plate 1. All of these tests were
performed with the air vents at the original elevations of 8, 21, 34,
and 47 ft.
13. Initial tests with gate leaves 3 and 4 in their normal posi
tions in bay 6 {see plates 2-17) revealed that, under certain river
stages, leaf 4 would bounce violently. Leaf 3 exhibited a tendency to
bounce at a tailwater of 40 ft and a headwater of 55 or 60 ft. The
magnitude of the cable stress induced by this bouncing was such as to
cause the small brass wire hooks, by which the cables were affixed to
the leaf, to straighten out. In order to avoid further damage to the
gate a model operator caught the leaf as soon as bouncing started. Under
these conditions it was impossible to measure the maximum downpull that
occurred; however, it is known that the downpull exceeded five times the
weight of the gate leaf at times. The degree of elasticity of the sus
pension seemed to have little effect since bouncing occurred even with
the spring scale removed from the system.
14. At this point testing of the 1:60-scale section model of the
outline of the 15-ft gate leaf was initiated so that flow patterns could
be observed. Violent flow conditions ensued with headwater and tail
water elevations comparable to those which had caused bouncing in the
1:36-scale model. The nappe just downstream from the gate oscillated
up and down rapidly, thereby creating an audible slapping sound. At
the same time vortices could be seen forming alternately at the upper
and lower lips of the gate leaf in resonance with the flapping action of
the nappe. A length of hollow glass tubing was held so that the lower
end was adjacent to the lower lip of the gate leaf. The water column in
this tube fluctuated with the same frequency as the formation of the
11
vortices. Air introduced under the nappe increased the fre~uency of vortex
formation and apparently reduced the amplitude but did not eliminate pres
sure fluctuations, thus indicating that modifications to the air vents
alone would not guarantee freedom from bouncing. The air vent size was
varied (see fig. 8) but no noticeable change in flow conditions resulted;
thus the original 15-in.-diameter vents were considered to be ade~uate for
all air demands. Honeycombing the skinplate with holes above the top
girder failed to prevent formation of the vortices. High-speed motion
pictures were taken which show the vortex formation clearly; one vor-
tex can be seen forming at the top lip of the gate leaf on fig. 7. 15. The phenomenon of alternate vortex formation at the sides
of a cylinder immersed in flowing water was first described by Strouhal*
in the formula:
where:
fD s = v
S = dimensionless "Strouhal number"
f freq_uency
D = diameter of cylinder
V velocity of fluid past cylinder.
This formula was derived from observations only. Some years later,
von Karman* made a theoretical analysis of the subject which led to the
development of a formula for the magnitude of the alternating force
associated with the vortex formation:
where:
FK =Karman force (normal to flow)
CK = Karman coefficient (approximately 1)
p = density of fluid
V = velocity of fluid past cylinder
A =projected area of obstacle (normal to flow).
* J. P. den Hartog, "Recent technical manifestations of von Karman's vortex wake," Proc., Nat. Acad. of Sc. of U.S.A., vol 40, No. 3, 1954•
12
Application of the latter formula to the case of the Old River vertical
lift gate results in an alternating force considerably less than the dry
weight of the gate except for the condition of maximum headwater
tailwater combination. Den Hartog* states that the Karman force is
greater for a cylinder that is vibrating at the Strouhal fre~uency than
for one that is at rest, and it is believed that this principle applied
in the bouncing of the gate. Apparently the alternating Karman force was
large enough to set the gate in motion, since the cable suspension was
somewhat elastic; and once motion had begun, the magnitude of the alter
nating force and the amplitude of the bounce each increased in a manner
of mutual excitation.
16. Rouse** states that the Strouhal number for a flat plate im
mersed in flowing water with the plane of the plate normal to the direc
tion of flow is approximately 1/7. Since the Old River gate installation
was analagous to this situation (see fig. 9), the Strouhal formula was
used to compute the theoretical vortex formation fre~uencies for gate
leaf heights of 15, 25, and 35 ft (see fig. 10). Actual observations of
the 1:60-scale model showed that the vortices were forming at the
Fig. 9
* J. P. den Hartog, op. cit. ** Hunter Rouse, Elementary Mechanics of Fluids, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Addition to :paragraph 15: \
Actual determination of' transverse forces resulting from flow :past immerse.d
bodies of various shapes is dif'ficult. Several authors t * have indicated that
the lateral or transverse forces can exceed the drag or longitudinal force by
a factor of from 2 to 4.
t Hunter Rouse, Engineering Hydraulics, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1950). * L. Landweber, Flow about a Pair of Adjacent Parallel C linders Normal to a Stream, Report No. 5, David Taylor Model Basin July 19 2 •
...... 11.1 0.. >.... g ~
0.6
0.5
~ 0.4
0 z 0 u 11.1 1/) /
.. .. ..1·-15-FT LEAF~
....... ........ v /
/ /
/ vi5-FTLEAF
1__ ·-a: w 0.. ---1-..r ~---~---~ ,....--- .,.. -25-FT LEAF 1/) 11.1
d 0.3 >u ~ >u z 11.1 :::l C1 w a: u.
z 0.2 0
~ ...J ...J iJ 1/)
0
0. I
OBSERVED IN 1."60 SCALE MODEL-:<
v L
/ /
v I/ v
/ v / ..........
/ v v /
v
10
/ ./ ?-
.......,... ~~ 1/
25-FT LEAF-
' _..... _.....
_..... -............
v v
v 35-FT LEA":-.....,
v ---v I--
v v v
20 30 HEADWATER-TAILWATER DIFFERENTIAL IN FEET
NOTE: CURVES SHOWN AS SOLID LINES WERE COMPUTED FROM THE FORMULA:
WHERE:
t'- -,t-
t' • FREQUENCY IN CPS
v - 0.9'"f29h L • LEAF HEIGHT IN FEET h • HEADWATER-TAILWATER IN FEET
Fig. 10. Vortex frequencies
-~ v
-~ ~
40
14
frequencies shown by the dashed curves of fig. 10 for 15- and 25-ft leaf
heights. Since model operation was at Reynolds numbers for which the
Strouhal formula should apply, it is believed that external factors and
nonsymmetrical velocity distribution around the gate were responsible
for the rather wide divergence from theoretical frequencies.
17. Since no way had been found to eliminate the vortices in the
small-scale section rr.odel, the first revisions to be tried in the 1:36-
scale comprehensive model were directed toward reducing the alternating
force effect upon the gate leaf. Types 1-A and 1-B gates (see plate 1)
incorporated 1.5- and 3.0-ft extensions to the upper and lower lips of
the leaves but failed to eliminate bouncing as shown on plates 18-23.
When the leaf was reversed in the slots so that the skinplate was on the
downstream side, it either bounced as in the case of type 1-R or failed
to close of its own weight as with types 1-A-R and 1-B-R (see plates
24-31). A skinplate from the top lip to the back of the top girder
(type 2) did not eliminate bouncing (see plates 32-34).
18. The fact that the gate leaf bounce was being caused by cir
culation around the leaf led to the belief that if the leaf height were
increased, damping effects might be increased and bouncing eliminated.
Leaf 3, which was 19 ft high, was first tried in the No. 4 position but
the tendency to bounce persisted. The next step was to fasten leaves 3
and 4 together and to operate them as a single 34-ft-high leaf. This
arrangement eliminated bouncing throughout the range of operation and a
tendency to bounce occurred only at the 54-ft-pool and 40-ft-tailwater
combination with the three center bays in operation. The results of
this series of tests are shown on plates 35-60. All of these tests were
performed using gate leaves of the original design.
19. When installed in gate bay 9 in the high section of the weir,
gate leaf 3, which occupieu the bottom position, bounced at tailwater
elevations above 25 ft. Gate leaves 3 and 4 operating as a single 34-
ft-high leaf (installed in the positions of leaves 2 and 3, respectively)
eliminated bouncing just as they had done in bay 6. Since the gate will
be 38 ft high with leaves 2 and 3 fastened together, these test results
are on the safe side (see plates 61-80).
15
20. Throughout the tests just described the maximum downpull force
for most test conditions had been about 100,000 to 190,000 lb with two
gates leaves of original design joined together. A few additional tests
were performed to determine whether or not this force could be reduced
by extending the bottom lip or by placing a cover plate over the top
girder of the top gate leaf. Type 1-C incorporating the lower lip ex
tension and type 2-C which utilized a plate extending only as far down
stream as the edge of the girder did not reduce downpull but types 2-A
and 2-B with overhanging cover plates were quite effective. Since the
effect of the overhanging plates was to prevent the jet from falling
back in on the lower girders, and since this condition probably would
not occur in the prototype except in high winds, the value of the cover
plate is questionable (see plates 81-84).
21. The addition of cover plates caused the gate to bounce under
certain conditions for the 67-ft-pool and 40-ft-tailwater combination.
This led to the opinion that the gate of original design might also be
somewhat susceptible to bouncing under the same conditions. For this
reason the original test, the results of which are shown on plate 50,
was rerun and the results are shown on plate 85. It was found that the
gate would bounce at a 15-ft opening if it were allowed to stay in that
position for a sufficient length of time. Deaeration of the nappe caused
the bouncing to startj consequently the air vents, originally located at
el 8, 21, 34, and 47 ft, were relocated at el 28, 34, 40, and 47 ft so as
to be more effective, and the bouncing was eliminated for all designs and
stages with the two bottom leaves operating together.
22. A short series of tests was performed on the 1:60-scale sec
tion model to determine the maximum pressure differential between the
upstream and downstream sides of the gate and the maximum negative
pressures on a cover plate with a 6-in. overhang on the downstream side
of the gate. Details of the installation are shown on fig. 8. It was
found that the maximum differential between piezometers 1 and 2 for de
sign conditions was 38 ft of water. The maximum negative pressure read
ing on piezometer 3 was -2.0 ft of water and on piezometer 4, -1.3 ft.
These negative pressures were read at a head just low enough to prevent
the jet from springing free of the cover plate.
16
PART Dl: CONCLUSIONS
23. The proposed design of the vertical lift gates is entirely
satisfactory provided the two bottom gate leaves are fastened together
and are operated as one unit. The air vents in the three center bays
should be relocated at el 28, 34, 40, and 47 ft to insure elimination
of the tendency of the gate leaves to bounce. Under these conditions,
the maximum hoist load per bay will be about 370,000 lb.
Table 1
Summary of Results
1:36-scale Comprehensive Model
Gate Plate leaf Leaf ..1!£..:_ ~'Design Features of Design
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35 36 37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3, 4
3, 4
3, 4
3, 4
3, 4
3, 4
3, 4
3, 4
3, 4
3, 4
3, 4
3, 4
3, 4
3, 4
3,
3, 4
3, 4
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1-A
1-A
1-A
1-B
l-B
l-B
l-R
Original design, leaf No. 4 in place Original design, leaf No. 4 in place Original design, leaf No. 4 in place Original design, leaf No. 4 in place Original design, leaf No. 4 in place Original design, leaf No. 4 in place Original design; leaf' No. 4 in place Original design, leaf No. 4 in place Original design Original design Original design Original design Original design Original de sign Original design Original design Original design, gate lips extended
L5ft Original design, gate lips extended
1.5 ft Original design, gate lips extended
1.5 ft. Original design, gate lips extended
3.0 ft Original design, gate lips extended
3.0 ft Original design, gate lips extended
3.0 ft Original design, skinplate on up
stream side 1-R Original design, skinplate on up-
stream side 1-A-R 1-A design, skinpla.te on upstream
side 1-A-R 1-A design, skinplate on upstream
side 1-A-R 1-A design, skinplate on upstream
side 1-B-R 1-B design, skinplate on upstream
side 1-B-R 1-B design, skinplate on upstream
side 1-B-R 1-B design, skinplate on upstream
side 2 Original design, skinplate over
top girder 2 Original design, skinplate over
top girder 2 Original design, skinplate over
top girder 1 Original design, leaf' No. 4 removed 1 Original design, leaf No. 4 removed 1 Original design, leaf No. 4 removed
1 leaves 3 and 4 joined, center bay operating
1 Leaves 3 and 4 joined, center bay operating
1 Leaves 3 and 4 joined, center bay operating
1 Leaves 3 and 4 joined, center bay operating
1 Leaves 3 and 4 joined, center bay operating
1 Leaves 3 and 4 joined, center bay operating
1 Leaves 3 and 4 joined, center bay operating
1 Leaves 3 and 4 joined, center 3 bays operating
1 Leaves 3 and 4 joined, center 3 bays operating
1 Leaves 3 and 4 joined, center 3 bays operating
1 Leaves 3 and 4 joined, center 3 bays operating
1 Leaves 3 and 4 joined, center 3 bays operating
1 Leaves 3 and 4 joined, center 3 bays operating
1 Leaves 3 and 4 joined, center 3 bays operating
1 Original design, center bay (No. 6) operating
l Original design, center bay (No. 6) operating
1 Original design, center bay (No. 6) operating
Pool El
60 55 50 45 45 40 35 30 56 50 45 45 40 35 30 25 60
50
40
6o
50
40
Maximum TW Downpull g K
40 62.5 4o 58.0 4o 44.o 40 16.0 20 100.0 20 100.0 20 86.0 20 30.0 40 44.3 40 44.1 4o 7.0 20 62.8 20 67 ·5 20 67 ·5 20 44.3 20 25.5 40 57.2
40 34.0
20 61.8
40 59-3
4o 17-3
20 82.6
20 184.2
40 20 160.6
60 40 271.8
50 40 122.5
40 20 225.0
6o 4o
50 4o
40 20
60 40
50 40
40 20
60 40 50 40 40 20
67 65
67 60
67 55
67 50
67 45
67 40
6o 4o
67 65
67 60
67 55
67 50
67 45
67 40
60 40
54 40
54 30
54 20
110.5
194.5
60.0
32.0
64.7
77-5 30.8 77-5
13-5
13.5
27-5
60.0
65.0
101.8
55.0
4.2
55-5
60.3
139-5
172.2
l20.8
107.3
181.8
At Gate
~ 30 25 20 16 16 ll
5 0.2
40 38.5 35 30 28 23 20 15 45
37
26
42
34
23
20
20
40
36
15
43
25
24
48
38
28
60
37
36
37
35
36
30
6o
36
37
37
36
35
32
24
24
24
Maximum Uplift
__ K_
26.0 31.0 30.8 35-5 None None None None 25.8 25.8 25.8 None None None 25.8 21.0 12.8
26.7
12.8
29.2
48.0
10.7
None
None
50.0
55.0
62.0
48.0
None
44.0 53-5 39-3
28.5
51.8
37.8
52-3
51.8
61.5
56.8
14.2
None
At Gate
~ 10 15 10 10
25 25 20
10 10 20
25-10
lO
10
10
25
25
27 5
30
30
20
15-10
15
15
15
30-5
30
20-15
25
15
10
10
Gate Bounces
Tendency Tendency No No No No No No Yes Tendency No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
No
Yes
Tendency
Tendency
No
Yes
Yes
Floats
Floats
Floats
Floats
Floats
Floats
Tendency
Tendency
Yes
Tendency No Yes, air
vents closed
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No 1
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
* Gate opening measured in feet from bottom lip of operating gate to sill or to top lip of next lower gate when installed.
At Gate
~ 21-14 16-9
20 5-0
10 10 10 8
8
20-lO
20-10
ll
ll
3.0
30-5
20-5
12
15-lO 15-10 10
Oate Plate Leat leaf ...!£!._ ...!!2.:.__ Design
55
56
57
58
59
6o
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
75
76
77
78
79
6o
81
82
83
84
85
3, 4
3, 4
3, 4
3, 4
3, 4
3, 4
3
3
3, 4**
3, 4**
3, 4**
3, 4**
3, 4**
3, 4**
3, 4**
3, 4**
3, 4**
3, 4**
3, 4**
3, 4**
3, 4**
3, 4**
3, 4**
3 4
' ~ 3 4
3, 4
l
l
l
1
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
1
1
1
l
1
l
l
l
1
l
l
1
l 1-c
2-A l
2-B l
2-c l
1
Table l (Continued)
Features ct Design
Original design, center bey (No. 6) operating
Original design, bays Nos. 5 a:nd 6 operating
Original design, beys Nos. 5, 6, a:nd 7 operating
Original design, bays Nos. 5, 6, a:nd 7 operating
Original design, bays Nos. 5, 6, a:nd 7 operating
Original design, bays Nos. 5, 6, a:nd 7 operating
Original design, bay No. 9 (high weir) operating
Original design, bay No. 9 (high weir) operating
Original design, bay No. 9 (high ""ir) operating
Original design, bay No. 9 (high 1reir) operating
Original design, bay No. 9 (high weir) operating
Original design, bay No. 9 (high weir) operating
Original design, bey No. 9 (high weir) operating
Original design, bay No. 9 (high weir) operating
Original design, bay No. 9 (high ""ir) operating
Original design, bay No. 9 (high '"'ir) operating
Original design, bay No. 9 (high weir) opernting
Original design, bey No. 9 (high weir) operating
Original design, bays Nos. 8, 9, a:nd 10 operating
Original design, bays Nos. 8, 9, a:nd 10 operating
Original design, bays Nos. 8, 9, a:nd 10 operating
Original design, bays Nos. 8, 9, a:nd 10 operating
Original design, bays Nos • 8, 9, a:nd 10 operating
Original design, beys Nos. 8, 9, a:nd 10 operating
Original design, bays Nos. 8, 9, a:nd 10 operating
Original design, bays Nos. 8, 9. a:nd 10 operating
Lower gate has 4.5-ft l~r lip extensions; bays Nos. 5, 6, and 7 operating
Cover plate over top girder vi th 1. 5 -ft straight extension; bays Nos. 5, 6, and 7 operating
Cover plate over top girder with 1.5-ft haunched extension; bays Nos. 5, 6, a:nd 7 operating
Cover plate over top girder, no extension; bays Nos. 5, 6, and 7 opernting
Original design; rerun of test shown on plate 50
Pool TW
...!L !! 4o 20
54 20
54 4o
54 30
54 20
4o 20
54 45
54 35
54 25
40 20
67 54
67 45
67 35
67 25
54 45
54 35
54 25
54 20
67 55
67 45
67 35
67 25
54 45
54 35
54 25
54 20
67 4o
67 40
67 40
67 40
67 40
Maximum Downpull __ K __
79·2
144.5
83.9
139·8
186.5
121.2
58.7
86.7
91.4
82.0
42.0
116.5
125.9
181.9
28.0
74.8
121.2
149.2
52.0
149.2
139·5
176.8
51.0
167.5
176.8
190.8
184.1
64.8
151.3
At Oate ~ ll
24
25
24
24
10
25
24
24
10
21
21
22
21
9
9
9
9
20
23
23
22
10
10
10
12
32
35
35
37
37
Note: All testa were conducted with center bey only in operation unless otherw1.se stated. Whenever two gate leaves ""re used, they were joined a:nd operated e.a a single gate.
M!.ximum Uplift __ K_
4.9
Hone
51.5
4.9
Hone
None
53.4
Hone
None
51.5
23.5
9.4
4.9
33.0
23.5
None
None
None
None
19.1
None
None
None
26.0
66.8
38.0
At Oate
~ 1
15
5
15
10
2
5-2
25
2
2
10
2
2
5-2
10
5-2
5-2
Oate Bounces
No
No
Tendency
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
NO
Yes, when nappe is not aerated
Yes, when nappe is not aerated
Yes, when nappe is not aerated
Yes, when nappe is not aerated
At Oate
~
15-10
15
10
15
15
15
15
* Oate opening aasured in feet from bottan lip of operating gate to sill or to top lip of next l~r gate wben installed. ** Leaves Nos. 3 a:nd 4 vere used in lieu of leaves Nos. 2 a:nd 3 a:nd occupied positions 2 a:nd 3, respectively. With leaves
joined, total height was 34 ft instead of 38 ft.
"U r ~ (TI
15-FT l.EAF
44'
TYPES 1,1-A,I-B, 1-C, 2, AND 2-C
PLAN VIEW
~
19-FT l.EAF
TYPE I TYPE 1-A TYPE 1-B
COVER Pl.ATE
TYPES 2 AND 2-C
CENTER-LINE SECTIONS
t-----------------1 ~~ f _______ ;::J TYPE 2-A TYPE 2-B
HALF PLAN VIEW HALF PLAN VIEW
TYPE 2-A
CENTER-LINE SECTIONS TYPE 2-B
l nPES '-R, ,;;;v HALF PLAN VIEW
jy__
TYPE 1-A-R TYPE 1-B-R
TYPE 1-R
GATE TYPES
80
75
70
65
POOL
cc= ...J
60 "' :::; t-w w 55 "-~ 1------- GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
c{ "- 50 <(
0 1/ w ...J
--r- -- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
TAIL WATER 1--1-- //
E:::' v / v
I\ v v I" AIR VENTS v
<.!) 45 z ~ "' w 40 a. 0 .._ 0 35 a. ::::;
"' 30 w l: 0 ...J ~ I/ v MARKED TENDENCY TO BOUNCE AT THIS ELEVATION-.._ 0
z 0 ;:: ~ w ...J w
~~ if j 0 z \ "-
25
20
<(
f\ w ...J
~ r-- t--r- r-o
15
~0 '<t
10
.5 ~~ "-
0 <( w
~ -5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6l
PLATE 2
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ o OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 CLOSING GATE LEAF NO. 4 IN PLACE
POOL ELEV 60.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 40.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
_J 60 U1
:::. f-w w 55
POOL "- 1-= !:: "-
GATE CONTACTS NAPPE 50 <(
w _J
1.9 45 z ~ 0: w 40 a. 0
"-0 35 a. _J
0: 30 w :;: 0 _J
"-
0 v v TAIL WATER 1\
= ~ c-.... t-- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
1---t-- v v
I\ v v v v
~ ~ AIR VENT~ v v 1-rr-25
0
z 0
20 ~
~~ !I l\ MARKED TENDENCY ro;~OUNCE IN THIS RANGE 0 z
> w _J w
"-<( w
15
10
_J
~ ~0
5 :::~ "-
0 <( w
~ -5 80
If
r- ;--!-;, j-o
60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
.-f-L-
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND o OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM t. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 CLOSING GATE LEAF NO. 4 IN PLACE
POOL ELEV 55.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 40.0 FT MSL
PLATE 3
80
75
70
65
..J 60 •VI
:::0 t-.... .... 55 .... ~ .... 50 <
POOL
.... =~ :=· GATE CONTACTS NAPPE v ..J 0
<!> 45 z ~ a: .... 40 a. 0
/ q
TAIL WATER 1\ ~E 1/ .._
0 35 ~ ..J a: 30 .... ~ 0 ..J .._ 25 0
z 0
20 ~ > .... ..J 15 ....
10
i\ I'--I'- ..........
~ > v ---AIR VENTS v ...-;: !---'
~ If / 0 z ...
\ ~~ ..J
~ -....;;;:
!'); pa
~0 5
~~ .._
0 <
-5 ~
80 60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 61
PLATE 4
v .-- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 1> MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GAiE LEAF NQ 3 CLOSING GAiE LEAF NO. 4 IN PLACE
POOL ELEV 50.0 Fi MSL TAILWAiER ELEV 40.0 Fi MSL
80
75
70
85
.J 60 1/) ~
.... w w 55 IL
~ IL 50 < w .J 0 GATE CONTACTS NAPPE POOL ~ 45
~ f5 40 Q. 0
TADTER
/
-== ~= ... 0 35 Q.
J a: 30 w 3; 0 .J ... 25 0
z 0
20 ;:: ~ w .J 15 w
10
\ ~
~ > AIR VENTS e--- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
), ./
~11 ./ v ...... v
z ....
\ ~ .J
~ ......_
......... p
~0 5 :~
... 0 <
~ ~ 60 ~ m o m ~ 60 so ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OllER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6}
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM tJ. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NQ 3 CLOSING GATE LEAF NO. 4 IN PLACE
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
45.0 FT MSL 40.0 FT MSL
PLATE 5
80
75
70
65
J 60 "' ::;;
t-w w 55 ... ~ ... 50 < w J 0 0 45 z
POOL
I== r-~ a: ~GATE CONTACTS NAPPE w 40 a_ 0
"-('
0 35 ~ J a: 30 w s: 0 J
"- 25 0
z 0
20 ~ > w
I\ \ ~ [) -1---AI~ VfNTS
~ liTAILWJEj 0 z ... f--=r- I < w
J 15 w
10
J
~ r; ~0 " 5 ~¥ "-
0 < w
~ -5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6}
PLATE 6
t-- / NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
f.-... 1--- ., >
v v v
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE o MAXIMUM tJ. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GAlE LEAF NO. 3 CLOSING GAlE LEAF NO. 4 IN PLACE
POOL ELEV IAILWATER ELEV
45.0 FT MSL 20.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
..J 60 <I)
~
t-w w 55 .._ ~ .._
50 < w ..J 0
l'l 45 z ~ a: w 40 a.
POOL
0 -~f==F
GATE CONTACTS NAPPE ... 0 35 ~ ..J a: 30 w :;:: 0 ..J ... 25 0
z 0
20 ~ >
v I\
~ ) AI~ VfNTS
~ If TAILWJEl
-r-r-0 z .._ E < -
w w ..J 15 w
..J
~ L 10
~0 't
5 ~~ "-
0 < w
~ -5 80 604020 0 2040
UPLIFT DOWN PULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN 'THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE 1-- c---r-1--b !,.¥
v~-"' v v ---p
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL fORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE D MAXIMUM 1J. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 CLOSING GATE LEAF NO. 4 IN PLACE
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
40.0 FT MSL 20.0 FT MSL
PLATE 7
80
75
70
65
..J 60 "' " 1-
w w ... 55
~ ... 50 < w ..J 0
" 45 z !i a: w 40 a.. 0 ... 0 35
POOL
a.. ::; I\ rr .--GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
a: 30 w :;:: g ... 25 0 z 0
20 ~ :> w ..J 15 w
10
/
~ ) A't 1NTS
~ lfTAILWJEj ~!f
~~ 1-:~t:- --r---- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE r- r---- ~
~ oi----~0
"<I 5
~;;t
0 i~
-5 ~ 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
UPLifT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF" TYPE SPECifiED IN THE TITLE REfERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF" WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL fORCES PLOT"TED ARE EXTERNAL fORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT Of FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6l
PLATE 8
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE C MAXIMUM t. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 CLOSING GATE LEAF NO. 4 IN PLACE
POOL ELEV 35.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 20.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
..J 60 "' ::;
t-w w 55 "-?: "- 50 < w ..J 0
" 45 z ~ a: w 40 a. 0 .... 0 35 ~ ..J \ GATE CONTACTS NAPPE a: 30 w 3: 0 ..J ... 25 0
z 0
20 ~ :>
POOL
~ v ~rTs ~~
_/TAtLWJEj 0 z "- "= F < w w
..J 15 w
10
..J
~ \ / rJ( "" ~0 '<I
5 ~~
.... 0
<
~ -5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 1>. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GAiE LEAF NQ 3 CLOSING GAiE LEAF NO. 4 IN PLACE
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
30.0 FT MSL 20.0 FT MSL
PLATE 9
80
75
70
65
_J 60 <Jl
::;; 1-w w 55 --f~"= "-~
"- 50 / GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
< w _J
.., 45 z
~ a: w 40 a. 0 .._ 0 35 Q, _J
a: 30 w 3: 0 _J
.._ 25 0
z 0
20 ~ >
0 K "'\ /NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
TAIL WATER ['\. / r=== \
!\ / .1.
> AIR VENTS .//
11 v ./
w _J GATE BOUNCES VIOLENTLY AT THIS ELEVATION r--... w 15
10
~0 5 :~
.._ 0
<
~ -5
80 60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6~
PLATE 10
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM tJ. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
56.0 FT MSL 40.0 FT MSL
80
7S
70
6S
_J 60 <I)
:::; t-w w ss lL
!; lL so <( w _J
POOL
I== 0
I.!J 4S z ~ "' w 40
g v I--GATE CONTCIS IAPIE TAIL WATER
a. 0 lL 0 3S a. ::::i
"' 30 w J:: 0 _J
-= \ N~PP~ O~E)TOPS GATE [\ /
I\ v )lD
[) AIR VENTS v lL 2S 0 z Q 20 t-
~
11 v _/..
\ w _J
IS w
10
~0 s
z lL
0 <(
~ TENDENCY 70 BOU'J;E IN THIS RANGE -s
80 60 4020 0 2040 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE D MAXIMUM t; MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
PvOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
50.0 FT MSL 40.0 FT MSL
PLATE 1t
60
75
70
65
..J 60 1/)
::1 ... w w ... 55
~
~ 50 w ..J
" 45
0 POOL
z ~
TAJ:t:li' /
GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
a: w 40 a. 0 ... 0 35
r-:: [ a. J i\ j v ~NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
a: 30 w
~ ..J ... 25 0 z 0
20 ~ > w ..J 15 w
> AIR VENTS ~ if k(
v 1 \
10
5
~0 \ ;
~!;f ...
0 <
~ ! -5 eo 604020 0 204060 60 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE ORY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6\
PLATE 12
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GAiE LEAF NQ 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWAiER ELEV
45.0 Fi MSL 40.0 Fi MSL
80
75
70
65
_J 60 "' ~
I-w w 55 IL.
"" IL. 50 <( w _J 0
" 45 z ~
POOL r=::=-
a: w 40 "-0 ... 0
/ GATE CONTACTS NAPPE 35
~ _J
a: 30 w s: 0 _J ... 25 0
z 0
20 ~ > w _J
15 w
I\ ~ ) Air VfNTS
....... ......._ 1--- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
~ r----lfTAILWJJ
v -c~ =- v
10 1 ~0
GATE BOUNCES VIOLENTLY AT THIS ELEVATION-.. " 5 ;~
... 0
<(
~ -5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE [] MAXIMUM 6 MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GAiE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEv
45.0 FT IIASL 20.0 Fi IIASL
PLATE 13
80
75
70
65
_j 60 <f)
::< I-w w 55 "-~ "- 50 <( w _j 0 <'l 45 z ~ a: w 40 a. 0
POOL
1-=-... 0 35 a. J I\ /
GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
a: 30 w ;: 0 _j
... 25 0
z 0
20 ~ > w _j
15 w
"-... AI~ VfNTS 1\ / v NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
ii TAILWJEJ
- r-- :----r-tJ ·f=:'-F v v
10 //
~0 v GATE BOUNCES VIOLENTLY AT THIS ELEVATION-5
':i ... 0
<( w
~ -5 60 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
PLATE 14
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM t;. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GAlE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
40.0 FT MSL 20.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
...J 60 <I)
:::; >-w w 55 ... ;e: ... 50 <( w ...J 0 <.9 45 z ~ 0:: w 40 a. 0
"-0 35 ~ ...J
0:: 30 w ~ 0 _J
"- 25
I
I I
POOL I I
\ 1 I
v Alt VrTS I
0 f TAILWJ.J v GATE COf!TACTS NAPPE
I z Q 20 >-~ w _J
15 w
/ c_ r- 1-1-- [/> NlPPE OVERTOPS GATE --= .__
/
/ VP'
10
~0 '<t GATE BOUNCES VIOLENTLY AT THIS ELEVATION~
5 ~~:
"-0
<( w
~ -5
80 60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 1:>. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
35.0 FT MSL 20.0 FT MSL
PLATE 15
80
75
70
65
...J 60 "' :::E ,..
w w 55 "-~ .... 50 < w ...J 0
" 45 z ~ 0:: w Q.
40 • 0 ... 0 35 Q.
J 0:: 30 w ~ 0 ...J ... 25 0
z 0
20
I\ POOL
[5 "A;t VrTS
jTAILWJJ t= ~ w ...J 15
r== == / GATE CONTACT! NIPPf ~
w
10
/ v I"- N~PP~ O~E~TOPS GATE /
~0 v v 5 ~~ GATE BOUNCES VIOLENTLY AT THIS ELEVATION
... 0 <
~ -5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE· THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
PLATE 18
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 1J. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GAlE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWA1'ER ELEV
30.0 F1' MSL 20.0 F1' MSL
80
75
70
65
.J 60 <I)
::l! t-w w 55 "-~ "- 50 < w .J 0 <!) 45 z ~ 0: w 40 a. 0
"-0 35 ~ .J 0: 30 w
"' 0 .J
"- 25 0 z 0
20
I\ I~ A~j VENTS POOL
ltrnR 1-= ~ > w
.J 15
~ Icc !--GATE COITAITS(Ai"PI
w
10
~ 0 '<t
5 ~~
..._
0 < w
-~ -5
80
~ v v v
v \
60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6l
Nt)E JEJTO~S GATE
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE D MAXIMUM ll MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
25.0 FT MSL 20.0 FT MSL
PLATE 17
80
75
70
65
J 60 II)
::l;
POOL
r== =_:= 1-
"' "' 55 tL.
~ ~
GATE CONTACTS NAPPE tL. 50 < "' J
<.9 45 z ~ a: "' 40 Q. 0 ... 0 35 Q.
:::; a: 30 "' 3: 0 J ... 25 0
z 0
20 ~ > "' J 15 "'
10
5
0 I
:---- ........ .....-NAPIE OVERTOPS GATE I I 1-- v I
I TAILWATER I'--
r==:= !="' 1 I I
I I
I\ v I I I
I I v I
I
/ I I I I I
:""- AIR VENTS v I I / v
li J I I
). I I
I ~
~~ 0 I I 0 i z
I
0
"-
I < UJ
~ -5
80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 ~T DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
PLATE 18
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 1-A GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV 60.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 40.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
_J 60 <I)
::; 1-w w 55 "-~ "- 50 < w
POOL
-=-_J 0 \.!) 45 z
I
' ~ r -,GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
I I a: w 40 a. 0
TAIL WATER
I-= F .._ 0 35
"' _J
a: 30 w ~ 0 _J
.._ 25 0
z 2 20 1-;} w _J
15 w
\ 1-------~ 1--
l> AIR VENTS v v /
1 v /
I
10 I ~
.. 0
b 5 z
lL
0
< ~ 'W _J
~ fb' I -5
80 60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE· THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
I II
I I ' NAPPE OVERTOPS ~ATE
I I I I
I I I !
I I I i ! I
' I
! I I I I I
'
I
!
i I
I i
I ! i
I
I I
I I
' ! I I ! I I I I I
j I I
I I I I 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 1> MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 1-A GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV 50.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 40.0 FT MSL
PLATE 19
80
7!'>
70
6!'>
...J 60 "' ::!0
t-w w 55 ... t: ... 50 < w ...J 0
" 45 z ~ "' POOL w 40 D. 0 -= ::-... 0 35 ~ ...J 0: \ GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
30 w ~ 0 ...J ... 25 0 z 0
20 ~ >
I> Ali VfNTS {
'TAILWJJ
I--~ -- v NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE r----v
-::::- / w ...J 15 w
/ //
10 ~ v MARKED TENDENCY TO BOUNCE AT THIS ELEVATION-
~0 I (j 5 z
GATE BOUNCES VIOLENTLY AT THIS ELEVATION u. < w
0
~ -!'>
80 60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLifT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAf TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REfERS TO THE LEAf WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
PLATE 20
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED A '/ERAGE 0 MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 1-A GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV 40.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 20.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
_j 60 <J)
:::; POOL
~ F 1-w w 55 "-~ v GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
"- 50 <( w _j 0
0 45 z ~ a: w 40 a. 0
"-0 35 ~ _j
a: 30 w ~ 0 _j
.... 25 0
z 0
20 ~ > w
TAIL WATER - ::-- - r-- --t--/' r--/ '--- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
\ ../v /
> AIR VENTS j
f j
IT lw
_j 15 w
10
5
~ I
CENOEN" ro BO(NCE W '"" R<NCE d 0 z u. <( w _j
0 ~
-5 80
~
60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT Of FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT Of THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 6 MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 1-B GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NQ 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV 60.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 40.0 FT MSL
PLATE 21
80
75
70
65
J 60 <fl
:l! 1-w w 55 "-~ "- 50 < w J
\!) 45 z
POOL
aT ~ I LV
~GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
a: TAIL WATER w 40 0. 0
"-0 35 ~ J a: 30 w 3: 0 J
-: c- I I
i
\ I
l> AIR VENTS /
P' ~ ..__ NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
"- 25 0
z 0
20 i= ~ w
!j /
/ i
r\ .J 15 w
10
5
~ I
""'"" ro BB"~" W m" "N" I I
d 0 .// z·
u.. < w J
0 ;;;;>
-5 80 60
"-......._ "-.
b 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTEo THE GATE LEAF" TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF" WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
PLATE 22.
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM fl. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 1-8 GATE LEAF
GAlE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEY TAILWATER ELEV
50.0 FT MSL 40.0 Fl MSL
80
75
70
65
...J 60 f/)
:l! t-
"' "' 55 LL
~ LL 50 <( w ...J 0 \.!) 45 z ~ a: "' 40 a. 0
POOL
-:::::F "-0 35 a. I ::; I\ /
GATE CONTACTS NAPPE a: 30 w ;;:: 0 .J
"- 25 0
z 0
20 ~ >
'-..._ Ali VENTS I( /
I iTAILWA)ER
\
-:t:- r----"' ...J 15 w
10
5
~ / v
0 0 AIR VENTS v z CLOSED "" / IL <( w
0 ,;_ \, :p
-5 80 60 40 20 o 2o 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
r--1-p ~ 1---1---- .....__
NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM !>. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 1-8 GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV 40.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 20.0 FT MSL
PLATE 23
80
75
70
65
..J 60 II)
:1 I-w w 55 ... ~ ... 50 < w ..J 0 <.!) 45 z ~
POOL 1-:: c:-
a: w 40 a. 0 ... 0 35
/GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
~ ..J a: w ~ 0 ..J ... 0
z 0
~ > w ..J w
30
25
20
\ '- -r--
[> AI~ Vrls i LLJR
c-
15
10
~0 GATE BOUNCES VIOLENTLY AT THIS ELEVATION
" 5 0 z "-
0 < w ..J
~ -5
80 604020 0 2040 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF" TYPE SPECIF"IED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL F"ORCES PLOT1ED ARE EXTERNAL F"ORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF" FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6l
PLATE 24
--t-- t-- -----NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE --r- --r-a v
\ \.
~ ~
e.--e.-1---1--_,.--
"' ~ 0 -of- 0
60 80
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE C MAXIMUM 1>. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 1-R GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
45.0 FT MSL 20.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
..J 60 !I)
::li 1-w w 55 lL
~ lL 50 <( w ..J 0 <.!) 45 z ~ 0: w 40 a. 0
POOL
--= E=-... 0 35 ~ ..J \ GATE CONTACTS NAPPE 0: w 3: 0 ..J ... 0
z Q 1-
~ w ..J w
30
) AI~ Vrls IL I- -r-,. 25
j 20
15
10
~ 0 <t
5 cj z "-
0 <( w
~ -5 80 60
JJAJR
== F
AT THIS ELEVATION GATE BOUNCES VIOLENTLY
4020 0 2040 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6l
r--t-r-I- v NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE -r-- r- ~ r-
.\ v v
k'" _.....
v v ~ cY
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM tJ. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 1-R GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NQ 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV 40.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 20.0 FT MSL
PLATE 25
80
75
70
65
_J 60 "'
POOL
::; 1-::: =-I-w w 55 "-!: v /--GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
"- 50 < w _J
I!) 45 z ~ a: w 40 0.. 0 .... 0 35 0.. _J
a: 30 w ~ 0 _J
.... 25 0
z 0
20 ;:: ~ w _J
15 w
~ 0 - r- NAPPE OVERTOPS GAT£ -1-
ll'r----~ ~ ~ TAIL WATER I'-r--t=: f= r-r--r-
~t-r- "' f!;,l
I\ I~ [; AIR VENTS v
k(
If ..,:;v v
10
5
k v ~~' 0 I-+-!-1-
+-I-+-!-d !--I-z
1--IJ._ 1--+--< +-I- GAT£ DOES NOT CLOSE OF ITS OWN w 1--1--0
~ WEIGHT BELOW THIS ELEVATION
-5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE· THE GATE LEAf TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT Of FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6\
PLATE 26
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM ;;. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 1-A-R GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV 60.0 Fi MSL TAILWATER ELEV 40.0 Fi MSL
80
75
70
65
_J 60 <I)
:::;; 1-w w 55 "-~ "- 50 < w _J
POOL
0 !===:==
0 45 z ;:: < /
GATE CONTACTS NAPPE a: w 40 a. 0 ... 0 35
TAIL WATER
'-c::: ::==- :>-. -r-r--r---a. _J
(( 30 w
:;: 0 ..J
\ ""'
?V;; NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
v AIR VENTS
... 25 0
z 0
20 ~ > w _J
15 w
1 J
10
5
~ I ~~ 0 ~ -- --
0 --f.----z u.. --~
0
~ <( --- -- f':;ftG~~E%f:_~~ cg;,~£ E~';~~~,g~~ w _J
~ -5
80 60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 1J. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 1-A-R GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
50.0 FT MSL 40.0 FT MSL
PLATE 27
80
75
70
65
.J 60 <I)
::< t-w w 55 ... ~ ... 50 < w ..J 0
" 45 z ~ a: w 40 Q.
0
POOL
=~ ... 0 35 ~ ..J \ GATE CONTACTS NAPPE a: w ~ 0 ..J ... 0
z 0 i= ~ w .J w
30
25
20
l> A/1 Vrls ~ l wLJEj
- =:= ~ 15
~ 10 ~- 0
0 5 z
u. <( w
0 .J
~ -5
80
--60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6~
PLATE 28
NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE --r-- r-1-- I-. - _j_ r-r---- ..__
I'--!'---....._
1\ v ::---
---v
- ~c----f-r- f-GATE DOES NOT CLOSE OF ITS OWN 1- WEIGHT BELOW THIS ELEVATION J.
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 1-A-R GATE LEAF
GAlE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
40.0 FT MSL 20.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
...J 60 "'
POOL
:::; '= 1-w w 55 u.. ~ GATE CONTACTS NAPPE u.. 50 <( w -'
" 45 z ~ a: w 40 n. 0
"-0 35 !:!o ...J a: 30 w ~ 0 ...J
"- 25 0
z 0
20 ;: ~ w
0 let: --- -r-- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE, r-I--r--r-TAIL WATER
-=r r----~ /
I\ > AIR VENTS 1\
If v __.....e---
v v
...J 15 w
10
5
~ / v
/ <t
/ 0 0 v z /
/
lL ~------<( --
0
I--w -- ~A;~,g~;~;~;wc;~!J E~;:;~~:~ ...J I-- ,...-.....
-5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTEo THE GATE LEAf TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAf WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ o OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM t. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 1-8-R GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
60.0 FT MSL 40.0 FT MSL
PLATE 29
80
75
70
65
_J 60 "' ::;
f-w w 55 "-:<; "- 50 <( w
POOL
c _J 0
" 45 z ~ /
~GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
a: w 40 ll. 0
"-0 35 !0 _J
a: 30 w ~ 0 _J
TAIL WATER / f-::- -- --I----I--r-
\ " "' [> AIR VENTS l ~ NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
"- 25 0 z Q
20
~ w _J
15 w
10
5
1 """ ~ / v
~ v vv
d 0 1-----,......-~--"
z _..-/" "-<( /"
0
v w
---- ~"(;zG~~E~;:_~~ c;~~EE ~~(;~g:~ _J 1-----..... -5
80 60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE· THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6),
PLATE 30
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~· 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 1> MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 1-8-R GATE LEAF
GAlE LEAF NQ 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
50.0 FT MSL 40.0 Fi MSL
80
75
70
65
_J 60 <f)
:::;; 1-w w 55 "-~
"- 50 <( w _J 0
" 45 z ~ 0:: w 40 0.
POOL -·
0 -· -
"-0 35 '!, _J 1\ GATE CONTACTS NAPPE 0:: 30 w ~ 0 _J
"- 25 0
z 0
20 ~ > w
> A/1 Vris 10: ii JJTE1
--1---ro- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE --t--,_ t-- r-;-- I
--=-:. t:- A l7 0
_J 15 w
10 ~ / 0 0 v ----z v
5 U-<( --f.---w _j
f.---- --;;;TE DOES NOT CLOSE OF ITS OWN 0
"""' -5
80 60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE· THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
WEICHT BELOW THIS ELEVATION
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 1J MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 1-B-R GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
40.0 FT MSL 20.0 FT MSL
PLATE 31
80
75
70
65
_J 60 Ill
::. POOL
I-=; c=-t-w w 55 ...
v GATE CONTACTS NAPPE ~ ... 50 <( w _J
0 45 z ~ a: w 40 D. 0
"-0 35 D.
:J a: 30 w ~ 0 _J
"- 25 0
z Q
2C \( > w _j
15 w
10 I li I I I
- 1---1--/" v ~---- I
I TAILWATER !......- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
I 1-:::;
==-- ! l I i
I\ v/ l>' AIR VtNT/[
I
I .I ! I I
I I I '
I I I i i
I
I. I I TENDENCY TO BOUNCE IN THIS RANGE I
10
~0 'f
5 ''£
"-0
<(
~ -5 80
I I I I
I I
60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT Of THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO 6).
PLATE 32
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 6 MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 2 GATE LEAF' GATE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
60.0 FT MSL 40.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
.J 60 "' ::;
t-w w 55 ... :;;:: ... 50 <( w
POOL 1-:= ==-.J 0
" 45 z ~ v I--GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
0: w 40 Q_
0
"-0 35 ~ .J 0: 30 w 3: 0 .J
"- 25 0
z 2 20 '< > w
TAIL WATER I <t 1-:= =- 1 I
I\ r-- t::: p-. r--- I I v NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
I> AIR VENT~ v i I v
I/ \ I
I l 1\ I I
.J 15 w
1 10
5
~0 TENDENCY TO BOUiCE IN THIS RANGE I
'<I
Ci z "-<(
0 w
~ -5 80
1\
60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
l 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 1> MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 2 GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
50.0 FT MSL 40.0 FT MSL
PLATE 33
80
75
70
65
--' 60 c/) :::;: !-w w 55 "-!'= "- 50 <( w --' 0
<!> 45 z ~ a: w 40 a. 0
POOL 1-::: ~
... 0 35 e, --' I\ GATE CONTACTS NAPPE a: 30 w ~ 0 --' ... 25 0
z 0
20 i= ~
/
> Ali VENTS I( I 'TAILWAJER
- r--- t::::: po. .--.-- '----- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
~ F w --' 15 w
I 10
~0 GATE BOUNCES VIOLENTLY AT THIS ELEVATION .. 5
~~ ... 0
<( w
~ -5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6l
PLATE 34
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 1>. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 2 GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 4 CLOSING
POOL ELEV 40.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 20.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
..J 60 <I)
:::;; POOL
·-= t=-1-w w 55 "-C": v GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
"- 50 <( w ..J
<.!) 45 z ~ a: w 40 a_ 0
"-0 35 a_
..J a: 30 w ;;: 0 ..J
"- 25 0
z 0
20 ~ >
0 r ,......_ r-- t-- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE t-- v TAIL WATER 1-- --- /
~ :;= /
[.,(
I\ 7 .L
> AIR VENTS v /
If v / /
w ..J IS w
10 ~ J. I ~0 rr 0
5 z "-
0
v • ..1. <( l£'ttl TOI BITfE t 1H/1 RrGr UJ ..J
~ -5 80
1'---. I'<
60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPUL..\;._
NOTEo THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE D MAXIMUM 1:1. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 CLOSING
POOL ELEV 60.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 40.0 FT MSL
PLATE 35
80 .
75
70
65
_j 60 "' ::;;
r-"-' "-' 55 "-3: "- 50 ..: "-' _j
l!l 45
POOL
aT I z ~ I ,Y GAT£ CONTACTS NAPPe
I a: "-' 40 0. 0
TAIL WATeR
== F 1.. 0 35 ~ _j
a: 30 "-' l: 0 _J
1..
\ '\ "\ ./" NAPPe OVeRTOPS GATE
>~Air Vrls -----
v ---~
25 0 If qov-AERAT~:{ -----I- VARIES BETWEeN I'.£ RATED AND NON-AERATED z I WITHOUT OUTSIDE INFLUENCE 0
20 ;: ~ w
i
! \ AERATED I
_j 15 w
~ I 1 j
10
5
~0 \ TeNDeNCY TO BOU~CE IN THIS RANGE 0 z U-<( w
0 I -5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
~I_.._.,-.DO--_W=N:_PU-,:Lo:L.._
NOTE THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
PLATE 36
! 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE D MAXIMUM tJ. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
50.0 FT MSL 40.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
...J 60 <I)
~
f-w w 55 "-
"" "- 50 ...: w ...J 0 1.9 45 z ~ 0:: POOL w 40 a. -= t=-0 .._ 0 35
"' I\ ...J 0:: w 30
~ :;: All VfNTS 0 / ...J
.._ 25 0 If TAILWJEj z Q 20 f-~ -:1:-
I(
w ...J 15 w
~ 10 ~": 0
0 5 z
/
NOTE THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAl.. FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
I NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
I
I I
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE D MAXIMUM D. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 CLOSING
POOL ELEV 40.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 20.0 FT MSL
PLATE 37
80
75
70
65
POOL
TA~ER 1-c::: ~
_.J 60 </)
::: 1- /
f-.- GATF DOES NOT CLEAR NAPPE
UJ UJ 55 ... ~ v "- 50 <( w _.J 0 ! <!) 45 z ~ 0: I w 40 a. 0 ... 0 35 '!:
""' >-,.__
_.J
0: \ / -- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE w 3: 0 _.J
... 0 z 0
~ > w ..J w
30
25
20
~ [> ~~ j 0 z
"-<( w
15 _.J
~ 10
~0 5 ~~ ...
0 <( w
~ -5 80 60
AIR vcys I
:\
40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT Of FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
PLATE 38
i i
i
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 6 MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 67.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 65.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
_j 60
~ TAILJATER
"' ::E t-
1--=: ::=- v f.-GATE DOES' NOT CLFAR NAPPE
w w 55 "-~
r "- 50 < w _j 0 1.9 45 z ~ oc w 40 0.
v 0
"- J NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE 0
~ _j
oc w :;;: 0 _j
"-0 z Q t-~ w _j
w
35
\ 30
25
20
~ I> ~~
' 0 z "-< w
15 _j
~ 10
~0 5 0 z
"-< 0 w
~ -5 80 60
I'- ........ v AIR VE]fTS~ f.-'
I--"'-.,
['.. ........_
40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 6 MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
67.0 FT MSL 60.0 FT MSL
PLATE 39
80
75
70
~~ 65
..J 60 "' ::;;
/ GAT£ OOES NOT CLEAR NAPPE 1-w w 55 u.
:!:
TAIL WATER v i.C:::: :== I
u. 50 <( w ..J 0 \.!) 45 z ~ a: w 40 a. 0
j f
... 0 35 !!o ..J a: 30 w ~ 0 ..J ... 25 0
z 0
20
~ w ..J 15 w
10
j
I\ ........ ........ v j---. ';::lJ v
~ !"'- AIR VENTS /"
,.......
v v /"
~ f 0 J z
1/ u. <(
I w ..J
~ \ 1\
~0 ~
5 0 z ... <(
0 w
~ -5
80 60 40 20 0 20 40 ~LIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
PLATE 40
NAPPE OVERTOPS GAT£
'
I
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE D MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF· NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
67.0 FT MSL 55.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
~F 65
J 60 "'
I ::E r-uJ uJ 55
v GATE DOES NOT CLEAR NAPPt
.,..v "-~ "- 50 < uJ
TAIL WATER
r== F J 0
0 45 z ~ a: uJ 40 a. 0 .._ 0 35 a. :::; a: 30 uJ J; 0 J
I
j I\ 1--t-- t-- 1--- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
p v L
~ l> AIR VENTS v v v v
"- 25 0 ~~ 11 v 'tf GAT£ VARIES FROM AERATED TO z 0
~ > uJ J w
0 20 z
"-< w 15
10
J
~ ~0 't
5 0 z "-
0 < w
~ -5 80 60
v NON-AERATED WITHOUT ,/ J OUTSIDE INFLUENCE
' V t--AERATED
v "-NON-AERATED
1/ I
1\
40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP'
NOTE: THE GATE LEAf TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAf WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOT"TED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6l
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 67.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 50.0 FT MSL
PLATE 41
80
75
70
65
~~ r==:r==
_j 60 "' ::! GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
t-
"' / "' 55 LL I~-~ LL 50 < "' _J
" 45 z ~ a: "' 40 ll. 0
0 \ TAIL WATER
---= F-1 I
"-0 35 ll. :::; a: 30 "' 3: 3 ... 25 0
z 0
20 ~ > w _j
15 w
10
I\ ------I'--r--
~ > AIR V£NTS ~ / v
~ If l7 0 .I z LL / < v w _j
~ v v ~0 !'--
~ 5 ~¥ I ...
0 < w
~ -5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE' SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6l
PLATE 42
1---- / NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
v
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM t:J. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 67.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 45:0 FT MSL
80
75
70
{'22.1:. 1--==-
65
...J 60 <I)
:< / GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
f-w w 55
/ "-~ "- 50 <( w ...J 0 <!) 45 ~
~ \ 0:: w 40 "-0
TAIL WATER
1--= E" I .... 0 35 ~ ...J 0:: 30 w ~ 0 ...J .... 25 0 z 0
20 i= ;; w ...J 15 w
10
5
0
\ r-- f--.
~ ) Air VrJ ' ' 1--
~",$;: 1 GAJ VAtEJ FROM v / 0 z
"-
( AERATED TO NON
li <( AERATED WITHOUT w OUTSIDE INFLUENCE ...J
~ ""' NON-AERATEV -A~RATEJ ~ I
~0 \ I 0 I z
j .... I <(
w
~ -5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWN~
NOTE THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE r---'--. y' ~
..-- ..--..--~
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE D MAXIMUM 1J. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 67.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 40.0 FT MSL
PLATE 43
80
75
70
65
.J 60 "' ::;
POOL
-= ~ >-"' w 55 "-
~ GATE CONTACTS NAPPE "- 50 < w .J
1.9 45 z ~ 0:: w 40 a. 0
0 lr TAIL WATER \
1-= F ... 0 35
"' .J 0:: 30 "' 3: 0 .J ... 25 0
z 0
20 ~ >
:\ J ~ ) AIR VENTS
......_ t---I' ......_
~~ J __...., __....,
v 0 __...., __...., z "- v ' < w
.J 15 w
10
5
"' ) .J
~ / v v
~ 0 '\
1\. :\[ 1/ ...
0 < w
~ -5
80 60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTEo THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 61
PLATE 44
v NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
60 80 roo 120 140 r6o 1ao 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL fORCE IN KIP
LEGEND o OBSERVED AVERAGE D MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 60.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 40.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
POOL
TA~ER ·==: r===
_J 60 "' ::; v GATE DOES NOT CLEAR NAPPE
t--w w 55 "- I ~ "- 50 <( w _J
J 0 I!
1.9 45 z ~ a: w 40 Q_
0
j I
I "-0 35 Q_
_J
a: \ /~ ........ t-- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
w 3:: 0 _J
"-0
z 0 >= :; w _J w
30
25
20
~ l> ~~ j 0 z
"-<( w
15 _J
~ 10
~0 " 5 0 z "-<(
0 w
~ -5 80 60
AIR VENTS
I
I
40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT THREE CENTER BAYS (BAYS NOS. 5, 6, 7}
I
I
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ o OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 6 MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 67.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 65.0 FT MSL
PLATE 45
80
75
70
85
_J 60 II)
* TA/LlATER
::!; ---=: b /
GATE OOES NOT CLEAR NAPPE t-w w 55 "-~
I" f
"- 50 < w _J 0
" 45 z ~ 0: w 40 Q. 0 ... 0 35
j 0..
::i I\ ""'-. ,......._ v NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
0: 30 w 3:: 0 _J ... 25 0 z 0
20 t= ;l: w
a'
~ •""'- AIR v~p.- / /
v ~ 11 ' 0 z
\ "-< w _J
15 w
10
_J
~ ~0
5 ~~ ...
0 < w
~ -5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE THE GATE LEAF TYPE. SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT THREE CENTER BAYS (BAYS NOS. 5, 6, 7}
PLATE 46
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM t> MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF" NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 87.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 80.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65 ~f!:!= -=:E=-
..J 60 !/) ~ v GATE DOES NOT CLEAR NAPPE t-w w 55 IL
TAIL WATER v r~ F
;;; IL 50 <( w ..J 0
" 45 z ~ a: w 40 0.. 0 IL 0 35 0.. ::i a: 30 w 3: 0 ..J ... 25 0
z 0
20 ~ > w ..J 15 w
10
5
0
\ r-- t----~ ~ > AIR VENTS
-----v
-----v
~~ ~~ v w ..J
~ ~0
l\ v
:~ I ... <(
~
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT THREE CENTER BAYS (BAYS NOS. 5, 6, 7}
-- f-NAPPEOVERTOPS GATE po-
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE C MAXIMUM 4 MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 67.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV !!15.0 FT MSL
PLATE 47
80
75
70
f.2~ 1-=F 65
-' 60 U) ::!;
/ GATE DOES NOT CLEAR NAPPE 1-w w 55 v "-?: "- 50 <( w
TAILWATER
"::::= r=---' '-' 45 z
0 \.
~ 0: w 40 c. 0 .... 0 35
"= -'
j
1 I\ -- --r- --a: 30 w
~
~ > AIR VENTS ---v--
0 .J .... 0 z 0 t= ;l: w -' w
25
20
IS
v ---~ 1/ .//
v 0 z
\ "-~: -'
~ \ 10
~0 5
~~ ....
0 <( w
~ -5
80 60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT THREE CENTER BAYS (BAYS NOS. 5, 6, 7}
PLATE 48
t7 ,...--f.- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE [] MAXIMUM 1> MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 67.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 50.0 Fi MSL
80
75
70 POOL
65 -==:==
..J 60 "' :::;;
1- v V GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
w w 55 LL
;; LL 50 <( w ..J 0
'-" 45 z ~ 0:: w 40 a. 0 ...
TAIL WATER
--== F i\ \
0 35 '!, ..J 0:: 30 w ~ 0 ..J ... 25 0
z 0
20 ~ > w
\ - r--- - r- .--NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE - - r- / :=.<
~ ) ~ ---AIR VENTS ~ --------~~ 11 /v
0 z LL / <( w
..J 15 w
10
5
0
..J
~ / /
~0 \
:\t l ... <(
~ -5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT THREE CENTER BAYS (BAYS NOS. 5, 6, 7).
VERTICAL FORCE IN Kl P
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 6 MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 67.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 45.0 FT MSL
PLATE 49
80
75
70
65
POOL
~F
.J 60 "' :I'
v GATE CONTACT$ NAPPE t-w w 55 "-?: ... 50 <( w .J 0
~ 45
~ \ a: w 40 a. 0
TAIL WATER
f= F- \ .._ 0 I". 35 a. I\ -r-t-t-t-t- yNAPPE OVERTOPS GATE :::; a: 30 w 3: g .._ 25 0 z 0
20 ~ > w .J 15 w
10
5
t-t-t-t-t-- v t-
~ l> AIR VeNTS 1-1-f--r-1-f--1-1--
~~ If v ~g l/
~ v v .J
~ v ~0 v
vv '<t
'~ II "-0
<(
-5 ~ 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTEo THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT THREE CENTER BAYS (BAYS NOS. 5, 6, 7}
PLATE 50
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE a. MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 67.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 40.0 FT MSL
80
7S
70
6S
...J 60 "' :I;
POOL
'---=: t=-.... w w ss ....
// GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
~ .... so <( w ...J
<!) 4S z 0 \
~ 0: w 40 Q. 0
TAIL WATER
1-:::: F \ ... 0 3S !!, ...J 0: \
30 w 3: ~ v -- .-1-- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE 0 AIR VENTS ...J ... 2S 0
z 0
20 f= ~ w
~~ 1 ~~ .... v <( w
...J IS w
10
s
0
~ // /
~0 v -<t / ~jf
\ ... <(
~
NOTEo THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT THREE CENTER BAYS (BAYS NOS. S, 6, 7).
-~---1---p __.... !--""'
__.... v
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 6 MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 60.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 40.0 FT MSL
PLATE 51
80
75
70
65
-' 60 <I) ::;: 1-w w 55 "-;<;
,__.. 1-- POOL F==::==
"- 50 < w -' 0 GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
<!! 45 z l/
~ a: w 40 a. 0
TAIL WATER 1 I--= =-
"-0 35 a. :J a: 30 w ~ 0 -' ... 25 0
z 0
20 ~ > w ..J 15 w
10
I\ I\_
~ [> AIR VENTS I ~~ l j 0 z
"- f--< 1--' w f--,....-
-'
~ v /
~0 v '<I 5 :~
"-0
< w
~ ~--5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
PLATE 5~
v /"NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
""
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM t. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 54.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 40.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
-' 60 1/)
::l! f-w w 55 IL
?:
- 1- POOL
~t== IL 50 < w -' 0 /GATE CONTACTS NAPPE <!J 45 z ~ a: w 40 Q. 0 .... 0 35 !:!, -' a: 30 w :;: 0 -' .... 25 0
z 0
20 i= ~
11 \
I\ TAIL WATER \.
~ ; "At~ viNTS \
~ If If 0 z ... <(
w w -' 15 w
10
5
0
..J
~ / ./
~0 j ..;
~~· v / .... L <(
~ \ -5
80 60 4020 0 2040 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
/ f---NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
f.--....,
f.-- f----
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 6 MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
54.0 FT MSL 30.0 FT MSL
PLATE 53
80
75
70
65
...J 60 "' :::. ...
w w 55 .... ~
f-r- POOL
~F' .... 50 < w ...J 0 GATE CON7ACTS NAPPE \!) 45 z ~ a: w 40 Cl.
I~ 0 .... 0 35 ~ ...J a: 30 w 3:: 0 ...J .... 25 0
z 0
20 ~ >
I\ I~
~ l> A/1 VENTS \
~~ I 'TAILWAJER
\ 0 1\ z "- '"'=t='" < w w
...J 15 w
10
...J
~ ~0 " 5
0
~g )/ .... v <
~ v (
-5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
PLATE 54
NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE ~ ~
j---t- r---t-r-
j---t-r--\ v
J
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM tJ. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
54.0 FT MSL 20.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
..1 60 V1
::. t--w w 55 "-~ "- 50 < w ..1 0
" 45 z ~ a: w 40 a. 0
POOL
I~ t=-"-0 35
"' ..1 a: I\ vGATE CONTACT,S NAPPE
30 w ~ 0 ..1
"- 25 0
z 0
20 ;::: ~ w ..1 15 w
10
~ [> A'l VrTS 1\ ~~
!iTAILWAt) 1\ 0 z "- 1-=:1=:-
1\ < w ..1
~ 1/ ~ 0
t--r- 1--'<t
5
0
~~ v "- J...--v < w v ~ lll/o
-5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT CENTER BAY (BAY NO. 6).
v NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE r- 1--1>< v v
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM ll MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GAlE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGE"THER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 40.0 FT MSL TAILWA"TER ELEV 20 .. 0 FT MSL
PLATE 55
80
75
70
65
..J 60 V)
::;; 1-w
55 w IL
~
1-'-- POOL
-==F IL 50 < w ..J 0 v
!---GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
\!) z ~ a: w a. 0 IL 0
!!: ..J a: w ~ 0 ..J
"-0
z 0 ;:: ;l: w ..J w
45
40
35
i\ 30
25
20
~ ) Ali VfNTS \ ~~
liTAILWAt) \
0 z
~~ -c.::::: I-
w 15 ..J
~ 10
~0 <t
5 :~ "-
0 <
~ -5 80
>OV 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTEo THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT TWO CENTER BAYS (BAYS NOS. 5 1 6)
PLATE 56
NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
~
__ )./ /
/
/ v j
i /
60 80 roo 120 r4o r6o 180 200 220 24o 26o
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF' NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF' NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
54.0 F'T MSL 20.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
.J 60 <I)
:::;: t-w w 55 "-?:
- f- ~ggf:.._ F
"- 50 < w ~ GATE CONTACTS NAPPE .J
<.!> 45 z ~
0 v \
a: w 40 n. 0
"-0 35 n. .J a: 30 w :;:: 0 .J
"- 25 0 z Q 20 t-~ w .J 15 w
TAIL WATER
t-~ I I\ \
~ I) AIR VENTS j
~ if t-- t-- t-- /v NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
0 t-- t--1--z "- 1--f-1-< 1--w 1- f-.J
~ v v 10
5
~0 I\ TENDENCY TO BO~NCE IN THIS RANGE
~~ "-
0 <
~ -5
80 60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT THREE CENTER BAYS (BAYS NOS. 5, 6, 7).
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE D MAXIMUM tJ. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
54.0 FT MSL 40.0 FT MSL
PLATE 57
80
75
70
65
.J 60 <11
~
r-w w 55 IL
~
1--t--{'!!~ --c::_=-IL 50 <( w .J
(!)
0 vGATE CONTACTS NAPPE
z 45
~ a: w 40 0.. 0 ... 0 35 0.. ::; a: 30 w ~ 0 J ... 25 0
z 0
20 ~ >
f \
I\ TAIL WATER 1\
~ l? A;k V~NTS \ ~~ If Cl z
IL <(
w w J 15 w
10
5
.J
~ v ./.
~0 j Cl ]/ z ... v <(
0 w
~ -5
80 604020 0 2040 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT THREE CENTER BAYS (BAYS NOS. 5,6, 7)
PLATE 58
v NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
t- t-+-t-I----
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 54.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 30.0 FT MSL
_, <f) :::;
t;; w LL
~
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
- I-~9~ -==-
LL <( w _,
~ ~
lo ,G, ITE, CCNT~CT t..4PPE
a:: w 0. 0
"-0
~ _, a:: w ;:: '3 "-0
z Q .... ~ w _, w
45
40
35
30
~ 25
Q ~-
~~: 15
10 ~ ~
5 ~l;i
~~
-5 ~ 80
I\ \. i>·AI• ~~N; S
l"AILWATER '-..,.
'-..,. 1·-::: :::---
0 I v
cV /
60 40 20 0 20 40 60 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
N' pp · o/Efi TO. ~5 ;AT '~
~
- r-- -- - 1--j
80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT THREE CENTER BAYS (BAYS NOS. 5,6,7}
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE D MAXIMUM tJ. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (O~IGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 54.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 20.0 FT MSL
PLATE 59
80
75
70
6S
..J 80 (/)
:::! 1-w w 55 "-!': "- 50 < w ..J 0 <!> 45 z ~ a: w 40 Q. 0
POOL
= t=-.._ 0 35 !!, ..J I\ /
V GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
a: 30 w ;= 0 ..J ... 25 0
z 0
20 ~ > w ..J 15 w
10
~ ) A/1 VfNTS c;
~ lfTAILWAt) 0 z ... ·::_t=-
\ <( w ..J
~ 1).,
~0 --t--'<t
5 ~~
0
... <( b-
~ ,flo -5
80 60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT Of FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT Of THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT THREE CENTER BAYS (BAYS NOS. S, 6, 7)
PLATE 60
r- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE --t-- v 1--~ f..- f.- :::-
f.- .-
60 80
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM l!. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
40.0 FT MSL 20.0 FT MSL
eo
75
70
85
...J 60 II)
::::; t-w w 55 ..... ~
r-r- I-POOL !-=====:!=-
..... 50 <( w
/" -GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
...J
<!} 45 z ~ a: w 40 c. 0 ... 0 35 c. :::i a: 30 w
0 c(' TAIL WATER
~-=~ \ .........
......... vNAPPEOVERTOPS GATE • ['---.
!"-- v I\ v v
....- /"
3: 0 AIR VENTr ......... ...J ~ ') ................ GAT£ BOUNCES AFTER SHORT PERIOD OF INSTABILITY-... 0
z 0 >= ::5 w ...J w
25
~~ 0
20 z .....
15 ij
~ 10
s
0
-s eo
If
r-c,
60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAY NO. 9.
60 eo 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
lliQ!f! 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM t.. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NQ 3 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
54.0 FT MSL 45.0 FT MSL
PLATE 61
...J
"' ::. t;; w lL
~ lL < w ...J
\S z ~ ffi Q. 0 ... 0
'!: ...J a: w
~ ... 0
80
75
70
65
60
50
45
40
~~
30
~ 25
~
t=:= _:.::__ =-
lo v r
r--TA lLW m'R
\ 1-=: -
v ·Ah v,rN;;s
1--"
,G; ,TE .co. ITA ,CT~ N,1PPf'
;--.. I-- ~N. 4PI ;EC ,VEl ?TC PS GA;'E I-----b-.. /
,/ pl
1--" 1--" ___..
....-
z 0 :~ I G4TI '8( !utv ~E~ VtfJL, 'NT tY.4T 'HI~· EiEVATI•JN -----.., ~ > w ...J w
20
:~ I
~ 5
0
-~
eo
'0
60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE• THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAY NO. 9
PLATE 62
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 26 0
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 1> MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 CLOSING
POOL ELEV 54.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 35.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
...J 60 <J)
:::; t-w w 55 "-~
f-f- ~/!f -c:::t=-
"- 50 < w ...J v GATE CONTACT NAPPE
0
" 45 z ~ a: w 40 0. 0
"-
1r t--r- ........ t--
0 35 e, ...J a: 30 w :;; 0 ...J
"- 25 0
z 0
20 f= ~ w ...J 15 w
10
I\ ~ I) AIR VENTS v I I v TAIL WATER
~~ 11 '--= F-
0 I\ z "- v v < w v ...J
~ to
5
0
-5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAY NO. 9
r- v NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE t--
v vP" v
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GAlE LEAF NO. 3 CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
54.0 FT MSL 25.0 Fi MSL
PLATE 63
80
75
70
65
.J 80 (/) ::t J-bJ
"' 55 ... ~ ... 50 < bJ .J 0
" 45 z ~ a: bJ 40 0.. 0
POOL
r==: ~ ... 0 35 0..
J \ 1--- I--GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
a: 30 bJ
~ .J ... 25 0 z 0
20 ~ > bJ .J 15 w
10
rf
~ [> AI~ VfNTS 1 ~
iTAILWAJE) --1-- -- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE ---- v I
2 -- /
~ '-= i- f..- ---- ----~ d
0
5
0
-5 80 604020 0 204060
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
PLATE 64
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE [] MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 CLOSING
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAY NO. 9
POOL ELEV 40.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 20.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65 ~~
...J 60 <I)
:::;; r-w w 55
TAIL WATER
"-~
1-= ==--
V GATE OOES NOT CLEAR NAPPE v "- 50 < w ...J 0
" 45 ~ \( a: w 40 Q. 0 ... 0 35 '!;: ...J a: 30 w ~ 0 ...J ... 25 0
z Q
20 \( > w ...J 15 w
10
~ 1/ "' j 0 z
§I\ r- )--. v NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE r-b v
~ [) AIR VENTS v v v v
~ If J 0 \ z
lL [\ < w r ~
lQ 5
0
-s80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM t. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAY NO. II
POOL ELEV TAILWATEA ELEV
67.0 FT MSL 55.0 FT MSL
PLATE 65
75~~~~~~~~t-t-t-t-t-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-i-i-i-~
70~~t-~t-+-t-t-t-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-i-i-i-i-i-~
l==:r= 65~~~~}-}-}-}-}-t-t-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-i-i-i-~
0
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
PLATE 66
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 6 MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAY NO.9
POOL ELEV 67.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 45.0 FT MSL
80
75
70 POOL rc· ··:c·
65
--' 60 "' ::;;
"" w w 55 "-~ v GATE DOES NOT CLEAR NAPPE
"- 50 < v I
w --' 0
<..? 45 z ~ "' w 40 ll. 0
"-0 35 ~ --'
"' 30 w 3: 0 --' "- 25 0
z Q 20 "" :;l: w --' 15 w
~ 1\ "' 1\ 0 NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE z TAIL WATER
~I\ . - 1-t-t-t-1-t- f::= ro
1=: t::-1-
~ 1"-- Atk VENTS v I/
~ If v VV .,. ..---v
0 v z '!L v < w
10 ~ 0
5
0
-5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAY NO. 9.
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 11 MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
67.0 FT MSL 35.0 FT MSL
PLATE 67
80
75
70
85 ~~ -=:E.:-
...J 80 II)
~
1-.... w 55 IL
i!: v IL 50 -< .... ...J 0
~ 45
~ a: w 40 a. 0 ... 0 35 a. ::i a: 30 w
~ ...J ... 25 0 z 0
20 ~ >
~ \ "' / 0 v z
~I\
I :"-...AIR VENTS
~ILJAT~R
~ =:§= " 0 z
.... lL
...J 15 .... -< w
10 ~
0
5
0
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOToED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A .RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOoAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF oHE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO oHE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAY NO. 9.
PLATE 68
GATE 00£5 NOT CLEAR NAPPE
NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE---.
\
/ v
v //
I v v
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND
0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 67.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 25.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
-' 60 U) :::; 1-w w 55 "-~
- r--~g -=t=-· "- 50 < w -' v ~~ATE CONTACTS NAPPE
0 \!) 45 z ~ a: w 40 a. 0
"-0 35 a. ::; a: 30 w ~ 0 -'
TAIL WATER
~ ·-= t:=-- 1\
"' j 0 z
~ \ 1r ,/
~ ) AIR VENTS ! ... 25 0 z 0
20 ~ :> w -' 15 w
10
~ If 1 / /NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
Ci P' ·z --u. --f.--
'<( ---w ,Y -'
~ to
5
0
-5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT Of FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAY NO. 9.
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 1>. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 54.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 45.0 FT MSL
PLATE 69
80
75
70
65
..J 60 V)
::; t-w w 55 ... !:
- !--_fgOL
-==~ ... 50 <( w ..J 0
/GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
<.!) 45 z ~ a: w 40 0.. 0
/
~ "' ...
0 35 ~ ..J a: 30 w 3: 0 ..J
0 z TAILWATER
~I\ -=: rr ~ ) Atk VENTS
... 25 0
z 0
20 ~ > w ..J 15 w
10
~ If j d z u.. f.--- --<( ---w ..J O"v ~
0
5
0
-5 80 604020 0 2040
UPLIFT DOWN PULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAY NO. 9.
PLATE 70
v NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
1-- -- ~
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE D MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
54.0 FT MSL 35.0 FT MSL
eo
75
70
65
.J 60 If)
:::; f-w w 55 ..._
~
- r-- POOL
~~ ..._
50 < w
// GATE CONTACTS NAPPE
.J 0
" 45 z ~ a: w 40 a. 0
~ "' ..._
0 35 ~ .J a: 30 w 3:: 0 .J ..._ 25 0
z 0
20 ~ >
0 z
§.1\ ~ ~ Alf VfNTS
TAILWATER
~ 11 ~ ~ Ci z
w u.. .J 15 w
< w
10 ~ of...--' --0
5
0
-5 eo 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAY NO. 9.
v NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
1--v 1--------
60 eo 100 120 140 160 leO 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ o OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 54.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 25.0 FT MSL
PLATE 71
80
75
70
65
.J 60 Cl}
::lE f-w
"' 55 4.
!;.
r- - POOL !=:::===
4. 50 < "' v GATE CONTACTS NAPPE .J
!i ~ a: w 0. 0 ... 0
~ .J a: w
"' 0 .J ... 0
z 0 i= ~ w .J
"'
0
45
40 ~ "' 0 z
35
~ \ 30
25 ~ ~
20 0 z u.. <
15 w
10 ~ 5
0
-5 eo
[> Ali VENTS
'TAILWAJER ~ r== ~
0
60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A .RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN. .
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAY NO. 9.
PLATE 72
d
v NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
1--f------
/
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN Kl P
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE C MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
54.0 FT MSL 20.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65 ~E?:
-' 60 "' ~ 1-w w 55
TAIL WATER
"- -=: t=- v GATE DOES NOT CLEAR NAPPE
"" "-< w -'
" z ~ 0:: w tl. 0
"-0
'!= -' a: w 3: 0 -' "-0
z 0 >= ~ w -' w
50
0
45
40 ~ "' 0 z
35
~ \ 30
25 ~ ~
20 (j z "-
15 '< w
10 ~ 5
0
-5 80
> i
0
60
/
1-----1--
---1--........
........ ~ ~
I r---. ....... .......
t----r--,
AIR VENTS -- --1--_.-1----1--
\
6
40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
/ v NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE D MAXIMUM I>. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAYS NOS. 8,9,10
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
67.0 FT MSL 55.0 FT MSL
PLATE 73
.J
"' ::> t;j w ... ~
~ w .J
~ ~ eJ a. 0 ... 0
~ _J
a: w
~ ... 0
z 0
~ > w .J w
7~
70
'~
60
50
~ ~~l 35
!~-~ ~ ~~j
I
~ I
5
-5
~ 2i. ~
/
lo z4tL¥Ar ER
1--:: t=- v 1\
\ I> ·Ali v.;N;~s
' _/
/ v
./
a/
0
~ fGA TE 'po. :s yor ,CL• 0 AA :NA pp,
/rrAPfE WE (?T< 1PS GA ':E
- e--- e----/
v v
/
00 w ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ w 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE· THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
PLATE 74
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 1J. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAYS NOS. 8,9,10
POOL ELEV 67.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 45.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
_f'O~ --=~
_j 60 <!)
::E
t-w w 55 "-
/ GATE DOES NOT CLEAR NAPPE
;!::
"-<( w _j
\.9 ;!::
~ a: w a. 0
"-0 a. _j
a: w i; 0 _j
"-0
z Q ~ > w _j w
50 v 0
45
40 ~ I\_
"' \ 0 TAIL WATER z 35
~I\ I-= j=:-_j
30
25 ~ ~
20 0 z lL
15 <( w
10 ~
5
0
-5 80
I) Alk VENTS
If vv l
to
60 40 20 0 20 40 ~ DOWNPULL
NOTE THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAYS NOS. B, 9, 10.
V NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
v ).--1--
).-- ........ v
v
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 6 MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 67.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 35.0 FT MSL
PLATE 75
80
75
70
65 ~~ ""=t==
...J 60 OJ)
:::< 1-w w 55 "- v GATE DOES NOT CLEAR NAPPE ~ "- 50 <
/ w ...J
~ 45
~ "' w 40 Q.
0
0 \_
~ \ <'1
... 0 35 Q.
::i
"' 30 w 3: 0 ...J ... 25 0
z 0
20 ~ > w ...J 15 w
10
0 z
~.\
~ ~AIR VENTS I I TAIL WATER
~ i r=:::: F
0 z
/ "- v < w
! ~ 6
5
0
-5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE• THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACT1NG UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAYS NOS. 8, 9, 10.
PLATE 76
NAPPE OVERTOPS GATEL""
I----~ / v
/
v v v
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 1J MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 67.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 25.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
-' 60 <I) :::. t-w w 55 "-
- r-~ T vGATE CONTACTS NAPPE "- 50 <( w -' <.!> 45 z ~ "' w 40 a.
0 TAIL LATER If
~ - t=- \
0 "' .._ 0 0 35
"' -'
"' 30 w ~ 0 -' .._ 25 0 z 0
20 ~ > w -' 15 w
10
z
~I\ J -'
~ ) AIR VENTS l j
~ If ........ ......_ 1---......_
(j ....... z v ---IL ----<( -w
If -'
~ 0
5
c
-5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE· THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAYS NOS. 8, 9, 10.
NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE v
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM t:. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 54.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 45.0 FT MSL
PLATE 77
80
75
70
65
ill 60 ::< 1-w w 55 ... f- !--- POOL
r=:::::= ~ GATE CONTACTS NAPPE ~ 50 w -' ~ 45
~ a: :;: 40 0 ... 0 35
"' -' ::5 30
~ -' ... 25 0
z 0 ~ 20 > w c;j 15
10
5
0
v 0 I/
~ \ ~~
0
z I-: TAILITR
~I \r==~=- 1\ ~ 1"-- Alk VENTS v ~ If 1-
(j z u. <( w
-~ ~
to
-5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE· THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT Of FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAYS NOS. 8, 9, 10.
PLATE 78
t- 1-t- NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE 1-t-t-1-t- v 1-t--+-1-I-1-
I-1-I-r-1-1-
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE
.D MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 54.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 35.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
65
_J 60 (/)
:::; 1-w w 55 LL
I-1-- POOL !=:::==
~ GATE CONTACTS NAPPE LL 50 < w _J
" 45 z ~ 0: w 40 0.. 0
0 {
~ \ t'>,"
... 0 35 0.. :::; 0: 30 w ;;r; 0 _J
... 25 0 z 0
20 ~ > w _J
15 w
10
0 z
~ \ ~ [),; AIR VENTS
I I TAIL WATER
~ 1 r=:: == t--!--
0 z u.. < w
~ d 6
5
0
-5 80 60 40 20 0 20 40
UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE ORY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAYS NOS. B, 9, 10.
NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE",
- 1-- \ t-- - r-- 1--- f- - ,_
-- 1---,_
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 54.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 25.0 FT MSL
PLATE 79
80
75
70
65
..J 60 "' ::;
t-w w 55 "-
I-1-- POOL t=::[:=
~ GATE CONTACTS NAPPE "-<( w ..J
c; z ~ a: w a. 0 ... 0
!!, ..J a: w ;: 0 ..J ... 0 z 0
~ > w ..J w
50
45
40
0 [(
~ \ ~;;;' 0 z 35
~[\ 30
25 ~ ~
20 d z "-
15 <( w
10 ~ 5
0
-5 80
[) Ali VENTS 1\ liTAILWJER
r=::r==
'o
604020 0 2040 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTEo THE GATE LEAf TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL fORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT Of fLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
PLATE 80
NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE,
\ 1----p
:....-v>-' 1--I--I--
r
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM A MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT BAYS NOS. 8,9,10
POOL ELEV 54.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 20.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
POOL
65 -==F'
....1 60 <I)
:::0 f-w w 55 "- GATE DOES NOT CLEAR NAPPE ~ "- 50 < w ....1
<!) 45 z ~
/ /
0 \ \
a: w 40 Q._
0 .._ 0 35 ~ ....1
a: 30 w >: 0 ....1
TAIL WATER
--= b \ ~ I\ 1\ ~ ) AIR VENTS 0 .._ 25
0
z Q 20 f-~ w ....1 15 w
10
~If ~ ~ v v
./ d
5
0
z 0 v lL < w /
~ / v
ll -5
80 60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE BOTTOM LEAF. THE UPPER LEAF IS TYPE I (ORIGINAL) DESIGN.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT THREE CENTER BAYS (BAYS NOS. 5, 6, 7).
I
NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE "-
1\. --1--_:;;;; rv
---f.--'
---~
---v / /
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 6 MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 1-C GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 67.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 40.0 FT MSL
PLATE 81
80
75
70
65
~gf:: -::::1;:-
..J 60 "' ::1:
t-w w 55 ...
/ GATE DOES NOT CLEAR NAPPE ~ ... 50 <
v w ..J 0
~ 45
~ 0: w 40 11. 0
"-0 35
TAIL WATER
'-:::: 1;:-\ .--NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
11.
:::i 0: 30 w ~ 0 ..J
"- 25 0
z 0
20 ~ > w ..J 15 w
\ fe. ~ F--
~ > AIR VENTS LV
v
~ f li ~ ... / < v w
v ~ / GATE BOUNCES AT THIS ELEVATION WHEN NAPPE IS NOT AERATED ~ 10
~0 5
:~ "-
0 <
~ -5
80
v v k
1\ !'--- r-....
604020 0 2040 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT THREE CENTER BAYS (BAYS NOS. 5, 6, 7).
PLATE 82
(NAPPE DEAERATES NATURALLY) I
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN Kl P
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 6 MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 2-A GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
67.0 FT MSL 40.0 FT MSL
80
7S
70
6S
-f}j~ -:::t=-
-' 60 <I) ::. f--w w 55 "-
~ v __.-GATE DOES NOT CLEAR NAPPE
"- so <( w -' <.!J 45 z ~
0 I \
a: w 40 0. 0
"-0 35
"' -' a: 30 w ?; 0 -' "- 25 0
z g
20
~
TAIL WATER
== F 11
,\ ~"o ~ _!( NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
r-
~ ) AIR VENTS l7 L
~ If v 0 z "- 7 <(
w -' IS w
w _/ -'
/ ~ v GATE BOUNCES AT THIS ELEVATION WHEN NAPPE IS NOT AERATED 1---10
~0 "¢
5 :~ "-
0 <( w
~ -5 80
/ ./
j 6
60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE' THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT THREE CENTER BAYS (BAYS NOS. S, 6, 7).
(NAPPE OEAERATES NATURALLY')
60 80 100 120 140 160 lBO 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 1>. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 2-B GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO.3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
67.0 FT MSL 40.0 FT MSL
PLATE 83
80
75
70
65 ~~ -=t=-
J 80 1/) ::::! 1-w w 55 ... ! v j..- GATE DOES NOT CLEAR NAPPE
... 50 < w J 0 ..,
45 z ~ a: w 40 0.. 0 ... 0 35 0.. :::i a: 30 w 31: 3 ... 25 0 z 0
20 ~ > w J 15 w
TAIL WATER
I~ F 1\ NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE
I\ l/
~ i) AIR VENTS ['\ !),
~ If [/ ~~ ~~ v ~g l/
vv 10 ~ v GATE BOUNCES AT THIS ELEVATION WHEN NAPPE IS NOT AERATED j---
~0 '<I
5 ~lz' ...
0 <(
~ -5 80
[/ v
J !
60 40 20 0 20 40 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT THREE CENTER BAYS (BAYS NOS. 5, 6, 7).
PLATE 84
(NAPPE DEAERATES NATURALLY)
60 80
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
LEGEND
0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM 1:. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE 2-C GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV 67.0 FT MSL TAILWATER ELEV 40.0 FT MSL
80
75
70
6S
~,Q.l: r=:t==
_j 60 "' ::!
1-w w 55 ....
v ~GATE DOES NOT CLEAR NAPPE ~ .... 50 <( w _j
'-' 45 z ~
0 II I \
a: w 40 [l_
0
"-0 35 ~ _j
a: 30 w :1: 0 _j
"- 25 0
z 0
20 ~ > w _j
15 w
TAILWATER
I~ F \ NAPPE OVERTOPS GATE\
I\ 1--~
~ ~ AIR VENTS 1--'--I--
1--1--c.-
~~ li v ~ ,./ .... v <( w
./.. _j
v ~ / GAT£ BOUNCES AT THIS ELEVATION WHEN NAPPI': IS NOT AERATED r--,. 10
~0 '<t
5 :g: "-
0 <(
~ -5
80
v v
/ '~-o
60 4020 0 2040 UPLIFT DOWNPULL
NOTE: THE GATE LEAF TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE TITLE REFERS TO THE LEAF WHICH IS OPERATING OR TO THE TOP LEAF WHEN TWO LEAVES ARE FASTENED TOGETHER.
VERTICAL FORCES PLOTTED ARE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING UPON THE GATE AS A RESULT OF FLOW OVER AND UNDER IT. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE TOTAL HOIST LOAD, THE DRY WEIGHT OF THE GATE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE FORCES SHOWN.
ALL BAYS CLOSED EXCEPT THREE CENTER BAYS (BAYS NOS. S, 6, 7).
(NAPPE DEAERATES NATURALL'r")
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
VERTICAL FORCE IN KIP
~ 0 OBSERVED AVERAGE 0 MAXIMUM t. MINIMUM
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC FORCE TYPE I (ORIGINAL) GATE LEAF
GATE LEAF NO. 3 AND GATE LEAF NO. 4 FASTENED TOGETHER AND CLOSING
POOL ELEV TAILWATER ELEV
87.0 F"T MSL 40.0 F"T MSL
REVISED TEST RESULTS
PLATE 85