DOCUMENT RESUME UD 027 743 AUTHOR Easton, John Q.; … · ED 325 595. AUTHOR TITLE. INSTITUTION...

ED 325 595

AUTHORTITLE

INSTITUTION

SPONS AGENCY

PUB DATENOTEPUB TYPE

DOCUMENT RESUME

UD 027 743

Easton, John Q.; Storey, SandraAttendance in Chicago Public Schools. Monitoring andResearching the Effects of School Reform in Chicago

Series.Chicago Panel on Public School Policy and Finance,IL.

Chicago Community Trust, Ill.; Field Foundation ofIllinois, Chicago.; John D. and Catherine T.MacArthur Foundation, Chicago, IL.; Lloyd A. FryFoundation, Chicago, IL.; Spencer Foundation,Chicago, Ill.; Woods Charitable Foundation, Inc.,Lincoln, Nebr.Sep 9045p.

Statistical Data (110) -- Reports -Research/Technical (143)

EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS *Academic Achievement; *Attendance; *Attendance

Patterns; *Dropout Rate; Elementary SecondaryEducation; Graduation; *School Statistics;Statistical Analysis; Student Mobility; *UrbanSchools

IDENTIFIERS *Chicago Public Schools IL

ABSTRACTThis report provides baseline data on attendance in

the Chicago Public Schools. The report is divided into four sectionsand two tables. The first section, "The Effects of StudentAssistance," examines the relationship between student attendance,achievement, and the dropout rate. The second section, "AttendanceStatistics," presents median attendance rates for elementary and highschools and shows the variation in attendance rates between schools.Next, a section headed "Statistical Analysis of Attendance Rates"examines the relationship between a school's attendance rate andother factors like attendance rates from previous years or a school'sachievement level. The fourth section, "Attendance Improvement,"discusses research on the components of an effective attendancepolicy as well as how improvement of school organization can have apositive effect on attendance. The report continues with the twotables, one for high schools and the other for elementary schools,which together provide attendance data from 1985-86 to 1988-89 forevery Chicago public school. Schools are grouped by geographical areaso that a school can be compared to other schools nearby. Indexesfollow, with a map to help locate a school within its area. (DM)

Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.

ATTENDANCE IN CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS

U g DEPARTMENT Of EDUCATIONOffice of Edtrcahonal Research and Immovempn!

EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER iERICI

docurnent has been reproduced asreceived from the defson of organitalionoriginatingMinor changes have been dkade to in,provereproduction gushily

Points of view or opinions stated in this docu',lent do not necessardp represent officialOE RI oosdbn or oohcv

Prepared by

'PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THISMATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY

//' .4M/1'

TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)

John Q. EastonDirector of Monitoring and Research

Sandra StoreyResearch Analyst

September 1990

CHICAGO PANEL ON PUBLIC SCHOOL POLICY AND FINANCE220 South State Street, Suite 1212 Chicago, Illinois 60604 (312) 939-2202

2

CHICAGO PANEL ONPUBLIC SCHOOL POLICY AND FINANCE

Harold W. Smith, PresidentJames Lucien & Arturo Jauregui, Vice Presidents

Lauren E Allen, Treasurer; Carolyn Cordes, SecretaryTee Gallay, Honorary President; G. Alfred Hess, Jr., Executive Director

The Chicago Panel is a coalition of the following member organizations

American Jewish CommitteeAspira Inc., of Illinois

Center for Neighborhood TechnologChicago Region PTA

Chicago UnitedChicago Urban League

Chicago Westside Branch N.A.A.C.P.Citizens Schools CommitteeCommunity Renewal SocietyErie Neighborhood House

Jewish Council on Urban AffairsJunior League of Chicago, Inc.

Latino InstituteLawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law

League of Women Voters of ChicagoMetropolitan Mission Strategy Organization of the United Methodist Church (Metro)

Modcan American Legal Defense and Educational FundUnited Neighborhood Organization of Chicago

The Woodlawn OrganizationYouth Guidance

Monitoring and Research Project Staff

John Q. Easton, Director of Monitoring and ResearchCheryl Johnson, Coordinator of Monitoring

Jesse Qualls, Research AnalystSandra Storey, Research Analyst

Paul Dean, Darryl Ford and William Yancey, Research Assistants

Major Funding for the Monitoring and Research Project is provided by

The Chicago Community TrustThe Field Foundation of IllinoisThe Iloyd A. Fry Foundation

The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur FoundationThe Spencer Foundation

The Woods Charitable Fund

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION 1

'ME EFFECTS OF STUDENT ATTENDANCE 2

Attendance and Achievement 2Attendance and the Dropout Rate 3

ATTENDANCE STATISTICS 4

Elementary School Attendance Rates 4High School Attendance Rates 5

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF ATTENDANCE RATES 8

Factors Related to Elementary School Attendance Rates 8Factors Related to High School Attendance Rates 11

ATTENDANCE IMPROVEMENT 14

Common Elements of Effective Attendance Policies 14Elementary School Organization and Attendance 15High School Organization and Attendance 15

NOTES 18

TABLE: HIGH SCHOOL ATTENDANCE RATES 20

TABLE: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE RATES 22

INDEX OF SCHOOLS BY COMMUNITY AREA - HIGH SCHOOLS 32

INDEX OF SCHOOLS BY COMMUNITY AREA - ELEM. SCHOOLS 33

MAP OF COMMUNITY AREAS 38

4

INTRODUCTION

This report is one of a series of reports completed as part of a project of the ChicagoPanel on Public School Policy and Finance, Monitoring and Researching the Effects ofSchool Reform in Chicago. The Monitoring and Research project is examining theimplementation of school reform in Chicago during school reform's first five years. Thepurpose of this report is to provide baseline data on attendance in the Chicago PublicSchools. Follow-up reports will use this information to determine the extent to which theschool district is attaining the goal of increased attendance stipulated in the Chicago SchoolReform Act.

We have divided this report into four sections and two tables. The first section,called "The Effects of Student Attendance," outlines some basic research on the relationshipbetween student attendance, achievement, and the dropout rate. The second section,"Attendance Statistics," discusses Chicago public school attendance data. This sectionprovides the median attendance rates for elementary and high schools and shows thevariation in attendance rates between schools. The third section, "Statistical Analysis ofAttendance Rates," examines the relationship between a school's attendance rate and otherschool factors like attendance rates from previous years or the school's achievement level.The fourth section, "Attendance Improvement," discusses research on the components of aneffective attendance policy as well as how improvement of school organization can have apositive effect on attendance. In this last section we have attempted to show how schoolscan decrease unnecessary absence.

The two tables at the end of this report, "High School Attendance Rates" and"Elementary School Attendance Rates' contain 1985-86, 1986-87, 1987-88 and 1988-89attendance rates for all Chicago public schools. The schools are listed by geographicalcommunity area so that schools can be compared to other schools nearby. The threeappendices, "Index of Schools - High Schools," "Index of Schools - Elementary Schools" and"Map of Community Areas" will help to locate a school within its community area. Theseappendices immediately follow the tables.

ME EFFECIS OF STUDENT ATTENDANCE*

Attending school regularly is one of many factors that contribute to success in school.Students must be in school in order to learn the curriculum. Attendance has beenconvincingly linked to higher achievement (for example, reading and math achievement) andto lower dropout rates.

Attendance and Achievement

Many studies have shown that in high schools, greater student attendance issignificantly related to greater student achievement. James Coleman and others' analyzedhigh school data from a large national study, High School and Beyond, and found thatattendance (along with other involvement measures including homework) was significantlyrelated to achievement. They also found that higher attendance rates were partlyresponsible for the higher achievement found in the private schools. In a study of inner-citysecondary schools in London, Michael Rutter and his colleagues2 also demonstrated asignificant link between attendance and achievement.

This relationship between high attendance and high achievement is also found at theelementary level. In elementary schools, greater attendance (as well as other measures ofstudent involvement or time-on-task) is significantly related to greater student achievement.For example, one early study3 of a large sample of schools demonstrated that the quantityof schooling, as measured by average daily attendance, length of the school day and lengthof the school year, had a strong positive relationship to achievement test scores. Anotherstud?, an analysis of the attendance and achievement records ofa large longitudinal sampleof elementary school students in the Chicago Public Schools, found that students whoattended school more often were more apt to have higher grades and test scores, even afterprevious achievement was accounted for. In a group of students with similar characteristics,those with better attendance have better achievement.

Good attendance certainly does not guarantee success in school. Once students arein school, they must of course pay attention, concentrate, and become involved in theinstruction; (several researchers have shown the relationship between time-on-task in theclassroom and s'.udent achievement)? However, even if good attendance does not ensurehigher achievement it does provide students with the necessary first step, the opportunityto learn the curriculum offered.

*Note: All endnote references are listed on pages 18 and 19 of this report.

2

Attendance and the Dropout Rate

High school attendance rates are strongly linked to dropout rates. A De PaulUniversity study6 examining Chicago public high schools by four categories (selectiveacademic, selective vocational, non-selective integrated and non-selective predominantlyminority) found that the schools with lower dropout rates had on average higher attendancerates. Likewise, schools with higher dropout rates had lower attendance rates. For example,

Average 1984 Attendance Rates forCPS High Schools with Low and High Dropout Rates

TYpe of SchoolAttendance in

Low Dropout HSsAttendance in

High Dropout HSs

Selective Academic 91.1 ---

Selective Vocational 89.8 ---

Non-selective Integrated 89.8 84.8

Non-selective Minority 88.5 83.3

Table adapted from De Paul University repore

in non-selective integrated high schools, the average attendance rate for schools withrelatively low dropout rates (below 42 percent) was 89.8 percent whereas the averageattendance rate in high schools with higher dropout rates (over 42 percent) was 84.8 percent.In all four types of schools, the study found that schools' attendance rates were lower wheredropout rates were higher. (See table above.)

In an analysis of data from High School and Beyond, Anthony Bryk and Yeow MengThum also found a strong connection between absences in high school and the dropout rate.They argued that dropping out is a result of chronic truancy in the earlier high school yearsand that "...early absenteeism is the strongest student-level predictor of dropping out...."6

Elementary school attendance has also been linked to dropping out of high school.In a recent study, Against the Odds: the Early Identification of Dropouts, the Chicago Panel9found that among the students in its sample, those who eventually dropped out were absentfrom elementary school more often than students who eventually graduated. In elemtntarygrades two through eight the eventual dropouts missed an average of six tn thirteen moi edays per year than those who eventually completed school. This study also found that bycombining absence data from three elementary years it was possible to predict a si4dent'srisk of dropping out with very high accuracy. For example, using the second, third andfourth grade attendance of the boys in the sample, the study found that it was possible topredict the likelihood of each boy dropping out with an accuracy of 75 percent.

3 7

ATTENDANCE STATISTICS

This section of the report describes attendance rates in the Chicago Public Schoolsfor the past four years. These attendance rates are reported in the Chicago Public Schools'annual publication, Test Scores and Selected School Characteristics. According to that source,the attendance rates exclude kindergarten, preschool and self-contained special educationclassrooms.

Elemental!, School Attendance Rates

The median attendance rate for Chicago Public elementary schools (excluding ChildParent Centers) was 93.0 percent in school year 1988-89. Half of the elementary schoolshad an average daily attendance rate higher than 93.0 percent and half had lowerattendance rates. This meant that the average student in the average school missed 12.7days of school in the 181 day school year. The median elementary school attendance ratewas slightly higher in 1988-89 than it was in 1987-88 when it was 92.4 percent. The medianattendance rates in 1987-88 and 1988-89 were lower than both 1985-86 and 1986-87 (93.4percent and 93.6 percent, respectively).

96

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE RATES75th PERCENTILE, MEDIAN, 25TH PERCENTIL

94 7

94 3

91 2:1

94

93 69 4

9 093

92 6

97 49 2

92 91 8

91 4

91

90

1985-86

0 75TH PERCENTILE

1986-87 1987-88

+ MEDIAN 0 25TH PERCENTILE

1988-89

Attendance rates vary somewhat from one elementary school to another. ForChicago elementary schools at the 75th percentile (doing better than three-quarters of all

4 8

elementary schools), the attendance rate was 94.2 percent in 1988-89. For those elementaryschools at the 25th percentile (doing better than only one-quarter of the schools), theattendance rate was 91.8 percent. Thus the difference in attendance between schools at the75th and 25th percentile was 2.4 percent.

Attendance was lower in both 1988-89 and 1987-88 than it was in 1985-86 and 1986-87. During this four year period the spread among schools has increased. In 1985-86 thedifference between schools at the 75th percentile and schools at the 25th percentile was 2.1percent. This difference increased slightly to 2.4 percent in 1988-89. Attendance rates havestayed more constant at the 75th percentile than at either the median or 25th percentile.

Because these statistics are school averages, they do not provide information aboutindividual students. However, from other sources, we know that there is great variation inattendance from one student to another within the same grade in the same school. Bycomparing the "average" student in different schools, we can see the practical effects ofdifferences in attendance rates. The differences are not enormous, but significant in terms

School 1988-89 Attendance Rate Average Absences

75th Percentile School 94.2 Percent Attendance 10.5 days absent



of the amount of material that can be covered and the amount of learning opportunitiespresented in even a very few days of school. As the table shows, the average child in anelementary school at the 75th percentile (according to attendance) missed 10.5 days ofschools, whereas an average child in a school at the 25th percentile missed 14.8 days. Anadditional four days of schools can be veiy beneficial, especially to a child who might needmore attention in school anyway.

We would find much greater differences in attendance ifwe compared students withgood attendance records to students with poor attendance records. In many cases, we wouldfind that students who had poor attendance over several years are often doing poorly inschool and at risk of dropping out. The Chicago Panel's study Against the Odds: The EarlyIdentification of Dropouts found that from second to eighth grade, eventual dropouts missedschool six to thirteen days more than eventual graduates. (The study also found that manystudents who eventually graduated had one isolated year of poor attendance. Dropouts hadpoor attendance patterns established over three to four year periods.)

High School Attendance Rates

Attendance is dramatically knver in high schools than in elementary schools. In 1988-89 the median high school attendance rate was 81.3 percent--half of the Chicago public highschools had higher attendance rates and half had lower rates. The high school median

59

attendance rate was 11.7 percent lower than the elementary school attendance rate, makinga difference of twenty-one more school days.

The median attendance rate for high schools has decreased drastically since 1985-86when it was 85.9 percent. In large part, this is due to more stringent procedures forcalculating average daily attendance that the Chicago Board of Education introduced in the1987-88 school year. (Illinois State Board of Education regulations require that studentswho cut one period be counted as absent for a half day. Students who cut more than oneperiod are counted as absent for a full day.)

There is greater variability among the attendance rates of different high schools thanthere is among those of the elementary schools. In the 1988-89 school year the attendancerate for high schools at the 75th percentile was 86.2 percent and the attendance rate for highschools at the 25th percentile was 763 percent, a difference of almost 10 percent. Thediffere -ce between relatively high attendance and low attendance high schools has increasedconsiderably between 1985-86 and 1988-89 from just over six percent to nearly ten percent.The graph belcw shows four years of attendance rates for schools at the 75th percentile, atthe median, and at the 25th percentile.

91

908 1 89 0

89

BB

87

HIGH SCHOOL ATTENDANCE RATES75TH PERCENTILE, MEDIAN, 25TH PERCENTIL

86 48 9 85 886

85

84

838 9 8

82 52 9

82

81

BO

79

78

77

76

8 2

81 3

7 5

75

1985-86 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89

0 75TH PERCENTILE + MEDIAN o 25TH PERCENTILE

61 10

Like the elementary school statistics, these high school attendance rates are schoolaverages, not attendance rates for individual students. However, we do know that thesediffer greatly from one student to another. Even comparing "average" students from oneschool to another, we see great differences. The average student in a high school at the75th percentilea relatively high attendance high schoolmissed 25 days of school in 1988-89. The average student in a high school at the 25th percentile--relatively low attendance--missed 423 days of school! It is difficult to imagine how students who miss that muchschool can be prepared for further education or for employment.

Schools 1988-89 Attendance Rate Average Absences

75th Percentile School 86.2 Percent Atteridance 25.0 days absent

5Nh Percentile School 81.3 Percent Attendance 33.8 days absent


STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF ATTENDANCE RATES

The following section of this report analyzes school level attendance rates in orderto discover what other school level factors are related to attendance. The purpose of thissection is to identify relationships among these factors so that we can determine if theychange during the implementation of school reform in Chicago. In our discussions of thefindings from this analysis, we also explore other related research to help interpret theseresults.

Factors Related to Elementary School Attendance Rates

Many characteristics of elementary schools are statistically related to attendancerates. The matrix on page 9 provides the correlation coefficients between attendance ratesand other variables. Because these are school averages and not individual student records,the statistics do not necessarily indicate patterns that hold for all students. The followinggeneralizations can be made from the correlation matrix:

1. Overall, elementary school attendance rates do not change much from year toyear relative to each other. Schools that had high attendance rates in 1985-86 tended to stayrelatively high in subsequent years. On the other hand, schools that had initially lowattendance rates tended to remain relatively low. This does not mean that schools cannotor do not change in attendance patterns, but rather that, for the most part, these rates arehighly stable.

Other studies have shown that for most ;tudents (as opposed to schools) there issome tendency for attendance patterns to be similar from one year to the next; however,there are often great differences. Many students who have good attendance one year mayhave poor attendance the following year. Similarly, students with poor attendance one yearmay have good attendance the next. For example, an earlier studyw analyzed longitudinalattendance data for a large sample of Chicago public school students and found correlationcoefficients between attendance from one year to the next that ranged from a low of .37(kindergarten to first grade and first to second grade) to a high of .56 (second to thirdgrade).

2. Chicago public elementary schools that have higher achievement on standardizedtests (more students scoring at or above grade level) tend to have higher attendance rates.The correlations do not tell whether having more students in school more often improvesachievement or whether schools that have high achievement levels have students who electto attend school more frequently. A regression analysis shows that attendance issignificantly related to achievement even after other factors, including mobility, low income,and non-promotion (retention) are held constant. This means that in a group of schoolswith similar mobility arid poverty rates those schools that have higher attendance rates havehigher achievement test scores. These statistics predict that a 1.0 percent increase inattendance is related to a 2.5 percent increase in the percent of students scoring above gradelevel.

8 1 2

CORRELATIONS BETWEEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE AND

OTHER SCHOOL CHARACTERISTICS

AM- ATT- ATT- MT- TOT- MOB- 3RD 6TH IITH 3RD 6TH 8TH83-89 87-88 86-87 85-86 ENRL LOWINC mrry READ READ READ MATH MATH MATH NPK-B

A1788-89 1.000

ATTI7-88 0.956 1.000

A1186-87 0.943 0.944 1.000

ATI1546 0.914 0.928 0.942 1.000

TOTENRL 0.022 0.010 0.010 -0.001 1.000

LOWI/4C -0.388 -0.385 -0.400 -0.396 0.279 1.000

MOBILITY -0.447 -0.460 -0.478 -0.493 0.056 0.413 1.0003RD READ 0.580 0.556 0.546 0.513 -0.290 -0.742 -0.473 1.0006TH READ 0.498 0.498 0.507 0.474 -0.272 -0.742 -0.385 0.768 1.000ITH READ 0.532 0.534 0.545 0.532 -0.152 -0.692 -0.532 0.766 0.779 1.0003RD MATH 0.560 0.532 0.533 0.'.48 -0.282 -0.682 -0.447 0.892 0.729 0.732 1.0006111 MATH 0.586 0.563 0.550 0.556 -0.228 -0.672 -0.401 0.715 0.864 0.721 0.696 1.0008TH MATH 0.531 0.548 0.542 0.536 -0.134 -0.622 -0.493 0. 667 0.708 0.1144 0.635 0.723 1.000

NMC-8 -0.529 -0.530 -0.449 -0.439 -0.038 0.288 0.225 -0.379 -0.292 -0.313 -0.310 -0.296 -0.290 1.000

The number of schools in this correlation matrix ranges from 367 to 475.

[Variable Definitions

ATT8889 Attendance rate for 1988-89

Amine Attendance rate for 1987-88ATT8687 Attendayea fete fo. 1986-87ATT8586 Attendance rate for 1985-86

TOTENRL Total enrollment 1988-89LOWINC Pet students eligible for free lunch 88.89

MOBILITY Pet of students moving in/out 88-89

13

3RD REA D

6TH READ

8TH READ

3RD MATH

6TH MATH

8TH MATH

NPK-8

TEST SCORES FROM SPRING 1989

Pet 3rd grade students at/ebove grade level, !TES, re4ding

Pet Oth gude students at/above grade level, ITBS, reading

Pet 8th grade students at/above grade level, ITBS, reeding

Pet 3rd grade students at/above grade level, ITBS, math

Pet 6th grade students at/above grade level, ITBS, math

Pct 8th grade students st/above grade level, ITBS, math

Pet students not promoted lune 1989 (K-8)

14

As discussed c artier, other researchn has found that students who attend schoolmore frequently were given higher grades by teachers and scored higher on the Iowa Testsof Basic Skills. These relationships were also significant after controlling for priorachievement and mobility (the number of different schools that a student attended fromkindergarten to eighth grade).

3. Schools that retain a large percentage of their students tend to have lowerattendance rates than schools that retain a smaller proportion of their students. (In aseparate study, June 1989 Grade Retention In Chicago Public Elementary Schools'', wefound that retention rates are more highly correlated to attendance than any other schoolfactor, including achievement test sbores.) This finding may suggen that schools with moreabsence are more likely to have "get tough" retention policies. Another interpretation ofthis relationship is that, in general, schools' retention policies may be more influenced byattendance and other school climate factors than by actual achievement levels.

4. Schools with low mobility (few transfers) tend to have high attendance rates andschools with high mobility tend to have lower attendance rates. (Mobility is the rate ofstudents who move in or out of a school, that is, transfer, during the school year.) Althoughit is probably true that students who move from one school to another are more apt to beabsent than students who do not move, we have no direct evidence here to support thatconclusion. The negative relationship between mobility and attendance may be due tohigher absence rates in children who move and to a more disruptive environment causedby high mobility that discourages attendance in other children.

5. On the average, schools with fewer low income students have higher attendancerates than schools with more low income students. Schools with more poor students oftenhave greater social problems that may make attendance more difficult for students.However, the percent of low income students is less highly related to attendance than themobility rate.

6. On the average, the size of elementary schools is not related to attendance.Attendance is no better or worse in large or small elementary schools.

1 510

Factors Related to High School Attendance Rates

Several high school characteristics are related to attendance rates. The correlationmatrix on page 12 contains corelation coefficients between attendance rates and severalother school characteristics, most of which are taken from the Illinois State Board ofEducation School Report Cud. Since these are school-wide average statistics, the patternsthat are shown do not iressarily hold true for individual students. The results of theinformation in the correlation matrix can be summarized as follows:

1. Attendance rates in Chicago public high schools stay basically the same relativeto each other from year to year. (The trend in Chicagu has been for decreasing attendancerates. Attendance rates have gone down but the schools have stayed roughly the samerelative to each other.) High school attendance rates are not as stable as elementary schoolattendance rates.

2. The mobility rate in high schools is strongly related to the attendance rate.Schools that have lots of transfers are likely to have low attendance and schools that havefew transfers are likely to have higher attendance. The correlation between attendance andmobility is much higher in the high schools than in the elementary schools. Mobility mayaffect the attendance of students who move from one school to another and also affect theat:endance of other students who are influenced by the relative instability in the school.

In Dropouts from the Chicago Public Schools' the Panel showed that students whotransfer from one Chicago high school to another are much more likely to drop out thanstudents who stay in one school for four years. This is true even for students who transferfrom a high dropout rate school to one with a lower dropout rate.

3. Schools with higher achievement (a higher percent of eleventh grade studentsscoring at or above grade level in reading and math) and higher graduation rates tend tohave higher attendance. Similarly, lower achieving schools with lower graduation rates havelower attendance. These statistics show that higher attendance goes hand-in-hand withhigher test scores and graduation rates but they do not demonstrate that the higherattendance is responsible for these better outcomes. However, regression analysis suggeststhat in those Chicago public high schools with comparably low income levels and mobilityrates, higher attendance is still associated with higher test scores and higher graduationrates. These findings are consistent with an analysis of data" from High School andBeyond that showed that truancy--unexcused absence--was the single strongest predictor ofdropping out of high school. Some evidence from other studies suggests that the absenceof classmates has a negative effect on the achievement of students who are present.15Teachers may spend more time repeating information to absent students when they returnto the detriment of students who were present.

4. The more students in a school taking a college prep program and the fewerstudents in general education or vocational education, the higher the attendance rate is

17

CORRELATIONS BETWEEN HIGH SCHOOL ATTENDANCE RATES AND

OTHER SCHOOL CHARACTERISTICS

ATT- ATT- ATT- KIT- TOT- MOB- GRAD COL- MATH- SCI- ENO- 8S-11849 87-88 86-87 8546 ENRL LOWINC IUTY RATE PREP GENED VOCED ENR ENRL ENRI. ENRL READ MATH

ATTS849 1.000

ATTS748 0.962 1.000

ATTS647 0 . 882 0.944 1.000

ATT8546 0.822 0.898 0.961 1.000

TOTENRL 0.246 0.185 0.125 0.113 1.000LOWINCOM -0.441 -0.432 -0.517 -0.511 -0.232 1.000

MOBILITY -0.766 -0.805 -0.851 -0.815 -0.205 0.595 1.000

GRAM:ATE 0.630 0.625 0.637 0.668 0.147 -0.457 -0.674 1.000COMFY 0.442 0.431 0.366 0.397 0.293 -0.247 -0.353 0.515 1.000

OWED -0.236 -0.201 -0.205 -0.225 0.065 0.004 0.143 -0.260 -0.492 1.000VOCED -0.317 -0.331 -0.255 -0.274 -0.379 0.275 0.284 -0.389 -0.749 -0.208 1.000

MATHENR -0.012 0.014 -0.004 -0.014 -0.001 -0.040 -0.001 0.221 0.423 -0.065 -0.426 1.000SCIENRL 0.088 0.115 0.073 0.065 0.077 -0.080 -0.176 0.370 0.468 -0.068 -0.474 0.744 1.000

ENGENRL 0.003 -0.013 -0.006 -0.039 -0.176 0.069 0.033 0.026 -0.165 -0.121 0.278 -0.335 -0.213 1.000SSENRL -0.110 -0.073 -0.086 -0.146 -0.257 0.237 0.173 -0.070 0.091 -0.017 -0.069 0.130 0.021 0.332 1.000

READ 0.697 0.709 0.690 0.670 0.273 -0.564 -0.696 0.676 0.519 -0.329 -0.333 0.247 0.420 -0.135 -0.160 1.000MATH 0.640 0.652 0.637 0.623 0.283 -0.524 -0.631 0.584 0.434 -0.273 -0.335 0.334 0.466 -0.183 -0.215 0.973 1.000

N 65 HIGH SCHOOLS

AT111889 Attendant": rate for 1988-89

ATT8788 Attendance rate for 1987-88AI78687 Attendance rate for 1986-87ATT8586 Attendance rate for 198546

TOTENRL Total enrollment for 198849LOWINC Pct students eligible for free lunch 8849

MOBILITY Pct of students moving in/out 8849GRADRATE Pct of catering class to grad in June 89

COLPREP Pct of students whu ..wmpleted couniework lading lo collegeGENED Pct of students neither college prep nor vocationalVOCED Pct of students who completed a vocational ed sequence

MATHENR Pct of students enrolled in a math courseSCIENRL Pct of students enrolled in a science course

ENGENRL Pct of students enrolled in an English courseSSENRL Pct of students enrolled in a social studies course

READ Pct of 1 1th grade students scoring at/above grade level in reading

MATH Pct of 1 1th grade students scoring at/above grade level in math

18

likely to be. Other studies have also found that schools serving students with similarbackground characteristics that have more students in academic courses have fewer absencesand dropouts.

5. In general, high schools with more low income students have lower attendancerates compared to high schools with fewer low income students.

6. Larger high schools are somewhat more apt to have lower attendance rates thansmaller high schools. (There was no relationship between total enrollment and attendancein the elementary schools.) At the high school level, school size has often been linked toattendance and achievement.

ATTENDANCE IMPROVEMENT

Although the importance of regular school attendance is clear, figuring out how toimprove attendance is not so simple. This section discusses research on effective attendancepolicies and research on how overall school improvement increases attendance.

Common Elements of Effective Attendance Policies

One of the most important parts of any attempt to boost attendance is a goodattendance policy. Though there is no formula for success, many studies have identifiedcommon components of effective attendance policies. The factors that came up most oftenin these studies" are the following:

Students, parents, teachers, and administrators should be involved in the attendancepolicy. All of these groups should be incorporated in the development of anattendance policy. For example, a school could poll students to identify reasors forpoor attendance and to get input on students' ideas on the most effective way toreduce absenteeism.

The policy should have high expectations for student behavior and should holdstudents responsible for their actions. Research has shown that students are morelikely to abide by policies and less likely to eventually drop out if school staff expectand believe that students can live up to high standards."

The attendance policy will be more effective if it rewards good behavior in additionto punishing bad behavior. The policy should use incentives (praise and attendanceawards, for example) to encourage good attendance.

The attendance policy (like any discipline policy) should be clear and well-publicizedto students, school staff and parents. The policy should be in writing, perhaps as partof a pamphlet on the discipline code. Students, staff and parents need to know theexpectations for behavior and the consequences of good and poor attendance.

Rules should be applied consistently and fairly. Students should be certain that theconsequences of poor attendance and the rewards for good attendance will beapplied to all students.

The school should have a good attendance monitoring system. The system shouldbe able to identify unexcused absences accurately and quickly. Administrators needto develop a system that will be effective in tracking attendance. This may includea computerized tracking system. Every teacher must understand and participate inattendance monitoring in the classroom.

School staff should immediately follow-up unexplained or unexcused absences witha phone call or letter to parents; (some schools use an automatic dialing system thatcalls parents immediately when their child is absent). Any disciplinary actionspecified in the attendance policy should also take place as soon as possible.

14

2 u

ElomntAry.k.haliQu. .

Many studies have shown that systematic, school-wide improvement efforts may resultin improved elementary school attendance. For example, the work of Dr. James Comer ofYale University's has demonstrated the value of addressing attendance within the contextof improing the entire school. Dr. Comer has been involved in school improvement effortsin the New Haven Public School system in Connecticut for about twenty yeaxs. Theprograms in several of these schools have succeeded in raising achievement and attendancesignificantly in schools serving low income communities. Dr. Comer's School DevelopmentProgram strives to reduce the sense of alienation from the schools that many poor studentsand their parents feel. It has made major changes in the attitudes and behaviors in thesepreviously low achieving schools by convincing students, parents, and teachers that hardwork could pay off with improved learning. Three major elements of these schools are:

A governance team which allows administrators, teachers, aides, professional supportstaff and parents to share decision-making and responsibility in order to build aconsensus among all those who participate in the education of the children. Thisgovernance team also attempts to decrease the distrust between home and school,between students and teachers, and between different types of staff.

A mental health team to help teachers understand and manage behavior problemsbefore they become too great.

Encouragement of parental involvement in order to strengthen parent interest in andsupport for the school and to insure that parents' values and needs are respected.

As these three components focussed on problem-solving and consensus, they increasedcommunications and the sense of cooperation between groups that had sometimes been atodds before.

Bigh..schislorganizathm_and_Autailans&

Better high school attendance may also result from several organizationalcharacteilstics of the school. Several researchers have studied factors that differentiate highschools that have higher attendance, higher achievement and lower dropout rates from otherschools that serve the same type of student body but are not as successful in these areas.This section discusses the results of two such studies'9--one a pioneering study of inner citysecondary schools in London and the second a statistical study of American high schools.

Both stuoles identified school processes and organizational and structural featuresof schools that distinguished more effective secondary schools (that is, schools with higherattendance, higher achievement, better behavior) from less effective ones. The researchersidentified several important processes that operated independently of the backgrounds ofthe students. Although students' preparedness and previous achievement were certainlyrelated to attendance, behavior and achievement, the researchers did identify school

15

21

characteristics that influenced a school's eThese differences include:

ffectiveness regardless of student characteristics.

Higher academic emphasis. In the more effective schools teachers assigned morehomework, students reported doing more homework, teachers provided feedback onhomework assignments, teachers had higher expectations for student success, teachersspent more of the school day teaching, and schools used collaborative teacherplanning for courses. Most students followed similar curricula with a high proportionof academic courses.

Quality of teaching. In the more successful schools the teaching style was more aptto include teaching to the entire class (rather than separately to individual pupils)and developing a cooperative and productive environment. Students in theseeffective schools rated teacher quality high.

Availability of incentives and rewards. Schools that provided more incentives andrewards, including classroom praise, school wide praise, prizes and awards, and workdisplayed on school walls, had better attendance, achievement and behavior.

Good conditions and discipline for students. The more effective schools haddeveloped pleasant environments by providing students with greater access to thebuilding, to telephones and snacks, etc., and had teachers who were willing to discusspersonal issues with students. Students also reported fewer discipline problems.

Extent tostudentsto have

which students can assume responsibility. In schools that providedwith opportunities to hold responsible positions, students were more likelyhigher attendance and achievement and better behavior.

One of the reports summarized its findings about schools that had high attendancerates and low dropout rates:

.the internal organizational features of schools can have significant educativeconsequences for all students, and especially at-risk youth. A picture emerges fromour analyses of a distinctive organizational environment that appears particularlyeffective: smaller schools where there are substantial opportunities for informaladult-student interactions, where teachers are committed to and interested in workingwith students, and where students are pursuing similar courses of academic studywithin an environment that is safe and orderly. These are institutions whosestructure and functioning coalesce around a sense of shared purpose. The result isa coherent school life that is apparently able to engage both students and teachersalike."

The authors of both studies suggest that schools and teachers can make deliberateimprovements in the ways that schools are organized and structured that will raise studentattendance, achievement and behavior.

16

Overall, elementary schools in Chicago have relatively high attendance rates.However, all schools have some students with poor attendance patterns who are jeopardizingtheir chances for future success. As we have noted, research shows that attendance in earlyelementary grades is highly predictive of whether students will eventually graduate from highschool.

High school attendance in Chicago is much worse. Only a few, selective high schoolshave high attendance rates. Given the strong connection between truancy and dropping out,attendance should be a high priority component of school improvement planning.

The research reviewed in this report and the statistics for the Chicago Public Schoolsshow that better attendance is related to higher student achievement. However, we havenot found any obvious, clear cut methods or simple programs that lead directly to betterattendance. Elementary school attendance increases when parents and schools cooperateto attain the same goals. High schools that emphasize academics and that have teacherswho respect students have higher attendance. Schools attempting to improve attendanceshould study the type of research discussed in this paper. Then they can develop creativeprograms that will meet their specific needs and improve attendance.

17 23

NOTES

1. Coleman J. S., Hoffer T., & Kilgore S. (1982). High school achievement. New York:Basic Books.

2. Rutter M., Maughan B., Mortimore P., & Ousten J. (1979). Fifteen thousand hows.Secondary schools and their effects on children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

3. Wiley, D., & Harnischfeger, A. (1974). Explosion of a myth: Quantity of schoolingand exposure to instruction, major educational vehicles. Educational Researcher, 3, 7-12.

4. Easton, J. Q., & Engelhard, G. (1982). A longitudinal record of elementary schoolabsence and its relationship to reading achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 75,269-274.

5. Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill Company.

6. Sween, J., Kyle, C. L, & Reyes, 0. (1987). Chicago public high schools: How theirstudents' low income, reading scores, and attendance rates relate to dropout level and type ofschooL Chicago: DePaul University, Department of Sociology, Chicago Area Studies Center.

7. Ibid.

8. Bryk, A. S., & Thum, Y. M. (1989). The effects of high school organization ondropping out: An exploratory investigation. American Educational Research Journa4 26, 353-383.

9. Hess, G. A., Lyons, A., Corsino, L, & Wells, E. (19E9). Against the odds: The earlyidentification of dropouts. Chicago: Chicago Panel on Public School Policy and Finance.

10. Easton & Engelhard.

11. Ibid.

12. Easton, J. Q., & Storey S. (1990). June 1989 Grade Retention in Chicago PublicElementary Schools. Chicago: Chicago Panel on Public School Policy and Finance.

13. Hess, F. & Lauber, D. (1985). Dropouts from the Chicago Public Schools, an analysisof dropout rates of 1982, 1983, and 1984, by individual schools, based on 100,000 studentrecords. Chicago: Chicago Panel on Public School Policy and Finance.

14. Bryk & Thum.

15. Monk, D.H & Mohd, M.A. (1984). Patterns of absence and pupil achievement.American Educational Research Journal, 21(2), 295-311.

18

16. This list was compiled from a number of different studies, some specifically aboutattendance and others that were more general but discussed attendance. The sources forthis list are:

Eastwold, P. (1989). Attendance is important: Combating truancy in the secondaryschool. NASSP Bulletin, 73 (516), 28-29.

Illinois Task Force on Children Out of Schoo4 Recommendations to Illinois State Boardof Education, August 31, 1979. Chicago: Illinois Task Force on Children Out of School.

Not Just Punishment: Discipline in Schools That Work (1984). Chicago: AlternativeSchools Network and Designs for Change.

Rosen, J. (1979). What Are Other Schools Doing to Cut Absenteeism? An Ideabook.Chicago: Illinois Task Force on Children Out of School.

Thomson, S., & Stanard, D. (1975). Student attendance and absenteeism. ThePractitioner, 1. Cited in Porwoll, P. (1977). Student Absenteeism. Arlington, Va.: EducationalResearch Service.

17. Bryk & Thum.

18. Comer, J. (1980). School Power. New York: The Free Press.

19. Rutter, et al. and Bryk & Thum.

20. Bryk & Thum.

19

25

HIGH SCHOOL ATTENDANCE RATESChicago Public Schools 1985-86 through 1988-89

Community Ares Unit/ Dint Schad NamTtl Earl1988-89

Attd. Rate Attd. Rate

192546 1986-87

Attd. Retie

198748Altd. Rd*198849

I Roger. Park 1570 11 SULLIVAN HIGH SCHOOL 1,206 85.9 88.6 84.9 82.42 Wee Ridge 1480 11 MATHES HIGH SCHOOL 1,782 87.7 87.3 87.4 88.04 Limola Spine 1210 11 AMUNDSEN HIGH SCHOO 1,704 84.7 84.7 74.9 70.0S North Caster 1440 11 LANE TIICHNICAL HIGH 4,100 90.7 91.0 90.6 00.46 Laim View 1430 11 LAKE VIEW HIGH SCHOO 1,190 83.6 83.6 81.2 80.87 Linda Park 1620 11 LINCOLN PAKHIGHJ 1,292 83.1 87.4 86.5 83.68 Neat North Side 1050 11 NEAR NORTH CARFSR M 988 83.4 83.2 80.4 79.0

1800 11 CHICAGO METROPOLITA 331 88.1 89.1 85.8 112.9

10 Harwood Park 1580 11 TAFT HIGH 3CHOOL 1,818 90.4 88.6 85.6 16.013 North Park 1610 I I VON STEUBEN METROPO 1,281 93.1 93.5 91.2 90.314 Athwq Park 1520 1 1 ROOSEVELT HIGH SCHO 1,682 87.2 87.1 85.0 12.015 Portage Park 1330 11 FOREMAN HIGH SCHOOL 1,367 83.2 83.8 79.4 77.516 Irving Park 1530 1 1 SCHURZ HIGH SCHOOL. 3,135 80.0 80.0 77.8 78.219 Heiman Cragin 1070 I 1 PROSSER VOCATIONAL H 1,203 89.5 89.1 87.8 88.4

1560 I 1 STEINMETZ HIGH SCHOO 2,013 87.5 86.7 84.6 83.420 Hermosa 1410 I I KELVYN PARK HIGH SCH 1,576 85.4 84.0 80.3 10.623 Humboldt Park 1160 I 1 WESTINGHOUSE AREA V 1,583 90.0 88.8 82.5 82.0

1830 I 1 ORR COMMUNITY ACAD 1,688 81.5 83 9 80.5 80.324 West Town 1640 I 1 WELLS COMMUNITY AC 1,772 83.1 83.8 81.1 81.8

1840 11 CLEMENTE COMMUNITY 2,874 82.4 82.1 79.9 77.225 Austin 1220 II AUSTIN COMMUNITY AC 1,977 81.1 78.8 77.5 n.127 East Garfield Park 1040 I 1 FLOWER VOCATIONAL H 479 84.1 83.9 79.2 73.6

1460 I 1 MANLEY HIGH SCHOOL 917 77.4 76.1 72.7 70.51470 I I MARSHALL METROPOLIT 1,864 82.9 82.8 80.1 76.8

28 Near West Side 1020 1 1 CREGIER VOCATIONAL H 547 81.2 77.5 69.0 65.31270 II CRANE HIGH SCHOOL 1,192 69.8 68.7 66.5 67.61810 1 1 YOUNG MAGNET HIGH S 2,046 91.0 91.1 90.4 91.31890 I I JUAREZ HIGH SCHOOL 1,881 84.5 86.4 83.4 86.3

29 North Lawodale 1880 1 1 iCOLLINS HIGH SCHOOL 1,417 81.4 79.9 75.5 72.830 South Lawodale 1300 II FARRAGUT CAREER ACA 2,179 76.2 77.5 76.7 78.432 Loop 1060 1 1 JONES METROPOLITAN H 741 90.4 90.8 89.2 89.635 Douglas 1030 I I DUNBAR VOCATIONAL H 2,275 89.9 89.0 88.1 86.8

1510 1 1 PHILLIPS HIGH SCHOOL 1,577 79.5 77.9 76.5 75.138 Grand Boulevard 1280 1 1 DUSABLE HIGH SCHOOL 1,556 73. I 75.3 71.1 69.539 Keuwood 1710 1 1 KENWOOD ACADEMY 1,818 92.0 92.4 87.6 84.7

1760 I 1 KING HIGH SCHOOL 1,201 80.3 78.0 70.2 68.942 Woodlawm 1390 1 1 HYDE PARK CAREER AC 2,422 88.9 89.0 85.8 83.943 South Shore 1550 1 1 SOUTH SHORE COMMUNI 1,688 j_ 84.4 85.1 83.7 80.845 Avalon Park 1010 1 1 CHICAGO VOCATIONAL 3,158 89.7 88.8 86.2 86.14 Calumet Heights 1240 I I BOWEN HIGH SCHOOL 2,002 85.6 84.2 81.2 77.949 Ranked 1310 1 1 FENGER HIGH SCHOOL 1,717 89.9 89.3 87.6 86.7

1350 1 1 HARLAN COMMUNITY A 1,222 82.8 85.1 80.5 78.950 Pullman 11360 I I CORLISS HIGH SCHOOL' 1,797 88.2 89.4 86.3 86.951 South Doering 1630 I I WASHINGTON HIGH SCH 1,547 88.9 89.4 88.2 86.654 Riverdale 1850 1 1 CARVER AREA HIGH SCH 1,062 86.8 86 5 83.2 80.656 Garfield Ridge 1420 11 KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL 1,246 87.9 85.2 79.8 75.057 Archer Heights 1820 1 1 CURIE METROPOLITAN H 3,387

t-88.4 87.9 84.0 83.3

58 Brighton Park 1400 I I KELLY HIGH SCHOOL 1,732 75.1 74.6 70.0 72.0

20

MOH SCHOOL ATTENDANCE RATESChicago Public Schools 19115-86 through 1981-119

Commity Ares Usk/ Giat, Baud NeseTd End198849

And. Rep Aftd. R. And. Rine198546 198647 193748

Aid. Rale198849

61 New City 1590 11 TILDEN MOH SCHOOL 1,618 81.9 73.6 76.3 75.163 Gyp Perk 1110 II RICHARDS 'VOCATIONAL 794 87.8 $7.8 33.3 82.7

I 340 11 GAOE FARB WON SCHOn 1,313 84.7 82.9 30.6 79.465 Wee Lew. 1670 I I !omit) IOW SCHOOt. 1,294 86.1 87.4 83.2 19.067 Wed Eaglewood 1360 11 HARPER /11011 SCHOOL 1,102 84.1 83.1 77.4 74.8

1450 I I UNDSLOM TECH 1110H $ 1,452 91.7 90.8 U.1 17.368 Esglewood 1320 I I ROBISON HIGH SCHOOL 1,752 83.1 80.8 76.2 76.1

1680 2/ ENGLEWOOD 1110H SCHO 1,698 81.9 79.1 73.1 71.469 Mesta Greed Crooks 1380 I I HIRSCH METROPOLITAN 1,013 85.9 8t 5 82.4 80.770 Aileen 1230 11 1100AN H1OH SCHOOL 2,391 91.1 90. 87.8 88.871 Aubuts Gresham 1150 11 SIMEON VOCATIONAL HI 1,671 89.2 83.9 83.9 14.3

1250 I I CALUMET HIGH SCHOOL 1,461 85.5 81.9 80.1 77.673 Weshivos Heights 1370 I I JULIAN HIGH SCHOOL 2,091 88.4 88.2 83.2 82.774 Mond Greuwood 1790 I I CHICAGO HIGH SCH FOR 445 92.6 90.8 90.8 89.375 Marrs Pot 1490 I I MORGAN PARK HIGH SC 1,908 92.0 92 5 90.4 89.277 Edgewnos 1540 11 SENN MEIROPOUTAN HI 2,222 86.0 84.3 83.2 84.2

2127

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE RATESChicago Public &boob 1985-86 through 1988-89

Td Enal. Attd. Rats Md. Roe Md. Roe And. Raft

An° Unia.1 Dial School Num 1911849 1985-86 198647 1987-88 1981149

1 Rogers Park 3350 2 FULD SUM SCHOOL 1,081 94.0 93.7 92.2 92.33480 2 GALE COBOAUNITY ACA 935 94.7 94.8 94.1 94.34300 2 113111111111AM SCHOOL 963 92.3 92.9 92.3 92.1

2 Wad Ridge 2030 2 0 ARMSTRONG BUM SC 771 92.9 94.3 93.8 94.52320 2 BOONE BUM SCHOOL 765 93.8 95.2 93.5 94.02810 2 CLINTON MEM SCHOOL 982 94.0 95.5 94.5 94.52990 2 DECATUR CLASSICAL SC 237 95.6 96.5 95.4 95.04180 2 JAMIESON SLIM BC1100 734 95.5 95.1 94.0 95.35630 1 ROGERS ELEM SCHOOL 605 93.9 93.9 93.0 94.26070 2 STONE SCHOLASI1C ACA1 708 95.2 95.3 93.6 94.3

3 Uptown 3590 2 OOUDY ELEM SCHOOL 601 91.3 92.5 91.0 91.64590 2 ARAI MIDDLE SCHOOL 844 89.5 90.8 89.6 119.3

6040 2 STEWART ELEM SCHOOL 485 93.1 93.4 92.8 94.26060 2 STOCKTON ELEM SCHOO 834 92.1 92.3 91.4 91.66340 2 MARTI BLNGL BD CR-BR 124 95.8 95.6 94.0 93.16600 2 BRENNEMAN ELEM SCH 651 92.9 94 0 93.1 93.56710 2 MCCUTCHEON SCHOOL- 224 94.7 94.7 93.6 93.46910 2 MCCUTCHEON ELEM SC 456 92.6 93.2 92.1 92.48000 2 DISNEY MAONET KHOO 1,633 94.2 94.5 92.6 94.1

4 Lincoln Square 2440 1 BUDLONO ELEM SCHOOL 717 93.7 94.7 93.9 93.72750 2 CHAPPELL ELEM SCHOO 453 94.0 94.7 92.5 92.94300 2 MCPHERSON ELEM SCHO 1,125 92.5 93.4 91.4 92.46370 1 WATERS ELEM SCHOOL 533 92.7 92.5 91.3 92.0

5 North Carder 2110 2 AUDUBON ELEM SCHOO 551 92.2 93.0 91.9 90.9U70 2 BELL ELEM SCHOOL 672 94.5 95.0 94.5 94.821180 2 COONLEY MEM SCHOOL 518 92.4 93.5 92.8 91.94170 3 JAHN ELEM SCHOOL 626 92.3 92.8 91.5 92.45790 3 SCHNEIDER ELEM SCHO 369 92.9 92.3 91.5 92.3

6 Lake View 2030 2 AGASSIZ ELEM SCHOOL 356 92.1 93.8 93.6 93.62300 2 BLAINE ELEM SCHOOL 577 93.2 93.3 92.9 92.12470 2 BURLEY ELEM SCHOOL 430 92.6 92.4 90.9 91.42730 2 GREELEY ELEM SCHOOL 586 92.9 93.2 91.6 93.13730 2 HAMILTON ELEM SCHOO 465 91.2 92.1 90.6 89.73830 2 HAWTHORNE SCHOLAST 536 96.3 96.2 96.2 96.14440 2 LEMOYNE ELEM SCHOO 388 92.3 91.0 89.1 89.54890 2 INTER-AMER1CAN MAGN 597 95.2 95.9 95.1 95.45070 2 NETTELHORST ELEM SC 440 91.5 92.4 90.5 91.05550 2 RAVENSWOOD ELEM SC 535 92.8 93.6 92.9 93.2

7 Lincoln Park 2040 2 ALCOTT ELEM SCHOOL 470 92.6 93.0 91.8 92.64420 2 LA SALLE LANGUAGE A 564 96.0 96.1 95.5 95.54480 2 LINCOLN ELEM SCHOOL 557 95.3 95.3 94.6 95.14680 2 MAYER ELEMENTARY Sq 654 93.7 94.1 92.7 92.95010 2 MULLIGAN ELEM SCH001 301 91.6 93.0 90.5 91.05080 2 NEWBERRY MAGNET SC 641 95.9 95.9 94.8 95.55500 3 PRESCOTT ELEM SCHOO 490 94.4 93.8 92.5, 92.8

8 Near North Side 2560 2 BYRD COMMUNITY ACA 537 93.4 92.7 :2.8 92.43420 2 FRANKLIN MAGNET SCH 367 95.7 95.9 95.1 95.54200 2 JENNER ELEM SCHOOL 587 93.2 92.0 93.0 93.74580 2 MANIERRE ELEM SCHOO 441 94.6 94.6 94.3 93.85150 2 OGDEN ELEM SCHOOL 498 94.1 94.1 93.4 94.25760 2 SCHILLER ELEM SCHOOLI 314 93.3 92.8 91.1 89.27900 2 TRUTH ELEM SCHOOL 1 514 92.0 91.5 91.1 89.3

22

23

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE RATESChicago Public Schools 1995-16 through 191111-119

Comm* Mu Uoid Dime Mod IlmosiEDINGER SLIM SCHOOL

Td Esti.1918-89

212

Mid. R. Md. Rats1911546 198647

92.3 93.5

Mtd. R. And. Rids1987-U 1988-110

92.0 92.79 Edina Palk 3150 1

10 Norwood Park 2220 I SAISON SCHOOL 242 96.1 96.0 95.8 96.03510 1 0Altily SUN SCHOOL 341 95.1 95.0 93.9 94.04010 1 HITCH Wad SCHOOL 404 93.3 93.7 94.1 9435120 1 NORWOOD PARK ELEM S 173 94.5 95.0 94.7 94.85190 1 ONAHANILEM SCHOOL 295 94.1 95.1 94.7 95.05200 1 ORIOLE PARK BLEW ICH 213 92.4 93.3 90.8 91.9

I I kffersca Park 2240 1 MOM ELEM SCHOO 462 93.7 94.0 92.7 93.73280 1 FARNSWORTH MEM SCH 429 94.1 94.6 93.6 94.4

12 Forest Gem 3170 1 EbOtuatone SUN SCHO 206 94.3 :3.2 92.9 94.06470 1 WILDWVIOD ELEM SCHO 125 93. I 94.3 93.9 94.6

13 North Park 5410 1 PETERSON 1LEM WHO° 691 95.7 96.0 95.1 911.6

5690 1 SAUGANASH SUM SCHO 264 93.4 92.8 92.0 03.45980 1 SOLOMON ELEM SCHOO 310 93.7 94.4 93.3 93.1

14 Alboxy Park 3810 1 HAUGAN ELEM SCHOOL 1,361 93.1 93.2 92.3 92.34000 1 HIBC A_RD MEM SCHOOL 753 94.1 94.6 94.1 94.25260 1 PALMER ELEM SCHOOL 497 94.6 95.2 94.3 95.16270 1 VOLTA ELEM SCHOOL 740 96.0 96.2 95.6 95.56290 I VON STEUBEN UPPER CY 169 94.1 92.3 91.1 119.3

15 Portage Park 3620 1 GRAY ELEM SCHOOL 634 94.1 93.9 92.0 92.55490 1 PORTAGE PARK ELEM 3C 608 94.7 94.9 93.3 93.25510 1 PRUSSINO ELEM SCHOOL 414 93.2 93.3 92.2 92.95600 1 REINBERG ELEMENTARY 430 91.4 91.2 89.6 91.25960 1 SMYSER ELEM SCHOOL 391 94.4 94.5 93.0 92.9

16 Irving Park 2190 1 BATEMAN ELEM SCHOO 1,023 92.5 92.8 91.5 92.02260 1 BELDING ELEM SCHOOL 494 93.8 94.3 93.5 03.92800 I CLEVELAND ELEM SCHO 540 92.8 92.4 91.6 91.83940 1 HENRY ELEM SCHOOL 702 91.6 92.9 91.6 92.74150 1 IRVING PARK 480 91.5 92.2 89.6 90.85020 1 MURPHY ELEM SCHOOL 430 92.7 93.9 93.1 93.45590 3 REILLY ELEM SCHOOL 750 94.2 95.1 94.5 94.75730 1 SCAMMON ELEM SCHOO 566 94.4 94.7 93.2 93.8

17 Dunning 2380 1 BRIDGE ELEM SCHOOL 446 93.9 95.1 93.6 95.02620 1 CANTY ELEM SCHOOL 342 94.3 94.3 92.0 93.23020 1 DEVER ELEM SCHOOL 515 94.3 94.5 93.4 93.86190 1 0 A THORP ELEMENTAR 725 94.3 95.1 94.3 95.2

III Mostclato 4510 1 LOCKE MEM SCHOOL 5901 93.8 93.5 91.7 92.419 %hood Cragin 2450 1 BURBANK ELEM SCHOOL 783 94.6 94.5 93.4 94.1

3270 1 FALCONER ELEM SCHOO 733 92.9 93.6 91.9 93.24500 1 LLOYD ELEMENTARY SC 657 93.3 93.2 91.7 93.14560 1 LYON BLEW SCHOOL 565 93.1 92.7 90.6 91.34770 1 HANSON PARK ELEM SC 722 93.1 93.4 91.8 92.95800 1 SCHUBERT ELEM SCHOO 633 92.9 93.1 92.2 93.0

20 Holum 2160 1 BARRY BUM SCHOOL 634 93.9 94.7 93.8 93.95100 3 NIXON ELEM SCHOOL 1,011 94.1 93.9 92.7 93.1

21 Avoid& 2140 3 AVONDALE ELEM SCHO 1,007 93.4 93.8 93.2 94.34490 3 L1NNE ELEM SCHOOL 777 93.4 93.9 91.7 91.8

22 Logo Spore 2370 3 BRENTANO BUM SCH001 1,227 93.5 93.3 92.1 92.52760 3 CHASE BUM SCHOOL 753 93.5 93.3 91.7 V2.92960 3 DARWIN SUM SCHOOL 1,390 92.3 92.3 90.6 91.73120 3 DRUMMOND ELEM WHO 436 94.2 93.6 93.7 93.73460 3 FUNSTON ELEM SCHOOL 884 93.0 93.1 92.5 93.2

23

29

ELEMENTARY SCPOOL ATTENDANCE RATESChimp Public hook 190-86 through 1918-89

Coneveity Area Usk/ Died Mod ItoonTd End.198849

Md. Rite1985-86

Md. lift198617

Md. R. Miti. 101987-88 19$1110

22 Lain Squin 3560 3 ooinibu,sti SCHOOL 1,005 94.6 94.7 94.0 944oostivad) 4850 3 )4011110011,11$4- NTAKY 922 92.5 93.6 92.5 93.4

5000 3 moSolktailli =Om 725 94.0 94.2 92.0 93.0

5520 3 MAIM ILIKICIOOL 1,204 91.8 92.7 92.2 93.06510 3 yAilisittail SCOWL 1,139 91.9 92.7 91.5 911

23 Humboldt Park 2610 3 Omit* tgaiiIitAft 1,573 90.8 91.2 90.6 91.1

4540 3 LOWELL 11111$9301001., 1,163 92.4 92.4 92.3 91.34900 3 MORSE EOM SCHOOL 668 92.7 92.9 915 9135110 3 NOEL ELEMENTAIT SC 843 93.3 93.3 91.6 9215210 3 PICCOLO SUM SCHOOL 1,093 93.5 93.7 92.3 9405470 3 LAURA WARDISLIKONT 772 91.7 91.1 90.4 19.1

MO 3 MINK* WM SCHOOL 725 93.6 93.2 92.6 9336080 3 STOWEELEM SCHOOL 1,438 92.7 93.2 91.9 92.36640 3 LOWELL MUNCH 275 n/a n/a n/a 119.2

6800 3 MORTON CASEElt ACAD 456 89.5 89.8 88.6 88.47400 3 PICCOLO 11111A14-111DDLE 711 92.3 92.7 91.8 9307410 3 MORTON X 'V 0 C 128 82.3 79.0 80.0 75.97500 3 WEIGHT BUM SCHOOL 447 94.2 93.8 92.4 91.7

24 Wou Tows 2060 3 ANDENSEN ELEM SCHOO 766 93.1 93.1 91.5 94.02530 3 swim ELM SCHOOL 522 93.6 94.9 93.1 94.42640 3 CARPENTER ELEMENTA 810 94.2 93.7 93.4 93.12770 3 CHOPIN ELEMENTARY 1 808 92.1 91.9 91.8 92.32350 3 COLUMBUS ELVA SCHO 398 94.8 94.9 93.1 94.64380 3 KOSCIDSZKO ELEM SCH 1,126 93.9 94.9 93.3 93.74400 3 LAFAYETTE LEM SCHO 1,314 92.1 92.3 92.2 92.54840 3 twat= ELEM SCHOO 593 93.6 93.9 92.6 93.64870 3 MOOS ELEMSCHOOL 853 94.5 95.1 94.2 9435220 3 OTIS ELEM SCHOOL 782 92.1 91.9 91.3 91.95330 3 PEABODY ELEM SCHOOL 650 94.1 93.4 92.1 94.36140 3 TALC017 ELEM SCHOOL 1,105 91.1 91.6 90.5 91.26280 3 VON HUMBOLDT ELEM S 1,217 90.9 91.8 91.2 90.76460 3 PRITZKER ELEM SCHOOL 626 93.2 94.2 93.2 93.67310 3 ANDERSEN ED VOC OUID 65 83.2 84.4 83.5 84.37420 3 DIEGO COMMUNITY ACA 1,461 94.5 94.3 93.3 94.17790 3 SABIN MAGNET SCHOOL 489 95.4 95.5 94.0 95.0

25 Austin 2230 4 CLARK ELEM-BRANCH 0 150 93.8 93.6 94.1 9312550 1 BYFORD ELEMENTARY S 637 92.1 92.7 90.9 90.53220 4 ELL1NOTON ELEM SCHO 420 91.4 92.3 91.1 92.03221 4 ELLINGTON BRANCH SC 232 90.0 91.0 89.4 9033230 4 EMMET ELEM SCHOOL 750 92.9 92.7 92.6 92.23840 1 HAY Comm:wry ACAD 1,036 92.9 93.3 92.2 92.13910 4 HEFFERAN ELEM SCHOO 658 93.9 94.5 94.1 94.14060 1 HOWE ELEM SCHOOL 1,307 93.1 94.1 92.4 93.04280 4 MUM SCHOOL 735 92.6 92.9 91.6 92.14450 1 LEWIS ELEM SCHOOL 689 92.7 93.0 90.9 92.34530 1 LOVETT ELEM 3CHO41L 472 93.6 93.6 91.8 92.34670 4 MAY ELEM SCHOOL 1,004 93.7 94.5 92.1 93.15050 4 NASH ELEM SCHOOL 1,215 92.3 92.7 91.7 91.95700 4 L ARMSTRONG ELEMENT 217 94.9 95.3 93.9 94.65720 1 SAYRE LANGUAGE ACAD 478 94.7 95.2 93.6 94.56000 4 SPENCER ELEM SCHOOL 955 91.1 91.8 92.0 92.06520 1 YOUNG ELEM SCHOOL 927 93.5 94.4 92.1 92.4

2430


111 Earl. And. Rae Attd. Rae Md. Rae Md. Ile leCoasesky Area Unit/ Dia% Nati Peak 1988-19 1915-16 191647 1917411 19814925 Antis 6390 4 MARCONI COMMUNITY 599 94.0 94.1 93.5 94.0

(ceetaved) 6620 4 MAK MID= SCHOOL 528 90.9 92.1 89.7 90.06630 4 DOUGLASSMIDDLE SCH 731 92.2 93.1 92.1 92.27040 1 HAY commutart ACM) 363 93.8 93.8 92.6 92.07320 4 ATOUTIONO SCHOOL-SR 259 93.5 93.3 91.2 91.28050 4 DE 11111117 Wed $1C1100 530 93.5 93.0 91.7 92.5

26 Wat ()afield Pk 3030 4 DELNO BUM SC11001. 658 92.2 92.4 92.5 NI6110 5 SUMS ELSISCHOOL 583 94.0 93.2 91.7 92.76210 4 TILTON ELEM SCHOOL 809 92.6 93.2 91.9 92.46380 5 WEBSTER ELM SCHOOL 548 94.5 94,8 94.0 94.17190 4 MELODY ELEM SCHOOL 626 95.0 95.0 93.9 93.11

7840 4 clowsuarr SLIM SCHO /17 93.2 92.6 91.6 93727 East Garfield Pk 2250 4 BEIDLERELM SCHOOL 521 92.1 91,6 90.6 913

3050 4 DODOS MEM SCHOOL 521 90.6 90.7 89.8 90.43240 4 ERICSON ELM SCHOOL 712 92.6 93.7 92.0 92.43660 5 GREGORY ELEM SCHOOL 691 92.2 92.9 92.2 91.94310 4 KINGELEM SCHOOL 478 94.4 95.1 94.0 93.64640 4 FARADAY SLIM SCHOOL 794 92.8 93.0 92.2 91.16610 4 CAIXOUN NORTH MEM 668 92.4 91.3 91.7 92.36730 4 CATHER ELEM SCHOOL 572 91.1 92.3 90.6 9116920 4 JENSEN SCHOLASTIC AC 695 95.7 95.6 94.2 9537140 4 ROENTGEN ED VOC GUI 169 80.1 80.9 74.3 74.08020 5 BETHUNE ELEM SCHOOL 789 90.6 91.1 89.6 NJ

23 Neer Weet Side 2400 4 BROWN ELEM SCHOOL 533 92.6 92.1 91.0 91A3540 4 GLADSTONE ELEM SCHO 558 93.0 94.0 92.5 92.53610 4 GRANT ELEM SCHOOL 983 91.9 91.2 90.1 89.03950 4 HERBERT ELEM SCHOOL 433 91.8 91.0 88.8 89.74190 4 JEFFERSON MEM SCHOO 455 91.3 91.6 90.8 9134690 4 JACKSON LANGUAGE AC 541 95.0 95.3 94.1 95.24810 4 MEDIU. PRIMARY ELEM 618 91.6 91.3 89.9 90.44820 4 MEDIU INT de UPPER S 434 90.7 87.6 87.6 15.35350 4 IRVING ELEM SCHOOL 367 n.3 92.9 92.2 92.15620 4 RES ELEMENTARY SCHO 526 92.1 90.7 90.5 9015940 4 SKINNER CLASSICAL SC 431 87.8 85.6 86.5 86.35970 4 SMYTH ELEM SCHOOL 798 91.7 91.3 88.3 U.66090 4 SUDER ELEM SCHOOL 664 91.9 92.3 90.8 91.26740 4 DE1T ELVA SCHOOL 552 92.1 92.2 90.7 91.37460 4 MCKINLEY E V 0 C 89 75.2 67.9 68.2 61.0

29 North Lawndele 2740 5 CHALMERS ELEM WHOA 537 92.2 91.3 89.1 91.13970 5 HEIM HUM SCHOOL 866 91.4 92.2 90.0 91.24070 5 HOWLAND ELEM SCHOO 551 92.1 93.3 92.1 93.14110 5 HUMS SUMENTARY 3 507 91.2 91.4 90.7 91.94430 5 LAWNDALE COMMUN1T 964 94.5 95.1 93.1 94.24650 5 MASON ELEMENTARY 3C 1,532 93.2 92.9 91.4 91.75370 5 PENN ELEM SCHOOL 806 92.2 91.6 90.4 90.15450 5 PLAMONDON ELEM Sal 277 94.5 94.5 94.2 93.85480 5 POPE MEM SCHOOL 579 93.3 94.3 92.3 92.16570 5 HENSON SLEW SCHOOL 359 92.2 92.4 91.2 91.96750 5 LATHROPELEM SCHOOL 592 92.5 92.0 91.0 90.96760 5 DVORAK MEM SCHOOL 623 94.2 94.3 93.4 9336940 5 JOHNSON ELEMENTARY 335 92.9 92.2 91.1 91.8

5 FRAZIER ELEM SCHOOL 659 93.1 93.2 92.0 92.7

2531


Ttl End. And. Rate And. R. And. Rate And. RateArea thud Dint $011001***16 1988-89 198546 1986-87 1987-88 198$49

30 South Lawedele 2510 5 ' 1 c i i '' SCHOOL 1,017 94.1 94.4 93.6 94.22910 5 ColelltYILM Scam 918 93.8 94.3 93.3 9402940 5 atOlont COmMuNrri AC 700 93.3 93.0 92.7 93.53370 5 ItANOOHMAOksi slam 772 96.3 96.5 95.8 05.93520 5 -GARY ELM SCHOOL 1,923 94.9 95.5 95.0 95.13750 5 HAMM) ILIMICHOO 934 93.3 96.1 95.0 9534250 5 SAWIDO MAGNET 8CH 1,121 94.7 95.1 93.9 94.64320 5 CARDENAS SLIM SCHOO 928 93.3 93.1 92.5 93.64720 5 MC CORM= ELEM SCH 1,025 94.1 94.1 93.4 93.1

6010 5 *KY EMI scHoot, 1,451 94.5 93.9 93.7 94.06310 5 MCCORMICK BRANCH 455 93.6 94.2 94.1 94.06440 5 WIITTHEYELEMENTARY 1,105 95.6 95.8 95.4 96.06930 5 PADEREWEITIELEM SCH 552 93.0 92.9 89.8 92.1

31 Lower Wen Side 2890 5 COOPER ELVA SCHOOL 958 94.8 95.3 93.4 92.74210 5 PILSEN COMMUNITY AC 1,001 95.4 94.8 94.4 94.64230 5 JUNOMAN ELEM SCHOO 546 95.7 95.7 94.2 95.04231 5 HIDALGO YVOSTILLA-I 81 oh oh oh 95.34232 5 IUNOMAN BRANCH 88 94.2 95.7 94.2 94.54370 5 KOMENSKY ELEM SCHO 516 94.2 95.1 94.4 94.25430 5 PICHARD ELEM SCHOOL 878 94.1 94.5 93.2 94.06320 5 WALSH ELEM SCHOOL. 482 95.1 96.1 94.9 94.76450 5 WILTITIER ELEM SCHOOL 474 94.1 93.4 91.5 92.46720 5 SALAZAR BILINGUAL CE 305 95.6 95.7 95.0 96.27330 5 WHIMER BRANCH 233 oh 94.7 93.6 93.17610 5 OROZCO UPPER CYCLE C 882 93.8 94.7 93.4 93.8

33 Neer South Side 3960 6 SOUTH LOOP 439 o/a a/a 93.7 93.03961 6 SOUTH LOOP BRANCH 155 oh oh 92.1 93.9

34 Anaour Square 2010 6 ABBOTT SUM SCHOOL 495 91.2 90.8 89.3 90.63700 6 HAINES ELEM SCHOOL 479 93.0 92.7 92.6 92.4

Douglas 2100 6 ATTOCILS ELEM SCHOOL 716 91.1 90.9 91.4 90.33070 6 DOOLTTTLE INTER-UPPE 499 90.7 90.5 88.8 89.93090 6 DOUGLAS COMMUNITY 602 90.0 90.6 90.0 91.33100 6 DRAKE RUM SCHOOL 412 93.8 93.5 91.9 91.53790 8 HARTIOAN ELEM SCHOO 777 92.7 92.6 91.2 90.14700 6 MAYO ELEM SCHOOL. 682 93.3 93.0 92.8 93.35400 6 PERSHING MAGNET SCH 288 97.0 97.0 96.2 96.05570 6 RAYMOND ELEM scH00 814 91.4 91.7 90.4 89.96330 6 TAMEsIWARD ELEMENTA 281 94.7 94.5 93.6 93.45490 6 WILLIAMS ELEM SCHOO 1,144 91.4 91.0 89.7 88.97340 6 DRAKE ED VOC OVID CT 69 84.1 84.9 78.7 78.67620 6 Docurnx PRIMARY EL 876 90.2 89.8 90.5 89.8

36 Oakland 3210 6 EINSTEIN ELEM SCHOOL 505 93.2 93.1 91.2 90.86780 6 ROBINSON ELEM-BR OF 240 03.7 92.6 92.4 91.96790 6 DONOGHUE MEM SCHO 509 90.5 90.8 90.7 89.8

37 Fuller Park 3930 8 HENDRICKS MEM :WHO 488 91.6 92.2 90.1 91.76540 8 BEETHOVEN ELEM SCHO 810 88.8 88.8 85.6 88.3

3$ Grand Boulevard 2840 8 COLMAN ELEM SCHOOL 776 89.5 89.8 89.3 89.23300 8 PARREN ELEM SCHOOL 906 88.4 89.2 87.6 87.23440 6 FULLER ELEM SCHOOL 542 93.3 93.4 92.2 89.46820 8 MCCORKLE ELEM SCHO 545 90.0 90.9 88.9 88.9

26

32


Td Earl. And. Rats And. R. Mid. Rare Add. italeCommit), Area Usid Did/ &hog Now 19111149 198546 198647 198748 1981149

311 Grad Souhroad 6950 6 MOLUSON LEM SCHOO 501 91.8 92.2 91.3 00.9(ooathmiall) 6960 8 OVERTON SUM SCHOOL 853 91.9 92.2 90.3 90.1

7750 6 WOODSON (NORTH) BLS 434 91.7 91.6 89.9 90.37820 6 WOODSON (SOUTH) SLR I 672 93.3 93.5 92.0 91.7

39 Keawood 4260 6 WIRTHBXIUIMBNTAL$I 180 93.3 93.5 91.8 93.45910 6 1SAVIS SUM SCHOOL 639 90.8 92.1 91.7 91.65850 6 SHANESPHARS ILSMENT 511 92.1 93.2 91.1 91.35920 6 $11011011111 SUM SCHO 291 93.7 93.8 92.7 94.36810 6 PRICE Mr.!. 3CROOL 694 93.0 91.9 91.0 90.1

40 Warhiagtoa Park 2460 8 SUSHI SUM SCHOOL 587 92.5 92. I 90.0 90,32670 8 CARTER HUM SCHOOL 853 91.0 90.7 89.7 19.95280 8 PARKMAN MEM SCA00 381 93.8 93.8 91.4 91.95650 8 ROSS SUM SCHOOL 694 91.5 91.8 89.9 91.06660 8 *EASLEY ACADEMIC CE 1,200 96.8 96.8 95.4 96.16840 8 TERRELL EWA SCHOOL 708 89.9 90.2 89.9 90.08070 8 DYErf MIDDLE SCHOOL 825 91.4 91.4 89.1 89.9

41 Hyde Park 3780 6 'HARTZ ELEM SCHOOL 330 94.2 94.2 93.6 93.04390 6 KOZMINSKI COMMUNITY 552 93.0 93.4 93.1 93.05030 6 MURRAY LANGUAGE AC 329 95.5 96.0 94.9 95.45560 6 RAY ELEM SCHOOL 751 95.0 95.7 94.5 95.0

42 Woodlawa 2630 6 CARNEGIE ELEM SCHOO 424 93.3 93.6 91.7 92.23360 6 FISKE ELEM SCHOOL 465 91.8 92.5 92.0 90.54740 6 MC COSH ELEM SCHOOL 1,147 91.7 92.2 90.6 92.05290 9 PARK MANOR MEM SCH 578 93.6 94.1 93.2 93.35330 6 SE7CCON ELEM SCHOOL 688 92.0 92.1 91.6 90.86300 6 WADSWORTH ELEM SCH 516 91.8 92.4 92.9 93.66860 6 DULLES ELEM SCHOOL 725 91.9 92.3 90.9 91.26890 6 DUMAS ELEM SCHOOL 650 93.2 93.3 92.0 933

43 South Shore 2340 9 BRADWELL ELEM SCHU 1,160 91.1 90.7 90.0 89.82430 9 BRYN MAWR ELEM SCHO 1,571 94.2 93.8 93.2 92.93320 6 FERMI ELEM SCHOOL 572 92.5 93.4 91.2 92.04570 9 MADISON MEM SCHOOL 692 94.1 94.0 91.5 92.15180 9 OKEEFFE ELEM SCHOOL 894 91.9 92.3 90.9 91.75300 9 PARKSIDE commuNrry 688 94.0 94.1 93.2 92.37010 9 POWELL ELEM SCHOOL 719 93.1 93.0 90.9 92.57380 9 BI.YN MAWR ELEM SCHO 332 94.5 94.7 94.3 94.27861 9 BLACK MAGNET SCHOOL 174 96.6 96.5 95.7 96.2

44 Chatham 2520 9 BURNSIDE SCHOLASTIC 827 95.2 95.7 95.1 95.63040 9 DIXON ELEM SCHOOL 622 94.5 95.1 94.1 94.44750 9 MCDADE CLASSICAL SC 168 97.0 97.2 95.6 96.95060 9 NEIL ELEM SCHOOL 197 95.1 94.9 94.2 94.85440 9 PIER ELEM SCHOOL 545 95.0 95.2 94.5 94.36900 9 SBARBARO BUM SCHOO 598 92.2 91.6 92.0 91.17260 8 WESCOTT MEM SCHOOL 674 92.3 92.7 91.2 91.7

45 Awake Park 2130 9 AVALON PARK BLEU SC 675 93.4 94.0 93.1 93.32580 9 CALDWELL ELEM SCHO 634 93.7 93.5 92.0 92.84610 9 MANN ELEM SCHOOL 832 94.1 93.9 91.7 92.4

46 South Chicago 2830 9 couss ELEM Sam. 850 94.3 94.9 92.7 93 33720 9 NINOS HEROES MAGNET 762 95.1 95.4 94.1 94.85880 9 SHERIDAN ELEM SCHOO 1,709 93.9 93.8 93.0 92.56100 9 SULLIVAN ELEM SCHOO 778 94.1 94.3 91.7 93.2

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE RATESChicago Public Schools 19115-16 through 19U-19

Commumily Ana Uaid Did 0111401 SWila

I- Td Bud.1988-89

And. Rea And. Rite And. Raft 4,84. Raft19S5-86 1986417 1987-88 IMO

46 Sou* Climp 6180 9 N iforo 1611-840114T-ARY 867 93.8 93.7 92.0 92.1(easdnued) 6181 9 le VOCCHHDCE 24 80.6 15.7 81.5 76.11

47 Dunnids 5380 9 PI1r1IIl4ié10OL 592 93.7 94.1 92.9 93.648 Calmat Haiku 4080 9 HOVITAIELE841198800L 219 94.8 95.0 94.4 95.6

6350 9 ASSISt UM SCHOOL 480 95.1 95.4 94.5 95.37390 9 MCDOWELL, WOMAN 213 95.0 94.9 93.1 9447450 9 RAMAT 111.04.11*A14011 148 95.3 95.4 95.1 95.77860 9 SUCK MAGNET SCHOOL 259 96.7 97.0 95.8 97.0

49 Remlaod 22110 9 BENNETT EL= SCHOOL 431 94.5 94.9 93.3 9342281 9 SHEDD BLEMSRANCII 0 195 94.7 95.7 95.0 95.42360 10 BREHM BLEU SCHOOL 910 93.7 93.4 91.8 91.93110 10 TURNEMIEWLANGUA 391 96.2 96.0 95.0 95.43160 10 moms ELEM SCHOOL 969 93.0 93.3 92.2 93.03530 9 GILLESPIE ELEM SCHOO 749 93.7 92.3 92.0 92.24100 10 CUUEN ELEM SCHOOL 435 94.9 94.3 93.2 93.11

4360 10 KOHN ELEM SCHOOL 763 93.0 93.6 92.4 92.16050 10 DUNNE ELEMENTARY sq 447 94.9 94.5 94.5 94.46260 10 VAN VLISSINGEN MEM 978 92.1 92.5 91.6 91.08060 10 HUGHES LANGSTON EIE 292 94.9 95.1 94.5 95.11

50 Pullman 3870 9 W SMITH ELEMENTARY 705 94.6 94.0 93.5 92.85460 10 POE CLASSICAL SCHOOL 170 96.2 97.2 95.8 97.25530 10 PULLMAN ELEM SCHOO 630 94.8 94.1 92.9 93.65950 9 SCHMID ELEM SCHOOL 240 94,0 94.6 93.6 93.7

51 South Desring 2390 9 BRIGHT ELBA SCHOOL 599 93.5 93.9 93.0 93.02480 9 BURNHAM ELEM SCHOO 110 93.9 95.7 94.7 94.72481 9 ANTHONY ELEM-BRANC 141 94.5 95.9 93.5 94.44550 9 LUELLA ELEM SCHOOL 391 93.0 93.4 92.5 92.24551 9 GOLDSMITH ELEM-BRAN 150 a/a nia 92.6 93.94630 9 MARSH ELEM SCHOOL 316 94.4 94.2 93.5 95.0

52 Eon Side 2020 9 ADDAMS ELEM SCHOOL 392 94.9 94.6 94.0 94.53490 9 GALLISTEL LANGUAGE 704 94.2 95.1 93.8 94.66150 9 TAYLOR ELEM SCHOOL 601 95.0 95.4 94.1 94.36360 10 WASHINGTON ELEM-SCH 497 96.1 96.0 94.7 95.3

53 Wee Pullman 3190 10 METCALFE MAGNET SCHI 974 95.5 96.0 94.5 94.93470 10 JESSIE OWENS COMMUNI 523 95.2 95.8 94.8 94.23570 10 GOMPERS SUM SCHOOL 541 95.3 95.0 94.1 94 q5040 10 HANSEN ELEM SCHOOL 452 94.0 94 I 93.8 94.05740 10 SCANLAN ELEM SCHOOL 721 94.2 94.2 93.8 94.56400 10 WEST PULLMAN ELEM $ 800 92.2 92.9 91.0 91.76420 10 WHISTLER ELEM SCHOO 584 94.3 94.7 93.6 93.57210 10 HIGGINS COMMUNITY A 572 95.0 94.5 94.0 94.77440 10 WEST PULLMAN SCHOS 241 94.6 94.6 93.9 94.1

54 Riveedsle 2690 10 CARVER PRIMARY SCHO 529 91.9 92.3 92.0 92.32700 10 CARVER MIDDLE SCHOO 663 93.2 93.4 92.0 91.82710 10 ALDRIDGE MEM SCHOO 483 91.8 92.7 92.1 93.211010 10 DUBOIS SUM SCHOOL 457 94.5 94.9 93.4 93.7

55 Hegewieck 2790 10 CLAY ELEM SCHOOL 495 94.4 94.6 93.7 94.03580 10 GRISSOM FILEM SCHOOL 245 95.0 94.6 94.7 94.8

56 Gurfield Ridge 2570 7 BYRNE ELEM SCHOOL 375 93.4 93.3 91.7 92.630 7 HEARST ELEM SCHOOL 777 93.6 93.1 91.2 92.36240 7 TWAIN ELEM SCHOOL 451 93.7 94.0 93.0 93.0

57 Ascher Haiglim 3200 7 EDWARDS ELEM SCHOO 695 94.2 93.9 91.8 92.6

28

34

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE RATESChicago Public Schools 191546 through 1911-19

Cams* Area Unit/2540

29703690

5910

Dili5411111IrK*10114111abi'l5

5

5

School HumWHO

DAV11111004 KM%01/14AULUS SalamiSHIELDSKLEM SCHOOL

Td End.198849

361

847

695

848

Mad. Rae Mid. Rats AWL Rate198546 198647 198748

94.6 94.4 92.293.8 93.9 93.494.3 95.2 94.1

92.5 92.9 91.6

And. Rae1981141

WI99.795.193.1

Se Brigham Put

MAW', Park 3260 5 svilkinT SUM *Mom 432 92.9 92.9 ni 92.96 iMPAINK EUIM SCHOOL 914 92.2 94.2 92.0 92.4

60 Britlypert 2070 6 AmMoint Mit KIN= 600 91.1 91.7 91.3 91.33880 6 HEALY WM SCHOOL 1,004 94.3 94.8 94.4 95.24020 6 HOLDEN ELEM SCHOOL 653 92.7 93.8 90.8 91.04710 6 MCCIABLIAN ELEM acao 354 93.6 93.3 91.0 93.14920 6 M SHERIDAN MAGNET I 520 96.5 96.7 96.2 96.2

61 New City 3030 8 DEWEY WM SCHOOL 446 94.0 94.2 92.8 93.73450 7 yulaux BUM acliom. 1,175 91.0 92.1 89.7 1913600 8 GRAHAM ELEM SCHOOL 681 89.5 90.0 88.7 8943740 8 HAMUNE BLEU SCHOOL 754 94.3 95.1 93.2 94.13900 5 HEDGES ELEM SCHOOL 337 93.6 93.7 94.1 94.73902 5 HEDGES BRANCH MEV 214 94.0 95.6 94.4 94.34470 7 LIBBY ELM SCHOOL 1,079 91.2 90.4 87.3 87.35820 8 SEWARD ELEM SCHOOL 1,157 93.6 94.0 92.5 93.25821 8 SEWARD BRANCH 216 a/a n/a 94.0 95.65890 7 SHERMAN ELEM SCHOO 729 92.1 92.6 90.5 19.76560 5 HEDGES BRANCH EAST 296 94.7 94.4 93.2 92.96561 5 HEDGES BRANCH CENTR 257 a/a a/a 92.0 92.6

FULTON ELEM SCHOOL- 259 91.7 91.8 91.1 9I.562 Wed libidos 5310 7 PASTEUR SLIM SCHOOL 450 93.8 93.3 92.9 93.0

5340 7 PECK ELEM SCHOOL 479 93.5 93.8 91.8 94.163 Gage Park 5090 7 NIGHTINGALE ELEM SCH 1,015 92.5 93.1 91.5 92.2

5710 7 SAWYER ELEM SCHOOL 564 93.7 94.0 92.8 92.11

6220 7 TONT1ELEMENTARY SC 684 92.5 93.5 92.3 92764 Clearing 3080 7 DORE ELEM SCHOOL 140 93.4 92.8 92.0 93.1

3680 7 GRIMES ELEM SCHOOL 186 95.4 94.5 94.2 93.63681 7 FLEMING ELEM-BRANCH 150 96.0 96.3 95.3 95.33710 7 HALE ELEM SCHOOL 503 93.9 93.6 92.6 93.3

65 Wed Lawn 4120 7 HURLEY ELEMENTARY S 420 95.0 94.5 93.4 94.37170 7 LEE ELEMENTARY SCHO 307 94.9 95.8 93.2 94.0

66 Chicago Lawn 3140 7 EBERHAR1' ELEM SCHOO 604 92.9 93.7 92.6 94.54330 7 KINZIE ELEM SCHOOL 355 93.0 93.5 91.5 93.04620 7 MARQUEITE MEM SCHO 1,030 93.4 93.8 92.3 9254760 7 MCKAY ELEMENTARY S 841 92.5 92.9 91.2 91.94880 7 MORRILL SLIM SCHOOL 1,110 94.3 95.1 93.9 931

67 West Englewood 2050 7 ALTGELDELEM SCHOOL 95$ 93.7 93.5 92.3 92.12900 7 COPERNICUS ELEM SCH 541 92.4 92.9 90.3 91.53130 7 EARLE ELM SCHOOL 858 92.9 92.9 91.6 91.43290 7 0000LOW MAGNET SCH 774 94.9 95.4 92.9 93.73550 7 RANDOLPH MAGNET SC 890 94.5 95.3 93.9 94.63920 7 HENDERSON BUM SCHO 931 91.4 91.4 89.1 90.25230 7 OTOOLE ELM SCHOOL 1,117 92.8 92.7 92.5 92.35540 7 RASTER ELM SCHOOL 484 92.1 92.3 92.4 9235750 7 BONTEMPS ELEM SCHOO 802 93.1 93.6 91.8 92. I6830 7 BUNCHE MEM SCHOOL 828 93.9 93.6 90.5 91.87080 8 GERSHWIN ELEM SCHOO 720 91.4 91.9 90.1 91.57180 7 RASTER BRANCH ELEM S 329 93.0 93.8 93.2 92.4

29

35

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE RATESMaw Public Schools 1985-86 through 1988-89

Ttl Earl. And. ILL Md. Rate Md. Rata AIM. RuleCossusiey Ares Usk/ Dist/ lkimbol Nome 1988-89 198546 198647 1987-U 1911149611 'Leawood 2180 8 WS USSUNTARY SCH 774 91.9 93.2 91.4 91.5

2200 8 UAW ELEM SCHOOL 824 91.1 92.4 90.6 9134030 7 HOLMES-UM SCHOOL 966 92.8 92.6 92.3 92.74130 8 HOP% CommuNtry ACA 1,001 91.6 91.6 89.2 89.24270 8 KERSHAW MEM SC2100 496 91.6 92.5 90.5 91.45160 8 001181148 RV 0 C 244 90.8 91.6 89.0 87.45270 8 PARKER COMMUNITY AC 813 93.5 94.5 93.1 93.15900 8 sisnooto BUM SCHO 397 91.8 92.1 92.1 92.16390 8 WENTWORTH MEM SCH 941 92.1 92.0 91.1 91.36550 8 HOND ELVA SCHOOL 545 92.3 92.2 92.2 92.76870 8 REED ELEU SCHOOL 702 91.4 91.1 90.1 90.46880 8 BANNEKER SUM SCHOO 664 91.2 91.8 91.4 90.87050 8 GUGGENHEIM =SI SCH 40.4. 93.3 93.1 92.1 91.97250 8 HINTON ELEM SCHOOL 573 92.2 93.1 91.2 91.47760 8 STAGG ELEM SCHOOL 838 91.9 92.6 92.3 91.8,

69 Graeae Grand Crossing 2410 9 BROWNELL ELEM SCHO 349 92.7 92.8 92.1 91.93010 9 DENEEN eLEM SCHOOL 585 91.5 91.7 90.7 91.63300 8 HARVARD ELEM SCHOO 753 91.7 92.8 91.3 91.85610 9 REVERE ELEM SCHOOL 633 92.5 93.1 92.0 42.15660 9 RUGGLES ELEM SCHOOL 564 93.9 93.3 92.6 93.56500 0 YALE ELEM SCHOOL 678 92.1 91.7 92.0 91.26970 9 TANNER ELEM SCHOOL 565 94.0 93.6 93.0 92.4

70 Ashburn 2650 7 CARROLL ELEM SCHOOL 264 95.0 95.0 93.6 94.52651 7 ROSENWALD ELEM-BRA 160 95.7 95.6 93.7 95.62980 7 DAWES ELEMENTARY SC 579 94.0 93.4 91.8 93.25240 7 OWEN SCHOLASTIC ACA 283 91.9 94.9 94.2 95.46030 7 STEVENSON ELEM SCHO 525 94.7 94.8 93.8 94.37240 7 LENART GIFTED BRANC 230 a/a n/a 94.7 95.77370 7 JOHN HANCOCK BRANCH 292 n/a n/a n/a 91.3

71 Auburn Gresham 2170 7 BARTON ELEM SCHOOL 997 93.7 93.7 92.1 93.22330 7 JOPUN ELEM SCHOOL 781 94.0 94.8 92.4 93.02860 8 COOK ELEMENTARY SCH 1,000 91.4 92.1 91.1 90.93430 7 FOSTER PARK ELEM SCH 623 93.3 92.8 92.3 92.33670 10 GRESHAM ELEM SCHOOL 581 93.8 94.1 92.2 93.04090 8 CUFFE ELEM SCHOOL 282 91.9 92.4 92.5 94.14830 10 MORGAN ELEM SCHOOL 569 I 94.3 94.3 92.9 93.35170 8 OGLESBY ELEM SCHOOL 827 93.4 93.8 93.6 92.55670 10 RYDER ELEMENTARY SC 497 92.9 93.2 91.8 91.68090 10 MAHALIA JACKSON ELE 503 92.9 93.4 90.8 91.1

72 Beverly 2150 10 BARNARD ELEM SCHOOL 413 95.0 95.6 94.9 94.44240 10 KELLOGG ELEM SCHOOL 286 95.4 95.4 94.6 95.76120 10 SUTHERLAND ELEM SCH 549 94.5 95.2 94.5 94.66250 10 VANDERPOEL MAGNET S 308 96.4 96.9 95.8 96.2

73 Washington Heights 3330 10 FERNWOOD ELEM SCHO 503 94.3 93.5 92.7 92.73400 10 FORT DEARBORN ELEM $ 958 94.4 94.9 93.5 94.04350 10 KIPLING ELEM SCHOOL 301 95.4 95.7 95.0 95.94410 10 GREEN ELEM SCHOOL 379 93.9 92.8 93.0 93.64980 10 MOUNT VERNON ELEM S 579 94.0 93.5 92.7 92.95420 10 GARVEY ELEMENTARY S 490 93.7 93.7 92.5 94.37990 10 EVERS ELEM SCHOOL 318 95.3 94.5 93.6 94.78030 10 WACKER ELEM SCHOOL 298 95.9 96.2 95.1 95.9

30 36

1;;;;;Ii1**

14;;:"'i;"*""r1imm1-

3-

ilii;;;;;;;;;1-

mmggg

VERIAiEEFEFi0

11I

iiilligellV

1/111 111110

ii

$111I 1

)229.99.2e""4"

P1111111115

JI

I:

2

liIP ii.'

INDEX OF SCHOOLS BY COMMUNITY AREA - HIGH SCHOOLS

&hug N. Usk/ Comm. Area kkool am Usk/ Commuity AreaAMUNDSEN HIGH 1210 4 Liman &piste LAKEVIEW HIGH 1430 6 Lake TwwANDERSEN EVGC (9T 1740 24 West Town LANE TECH HIGH 1440 5 North CantuAUSTIN COMM ACAD 1220 25 Austin LAS CASA., OCC HIGH 1910 51 South DeeringROGAN HIGH 1230 70 Ashbora LINCOLN PARK HIGH 1620 7 Lincoln PerkBOWEN HIGH 1240 48 Calumet Heights LINDBLOM TECH HIG 1450 67 West EnglewoodCALUMET HIGH 1250 71 Ambers Gresham MANLEY HIGH 1460 27 East Garfield ParkCARVER HIGH 1850 54 Riverdale MARSHALL METRU HI 1470 27 Eut Garfield ParkCHICAGO METRO HIG 1800 i Near North Side MATHER HIGH 1480 2 Wed RidgeCHICAGO VOC HIGH 1010 45 Avalon Park MCLAREN OCC HIGH 1930 27 East Garfield ParkCHS FOR AGR SCIENC 1790 74 Mount Gratewood MORGAN PARK HIGH 1490 75 Morgan ParkCLEMENTE COMM AC 1840 24 West Town NEAR NORTH CAREER 1050 8 Near North SideCOLLINS HIGH 1880 29 Haub Lawndale NORTHSIDE LRN CEN 1690 13 North ParkCORLISS HIGH 1860 50 Mimes ORR COMM ACADEM 1830 23 Humbokk ParkCRANE HIGH 1270 28 Near West Side PHILLIPS HIGH 1510 35 Datil=CREGIER VOC HIGH 1020 28 Near West Side PROSSER VOC HIGH 1070 19 Belmont CraginCURIE METRO HIGH MO 57 Archer Heights RICHARDS VOC HIGH 1110 63 Gage ParkDUNBAR VOC HIGH 1030 35 Douglas ROBESON HIGH 1320 68 EnglewoodDUSABLE HIGH 1230 38 Grand Boulevard ROOSEVELT HIGH 1520 14 Albany ParkENGLEWOOD HIGH 1680 68 Englewood SCHURZ HIGH 1530 16 Irving ParkFARRAGUT CAREER A 1300 30 Soutb Lawndale SENN BRANCH 1541 77 EdgewaterFENGER HIGH 1310 49 Roseland SENN METRO HIGH 1540 77 EdgewaterFLOWER VOC HIGH 1040 27 Ent Garfield Park SIMEON VOC HIGH 1150 71 Auburn GreshamFOREMAN HIGH 1330 15 Portage park SOUTH SHORE COMM 1550 43 South ShoreGAGE PARK HIGH 1340 63 Gage Park SOUTHS1DE LRN CEN 1700 67 Wed EnglewoodGRAHAM TRAINING C 1950 33 Near South Side SPALDING HIGH 1650 23 Near Wed SideHARLAN COMM ACAD 1350 49 Roseland STEINMETZ HIGH 1560 19 Belmont CraginHARPER HIGH 1360 67 Wee Englewood SULLIVAN HIGH 1570 1 Rogers ParkHIRSCH METRO HIGH IRO 69 Greeter Grand Crossing TAFT HIGH 1580 10 Norwood ParkHUBBARD HIGH 1670 65 Weet Lawn TILDEN HIGH 1590 61 New CityHYDE PARK CAREER 1390 42 Woodlawn VON STEUBEN METRO 1610 13 North ParkINDUSTRIAL SKILL CT 1130 30 South Lawndale WASHINGTON HIGH 1630 51 South DeeringJONES METRO HIGH 1060 32 Loop WELLS COMM ACADE 1640 24 West TownJUAREZ HIGH 1890 28 Near West Side WESTINGHOUSE VOC 1160 23 Humboldt ParkJULIAN HIGH 1870 73 Washington Heights WILSON O.W. OCC HI 1920 11 Jefferson ParkKELLY HIGH 1400 58 Brighton Park YOUNG MAGNET H1G 1810 28 Near West SideKELVYN PARK HIGH 1410 20 HermosaKENNEDY HIGH 1420 56 Garfield RidgeKENWOOD ACADEMY 1710 39 KenwoodKING HIGH 1760 39 Kenwood

32

38

IND

EX

Oil

SCH

OO

LS

BY

CO

MM

UN

ITY

AR

EA -

EL

EM

EN

TA

RY

SCH

OO

LS

Moo

t

ma

WM

?

Com

mat

dry

Are

a

Scho

ol

mos

Uni

t.

Con

umm

ity

Are

a

AB

BO

TT

2010

AD

DA

MS

2020

34 Arm

our

Squa

re

52 Eas

t

Side

BU

RN

HA

M

BU

RN

S

2480 51 Sout

h

Dee

ring

2510 30 Sout

h

Law

adsl

e

AG

ASS

JZ

2030 6 L

ake

Vie

w

BU

RN

SID

E

SCH

OL

AC

2520 44 C.

AL

CO

TT

2010 7 Ia

mb

Park

BU

RR

2530 24 Wes

t

Tow

n

AL

DR

IDG

E

2710 54 R

iver

dale

BU

RR

OU

GH

S

2540 58

Bri

ghto

n

Park

AL

TO

EL

D

2050 67 Wet

Eng

lew

ood

BY

FOR

D

2550 25 A

ustin

AN

DE

RSE

N

2060 24 Wes

t

Tow

n

BY

RD

CO

MM

AC

AD

E

2560 8 Nea

r

Nor

th

Sidi

:.

AN

DE

RSE

N

EV

OC

BR

7310 24 Wed

Tow

n

BY

RN

E

2570 56 G

arfi

eld

Rid

ge

AN

TH

ON

Y

BR

BU

RN

H

2411 SI Sout

h

Dee

ring

CA

LD

WE

LL

2580 45 A

valo

n

Park

AR

M

MID

DL

E

4590 3

Upt

own

CA

LH

OU

N

NO

RT

H

6610 27 E

ast

Gar

fiel

d

Park

AR

MO

UR

2070 60

Bri

dgep

ort

CA

ME

RO

N

2610 23 H

umbo

ldt

Park

AR

MST

RO

NG

GE

OR

GE

2080 2 Wes

t

Rid

ge

CA

NT

Y

2620 17

Dun

ning

AR

MST

IPM

NO

LO

UIS

$700 25 A

ustin

CA

RD

EN

AS

4320 30 Sout

h

Law

adal

e

AR

MST

RO

NG

LO

UIS E 73

11)

25 Aus

tin

CA

RN

EG

IE

2630 42

Woo

dlaw

o

AIT

UC

KS

2100 35

Dou

glas

CA

RPE

NT

ER

2640

24 Wes

t

Tow

n

AU

DU

BO

N

2110 S N

orth

Cen

ter

CA

RR

OL

L

2650 70 A

shbu

rn

AV

AL

ON

PAR

K

2130 45 A

yala

Park

CA

RT

ER

2670 40

Was

hing

ton

Park

AV

ON

DA

LE

2140 21 A

vond

ale

CA

RV

ER

MID

DL

E

2700 54 R

iver

dale

BA

NN

EK

ER

MO 68

Eag

lew

ood

CA

RV

ER

PRIM

AR

Y

2690 54 R

iver

dale

BA

RN

AR

D

2150 72

Bev

erly

CA

SSE

LL

2720 74 M

ount

Gra

mw

oed

BA

RR

Y

2160 20 H

enno

sa

CA

TH

ER

6730 27 E

ast

Gar

fiel

d

Park

BA

RT

ON

2170 71 A

ubur

n

Gre

sham

CH

AL

ME

RS

2740 29 N

orth

Law

adal

e

BA

SS

2180 68

Eng

lew

ood

CH

APP

EL

L

2750 4 L

inco

ln

Squa

re

BA

TE

MA

N

2190 16 Ir

ving

Park

CH

ASE

2760 22

Log

an

Squa

re

BE

AL

E

2200 68

Eng

lew

ood

CH

OPI

N

2770 24 Wes

t

Tow

n

BE

ASL

EY

AC

AD

MR

6660 40

Was

hing

ton

Park

CH

RIS

TO

PHE

R

PHY H 27

80 63 Gag

e

Park

BE

AU

BIE

N

2240 11 Je

ffer

son

Park

CL

AR

K

MID

DL

E

SCH

O

6620 25 A

ustin

BE

ET

HO

VE

N

6540 37 Fulle

r

Park

CL

AY

2790 55

Heg

ewis

ch

BE

IDL

ER

2250 27 E

ast

Gar

fiel

d

Park

CL

EV

EL

AN

D

2800 16

Irvi

ng

Park

BE

LD

ING

2260 16

Irvi

ng

Park

CL

INT

ON

2810 2 Wes

t

Rid

ge

BE

LL

2270 S N

orth

Cen

ter

CL

ISSO

LD

2820 75

Mor

gan

Park

BE

NN

ET

T

2280 49 R

osel

and

CO

LE

S

2830 46 Sout

h

Chi

cago

BE

TH

UN

E

8020 27 E

ast

Gar

fiel

d

Park

CO

LM

AN

2840 33 G

rand

Bou

leva

rd

BL

AC

K

MA

GN

ET

7860

41 Cal

umet

Hei

ghts

CO

LU

MB

US

2850 24 Wes

t

Tow

n

BL

AC

K

MA

GN

ET

BR

A

7861

43 Sout

h

Shor

e

CO

OK

2860 71 A

ubur

n

Gre

sham

BL

AIN

E

2300 6 L

ake

Vie

w

CO

ON

LE

Y

2810 5 N

orth

Cen

ter

BO

ND

6550 68

Eng

lew

ood

CO

OPE

R

PRIM

INT

ER

2890 31 L

ower

Wes

t

Side

BO

NT

EM

PS

5750 67 W

ee

Eng

lew

ood

CO

PER

NIC

US

2900 67 Wed

Eng

lew

ood

BO

ON

E

2320 2 Wat

Rid

ge

CO

RK

ER

Y

2910

30 Sout

h

Law

ndal

e

BR

AD

WE

LL

2340 43 Sout

h

Shor

e

CO

STE

LL

A

BR

JUN

GM

4231 31 L

ower

Wed

Side

BR

EN

AN

2360 49 R

osel

and

CR

OW

N

CO

MM

AC

AD

2940

30 Sout

h

Law

ndal

e

BR

EN

NE

MA

NN

6600 3

Upt

own

CU

FFE

4090 71 A

ubur

n

Gre

sham

BR

EN

TA

NO

2370 r/ L

opn

Squa

re

CU

LL

EN

4100 49 R

osel

and

BR

IDG

E

2380 17

Dun

ning

CU

RT

IS

3160 49 R

osel

and

BR

IGH

T

2390 51 Sout

h

Dee

ring

DA

RW

IN

2960 r2

Log

an

Squa

re

BR

OW

N

2400 21 N

ear

Wan

Side

DA

VIS

2970 58

Bri

ghto

n

Park

BR

OW

NE

LL

2410 69 G

reat

er

Gra

nd

Cro

sein

g

DA

WE

S

2980 70 A

shbu

rn

BR

YN

MA

WR

2430 43 Sout

h

Shor

e

DE

CA

TU

R

CL

ASS

ICA

L

2990 2 Wes

t

Rid

ge

BR

YN

MA

WR

BR

7380 43 Sout

h

Shor

e

DE

LA

NO

3000 26 Wes

t

Gar

fiel

d

Park

BU

DL

ON

G

2440 4 L

inco

ln

Squa

re

DE

NE

EN

3010 69 G

reat

er

Gri

nd

Cro

ssin

g

BU

N=

6830 67 Wet

Eng

lew

ood

DE

PR1E

ST

8050 25 A

ustin

BU

RB

AN

/C

2450 19 B

elm

ont

Cra

gie

DE

TT

6740

28 Nea

r

Wes

t

Side

BU

RK

E

2460 40

Was

hing

ton

Park

DE

VE

R

3020

17

Dun

ning

BU

RL

EY

2470 6 lake

Vie

w

DE

WE

Y

3030 61 New

City

33

39

INDEX OF SCHOOLS BY COMMUNITY AREA - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

Scheel .... yawDICKENS CPC 4311

DIE00 COMM ACAD 7420

DIRKSEN 2950

DISNEY MAGNET 8000

DIXON 3040

DODGE 3050

DONOGHUE 6790

DOOLITTLE INT LIPPE 3070DOOLTITLE fRIMARY 7620DORE 3080

DOUGLAS COMM ACA 3090DOUGLASS MIDDLE 6630

DRAKE 3100

DRAKE EVOC BR 7340

DRUMMOND 3120

DU BOIS 8010

DULLES 61160

DUMAS 6890

DUMAS CPC 6891

DUNNE 6050

DVORAK 6760

DYETT MIDDLE 8070

EARHART BR HOYNE 7450EARLE t 3130

ESERHAAT 3140

EDINGER 3150

EDGEBROOK 3170

EDISON COMP GIFT 2220

EDWARDS 3200

EINSTEINELLINGTONELLINGTON BREMMETERICSON

ESMOND

EVERETTEVERS

FALCONERFARADAYFARNSWORTH

FARREN

3210

3220

3221

3230

3240

3250

3260

7990

3270

4640

3280

3300

FARREN CPC BR BEAS 6661

FERGUSON CPC 4581

FERMI 3320

FERNWOOD 3330

FIELD 3350

FISKE 3360

FLEMING BR 3681

FORT DEARBORN 3400

FOSTER PARK 3430

FRANKLIN MAGNET 3420

FRAZIER 7780

FULLER 3440

FULTON 3450

Comsav Area27 Esd airfield Park24 Wet Town76 O'Hare3 Uptowa

44 Chatham

27 East Outsold Park36 Oeldead

35 Douglas35 Douglas64 ClawMg35 Douglas

25 Austin35 Douglas35 Douglas22 Lope Square54 Riverdale42 Woodlawn42 Woodlawn42 Woodlawn49 Rowland29 North Lawndale

40 Washington Park

48 Calumet Heights67 Wan Englewood

66 Chicago Lawn

9 Edina Park12 Forest Glen10 Norwood Park

57 Archer Heights36 Oakland

25 Austin25 Austin25 Austin27 East Garfield Park

75 Morgan Park59 McKinley Park73 Washington Heights

19 Belmont Cragin

27 Eut Gerfield Park11 Jefferson Park

38 Grand Boulevard

40 Washington Park8 Neu North Side

43 South Shore

73 Washington Heights

1 Rogers Park

42 Woodlawn64 Clearing73 Washington Heights

71 Auburn Gresham8 Near North Side

29 North Lawndale38 Grand Boulevard

61 New City

34

School some Witt Commusity Ares

FULTON BRANCH 7150

FUNSTON 3460

GALE COMM ACADE 3480GALLISTEL LANG AC 3490GARVEY MARCUS 5420

GARVY JOHN 3510

GARY 3520

GERSHWIN 70110

GILLESPIE 3530

GLADSTONE 3540

MURALS EVGC 5160

GOETHE 3560

GOLDBLATT 7140

GOLDSMITH BR LUEL 4551GOMPERS 3570

GOODLOW MAGNET 3290

GOUDY 3590

CRAHAM 3600

GRANT 3610

GRAY 3620

GREELEY 2730

GREEN WENDELL 4410

GREENE NATHANAEL 3650GREGORY 3660

GRESH AM 3670

GRIMES 3680

GRISSOM 3580

GUGGENHEIM 7050

GUNSAULUS SCHOL A 3690HAINESHALEHAMILTONH AMINEHAMMONDHANCOCK BR

HANSBERRY CPC

HANSON PARKHARTEHARTIGAN

HARVARD

3700

3710

3730

3740

3750

7370

6331

4710

378C

3790

MOO

HAUG AN 3810

HAWTHORNE SCHOL 3830HAY BRANCH 7040

HAY COMM ACADEM 3840HAYT 3850

HEALY 3880

HEARST 3890

HEDGES 3900

HEDGES CENTRAL BR 6561

HEDGES EAST BR 6560

HEDGES WEST BR 3902

HEFFERAN 3910

HENDERSON 3920

HENDRICKS 3930

4 0

61 New City22 Loges Square

1 Rogers Park

52 East Side

73 Wuhington Heights10 Norwood Park

30 South Lawndale

67 West Egli:wood49 Roseland

28 Near Wee Side68 Englewood

22 Lopn Squaw26 Wed Garfield Park51 Sold Dewing53 West Pullmen67 Wet Englewood3 Uptown

61 New City28 Near Wet Side15 Portage Park

6 Lake View73 Washington Heights

59 McKinley Park27 East Garfield Park71 Auburn Gresham

64 ClearingSS Hegewiech

68 Englewood

58 Brighton Park34 Armour Square64 Clearieg

6 Lake View61 New City30 South Lawndale

66 Chicago Lawn

29 North Lawndale1C Belmont Cragin

41 Hyde Park35 Douglas

69 Greater Grand Crossing

14 Albany Park

6 Lake View25 Austin25 Austin77 Edgewater

60 Bridgeport56 Garfield Ridge61 New City61 Now City61 New City61 New City25 Austin67 West Englewood37 Fuller Park

IND

EX

OF

SC

HO

OLS

BY

CO

MM

UN

ITY

AR

EA

-

ELE

ME

NT

AR

Y

SC

HO

OLS

Scho

ol

are

U.

Con

way

Are

a

HE

NR

Y

3940

FAN

SON

6570

HE

RM

IT

3950

HE

RZ

L

3970

=D

AM

40C

e)

MO

MS

CO

MM

AC

AD

72i 1

HIN

TO

V

7250

HIT

CH

4010

HO

LD

EN

4020

HO

LM

ES

4030

HO

PE

CO

MM

AC

AD

EM

4130

HO

WE

4060

HO

WL

AN

D

4070

HO

YN

E

4090

HU

GH

ES

CH

AR

LE

S

4110

HU

GH

ES

LA

NG

STO

N

8060

ItU

RU

IT

4120

INT

ER

-AM

ER

ICA

N

MA

4890

IRV

ING

5350

IRV

ING

PAR

E

4150

JAC

KSO

N

LA

13

AC

AD

4cal

)

JAC

KSO

N

M AH

AL

iA

8090

JAH

N

4170

JAM

IESO

N

4110

JEFF

ER

SON

4190

JEN

NE

R

4200

JEN

SEN

SCH

OL

AC

AD

6920

JOH

NSO

N

6940

JOH

NSO

N

CPC

6941

AR

UN

2330

JOY

NE

R

CPC

5971

JUN

OM

AN

4230

JUN

OM

AN

BR

4232

KA

NO

ON

MA

GN

ET

3370

KE

LL

ER

M AG

N

ET

4960

KE

LL

OG

G

4240

KM

'MA

W

4270

4280

KIL

ME

R

4300

KIN

G

EL

EM

4310

KIN

ZIE

4330

KIP

LIN

G

4350

KO

HN

4360

KO

ME

NSK

Y

4370

KO

SCIU

SZK

O

4380

KO

ZM

INSK

I

CO

MM

AC

4390

LA

FAY

ET

TE

4400

LA

SAL

LE

LA

NG

AC

AD

4420

LA

TH

RO

P

6750

LA

WN

DA

LE

CO

MM

A 4430

LE

E

7170

LE

MO

YN

E

4440

LE

NA

RT

BR

7240

LE

WIS

4450

16 kvia

s

Part

29 Nor

th

Lam

aist

*

7s Nea

t

Wes

t

Side

Nor

th

Law

ndat

e

14 Alb

any

Park

53 Wse

t

Pullm

an

68

Eas

twoo

d

10 Nor

woo

d

Park

60

Bri

dgep

ort

68

Eas

twoo

d

68 Eng

lew

ood

25 Aus

tin

29 Noc

tk

Law

ndal

e

48 Cal

mat

Hei

ghts

29 Nor

th

Law

ndal

e

49 Ros

elan

d

65 Wes

t

Law

n

6 LA

:

Vie

w

28 Nea

r

Wes

t

Side

16

Irvi

ng

Park

28 Nea

r

Wes

t

Side

71 Aub

urn

Gre

sham

5 Nor

th

Cen

ter

2 Wes

t

Rid

ge

28 Nea

r

Wes

t

Side

Nea

r

Nor

tb

Side

27 Eas

t

Gar

fiel

d

Park

29 Not

th

Law

ndsl

e

29 Nor

th

Lew

d&

71 Aub

uro

Gre

sham

28 Nea

r

Wes

t

Side

31 Low

er

Wes

t

Side

31 Low

er

Wes

t

Side

30 Sout

h

Law

ndal

e

74 Mou

nt

Gre

enw

ood

72

Bev

erly

68

E-e

ewoo

d

25 Aus

tin

1

Rog

ers

Park

27 Eas

t

Gar

fiel

d

Park

66

Chi

cago

Law

n

73

Was

hing

ton

Hei

ghts

49 Row

land

31 Low

er

Wes

t

Side

24 Wes

t

Tow

n

41 Hyd

e

Park

24 Wel

t

Tow

n

7 Lin

coln

Park

29 Nor

th

Law

ndal

e

29 Nor

th

Law

ndal

e

65 Wea

t

Law

n

6 Lak

e

Vie

w

70 Aeh

burn

25 Aus

tin

35

Scho

ol

nam

e

uas

Com

mua

gy

Are

s

UB

BY

UN

CO

LN

LIM

NS

LL

OY

DW

WI

LO

VE

TT

LO

WE

LL

LU

EL

LA

LY

ON

MA

DIS

ON

MA

NIE

RR

E

MA

NN

4470

4480

4490

4500

4510

4530

4540

4550

4560

4570

4580

4610

MA

RC

ON

I

CO

MM

AC

A

6590

MA

RQ

UE

TT

E

4620

MA

RSH

4630

MA

RT

I

BIL

ING

UA

L

BR

6340

MA

SON

MA

SON

CPC

MA

Y

MA

YE

R

MA

YO

MC

CL

EL

LA

N

MC

CO

RK

LE

MC

CO

RM

ICK

MC

CO

SH

MC

CU

TC

HE

ON

MC

DA

DE

CL

ASS

ICA

L

MC

DO

WE

LL

BR

CA

LD

MC

KA

Y

MC

PHE

RSO

N

ME

DIL

L

INT

UPP

ER

ME

DIL

L

PRIM

AR

Y

ME

LO

DY

ME

TC

AL

FE

MA

GN

ET

MIL

LE

R

CPC

MIT

CH

EL

LM

OL

LIS

ON

MO

NR

OE

MO

OS

MO

RG

AN

MO

RR

O LM

OR

SE

MO

RT

ON

U C

MO

RT

ON

EV

GC

BR

MO

ZA

RT

MT

GR

EE

NW

OO

D

MT

VE

RN

ON

MU

LL

IGA

N

MU

RPH

YM

UR

RA

Y

LA

NG

AC

AD

N AN

SEN

NA

SHN

EIL

NE

TT

EL

HO

RST

41

4650

4631

4670

4680

4700

4710

6820

4720

4740

6910

4750

7390

4760

4800

4320

4810

7190

3190

6921

4840

6950

4830

4870

4330

4880

4900

6800

7410

5000

4940

4980

5010

5020

5030

5040

5050

5060

5070

61 New

City

7 Lim

b

Perk

21 Avo

adsl

a

19 Bel

r-oa

t

Cre

sin

II Mag

adan

,

25 Aus

tie

23 Hum

bold

t

Park

31 Sout

h

Dee

ring

19 Woo

d

Cra

gin

43 Sout

h

Shor

e

Nee

r

Nor

th

Side

45 Ava

lon

Park

25 Aus

tia

66

Chi

cago

Law

n

51 Sout

h

Dte

ring

3 Upt

own

29 Nor

th

Law

ndal

e

29 Nor

th

Law

ndal

e

25 Aus

tin

7 Lin

coln

Park

35

Dou

glas

60

Bri

dgep

ort

38 Gra

nd

Bou

leva

rd

30 Sout

h

Law

ndal

e

42 Woo

dlaw

n

3

Upt

own

44 Cha

tham

48 Cal

umet

Hei

ghts

66

Chi

cago

Law

n

4 Lin

coln

Squa

re

28 Neu

Wes

t

Side

28 Nee

r

Wes

t

Side

26 Wes

t

Gar

fiel

d

Park

53 Wes

t

Pullm

an

27 Eas

t

Gar

fiel

d

Park

24 Wes

t

Tow

n

38 Gra

nd

Bou

leva

rd

22

Log

an

Squa

re

24 Wes

t

Tow

n

71 Aub

urn

Gre

sham

66

Chi

cago

Law

r

23

Hum

bold

t

Park

23 Hum

bold

t

Park

23 Hum

bold

t

Park

22 Los

au

Squa

re

74 Mou

nt

Gre

eow

ood

73

Was

hing

ton

Hei

ghts

7 Lin

coln

Park

16

Irvi

ng

Park

41 Hyd

e

Park

53 Wes

t

Pullm

an

25 Aus

tin

44 Cha

tham

6 Lak

e

Vie

w


School arm Ugh! Community Area

NEWBERRY MAGNET 5080NIGHTINGALE 5090NI14011 HEROES MACIN 3720

NDCON 5100NOBEL 5110NORWOOD PARK 5120OGDEN 5150OGLESBY 5170 71OKEEFFE 5180 43OLIVE CPC 6571 NONAHAN 5190 10ORIOLE PARK 5200 10OROZCO UPPER CYCL 7610 31OTIS 5220 24OTOOLE 5230 67OVERTON 6960 38OWEN SCHOL ACAD 5240 70OWENS COMM ACAD 3470 53PADEREWSKI 6930 30PALMER 5260 14PARK MANOR 5290 42PARKER COMM ACAD 5270 68PARKER CPC 5271 68PARKMAN 5280 40PARKSIDE COMM ACA 5300 43PASTEUR 5310 62PEABODY 5330 24PECK 5340 62PEIRCE 5360 77PENN 5370 29PERRY 53110 47

PERSHING MAGNET 5400 35PETERSON 5410 13PICCOLO ELEM 5210 23PICKARD 5430 31PILSEN COMM ACAD 4210 31PIRIE 5440 44PLAMONDON 5450 29POE CLASSICAL 5460 50POPE 5480 29PORTAGE PARK 5490 15POWELL 7010 43PRESCOTT 5500 7

PRICE 6810 39PRITZKER 6460 24PRUSSING 5510 15PULASKI 5520 22PULLMAN 5530 50RANDOLPH MAGNET 3550 67RASTER 5540 67RASTER BR 7180 67RAVEN SWOOD 5550 6RAY 5560 41RAYMON D 5570 35

7 Lincola Park63 Gage Park46 South Chicago20 Hansom23 Husaboldt Park10 Norwood Park8 Neer North Sid*

Auburn Gresham

South Shore

Noeth Lowed&Norwood Park

Norwood ParkLower Wen Si;Wee TownWest Eaglewood

Grand Boulevard

AshburnWest Pullman

South Lawndale

Albany Park

Woodlawn

Englewood

Englewood

Washington Park

South Shore

Wed EladonWed TownWest Eladon

EdgewaterNorth Lawndale

Burnside

Douglas

Notth ParkHumbokk Park

Lower Wed SideLower Wed SideChatham

North Lawndale

Pullman

North LawndslePortage Park

South Shore

Lincoln ParkKenwood

West Town

Portage ParkLogan Square

Pullman

West Englewood

West Englewood

West Englewood

Lake View

Hyde ParkDouglas

36

School name Usk, Commueity Area

REAVISREED

REILLY

REINBERGREVERE

RIO'MUNSON BR OAKENROENTGEN EVCIC

ROGERS

ROSENWALD BRROSS

RUGGLES

RYDER

RYERSON

SABIN MAGNET

SALAZAR BILINGUAL

SAUCED° MAGNETSAUGANASH

SAWYER

SAYRE LANG ACADE

SBARBARO

SCAMMON

SCANLAN

SCHILLERSCHMID

SCHNEIDER

SCHUBERTSEWARD

SEWARD BR

SEXTON A 0

5580

6870

5590

5600

5610

5620

6780

71405630

2651

5650

5660

56705680

7790

6720

425056905710

5720

6900

5730

57405760

5950

5790

58005820

5821

5830SHAKESPEARE 5850SHEDD BR BENNETT 2281

SHERIDAN M MAGNE 4920SHERIDAN PHIL 5880SHERM AN 5890SHERWOOD 5900SHIELDS 5910SHOESMITH 5920SHOOP 5930

SKINNER CLASSICAL 5940SMITH WENDELL 3870

SMYSER 5960SMYTH 5970

SOLOMON 5980SOUTH LOOP BR 3961

SOUTH LOOP SCHOOL 3960

SPALDING ELEM PHY 5990SPENCER 6000SPRY 6010STAGG 7760STEVEN SON 6030STEWART 6040STOCKTON 6060

STONE SCHOL ACADE 6070

42

39 Kensvod68 Eaglewood16 Irving Park15 Portage Park69 Greater Grand Crossing28 Near West Side36 Oakland27 East Gerfield Park

2 West Ridge70 Ashburn40 Washington Park69 Greater Grand Crossing71 Auburn Gresham23 Humbokk Park24 West Town31 Lower West Side30 South Lawndale13 North Park63 Gage Park25 Austin44 Chatham16 Irving Park53 West Pullman8 Neer North Side

50 Pullman5 North Center

19 Belmont Cragin61 New City61 New City42 Woodlawn39 Keawood49 Roseland60 Bridgeport46 South Chicago61 New City68 Englewood58 Pighton Park39 Kenwood74 Mount Greenwood28 Near West Side50 Pullman15 Portage Park28 Near West Side13 North Park33 Near South Side33 Near South Side28 Near West Side25 Austin30 South Lawndale68 Englewood70 Ashburn3 Uptown3 Uptown2 West Ridge


School Unit/ Commeay Arm Mod as Usk! Conummity Aresmese

STOWE 6000 23 Hentholdt Park %scram 7260 44 ChathamSUDER 6090 2S New Wat Side WHEATLEY CPC 2691 54 RivardeleSULLIVAN ELEM 6100 46 South Chicago WHISTLER 6420 53 West PelhamSUMNER 6110 26 Wee Garfield Park WHITE BR 7440 53 Wee PillowSUTHERLAND 6120 72 Bendy WHITNEY 6440 30 South Lambda,SWIFT 6130 77 Edgewater WHITTIER 6450 31 Lower West SideTALCOTT 6140 24 Wee Tows WHITTIER BRANCH 7330 31 Lome West SideTANNER 6970 69 Gnaw Grand Crossing WILDWOOD 6470 12 Forest GlenTAYLOR 6150 52 East Side WILLIAMS WO 35 DouglasTERRELL 6840 40 %Waggon Pork WIRTH EXP BR KENW 4260 39 KeewoodTHORP EVOC BR 6181 46 South Chimp WOODSON N 7750 38 Gruel BoulevardTHORP J N 6180 46 South Chicago WOODSON S 7820 38 Greed BoulevardTHORP 0 A SCHOL AC 6190 17 Deaaing WRIGHT 7500 23 Humboldt ParkTILTON 6210 26 Wee Garfield Park YALE 6500 69 Greater Greed CrossingTONTI 6220 63 Gage Park YATES 6510 n Logan SquareTRUMBULL 6230 77 Edgewater YOUNG 6520 25 AustinTRUTH PRIMARY 7900 8 Neer North SideTURNER-DREW LANG 3110 49 Roadie!MAIN 6240 56 Garfield RidgeVAN VLISSINGEN 6260 49 RoselandVANDERPOEL MAGNE 6250 72 BeverlyVOLTA 6270 14 Albany ParkVON HUMBOLDT 6280 24 Wed TownVON HUMBOLDT CPC 6282 24 Wee TownVON STEUBEN U C 6290WACKER 8030WADSWORTH 6300WADSWORTH CPC 6301WALSH 6320WARD JAMES 6.:10WARD LAURA St70WARREN 6350

WASHINGTON ELEM 6WWATERS 6370WEBSTER 6380WENTWORTH 6390WEST PULLMAN 6400

14 Albany Park73 Washington Heights42 Woodlawn42 Woodlawn31 Lower West Side3S Douglas23 Humboklt Park48 Calumet Heights52 East Side4 Lincoln Square

26 Wed Garfield Park68 Englewood53 West Pullman

473

MAP OF COMMUNITY AREAS

COMMUNITY AREASAS 01 1910 U S CENSUS

CITY 04 CHICAGO

11.0wwl N DeMakorr

05 491.1m1150 04 PLAIONNODowd IR Mewls, Coolmse.pnef

Fe

COMMUNITY AREA NAMES

5

I.11121i14Is

ISIi21

21

as

24.

27

as

313233.

37

ROGWEST RIDGEUPTOWNLINCOLN SOUARENORTH CENTERLAKE VIEWLINCOLN PAR KMAR NORTH SIDEEDISON PARKNORWOOD PARKAMMON PARKPOKIEST GLENNORTH PARKMAME( PARRPORTAGS PARKIRVING PARKDUPININGMONTCLAREBELMONT CRAGINMAMMAAVONDALELOGAN SOUAREHUMBOLDT PARKWIST TOWNAUSTINWEST GARFIELD PARKEAST GARFIELD PARKNEAR WEST SIDENORTH LAWNOALESOUTH LAWNDALELOWER WEST SIDELOOPNEAR SOUTH SIDEARMOUR SOUAREDOUGLASOAKLANDFULLER PARKGRAND BOULEVARD

40SI42

444644L

47a4.sos 1

52535456St57Si

65.3II426314INis67Isss70717273747576/7

REIMOODWASHINGTON PUREHYDE PARKWOODL AWNSOUTH MORECHATHAMAVALON PARKSOUTH CHICAGOIURNSIDECALUMET HEIGHTSROSELANDPULLMANSOUTH DEFRINGEAST SIDEWEST PULLMANRIVERDALEHEGEWISCHGARFIELD RIDGEARCHER HEIGHTS KleBRIGHTON PARKMeKINLEY PARKBRIDGEPORT

semNEW CITYWEST ELSOON uniGAGE PARK aCLEARING inkWEST LAWNCHICAGO LAWN E.WEST ENGLEWOODENGLEWOODGREATER GRAND CROSSINGASHIURNAUBURN GRESHAMBEVERLYWASHINGTON HEIGHTSMOUNT GREENWOODMORGAN PARK0 HAREEOGERAT ER

0144119

MADISON

040410$4

ROOUOIL T

ISA

CIPMAK ft

35 Z

41

42 e

IMMAYI,109,

46

10,6

I

10771%

1151

11951 14,

It]) 2

52 C.,

38

4 4

0-"

LIST OF PUBLICATIONS OFME CHICAGO PANEL ON PUBLIC SCHOOL POLICY AND FINANCE and METROSTAT

ns Sea ads Souk 8.16 1212 Chimp, Mho* 60E14 (312) 939-2202

CHICAGO SCHOOL WORM - RIERARCII AND MONITORING PROJECT

.....**mirehrdejpailm f Schook for on In-Depds Obeenotional Sao.. Juty 1990Otsilla Ikkatiars in Chicon Ptikie Ehnen** Schoob. May 199a

4isecluo Anlastke ?Ward School itsfrem. °aim 1989.::,;:#sassvisg Loot School Council Elections. October 1999.

11TATS SCWOOL WORM

litrpirawningiretmalsosid Reierm in Illinois. November 1985.*tat Are Mb Min g o y for School Refonnt May 1985.

.'tjiassatscAgnoNAND ssram. PROGRAMS

The Clarsplug Reda Sam/bnerg Parma in Chkag0 Schools. April 1990Mho Sou* Anti Desegyegetion? December 1967.

Gas Rom SAP May 1986.Annsadonal Pawns i a Time of Swat Constraint. January 19115.

,10110POIYIE

1.4pinat the Odds: 77se Early Identification of Dropouts. June 1989.Arai* berme Thaw Mothers and the Chkago Public Schools. December 1988.Sod* the nvis The Elementery Years and DropoW Rotes in the Chicago Public Schools. July 1987.Whorls lloom 185T How Schools Cas Reduce Their Dropout Problem. December 1966.

:th'epoub from the Map Public Schools. April 1965.

TEACHER MANAGEMENT EMIRS

Ilsacher Tionsfew and Classroom Disnsption. January 1964.am: Cower in the Chicago Public Schools. June 1983.

BUDGET

I98?49 8 8 Assessment of School Site Budgeting Practices of the Chicago Public Schools. August 1988.V40164987 Aar wow ofSchoo/ Site Budgeting Practice of the Chicago Public Schools. June 1987.:Saw/ Buipt LAN* AuesemenL June 1986.ritevenne Short Paha t the Chicago Board of Eoucation: 197049M. June 1984 (updated annually).

Gib m the Board of Education. July 1982 (updated annually).

RESOURCE VOWMES

Leaky° Public Schools DataBook. School Year 19884989. February 1990.iplactosy of Yowls Swims. December 1989.41nMEIROS7ATAMABook. November 1989.

School Reform: What It Is and How It Came To Be. March 1990.efSers Zoe COWtiOles Adopt-A-School Program at Harper HO School 1982 - 1988. August 1988.

kilitspow View Their Public Schools. June 1985.

M ar descriptions and costs el these pub1ic4tions, please request a publication list from the Chicago Panel, (312) 939-2202.

45

DOCUMENT RESUME UD 027 743 AUTHOR Easton, John Q.; … · ED 325 595. AUTHOR TITLE. INSTITUTION...

Documents

Transcript of DOCUMENT RESUME UD 027 743 AUTHOR Easton, John Q.; … · ED 325 595. AUTHOR TITLE. INSTITUTION...