Do not duplicate or distribute without permission from ... · T1N0M0 > RT T1N1-3, T2-T4 any N 1....

NPC

Lisa Licitra

H&N Medical Oncology Dept

Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori

& University of Milan

ItalyDo not duplica

te or distr

ibute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Former TYPE 1 Keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (8071/3)

Former TYPE 2 Non keratinizing carcinomas (8072-3/3)

Differentiated non keratinizing carcinoma (8072-3/3)

Undifferentiated carcinoma (undifferentiated carcinoma of

nasopharyngeal type) (8020/3)

Former TYPE 3 Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma (8083/3)

Histological types WHO

25%

60%

12%

Do not duplicate or d

istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

EBV genomic variations are affected by: -geographic distributions, -environmentalinfluences-disease subtypes-phase of EBV latency


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

NATURAL HISTORYGenetic, EBV latent infection, environmental carcinogenesis

Inherited (germline mut + EBV), endemic (gene polymorph + EBV) , sporadic(EBV + carcinogens)

Salted fish exp early life exposure, smoking

Familial cluster

M > F

40-60 peak age

Survival declining in EU!


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Prognostic factors

◼ Keratynisation

◼ TNM (supraclavicular nodes, masticatory space, T1

and T3)

◼ Tumor volume

◼ Gender F > M

◼ Age only in M

◼ QOL

◼ BMI

◼ IMRT

◼ Molecular: EGFR hx, p53 hx, PI3KCA, ERBB2, ERBB3

mut, miRNA, gene signature12/12/2018 6


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

EBV-DNA testing

7

Screening for early NPC

Prognosis

Risk stratification for treatment

Disease surveillanceDo not duplica

te or distr

ibute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

- OS according to EBV DNA value

1 week post treatmentPre-treatment value

Prognostic/Predictive Factors


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

2013

Plasma: DNA was extracted and EBV DNA copy number was determined by real-time quantitative PCR (BamHI-W primer/probe)Do not duplica

te or distr

ibute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

11

Guidelines for delineation


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

NCCN Guidelines 2018

12/12/2018 12

◼ T1N0M0 > RT

◼ T1N1-3, T2-T4 any N

1. Multimodality clinical trial

2. Concurrent CT/RT > Adjuvant CT

3. CT/RT (category 2B)

4. Induction > CT/RT (category 3b)

◼ M1

1. Trial

2. CT/RT

3. CT


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

JNCI,2011Do not duplicate or d

istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

12/12/2018 15

2018


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

12/12/2018 18Do not duplica

te or distr

ibute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

20


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO


te or distr

ibute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Hong Kong NPC Study Group 0502 Trial <br />(NCT00370890)

Presented By Anthony Chan at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Primary endpoint: Relapse free survival

Presented By Anthony Chan at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Overall survival in EBV DNA screening population

UICC stage

Post-RT plasma EBV DNA level

a) Post-RT plasma EBV DNA undetectable (=0 copy/ml)

b) Post-RT plasma EBV DNA detectable (>0 copy/ml)

IIB

III

IVAB

IIB

IIB

III

III

IVAB

IVAB

0

1-49

50-499

≥500


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Pts < 60 yrs

Excluded T3-T4N0

TPF at reduced doses (60-60-600)


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO


te or distr

ibute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (NCRT+CCRT) Versus CCRT Alone in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Presented By Ming-Yuan Chen at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Excluded T3N0, N1 Do not duplicate or d

istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Efficacy analysis

Presented By Ming-Yuan Chen at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

34


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

35


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

12/12/2018 36

CCR 2018


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Metastatic disease

◼ CDDP based RR 63-75%

◼ CDDP + Gem first line SOC

◼ Other active drugs: Taxanes, IFO, FU,

capecitabine,vinorelbine, gemcitabine , MTX, EDX,

cetuximab (11%)

◼ Non active drugs: TKI

◼ Immunotherapy: CTL, to disrupt EBV cell latency

(azactidine..), Nivo: 20% RR, PFS @1yr 19%

◼ Oligometastatic disease


te or distr

ibute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO


te or distr

ibute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

12/12/2018 39

2018


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Conclusions

◼Rare disease

◼CT is beneficial in NPC

◼Refinement of pts selection for

neoadjuvant/adjuvant (?) CT based on

prognostic factors and biology

◼Biological agents


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Sinonasal

Cancers


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

FACTS in EUIncidence

n/100.000

Survival @ 5 yrs

Epithelial nasal and

sinonasal cavity cancers

<1

SCC 50%

Lymphoepithelial 27%

SNUC 34%

ITAC 50%

Salivary gland tumor

types

69%

http://www.rarecare.eu/Do not duplica

te or distr

ibute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

WHO 2017Keratinising SCC

Non keratinising SCC

Spindle cell SCC

Lymphoepithelial

SNUC

NUT carcinoma

Neuroendocrine

Small cell neuroendocrine

Large cell neuroendocrine

Adenocarcinomas

ITAC

Non ITAC

TeratocarcinosarcomaDo not duplica

te or distr

ibute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

WHO 2017

• Sarcomas

• 12 subtypes

• Neuroectodermal tumors

• Ewing

• ONB (Hyams grading)

• MMDo not duplicate or d

istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

New described

epithelial entities• NUT midline carcinoma (NMC):

cromosome rearrangement

NUT/BRD4 + variants (NUT1

protein in IHC)

• HPV related carcinoma with

adenoid cystic like features (HPV

33)

• SMARCB1 (INI-1) deficient


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Am J Surg Pathol 2017Do not duplica

te or distr

ibute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

2018


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Cancer 2017


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

2018

54 pts


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Which chemotherapy?

• Maximise localregional and distant sites effect

• Histotype driven


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Response to

induction CT

is a strong

prognostic factor

Median survival:

CR → 21+ months

PR → 13.5 months

NR → 3 months

Hanna 2010

Licitra 2003


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Bossi Cancer Treat Reviews 2015Do not duplica

te or distr

ibute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Turri Zanoni Oral Oncol 2017Do not duplicate or d

istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

First evidence: TP53 predict pCR to induction chemotherapy


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Functional p53 determinants of pCR


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Head and Neck 2016

SCC


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Multidisciplinary approach for poor prognosis sinonasal tumors:

Phase II study of chemotherapy, surgery, photon and heavy ion radiotherapy

integration for more effective and less toxic treatment in

operable and inoperable patients

SINTART1 (OPERABLE PATIENTS)

Study design:

Ph II, single-arm, open-label, multicenter studies

SINTART2 (INOPERABLE PATIENTS)

Study design:RC/RP >80%:

heavy ion based RT+ CT

no RC or RP <80%:

Surgery + Heavy ion based RT+CT

histology-driven CThistology-driven CT

heavy ion based

RT+ CT

AJCC stage: II-III-IVa

AJCC stage: Tb4

Sample size: 40 patients

Sample size: 25 patients

Primary endpoint: 5-yr PFS from 40 to 65%

Primary endpoint: 5-yr PFS

from 14% to 40%

Protocol: SINTART1 // SINTART2Sponsor: Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano PI: Dott.ssa Lisa Licitra


istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Conclusions

• WHO classification

• Multimodal therapeutic approach that

includes surgery, radiation and histotype

driven chemotherapy

• Biology to be exploited

• Multinational collaborationsDo not duplicate or d

istribute without

permiss

ion from author a

nd ESO

Do not duplicate or distribute without permission from ... · T1N0M0 > RT T1N1-3, T2-T4 any N 1....

Documents

Transcript of Do not duplicate or distribute without permission from ... · T1N0M0 > RT T1N1-3, T2-T4 any N 1....