Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity...

26
Institute of Geodesy Torsten Mayer-Gürr 1 Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? Torsten Mayer-Gürr and Christian Pock WG Theoretical Geodesy and Satellite Geodesy Institute of Geodesy, NAWI Graz Graz University of Technology

Transcript of Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity...

Page 1: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 1

Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies?

Torsten Mayer-Gürr and Christian Pock

WG Theoretical Geodesy and Satellite Geodesy Institute of Geodesy, NAWI Graz

Graz University of Technology

Page 2: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 2

Goal: Geoid determination in Austria with cm accuracy

GARFIELD

Page 3: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 3

Input data: Gravimetric observations

72.723 observations in and around Austria

Accuracy for most data: << 0.1 mGal

Page 4: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 4

Fundamental equation of physical geodesy

“This error is [on a global average] on the order of ±20 cm in the geoidal height. This is one order of magnitude smaller than the accuracy implied by the present gravimetric and satellite data.”

Helmut Moritz (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: “This spherical approximation causes an error which is negligible in most practical applications.”

r

T

r

Tg 2

Linearized with spherical approximation

Connection

Is the fundamental equation of physical geodesy in linearized form (with spherical approximation) accurate enough to model the observations?

Page 5: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 5

Observation equations

Linearization of non-linear observation equations

)()()( 00

0

xxx

fxfxf

x

ellipsoidal height = orthometric height + geoid height

)(WNHh

),,( hBLWx Unknown parameter Gravity potential

),,(0 hBLUx Taylor point Normal potential

),,(0 hBLTxx Difference Disturbance potential

),,()( hBLgxf Observed Observed absolute gravity

),,()( 0 hBLxf Computed Normal gravity

with 00 N

Page 6: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 6

with

Observation equations

Linearization of non-linear observation equations

)()()( 00

0

xxx

fxfxf

x

),,( hBLWx

),,(0 hBLUx

),,(0 hBLTxx

Unknown parameter

Taylor point

Difference

Observed ),,()( hBLgxf

Gravity potential

Normal potential

Disturbance potential

Observed absolute gravity

Normal gravity Computed

00 N

)( 0

0

xxx

f

x

Linear model

r

T

r

T2

Fundamental equation in physical geodesy

(In spherical approximation)

)()( 0xfxf Reduced observations gNHBL

NHBLg

),,(

),,(

0

(Free air) gravity anomalies

),,()( 00 hBLxf

r

T

r

Tg 2

Page 7: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 7

Observation equations

Linearization of non-linear observation equations

)()()( 00

0

xxx

fxfxf

x

x

)(xf

0x

)( 0xf

Possible improvements of accuracy:

1. Better linearization (without spherical approximation)

Page 8: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 8

Observation equations

Linearization of non-linear observation equations

)()()( 00

0

xxx

fxfxf

x

x

)(xf

0x

)( 0xf

Possible improvements of accuracy:

1. Better linearization (without spherical approximation)

2. Inlcude quadratic terms

Page 9: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 9

Observation equations

Linearization of non-linear observation equations

)()()( 00

0

xxx

fxfxf

x

x

)(xf

0x

)( 0xf

Possible improvements of accuracy:

1. Better linearization (without spherical approximation)

2. Include quadratic terms

Page 10: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 10

Observation equations

Linearization of non-linear observation equations

)()()( 00

0

xxx

fxfxf

x

x

)(xf

0x

)( 0xf

Possible improvements of accuracy:

1. Better linearization (without spherical approximation)

2. Include quadratic terms

3. Better Taylor point

Page 11: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 11

Observation equations

Linearization of non-linear observation equations

)()()( 00

0

xxx

fxfxf

x

x

)(xf

0x

)( 0xf

Possible improvements of accuracy:

1. Better linearization (without spherical approximation)

2. Include quadratic terms

3. Better Taylor point

Page 12: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 12

Geoid Satellite model GOCO05s

Taylor point

Approximate values (Taylor point)

Classic ),,()( 00 NHBLxf

),,()( 0 satsat NHBLgxf New approach

with 00 N

Page 13: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 13

Geoid Satellite model GOCO05s ),,(),,(),,( rZrVrW Gravity potential:

Taylor point

Approximate values (Taylor point)

Classic ),,()( 00 NHBLxf

),,()( 0 satsat NHBLgxf satsat W gNew approach

with 00 N

12

0

1

0

),(),(),,(max n

m

nmnmnmnm

nn

n

SsCcr

R

R

GMrV Gravitational potential:

sin2

1),( 2rrZ Centrifugal potential:

rW

rW

rW

zW

xW

xW

Wg

sinGravity:

Page 14: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 14

Reduced observations

gg

Classic approach

satgg g

New approach

Page 15: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 15

Reduced observations

satggg

Classic approach

satgg g

New approach

Page 16: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 16

satggg

Reduced observations

Classic approach

satgg g

New approach

Difference

Page 17: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 17

Reduced observations

satggg

Classic approach

satgg g

New approach

Page 18: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 18

Topography

Gravitational potential from topographic masses

)()(),(

1)( QQ

QP

P dl

GT rrrr

r

Satellite model includes topographic effect

Topography without satellite model part

N

n

topo

ntopotopo TTT0

Spherical harmonic expansion of topography

0

1

)()(n

n

nm

Pnm

topo

nm

n

Ptopo Yar

R

R

GMT rr

)()()(

'

)12(

1QQnmQ

n

topo

nm dYR

r

nMa rrr

Page 19: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 19

Reduced observations

satggg

Classic approach

satgg g

New approach

Page 20: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 20

Reduced observations

Classic approach New approach

toposat gggg toposatgg gg

Page 21: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 21

Reduced observations

Classic approach New approach

toposat gggg toposatgg gg

Page 22: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 22

Reduced observations

Classic approach New approach

toposat gggg toposatgg gg

Difference

Page 23: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 23

Reduced observations

Classic approach New approach

toposat gggg toposatgg gg

Page 24: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 24

Estimated Geoid

Classic approach New approach

toposat gggg toposatgg gg

Residual geoid Residual geoid

Page 25: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 25

Estimated Geoid

Classic approach New approach

toposat gggg toposatgg gg

Residual geoid Residual geoid Difference

Page 26: Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? · Do we need a new definition of gravity anomalies? ... (1980), Advanced physical geodesy: ... Linearized with spherical approximation.

Institute of Geodesy

Torsten Mayer-Gürr 26

Summary

gg

Not accurate enough for geoid computation

satgg g

Generalized definition: Gravity anomalies = Observed absolute gravity – Computed gravity from an approximate model

Classical definition: Gravity anomalies = Observed absolute gravity - Normal gravity