Diversity Update 2011 September 2011
description
Transcript of Diversity Update 2011 September 2011
Diversity Update 2011
September 2011
Equity Scorecard FrameworkAccess
Excellence
Institutional Receptivity
RetentionEquity in
Educational Outcomes
The Equity Scorecard was developed by Dr. Estela Mara Bensimon at the Center for Urban Education, University of Southern California (http://www.usc.edu/dept/education/CUE/).
Each of the four perspectives has an objective.
From this objective we can:-Measure baseline performance - Set an
improvement target
- Work towards equity in educational outcomes.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Demographic Variables for Analysis
This presentation is limited to variables for which we have quantitative information, including: Race/ethnicity Income level First-generation in college Gender Geographic diversity. Information is not systematically available for other groupsthat are important to inclusive excellence.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Components:• Enrollment
– Undergraduate– Graduate– Professional– School/College
• Pipeline• Financial Aid/Need-Based
Aid• Majors/Degrees
Access
Excellence
Institutional Receptivity
Retention
Access
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
RevisedRace/Ethnic Categories
Southeast Asian Collection BeginsRace/Ethnicity Collection Begins
Minority Students, 14.5%
Targeted Minority Students, 9.9%
From 2002 to 2011 4.9 percentage
point increase in Minority Enrollment
3.7 percentage point increase in Targeted Minority Enrollment
Indicator 1: Percent Enrollment of MinorityUndergraduate Students
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). Minorities include targeted minorities as well as Other Asians and Native Hawaiians. International students are not counted for targeted minority collections.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2011 data is preliminary.
Race/Ethnic Categories: Students
Continued terminology from Plan 2008
Excludes all Asians, useful for national peer comparisons.
• Targeted Minorities include:» African American» Native American» Hispanic/Latino/a» Southeast Asian (Cambodians,
Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong)
• Minorities include:» Targeted Minority categories» Other Asians» Native Hawaiians
Students self-report their race/ethnicity at the time of application.http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
International students are not counted in any of these collections, in keeping with state/federal guidelines.
Access: Enrollmenthttp://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Reporting Methodologies for Race/Ethnicity InformationThe relatively new ability to indicate multiple race/ethnic values results in a much richer picture of student diversity but data reporting is more complicated. To deal with these complexities, methodology options for data reporting have emerged . The method that is most appropriate depends on for what purpose the data will be used. The table below describes the features of each method and shows how the methods are similar and different from each other.
Reporting Feature Primary Federal Count All
Results in single count of students P PPrioritizes Hispanic/Latina(a) over other values PCreates new categories that are not reported by students themselves P
Displays race/ethnic values only for domestic (non international) students P P P
Displays ALL students who indicate a particularrace/ethnicity P
Prioritizes some race/ethnicities over others P PUsed in external data reporting and rankings P
Access: Enrollmenthttp://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Fall 2011 UW-Madison Students by Race/Ethnicity and Methodology
“Primary” Federal Count All
Hispanic/Latino(a) 1,698 1,735 1,735
Black or African American 1,219 1,033 1,315
American Indian or Alaska Native 399 136 418
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 107 38 124
Asian 2,477 2,160 2,564
White 31,083 31,083 32,527
Two or more races --- 798 ---
Unknown 1,088 1,088 1,088
International 4,370 4,370 4,370
Total 42,441 42,441 44,141
Subsequent slides use “Primary” race/ethnic methodology
Indicator 2: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Undergraduate Students by Race/Ethnicity
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
2.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.5% 2.7% 2.9% 2.9% 3.0% 2.8% 2.8%
1.0% 1.2% 1.4% 1.6% 1.7% 1.8% 1.8% 1.9% 1.9% 1.8%0.5% 0.5%0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 1.0%2.4% 2.4%2.6%
2.8%3.1%
3.3% 3.6%3.8% 3.9% 4.3%
% o
f Tot
al U
nder
grad
uate
s
His-panic/ Latino/a
Native American
SE Asian
African Ameri-can
From 2002 to 2011: Increases in
undergraduate enrollment in all race/ethnic categories
3.7 percentage point increase in undergraduate targeted minority enrollment
International Students: 6% of Undergraduate Enrollment2011 data is preliminary.
From 2002 to 2011: 3.1 percentage
point increase in first-year undergraduate targeted minority enrollment
Indicator 2 Detail: Percent Enrollment of First-Year Targeted Minority Undergraduates, by Race/Ethnicity
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
2.6% 2.7% 2.7% 2.9% 3.3% 3.0% 2.6% 3.0% 2.6% 2.8%
2.1% 1.5% 1.9% 1.9%2.0% 2.2%
1.6%2.2%
2.2% 2.0%
0.5%0.6%
0.8% 0.6%0.6% 0.9%
0.9%
1.2%1.0% 1.0%
2.8%2.6%
3.3% 3.4%3.7% 3.7%
4.2%
4.7%
3.7%5.2%
% o
f Tot
al F
irst Y
ear U
nder
grad
uate
s
His-panic/ Latino/a
Native American
SE Asian
African American
2011 data is preliminary.
Nebraska
Iowa
Indiana
Missouri
Oregon
Penn State
Colorado
Stony Brook
Minnesota
Texas A & M
Virginia
Arizona
Florida
Texas
Rutgers
UC-Davis
UC-San Diego
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
N = 1,787N = 2,135N = 2,003N = 2,042N = 3,797N = 3,900N = 2,917N = 2,776N = 2,446N = 4,042N = 5,579N = 6,193N = 4,118N = 2,757N = 2,511N = 6,087N = 5,903
N = 5,952N = 9,060N = 4,339N = 3,781
N = 8,449N = 9,493
N = 9,049N = 11,795N = 11,943
N = 16,039N = 8,557N = 13,156
N = 14,408N = 13,949N = 15,355
N = 14,752N = 15,415
Percent of Undergraduates
Percent of Undergraduates who are Minorities at AAU Public Institutions, Fall 2009
Average Percent Minority for AAU Public Institutions: 27%
9 AAU Public Institutions have a lower percent of minority students than UW-Madison.
12 AAU Public Institutions have a smaller number of minority students than UW-Madison.
Access: Peers
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Source: IPEDS Fall Enrollment, Fall 2009
80%
Indicator 3: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Graduate Students, by Race/Ethnicity
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
From 2002 to 2011: Increases in
graduate student enrollment in all race/ethnic categories
2.8 percentage point increase in graduate targeted minority enrollment
International Students make up 24.3% of graduate enrollment
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
2.2% 2.1% 2.2% 2.1% 2.3% 2.5% 2.7% 2.7% 2.6% 2.7%
0.6% 0.5% 0.3% 0.5% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 1.0%0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.5%0.6% 0.7% 0.8% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%2.4% 2.5% 2.5% 2.7%2.8% 2.9% 2.9%
3.2% 3.5% 3.7%
% o
f Tot
al G
radu
ate
Stud
ent E
nrol
lmen
t
Hispanic/ Latino/a
Native American
SE Asian
African American
2011 data is preliminary.
• From 2002 to 2011: 1.4 percentage
point increase in professional targeted minority enrollment
International Students make up 4.6% of professional student enrollment
Indicator 4: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Professional Students, by Race/Ethnicity
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
3.2% 3.6% 3.4% 3.9% 4.0% 4.4% 4.5% 4.1% 4.2% 4.2%
0.4%0.3% 0.4%
0.7% 0.9%1.3% 1.6%
1.6% 1.3% 1.2%1.2% 1.1% 1.0%
0.9% 1.1%1.2%
1.3%1.2% 1.0% 1.0%
3.5%4.0% 4.1%
3.5%3.6%
3.7%3.7%
3.4% 3.4% 3.3%
% o
f Tot
al P
rofe
ssio
nal S
tude
nt E
nrol
lmen
t
Hispanic/ Latino/a
Native Ameri-canSE Asian
African American
2011 data is preliminary.Professional: DVM, MD, PharmD, Law, PA, MPH, DPT
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
2
4
6
8
10
12
8.0 7.48.7 8.8
9.6 9.8 9.3
11.19.5
11.1
Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Students
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2011 data is preliminary.
• 9.9% of all undergraduates are targeted minorities.
• 11.1% of new students (new freshmen + new transfers) are targeted minorities.
All Undergraduates
New Undergraduates2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
6.2 6.5 7.1 7.5 8.0 8.6 9.0 9.7 9.5 9.9
Indicator 5: Percent Enrollment of Pell Grant Recipients
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2011 data is preliminary.
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 201102468
1012141618
12.4 12.0 12.510.7 11.4 11.7 11.1
14.116 16.5
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 201102468
1012141618
11.9 12.6 12.8 11.6 11.5 12.2 11.714.7
17.0 16.0 • 16% of all undergraduates are Pell Grant recipients.
• 16.5% of new students (new freshmen + new transfers) are Pell Grant recipients.
All Undergraduates
New Undergraduates
Percent of Undergraduates who Pell Recipients at AAU Public Institutions, 2008-09
Average percent pell recipients for AAU public institutions: 19%
3 AAU public institutions have a lower or equal percent of Pell recipients than UW-Madison.
10 AAU public institutions have a lower number of Pell recipients than UW-Madison.
Access: Peers
Source: IPEDS Student Financial Aid Data, 2008-09http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
50%
Pell Grants are federally funded grants for students with high financial need. This indicator is a proxy for low income student enrollments.
VirgininaColoradoMichigan
WisconsinIndianaKansas
MarylandNorth Carolina
Penn StatePurdueIllinois
MissouriPittsburgh
Texas A&MIowa
MinnesotaNebraska
Ohio StateIowa State
Michigan StateOregon
WashingtonTexas
ArizonaRutgersFlorida
UC-IrvineUC-Santa Barbara
SUNY - BuffaloSUNY - Stony Brook
UC-BerkeleyUC-Davis
UCLAUC-San Diego
0 10 20 30 40 50N = 1,275
N = 3,267N = 3,078N = 3,534
N = 4,303N = 2,985N = 3,809N = 2,490N = 5,610N = 5,121N = 4,744N = 3,421N = 2,672N = 6,192N = 3,281N = 5,584N = 3,087N = 7,291N = 4,092N = 6,837N = 3,311N = 5,713N = 7,952N = 6,557
N = 6,784N = 8,209N = 5,567N = 4,802
N = 5,384N = 4,824N = 7,487N = 7,610N = 8,160
N = 7,589
Percent of Undergraduates
• Data on first-generation status is collected at the time of application.
• Question first asked in 2005.
• 21.9% of New Students (New Freshmen + New Transfers) are
Indicator 6: Percent Enrollment of First-Generation Students
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2011 data is preliminary.2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
0
5
10
15
20
25
21.9 23.0 23.4 22.9 23.1 21.4 21.9
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
5
10
15
20
25
8.1
13.317.6
20.8 22.3 22.1 21.8All Undergraduates
New Undergraduates
Accumulating Data
10%
8%
5%
10%
7%
15%
11% 10%
3%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
Total CALS Business Education Engineering SoHE L&S Nursing Pharmacy
N = 2,833
N = 234
N = 90
N = 207
N = 288
N = 143
N = 1,782 N = 82
N = 1
• In 2011, the College of Letters and Science has the largest number of undergraduate targeted minority students enrolled.
• The School of Human Ecology has the largest percentage of undergraduate targeted minority students enrolled, with 15 percent of SoHE students identifying as targeted minorities.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Percent Targeted Minority Enrollment by School/College: Undergraduates, Fall 2011
2011 data is preliminary.
9%
7% 7%
16%
6%
13%
4%
7%
14%
9%
6%
8%
6%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
Total CALS Business Educ. Engin. SoHE Nelson L&S Law SMPH Nursing Pharm Vet Med
N = 69 N = 42
N = 183
N = 89
N = 9
N = 6
N = 309
N = 124
N = 135
N = 8
N = 48
N = 23
N = 1,045
Targeted Minority Enrollment by School/College:Graduate/Professional Programs, Fall 2011
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• Fall 2011• The School of
Education has the largest percentage of targeted minority graduate students (16%).
2011 data is preliminary.
Access: Enrollment
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Total 1728 28677 6.0% 2833 28736 9.9% 1105 59 3.8%CALS 104 2190 4.7% 234 2764 8.5% 130 574 3.7%
Business 55 1332 4.1% 90 1940 4.6% 35 608 0.5%Education 137 2371 5.8% 207 2016 10.3% 70 -355 4.5%
Engineering 147 3601 4.1% 288 3847 7.5% 141 246 3.4%SoHE 66 1005 6.6% 143 928 15.4% 77 -77 8.8%
L&S 1232 17495 7.0% 1782 16384 10.9% 550 -1111 3.8%Nursing 22 446 4.9% 82 783 10.5% 60 337 5.5%
Pharmacy 0 15 0.0% 1 38 2.6% 1 23 2.6%
% of Total Enrollment
Targeted Minority
EnrollmentTotal
Enrollment% of Total
Enrollment
Targeted Minority Undergraduate Enrollment by School/College2002-2011
2002 2011 ChangeTargeted Minority
EnrollmentTotal
Enrollment% of Total
Enrollment
Targeted Minority
EnrollmentTotal
Enrollment
2011 data is preliminary.
Access: Enrollment
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Individuals who indicate more than one race have a primary race selected giving precedence to the least prevalent race/ethnicity within Wisconsin’s population.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
CALS 2,764 2,185 64 98 49 147 23 9 150 39Business 1,940 1,506 23 52 6 54 9 3 254 33
Education 2,016 1,719 54 87 44 47 22 8 15 20Engineering 3,847 3,027 68 128 58 184 34 8 288 52
SoHE 928 735 64 43 28 17 8 2 20 11L &S 16,384 12,573 498 796 317 760 171 47 979 243
Nursing 783 661 23 24 29 25 6 4 2 9Pharmacy 38 27 1 0 0 5 0 0 5 0
Total 28,736 22,433 795 1,228 531 1,239 273 81 1,713 407
Primary Race/Ethnic Detail of Enrollment (Undergraduate), by School/College, Fall 2011
Total WhiteAfrican
AmericanHispanic/ Latino/a
South East Asian Other Asian
American Indian
Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander International Unknown
2011 data is preliminary.
Access: Enrollment
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Total 708 10994 6.4% 1045 12078 8.7% 337 1084 2.2%CALS 42 978 4.3% 69 965 7.2% 27 -13 2.9%
Business 46 624 7.4% 42 598 7.0% -4 -26 -0.3%Education 118 1100 10.7% 183 1118 16.4% 65 18 5.6%
Engineering 41 1325 3.1% 89 1462 6.1% 48 137 3.0%SoHE 7 102 6.9% 9 67 13.4% 2 -35 6.6%
Nelson 6 163 3.7% 6 146 4.1% 0 -17 0.4%L&S 196 3842 5.1% 309 4252 7.3% 113 410 2.2%Law 118 882 13.4% 124 889 13.9% 6 7 0.6%
SMPH 70 1043 6.7% 135 1470 9.2% 65 427 2.5%Nursing 3 165 1.8% 8 127 6.3% 5 -38 4.5%
Pharmacy 23 603 3.8% 48 608 7.9% 25 5 4.1%Vet. Medicine 21 371 5.7% 23 367 6.3% 2 -4 0.6%
Targeted Minority
EnrollmentTotal
Enrollment
Targeted Minority
Enrollment% of Total
EnrollmentTotal
Enrollment
Change2002 2011
Targeted Minority Enrollment in Graduate/Professional Programs by School/College2002-2011
% of Total Enrollment
Targeted Minority
Enrollment% of Total Enrollment
Total Enrollment
2011 data is preliminary.
Access: Enrollment
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Individuals who indicate more than one race have a primary race selected giving precedence to the least prevalent race/ethnicity within Wisconsin’s population.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
CALS 965 578 16 39 7 31 7 6 252 29Business 598 414 24 13 3 35 2 2 80 25
Education 1,118 712 76 67 16 35 24 3 160 25Engineering 1,462 680 19 52 10 56 8 3 599 35
SoHE 67 39 3 5 0 3 1 0 14 2Law 889 526 53 52 3 37 16 3 107 92
L & S 4,252 2,658 84 134 48 117 43 5 1,000 163Medicine 1,470 1,018 61 48 18 135 8 1 101 80
Nelson 146 110 2 3 0 4 1 1 17 8Nursing 127 101 3 2 2 1 2 0 11 5
Pharmacy 608 471 17 11 15 38 5 1 38 12Vet Med 367 308 8 10 1 11 4 0 16 9
Total 12,069 7,615 366 436 123 503 121 25 2,395 485
Primary Race/Ethnic Detail of Enrollment (Grad/Professional), by School/College, Fall 2011
American Indian
Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander International UnknownTotal White
African American
Hispanic/ Latino/a Other Asian
South East Asian
2011 data is preliminary.
Indicator 7: Percent UndergraduateEnrollment by Gender, Fall 2011
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2011 data is preliminary.
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 201142%
44%
46%
48%
50%
52%
54%
56%
51.5%
48.5%
Women
Men
Women havecomprised morethan half ofundergraduateenrollment since1996.
52%57%
43%
72%
19%
81%
53%
89%
58%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Total CALS Business Education Engineering SoHE L&S Nursing Pharmacy
Women as a Percentage of Total Undergraduate Enrollment, by School/College, Fall 2011
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• Fall 2011• Nursing has the
highest percent of women undergraduates enrolled (89%) and Engineering has the lowest percent (19%)
2011 data is preliminary.
Women havecomprised morethan half ofgraduate/professionalenrollment since2003
Indicator 8: Percent Graduate/ProfessionalEnrollment by Gender, Fall 2011
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 201142%
44%
46%
48%
50%
52%
54%
56%
51%
49%
Women
Men
2011 data is preliminary.
Women as a Percentage of Total Grad/Professional Enrollment, by School/College, Fall 2011
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• Fall 2011• Nursing has the
highest percent of women enrolled in a graduate or professional program, while Engineering has the lowest percent of women enrolled.
2011 data is preliminary.
52%
34%
67%
20%
85%
64%
54%49%
67%
92%
54%
41%46%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
ALS BUS EDU EGR HEC IES L&S MED MSN NUR PHM VET LAW
Access: Enrollmenthttp://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Student Level 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Undergraduates
Men 13,302 13,454 13,271 13,437 13,229 13,232 13,337 13,621 13,880 13,778 13,969Women 15,174 15,334 15,406 15,146 14,988 15,226 15,125 15,378 15,273 14,912 14,931Percent Women 53.3 53.3 53.7 53.0 53.1 53.5 53.1 53.0 52.4 52.0 51.7
Graduate StudentsMen 4,650 4,670 4,628 4,647 4,556 4,478 4,465 4,456 4,366 4,576 4,735Women 3,970 4,074 4,194 4,277 4,387 4,363 4,367 4,404 4,344 4,540 4,624Percent Women 46.1 46.6 47.5 47.9 49.1 49.3 49.4 49.7 49.9 49.8 49.4
Professional StudentsMen 1,027 1,003 999 1,037 1,050 1,064 1,110 1,120 1,123 1,143 1,157Women 1,347 1,337 1,381 1,393 1,410 1,469 1,469 1,443 1,447 1,497 1,525Percent Women 56.7 57.1 58.0 57.3 57.3 58.0 57.0 56.3 56.3 56.7 56.9
Special StudentsMen 790 768 818 755 703 736 718 745 759 788 821Women 959 912 810 896 846 912 875 874 838 865 836Percent Women 54.8 54.3 49.8 54.3 54.6 55.3 54.9 54.0 52.5 52.3 50.5
TotalMen 19,769 19,895 19,716 19,876 19,538 19,510 19,630 19,942 20,128 20,285 20,682Women 21,450 21,657 21,791 21,712 21,631 21,970 21,836 22,099 21,902 21,814 21,916Percent Women 52.0 52.1 52.5 52.2 52.5 53.0 52.7 52.6 52.1 51.8 51.4
Source : Registrar's Enrollment Report
Fall Semester Enrollment by Gender
Access: EnrollmentHome County of UW-Madison Undergraduate Students (Wisconsin Residents)
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Among the 72 Wisconsin counties, each is represented by at least 5 undergraduate students in Fall 2011.
There are 18,107 Wisconsin Resident undergraduates enrolled in Fall 2011.
Red: More than 4% of resident undergraduates from countyBlack: Between 2% and 4% of resident undergraduates from countyLight Gray: Less than 2% (but at least one student) of resident undergraduates from county
Access: EnrollmentStudents from Farms: Home County of UW-Madison Undergraduates from Wisconsin Farms* in 2010
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
*Students from farms are identified by the presence of farm income on the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA). There may be undergraduates from Wisconsin farms who did not apply for financial aid.
Black: More than 4% of undergraduates from farmsDark Gray: Between 2% and 4% of undergraduates from farms Light Gray: Less than 2% (but at least one undergraduate) from farms White: No undergraduates from farms
Access: EnrollmentHome County of UW-Madison Undergraduate FASTrack Participants in 2010
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
FASTrack is a financial aid program that assures a student’s financial need will be met each year for four years. Single, financially dependent students are considered for the program based on the family's current and past financial situation and need for assistance. Both work and borrowing are minimized to reduce the student's financial burden. All students who apply for aid are considered for FASTrack, there is no special application. Qualifying students are selected by the Office of Student Financial Aid.
Black: More than 4% of undergraduates in the FASTrack programDark Gray: Between 2% and 4% of undergraduates in the FASTrack programLight Gray: Less than 2% (but at least one student) of undergraduates in the FASTrack program White: No undergraduate participants in the FASTrack program
Access: Diversity Programs
Programs that increase access and success for underrepresented populations on campus• Programs with a Pre-College Component
– PEOPLE– POSSE
• Student Support Programs– CEO (formerly TRIO)– Academic Advancement Program– Pathways
• Scholarship Programs– Chancellor’s Scholars– Powers/Knapp– First Wave
Academic Excellence Communitieshttp://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Fall 2011 Undergraduate Participation in Academic Excellence Communities
*Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Academic Excellence Community
Total Participants
Targeted Minority* Male Wisconsin
ResidentFirst
GenerationPell Grant
Eligible
Academic Advancement Program (AAP)
393 96% 44% 70% 25% 44%
Center for EducationalOpportunity (CEO) 477 90% 40% 69% 94% 84%
PEOPLE 342 89% 40% 95% 58% 63%
Posse 137 84% 48% 0% 66% 66%
First Wave 46 65% 42% 22% 52% 61%
Chancellor’s Scholar Program 193 100% 36% 69% 35% 29%
Powers/KnappProgram 160 100% 47% 86% 51% 46%
Pathways 36 89% 58% 53% 17% 28%
All Undergraduates 28,736 10% 48% 63% 22% 16%
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Access: Pipeline
The population in high school serves as a major pool for UW-Madison undergraduates• We can estimate the pipeline for several groups
– Minority Students– Low-Income (Pell or Free/Reduced Lunch)– First-Generation Students– Rural students
Pipelinehttp://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Access: Pipeline: First Generation
*“Potential” First Generation Students does not imply any level of academic achievement, school enrollment, or preparedness. This estimate reflects the population 13-17 with no parent/guardian in the household with a Bachelor’s Degree. Sources: Overall WI Population (U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2005-2007 Estimates), Potential First Generation Students (“Parental Education and College Participation Rates in Wisconsin”, Sara Lazenby, August 2009), Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls for 2009-10 School Year
An estimated 75% of 13-17 year old Wisconsin residents live in households where no parent/guardian holds a bachelor’s degree.
Approximately 26% of UW-Madison Resident New Freshman are first-generation students.
We do not have a reliable data source on high school graduation or college preparedness by parental education levels for Wisconsin residents.
UW-Madison Enrolled
UW-Madison Admits
UW-Madison Applicants
Population 13-17"Potential"* First
Generation Students
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Percent of Group Total
Wisconsin's First-Generation College-Going Recruiting Pool
(290,550 of 385,907)
(2,323 of 8,140)
(1,409 of 5,637)
(908 of 3,452)
No data available on graduation rates or academic achievement by parental education levels within Wisconsin
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2009-10 Data
Access: Pipeline: Low Income
“Economically Disadvantaged” represents those students who are eligible for free/reduced lunch.Sources: Wisconsin DPI WINSS, 2008-09 Enrollment by Student Group, Completions by Student GroupUW-Madison Data based on Fall 2009-10
• 34% of Public K-12 students in Wisconsin are Economically Disadvantaged (2008-09)
• 23% of Public High School Graduates are Economically Disadvantaged (2008-09)
• We have no reliable information on income of applicant students, all data based on financial aid applications
• 16% of Resident New Freshmen are Pell Grant Recipients
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Percent of Group Total
Wisconsin's Low-Income Recruiting Pool
(88,196 of 279,103)
(13,042 of 66,266)
No Data Available on Low-Income Status of UW-Madison Applicants or Admits
(561 of 3,437)
Economically Disadvantaged High School Public School Students
Economically Disadvantaged Public High School Graduates
UW-Madison Enrolled
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2009-10 Data
Access: Pipeline: Minority
• 21% of Public High School students in Wisconsin are minority students(2008-09)
• 18% of Public High School Graduates are minority students (2008-09)
• 15% of Resident New Freshmen are minority students
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
“Well-prepared” high school graduates are in the top quartile of their graduating classes and score at least 22 (WI Average) on the ACT (or equivalent SAT score). This does not reflect any policies by UW-Madison admissions with regards to academic preparation requirements.
UW-Madison Enrolled
UW-Madison Admits
UW-Madison Applicants
"Well-Prepared" Minority Public High
School Graduates
Minority Public High School Graduates
Minority Public High School Students
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Percent of Group Total
Wisconsin's Minority Recruiting Pool
(290,550 of 385,907)
(1,114 of 8164)
(733 of 5,651)
(517 of 3,457)
(697 of 11,623)
(11,623 of 66,266)
(57,495 of 279,103)2009-10 Data
Access: Pipeline: Rural• While over half of
WI high schools are considered rural, only 25% of 12th graders attend a rural high school.
• Rural high school students apply at lower rates than other students
• Once they apply, rural students are admitted and enroll at rates proportional to their application rate.
Source: High School Characteristics and Early Academic Performance at UW-Madison, Clare Huhn, APA, 2005
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
17
17
17
25
51
83
83
83
75
49
Percent of Enrolled Freshmen
Percent of Freshmen Admits
Percent of Freshmen Applicants
Percent of 12th Graders
Percent of High Schools
Percent Rural, by Pipeline Step Not Rural Rural
Impact of People and POSSE on Freshmen Enrollment
Targeted Minority New Freshmen Fall 2011 / Fall 20012011 New Freshmen (644) 2001 New Freshmen (389)
Non-Residents(256)
WI Residents(388)
Non-Residents (143)
WI Residents(246)
Illinois(96)
POSSE (9) Milwaukee(105)
PEOPLE (22) Illinois(42)
Milwaukee(76)Other (87) Other (83)
Minnesota(59)
Dane(68)
PEOPLE (37) Minnesota(36)
Dane(54)Other (31)
California(18)
POSSE (8) Waukesha(29)
PEOPLE (2) California(9)
Waukesha(16)Other (10) Other (27)
DC/Maryland/VA(18)
POSSE (11) Racine(11)
PEOPLE (2)New York (7) Brown
(12)Other (7) Other (9)
Other States(65)
Marathon(19)
Other States(49)
Outagamie(10)
Kenosha(17)
PEOPLE (8) Kenosha (7)Other (9)
Other Counties(139)
PEOPLE (7) Other Counties(71)Other (132)
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• The first PEOPLE/POSSE students entered college in 2002
Access: Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls,New Freshmen, Fall 2011
• Wisconsin residents are the most likely applicants to be admitted and are most likely to enroll compared to other groups.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Total Applicants
% Admitted
% Enrolled/ Yield Rate
Overall 28,983 50.5 39.8
Male 14,265 47.8 40.5Female 14,688 53.1 39.3
Resident 8,921 62.9 61.9Domestic Non-Res. 12,023 49.4 22.5
International 4,570 26.9 20.5
Targeted Minorties 3,304 44.1 44.2Total Minority 5,257 48 38.1
First Generation 5,127 43.2 50.9
Access: Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls, Transfer Students, Fall 2011
• One reason for low admit rates for transfer applicants is that many applicants do not meet the minimum requirements for admission
• Wisconsin residents are the most likely applicants to be admitted and are most likely to enroll compared to other groups.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Total Applicants
% Admitted
% Enrolled/ Yield Rate
Overall 5,167 42.1 60.9
Male 2,627 43.2 57.2Female 2,540 40.9 64.8
Resident 2,726 51.9 71.1Domestic Non-Res. 1,166 35.1 35.2
International 968 22.3 46.8
Targeted Minorties 514 36.7 58.9Total Minority 713 40.4 58.8
First Generation 1,606 40.3 67.7
Access: Comparisonshttp://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• UW-Madison had 2,750 targeted minority undergraduates (Fall 2009)
• There are 2,528 institutions in the United States that grant bachelor’s degrees. Of these, only 816 (32.3%) have more total undergraduates enrolled than UW-Madison has targeted minority undergraduates enrolled
• There are 48 institutions in Wisconsin that grant bachelor’s degrees. Of these, only 18 (38%) have more total undergraduates enrolled than UW-Madison has targeted minority students enrolled
UW-Madison educates relatively large numbers of minority students
Components :• Retention• Course-taking• Success• Degree Completion
Access
Excellence
Institutional Receptivity
Retention
Retention
Equity in Educational Outcomes
Retention
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• 84% of the 2004 cohort graduated after six years.
• For the cohort entering in 2009-10, 95% of students were retained after one year.
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Perc
ent R
etai
ned
Fall Semester of Entrance
Percent of First Year Undergraduates Retained after One Year (All Students)
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Perc
ent G
radu
ated
Fall Semester of Entrance
Percent of First-Year Undergraduates Graduated After 6 Years (All Students)
Indicator 9: Retention and Graduation Rates of Targeted Minorities, Pell Recipients, and First-Generation Students
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Summary of Retention and Graduation Rates by Student Group1-Year
Retention Rate % Difference 6-Year Graduation Rate % Difference
All New Freshmen 94.8 - 83.9 -Targeted Minority 91.3 -3.5 66.8 -17.1
First-Generation College Students* 93.1 -1.7 Freshmen Recipients of Pell Grants 92.5 -2.3 73.1 -10.8
Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2009 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2004 Cohort
* Graduation rates not yet available for first-generation college students,
Summary of Retention and Graduation Rates by Student Group
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html1-Year Retention Rate % Difference 6-Year Graduation
Rate % Difference
All New Freshmen 94.8 - 83.9 -Women 95 0.2 85.6 1.7
Men 94.5 -0.3 81.8 -2.1Targeted Minority 91.3 -3.5 66.8 -17.1
Non-Targeted 95.2 0.4 85.5 1.6African American 91.9 -2.9 62.6 -21.3Native American 83.3 -11.5 60 -23.9
Hispanic/Latino/a 92.8 -2 71 -12.9South East Asian 91.2 -3.6 68.5 -15.4
Non-Targeted Asian 95.5 0.7 84.4 0.5International 92 -2.8 72.7 -11.2
Wisconsin Residents 95.4 0.6 85.6 1.7Non-Residents 92.9 -1.9 81.8 -2.1
First-Generation College Students* 93.1 -1.7 Freshmen Who Received Need-Based Aid 93.6 -1.2 78.9 -5
Freshmen Recipients of Pell Grants 92.5 -2.3 73.1 -10.8FIGs 94.4 -0.4 81.4 -2.5
Targeted Minority in FIGs 92.4 -2.4 63.8 -20.1PEOPLE 88.9 -5.9 75.7 -8.2
POSSE 96.6 1.8 82.6 -1.3Chancellor's Scholars 97.7 2.9 88.1 4.2
Powers/Knapp Scholars 92.5 -2.3 78.6 -5.3AAP Participants 90.4 -4.4 68.9 -15
First Wave* 100 5.2 CEO*
Pathways*Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2009 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2004 Cohort* Graduation rates not yet available for first-generation college students, First Wave. Data not yet available for CEO, Pathways
Summary of Retention and Graduation Rates by Student Group
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Summary of Retention and Graduation Rates by Student Group
1-Year Retention Rate % Difference 6-Year Graduation
Rate % Difference
All New Freshmen 94.8 - 83.9 -Targeted Minority 91.3 -3.5 66.8 -17.1
Targeted Minority in an Academic Excellence Program 92.4
-2.4 75.1 -8.8
Targeted Minority Not in an Academic Excellence Program 90.4
-4.4 60.3 -23.6
PEOPLE 88.9 -5.9 75.7 -8.2POSSE 96.6 1.8 82.6 -1.3
Chancellor's Scholars 97.7 2.9 88.1 4.2Powers/Knapp Scholars 92.5 -2.3 78.6 -5.3
AAP Participants 90.4 -4.4 68.9 -15First Wave* 100 5.2
CEO*Pathways*
Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2009 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2004 Cohort*Retention/Graduation Rates not yet available for CEO and Pathways; Graduation rates not yet available for First Wave
Graduation Rates of Targeted Minorities by Participation in an Academic Excellence Program
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 200450
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
All Students
Targeted Minorities in an Academic Excellence Program
Targeted Minorities not in an Academic Excellence Program
All Targeted Minorities
Retention and Graduation Rates, by Gender and Race/Ethnicity
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Retained to Second Year (Men)
Retained to Second Year (Women)
Graduated in Six Years (Men)
Graduated in Six Years (Women)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
UW-Madison Retention and Graduation Rates By Gender and Race/Ethnicity
All Students White Asian/Pacific Islander Hispanic Black American Indian/Alaskan Native
Source: UW-Madison CSRDE Submission; 3-Year Average of Rates from 2002-2004, SL, APA, August 2011
Retention and Graduation Rates,among Student Athletes
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Total White Black International0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
N=22,727 N=19,593
N=557
N=658N=357
N=253
N=64
N=26
Graduation Rates Among Student-Athletes (Average of 2000-2004 Entering Cohorts)
All Students Student-Athletes
Source: 2010 NCAA Graduation Rates Report. Data represents those groups with at least 10 student athletes in the four-cohort average. SL, APA, August 2011
Carn
egie
-Mel
lon
Arizo
naKa
nsas
SUN
Y-Bu
ffalo
Colu
mbi
aN
ebra
ska
SUN
Y-St
ony
Broo
kCo
lora
doO
rego
nIo
wa
Min
neso
taM
issou
riIo
wa
Stat
ePu
rdue
Indi
ana
Ohi
o St
ate
Rutg
ers
Pitt
sbur
ghW
eigh
ted
Aver
age
Mic
higa
n St
ate
Geor
gia
Tech
Texa
s A&
MW
ashi
ngto
nTe
xas
UC S
anta
Bar
bara
UC D
avis
UC Ir
vine
Mar
ylan
dSy
racu
seFl
orid
aW
iscon
sinIll
inoi
sPe
nn S
tate
Nor
th C
arol
ina
Mic
higa
nCa
ltech
UCLA
Vand
erbi
ltUC
Ber
kele
yCo
rnel
lM
ITVi
rgin
iaN
orth
wes
tern
Brow
nHa
rvar
d
-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
Perc
enta
ge P
oint
Gap
Percentage Point Graduation Gap of Fall 2002-2004 Entrance Cohorts, Selected AAU Institutions
Selected Institutions, CSRDE data, sorted from lowest to highest overall graduation rates.
• Average graduation gap among AAU institutions is 9.1%
• Gap at UW-Madison is 17.1 percent
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• Grades• GPA• Honors and Awards• Participation in High
Demand Programs
Access
Excellence
Institutional Receptivity
Retention
Excellence
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• “Wisconsin Experience” captures four inquiry-based high-impact practices and includes:– Substantial research experiences that
generate knowledge and analytical skills
– Global and cultural competencies and engagement
– Leadership and activism opportunities– Application of knowledge in the “real
world”• In 2009-10, 88% of bachelor’s degree
recipients participated in at least one Wisconsin Experience Program
• Targeted minority graduates were slightly more likely to have completed at least one Wisconsin Experience activity.
Excellence: Wisconsin Experience
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
88% 92%
0
20
40
60
80
100
Percent of Graduates with at Least One Wisconsin Experience Activity
All Graduates Targeted Minority Graduates
Excellence: Wisconsin Experience
Equity in Educational Outcomes
• In 2009-10 targeted minority students were slightly more likely to have completed a Wisconsin Experience activity.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Non-Targeted Targeted* Non-Targeted Targeted*ALS 588 45 100 100BUS 639 28 81 82EDU 360 24 96 96EGR 564 28 87 96HEC 278 43 92 93L&S 3,314 324 85 90MPH 51 3 100 100NUR 164 16 100 100PHM 4 1 100 100Total 5,962 512 88 92
Number of Graduates Percent of Graduates with at Least One Wisconsin Experience Activity
Bachelor's Degree Recipients in 2009-10 by Targeted Minority Status
Excellence: Wisconsin Experience
Equity in Educational Outcomes
• Transfer-start graduates participated in Wisconsin Experience activities at lower rates (80%) than freshman-start graduates (90%).
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
ALS 491 141 100 100BUS 540 127 84 70EDU 286 98 98 90EGR 469 123 91 75HEC 238 83 93 89L&S 2,861 777 88 73MPH 29 25 100 100NUR 104 76 100 100PHM 3 2 100 100Total 5,021 1,453 90 80
Bachelor's Degree Recipients in 2009-10 by Type of Entrance to UW-Madison (Freshman or Transfer)
Number of Graduates Percent of Graduates with at Least One Wisconsin Experience Activity
Freshman-Start Transfer- Start
Freshman-Start Transfer- Start
• Diversity of:– Faculty– Staff– Administrators
• Climate
Access
Excellence
Institutional Receptivity
Retention
Institutional Receptivity
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Employees
Employees self-report their race/ethnicity at the time of hire.
Employees may choose any of the following designations, and may select two or more races as of 2009:
• White• Black• Asian• American Indian• Hispanic/ Latino/a• Hawaiian
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Employees
2011 data available in December 2011
Employees by Categoryhttp://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Executive/ Instructional OtherDirector/ Academic Academic Classified Employes- Graduate
Faculty Administrator Staff Staff Staff in-Training Assistants TotalWomen Black 23 11 11 46 59 15 83 248
Asian 69 5 68 198 130 108 516 1,094Native American 6 0 3 13 7 0 19 48Hispanic 31 10 24 52 138 19 136 410White/unknown 541 171 870 2,523 2,578 280 1,632 8,595Two or more races 4 0 5 20 17 0 5 51Total 674 197 981 2,852 2,929 422 2,391 10,446
Men Black 24 9 23 39 70 8 57 230Asian 169 1 91 208 103 215 741 1,528Native American 4 3 2 10 9 2 8 38Hispanic 46 8 33 38 153 17 132 427White/unknown 1,252 190 1,092 1,939 2,135 346 1,957 8,911Two or more races 8 2 3 6 11 0 5 35Total 1,503 213 1,244 2,240 2,481 588 2,900 11,169
Grand Total 2,177 410 2,225 5,092 5,410 1,010 5,291 21,615
2010 Headcount of Faculty and Staff by Gender and Race/Ethnicity
Source: October IADS data. Notes: Non-duplicating headcount reported- see Technical Note # 7. LTEs, Student and Unclassified hourly workers excluded. See technical note #10 for information on new race/ethnicity categories.
Institutional Receptivity: Employees
2011 data available in December 2011
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Faculty Women 546 563 586 603 617 638 643 648 663 674
Men 1,667 1,662 1,650 1,635 1,603 1,572 1,555 1,530 1,512 1,503Total 2,213 2,225 2,236 2,238 2,220 2,210 2,198 2,178 2,175 2,177
Executive/Director/ Women 171 183 187 187 188 179 182 186 192 197Administrator Men 205 198 202 201 200 197 201 201 207 213
Total 376 381 389 388 388 376 383 387 399 410Instructional Women 763 793 795 836 876 871 901 942 973 981Academic Staff Men 1,099 1,123 1,088 1,113 1,162 1,152 1,147 1,197 1,210 1,244
Total 1,862 1,916 1,883 1,949 2,038 2,023 2,048 2,139 2,183 2,225Other Women 2,373 2,475 2,482 2,522 2,494 2,530 2,597 2,667 2,751 2,852Academic Staff Men 1,902 2,004 2,091 2,150 2,158 2,133 2,181 2,179 2,187 2,240
Total 4,275 4,479 4,573 4,672 4,652 4,663 4,778 4,846 4,938 5,092Classified Staff Women 2,876 2,902 2,887 2,872 2,852 2,829 2,843 2,866 2,904 2,929
Men 2,236 2,252 2,287 2,365 2,333 2,353 2,385 2,399 2,462 2,481Total 5,112 5,154 5,174 5,237 5,185 5,182 5,228 5,265 5,366 5,410
Employes-in-Training Women 275 281 282 314 324 324 325 361 424 422Men 437 459 460 485 489 503 482 507 571 588Total 712 740 742 799 813 827 807 868 995 1,010
Graduate Assistants Women 2,001 2,128 2,243 2,341 2,398 2,310 2,261 2,279 2,327 2,391Men 2,794 2,788 2,876 2,881 2,888 2,828 2,822 2,728 2,779 2,900Total 4,795 4,916 5,119 5,222 5,286 5,138 5,083 5,007 5,106 5,291
Total Women 9,005 9,325 9,462 9,675 9,749 9,681 9,752 9,949 10,234 10,446Men 10,340 10,486 10,654 10,830 10,833 10,738 10,773 10,741 10,928 11,169
Grand Total 19,345 19,811 20,116 20,505 20,582 20,419 20,525 20,690 21,162 21,615Source: October EEO and IADS data. Notes: Non-duplicating headcount reported- see Technical Note #7. LTEs, Student and Unclassified hourly workers excluded.
Headcount of Faculty and Staff by Gender
Indicator 10: Women as a Percentage of all Faculty
2011 data available in December 2011
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• In Fall 2010 31% of Faculty were women.
• 24.4% of Full Professors, 35.3% of Associate Professors, and 43% of Assistant Professors were women.
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20100
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Num
ber o
f Fac
ulty
Perc
ent o
f Fac
ulty
31%
Institutional Receptivity: Employees
2011 data available in December 2011
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• Women make up just under 50% of all employees at UW-Madison.
• A smaller proportion of faculty members are women (31%)
Total Faculty Exec/Dir/
Admin
Instructional Acad. Staff
Other Acad. Staff Classified0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Percent of Women Faculty and Staff by Employee Type
Indicator 11: Minority Faculty Recruitment
• Increases in the percent of faculty hires that are racial/ethnic minorities.
2010-11 Data is preliminary.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 100
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
UW-Madison Faculty Hires by Minority Status
Minority Faculty
Year of Hire
Perc
ent
Madison Plan
Strategic Hires SHI - 2
Black, 2.2%
Asian, 10.9%
American Indian, 0.5%
Hispanic, 3.5%
Two or More Races, 0.6%
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Minority Faculty as a Percent of the Total Faculty Headcount
16.8%16.9%16.2%
13.2%13.8%
14.3% 14.6%15.1%
15.4%
17.6%
Indicator 12: Minority Faculty Representation
• In 2010: 2,177 total faculty members
• 17.6% (384) of Faculty are racial/ethnic minorities.
• 8% increase in minority faculty since 1996
2011 data available in December 2011, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Staff
• In 2010, 2,225 Instructional Academic Staff members
• 11.8% (263) of Instructional Academic Staff are racial/ethnic minorities
• 2.7% increase in minority instructional academic staff since 1996
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2011 data available in December 2011, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Minority Instructional Academic Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount
11.7%12.1%
11.2%11.9%11.5%
10.5%9.8%
8.8%8.9%
Black,1.5% (34)
Asian,7.1% (159)
American Indian,.2% (5)
Hispanic/Latino/a,2.6% (57)
11.8%
Two or More Races,.4% (8)
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Minority Non-Instructional Academic Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount
Hispanic/ Latino/a, 1.8% (90)
AmericanIndian, .5% (23)
Asian,8.0% (406)
Black,1.7% (85)
12%12%11.7%11.2%11.1%10.9%
10.2%9.6%9.4%
12.3%
Two or More Races,.5% (26)
Institutional Receptivity: Staff
• In 2010: 5,092 non-instructional Academic Staff
• 12.3% of non-instructional Academic Staff are minorities
• 3.7% increase in minority non-instructional academic staff since 1996
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2011 data available in December 2011, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
Institutional Receptivity: Staff
• In 2010: 5,410 Classified Staff members
• 12.9% (697) of classified staff are minorities
• 8.7% increase in minority classified staff since 1996
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2011 data available in December 2011, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Minority Classified Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount
12.6%12%11.8%11.3%
11%10%
9.1%8.5%8.1%
Hispanic/ Latino/a, 5.4% (291)American Indian,.3% (16)
Asian, 4.3% (233)
Black,2.4% (129)
12.9%
Two or More Races, 0.5% (28)
Institutional Receptivity: Staff
• In 2010: 410 Executive/Director/Administrators
• 11.9% of Executive/Director/Administrators are racial/ethnic minorities
• 1.4% increase in minority Executive/Director/Administrators since 1996.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2011 data available in December 2011, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Minority Executive/Director/Administrators as a Percent of the Total Headcount
Hispanic/Latino/a, 4.4% (18)American Indian, .7% (3)
Asian, 1.5% (6)
Black,4.9% (20)
11.2%11.6%11.2%11.2%10.8%10.8%11.1%
10.2%10.9%
11.9%
Two or More Races,.5% (2)
Institutional Receptivity: Employees
- Around 13% of all employees are minorities
- A larger proportion of faculty are minorities.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
2011 data available in December 2011, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
Total Faculty Exec/Dir/
Admin
Instructional Acad. Staff
Other Acad. Staff
Classified0%2%4%6%8%
10%12%14%16%18%20%
Percent of Minority Faculty and Staff by Employee Type
Institutional Receptivity:
Peer Comparisons
for Faculty Diversity
Non-White Full-Time Faculty as a Percent of Total Full-Time Faculty at AAU Public Institutions, 2009-10
Source: IPEDS Fall HR, 2009-10 (AAUDE data)http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
VirginiaWisconsin
OregonIndiana
North CarolinaPenn State
KansasWashingtonStony Brook
ColoradoNebraska
Ohio StateMissouri
UC-Santa BarbaraFlorida
Texas A & MPittsburgh
Michigan StateUC-Berkeley
IowaBuffaloIllinois
UC-San DiegoArizona
Iowa StateUC-Davis
MinnesotaTexasUCLA
MarylandUC-Irvine
PurdueRutgers
Michigan
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
N=357N=528
N=224N=473N=630N=685N=555N=776N=344N=553N=396N=816N=744N=280N=1,058N=583N=1,048N=678N=597N=604N=411N=617N=655N=696N=616N=788
N=1,210N=800N=1,073N=951
N=661N=805N=812
N=2,093
Average percent non-white faculty for AAU public institutions: 26%
UW-Madison: 18%
1 AAU public institution has a lower percent of non-white faculty.
7 AAU public institutions have a lower number of non-white faculty.
Institutional Receptivity: Tenure
• Those who did not receive tenure include the following:– Those who were denied
tenure– Those who left the university
for another position elsewhere
– A few faculty members still hold probationary appointments after 9 years.
• Tenure and promotion rates are calculated at 6 and 9 years after hire, to account for those who have extensions on the tenure clock.
• Data combine hires from 1989-90 to 2003-04 or 1991-92 to 2003-04. This is necessary to account for small numbers of hires.
• Small Ns make tenure rates subject to large variation.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Notes about faculty tenure data:
55%
72%
42%
64%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
6 Years 9 Years
Percent Promoted to Tenure by Gender,within Six (6) and Nine (9) Years
Men Women
Indicator 13: Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Gender
• At 9 years, 64% of women faculty have been promoted to tenure.Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1995-96 to 2004-05
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
51%
70%
47%
65%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
6 Years 9 Years
Percent Promoted to Tenure by Minority Status, within Six (6) and Nine (9) Years
Non-Minority Minority
Indicator 14: Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Minority Status
• At 9 Years, 65% of minority faculty members have been promoted to tenure.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1995-96 to 2004-05
3220
3527
1632
14 29
3311
27 10
19
3823
34
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Minority Males Minority Female Non-Minority Male Non-Minority Female
Faculty Disciplinary Divison Affiliation,by Minority Status and Gender
Social Studies
Physical Science
Arts and Humanities
BiologicalSciences
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
• Selecting a divisional affiliation is a step in the tenure process. Faculty are not required to identify their divisional affiliation at the time of hire, but many do.
• Women, especially minority women, are heavily concentrated within the Social Studies Division
Note: Chart excludes 24 faculty members who have not yet selected a disciplinary division, as they are not required to do so until they go up for tenure. Data as of October 2010 payroll.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
72%
81% 79%74%
57%64% 66%
81%
72%
48%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Total Physical Sciences Arts and Humanities
Biological Sciences Social Studies
Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years, by Gender and Division
Men Women
N=547
N=279
N=89N=144
N=29
N=93N=190 N=74
N=124
N=83
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
• A lower percentage of women and men are promoted to tenure within the Social Studies.
• The largest gap in tenure rates by gender is within the Physical Sciences division.
Data on faculty hires from 1989-90 to 2002-03
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
61%
71% 68% 67%
45%
69%
82% 81%
71%
54%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Total Physical Sciences Arts and Humanities
Biological Sciences Social Studies
Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years, by Minority Status and Division
Minority Non-Minority
N=157
N=669 N=44
N=129
N=42
N=140
N=34N=230
N=37N=170
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
• A lower percentage of faculty members are promoted to tenure within the Social Studies division.
• The largest gap in tenure rates by minority status is within the Physical Sciences and Arts and Humanities.
Data on faculty hires from 1989-90 to 2003-04
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
Data on faculty hires from 1989-90 to 2004-05
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
61 61
74
63
45
63
78
6772
46
72 71
85
78
5964
6973
83
48
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Total Biological Sciences Physical Sciences Arts and Humanities
Social Studies
Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years, by Gender and Division
Minority Men Minority Women Non-Minority Men Non-Minority Women
WomenMenWomenMen
Biological Sciences
99 59 448
Number of Faculty Promoted to Tenure
21
19
39
20
Non-MinorityMinority
70
67103
170
105Physical Sciences
221
60
24
70Arts and Humanities
Social Studies
Total
16
23
6
14
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
Data on faculty hires from 1989-90 to 2004-05
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• All groups have lower promotion rates within the Social Studies division.
• Women, and especially minority women, are more likely to be within the social studies division.
• For groups with small hiring pools, the effect of one person’s tenure/non-tenure can affect the percent tenured dramatically.
• Those not receiving tenure includes those who took a position elsewhere or still have a probationary appointment after 9 years.
Key findings from tenure/promotion data:
Institutional Receptivity: Climate
Selected NSSE 2011 Results
** significantly different
Percent of Seniors who often or very much:
See: http://www.apa.wisc.edu/performance_students_surveys.html
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Tried to better understand someone else's views by imagining how it looks from their perspective
Included diverse perspectives in class discussion or assignments
Had serious conversations with student of a different race or ethnicity than your own
Understand people of other racial/ethnic backgrounds
75
63
71
55
66
56
49
56
67
57
52
56AllNon-MinorityMinority
**
**
Institutional Receptivity: Climate
Selected NSSE 2011 ResultsPercent of Seniors for whom the university emphasizes quite a bit or very much:
See: http://www.apa.wisc.edu/performance_students_surveys.html
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds
Helping you cope with non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc)
Providing the support you need to thrive socially
Providing the support you need to succeed academically
44
25
40
71
47
21
41
72
46
22
41
72
AllNon-minorityMinority
Summary of Indicators
Indicators present in this report:1. Percent enrollment of minority undergraduate students2. Percent enrollment of targeted minority undergraduate students3. Percent enrollment of targeted minority graduate students4. Percent enrollment of targeted minority professional students5. Percent enrollment of Pell grant recipients6. Percent enrollment of first-generation students7. Percent enrollment of undergraduates by gender8. Percent enrollment of graduate/professional students by gender9. Retention/Graduation rates of targeted minorities, Pell grant recipients,
and first-generation students.10. Women as a percent of all Faculty11. Minority Faculty recruitment12. Minority Faculty representation13. Percent of Faculty promoted to tenure by gender14. Percent of Faculty promoted to tenure by minority status
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Diversity Update 2011
• Slideshow available at http://www.apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• Questions about these slides:– Sara Lazenby ([email protected])– Jocelyn Milner ([email protected])