DOCUMENT RESUME

237

AUTHORTITLE

_INSTITUTION

SPONS AcENCYPUB DATECONTRACTNOTEPUB TYPE

EDRS PRICE:DESCRIPTORS

IDENTIFIERS

ABSTRACT

Smith, JanarKayj. SMith,'N.ick'Cost7AnalYsid Bibliography Evaluation

. :Brogram.,Paper and Report. Series No.: 88.Northwest Iab, Portland, OR.:Researc on:',RvaluatiOn Program.' : .

-7.114tiOnal indt,of_Education -(ED_} ,IWashington, D C.yep400 -80-0105=

.Reference MaterialS

TM

MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage.*Cost Effectiveness; Educational'Res,_, rch;*Evaluation Methods; *Program Evaluation; *Researchand Development Centers; Research Methodology;ResearchNeedsNorthwest Regional Educational Laboratory; TechnicalAssistance Centers

Because of declining school budgets and the general,economic recesdion, educational evaluators- have become increasinglyinterested in .cost- analysis methods. Although there is a largq bodyof literature on economic and cost-analysis procedures, there are nocurrent bibliographies targeted at the use of cost methods in programevaluation,. This report contains over 350 non-annotated iefer.ences tobooks, reports, and articles on cost-analysis methods published from1961 to 1983. (PM)

****** **Reprbduc ibns

**** ****

****** ********* *************_ ********-supplid by EDRS are the beat-that can be made

from the original document.****************** ***** **

"PERMISSION TOREpRODUCE THIS ' At fl DNEAPLAINSTITUTER

OPEPEUDCAUCTIATTONMATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED; BY , ED ATIONAL RESOURCES `h/FORMATION

s; CENTER (ERIC)Q r I _

document has been reproduced asreceivhd from the Cie, man ororiginating it,

jnorohongoo have been made tfeeroduction quality=70 THE EDUCATIONAL

RESOURCESINPOR ATIONCENTER (ERIC)

a

-a

Forms of view of opfniensrated In this docu-ment do not necessarily represent official ME

ten or golfs),

GUST- ANALYSISBIBLI PHY.

JANA KAY SMITH;NICK L. SMITH

September 1983-.

Nick L. Smith, DireotO4Research on Evaluation Program

Northwest Regional Educational LAboratory300 S. W. Sixth Avenue, Tort/and, 0 egon 97204

Published by the Notthwest Regional;EducationalLaboratory, a privatenonprofit corPoration. The work upon 'this publication is baSed wasperformed pursuant tp,Contractlio. _-8070105 of the..National InstituteOf Education. It'ddes not, howe er necessarily reflect the views of

that'agencle..-

Theinformation:presented.in thi publication does not necessarilyreflect the opinions of the Northwe = Regional EducationaLLaboratory andno endorsement should be inferred.

The Research on Eyalua on Program is a Northwest Regional Educational

Laboratory proje t of research, development,.testing, and training

designed to to new evaluation methodologies for use in educationThis document one of a series of papers and reports produced byprogram staff, v siting scholars, adjunct scholars, and project-collaboratorsall members of,a cooperative network of coll'agues workingon the development of new methodologies.

What literature exists On the methodh of cost analysis and their useprogram evaluation? This bibliography was compiled in an attempt to

answer-that question. It contains 4 non-annotated listing of over 350articles and books on cost analysis, many of which should be of use toevaluators-seekIng to employ cost-anarySis methods in their work.

Nick L. Smith, EditorPaper 'and Report Series

Because of declining Sc, get and the general economicrecession,' educational evalu-- become -449reasingly interested incost-analysis methods. -nu is a, large lady. of literature oneconomib and cost-analysis a, we know of no current bibliog-raphies targeted at the'use (J1_ cE=10. methods in program evaluation.- Thisreport contains oar initial attempt tobuil&such a bibliography.

This document contains over 350 references to Woks', reports, andarticles on, cost- analysi=s Methods. We have ,eelected items which seemedof most relc to researchers seeking to use cost procedures inevaneprogram evaluation. Since dost-analysiS prodedures appear to have:beenused more extensively in health evaluation than in edupational evalua-tion, we have included a,large number of references from the healthfield. While our referenbes come primarily'from-health,and education,they are wide-ranging, covering such diverse journals as ,the AmericanSchool Board Journal, the Journal of Political Econo and the communityDental and Oral EpidemiOlogV journal.

An increasing number of articles are appearing on the specific usecost methods in program evaluation, making it possible that a moreselective, annotated collection could be produced in the near future.Until'then, we offer this listing as .a temporary aid.,

Eective health care.

e,

C. C. Design for an education system cost- effectiveness modelEfficiency in resource utilization in education.; Paris:Organization for EConomic Cooperation and Development, 1969, 65-91.

Science 1976 , 192

IUD C. C. The issue of social cost in cost-benefit analysis ofsurgery. In J. P. Bunker; B. A. Barnes and F. Hosteller (Eds.)Costs, risks,.and benefits of surgery. New York: Oxford Univeisity,

Press, 1977, 40-55.

Acton,.J. Measuring monetary value of life-savingp ProgramCofitemporarV Problems, 1976, 40(4), 46-72.

Law and

Albritton,.R.LB. Cost-benefits of measles eradication: Effectsfederal ervention. Policy Analysis 1978, 4(1), 1.

Alford, R. Health. Care P.

Press, 1975.-tics. Chicago: University of

).

hidago

2:11kin, M. C. .Evaluating the,costeffectivenessofinatructional,'prOgfams. In M.' Wittrock and D. EWiley (Eds.) , The evaluation ofinstqctioni_ Issues and proolems. New York: Heat, Hindhert AndWinston, `1970, 221238.

Amadio, J., Mueller, J., Grey,' R. Benefit/cost ratio. In PublicHealth Report, Illinois Department of Public Health, SouthernIllinois University, Carbondale e-and Jackson unty Health Departm n1976.

chler, D. H. Pap tests every three years: Cost - effective in the

run? Health Education, 1983, 14(1) , A2-45.

Andersen, D. Problems in.estimAting the costs of special education inurban areas: The New York City case. Journal- of Education Finance,

1982, 7(4), 403-424..

strong, J. FaSilLartj*.ceresidencrr:Acciefitrnamodelfor esourCe allocation decision-makin Unpublished masters thesis,

Un rsity of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Armstrong, R. L. The intangible coats and benefAts of school

- self-study'. North Central_Asso iat ion iarterly, 1982, 56(395 -401.

herly, G. H. C. Cale,..H. W., S.Drummond, M.F., et al. ,An apps ach tothe financial evaluation of occupational health services. ournal of

'al and = Occupational Medicine, 1976, 26, 21-30.

B

-Barnes, B. A. Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis ind surgery.Surgical_ Clinic North America", 1982, 62(4), 737-749.

say, S. L. Cost-benefit analysis and man _,-Health, 1971, Lexington, MA: ington.

Baumol, W. J On the social Tate o diScount. unerican Economic Review1968, 58, 788-802.

8a 1, W. .7, Oh thp:discount rate for public projects. In. R. Haveman

and,4!-44rgolis, Public e enditures and 'c anal sis.1 Chicago:Markham, 1970,;273-290.

Bennett,,W. Copt-benefit ratio of pretransplaht bilater'al nephrectomy.Journal of American Medtcal Association, 1976 235 1703.

Bentkover.,-J.,D.0 & Drew, P.medical. technologies:(-PTAI-BP7H79(14)' HealthD. C4 U. 4. Government

9. Cost benefit cost effectiveness of

%cchctlZat sotrtuhayope

Sdericiel7i.ntwaiMPlIgn;ossh nrPtihting Office, 1980.-. .

Berk, A., Paiinger, L., & Mushkin,.-B. J. The ecanomic cost illness,

fiscal 1975. -Medical Care, 1978,- 16 785-79(4

Bernstein, C., Hartman, W. T, t, M., shall, W. Financingeducational Services for the ndicapped: An analysis of current

research and practices. Reston, VA: Council for tbcceptionalChildren, 1976.

Berry, R. E. ._Estimating the economit Costs of alcohol abuse.England" Journal of Medicine; 1976, 295, 620-621.

Berwick, 11. M., & Komaroff, A. L. Cast-effectiveness of lead screening.

New England Journal of Medicine, 1982,.306(23), 1392-1398.

Binner,, P. R. putcome measures and cost analysis.1 In N. Neigher,R. J. Hammer, and G. Landsberg (Eds.), Emerging_ developments in

mental health program evaluation. New-York, N. Y.: Argold Press,1977.

_ 3

Sinner, - -P.; Cost analysis of state hospitala: Custodial efficiency or

treatment efficiency. In Landsberg et al. (Ws.), Evaluation inpractice, DREW publication No. (ADM) "78-763, 1979.1'

Binner P., Halpern, J., & Potter, A. Patients, programs, and resul in

a comprehensive mental health center. Journal of Clinical andConsulting. PsYchologX; 1973, 41(1), 148-156-.

Binner,- p. Potter, IC* & Halpern, .7. -Workload levels , "program costs,

and prograebenefits: 3 Ark output valtie analysis. Administration in

Mental Health, 1976, 3.

C. Cdstilhos, M., Davis,-13., Snyder, M,, & Stecher, B.Cost-benefit analysis in-educational evaluation'. Studies in

Educational Evaluation 1982 8(1), 75-85.

Carrera, G. F., Gerdon, D. E., Schnur J., & McNeil, Computedtomography of the brain in patients with headache or temporal lobe

epilepsy: Findings and cost-effectiveness. Journal of ComputerAssisted Tomography, 1977, 1(2); 200-203. .

Chamie, M., & Henshaw, S. K.' The costs and benefits of governmentexpenditures for family planning progrdms. Family PlanningPerspective, 1981, 13(3), 117-118, L20-124.

Charp, S., VSebastian, R. N. -Cost-effectiveness considerations in the

use of a combined CAI/CMI system. The Journal: TechnologicalHorizons in. Education, 1978, 5(2) 42 -46.

Christianson, J. B., KriShan,.I.,-Nobrega, F. T., Davis, Smoldt,

R. K., & Harris,_ A. M. The Mayo three-community hypertension controlprOgram vs. cost-effectiveness of intervention. Mayo ClinicProceedings, 1981, 56(1); 11-16-

Cohn, E. The_sconomics of education.Ballinger, 1979.

Cohn, E., & Millman, S. D. Input -- output analysis in pub

Cambridge, Mass. Ballinger, 1975.

Cambridge,

c education.

Cohodes, D. R. Froblems an meaSuringthe cost of inness. Evaluationthand e HealthProfessions, 1982, 5(4),,3817-392.-

Cobra', M. E., SeFrankenhurg, H1. K. AcceptanCe of home screening: How to

reach the unreached. Clinical Researchi,1973, 21, 299.

Callen, M. P., Feldman, R., Siagelauhr & Crawford. D. Dollar,cost

Per Positive-tests:for automated multiphasic Screening, New-Ellaland

JournaLof Medicine, 19700 283, 459463.':-,,

Collins, A cost-effectiveness-model. In William T. Hall and Gerald

C.. St. Denis (Eds.),-Froceedings: 12uallty assurance in soclalservices in health-4r.,ramS for mothers and children.. Pittsburgh,

PA :. of-Pittsburgh Graduate School cif Public Health and

U.S. Department of Health, Education & Welfa're, 1975; 10-, 139.

Conley, R. W. Issues in benefit-cost analyses-of the vocationalrehabilitation'program. American Rehabilitation, 1975, 1, 19-3.

Conley, R. W., Cornwall M., & Arrill, M. B. An approach to measuring

cost of illness. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1967,k124, 63.

Cooper, R. & Rice, D. P. The economic cost of illness revisited..Social Security Bulletin. 39, 1976, 2, 21-36.

Stich, J. P. A simplified cost - finding methodology. Journal of

Medical Education, 1983, 58 203-204.

Coulton, C. J., & Butler, N. Measuring social Work productivity inhealth care. Health _and Social

Fial Work 1981, 6(3) 4-712.

Coulehan, J. L., Baacke, G., Welty, T. K., & Goldtooth, N. L. .

Cost - benefit of a streptococcal surveillafide program among-NavajoIndians. Public Health Reports,.1982, 97(1),.73-77. .

abtree, M. Application of cost-benefit analysis to clinical nursingpractice: A comparison of individual and group preoperative,teaching. Journal of Nursing Adminis ration, 1978, 8, 11.

Craig, J. L. A practical approach to cost analysis of an occupationalhealth program. Journal of OccPpational Medicine, 1974, pp. 445-448.

Cretin, S. Cost-benefit analysis of treatment':famd prevention ofmyocardial infarction. Health Services Research, 1977, 12, 174-189.

Crystal, R., & Brewster, A. Cost-benpfit and, cost -effectiveness - analysesin the health field:- An introduCtion. In airy, 1966, 3,3-13.

Cumming, P. D., Kendall, K. E., Pe1gels, C. C. a Seagle,,,J. R.Cost-effectiveness of use of ;frozen blood alleviate Bloodshortages. Transfusion, 1977 , 17(6) 602 606.

,

Dahma, W. T.,Molitch, M. E., Bray, G.-A., G eenway, F. L., Atkinson,R. L., & Hamilton, K. Treatment of obesity: Cost benefit assessmentof behavioral therapy, placebo, and two anorectic drugs. AmericanJournal of Clinical Nutrition, 1978, 314 774-778.

Davis, R. W. ApproaChes to CBI effectiveness: Activity in the BellSystem. T. H. E. Journal: Technological Horizons in Education.1981, 8(3), 43-45.

Dawson, P., Cohrs, M., Eversole, C. Frankenburg, W. K., i Rothe M. L.Cost-effectiven(mmCof screening children in housing projects.AMerican'Journal of Public Healtht,1976,:66(12), 1192-1194..

Dawson, P., Cohrs, M., EVersole, C., Frankenburg, W. F.,& Roth, M. L.-Cost-effectiveness of scrning childr n in health centers.. PublicHealth Reports, 1979, 94, 362-365.-

E.

del Bueno, D. J., & Kelly, K. J. Haw cosh- effective is your staffdevelopment prCgram? Journal of Nursing Administration, 1980, 10 (4),'31-36.

I

Denton, J.. & SMith, N. L. .:Alternativeteacher preparation programs: Acost-effectiveness comparison (Repor_ No. 86 of, the Research onEvaluation Program Paper & Report ies) Portland, OR NorthRegional Educational Laboratory, 19

Dittman, D. A., & Smith, K.conceptual framework forReview, 1979,'4,

Consideration of benefits_and coata: AHealth Care MandgeMeathe health planner

ge, W.. F. Cost-effectiveness of renal disease screeningJournal of Diseases of Children, 1977,. '131(11) ; 1274-1282.

Doherty, N. Alternatives toinsatutionilitation:for the ged:Viability and cost-effeCtiveneas'.. A ed-Care and ServiceiRevieW,19764 1, 1-16.

Doherty, N & Crakes, G. Social Program costs ad uiting' for,lesarch

and evaluation. .Activities Evaluation Review, 1960; 4(4),,5.37 -548.

bdtherty, N & Hicks, 8; The useof cost-effectiVeness analypia ingeriatric day care. 'Gerontologist, 1975, 15, 412.

Doherty,- N., & Hick B. Coat-effectiveness analysis'ind_ alternativehealth care pr grams for-the_elderly. Health Services Research,1977, 12, 190- 03. at

Doherty, N., Horowitz, P., & Crakes, G. Real costs of dental care. inprivate 'and public-practices. Medical Carew 1980, 18, 96-105.

.

Dolan, T. J., Hodgson, T. A;, & Wun, Present values of epected-lifetimeearnin s and'housekee services 1977. Division ofAnalysis, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD,1980.

Drummond, M. F. Welfare economics and- cost - benefit analysis in'healtn

care. Scottish Journal of Political EConomz, 1981, 28(2),,125-l45..

Dunlop, B.'D. Expanded home-based care for the elderly: Solution or

pipe dre American Journal Of Public Health, 1980, 70, 514-519.,

Dunlop, D. Benefit-cOst analysis: A review of its applicability.inpolicy-analysis for deliverifig health services. 'Social Science andMedicine, 1975, 9, 133-139.

Dunn, B. P., & Sullins, W. R. Costbenefit analysis: Applicability

higher education. ±journal of Education Pinance, 1982, 8, 20-32.

Eastaugh S. R., & Hatcher, M E. lmproving.compliance among

hypertensives: A triage criterion with cost- bens_fit'i lications.

Medical Care, 1982, 20(10), 1001., ---..

English, D. C., & Geyman, J. P. The' and-cest-effec ivenes9of diagnostic tests for'infectioas mononucleosis. J6urnal of FamilyPractice, 1978, 6(5), 977981.

Fein," R. Economics Of mental _illness New York: Basic Books, 1958..

Fein, R; But on the Othei hand: _High blood pressure; ei;onomics; .and,equity New En land JOurnal of: Medicine, 1977,.296, 751-753;.

Feldstein, M. The social time =preference discount rate in cost-benefitanalysis. Economic Journal, 1964, 74, 360 -379.

Fielding, .1. E. Successes of prevention. Millbank Memorial Fundquarterly, 1978, 56, 274-302.

Finebeig, H. V., & Pearlman, L.- A. Benefit and cost-analysis of m al

interventions: The case of cimetidine and peptic ulcer diseas e(OTA-BP7H-9 (11) Health Technology Case -Study-r Series) . Washington,D.-C: U. -B. vernment- Priting-Office,---19801

Fishman, D. B. Development and test of acostffectiveness_methosL)Imlfor CMHCs: Final, report of NIMH Contract No HSM-42-737162 (QPI.Development andesting of a cost-effeCtiveness methodology forMCs" PB-2467676, (Vol. 1), Exhibits for the final report:Development and testing of "a cost-effectivenese methodology for

Cs, _PB-246-677,- "COCE Adult-interview- for ,Developmertesting of a cost-effectiveness methodology for CmsCs, PB-246-678,(Vol.;" 3). Springfield,- VA: U.S. Dept. pf Commerce , 1975.

Fi _D. B. _ Development of a generic cost-effectiveness methodologyor` evaluating the patient services of a community- mental health`ter: In Zusman, J. and Wurster, C. R. (Eds.),-Program

evaluation: -.Alcohol, drug abuse, and mental health services,Lexington, -Mass.-: D. C. Health, 1915.

Fishman, D--; B. ccerPuterized, -Cost-effectiveness methodology -for

Community Mental Health Centers.- in J. Johnsbn, J. B.. Sidowski T.

Williams (Eds.), Technoloov _in mental. heal care delivery systems._Stems.New-York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978/.

Fishman, D. B. Cost-effectiveness as a buyer's guide to mental healthservices: A pilot test. In LandSberg et al. (Eds.), Evaluation_ idpractice, DEW Publication NO. .(ADM) 78 -763, 1979.

Foo e, A., -a Erfurt, J. C. Controlling hypertension: A cost -effectivemodel. Preventive Medicine, 1977, 6, 319-343.

Forst, B. C. An analysis of alternative periodic healtb xaminationstrategies In W. Niskanen -et al. (Eds.), Benefit cost and_policanalysis. icago: Aldine, 1973`, 393-409.

4--

Fuchs, V. R. What is CBA/CEA, and why are they' doirigEngland Journal of Medicine. 1980,- 303(16), 937-93

_Garner, W. T. Linking school.resources- to educational'outcomes: Therole of homework. Horace Mann- Lincoln institute Research Bulletin,-1978, 19(1).

snadian 'Aid

. _

Costbenefit in health care: We need to know much more.&cal Association Journal, 1974, 3, 988-999.

rson, -L. W.,home care.543 -555.

& Hughes, 0. ,A comparative study of the economics ciInternational Journal of Health Services, 1976, 6(4),

Geske, T. G. Some observations on cost-effectiveness analysis;of Educational Finance, 1979, Spring, 451-468.

Journal

Ceske, T. , Z uelke -D .--C --Cost-effectiveness- analys is p ract ical

for educational planning- and - changing. Planning and Changing, 1982,13(1) 310.

Glassi_N.1J., & Goldberg, D. Costbenelfi _analysis and the evaluation of-psychiatric serviceS.:0PsycheilogicalMedidine, 1977, 7, 701-707.:.

Go dMan,-T-.-A. dec is

taking. New York: Praeger, 1967.

Galdschmidt, P. G. A cost-effectiveness model for - evaluating health care,.programs:. Application to (drug abuse treatment. Inquiry, 1976c 13,29-47.

Good, D. A- Cost benefit and co_ st-effectiveness analysis: Theirapplication tonrban public services and facilities (RSRI DiSCUPaper Series No.- 47). Regional Science Research Institute,Philadelphia, PA, 1971.

ramliche E. Benefit-cost analysis of governmentEnglewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 19.81.

rograms.

r

sion

Gray, C. M., Conover, C. J., & Hennessey,T. M. Coa-effectivenessresidential community corrections : An analytical prototype.Evaluation Qllarterlv, 1978, 2(3), 375-400.

Green,- L. W. How.to-evalUate health promotion._ _

106 -108.

Greenberg, J., & Kroft R. The economic impact of alternative cardiac

care unit treatmen _practices. Health Services Research, 1982,17(1), 4560.-.

Griffith, _D. A. T. Economic evaluation in health services.Societe Bel e Medicine Tro icale, 1972, 52, 215 -233.

Grosse, R. N. Preface. In T. A. Goldman (Ed.)analysis: New a °aches in decision-makin

erations Researc

GroSse,. R.'c n

Cost-effectiveness-New 'fork: Washington

unc-il,z P. A. Praeger, 1967;-

7benefit ana1yE health:services.- Annals of theaadem of Politicarand Social Science, 1972, 399, 89.

Grover, P. L. et al..,..ram for cancer.:detecti

c iveness a multisite ma- screeninPaper presented at 'the

104th Annual Mee g of the American 'P ycholbgical Association,.Miami, Florida, 1976.

Grubb-, -TereVane-iT hbapital` education and- trainingdebated. lsta , 1981,- 55(7), 75-79.

Guzick, D. S. Efficacy. of screening for cervical cancer: A review.American Journal of Public Health, 1978, 68, 125-134a

on -SC-

Hag rd, H., Carter, & Milne, R. G. Screening for spina bifidacysticd: A dost-benefit analysis. British Journal of PreventivSocial Medicine. -1976, -30, 43.

Halpern, ., & Binner, P. a A. model for an output value analysismental health programs. Administration- in Mental Health, 1972,Winter-, 40751.

Flammersberg7 S. S. A ce benefit study of clinical education in-selected allied health ograms. Journal of Allied Health, 1982;11(1),

almond, J. Home-health care cost-effectiveness:-An overview-literature. Public Health Re rts,. 1979, 94(4), 305-311.

Hannan, E. L., &-Graham, . K. A cost-benefit study` of a hypertensionscreening and treatment program at,the work setting Inquiry, 1978,

15, 345-356.

Ha is,- G. Introduction to-cost-benefit analysis applied to new healthtechnologies. -Prepared for Bureau of Health Planning and ResourcesDevelopment, ERA, Cambridge, Mass: Arthur D. Little, Inc., 1977.

Hartman, W. T. review:- -Rand`educati Washington, D. C.: U.S. Office of Education, 1978.

Hartman, W. T. .mating the costs of educating handicapped children: Aresource-cost model approachsummary report. Educational Evaluation.

d Polior Anal sis, 1981, 3(4), 33-47.

10

Hartunian, N. Smart, C. N., & Thompson, S. The incidence andeconomic costs cfcancer,_motor vehicle dnjuries, coronary heart .

disease, and stroke: A comparative analysid. iCan-JournalPublic Health, 1980 70, 1249-1260.

skell, N. L., &-Blair N. The physical activity component of healEh ,promotion in occupational settings. Public Health Reports, 1980, 95,109-118.

Hauver, J.IN. & Goodman,-.1. A. The evaluation of performance and-costin a hypertensive control program. Medical=Care, 1980, 18, 485-502.

R. B., Sackett, D. L., & Taylor, D. W. Increased absenteeismfrom work after detection and labeling of hypertensive patient. Neuf

England Jourrial of.Medicine, 1978, 299, 741-744.

gin, R. F. A cost-benefit analysis for seafood proce_ ing trainingsessions ;in-the-Galveston-Bay- area;- College of, the-Mainlancr,- Texas -----_

City, Texas, June, 1982. -

Hockey, P. Cost -benefit evaluationSSocial Work, 1979, 4(3), 152-167.

prima-- health_care. Health and

Jacobs, P., & Chovil, A. EConomic evaluation of corporate medicalprograms. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 1983, 25(4), 273-278

Jacobson, S., & Ward, D. Prevention cif ins 't ionalization: A

cost-effectiVeness el of -c unit -baste alt -ativ . Paper

present at Dual meeting ,: the American Public Health .

. Association, --Beach, FL, October, 1976, 1721.

'goglekar,. P. R. Advocacy through convenient definition ofsocietal_objectiVes. Evaluation ancithe Health Professions, 1982, 5(4),363-379.

Jogleka Cost-benefit studies of health care-pr Choosing

methods for desired results. Evaluation and the Health Professions.

Forthcoming.

Jones, R., Goldberg; D., & Hughes, B. A. A-comparison of two different

services treating schizophrenia: A cost-benefit analysis.Psychological Medicine, 1980, 10, 493T505.

ones-Lee, M. N, The value of _life: An economic analyaL.s.

University of Chicago Press, 1976.

Chicago:

Karon, B. P., & Vandenbos, G. R. Cost-benefit analysis: Psychblogist.vs. psychiatrist for schizophrenics-. -Professional Psychology, 1976,.7, 107-111; r

Kazanowki, A. 13._-A standaidized approach to cost-effectivenessevaluations. In J. W. English (Ed.), Cast- effectiveness- -Theeconomic evaluation'of engineered systems. New York: Wiley 196113-133. ,

Kelman, Cost-benefit analysis: An ethicalJanuary, 1981,

D. Self care 'education:1-98,-20, 710-718.-

egnlations,

n HMO costs. cal Care,

_Kies ling, H. 110 Some estimates for the cost-- effectiveness of educationalinputs for reading performance of disadvantaged children inCalifornia Title I projects (Report No. ED' 068616). Washington,D. C.: Educational Resources Information Center, 1972.._.

Kim, J. E., Harris, R. C. -A cost-effectiveness model for secondary__ __vocaticinal-programs. -B oomington, Ind. col-_of _Education

Indiana University; 1976.

.Kinney, Godfrey, C.,- Haapala,

. .D., & Mad

Keeping families together. In T..andsbergpractice, 1979.--

Kissick, W. L. Cost- benefit studies in health planning in the U.SHealth' ics. Copenhagen, 1969, 39-44.

en, B. Horgebuilderseet al. s), Evaluation in

arman, E. Syphilis control- programs. -In- R4-Dorerrian- ( Ed.)-Measuring-- --benefits of :government investments.- Washington, D. C. 1965, 367.414.

Klarman, H - The economics of health. New-York:Press-. 1965

iumbia universityf

Klarman, H. E. Present status of cOst-benefit analyGis in the healthfield. American Journal of Public Health, 1967, 57, 1948-1958.

Klarman, H. E., Francis, & Rosenthal -, G. D. Cost-effectivenesanalysis applied to the treatment of chronic renal disease. MedicalCare, 1968, 6(1), 44-54

Klarman,.H. E. Applrcation Of cost-benefit systems tec hPsJl 3Y,-technology and health care systems in the 1980s (Uki t Publication No.HM473-3016). M. F. collerl. (Ed.), Washington, D.G. : vernmentPrinting Office, 1973.

Klarman, H. E. Application of cost-benefit analysis to health = servicestechnology. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 1974 16, 172-186.

Klarman, - H. E. ication- of costrbenef it -analysis the healthservices and the-special aria ofii-technologic innovation. -

-International Journal of Health-Services 1974, 4, -325-352

H.- _ancis, J. O., & Rosenthal, G4 D. t-effect venessanalysis -applied to_the treatment of ahronid renal disease. - MedicalCarei- 1968, 6, 48 -54.

_

_Klock, H. nomic a _cts of a caries preventive program Community

ntal Oral_ Epidemiology, 1980,, 8(2), 97-102,

Kogan, J., Schoenbaum. 8;, Weinstein, M., & Praber,, Pertussis

vaccine: analysis.of benefits, risks and costs. New En-landJournal of Medicine, 1979, 301, 906-911,

Winston, D. Cost-effective medical care. Chicago:Physicians Sections of the American-Medic41 Association,

K istein, M. M. Economic issues in prevention. - Prevention Medicine,1977, 6, 252-264.

ein,.M. M. Arnold, C. E. , & Wunder, E., L. Health coonpreventive care. -Scie ce, 1977, 195, 457-462.

Krumboltz, J. D. An accountability-model for counselors. Personnel andGuidance Journal 1974 52 -639-646._ _

K lik, J. Kulik, C. r &I Cohen, P. Effectiveness of computer-basedcollege` teaching A meta-analysis of findings. Review ofEducational Research, 1980, .22, 525-544.

Landefel- theory practi6e. Ameridan Journal of Public Health, 1982, 72(6),

555r

J. S.., -& Seekin, E. P.. The economic value- of life: Linking

Lave, L. 11.- Economic evaluat n of public health progi

of Public Health, 1980, . 1, 255-276. _

Lave, J. R., et al. Economic impact of preventive medicine. In

,\ Preventive Medicine. Prodist New York, 1976, 675-714.

Lave, J. R, & Lave, L. B. Cost-benefit concepts in health: Examination

of some prevention efforts. Preventive Medicine, 1978, 7, 414-423.

Lave, P. M., von Ali en, 8. 14, & Oakley, G. P., Jr. Maternal. serumalpha-fetoprotein screening: A cost benefit analysis. Pkmericdn

Journal of. Public- Wealth, 1979;69, 566-573.

Vor, Call-ender, _Ho-measur Medical: Care

. .

LeRoy, L olkow The costs and effectivenes of =nurse79416) 'He lth,Techrtologyi Case Study- Series

Washiitgto n,- i) - Covetn rtt-'Printing Office, 1%30.

ealthicost-effectiveness: What are

Levin,- A. -effectiVene in. maternal and child health. New EnglandJournal of-MediCine, 3:958 :-"1041-1047.

-Levin,- M eaddring-_e--Finance uarterly

_ - -

edticational production. -Public

Levin, H. M. -effectivenessGtittentag Struening

evaluation researchi In M.n- k of evaluation research.

Beverly Hills, 1979, 2.

vin, M. Concepts of-economic- icieproduction. In J Froomkin, D. Jamison a

ucation as an industry. _

149-191.

aucatirnalduek (Ms.),

nger, -1976,

Levin," H. M. A cost-effectivenese analysis:-Journal of Human Resources, 1970, 5(1),:

Levin, H. M. Cost analysis.evaluatiort. Beverly Hills:

selection. The

-N. L. Smith (Ed.) New techniques _for__SAGE- Publications, 1981, 19 -23.

yin, H. M. .Cost-effectivenss: A primer. Beverly Hills-Publications, 1983.

Levine post effectiveness evaluation in mental- health care.G. J. Stahler W. R. Tash Innovative approaches to mental healthevaluation. Santa Clara, CA: Academy Press, 1381.

vine, V. The role of outcomes in cost-benefit evaluation.Directions for pr ram Evaluation, 1981, 9, 21-41.

nate,_G. A., Jr., & Hughes, J. T. The administratively effective'schoCil district: The role of the computer. Educational Computer,1982,.2(4), 10-12..

Linnerooth, J. The _value of humanEconomic Inquiry, 1979, 17, 52-74

oath, L. Cost-effectiveness of a preventive program renaldisease., Milbank. Memorial Fund' Quarterly, 1969, July,

an, A. G., Milne, B. J., Achber, C., Campbell, W. P., & Haynes, R._.Cost-effectiveness of a worksite hypertension treatment program.Hypertension, 1981, 3 (2) , 211-218.

Longabaugh, R. A 1-year followup comparison of day hospital, dayhospitai,_transfer, and inpatient samples with respect tocost-effectiveness of psychiatric carer I Landsberg et al. (Eds.Evaluation in Practice, 1979.

Longabaugh, H. -effectiveness of the acute day hospital as atreatment .setting. Evaluation in: Practice, DST publication No.ADM) '78-763, 1979.

Longabaugh, R., McAuley, T._, Imerman,. _L., & Westlake, R.Cast-effectiveness of ale- acute day hospital as a treatment. setting ,Butler Hospital Treatment Evaluation Series Report No. 8).Providence, R.I., 1975.

Lubeck, D. P., & Bunker, J. The artificial heart: Cosbenefits (OTA-BP-H-9(9) Health, Technology Case Study SeriesWashington, D. C.: U. S. GoVernment Printing Office, 1988.

Luce, B. R. Allocating costs and benefits in disease preventionprograms: An application to cervical cancer screenta.n (aTA-BP-H-9(7)Health Technology. Case Study -Series). Washington; D.C.: U.S.

Government Printing Office, 1980.

Luft, u oL. L., & Fakhori, J. A"modei for a comparative cost-benefit _

car% rograms. aluationevaluation cif two mental health partial c Ev-

and Program Planning, 1979, 2, 33-40.

Luf L., & F'akhohri, J. A cone arative cost-effectiveness evaluation oftwo_partial care programs. In ,Landsberg et al (Eds.) Evaluation in

,.ractice, 1979, 198-199.-

sciences.HaYri ." -APPlied -time-heries analysis for the social

AGE Publications, .1980.

miendon, M. J., & Pesten°, F. P. White opposition: To busing or

to-desegregation. Social Science Quarterly,, 1982, 11(1), 70-82.

McGhan, W. F., Rowland, C. R., & Bootman, J. L. Coet-benefit andcost-effectiveness methodologies for evaluating innovative -

pharmaceutical services. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy,1978, 35(2), 133-140.

McKenna, C.1 uantitative methYork: McGraw-Hill, 1980.

McNeil, B. et al. Cost effectiveness in hypereellsive renovascu

disease. New _En land Journal of Medicine, 19475, 293, 216.

New

eil, B. J., Varady, P. D.,'Burrows,-B. W., et al; Measures,clinical efficacy:. Costreffectiveness calculations in the diagnosis,and treatment orhypertensive renovascular disease. New EnglandJournal of Medicine, 1975, 293(5), 216-228.

N- -B.- Eddy, D. M.----The costs and effects of screening for-:Cancer among asbestos-exposed workera. Journal_of Chronic cseas

35(5), 351-358.%

= _

McPhail- Wilcox,Texas 'A:Nisei-197B

462-472:-=

analysis of investment in teacher education: Thecarnal of Education Finance, 1982, 7(4),

Mace4 J. 3ucaEducational media and economicand Developieni, 1982, 15(2), 91-93.

Mirvis, P. H. Organizational change efforta:for-assessing-organizational- effectivenens =and prograja-

cost Versus benefits. Diraluatidn Review, 1982, 6(3)i 301-372.:

Maidlow & Berman, H. The economics of hero 'refitment.America Journal of Public Aalth, 1972e 1312-1406:

Marglin, S. The social rate of discount at optimal rate ofinvds erl -Journal of pconomics, 146 77, = 5 -111.

Marks, S0, Greenlick, Hurtado, A., Johnson, Zro, 4_ Henderson, J.AMbulatory Surgery in HMO: A study of costsfi rqualitY of care andsatisfaction. Medical Care, 1980, 18, 7-1460'

Massachusetts DepartMent of Public Health.newborn screening for-Metabolic disorder.Medicine. 1974, 291, 1414-1416.

Masse, H. , When programsgoes. and what stays.30 -37.

st-benefit analysis ofw England Joarnal_of

ust be cut,Huse'thisplan:-to-:dete _ine-whatifAmeriCan---8chool Board Journal 198-2'169(10) r

Massey, R. M. analysis of a state-level, multi- option procedure-for the a uisition of com etenc -based instructional'materials.Paper presented -at the Annual Meeting of the American EducationalResearch. Association, =New York, NY, March, 1982.

y, P. R. A. Lost- efficiency of mental health care'III:method as ''a` parameter- of cost in treatment of'schixophrenia.American Journal' of Public Health, 1971, 61, 127 -129.

May, P. R. A.- Cost-efficiency of treatment for the sehozophrenicsatient. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1971, 127, 1382-1385.

Merin, F. D. Economics of disease prevention: Infectious kidneydisease. Inquiry, 1971, 3-18.

ichels, &-Reifler, C. B. Mental. healthbenefit-and valde. Journal of the Amen i

-Association 1976 24, 208 -210._

students - -Costealth

Higher', R. Evaluation- of 'life-and limb:Journal- of Political. Econoriy, -1971; 79

Shan, H.-Unwin, 1975.

t-benefit analysi .

oretical a-705..

London:: Allen -&

ishan E. Cost-benefit anal ysis. Nei," York: Praeg , 1976.

Mooneyi Gavin. Breast cancer screening: A. study in cost-effectivenessanarsis. Social Science Medicine, 1982,- 16, 1277-128r.

kowitz, M. F & Fox , B. H. Cost analysis of aggressive breast cancerscreening. Rediology,-- 1979, 130, 253-256.

Mushkin, S. J. Health as an investment. Journal of Political 'icon1962, 70, 129-157.

hkin, S. Evaluation f health policies andScience d Medicine, 1977, 3, 491-499.

MushAir3, -S. J. aCollings,- Pi.-- nomic-cosi;:t`Public Health Reports, 1959, 74, 795-809.

Mushk in S . J., & Dunlop, D. W. Health._.

health benefits. New York: Per

T

t sus it o Measures oam on ress, 1979.

Nagel,. Stuart S. Ncnmonetary variables in benefit-c .evai.uatio

Evaluation Review, 1983, 7(1), 37-54.

Nelson.'?., Delbanco, T. L. oft services: A major cost- effectivecomponent of primary medical care.. Social Work in Health Care, 1976,Spring, 1, 297-308.

Neuhauser, D., 6.Lewicki, A. What do we gain from the sixth stoolguaiac? New England Journal of Medicine, 1915,' 293, 226.

Newman, P. L. Planning and cost outcome analysis in prhmEEsL.Tentian:Preli ins y thou ow . unpublishedmanuscript, available from author, 2001 Grace Lane, Plourtown, PA

19031.

Newman, F., Burwell, B. A. &.Underhill, W. R. Program analysis using

the client-oriented cost Outcome System.. Evaluation and PrEramELLarmira, 1978, 1(1) 19-30.

NIDA. effectiveness measures use reatmenprograms, Vol. 1; -Cost benefit analysis, Vol , to society'odrugmouse, Washington,,D.C.: Supt-. of Doctiments, G, 1977.

NIMH. Accounting guidelines_ for mental health centers and relatedfacile ties (DREW ,Publication No. (HSM). 72=9137) -Washington, D.C;:Super iritendent of Documental GPO, 1972.

NIMH. A client-oriented stem of mental health servide delivpro9ram emen_. -workbook-and g_uide (DIM,' Publication No.76 -307). Washington, D.C. Superintendent:of Documents, GPO, 1976.

NIMH.,- A cost-effectiveness methodology for community mental healcenters: _Development and pilot test (DIIHS Publication Na.i (ADM)

81-767, Series PH No. 3)., Washington, D.C:- Super intendent of.-Documents, .GFO, 1981.

artif inding -and rate -ett-ing-for-community- mental-healthcenters (DHEW Pub. NO. (AI:1M) 760291). Washingtoni-D.C.:'Superintendent of Documents, GPO, 1975.

NiskanenW. A. Measurement of effectiveness. In T. A. GolCost-effectiveness analysis. New York: Praeger, 1967.

H; The limits-of-cost-benefit analysis- -a guide topriority-setting in rehabilitation. Evaluation Quarterly, 1977, 1,347-480.

O'Donnell,, The Chandler Street, enter time/cost study. It Landsberget al. (Eds.), valuation in Practice, DHEW Publication No. (ADM),8-763, 1979.

office of Technology Assessment. The implications of cost-ffectivenessanalysis ofmedical technology (Stock No. 052-003-0076507).'Washington, D.C. Superintendent of Documents, GPO, 1980.

Packer, A. H. Applying cost-effectiveness concepts to the communityhealth system. erations Research, 1968, 16, 227-253.

Page, E.-.a . --Effects of higher education:. teomes, values, orbenefits. In S. C. Lewis-and J. P. Taubman (Eds.), Does collegematter? New York = Academic Press, 1973.

Pastorello, T. A cost-effectiveness model for geriatric careprogramalternatives evaluation. Papertpresented at the 29th scientificmeeting of the Gerontological Society, New York, October, 1976.

Pauker, S.,analye

Kassirer, J. Therapeutic decision- making: A cost-tbenefitNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978, 293, 229. __

Penner, D. W. -et-effectiveness of the autopsy in maintaining andimproving the standard of patient care. American Journal of ClinicalPathol 1978, 69, 250-2

Pezzot_Pearce, T. D., a others. Increasing cost-effectiveness inobesity treatment through use gf self-help behavioral manuals and.decreased therapist contact. Journal of Consulting and ClinicalPsychology, 1982, 50(3),,448 -449.

Pliskin, N., & Taylor, .A. :General grinciples: and-benefit n,decision analysis. In J. Bunker, B. Barnes, and F. Mosteller (Eds.),Cost, risks and benefits of surgery, New York: fiord UniversityPress, 1977, 5-27.

-p

Po

ow, S. hitting g-policy -ana lysis and- formation-from-an-effectivenessemphasis to a cost perspectiv4i. ucational Evaluation and PolicyAnalysis, 83, 5(1)., 75-82.

ister, T. H. Performance monitoring in the evaluation process.Evaluation Review,' 1982, 1(5) 601 -621.

Prest,' A fit., & Turvey, CoyJournal, 1965, 75, 683-705.

Psacharopoulos, G. The emnomics of early 'childhood education andday-care. International Review of Education, 1982, 28(1), 53-70.

rbenef it -analys is A Urvey. Economic

4,4sasharopoulos,countries.

The ecomomics of = higher zecucation in developingnative Education/'Reviewp 1982, 26(2), 139-159.

Quade, -E. Introduction and overview. In T. Goldman _

Cost-effectiveness analy_sis-.:- New Yorl Praeger, 1967, 1-16.

done-McCuan, E. , Bolin, - H., Levenson, J., & Hsu, J.Cost - effectiveness evaluation,of the Levindale Adult Day Treatment

Levindale riatric Reeearch Center, 197n.Center. -Hal

Reim', L. Formula measures cot-effectiveness of volunteer servicesprograms. Hospitals, 1981, 55(5)-, 37-38.

Rice, D. P. Estimating the costs of illness. American J urnal of PublicHealth, 1967, 57, 424 -44a.

19

Rice, D. P. -Measurement' and application ofR2porta,-= 1989,_ 84, 95-101.= -

Rice, D., &

Ilined& costs Pub Health

Cooper, B. The economic value of he AmericanJournal_ of Public Health, 57, 1954-1966.

Mandatory continuing education: Cost versus benefit.-ournal Education'ucation' in Nursing, 1982413(3), 7-43.

Rizzuto, C.J-ars, P., Hato*, E., & Bruhn, Is health promotion st effectivePreventive Medicine, 1981, 10, 324-339..

Romans, J. J. The economic- evaluation of mental health FrogInternational Journal of Mental Health, 1973, 2, 38-50.

Productivity and cost -effectiveness as financingn W. W. McMahon and T. G. Geskel(Eds.), Financing

ucation: -10vercoming7inefficiency-aneinequi aign-Urbana:f Illinois- Pressic 1982.,

Rossmiller, R.criteria.

University

Ho henberg, J. _st- benefit analysis: A methodological exposition.M. Guttentag and E. L. Struening (Ens.) , Handbook ofievaluation

-ft--research. Publications: Beverly Hills', CA, 1975, 2.

Rubin, -Cost measurement and cost-data-1n mental health settings.Hospital Com6unity,Psychiatry, 1982, 33(9), 750754.

Ruchlie, H. S.,/Finkel,. M. L McCarthy,.E. G. The efficacysecond-opionion consultation programs: A:cost-benefit perspective.Medical Care, 1982, 20(1), 3-20.

Ruchlin, H. g Mariis, N Coat =benefit analysis of an:emergency,alarm and response system:- A case 'study of = =die long-term care'{program. Health Services Research, -1981, 16(1) 6580.

Sandell; 0. H., Jones, R. K., gdregori, D. ,Practiaal.benefit-costanalysis for alcoholism programs. Alcoholism, 1981, 514)i* 497-50

Sabock, R.-alucator

& Kowalski, P. How't1982, 4(5), 26-27.

Salinger, H. D. Deming, B. S. Practical seratraining. Training and Developme -Journal,_28-29.

rta costs. Executive

egies for Valti,ting1%82, 36(8 ) , : 20-26;

_71

Sansone, P., i Schaffer, W. Cost-benefita A handbook.-

New York: Academia, 1978;

Saxe, L. Public policy and psychotherapy= Can evaluative research play

a role? New-Directions"for Program Evaluation, 1982; 14,3'73-86.

20

Saxe, L. The efficacy and cost effectiveness =o f psycVtheraPYOTA-BP-11-9(18).Health Technology Case Study Series)., Washing

D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1980.--- . .. .-

Saxe, L., Dougherty, D., Esty, K., & Pine, M. The> effectiveness andcosts of alcoholism treatment (OTA-HCS-22 Health Technology CaseStudy Ser4.es)-. Washington, D. C.: U. S.--Government Printing Office.

1980.

SChaLock, R. L. & Harper, R. Skill acquisition and client movellentindices: Implementing cost-effectiveness analysis in rehabilitation

Programs- Evaluation = and Program Planning, 1982, 5, 2237231.-

Scheffler, R. M. The economic :evidence on prevention. In Healthypeople: Background papers (DREW (PHS) Pith. No. 79-55071A) .Washington, D.C.: Superintendent of Documents, Guiverment Printing

1Office, 1979, 439-455 .

Scheffler,` R. N., & Delaney, M. AssesSiselected respiratory thereodalities: Trends and relative costs in the Washington, D. C.-area

( K-BP-H-9(12) Health Technology Case Study Series). Washington,U. S.. Government Printing Office, 1980..

Scheffler, R. M., & Paring L. A. A review of the enmity evidence on

preventiOn. Medical Care, 1980; 18(5), 473=484.

Scheffler, M., & licnrin, S.' Periodontal disease: Assessiiv theeffectiveness and costs of the Keyes technique- (OTA-BP-H9(5) HealthTechnology Case Study Series). Washington, D. C.: .U. S. GovermentPrinting Office, 1980. g = ,

Schelling; T.' C. The life kau save may be ycsurit own. In S. B. Chase -

(Ea.), Problems in lic c enditure anal Washington, D. C.: v-

The Brookings Inst t n, 9 , 127-162. ,

Schoenbaiim, S., Hyde, ., 'Bartoshesky, L., & Crampton, -K. Benefit-cost

.analysis of rubella vaccination policy. New England Journal ofMedicine, 1976,, 294, 306-310. ;'`

Schoenbaum, S.., A. & Kavet J. The swine-influenZa decision.New England Journal of Medicine 1976, 294, 759-765.

chramm, C. Measuring the return on program Costs: Eva1uation of amulti-employer alcoholism treatment progrps. American JournalPublic- Health, 1977, 67, 50-51.

he -evalhation-Schultz, G. Discoundelayed benefits (GilBudget)-. Washington

Schweitz O. Cost effectiveness of early detection ofHealth Services Research, 1974,.28-32,-

Schweitzer,. S. 0 lzi, C. C.' The Oost_effec iveness of bane-MarroWtransplant therapy and its policy implications (OTA-HP-H-9 (6) Hearth=

finology __Case:Study Series)-._ Washingt9n,:_D; C.: 'U. S;-Government-Printing Office, 1980;

Shapiro, a., and others. Cost-effectivenessof individual versus group:,cognitive behavior therapy for- problems of depression and anxiety in =an HMO-population. Journal-of Clinical Psycholy, 1982, 38(3),674-677.

Sharfstein, S. S:, afziger, J. C. Community care: Costs and benefitsfor the chronic patient. Hospital and unity- Psychiatry.- 1976,-976,27 170-173.

=

Shaughnessy, P. W. Methodological issues in per capita measurement inhealth care. 'Health Services Research, 1982, 17(4, 61-81. -

Sheinfeld, S., & Santiago, H. unit of 'service cost analysis inoutpatient services: Methodology and applications (HahnemannResearch and Evaluation Report No. 58).- Philadelphia: Department ofMen'tal- Health-Sciencesi-- Hahnemann-Medical-College-and -Hospital; -1978-;-----

Shepard, D. S., & Thomkison, M. S. First principles of cost-effectiyenessanalysis in health. Public Health Reports, 1979, 94, 53-5-543.

Shortell, S., M.; & Richardson, W. C. Health- ro ram evaluation. Mosby:St. Louis, MO, 1978.

ShOwstack, J. A., '& Schroeder, S. A. The cost effectiveness of uppergastrointestinal enddscopv (Ma-HP-H-9(8) Health 'technology CaseStudy Series). Washington, fl. C.: U. ..Government Printing Office,1980.

Showstocko J., Schroeder S., A. & Steinberg 'H..' Evaluating the etsand benefits of a diagnostic technology. Medical Carei19814498509.

-Shugoll, & Helms-, T. Co benefit analysis of-vocational education:.Probleins and-strategies. Journal of Vocational Education= Research,_1982, 7(2), 31-43.

Siegel, .7.. Strategies for resource allocation: A cost-benefit approachto program management. In Plannin in men health: suantitative

'input and uses of information. A report on the 18th annual- meeting. of the Southern Regional Conference on Mental Health Statistics, New

Orleans, October, 1976.

Simmons, .7. M. Fighting the budget battle with evidence:CosteffectiveneaS, data-based-decision making. Journal of StaffDevelopment, 1982; 3 (1) , 118-146.

skein A. an,-R. E. Communitybased long-t-erm care and#

mortality: Preliminary findings of'Georgia's Alternative HealthServices project. =The Gerontologist, 1960, 20, 372-379.

22

A., Moblei, G.,M., an, R. E. _Coat-effectiveness ofnity-based longterm care: Current findings of Georgia's

alternative health services project. American Journal of-PublicHealth, 1982, 72(4 ) =, 353-358.

Smith, J. K. Case-re of Northwe onalcost studies Report No. 82 of .the 1eeeerch on Evaluation ProgramPaper and Be t Series) . Portland, OR: Northwest-RegionalEducttionalLaborabary, 1983.

=

Smith, J. K. ProceinEvaluation: Wher

he seminaRe

Evaluation Program. Pa per` and. eport- _Series) Portland, OR1 NorthwestRegional Educational Laboratory, 1983.

==

3t Ail 'Is in Bducat'onal=lo. -87 ofhe-Researchon_

th, K. R., Miller,. & Golladay, F. L. An analysis of the optionalof inputs in the production of medical services. Journal of AmericanResources, ,1972;2, 208-225.

-Smith, M. C., A Hendrickson, L. S. Evaluating the cost of schopl health

se ices -'A case study. Bdtma ohal- aluition-and-Policy--Analysis,

1982, 4, 527-534.

i'th, N. L. & Rutherford, W. L. i illustrative cost-effectivenessinvestigation of field-based teacher Preparation courses.(Report No85 of the Research on Evaivation. Program Paper and Report Series).

Portland, _OR: Northwest-Regional-Educational Laboratory, 1983.'

_

rf

Smith, W. Cost-effectiveness and -t-benefit for public health

programs; Public Health Reports, 1968, November, 899-906.

Sorensen, J. E., & Grove, H. D. Costoutcome and cost-effectivenessanalysis: Emerging nonprofit-performance evaluation techniques.Accounting Review, 1977, 52(3), 658-675.

Sorensen, J. E., & Grove, H. D Using coht-outcome andcosteffectiveness_analyses for iMproved program management and

accountability. In Attkisson et al. (Eds.), Evaluation of human'serviceprograms. Academic Press, 1978.

Sorensen, J. E., & Phipps, D. W. Cost-finding -_setting-setting for

community mental health. c2BXers (NIMH Mental Health Statisti-sSekies C. 6). Eckville, Maryland, 1972.

The

Spencer, Feasibility of:thenefitcostianalysiaEvaluation Review11982t'0(5)0 649 -672.

Starfield, B., & Holtzmann, N. A. A comparison of effectiveness ofscreening for ph'enyketonuria in the United tates, United KingdomIreland. New-England Medicine. 1975, 293, 118.

Season, W. B., & Fortess, E. Cardiac radibnuclida imaging and costeffectiveness (OTA-BP-B-9(13) Health Technology Case Study Series).

Washington,' D. C.: S. < Government Printing Office, 1980.

nd

v Ce

Stason, W. einstein, M. C. -Allocation of resources to managension. New England Journal of 'Medicine, 1977, 296, 732-739.

Stei rg, L- D.,- Greenberger, F.., Garduque, L. & Mcauliffe,school students in the labor force: Some costs and benefits toschooling and learning; Educational Evaluation d`li= An 1 sic,1982, 4 (3) , 363-372.

_High

.Steiner, K. C. A cost-benefit analysis of -a possible screening-program

for the detection of phenylketenuria' in the state of Mississippi.Mantets -thesis, University of Missippi', 1969.

Steiner, K. C., & Smith, H. At A ication of cost benefit analysip to aPKU screening program.- I , 1973, 10, 34-40.

Stoddart, Greg L. Economic evaluation methods and health policy.Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1982, -5(4), 393-414. __

& A. The principles of practical cost-benefitanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978, 15-29.

Sullivan, C. F., & Smith, D. E. Cost-effectiveness of undergraduateprogrms in dietetics. Journal of American Dietetic Association,1982, -80 (6) , 561-565.

Swint, J. Nelson, W. B. Prospective evaluation of alcoholismrehabilitation efforts: The role of cost-benefit andcost-effectiveness-analyses. Journal of-Studies-in Alcohol-, 1971,38(7), 1386-3.404.

Szykula, S. A., & Fleishchman, M. J. _Generating referrals to newlyestablished programs: A cost effective comparison of twoProcedures. Community Mental Health Journal, 1980, 16(3), 201-284.

_T

Templeman,-Di and others. Cost effectiveness of the group home.Journal of _the Association for the _Severely Handicap d,- 1982, 6(4),11-16.

Terre, Warnke, D. W., eiss, A. P. rbenefi_ analysispublic projects. Mana_gement Accounting, 197 54, 34-31.

Thompkins, R. K., Buttnes, D. C., & Cable,-W. E. An analysis of the.;-costeffectiveness of pharyngitis management and acute rheumaticfever prevention. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1977, 86, 81-492.

Thompson, MBeverly

evaluation.Hills,

Thompson,program

S., & Portess, E. = Cost-effectiVeness analysis in hea'valuation.- Evaluation Review, 1980, 4(4), 549-568.

24'

Torrence,_ A general zed cost -e f ec ti4eness model-for evaluationhealth programs -Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State Univerdity

of,Mew York at Buffalo, 1971. _

_

-' To rance, G.W., Stoddart,-G. L., Drummond, M. F., & Gafni, A.Cost-benefit analysis versus cost-effectiveness analysis for the-evaluation of long-term-care programs. Health Services Research,1981, 16(4), 474-476. .

Tuft,-L., &-Pakhouri, J. A model for comparative cost-effectivenessevaluation of- two mental health partial care programs. .Evaluatio

and Program Planning, 1079, 33-40.

-

Urban._ N., Bergner L., & Eisenberg, M. The costs of a suburbanParamedic Prog qua in reducing deaths due to cardiac arrest. Medical.

re, 1981, l9 379-392 .

Vander Haeghen, P. Independent study coursed can be very cost

effective. The Journal: Technological' Horizons in Education, 1981,8(4), 52-59.

lien Pelt, A., & Levy, H. L. Cost: benefit analysis new screening-for

metabolic disorders.1414-1426.

ew En land Journal of Medicine, = 1974, 291c__

Volker, C. & Deacon, R. E. Evaluation of benefit from redearch-inhome economics. Home Economics Research Journal, 1982, 10(4),321-331;

Wagner asibility o economic evaluation of diagnosticproceddres: The case of CT scanning (OTA-BP7H-9(2) Health TechnologCase Study Series). Washington, D. C.: S. Government PrintingOffice, 1980.

Warner, K. E. The economic impliations of preventive health care.dial Science Medicine, 1979, 13C; 227-237.

Warner, K., & Luce, B. Cost-benefit and cost-effectivenss analysis inhealth care: P inci led actice and ential. Ann Arbor:Health Adminis Press ,'in press.

_

Warner, a-Button, R. C. Costbenefitand- cost-effectivenesshealth care. Medical.Care, 1980,-18(11), 1069- 1084.

Weiner; C.; et al. What price chronic illness?_ Society, 1982,19(2), 22-30.

Weinrott, M., Jones, R. R., & Howard, -.1;- R-. st-effectiveness ofteaching family progrants for delinquents: Results of a nationalevaluation. = Evaluation 'Review, 1982, 6 (I ,. =173 -201.

-Weinstein, L. - -M. Collecting Training _Cost Data. TraininDevelopment Journal, 1982, 36(8), 31-34.

Weinstein, M. Economic evaluation of medimal procedures andtechnologies: Progress, -problems and prospects (Mktg Publication NoPHS 79-3254). =In J. Wagner (Ed.)`r Medical technology. Washington,D.C.: U. S. Government_Printing Office, 1979, 52-68. -s

Weinstein, M. & Pearlman, L-. A. oast effectiveness of automated-multichannel chemistry analyiers-.,(OTA-BP-B-9(4) Health Technology-Case-Study- Series) . Washington,' S. -Government-PrintingOffice, 1980.

Weinstein, M. C., & Stason, W. B.° Foundations of cost-effectivenessanalysis for. health and medieal-practices. New-`England JournalMedicine, 1977, 298(13) 716-721.

eisbrod B-.A. Economics of- public- health: Measuring_ econoimpact of diseases. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania' P ess,1961.

Weisbrod, B. A. Income redistribution effects and benefit-costanalysis. in S. B. Chase (Ed.), Problems in public expenditureanalysis. Washington, D. C.:- Brookings, 1968, 177-209.

Weisbrod, B. A. Costs and benefits of medical research: A case study ofpoliomyelitis. Journal of Political _Economy, 1971, 79(3), 527-544.

Weisbrod, B. A., Test, M. A., & Stein, L. I. Alternative to mentalhospital treatment. II. Economic benefit-cost analysis; Archivesof general psychiatry, 1980, 347(4), 400-405.

Weissert, W., Wan, T. Livieratos, -&-Katz, S. Effects and ,_costs ofday-care services for the chronically ill. Medical Care, 1980,.10567-584.

Weissert W. G., Wan, T. T., L vieratos, B. B.., a Pellegrino, J.Cost-effectiveness of homemaker services for the chronically ill.Inquiry, 1980, 17, 230-243.

endler,-C. L. W. aptimizing test selectionOusing a cost analysisapproach. Paper presented at the Annual -Meeting of the AmericanEducational Research AsSociation, New York, NY-, March, 1982.

illiams, A. Cost-benefit analysis: Bastard science? and /or insidiouspoison in 'the body politick?-,In J. N. Wolfe (Ed.); benefitbenefi and

cost effectiveness. -Studies and analysis. London: ge en

Unwin, 1.973._

Wilson, A. L., et al. Development of a correspond#nce CME coursefor riiralPhysicianS. Journal-of Medical Education-,-1982', 57(8),635-637.

_111-

Wolfe, J. N. benefitndons - Allen Unwin. 1973.

ivenss. tudi

Y

Yarborough, N. P. Taking a- look at cost effectivene via faculty

loads. Communit and Junior Colle e Journal-, 1982. 52(5) 21-24

A costefflictiveness analysis of a residential treatmentprogram for behaViorally disturbed children. In P. Wittier (Ed.),Research and practice in mental retardation. Baltimore: University

Park Press, 1977,. -1', 435445.=

Yates, B. T -effectiveness analysiS: Using it for our own good.State-Psychological Association Affairs Newsletteri 1977, 8, b.

_______

Yates, T. Improving the cost-effectiveness of obesity programs:Three basic strategieS for reducing the cost Per pound.International Journal of Obesity, 1978,-2,1N9-266. )

Yates, B. T. The theory and-practice of cost-effectiveness-cost-benefit, and cost- utility analysis in behaviOral medicine. In

J. Ferguson and B. Taylor- (Eds.), -Advances in behavioral medicine.

EnglewoOd Cliffs, Spectrum, 1978.

--Yates, B. T. utcome analysis of_psychol_ ical service cystSpringfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1979.

Yates, E. T. Three basic stretegies for improving the cbst-effectivenessof social services., In Landsberg et al. (Eds )r Evaluation inpractice, 1979, 206-207. ,

Yates, B. T. Improving effectiveness and reducingheal Springfield, allihois: C. C. Thomas, 1980.

Yates B. T. Haven, W 'O., & Thoresen, C. E. Micro and macrocost-effectiveness analyses-at Learning House: How muchcbange for

how much money? In J. S. Stumphanzer (Ed.), Progress in haviortherapy with delin uents. Springfield, Ill.: 'Charles C. ThoMas,

Yates,_ B. T., & HaVen, W. A. - 1115-statement ALGOLW computer program for_ calculation and display, of cOst-effeCtiveness- indiCes. StanfordUniversity', 1975.

Yates, B. T.-, Haven, W.G., v& Thoresen, C. E. st-effectiveneasanalysis of a residential treatment center for disturbedpreadolescents. In Lindsberg at al. (Eds.), EValnatibn in-Practice,

_ _1979, 204205._

Zeckhauser,419 -464.

for valuing lives. Public Policy, 1975, 23,

Zeckhauser,_ Shepard* U. Where now for saving- lives? Law and --

-Contemporary Problems, 1978, 40,

Zelraan, W., Stone, A., & Davenport, S. Factars contributing tar i s tual= -in -reported--mental-health-costs=Administration in Mental Health, 1982, 10(1)_ -40-52.

Zumeta, W Doctoral programs d the labor market should werespond .to the "Ph.D. glut Hi her Education 1982, 1113), 321-343.