10_Goldman_La Revolución de Mayo Moreno, Castelli y Monteagudo...
DOCUMENT RESUME TITLE INSTITUTION · DOCUMENT RESUME ED 467 774 HE 035 161 ... Thomas Lamont,...
Transcript of DOCUMENT RESUME TITLE INSTITUTION · DOCUMENT RESUME ED 467 774 HE 035 161 ... Thomas Lamont,...
DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 467 774 HE 035 161
TITLE Report to the Governor and General Assembly onUnderrepresented Groups in Illinois Higher Education.
INSTITUTION Illinois State Board of Higher Education, Springfield.PUB DATE 2002-06-00NOTE 123p.; For the previous year's (2001) report, see ED 450 666.PUB TYPE Numerical/Quantitative Data (110) Reports Descriptive
(141)
EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC05 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS *Access to Education; Annual Reports; Black Students;
*Diversity (Student); Educational Policy; Educational Trends;Enrollment; *Equal Education; *Higher Education; HispanicAmerican Students; *Minority Groups; Racial Differences; SexDifferences; Tables (Data)
IDENTIFIERS *Illinois
ABSTRACT
This annual report presents information on minority, female,and disabled students and staff in Illinois higher education. It seeks toexplain and track recent changes in representation among these groups andhighlights statewide and institutional efforts to improve representation.This year's report is divided into three sections: (1) postsecondaryenrollment and degree trends; (2) the focus topic; and (3) initiatives toimprove representation. Total black undergraduate and graduate/professionalenrollment increased by 2.6% during the past year, and total Hispanicenrollment increased by 6.4%. Black and Hispanic graduate enrollment andgraduate degrees awarded also increased. The focus topic of this year'sreport is perception of campus climate by underrepresented student groups.Public colleges and universities surveyed students from underrepresentedgroups about their perceptions of campus climate in eight key areas. Samplesizes varied at the universities, but at one campus, more than 1,000 studentscompleted surveys. The vast majority of students surveyed had positiveopinions about their campus climate as a whole, but the students expressedconcerns about the continued availability of financial aid and the lack ofdiversity of faculty and staff. The final section describes campusinitiatives directed at minority students, female students, students withdisabilities, and underrepresented faculty and staff. (Contains 26 tables.)(SLD)
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.
STATE OF ILLINOISBOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION
REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR AND GENERAL ASSEMBLYON UNDERREPRESENTED GROUPSIN ILLINOIS HIGHER EDUCATION
PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE ANDDISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS
BEEN GRANTED BY
TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)
1
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
June 2002
2
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOffice of Educational Research and Improvement
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER (ERIC)
fli?This document has been reproduced asreceived from the person or organizationoriginating it.
Minor changes have been made toimprove reproduction quality.
Points of view or opinions stated in thisdocument do not necessarily representofficial OERI position or policy.
ILLINOIS BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Members
Steven H. Lesnik, Winnetka, ChairmanMark Barmak, Lake BluffJ. Robert Barr, EvanstonJerry D. Blakemore, ChicagoEdward T. Duffy, CiceroRobert J. English, AuroraSamuel K. Gove, UrbanaJames L. Kaplan, LincolnshireThomas Lamont, SpringfieldR. Eden Martin, GlencoeCordelia Meyer, ChicagoLourdes Monteagudo, ChicagoLucy A. Sloan, HerrinJohn Thompson, Springfield
Staff
Daniel J. La Vista, Executive DirectorIllinois Board of Higher Education431 E. Adams Street, Room 200Springfield, Illinois 62701-1214217/782-2551TDD 217/524-3494FAX 217/782-8548www.ibhe state it us
3
STATE OF ILLINOISBOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION
REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR AND GENERAL ASSEMBLYON UNDERREPRESENTED GROUPSIN ILLINOIS HIGHER EDUCATION
June 2002
Printed on Recycled Paper
4
Printed by Authority ofthe State of Illinois
6/02 450c.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary
Introduction 3
Postsecondary Enrollment and Degrees 5
Fall 2000 Enrollment 5
Black Enrollment 5
Hispanic Enrollment 5
Degrees Awarded In 1999-2000 7
Black Student Decrees 8
Hispanic Student Degree 8
Enrollment and Degree Trends, 1990 to 2000 9
Black and Hispanic Enrollment 9
Black and Hispanic Degrees 9
2002 Focus Topic: Student Perceptions of Campus Climate 11
Public Universities 11
Institutional Attractiveness 11
Faculty and Classroom Behavior 12
Student Needs and Concerns 12
Student and Institutional Racial Climate 13
Racial Relations 13
Public Community Colleges 14
Institutional Attractiveness 14
Faculty and Classroom Behavior 15
Student Racial Climate 15
Institutional Racial Climate 15
Summary 16
The Year in Review: Initiatives to Improve Representation 19
Minority Students 19
Institutional Planning 19
Pre-collegiate Programs 19
College Support Programs 19
The College Environment 20
Opportunities in Fields of High Employer and Societal Need 20
Female Students 21
Students with Disabilities 22
Underrepresented Staff 23
Appendix I: List of Tables 25
6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Illinois Board of Higher Education's animal report on underrepresented groupspresents information on minority, female, and disabled students and staff in Illinois highereducation. It seeks to explain and track recent changes in representation among these groups andhighlights statewide and institutional efforts to improve representation. This year's report isdivided into the following three sections: 1) postsecondary enrollment and degree trends, 2) focustopic, and 3) initiatives to improve representation. An appendix of tables presents additionalenrollment and degree data, as well as information on the resources budgeted to each publiccollege and university program that serves underrepresented groups.
Postsecondary Enrollment and Degree Trends
The report presents data for all higher education sectors in Illinois. Postsecondaryenrollment and degree trends are shown for all sectors and degree levels from one-year certificateto doctoral education. As shown in this report, major findings include:
Total Black undergraduate and graduate/professional enrollment increased by 2.6 percentduring the past year. Between 1990 and 2000, Black enrollment increased by 8.0 percentat the undergraduate level and 54.6 percent at the graduate/professional level.
Total Hispanic undergraduate and graduate/professional enrollment increased by6.4 percent during the past year. Between 1990 and 2000, Hispanic enrollment increasedby 67.4 percent at the undergraduate and 97.9 percent at the graduate/professional levels.
Black and Hispanic graduate enrollment increased by 5.1 and 9.3 percent, respectively,over the previous year. This is the largest single year percentage increase since 1994 foreach group.
Total degrees awarded to Black students increased by 4.2 percent during the past year.Increases occurred at all levels, except the associate and doctoral levels. Between 1990and 2000 total degrees awarded to Black students increased by 38.7 percent.
Total degrees awarded to Hispanic students increased by 3.7 percent during the past year.Increases occurred at all levels, except the master's and doctoral levels. Between 1990and 2000 total degrees awarded to Hispanic students increased by 72.3 percent.
2002 Focus Topic
Each year the report presents information on topics of special relevance. This year's topicis underrepresented student perceptions of campus climate. Public colleges and universitiessurveyed students from underrepresented groups about their perceptions of campus climate ineight key areas: 1) institutional attractiveness, 2) faculty and classroom behavior, 3) studentneeds and concerns, 4) institutional responsiveness, 5) student racial climate, 6) institutionalracial climate, 7) student life, and 8) race relations. The report provides a synopsis of the results.Major findings include:
1
7
The vast majority of underrepresented students had positive opinions about their campusclimate as a whole.
A large majority of underrepresented students feel that faculty treat all students the same.
Underrepresented students are concerned about the continued availability of financial aidand the lack of diversity in faculty and staff.
Underrepresented student perceptions of campus racial climate are, for the most part,positive. However, many students from underrepresented groups believe problems doexist on campus.
Since attending college, a majority of underrepresented students indicated animprovement in their attitude toward others of different race and ethnicities. However, asignificant percentage indicated there had been no change in their attitude.
Initiatives to Improve Representation
The report contains information on major statewide and institutional initiativesundertaken during the past year to improve student and staff representation. Campus initiativesare presented for four underrepresented populations: minority students, female students, studentswith disabilities, and underrepresented faculty/staff.
2
INTRODUCTION
This is the fourteenth annual report on minority, female, and disabled students and staffin Illinois higher education. The report is submitted in accordance with Public Act 85-283 andsubsequent legislation that direct the Illinois Board of Higher Education to report annually to theGovernor and General Assembly on underrepresented groups. Information in the report comesprimarily from three sources: Board of Higher Education data systems, surveys, and reports;Integrated Postsecondary Education Data Systems Fall Staff survey (IPEDS); and reportssubmitted each year on this topic by public colleges and universities to the Illinois Board ofHigher Education.
Each year the report highlights topics of particular importance in improving student andstaff representation, and presents the "year in review" as it affects underrepresented groups. Thisyear's report highlights student perceptions of campus climate. The report also providesinformation on recent trends in enrollment and degrees awarded. The appendix containsadditional enrollment and degree data.
The 2002 underrepresented groups report is the last report to follow the current format.This past year, Board staff, Illinois Community College Board staff, and campus representativesmet to collaboratively restructure the report to make it more useful as an informational andaccountability tool from both an institutional and state perspective, while still meeting thelegislatively mandated requirements. The 2003 report will be the first under the new format.
3
POSTSECONDARY ENROLLMENT AND DEGREES
Fall 2000 Enrollment
Table 1 presents Fall 2000 postsecondary enrollment figures for Black and Hispanicstudents and the one-year percent change in enrollment over Fall 1999 by sector and degree level.Undergraduate enrollment at community colleges does not include enrollment in pre-collegiateand continuing education programs. Enrollment for these two programs can be found inAppendix Table 2.
Black Enrollment
In Fall 2000, total Black enrollment at Illinois colleges and universities was 78,595, aone-year increase of 2.6 percent. Statewide, Black students accounted for 12.9 percent of totalenrollment. By sector, Black students accounted for 12.0 percent of total enrollment at publicuniversities, 11.6 percent at private colleges and universities, and 14.9 percent at publiccommunity colleges.
Black undergraduate enrollment was 67,865, a one-year increase of 2.2 percent. Blackundergraduate enrollment at public universities experienced a one-year decline of 3.6 percent, butprivate colleges and universities and public community colleges had one-year increases of9.1 percent and 2.1 percent respectively. Black undergraduate enrollment accounted for13.8 percent of total undergraduate enrollment at all Illinois colleges and universities. By sector,Black undergraduate enrollment was 12.7 percent of total undergraduate enrollment at publicuniversities, 13.2 percent at private colleges and universities, and 14.9 percent at publiccommunity colleges.
Black graduate enrollment was 10,730, a one-year increase of 5.1 percent statewide. Thisis the largest single year increase since 1993-94. There were declines in first professionalenrollment, however, at both public and private colleges and universities. Black graduateenrollment accounted for 9.1 percent of total graduate enrollment. By sector, Black studentsaccounted for 10.0 percent of graduate enrollment at public universities and 8.4 percent at privatecolleges and universities.
Hispanic Enrollment
In Fall 2000, total Hispanic enrollment at Illinois colleges and universities was 43,902, aone-yeai increase of 6.4 percent. Hispanics accounted for 7.2 percent of total enrollment atIllinois colleges and universities. By sector, Hispanics accounted for 5.9 percent of enrollment atpublic universities, 7.7 percent at private colleges and universities, and 8.0 percent at publiccommunity colleges.
Hispanic undergraduate enrollment was 39,467, a one-year increase of 6.1 percent.Hispanics experienced one-year increases of 1.3 percent at public universities, 10.3 percent atprivate colleges and universities, and 5.7 percent at public community colleges. Hispanicundergraduate enrollment accounted for 8.0 percent of total undergraduate enrollment. By sector,Hispanics accounted for 6.5 percent of undergraduate enrollment at public universities, 9.6percent at private colleges and universities, and 8.0 percent at public community colleges.
5
10
Hispanic graduate enrollment was 4,435, a one-year increase of 9.3 percent. Like Blackgraduate enrollment, this is the largest single year increase since 1993-94. Hispanic graduateenrollment experienced one-year increases of 12.4 percent at public universities and 7.0 percentat private colleges and universities. Statewide, Hispanics accounted for 3.8 percent of totalgraduate enrollment. By sector, Hispanics accounted for 4.1 percent of total graduate enrollmentat public universities and 3.5 percent at private colleges and universities.
Table 1
Black and Hispanic Postsecondary Enrollment for Fall 2000by Sector and Degree Level
Black Enrollment Hispanic Enrollment
Fall 2000Enrollment
Percent Change1999 to 2000
Fall 2000Enrollment
Percent Change1999 to 2000
All Colleges and I lniversitios 78.595 21i % 41.90Z L4 (1/0
Undergraduate* 67,865 2.2 39,467 6.1
Graduate 10 730 51. 4,435 21Master's** 8,496 5.8 3,074 11.4
Doctorate 1,137 9.7 583 18.5
First Professional 1,097 (3.6) 778 (3.4)
Public liniversitiei 23,250 all 11,420 31.
Undergraduate 18,432 (3.6) 9,469 1.3
Graduate 4,818 12 1 951 illMaster's** 4,092 3.9 1,449 15.0
Doctorate 447 6.7 228 20.6
First Professional 279 (1.1) 274 (4.2)
Private Co IletTs and liniversities 24,270 83. 2.8
Undergraduate 18,358 9.1
.1.548116
13,322 10.3
Graduate 5 917 fil 7,484 211
Master's** 4,404 7.5 1,625 8.3
Doctorate 690 11.8 355 17.2
First Professional 818 (4.4) 504 (2.9)
Public Community Collet Ts* 31.074 2.1 16.6'76
Undergraduate 31,075 2.1 16,676 5.7
* Does not include students enrolled in pre-collegiate and continuing education programs.
** Includes advanced certificate enrollment.
6
11
Degrees Awarded in 1999-2000
Table 2 presents degrees awarded to Black and Hispanic students in 1999-2000 and theone-year percent change in degrees awarded over 1998-1999 by sector and degree level.Information on Black and Hispanic degrees awarded as a percent of total degrees by sector anddegree level can be found in Appendix Table 15. Additional information on degrees can also befound in Appendix Tables 16 through 23.
Table 2
Black and Hispanic Degrees Awarded in 1999-2000by Sector and Degree Level
Black Degrees Awarded Hispanic Degrees Awarded
1999-2000Deo.eci
One-YearPercent Chance
1999-2000De reel
One-YearPercent ChaTyr,
All Colleges and Ilniversities 14.093 AI% 7.277 3.2, %
1 to 4 Year Certificate 3,330 5.8 1,594 10.5
Associate 2,779 (2.1) 1,869 2.1
Baccalaureate 5,317 4.4 2,874 4.3
Master's* 2,314 11.1 687 (7.8)
Doctorate 105 (18.6) 47 (6.0)
First Professional 248 6.4 206 5.6
Public 11niversitie 4.111 21 1,746 414Associate 7 (30.0) 4 (20.0)
Baccalaureate 3,177 3.7 1,403 (0.4)
Master's* 822 1.9 198 (30.8)
Doctorate 42 (4.5) 13 (13.3)
First Professional 69 (15.9) 78 36.8
Private Colleges and Ilniversitipi 5..132 52 3.146 al1 to 4 Year Certificate 569 (7.9) 368 (5.2)
Associate 696 (3.3) 706 (7.2)
Baccalaureate 2,140 5.4 1,471 9.2
Master* 1,492 16.9 439 (4.4)
Doctorate 59 (30.6) 30 (14.3)
First Professional 179 18.5 128 (7.2)
Public Community Collegy LEM Al 2-385 .12.1
1 to 4 Year Certificate 2,761 9.2 1,226 16.4
Associate 2,076 (1.5) 1,159 8.9
* Includes advanced certificates.
Black Student Degrees
In 1999-2000, the total number of degrees and certificates awarded to Black studentsstatewide was 14,093, a one-year increase of 4.2 percent. Increases in the number of degreesoccurred at the certificate, baccalaureate, master's, and first professional degree levels. Theassociate and doctoral degree levels experienced declines.
All three institutional sectors had increases in the total number of degrees awarded toBlack students. Private colleges and universities experienced a one-year increase of 5.3 percent,public community colleges 4.3 percent, and public universities 2.7 percent. Most of the increaseat public universities and private colleges and universities occurred at the baccalaureate andmaster's degree levels. The increase at public community colleges is accounted for at thecertificate level.
Hispanic Student Degrees
In 1999-2000, the total number of degrees and certificates awarded to Hispanic studentsstatewide was 7,277, a one-year increase of 3.7 percent. Most of the increase resulted fromgrowth in certificates and associate degrees awarded by public community colleges andbaccalaureate degrees awarded by private colleges and universities.
A different picture emerges when degrees are broken down by institutional sector. Thenumber of certificates and associate degrees awarded to Hispanic students by public communitycolleges experienced large increases of 16.4 and 8.9 percent respectively. Public universities hada one-year decline of 1.5 percent in the number of degrees awarded to Hispanics, resulting fromdeclines at all degree levels except professional degrees. Degrees and certificates awarded byprivate colleges and universities remained relatively stable with only a 0.6 percent increase, witha one-year increase of 9.2 percent in baccalaureate degrees offsetting declines in all other degreelevels.
Postsecondary Enrollment and Degree Trends, 1990 to 2000
Black and Hispanic Enrollment
Between 1990 and 2000, total Black enrollment increased by 12.6 percent at all Illinoiscolleges and universities. The largest growth in total Black enrollment occurred at privatecolleges and universities with an increase of 34.4 percent, followed by public universities at11.3 percent and public community colleges at 0.8 percent. Black undergraduate and graduateenrollment increased by 8.0 percent and 54.6 percent, respectively, between 1990 and 2000.Undergraduate enrollment at private colleaes and universities grew by 23.0 percent and graduateenrollment by 88.2 percent. Undergraduate enrollment at public universities grew by 7.8 percentand graduate enrollment by 26.8 percent. Undergraduate enrollment at public communitycolleges increased by 0.8 percent.
Between 1990 and 2000, total Hispanic enrollment increased by 70.0 percent at allIllinois colleges and universities. The largest growth in total Hispanic enrollment occurred atpublic community colleges with an increase of 75.6 percent, followed by private colleges anduniversities at 69.6 percent, and public universities at 63.1 percent. Hispanic undergraduate andgraduate enrollment increased by 67.4 percent and 97.9 percent, respectively, between 1990 and2000. Undergraduate enrollment at private colleges and universities grew by 65.4 percent andgraduate enrollment by 95.9 percent. Undergraduate enrollment at public universities grew by57.1 percent and graduate enrollment by 100.5 percent. Undergraduate enrollment at publiccommunity colleges increased by 75.6 percent.
Black and Hispanic Degrees
Table 3 presents the ten-year change in degrees awarded to Black and Hispanic studentsby sector and degree level.
Between 1990 and 2000, the total number of degrees awarded by all Illinois colleges anduniversities to Black students increased by 38.7 percent, with all degree levels experiencinggrowth. The largest growth occurred at the baccalaureate and master's degree levels withincreases of 52.6 percent and 96.6 percent respectively. Each sector experienced growth in thenumber of degrees awarded, with public universities experiencing a total increase of 53.6 percent,private colleges and universities 51.6 percent, and public community colleges 18.4 percent.
Between 1990 and 2000, the total number of degrees awarded by all Illinois colleges anduniversities to Hispanic students increased by 72.3 percent, with all degree levels experiencinggrowth. The largest growth occurred at the baccalaureate and master's degree levels withincreases of 95.4 percent and 80.8 percent respectively. Each sector experienced growth in thenumber of degrees awarded, with public universities experiencing a total increase of 56.6 percent,private colleges and universities 74.2 percent, and public community colleges 83.2 percent.
9 14
Table 3
Ten-Year Change in Black and Hispanic Degrees Awardedby Sector and Degree Level
Black Degrees Awarded Hispanic Degrees Awarded
All C'nileupq and I Tniversitim
Ten-Year Percent Change1990 to 9000
Ten-Year Percent Change1990 to 2000
11.2
20.0
12.2
52.6
96.6
36.4
49.4
Sal(82.1)
59.2
48.4
16.7
21.1
5L5.
(10.8)
42.3
43.6
139.5
53.7
64.2
1.8-4
29.1
6.5
% /2.355.5
60.3
95.4
80.8
20.5
45.1
511..G
(42.9)
70.1
23.4
(27.8)
23.8
24.211.5
28.1
127.7
145.3
61.9
62.0
83.276.7
90.6
'3/0
1 to 4 Year Certificate
Associate
Baccalaureate
Master's*
Doctorate
First Professional
Public liniversitie
Associate
Baccalaureate
Master's*
Doctorate
First Professional
Private Cnllegrs and IlniversitieS
1 to 4 Year Certificate
Associate
Baccalaureate
Master*
Doctorate
First Professional
Public ennimunity CANT"
1 to 4 Year Certificate
Associate
* Includes advanced certificates.
10
i5
2002 FOCUS TOPIC
STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF CAMPUS CLIMATE
Each year, this report focuses on topics pertaining to student and staff representation.The topics are selected in consultation with public colleges and universities who includeinformation about each topic in their annual reports to the Illinois Board of Higher Education.
This year a single focus topic is presented on student perceptions of campus climate.Public universities and colleges were asked to assess undergraduate student perceptions of thefollowing eight components institutional attractiveness, faculty/classroom behavior, studentneeds and concerns, institutional responsiveness, student racial climate, institutional racialclimate, student life, and racial relations. These eight components are part of a student life surveydeveloped at Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. Because of the basic differences incampus life between public universities and public community colleges, each is presentedseparately. The report for the public community colleges was developed by staff from the IllinoisCommunity College Board.
Public Universities
For this report, institutions had the flexibility to determine how best to assess studentperceptions of campus climate. Public universities used a combination of written surveys,telephone surveys, and focus groups to assess student opinion. Written surveys included thosedeveloped in-house and national surveys such as the College Student Survey, CooperativeInstitutional Research Program Freshman Survey, and the Student Satisfaction Survey.
Undergraduate students from underrepresented groups were the principal population ofinterest for the assessment, and each institution took significant steps to target surveys to thesestudent groups. For instance, one campus assessed the opinions of over 1,000 students fromunderrepresented groups using a combination of surveys and focus groups. Another campus,using a combination of mail surveys and surveys of students in Black Studies courses, had over400 responses from students from underrepresented groups. As a result of these efforts, theoverwhelming majority of student opinions presented below are those of students fromunderrepresented groups.
Because of the variation in depth of coverage, sufficient statewide data were collected onsix of the eight components institutional attractiveness, faculty and classroom behavior, studentneeds and concerns, student racial climate, institutional racial climate, and racial relations. Abrief synopsis of the results for each of these six components is presented below.
Institutional Attractiveness
Institutional attractiveness addressed two concerns factors influencing student decisionsto attend a particular public university and factors influencing decisions to remain at thatinstitution. By an overwhelming margin, four factors emerged as having the most influence inselecting an institution: 1) affordability (tuition and fees), 2) availability of financial aid, 3)academic reputation, and 4) the presence of a specific academic program. Other, less influential,factors were proximity to home and ability to get a good job after graduation.
Factors influencing decisions to remain at an institution paralleled those for institutionalselection. In general, institutions reported three major factors that influenced decisions to remainat a selected institution: 1) affordability (tuition and fees), 2) financial aid, and 3) perceivedquality of program major. Other, less influential, factors included a sense of belonging andability to get into good graduate programs.
Few underrepresented students reported that diversity influenced their decisions to attendor remain at their selected institution. Two institutions reported that diversity did play some rolein the decisions of Black students. While "bread and butter" issues such as affordability andprogram quality are the main factors influencing underrepresented student enrollment decisions,as shown below, students do have opinions about racial climate that affects the quality of theircollege experience.
Faculty and Classroom Behavior
Faculty behavior was viewed positively by underrepresented students across campuses.The majority of minority and female students and students with disabilities indicated that race,ethnicity, gender, or disability does not impact the manner in which faculty treat them.
However, there were concerns raised by a significant percentage of minority students onsome campuses regarding faculty behavior. For instance, on one campus, 21 percent of Hispanicstudents and 25 percent of Black students believed that instnictors showed less personal interestin them compared with other students. On this same campus, 25 percent of Asian-Americanstudents believed that faculty treated them with more indifference than other students. At anothercampus, a significant percentage of Black and Hispanic students indicated that they were morelikely to be referred for tutorial assistance. Still, another campus reported that 22 percent ofBlack students indicated that race/ethnic or gender insensitivity in the class was either moderate,substantial, or critical.
The fact that at some institutions a number of students perceive disparate treatment on thepart of some faculty members is cause for concern. While this is not a pervasive problem acrossall university campuses, survey results suggest that continued monitoring of student opinion isnecessary as are development programs that enhance faculty efforts to meet the educational needsof all students.
Student Needs and Concerns
Underrepresented students were asked about which needs or concerns regarding campusclimate they felt needed to be addressed by their institution. Some indicated concerns werecommon to all student groups, while others were more group specific.
The number one or two concern on all campuses was the availability of financial aid.Financial aid was of particular concern for Black and Hispanic students on most campuses. Forinstance, at one institution less than 80 percent of female, disabled, and Asian-American studentsindicated the need for increased financial aid, while over 90 percent of Black and Hispanicstudents did so.
Several other issues were of particular concern to Black and Hispanic students. Oneconcern reported by ten public universities was the lack of minority faculty and staff on campus.On many campuses, Black and Hispanic students indicated the need for improved academic
12
17
support and the need for more counseling and advisement that focused on their needs. Onecampus reported that close to 90 percent of Black students called for better treatment by campuspolice and a more favorable local community racial climate. The institution took immediate stepsto correct this problem by hiring a new minority chief of police and additional minority officers,and increasing salary to attract better qualified candidates. Since these changes there has not beena single complaint about campus police behavior.
Students with disabilities indicated several concerns. For instance, one campus reportedthat 65 percent of students with disabilities wanted additional counseling and advisement.Another campus reported that over 70 percent of students with disabilities sought improvedacademic support for freshmen and better availability of adaptive technology.
Female student concerns, for the most part, mirrored those of other students including theneed for increased financial aid and improved support services. However, on one campus femalestudents indicated a need for healthcare services that better addressed the special needs of women.
Student and Institutional Racial Climate
Underrepresented students were asked about multiracial/ethnic relations on campus fromtheir personal perspective and regarding the institution as a whole. Their perceptions of campusracial climate were, for the most part, positive. A majority of students had good relationshipswith other students and reported that their campus was friendly and relaxed. One campusreported that 98.5 percent of students indicated the campus climate was friendly or very friendly.Students with disabilities were positive about facility access improvements and the ability to relyon other students for assistance.
While a majority of students viewed campus racial climate positively, few students fromunderrepresented groups reported that their campuses were free from racial conflict. Oneuniversity reported that a large percentage of Black, Hispanic, and Asian-American studentsperceived the campus climate to be very segregated in its social relations. At another university,minority students reported they were treated unfairly compared with white students. Also, somestudents with disabilities were slightly more likely than other students to have heard insensitive ordisparaging remarks about people with disabilities from faculty, staff, and students.
Racial Relations
Underrepresented students were asked about their attitudes or views on race relations andwhether or not they had changed since first attending college. In general, all student groupsreported they had gained a greater understanding and appreciation of multicultural differencesand diversity and that they were friendlier toward others. One campus reported that 40 percent ofstudents indicated that they were friendlier to people of other race/ethnic groups. Anothercampus reported that close to 30 percent of students from underrepresented groups weresomewhat to distinctly friendlier with people of other race/ethnicities.
However, responses regarding racial relations were mixed across institutions. Whilesome universities reported that a majority of students indicated improved views on race relations,others reported that a majority of students had not changed their views. One university reportedthat a majority of Black, Hispanic, and Asian-American students indicated no change in theirattitudes towards other race/ethnic groups. Another university indicated that close to 50 percentof students were unchanged in their beliefs on segregation and close to 12 percent had stronger
13
18
beliefs in segregation. On a more positive note, 35 percent of students at another institution hadstronger beliefs in integration since first attending.
Public Community Colleges
Community colleges employed surveys and focus groups to examine campus climate forunderrepresented groups. Many used surveys developed by Kishwaukee College and SouthernIllinois University at Carbondale. Other surveys included ACT/AACC's Faces of the Future,Noel-Levitz's Student Satisfaction Inventory, the Intercultural Development Inventory, ACT'sStudent Opinion Survey, and an adaptation of the Student Campus Climate Survey developed bythe University of Illinois at Springfield.
Each public community college provided campus specific results to the IllinoisCommunity College Board. Similar to public universities, there was variation in the depth ofcoverage needed to permit statewide analysis. As a result, only four components are covered inthis survey institutional attractiveness, faculty and classroom behavior, student racial climate,and institutional racial climate. A brief synopsis of the results for each of these four componentsis presented below. Some community colleges surveyed all student groups. In these instances,distinctions were made between responses by underrepresented and other students.
Institutional Attractiveness
Students choose to enroll at community colleges for a variety of reasons including qualityof instruction, institutional reputation, program availability, proximity to home or work,affordability (tuition and fees), and availability of financial aid. One college reported that groupsof primarily younger, on-campus minority students and students with disabilities appreciateopportunities such as previewing the college experience, exploring careers, and experimentingwith multiple educational paths prior to transferring to four-year institutions. Some minoritystudents stated that going to school with friends was important to them. Students interested intransfer programs preferred starting their college career at the community college because of theconvenience, location, affordability, and familiarity with other students on campus. Students alsoappreciated the assistance offered with the transfer of credits to other colleges and universities.
Overall, colleges reported a high degree of consistency between reasons cited fordeciding to enroll and continuing at the same institution. The convenience of a college close towork, with child care and quality education in one location, was cited as a plus by many students.Some students indicated the quality of several healthcare programs as particularly appealing. Thefaculty and staff were recognized for their helpfulness in assisting students achieve theireducational goals.
One college reported that a majority of Black, Hispanic, and white students ratedreasonable cost as very important in their decision to stay. Black and Hispanic students weresignificantly more likely than white students to rate "chance for a good job" as very important,while white students were more likely to rate flexible class scheduling as very important.Minority students were significantly more likely than white students to rate a multiculturalatmosphere and presence of students and faculty/staff of various raciallethnic groups as veryimportant in their decision to stay. Other positive factors included: flexible course scheduling,affordability, small class size, and comfortable environment. Approximately two-thirds ofminority and white students intended to return to the college next semester.
14
19
Faculty and Classroom Behavior
In general, results indicated that the vast majority of students believed that facultymembers treated all students with respect and were interested in them. For example, over92 percent of students from all groups at one college agreed that there were opportunities formentor relationships with faculty. Students also agreed that faculty members generally showedpersonal interest in students regardless of race/ethnicity, gender, or disability and that facultymembers treated all students the same.
Another college reported that 93 percent of the students reported good interactionbetween faculty and students within the classroom environment. Eighty-six percent of thestudents felt that faculty showed a personal interest in all students and 93 percent felt all studentswere treated the same by faculty.
Student Racial Climate
In general, students were positive about the extent to which the climate was accepting ofindividuals of different racial/ethnic backgrounds and about the level of integration at theircollege. For example, at one campus 78 percent of students indicated that positive interactionsexist between minority and non-minority students and among different minority groups. Nearlytwo-thirds of the students agreed that open discussion of racial/ethnic issues occurred but alsoatzreed that separate seating patterns by racial groups exist on campus.
A small contingent of students felt pressure from members of their own racial/ethnicgroup to limit the amount of social interaction with other racial/ethnic groups. However, at onecampus, a majority of students reported they did not feel pressure to socialize with members oftheir own racial/ethnic group. Furthermore, students felt it important to socialize with membersof other race/ethnic groups and different religions. Another college reported that students hadmany multicultural friendships and viewed favorably the racial climate among students.
Results from another college indicated that on-campus incidences of discrimination arerare. Also, the college was responsive in terms of sensitivity to the needs of different groups butratings were not as positive as those received on other survey items.
Institutional Racial Climate
Overall, campuses reported that the majority of students "surveyed had a positiveperception of the racial climate at their institution. For instance, one college reported that80 percent of the underrepresented students agreed that the college is sensitive to the needs ofstudents of all race/ethnic groups. Close to 75 percent of students agreed or strongly agreed thatcourses, events, and programs reflected the perspectives of minorities and women and more than80 percent of students agreed that they felt comfortable at the college and had a sense ofbelonging.
On another campus, students were asked about how individuals were portrayed incampus publications and whether the perspectives of minorities and women were included incollege courses, events and programming. More than 92 percent of the students agreed that allindividuals were positively portrayed in campus publications and that college courses, events, andprograms included the perspectives of minorities and women. Only five percent or less of Black,
15
female, and disabled students, and eight percent of Hispanic students disagreed.
At many institutions, a significant number of students voiced their preference to havegreater numbers of minority faculty and staff. For example, at one campus, approximately25 percent of the students thought that the college staff and faculty did not adequately reflect thecross-cultural composition of the student body. Nearly 50 percent of minority students agreedthey would be more comfortable if faculty and staff were more diverse.
One college asked students about whether the campus climate was conducive to positiverelations between students of different racial and ethnic backgrounds. Over 79 percent ofstudents agreed that the campus supported the cultural and racial diversity of all students. Inaddition, approximately 85 percent of students agreed that students respected each other.
Students at one college reported that student organizations were instrumental in creating apositive racial climate. Seventy-two percent of students at another college indicated that havingmore multicultural inclusive social activities was important to them. Furthermore, 78 percentnoted that these organizations were important for a more diversity-friendly campus climate.
Summary
The majority of students from underrepresented groups expressed positive attitudes abouteach of the campus climate components discussed in this report. For example, the majority ofstudents expressed positive opinions about faculty behavior and how faculty treated all studentsequally. Students favorably viewed the campus racial climate and expressed positive opinionsabout the importance of social interaction among students from all backgrounds. Also, a largepercentage of students expressed improvement in their attitudes towards different racial/ethnicgroups since first attending college. Each of these components plays a role in creating a diversityfriendly campus, which is so important in enhancing the educational experience of all students.
However, it would be unrealistic to think that campuses are without problems.Significant percentages of underrepresented students had less than favorable opinions about theircampus climate, and, in particular, about the racial climate. Students expressed concern overdisparate treatment by faculty and, in some instances, by campus staff. Many expressed opinionsabout the presence of racial conflict on campus and of being targets of disparaging remarks. Allthis leads to an unhealthy environment that benefits no one and degrades the educationalexperience.
These findings are general statewide observations made from individual institutionalreports. Each institution has its own unique. campus climate with its own unique set of strengthsand weaknesses. This exercise afforded each institution the opportunity to identify their areas ofstrength and weakness and plan a course of action to address them. Institutions should takeadvantage of student input when addressing campus climate. Campuses should be proactive inasking students to voice their concerns about race/ethnicity issues, as well as other issuesimportant to their collegiate experience.
Three results of this climate survey reinforce the importance of ongoing statewide policyinitiatives in Illinois higher education. First, it is clear that underrepresented students are stronglyconcerned about questions of college affordability. The state's longstanding commitment toneed-based student financial aid and the Monetary Award Program, the second largest program in
16
21
the nation, is a direct response to such student needs. Second, a large percentage of Black andHispanic students voiced concern about the lack of minority faculty and staff. In the comingyear, the Illinois Board of Higher Education will undertake a study that addresses minorityfaculty and staff diversity on college campuses. In compiling evidence, the Illinois Board ofHigher Education report will draw on results from this climate survey. Third, many students withdisabilities expressed concern about the need for improved access to assistive technologies. TheIllinois Board of Higher Education August 2001 report Gateway to Success: Rethinking Accessand Diversity fin. a New Century, also stressed the importance of capitalizing upon assistivetechnology. In May 2002, the Illinois Board of Higher Education awarded a Higher EducationCooperation Act (HECA) grant to Northern Illinois University to undertake a conference toincrease statewide knowledge and awareness about how assistive technology can better servestudents with disabilities. A description of this conference is provided in another item in theseagenda materials.
Because this focus topic will be periodically revisited, some suggestions about the scopeand methodology of campus climate surveys are appropriate. Some institutions need to provide amore critical analysis of their campus climate. It is important to explore both strengths andweaknesses to create an accurate picture of student opinion. In some cases, institutions may wantto follow surveys with focus groups that permit a more in-depth exploration of student opinion.Such an approach is especially useful when a significant percentage of underrepresented studentsidentify an area of concern.
When an area of weakness is identified, institutions also should report to the IllinoisBoard of Higher Education on any initiatives they intend to undertake to address the issue. In thisway, institutions demonstrate that the survey is more than just information gathering, but also aplanning tool. It would also be helpful if there were a set of core survey questions used by allinstitutions. While flexibility of assessment is useful, in this case it did not lend itself to adequatestatewide coverage of all components of campus climate. Finally, while most institutions tooksignificant steps to target surveys to underrepresented students, some reported results for allstudents, thereby, obscuring the opinions of underrepresented students. In cases in which allstudents are surveyed, the opinions of underrepresented students should receive singularattention.
In conclusion, Illinois colleges and universities should continue to:
Periodically, survey students from underrepresented groups and other studentsabout their perceptions of campus climate; and
Promptly and fully respond to problems identified in these surveys.
The Illinois Board of Higher Education should continue to report on results of campusclimate surveys. In addition, the Board should look to identify statewide issues that are reportedin the campus climate surveys helping institutions enhance their capability to respond to theseissues and improve the overall campus racial climate. Based on the results of this year's survey,the Board especially should look for opportunities to:
Continue to support a, financial aid system that finds needy students and,thereby, offers access to many underrepresented students;
Increase the number of underrepresented faculty and staff; and
17
Provide assistive technologies for students with disabilities and help students andfaculty understand how this technology is best used to support student learning.
18
THE YEAR IN REVIEW:INITIATIVES TO IMPROVE REPRESENTATION
Each year this report presents information on initiatives to improve student and staffrepresentation. The information is organized around key policy themes and includes results fromstudies and program evaluations.
Minority Students
Institutional Planning
Planning for Diversity. Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville initiated twocommittees, the Minority Student Recruitment and Retention Committee and theMinority Faculty and Retention Committee, to strengthen institution planning forminority representation.
Pre-collegiate Programs
Mentoring for Success. Northern Illinois University's Center for Black Studies initiatedthe Students Teaching Others Mentor Program (STOMP) with the DeKalb SchoolDistrict. The program coordinates efforts of student organizations at the university tomentor precollegiate students and holds the Drug and Gang Prevention Workshop forjunior and high school students.
Careers in Medicine. Chicago State University initiated the Health and Medical CareersProgram, which served 40 students from 16 high schools. The six-week summer programprovides students with academic enrichment and career exploration to better prepare themfor college.
Admissions Assistance. Chicago State University initiated Project Adelante to assistprospective Hispanic students and their families through the college application process.Bimonthly seminars (delivered in Spanish) cover topics such as applying to college andsearching for financial aid.
The African-American Academic Network at the University of Illinois at Chicagoinitialed Decision Day. The program, held twice a year, offers on -sight admissionsdecisions to participants with completed applications.
College Support Programs
Financial Aid. Illinois State University increased the value of its Minority AcademicScholarship from $2,500 to $5,000 a year. The increase was based on a study of minoritystudents who were admitted but did not enroll. The study found the principal reason fornot enrolling was that the university's financial aid package was not as competitive aspeer institutions. The number of minority students accepting the scholarship increasedfrom 17 to 42 this past year.
19
Mentoring Programs. The graduate school at Northern Illinois University instituted apeer mentoring pilot program where experienced graduate students serve as mentors fornew minority graduate students.
The African-American Cultural Program at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign initiated a pilot Student Leaders Mentoring Program to encourage leaders ofstudent organizations to achieve high academic success.
Southern Illinois University at Carbondale initiated a peer-mentoring program forminority freshman and transfer students who are matched with upper-division minoritystudents.
Danville Area Community College created a college-wide Diversity Team. The teamsponsored a mentoring program that paired 120 students with 90 faculty and staffvolunteers.
Northeastern Illinois University received a grant from the National Endowment for theHumanities to develop learning communities for students in the humanities. The projectgoal is to enhance student learning and retention, especially among Hispanic students.
Recognition. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale was recognized by Black Issuesof Higher Education for its success in graduating Black males.
The Committee on Institutional Cooperation's Summer Research Opportunities Programat the University of Illinois at Chicago was awarded the prestigious Presidential Awardfor Excellence in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Mentoring by the White HouseOffice of Science and Technology Policy. This program served 25 African-Americanand 23 Hispanic students in 2000-01.
New Staff. Danville Area Community College created a Student Diversity AdvocatePosition.
New Services. Oakton Community College's "Services To Establish Patterns of Success"(STEPS) program promotes student success among first generation college and low-income students, and students with disabilities.
The College Environment
Orientation. Western Illinois University initiated "You Make WIU a Premier University:A Multicultural Orientation," a program addressing issues unique to entering minoritystudents.
Minority Student Academic Center. Illinois State University opened the Minority StudentAcademic Center. The center coordinates activities for minority students, includes acomputer lab and study center, and provides a supportive environment for both formaland informal activities.
Forum for Debate. Western Illinois University established the African-American DebateSociety to provide an academic format in which to discuss issues related to the African-American experience.
New Fellowships. The University of Illinois at Chicago initiated the African-AmericanCulture Fellowship Program. The program focuses attention on African-American issuesand offers two fellowshipsthe Faculty Fellowship in African-American Culture and theCommunity Fellowship in African-American Culture.
Focus on Race Relations. The University of Illinois at Springfield's Diversity Taskforceconducted a study circle on race relations. This six-week experience brought peopletogether to discuss and make recommendations on improving race relations. The group'srecommendations will be shared with the campus community.
Remediation. Parkland College's Learning Lab, in conjunction with the TRIO/ProjectG.O.A.L.S, developed a supplemental instructional course for selected students enrolledin remedial courses.
Opportunities in Fields of High Employer and Societal Need
Careers in Nursing. Northern Illinois University's School of Nursing was awarded a$1.3 million grant from the Department of Health and Human Services to develop arecruitment plan that targets minorities living in rural underserved areas.
Careers in Science. The Reproductive Biology Training Program at the University ofIllinois at Urbana-Champaign offered an opportunity for minority undergraduatesmajoring in the life sciences to participate in faculty research projects in reproductivebiology during the summer of 2001.
Bilingual Teachers. Chicago State University created Nueva Generation, a communitybased bilingual teacher education program, to provide opportunities for parents who areactive in predominately Hispanic neighborhoods to continue their education and becomecertified teachers.
Allied Health Careers. Triton College created the Access to Allied Health CareersProgram. The program's goal is to expand the number of students pursuing careers inallied health professions.
Workforce Diversity. Northeastern Illinois University established the Work ForceInstitute for Diversity. The institute assists organizational leaders make informeddecisions that build diversity and enables workers to learn successful strategies forworking with people from different cultures, ethnicities, and age groups.
Female Students
Help for Parents. Northern Illinois University established a support group for femalestudents who are parents.
Mathematics Participation. Northern Illinois University was awarded $100,000 by theNational Science Foundation for a project to enhance women's participation and successin mathematics.
Conference on Women. The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign held its firstundergraduate conference on women, titled "Rites of Passage: Women and the CampusExperience."
Relationship Violence. Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville sponsored a programon relationship violence facilitated by representatives from Michigan State University.The program included workshops, a community forum, and information on wherestudents in abusive relationships may turn for help.
Women's Studies. The Women's Studies Program at Northeastern Illinois Universityreceived approval to offer an undergraduate major. This is the only undergraduate majorin woman's studies at an Illinois public university.
Students with Disabilities
National Host Site. Governor's State University served as a host site for three nationaltelephone conferences sponsored by the Great Lakes Disability and Business TechnicalAssistance Center. The conferences focused on best practices in disability managementservices, and the application of ADA accessibility guidelines, including responsibility forensuring electronic access.
New Staff Western Illinois University created a position at the Quad Cities campus towork directly with students with disabilities.
The University of Illinois at Springfield hired a full-time disability specialist to meet theneeds of students with disabilities.
Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville hired a specialist to diagnose and work withstudents with learning disabilities and attention deficit disorder.
New and Assistive Technologies. Illinois State University purchased a high-speedscanner and software to convert text to speech and text to Braille to facilitate access towritten material.
Chicago State University acquired new equipment to better serve students withdisabilities. The equipment includes a Max Eye portable electronic magnifier, two laptopcomputers, and a PIAF raised line copier.
Illinois State University received a $1 million federal grant to fund the Center for SpecialEducation Assistive Technology. The center will serve as a demonstration site to instructteachers how to use assistive technology, allow faculty to engage in research related toassistive technology, and provide individuals with assistance in the acquisition and use ofadaptive devices.
Policy and Planning. The University of Illinois at Springfield's Campus Senate
22 27
approved a new policy on academic accommodations and course substitutions. The newpolicy provides a formal review process for requests for accommodations, in particularfor requests for course substitutions, when presented by a student with a documenteddisability.
The University of Illinois at Chicago commissioned a disability expert to evaluate andreport on current services to students with disabilities.
Recognition. The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign was rated the nation's bestand most user-friendly campus for students with disabilities among the 50 top publicuniversities in New Mobility: Disability Culture and Lifestyle.
Enhanced Tutoring. South Suburban College used special population grant funds toincrease the quality and extent of tutoring and other academic assistance given to studentswith disabilities enrolled in remedial mathematics, reading, or English.
Underrepresented Staff
Women and Asian-American Recruitment. The University of Illinois at Chicagoapproved an extension of the Under-represented Faculty Recruitment Program to includedepartments where Asian-Americans and women are severely underrepresented.
A New Recruitment Tool. The University of Illinois at Springfield produced arecruitment brochure that targets prospective minority faculty. The brochure was mailedto historically Black colleges and universities and institutions with large Hispanicenrollments.
Improving Diversity. The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign created theDiversity Initiatives Committee. One purpose is the development of proposals toincrease the gender and race /ethnic diversity of faculty and staff members.
Improving the Work Environment. Chicago State University conducted a conflictresolution workshop to facilitate development of a fair and diversity friendly workenvironment.
23
APPENDIX 1
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Enrollment by Racial/Ethnic Category at Illinois Institutions of Higher Education,Fall 1980 to Fall 2000
Table 2 Community College Enrollment by Racial/Ethnic Category and Program Type,Selected Years, Fall 1990 to Fall 2000
Table 3 Total Black and Hispanic Undergraduate & Graduate/Professional Enrollment,Illinois Colleges and Universities, Fall 1990 to Fall 2000
Table 4 One-Year, Five-Year, and Ten-Year Changes in Black Enrollment at Illinois PublicUniversities
Table 5 One-Year, Five-Year, and Ten-Year Changes in Hispanic Enrollment at IllinoisPublic Universities
Table 6 Number of Illinois Public High School Graduates by Racial/Ethnic Category,FY1990 to FY2001
Table 7 Transfers from Illinois Public Community Colleges to Illinois Four-Year Collegesand Universities, Selected Years, Fall 1990 to Fall 2000
Table 8 Black Enrollment at Illinois Public Universities, Fall 2000Table 9 Hispanic Enrollment at Illinois Public Universities, Fall 2000Table 10 Community Colleges with Largest Black Enrollment, Fall 2000Table 11 Community Colleges with Largest Hispanic Enrollment, Fall 2000Table 12 Private Institutions with Largest Black Enrollment, Fall 2000Table 13 Private Institutions with Largest Hispanic Enrollment, Fall 2000Table 14 Enrollment by Sex at Illinois Institutions of Higher Education, Selected Years
Fall 1990 to Fall 2000Table 15 Number of Degrees Conferred by Racial/Ethnic Category at Illinois Institutions of
Higher Education, 1990-91 to 1999-2000Table 16 Black Bachelor's Degree Recipients, by Field, at Illinois Institutions of Higher
Education, 1990, 1995, 1999, and 2000Table 17 Hispanic Bachelor's Degree Recipients, by Field, at Illinois Institutions of Higher
Education, 1990, 1995, 1999, and 2000Table 18 Black Master's Degree Recipients, by Field, at Illinois Institutions of Higher
Education, 1990, 1995, 1999, and 2000Table 19 Hispanic Master's Degree Recipients, by Field, at Illinois Institutions of Higher
Education, 1990, 1995, 1999, and 2000Table 20 Black Doctoral Degree Recipients, by Field, at Illinois Institutions of Higher
Education, 1990, 1995, 1999, and 2000Table 21 Hispanic Doctoral Degree Recipients, by Field, at Illinois Institutions of Higher
Education, 1990, 1995, 1999, and 2000Table 22 Conummity College Degrees, By Level and Type, and By Racial/Ethnic Category,
Fiscal Year 2001Table 23 Community College Degrees, by Level, Type and Racial/Ethnic Category, Fiscal
Years 1989, 1995, 2000, & 2001Table 24 Students with Disabilities, Enrollment at Illinois Public Institutions, FY 2001Table 25 Dollars and Staff Years Budgeted to Programs Serving Underrepresented Students
and Staff at Illinois Public Universities, Fiscal Years 2000 and 2001Table 26 Dollars and Staff Years Budgeted to Programs Serving Underrepresented Students
and Staff at Community Colleges, Fiscal Years 2000 and 2001
25
Tab
le 1
EN
RO
LLM
EN
T B
Y R
AC
IAL/
ET
HN
IC C
AT
EG
OR
Y A
T IL
LIN
OIS
INS
TIT
UT
ION
S O
F H
IGH
ER
ED
UC
AT
ION
Fal
l 198
0 to
Fal
l 200
0
Whi
te
Non
-His
pani
c
Bla
ck
Non
-His
pani
cH
ispa
nic
Asi
an o
rP
acifi
cIs
land
er
Am
eric
anIn
dian
or
Ala
skan
Non
-Res
iden
tA
lien
No
Indi
catio
nT
otal
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Com
mun
ity C
o Ile
ees*
*F
all 1
980
231.
698
64.5
%55
,718
15.5
%18
,459
5.1
%8,
516
2.4
%3,
964
1.1
%*
0.0
%40
,692
113
%35
9.04
710
0.0
Fal
l 199
025
1,90
971
.450
,687
14.4
32,7
6393
1338
33.
81,
333
0.4
859
0.2
1,96
40.
635
2,89
810
0.0
Fal
l 199
523
4,44
369
.446
,703
13.8
36,3
0410
.714
,874
4.4
1,25
90.
41,
846
0.5
2,28
70.
733
7,71
610
0.0
Fal
l 199
922
3,52
065
.848
,369
14.2
46,2
2813
.615
,468
4.6
1,11
30.
32,
920
0.9
2,05
50.
633
9,67
310
0.0
Fal
l 200
021
9.18
364
.547
,237
13.9
51,2
2215
.116
,059
4.7
1,14
00.
32.
188
U.6
3,07
20.
934
0,10
110
0.0
Pub
lic U
nive
rsiti
es
Und
ergr
adua
teF
all 1
980
115,
102
77.6
17,2
2011
.63,
801
2.6
3,32
32.
242
903
2,87
01.
95.
611
3.8
1483
5610
0.0
Fal
l 199
011
4,81
576
.417
,092
11.4
6,02
94.
07,
811
5.2
378
0.3
2,55
61.
71,
690
1.1
150,
371
100.
0
Fal
l 199
510
0,22
970
.619
,377
13.6
8,35
75.
99,
184
6.5
427
032,
730
1.9
1,71
11.
214
2,01
510
0.0
Fal
l 199
910
0,61
368
.819
,118
13.1
9,34
46.
410
,590
7.2
393
0.3
2,31
31.
63,
792
2.6
146,
163
100.
0
Fal
l 200
099
,529
68.4
18,4
3212
.79,
469
6.5
10,6
147.
337
10.
32,
476
1.7
4,72
33.
214
5.61
410
0.0
Gra
duat
e/P
rofe
ssio
nal
Fal
l 198
035
,121
75.1
3,21
56.
966
71.
492
52.
011
30.
22,
732
5.8
3,99
68.
546
,769
100.
0
Fal
l 199
033
,743
70.1
3,79
97.
997
32.
01,
597
3310
10.
25,
562
11.6
2.33
54.
948
,110
100.
0
Fal
l 199
533
.882
67.1
5,12
810
.213
703.
12,
332
4.6
131
0.3
5.50
210
.91,
972
3.9
50,5
1710
11.0
Fal
l 199
929
,931
62.7
4.63
79.
71,
735
3.6
2,32
44.
913
403
6,37
213
.42.
584
5.4
47.7
1710
0.0
Fal
l 200
029
.606
61.5
4,81
810
.01.
951
4.1
2,27
34.
713
40.
37,
402
15.4
1,98
54.
148
,169
100.
0
Priv
ate
Uni
vers
ities
Und
ergr
adua
teF
all 1
980
83,2
4473
.212
.660
11.1
3308
2.9
2,52
12.
217
60.
21.
959
1.7
9,78
68.
611
3.65
410
0.0
Fal
l 199
090
,619
73.7
14,9
2012
.18,
053
6.5
6,04
84.
9 s
332
0.3
2,03
21.
796
40.
812
2,96
810
0.0
Fal
l 199
587
.078
69.3
14,5
8011
.610
,450
8.3
7,91
96.
344
00.
42,
751
2.2
2,48
72.
012
5,70
510
0.0
Fal
l 199
986
,757
64.7
16,8
3312
.612
,077
9.0
8,74
56.
547
60.
43,
506
2.6
5.70
943
134,
103
100.
0
Fal
l 200
087
,907
63.2
18,3
5813
.213
,322
9.6
8,79
66.
346
90.
33,
728
2.7
6,51
04.
713
9,09
010
0.0
Gra
duat
e/P
rofe
ssio
nal
Fal
l 198
036
351
78.4
1,96
64.
256
61.
21,
241
2.7
590.
12,
097
4.5
4,11
28.
946
,392
100.
0
Fal
l 199
045
,515
77.8
3.14
15.
41,
268
2.2
3,23
85.
594
0.2
4,11
57.
01.
112
1.9
58.4
8310
0.0
Fal
l 199
548
.016
73.2
4,36
06.
61.
914
2.9
4,58
57.
013
80.
25,
144
7.8
1,46
52.
265
,622
100.
0
Fal
l 199
944
,410
65.9
5.57
183
2,32
23.
45,
252
7.8
143
0.2
6,79
710
.12.
887
4367
382
100.
0
Fal
l 200
044
,082
63.0
5,91
28.
42,
484
3.5
5,22
37.
513
10.
27,
469
10.7
4,67
46.
769
,975
100.
0
All
Inst
itul i
ons
Fal
l 198
050
1,51
670
.290
,779
12.7
26,8
013.
816
,526
2.3
4,74
10.
79,
658
1.4
64,1
979.
071
4,21
810
0.0
Fal
l 199
053
6,60
173
.289
,639
12.2
49,0
866.
732
,077
4.4
2,23
803
15.1
242.
18,
065
1.1
732,
830
100.
0
Fal
l 199
550
3,64
869
.890
,148
12.5
58.5
958.
138
,894
5.4
2395
0.3
17,9
732.
59,
922
1.4
721,
575
100.
0
Fal
l 199
948
5,23
166
.094
,528
12.9
71,7
069.
842
,379
5.8
2,25
90.
321
.908
3.0
17,0
272.
373
5,03
810
0.0
Fal
l 200
048
0,31
1764
.694
,757
12.8
78,4
4811
1.6
42,9
655.
82,
245
0323
,263
3.1
20.9
642.
874
2.94
910
0.0
" C
ombi
ned
with
No
Indi
catio
n**
Incl
udes
stu
dent
s en
rolle
d in
all
com
mun
ity c
olle
ge p
rogr
ams:
und
ergr
adua
te, p
reco
llegi
ate,
and
con
tinui
ng e
duca
tion
prog
ram
s.
Sou
rce:
HIR
E F
all E
nrol
lmen
t Sur
veys
3IE
T C
OPY
AV
AIL
AM
E31
Tab
le 2
CO
MM
UN
ITY
CO
LLE
GE
EN
RO
LLM
EN
TB
Y R
AC
IAL/
ET
HN
IC C
AT
EG
OR
Y A
ND
PR
OG
RA
M T
YP
E.
SE
LEC
TE
D Y
EA
RS
: FA
LL 1
990
TO
FA
LL 2
000
Inst
ruct
iona
l Pro
gram
Whi
teN
on-H
ispa
nic
Bla
ckN
on-H
ispa
nic
His
pani
c
Asi
an o
rP
acifi
cIs
land
er
Am
eric
anIn
dian
or
Ala
skan
Non
-Res
iden
tA
lien
Unk
now
nT
otal
Fal
l 199
025
1.90
950
,687
32,7
6313
,383
1333
859
1,96
435
2,89
8U
nder
grad
uate
167,
517
30,8
369,
498
7,34
579
538
81,
074
217,
453
Pre
-Col
legi
ate
12,9
0611
,115
20,1
953,
256
249
257
139
48,1
17C
ontin
uing
Edu
catio
n71
,486
8,73
63,
070
2,78
228
921
475
187
,328
Fal
l 199
523
4.44
146
.703
36.3
0414
,874
II=1.
/116
2,28
733
7.71
6U
nder
grad
uate
157,
534
30,3
1012
,821
8,96
378
460
61,
318
212,
336
Pre
-Col
legi
ate
12,3
839,
093
18,7
532,
908
209
576
339
44,2
61C
ontin
uing
Edu
catio
n64
,526
7,30
04,
730
3,00
326
666
463
081
,119
Fa1
1199
922
3.52
048
369
46.2
2815
.468
L-12
12.
920
2.05
533
9.67
3U
nder
grad
uate
154,
227
30,4
3915
,781
9,34
371
561
01,
134
212,
249
Pre
-Col
legi
ate
10,6
639,
085
24,1
802,
994
169
1,60
631
649
,013
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
58,6
308,
845
6,26
73,
131
229
704
605
78,4
11
Fal
l 200
021
9.18
347
.237
51,2
2216
.059
1.14
02
188
3 07
234
0.10
1U
nder
grad
uate
147,
673
31,0
7516
,676
9.82
670
758
91.
793
208.
339
Pre
-Col
legi
ate
11,1
868,
394
2758
63,
195
161
1,04
041
351
,975
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
60,3
247,
768
6,96
03.
038
272
559
866
79,7
87
Per
cent
Cha
nce
in E
nrol
lmen
t
Und
ergr
adua
te19
90 to
200
0(1
1.8)
%0.
8%
75.6
%33
.8%
(t A
) %
51.8
%66
.9%
(4.2
) "/
.19
95 to
200
0(6
.3)
2.5
30.1
9.6
(9.8
)(2
.8)
36.0
(1.9
)19
99 to
200
0(4
.2)
2.1
5.7
5.2
(1.1
)(3
.4)
58.1
(1.8
)
Pre
-Col
legi
ate
1990
to 2
000
(13.
3)(2
4.5)
36.6
(1.9
)(3
5.3)
304.
719
7.1
8.0
1995
to 2
000
(9.7
)(7
.7)
47.1
9.9
(23.
0)80
.621
.817
.419
99 to
200
04.
9(7
.6)
14.1
6.7
(4.7
).
(35.
2)30
.76.
0
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
1990
to 2
000
(15.
6)(1
1.1)
126.
79.
2(5
.9)
161.
215
3(8
.6)
1995
to 2
000
(6.5
)6.
447
.11.
223
(15.
8)37
.5(1
.6)
1999
to 2
000
2.9
(12.
2)11
.1(3
.0)
18.8
(20.
6)43
.11.
8
Tot
al E
nrol
lmen
ts19
90 to
200
0(1
13)
(4.6
)41
.115
.6(1
6.5)
239.
94.
6(3
.7)
1995
to 2
000
(4.7
)3.
627
.34.
0(1
1.6)
58.2
(10.
1)0.
619
99 to
200
0(1
.9)
(2.3
)10
.83.
82.
4(2
5.1)
49.5
0.1
Sou
rce:
IBH
E F
all E
nrol
lmen
t Sur
veys
BE
ST C
OPY
AV
AIL
AB
LE
33
Table 3
TOTAL BLACK AND HISPANICUNDERGRADUATE & GRADUATE /PROFESSIONAL ENROLLMENT
ILLINOIS COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIESFALL 1990 TO FALL 2000
Black Hispanic
UndergraduateGraduate/
Professional Total UndergraduateGraduate/
Professional Total
1990 62,848 6,940 69,788 23,580 2,241 25,821
1991 64,555 7,440 71,995 25,718 2,543 28,261
1992 64,418 7,694 72,112 27,418 2,604 30,022
1993 64,236 8,321 72,557 28,545 2,840 31,385
1994 65,430 9,192 74,622 30,700 3,191 33,891
1995 64,267 9,488 73,755 31,628 3,484 35,112
1996 65,478 9,576 75,054 32,674 3,726 36,400
1997 65,386 9,698 75,084 33,965 3,747 37,712
1998 66,247 9,816 76,063 35,517 3,923 39,440
1999 66,390 10,208 76,598 37,202 4,057 41,259
2000 67,865 10,730 78,595 39,467 4,435 43,902
Percent Cbanae1990 to 2000 8.0 % 54.6 % 12.6 % 67.4 % 97.9 % 70.0
1995 to 2000 5.6 13.1 6.6 24.8 27.3 25.0
1999 to 2000 2.2 5.1 2.6 6.1 9.3 6.4
Source: FBHE Fall Enrollment Surveys
34
%
Tab
le 4
ON
E-Y
EA
R, F
IVE
-YE
AR
, AN
D T
EN
-YE
AR
CH
AN
GE
S IN
BL
AC
K E
NR
OL
LM
EN
T A
T I
LL
INO
IS P
UB
LIC
UN
IVE
RSI
TIE
S
Enr
ollm
ent
One
-Yea
r C
hang
eE
nrol
lmen
tFi
ve-Y
ear
Cha
nge
Enr
ollm
ent
Ten
-Yea
r C
hang
e19
9920
00N
umbe
rPe
rcen
t19
9520
00N
umbe
rPe
rcen
t19
9020
00N
umbe
rPe
rcen
t
Chi
cago
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
6,31
45,
701
(613
)(9
.7)
%7,
752
5.70
1(2
,051
)(2
6.5)
%5,
891
5,70
1(1
90)
(3,2
)%
Eas
tern
Illi
nois
Uni
vers
ity62
765
528
4.5
618
655
376.
052
765
512
824
.3G
over
nors
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
1,77
11,
839
683.
81,
424
1,83
941
529
.11,
117
1,83
972
264
.6Il
linoi
s St
ate
Uni
vers
ity1,
447
1,38
1(6
6)(4
.6)
1,60
41,
381
(223
)(1
3.9)
1,29
61,
381
856.
6
Nor
thea
ster
n Il
linoi
s U
nive
rsity
1,33
21,
351
191.
41,
271
1,35
180
6.3
1,10
01,
351
251
22.8
Nor
ther
n Il
linoi
s U
nive
rsity
2,25
82,
400
142
6.3
1,84
52,
400
555
30.1
1,45
92,
400
941
64.5
Wes
tern
Illi
nois
Uni
vers
ity77
176
9(2
)(0
.3)
878
769
(109
)(1
2.4)
1,02
476
9(2
55)
(24.
9)
Sout
hern
Illi
nois
Uni
vers
ity4,
225
4,21
4(1
1)(0
.3)
3.96
04,
214
254
6.4
3,68
34,
214
531
14.4
Car
bond
ale
2,93
12,
924
(7)
(0.2
)2,
550
2,92
437
414
.72,
246
2,92
467
830
.2
Edw
ards
ville
1,29
41,
290
(4)
(0.3
)1,
410
1,29
0(1
20)
(8.5
)1,
437
1,29
0(1
47)
(10.
2)
Uni
vers
ity o
f Il
linoi
s5,
010
4.94
0(7
0)f1
.4)
5,15
34,
940
(213
)(4
.1)
5.15
34.
940
(213
)(4
.1)
Chi
cago
2,26
92,
280
110.
52,
458
2,28
0(1
78)
(7.2
)2,
374
2,28
0(9
4)(4
.0)
Spri
ngfi
eld
311
315
41.
333
831
5(2
3)(6
.8)
250
315
6526
.0
Urb
ana-
Cha
mpa
ign
2,43
02,
345
(85)
(3.5
)2,
357
2,34
5(1
2)(0
.5)
2,17
02,
345
175
8.1
Tot
al B
lack
Enr
ollm
ent
23,7
5523
,250
(505
)(2
.1)
%24
,505
23,2
50(1
,255
)(5
.1)
°A)
20,8
9123
,250
2,35
911
.3%
=11
1==
1111
:11.
1 IM
ZIE
NE
=i1
=1
1!IM
: =C
I=IM
IC1.
11=
i111
111
1111
MM
INM
ZE
ISC
ICIM
111
71M
Sour
ce: I
BH
E F
all E
nrol
lmen
t Sur
veys
BE
ST C
OPY
AV
AIL
AB
LE
3536
Tab
le 5
ON
E-Y
EA
R, F
IVE
-YE
AR
, AN
D T
EN
-YE
AR
CH
AN
GE
S IN
HIS
PAN
IC E
NR
OL
LM
EN
T A
T I
LL
INO
IS P
UB
LIC
UN
IVE
RSI
TIE
S
Enr
ollm
ent
One
-Yea
r C
hang
eE
nrol
lmen
tFi
ve-Y
ear
Cha
nge
Enr
ollm
ent
Ten
-Yea
r C
hang
e19
9920
00N
umbe
r Pe
rcen
t19
9520
00N
umbe
rPe
rcen
t19
9020
00N
umbe
rPe
rcen
t
Chi
cago
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
343
372
298.
5%
376
372
(4)
(1.1
)%
246
372
126
51.2
%E
aste
rn I
llino
is U
nive
rsity
183
198
158.
215
919
839
24.5
8519
811
313
2.9
Gov
erno
rs S
tate
Uni
vers
ity25
329
]38
15.0
191
291
100
52.4
114
291
177
155.
3
Illin
ois
Stat
e U
nive
rsity
481
446
(35)
(7.3
)42
744
619
4.4
249
446
197
79.1
Nor
thea
ster
n Il
linoi
s U
nive
rsity
2,49
72,
558
612.
41,
828
2,55
873
039
.91,
325
2,55
81,
233
93.1
Nor
ther
n Il
linoi
s U
nive
rsity
1,10
11,
140
393.
598
11,
140
159
16.2
691
1,14
044
965
.0W
este
rn I
llino
is U
nive
rsity
332
349
175.
130
134
948
15.9
171
349
178
104.
1
Sout
hern
Illi
nois
Uni
vers
ity73
676
630
4.1
641
766
125
19.5
529
766
237
44.8
Car
bond
ale
585
598
132.
251
359
885
16.6
415
598
183
44.1
Edw
ards
ville
151
168
1711
.312
816
840
31.3
114
168
5447
.4
Uni
vers
ity o
f Il
linoi
s5
153
5,30
014
7/9
5,02
35.
300
277
5.5
3.59
25
300
1,70
847
.6
Chi
cago
3,33
33,
383
501.
53,
271
3,38
311
23.
42,
277
3,38
31,
106
48.6
Spri
ngfi
eld
5149
(2)
(3.9
)43
496
14.0
3349
1648
.5
Urb
ana-
Cha
mpa
ign
1,76
91,
868
995.
61,
709
1,86
815
99.
31,
282
1,86
858
645
.7
Tot
al. H
ispa
nic
Enr
ollm
ent
11,0
7911
,420
341
3.1.
9,92
711
,420
1,49
315
.07,
002
11,4
204,
418
63.1
%
Sour
ce: 1
BH
E F
all E
nrol
lmen
t Sur
veys
EST
CO
PYA
VA
ILA
BL
E
37
38
Table 6
NUMBER OF ILLINOIS PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATESBY RACIAL/ETHNIC CATEGORY
FY1990 TO FY2001
Fiscal Year
WhiteNon-Hispanic
BlackNon - Hispanic Hispanic
Asian orPacificIslander
American
Indian orAlaskan Total
1990 79.980 18,139 6,437 3,414 149 108,119
1991 76,050 17,067 6,467 3.647 98 103,329
1992 75,754 16.017 7,079 3,705 187 102,742
1993 75.916 16,045 7,782 3.746 139 103,628
1994 74,473 I5,598 7,983 3,929 143 102.126
1995 77,181 15.411 8,263 4,089 220 105,164
1996 76,349 15,597 8,459 4,063 158 104,626
1997 79,671 16,472 9,377 4,380 269 110.169
1998 81.878 17,390 10,302 4,816 225 114,611
1999 80,229 16,964 10,468 4,731 165 112,557
2000 79,590 16,416 10.873 4,750 206 111,835
2001 79,210 15,498 10,855 4,889 172 110,624
Percent Change
1990 to 2001 (1.06) % (16.02) % 75.50 % 47.52 % 16.98 % 2.55
1995 to 2001 2.63 0.56 31.37 19.56 (21.82) 5.19
2000 to 2001 (0.48) (5.59) (0.17) 2.93 (16.50) (1.08)
Source: Illinois State Board of Education
39
%
Table 7
TRANSFERS FROM ILLINOIS PUBLIC COMMUNITY COLLEGESTO ILLINOIS FOUR-YEAR COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES
SELECTED YEARS: FALL 1990 TO FALL 2000
Fall 1990
TotalTransfers
BlackNon-Hispanic Hispanic
To Public Universities 10,636 931 308
To Non-Profit Institutions 4,901 651 199
To Proprietary Institutions 227 81 26
Total 15,764 1,663 533
Fall 1995To Public Universities 10,693 1,037 443
To Non-Profit Institutions 5,724 748 372
To Proprietary Institutions 166 20 9
Total 16,583 1,805 824
Fall 1999To Public Universities 10,518 941 542
To Non-Profit Institutions 5,846 780 480
To Proprietary Institutions 424 49 32
Total 16,788 1,770 1,054
Fall 2000To Public Universities 10,503 1,004 518
To Non-Profit Institutions 5,857 792 527
To Proprietary Institutions 317 35 42
Total 16,677 1,831 1,087
Percent Change
TotalTransfers
BlackNon-Hispanic Hispanic
Fall 1990 to Fall 2000 5.8 % 10.1 % 103.9 %
Fall 1995 to Fall 2000 0.6 1.4 31.9
Fall 1999 to Fall 2000 (0.7) 3.4 3.1
Source: IBHE Fall Enrollment Survey!
EST COPY AVAIRAB
40
Table 8
BLACK ENROLLMENTAT ILLINOIS PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES
FALL 2000
Institution
BlackEnrollment
Percentage ofTotal Campus Enrollment
Chicago State University 5,701 75.2 %Southern Illinois University at Carbondale 2,924 13.1
Northern Illinois University 2,400 10.5
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2,345 6.0
University of Illinois at Chicago 2,280 9.3
Governors State University 1,839 29.9
Illinois State University 1,381 6.7
Northeastern Illinois University 1,351 12.4
Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville 1,290 10.9
Western Illinois University 769 5.9
Eastern Illinois University 655 5.8
University of Illinois at Springfield 315 7.7
All Public Universities 23,250 12.0 %
Source: IBHE Fall Enrollment Survey
Table 9
HISPANIC ENROLLMENTAT ILLINOIS PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES
FALL 2000
Institution
HispanicEnrollment
Percentage ofTotal Campus Enrollment
University of Illinois at Chicago 3,383 13.7 %
Northeastern Illinois University 2,558 23.4
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1,868 4.8
Northern Illinois University 1,140 5.0
Southern Illinois University at Carbondale 598 2.7
Illinois State University 446 2.2
Chicago State University 372 4.9
Western Illinois University 349 2.7
Governors State University 291 4.7
Eastern Illinois University 198 1.8
Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville 168 1.4
University of Illinois at Springfield 49 1.2
All Public Universities 11,420 5.9 %
Source: IBHE Fall Enrollment Survey
41
Table 10
COMMUNITY COLLEGESWITH LARGEST BLACK ENROLLMENT
FALL 2000
Black Percentage ofCommunity College Enrollment Total Campus Enrollment
Olive-Harvey College* 5,099 77.6 %Kennedy-King College* 4,996 82.9
Malcolm X College* 4,759 55.1
Harold Washington College* 3,735 45.8
South Suburban Coll. of Cook Co. 3,309 49.0
Triton College 2,666 15.7
Southwestern Illinois College 2,145 16.1
Richard J. Daley College* 2,030 21.3
Harry S Truman College* 1,784 11.5
Prairie State College 1,604 33.5
* City Colleges of Chicago
Source: IBHE Fall Enrollment Survey
Table it
COMMUNITY COLLEGESWITH LARGEST HISPANIC ENROLLMENT
FALL 2000
Hispanic Percentage ofCommunity College Enrollment Total Campus Enrollment
Harry S Truman College* 7,503 48.5 %Richard J. Daley College* 5,594 58.7
Wilbur Wright College* 5,494 45.7
Triton College 3,250 19.2
College of DuPage 2,926 10.1
Elgin Community College 2,918 28.7
Morton College 2,881 64.5
College of Lake County 2,701 18.7
Malcolm X College* 2,648 30.7
William Rainey Harper College 2,260 15.0
* City Colleges of Chicago
Source: 113HE Fall Enrollment Survey
44
Table 12
PRIVATE INSTITUTIONSWITH LARGEST BLACK ENROLLMENT
FALL 2000
Black Percentage ofInstitution Enrollment Total Campus Enrollment
DePaul University 2,131 10.4 %
Robert Morris College 2,010 40.7
Roosevelt University 1,859 25.3
Columbia College 1,648 18.2
National-Louis University 1,507 20.9
DeVry Inst. of Tech, Chicago 1,334 32.6
Loyola University 1,142 9.1
Northwestern University 909 5.4
Lewis University 673 15.6
St Xavier University 611 13.3
Source: IBHE Fall Enrollment Survey
Table 13
PRIVATE INSTITUTIONSWITH LARGEST HISPANIC ENROLLMENT
FALL 2000
Hispanic Percentage ofInstitution Enrollment Total Campus Enrollment
DePaul University 1,907 9.3 %St Augustine College 1,300 84.3
Robert Morris College 1,214 24.6
DeVry Inst. of Tech, Chicago 1,001 24.4
Columbia College 991 10.9
Loyola University 829 6.6
Roosevelt University 669 9.1
Northwestern University 563 3.3
University of Chicago 555 4.4
National-Louis University 505 7.0
Source: IBHE Fall Enrollment Survey
IEST COPY AV
43
'able 14
ENROLLMENT BY SEX Al' ILLINOIS INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATIONSELECTED YEARS: FALL 1990' O FALL 2000
Community Colleges* Public Universities Primate Institutions
k=1Lttui
Undergraduate
aw&Percent
emule ale emale
Percent'ettLtsa e e
Percent
emale
Fall 1990 148,803 204,095 57.8 74,300 76,071 50.6 55,256 67,712 55.1
Fall 1995 1410,384 197.332 58.4 67,743 74,272 52.3 54,356 71,349 56.8
Fall 1996 1.11,633 198.518 58.4 67,034 75,438 52.9 54,683 71,893 56.8
Fall 1997 143,957 200.599 58.2 66,287 76,396 53.5 54,295 72,137 57.1
Fall 1998 143,058 197,464 58.0 67,344 78,559 53.8 56,008 74,926 57.2
Fall 1999 144,497 195,176 57.5 67,325 78,838 53.9 57,246 76,857 57.3
Fall 2000 145,416 194,685 57.2 67,272 78,342 53.8 59,814 79,276 57.0
Master's*"Fall 1990 15,454 21,292 57.9 18,281 18,950 50.9
Fall 1995 15,268 22,846 59.9 19,598 23,591 54.6
Fall 1996 14,949 22,791 60.4 19,385 24,224 55.5
Fall 1997 14,255 22,284 61.0 19,598 24,054 55.1
Fall 1998 13,773 21,956 61.5 19,910 24,750 55.4
Fall 1999 13,962 21,850 61.0 20,162 25,135 55.5
Fall 2000 13,681 21,969 61.6 20,913 26,502 55.9
First Professional
Fall 1990 2,469 1,719 41.0 8,104 4,744 36.9
Fall 1995 2,438 1,959 44.6 7,762 5,257 40.4
Fall 1996 2,381 1,987 45.5 7,560 5,170 40.6
Fall 1997 2,350 1,965 45.5 7,413 5,428 42.3
Fall 1998 2,363 1,971 45.5 7,204 5,507 43.3
Fall 1999 2,281 1,978 46.4 7,065 5,606 44.2
Fall 2000 2,224 2,073 48.2 6,667 5,599 45.6
Doctoral4,344 2,832 39.5 5,031 3.373 40.1Fall 1990
Fall 1995 4,580 3,426 42.8 5,207 4,207 44.7
Fall 1996 4,333 3,406 44.0 5,077 4,353 46.2
Fall 1997 4,244 3,311 43.8 4,959 4,343 46.7
Fall 1998 4,255 3,327 43.9 4,983 4,237 46.0
Fall 1999 4,218 3,428 44.8 5,032 4,382 46.5
Fall 2000 4,507 3,715 45.2 5,407 4,887 47.5
Total
Fall 1990 148,803 204.095 57.8 96,567 101,914 51.3 86,672 94,779 52.2
Fall 1995 140,384 197,332 58.4 90,029 102,503 53.2 86,923 104,404 54.6
Fall 1996 141,633 198,518 58.4 88,697 103,622 53.9 86,705 105,640 54.9
Fall 1997 143,957 200,599 58.2 87,136 103,956 54.4 86,265 105,962 55.1
Fall 1998 143,058 197,464 58.0 87,735 105,813 54.7 88,105 109,420 55.4
Fall 1999 144,497 195,176 57.5 87,786 106,094 54.7 89,505 111,980 55.6
Fall 2000 145,416 194,685 57.2 87,684 106,099 54.8 92,801 116,264 55.6
" Includes students enrolled in all community college programs."* Includes students enrolled in Advanced Certificate programs.
Source: !BRE Fall Enrollment Surveys
44
Whi
te
Non
-His
pani
c
Tab
le 1
5
NU
MB
ER
OF
DE
GR
EE
S C
ON
FE
RR
ED
BY
RA
CIA
L. C
AT
EC
0 R
Y A
T IL
LIN
OIS
INS
TIT
UT
ION
S O
F *
III:1
1ER
ED
UC
AT
ION
1990
-91
to 1
999-
2000
Bla
ckA
sian
or
Am
eric
an In
dian
Non
-Res
iden
t
Non
-His
pani
cH
ispa
nic
Pac
ific
Isla
nder
or A
lask
anA
lien
No
Indi
catio
nT
otal
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Com
mun
ity C
olle
ges
Cer
tific
ates
1990
-91
6,93
866
.42,
138
20.5
694
6.6
566
5.4
460.
417
0.2
520.
510
,451
100.
0
1994
-95
7,61
467
.92,
139
19.1
759
6.8
558
5.0
450.
428
0.2
690.
611
,212
100.
0
1998
-99
6,66
460
.12,
528
22.8
1,05
393
669
6.0
610.
548
0.4
7311
.711
,096
100.
0
99-2
1100
7,51
1961
1.9
2,76
122
.41,
226
9.9
637
5.2
500.
451
0.4
890.
712
,323
100.
0
Ass
ocia
te's
1990
-91
18,6
4389
.31,
949
8.9
608
2.8
490
2.2
5503
460.
267
0.3
21,8
5810
0.0
1994
-95
19,7
2783
.12,
190
9.2
853
3.6
704
3.0
820.
313
40.
657
0.2
23,7
4710
0.0
1998
-99
18,3
6381
.82,
108
9.4
1,06
44.
767
73.
083
0.4
106
0345
0.2
22,4
4610
0.0
99-2
900
18,3
9781
.82,
1176
9.2
1,15
95.
262
52.
859
0389
0.4
7203
22,4
7710
01
Pub
lic U
nive
rsiti
es
Cer
tiftc
ates
1990
-91
4992
.50
0.0
11.
92
3.8
00.
00
0.0
11.
953
1011
.0
1994
-95
1894
.71
5.3
00.
00
0.0
00.
00
0.0
00.
019
100.
0
1998
-99
1885
.7I
4.8
14.
81
4.8
00.
00
0.0
00.
021
100.
0
99-2
000
1688
.90
0.0
00.
01
5.6
00.
00
0.0
15.
618
10)1
.0
Ass
ocia
te's
1990
-91
454
86.5
397.
47
1.3
61.
11
0.2
112.
17
1352
510
11.0
1994
-95
464
84.1
336.
913
2.4
40.
71
0.2
193.
418
3.3
552
100.
0
1998
-99
253
86.3
103.
45
1.7
51.
71
0.3
82.
711
3.8
293
100.
0
99-2
000
188
87.9
733
41.
94
1.9
20.
95
234
1.9
214
100.
0
Bac
helo
r's
1990
-91
24,7
3383
.41,
995
6.7
825
2.8
1,25
54.
252
0.2
442
1334
11.
229
.643
100.
0
1994
-95
23,5
5078
.12,
700
8.9
1,14
73.
81,
628
5.4
730.
268
323
389
1330
,170
100.
0
1998
-99
22,0
8674
.83,
064
111.
41,
409
4.8
1,88
96.
477
0.3
5117
1.7
505
1.7
29,5
3710
11.0
99-2
000
22,4
0373
.53,
177
10.4
1.40
34.
62.
020
6.6
910.
344
01.
493
53.
130
,469
100.
0
Mas
ter's
"
1990
-91
6,62
173
.955
46.
220
12.
224
82.
815
0.2
1,14
012
.718
32.
08,
962
100.
0
1994
-95
7,00
670
.367
46.
819
82.
035
63.
618
0.2
1,47
414
.824
22.
49,
968
100.
0
1998
-99
6,55
065
.880
78.
128
62.
939
03.
98
0.1
1,57
715
.833
53.
49,
953
1011
.0
99-2
1101
16,
579
64.3
822
8.0
248
2.4
378
3.7
190.
21.
884
18.4
303
3.0
111,
233
11)0
.9
Pro
fess
iona
l19
90-9
189
780
.357
5.1
635.
696
8.6
00.
03
031
0.1
1,11
710
0.0
1994
-95
808
73.3
797.
262
5.6
143
13.0
303
503
303
1,10
310
0.0
1998
-99
785
68.0
827.
157
4.9
191
16.5
603
131.
121
1.8
1,15
510
0.0
99-2
900
723
64.8
696.
278
7.0
216
19,4
I0.
13
0325
2.2
1,11
510
0.0
Doc
tora
tes
1990
-91
739
59.3
362.
918
1.4
614.
91
0.1
383
30.7
80.
61,
246
190.
9
1994
.95
71N
52.9
554.
115
1.1
533.
95
11.4
479
353
332.
41,
358
100.
0
1998
-99
650
56.3
443.
815
1355
4.8
40.
3.3
5931
.128
2.4
1,15
510
0.0
99-2
000
600
56.3
423.
913
1.2
4643
20.
234
332
.220
1.9
1,06
619
0.0
4513
E 5
T C
OPY
AM
IAB
LE
46
Whi
teN
on-H
ispa
nic
Num
ber
Perc
ent
Tab
le 1
5 (C
ontin
ued)
NU
MB
ER
OF
DE
CR
EE
S C
ON
FER
RE
D E
IY R
AC
:IA
l. C
AT
EC
O R
V A
T I
LL
INO
IS I
NST
ITU
TIO
NS
OF
1110
E I
ER
F.D
13C
AT
ION
1990
-91
to 1
999-
2000
Bla
ckA
sian
or
Am
eric
an In
dian
Non
-Res
iden
t
lion-
His
pani
cH
ispa
nic
Pac
ific
Isla
nder
or A
lask
anA
lien
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
No
Indi
catio
nT
otal
Num
ber
Perc
ent
Num
ber
Perc
ent
Priv
ate
Inst
itutio
nsC
enif
icat
es
1990
-91
767
42.4
638
35.2
330
18.2
402.
23
0.2
50.
327
1.5
1,81
010
0.0
1994
-95
801
41.8
659
34.4
375
19.6
432.
22
0.1
503
321.
71,
917
100.
0
1998
-99
675
38.5
618
35.3
388
22.2
442.
513
0.7
100.
63
0.2
1,75
110
0.0
99-2
000
623
38.4
569
35.1
368
22.7
523.
25
0.3
30.
23
0.2
1,62
310
0.0
Ass
ocia
te's
1990
-91
1,57
858
.148
918
.0S5
120
375
2.8
S0.
220
0.7
00.
02,
718
100.
0
1994
-95
1,62
451
.072
122
.674
523
.478
2.4
30.
112
0.4
20.
13,
185
100.
0
1998
-99
1,55
347
.572
022
.076
123
316
04.
920
0.6
511.
65
0.2
3,27
010
0.0
99-2
000
1,62
750
.469
621
.670
621
.913
54.
220
0.6
230.
719
0.6
3,22
619
0.0
Bac
helo
r's
1990
-91
17,2
4181
.41,
490
7.0
646
3.1
979
4.6
590.
338
21.
837
21.
821
,169
100.
0
1994
-95
17,1
0377
.61.
709
7.8
980
4.4
1,33
76.
156
0349
42.
236
41.
722
,043
100.
0
1998
-99
17,4
6872
.82,
031
8.5
1,34
75.
61.
807
7.5
790.
366
62.
860
72.
5.
24,0
0510
0.0
99-2
000
17,8
4872
.12,
140
8.6
1,47
15.
91,
750
7.1
7003
692
2.8
792
3.2
24,7
6310
0.0
Mu
ster
's19
90-9
19,
064
78.0
623
5.4
179
1.5
528
4.5
220.
282
77.
137
73.
211
,620
100.
0
1994
-95
10,2
9174
.893
16.
832
12.
371
35.
221
0.2
1,16
88.
531
82.
313
,763
100.
0
1998
-99
11,4
2870
.21,
276
7.8
459
2.8
988
6.1
4203
1,68
910
.439
82.
416
,280
100.
0
99-2
000
11,1
5966
.81,
492
8.9
439
2.6
1,05
463
260.
21,
954
11.7
580
3316
.704
100.
0
Prof
essi
onal
1990
-91
2,87
285
.210
93.
279
2323
57.
06
0.2
702.
10
0.0
3,37
110
0.0
1994
-95
2,44
875
.216
14.
910
93.
339
412
.17
0.2
128
3.9
1003
3.25
710
0.0
1998
-99
2,43
071
.615
14.
413
84.
142
612
.511
0315
443
862.
53,
396
100.
0
99-2
0110
2,40
570
.817
95.
312
83.
842
412
3tt
0.2
154
4.5
972.
93,
395
100.
0
Doc
tora
tes
1990
-91
856
71.0
413.
421
1.7
453.
71
111
241
20.0
011
01,
205
100.
0
1994
-95
954
64.6
432.
943
2.9
745.
03
0.2
342
23.2
IS1.
21,
477
100.
0
1998
-99
994
65.4
855.
635
2376
5.0
403
284
18.7
412.
71,
519
100.
0
99-2
000
923
65.7
634.
434
2.4
684.
83
0.2
312
22.0
151.
11,
418
100.
0
Tot
al D
eere
cs19
90-9
191
,452
79.0
10,1
588.
84,
223
3.6
4.62
64.
026
60.
23,
587
3.1
1,43
61.
211
5,74
810
0.0
1994
-95
93,1
2675
.212
,095
9.8
5,62
04.
56,
085
4.9
319
0.3
4,97
14,
01,
555
1312
3,77
110
0.0
1998
-99
89,9
1771
.413
,525
10.7
7,11
185.
67,
178
5.9
409
035,
472
4.3
2,15
81.
712
5,87
710
0.0
99-2
000
91,0
0070
3.1
4,09
310
.97,
277
5.6
7.41
05.
735
60.
35,
953
4.6
2.95
523
129,
044
100.
0
' Inc
lude
s A
dvan
ced
Cer
tific
ates
Sou
rce:
Deg
rees
Aw
arde
dSu
rvey
q57:
1 C
OPY
AV
AE
LA
130
48
Table 16
BLACK BACHELOR'S DEGREE RECIPIENTS, BY FIELDAT ILLINOIS INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Field 1990
1990,
1995
1995,
1999
1999, and 2000
2000
Change1999-2000
Change1990-2000
Number Percent Number Percent
Arts & Humanities 213 12 E 321 419 44 11.7 % 206 96.7
Visual & Performing Arts 61 110 101 169 68 67.3 108 177.0
Theology/Religion 4 11 7 7 0 0.0 3 75.0
Letters 122 219 232 217 (15) (6.5) 95 77.9
Foreign Languages 13 21 25 24 (1) (4.0) 11 84.6
Philosophy & Religion 13 17 10 2 (8) (80.0) (11) (84.6)
Business & Communication 769 1.055 1.241 1.430 189 15.2 661 86 ()
Business & Administration 575 860 1,054 1,165 111 10.5 590 102.6
Communications 183 176 179 249 70 39.1 66 36.1
Marketing & Distribution 11 19 8 16 8 100.0 5 45.5
Education & Psychology 503 685 814 772 (421 .:12) 269 53.5
Education 292 406 459 455 (4) (0.9) 163 55.8
Psychology 211 279 355 317 (38) (10.7) 106 50.2
Sciences, Math. & Engin. 783 80'5 1.018 1.021 3 0.3 238 30 4
Health Professions 349 319 472 448 (24) (5.1) 99 28.4
Computer Science 137 113 150 155 5 3.3 18 13.1
Engineering 71 102 100 94 (6) (6.0) 23 32.4
Physical Science 20 28 41 40 (1) (2.4) 20 100.0
Biological/Life Science 83 107 130 139 9 6.9 56 67.5
Mathematics 27 28 21 28 7 33.3 1 3.7
Engineering Technologies 96 108 104 117 13 12.5 21 21.9
Social Sciences 375 573 541 636 95 17.6 261 69.6
Public Administration 47 89 114 126 12 10.5 79 168.1
Social Sciences/History 325 472 414 488 74 17.9 163 50.2
Area/Ethnic Studies 3 12 13 22 9 69.2 19 633.3
Other 684 913 1.105 1.039 (66) (6.0) 355 51.9
Protective Services 147 160 175 187 12 6.9 40 27.2
Architecture 22 16 16 12 (4) (25.0) (10) (45.5)
Parks & Recreation 8 30 25 38 13 52.0 30 375.0
Liberal/General Studies 154 501 695 560 (135) (19.4) 406 263.6
Law and Legal Studies 4 5 13 9 (4) (30.8) 5 125.0
Home Economics 79 65 62 61 (1) (1.6) (18) (22.8)
Natural Resources 0 2 2 1 (1) (50.0) l
Agriculture 5 5 11 2 (9) (81.8) (3) (60.0)
Multi/lnterdis. Studies 228 102 92 127 35 38.0 (101) (44.3)
Transportation 19 27 14 19 5 35.7 0 0.0
Other 18 0 0 23 23 5 27.8
Total--All Fields 3,327 4,409 5,094 5,317 223 4.4 % 1,990 59.8 %
Source: IBHE 2000 Degrees Conferred Survey
49BUT CO
Table 17
HISPANIC BACHELOR'S DEGREE RECIPIENTS, BY FIELDAT ILLINOIS INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION
1990, 1995, 1999, and 2000
Change1999-2000 1990-2000
Change
Field 1990 1995 1999 2000 Number Percent Number Percent
Arts & Humanities lii 261 342 388 46 13.5 % 243 167.6 %Visual & Performing Arts 35 74 94 169 75 79.8 134 382.9
Theology/Religion 4 3 15 7 (8) (53.3) 3 75.0
Letters 44 92 106 93 (13) (12.3) 49 111.4
Foreign Languages 56 81 109 109 0 0.0 53 94.6
Philosophy & Religion 6 11 18 10 (8) (44.4) 4 66.7
Business & Communication 304 507 688 794 106 15.4 490 161.2
Business & Administration 242 458 626 706 80 12.8 464 191.7
Communications 60 43 60 84 24 40.0 24 40.0
Marketing & Distribution 2 6 2 4 2 100.0 2 100.0
Education & Psychology 197 329 469 493 24 5.1 296 1503
Education 114 189 282 312 30 10.6 198 173.7
Psychology 83 140 187 181 (6) (3.2) 98 118.1
Sciences. Math. & Engin. 351 425 567 547 (20) (3,5) 196 55.8
Health Professions 84 97 163 165 2 1.2 81 96.4
Computer Science 60 72 77 96 19 24.7 36 60.0
Engineering 65 83 122 97 (25) (20.5) 32 49.2
Physical Science 13 13 23 10 (13) (56.5) (3) (23.1)
Biological/Life Science 52 78 100 93 (7) (7.0) 41 78.8
Mathematics 18 10 24 18 (6) (25.0) 0 0.0
Engineering Technologies 59 72 58 68 10 17.2 9 15.3
Social Sciences 149 245 288 221 33 11.5 172 115.4
Public Administration 16 33 49 59 10 20.4 43 268.8
Social Sciences/History 129 204 227 249 22 9.7 120 93.0
Area/Ethnic Studies 4 8 12 13 1 8.3 9 225.0
Other 162 359 1Q2 331 (71) (17,7) 169 104.3
Protective Services 37 83 80 101 21 26.3 64 173.0
Architecture 10 26 30 18 (12) (40.0) 8 80.0
Parks & Recreation 4 11 14 23 9 64.3 19 475.0
Liberal/General Studies 45 177 218 128 (90) (41.3) 83 184.4
Law and Legal Studies 4 5 0 0 0 0.0 (4) (100.0)
Home Economics 13 14 17 18 1 5.9 5 38.5
Natural Resources 0 3 6 6 0 0.0 6
Agriculture 4 3 4 6 2 50.0 2 50.0
Multi/lnterdisiplinary Studies 19 17 19 17 (2) (10.5) (2) (10.5)
Transportation 14 20 12 9 (3) (25.0) (5) (35.7)
Other 12 0 2 5 3 150.0 (7) (58.3)
Total--All Fields 1,308 2.126 2,756 2,874 118 4.3 % 1,566 119.7 %
Source: 1BHE 2000 Degrees Conferred Survey
50BEST COPY AVAITILABLE
Table 18
BLACK MASTER'S DEGREE* RECIPIENTS, BY FIELDAT ILLINOIS INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Field 1990
1990,
1995
1995, 1999, and 2000
1999 2000
Change
1999-2000
Change
1990-2000
Number Percent Number Percent
Arts & Humanities 72 73 107 101 1_6.1 j5.61 29 40.3 %Visual & Performing Ads 26 29 28 32 4 14.3 6 23.1
Theology/Religion 11 11 28 30 2 7.1 19 172.7
Letters 26 25 46 30 (16) (34.8) 4 15.4
Foreign Languages 1 4 3 2 (1) (33.3) 1 100.0
Philosophy & Religion 8 4 2 7 5 250.0 (1) (12.5)
Business & Communication al 542 607 L 12.0 DA 185.0
Business & Administration 192 303 486 561 75 15.4 369 192.2
Communications 21 41 56 43 (13) (23.2) 22 104.8
Marketing & Distribution 0 1 0 3 3 3
Education & Psychology 490 720 828 955 127 15.3 465 94.9
Education 465 694 764 892 128 16.8 427 91.8
Psychology 25 26 64 63 (1) (1.6) 38 152.0
Sciences, Mathematics & Engineerine l 193 al 34 17.6 120 112.1
Health Professions 70 79 110 153 43 39.1 83 118.6
Computer Science 23 14 19 29 10 52.6 6 26.1
Engineering 5 16 29 16 (13) (44.8) 11 220.0
Physical Science 4 9 13 12 (1) (7.7) 8 200.0
Biological/Life Science 2 5 11 6 (5) (45.5) 4 200.0
Mathematics 3 9 6 2 (4) (66.7) (1) (33.3)
Engineering Technologies 0 5 5 9 4 80.0 9
Social Sciences 133 242 21... 6 333 7 2.1 200 150.4
Public Administration Services 109 178 247 263 16 6.5 154 141.3
Social Sciences/History 23 49 58 59 1 1.7 36 156.5
Area /Ethnic Studies 1 15 21 11 (10) (47.6) 10 1,000.0
Other 68 88 87 91 4 4.6 23 318Protective Services 43 46 34 23 (11) (32.4) (20) (46.5)
Library Science 9 14 8 12 4 50.0 3 33.3
Architecture 6 7 7 12 5 71.4 6 100.0
Parks & Recreation 0 1 2 3 1 50.0 3 - - --
Liberal /General Studies 2 5 9 9 0 0.0 7 350.0
Law and Legal Studies 2 5 17 23 6 35.3 21 1,050.0
Home Economics 2 4 2 4 2 100.0 2 100.0
Natural Resources 0 3 3 1 (2) (66.7) 1
Agriculture 2 1 3 2 (1) (33.3) 0 0.0
Multi/In terdi s. Studies 2 2 2 2 0 0.0 0 0.0
Industrial Arts 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total--All Fields 1,083 1,605 2,083 2,314 231 11.1 °,/0 1,231 113.7 %
* Includes Advanced Certificates
Source: IBHE 2000 Degrees Conferred Survey
IMIli111=1
Table 19
HISPANIC MASTER'S DEGREE* RECIPIENTS, BY FIELDAT ILLINOISINSTIFUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Field 1990 1995
1990,1995,
1999
1999, and 2000
Change
1999-200(1
Change
1990-2000
2000 Number Percent Number Percent
Arts & Humanities 35 44 59 49 flU) 116.9) 14 40.0 "A.
Visual & Performing Arts 11 12 26 21 (5) (19.2) 10 90.9
Theology/Religion 9 10 9 10 1 11.1 1 11.1.1
Foreign Languages 7 8 11 7 (4) (36.4) 0 0.0
Letters 6 11 12 10 (2) (16.7) 4 66.7
Philosophy & Religion 2 3 1 1 0 0.0 (1) (50.0)
Business & Communication 12 140 MQ 168 (121 (16.0) 89 112 7
Business & Administration 66 128 188 161 (27) (14.4) 95 143.9
Communications 13 12 12 6 (6) (50.0) (7) (53.8)
Marketing & Distribution 0 0 0 I I 1
Education & Psychology 77 157 2.L 251 ID (2.0) 174 226.0
Education 67 142 225 221 (4) (1.8) 154 229.9
Psychology 10 15 31 30 (1) (3.2) 20 200.0
Sciences, Math & Engin. 54 54 91 88 al (3.3) 24 63.0
Health Professions 20 29 39 45 6 15.4 25 125.0
Computer Science 9 7 9 6 (3) (33.3) (3) (33.3)
Engineering 15 28 25 26 1 4.0 11 73.3
Biological/Life Science 5 7 6 3 (3) (50.0) (2) (40.0)
Physical Science 2 3 9 5 (4) (44.4) 3 150.0
Mathematics 2 3 2 2 0 0.0 0 0.0
Engineering Technologies 1 0 1 1 0 0.0 0 0.0
Social Sciences 12 81 100 100 a 0.0 a 244 8
Public Adminisration 21 55 74 70 (4) (5.4) 49 233.3
Social Sciences /History 8 21 23 23 0 0.0 15 187.5
Area/Ethnic Studies 0 5 3 7 4 133.3 7
Other 18 20 39 31 al (20.5) 13 =Protective Services 7 3 8 0 (8) (100.0) (7) (100.0)
Library Science 2 5 9 5 (4) (44.4) 3 150.0
Architecture 1 5 7 7 0 0.0 6 600.0
Parks & Recreation 0 2 0 6 6 6
Liberal/General Studies 2 1 2 4 2 100.0 2 100.0
Law and Legal Studies I I 8 5 (3) (37.5) 4 400.0
Home Economics 3 I 1 I 0 0.0 (2) (66.7)
Natural Resources 0 2 1 2 1 100.0 2
Agriculture 1 0 1 1 0 0.0 0 0.0
Multiilnterdis. Studies 0 0 2 0 (2) (100.0) 0
Leisure & Recreation 1 0 0 0 0 (1) (100.0)
Total-All Fields 292 532 745 687 (58) (7.8) % 395 135.3 94
*Includes Advanced Certificates
Source: 11311E 2000 Degrees Conferred Survey
5 r)
JET COPY AVAILABILIE
Table 20
BLACK DOCTORAL DEGREE RECIPIENTS, BY FIELDAT ILLINOIS INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION
1990, 1995, 1999, and 2000
Field 1990 1995 1999 2000
Change1999-2000
Change1990-2000
Number Percent Number Percent
Arts & Humanities 6 18 14 17 3 21.4 % 11 183.3 %Visual & Performing Arts 1 2 1 3 2 200.0 2 200.0
Theology/Religion 5 10 6 9 3 50.0 4 80.0
Letters 0 3 5 4 (1) (20.0) 4
Foreign Languages 0 2 1 0 (1) (100.0) 0
Philosophy & Religion 0 1 1 1 0 0.0 1
Business & Communication 1 1 6 3 al (50.0) 2 200.0
Business & Administration 0 .1 6 1 (5) (83.3) 1
Communications 1 0 0 2 2 1 100.0
Marketing & Distribution 0 0 0 0 0 0
Education & Psychology 41 56 74 54 (20) (27.0) 13 3L7
Education 32 45 60 40 (20) (33.3) 8 25.0
Psychology 9 11 14 14 0 0.0 5 55.6
Sciences, Math & Elwin. 3 12 16 18 2 12.5 15 500.0
Health Professions 1 4 7 6 (1) (14.3) 5 500.0
Computer Science 0 0 1 1 0 0.0 1
Engineering 1 3 2 6 4 200.0 5 500.0
Physical Science 0 0 2 0 (2) (100.0) 0
BiologicaVLife Science 1 5 4 5 1 25.0 4 400.0
Mathematics 0 0 0 0 0 0
Social Sciences 6 9 18 11 EL (38.9) 5 83.3
Public Adminisration 3 2 8 3 (5) (62.5) 0 0.0
Social Sciences/History 3 7 10 8 (2) (20.0) 5 166.7
Other 1 3 1 2 1 100.0 1 100.0
Parks & Recreation 0 0 0 1 1 1
Agriculture 0 1 1 1 0 0.0 1
Total--All Fields 57 98 129 105 (24) (18.6) 48 84.2 %
Source: IBHE 2000 Degrees Conferred Survey
EST COPY AVMLAI8LIE
53
Table 21
HISPANIC DOCTORAL DEGREE RECIPIENTS, BY FIELDAT ILLINOIS INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Field 1990
1990,
1995
1995,
1999
1999, and 2000
2000
Change1999-2000
Change1990-2000
Number Percent Number Percent
Arts & Humanities 5 26 7 13 6 85.7 °A, 8 160.0 %
Visual & Performing Arts 1 0 1 1 0 0.0 0 0.0
Theology/Religion 1 21 3 4 1 33.3 3 300.0
Letters 1 1 1 3 2 200.0 2 200.0
Foreign Languages 2 3 1 2 1 100.0 0 0.0
Philosophy & Religion 0 1 1 3 2 200.0 3
Business & Communication 0 1 1 2 1 100.0 2
Business & Administration 0 1 1 1 0 0.0 1
Communications 0 0 0 1 1 1
Marketing & Distribution 0 0 0 0 0 0
Education & Psychology 8 16 20 23 3 15.0 15 187.5
Education 5 9 10 8 (2) (20.0) 3 60.0
Psychology 3 7 10 15 5 50.0 12 400.0
Sciences, Math & Engin. 7 9 13 7 (6.1 (46.2) 0 0.0
Health Professions 1 1 4 0 (4) (100.0) (1) (100.0)
Computer Science 1 0 0 0 0 (1) (100.0)
Engineering 0 1 5 3 (2) (40.0) 3
Physical Science 1 3 3 0 (3) (100.0) (1) (100.0)
Biological/Life Science 4 3 1 4 3 300.0 0 0.0
Mathematics 0 1 0 0 0 0
Engineering Technologies 0 0 0 0 0 0
Social Sciences 4 5 9 / .0 (77.8) al (50.0)
Public Adminisration 1 2 1 0 (1) (100.0) (1) (100.0)
Social Sciences/History 3 3 8 2 (6) (75.0) (1) (33.3)
Area & Ethnic Studies 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other 3 2 0 0 0 11 (100.0)
Agriculture 3 1 0 0 0 (3) (100.0)
Architecture 0 0 0 0 0 0
Home Economics 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total-All Fields 27 58 50 47 (3) (6.0) % 20 74.1 %
Source: IBHE 2000 Degrees Conferred Survey
54
Tab
le 2
2
com
muN
rry
CO
LLE
GE
DE
GR
EE
S, B
Y L
EV
EL,
TY
PE
,A
ND
RA
CIA
L/E
TIIN
IC C
AT
EG
OR
YF
fSC
AL
YE
AR
200
1
prue
ram
Tyn
e
Whi
teN
on-H
ispa
nic
Bla
ckN
on-H
ispa
nic
hisp
anic
Asi
an o
rP
acifi
c Is
land
er
Am
eric
anIn
dian
or
Ala
skan
Non
-Res
iden
tA
lien
Unk
now
nT
otal
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Per
cent
Gen
eral
Ass
ocia
te54
92.
0%
253
4.1
%70
2.6
%23
1.2
%6
4.7
%2
1.5
%3
2.5
%90
62.
4 %
Bac
cala
urea
tear
ansf
er10
.754
39.6
928
15.1
MI
26.3
'149
321
3251
38.9
108.
312
.844
33.4
Ass
ocia
te in
Art
s6,
325
233
679
11.0
530
19.3
222
113
1713
.415
11.5
1083
7,79
820
3A
ssoc
iate
in S
cien
ce33
6213
.121
43.
517
56.
410
65.
41.
411
.032
24.4
00.
04,
103
10.7
Ass
ocia
te in
Art
s &
Sci
ence
749
2.8
2903
703
100.
5I
0.8
I0.
80
0.0
797
2.1
Ass
ocia
te in
Eng
. Sci
ence
720.
34
0.1
40.
19
0.5
00.
03
230
0.0
920.
2A
ssoc
iate
in F
ine
Art
s46
0.2
20.
04
0.1
20.
10
0.0
00.
00
0.0
540.
1
Occ
upat
iona
l15
847
583
4 96
380
.81
951
711
1 60
081
.189
70.1
7658
.030
?89
.224
,633
64.1
Ass
ocia
te in
App
lied
Sci
ence
6,94
825
.671
711
.737
813
.827
113
.717
13.4
3224
.48
6.7
8,37
121
.8C
ertif
icat
e of
1 y
r or
mor
e2,
996
11.0
1.22
419
.939
114
313
66.
918
14.2
1410
.79
7.5
4,78
812
3C
ertif
icat
e of
less
than
1 y
r5,
882
21.6
2,99
148
.71,
163
42.4
1,17
159
.453
41.7
3022
.990
75.0
11,3
8029
.6V
ocat
iona
l Ski
lls C
ertif
icat
e21
0.1
310.
519
0.7
221.
11
0.8
0IL
O0
0.0
940.
2
Gen
eral
Stu
dies
Cer
tific
ates
320.
12
0.0
10.
00
0.0
00.
02
130
0.0
370.
1
Tot
al C
ompl
etio
ns27
,182
100.
0%
6,14
610
0.0
%2,
742
100.
0%
1,97
210
0.0
%12
710
0.0
%13
110
0.0
%12
010
0.0
%38
.420
100.
0 %
Sou
rce:
ICC
B A
nnua
l Enr
ollm
ent a
nd C
ompl
etio
n R
ecor
ds. C
olle
giat
e le
vel o
nly
-- a
dvan
cem
ents
in a
dult
educ
atio
n an
d E
SL
prog
ram
s no
t inc
lude
d
EST
CO
PYA
NA
IIA
BL
IE
56
Table 23
COMMUNITY COLLEGE DECREES, BY LEVEL, TYPE,AND RACIAL/ETHNIC CATEGORY
FISCAL YEARS 1989, 1995, 2000, & 2001
Program Type and YearBlack Non-Hispanic Hispanic Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Colle iate LevelGeneral Associate
FY 1989 83 21.1 % 19 4.8 % 393 100.0 %FY 1995 204 25.2 39 4.8 810 100.0
FY 2000 307 30.1 79 7.7 1,021 100.0
FY 2001 253 27.9 70 7.7 906 100.0
Baccalaureate/TransferAssociate in Arts
FY 1989 772 11.8 206 3.2 6,517 100.0
FY 1995 663 9.1 302 4.1 7,304 100.0
FY 2000 758 9.6 486 6.2 7,861 100.0
FY 2001 679 8.7 530 6.8 7,798 100.0
Associate in ScienceFY 1989 136 2.1 206 3.2 6,517 100.0
FY 1995 359 7.1 163 3.2 5,085 100.0
FY 2000 224 5.2 178 4.2 4,272 100.0
FY 200.1 214 5.2 175 4.3 4,103 100.0
Associate in Arts & ScienceFY 1989 6 1.6 0 0.0 384 100.0
FY 1995 26 4.1 1 0.2 633 100.0
FY 2000 18 3.1 9 1.6 578 100.0
FY 2001 29 3.6 7 0.9 797 100.0
Associate in Eng. ScienceFY 1989 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
FY 1995 0 0.0 0 0.0 26 100.0
FY 2000 3 3.6 4 4.8 84 100.0
FY 2001 4 4.3 4 43 92 100.0
OccupationalAssociate in Applied Science
FY 1989 869 10.4 204 2.4 8,345 100.0
FY 1995 938 9.5 348 3.5 9,889 100.0
FY 2000 765 8.9 402 4.7 8,604 100.0
FY 2001 717 8.6 378 4.5 8,371 100.0
Certificate of 1 yr or more
FY 1989 560 16.5 136 4.0 3,393 100.0
FY 1995 824 18.7 238 5.4 4,415 100.0
FY 2000 1,135 25.0 386 8.5 4,547 100.0
FY 2001 1,224 25.6 391 8.2 4,788 100.0
IEST COPY AVAILA LE
Table 23 (Continued)
COMMUNITY COLLEGE DEGREES, BY LEVEL, TYPE,AND RACIAL/ETHNIC CATEGORY
FISCAL YEARS 1989,1995, 2000, & 2001
Program Type and YearBlack Non-Hispanic Hispanic Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Certificate of less than 1 yrFY 1989 1,240 23.1 % 323 6.0 % 5,376 100.0
FY 1995 1,297 19.5 516 7.7 6,659 100.0
FY 2000 1,542 20.7 795 10.7 7,442 100.0
FY 200.1 2,991 26.3 1,163 10.2 11,380 100.0
Vocational skills certificateFY 1989 85 36.0 40 16.9 236 100.0
FY 1995 16 12.7 4 3.2 126 100.0
FY 2000 84 29.2 43 14.9 288 100.0
FY 2001 31 33.0 19 20.2 94 100.0
General Studies CertificatesFY 1989 4 16.0 1 4.0 25 100.0
FY 1995 2 16.7 1 83 12 100.0
FY 2000 0 0.0 2 4.3 46 100.0
FY 2001 2 5.4 1 2.7 37 100.0
Collegiate TotalFY 1989 3,755 12.0 1,135 3.6 31,186 100.0
FY 1995 4,329 12.4 1,612 4.6 34,959 100.0
FY 2000 4,837 13.9 2,385 6.9 34,800 100.0
FY 2001 6,146 16.0 2,742 7.1 38,420 100.0
Precollegiate LevelAdult Basic EducationFY 1989 11 9.7 17 15.0 113 100.0
FY 1995 27 12.3 2 0.9 220 100.0
FY 2000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
FY 2001 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Adult Secondary EducationFY 1989 78 6.7 31 2.7 1,163 100.0
FY 1995 237 15.1 142 9.0 1,573 100.0
FY 2000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AFY 2001 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total CompletionsFY 1989 3,844 11.8 1,183 3.6 32,462 100.0
FY 1995 4,593 12.5 1,756 4.8 36,752 100.0
FY 2000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
FY 2001 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Source: 1CCB Annual Enrollment and Completion Records
%
Table 24
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESENROLLMENT AT ILLINOIS PUBLIC INSITUTIONS
FY 2001
Community Colleges Enrollment
Black Hawk College 95
City Colleges of Chicago
Daley College 295
Kennedy-King College 322
Malcolm X College 130
Olive-Harvey College 176
Truman College 305
Harold Washington College 348
Wright College 530
Danville Area Community College 75
College of Du Page 1,311
Elgin Community College 198
William Rainey Harper College 466
Heartland Common ity College 173
Highland Community College 60
Illinois Central College 191
Illinois Eastern Community Colleges 139
Illinois Valley Community College 89
Joliet Junior College 821
Kankakee Community College 189
Kaskaskia College 21
Kishwankee College 61
College of Lake County 133
Lake Land College 192
Lewis and Clark Community College 138
Lincoln Land Community College 155
John A. Logan College 53
McHenry County College 276
Moraine Valley Community College 370
Morton College 14
Ookton Community College 387
Parkland College 370
Prairie State College 190
Rend Lune College 21
Richland Community College 183
Flock Valley College 57
Carl Sandburg College 41
Sank Valley Community College 128
Shawnee Community College 14
South Suburban College of Cook County 259
Southeastern Illinois College 26
Southwestern Illinois College 606
Spoon River College 53
Triton College 20
Waohonsee Community College 242
John Wood Community College 65
Public Universities* Enrollment
Chicago State University 206
Eastern Illinois University 155
Governors State University 62
Illinois State University 302
Northeastern Illinois University 408
Northern Illinois University 335
Western Illinois University 232
Southern Illinois University at Carbondale 761
Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville 228
University of Illinois at Chicago 130
University of Illinois at Springfield 121
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 494
Count of number of student; with disabilities ludiedly served.
59
Tab
le 2
5
DO
LL
AR
S A
ND
ST
AFF
YE
AR
S B
UD
GE
TE
D T
O P
RO
GR
AM
S SE
RV
ING
UN
DE
RR
EPR
ESE
NT
ED
ST
UD
EN
TS
AN
D S
TA
FF A
T P
UB
LIC
UN
IVE
RSI
TIE
S*FI
SCA
L Y
EA
RS
2000
AN
D 2
001
Prog
ram
CH
ICA
GO
ST
AT
E U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dD
olla
rs B
udge
ted*
*C
hang
e in
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01FY
00FY
01
Aca
dem
ic E
nhan
cem
ent P
rogr
am1.
001.
0050
,000
50,0
000
Bio
med
ical
Eng
inee
ring
Edu
catio
n0.
16--
--38
,800
- -
--
Che
mis
try
Cam
p***
0.20
0.34
50,0
0050
,000
0
Che
mis
try
Van
***
0.83
0.34
80,0
0080
,000
0
Chi
cago
Alg
ebra
. Pro
ject
***
0.00
0.34
55,0
0060
,000
5,00
0
Chi
cago
Alli
ance
for
Min
ority
Par
ticip
atio
n (A
MP)
----
1.67
---
500,
000
- -
--
Chi
cago
Eng
inee
ring
Con
sort
ium
5.90
5.75
313,
500
312,
200
(1,3
00)
Chi
cago
Lin
kage
for
Min
oriti
es in
Bio
med
ical
Car
eers
2.50
2.50
160,
000
170,
700
10,7
00
CSU
-Uni
vers
ity o
f C
hica
go M
inor
ity S
tude
nt E
nric
hmen
t Pro
gram
0.33
0.34
3,00
03,
000
0
CSU
Wor
ks**
5.80
10.4
01,
597,
500
1,59
7,50
00
Cul
tura
lly A
ppro
pria
te S
peci
al E
duca
tion
(CA
SE)
1.00
1.00
138,
700
138,
700
0
Edu
catio
nal O
ppor
tuni
ty C
ente
r/Pr
ojec
t Suc
cess
4.00
4.00
252,
200
257,
100
4,90
0
Equ
al O
ppor
tuni
ty O
ffic
e (f
orm
erly
Aff
irm
ativ
e A
ctio
n O
ffic
e)1.
001.
0058
,000
58.0
000
Fiel
d-B
ased
Tea
cher
Pre
para
tion
Prog
ram
s1.
000.
5020
1,00
013
0,00
0(7
1,00
0)Fi
nanc
ial A
ssis
tanc
e O
utre
ach
Cen
ter
***
5.50
8.00
400,
000
396,
000
(4,0
00)
Futu
re T
each
ers
Prog
ram
***
0.20
0.34
17,6
0012
5,00
010
7,40
0
Hea
lth a
nd M
edic
al C
aree
rs P
rogr
am--
--0.
40--
--37
,500
- -
--
His
tory
Day
***
0.10
13,1
00H
onor
s Pg
m in
Int
erna
tiona
l Stu
dies
(U
niv.
of
Min
n.)
1.00
1.00
84,9
0031
,400
(53,
500)
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dies
Pro
gram
s5.
506.
0017
1,50
017
1,50
00
Job
Loc
atio
n an
d D
evel
opm
ent
1.00
1.00
50,0
0050
,000
0
Mat
hem
atic
s In
tegr
atin
g Sc
ienc
e an
d T
echn
olog
y (M
IST
)1.
331.
0015
0,00
083
,500
(66,
500)
Min
ority
Bio
med
ical
Res
earc
h Su
ppor
t - S
CO
RE
4.20
4.60
617,
700
520,
600
(97,
100)
Min
ority
Bio
med
ical
Res
earc
h Su
ppor
t - R
ISE
***
0.70
3.25
636,
600
639,
100
2,50
0
Min
ority
Enh
ance
men
t Pro
gram
0.00
0.00
16,8
0016
,800
0
Min
ority
Ini
tiativ
e R
esea
rch
Car
eer
0.33
0.34
I0,0
0010
,000
0
Min
ority
Int
erns
hip
Prog
ram
(fo
rmer
ly .B
GU
Min
ority
Int
erns
hip)
1.00
1.00
176,
200
325,
000
148,
800
Nue
va G
ener
atio
n0.
9022
6,60
0O
ffic
e fo
r H
ispa
nic
Prog
ram
s***
2.00
2.00
73,0
0073
,000
0
PASE
(Pa
rtne
rshi
p fo
r A
cade
mic
Ski
lls E
nhan
cem
ent)
3.40
3.40
80,0
0080
,000
0
Pre-
Med
ical
Edu
catio
n Pr
ogra
m3.
003.
7523
0,30
024
5,30
015
,000
Proj
ect F
utur
o0.
400.
2019
0,50
015
5,10
0(3
5,40
0)R
onal
d M
cNai
r Pr
ogra
m2.
001.
7019
1,00
020
3,70
012
,700
Scho
lars
hip
and
Stud
ent S
uppo
rt P
rogr
am in
Mat
h an
d C
omp
Sci.
----
0.00
---
135,
000
6061
Tab
le 2
5 (c
ontin
ued)
DO
LL
AR
S A
ND
ST
AFF
YE
AR
S B
UD
GE
TE
D T
O P
RO
GR
AM
S SE
RV
ING
UN
DE
RR
EPR
ESE
NT
ED
ST
UD
EN
TS
AN
D S
TA
FF A
T P
UB
LIC
UN
IVE
RSI
TIE
S*FI
SCA
L Y
EA
RS
2000
AN
D 2
001
Prog
ram
CH
ICA
GO
ST
AT
E U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y (
cont
inue
d)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dD
olla
rs B
udge
ted*
*C
hang
e in
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01FY
00FY
01
Stud
ent S
uppo
rt S
ervi
ces
3.00
3.34
203,
300
206,
500
3,20
0Su
mm
er U
nder
grad
uate
Res
earc
h E
xper
ienc
e (S
UR
E)
Supp
ort S
ervi
ces
for
Dis
able
d St
uden
tsT
ech-
Kno
w C
amp*
**
0.00
1.00
2.50
0.00
1.00
4.00
08,
800
490
150,
000
8,80
049
,300
140,
000
0
(100
)(1
0,00
0)T
rans
ition
al C
olle
ge P
repa
rato
ry**
*2.
1013
5,00
013
5,00
00
Tra
nsiti
onal
Inv
olve
men
t Pro
gram
***
7.50
11.0
055
,000
50,0
00(5
,000
)U
pwar
d B
ound
/Pro
ject
Fam
e***
3.00
- 5.
7020
7,50
077
4,10
056
6,60
0W
omen
's R
esou
rce
Cen
ter*
*0.
250.
007 7,
400
7,40
0,
0
EA
STE
RN
IL
LIN
OIS
UN
IVE
RSI
TY
Civ
il R
ight
s, A
ffir
mat
ive
Act
ion
and
Div
ersi
ty O
ffic
e3.
603.
6021
7,50
022
5,90
08,
400
Afr
o-A
mer
ican
Cul
tura
l Cen
ter
1.00
1.00
6,70
07,
200
500
Afr
ican
-Am
eric
an S
tudi
es3.
003.
0011
8,60
013
3,60
015
,000
Gat
eway
Pro
gram
5.50
5.00
11,1
0011
.300
200
Min
ority
Stu
dent
Aff
airs
Off
ice
2.00
2.00
243,
400
260,
800
17,4
00O
ffic
e of
Stu
dent
Hou
sing
Mul
ticul
tura
lism
& D
iver
sity
Com
mitt
ee1.
000.
5044
,000
40,0
00(4
,000
)Se
rvic
es f
or S
tude
nts
with
Dis
abili
ties
2.00
2.00
57,7
0077
,000
19.3
00W
omen
's A
dvoc
acy
Cou
ncil
0.20
0.20
25,8
0019
,100
(6,7
00)
Wom
en's
Stu
dies
Min
or0.
2012
,200
16,4
004.
200
Peer
Hel
per
0.00
0.00
3,60
04,
900
1,30
0M
inor
ity S
tude
nts
Sum
mer
Lea
ders
hip
Cam
p*1.
001.
0018
,000
18,0
000
AD
A C
ompl
ianc
e .
29,0
0030
,000
1,00
0T
RIO
4.00
4.00
194,
700
198,
600
3,90
0M
inor
ity T
each
er I
dent
ific
atio
n Pr
ogra
m*
1.50
1.00
100,
000
90,0
00(1
0,00
0)L
atin
o H
erita
ge C
omm
ittee
0.00
0.00
3,40
03,
500
100
Exc
elle
nce
Thr
ough
Enr
ichm
ent C
amp
0.50
0.50
50,0
0044
,700
(5,3
00)
EIU
Uni
ty0.
000.
0015
,000
15,0
000
Min
ority
Stu
dent
Int
erns
hip
Prog
ram
0.00
0.00
3,40
030
,500
27,1
00
GO
VE
RN
OR
S ST
AT
E U
NIV
ER
SIT
YA
uxili
ary
Serv
ices
for
Dis
able
d1.
001.
0030
,000
30,0
000
Min
ority
Gra
duat
e St
uden
t Tui
tion
Wai
ver
0.00
0.00
20,0
0020
,000
0
6263
Tab
le 2
5 (c
ontin
ued)
DO
LL
AR
S A
ND
ST
AFF
YE
AR
S B
UD
GE
TE
D T
O P
RO
GR
AM
S SE
RV
ING
UN
DE
RR
EPR
ESE
NT
ED
ST
UD
EN
TS
AN
D S
TA
FF A
T P
UB
LIC
UN
IVE
RSI
TIE
S*FI
SCA
L Y
EA
RS
2000
AN
D 2
001
Prog
ram
GO
VE
RN
OR
S ST
AT
E U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y (
cont
inue
d)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dD
olla
rs B
udge
ted*
*C
hang
e in
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01FY
00FY
01
Lat
ino
Ach
ieve
men
t Sch
olar
ship
0.00
0.00
16,8
0016
,800
0E
cono
mic
Ach
ieve
rs P
rogr
am1.
001.
0029
,000
29,0
000
Nur
sing
Tra
inee
ship
Gra
nt0.
000.
0032
,470
16,0
00(1
6,47
0)H
ealth
Adm
inis
trat
ion
Tra
inee
ship
Gra
nt0.
000.
0012
,000
12,0
000
Proj
ect H
OPE
***
3.00
2.00
123,
500
125,
000
1,50
0Pr
ofes
sion
al E
nric
hmen
t Pro
gram
1.00
1.00
12,6
0012
,600
0A
ffir
mat
ive
Act
ion
and
Cul
tura
l Div
ersi
ty1.
501.
5011
5,00
011
5,06
060
Lea
rnin
g hi
Con
text
***
2.25
2.25
92,6
4010
5,03
912
,399
Stud
ent S
uppo
rt S
ervi
ces
3.70
4.00
189,
800
195,
045
5,24
5C
PS U
nive
rsity
Aca
dem
y***
0.50
0.00
283,
648
217,
245
(66,
403)
Chi
cago
Alli
ance
for
Min
ority
Par
ticip
atio
n0.
200.
0016
,000
0(1
6,00
0)U
pwar
d B
ound
***
0.75
4.00
18,1
0019
9,90
018
1,80
0
ILL
INO
IS S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RSI
TY
Aca
dem
ic A
ffai
rs
Min
ority
Men
tors
hip
Prog
ram
(jo
int p
rogr
am w
ith S
tude
nt A
ffai
rs)
1.00
1.00
56,2
0051
,700
(4,5
00)
Min
ority
Aca
dem
ic S
chol
arsh
ips
2.00
2.00
90,0
0067
,500
(22,
500)
Min
ority
Tea
cher
Rec
ruitm
ent P
rogr
am0.
500.
5018
,000
18,0
000
Cou
nsel
ing
and
Car
eer
Serv
ices
Gue
rrill
a T
heat
re T
roup
e0.
800.
8023
,500
23.5
000
IDS
105-
Cul
tura
l Und
erst
andi
ng0.
350.
7012
,000
24,0
0012
,000
Min
ority
Pho
nath
on0.
450.
4514
,300
14,3
000
Supp
ort G
roup
s1.
001.
0042
,000
42,0
000
Dis
abili
ty C
once
rns
Off
ice
7.50
7.50
231,
900
303,
900
72,0
00G
radu
ate
Stud
ies,
Res
earc
h, a
nd I
nter
natio
nal E
duca
tion
Min
ority
Gra
duat
e T
uitio
n W
aive
r Pr
ogra
m0.
200.
2086
,800
86,8
000
ICE
OP
0.20
0.20
70,0
0070
,000
0D
octo
ral M
inor
ity R
ecru
itmen
t0.
030.
001,
000
0(1
,000
)M
cNai
r O
utre
ach,
Boo
k Fe
llow
ship
, BG
SA, B
lack
Col
legi
an0.
400.
106,
000
3,20
0(2
,800
)M
cHen
ry F
ello
wsh
ip0.
030.
036,
000
6,00
00
Ada
Bel
le C
lark
Wel
sh S
chol
arsh
ip f
or W
omen
0.03
0.03
7,50
09,
000
1,50
0M
EC
CPA
CB
lack
His
tory
Mon
th1.
421.
7513
,000
12,7
00(3
00)
Lat
ino
Her
itage
Mon
th1.
421.
7510
,800
11,2
0040
0
6465
Tab
le 2
5 (c
ontin
ued)
DO
LL
AR
S A
ND
ST
AFF
YE
AR
S B
UD
GE
TE
D T
O P
RO
GR
AM
S SE
RV
ING
UN
DE
RR
EPR
ESE
NT
ED
ST
UD
EN
TS
AN
D S
TA
FF A
T P
UB
LIC
UN
IVE
RSI
TIE
S*FI
SCA
L Y
EA
RS
2000
AN
D 2
001
Prog
ram
ILL
INO
IS S
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RSI
TY
(co
ntin
ued)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dD
olla
rs B
udge
ted*
*C
hang
e in
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01FY
00.
FY01
Min
ority
Sch
olar
s-in
-Res
iden
ce1.
421.
758,
900
8100
(800
)W
omen
's H
isto
ry M
onth
1.42
1.75
11,9
0010
,700
(1,2
00)
Asi
an H
isto
ry M
onth
1.42
1.75
9,00
086
00(4
00)
Nat
ive
Am
eric
an H
isto
ry M
onth
1.42
1.75
9,00
010
,200
1,20
0
Co-
Spon
sors
hip
Prog
ram
s1.
421.
7527
,900
27,4
00(5
00)
Gay
, Les
bian
, Bi-
Sexu
al, T
rans
gcnd
er A
war
enes
s0.
001.
750
9400
9,40
0In
terc
ultu
ral P
rogr
ams
and
Serv
ices
Com
mun
ity O
utre
ach
4.12
1.75
40,9
0049
,500
8,60
0Pu
blic
atio
ns4.
121.
7541
,000
39,9
00(1
,100
)R
eten
tion
4.12
1.38
45,9
0041
,000
(4,9
00)
1st Y
ear
Men
tors
hip
Prog
ram
4.12
1.75
57,5
0053
,200
(4,3
00)
Off
ice
of th
e Pr
ovos
tFa
culty
Ret
entio
n A
ssis
tanc
e Pr
ogra
m2.
502.
5025
0,70
030
3,20
052
,500
Stud
ent a
nd A
lum
ni P
lace
men
tW
orkp
lace
Div
ersi
ty C
aree
r Fa
ir1.
361.
4014
,300
15,0
0070
0St
uden
t Hea
lth S
ervi
ces
Bre
ast H
ealth
Aw
aren
ess
Proj
ect
0.00
0.00
00
0W
omen
's H
ealth
Clin
ic1.
006.
7028
2,20
024
9,30
0(3
2.90
0)W
omen
's R
epro
duct
ive
Hea
lth C
lass
0.10
0.10
6,80
070
0020
0Se
xual
Ass
ult P
reve
ntio
n an
d Su
rviv
or S
erie
s0.
500.
5030
,000
31,9
001,
900
Stud
ent L
ife
and
Prog
ram
sA
LA
S0.
250.
2517
,500
20,8
003.
300
BSU
0.25
0.25
17,8
0019
,000
1,20
0N
atio
nal P
an H
elle
nic
1.00
1.00
20,6
0018
,000
(2,6
00)
Safe
Zon
e0.
000.
100
6,80
06,
800
Pass
ages
Ori
enta
tion
for
Stud
ents
of
Col
or0.
000.
050
2,40
02,
400
Nat
iona
l Bla
ck G
reek
Lea
ders
hip
Con
fere
nce
0.00
0.20
07,
200
7,20
0U
nive
rsity
Col
lege
Aca
dem
ic. E
nric
hmen
t Cen
ter
1.00
1.38
55,0
0066
,000
11,0
00Su
mm
er E
nric
hmen
t Pro
gram
***
0.33
0.38
028
,700
28,7
00W
omen
's S
tudi
es/W
omen
's C
ente
r2.
702.
7510
,900
11,7
0080
0
Alli
ance
for
Min
ority
Par
ticip
atio
n (A
MP)
0.63
1.00
055
,200
55,2
00
6 6
6"7
Tab
le 2
5 (c
ontin
ued)
DO
LL
AR
S A
ND
ST
AFF
YE
AR
S B
UD
GE
TE
D T
O P
RO
GR
AM
S SE
RV
ING
UN
DE
RR
EPR
ESE
NT
ED
ST
UD
EN
TS
AN
D S
TA
FF A
T P
UB
LIC
UN
IVE
RSI
TIE
S*FI
SCA
L Y
EA
RS
2000
AN
D 2
001
Prog
ram
NO
RT
HE
AST
ER
N I
LL
INO
IS U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dD
olla
rs B
udge
ted*
*C
hang
e in
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01FY
00FY
01
Sum
mer
Tra
nsiti
on P
rogr
am3.
803.
8029
1,30
032
8,40
037
,100
Part
ners
for
Suc
cess
0.60
0.60
31,7
0031
,400
(300
)Pr
ojec
t Suc
cess
6.50
6.50
254,
400
272,
500
18,1
00Pr
oyec
to P
a'L
ante
4.50
5.50
191,
900
186,
600
(5,3
00)
El C
entr
o4.
004.
0020
7,60
024
8,30
040
,700
Cen
ter
for
Inne
r C
ity S
udic
s24
.50
25.0
092
4,00
01,
007,
000
83,0
00W
omen
's S
tudi
es1.
671.
6762
,000
65,7
005,
700
Wom
en's
Ser
vice
s2.
502.
5094
,100
96,3
002,
200
Han
dica
p E
duca
tion
Lia
ison
Pro
gram
3.00
3.00
143,
100
150,
200
7,10
0A
ffir
mat
ive
Act
ion
Off
ice
2.00
2.00
103,
000
108,
500
5,50
0C
hica
go T
each
ers
Cen
ter*
**84
.20
108.
006,
331,
100
11,5
52,3
005,
221,
200
Bili
ngua
l/Bic
ultu
ral E
duca
tion
3.06
3.13
195,
500
192.
700
(2,8
00)
Rea
ding
Lab
3.25
3.25
140,
200
151,
500
11,3
00E
nglis
h L
angu
age
Prog
ram
11.0
011
.00
449,
700
479,
000
29,3
00St
uden
t Sup
port
Ser
vice
4.00
4.00
201,
500
198,
400
(3,1
00)
Dev
elop
men
t Off
ice
Scho
lars
hips
0.70
0.65
65,9
0081
,400
15,5
00St
uden
t Clu
bs0.
400.
4055
,800
56,2
0040
0In
st. I
slam
ic S
tudi
es0.
000.
005,
400
1,60
0(3
.800
)Fa
st P
ace
Hig
h Sc
hool
Sci
ence
/Mat
h***
0.00
0.00
67,9
0062
,200
(5,7
00)
Mat
hem
atic
s L
ab4.
255.
7521
0,60
025
9,00
048
.400
Min
ority
Int
erns
hip
Prog
ram
0.20
0.20
14,1
0014
,600
500
Puls
e0.
000.
0010
0,00
016
9,40
069
.400
Chi
cago
Pub
lic S
choo
ls P
re K
inde
rgar
ten*
**1.
001.
0046
,000
57,9
0011
,900
Car
eer
Lad
der
Prog
ram
0.00
0.00
131,
800
178,
400
46,6
00T
rain
ing
for
all T
each
ers
0.00
0.00
106,
000
116,
300
10,3
00E
mpo
wer
ing
Wom
en th
roug
h C
ompu
ter
Exp
ertis
e0.
000.
0027
,500
64,0
0036
,500
Div
ersi
ty I
nstit
ute
0.00
1.00
5,20
016
6,10
016
0,90
0C
hica
go A
llian
ce f
or M
inor
ity P
artic
ipat
ion
0.00
0.00
10,9
008,
900
(2,0
00)
GT
E N
-Con
nect
s0.
000.
0011
,700
10,6
00(1
,100
)E
NL
AC
E0.
000.
0020
,100
223,
300
203,
200
Stre
ngth
enin
g H
SI0.
000.
000.
0061
,700
61,7
00W
ashi
ngto
n R
esea
rch
Inst
itute
0.00
0.00
0.00
28,5
0028
,500 69
68
Tab
le 2
5 (c
ontin
ued)
DO
LL
AR
S A
ND
ST
AFF
YE
AR
S B
UD
GE
TE
D T
O P
RO
GR
AM
S SE
RV
ING
UN
DE
RR
EPR
ESE
NT
ED
ST
UD
EN
TS
AN
D S
TA
FF A
T P
UB
LIC
UN
IVE
RSI
TIE
S*FI
SCA
L Y
EA
RS
2000
AN
D 2
001
Prog
ram
NO
RT
HE
RN
IL
LIN
OIS
UN
IVE
RSI
TY
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dD
olla
rs B
udge
ted*
*C
hang
e in
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01FY
00FY
01
Aff
irm
ativ
e A
ctio
n8.
008.
0041
9,80
052
6,30
010
6,50
0C
ente
r fo
r A
cces
s-A
bilit
y R
esou
rces
15.0
015
.00
439,
000
500,
400
61,4
00C
ente
r Fo
r B
lack
Stu
dies
4.75
5.00
230,
500
237,
400
6,90
0C
ente
r Fo
r L
atin
os &
Lat
in A
mer
ican
Stu
dies
2.00
2.00
192,
000
1884
00(3
,600
)C
ouns
elin
g an
d St
uden
t Dev
elop
men
t Cen
ter
Dia
logu
e on
Rac
e0.
305,
000
5,00
00
SOA
R1.
301.
3033
,700
33,7
000
Oth
er0.
800.
8030
,200
17,2
00(1
3,00
0)E
duca
tiona
l Ser
vice
s &
Pro
gram
sC
HA
NC
E18
.13
18.6
060
3,10
059
2,40
0(1
0,70
0)A
CC
ESS
8.64
11.5
728
3,50
041
8,20
013
4,70
0L
AR
C0.
380.
382,
500
3,00
050
0St
uden
t Sup
port
Ser
vice
s5.
005.
0024
7,30
026
9,60
022
,300
Upw
ard
Bou
nd**
*7.
007.
0040
7,60
041
9,90
012
,300
Min
ority
Edu
catio
nal A
chie
vem
ent P
rogr
am**
*0.
500.
5035
,000
35,0
000
ESP
Tui
tion
Wai
vers
---
-67
,200
61,8
00(5
,400
)G
radu
ate
Scho
olM
inor
ity G
radu
ate
Stud
ent R
ecru
itmen
t85
,300
122,
400
37.1
00Il
linoi
s C
onso
rtiu
m f
or E
duca
tiona
l Opp
ortu
nity
179,
600
134,
400
(45,
200)
Min
ority
Fel
low
ship
53,1
0042
,200
(10.
900)
Car
ter
G. W
oods
on S
chol
ars
Prog
ram
46,9
0039
,600
(7,3
00)
Rho
ten
A. S
mith
Ass
ista
ntsh
ip P
rogr
am45
0,20
052
2,30
072
,100
Gra
duat
e T
uitio
n W
aive
rs58
1,40
014
8,40
0(4
33,0
00)
Off
ice
of A
dmis
sion
Min
ority
Und
ergr
adua
te R
ecru
itmen
t3.
503.
5038
,700
40,4
001,
700
Und
ergr
adua
te T
uitio
n W
aive
rs--
-38
3,10
038
6,30
03,
200
Off
ice
of th
e Pr
ovos
t -A
ssis
tant
Pro
vost
for
Aca
dem
ic S
uppo
rt S
ervi
ces
1.50
113,
600
113,
600
0U
nive
rsity
Pro
gram
min
g an
d A
ctiv
ities
Uni
ty in
Div
ersi
ty P
rogr
amm
ing
0.90
0.90
12,8
0015
,000
2,20
0Fi
ne A
rts
Prog
ram
s Pr
omot
ing
Div
ersi
ty0.
300.
3019
0,90
046
200
(144
,700
)M
id-L
evel
---
---
--8,
500
Spea
kers
11,4
00M
B1,
800
Con
cert
s15
5,00
0
71
Tab
le 2
5 (c
ontin
ued)
DO
LL
AR
S A
ND
ST
AFF
YE
AR
S B
UD
GE
TE
D T
O P
RO
GR
AM
S SE
RV
ING
UN
DE
RR
EPR
ESE
NT
ED
ST
UD
EN
TS
AN
D S
TA
FF A
T P
UB
LIC
UN
IVE
RSI
TIE
S*FI
SCA
L Y
EA
RS
2000
AN
D 2
001
Prog
ram
NO
RT
HE
RN
IL
LIN
OIS
UN
IVE
RSI
TY
(co
ntin
ued)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dD
olla
rs B
udge
ted*
*C
hang
e in
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01FY
00FY
01
Uni
vers
ity R
esou
rces
For
Lat
inos
4.00
4.00
168,
200
174,
900
6,70
0U
nive
rsity
Res
ourc
es F
or W
omen
3.00
3.00
132,
500
144,
800
12,3
00T
uitio
n W
aive
rs--
----
-6,
400
0(6
,400
)W
omen
's S
tudi
es P
rogr
am3.
003.
0021
0,90
022
3,00
012
,100
WE
STE
RN
IL
LIN
OIS
UN
IVE
RSI
TY
Aff
irm
ativ
e A
ctio
n A
dmin
istr
ativ
eIn
tern
ship
Pro
gram
0.00
0.00
28,0
0035
,300
7,30
0A
fric
an-A
mer
ican
Stu
dies
Dep
artm
ent
3.50
6.02
161,
400
321,
600
160,
200
Cas
a L
atin
a C
ultu
ral A
war
enes
s C
ente
r2.
402.
3075
,800
64,8
00(1
1,00
0)D
isab
ility
Sup
port
Ser
vice
s5.
905.
4016
6,30
016
1,70
0(4
,600
)E
thni
c St
uden
t Out
reac
h an
d R
eten
tion
Prog
ram
***
5.30
5.40
119,
000
128.
900
9,90
0G
wen
doly
n B
rook
s C
ultu
ral C
ente
r2.
802.
6081
,900
87,9
006,
000
Cro
ss-C
ultu
ral E
duca
tiona
l Pro
gram
***
6.00
5.40
214,
700
198,
600
(16,
100)
Min
ority
Ach
ieve
men
t Pro
gram
0.00
0.00
16,8
0020
,000
3,20
0M
ultic
ultu
ral S
tude
nt R
ecru
itmen
t Off
ice
2.50
2.00
80,9
0084
,900
4,00
0Pr
esid
ent's
Min
ority
Gra
duat
e A
cces
s Pr
ogra
m0.
000.
0026
,000
27,0
001,
000
Wes
tern
's E
qual
Opp
ortu
nity
Sch
olar
ship
& G
rant
0.00
0.00
24,0
0023
,000
(1.0
00)
Wes
tern
's F
utur
e Fa
culty
Fel
low
s Pr
ogra
m0.
000.
007,
000
0(7
,000
)W
omen
's C
ente
r2.
502.
2579
,600
79,7
0010
0
Wom
en's
Stu
dies
Pro
gram
3.25
3.05
226,
200
270,
100
43,9
00
SOU
TH
ER
N I
LL
INO
IS U
NIV
ER
SIT
YSO
UT
HE
RN
IL
LIN
OIS
UN
IVE
RSI
TY
CA
RI3
ON
DA
LE
Futu
re S
chol
ars
Prog
ram
0.92
0.92
62,9
0062
,900
0
Min
ority
Eng
inee
ring
Pro
gram
* *
*2.
002.
0020
8,00
021
3,20
05,
200
ME
P Su
mm
er B
ridg
e Pr
ogra
m0.
750.
7540
,000
23,8
00(1
6,20
0)So
. IL
Reg
iona
l Car
eer
Prep
arat
ion
Prog
ram
***
4.46
4.46
60,0
0080
,000
20,0
00U
pwar
d B
ound
***
5.50
5.50
324,
000
333,
000
9,00
0W
omen
's I
ntro
duct
ion
to E
ngin
eeri
ng**
*0.
200.
007,
100
0(7
,100
)A
ffir
mat
ive
Act
ion
Off
ice/
Med
ical
Sch
ool
Bla
ck A
mer
ican
Stu
dies
Pro
gram
3.29
3.40
230,
000
249,
000
19,0
00B
lack
Tog
ethe
rnes
s O
rgan
izat
ion
0.60
0.60
12,0
0012
,500
500
73
Tab
le 2
5 (c
ontin
ued)
DO
LL
AR
S A
ND
ST
AFF
YE
AR
S B
UD
GE
TE
D T
O P
RO
GR
AM
S SE
RV
ING
UN
DE
RR
EPR
ESE
NT
ED
ST
UD
EN
TS
AN
D S
TA
FF A
T P
UB
LIC
UN
IVE
RSI
TIE
S*FI
SCA
L Y
EA
RS
2000
AN
D 2
001
Prog
ram
SOU
TH
ER
N I
LL
INO
IS U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y C
AR
BO
ND
AL
E (
cont
inue
d)C
ente
r fo
r B
asic
Ski
llsC
olle
ge o
f B
usin
ess
Min
ority
Ret
entio
n Pr
ogra
mC
olle
ge o
f E
duca
tion
Min
ority
Ret
entio
n &
Rec
ruitm
ent P
rogr
amD
isab
led
Supp
ort S
ervi
ces
Gra
duat
e D
ean'
s Fe
llow
ship
Pro
gram
Hea
lth S
cien
ce E
nric
hmen
t Pro
gram
/Med
ical
Sch
ool
1L C
onso
rtiu
m f
or E
duca
tiona
l Opp
ortu
nity
Pro
gram
IL M
inor
ity G
radu
ate
Ince
ntiv
e Pr
ogra
mM
edic
al/D
enta
l Pre
para
tory
/Med
ical
Sch
ool
Min
ority
Par
ticip
atio
n Sc
hola
rshi
psM
ultic
ultu
ral P
rogr
ams
and
Serv
ices
Nig
ht T
rans
itO
ffic
e of
Exe
c. A
sst.
to th
e C
hanc
ello
rPr
ojec
t Ach
ieve
Proa
ctiv
e R
ecru
itmen
t olM
ultic
ultu
ral P
rofe
ssio
nals
for
Tom
orro
w(P
RO
MPT
)Sc
hool
of
Law
Div
ersi
ty F
ello
wsh
ips/
Scho
lars
hips
Uni
vers
ity W
omen
's P
rofe
ssio
nal A
dvan
cem
ent
Whe
elch
air
Rep
air
Serv
ice
Wom
en's
Ser
vice
sW
omen
's S
tudi
esD
isab
ility
Sup
port
/Ove
rhea
d R
ecov
ery
Min
oriti
es in
Agr
icul
ture
, Nat
.R
esou
rces
& R
elat
ed S
cien
ces
Gra
duat
e Sc
hool
Dev
elop
ing
Scho
lars
Dis
abili
ty A
ccom
mod
atio
nsU
nite
d A
irlin
es-S
outh
ern
Illin
ois
Uni
vers
ity C
arbo
ndal
eA
viat
ion
Car
eer
Day
for
Afr
ican
Am
eric
an, H
ispa
nic
Am
eric
an, a
ndFe
mal
e H
igh
Scho
ol S
tude
nts
Min
ority
Avi
atio
n C
ounc
il, R
otor
Win
g A
ssn.
and
Wom
en in
Avi
atio
n
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dD
olla
rs B
udge
ted*
*C
hang
e in
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dFY
00
12.7
52.
800.
605.
750.
40
2.00
2.00
0.08
2.45
0.70
6.00
12.2
5
3.00
0.02
1.60
0.50
2.30
1.00
1.20
(0).
.002
0
0.25
1.30
0.00
0.15
0.03
FY01
13.0
02.
50
5.25
0.40
2.00
2.00
0.08
3.00
0.70
6.00
12.2
5
3.00
0.20
1.60
0.50
2.20
1.00
0.00
0.02
0.25
0.40
0.00
0.15
0.03
FY00
316,
200
65,0
00
222,
000
50,0
00
100,
000
60,0
00
157,
000
94,0
0040
,000
312,
000
587,
600
168,
000
60,0
0092
,200
16,0
0059
,000
135,
500
33,0
000 0
2,90
049
,000 0
6,00
0
2,00
0
FY01
328,
900
64,0
00
199,
500
50,0
00
160,
000
60,0
00
155,
000
102,
000
45,0
0031
9,80
056
5,30
0
175,
900
111,
000
97,5
0013
,200
65,0
0014
1,40
061
,000
050
0
3,00
061
,000
0
3,00
0
1,00
0
12,7
00(1
,000
)
(22,
500) 0
60,0
00 0
(2,0
00)
8,00
05,
000
7,80
0(2
2,30
0)
(51,
000)
5,30
0)(2
80 6.00
0
5,90
028
,000
0 0
12.0
00 0
(3.0
00)
(1,0
00)
7475
Tab
le 2
5 (c
ontin
ued)
DO
LL
AR
S A
ND
ST
AFF
YE
AR
S B
UD
GE
TE
D T
O P
RO
GR
AM
S SE
RV
ING
UN
DE
RR
EPR
ESE
NT
ED
ST
UD
EN
TS
AN
D S
TA
FF A
T P
UB
LIC
UN
IVE
RSI
TIE
S*FI
SCA
L Y
EA
RS
2000
AN
D 2
001
Prog
ram
SOU
TH
ER
N I
LL
INO
IS U
NIV
ER
SIT
YSO
UT
HE
RN
IL
LIN
OIS
UN
IVE
RSI
TY
ED
WA
RD
SVIL
LE
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dD
olla
rs B
udge
ted*
*C
hang
e in
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01FY
00FY
01
Cam
pus
of L
earn
ers
Proj
ect
5.84
4.08
273,
100
232,
000
(41,
100)
Cha
ncel
lor's
Min
ority
Gra
duat
e T
uitio
n A
war
ds0.
010.
0133
,900
26,9
00(7
,000
)C
ompe
titiv
e G
radu
ate
Aw
ard
0.50
0.05
161,
400
158,
900
(2,5
00)
Com
pute
r L
ab/E
ast S
t. L
ouis
3.00
3.31
29,3
0053
,800
24,5
00D
isab
ility
Sup
port
Ser
vice
s2.
83.
0087
,600
108,
500
20,9
00E
ast S
t. L
ouis
Cen
ter
for
the
Perf
orm
ing
Art
s6.
285.
8831
1,00
022
5,00
0(8
6,00
0)E
duca
tiona
l Opp
ortu
nity
Cen
ter/
Eas
t St.
Lou
is3.
003.
3112
0,90
017
4,66
053
,760
IL C
onso
rtiu
m f
or E
duca
tiona
l Opp
ortu
nity
0.05
0.07
7,30
07,
300
0L
atin
Am
eric
an S
chol
arsh
ip P
rogr
am o
f A
mer
ican
Uni
vers
ity0.
010.
014,
800
6,40
01,
600
Min
ority
Eng
inee
ring
Pro
gram
2.00
2.00
68,0
0068
,300
300
Min
ority
Tea
cher
s of
Illi
nois
Sch
olar
ship
0.01
0.01
47,5
0027
,500
(20,
000)
Proj
ect G
AIN
2.50
2.50
160,
000
158,
000
(2,0
00)
Rec
ruitm
ent a
nd R
eten
tion
Fund
Facu
lty R
ecru
itmen
t and
Ret
entio
n0.
250.
2519
2,80
017
5,20
0(1
7,60
0)Jo
hnet
ta H
aley
Sch
olar
ship
0.25
0.25
331,
500
294,
300
(37,
200)
Scho
ol o
f D
enta
l Med
icin
e.
Min
ority
Sch
olar
ship
Pro
gram
0.01
0.01
11,0
0011
,000
0
Spec
ial S
ervi
ces
Prog
ram
12.0
013
.27
241,
900
246,
800
4,90
0St
uden
ts E
ngag
ed in
Eng
inee
ring
0.03
0.03
1,60
01,
700
100
Titl
e II
Tea
cher
Rec
ruitm
ent P
artn
ersh
ip G
rant
0.66
.
20,8
0020
,800
Wom
en's
Stu
dies
Pro
gram
0.75
0.75
40,0
0022
,000
(18.
000)
Am
eriC
orps
/Eas
t St.
Lou
is**
*32
.50
40.5
043
3,20
053
5,67
010
2,47
0A
mer
ica
Rea
ds M
S***
12.0
012
.00
80,0
0080
,000
0C
hild
Dev
elop
men
t Pro
gram
/Eas
t St.
Lou
is**
*25
.24
17.3
497
8,10
084
6,30
0(1
31,8
00)
Edu
catio
nal E
nric
hmen
t Pro
gram
***
0.30
0.50
15,0
0023
,150
8,15
0E
duca
tiona
l Tal
ent S
earc
h***
5.29
4.50
193,
000
199,
800
6,80
0H
ead
Star
t Pro
gram
***
156.
1415
8,69
7,99
0,70
08,
236,
500
245,
800
Jobs
for
IL
Gra
duat
es**
*1.
001.
3660
,000
48,4
00(1
1,60
0)L
atch
key
Prog
ram
***
2.48
2.05
148,
700
155,
350
6,65
0M
idw
est E
ngin
eeri
ng a
nd S
cien
ce A
ssoc
iatio
nPr
ecol
lege
Pro
gram
***
4.00
3.50
35,0
0032
,000
(3,0
00)
Pre-
Col
lege
Edu
catio
n an
d C
aree
r T
rain
ing
Inst
itute
***
1.53
1.39
50,0
0050
,000
0
Proj
ect S
ucce
ss/E
ast S
t. L
ouis
***
5.82
6.66
305,
300
319,
900
14,6
00
7677
Tab
le 2
5 (c
ontin
ued)
DO
LL
AR
S A
ND
ST
AFF
YE
AR
S B
UD
GE
TE
D T
O P
RO
GR
AM
S SE
RV
ING
UN
DE
RR
EPR
ESE
NT
ED
ST
UD
EN
TS
AN
D S
TA
FF A
T P
UB
LIC
UN
IVE
RSI
TIE
S*FI
SCA
L Y
EA
RS
2000
AN
D 2
001
Prog
ram
SOU
TH
ER
N I
LL
INO
IS U
NIV
ER
SIT
Y E
DW
AR
DSV
ILL
E (
cont
inue
d)R
ecru
itmen
t and
Ret
entio
n Fu
nd
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dD
olla
rs B
udge
ted*
*C
hang
e in
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01FY
00FY
01
Eng
inee
ring
and
Sci
ence
Pre
colle
ge P
rogr
am**
*.
0.88
0.88
13,8
0013
,800
Upw
ard
Bou
nd/S
cien
ce A
war
enes
s Pr
ogra
m**
*8.
2610
.02
482,
900
506,
000
0023
,1 0
Upw
ard
Bou
nd M
ath
and
Scie
nce
Cen
ter*
**4.
364.
0322
9,50
024
6,30
016
,800
Upw
ard
Bou
nd 1
1***
4.40
4.49
255,
800
272,
700
16,9
00C
hart
er S
choo
l***
8.00
20.1
768
9,90
061
9,20
0(7
0,70
0)G
EA
R U
P***
2.45
5.61
290,
000
377,
400
87,4
00
UN
IVE
RSI
TY
OF
ILL
INO
IS A
T C
HIC
AG
OA
cade
mic
Cen
ter
for
Exc
elle
nce
15.3
513
.35
460,
100
476,
300
16,2
00O
ffic
e fo
r A
cces
s an
d E
quity
9.50
1 I
.00
608,
100
671,
200
63,1
00A
fric
an-A
mer
ican
Aca
dem
ic N
etw
ork
30.0
017
.00
673,
000
691,
400
18,4
00A
fric
an-A
mer
ican
Cul
tura
l Cen
ter
2.63
2.63
188,
400
192,
100
3,70
0O
ffic
e of
Com
mun
ity R
elat
ions
AC
T-S
O**
2.28
2.78
7,50
07,
500
0B
lack
His
tory
Mon
th6.
007.
3718
,000
19,0
001,
000
Cam
pus
Adv
ocac
y N
etw
ork
Cen
ter
for
Res
earc
h on
Wom
en a
nd G
ende
r9.
599.
2068
8,00
055
9,50
0(1
28,5
00)
Cha
ncel
lor's
Aw
ard
0.00
0.00
33,4
0032
,000
(1,4
00)
Cha
nc. C
omm
. on
the
Stat
us o
f B
lack
s0.
190.
1927
,300
32,2
004.
900
Cha
nc. C
omm
. on
the
Stat
us o
f G
ays,
Les
bian
s an
d B
isex
uals
0.19
0.19
26,1
0026
,000
(100
)C
hanc
ello
r's C
omm
ittee
on
Stat
us o
f L
atin
os0.
250.
2516
,900
18,0
001,
100
Cha
nc. C
omm
. on
the
Stat
us o
f Pe
rson
s w
ith D
isab
ilitie
s0.
250.
2524
,700
24,7
000
Cha
nc. C
omm
. on
the
Stat
us o
f W
omen
0.19
0.19
37,2
0039
,900
2,70
0C
hanc
. Com
m. o
n th
e St
atus
of
Asi
an A
mer
ican
0.25
0.25
15,0
0020
,000
5,00
0T
he M
ento
ring
Exp
erie
nce
0.25
0.35
02,
000
2,00
0C
hica
go A
llian
ce f
or M
inor
ity P
artic
ipat
ion
Chi
ldre
n's
Cen
ter
20.5
420
.54
702,
100
,72
8,80
026
,700
Col
lege
of
Arc
hite
ctur
e an
d th
e A
rts
0Sp
iral
Wor
ksho
p1.
630.
601,
400
800
(600
)U
IC-
Tus
kege
e E
xcha
nge
Prog
ram
0.20
0.20
00
0C
olle
ge o
f E
duca
tion
Futu
re T
each
ers
Clu
b**
0.25
0.23
5,30
02,
800
(2,5
00)
Gol
den
App
le S
chol
ars
1.15
1.00
4,00
04,
000
0
079
Tab
le 2
5 (c
ontin
ued)
DO
LL
AR
S A
ND
ST
AFF
YE
AR
S B
UD
GE
TE
D T
O P
RO
GR
AM
S SE
RV
ING
UN
DE
RR
EPR
ESE
NT
ED
ST
UD
EN
TS
AN
D S
TA
FF A
T P
UB
LIC
UN
IVE
RSI
TIE
S*FI
SCA
L Y
EA
RS
2000
AN
D 2
001
Prog
ram
UN
IVE
RSI
TY
OF
ILL
INO
IS A
T C
HIC
AG
O (
cont
inue
d)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dD
olla
rs B
udge
ted*
*C
hang
e in
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01FY
00FY
01
Proj
ect 2
91.
251.
7520
0,00
025
0,00
050
,000
Col
lege
of
Eng
inee
ring
Min
ority
Eng
inee
ring
Pro
gram
11.1
27.
5730
5,90
031
8,10
012
,200
Col
lege
of
Med
icin
eH
ispa
nic
Cen
ter
of E
xcel
lenc
e4.
521.
2750
0,00
050
0,00
00
Dis
abili
ty S
ervi
ces
11.5
1.00
320,
000
320,
000
0
Ear
ly O
utre
ach
His
pani
c M
ath/
Scie
nce
Edu
. Ini
tiativ
e**
3.79
9.67
120,
000
146,
400
26,4
00M
ayor
's S
umm
er J
ob P
rogr
am *
*0.
3010
.04
49,5
0049
,500
0
Pre-
Fres
hman
Enr
ichm
ent P
rog.
**13
.45
'
20.1
524
7,00
035
2,20
010
5,20
0
Satu
rday
Col
lege
"'7.
508.
3029
0,00
029
6,00
06,
000
Col
lege
Com
pone
nt**
0.21
0.31
2,00
02,
000
0
Hig
h Sc
hool
/Col
lege
Tra
nsiti
on C
ompo
nent
***
0.21
1.04
8,00
08,
000
0
AL
BA
Com
mun
ity S
chol
ars
Prog
ram
***
6.55
4.20
213,
000
213,
000
0Su
mm
er R
esid
entia
l Hea
lth/S
cien
ce E
nric
hmen
t Pro
gram
***
0.75
8.05
15,0
0055
,000
40,0
00E
duca
tiona
l Enr
ichm
ent P
rogr
am**
*0.
456.
1020
,000
53,0
0033
,000
Gra
duat
e C
olle
ge A
dmis
sion
s &
Ret
entio
n Pr
ogra
mA
brah
am L
inco
ln G
radu
ate
Fello
wsh
ip0.
140.
14.1
12,0
0012
0,00
08.
000
CIC
Dir
ecto
ry o
f M
inor
ity P
h.D
. Can
dida
tes
and
Rec
ipie
nts
1.12
1.12
00
0
CIC
Nam
e E
xcha
nge
Prog
ram
0.74
0.74
00
0
CIC
Sum
mer
Res
earc
h O
ppor
tuni
ty P
rogr
am3.
446.
0040
0,00
040
0,00
00
Gra
duat
e C
olle
ge D
iver
sity
Fel
low
ship
0.20
0.14
300,
000
300,
000
0Il
linoi
s C
onso
rtiu
m f
or E
duca
tiona
l Opp
ortu
nity
Pro
gram
0.19
0.19
160,
000
140,
000
(20,
000)
Illin
ois
Min
ority
Gra
duat
e Fe
llow
ship
0.19
0.19
015
,000
15,0
00L
atin
o C
omm
ittee
on
Uni
vers
ity A
ffai
rs0.
500.
5025
,000
26,0
001,
000
Lat
in A
mer
ican
Rec
ruitm
ent a
nd E
duca
tiona
l Ser
vice
s17
.22
17.2
249
6,60
051
2,50
015
.900
Mar
tin L
uthe
r K
ing,
Jr.
Sch
olar
ship
s0.
000.
0077
,500
80,0
002,
500
Min
ority
Fac
ulty
Rec
ruitm
ent P
ool
0.15
0.15
483,
300
540,
000
56,7
00N
atio
nal Y
outh
Spo
rts
Prog
ram
**4.
354.
3589
,300
96,0
006,
700
Nat
ive
Am
eric
an S
uppo
rt P
rogr
am3.
003.
0011
9,30
012
2,40
03,
100
Off
ice
of W
omen
's A
ffai
rs3.
343.
2317
0,70
018
1,90
011
,200
Pres
iden
t's A
war
d Pr
ogra
m2.
192.
191,
577,
200
1,51
6.30
0(6
0,90
0)T
rio
Prog
ram
sPr
ojec
t Upw
ard
Bou
nd"'
8.00
6.26
420,
100
501,
600
81,5
00
8081
Tab
le 2
5 (c
ontin
ued)
DO
LL
AR
S A
ND
ST
AFF
YE
AR
S B
UD
GE
TE
D T
O P
RO
GR
AM
S SE
RV
ING
UN
DE
RR
EPR
ESE
NT
ED
ST
UD
EN
TS
AN
D S
TA
FF A
T P
UB
LIC
UN
IVE
RSI
TIE
S*FI
SCA
L Y
EA
RS
2000
AN
D 2
001
Prog
ram
UN
IVE
RSI
TY
OF
ILL
INO
IS A
T C
HIC
AG
O (
cont
inue
d)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dD
olla
rs B
udge
ted*
*C
hang
e in
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01FY
00FY
01
Aca
dem
ic S
uppo
rt P
rogr
am**
8.75
3.55
239,
100
230,
100
Edu
catio
nal T
alen
t Sea
rch*
*5.
133.
5129
0,80
024
9,60
0(4
(91,
2°0°
00))
Proj
ect G
earu
p0.
873.
8932
9,40
033
9,40
010
,000
Mat
h/Sc
ienc
e C
ente
r**
4.90
3.89
266,
600
268,
500
1,90
0R
apha
el C
intr
on O
rtiz
Cul
tura
l Cen
ter
Salu
te to
Aca
dem
ic A
ch.*
*U
rban
Hea
lth P
rogr
am
2.68
0.75
4.00
2.56
0.75
4.00
175,
100
22,2
0031
231
2,30
0
185,
700
24,7
0039
3,60
0
10,6
002,
500
81,3
00U
rban
Hea
lth P
rogr
am -
Aca
dem
ic C
ente
r fo
r E
xcel
lenc
e1.
650.
8065
,300
68,8
003,
500
Urb
an H
ealth
Pro
gram
- C
olle
ge o
f Ph
arm
acy
1.38
1.19
75,0
0086
,000
11,0
00U
rban
Hea
lth P
rogr
am -
UIC
Sch
ool o
f Pu
blic
Hea
lth1.
354.
8524
,600
24,6
00U
rban
Hea
lth -
Col
lege
of
Den
tistr
y2.
001.
0010
410
4,00
011
0,30
06,
300°
Urb
an H
ealth
- C
olle
ge o
f M
edic
ine
13.8
58.
9782
6,00
01,
329,
600
503,
600
Urb
an H
ealth
- G
radu
ate
Col
lege
0.00
3.00
041
,300
41,3
00U
rban
Hea
lth -
Col
lege
of
App
lied
Hea
lth S
cien
ces
2.56
2.56
113,
000
119,
800
6,80
0U
rban
Hea
lth -
Col
lege
of
Nur
sing
1.41
1.41
110,
000
111,
300
1,30
0U
rban
You
th L
eade
r Pr
ojec
t**
1.42
1.48
22,6
0025
,500
2,90
0U
IC A
ssoc
iatio
n of
Par
ents
1.19
1.19
10,6
0010
,720
1,00
9.00
0
100
Gen
der
and
Wom
en's
Stu
dies
6.63
6.7
400,
300
21,6
00
UN
IVE
RSI
TY
OF
ILL
INO
IS A
T S
PRIN
GFI
EL
DO
ffic
e of
Min
ority
Stu
dent
Aff
airs
2.5
1.75
52,5
0053
,000
500
Min
ority
Lea
ders
hip
in P
ublic
Ser
vice
0.12
0.25
89,2
0088
,700
(500
)M
inor
ity R
ecru
itmen
t1.
001.
0026
,000
26,0
000
Min
ority
Stu
dent
Sup
port
for
'rea
chin
g***
0.87
0.79
107,
300
97,5
00(9
,800
)St
uden
t/Par
ent/T
each
er P
rogr
am**
*1.
331.
3342
,400
43,7
001,
300
Inco
rpor
atio
n Pr
ojec
t0.
000.
005,
200
5,00
0(2
00)
Mul
ticul
tura
l Div
ersi
ty0.
100.
1014
,100
14,2
0010
0
Whi
tney
M. Y
oung
Fel
low
ship
Pro
gram
0.45
0.45
122,
700
125,
300
2,60
0W
omen
's C
ente
r1.
702.
0054
,500
58,8
004,
300
Dis
abili
ty S
ervi
ces
2.80
3.05
58,8
0010
5,70
046
,900
UN
IVE
RSI
TY
OF
ILL
INO
IS A
T U
RB
AN
A-C
HA
MPA
IGN
Aca
dem
ic A
ssis
tanc
e Pr
ogra
m, L
AS
3.00
3.00
112,
800
118,
100
5,30
0A
cade
mic
Sup
port
Ser
vice
s, A
cade
mic
Aff
airs
14.3
813
.00
260,
100
265,
800
5,70
0
0 A
10
4.E
sT c
gpy
AV
AIL
AB
LE
8
Tab
le 2
5 (c
ontin
ued)
DO
LL
AR
S A
ND
ST
AFF
YE
AR
S B
UD
GE
TE
D T
O P
RO
GR
AM
S SE
RV
ING
UN
DE
RR
EPR
ESE
NT
ED
ST
UD
EN
TS
AN
D S
TA
FF A
T P
UB
LIC
UN
IVE
RSI
TIE
S*FI
SCA
L Y
EA
RS
2000
AN
D 2
001
Prog
ram
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dD
olla
rs B
udge
ted*
*C
hang
e in
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01FY
00FY
01
Aca
dem
ic W
ritin
g Pr
ogra
m, E
nglis
h D
epar
tmen
t, L
AS
15.1
012
.46
173,
400
340,
700
167,
300
Afr
o-A
mer
ican
Stu
dies
and
Res
earc
h Pr
ogra
m, L
AS
10.4
412
.13
487,
500
317,
000
(170
,500
)A
pplie
d L
ife
Stud
ies
Stud
ent S
uppo
rt S
ervi
ces
0.60
0.60
22,0
0022
,800
800
Bri
dge/
Tra
nsiti
on P
rogr
am, L
AS
7.94
7.58
469,
600
498,
600
29,0
00
Bud
dy C
ore
0.00
0.05
06,
000
6,00
0C
BSU
0.00
2.83
06,
500
6,50
0C
hild
care
Res
ourc
e Se
rvic
es35
.00
30.3
992
4,20
01,
445,
000
520,
800
Div
isio
n of
Reh
abili
tatio
n E
duca
tion,
App
lied
Lif
e St
udie
s28
.66
30.8
51,
765,
800
1,86
6,20
010
0,40
0
Eng
inee
ring
Con
sort
ium
Fel
low
ship
Pro
g., C
olle
ge o
f E
ngr
0.40
0.40
276,
400
267,
600
(8,8
00)
Equ
al O
ppor
tuni
ty P
rogr
am, C
olle
ge o
f L
aw0.
790.
9836
4,50
036
4,20
0(3
00)
Exp
lori
ng Y
our
Opt
ions
(W
YSE
)1.
280.
0843
,100
79.4
0036
,300
Gra
duat
e C
olle
ge M
inor
ity S
tude
nt A
ffai
rs O
ffic
e2.
75.
0.38
52,3
0052
,300
0
Am
eric
an I
ndia
n Fe
llow
ship
s, G
radu
ate
Col
lege
0.00
0.00
00
0
Gra
duat
e C
olle
ge F
ello
wsh
ips
0.00
0.00
598,
000
765,
000
167,
000
Illin
ois
Con
sort
ium
for
Edu
catio
nal O
ppor
tuni
ty0.
000.
0036
0,00
037
5,00
015
,000
Illin
ois
Min
ority
Gra
duat
e In
cent
ive
Prog
ram
0.00
0.00
135,
000
120,
000
(15,
000)
Inte
rins
titut
iona
l Col
labo
ratio
ns, A
cade
mic
Aff
airs
0.20
0.00
25,0
000
(25,
000)
Min
ority
Aca
dem
ic P
artn
ersh
ip P
lan
0.00
0.00
273,
000
300,
000
27,0
00
Sum
mer
Res
earc
h O
ppor
tuni
ties
Prog
ram
5.35
5.10
604,
400
613,
400
9,00
0Il
lini U
nion
Stu
dent
Pro
gram
s &
Act
iviti
es, S
tude
nt A
ffai
rs1.
771.
7314
5,90
013
5,30
0(1
0,60
0)L
a C
asa
Cul
tura
l Lat
ina,
Off
ice
of th
e C
hanc
ello
r6.
005.
6313
9,50
013
7,00
0(2
.500
)L
atin
o/L
atin
a St
udie
s Pr
ogra
m, L
AS
1:19
2.20
60,7
0011
1,70
051
,000
Men
/Wom
en o
f Im
pact
, Hou
sing
0.00
0.10
07.
800
7,80
0M
erit
Prog
ram
for
Em
ergi
ng S
chol
ars
in C
hem
istr
y, L
AS
3.00
3.75
85,0
0085
,000
0
Mer
it W
orks
hop,
Mat
hem
atic
s D
epar
tmen
t, L
AS
17.8
317
.83
58,0
0058
,000
0
Min
ority
Acc
ess
Prog
ram
, Col
lege
of
Law
0.81
0.81
76,6
0076
;600
0
Min
ority
Eng
inee
ring
Pro
gram
, Col
lege
of
Eng
inee
ring
3.17
5.10
662,
300
708,
500
46,2
00M
inor
ity S
tude
nt R
eten
tion
Prog
., A
CE
S1.
311.
3114
0,00
014
0,00
00
Mul
ticul
tura
l Fel
low
ship
s, C
olle
ge o
f V
et M
ed0.
200.
2013
8,90
010
3,60
0(3
5,30
0)M
ultic
ultu
ral T
rans
fer
Adm
issi
on P
rogr
am, O
AR
1.46
1.46
80,4
0072
,100
(8,3
00)
Nat
iona
l Ach
ieve
men
t Sch
olar
ship
Pro
gram
, UO
APA
0.01
0.00
21,8
0026
,800
5,00
0O
ffic
e of
Min
ority
Stu
dent
Aff
airs
(O
MSA
)12
.25
18.2
538
5,70
038
5,70
00
Afr
ican
-Am
eric
an C
ultu
ral P
rogr
am (
OM
SA),
Stu
dent
Aff
airs
5.50
5.50
194,
700
199,
500
4,80
0C
aree
r D
evel
opm
ent &
Pla
cem
ent S
ervi
ces
(& P
res.
Lea
ders
hip
Pmg.
)1.
681.
6810
1,00
010
1,00
00
Edu
catio
nal O
ppor
tuni
ties
Prog
ram
6.50
2.00
215,
400
228,
600
13,2
00
S5
Tab
le 2
5 (c
ontin
ued)
DO
LL
AR
S A
ND
ST
AFF
YE
AR
S B
UD
GE
TE
D T
O P
RO
GR
AM
S SE
RV
ING
UN
DE
RR
EPR
ESE
NT
ED
ST
UD
EN
TS
AN
D S
TA
FF A
T P
UB
LIC
UN
IVE
RSI
TIE
S*FI
SCA
L Y
EA
RS
2000
AN
D 2
001
Prog
ram
UN
IVE
RSI
TY
OF
ILL
INO
IS A
T U
RB
AN
A-C
HA
MPA
IGN
(co
ntin
ued)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dD
olla
rs B
udge
ted*
*C
hang
e in
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01FY
00FY
01
McN
air
Scho
lars
Pro
gram
1.58
1.28
224,
100
274,
900
50,8
00T
RIO
/Stu
dent
Sup
port
Ser
vice
s5.
254.
7519
7,00
020
0,90
03,
900
Upw
ard
Bou
nd5.
315.
3134
9,20
034
9,20
00
Off
ice
of W
omen
in I
nter
natio
nal D
evel
opm
ent,
LA
S2.
852.
3512
4,90
030
2,20
017
7,30
0O
ffic
e of
Wom
en's
Pro
gram
s, S
tude
nt A
ffai
rs4.
504.
5017
9,40
017
9,40
00
Pack
ard
Fello
wsh
ip, G
rada
ute
Col
lege
0.00
0.00
60,0
0040
,000
(20,
000)
Peer
Rec
ruitm
ent P
rogr
am, O
AR
, Aca
dem
ic A
ffai
rs0.
700.
704,
300
4,30
00
Pres
iden
t's A
war
d Pr
ogra
m, A
cade
mic
Aff
airs
0.38
0.08
2,45
1,50
02,
398,
800
(52,
700)
Prin
cipa
l's S
chol
ars
Prog
ram
, Aca
dem
ic A
ffai
rs8.
259.
2576
3,90
074
9,70
0(1
4,20
0)R
es. A
ppre
ntic
e. P
rog.
in A
pplie
d Sc
i., C
ol. o
f A
CE
S &
Vet
Med
***
1.00
1.00
95,0
0095
,000
0
Spec
ial E
duca
tiona
l Opp
ortu
nity
Pro
gram
, Col
lege
of
Edu
catio
n0.
100.
1017
4,40
018
6,20
011
,800
Spec
ial P
opul
atio
ns H
ealth
Pro
gram
***
2.63
2.81
68,3
0072
,600
4,30
0Su
mm
er R
esea
rch
Prog
ram
for
Min
ority
Stu
dent
s, A
CE
S0.
060.
0643
,500
41,5
00(2
,000
)Su
ppor
t for
Und
erre
pres
ente
d G
roup
s in
Eng
., C
olle
ge o
f E
ngin
eeri
ng *
**0.
750.
7531
2,20
027
9,90
0(3
2,30
0)W
omen
in E
ngin
eeri
ng, C
olle
ge o
f E
ngin
eeri
ng4.
004.
5037
1,40
035
3,30
0(1
8,10
0)W
omen
's S
tudi
es P
rogr
am, L
AS
11.0
09.
9339
8,00
033
9,20
0(5
8,80
0)Y
oung
Sch
olar
s in
Agr
icul
ture
Pro
gram
, Col
lege
of
Agr
icul
ture
0.38
0.38
70,5
0070
,500
0
Off
ice
of E
qual
Opp
ortu
nity
and
Acc
ess,
Off
ice
of th
e C
hanc
ello
r9.
008.
0044
7,90
045
2,70
04,
800
Tar
gets
of
Opp
ortu
nity
Pro
gram
, Aca
dem
ic A
ffai
rs0.
030.
0036
0,00
033
1,80
0(2
8,20
0)
Not
Ava
ilabl
eIn
clud
es a
ll pr
ogra
ms
that
hav
e a
prim
ary
purp
ose
to s
erve
und
erre
pres
ente
d st
uden
ts a
nd th
at h
ave
a bu
dget
allo
catio
n fr
om th
e in
stitu
tion
for
this
pur
pose
.Pr
ogra
m is
dir
ecte
d to
ser
ve m
ore
than
one
und
erre
pres
ente
d gr
oup
(e.g
., m
inor
ities
and
fem
ales
).Pr
ogra
m s
erve
s el
emen
tary
and
sec
onda
ry s
choo
l stu
dent
s.
887
Tab
le 2
6
DO
LL
AR
S A
ND
ST
AFF
YE
AR
S B
UD
GE
TE
D T
O P
RO
GR
AM
S SE
RV
ING
UN
DE
RR
EPR
ESE
NT
ED
ST
UD
EN
TS
AN
D S
TA
FF A
T P
UB
LIC
CO
MM
UN
ITY
CO
LL
EG
ES
FISC
AL
YE
AR
S 20
00 A
ND
200
1
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dT
otal
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dC
hang
e In
Spec
ial P
opul
atio
ns
Prog
ram
FY00
FY01
FY 0
0FY
01D
olla
rs B
udge
ted
FY 0
0FY
01
SO
UT
HW
ES
TE
RN
ILLI
NO
IS C
OLL
EG
EM
inor
ity T
rans
fer
Cen
ter
3.00
2.00
73,3
0080
,000
6,70
0Sp
ecia
l Ser
vice
s C
ente
r8.
008.
0020
8,00
023
4,30
026
,300
Spec
ial P
opul
atio
ns P
rogr
ams
10.0
010
.00
1,46
3,00
01,
070,
400
(392
,600
)29
1,00
030
0,40
0
BL
AC
K H
AW
K C
OL
LE
GE
Spec
ial P
opul
atio
ns G
rant
s7.
517.
5130
0,50
030
0,70
020
030
0,50
030
0,70
0A
cces
s to
Edu
catio
n &
Em
ploy
men
t5.
005.
0071
;000
70,0
00(
I ,0
00)
71,0
0070
,000
Eng
lish
as a
Sec
ond
Lan
guag
e0.
002.
500
115,
200
115,
200
011
5,20
0
CIT
Y C
OL
LE
GE
S O
F C
HIC
AG
OD
AL
EY
CO
LL
EG
E, R
ICH
AR
D J
.A
LSP
Cou
nsel
ing
1.00
1.00
41,1
0043
,600
2,50
041
,100
43,6
00A
LSP
Tut
orin
g5.
000.
2374
,000
36;2
00(3
7,80
0)36
,200
CB
O P
rogr
am0.
331.
3235
,000
40,8
005,
800
40,8
00C
ontin
uing
Edu
catio
n0.
001.
0024
0,50
034
,600
(205
,900
)26
,000
Facu
lty A
dvis
ing
1.50
3.00
46,0
0011
4,80
068
,800
47,8
00N
atio
nal Y
outh
Spo
rts
1.00
1.00
66,9
0050
,700
(16,
200)
Nov
aNE
T1.
671.
0010
2,00
049
,200
(52,
800)
102,
000
24,6
00
Opp
ortu
nitie
s Pr
ogra
m*
2.00
0.00
156,
500
0(1
56,5
00)
Plac
emen
t Ser
vice
s1.
501.
6646
,900
23,9
00(2
3,00
0)23
,900
Spec
ial N
eeds
Ser
vice
s1.
001.
0033
,500
33,5
000
Stud
ent F
acili
tato
rs2.
006.
2134
,000
89,6
0055
,600
83,4
00T
itle
Ill P
rogr
am*
1.75
0.00
348,
400
0(3
48,4
00)
Tra
nsfe
r C
ente
r2.
004.
3585
,900
125,
000
39,1
001,
100
Upw
ard
Bou
nd0.
007.
5224
0,40
012
3,00
0(1
17,4
00)
KE
NN
ED
Y-K
ING
CO
LL
EG
E
Ben
jam
in E
. May
s A
cade
my
10.2
59.
2570
0,00
068
4,30
0(1
5,70
0)B
uild
ing
Opp
ortu
nitie
s*4.
000.
0010
,000
0(1
0,00
0)
8889
Tab
le 2
6 (c
ontin
ued)
Sta
ff Y
ears
Bud
gete
dT
otal
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dC
hang
e In
Spe
cial
Pop
ulat
ions
Pro
gram
FY
00F
Y01
FY
00
FY
01D
olla
rs B
udge
ted
FY
00
FY
01
KE
NN
ED
Y -
.KIN
G C
OLL
EG
E (
cont
inue
d)F
utur
e T
each
ers
1.00
0.00
100
0(1
00)
Opp
ortu
nitie
s P
rogr
am*
7.25
4.50
650,
000
93,4
00(5
56,6
00)
Pro
ject
Tra
nsfe
r1.
751.
7586
,000
87,2
001,
200
Spe
cial
Pop
ulat
ions
Gra
nt**
0.00
15.5
00
462,
200
462,
200
462,
200
Tal
ents
Sea
rch*
*0.
004.
000
236,
400
236,
400
MA
LCO
LM .X
CO
LLE
GE
AA
WC
C0.
250.
251,
800
1,30
0(5
00)
Aca
dem
ic S
uppo
rt C
ente
r29
.37
34.3
01,
041,
600
734,
400
(307
,200
)1,
041,
600
734,
400
CB
O P
rogr
am0.
250.
2546
,300
57,9
0011
,600
Fut
ure
Tea
cher
s0.
350.
354,
400
4,40
00
Latin
o C
ente
r1.
251.
0059
,900
63,4
003,
500
11,5
00N
YS
P4.
204.
2911
7,50
012
0,50
03,
000
Opp
ortu
nitie
s P
rogr
am4.
292.
3323
2,20
084
,400
(147
,800
)P
lace
men
t Cen
ter
3.00
2.80
82,5
0082
,600
100
40,7
0025
,800
Spe
cial
Nee
ds5.
275.
2020
0,60
015
6,10
0(4
4,50
0)69
,000
82,1
00T
rans
fer
Cen
ter
6.00
5.90
242,
800
231,
000
(11,
800)
156,
900
122,
300
OLI
VE
-HA
RV
EY
CO
LLE
GE
Aca
dem
ic C
ompu
ting
Cen
ter
4.33
2.16
109,
500
47,5
00(6
2.00
0)10
2,20
046
,900
CB
O P
rogr
am1.
502.
0071
,000
23,2
00(4
7,80
0)C
olle
ge A
cade
my
(for
mer
ly B
ridge
Pro
gram
)1.
751.
7533
,000
71,0
0038
,000
Fut
ure
Tea
cher
s0.
500.
256,
300
2,00
0(4
,300
)Jo
b P
lace
men
t Cen
ter
1.50
1.50
45,6
0058
,400
12,8
0045
,600
58,4
00La
tino
Ser
vice
Cen
ter
0.25
0.00
00
0
Mid
dle
Col
lege
14.0
015
.00
800,
000
992,
000
192,
000
Nov
aNE
T3.
801.
4494
,800
40,3
00(5
4,50
0)94
,800
40,0
00
Opp
ortu
nitie
s P
rogr
am6.
503.
1225
6,30
010
0,00
0(1
56,3
00)
Sci
ence
Res
ourc
e C
ente
r/C
hAM
PS
0.25
0.25
10,0
003,
000
(7,0
00)
Spe
cial
Nee
ds9.
507.
0058
,100
133,
600
75,5
0037
,600
98,3
00T
rans
fer
Cen
ter
1.75
1.75
85,9
0087
,000
1,10
00
0
Tut
orin
g S
ervi
ces
16.1
828
.70
109,
000
571,
400
462,
400
77,0
0032
1,10
0
iAS
TC
OP
Y H
AM
&91
Tab
le 2
6 (c
ontin
ued)
Prog
ram
TR
UM
AN
CO
LL
EG
E, H
AR
RY
S
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01T
otal
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dC
hang
e In
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dSp
ecia
l Pop
ulat
ions
FY 0
0FY
01FY
00
FY01
Adm
issi
ons
5.00
7.00
135,
000
160,
000
25,0
0054
,000
160,
000
Adu
lt E
duca
tion
Cou
nsel
ing
2.00
2.00
120,
000
120,
000
012
0,00
012
0,00
0
Car
eer
Plan
ning
and
Pla
cem
ent
2.00
6.00
70,0
0014
0,00
070
,000
70,0
0014
0,00
0
Col
lege
Lev
el T
utor
ing
Serv
ices
16.0
014
.00
200,
000
200,
000
014
5,00
020
0,00
0C
ompu
teri
zed
Tut
orin
g C
ente
r8.
008.
0021
5,00
021
5,00
00
160,
000
215,
000
Cou
nsel
ing
Dep
artm
ent
7.00
7.00
350,
000
300,
000
(50,
000)
10,0
0030
0,00
0In
stitu
te f
or-N
ativ
e A
mer
ican
Dev
elop
men
t4.
003.
0012
5,00
080
,000
(45,
000)
100,
000
80,0
00In
tern
atio
nal S
tude
nt C
ente
r3.
002.
0040
,000
25,0
00(1
5,00
0)40
,000
25,0
00L
akev
iew
Lea
rnin
g C
ente
r20
.00
12.0
045
0,00
030
0,00
0(1
50,0
00)
75,0
0030
0,00
0L
atin
Am
eric
an S
tude
nt C
ente
r2.
001.
0070
,000
60,0
00(1
0,00
0)70
,000
60,0
00O
ppor
tuni
ties
Prog
ram
.6.
000.
0013
0,00
00
(130
,000
)50
,000
Ref
ugee
Ass
ista
nce
Cen
ter
5.00
4.00
160,
000
100,
000
(60,
000)
160,
000
100,
000
Spec
ial S
ervi
ces
for
Dis
able
d St
uden
ts/T
ouch
Clu
b4.
003.
0090
,000
100,
000
10,0
0040
,000
100,
000
Tec
hnic
al C
ente
r -
Cou
nsel
ing
& T
utor
ial S
ervi
ces
4.00
1.00
90,0
0035
,000
(55,
000)
90,0
0035
,000
Tee
n Pa
rent
Ser
vice
s4.
002.
0015
0,00
010
0,00
0(5
0,00
0)20
,000
100,
000
Tes
ting
Cen
ter
5.00
5.00
100,
000
150,
000
50,0
0010
0,00
015
0,00
0T
rum
an M
iddl
e C
olle
ge A
ltern
ativ
e H
igh
Scho
ol18
.00
I8.0
040
0,00
00
(400
,000
)45
,000
WA
SHIN
GT
ON
CO
LL
EG
E, H
AR
OL
DA
AW
CC
0.00
0.00
5,00
05,
000
0A
fric
an S
tude
nt A
ssoc
iatio
n0.
500.
501,
000
1.00
00
Bla
ck S
tude
nt U
nion
0.50
0.50
1,50
01,
500
0
Bla
ck W
omen
's C
aucu
s0.
000.
001,
000
1,00
00
Car
eer
Plan
ning
& P
lace
men
t3.
002.
5085
,000
87,0
002,
000
10,0
00
CB
O P
rogr
am0.
500.
5038
,000
23,2
00(1
4,80
0)C
LIM
B0.
500.
5010
,000
10,0
000
Com
mon
Gro
und
Proj
ect (
Plur
alis
m)
0.25
0.00
3,00
03,
000
03,
000
Com
pter
-Ass
iste
d In
stru
ctio
n7.
317.
8091
,700
107,
700
16,0
0091
,700
107,
700
Dep
t of
Men
tal H
ealth
Voc
Tra
inin
g***
Indi
vidu
al N
eeds
(IN
) Pr
ogra
m0.
500.
0020
,000
0(2
0,00
0)O
ppor
tunu
ties
Prog
ram
*7.
000.
0024
5,60
00
(245
,600
)O
rgan
izat
ion
of L
atin
Am
eric
an S
tude
nts
0.50
0.50
1,50
01,
500
0
Pre-
Col
legi
ate
Prog
ram
1.00
1.00
29,6
0028
,000
(1,6
00)
19,6
0022
,400
Supp
orte
d E
mpl
oym
ent (
IL D
ept.
of H
uman
Ser
vice
s)**
*5.
695.
6824
6,00
025
2,20
06,
200
Spec
ial N
eeds
Cen
ter
3.50
3.41
133,
200
149,
200
16,0
0080
,200
86,0
00
9293
Tab
le 2
6 (c
ontin
ued)
Prog
ram
WA
SHIN
GT
ON
CO
LL
EG
E, H
AR
OL
D (
cont
inue
d)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01T
otal
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dC
hang
e In
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dSp
ecia
l Pop
ulat
ions
FY 0
0FY
01FY
00
FY01
Tra
nsfe
r C
ente
r2.
002.
0082
,500
87,2
004,
700
Tut
orin
g Se
rvic
es13
.00
15.0
013
2,70
012
4,00
0(8
,700
)10
8,60
0V
ocat
iona
l Tra
nsiti
on P
rogr
am, D
OM
II3.
983.
5920
5,40
021
0,60
05,
200
WR
IGH
T C
OL
LE
GE
, WIL
BU
RA
dult
Edu
catio
n Su
ppor
t Ser
vice
s3.
003.
0012
5,00
012
0,00
0(5
,000
)12
5,00
012
0,00
0A
fric
an A
mer
ican
His
tory
Mon
th0.
210.
202,
500
2,00
0(5
00)
Ann
ual A
fric
an A
m S
tude
nt A
war
ds L
unch
eon
0.12
0.10
2,50
02,
000
(500
)A
nnua
l Eth
nic
Food
Fes
t0.
250.
2050
050
00
Cle
rica
l Exc
elle
nce
Aw
ards
0.05
0.05
1,20
01,
200
0
His
pani
c H
erita
ge M
onth
Act
iviti
es0.
251.
005,
000
4,50
0(5
00)
Job
Tra
inin
g -
Ban
k T
elle
r0.
700.
5021
,200
20,0
00(1
,200
)Jo
b T
rain
ing
- C
ompu
ter
Cer
tific
ates
0.70
0.50
23,0
0025
,000
2,00
0M
inor
ity H
ealth
Pro
gram
s0.
020.
023,
000
3,00
00
Mul
ticul
tura
l Com
mun
ity E
vent
s0.
150.
1525
,000
20,0
00(5
,000
)N
atio
nal W
omen
's H
isto
ry M
onth
Act
iviti
es0.
250.
025,
000
4,50
0(5
00)
Nov
aNE
T8.
008.
0040
,000
40,0
000
40,0
00O
ppor
tuni
ties
Prog
ram
1.60
1.00
94,0
0050
,000
(44,
000)
Rec
ruitm
ent,
Mar
ketin
g, &
Par
tner
ing
2.50
2.00
310,
500
300,
000
(10,
500)
Res
urre
ctio
n M
inor
ity S
chol
arsh
ip0.
010.
0125
,000
25,0
000
Sitte
r Se
rvic
e2.
502.
2011
0,00
011
0,00
00
Spec
ial N
eeds
Off
ice
2.75
2.50
94,0
0090
,000
(4,0
00)
67,0
0065
,000
Stud
ent A
war
ds0.
050.
051,
200
1,20
00
Stud
ent C
lubs
& A
ssoc
. (SG
A)
0.40
0.40
32,0
0030
,000
(2,0
00)
Unt
enur
ed F
acul
ty D
inne
r0.
040.
0470
070
00
DA
NV
ILL
E A
RE
A C
OM
MU
NIT
Y C
OL
LE
GE
Bla
ck S
tude
nt U
nion
0.00
0.00
200
0(2
00)
Car
eer
Dir
ectio
ns/G
ende
r E
quity
0.52
0.00
32,0
0010
,000
(22,
000)
Min
ority
Sch
olar
ship
/Fou
ndat
ion
0.00
0.00
8,50
010
,400
1,90
0O
ppor
tuni
ties
Prog
ram
4.66
4.00
172,
500
109,
000
(63,
500)
Proj
ect E
xcel
1.50
1.50
50,0
0048
,000
(2,0
00)
Spec
ial P
opul
atio
ns/D
isab
led
Stud
ents
1.50
1.50
75,9
0074
,500
(1,4
00)
9,20
0St
uden
t Hum
an R
elat
ions
Cou
ncil
0.00
0.00
4,60
00
(4,6
00)
Tee
n Pa
rent
Ser
vice
s / I
DH
S1.
301.
7569
,500
87,5
0018
,000
9495
Tab
le 2
6 (c
ontin
ued)
Prog
ram
DA
NV
ILL
E A
RE
A C
OM
MU
NIT
Y C
OL
LE
GE
(co
ntin
ued)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01T
otal
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dC
hang
e In
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dSp
ecia
l Pop
ulat
ions
FY 0
1)FY
01FY
00
FY01
The
Lea
rnin
g C
omm
unity
/TR
IO3.
504.
0019
4,70
019
8,60
03,
900
Perk
ins
III
/ Spe
cial
Pop
ulat
ions
1.50
1.50
232,
900
221,
300
(11,
600)
Div
ersi
ty T
eam
0.00
0.00
04,
600
4,60
0
DU
.PA
G.E
, CO
LL
EG
E O
FH
ealth
& S
peci
al S
ervi
ces
3.50
3.50
117,
500
123,
400
5,90
0In
tern
atio
nal S
tude
nt A
dvis
ing
1.00
1.00
54,1
0056
,800
2,70
0
Min
ority
Tra
nsfe
r Pr
ogra
m (
incl
udes
Min
ority
Art
icul
atio
n)2.
252.
2518
8,70
019
8,10
09,
400
Proj
ect S
EL
F2.
502.
5012
7,10
013
3,40
06,
300
AB
E/A
SE/E
SL24
.00
24.0
067
5,50
02,
060,
000
1,38
4,50
025
0,00
0
ESL
Dev
elop
men
t21
.00
21.0
040
1,50
045
0,00
048
,500
95,3
0025
0,80
0
EL
GIN
CO
MM
UN
ITY
CO
LL
EG
EA
BE
/ESL
12.0
012
.00
221,
000
838,
600
617,
600
AD
APT
(D
isab
led
Stud
ent O
rgan
izat
ion)
0.00
0.00
100
100
0
Adv
anci
ng O
ppor
tuni
ties
2.50
2.50
210,
000
74,0
00(1
36,0
00)
Aff
irm
ativ
e A
ctio
n0.
100.
1014
,100
41,7
0027
,600
BSA
(B
lack
Stu
dent
Ass
ocia
tion)
0.25
0.25
2,50
02,
300
(200
)D
ispl
aced
Hom
emak
ers
0.75
1.25
59,0
0057
,800
(1,2
00)
Foun
datio
n M
inor
ity S
chol
arsh
ips
0.00
0.00
20,0
0020
,000
0
Lea
rnin
g Sk
ills
Cen
ter
4.00
4.00
291,
500
333,
000
41,5
00M
inor
ity T
rans
fer
Cen
ter
1.00
1.50
65,5
0065
,000
(500
)M
ulti-
Cul
tura
l Exc
hang
e Pr
esen
tatio
ns &
Tra
inin
g0.
330.
0027
,000
17,0
00(1
0,00
0)M
uslim
Stu
dent
Ass
ocia
tion
0.00
0.00
060
060
0
Off
ice
of M
ultic
ultu
ral A
dmis
sion
s2.
002.
0010
0,00
010
3,30
03,
300
OL
AS
(Org
aniz
atio
n of
Lat
in A
mer
ican
Stu
dent
s)0.
250.
255,
300
5,70
040
0
Paka
stan
i Stu
dent
s A
ssoc
iatio
n (N
ew)
0.00
0.00
500
0(5
00)
Pare
nts
and
Kid
s0.
000.
0030
00
(300
)
Proj
ect E
scal
ara
1.00
1.50
205,
000
209,
400
4,40
0
Spec
ial P
opul
atio
ns A
ssis
tanc
e1.
001.
000
00
236,
000
254,
100
Stud
ent S
ervi
ces
Supp
ort
44.0
04.
5029
2,90
019
6,00
0(9
6,90
0)U
nite
d St
uden
ts o
f A
ll C
ultu
res
0.00
0.00
3,60
03,
700
100
Wel
fare
-to
-W
ork
1.50
1.50
68,8
0010
0,80
032
,000
2000
Int
ensi
ve E
nglis
h Pr
ogra
m1.
001.
0068
,300
92,2
0023
,900
Perk
ins
2.00
1.50
163,
700
183,
600
19,9
00
97
Tab
le 2
6 (c
ontin
ued)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dT
otal
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dC
hang
e In
Spec
ial P
opul
atio
ns
Prog
ram
FY00
FY01
FY 0
0FY
01D
olla
rs B
udge
ted
FY 0
0FY
01E
LG
IN C
OM
MU
NIT
Y C
OL
LE
GE
(co
ntin
ued)
You
th L
eade
rshi
p A
cade
my
0.00
1.50
80,0
0080
,000
0
Upw
ard
Bou
nd11
.00
5.00
238,
100
255,
000
16,9
00U
pwar
d B
ound
Sci
ence
/Mat
h0.
005.
0020
0,00
018
5,80
0(1
4,20
0)
HA
RPE
R C
OL
LE
GE
:, W
ILL
IAM
RA
INE
Y0
0
Cen
ter
for
Dis
abili
ties
25.0
025
.00
739,
100
792,
900
53,8
0032
2,60
0M
inor
ity S
tude
nt T
rans
fer
Cen
ter
3.00
1.50
67,5
0070
,000
2,50
0Pr
ojec
t HO
PE1.
800.
000
00
Res
ourc
es f
or W
omen
6.00
6.00
319,
700
276,
900
(42,
800)
Cen
ter
for
Mul
ticul
tura
l Aff
airs
and
Cou
nsel
ing
0.00
9.00
038
1,30
038
1,30
0
HE
AR
TL
AN
D C
OM
MU
NIT
Y C
OL
LE
GE
Spec
ial P
opul
atio
ns0.
500.
5081
,400
89,6
008,
200
81,4
0089
,600
Spec
ial N
eeds
0.00
0.03
01,
000
1,00
01,
000
HIG
HL
AN
D C
OM
MU
NIT
Y C
OL
LE
GE
DA
VT
E S
peci
al P
opul
atio
ns4.
004.
0045
,500
94,0
0048
,500
45,5
0094
,000
Titl
e IV
, Stu
dent
Sup
port
Ser
vice
s4.
004.
0073
,700
125,
000
51,3
00T
itle
IV, U
pwar
d B
ound
2.00
2.00
68,7
0069
,000
300
Car
l Per
kins
1.50
1.50
040
,000
40,0
00
ILL
INO
IS C
EN
TR
AL
CO
LL
EG
ED
isab
ility
Ser
vice
s1.
001.
0058
,900
92,9
0034
,000
33,0
0060
,000
Min
ority
Tra
nsfe
r C
ente
r2.
502.
5066
,000
65,0
00(1
,000
)O
ppor
tuni
ties
Prog
ram
9.00
6.50
473,
100
441,
600
(31,
500)
Spec
ial A
cade
mic
Ser
vice
s1.
001.
0019
0,30
017
3,90
0(1
6,40
0)St
uden
t Sup
port
Ser
vice
s5.
005.
0024
7,90
025
6,90
09,
000
Cat
erpi
llar
You
ng S
chol
ars
0.25
0.25
25,0
0025
,000
0
AE
S/ C
ILC
O C
olle
ge Y
es0.
250.
5060
,000
60,0
000
ILL
INO
IS E
AST
ER
N C
OM
MU
NIT
Y C
OL
LE
GE
S
ICC
B S
peci
al P
opul
atio
ns7.
556.
1414
5,20
014
2,60
0(2
,600
)14
5,20
014
2,60
0A
dult
Bas
ic/A
dult
Seco
ndar
y E
d3.
000.
0025
3,10
00
(253
,100
)E
duca
tion
to C
aree
rs1.
050.
0098
,600
0(9
8,60
0)IL
Em
ploy
men
t Tra
inin
g C
ntr
(1E
TC
)1.
000.
0065
,800
0(6
5,80
0)
0 8
99
Tab
le 2
6 (c
ontin
ued)
Prog
ram
ILL
INO
IS E
AST
ER
N C
OM
MU
NIT
Y C
OL
LE
GE
S (c
ontin
ued)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01T
otal
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dC
hang
e In
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dSp
ecia
l Pop
ulat
ions
*FY
00
FY01
FY 0
0FY
01
Inte
rnat
iona
l/ E
nglis
h as
a S
ec L
ang
11.0
00.
0025
4,80
00
(254
,800
)Jo
b L
ocat
ion
Dev
elop
men
t (JL
D)
1.86
0.00
30,0
000
(30,
000)
Lite
racy
2.00
0.00
50,0
000
(50,
000)
Perk
ins(
Dis
adva
ntag
ed S
tude
nts)
7.85
0.00
328,
500
0(3
28,5
00)
Sing
le P
aren
t/Dis
plac
ed H
omem
aker
0.62
0.00
54,3
000
(54,
300)
Stud
ent S
ucce
ss N
etw
ork
6.00
0.00
203,
300
0(2
03,3
00)
Tal
ent S
earc
h4.
760.
0019
7,70
00
(197
,700
)U
pwar
d B
ound
Pro
gram
5.29
0.00
248,
500
0(2
48,5
00)
Wel
fare
to W
ork
7.00
0.00
254,
000
0(2
54,0
00)
ILL
INO
IS V
AL
LE
Y C
OM
MU
NIT
Y C
OL
LE
GE
Aca
dem
ic D
ev C
ente
r/Sp
ecia
l Nee
ds7.
267.
2610
8,70
010
8,70
039
,500
JOL
IET
JU
NIO
R C
OL
LE
GE
Mul
ticul
tura
l Tra
nsfe
r C
ente
r1.
751.
7565
,000
64,0
00(1
,000
)Jo
liet A
rea
Mat
h, S
cien
ce a
nd C
ompu
ter
Edu
catio
nal
2.00
2.00
90,4
0085
,000
(5,4
00)
Proj
ect A
chie
ve\S
tude
nt S
uppo
rt S
vc6.
006.
0026
2,70
026
7,70
05,
000
Spec
ial N
eeds
(N
ow S
tAR
Pro
gram
)10
.00
8.25
186,
100
231,
800
45,7
0050
,000
Car
l Per
kins
248,
100
236,
800
(11,
300)
0
Div
isio
n of
Adu
lt an
d Fa
mily
Ser
vice
s53
.00
60.0
060
9,40
062
2,80
913
,400
70,0
00
Opp
ortu
nitie
s Pr
ogra
m4.
0028
3,00
01,
110,
400
827,
400
Adu
lt E
duca
tion
Adm
in/S
uppo
rt/S
taff
0.00
12.0
00
00
Adu
lt C
ase
Man
ager
s, O
utre
ach,
and
Edu
catio
n to
Car
eer
staf
f0.
005.
000
00
SOS
Vol
unte
er L
itera
cy T
utor
ials
80.0
050
,000
45,0
00(5
,000
)R
eadi
ng A
chie
veni
nt P
rogr
am0.
001.
000
00
Spec
ial P
opul
atio
ns (
Adm
in,C
ouns
elin
g, S
uppo
rt)
0.00
13.0
00
00
Adv
anci
ng O
ppor
tuni
ties
0.00
2.00
00
0
. Dis
plac
edH
omem
aker
s1.
001.
0061
,900
71,0
009,
100
61,9
00W
elfa
re to
Wor
k2.
001.
0081
,000
77,1
00(3
,900
)11
,000
Lea
rnin
g fo
r E
arni
ng2.
002.
5012
7,00
00
(127
,000
)12
7,00
0T
een
Rea
ch0.
001.
500
00
Wom
en's
Col
lege
1.00
1.00
35,0
000
(35,
000)
Car
eer
Plan
ning
& P
lace
men
t - C
arl P
erki
ns1.
671.
8830
,000
24,7
00(5
,300
)In
tern
atio
nal/I
nter
cultu
ral E
duca
tion
(11E
)1.
000.
000
00
1i 0
101
Tab
le 2
6 (c
ontin
ued)
Prog
ram
:JO
LIE
T J
UN
IOR
CO
LL
EG
E (
cont
inue
d)T
ech
Prep
KA
NK
AK
EE
CO
MM
UN
ITY
CO
LL
EG
EA
ffir
mat
ive
Act
ion
Gen
der
Equ
ityPa
rtne
rs in
Suc
cess
Bui
ldin
g O
ppor
tuni
ties
ESL
/Coo
p/H
ispa
nic
Com
mun
ityT
rans
fer
Cen
ter
Job
Tra
inin
g Pa
rtne
rshi
pL
itera
cy P
rogr
ams
Off
ice
of S
peci
al P
opul
atio
nsO
unce
of
Prev
entio
nPa
rent
Sup
port
/DF1
Pare
nt T
rain
ing.
lniti
ativ
eA
dvan
cing
Opp
ortu
nitie
sB
eyon
d th
e G
ED
Wor
kfor
ce P
rep
Lia
ison
; WT
WH
ealth
y Fa
mili
esPu
blic
Aid
Job
Ski
llsK
CT
C -
Adu
lt E
duca
tion*
*W
elfa
re to
Wor
k G
rant
s**
Upw
ard
Bou
nd**
*M
inor
ity A
chie
vem
ent E
xper
ienc
eE
duca
tiona
l Tal
ent S
earc
hC
ITE
You
th P
rogr
am S
ervi
ces
Wor
kfor
ce I
nves
tmen
t Act
You
ng P
aren
ts P
rogr
am
KA
SKA
SKIA
CO
LL
EG
EA
ffir
mat
ive
Act
ion
Bla
ck S
tude
nt A
ssoc
iatio
nT
RIO
/Stu
dent
Sup
port
Ser
vice
sM
inor
ity A
war
ds B
anqu
et
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01T
otal
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dC
hang
e In
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dSp
ecia
l Pop
ulat
ions
FY 0
0FY
01FY
00
FY01
1.00
0.50
0.15
2.50
0.15
0.00
1.30
19.5
04.
256.
204.
002.
002.
004.
202.
001.
50
4.00
0.00
1.00
5.00
3.82
1.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 NA
0.50
4.00
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.20
0.00
3.50
6.20
0.00
2.00
2.00
3.50
1.50
1.50
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
3.90
1.00
4.00
1.00
3.00
21.0
09.
00 NA
0.50
4.00
0.50
0
2,00
013
,600
65,0
0013
,600 0
43,5
002,
132,
400
112,
000
322,
900
127,
500
54,9
0033
,000
181,
500
75,0
0072
,000
136,
400 0
31,6
0029
1,00
024
7,80
065
,000
198,
600 0 0 0 0
361,
900
1,20
019
4,80
01,
300
246,
900
2,00
0 0 0 0 0
43,0
000
84,3
0033
6,40
0 054
,000
33,1
0011
7,30
075
,000
72,0
00 0 024
,500
0
350,
100
50,0
0019
7,70
060
,000
140,
000
2,63
5,00
033
3,30
0
361,
900
800
221,
500
1,30
0
246,
900 0
(13,
600)
(65,
000)
(13,
600) 0
(500
)(2
,132
,400
)(2
7,70
0)13
,500
(127
,500
)(9
00)
100
(64,
200) 0 0
(136
,400
) 0(7
,100
)(2
91,0
00)
102,
300
(15,
000)
(900
)60
,000
140,
000
2,63
5,00
033
3,30
0 0(4
00)
26,7
000
3,60
0
3,60
0
6,00
025
6,80
07,
400
7,40
0
8,10
0
268,
000
102
103
Tab
le 2
6 (c
ontin
ued)
Prog
ram
KA
SKA
SKIA
CO
LL
EG
E (
cont
inue
d)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01T
otal
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dC
hang
e In
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dSp
ecia
l Pop
ulat
ions
FY 0
0FY
01FY
00
FY01
1.50
1.50
00
061
,200
98,0
00
Rea
ding
Lin
k:5.
005.
0019
6,10
017
0,60
0(2
5,50
0)
:KIS
HW
AU
KE
E C
OL
LE
GE
Span
ish
Gen
eral
Edu
catio
n D
evel
opm
ent C
lass
es0.
500.
508,
500
9,50
01,
000
8,50
09,
500
Span
ish
Gen
eral
Edu
catio
n D
evel
opm
ent T
estin
g0.
050.
0550
030
0(2
00)
500
300
Spec
ial N
eeds
Cou
nsel
ing
Serv
ices
0.40
0.40
20,9
0022
,000
1,10
0M
inor
ity T
rans
fer
Cen
ter
2.00
2.00
56,0
0056
,500
500
Mat
h/Sc
ienc
e A
cade
my
for
Gir
ls0.
350.
357,
000
11,4
004,
400
LA
KE
CO
UN
TY
, CO
LL
EG
E O
F1E
TC
Ser
vice
s0.
500.
5030
,000
30,0
00Fi
fty
Plus
Job
Fai
r0.
250.
2512
,500
12,5
00A
cade
mic
Sup
port
for
Ath
lete
s0.
050.
054,
100
4,10
0H
ispa
nic
Aut
o Pr
ogra
m0.
500.
5021
,000
21,0
00W
elfa
re to
Wor
k2.
001.
0076
,800
74,1
00(2
,700
)76
,800
74,1
00A
dult
Edu
catio
n16
.41
16.5
065
3,80
064
4,60
0(9
,200
)65
3,80
064
4,60
0Pu
blic
Ass
ista
nce
Inta
ke R
efer
rals
2.00
2.00
188,
900
179,
000
(9,9
00)
188,
900
179,
000
Adv
anci
ng O
ppor
tuni
ties
2.50
1.00
248,
700
87,9
00(1
60,8
00)
248,
700
87,9
00A
dult
Edu
catio
n Pe
rfor
man
ce7.
407.
4016
4,90
016
0,90
0(4
,000
)16
4,90
016
0,90
0
GE
D/H
igh
Scho
ol C
ompl
etio
n15
.00
15.0
022
1,30
020
1,50
0(1
9,80
0)A
BE
/ESL
Fed
eral
Gra
nt35
.00
37.0
024
6,00
029
8,00
052
,000
Vol
unte
er L
itera
cy3.
503.
5074
,600
74,6
000
Lea
rnin
g A
ssis
tanc
e C
ente
r0.
501.
0018
,000
25,0
007,
000
New
Stu
dent
Ori
enta
tion
0.66
2.25
37,9
0055
,200
17,3
00St
uden
t Ret
entio
n Pr
ogra
m3.
003.
0094
,100
103,
900
9,80
073
,900
75,9
00
Gos
pel C
hoir
0.50
0.50
17,8
0017
,800
017
,800
17,8
00Fu
ture
Tea
cher
s0.
500.
5042
,300
18,5
00(2
3,80
0)12
,300
18,5
00Sa
turd
ay Y
outh
Ins
titut
e1.
001.
0019
,200
20,1
0090
015
,200
23,4
00M
artin
Lut
her
Kin
g W
all o
f R
espe
ct0.
200.
207,
200
18,1
0010
,900
7,20
018
,100
US
His
pani
c L
eade
rshi
p C
onfe
renc
e0.
050.
052,
700
2,70
00
2,70
02,
700
Spec
ial N
eeds
Dis
able
d7.
007.
5018
4,60
020
6,70
022
,100
Bla
ck S
tude
nt U
nion
0.20
0.20
4,70
06,
400
1,70
010
06,
400
His
pani
c C
lub
0.20
0.20
7,40
07,
400
07,
400
7,40
0H
isto
rica
lly. B
lack
Col
lege
Tou
r0.
100.
1090
090
00
104
105
Tab
le 2
6 (c
ontin
ued)
Prog
ram
LA
KE
CO
UN
TY
, CO
LL
EG
E O
F (c
ontin
ued)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
d.
FY00
FY01
Tot
al D
olla
rs B
udge
ted
Cha
nge
InD
olla
rs B
udge
ted
Spec
ial P
opul
atio
nsFY
00
FY01
FY 0
0FY
01
Kin
g's
Dre
am0.
400.
6010
,600
14,2
003,
60()
10,6
0014
,200
Bla
ck D
iam
onds
0.10
0.10
400
400
040
040
0K
wan
zaa
0.15
0.15
3,50
03,
600
100
3,50
03,
600
Get
ting
it T
oget
her
0.50
0.50
12,6
0011
,800
(800
)7,
100
11,8
00
Mul
ticul
tura
l Men
tors
hip
0.25
0.00
10,0
000
(10,
000)
10,0
00
Tal
ent S
earc
h5.
005.
0023
2,30
023
2,30
00
Facu
lty a
nd S
taff
Div
ersi
ty P
roje
ct1.
001.
0076
,000
76,0
000
18,0
0018
,000
Bri
dges
0.30
0.65
18,0
0025
,300
7,30
017
,000
25,3
00Pe
rkin
s G
rant
2.75
2.75
237,
700
242,
500
4,80
023
7,70
024
2,50
0Pr
ojec
t Win
0.50
0.50
15,0
0015
.000
015
,000
15,0
00
Sum
mer
Tec
h W
orks
hop-
Tal
ent S
rch
0.20
0.20
3,00
03,
000
0
LA
KE
LA
ND
CO
LL
EG
ESi
ngle
Par
ent/I
lom
emak
er0.
500.
0020
,000
0(2
0,00
0)Sp
ecia
l Nee
ds C
ouns
elor
& S
ervi
ces
2.05
2.05
78,6
0083
,200
4,60
078
,600
83,2
00Pe
rkin
s Se
rvic
es1.
501.
5082
,000
106,
000
24,0
00
LE
WIS
& C
LA
RK
CO
MM
UN
ITY
CO
LL
EG
EB
lack
Stu
dent
Ass
ocia
tion
1.00
1.15
37,1
0056
,200
19,1
0032
,800
35,7
00St
uden
t Sup
port
Ser
vice
s4.
004.
7020
8,90
022
1,70
012
,800
'1,
900
Supp
orte
d Sc
hool
-to-
Wor
k T
rans
ition
6.00
7.50
220,
000
286,
500
66,5
0013
,700
26,4
00S-
JET
1.70
0.00
73,2
000
(73,
200)
17,5
00
LIN
CO
LN
LA
ND
CO
MM
UN
ITY
CO
LL
EG
EL
LC
C S
umm
er C
olle
ge f
or K
ids
0.51
0.51
6,00
06,
000
0L
LC
C T
rust
ee T
uitio
n W
aive
rs0.
000.
0015
,800
16,8
001,
000
Min
ority
Tra
nsfe
r C
ente
r1.
001.
7559
,000
65,0
006,
000
Spec
ial N
eeds
Pro
gram
10.6
07.
7518
8,80
017
5,80
0(1
3,00
0)15
,700
13,9
00
Com
mun
ity T
echn
olog
y C
ente
r0.
001.
000
300,
000
300,
000
Wom
en's
Cen
ter
1.00
1.00
8,00
08,
500
500
Urb
an L
eagu
e T
uitio
n W
aive
rs0.
000.
0024
,200
35,5
0011
,300
LO
GA
N C
OL
LE
GE
Bla
ck S
tude
nt A
ssoc
iatio
n1,
000
700
(300
)D
isab
led
Stud
ent S
ervi
ces
1.00
1.00
117,
000
112,
900
(4,1
00)
106
107
Tab
le 2
6 (c
ontin
ued)
Prog
ram
LO
GA
N C
OL
LE
GE
(co
ntin
ued)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01T
otal
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dC
hang
e In
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dSp
ecia
l Pop
ulat
ions
FY 0
0FY
01FY
00
FY01
Dea
f an
d H
ard
of H
eari
ng S
ervi
ces
1.00
1.00
105,
100
107,
700
2,60
028
,200
Inte
rnat
iona
l Clu
b30
030
0.0
Min
ority
Tra
nsfe
r C
ente
r2.
002.
0048
,500
50,0
001,
500
30,8
00
McH
EN
R Y
CO
UN
TY
CO
LL
EG
E
Adu
lt R
e-E
ntry
(D
EFU
NC
T 2
001)
1.00
0.00
14,7
000
(14,
700)
Mul
ticul
tura
l Ser
vice
s an
d Pr
ogra
ms
2.00
2.00
110,
000
121,
000
11,0
0040
,000
40,0
00Sp
ecia
l Nee
ds13
.00
14.0
026
4,50
026
8,30
03,
800
157,
300
150,
300
Eng
lish
as a
Sec
ond
Lan
guag
e31
.00
55.0
038
1,50
044
5,00
063
,500
Adu
lt B
asic
Edu
catio
n5.
009.
0068
,000
65,0
00(3
,000
)A
dult
Seco
ndar
y E
duca
tion
7.00
13.0
073
,200
88,2
0015
,000
MO
RA
INE
VA
LL
EY
CO
MM
UN
ITY
CO
LL
EG
EA
dvan
cing
Opp
ortu
nitie
s0.
500.
5046
,300
22,7
00(2
3,60
0)A
fric
an A
mer
ican
His
tory
Mon
th0.
500.
506,
000
2,50
0(3
,500
)A
llian
ce o
f A
fric
an A
mer
ican
Stu
dent
s0.
250.
2540
090
050
0A
llian
ce o
f L
atin
Am
eric
an S
tude
nts
0.50
0.50
900
800
(100
)A
rab
Stud
ent U
nion
0.00
0.00
040
040
0
Bui
ldin
g O
ppor
tuni
ty (
nam
e ch
ange
to*)
1.00
1.00
00
0
Col
lege
Pre
p W
orks
hops
at H
igh
Scho
ols
1.00
1.00
2,50
02,
500
0
Com
mun
ity N
ight
s/In
form
atio
n Se
ssio
ns0.
500.
501,
000
4,10
03,
100
Cul
tura
l Div
ersi
ty P
rogr
ams:
Col
lege
Act
iviti
es0.
500.
503,
000
4,00
01,
000
Cul
tura
l Div
ersi
ty C
ente
r1.
001.
0012
7,00
013
4,60
07,
600
Dev
elop
men
tal E
duca
tion
0.00
0.00
815,
000
926,
000
111,
000
209,
900
Fam
ily L
itera
cy a
nd P
ublic
Ass
. Coo
rdin
ator
's1.
001.
0010
0,50
097
,900
(2,6
00)
Hig
her
Edu
catio
n Is
sues
for
Lat
in A
mer
ican
Stu
dent
s0.
250.
251,
800
300
(1,5
00)
Indi
an/P
akis
tani
Stu
dent
Uni
on0.
000.
000
300
300
JTPA
Titl
e-3A
2.00
2.00
242,
200
125,
000
(117
,200
)JT
PA T
itle-
3G1.
001.
0049
,600
0(4
9,60
0)JT
PA T
itle-
2A0.
500.
5050
,000
50,0
000
Lat
in C
ultu
ral A
war
enes
s M
onth
0.25
0.25
5,20
02,
500
(2,7
00)
LE
AP
0.00
0.00
048
,000
48,0
00L
earn
ing
Dev
elop
men
t Sup
port
Sys
tem
0.00
0.00
101,
900
101,
900
0
Min
ority
Stu
dent
Aca
dem
ic A
chie
vem
ent
1.00
1.00
28,0
0032
,500
4,50
0M
inor
ity S
tude
nt T
rans
fer
Cen
ter
1.50
1.50
66,0
0066
,000
0
CO
PY A
VA
ILA
BIL
13
108
109
Tab
le 2
6 (c
ontin
ued)
Prog
ram
MO
RA
INE
VA
LL
EY
CO
MM
UN
ITY
CO
LL
EG
E (
cont
inue
d)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01T
otal
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dC
hang
e In
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dSp
ecia
l Pop
ulat
ions
FY 0
0FY
01FY
00
FY01
Nur
sing
(M
ento
ring
Pro
gram
/Tut
orin
g)1.
001.
005,
000
22,0
0017
,000
Off
-Cam
pus,
Eis
enho
wer
Cen
ter
0.25
0.25
10,0
0010
,000
0
Phys
ical
ly H
andi
capp
ed S
uppo
rt S
ervi
ces
0.00
0.00
79,0
0079
,200
200
Ret
urni
ng W
oman
0.00
0.00
8,00
08,
000
0
Sens
itivi
ty to
Div
ersi
ty W
orks
hop
0.25
0.25
3,00
00
(3,0
00)
Sing
le P
aren
t0.
000.
0010
,000
64,8
0054
,800
Sum
mer
You
th T
rain
ing
prog
ram
2.00
2.00
76,5
0058
,900
(17,
600)
Tec
h Pr
ep T
rans
ition
1.00
1.00
20,0
000
(20,
000)
Thu
rgoo
d M
arsh
all E
duca
tion
Scho
lars
hip
0.00
0.00
00
0W
elfa
re to
Wor
k1.
251.
2581
,400
70,6
00(1
0,80
0)W
omen
's H
isto
ry M
onth
Pro
gram
0.00
0.00
2,00
030
0(1
,700
)
MO
RT
ON
CO
LL
EG
E
His
pani
c H
erita
ge C
lub
0.10
0.10
400
400
0L
illia
n B
aar
Scho
lars
hip
0.00
0.00
400
1,10
070
080
0Pi
nnac
le B
ank
Scho
lars
hip
0.00
0.00
800
1,00
020
030
0
Spec
ial P
opul
atio
ns/L
D S
peci
alis
t0.
650:
5034
,000
28,6
00(5
,400
)28
,600
28,6
00Sp
ecia
l Pop
ulat
ions
Coo
rdin
ator
1.00
1.00
30,9
0032
,800
1,90
012
,000
13,9
00L
EP
Serv
ices
1.00
0.50
28,3
0014
,200
(14,
100)
28,3
0014
,200
AC
S/E
SL S
peci
alis
t1.
001.
0018
,300
19,2
0090
018
,300
19,2
00Pe
er T
utor
s/M
ath-
Wri
ting
Lab
Tut
ors
1.50
1.50
63,9
0064
,000
100
19,0
0064
,000
Spec
ial N
eeds
Aca
dem
ic A
dvis
or1.
001.
0033
,200
34,0
0080
033
,200
34,0
00Sp
ecia
l Nee
ds T
estin
g Sp
ecia
list
1.00
1.00
32,8
0033
,700
900
32,8
0033
,700
Adu
lt E
duca
tion
Tes
ting
Spec
ialis
t1.
001.
0032
,800
33,7
0090
0A
dult
Edu
catio
n Pr
ogra
m S
peci
alis
t1.
001.
0026
,900
27,2
0030
0
OA
KT
ON
CO
LL
EG
EA
SSIS
T S
ervi
ces
for
stud
ents
with
dis
abili
ties
2.50
2.00
86,3
0074
,900
(11,
400)
31,8
00B
lack
Stu
dent
Uni
on0.
000.
002,
400
0(2
,400
)B
N/A
T (
Bas
ic N
urse
Ass
ista
nt T
rain
ing
Prog
ram
)3.
003.
5016
0,00
011
0,00
0(5
0,00
0)C
ultu
res
Wee
k0.
000.
006,
800
6,80
00
Edu
catio
nal P
rogr
amm
ing
0.40
0.40
24,3
0021
,500
(2,8
00)
Fam
ily L
itera
cy0.
250.
2523
,300
32,3
009,
000
Futu
res
0.15
0.15
5,50
05,
000
(500
)H
igh
Ris
k N
ursi
ng P
rogr
am2.
001.
5040
,000
24,0
00(1
6,00
0)
110
111
Tab
le 2
6 (c
ontin
ued)
Prog
ram
OA
KT
ON
CO
LL
EG
E (
cont
inue
d)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01T
otal
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dC
hang
e In
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dSp
ecia
l Pop
ulat
ions
:FY
00
FY01
FY 0
0FY
01
HC
OP
(Ear
th C
aree
r O
ppor
tuni
ty P
rogr
am)
2.50
3.00
123,
100
150,
000
26,9
00JV
S M
edic
al B
illin
g0.
000.
000
00
Japa
nese
Clu
b0.
000.
001,
000
2,00
01,
000
SOS/
Lib
rary
Lite
racy
1.30
1.30
70,0
0070
,000
0ST
EPS
(Se
rvic
es to
Est
ablis
h Pa
ttern
s of
Suc
cess
)3.
503.
5021
0,30
020
6,70
0(3
,600
)4,
700
Tra
nsit
0.00
0.00
00
0M
iddl
e E
aste
rn C
lub
0.00
0.00
00
0
Min
ority
Lea
ders
hip
Con
fere
nce
0.0Q
0.00
00
0M
inor
ity T
rans
fer
Cen
ter
1.50
1.25
53,5
0054
,000
500
Pnyo
zone
(Fi
lipin
o cl
ub)
0.00
0.00
00
0So
uth
Asi
an A
ssoc
iatio
n0.
000.
001,
000
2,70
01,
700
Span
ish
Clu
b0.
000.
001,
000
700
(300
)T
rans
fer
Clu
b0.
000.
0040
00
(400
)W
omen
's D
ay0.
200.
2012
,400
9,50
0(2
,900
)Fr
ench
Clu
b0.
000.
000
500
500
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
s0.
000.
000
500
500
Oak
ton
Prid
e0.
000.
000
100
100
Tod
os U
nido
s0.
000.
000
100
100
PAR
KL
AN
D C
OL
LE
GE
Cla
ssro
om A
sses
smen
t & R
esea
rch
Initi
ativ
e0.
500.
253,
900
2,50
0.(1
,400
)D
isab
ility
Ser
vice
s (S
tude
nt S
uppo
rt/C
ouns
elin
g)2.
502.
508,
800
84,9
0076
,100
18,0
0018
,000
Div
ersi
ty 2
000
3.00
4.00
12,0
0010
5,20
093
,200
00
Spec
ial P
opul
atio
ns (
Prep
ared
ness
/Tra
nsiti
on /D
isab
ilitie
s)4.
754.
7516
5,00
016
8,70
03,
700
147,
000
142,
200
Tra
nsfe
r C
ente
r (H
EC
A)
1.00
1.00
60,0
0062
,000
2,00
0V
oc E
d -
Perk
ins
2.00
2.00
390,
900
422,
000
31,1
00W
omen
's P
rogr
am/S
ervi
ces
0.50
1.25
45,1
0048
,800
3,70
08,
500
Lea
rnin
g L
ab4.
804.
8015
3,50
015
3,40
0(1
00)
Peer
Tut
orin
g2.
902.
9022
,900
26,2
003,
300
Inte
nsiv
e E
nglis
h Pr
ogra
m6.
006.
0026
4,50
028
9,20
024
,700
TR
IO/S
tude
nt S
uppo
rt S
ervi
ces
4.50
4.50
195,
900
205,
400
9,50
0C
olle
ge F
or K
ids
prog
ram
1.99
2.20
108,
500
130,
700
22,2
00T
RIO
/Edu
catio
nal T
alen
t Sea
rch
3.00
3.00
194,
800
197,
700
2,90
0
1
113
Tab
le 2
6 (c
ontin
ued)
Prog
ram
PRA
IRIE
ST
AT
E C
OL
LE
GE
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01T
otal
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dC
hang
e In
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dSp
ecia
l Pop
ulat
ions
FY 0
0FY
01FY
00
FY01
Aff
inna
tive
Act
ion/
Equ
al. O
ppor
tuni
ty0.
100.
106,
900
7,20
030
0D
isab
led
Stud
ent S
ervi
ces
0.30
0.30
20,0
0021
,000
1,00
0A
cade
mic
Ass
ista
nce
and
Ass
essm
ent C
ente
r4.
004.
0016
5,20
026
6,50
010
1,30
0H
EC
A T
rans
fer
Cen
ter
1.00
1.00
65,5
0070
,000
4,50
0O
ffic
e of
M in
ority
Stu
dent
Aff
airs
2.00
2.00
57,6
0059
,200
1,60
0Pr
ojec
t HO
PE3.
003.
0012
5,00
012
0,00
0(5
,000
)R
etur
ning
Wom
an's
Pro
gram
0.20
0.20
8,30
08,
700
400
Wor
kfor
ce T
rain
ing
and
Serv
ices
(W
(A)
0.00
6.00
015
4,50
015
4,50
0M
ultic
ultu
ral A
ffai
rs T
ask
Forc
e0.
250.
258,
900
9,30
040
0O
ffic
e of
Stu
dent
Lif
e -
Clu
bs0.
500.
5057
,600
37,5
00(2
0,10
0)W
orkp
lace
Lite
racy
Ins
titut
e2.
502.
5064
,600
65,8
001,
200
Fam
ily L
itera
cy I
nstit
ute
3.00
3.00
85,3
0090
,000
4,70
0A
dult
Lite
racy
Ins
titut
e3.
003.
0066
,000
69,6
003,
600
Lea
rnin
g In
Con
text
0.25
0.25
45,8
0048
,300
2,50
0E
arly
Ale
rt0.
250.
258,
900
9,40
050
0O
utco
mes
Ass
essm
ent I
nitit
ativ
e0.
500.
5020
,900
21,9
001,
000
GE
D P
rogr
am40
.00
40.0
098
,900
99,1
0020
0E
SL P
rogr
am13
.00
13.0
045
,100
47,3
002,
200
Spec
ial N
eeds
Coo
rdin
ator
0.50
0.50
18,7
0019
,600
900
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
1.00
1.00
8,00
05,
500
(2,5
00)
Div
ersi
ty L
earn
ing
Cir
cle
0.10
0.10
4,20
04,
400
200
Kid
s@ C
olle
ge4.
004.
0044
,800
52,5
007,
700
Chi
ld C
are
Cen
ter
5.50
5.50
220,
000
225,
000
5,00
0
RE
ND
LA
KE
CO
LL
EG
EA
ffir
mat
ive
Act
ion
Off
ice
0.13
0.10
3,80
03,
800
0ST
AR
S (T
RIO
)3.
253.
5018
5,70
018
8,40
02,
700
Sing
le P
aren
t0.
250.
0010
,000
0(1
0,00
0)T
een
Pare
nt S
ervi
ces
3.00
2.75
150,
000
82,5
00(6
7,50
0)V
ocat
iona
l Spe
cial
Pop
1.75
1.25
130,
900
104,
300
(26,
600)
Skill
s C
ente
r-C
olle
ge P
rep
4.58
4.80
156,
200
211,
600
55,4
0038
,600
34,3
00Sk
ills
Cen
ter-
Adu
lt E
d4.
106.
2529
0,30
033
3,60
043
,300
31,8
0037
,200
Eve
n St
art-
Fam
ily L
itera
cy1.
752.
5010
0,00
075
,000
(25,
000)
SOS-
Lite
racy
1.75
1.75
65,0
0065
,000
0H
UD
-F'a
mily
Inv
estm
etn
Grt
.Wel
fare
to W
ork
0.35
0.75
55,5
0037
,000
(18,
500)
114
115
Tab
le 2
6 (c
ontin
ued)
Prog
ram
RE
ND
LA
KE
CO
LL
EG
E (
cont
inue
d)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01T
otal
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dC
hang
e In
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dSp
ecia
l Pop
ulat
ions
FY 0
0FY
01FY
00
FY01
Wel
fare
to W
ork
3.00
2.00
275,
000
65,8
00(2
09,2
00)
Cou
nsel
ing-
Spec
ial N
eeds
0.33
0.25
17,2
0013
,100
(4,1
00)
HE
CA
-Pro
ject
Fir
st C
lass
1.00
1.00
40,0
0050
,000
10,0
00A
ltern
ativ
e E
duca
tion*
1.50
1.00
85,0
0053
,100
(31,
900)
Futu
re F
ocus
3.50
3.50
225,
000
175,
000
(50,
000)
Upw
ard
Bou
nd (
TR
IO)
2.00
3.00
200,
000
203,
000
3,00
0
RIC
HL
AN
D C
OM
MU
NIT
Y C
OL
LE
GE
Bla
ck S
tude
nt A
ssoc
iatio
n0.
120.
122,
300
2,30
00
Col
lege
Fut
ures
1.00
1.00
65,0
0060
,000
(5,0
00)
Dis
plac
ed H
omem
aker
s1.
501.
5061
,900
68,0
006,
100
Fam
ilies
in T
rans
ition
0.00
0.00
300
300
0
Spec
ial P
opul
atio
ns1.
001.
000
00
80,5
0085
,400
Tra
nsfe
r C
ente
r2.
002.
0069
,000
68,0
00(1
,000
)D
isab
ility
Acc
omm
odat
ions
Ser
vice
s2.
002.
0050
,700
62,0
0011
,300
Stud
ents
Unl
imite
d0.
120.
1250
050
00
NA
AC
P C
olle
ge C
hapt
er0.
120.
121,
000
1,10
010
0
RO
CK
VA
LL
EY
CO
LL
EG
E
Tar
gete
d Po
pula
tions
No-
Tec
h Pr
ogra
ms
3.50
1.50
113,
500
221,
800
108,
300
Spec
ial P
opul
atio
ns G
rant
7.00
7.00
138,
200
173,
900
35,7
0013
8,20
017
3,90
0Sp
ecia
l Nee
ds S
uppo
rt0.
250.
2535
,000
35,0
000
Upw
ard
Bou
nd3.
003.
001,
788,
000
2,00
0,00
021
2,00
0M
inor
ity T
rans
fer
Cen
ter
1.00
1.00
60,0
0060
,000
0B
lack
Stu
dent
Alli
ance
0.00
0.00
1,50
01,
500
0A
ssoc
iatio
n fo
r L
atin
Am
eric
an S
tude
nts
0.00
0.00
500
500
0A
ssoc
iatio
n fo
r A
sian
Stu
dent
s0.
000.
0050
050
00
Inte
rnat
iona
l Pro
gram
0.00
0.50
010
,000
10,0
00
SAN
DB
UR
G C
OL
LE
GE
, CA
RL
Dis
abili
ties
Supp
ort S
ervi
ces/
Stud
ent P
eer
Tut
ot1.
501.
5073
,700
100,
000
26,3
0075
,600
GE
D A
BE
1.20
1.20
272,
600
381,
700
109,
100
ESL
0.40
0.40
7,00
04,
500
(2,5
00)
Opp
ortu
nitie
s gr
ant
1.00
1.00
25,0
0025
,000
0
117
116
Tab
le 2
6 (c
ontin
ued)
Prog
ram
SAN
DB
UR
G C
OL
LE
GE
, CA
RL
(co
ntin
ued)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01T
otal
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dC
hang
e In
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dSp
ecia
l Pop
ulat
ions
FY 0
0FY
01FY
00
FY01
TR
IO (
Stud
ent S
uppo
rt S
ervi
ces)
3.00
3.00
124,
400
137,
200
12,8
00U
pwar
d B
ound
3.00
3.00
205,
400
211,
600
6,20
0
SAU
K V
AL
LE
Y C
OM
MU
NIT
Y C
OL
LE
GE
Spec
ial N
eeds
Coo
rdin
ator
1.00
1.00
43,3
0046
,200
2,90
08,
200
Titl
e IV
, Stu
dent
Sup
port
Ser
vice
s1.
001.
0019
7,00
020
1,00
04,
000
Peer
Tut
ors
(Sp.
Pop
s &
Per
kins
)0.
000.
0042
,000
43,7
001,
700
21,7
007,
900
SHA
WN
EE
CO
MM
UN
ITY
CO
LL
EG
EA
cade
mic
Enh
ance
men
t6.
006.
0019
8,00
020
7,60
09,
600
Car
l Per
kins
Spe
cial
Nee
ds1.
001.
0045
,100
178,
600
133,
500
Min
ority
Tra
nsfe
r C
ente
r2.
002.
0037
,100
40,5
003,
400
JTPA
Gra
nt
SOU
TH
SU
BU
RB
AN
CO
LL
EG
E O
F C
OO
K C
OU
NT
YA
cade
mic
Ass
ista
nce
Cen
ter
5.00
5.00
372,
800
395,
200
22,4
0017
,000
17,0
00L
S-A
MP
Gra
nt2.
002.
007,
500
3,00
0(4
,500
)2,
500
Cul
tura
l Div
ersi
ty2.
002.
0057
,700
61,3
003,
600
Dis
able
d St
uden
t Ser
vice
s2.
002.
0055
,200
60,4
005,
200
Opp
ortu
nitie
s7.
00.
3.00
380,
000
130,
600
(249
,400
)R
etur
ning
Adu
lt Pr
ogra
mm
ing
1.00
1.20
34,4
0036
,100
1,70
0Sp
ecia
l Nee
ds3.
003.
7512
5,00
013
3,30
08,
300
Stud
ent S
uppo
rt S
ervi
ces
5.25
5.25
220,
000.
223,
300
3,30
0M
inor
ity T
rans
fer
Cen
ter
2.00
2.00
62,5
0066
,500
4,00
0
SOU
TH
EA
STE
RN
IL
LIN
OIS
CO
LL
EG
ED
evel
opm
enta
l Stu
dies
1.50
1.50
66,6
0058
,900
(7,7
00)
Proj
ect A
spir
e0.
000.
000
00
Sing
le P
aren
t/Hom
emak
er A
dvan
cem
ent P
roje
ct0.
000.
0010
,000
0(1
0,00
0)Sp
ecia
l Nee
ds (
Perk
ins)
3.00
3.00
207,
900
188,
800
(19,
100)
Stud
ent S
uppo
rt S
ervi
ces
4.00
4.00
202,
000
206,
100
4,10
0
SPO
ON
RIV
ER
CO
LL
EG
E
Han
dica
pped
and
Dis
adva
ntag
ed0.
750.
7526
,500
29,3
002.
800
Spec
ial P
opul
atio
ns2.
002.
0043
,700
42,2
00(1
,500
)
1 1.
811
9
Tab
le 2
6 (c
ontin
ued)
Prog
ram
TR
ITO
N C
OL
LE
GE
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01T
otal
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dC
hang
e In
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dSp
ecia
l Pop
ulat
ions
FY 0
0FY
01E
Y 0
0FY
01
AB
E J
ob P
lace
men
t Ser
vice
s0.
001.
000
25,0
0025
,000
10,0
00A
cces
s to
Alli
ed H
ealth
Car
eers
1.25
1.00
120,
000
120,
000
0
Bla
ck A
cade
mic
Stu
dent
Ass
ocia
tion
0.00
0.00
500
500
0
Cen
ter
for
Stud
ents
with
Dis
abili
ties
2.00
2.00
110,
500
84,0
00(2
6,50
0)E
nglis
h as
a S
econ
d L
angu
age
2.50
3.00
743,
000
775,
000
32,0
0035
9,80
031
2,50
0L
atin
Am
eric
an C
lub
0.00
0.00
500
500
0
Lea
rnin
g A
ssis
tanc
e C
ente
r12
.00
12.0
038
0,50
036
2,80
0(1
7,70
0)M
athP
ower
Hea
dqua
rter
s3.
003.
0065
,000
72,0
007,
000
Min
ority
Tra
nsfe
r C
ente
r4.
004.
0016
6,00
014
0,00
0(2
6,00
0)M
ultic
ultu
ral C
ente
r0.
750.
7514
,400
14,4
000
Nue
vos
Hor
izon
tes
4.25
6.00
115,
900
122,
800
6,90
0Pr
ojec
t Stu
dent
Suc
cess
0.50
0.50
25,0
0020
,000
(5,0
00)
18,0
0020
,000
Publ
ic A
ssis
tanc
e C
oord
inat
ion
Spec
ial P
roje
ct0.
250.
2511
,000
11,0
000
11,0
0011
,000
Span
ish
Lite
racy
/ESL
Pre
para
tion
1.00
1.00
18,5
0020
,000
1,50
013
,500
13,5
00
Sum
mer
Bri
dge/
Tec
h-Pr
ep B
ridg
e Pr
ogra
m0.
500.
5086
,900
86,9
000
Tri
ton
Col
lege
/Wes
tlake
Hos
pita
l Sch
olar
ship
Pro
g.0.
000.
000
103,
700
I03,
700
Upw
ard
Bou
nd4.
004.
0024
7,80
026
4,00
016
,200
Wor
kfor
ce D
evel
opm
ent C
ente
r/W
elfa
re to
Wor
k1.
501.
5080
,800
106,
900
26,1
00
WA
UB
ON
SEE
CO
MM
UN
ITY
CO
LL
EG
EL
earn
ing
Enh
ance
men
t Cen
ter
15.0
07.
7517
2,10
022
9,90
057
,800
Acc
ess
Cen
ter
for
Dis
able
d St
uden
ts11
.00
11.0
034
2,20
034
0,70
0(1
,500
)A
dult
Edu
catio
n7.
7517
.00
416,
000
429,
400
13,4
00
Adv
anci
ng O
ppor
tuni
ties
1.50
1.75
76,1
0051
,000
(25,
100)
Car
eer
Serv
ices
2.50
2.50
100,
400
99,8
00(6
00)
Inno
vativ
e T
ech
Des
ign
Cen
ter
2.50
2.00
78,4
0065
,200
(13,
200)
LIN
C1.
000.
0018
,900
0(1
8,90
0)O
ffic
e T
echn
olog
y2.
500.
0013
5,80
00
(135
,800
)Pr
ojec
t Suc
cess
1.00
0.00
10,1
000
(10,
100)
Stud
ent S
uppo
rt S
ervi
ces
12.0
012
.00
242,
400
223,
200
( I
9,20
0)T
rans
fer
Cen
ter
2.00
2.00
46,0
0063
,100
17,1
00T
rans
ition
Pro
gram
1.25
1.50
72,2
0079
,200
7,00
0
Wor
kpla
ce E
nglis
h1.
500.
0067
,700
0(6
7,70
0)A
fric
an-A
mer
ican
Cul
tura
l Alli
ance
0.25
0.00
500
0(5
00)
Lat
inos
Uni
dos
0.25
0.00
500
0(5
00)
120
i.EST
CO
PY M
INA
LIE
121
Tab
le 2
6 (c
ontin
ued)
Prog
ram
WA
UB
ON
SEE
CO
MM
UN
ITY
CO
LL
EG
E (
cont
inue
d)D
elta
Sig
ma
Om
icro
nM
inor
ity T
each
er E
duca
tion
Ass
ocia
tion
Inte
rpre
ter
Tra
inin
g Pr
ogra
mN
ew R
eade
rsL
itera
cyM
utua
l Lea
rnin
gC
ultu
ral E
vent
s/St
uden
t Org
aniz
atio
n
WO
OD
CO
MM
UN
ITY
CO
LL
EG
E, J
OH
NPe
rkin
s 11
1
Tal
ent S
earc
hSt
uden
t Sup
port
Ser
vice
sSt
uden
t Ser
vice
s C
ente
r (T
otal
of
the
abov
e)
Staf
f Y
ears
Bud
gete
dFY
00FY
01T
otal
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dC
hang
e In
Dol
lars
Bud
gete
dSp
ecia
l Pop
ulat
ions
FY 0
0FY
01FY
00
FY01
0.25
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.00
5.50
5.00
14.5
0
0.00
0.00
3.50
0.25
2.50
0.25
1.50
4.00
6.50
5.00
15.5
0
500
500 0 0 0 0 0
224,
600
229,
600
218,
400
672,
400
0 012
5,00
06,
200
72,7
0021
,500
73,6
00
215,
300
234,
100
222,
700
672,
000
(500
)(5
00)
125,
000
6,20
072
,700
21,5
0073
,600
(9,3
00)
4,50
04,
300
(400
)
127,
500
153,
700
1°2
103
U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI)
National Library of Education (NLE)
Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC)
NOTICE
Reproduction Basis
Blum lload Resumes hilennelion Con
This document is covered by a signed "Reproduction Release (Blanket)"form (on file within the ERIC system), encompassing all or classes ofdocuments from its source organization and, therefore, does not require a"Specific Document" Release form.
This document is Federally-funded, or carries its own permission toreproduce, or is otherwise in the public domain and, therefore, may bereproduced by ERIC without a signed Reproduction Release form (either"Specific Document" or "Blanket").
EFF-089 (1/2003)