DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen...

25
DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Biology Temple University School of Medicine Philadelphia, PA 19140

Transcript of DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen...

Page 1: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived

in vitro vs. in vivo

Carmen Sapienza

Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular BiologyTemple University School of Medicine

Philadelphia, PA 19140

Page 2: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

ART vs. in vivo conception: • Neural tube defects - 3X (Ericson and Kallen, 2001)• “Major” birth defects - 2X (Hansen et al., 2002)• Respiratory disease - 3.5X (Koivurova et al., 2003)• Low birth weight - 2.6X (Schieve et al., 2002)

ART and imprinting defects:• Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome - 5.4 - 8.1X• Angelman syndrome - ?X (3/3 imp.def.)

• Animal models demonstrate “LOI”, “LOS”

Page 3: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

EnvironmentGenes

Changes in Epigenotype

Long-Term, Somatically HeritableChanges in Gene Expression

“Genes + Environment” Phenotype

Effectors of cellular stressresponses

Page 4: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

Do Children Conceived in vitro Differ from Children Conceived

in vivo in “Epigenotype” ?

Page 5: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

Experimental Designs for Small Effects• Compare many individuals at few “likely suspect”

loci • Compare few individuals at many loci

– Placenta and cord blood DNA - 10 ART children versus 12 Control children

– Methylation at 1,536 CpGs in promoters of more than 700 genes (highly biased selection)

• 205 CpGs in DMRs of all genes known or suspected to be imprinted/expressed from only one allele

– Use DNA methylation differences to select candidate genes for analysis of mRNA levels in a larger number of individuals

Page 6: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

“GoldenGate” assay (Illumina, Inc.): fraction of methyl C at a CpG sitehybridization/synthesis/ligation/PCR in bisulfite treated/untreated DNA

Page 7: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

Data Filtering for Candidate Genes:

Reduction of false positives: require 2 CpGs differ in the same gene

Reduction of false negatives: reduce stringency CpGs differ at P<0.08

Result: 78 genes “different” in cord blood 40 genes “different” in placenta

Page 8: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.
Page 9: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

EnvironmentGenes

Changes in Epigenotype

Long-Term, Somatically HeritableChanges in Gene Expression

“Genes + Environment” Phenotype

Effectors of cellular stressresponses

Page 10: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

Absolute range of difference small…

Page 11: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.
Page 12: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

Absolute range of difference moderate…

Page 13: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

PYY in Placenta

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

cg03384000

cg22028686

ARTControl

Absolute range of difference large…

Page 14: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

EnvironmentGenes

Changes in Epigenotype

Long-Term, Somatically HeritableChanges in Gene Expression

“Genes + Environment” Phenotype

Effectors of cellular stressresponses

Page 15: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

Assume cis-acting epigenetic differences linked to steady-state mRNA levels

Page 16: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.
Page 17: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.
Page 18: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.
Page 19: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.
Page 20: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.
Page 21: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

Do Children Conceived in vitro Differ in “Epigenotype” from Children Conceived in vivo?

As a group, yes. But most individuals are within the

“normal” range.

Page 22: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

Associated Phenotype?

CEBPA, MEST, NNAT and SERPINF1 all involved in adipocyte

differentiation/development or insulin signaling

Link between low birthweight – later obesity/hypertension type 2 diabetes?

Page 23: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

Conclusions • in vitro conception is associated with

significant DNA methylation differences in 6-10% of genes assayed

• in vitro conception-associated methylation differences are associated with significant differences in steady state mRNA levels of 20-40% of affected (highly selected) genes

• the level of expression of individual genes in some in vitro children is more than two standard deviations from the in vivo mean

Page 24: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

Many Questions…

• Infertility, per se, ART or both? • If infertility - genetic, environmental, male

factor, female factor?• If ART – gonadotropins, ICSI, IVF, culture?• Are differences between groups (preexisting

or alleged “changes”) random or are some genes more susceptible than others? (useful in predicting phenotype/treatment?)

Page 25: DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro vs. in vivo Carmen Sapienza Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular.

Acknowledgments

Fels Institute for Cancer Research,Temple University School of MedicineNahid Turan, Ph.D. (Temple)Sunita Katari, M.D. (Temple)Oluwatoyin Erinle, B.A. (Temple)Halleh Asadpour, B.S. (Temple)Margaret Brannigan, B.A. (Temple)Noa Holzman (Cornell)Leigh Gerson, B.S. (Temple)Sidd Kosaraju (Duke)

Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility,University of PennsylvaniaChristos Coutifaris, M.D., Ph.D. (Penn)Raffi Chalian, M.D. (Penn) Michael Foster, B.A. (Penn)

Research supported by NIH R01 HD048730