Dominick Bartone

8/13/2019 Dominick Bartone

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dominick-bartone 1/35

. .. :...

l( . l • . • • • · ·IJ·. i l .

·, · . . .

·. .' ... . --· ·--- - .

1 • • : ...- i

. . 11 .. .. ) .-.. ..

• .. :

. . . .

•:.

I ...: : • . \ t : , •• • I



\ ..

'

I

I

·. .· , ; .

- .. ..... .--. - - · " " 1 ' - . - ~ - -. - . . . -- : . . ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . _.. .

, ...... -

...\ . - .' • I:t-. - .

·.

. · ·-·.

(' .. .

·.• J

•>·

I .

..

(*

.... .: ..

· ; - - : : ' .. 'I I .. : .. < \_ I ~

·AGREEMENT made and entered into at Miami, Florida, this

r ·_ day of October, 1961, by and between Dominick Bartone, hereinafter- - . . . ; : _ __

re fe r red to as BARTONE, and Edward Browder, J r • hereinafter referred

to as BROWDER,.. ·. ·. · . . ...

W I T N E S S E T H:

For and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars t 10. GO· , .

each to the other in hand paid by the part ies hereto, receipt ·of which is

I • •

hereby acknowledged, and the t ransfer by BARTONE to BROWDER by en-

dorsement in blank of Certif icate No. 2.81 1 . representing 50 000 shares

of the capi tal stock of Empire Industries , Inc •• previously known as

Empire Studios. Inc. a Florida corporation, receipt of which also i s hereby

acknowledged by BROWDER, and in further consideration of the mutual

covenants and undertakings of the r espective part ies i t is hereby covenanted

· A. At or before noon, Tuesday, October 31. 1961,

he. BAR TONE, will pay to BROWDER the sum of Thirty One Thousand

Dollars ( 31, 000. 00) cash or cert if ied check, or in l ieu thereof will en-

dorse and t ransfer to BROWDER negotiable and marketable shares of stock

of equivalent market value, said market value to be determined as of the

date of t ransfer .

l l . BROWDER agrees as follows:

A. Upc n h e receipt by him , R O W D E R ~ of the sum

of Thirty One Th:.Jusand Dollars ( 31, 00. 00) cash or· negotiable o r marketable

shares of stock of an equivalent market value as of the date of t rans fer he

will

l . Surrender to BARTONE s tock ce rt ificate described

in the ope ning paragraph hereof;

2 . Give BARTONE a ge nera l r·e l t-ase , duly executed and

acknowledged;

EXHIBIT A

.·....

---·



( . •• ~

MM 87-87 56

eince he had .already been conv cted on the charge andwas to be t ransferred to a F e d r a l penal ins t i tu t ion

to commence serving his 3-year sentence.

. . _

On January 16, 1962, Lieutenant F. c . tLARKIN',) _... . ..t: c,·J .or tf1e Dade county Sher i f f • s off ice ; - ·a t:a t-e a -tna£-ne_ __, c - - ·- . ·_ '

holdsfwa-..·warrant·s·--for -BROWDEif a n ( f D e p u t y G A I T H E R ~ of : 5 j

h i s b ff lce-ha·a --·be-ena ftemptil1g to serve them t o r severalmonths. On January 16, 1962, Detective BILL JEMIS or theDade county She r i f f s Office advised tha t he alsohad an in teres t in ED R O W D E R ~ but he had no leads on

where he might cur ren t ly be located.

____ __ _ n _ E e b r u ~ r y 21, 1962, JACK GROWSSE, inves t iga tor

for< MuRRAY GOLDBERG', the bond5man, statl d he has beenconatiCt-fng- ·sorri·e---1-nquiry to t r y to loca te BROY.'DER, but he

had no leads other than the rumors tha t BROWDER proba bly hasgone to M e x i c _ o r ~ p m e o ~ n e r L a t i n __q.QtLYltry. He re la ted

he me .t ···J];ss·E VICKERs> ·:BROWDER' s friend-:) a few weeksp r e v i ~ ~ e l y a n a V f d { E R s c i a i m e c C d Y d n o t know where

BROWDER was, nor did he know \ihere PAUL HICK?<1AN was

located.

On February 20, 1962, t h ~ f i l e s of the United1 Sta tes Dist r ic t Court under t he i r number 10743M-Civ11,

contained a su i t f i led by Aero Ordnance, Inc .---versusi S O M I N I C K B A R T O } i E ~ This su i t was f i l ed May 17, 1961,

\ --and- re-f l-e-ct'eci- -thiit on April 11, 1960, Aero O r d n a n c ~; loaned BARTONE $15,802.57 fo r s ix months, which note: becam;e due on October 11, 196 0. I t a lso re la ted on

I May 5, 1960, Aero loaned BARTONE another $5 >000 and

\ s ta ted on May 20, 1960, $26,842 worth of ~ ~ n i c sI merchandise waa seized and sold for f re igh t and storage \\ ~ t h e

Ryder Trucking Company. Aero Ordnance s ta ted

\

. BARTONE waa r e ~ p o n s i b l e for a l l o r the above mentioned .i tems. An order ror a pre - t r i a l con:rerence was se t for \

\

February 5, 1962, but on January 26, 1962, a motion r'or a 'continuance was f i led . The Aero Ordnance a t to rney , RICHARD



(Rev . l - :l 5·D 0 ) - FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGA ,ON

Doto ___ _p_r_1_l __ _ O __ ~ 9 _ 6 _ 2_____

_ _ _ . . . ..

( DOMINIC .BARTONEJwas- inte .r.vJ.ew.ed a t his off iceRoom 551, o r t h e : : J . § n ~ - : - : . A n i ~ ~ i _ 2 a n Bank Building\ Miami

1

Flor ida. BARTONE ··wa:s····a:dvised.·-·he ··nee·d not ··· make a s ta tement; any statement he did make could be used in a courtof law against him; he had the r ight to consul t an at torneybefore making a statement and in the event he did notwish to discuss th is matter no threats or promises wouldbe made to him.

BARTONE . re la ted . he _ordinar i ly does not ta lkw _() _ i BI _ \gel)t_ _: _I)d ha_.___ __in ~ p t i _ . o n __of_ sa_ying . n y ~ h i n gabout any_of his acquaintances w h ~ h ~ i g h t cause t h ~ r n anydiff icul ty ; however, he - s ta ted he was will ing d i s u s ~

· o ther matters with the FBI.

BARTONE s ta ted he did not know where BROWDERmight be located, but he added i f he di d know whereBROWDER might be located he would not advise any lawenforcement agency of BROWDER s whereabouts . BARTONEs ta ted the l a s t time he heard from BROWDER was a fewdays before · Christmas when BROWDER telephoned him one i ther one or two occasions. At t ha t time BROWDER r e l a tedhe was somewhere . put West, possibly San Antonio, Texas ,

and he needed money in order t o get back to Mi ami, Florida,k in ce he told BARTONE he was due to appea r in Court a t

/' Miami in connection with the case involving BROWDER 1 s

. handling of stolen Canadian Bonds.

BARTONE pointed out t.hat BROWDER had s uedhim in Federal Court in Miami in connection with moneyBARTONE s ta ted he ow ed BROWDER. BARTONE pointed out,however, that he only owed BROWDER a bout $5, 000 . 0 0 andthe sui t f i led on behal f of BROWDER against BARTONEclaimed BARTONE owed BROWDER a considerably larger sum ofmoney. For th is reason when BROWDER t e l e phoDed BARTONE,BARTONE berated BROWDER for f i l in g the su i t a t a l l and

also for f i l ing it for such a l a rge amount because BARTONEexplained to BROWDER he intende d to pay him the $5 , 000 . 00

•r so he owed him and the su i t was not necessary. BARTONE

MIAl1I 87-8756On _:./_4-.:._6_2 t _M_1_a_m_1..;.,_F_l_-o_r_i_d_a F i l 0 .:.::I:_A_M.:.::I=8:7 1_2 :5::: :5; __2

by _A_S _ . , . . , R , . . . E n - n D ~ W r - · _ , D - r O ~ E : r R , . . . . , N E I T l f R n - 7 - , - = J R = - . ~ ' : _ _ a _ n__ Dote di ctot ed ___ _ _ o _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __JQHN P. L E N I E ~ N : b a r n

Th l a doc um e nt c on ta lna nol thor ro c o mmond a t iona nor c on c lu a lo n a o f t h e FB I. l t Ia t h e propur ty o tho F b i " nd t a loane d t ov n•: r rt q o ncy; II a n d It s cont o n ta aro n o t to bo dis tr ib u t ed o u t • lde y our a q .. n c y .



·:

MM 8 { - 8r(56MM 87-12552

recal led t the time BROWDER wanted 500.00 fromBARTONE to help him get back to Miami. BARTONE

' recal led he only -had 400.00 t the time. Hisrecol lect ion is he agreed to wire BROWDER 200 .00 ands ta ted although he could not rfn tlie··w€8-fe rn Unionreceipt for transmitt ing this money) he fe l t confidenthe would be able to locate t and would be glad tofurnish the date) dest inat ion and amount of the WesternUnion Money Order. BARTONE's recol lect ion was he sent

the money order from the l 05 th Street Branch inCleveland, Ohio. BARTONE s ta ted BROWDER . a sui t againstBARTONE was subsequently dismissed as he s ta ted he paidthe difference between the money he sent BROWDER in th is

Western Union Money Order and t he 5 , 000.00 owed BROWDERto Mrs. LILYAN BROWDER.

BARTONE pointed out he thought t was a verys tupid thing for BROWDER to j u m p b ~ n this case sinc e heonly h ~ d a three year sentence to serve. BARTONE s ta tedhe f e l t c ~ n f i d e n t BROWDER was not in the United States)though he ·again re i te r ted he d i d· not know where BROWDER

might be located.

BARTONE was asked i f BROWDER had any con tactsin Panama or any other L t in American Country. BARTONE'sonly rep ly was that BROWDER might have gone anywhere s inc ehe speaks Spanish so well and had been in most of theLa t in Amer i can Countries.

BARTONE pointed out th t BROWDER seems tohave deta led data on the geography of many of the L t inAmerican Countr ie s because on one occasion BROWDER \<Jasable to draw an accura te map of ah area . i n .:....._ _

J F ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ t " : o t £ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ t ~ ~ ~ r /2y ·



·f

• (Rev. 1·25 - 0) FEDERAL BVREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Date March 12 1962

Mrs. LILYAN MARTIN BROWDER was interviewed a t herresidence 6300 Snapper Creek Drive, Miami. She stated shehad not heard from her husband since she was l as t contacted.The provisions of the Harboring Statute were explained toher and she stated she certainly would not attempt toharbor BROWDER since he had apparently deserted her. She didsay tha t she did not believe she woula t e l l the law i f sheknew where he could be located, however, she would f i r s t t ry

to persuade him to surrender and fa i l ing in th is she wouldcontact her attorney and BROWDER's attorney, RICHARD BOOTH,and have BOOTH handle the matter in any way he saw f i t .

She exhibited her telephone b i l l as well as herShell Oil Company credit card b i l l and pointed out tha tvi r tua l ly a l l of the charges on a l l of these bill ,s had beenmade by her husband, EDWARD BROWDER, or her son, CARL MARTINBROWDER. I t was noted in the telephone b i l l there were s e veralca l l s to Cleveland and one to Miami around December 23, 1961.Mrs. BROWDER s t_t;.e.P. the Miami ca l l was not to her . and shepresumes t h e : : : : : q _ : ( e y e l ~ n a _ c a ~ l ~ e r ~ p ~ p b a 1 ; > _ J . . y t<?. a J ' J . ~ f e ~ q . .ofEQ.WARD BROWDER• ·s - namep DOMENICK BARTONE. At th is juncture , - ·· · --

1

SA JOHN .P •. LEN.LHAN ~ l ' s k e r BROWDER i f th i s was the same DOMENICK, B A R T O N E - . . . . . w h o was·-associated _:w.i.th _BRO.WDER C 9 . D ~ c t 1 o n wi t l : · ------

; d e q . J . wherein---a- -large .amount ._o__ ~ Y " ~ ~ ~ .ob.t.ained _f'rom t ; h _ ~_ : : : ; . - ; ( ~ \ (1 H o _ ? . ? . . ' : l ~ Q 9 ye rnme n.t...-.

l j l \ =• r Mrs. BROWDER stated tha t on the one hand s ~ 1 e wanted

On

to co-operate ·on th is fugit ive invest igat ion on EDWARDBROWDER and a t the same time she had no intention of d is cussingany p h _ . g . s ~ - ~ t f . l £ a n ~ a c t _ 1 o t ~ a t ~ A R T . Q ~ E .. n ~ ~ ~ O W D E R ~ __ .1 t_hthe ..Hon-dur-an Government:-.. Mrs. BROWDER verif ied tha t there wasaclviT-·sui' t . pending between BARTONE and BROWDER and she related

she ,Dt?.J d:?_ to pursue th i s c iv i l su i t since _she l s an .. ? f f . i ~ ~ in

Aero Ordnan·ce-. . She declin ed to s ta te where BROWDER would be~ a p r - t o go i f he went to Panama and merely ~ e p l i e d that BROWDERi s apt to go anywhere in any Latin country since he speaksSpanish so f luent ly and has t raveled in many Latin countriesconsiderably.

;z J

2/21/62 at _M_i_a_m_i..:. _F_l_o_r_i_d_a______ File i Miami 87-8756

SA JOHN P. LENIHAN :mjm

byDatu

ictated : _6 : _6_

2

T h " d t)cu ment contain . n e l t t ~ r re comme nda t ion s no r conc lu s t ona o f tht1 F B I . I t ta tha proper ty o f the FBI end te loaned to· ' • . . . . , ,....,, t ro ho rl otr l bu t ed ou ts ide y ou r a q e ncy.



MM 87-8756. t

' ./

· ~ She added that ri_OE VEOAJ who_works for the Aero

Ordnan.oe . warehouse 3335 w south R1.ver___ i 1\1e·;· · made at'r1-p-o·ut-to-· m a r I r o Texas ·1n ··a:n attempt t ·o-·-focate someleads on BROWDER but returned and told her he had no ideawhere BROWDER could have gone .

.2 2.



. .._ - - - ~ ~ . _ . . . . . . w - • ~ · - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~

'

UNITED STATES OF ANERICA

P l a i n t i f f

vs .

DOHT NICK ''Dom EDWARD BARTONE

and MORTON "Mort" H FRANKLIN

Defendants

---------------------------------

THE GRAND JURY CHARGES :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOU.TIIERN D I ~ R 4 T N ~ ~fl 1 7 = u ·- - . ~ r ~NO. e

· h f

18 u.s.c. 150318 u.s. c. 218 u.s.c. 371

I N D I C T M E N T Fl .

. ·I • I • • ' J

. "'.•L· · · .

f \ • r , ·v ; , :

S ~ GF i L. · . - : : : . ;. ,;

COUNT I

From on o r about March 29, 1976, and cont inuing t h e n t e rthrough and i nc ludin g Apri l 6, 1976, in thE· Southern D i s t r i c t o f

Flor: ida, i n the Northe rn D i s t r i c t o f Ohio, and th e D i s t r i c t o f New

.Jc.r.sey , and 1: lsewhere, DOHINICK "Dom" EDWARD BARTONE and NORTON

"t1ort" H. FRANKLIN, he re ina f t e r r e f e r r e d to as the D E F E N D f u ~ T S and

with o th e r persons kno <.<.rn to the Grand Jury wi l l fu . l ly and knm7ingly

did consp i re confedera te and. a g n toge ther and ·with each o t h e r

to v io l a t e Sect ion 1503 of Ti t l e 18, United Sta t e s Code; t ha t i s

to co r rup t ly endeavor to inf luence Jame s Michael Neve ra s a witness

whom the DEFENDANTS knew had been subpoenaed to t e s t i f y be fo re

'Federal Grand Jury o f t he United Sta tes D i s t r i c t Court fo r the

Southern D i s t r i c t o f F lo r id a concerning p o ss i b l e v i o l a t i o n s o f t he

Neut ra l i ty Act o f the United S t a t e s T i t l e 22, United Sta tes Co de,

~ ~ e c t i o n 1934; f raud to ob ta in a lo a n from a f e d e ra l l y i nsu red bank,

Ti t l e 18, Unite d Sta tes Code, Sec t i on 1014; Federa l Fi rea11ns

laws,

Ti t l e 26, lli1ite d S t a te s Code , Sec t ion 5861; and con s p i racy , T i t l e 18 ,

United S ta tes Code, Se c t ion 371 , and th e reby cor rup t ly endeavor to

in f luence obs t ruc t and impe de the due admi n i s t r a t io n o f ju s t i c e ;n



4

t qe United States Distr ict Court for the Southern is t r ic t of Florida.

t was par t of the conspiracy that the D E ~ N D N T Swould urge, advise, procure, persuade and ~ n s t r u c t the witness

James Michael Neveras to give false testimony before said Grand

Jury with respect to the aforesaid matters under invest igat ion

by said Grand Jury.

I t was further par t of the conspiracy tha t the

DEFENDANTS would urge, advise, procure, persuade, and ins t ruc t

the witness James Michael Neveras to present false bank records

of The Trust Company of New Jersey, Jersey City, New Jersey to

said Grand Jury.

OVERT ACTS

In furtherance of the said conspiracy and to ef fec t the

objectives thereof, in the Southern is t r ic t of Florida, in the

Northern Distr ict o f Ohio, and the is t r ic t of New Jersey, and

e l sewhere, the DEFENDANTS committed and caused to be committed

the following overt acts , among others:

.1 . On or about March 29, 1976, the defendant DOMINICK

Dom EDWARD BARTONE had a telephone conversation with James

Michael Neve ras.

2. On or about March 30, 1976, the defendant DOMINICK

''Dom EDWARD BARTONE had a telephone conversation with James

Michael Neveras.

3. On or about March 31, 1976, the defendant DOMINICK

Dom EDW RD BARTONE had a telephone conversation with James Michael

Neveras.

4. On or about April 1, 1976, the defendant DOMINICK

Dom Em•J'ARD BARTONE had a telephone conversation with Gera l d

Wayne Cunningham.

5. On or about April 1, 19 76, the defendant MORTON Mort

H. FRANKLIN had a telephone conversation with Gera ld Wayne

Cmtningham.

- 2-

___-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

·



6. On or about April 2 1976 Gerald Wayne Cunningham

and Earl Warren Dameworth went to the Doral Country ClUb, 4400

N W 87th Avenue, Miami, Florida.

7. On or about April 2 1976 the defendant

DOMINICK Dom EDW RD BARTONE had a telephone conversation with

James Michael Neveras.

8. On or about April 6 1976 James Michael Neveras

t es t i f i ed falsely before the Federal Grand Jury of the United

States i s t r ict Court for the Southern i s t r ict of Florida.

9. On or about April 6 1976 James Michael Neveras

presented false bank records of The Trust Company of New Jersey

to the Federal Grand Jury of the United States i s t r ict Court

for the Southern i s t r ict of Florida.

All in violat ion of 18 United States Code, Section

371.



~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ : ~ : a ~ I ¥ E ~ ~ • J I I:.

THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES:

·col NT I I

1. On or about April 6, 1976, in the Southern Dist r ic t

of Florida, OOMINICK Dom .Em-lARD BARTONE and MORTON Mort H.

FRANKLIN hereinaf ter referred to as the DEFENDANTS corruptly

did endeavor to influence, obstruct , and impede, and did inf luence,

obstruct , and impede the due administrat ion of jus t ice in the

United States Dist r ic t Court for the Southern Dis t r ic t of Florida,

in that the DEFENDANTS knowing that one James Michael Neveras had

received a subpoena to appear before the Federal Grand Jury for

the Southern Dist r ic t of Florida, aided, abet ted, counseled,

commanded, induced, procured and caused James Michael Neveras to

give false testimony under oath before said Grand Jury and present

fa lse bank records of The Trust Company of New Jersey to sa id

Grand Jury with respect to material matters being inquired in to

by the Federal Grand Jury·and did thereby corruptly endeavor to

inf luence, obstruct , and impede and did inf luence, obstruct , and

impede the due administration of jus t ice .

2. The Federal Grand Jury for the Southern Dis t r i c t of

Florida during April 6, 1976, was conducting an invest igat ion in to

possible violat ions of the Neutral i ty Act of the United States

Tit le 22, United States · Code, Section 1934; fraud to obtain a loan

from a federal ly insured bank, Ti t le 18, United States Code, Section

1014; Federal Firearms laws, Tit le 26, United States Code·, Section

5861; and conspiracy, Tit le 18, United States Code, Section 371.

3. On April 6, 1976, James Michael Neveras did appear

as required by subpoena before the said Grand Jury as a witness,

was duly sworn, and took his oath as a witness in said proceeding.

4. I t was then and there and a t a l l times mentioned

herein a material matter in said Grand Jury proceeding:

(a) whether DOlUNICK Dom Em.JARD BARTONE was an

endorser of the loan of money from said Trust

Company to D.W.I.E.R., INC., in November 1975;

-4-

I



(b) whether a promissory note t o The Trust Company

of New Jersey marked Grand Jury 75-6, April

6, 1976, Exhibit 2A ST wa s the t rue, ori gina l

promissory note of said Trust Company for the

November 1975, loan of money from said Trust

Company to D.W.I.E .R., INC . ; and

(c) whether a credi t f i le of The Trust Company of

New Jersey marked Grand Jury 75-6, 1976,

Exhibit fo2 ST'' was the t rue , or iginal , fu l l

and complete credi t f i le of said Trust Company

for the November 1975 loan of money from sa id

Trust Company of New Jersey to D.W.I.E.R., INC.

5 . James Michael Neveras, in consequence of sa id

aiding, abett in g , counseling, command, inducement

and procuremen t of the DEFENDANTS, being under o a th

as aforesaid, did fa l se l y and knowingly and

contrary t sa id oath, t e s t i fy in substance and

to the followin g effe c t :

( a) that DOMINICK Dom EDWARD BARTONE was not

an endorser of the lo an of money from said

Trust Company t o D.W . I .E . R. INC. , in Novembe r

1975;

(b) that t he promiss ory note to The Trust Company

of New Jersey ma rke d Grand Jury 75-6, Apr i l 6 ,

1976, Exhibit 2A ST was the t rue , orig ina l

promiss ory no te of s a i d Tr us t Company for the

Novemb er 19 75 l oan of money fro m said Trus t

Company to D. W. I .E . R . I NG . , and

( c) t ha t the credi t f le of The Trust Company of

New Je r sey marke d Grand Jury 75- 6, 1976,

Exhib t #2 ST was the t rue , orig ina l f ul l

-5-



~ = = = = = = ~ ~ = = ~ ~ ~ = = = = ~ ~ ~ ~

- • l ;:

and complete credi t f i l e of sa id Trust

Company for the November 1975 loan of ~ ~ n e y from

said Trust Company of New Jersey to D.W.I .E.R . ,

INC.

6 . Said testimony of James Michael Neveras was false

and contrary to the oath taken by James Michael Neveras, as he

and the DEFENDANTS then and there well knew and believed :

(a) tha t OOMINICK Dom EDWARD BARTONE was an

endorser of the loan of money from said

Trust Company to D.W.I.E . R. , INC. in November

1975;

(b) that the promissory note to The Trust Company

of New Jersey marked Grand Jury 75-6 , April

6, 1976, Exhibit 2A ST was not the t rue,

original promissory note of said Trust Company

for the November 19 75 loan of money from sa id

Trust Company to D.W I .E. R. , INC ; and

(c) that the credi t f i l e of The Trust Company

of New Jersey marked Grand Jury 75-6, 1976,

Exhibit 4 2 ST was not the t rue, or i gin al ·

fu l l and complete credi t f i le of sa id Trus tCompany for the November 1975 loan of money

f rom said Trust Company of New J e rs ey to

D.W I .E . R . , INC .

7 . Said testimony of Jame s M chae l Neveras in

consequence of said aiding , abe t t ing counse l in g , command,

·4

inducemen t , and pr ocuremen t of the ~ F E N N T S in f luenced, obs t ructe d ,

and impe de d the due adm i n i s t ra t i on of jus t ice .

- 6 -



All in violat ion of i t le 18 United States Code

Sections 1503 and 2.

A TRUE BILL

...

., . . . ' I

0 « /(A.k <__ / /-c 6( ·. ,FOREM N /~ <. dw w ~

:::hrt RO ERT W RUST_lJ United States Attorney

. V NS

~ ~ ~ c i l AttorneyU. S. Department of Justice111 N W 5th StreetMiami Fiorida 33180

-7

...· · · · ·



. i / · ~4<.r ' •

~

·•

oc

NITED STATES DISTRIC+.-1QO, JR}l'•>' ---

SOUTHERN DISTRICT 'oF Jtr:dR'r:DA \ ol\ \ \

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

P l a i n t i f f

vs .

DOMINICK BARTONE, e t a l

Defendants

" \ '''4 f \ \

\No. 76-6066-Cr-CA s) .\W ·; ~ 1 \ \ ~,..p\.\ \. • ~ , - 1 · C c•

.\0 r . ~ \ , \)I " 1• , I'\.I

' ,, \ ,\'• - ) ' -I'\ >\ . } \ . - • ~ r• .-\..t-\·\)Or r

GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO

JOIN INDICTMENTS FORTRIAL

The United Sta tes by i t s undersigned a t to rney moves

t ha t the indic tment in the above-en t i t l ed case aga ins t the

defendants Dominick Edlvard Bartone and Norton H. Frank l in be

j o in ed fo r trial •vi th the indic tment in the case e n t i t l e d

United Sta tes v . Dominick EdHard Bartone and Horton H.

Frankl in , No. 77-243-Cr-NCR, a l so now pending t r i a l in the

Federa l D i s t r i c t Court for the Southern D i s t r i c t of Flor ida .

In support o f i t s Notion the United Sta tes s t a t e s the fo l low-

ing :

l . On March 10, 1977, the Federa l Grand Jury in

the Southern D i s t r i c t o f Flor ida r e tu rned an indic tment in

the i n s t a n t case charging s i x defendan t s , i nc lud ing Dominick

Edward Bartone and Norton H. Frank l in with consp i racy from

J u ly l , 1975 to Narch <10, 1975, to v io l a t e the Neut ra l i ty Act

o f the United Sta t e s , 18, United Sta tes Code, Sec t ion 1934,

and othe r r e l a t e d of fenses .

2. On o r about Apr i l 14, 1977, t h i s Court , pursuant

to Government motion, dismissed the indic tment as to the

defendants Cunningham, Dameworth, -and D.H.I .E.R. , INC., l e av in g

t he defendants Bartone, Frankl in , and Henry Anthony Grecco.

..



. - . .

-·· · .. ~ ;- · <- . _____: . . . : . . . . . ......-..... .. ._ ~ . . . . : . . . . . . . . _ __ ..... . . : . ...... .:. .,· : .. • • 0 •M

j

.j :r.,



· ..

. - - -· 7 ·· / ·· · 7 : :



- ' '

•• • ' I:i

IJ

. . - -. -.. L / _ _ __ ~ ···· - ·

' . .. . :·- . ... .

-. --·--- .. · Ti ____ .. .. . .. .... ....- -- : --- ·-- -- .. -- .. .. . . . .

- .. ~ ~ ~ g J . ~ - · ~ : ·- ·--

- . -- ~ = -- -·- .- .... -··-_______ ~ ~ · · ~ .... _ _____ ... -...· ·.

. , I . - . .

I ',. ·-· · ~ · ; _ __ --- - ···-··- ·- ----···· ···· ... - _ ._ ·- - - -- -- -·--

1 . . _ .. .

. .. - · ..i •• ••• • : . _,.:; •• , . .• _. __ __ , : ..... . ; . ; . _ : _ _ = : . . . . . : .. . . ; . •• · - · . ' . - . .. ______-·-··-·· ·

• • ·· .. : • · - ·•· · ... .. ./ : .. c· . - .-- · : . : . .. · : . . c ·



·.

~ l l; : :d ' / J - . . ~ . . . ··- - - = - ~ ~ · ~ : s ~ ~- - - -=---- - - .. - .

' '

I

' '· '

. ,

j o ~ ~ .. · .. . '

. . -- -

. ------ - ----· - ·- -. - - - - - - - ~ -- - - - - - ---=--- - ~ -

~ ·-- - ·-

' . ._,. . · · - : . . ...

.. - - ~ .. ---- - - - --- -..·- - - - - - -

'

... . .. .

__ ,

_______________

_______' '~ ' .

'. - .

--- ---- - -·· - --- ... _____ :.__ ' . --- ----------- - ·-·- ~ ..____ --------- - - -______· - ·- ' ...... ... . . .....- - - - - - -

. . . . . .·--- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- _______ __ __ ________ ____ ___ - _..__ ________ ___________

. ------- -- . --- - --- -··· - ---- - - - ... ---- -·· · - --"- - ----------- - ------ - ~ - = - - - . .

- - - ~ -- -- ·-· --·-·- ------------------ -.. ·

,_.. __

-·--·-····· ·- ..-0.- - - · - - - --·

........ ~ · __ :.._::__ ~ . : _ _ _______ _____ __ ____ .....__. ._ _ -- - -I ,

- - ---·-· - ~ · · · ~ ·-------- - - - - -- -- -- - · -

---·-- -- - - -·- •·· · ______ ~ -o • •

. .-- -

- --·-- · ~; ·

.. , . . . ..

· - ·-- · ·

-

----·- .. .... ------ - - --. - --- ·------ - ----------. ·- --- - - - - ---·---- -------· • · · •• .. - - • - ; ; . . . . - i · - ·

/ - . . /



i

l I

, ,. · ··· . . . . ··· .. .. . . ..... .. .

,,.



/ I ..._ ...... -- .



..___.. .. -

. ··--- .. - -- - -- - - - - - ·J. .. •••

--

- - --··-

-

-

- - --jl,,· ·----· ....._________

. lij :

-- -- · - -- - · ·:I

-· · • 1

. .;..: -·..

.

: . .

· - ·· -· -- -· --·



.

·,

. 1

, /

. ...; . > - - - - - . . . - . ~ - - - - · · - - - - - - · -- ··- : _: ___ -- - - ·

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

· Office of the ClerkSouthern District of Florida

P. o. Box 669Miami Florida 33101

FEDERAL RECORDS CENTER

:l557 ST. JOSEfH STREEt

EAST POINT, GEORGIA. 30044

Dear Sir:

Please send the Following:

Date: Oct. 12, 1967

/

Accession ~ o : ]Q__gontainer No. Box No. Case No.~ t y l e

j . .

· .- ·

US4 V

66A241 2Wl0522R 5 11,190-CR BARTONE, e =-t-a ' 'l::-.---

. - -

Notified on:

Returned on :

··----- - -

FRANK NELSON

JQSEPij "r • BQGART, CLEHKJ j' ' \

: ··. I

1 -D e p u t y ~ ?THIS GENTLEMAN IS · GOING TO BE IN ~EAST P.OINT EITHER MON OR ·TUE .. OF

NEXT W E ~ K AND WOULD LIRE TO SEE

THIS FILE,' AS WE JUST RETURNED IT ·

ON OCT. 10.

----- -- - -··· :: ~ ; / ~ - \ ~ - ~ ~

: : _ _ _ --- .

".



---------- - ----- . - - - - - --- - -- . - . ··

-..

-C-f

)

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

UNITED STATES IN AND FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA.

NO.

~ D O M ~ I N ~ I ~ C ~ K ~ E ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - )

O R D E R

This ·Sause ~ a v i n g _ : P t J l ~ on befor.e t h i s :__Court upon . he motion.- : - ' = ·: · _.

of 'the witness DOMINICK E. B A R T O ~ ~ o r d ~ r quashing ~ u b p _ o e n a. . _. .. ..,. . · . .. . . . .- - . ... . . ·.

_ ~ e ~ ' ; ' i , E ~ I l : g him ~ ~ ~ p p ~ ~ r in _ I > ~ ~ ~ o i t , Michigan a t 10:00 A.M. on the 14th

day of August . l9,6l. .for p u r p o s e s of _es t i fy ing before a Federal 'Gran,d

· Jury and the Court having considered the wr-itten -motion and the · grounds

. .s e t for-th therein and having h ~ a r d argument of counsel ·for the witness .

. --- ·· . . . ....._ · - : : :.:-:..- ': ' = = ·- -T ,..__

and for the Yn-ited States Government and ehe -Cour,.t--baing otherwisa ful ly

advised in the premises it i s •

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion To Quash Subpoena e and

the same i s hereby denied.

- ·-· - . .... . _ :_.· c---DONE AND ORDERED-at Miami Florida th i s 13th day of August

1963.. .

CHIEF JUDGE

· .. :



. - . .

;

. . I

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

NO.

AERO O R D N N C E ~ INC.

flt E OM\AM\ _LA . 1

.

lli\111 \ Sl

Plaintiff,

-vs-

,Ai\1 A ~Ju ,..li U u;.Rl< -

COMPLAINT c

DOMINICK BARTONE, AND DEMAND FORJURY TRIAL.

Defendant.

COMES NOW plaintiff. AERO ORDNANCE, INC•• by i ts under-

signed attorneys . and fi les this i ts complaint against DOMINICK BARTONE.

to wit:

1. Plaintiff is a corporation duly organized and existing under the

laws of the State of Florida, with i ts principal place of business in Dade

County, Florida; defendant DOMINICK BARTONE. is a citizen and resident

of a state other than Florida, to wit: Ohio; the cause of action herein

alleged .ifivolves a sum of money in excess of Ten Thousand ($10, 000. 00)

Dollars exclusive of interest and costs; at all t imes pertinent hereto there

has been and is a diversity of citizenship as between the plaintiff and the

defendant.

2. On or about April 11, 1960, in Miami. Dade County, Florida.

plaintiff, AERO O R D N N C E ~ INC. did loan to defendant, DOMINICK

BARTONE the sum of Fifteen Thousand Eight Hundred Two and 57/100. .

($15, 802. 57) Dollars for a period of six (6) months, the same b e ing due

and payable in full on or before October 11, 1960, t no interest .

WAL11 :RS MOORE a COSTANZO, ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1008 AINSLEY BUILDING MIAMI, FLORIDA



- ..•

I.

3. That on or about May 5, 1960, in Miami, Dade County,

Florida, AERO ORDNANCE, INC. did loan to the said defendant, DOMINICK

BARTONE, the sum of Five Thousand ($5, 000. 00) Dollars, without interest ,

·for a period of Fifteen (15) days, the same being due and payable in full on

May 20, 1960.

4. Th,at t,he f irst of sa id loans ($15, 802. 57) was advanced by the

plaintiff through i ts President , Edward Browder, Jr . , while there were

certain arms transactions pending between the plaintiff and certain persons

in various Latin-American countries which were to be participated in by

the defendant by the aforesaid amounts being credited against future com-

missions which might become due the said defendant, DOMINICK BARTONE,

for his part n said arms transactions; that sa id arms _ransact ions did

not material ize and demand was made by plaintiff through i ts President ,

Edward Browder, Jr. upon the said OOMINICK BARTONE to repay the said

amounts; however, despite his· avowals that he w o u ~ repay the said amounts

the said defendant has refused and neglected to do so.

5. That the sa id Five Thousand ($5. 000. 00) Dollar loan was loaned

to th defendant by the plaintiff, the defendant well knowing that plaintiff

had obligations becoming due shortly after May 20., 1960, and that in the

event the said loan were not repaid by that date, the plaintiff would suffer

·a substantial financial loss; that as a result of his failure to rep3:y the said

Five Thousand ($5, 000. 00) Dollars on or before May 20, 1960, plaintiff

suffered a financial loss of Twenty-Six Thousand Eight Hundred Forty-two

($26, 842. 00) Dollars, being the value of electronic merchandise seized and

sold for freight and storage charges by the Ryder Trucking Company due

to the failure of plaintiff to pay the said charges; that as a further resul t

2

WALTERS, MOORE r COSTAN:ZO , ATTORNEYS AT LAW, COB AINSL.EY BUIL.DJNG, MIAMI, FLORIDA



,

r

\

.

of defendant's failure to pay said sum on the date due, plaintiff suffered

damages in the amount of Twenty-five Thousand ( 25, 000. 00) Dollars ,

representing lost profit on the said merchandise.

WHEREFORE, plaintiff sues the defendant and alleges damages

to be Fifty-one Thousand Eight Hundred Forty-two ( 51, 842. 00) Dollars

plus interest and ·costs.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Plaintiff, AERO ORDNANCE, INC•• demands a jury t r ia l herein

on all issues tr iable as of right by a jury.

3

WALTERS, MOORE a COSTAN40 , ATTORNEYS AT LAW, 1008 AINSLEY BUILDING. MIAMI, FLORIDA



·, . ..

-.;- ·· . •

........ .. .

. -- _.

f· : , .. ... . - . .l:·:

•

. ..:· ,

··: - ' : .• , : , I ·. •

- . ,.,, .

;.-.. .:: .. . . :.

. ' ..

- - ~ · _: ..· . . . . .

.. .

'

. ·-: .- . / . . .. _

. : ·

.

·

...I , • . · .:•; . •

: .. - . . - . .

. ·.- ..-· .

. •; ·. : .· - ;· --.__.-_.

3. Dismiss with prejudice that certain action pending

in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami

.Division; entit led Aero Ordnance v. Dominick Bartone, being case No•

. . . ~ 10, 743-M-.Civil that Court. • . I ... --Y :

0 ; _: . • . · · . .:· . . /. : ·· :

. · _·,..:-.-:" ·.· _\ ·::<\.:::.:.ni. BARTONE further agrees:·, • 0. : • ,

: . - . ' ~ : ·. . · .... .. . ·· · ; · A. Upon r e c e i p ~ by him of the general release from . .. .

BROWDER r e f e r ; ~ to in Paragraph IIA2 a b ~ v e to give BROWDER a g e n e r ~ l ·::: :·. ,·· ·; . . .

.;

..r e l ~ a s e .duly ~ e c u t e d and acknowledged,·it being the intent of the part ies. . . . · ; : < - : · - ·. . . .-.

hereto that the performance by the part ies hereto of their undertakings

· · ; .. hereinab.ove se.t forth shall fully and completely sett le all matters between ·I , , ;

• • j . . .., \ ' 1, •• 1

. : . • ·

the p a r t i e ~ 'up to a ~ i n c l u d i n the date of the final act to be perfo.rmed. ·,

hereunder

IV. · BARTONE and BROWDER both agree that TIME SHALL BE

OF THE ESSENCE in this agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the part ies hereto have signed and

sealed these presents the day and year f i rs t above mentioned... . . .

.. , ·.··. ····

· ·:..-.-.-.·

-·:·· . · .

. .' fo • •' I

. _....

, .:

; . ..

• . f

.- : . ..· .

·:. W I T N E S ~ S . · · · ··

.·: ~ s B ~ r t ~ e ~ . .. . ... . · ., . . . .. .. · . : · : : { : \;. ... : . .-...- : . ; ·, . ,. _. · ._: . . ... . . . · ·..: __ . _ ; . : . ·..

- ~ : ·, :· . . . . • • . . •.. • • · : ••• ••• • / : ~ • < • .. • •• • · . - • rtL... . . · . . , . ; . · : ~ : .

~ : : . ~ . ) \ :. _.:.· :. · · _ - ; { 4 . t c ~ : } : J : £ ; ~ · ~ . - - . . . . ; - ~ ~ ~ ~ : ' - ~ ~ ~ - - = -; - - =/ ~ ~ ~ . . . , .~ - ~ - ~ - ~ - 6 l . . _ 0 \ . . ; : : . : : : . . - < . _ s E _ ~ t;:{} , . .· } ~ 1 J i - J ~ , D o m i n i c k B ~ - -

, 0t '{ • • , ' , , • · · ' , . ., , ' I l ., ,

;::':<?··):'· · · ,:: ·> As to_ B ~ w d e r : . .. ,

.( ;.: \ --v -1fJ - _ , _ ~ .~ f · I . 5£P-,y..-y '

· .;,....

. .. . -.... _;- :.-·.. ; .. .'

· . ..·,

~ ~ r 4 x ? u s = ' .. ..

· I r c : n s i de ra t i on of the sum of ten dollars( 10.00) to Aero ·.Ordnance,· Inc .. , paid by BARTONE, Aero Ordnance, Inc . hereby adopts as· corporate obligations the obligat ions under :·aken by BRO\'IDER in

paragraphs IIA(2)(3) of the foregoing agreement upon perfoxrnanceby BARTONE of his obligations under said agreetient.

In \rl tness whereof the caporation has cbe s i g n e ~ by i t s President and a t t e s tC o r ~ o r a t e Seal to be aff ixed.

ATTEST:·

- - ~-2-

.. .. .. .

.



.

. '

...

. . . . . . J,

., ..· · · J

-:: • •

. & . V - - . - . J ~ O ~ . t t AUl J

DATE J/t/7 . n r • ~ £ 1994AWQOVBl f 0 ~ 8 .uw

tiA ttiSIOilCALlDPI PROGRAM ·

M e l t '

IARTONE DOMINICK

201-269811

SEX M 8 1

ZOl-Z5llltOTR -OOit56U SEP 59

CIT USA tReAS

ace 1 .·REGARDING ASSOCIATION W/WILLIAM ALEXANDER

< lmRGAN• Z01-25lllt5• AND INfO CONCERNING

· ·.: _ A Pt OT TO ASSASSINATE CASTRO

..:-_

.. ) . -.. ·.,

I · . ••

·

-. i

.. . ·'

j .

:I

.

: t·. 1

• i'

\tI

. IL .

. 1:. ·.

:; . . I_:•:.

.iJ· '

f

.•,

·

.· '. I. \

J



l ··•· o .t.. w., ... ;r.;(j (el.l<'.K. A(,"l')

DATE .J/?/7 JFORRElEASE 1994

ttA-HISlOJUCAl REVlEW_ PROGRAM

o.o .UNit • L .__.117 m

C ~ ~ - . :r u r ~ , r t(T' • J l sJ

OA" ' %7 1 0 0 ~ l95'fJ I i • I

to'

FIID1l. 11.-o.w OF n n . 1 f r - ~ . a . ,•( ) ( f f t tU) .Aoo Z1 21 I 0ei5

• . . : ~ · o tUt.E SEC' .e()M, tiKCfEM Cat:U. DITil.:LICC1CI .&.Gr;ct c X IOUT'Hl•• . - . .a ·ICONfo W15 f'ltOIITf.. ·-

Cl, CI/OPS, r1, rt/RQM 3, S/C 2c O H t A r ~

- .o. IW. tDIAt l

i,I

C IT93344 .; 10 IHfO Clt l DllIIQ'Ca/CCiftUUID CO n'BCa. ~ a . J . . I ;::l.-0 \ - :;

I

'.I\-

L

·.·' .

, ..,

• rw.1

f t l l . l ~

t l ln or IlfJO, 10 : 24 &oou: 1.959

le l llml BII,IIBt,l SJU113, WHO ~ O P ~ I D 'fO 'f m OOVilUOnM 01 liDEL~ IOlt rlnm m l f la 01 ctml, U S UPOR iD l' a.f 0 1 lO .I.OOU3l' _19S9 KlJOR

vn.tl.L"f l iJ;Xi_'fDm 1tem.llf Kft lat'B .1. GBOUP 07 CUIWC: OPPO.'JID 'fO C.I.MII)tS UJIKI

I I KIAKI, J'LOB.IDl. fBI Jti&'t'Dto ~ IIILD .I.T T' l lfJHK 07 OOKIJIIC I . BAR't01fi,

la)6 CHAR .I.YIIrol, JtW I BIACJI. FBiiSI'1' At 'fT K kDtDU WJBI M:lBallf, (J' ro)

, _ , . ri IB Dlt RIO Plrlr.rt101 I I CUBA, 1U.MJif JO:mtl, .U.D .I.Jft'Otm) KmnX>U. DUJI.IRQ

JII Uif'OO tt:mall ~ O Tift tlho,OOO I I Ol B BI BD Q(JX)U. J'OI U 9

AOUII c.&. ml). (S '¥ R JM CO • I I ~ l.9S9 .l1f UH'tJISfiD OOHJI nPORn1)

P.A o n ~ JARrtn, .lt80 iJicim AS "ICI ~ I D I )Dl l t [B i t l A A PP.OePDOUI

;··:.-- · ~ J f 0 0 ~ rP.CM OLIVJU,I(l) 1 OKIO, W 'l'RmG 0 BILL SOKI OUJDWfJa (0•

116) ADIOJW't 0 Til CTJJI» R'M>tV IO Wir AD JOROI m JW) IDil»UE ~,_ I l l ~ I C X II.UTOifi KWn'IOl(ID U YOUJl M»«)JU rn1H lA'fiiD 6 AOOUit 1$$,, 1'0UI nLI

P.7DII ~ 7 0 9 7 , , o o m ~ t : l l ~ ~ l l t W I , DC*I1lO 1. e.um:nn, 1 XliCIJCIO IAJI OWI, no1 ·

i f J. ~ / H P /

:

;' ..

\.-

. ,

/ ' .

I

.i ·

....... r.. • ,.... £11 f i iUUI UI I N . 0 I ' IC t

:

I. I.,

·I

, ;' ·.

I...

:1

..

I

..

..

1

-i<

;

..

.. .. •·..... ;: .... '· ..,.. . .... ... '··-·· .• -:.• .- .. . - - .-. .-.. J.t ll-1 :•· ........ . .. "• -+

• ;..

L

s

.

.• I'



/?r?/f_- " - . ~ . . v . . - u ~ o {d.t' '.K A(Jl ) l\PPROVf.D tUtl t . l . f : R J ; . Aol•rT~ DATE J/1 /:; .... CIA HISTORICAL REVIEW PROGRAM .

;

I

. .OIIG I

UNi.

mOATt'

10 •

fiOM,

CCHf,

NO

10

, .

Oaf<:TOI

I

,

~

:.. C fflbtOI

I:

I'itIOUTM•• ,-...

• PIIOti1Y

" ~ T l O N A l 1 . . ._r

II.WlO\ATl

QJT 903\"

em D41

III2 Cif, .l.l{D THE DCJIDUC BIB1'08 MIKYICRD BIWW J.RE BELUVID 0 B1 III . . ~~ .

t . 01 24 J.IXRm' A fURLY RALIIBU :sootlCI RiroR'riD BAT tx:l mUC BmtlX. (SIC),

VI111 A UBOI HOOtfl' Of CA3B fO OPD J. ChiCUKG Acxxmt IK HI P.l.'WU. c tn BBAKCir. .

OF I l l JUIOIW. CITI BA fi. 1m JWfl DID 1fOT I..CCiPr 'l'HI DiPOSI'r OOiiDI.Un:I, BU'

. . • J ) ~ I O l f ~ I : I P ~ Br 26 I..UOUM'. Bli2 0 t'l1:5 t.l.Wim liA:s 111 BUI

~ .· . 0 l.lCOIPf f l J.CCOtmr. ~ I COHMil' . U ~ Bi.L.IlnD 'r A HI J'OlfDS n . l

. III OD' S LlWDa 001 1 0 P.llWU. .lRI oonM..-nD VIt1t VU.UAM I..I.m milll JIJBQU.)

~ .... .. A R I M C C M ~ . ll>imK PUBLICLY DEI..lRID D JW 4U W HI JW) llli'CIIYID

1 ~ , 0 0 0 noM 9 W t l ~ roa u l AQ.Ul(M CAMBJ. m mm am

to I WMA om m BJ m DitriiiWlcJ Bml l l l tu .uannrt D.,uaJn sr JmllU .&e

I ,

' '... . :: · ..J, m 80Ult01 or I I I 'O U(Anol 11 r.w.GlW :i u a ~ ~ e m n : ~ AJm CAll

I..'· Mmn Ill I X i l U l l ~ l t l I1f DI'IW Pml WM OIC TI Ia IUf ta

' . . (IPfD Of' MI AOi) , ....

lUI i\

..'·. i. I

l.. i

I. j · I

1<;j/ ·.j.. .. .;1

. .·11I

. II,.OOUCTION IY OTHU c., Me ,

...-L I~........ . .. ..f v--

.. '• ,. . .... - .

L : .

( •

t

? .

·) . I.-il·: · l. l .

: ... • I

' ·• f, '.• ''.. .



.....)

)

.1

'Gl<<

AGENCY SSCIA

: . . ... - .

JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM

IDENTIFICATION FORM

AGENCY INFORMATION

RECORD NUMBER 157 10003 10003

RECORD S SERIESLETTER

AGENCY FILE NUMBER

ORIGINATOR SSCIAFROM

TO

. TITLELETTER FROM PETE CLAPPER

DATE 05 06 75

PAGES 1

SUBJECTSCLAPPER PETEBARTONE, DOMINICSTURGIS FRANK

CASTRO

HOGOL, MARY

DOCUMENT INFORMATION

1 DOCUMENT TYPE PAPER TEXTUAL DOCUMENT

uCLASSIFICATIONRESTRICTIONS

CURRENT STATUSDATE OF LAST REVIEW

. OPENING CRITERIA

COMMENTSBOX 300 20. .

OPEI i IN FULL

012/01/93

[R] ITEM IS RESTRICTED

·_

Date:12/01/93Page:l



< · , - .0 oriJ-v .......... ~ v o : . : ; - o ; : : a : : ; (el.li K . . ... . . ;'\ N/l RA .w 1.1 . ' . \., ... ··· · ·· DATE . ::> 1 < : f \ i H ~ W W N O i l V t i 3 H 1 a 3 : : > n a o ~ d 3 i l

......_,__ ; ,.,_ ,_ ;_., ___ _____ _ . : . -·-· · - \ _. :':: ~ _ . _ _ _ ..

•.

ih y' 6 1975 oo 20

.....

Bob:

I t may be of interest that DoTTlinic Bartone a mafia member in

Cleveland has told P1.ain Dealer reporter Ha.ry Wogol tha t he was

hired in 1959 by Frank Sturgi5 to help ~ t h assassination plott ing

against Castro. Ms. Wogol called to volunteer the information.

P e t ~ Clapper

M

M

i N

]g_

I ut l )

:r::

0· r-1

J0Q

u:: ::;

t-

..

00

IQ

(

l0

( s:::Q

Q

4-Q

Q IH

p :Q

: -

-•":;:. ~ ... .

\

·,

·- ··--··- · -----· - ..... ......- --- -- ...



•. rf

i

- l

.

-

..·

I

.. .

REPRODUcED T THE N TION l ARCHIVES •

1055 hours MO/the s ame person who phoned a day or so ago and spoke nbroken Russian/speaks to OBYEDKOV.

MO: Hello, th is LEE OSW LD (phon) speaking. I was a t your place l a s t

Saturday and spoke to a consul, and they said that they 1d send a

telegram to Washington, so I wanted to . f ind out i f you have anthing

new? But I don t remember the name of that consul.

OBY: KOSTIKOV. He is dark /ha i r or skin?/.

LEE: Yes. } y name i s OSWALD.

OBY:

LEE:

Just a minuteI ll

f ind out. They say that they haven t received anything

Have they done anything?

OBY :

LEE:

Yes, they say t ha t a request has been sent out, but nothing has been

received as yet .

And what ••• ? /OBY hangs up/.

Attachment f

A telephone ca l l to the Sov.i.et Eni>assy10 PS:. hours on 1 October 1965 by the saJman who called previous:cy- (28 Septenbe

and spoke broken Russian. He said hiswas Lee OSW LD and wanted- to know i f t

had heard anything. Soviet said no.

Dominick Bartone

Documents

Transcript of Dominick Bartone