DONOR CHARTS - oecd.org · sex. CRITERIA FOR ... Myanmar. 51 35 69%. Pakistan. 42 34 82%....

Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment

DONOR CHARTS

March 2018

Statistics based on DAC Members’ reporting on the Gender Equality Policy Marker, 2015-2016

Creditor Reporting System database

DEFINITION

THE GENDER EQUALITY POLICY MARKER

DEFINITION

An activity should be classified as gender equality focused (score Principal or Significant) if:

It is intended to advance gender equality and women’s empowerment or reduce discrimination and inequalities based on sex.

CRITERIA FOR ELIGIBILITY Gender equality is explicitly promoted in activity documentation through specific measures which:

a) Reduce social, economic or political power inequalities between women and men, girls and boys, ensure that women benefit equally with men from the activity, or compensate for past discrimination; or

b) Develop or strengthen gender equality or anti-discrimination policies, legislation or institutions.

This approach requires analysing gender inequalities either separately or as an integral part of agencies’ standard procedures.

EXAMPLES OF TYPICAL ACTIVITIES

Examples of activities that could be marked as principal objective:

-- legal literacy for women and girls; -- male networks against gender violence; -- a social safety net project which focuses specifically on assisting women and girls as a particularly disadvantaged group in a society; -- capacity building of Ministries of Finance and Planning to incorporate gender equality objectives in national poverty reduction or comparable strategies.

Such activities can target women specifically, men specifically or both women and men. Examples of activities that could be marked as significant

objective:

-- activity which has as its principal objective to provide drinking water to a district or community while at the same time ensuring that women and girls have safe and easy access to the facilities; -- a social safety net project which focuses on the community as a whole and ensures that women and girls benefit equally with men and boys.

N.B. Support to women’s equality organisations and institutions (CRS sector code 15170) scores, by definition, principal objective.

OVERVIEW

Gender Equality Focus of DAC Members’ Aid by Sector Average annual value of commitments in 2015-2016

constant 2015 USD 41.4 billion

Coverage – All DAC members report on the gender equality focus of their aid. As from 2010 data, the

calculation of allocable aid is no longer based on sectors but on types of aid. This new methodology slightly extends the scope of aid screened, mainly with the inclusion of humanitarian aid. The calculation includes the following types of aid: sector budget support, core support to NGOs, support to specific funds managed by international organisations, pooled funding, projects, donor country personnel and other technical assistance, and scholarships in donor country. The term bilateral allocable aid in this publication refers to this new methodology.

This chart is based on commitment data, which best reflect current policies by donors. A two-year average is given, as the focus and volume of commitments vary from year to year. DAC members use a ‘marker’ to identify activities that have gender equality as a principal or significant objective. Reporting has strongly improved over the years, and although some members encounter difficulties in applying the methodology, the currently available data nevertheless give a reliable indication of the extent to which those donors that report address gender equality in their aid programmes.

9%

8%

8%

5%

18%

3%

3%

1%1%

9%

8%

3%

3%

9%

10%

Education

Health

Population Pol./Progr. & Reproductive Health

Water Supply & Sanitation

Government & Civil Society

Other Social Infrastructure & Services

Other Economic Infrastrustures & Services

Energy

Banking & Financial Services

Business & Other Services

Agriculture & Rural Development

Other Multisector

General Environment Protection

Industry, Mining,Construction, Trade &

Tourim

USD 41.4 bn

Humanitarian Aid

AID AT A GLANCE - DONORS' CHARTS

The following charts (2015-2016) summarise statistics on aid focused on gender equality and women’s empowerment extended by each DAC member. Information shown includes the gender equality policy marker coverage, the top ten recipients and a sector breakdown of aid focused on gender equality and women’s empowerment.

Charts are not shown for Hungary which became DAC member in 2016 and did not report on the marker in 2015-2016.

Guidance for the interpretation of the charts: The first element to take into account when analysing the data for one country or when comparing data between countries is the COVERAGE RATIO, i.e. the proportion of aid which is screened. A high percentage of gender equality focused aid ALONE does not mean that aid is well aligned with the gender equality policy objective, such a conclusion would only be valid for a donor with 100% coverage. When comparing data between donors, both coverage ratio and % of aid focused on gender equality and women’s empowerment have to be considered. (A number of members do not screen contributions that are by nature likely to fall under the “not targeted” category, e.g. imputed student costs. Therefore, a high amount in the category “not screened” generally increases the percentage of gender equality focused aid significantly.)

Aid in support of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment, 2015-2016 average (2015 USD million)

Note: An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and fundamental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened for promoting gender equality, but was found to not be targeted to it.

Principal Significant

Sub-Total:

Gender

Equality

focused

as % of aid

screenedNot targeted

Total:

aid screenedNot screened

Bilateral

allocable, total

a b c = a + b c / e d e = c + d f included in (a)

Australia 186 1,139 1,325 62 817 2,142 195 2,337 43Austria 6 78 84 45 103 187 90 277 2

Belgium 62 521 582 64 329 911 14 925 2Canada 90 2,218 2,308 70 977 3,285 0 3,285 2Czech Republic 1 5 5 16 28 33 16 50 0

Denmark 58 436 493 47 547 1,040 153 1,193 6

EU Institutions 206 8,136 8,343 48 9,089 17,432 2,417 19,849 13Finland 31 166 197 51 188 384 0 385 12France 80 1,161 1,241 22 4,337 5,578 1,076 6,654 2

Germany 158 5,783 5,940 43 7,828 13,769 834 14,602 28

Greece 0 3 3 39 5 8 0 8 ..Hungary .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 31 ..

Iceland 2 19 21 86 3 25 0 25 1

Ireland 38 264 302 81 69 370 14 384 7

Italy 27 237 264 35 491 755 36 791 12

Japan 138 6,286 6,424 37 10,742 17,166 851 18,017 36Korea 65 226 291 13 2,001 2,292 2 2,294 3

Luxembourg 19 64 83 33 165 248 2 250 0Netherlands 597 1,218 1,815 61 1,160 2,975 0 2,975 112

New Zealand 6 167 173 58 125 298 0 298 0

Norway 230 538 767 27 2,059 2,826 0 2,826 42Poland 1 2 3 2 117 120 0 120 0

Portugal 1 32 33 23 110 143 0 143 0

Slovak Republic 0 4 4 22 15 19 0 19 0

Slovenia 0 1 1 17 5 6 5 11 0

Spain 72 124 196 39 306 502 0 502 22Sweden 404 1,249 1,652 88 223 1,875 101 1,976 86

Switzerland 35 314 349 20 1,430 1,779 0 1,779 3United Kingdom 417 2,341 2,758 43 3,595 6,353 1,082 7,435 24United States 1,637 4,132 5,769 28 15,045 20,814 0 20,814 9Total DAC members 4,565 36,860 41,425 40 61,910 103,336 6,889 110,256 470

Support to

women's

equality

organisations

and institutions

Australia

2015 2016

Principal objective 159 214

Significant objective 1,153 1,125

Not targeted 1,112 521

Not screened 142 249

Total bilateral allocable aid 2,567 2,108

Gender equality focused aid (3) 54% 72%

Memo:

Total non bilateral allocable aid 181 201

Aid to Women's equality organisations

(included in principal) 64 22Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 9

(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010

Papua New Guinea 379 379 61%

Indonesia 314 305 64%

Solomon Islands 116 116 60%

Viet Nam 79 79 49%

Philippines 73 73 42%

Afghanistan 70 70 73%

Vanuatu 65 65 40%

Timor-Leste 60 60 62%

Cambodia 54 54 54%

Myanmar 51 51 69%



Solomon Islands 116 58 60%


Fiji 50 38 78%

Viet Nam 79 38 49%


Myanmar 51 35 69%

Pakistan 42 34 82%


(2) DAC Guidelines for Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Development Co-operation, 1999

(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.

Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category

includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.

Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender

(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2015-2016, unless otherwise shown

Sector breakdown Top ten recipients

Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to

top ten recipients2015 USD million

Total aid Total bilateral

allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)

Top ten recipients of gender equality

focused aid

Gender equality focus of sectors

2015 USD million2015 USD million

Total bilateral

allocable aid

Gender equality focused aid

(3)

Investment in gender equality and women’s empowerment is vital for improving economic, social and political conditions in developing countries within the

framework of sustainable development. A focus on gender equality and women’s empowerment in development co-operation is a means for enhancing the total

effectiveness of aid (2).

An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and

fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was

screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.

Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 92%.

Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2015 USD million

Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2015-2016

(1)

020406080

100

Economicinfrastructure

Education

Government and civilsociety

Health

MultisectorOther social

infrastructure

Population andreproductive health

Production

Water and sanitation

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Education Health andPopulation

Other SocialInfrast., incl.

Women'sequality

EconomicInfrastructure

Production Multisector

Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0

250

500

750

1000

1250

1500

2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16

Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %

2015 USD million % of bilateral allocable

Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Austria

2015 2016


Significant objective 67 88

Not targeted 89 117

Not screened 72 108

Total bilateral allocable aid 234 320


Memo:



(included in principal) 1 3

Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 0


Turkey 48 30 0%

Bosnia and Herzegovina 19 1 3%

Ukraine 12 4 15%

Serbia 12 2 2%

Uganda 10 10 87%

Iran 10 0 0%

Mongolia 9 8 0%

Kosovo 9 5 80%

Albania 8 5 28%

Viet Nam 8 7 0%

Uganda 10 9 87%

Burkina Faso 6 5 86%

Ethiopia 6 5 72%

Syrian Arab Republic 6 5 75%

Kosovo 5 3 80%

Mozambique 6 3 71%

West Bank and Gaza Strip 5 3 53%

Georgia 7 2 37%

Lebanon 3 2 74%

Moldova 6 2 51%









top ten recipients 2015 USD million


allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80



Women'sequality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

0

20

40

60

80

100

2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Belgium

2015 2016



Not targeted 228 429

Not screened 16 11



Memo:



(included in principal) 3 0.33Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 4


Democratic Republic of the Congo 95 94 62%

Rwanda 46 46 92%

Burundi 37 37 86%

Turkey 36 36 16%

Uganda 31 31 92%


Kenya 28 28 10%

Benin 25 25 91%




Rwanda 46 42 92%

Burundi 37 31 86%


Uganda 31 29 92%

Benin 25 22 91%


Bolivia 17 14 88%


Iraq 15 13 85%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350



Women'sequality




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

0

200

400

600

800

2007-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Canada

2015 2016



Not targeted 879 1,075

Not screened 0 0



Memo:



(included in principal) 2



Ethiopia 156 156 81%


Ukraine 138 138 28%

Jordan 136 136 77%

Iraq 119 119 74%

Ghana 118 118 99%

Tanzania 116 116 84%

South Sudan 115 115 83%

Lebanon 104 104 77%



Ghana 118 117 99%

Jordan 136 105 77%

Tanzania 116 97 84%


Iraq 119 88 74%

Lebanon 104 80 77%


Haiti 91 62 69%

Mali 60 58 96%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)







All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.



(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200



Women'sequality




0%

15%

30%

45%

60%

75%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Czech Republic

2015 2016



Not targeted 33 23

Not screened 14 18



Memo:



(included in principal) 0.1 0.2

Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0.02 0.02


Moldova 4 4 26%

Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 3 4%

Ethiopia 3 3 49%

Ukraine 3 3 0%

Jordan 3 3 68%

Afghanistan 3 3 1%

Georgia 3 3 23%

Serbia 2 2 5%

Mongolia 2 2 0%

Cambodia 2 2 37%

Ethiopia 3.3 1.6 49%

Moldova 4.3 1.0 26%

Cambodia 1.9 0.6 37%

Georgia 2.8 0.5 23%

Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 0.1 4%

Myanmar 0.7 0.1 40%

Jordan 3.2 0.1 68%

Syrian Arab Republic 1.3 0.1 28%

Kosovo 1.6 0.1 6%

Lebanon 0.4 0.1 40%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

3

6

9

12

15



Women'sequality




0%

7%

14%

21%

28%

35%

0

2

4

6

8

10

2012 13 14 15 2016



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Denmark

2015 2016







Memo:






Kenya 83 83 99%



Somalia 39 39 0%

Tanzania 33 33 97%


Ghana 26 26 72%

Myanmar 23 23 84%

Turkey 22 22 0%

Bangladesh 19 19 96%

Kenya 83 76 99%


Tanzania 33 32 97%


Myanmar 23 19 84%


Ghana 26 17 72%


Mali 17 10 76%












allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

100

200

300

400

500



Women'sequality




0%

15%

30%

45%

60%

0

200

400

600

800

2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

EU Institutions

2015 2016



Not targeted 6,265 11,913

Not screened 4,835 0



Memo:

Total non bilateral allocable aid 1,840 1,494




Turkey 2,307 2,306 26%

Ukraine 677 677 36%

Morocco 549 549 28%

Serbia 484 484 29%

Tunisia 471 432 56%



China (People's Republic of) 415 415 0%


India 358 358 24%

Turkey 2,306 455 26%


Rwanda 246 218 89%

Ukraine 677 205 36%



Tunisia 432 181 56%

Niger 274 181 66%













allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000



Women'sequality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Finland

2015 2016




Not screened 0 1



Memo:





Myanmar 26 25 93%

Ethiopia 21 20 90%

Nepal 19 18 86%


Somalia 17 17 46%

Tanzania 16 14 51%

Mozambique 16 14 99%


Kenya 12 11 56%

Zambia 12 11 60%

Myanmar 25 24 93%

Ethiopia 20 18 90%

Nepal 18 15 86%



Somalia 17 8 46%

Tanzania 14 7 51%

Zambia 11 7 60%

Kenya 11 6 56%












allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140



Women'sequality




10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0

100

200

300

400

500

2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

France

2015 2016




Not screened 838 1,314



Memo:






Morocco 305 204 28%

Turkey 301 290 39%

Côte d'Ivoire 299 282 2%

Colombia 274 261 40%

Tunisia 248 206 16%


Jordan 241 239 45%

Egypt 241 222 1%

India 236 225 2%

Nigeria 202 199 20%

Jordan 239 105 45%


Turkey 290 93 39%

Gabon 174 88 51%

Senegal 165 70 50%

Congo 167 60 36%

Viet Nam 105 53 56%

Morocco 204 52 28%

Nigeria 199 40 20%

Niger 44 33 94%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500



Women'sequality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2008 09 10 * 11 12 13 14 15 2016



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Germany

2015 2016







Memo:





India 1,196 1,099 26%


Turkey 691 648 44%




Ukraine 424 388 25%

South Africa 358 356 8%

Iraq 326 321 70%

Morocco 312 288 13%


Turkey 648 280 44%

India 1,099 272 26%

Iraq 321 225 70%

Lebanon 201 189 94%




Ukraine 388 98 25%

Jordan 161 94 59%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000



Women'sequality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Greece

2015 2016



Not targeted 1 8

Not screened 0 0



Memo:






Turkey 4.4 4.2 6%

Albania 1.1 0.6 99%

Ukraine 1.0 0.2 71%

West Bank and Gaza Strip 0.4 0.1 100%

Egypt 0.4 0.3 100%

Democratic Republic of the Congo 0.4 0.1 100%


Iran 0.3 0.0 100%

Moldova 0.2 0.0 100%

Tunisia 0.2 0.2 100%

Albania 0.6 0.6 99%

Egypt 0.3 0.3 100%

Turkey 4.2 0.2 6%

Tunisia 0.2 0.2 100%

Serbia 0.2 0.2 98%

Ukraine 0.2 0.2 71%

Algeria 0.1 0.1 100%


Democratic Republic of the Congo 0.1 0.1 100%

Argentina 0.1 0.1 100%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7



Women'sequality




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0

20

40

60

80

100

2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scaleLeft hand scale

Iceland

2015 2016



Not targeted 3 4

Not screened 0 0



Memo:






Malawi 4 4 100%

Uganda 4 4 99%

Mozambique 3 3 100%


Lebanon 1 1 93%


Afghanistan 0.6 0.6 73%

Ethiopia 0.4 0.4 100%

Belarus 0.3 0.3 100%

Ukraine 0.2 0.2 53%

Malawi 4 4 100%

Uganda 4 4 99%

Mozambique 3 3 100%


Lebanon 1 1 93%



Ethiopia 0.4 0.4 100%

Belarus 0.3 0.3 100%

Nepal 0.2 0.2 100%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

2

4

6

8

10

12



Women'sequality




40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

0

5

10

15

20

25

2011 12 13 14 15 2016



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Ireland

2015 2016



Not targeted 77 60

Not screened 10 19



Memo:






Ethiopia 39 38 92%


Tanzania 30 25 91%

Uganda 26 24 81%

Malawi 22 21 92%

Zambia 16 15 93%

Viet Nam 12 12 26%

Sierra Leone 12 11 81%



Ethiopia 38 34 92%

Tanzania 25 23 91%


Uganda 24 20 81%

Malawi 21 19 92%

Zambia 15 14 93%




Kenya 8 8 97%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140



Women'sequality




0%

25%

50%

75%

0

100

200

300

2007-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Italy

2015 2016




Not screened 0 71



Memo:








Ethiopia 52 52 63%

Argentina 50 2 4%

Turkey 36 36 14%

Lebanon 35 35 24%

Senegal 26 26 94%

Iraq 17 17 53%

Kenya 17 16 17%

Somalia 16 16 39%

Ethiopia 52 33 63%


Senegal 26 24 94%

Myanmar 14 13 93%


Iraq 17 9 53%

Ecuador 10 9 85%

Lebanon 35 8 24%

Sudan 11 7 63%

Somalia 16 6 39%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

50

100

150

200

250



Women'sequality




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

0

100

200

300

400

2008 09 10 * 11 12 13 14 15 2016



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Japan

2015 2016







Memo:





Viet Nam 1,928 1,928 49%

India 1,800 1,800 55%

Philippines 1,355 1,355 83%

Bangladesh 1,325 1,325 43%

Myanmar 873 873 30%

Thailand 872 872 18%

Egypt 660 660 43%


Iraq 620 517 8%

Ukraine 615 462 1%

Philippines 1,355 1,105 83%

India 1,800 976 55%

Viet Nam 1,928 916 49%

Bangladesh 1,325 569 43%

Egypt 660 284 43%

Myanmar 873 252 30%

Turkey 207 199 97%


Thailand 872 160 18%

Mongolia 243 154 65%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000



Women'sequality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Korea

2015 2016




Not screened 0 3



Memo:






Viet Nam 309 309 1%


Uzbekistan 155 155 0%

Lao People's Democratic Republic 151 151 2%

Myanmar 113 113 2%

Cambodia 110 110 3%

Ethiopia 90 90 13%


Nicaragua 80 80 16%



Pakistan 42 38 91%

Iraq 29 21 72%

Tanzania 68 14 20%

Ecuador 22 13 59%

Nicaragua 80 13 16%

Ethiopia 90 11 13%


Ghana 15 9 57%












allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

200

400

600

800



Women'sequality




0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2007-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Luxembourg

2015 2016




Not screened 4 0



Memo:



(included in principal) 0.3 0.5Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 1 1


Niger 24 22 74%


Senegal 20 18 72%

Mali 16 15 45%


Cabo Verde 13 12 18%

Viet Nam 9 8 47%

Nicaragua 9 8 58%



Niger 22 16 74%


Senegal 18 13 72%


Mali 15 7 45%

Nicaragua 8 4 58%

Viet Nam 8 4 47%

Cabo Verde 12 2 18%


Mongolia 3 1 52%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70



Women'sequality




10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0

20

40

60

80

100

2008 09 10 * 11 12 13 14 15 2016




Netherlands

2015 2016


Significant objective 1,452 984


Not screened 0 0



Memo:

Total non bilateral allocable aid 1,751 698






Lebanon 58 58 55%

Rwanda 56 56 35%


Turkey 54 54 0%


Burundi 48 48 47%

Benin 46 46 85%

Iraq 43 43 33%


Ethiopia 122 86 71%

Benin 46 39 85%

Lebanon 58 32 55%

Mali 34 30 88%




Burundi 48 22 47%

Rwanda 56 20 35%

Jordan 37 19 51%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400



Women'sequality




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

New Zealand

2015 2016




Not screened 0 0



Memo:






Vanuatu 38 38 71%

Cook Islands 24 17 50%


Niue 17 12 2%

Indonesia 16 16 95%


Kiribati 14 14 49%

Samoa 14 13 94%

Fiji 11 11 69%

Tokelau 10 2 57%

Vanuatu 38 27 71%


Indonesia 16 15 95%

Samoa 13 12 94%

Cook Islands 17 9 50%

Myanmar 9 8 96%

Fiji 11 8 69%

Kiribati 14 7 49%


Viet Nam 4 4 99%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

20

40

60

80

100

120



Women'sequality




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

0

50

100

150

200

2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Norway

2015 2016




Not screened 0 0



Memo:

Total non bilateral allocable aid 711 1,083




Brazil 135 135 1%




Indonesia 72 72 3%


Somalia 57 56 52%

Lebanon 55 55 22%

Nepal 49 49 67%

Ethiopia 47 47 64%


Nepal 49 32 67%

Ethiopia 47 30 64%

Somalia 56 29 52%



Malawi 40 18 45%

Tanzania 40 16 40%

Myanmar 35 16 44%

Zimbabwe 20 15 76%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400



Women'sequality




10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

0

200

400

600

800

1000

2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Poland

2015 2016



Not targeted 88 146

Not screened 0 0



Memo:



(included in principal) 0.11 0.03Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0.01 0.01


Ethiopia 36 36 1%

Ukraine 27 13 3%

Belarus 19 13 0%

Tanzania 12 12 3%

Angola 10 10 0%

Turkey 9 9 0%


Kenya 5 5 8%

Moldova 2 2 9%

Georgia 2 2 10%

Kenya 4.9 0.4 8%


Tanzania 12.2 0.4 3%

Ukraine 13.1 0.4 3%

Ethiopia 35.7 0.2 1%

Moldova 2.2 0.2 9%

Georgia 1.8 0.2 10%

Myanmar 0.3 0.1 48%

Senegal 0.1 0.1 61%

Tajikistan 0.2 0.1 44%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

10

20

30

40

50

60



Women'sequality




0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

0

1

2

3

4

2013 14 15 2016



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Portugal

2015 2016



Not targeted 125 96

Not screened 0 0



Memo:



(included in principal) 0.01 0.02Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0.02 0.00


Cabo Verde 43 36 5%


Sao Tome and Principe 21 19 20%


Guinea-Bissau 13 12 40%

Morocco 9 9 0%

Angola 7 7 37%



Brazil 3 3 1%


Mozambique 20 9 45%

Guinea-Bissau 12 5 40%

Sao Tome and Principe 19 4 20%

Angola 7 2 37%

Cabo Verde 36 2 5%

Kosovo 0.2 0.2 96%

Rwanda 0.1 0.1 100%


Brazil 2.7 0.0 1%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

10

20

30

40



Women'sequality




0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

0

10

20

30

40

50

2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16




Slovak Republic

2015 2016

Principal objective 0.0 0.5

Significant objective 0.1 7.6

Not targeted 15 15

Not screened 0.1 0.7



Memo:






Ukraine 2.0 2.0 0%

Turkey 1.7 1.7 100%

Kenya 1.6 1.6 15%

Serbia 1.3 1.3 0%

Moldova 0.7 0.7 7%

Kosovo 0.4 0.4 26%

Georgia 0.4 0.4 0%


Albania 0.3 0.3 0%

Haiti 0.3 0.3 0%

Turkey 1.7 1.7 100%

Kenya 1.6 0.2 15%

Kosovo 0.4 0.1 26%

Moldova 0.7 0.0 7%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

1

2

3

4

5

6



Women'sequality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

0

2

4

6

8

2013 14 15 2016



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Slovenia

2015 2016

Principal objective 0.3 0.03


Not targeted 6 4

Not screened 1 9



Memo:



(included in principal) 0.1 0




Turkey 2.8 2.8 0%

Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 2.6 0.3 1%

Serbia 2.2 1.4 0%

Kosovo 1.1 1.0 66%

Montenegro 1.0 0.7 4%

Albania 0.4 0.4 0%


Ukraine 0.3 0.3 0%


Kosovo 1.0 0.6 66%




Rwanda 0.04 0.04 100%

Uganda 0.04 0.04 100%

Lebanon 0.12 0.04 35%

Egypt 0.02 0.02 100%

Morocco 0.02 0.02 100%

Montenegro 0.73 0.01 4%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7



Women'sequality




0%

3%

6%

9%

12%

15%

18%

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

2010 * 11 12 13 14 15 2016



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Spain

2015 2016




Not screened 0 0



Memo:

Total non bilateral allocable aid 266 2,396




Cuba 1,118 4 86%

Turkey 84 84 2%


Morocco 22 21 57%


Peru 17 17 84%


Guatemala 14 14 88%

El Salvador 14 13 84%

Colombia 13 12 53%

Peru 17 14 84%

Guatemala 14 13 88%

Morocco 21 12 57%

El Salvador 13 11 84%

Bolivia 11 9 84%


Nicaragua 10 8 83%

Senegal 11 7 69%

Colombia 12 6 53%

Honduras 7 6 79%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

40

80

120

160



Women'sequality




20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

0

200

400

600

800

1000

2005-06 07-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Sweden

2015 2016




Not screened 22 179



Memo:








Uganda 59 58 97%


Zambia 51 51 96%

Zimbabwe 33 33 91%

Ethiopia 33 33 79%

Guatemala 32 32 99%

Mali 31 31 100%




Uganda 58 56 97%

Zambia 51 49 96%


Guatemala 32 31 99%

Mali 31 30 100%

Zimbabwe 33 30 91%


Rwanda 28 28 99%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

200

400

600

800



Women'sequality




50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Switzerland

2015 2016




Not screened 0 0



Memo:






Tanzania 44 43 51%


Colombia 42 42 34%

Nepal 36 36 24%

Myanmar 36 36 16%


Niger 31 31 0%

Peru 30 30 33%



Tanzania 43 22 51%

Colombia 42 14 34%


Peru 30 10 33%


Mongolia 22 9 43%

Nepal 36 9 24%

Bangladesh 26 9 33%



(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700



Women'sequality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

0

100

200

300

400

2007-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

United Kingdom

2015 2016




Not screened 2,164 0



Memo:

Total non bilateral allocable aid 1,656 702





Pakistan 331 302 74%






Uganda 175 174 75%

India 174 172 59%

Yemen 162 160 39%


Pakistan 302 215 74%


Uganda 174 122 75%

Nigeria 128 95 78%


Rwanda 91 80 89%

Kenya 105 79 90%


Somalia 79 67 87%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000



Women'sequality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 * 11-12 13-14 2015-16



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

United States

2015 2016

Principal objective 1,565 1,709



Not screened 0 0



Memo:





Afghanistan 2,685 2,685 34%

Syrian Arab Republic 1,527 1,527 1%

Kenya 1,382 1,382 33%

Ethiopia 1,377 1,377 31%

Jordan 1,259 1,259 15%

Pakistan 1,164 1,164 29%

South Sudan 1,137 1,137 23%

Nigeria 1,036 1,036 31%

Uganda 905 905 30%

Liberia 861 861 18%

Afghanistan 2,685 905 34%

Kenya 1,382 460 33%

Ethiopia 1,377 428 31%


Pakistan 1,164 339 29%

Nigeria 1,036 324 31%


Uganda 905 270 30%

South Sudan 1,137 267 23%

Ghana 430 248 58%











allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)










(1)

020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000



Women'sequality




0%

7%

14%

21%

28%

35%

42%

49%

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

2011 12 13 14 15 2016



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

OECD-DAC Secretariat http://oe.cd/oda-gender

DONOR CHARTS - oecd.org · sex. CRITERIA FOR ... Myanmar. 51 35 69%. Pakistan. 42 34 82%....

Documents

Transcript of DONOR CHARTS - oecd.org · sex. CRITERIA FOR ... Myanmar. 51 35 69%. Pakistan. 42 34 82%....