Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0 Submission March 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 1 802.11...
-
Upload
ophelia-wood -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0 Submission March 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 1 802.11...
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 1
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
802.11 March 2009 Closing Plenary Reports
Date: 2009-03-12
Name Company Address Phone email Adrian Stephens Intel
Corporation +44 792 008
4900 (mobile)
Authors:
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 2
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Abstract
• This document is a digest of the closing reports of all 802.11 sub-groups for presentation at the March 2009 closing plenary meeting.
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 3
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
802.11 WG Editor’s Meeting (Mar 09)
Date: 2009-03-12
Name Company Address Phone email Adrian Stephens Intel Corporation [email protected]
Authors:
from slide 1 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 4
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Summary of actions – 2009-03-10
• Michelle to check Get802 status for .11r - done
• Nancy to publish MEC comments for .11w
• Adrian to ping Menzo on whether he has updated 11-08/0644r5 (numbering spreadsheet) – done, in process
• Goal: get TGz and TGp to have updated the numbering spreadsheet by May 09 meeting.
• All: please send draft status update via the editor’s reflector asap, but no later than Thursday am2 to update table on next page!
• Necati email to Michelle list of issues with templates
from slide 2 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 5
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Abstract / Agenda
• Roll Call / Contacts / Reflector
• Publication Work Plan
• Amendment Ordering / ANA Status / Draft Snapshots
• Draft naming rules
• Conference Calls
• Editorial Streamlining Projects
• Archival material– Lessons Learned
from slide 3 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 6
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Roll Call• Editor’s Present
– P802.11mb Amendment (REVmb) – Adrian Stephens– P802.11n Amendment (HT) – Adrian Stephens– P802.11p Amendment (WAVE) – Wayne Fisher– P802.11s Amendment (MESH) –Kazuyuki Sakoda (until end ‘09)– P802.11u Amendment (IW) -- Necati Canpolat– P802.11w Amendment (SEC) – Nancy Cam-Winget– P802.11v Amendment (WNM) – Emily Qi– P802.11aa Amendment (VTS) – Hang Liu
• Also present:• IEEE Staff present:
– Michelle Turner – staff editor for 802, [email protected]
• 802.11 Editor’s Not Present
– P802.11y Amendment (CBP) – Peter Ecclesine– P802.11z Amendment (TDLS) – Menzo Wentink
• IEEE Staff not present and always welcome!– Kim Breitfelder – manager publishing, [email protected]?– Michael Kipness – our staff liaison, [email protected]?
• Note: editors request that an IEEE staff member should be present at least during Plenary meetings
– Michelle Turner is present at this plenary meeting
from slide 4 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 7
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Volunteer Editor Contacts• TGn – Adrian Stephens – [email protected]
• TGp – Wayne Fisher – [email protected]
• TGs – Temporary: Kazuyuki Sakoda - [email protected]
• TGu – Necati Canpolat – [email protected]
• TGv – Emily Qi – [email protected]
• TGw – Nancy Cam-Winget – [email protected]
• TGz – Menzo Wentink– [email protected]
• TGmb – Adrian Stephens – [email protected] (TBC)
• TGaa – Hang Liu – [email protected]
• Editor Emeritus:
– TGk – Joe Kwak– [email protected]
– TGr – Bill Marshall – [email protected]
– TGy – Peter Ecclesine – [email protected]
from slide 5 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 8
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Reflector Updates
• Each editor is expected to be on the reflector and current.
• If you didn’t receive the meeting notice from the reflector, please send email to [email protected]
• To be updated:– None
from slide 6 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 9
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
IEEE Publication Status
• IEEE 802.11-2007 published and for free download with Get802– Published in June 2007
– Combines all existing amendments and includes maintenance work by TGma
• Publications completed for 802.11k, 802.11r and 802.11y, – 11k now available with Get802
– 11r now available with Get802
from slide 7 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 10
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
MEC Status
• P802.11n D6.0 has gone through Mandatory Editorial Coordination (document 11-08-1045r0)– SCC14 coordination done
– Second review by Michelle pending
• 11w has gone through Mandatory Editorial Coordination (09-????) in September– Action: Nancy to publish MEC comments for .11w
from slide 8 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 11
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Alignment Process for 802.11k/r/y
• The 08/0644r5 Numbering Spreadsheet has all changes from publication of 11k and 11r and 11y (and 11n D7.03 and 11w D7.0)
• ?? TGz has done it? • Action: Adrian to ping Menzo on whether he has updated 11-
08/0644r5 (numbering spreadsheet)• TGp – Wayne
• Goal: get TGz and TGp to have updated the numbering spreadsheet by May 09 meeting.
• Then discuss at May Meeting, expectation TGv correct numbering.
from slide 9 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 12
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Amendment & other ordering notes
• Editors define publication order independent of working group public timelines:– Since official timeline is volatile and moves around
– Publication order helps provide stability in amendment numbering, figures, clauses and other numbering assignments
– Editors are committed to maintain a rational publication order
• Numbering spreadsheet 08/0644:– Succeeding amendments to do their respective updates
– Must match the official timeline
from slide 10 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 13
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Numbering of Annexes and Clauses
• Proposal: TGMb will fix the ordering of annexes– Ample bad precedent set by 11k
– Bibliography should be the final annex per IEEE Standards Style Guide
• Clause numbering has similar issue during rollup– TGn clause 3a, 11r clause 11a, 11y clause 11.9a
• REVmb numbering will stay using “Amendment style” numbering until the very last possible moment.
from slide 11 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 14
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
ANA Announcements• Current ANA announced to group is 802.11-09-0031r2.
– See https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-09-0031-02-0000-ana-database-assigned-numbers.xls
– All new requests received by end of meeting will be uploaded and announced via 802.11 WG reflector
• No requests have been received directly from editors this week and acted on in preparation for publishing next version.
• Others as may arise before the editors conference call #1 will be included
• Procedure for ANA is contained in 07/0827r0.– See http://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/public/07/11-07-0827-00-0000-assigned-number-authority-ana-mechanisms.ppt
• Editorial Guidance– ANA assignments should be done at the time of moving from WG LB to
Sponsor ballot.– If a resource number is not in the ANA Database, please use <ANA> in drafts!– Editors to replace any ANA controlled resources numbers with <ANA> upon
incorporation of material into drafts.
from slide 12 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 15
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Amendment Ordering
Amendment Number Task Group REVCOM Date
802.11 Amendment 4 TGw Sept 2009
802.11 Amendment 5 TGn Jan 2010
802.11 Amendment 6 TGz Jan 2010
802.11 Amendment 7 TGp June 2010
802.11 Amendment 8 TGv June 2010
802.11 Amendment 9 TGu May 2010
802.11 Amendment 10 TGs Sept 2010
802.11 Revision 802.11mb Mar 2011
802.11-2011 Amendment 1 TGaa June 2011
802.11-2011 Amendment 2 TGac Dec 2012
802.11-2011 Amendment 3 TGad Dec 2012
• Data as of March 12 from 802.11 website. • See http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Reports/802.11_Timelines.htm
Amendment numbering is editorial! No need to make ballot comments on these dynamic numbers!
from slide 13 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 16
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Email Your Draft Status Updates
• Each editor, please send update for next page via the editor’s reflector no later than Thursday am2 to update table on next page!
from slide 14 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 17
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Draft Development Snapshot Most current doc shaded green.
TG
Published or Draft Baseline DocumentsSource MEC
Style
Guide EditorSnapshot
Date802.11 k r y w n z p v u s mb aa
w 2007 2008 2008 2008 8.0 Frame 7.2 Yes 2007 Nancy Cam-Winget
10-Mar
n 2007 2008 2008 2008 7.0 8.00 Frame 7.2 Yes 2007 Adrian Stephens
10-Mar
z 2007 2008 2008 2008 6.0 7.0 3.0 Word No 2007 Menzo Wentink
17-July
p 2007 2008 2008 2008 6.0 7.0 2.0 5.02 Frame 7.2 No 2007 Wayne Fisher
11-Mar
v 2007 2008 2008 2008 6.0 7.0 2.0 4.0 4.01 2.0 2.0 Frame 7.2 No 2007 Emily Qi Nov
u 2007 2008 2008 11.0 6.0 6.04 - - 4.0 4.02 Frame 7.2 No 2007 Necati Canpolat
Nov
s 2007 2008 2008 2008 7.0 7.02 3.0 5.0 4.01 4.02 2.07 Frame 7.2 No 2007 Kazuyuki Sakoda
15-July
mb
- - - - - - - - - - - - No draft yet Adrian Stephens
15-July
aa No draft yet Vacant xx
T (1.01) Frame 6 No 2007 Tom Alexander
20 -Mar
Changes from last report shown in red.
from slide 15 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 18
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Editorial Streamlining• Focus is on consistency across all TGs:
– Completed• Streamlined ANA processes – 07/0827r0• Consistent format for REDLINE contributions across TGs – 07/0788r0 • Consistent process for editorial comment resolution across TGs (WG & Sponsor) –
07/2050r0– Guideline for technical vs. editorial, sample editorial comment responses
• Format for comment reporting across TGs (WG & Sponsor) – 07/1990r0 (tool in 07/2116r0)
• Stable numbering method (See 07/2810r0)• Consistent naming of redlines (See 07/2810r0)• Draft templates for FRAME (no Word) to help train new editors more rapidly
– Under Construction (in priority order)1. Revise the editor’s guideline2. Mentoring program – Name a mentor for each new editor3. Request in future Plenary sessions Mondays 7:30pm Frame surgery 4. MIB element numbering and compiling – publish a rolled-up MIB of k/r/y5. Guideline on non-technical front matter6. Guideline describing expected editorial development and maturity of draft through
stages in 802.11 for consistency across TGs7. Guidelines for primitives – ARC to consider
from slide 16 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 19
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Draft naming convention• Drafts and redlines are .pdf files• Syntax: Draft <project>_<draft> [Redline [Compared to <project>_<draft>]].pdf
• Examples:
• Draft P802.11n_D8.0.pdf• Draft P802.11n_D8.0 Redline.pdf• Draft P802.11n_D7.04 Redline Compared to P802.11n_D7.03.pdf
Please use this convention for all drafts posted on the 802.11 website.
from slide 17 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 20
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
AOB
• Nancy: participant lists. TGn, r, y all different.– How do we define contributor list?
– Is second list, all letter balloters, or 802.11 members, or sponsor balloters?
– Michelle: every group does it differently.
– Nancy: defer to chair
• Necati: any update on templates?– Michelle: need to do another update with new frontmatter (new
board members)
– Issues with numbering of pages.
– Action: Necati email to Michelle list of issues.
from slide 18 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 21
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Archive Material
from slide 19 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 22
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Publication Work PlanNote: to be included in the editor’s operations manual
Here is the workflow we have used for a number of years with IEEE staff on publication of 802.11 publications:
1. Editors provide FRAME source and any freestanding graphics (Powerpoint, Visio. TIF) to staff at time of REVCOM submission.
2. Editors provide a list of requests editorial corrections no later than REVCOM approval date.
3. Staff prepares a publication draft and highlights changes they have made and questions they need addressed or confirmed. This draft is sent to Task Group Editor and the Working Group Technical Editor (me). This typically occurs about 2-3 weeks after approval for publication, since the preparation work is usually (but not always) begun ahead of approval. This is also typically the draft peer reviewed by IEEE staff.
4. The Task Group Editor responds to all questions on domain specific questions, with copy to Working Group editor (me). This typically takes about 3-5 days.
5. The Working Group Technical Editor reviews responses from the Task Group editor, completes any responses, and provides a list of WG officers and voting members valid for the document as of the opening day of the Sponsor ballot. This typically only takes one additional day from the prior step as most of the work is done in parallel by the two editors.
6. Final draft is submitted by the IEEE staff to Working Group Technical Editor and Task Group Editor for sign-off. Any changes from the responses or IEEE peer review are highlighted and explained. This typically takes only one or two days more after the responses are received from the editors.
7. Task Group Editor gives final approval. No changes are expected. This usually occurs within 24 hours.
8. Working Group Technical Editor signs off and provides draft to Working Group Chair. No changes are expected. This usually occurs within 24 hours and in parallel with the previous step.
9. Working Group Chair sends email to sponsor and IEEE staff letting them know the Working Group has signed off on the publication process.
from slide 20 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 23
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Terry Cole on Changes to MIB elements
• You can incrementally add to a MIB element without deprecation at any level. That is, add new values and meaning pairs.
•
• You can change the description of a MIB element without deprecation at any level. That is add new text clarifying or even changing the meaning of the element to keep up with the standard.
•
• I would advise deprecation when changing the definition of some value of a MIB from one thing to another. However, I don't know of any rules requiring this.
from slide 21 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 24
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Publications: lessons learned
• When quoting baseline text inaccurately, the baseline text is changed whether or not the changes were marked. The IEEE staff will actually do the appropriate changes as if the task group had actually intended to change the baseline.– Drafts can minimally quote baseline text to minimize such changes– Should revisit the decision to include full context during insertion
• Full Annex titles have to be shown in the amendment; more importantly included “normative” vs. “informative”– TGk inadvertently changed Annex A to be fully informative– TGr battled to fix Annex A but caused ripples– TGy 08-1215r1 has brief review of significant things changed for
publication– In editor’s operations manual and during balloting, should comment that
Annexes should be fully titled with good reason to vote “No” in balloting
from slide 22 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 25
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Publications: lessons learned (cont’d)
• Acronym rules are inconsistent– Styleguide doesn’t include definitions– Every document is treated as standalone, thus first acronym reference
must be spelled out. Even though, other amendments or baseline may have defined and used the acronym earlier.
– Goal should be to have as few changes between the final balloted amendment and final published amendment.
• How do we deal with subjective decisions made by the IEEE copy editors as their styles vary?
• Booleans should be capitalized: TRUE and FALSE– when “set to”
• Booleans should be lower case: is true and is false (raise the issue with Style Guide update)
from slide 23 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 26
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-13
Name Company Address Phone email
Stephen McCann Research in Motion (RIM) UK Ltd
200 Bath Road, Slough, Berkshire, SL1 3XE, UK
+44 1753 667099 [email protected]
Authors:
from slide 1 of 11-09/0367r0 by Stephen McCann, RIM
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 27
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Abstract
Closing report for Wireless Next Generation (WNG) Standing Committee
(SC) for March 2009, Vancouver, BC, Canada
from slide 2 of 11-09/0367r0 by Stephen McCann, RIM
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 28
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Presentations
• 11-09-0315-01-0wng-enhanced-security.ppt [Dan Harkins]– StrawPoll: A study group to develop a PAR and Five Criteria for Enhanced
Security for 802.11 should be created.
– Yes: 11, No: 1, Don’t know, Need more information:11, Don’t care: 6.
• 11-09-0338-00-0wng-enhancement-of-802-11-ad-hoc-mode.ppt [Chiu Ngo]– StrawPoll: Should IEEE 802.11 WNG receive further presentations on the
topic of performance improvement for IEEE 802.11 ad hoc mode?
– Yes: 10, No: 1, Abstain: 14
• 11-09-0337-00-0wng-802-next-generation-security.ppt [Richard Paine]
Discussion Point
• 11-09-0239-02-0wng-comments-on-802-22-input-to-08-260-petition-for-reconsideration.doc
from slide 3 of 11-09/0367r0 by Stephen McCann, RIM
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 29
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
ARC Mar ‘09 Summary Report
• Jan -> Mar:– Continued MAC breakdown work
• 3 tele confs extended model; • Shifting from component to functional orientation
• Mar F2F sessions– Advice request re MIBs
• Usage and inconsistency issues• Possible recommendation in development re MIB usage & SAP sequence data
flows– Proposal: Classification of mib vars into
• capability, status, control knob, “confused/mixed perceptions”• Internal/external to an entity
– MAC Functional Model Status • Updated snapshot in 9/118 “r latest” (will be updated after this week)
from slide 1 of 11-09/0333r1 by David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 30
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
ARC Planning for Mar -> May
• Conf Calls– Mar 31 18:00-19:00 ET
– Apr 14, Apr 28, 13:00-14:00 ET
• Next F2F sessions in May In Montreal
from slide 2 of 11-09/0333r1 by David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 31
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
March 2009 Closing Report for TGmbDate: 2009-03-12
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Matthew Gast Trapeze Networks 5753 W. Las Positas Blvd,
Pleasanton, CA 94588 USA +1 (925) 474-2273 [email protected]
Authors:
from slide 1 of 11-09/0407r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 32
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Abstract
Closing report for TGmb for March 2009 plenary meeting in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
from slide 2 of 11-09/0407r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 33
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGmb Status
Photo credit: Ted Percival (tedpercival on Flickr); used with permission
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tedpercival/2621455898/
(Yes, we found an editor…)
from slide 3 of 11-09/0407r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 34
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Accomplishments
• Elected Adrian Stephens as Technical Editor– Disbursed US$2.25 collected in fines for use of the word “editor”
– Adopted proposed editorial process
• Adopted new plan of record (see next slide)
• Continued processing comment spreadsheet– Discussed multi-BSS operation and power save
• Note: no interpretation requests were received
from slide 4 of 11-09/0407r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 35
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGmb Plan of Record May 2008 – Issue Call for Comment/Input July 2008 – begin process input and old Interpretation requests
Acknowledge previous Task Group referrals Sept 2008 – PAR revision process started Nov 2008 – close receipt of new input Nov 2008 – WG/EC approval of PAR Revision Dec 2008 – NesCom/SASB approval PAR Revision• May 2009 – First WG Letter ballot
– (includes All published Amendments as of May 2009)• Sep/Nov 2009 – Recirc start• November 2009– Form Sponsor Pool• January 2010 – Sponsor Ballot Start
– (Include all published amendments as of Jan 2010)• May 2010 – Sponsor Recirc• Jan 2011 – WG/EC Final Approval (conditional in Nov 2010)• Mar 2011 – RevCom/SASB Approval
from slide 5 of 11-09/0407r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 36
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Plans for May Meeting and Beyond
• Goal: Letter ballot after May 2009 meeting in Montréal
• Teleconferences planned to work on remaining open issues– Schedule and topics to be announced after WG approval of
teleconferences
• TGmb editorial team is still seeking reviewers to assist in checking draft changes– See 11-09/0250r0 for process and time requirements
from slide 6 of 11-09/0407r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 37
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Documents
• Agenda: 11-09/0341r1
• Minutes: 11-09/0325r0
• Current issues list: 11-08/1127r13
from slide 7 of 11-09/0407r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks
March 2009
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGn Closing Report Vancouver, BC, Canada 802 Plenary
Date: 2009-03-13
Authors:
+1 (321)427-4098
5488 Marvell Lane,Santa Clara, CA, 95054
Name Company Address Phone email Bruce Kraemer Marvell
Sheung Li SiBEAM
Adrian Stephens
Intel Corporation
15 JJ Thompson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0FD, UK
+1 (503)616-3800
555 Mathilda Ave,Sunnyvale, CA 94085
+1 (408)245-3120
from slide 1 of 11-09/0412r2 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 39
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Sponsor Ballot Recirculation #1 on TGn
Sponsor recirculation ballot closed March 07 and passed with a 80.1% affirmative vote (169 approve, 42 not approve, 17 abstain)77 comments received
During March meeting, All comments resolved, and editor empowered to create TGn Draft 9.0 for further balloting
from slide 2 of 11-09/0412r2 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 40
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGn - Primary March Meeting Documents
• SB #1 Comment Composite 11-09- 0024 r5• Meeting Report 11-09- 0219 r10• Editors Report 11-09- 0251 r1• Closing Report 11-09- 0412 r0• Meeting Minutes 11-09- 0326 r0• TGn Draft 8.0
from slide 3 of 11-09/0412r2 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 41
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Mar ’09 to May ‘09 TGn Teleconference Plan
Wednesday Blocking events
Ad hoc group Meeting chair Bridge # Passcode
Mar 11 Plenary
Mar 18 5 2457232
Mar 25 W topics Bruce Kraemer 5 5282348
Apr 01 W topics Bruce Kraemer 5 5228709
Apr 08 5 9662615
Apr 15 5 3527796
Apr 22 5 3309270
Apr 29 5 3813773
May 06 5 7927018
May 13 Interim
Call number: 916-356-2663 Call time: 11:00 – 13:00 ET
from slide 4 of 11-09/0412r2 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 42
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGn Timeline is Unchanged
Event Name Accepted Dates
Actual Previously Approved
Currently Published
PAR Approved Sep ‘03Initial WG Letter Ballot Mar ‘06Recirculation WG Letter Ballot
Oct ‘07
Form Sponsor Ballot Pool Jul ‘08Initial Sponsor Ballot Dec ‘08 Nov ‘08 Jan ‘09Recirculation Sponsor Ballot
Feb ‘09 Jan ‘09 May ‘09
Final WG Approval Jul ‘09 Nov ‘09Final EC Approval Jul ‘09 Nov ‘09RevCom/ Stds Board Approval
Sep ‘09 Jan ‘10
Publication Nov ‘09 Mar ‘10from slide 5 of 11-09/0412r2 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 43
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGp Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-13
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Stuart J. Kerry OK-Brit 1020 White Cloud Drive,
Morgan Hill, CA 95037, United States of America
+1 (408) 348-3171 [email protected]
Author:
from slide 1 of 11-09/0258r1 by Stuart J. Kerry (OK-Brit)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 44
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Abstract
TGp closing report for March 2009 meetings
from slide 2 of 11-09/0258r1 by Stuart J. Kerry (OK-Brit)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 45
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
March 2009 TGp Meetings Summary
• All LB# 141 Comment resolutions completed (many revisited with altered resolutions this week as a result of CRs)
– Original LB# 141 comments received:
• 221 comments, 83 were editorial
• 6 two-hour time slots this week plus Monday 1.5 hour ad-hoc slot
• Current working draft is D5.02• Voted to go to WG recirculation ballot• Presentation in doc: 11-09/0395r1 was made regarding a WAVE
ITS Station Technical Capabilities Summary
from slide 3 of 11-09/0258r1 by Stuart J. Kerry (OK-Brit)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 46
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Status
• Current draft D5.02 is on server
• Master Comment Resolution document 11-08-1452r6
• Represents LB# 141 CR changes from D5.0
• Plan to go to 2nd recirculation WG letter ballot• Weekly teleconferences planned for every Thursday @
15:00 ET - Piscataway time (commencing after letter ballot results are received, if 2nd recirculation LB approved by WG)
from slide 4 of 11-09/0258r1 by Stuart J. Kerry (OK-Brit)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 47
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGp Timeline Update
IN PROCESS - Standards, Amendments, and Recommended Practices
Form Sponsor
Ballot (SB) Pool
MEC Done
IEEE-SA Sponsor Ballots (SBs)
Final 802.11 WG Approval
Final or (Conditional)
802 EC Approval
RevCom & Standards Board
Final or Continuous
Process ApprovalANSI
Approved
Superseded or Withdrawn by Standards
Board
Initial Recirculation
Draft Date Draft DateMar-09May-09
Mar-09May-09
May-09Jul-09
Sep-09N/C
Jan-10N/C
Mar-10N/C
Jun-10N/C
N/AN/C
N/AN/C
Note:
• March 2009 session changes shown in Red on above chart
• N/C = No Change
from slide 5 of 11-09/0258r1 by Stuart J. Kerry (OK-Brit)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 48
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGp Motion to start 2nd Recirculation WG LBMotion:• Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received
from LB# 141 on 802.11 TGp Draft 5.0 as contained in document 11-08-1452-06-000p (TGp Comment Resolutions),
• Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 6.0 incorporating these resolutions and,• Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question
“Should P802.11 TGp Draft 6.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”
Moved by Stuart J. Kerry on behalf of TGp
TGp vote:
Moved: Alastair Malarky, Seconded: Wayne Fisher, Result: 8-0-1
from slide 6 of 11-09/0258r1 by Stuart J. Kerry (OK-Brit)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 49
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGs Vancouver Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-12
Authors:
from slide 1 of 11-09/0365r0 by Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 50
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Abstract
Report of TGs, Mesh Networking Task Group, to the March 2009 (Vancouver, British Columbia) 802.11 Closing Plenary.
TGs Motto: Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing left to add but when there is nothing left to take away.
from slide 2 of 11-09/0365r0 by Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 51
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGs Closing Plenary Report• TGs has achieved its goals for this meeting of
(1) completing resolution of all comments on its Draft D2.0 from LB #126 and (2) voting to go to Letter Ballot again.
• The current TGs comment resolution spread sheet is 11-08/493r43 and shows the resolution of all comments.
• Sony Corporation has agreed to continue sponsorship of Kazuyuki Sakoda as TGs temporary Editor through the end of 2009.
from slide 3 of 11-09/0365r0 by Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 52
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGs Closing Plenary Report
• TGs requests a 15 day procedural Letter Ballot to approve going to Working Group Letter Ballot with Draft D3.0.
• TGs requests Working Group approval for an ad hoc meeting Sunday, 10 May, in Montreal, Quebec, to work on comment resolution.
• TGs is holding teleconferences some Wednesdays through the July Plenary at 10:00 for up to 1 ½ hours. Dates: 6 May, 27 May, 10 June, 24 June, 8 July
from slide 4 of 11-09/0365r0 by Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 53
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGs Closing Plenary Report
• An annotated agenda for TGs at this meeting is available in 11-09/205r13. The draft minutes will be posted shortly as 11-09/312r0.
• Goal for the May 2009 TGs meeting in Montreal, Quebec:– Start resolving new Letter Ballot comments.
from slide 5 of 11-09/0365r0 by Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 54
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
End of Report
from slide 6 of 11-09/0365r0 by Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 55
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-13
Name Company Address Phone email
Stephen McCann Research in Motion (RIM) UK Ltd
200 Bath Road, Slough, Berkshire, SL1 3XE, UK
+44 1753 667099 [email protected]
Authors:
from slide 1 of 11-09/0366r0 by Stephen McCann, RIM
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 56
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Abstract
Closing report for TGu Interworking with External Networks for March 2009,
Vancouver, BC, Canada
from slide 2 of 11-09/0366r0 by Stephen McCann, RIM
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 57
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
• Re-circulation Letter Ballot 142 progress– Resolved all comments this week
– 10 submissions
– Ask WG for a 15 day re-circulation letter ballot
• Teleconferences– 15th April 2009 1hr 11 ET
– 22nd April 2009 1hr 11 ET
– 29th April 2009 2hr 11 ET
– 6th May 2009 2hr 11 ET
• Liaison– Reply to 3GPP CT1 regarding TGu elements for ANDSF (Access
Network Discovery and Selection Function)
• Plans for May 2009– LB comment resolutions
from slide 3 of 11-09/0366r0 by Stephen McCann, RIM
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 58
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
March 2009 Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-12
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Dorothy Stanley Aruba Networks 1322 Crossman Ave
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
+1 630-363-1389
Authors:
from slide 1 of 11-09/0399r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 59
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Abstract
This document contains the TGv closing report for March 2009.
from slide 2 of 11-09/0399r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 60
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Goals and Accomplishments
• Comment resolution from LB 140– Completed resolution of LB 140 comments
• Letter Ballot
• Acknowledgements– Thanks to David Goodall, for serving as secretary
from slide 3 of 11-09/0399r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 61
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Comment Processing Summary
Total 586
Technical 418
Editorial 168
Editor Done/To Do 306/280
Comment resolutions adopted to date 586
Comments remaining 0
from slide 4 of 11-09/0399r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 62
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Documents for 08/1467 comment resolutionCategory Volunteers Document
Annex S. McCann 09-0014
Collocated Interference Jari Jokela, Jing Zhu 09-0021
Diagnostics D. Stanley 09-0036
Event Joe Kwak 09-0194
FMS A. Thomson 09-0049
General D. Stanley 09-0009, 0019
Multicast Diagnostics Alex Ashley 09-0082, 0135
Location/Timing A. Thomson/Ganesh 09-0048, 0133
Proxy ARP D. Stanley 09-0028
Roaming Management Emily Qi 09-0116
SleepMode Emily Qi 09-0117
STA Statistics Y. Seok, G. Venkatsan 09-0109, 0131
TFS Emily Qi 09-0006
TIM Broadcast M. Wentink 09-0164
Traffic Generation Moo-Ryong Jeong 09-0169
Virtual AP Qi Wang 09-0069
TCLAS G. Venkatsan 09-0008
Channel Usage E. Qi 09-0005
Directed Multicast E. Qi 09-0007
Resolutions # CID # remaining
1/13, 1/6 5 0
1/13, LA 16 0
LA 19 0
LA 51 0
LA 28 0
LA 42 0
LA 14 0
LA 55/72 0
LA 4 0
LA 13 0
LA 19 0
LA 8 0
1/6 6 0
LA 16 0
LA 13 0
LA 27 0
1/6 1 0
1/6 3 0
LA 20 0
from slide 5 of 11-09/0399r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 63
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Output Documents
• 11-09-0399-00-000v-TGv-March-2009-closing-report.ppt
• 11-09-0215-07-000v-March-2009-agenda.ppt
• 11-09-0400-00-000v-March 2009 meeting notes
from slide 6 of 11-09/0399r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 64
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Motion
• Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB140 on TGv Draft 4.0, instruct the editor to prepare Draft 5.0 incorporating these resolutions and
• Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should TGv Draft 5.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”
• Mover: Allan Thomson• Seconder: Qi Wang• Result: 5-0-0
from slide 7 of 11-09/0399r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 65
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGv Timeline – Updated Sept, 2008 • Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: July 07 – completed
– Jan 08 – D2.0, May 08 – D3.0
• Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: November 08 (D4.0)– Mar 09 – D5.0, May 09 – D 6.0, July 09 – D7.0, D7.0(unchanged)
• Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: June 09• Initial Sponsor Ballot: Sept 09
– Sept 09 – D7.0
• Approved Sponsor Ballot: Nov 09– Nov 09 – D8.0, Jan 09 - D9.0, Feb D10.0, March D11.0– May 12th ( or so) for Revcom June Approval
• Final WG/EC Approval: July 2010 • RevCom/Standards Board Approval: June 4th/June 5th(or so)• Note: TGv PAR is authorized through Dec 2010
from slide 8 of 11-09/0399r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 66
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Goals for May 2009
• Comment resolution
• Recirculation Letter Ballot
from slide 9 of 11-09/0399r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 67
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
References
from slide 10 of 11-09/0399r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 68
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
IEEE 802.11 TGw March Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-11
Name Company Address Phone email Jesse Walker Intel Corporation 2111 N.E. 25th Ave,
Hillsboro, OR USA +1-712-1849 [email protected]
Authors:
from slide 1 of 11-09/0406r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 69
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Abstract
This presentation contains the closing report for the March 2009 meeting of IEEE 802.11 TGw
from slide 2 of 11-09/0406r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 70
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
March Meeting Objectives
• March Meeting Objectives– Schedule Teleconferences
– Discuss Public Action frames issue
from slide 3 of 11-09/0406r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 71
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Accomplishments
• Voted to rescind decision to initiate a Sponsor Ballot recirculation for P802.11w D8.0
– The resolution adopted in D8 breaks P802.11n Coexistence Management– Due to conflicting requirements on Public Action frames from different task groups
• Appear to reach a tentative consensus resolution of the Public Action Frame issue:
– 802.11w should create no problems for 802.11n for unicast Public Action frames, as protection is not required between two STAs for which a security association does not exist. Resolution: clarify the P802.11w draft.
– It is the intent of TGw that broadcast unprotected Management frames with a wildcard BSSID will be received. Resolution: clarify the P802.11w draft.
– The rules for setting the BSSID field of the Public Action frame may require work in TGn. For example, setting it to the transmitters BSSID probably doesn’t work. The rules for receiving and filtering Public Action frames based on the BSSID field need to be clarified. Resolution: TGn to clarify the P802.11n draft
from slide 4 of 11-09/0406r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 72
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Submissions
• 11-09/386r1 – Open report and agenda
• 11-09/388r0 – Meeting Minutes (Peter Yee)
• 11-09/406 – Closing Report
from slide 5 of 11-09/0406r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 73
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Teleconferences
• For 1 hour, on Wednesdays at 12:00 ET, through 1 week past the IEEE 802.11 May 2009 Interim Meeting except for:– March 23
from slide 6 of 11-09/0406r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 74
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Motion
• Motion: Move that the recirculation of P802.11w D8.0 be rescinded
• Mover: Allan Thomson
• Seconder: Stephen McCann
• Result: 9-1-0, motion passes
from slide 7 of 11-09/0406r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 75
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
May Meeting Planning
• Objectives– Comment Resolution for Recirculation Sponsor Ballot
• Conference Call(s)
from slide 8 of 11-09/0406r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 76
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGz Vancouver Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-13
Name Company Address Phone email Menzo Wentink Qualcomm Straatweg 66,
Breukelen, the Netherlands
+31-65-183-6231
Authors:
from slide 1 of 11-09/0415r0 by Menzo Wentink (Qualcomm)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 77
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGz Accomplishments
• TGz generated proposed resolutions for 68% of the LB143 comments– The resolutions are in 11-09-0313-01-000z
– 51 comments left (41 technical)
• Special thanks to Yongho Seok for filling in as the secretary this week!
from slide 2 of 11-09/0415r0 by Menzo Wentink (Qualcomm)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 78
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGz Goals for Montreal
• The goal for Montreal is to continue to work on LB143 comment resolution
from slide 3 of 11-09/0415r0 by Menzo Wentink (Qualcomm)
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 79
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
802.11aa – Robust Audio Video Transport Streaming Vancouver, British Columbia Closing Report
Date: 2009-03-12
Authors:
Name Affiliation Address Phone email Ganesh Venkatesan
Intel Corporation
JF3-336 2111NE 25th Ave
+1 503 334 6720
from slide 1 of 11-09/0384r1 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 80
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Abstract
This submission summarizes TGaa the activities of TGaa in the IEEE 802.11 Vancouver Session (March 2009).
Slide 80from slide 2 of 11-09/0384r1 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 81
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Alex Ashley – for volunteering to be TGaa secretary for the entire week.
Recognition
from slide 3 of 11-09/0384r1 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 82
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Since the Los Angeles session:• 2 Teleconferences focused on (a) OBSS and (b)
Reliable Multicast.Goals for the Vancouver Session:
• OBSS Adopt formal definition of OBSS for TGaa Listen, review and adopt OBSS solution into the TGaa draft
• Listen, review, down select and adopt Reliable Multicast mechanism(s) into TGaa draft
• Jointly meet with 802.1AVB: Discuss 802.11 specific input to DMN specification Discuss viability of the ‘drop precedence’ idea
Snapshot
from slide 4 of 11-09/0384r1 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 83
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
• OBSS Listened to four presentations on OBSS in the context of TGaa Started discussions on a strategy and plan for OBSS
• Reliable Multicast Reviewed the harmonized set of Reliable Multicast mechanism(s) Listened to 2 additional proposals on reliable multicast Adopted harmonized Reliable Multicast mechanism(s) into TGaa
draft
• Joint Meeting with 802.1AVB How to accommodate SRP in 802.11? Strategies for priority levels, precedence levels and drop
precedence• Teleconference schedule• Minutes from the session are in document 09//371r0
What we did this week?
from slide 5 of 11-09/0384r1 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 84
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Plans for the Montreal (May 2009) Session
In upcoming teleconferences• Layout a OBSS strategy and plan
• MRG discussions
• Additional mechanisms for Reliable Multicast
• Address other topics from TGaa PAR
Plans for May ‘09 (Montreal) Meeting• Continue activities from teleconferences
• Technical presentations on TGaa PAR topics
• Review and improve TGaa draft
Slide 84from slide 6 of 11-09/0384r1 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 85
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Teleconferences
Bi-weekly on Mondays between 1100-1230Hrs ET, starting March 23rd 2009 till July 27th, 2009.
Schedule will be announced in the TGaa reflector soon.
Slide 85from slide 7 of 11-09/0384r1 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 86
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Background details
from slide 8 of 11-09/0384r1 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 87
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Technical Presentations
1. Distributed Channel Assignment 09/285r0 Andrew Myles2. OBSS Analysis of Channel Requirements 08/1470r4 Graham Smith3. Overlapping BSS Proposal 09/230r0 Graham Smith4. OBSS OSQAP QoS Issues 09/347r0 Graham Smith5. Efficient Error Control Using Network Coding for Multicast Transmission 09/277r0
Kevin Rhee6. Feedback-jamming Multicast ARQ 09/.290r0 Jochen Miroll7. Quasi-reliable Multicast 09/247r0 Jochen Miroll8. More Reliable GroupCast Proposal Present 09/340r0 Hang Liu9. Drop Precedence in wireless, wired-wireless networks* 09/264r0 Alex Ashley10. AVB DMN and 802.11 09/0403r0 Philippe Klein11. Group addressed normative text 08/1244r2
Slide 87
* Discussed at the joint meeting with 802.1AVB
from slide 9 of 11-09/0384r1 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 88
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
What is OBSS?OBSS Definitions:•OBSS edge -- Any two APs operating in the same channel and can hear each other (either directly or via a STA associated to one of the APs)
•OBSS Graph – is a graph where APs are nodes of the graph and the edges are OBSS edges and every AP with in the OBSS graph can be connected via one or more OBSS APs to every other AP in the OBSS graph
•Length(OBSS graph) – longest shortest path between any two APs in the OBSS graph
•Size(OBSS graph) – number of nodes (APs) in the OBSS graph
Scope of TGaa OBSS Solution (proposed in Los Angeles session) –
if length(OBSS graph) <= 2 and the size(OBSS graph) <=3 , enable the OBSS QAP solution otherwise (a) backoff to legacy (non .11aa) mode or (b) use a different solution
from slide 10 of 11-09/0384r1 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 89
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Issues with the scope of OBSS solution?
(a)Length (OBSS graph) <= 2 is insufficient? – 2.4GHz band has only 3 channels and suffers in OBSS environment.
It is not in the scope of TGaa OBSS solution– If the number of channels is > 17, a length of greater than 2 is
improbable– A length of 7 or 8 is common in dense deployments if the number of
available channels is limited 9 or 11. This condition could be mitigated by having the QAPs fall back from 40MHz to 20MHz channels. Should TGaa specify a mechanism for this?
– Is a mechanism/solution that only addresses the scope as defined acceptable (despite the fact that consistent performance will not be met) as an incremental step over legacy?
(b)If a length of 7 or 8 is accepted to be the scope of the solution, it is not any simpler than the general OBSS problem (which is considered NP-Hard)
from slide 11 of 11-09/0384r1 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 90
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGac March 2009 Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-12
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Osama Aboul-Magd Nortel Networks 3500 Carling Avenue
Ottawa, ONT, Canada K2H-8E9
613-763-5827 [email protected]
Authors:
from slide 1 of 11-09/0409r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 91
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Abstract
This document is the closing report for the TGac for the March 2009 session
from slide 2 of 11-09/0409r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 92
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Submissions• 09/0305r0, “TGac Status and Timeline” Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks • 09/0161r2, “Usage Models”, Rolf De Vegt, Qualcomm• 09/0059r3, “Proposed Selection Procedure”, Rolf De Vegt, Qualcomm• 09/0306, “Proposal Regarding .11ac Evaluation approach”, Rolf De Vegt, Qualcomm• 09/307r1,” Evaluation of AoD and AoA for TGac Channel Models”, Hemanth Sampath,
Qualcomm• 09/364r0, “Comments on AOA and AOD Selection for a Multi-User SDMA Network”, JT
Chen, Ralink Technology • 09/308r1, “TGac Channel Model Addendum Document”, Hemanth Sampath, Qualcomm • 09/309r1, “TGac Channel Model Addendum Document Highlights”, Hemanth Sampath,
Qualcomm• 09/308r1, “TGac Channel Model Addendum Document”, Hemanth Sampath, Qualcomm• 09/345r0, “Indoor Channel Measurements for TGac ”, Minho Cheong, ETRI• 09/343r0, “W-PAN Structures Inside an OFDMA/SDMA W-LAN ”, JT Chen, Ralink
Technology • 09/0303r0, “Effect of SDMA in IEEE 802.11ac”, Naoki Honma, Kentaro Nishimori, Riichi
Kudo, Yasushi Takatori (NTT) • 09/0304r0, “TGac Functional Requirements”, Peter Loc, Ralink and Minho Cheong, ETRI• 09/0376, “Proposal for TGac Evaluation Methodology”, Minho Cheong and Peter Loc
from slide 3 of 11-09/0409r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 93
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Work Completed• Election of two Vice Chairs
– Menzo Wentink (Qualcomm)– Joonsuk Kim (Broadcom)
• Two TG motions passed– Accept 09-059r4 as the TGac baseline document for the selection procedure– Accept 09-0161r4 as the TGac baseline document for usage models
• Channel Models– Number of contributions related to channel models were presented– More work is needed before the TG accept a channel model baseline document.– Work is to continue on conference calls
• Functional Requirements– Agreed to include comparison criteria and simulation scenarios in the functional
requirements document– Work is to continue on conference calls
• Specification Framework– No relevant submissions.
from slide 4 of 11-09/0409r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 94
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
March 2009 Goals• Functional Requirements
– Continue the functional Requirement discussion with the aim to have a first draft available by March.
• Channel Models– Continue the discussion on the channel models.– Converge the different views on the channel models.
• Specification Framework– Initial view on the outline of the document
• Selection Procedure– Continue to refine the selection procedure described as needed
• Usage Models– Continue to refine usage models as needed.
• Technical Submissions
from slide 5 of 11-09/0409r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 95
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Conference Call Times
• Bi-Weekly, alternating with TGad• March 26
– 11:00 – 13:00 ET
• April 9– 20:00 -22:00 ET
• April 23– 11:00 – 13:00 ET
• May 7– 20:00 – 22:00 ET
• Possible Topics– Channel Models– Functional Requirements
from slide 6 of 11-09/0409r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 96
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
TGad March 2009 Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-13
Name Company Address Phone email Eldad Perahia Intel
Corporation
2111 NE 25th Ave Hillsboro, OR 97124
503-712-8081 [email protected]
Authors:
from slide 1 of 11-09/0410r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 97
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Abstract
This document is the closing report for the TGad for the March 2009 plenary session.
from slide 2 of 11-09/0410r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 98
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Work Completed• Task Group document development
– TGad Functional Requirements, 09/0228r1, Eldad Perahia– TGad Channel Model Requirements, 09/0323r0, Vinko Erceg– TGad Evaluation Methodology, 09/0296r1, Eldad Perahia
• Channel Modeling– Deterministic Channel Modeling for 60 GHz WLAN, 09/302r0, Martin Jacob– Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems, 09/336r0 & 09/334r0, Alexander Maltsev
• Joint 802.15.3c/TGad meeting– Common mode signaling (CMS) for intersystem coexistence enhancement, 09/0370r0,
Shu Kato– IEEE 802.15.3c DEV sync frame transmission for adjacent piconet coexistence,
09/0372r1, Zhou Lan– Tg3c beamforming overview, 11-09/0355r1, Ismail Lakkis– Introduction of TG3c channel model and beyond, 11-09/0375r1, Hirokazu Sawada– Review of TG3c Coexistence Assurance Document, James P. F. Gilb
• 15-09/0022r8, CA document• 15-09/0184r1, response to 802.19 comments• 15-09/0078r1, changes to CA document
• Technical submission– Implication of usage models on TGad network architecture, 09/0391r0, Carlos Cordeiro
from slide 3 of 11-09/0410r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 99
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Goals for May
• Continue working on task group documents– Motion initial draft of functional requirements &
evaluation methodology
• Technical contributions• Joint meeting w/ 802.15.3c
– TGad responses to March 802.15.3c presentations
– (suggested activities from minutes of March 15.3c/TGad joint meeting)
from slide 4 of 11-09/0410r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 100
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Conference call times
• Bi-weekly, alternate with TGac
• April 2 – – 11:00-13:00 ET
– Channel modeling
• April 16 -– 20:00-22:00 ET
– Channel modeling
• April 30 –– 11:00-13:00 ET
– Task group documents
from slide 5 of 11-09/0410r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 101
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
JTC1 Ad Hoc January 2009 Closing Report
Date: 2009-10-20
Name Company Address Phone email Jesse Walker Intel Corporation 2111 N.E. 25th Ave,
Hillsboro, OR USA +1-503-712-1849
Authors:
from slide 1 of 11-09/0405r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 102
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Abstract
This presentation summarizes the March 2009 meeting of the IEEE 802.11 JTC1 Ad Hoc.
from slide 2 of 11-09/0405r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 103
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
JTC1 March Meeting Goals
• Meeting Objectives for Vancouver– Complete and ratify liaison letter: 11-09/0168 “Response to
Liaison Letter 6N13770 from ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 WG1 to the IEEE 802 LMSC”
– Develop response to 11-09/207r0, 11-09/208r0, and 11-09/209r0
– Decide whether to progress 802.11-2007 to fast track
from slide 3 of 11-09/0405r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 104
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Accomplishments and Decisions
• Decided to follow advice from IEEE staff to defer progressing IEEE 802.11-2007 to ISO/IEC fast track ballot– IEEE staff and ISO negotiating issues with PSDO
• Completed 11-09/0168 “Response to Liaison Letter 6N13770 from ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 WG1 to the IEEE 802 LMSC” and requesting 802.11 WG to forward to EC for approval
• Completed 11-09/0351r1, “Response to liaison request to the IEEE 802 LMSC from ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 WG1 to review documents 6N13774, 6N13775, and 6N13776”
• Began forming WG position for the June 2009 SC6 Meeting in Tokyo
from slide 4 of 11-09/0405r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 105
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Documents
• 11-09/0350r1 – Agenda and Opening Report
• 11-09/404r0 – Meeting Minutes
• 11-09/168r6 – Liaison letter from P. Nikolich/EC responding to request from SC6
• 11-09/351r1 – Liaison letter from IEEE 802.11 Task Group reiterating WG position of 11-08/1166
from slide 5 of 11-09/0405r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 106
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Motion
• Motion: Move to forward doc. 11-09/0168r6, the liaison letter “Response to Liaison Letter 6N13770 from ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 WG1 to the IEEE 802 LMSC”, to the IEEE 802 LMSC Executive Committee for its approval
• Mover: Donald Eastlake III
• Seconder: Peter Yee
• Result: 4-0-0, motion passes
from slide 6 of 11-09/0405r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 107
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
Motion
• Motion: Move to send doc. 11-09/0351r1, a liaison letter to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group, “Response to liaison request to the IEEE 802 LMSC from ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 WG1 to review documents 6N13774, 6N13775, and 6N13776”
• Mover: Peter Yee
• Seconder: Donald Eastlake III
• Result: 4-0-0, motion passes
from slide 7 of 11-09/0405r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
March 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 108
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0
Submission
May Meeting Planning
• Objectives– Develop positions for June SC6 meeting
from slide 8 of 11-09/0405r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation