Doing business for the poor

10
Doing business for the poor Rural development and bo>om of the pyramid approaches By Niko Spiegel

Transcript of Doing business for the poor

Page 1: Doing business for the poor

16.04.2010–NikoBenjaminSpiegel

Doingbusinessforthepoor

Ruraldevelopmentandbo>omofthepyramidapproaches

ByNikoSpiegel

Page 2: Doing business for the poor

16.04.2010–NikoBenjaminSpiegel

Agenda

1

2

3

Thebo>omofthepyramidconcept

Twosuccessstories

Thecycleofruralpovertyandwaysoutofit

4 CashflowproblemsandsoluIons

5 Lessonslearned

Page 3: Doing business for the poor

16.04.2010–NikoBenjaminSpiegel

Thebo4omofthepyramidconcept

Improving the lives of the billions of people at the bottom of the economic pyramid is a noble endeavor.

It can also be a lucrative one.

C.K. Prahalad & A. Hammond

Claims of the BoP approach

The 4 billion people with a PPP below $2,000 have up to now been largely overlooked by MNCs. The BoP market offers 3 main advantages:

(1)  Immense growth potentials (2)  Reduced costs (3)  Innovation

Criticism

Aneel Karnani (2007) criticizes the BoP and describes several deficiencies in Prahalad’s assumptions.

(1)  Scalability is difficult (2)  Cost-quality trade-offs (3)  Exploitation

ClaimsoftheBoPapproach CriIcism

Page 4: Doing business for the poor

16.04.2010–NikoBenjaminSpiegel

Twosuccessstories

MYRADA (M ICROF INANCE ) THE AMULCOOPERAT IVE

•  Foundedin1946•  1.33billionUSDinturnover•  2.8millionmilkproducers

•  10.16millionlitersofmilkperday

•  TheAmulpa>ernwascopiedthroughoutthecountry,makingIndiathelargestmilkproducerintheworld.

•  Foundedin1968•  52.8millionUSDfundsundermanagement

•  9,253women’sself‐helpgroups

•  15‐20womenformaself‐helpgroupthatisboundbyaffinityandtrustamongthemembers.

•  Groupmembersmanagefinancesjointly.

Page 5: Doing business for the poor

16.04.2010–NikoBenjaminSpiegel

Thecycleofruralpovertyandwaysoutofit

Lackofcapital

Noinvestmentsintoassetsor

workingcapital

Dependenceonmoneylendersor

localmonopolies

Lowreturns Microfinance

CooperaIves

•  Powerfulmiddlemenareskipped.

•  ThecooperaIveisulImatelyownedbythefarmers.

•  Costsavingsarepassedontothefarmer.

•  Accesstocapitalatlowinterestrates.

•  LoanscanbeusedtopurchaseproducIveassets.

•  Groupaffinityservesascollateral.

Page 6: Doing business for the poor

16.04.2010–NikoBenjaminSpiegel

CashflowproblemsandsoluLons

MICROFINANCEINSTITUTIONS

•  Themonopolyoflocalmoneylendersisovercome.

•  Pre‐financingofcroppurchases.

•  CollateralmaybesubsItutedwithaffinitythroughgrouplending.

COOPERATIVES

•  Farmersreceivehigherpricesoncropsduetoskippingof“lastmile”traders.

•  CooperaIvescanincreasemarginsbystoringcropsunIltheendofharvestseason.

•  Sizeallowsforproductbranding.

cash

flow

s

time

KEYCHALLENGES

•  Se^ngtherightincenIves.

•  Dealingwithconflict,resistanceandexploitaIon.

•  Qualitycontrol.

Page 7: Doing business for the poor

16.04.2010–NikoBenjaminSpiegel

Lessonslearned

Bottom of the pyramid markets are complex.

Classical challenges (e.g. quality, incentives, conflict) reappear in unique contextual settings.

Finding the levers of poverty is key.

Joint ventures with NGOs can provide access to vital experiences in target markets.

Page 8: Doing business for the poor

16.04.2010–NikoBenjaminSpiegel

Backup1:Balancesheetofaself‐helpgroup

Page 9: Doing business for the poor

16.04.2010–NikoBenjaminSpiegel

Backup2:FinancialsustainabilityofSHGs

Page 10: Doing business for the poor

16.04.2010–NikoBenjaminSpiegel

Backup3:InterestratesofSHGsandassociatedbanks