Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

download Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

of 41

Transcript of Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    1/41

    1 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Vodacom 4G

    RL10 LTE Trial Benchmark ReportNSN - Network Planning & Optimisation

    29 March 2011

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    2/41

    2 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Content

    Introduction

    LTE eNB Equipment Setup

    LTE Coverage Plots

    LTE Mobility Tests

    LTE Stationary Tests

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    3/41

    3 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Introduction

    Following the completion of LTE tests in the Vodacom Test Exchange, NSN installed two LTE eNBs inthe Germiston area. The aim was to setup two live sites that will allow for drive test measurements to becollected from a real network environment.

    The following requirements had to be met during site selection:1. The LTE sites were to share the 2100Mhz 3G RF spectrum and so the chosen site locations, as

    well as the immediate surrounding sites, should currently not be using the 3 rd 3G frequencyband (i.e. only existing 1/1/1 and 2/2/2 sites could be chosen)

    ▪ LTE would be configured to run on the third 5Mhz band (in the Vodacom Test Exchange the LTE eNBswere setup to run with 20Mhz bandwidth)

    2. Because the LTE sites would be co-located with existing 3G hardware, RF combining would not

    be possible within the BTS RF amplifiers. Instead RF combining would need to be done usingexternal MIMO combiners, or a separate antenna would have to be installed for the LTE signal

    ▪ It was decided that separate antennas would be used and so the chosen sites would needto have enough free tower capacity to accommodate the weight of the additional antennas

    ▪  Additional RF combining is not required in Multi-RF configurations (i.e. 2G/3G/LTEtransmitted through the same BTS hardware)

    3. The sites should be neighbours to allow for inter-eNB handover testing

    4. The sites should be configured with at least two sectors to allow for intra-eNB handover testing5. IP transmission, with a minimum of 40Mbps bandwidth, should be available to the sites

    6. The LTE sites would run on the commercial RL10 software release▪ It should be noted that RL20 is available as a commercial release since February 2011

    Two sites were identified in the Germiston area that met the requirements; Primrose and Driehoek.

    The following report provides a summary of the results from drive tests performed between February and

    March 2011.

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    4/41

    4 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    LTE eNB Equipment Setup

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    5/41

    5 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    LTE eNB Equipment Setup  – BTS HW

    The eNBs are setup to share the

    existing 3G 2100Mhz band and arefitted with the following hardwaremodules:

    • 1xFSME System Modules

    These are identical to the System Modulesused for all current 3G Flexi BTS deployment.The FSME module can be configured to

    process either WCDMA or LTE• 2xFRGP 2100Mhz 60W RF Modules

    Two RF modules were installed to allow forMIMO operation with a 1/1/1 20Mhz cellconfiguration.

    • Because the sites are sharing spectrum withthe existing 3G sites (which are currentlyrunning 2/2/2 WCDMA configurations), theeNBs have been configured with the followingcell configurations:

    1/1/0 5Mhz @ 20W• The picture on the right shows the eNB at

    Primrose during installation

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    6/41

    6 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    LTE eNB Equipment Setup  – BTS HW

    • The eNBs have beenconfigured with two RFmodules to allow for MIMOoperation

    • *Additional (currentlyunused) RF ports on themodules will allow for up to4-way UL diversity (in laterSW releases)

    Tx1/Rx1

    Tx2/Rx2

    Div Rx2

    Rx3*

    Rx4*

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    7/417 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    LTE eNB Equipment Setup - TMA

    For improved UL gain, the

    two eNBs have been fittedwith Dual-Input Mast Head

     Amplifiers (MHAs)• The amplifiers were lent to the trial

    by the Vodacom SGS Region

    • The amplifiers were taken out of theVodacom SGS Region spares store

    •  As can be seen in the picture, theDTMAs had previously alreadybeen used in the field

    • The model type is DTMARETFV3

    • The MHAs used are part ofstandard existing networkequipment and are suitable forMIMO operation

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    8/418 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    LTE eNB Equipment Setup - Antenna

    The eNBs were fitted with Kathrein XX-PolarisedDualband (900Mhz & 2100Mhz) antennas

    • X-polarised antennas rotate the V and H polarizationsgiving +/- 45 degrees slanted polarizations. Antennabranches admit equal power providing an ‘easier’signal from receiver perspective. This allows both RXand TX to be embedded to the same physical antennabox and hence provides a compact antenna design.

    • The antennas were lent to the trial by the Vodacom

    SGS Region• The amplifiers were taken out of the Vodacom SGS

    Region spares store

    •  As can be seen in the picture, the antennas hadpreviously already been used in the field

    •  Antennas were of model:

    Type No.: 742222XXPol Panel 806-960/1710-2170

    C 65°/60° 12/14dBi 0°/°0T

    • The antennas used are part of standard existingnetwork equipment and are suitable for MIMOoperation

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    9/41

    9 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    LTE eNB Equipment Setup  – Driehoek

    Driehoek LTE eNB

    1/1/0 5Mhz @ 20W

    Sector 1 PCI 100 Sector 2 PCI 101

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    10/41

    10 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    LTE eNB Equipment Setup  – Primrose

    Primrose LTE eNB

    1/1/0 5Mhz @ 20W

    Sector 2 PCI 201

    Sector 1 PCI 200

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    11/4111 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    LTE Coverage Plots

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    12/41

    12 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Predicted RF Coverage Plot

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    13/41

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    14/41

    14 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Driehoek & Primrose Terrain MapQuarry directly between the two sites provides a challenge for RF cover 

    Hill

    Hill

    Poor Coverage Area

    Poor Coverage Area

    Quarry/Dump Site

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    15/41

    15 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Driehoek & Primrose Terrain MapQuarry directly between the two sites provides a challenge for RF cover 

    Hill

    Hill

    Hill

    Hill

    Poor Coverage Area

    Poor Coverage Area

    Quarry/Dump Site

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    16/41

    16 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Driehoek & Primrose Terrain MapQuarry directly between the two sites provides a challenge for RF cover 

    Hill

    Hill

    Poor Coverage Area

    Poor Coverage Area

    Quarry/Dump Site

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    17/41

    17 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Total Received Wideband Power Field Measurements

    Drive tests show that the measured LTE

    coverage closely matches the predicted plot

    Poor coverage may

    result in loss of signalduring drive tests

    Poor coverage may

    result in loss of signal

    during drive tests

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    18/41

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    19/41

    19 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    LTE Mobility Tests

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    20/41

    20 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    LTE Coverage Drive Test Measurements (dBm)

    Poor coverage due

    to shadowing from

    the quarry hills

    Poor coverage due to

    shadowing from the

    earth/quarry mounds

    along the road

    Poor coverage due to

    shadowing from a hill

    and industrial buildingsalong the road

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    21/41

    21 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    SINR Measurements (dB)

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    22/41

    22 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Mobility DL Throughput Measurements

    Low throughput

    due to poor RSRP

    Low throughput

    due to poor RSRP

    Low throughput

    due to poor RSRP

    Low throughput

    at cell edge

    Throughput frequently

    between 25-31Mbps

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    23/41

    23 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Handovers (Intra and Inter eNodeB)

    Serving Physical Cell Identities representing Inter and Intra eNodeB Handover locations

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    24/41

    24 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    LTE Stationary Tests

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    25/41

    25 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Throughput and RTT (Stationery Tests)Test Scenarios

    Radio Conditions Tested:

    • Good Conditions: RSRP > -75dBm•  Average Conditions: RSRP -75dBm to -85dBm

    • Poor Conditions : RSRP < -100dBm

    DL & UL Tests:• Vodacom Speed Test

    • FTP Download

    • FTP Upload

    Round-trip Time Tests:

    • Vodacom Speed Test

    • Multiple Ping Commands

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    26/41

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    27/41

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    28/41

    28 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Very Poor Radio Conditions, RSRP= -120dBm3.6 Mbps DL Throughput on 5Mhz LTE

    The following test was performed at an RSRP of -120dBm

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    29/41

    29 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Driehoek Sector 1 (Good Radio Conditions)RSRP > -75dBm

     Average from three separate

    test sessions:

    Speed Test: 26,100 Mb/sec

    FTP DL: 27,5 Mb/sec

    FTP UL: 7,721 Mb/sec

    RTT: 25ms

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    30/41

    30 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Driehoek Sector 1 (Average Radio Conditions)RSRP -75dBm to -85dBm

     Average from three separate

    test sessions:

    Speed Test: 28,675 Mb/sec

    FTP DL: 25,1 Mb/sec

    FTP UL:7,692 Mb/sec

    RTT: 23ms

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    31/41

    31 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Driehoek Sector 1 (Poor Radio Conditions)RSRP < -100dBm

     Average from three separate

    test sessions:

    Speed Test: 14,669 Mb/sec

    FTP DL: 14,184 Mb/sec

    FTP UL: 5,406 Mb/sec

    RTT: 23ms

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    32/41

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    33/41

    33 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Driehoek Sector 2 (Average Radio Conditions)RSRP -75dBm to -85dBm

     Average from three separate

    test sessions:

    Speed Test: 27,386 Mb/sec

    FTP DL: 24.9 Mb/sec

    FTP UL:7,630 Mb/sec

    RTT: 25ms

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    34/41

    34 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Driehoek Sector 2 (Poor Radio Conditions)RSRP < -100dBm

     Average from three separate

    test sessions:

    Speed Test: 11,298 Mb/sec

    FTP DL:10,110 Mb/sec

    FTP UL:2,153 Mb/sec

    RTT: 27ms

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    35/41

    35 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Primrose Sector 1 (Good Radio Conditions)RSRP > -75dBm

     Average from three separate

    test sessions:

    Speed Test: 26,880 Mb/sec

    FTP DL: 27,4 Mb/sec

    FTP UL: 7,362 Mb/sec

    RTT: 24ms

    P i S 1 (A R di C di i )

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    36/41

    36 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Primrose Sector 1 (Average Radio Conditions)RSRP -75dBm to -85dBm

     Average from three separate

    test sessions:

    Speed Test: 28,011 Mb/sec

    FTP DL: 23,9 Mb/sec

    FTP UL: 7,576 Mb/sec

    RTT: 26ms

    P i S t 1 (P R di C diti )

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    37/41

    37 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Primrose Sector 1 (Poor Radio Conditions)RSRP < -100dBm

     Average from three separate

    test sessions:

    Speed Test: 9718 Mb/sec

    FTP DL:10,103 Mb/sec

    FTP UL: 1,316 Mb/sec

    RTT: 24ms

    P i S t 2 (G d R di C diti )

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    38/41

    38 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Primrose Sector 2 (Good Radio Conditions)RSRP > -75dBm

     Average from three separate

    test sessions:

    Speed test: 29,832 Mb/sec

    FTP DL: 30,4 Mb/sec

    FTP UL: 7,185 Mb/sec

    RTT : 25ms

    P i S t 2 (A R di C diti )

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    39/41

    39 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Primrose Sector 2 (Average Radio Conditions)RSRP -75dBm to -85dBm

     Average from three separate

    test sessions:

    Speed test: 29,814 Mb/sec

    FTP DL: 30,5 Mb/sec

    FTP UL:4,529 Mb/sec

    RTT: 25ms

    P i S t 2 (P R di C diti )

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    40/41

    40 © Nokia Siemens Networks

    Primrose Sector 2 (Poor Radio Conditions)RSRP < -100dBm

     Average from three separate

    test sessions:

    Speed test: 12,817 Mb/sec

    Ftp download:12,860 Mb/sec

    Ftp Upload: 6,856 Mb/sec

    RTT: 23ms

  • 8/15/2019 Docfoc.com-Vodacom LTE Trial Benchmark Report (2011.03.29)_Final.pdf

    41/41

    End  – Thank You!