DISTRICT IRRIGATION PLAN · At length, I bow down my head with devotion and selfness before the...

1

DISTRICT IRRIGATION PLAN OF

BOUDH

(ODISHA)

PRADHAN MANTRI KRISHI SINCHAYEE YOJANA

(PMKSY)

MARCH-2016

DISTRICT LEVEL IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE

BOUDH, ODISHA

2

Prepared by:

District Level Implementation Committee,

Boudh, Odisha

Technical Support by:

Technical Support Agency, RRTTS, G. Udayagiri, (OUAT),

Kandhamal,Odisha-762100, Phone(OFF) 06847-260012

[email protected]

3

Acknowledgement

I take this opportunity to express my deep sense of gratitude and indebtedness to

Sri Madhusudan Mishra, I.A.S, Collector-cum-District Magistrate of Boudh District for his

valuable guidance, able supervision, constructive criticism, enthusiastic interest and

painstaking effort throughout the period of preparation of District Irrigation Plan (DIP),

Boudh.

I deem it the rarest opportunity and proud privilege to express my profound

sense of immeasurable gratitude and indebtedness to Professor Dr. P. N. Jagdev, Dean of

Research, OUAT, Bhubaneswar for his timely supervision, release of funds and inspiration

for completion of Draft of DIP, Boudh with busy schedule of works, I am also grateful to the

Professor Dr. A. K. Mohanty, Nodal Officer of DIP of 5 districts of Odisha for providing

technical assistance, timely guidance and co-operation throughout the preparation of DIP,

Boudh.

I would like to express my thankfulness to Dr. Amulya Parida, Professor & Head,

Department of statistics for his prudent inspiration, clarification, constructive criticism and

devoting longtime with his busy schedule of work. I am also indebted to Dr. D. K. Debata

and Dr. D. Panigrahi, Senior Scientist, RRTTS, G. Udayagiri, O.U.A.T. for giving support in

completion of DIP work.

My sincere thanks to Sri Niranjan Sahu, Consultant DIP, Odisha Watershed Mission,

Bhubaneswar for his co-operation and suggestions during the preparation of DIP, Boudh. My

sincere thanks to Sri Kar Babu, for extending his helping hands voluntarily during the

investigation and preparation of the manuscript of DIP, Boudh. I highly obliged to Sri Raghab

Mallick, Project Director, Watersheds, Boudh, Sri Sridhar Das, Convener and DDA, Boudh, Sri

Deepak Mahapatra, Technical Expert, Sri Padmanava Nayak, Data Entry Operator, Sri Dillip

Kumar Pradhan, Data Entry Operator, Watersheds, Boudh, Sri A. K. Sahu, Executive

Engineer, OLIC, Boudh, Sri A. K. Sethy, Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Boudh, Sri G.

P. Prusty, Executive Engineer, MIP, Boudh, Sri Bibhudutta Pradhan, Designer, CADA, Boudh

for their co-operation during preparation of DIP, Boudh. Last but not the least, I wish to

express my appreciation and gratefulness to one and all who had helped me in any manner

for completion of DIP, Boudh. At length, I bow down my head with devotion and selfness

before the Almighty for fulfillment of his eternal desire.

Akshaya Kumar Sethy,

Nodal Officer, RRTTS, G. Udayagiri, OUAT

5

Contents Chapter Particulars Page

Executive Summary

1. Introduction 13

i. Background 13-14

ii. Vision 14

iii. Objective 14-15

iv. Strategy/Approach 15-19

v. Rationale/Justification Statement 19-20

Chapter-I: General Information of the District:

1.1: District Profile: 21-25

1.2: Demography: 26-31

1.3: Biomass and Livestock 32-37

1.4: Agro-Ecology, Climate,Hydrology and Topography: 38-41

1.5: Soil Profile: 41-51

1.6: Soil Erossion And Runoff Status: 51

1.7: Land Use Pattern: 51-55

Chapter-II: District Water Profile:

2.1: Area Wise, Crop Wise irrigation Status: 56-60

2.2: Production and Productivity of Major Crops: 60-64

2.3: Irrigation based classification: 65

Chapter III: Water Availability:

3.1: Status of Water Availability: 66-67

3.2: Status of Ground Water Availability: 67

3.3: Status of Command Area: 67-68

3.4: Existing Type of Irrigation: 68-69

Chapter IV: Water Requirement /Demand:

4.1: Domestic Water Demand: 70

4.2: Crop Water Demand: 71-72

4.3: Livestock Water Demand: 72-73

4.4: Industrial Water Demand: 74-75

4.5: Water Demand for Power Generation: 75

4.6: Total Water Demand of the District for Various sectors: 76

4.7: Water Budget: 77-78

Chapter V: Strategic Action Flan for Irrigation in District under PMKSY 79-111

Annexure-I

Water requirement of different Crops 112

Common Values of water requirement of different livestock 113

Annexure-II

List of projects 114

Phone Numbers of DLIC Members 116

6

List of Tables

SL.

No. Title Page

1.1 District Profile of Boudh 22

1.1.1. Forest Area of the District 23

1.1.2. Administrative Set-up of Boudh District 25

1.2. Demographic Situation of Boudh District 27

1.3. Block Wise Biomass and Livestock Data of the District 33

1.3.1. The Different Veterinary Institutions in the District 36

1.4. Agro Ecology Climate Hydrology and Topographic Situations of Boudh 39

1.4.1 ACS and AES of Boudh District 39

1.4.2. Block Wise Monthly Rainfall Data of the Year 2014-15 in mm. 40

1.5. Major Soil classes and type of the District and Blocks. 42

1.5.1 Soil types in Boudh 44

1.5.2 The block wise soil reaction and fertility status in percent 44

1.6. Soil Erosion and Run Off Status of the Boudh District 51

1.7. Land Use Pattern of Boudh District (Area in thousand ha. ) 52

2.1. Area Wise Crop Wise Irrigation Status 58

2.1.1. Source wise Area Irrigated (Area in hectares) of the Year 2014-15 59

2.2. Production and Productivity of Major Crops 62

2.2.1. The Production and Productivity of Major Horticultural Crops During 2015 63

2.2.2. Area, Production and Yield of Major Horticulture Crops During 2013 63

2.2.3. Area, Production and Productivity Trend of Main Crops in the District

( Area – ha, Production–q,productivity –q/ha) 64

2.3. Irrigation Based Classification of Boudh District 65

3.1. Status of Water Availability 66

3.2 . Status of Ground Water Availability 67

3.3. Status of Command Area 67

3.4 . Existing type of irrigation 69

4.1. Domestic Water Demand 70

4.2 Crop Water Requirement 71-72

4.3. Livestock Water Demand for the Boudh District 73

4.4. Industrial Water Demand for Boudh District 74

4.5. Water Demand for Power Generation 75

4.6. Total Water Demand of the District for Various Sectors 76

4.7. Water Budget 77

5.1. PLAN-A: Component 1 Strategic Action Plan for Irrigation in Boudh District

( Odisha ) under PMKSY and state plan & other irrigation schemes 82-98

5.2. PLAN- B: Strategic Action Plan for Irrigation in Boudh District (Odisha)

under PMKSY 99-111

7

List of figures

SL.

No. Title Page

1.1.1. District Map of Boudh 21

1.1.2. Forest Area of the District 23

1.1.3 Map of Reserve Forest Area 24

1.2.1. Block wise total population 28

1.2.2 Block wise and caste wise population classification 29

1.2.3. Block wise household and family members 30

1.2.4. The Population growth Trend of Boudh District (1901-2011) 31

1.3.1. Block wise Small Animal Distribution 34

1.3.2. Block wise Distribution of Cattle Population 35

1.3.3. Veterenary Institutions in Boudh Block 37

1.4.1. Rainfall trend of Boudh District from 2006-2015 40

1.5.1. Soil Classification Map of Boudh 43

1.5.2 The Soil Status in Boudh 44

1.5.3 Land Slope Classification of Boudh Block 45

1.5.4 Land Slope Classification of Harabhanga Block 46

1.5.5. Land Slope Classification of Kantamal Block 47

1.5.6. Soil Classification of Boudh Block 48

1.5.7. Soil Classification of Harabhanga Block 49

1.5.8. Soil classification of Kantamal Block 50

1.7.1. Land Utilisation Pattern of the Boudh District 52

1.7.2. Land Use Pattern of Boudh Block (Area in thousand Ha.) 53

1.7.3. Land Use Pattern of Harabhanga Block (Area in thousand Ha.) 54

1.7.4. Land Use Pattern of Kantamal Block (Area in thousand Ha.) 55

2.1.1. Block wise Irrigated Area 60

4.1.1 Domestic water demand of Boudh district 70

4.3.1. Livestock water demand of Boudh district 73

4.4.1 Industrial water demand of Boudh district 75

4.6.1 Total water demand of Boudh district of various sectors 76

4.7.1 Water budget 78

8

ABBREVIATIONS

ACS Agro- Climatic Situation

ADH Assistant Director of Horticulture

ADR Associate Director of Research

AES Agro-Ecological Situation

AIBP Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Programme

AIC Artificial Insemination

BBSR Bhubaneswar

BCM Billion Cubic Metres

BDA Block Development Authority

CADA Command Area Development Agency

CDC Cattle Development Centre

CDCP Check Dam Construction Programme

CDVO Chief District Veterinary Officer

Ch Children

DAC&FW Department of Agricultural Co-Operation &

Farmer’s Welfare

DDA Deputy Director Agriculture

DIC District Industries Centre

DIP District Irrigation Plan

DLIC District Level Irrigation

DoLR Department of Land Resources

DoWR

DPAP Drought Prone Area Programme

GDP Gross Domestic Product

GIS Geography Information System

GWD Ground Water development

HA Hactre

HaM Hactre Metre

ICT Information Communication Technology

ILDC Integrated Livestock Development Centre

KVK Krishi Vigyan Kendra

LA Large Animal

LDC Livestock Development Centre

LI Lift Irrigation

MCP Mega Lift Construction Programme

9

MGNREGA Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment

Act

MGNREGS Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment

Guarantee Scheme

MI Minor Irrigation

MOA&FW Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare

MoRD Ministry of Rural Development

MoWR Ministry of Water Resources

MT Metric Tone

NAC Notified Area Council

NGO Non Government Organization

NIC National Informatics Centre

NRM Natural Resource Management

OAIC Odisha Agro- Industries Corporation

OBC Other Backward Classes

OIP Other Irrigation Project

ORSAC Odisha Space Application Centre

OUAT Orissa University of Agriculture and

Technology

PD Project Director

PET Potential Evapo Transpiration

PMKSY Pradhan Mantra Krishi Sinchai Yojana

Qt Quintal

RRR Repair Renovation and Restoration

RRTTS Regional Research and Technology Transfer

Station

SA Small Animal

SC Schedule Caste

SIP Surface Irrigation Project

SIP State irrigation Plan

SIP Salki irrigation project

ST Schedule Tribe

TSA Technical Support Agency

VAS Veterinary Assistant Surgeon

WHS Water Harvesting Structure

WR Water Resources

10

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Introduction

Agriculture is the main stay of people and around 95% of the population depends upon

this sector as source of their livelihood in Boudh district. It contributes one fifth of the total

gross domestic product (GDP), provides employment to 76% of total workforce, contributes

9.5% of the total export earnings and provides raw materials to a large number of industries.

The district of Boudh has geographical area of 3444.8 Sq.km. and is under western central table

land agro climatic zone depending upon the soil types, topography, rainfall, cropping pattern

with uneven and hilly terrain. The district receives normal rainfall 1597.10 mm within 68.10

rainy days.

As agriculture development is directly proportional to irrigation potential of the

district, the “Prime Minister Krishi Sinchayee Yojana ” (PMKSY) was promoted by honorable

President of India in his address during 16th

Lok Sabha for bringing revolution to agricultural

sector by enhancing crop production and productivity. The main thrust of PMKSY yojana is

Har Khet Ko Pani and Per drop more crop. The government of India has mandated different

state governments to prepare District Irrigation Plans (DIP) which would strategically plan

for the expansion of irrigation area of the concerned district which would trigger higher crop

production and productivity.

The DIPs has emphasized to enhance the water potential of the district by creating

diversified water sources by promotion of water harvesting structure, lift irrigation system,

open well, dug well, cement lining of canal system and enhancing the existing command

area.

Background

The Associate Director of Research (ADR), Regional Research and Technology Transfer

Station (RRTTS), Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology (OUAT), G.Udayagiri,

Kandhamal, Odisha has been entrusted to prepare the District Irrigation Plan (DIP) for

Boudh district by the Dean of Research, OUAT, Bhubaneswar. The ADR selected a team of

scientists consisting of 4 members working under him to visit the Boudh district and conduct

11

meetings in consultation with DLIC members. The University was assigned to prepare DIP for

Boudh district in the capacity of Technical Support Agency (TSA) whose main mandate is to

prepare the DIP in consultation and coordination with DLIC. The role of TSA is to provide

hand holding and technical support to DLIC in preparing a good, relevant and tangible

irrigation plan for the district. The data for the preparation of DIP was collected, collated

and organised in DIP templates by the Project Director, Watershed 0f Boudh district and was

handed over to OUAT after a through discussions in DLIC meetings. The role of OUAT after

receipt of data was to scrutinize the authenticity, reliability and credibility of the data. The

final selected data was analysed and interpreted for the preparation of DIP for the district.

Vision

The prime vision of the District Irrigation Plan is Har khet ko pani and Per drop more

crop. The thrust is to improve the production and productivity of agricultural crops by

provision of irrigation facilities and improve income from farm sector.

Objective

The broad objectives of PMKSY are:

a) Achieve convergence of investments in irrigation at the field level (preparation of

district level and, if required, sub district level water use plans).

b) Enhance the physical access of water on the farm and expand cultivable area under

assured irrigation (Har Khet ko pani),

c) Integration of water source, distribution and its efficient use, to make best use of

water through appropriate technologies and practices.

d) Improve on-farm water use efficiency to reduce wastage and increase availability

both in duration and extent,

e) Enhance the adoption of precision-irrigation and other water saving technologies

(More crop per drop).

f) Enhance recharge of aquifers and introduce sustainable water conservation practices

12

g) Ensure the integrated development of rainfed areas using the watershed approach

towards soil and water conservation, regeneration of ground water, arresting runoff,

providing livelihood options and other NRM activities.

h) Promote extension activities relating to water harvesting, water management and

crop alignment for farmers and grass root level field functionaries.

i) Explore the feasibility of reusing treated municipal waste water for peri-urban

agriculture, and

j) Attract greater private investments in irrigation.

Strategy and Approach

To achieve above objectives, PMKSY will strategize by focussing on end-to end

solution in irrigation supply chain, viz. water sources, distribution network, efficient farm

level applications, extension services on new technologies & information etc. Broadly,

PMKSY in preparation of DIP for Boudh district will focus on:-

a) Creation of new water sources; repair, restoration and renovation of defunct water

sources; construction of water harvesting structures, secondary & micro storage,

groundwater development, enhancing potentials of traditional water bodies at

village level like Bandhas (Odisha) etc.

b) Developing/augmenting distribution network where irrigation sources (both ) are

available or created; assured and protective

c) Promotion of scientific moisture conservation and run off control measures to

improve ground water recharge so as to create opportunities for farmer to access

recharged water through shallow tube/dug wells;

d) Promoting efficient water conveyance and field application devices within the farm

viz, underground piping system, Drip & Sprinklers, pivots, rain-guns and other

application devices etc.;

e) Encouraging community irrigation through registered user groups/farmer producers’

organisations/NGOs; and

13

f) Farmer oriented activities like capacity building, training and exposure visits,

demonstrations, farm schools, skill development in efficient water and crop

management practices (crop alignment) including large scale awareness on more

crop per drop of water through mass media campaign, exhibitions, field days, and

extension activities through short animation films etc.

The PMKSY will have following programme components:

A. Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Programme (AIBP):

To focus on faster completion of ongoing Major and Medium Irrigation including

National Projects.

B. PMKSY (Har Khet ko Pani)

a) Creation of new water sources through Minor Irrigation (both surface and

ground water)

b) Repair, restoration and renovation of water bodies; strengthening carrying

capacity of traditional water sources, construction rain water harvesting

structures (Jal Sanchay);

c) Command area development, strengthening and creation of distribution network

from source to the farm;

d) Ground water development in the areas where it is abundant, so that sink is

created to store runoff/ flood water during peak rainy season.

e) Improvement in water management and distribution system for water bodies to

take advantage of the available source which is not tapped to its fullest capacity

(deriving benefits from low hanging fruits). At least 10% of the command area to

be covered under micro/ precision irrigation.

f) Diversion of water from source of different location where it is plenty to nearby

water scarce areas, lift irrigation from water bodies/rivers at lower elevation to

supplement requirements beyond IWMP and MGNREGS irrespective of irrigation

command.

14

g) Creating and rejuvenating traditional water storage systems like Jal Katas,

Bandhas in Odisha at feasible locations.

C. PMKSY (Per Drop More Crop):

a) Programme management, preparation of State/District Irrigation Plan, approval

of annual action plan, Monitoring etc.

b) Promoting efficient water conveyance and precision water application devices

like drips, sprinklers, pivots, rain-guns in the farm (Jal Sinchan);

c) Topping up of input cost particularly under civil construction beyond permissible

limit (40%), under MGNREGS for activities like lining inlet, outlet, silt traps,

distribution system etc.

d) Construction of micro irrigation structures to supplement source creation

activities including tube wells and dug wells (in areas where ground water is

available and not under semi critical /critical /over exploited category of

development) which are not supported under AIBP, PMKSY (Har Khet ko Pani),

PMKSY (Watershed) and MGNREGS as per block/district irrigation plan.

e) Secondary storage structures at tail end of canal system to store water when

available in abundance (rainy season) or from perennial sources likestreams for

use during dry periods through effective on-farm water management;

f) Water lifting devices like diesel/ electric/ solar pumpsets including water carriage

pipes, underground piping system.

g) Extension activities for promotion of scientific moisture conservation and

agronomic measures including cropping alignment to maximise use of available

water including rainfall and minimise irrigation requirement (Jal sarankchan);

h) Capacity building, training and awareness campaign including low cost

publications, use of pico projectors and low cost films for encouraging potential

use water source through technological, agronomic and management practices

including community irrigation.

15

i) The extension workers will be empowered to disseminate relevant technologies

under PMKSY only after requisite training is provided to them especially in the

area of promotion of scientific moisture conservation and agronomic measures,

improved/ innovative distribution system like pipe and box outlet system, etc.

Appropriate Domain Experts will act as Master Trainers.

j) Information Communication Technology (ICT) interventions through NeGP-A to

be made use in the field of water use efficiency, precision irrigation technologies,

on farm water management, crop alignment etc. and also to do intensive

monitoring of the Scheme.

D. PMKSY (Watershed Development)

a) Effective management of runoff water and improved soil & moisture

conservation activities such as ridge area treatment, drainage line treatment,

rain water harvesting, in-situ moisture conservation and other allied activities on

watershed basis.

b) Converging with MGNREGS for creation of water source to full potential in

identified backward rainfed blocks including renovation of traditional water

bodies

Calculation Factors

• 100 litres of water per day was considered for domestic consumptions both

per rural and urban population.

• The annual population growth rate from 2001 census to 2011 census was

considered for projecting population growth from 2015 to 2021.

• The crop water requirement as standardised by Indian Institute of Water

Management, ICAR, Government of India , Chandrasekhrpur, Bhubaneswar

was used to calculate the water requirement for crop, small & large

ruminant animals and poultry birds. (Annexure-1).

16

• Around 80% water requirement for kharif crop is assumed to be

met from seasonal rainfall and hence the net crop water demand

for kharif season will be 20% of the total crop water requirement.

• For rabi crop 100% of the water requirement is assumed to be met from

assured irrigation

• The existing water resource potential has been calculated by combining the

water requirements for both kharif and rabi crops, water utilised for

domestic and livestock purposes, water consumed by cottage, heavy and

power generation industries, etc. Calculated per annum basis.

• For estimation of projected crop water demand for the year 2021, the

present irrigation crop water demand ( 2015 value)was multiplied by a factor

of 1.1365 (as the agricultural growth rate for five years is 13.65% as per the

estimate of Planning Commission, Government of India).

• For estimation of projected livestock water demand by the year 2021, a

factor of 1.15 is multiplied to present (2015) livestock water demand.

Rationale/Justification

Irrigation is one of the most important critical input in agriculture which has the

potential to enhance crop production and productivity by more than 45 % alone. Hence,

there is a need to increase the irrigation potential of cropped area to obtain higher crop

production and income from agriculture sector. The Prime Minister Krishi Sinchayee Yojana

(PMKSY) is such initiative floated by the Government of India to improve the irrigation

potential of the districts in India by converging the resources of different government

departments and focusing on infrastructure creations in agricultural sector to enhance

livelihood security of the farming people.

The present irrigated area of Boudh district of the state of Odisha is 35% while the

rain 65% of the total cropped area (1,32,780 ha ). The rain fed areas are subjected to high

risk of crop production. Substantial dependency on monsoon rainfall makes cultivation in

un-irrigated areas a high risk, less productive farming profession. To make the farming a

profitable enterprise and to provide substantial employment opportunities to the future

17

generation for their sustainable livelihood security, promotion of assured irrigation system is

a viable option. Empirical evidences suggest that assured or protective irrigation

encourages farmers to invest more in farming technology and inputs leading to productivity

enhancement and increased farm income.

The overreaching vision of PMKSY will be to ensure access to some means of assured

irrigation to all farming community in the district, to produce ‘per drop more crop’ thus

bringing much desired rural prosperity. As per the guideline of PMKSY, DLIC is to prepare a

perspective and strategic plan for irrigation facilities development in the district based on

the priorities of the blocks and indicate implementation strategy and expected

outputs/outcomes, financial outlays and approach. The detailed strategic plan of Boudh

district has been prepared based on the objectives, thrusts and approaches of PMKSY.

The strategic approach in preparing district irrigation plan for Boudh district of the

state of Odisha has been to enhance the irrigated area from present level of 35% to 56%,

registering an increase of 21% over the existing irrigated area (46570 ha). To achieve the

proposed target by the end of 2021, the DIP has emphasised to convert 29000 ha of rain

fed area to irrigated area by an estimated expenditure of Rs. 814.741crore spread over 5

years period from 2016-17 to 2020-21.

18

CHAPTER-I

GENERAL INFORMATION OF THE DISTRICT

1.1. District Profile

The Boudh district presents a panorama of many millennia in the human history. It

occupies a unique position being endowed with lush green vegetation, different fauna and

rich cultural heritage. The district is separated from Phulbani district which was called

Bauda- Phulabani earlier. Mostly the Southern part of the district is bestowed

with dense forest. Boudh district was formed on 2nd

January 1994. The Boudh district is

bounded by River Mahanadi & Angul district to the North, Kandhamal district to the South,

Nayagarh district to the East and River Tel and Subarnapur district to the West, covering a

geographical area of 3098 sq km (1.99% of the state), the district lies between 200 22’ N to

200 50’ North Latitude and 83

0 34’E to 84

049’ East longitude (Table 1.1). The district code is

391.

The district consists of only one Sub-Division i.e. Boudh and three Blocks, viz. Boudh,

Harbhanga and Kantamal with district headquarters at Boudh. There is no municipality area

in the district. There are 3 Tehsils, 1 NAC, 6 Police Stations, 63 Grampanchayats and 1186

villages. There are 2 Fire Stations and 1 no, of Assembly Constituency in the district. The

block codes of Boudh, Harbhanga and Kantamal blocks are 0233, 0234 and 0232,

respectively. The geographical locations of the blocks are given in Table 1.1.

19

Fig. 1.1.1. District Map of Boudh

Table 1.1. District Profile of Boudh

SL.

NO. DISTRICT

DISTRICT

CODE LATITUDE LONGITUDE

1 BOUDH 391 20°22’ to 20°50’ N 83°34’ to 84°49’ E

BLOCK WISE

SL.

NO. BLOCK BLOCK CODE LATITUDE LONGITUDE

1 Boudh 0233 20° 49' 42.4056'' N 84° 19' 37.6716'' E

2 Harabhanga 0234 20° 37' 25.8744'' N 84° 36' 26.4744'' E

3 Kantamal 0232 20° 39' 37.3788'' N 83° 44' 39.0984'' E

Source; DDA ,Boudh

The Boudh district is concerned with the native rulers of Boudh. Raja Jogindar Dev

was benevolent and generous and introduced the english education in the state. During his

regime, Boudh has made a considerable progress in the field of modern education and

culture. His sudden death in 1913, resulted in numerous uprising of rebellions throughout

the district, which was successfully suppressed by Raja Narayan Dev. Raja Narayan Dev was

the last ruler of Boudh District, when it was merged with Odisha province on 1st

January

1948. Finally in 1994, the Boudh was raised to the status of a separate functioning district

on 2nd

January 1994. There are many festivals in the Boudh District that are celebrated by

total population of Boudh with great enthusiasm and faith. Festivals like Chuda Khai Jatra,

Ratha Yatra, Laxmi Puja, Nuakhai, Shivaratri, Dasahara, Dola Jatra, Puajiuntia and

Bhaijiuntia, Ramaleela, Kailashi Jatra, Christmas, Id–Ul–Fitre are the important festivals of

the District.

Out of the total geographical area of 3,10,000 ha in the district, the area under forest

is 1, 12,771 ha. Which is 36% of the total area. The forest produce of economic importance

in the district are Bamboo, Kendu leaves, Mahua Flowers/Seeds, Siali leaves, Timber, Fire

wood, Myrabolam, Gendulingama and Tamarind. Over the years, the forest suffered serious

20

depletion due to relentless pressure arising due to increasing demand for fuel wood, fodder

and timber.

Table 1.1.1. Forest Area of the District

Sl. No Type Area in Sq. Kms.

1 Total Forest Area 1277.17

2 Reserved Forest 983.33

3 Demarcated Forest 43.48

4 Other Forests 249.34

5 Un-demarcated Protected Forest 0.00

6 Un Classified Forest 1.02

7 Forest Division 1 [Boudh]

Fig.1.1.2 Forest Area of the District

21

Fig. 1.1.3 Map of Reserve Forest Area

22

The district is mostly rural in character having 1186 villages without any municipality and

one NACs. Increasing urbanisation has contributed in developing township in the district falling

under three Tahasils. The district is having one town i.e. Boudhin the district. The district head

quarter is Boudh. Detail administrative set-up of the district is reflected in the following

table.

Table 1.1.2 Administrative Set-up of Boudh District

Geographical Area 3,09,800 ha

Geographical Location Latitude – 20º.22’ to 20º.50’-N

Longitude – 83º.34’ to 84º.49’-E

Geographical Boundary North- River Mahandai & Angul Dist.

South- Kandhamala Dist.

East- Nayagarh Dist.

West- River Tel & Subarnapur Dist.

Number of Sub-Division 1 (Boudh)

No. of Municipalities / Corporation 0

Number of Blocks 3[Boudh, Harbhanga and Kantamal ]

Number of N.A.Cs. 1 ( Boudh) No.of Wards - 17

Number of Tahasils 3 ( Boudh,Harabhanga,Kantamal)

Number of Police Stations 6 (Boudh,Manamunda,Harabhanga,Kantamal,

Bousuni and Purunakatak)

No. of Registration Offices 2 ( Boudh & Kantamal)

No. of Treasuries 2 ( Boudh & Kantamal)

Number of Gram Panchayats 63

No. of Inhabited Villages 1115

No. of Uninhabited Villages 71

Total Number of villages 1186 [Inhabited - 1115,Uninhabited -71]

Fire Stations 4 (Boudh,Charichhak, Baunsuni and Kantamal)

No. of Jails 1 (Boudh)

No. of Assembly Constituencies 2 ( 85-Kantamal ,86-Boudh)

Source: http://ordistricts.nic.in/district_profile/dist_glance.php

23

1.2. Demography

As per census 2011, Boudh had population of 419343 of which male and female are

210036 and 209605, respectively. In 2001 census, Boudh had a population of 373,372 of

which male population was 188,155 while female population was 185,217. The Boudh

district population constituted 1.05 percent of total Odisha population. In 2001 census, this

figure for Boudh district was at 1.01 percent. There was net addition of 18.16 percent

population compared to 2001 census. The population density of Boudh during 2011 census

was 142 people per sq. km. in comparison to 121 persons/ sq. km during 2001. Average

literacy rate of Boudh in 2011 is 71.61 compared to 57.73 of 2001. If things are looked out at

gender wise, male and female literacy are 83.34 and 59.79 respectively. Total literate in

Boudh District are 271,612 of which male and female are 158,648 and 112,964, respectively.

24

Table . 1.2. Demographic Situation of Boudh District

Population SC ST General Total

Name of

the Block

No of

GPs/

Villages

Covered

Code of

Villages

Covered M F CH* Total

No of

house

hold

No of

Members

No of

house

hold

No of

Members

No of

house

hold

No of

Members

No of

house

hold

No of

Members

Boudh 22

(415) 71972 72450 144124 5717 34301 3002 18015 15302 91807 24021 144124

Harbhanga 18

(362) 63826 63008 126834 5031 30186 2642 15854 13465 80793 21138 126834

Kantamal 23

(409) 74238 74147 148385 5886 35316 3092 18548 15753 94521 24731 148385

TOTAL 63

(1186) 210036 209605 419343 16634 99803 8736 52417 34887 267121 69890 419343

The figures in parenthesis is the number of villages

Source: District Planning Officer, Boudh, Census- 2011

25

Fig. 1.2.1. Block wise total population

26

Fig.1.2.2. Block wise and caste wise population classification

27

Fig. 1.2.3. Block wise household and family members

28

The SC and ST population accounts for 23.7% and 12.4 %, respectively of the

total population as given in Table 1.2. The population density in the village area is

225/sq. km. The scheduled caste and scheduled tribe population is high in Kantamal

block. The higher number of villages (415) is in Boudh block while the higher number

of gram panchayats (23) is in Kantamal block. The sex ratio of the district is for every

1000 males the female population is 992. The average literacy rate of Boudh is 71.61

% during 2011 Census as compared to 57.73 % during 2001. The male and female

literacy is 83.34 % and 59.79 %, respectively.

As per 2011 census, 95.37 % population of Boudh district lives in villages. The

total population living in rural areas is 420,738 of which males and females are

211,133 and 209,605, respectively. In rural areas, the sex ratio is 993 females per 1000

males. The child sex ratio is 979 girls per 1000 boys. The child population in the age

group 0-14 is 59,737 in rural areas of which males were 30,184 and females were

29,553. The child population comprises 14.30 % of the total rural population of the

district.

Fig. 1.2.4. The Population growth Trend of Boudh District (1901-2011)

29

1.3. Biomass and Livestocks

The animal husbandry and dairy development have recognized as an important

economic activities of the populace of Boudh district. Next to agriculture, livestock is

the second most important income generation activities for the farmers. The back

yard poultry is very relevant mainly for small, marginal and landless farmers. The

rearing of goat, sheep and pigs are traditional activities of OBC, SC and ST population

of the district. This sector provides ample employment opportunities and livelihood

options to small, marginal and landless farmers who mostly rear small ruminant

animals for their pittance.

30

Table 1.3. Block Wise Biomass and Livestock Data of the District

Sl. Small Animals Large Animals

No.

Block Poultry

(No.)

Ducks

(No.)

Animal

(Nos.)

Pigs

(Nos.)

Goats

(Nos.)

Sheep

(Nos.)

Indigenious

Cows (Nos.)

Hybrid

Cows

(Nos.)

Indescript

ive

Buffalo

(Nos.)

Hybrid

Buffalo

(Nos.)

Any Other

Milch /

Meat

Draft Animal

(Buffalo /Yak

/ Bulls/

Any Other)

(Nos.)

1 Boudh 32,836 1095

33 (in

NAC)

only

29,879 36,134 18,956 1935 4954 nil nil nil

2 Harabhang

a 20,200 1200 150 26,881 19,364 28,266 1841 7047 nil nil nil

3 Kantamal 50,550 992 100 38,884 28,550 17,245 2977 4663 nil nil nil

Total - 103,586 3,287 283 95,644 84,048 64,467 6,753 16,664

Source: CDVO,Boudh

31

Fig. 1.3.1. Block wise Small Animal Distribution

32

Fig. 1.3.2. Block wise Distribution of Cattle Population

33

The Table 1.3 shows that the total population of the livestock’s in the district is

374732 of which the small ruminant population is 179975, cattle population is 87884

and the poultry bird population is 106873. There is large scope for expansion of

livestock’s in the district as the forest area is comparatively high. The small ruminate

animals can provide livelihood support to small and marginal farmers, considerably.

The district is having 7 Dispensaries, 28 Live Stock Aid Centres (2014-15) and 82

Artificial Insemination Centres which provides insemination facilities to the livestock

rearing families. Apart from this, the district is also having 40 Integrated Livestock

Development Centre (ILDC) sponsored by a NGO named JK Trust. The district is having

5 numbers of Cattle Development Centre (CDC) of managed by a NGO named BAIF.

The milk production and productivity in the district is low due to presence higher

number of indigenous cattle whose productivity is less than cross breed /exotic cattle.

Table 1.3.1. The Different Veterinary Institutions in the District

Institutions Boudh Kantamal Harabhanga Total

Vety. Disp. 3 2 2 7

Livestock Aid Center 10 11 7 28

Cattle Development center (CDC) BAIF 2 2 1 5

Integrated Livestock Development Center(ILDC)

JK Trust 18 13 9 40

Gomitra 3 2 4 9

Total Institutions 35 29 23 87

Non AI Center 3 1 1 5

Total AI Center 32 28 22 82

New LAC 3 4 4 11

34

Fig. 1.3.3. Veterenary Institutions in Boudh Block

35

1.4. Agro Ecology, Climate, Hydrology and Topography

Phytogeographically, the vegetation of Boudh district comes under two major

divisions, Northern tropical semi-evergreen forest and Northern tropical moist

deciduous forest. The Boudh district comes under West Central Table Land Agro

Climatic Zone of the state. The district has uneven and hilly terrain with geographical

area is 309800 ha. The climate of this district is sub-tropical, hot dry in summer, cold

dry in winter, cool and humid during rainy season. In summer the temperature rises

up to 450 C, in winter it falls to 10

0 C. December is the coldest month in the year and

May is the hottest month. The rainfall is erratic with uneven distribution resulting

drought or flood condition. The monsoon breaks in the middle of June and completely

ends in mid-October, causing heavy downpour in July and August. The normal rainfall

of this district is 1623.10 mm (Table 1.4.). The district is covered under one agro

climatic zone and two agro-ecological situations as indicated below:

36

Table1.4. Agro Ecology, Climate, Hydrology and Topographic Situations of Boudh

Maximum rainfall

intensity (mm)

Average weekly temperature (oc) Potential evapo-

transpiration (pet)

Elevation

Period Period

Summer

(april - may)

Winter

(oct - mar)

Rainy

(june - sept)

Sl.

No.

Name

of

block

Ag

ro e

colo

gic

al

zon

e t

yp

e

Ty

pe

of

terr

ain

Blo

ck a

rea

(h

a.)

N

orm

al

an

nu

al

rain

fall

(m

m)

A

ve

rag

e m

on

thly

ra

infa

ll

(mm

)

N

o.

Of

rain

y d

ay

s (n

o)

Up

to 15

min

Beyo

nd 15

but

up to

30

min

Beyon

d 30

but up

to 60

min

Min

Ma

x

Me

an

Min

Ma

x

Me

an

Min

Ma

x

Me

an

Su

mm

er

Win

ter

Ra

iny

se

aso

n

Cu

mu

lati

ve

to

tal

Mi

n

Max

Mea

n

1 BOUDH Western

Central

Table

Land

Uneven

& hilly

terrain

309,800 1623.10 135.26 68.10 221

mm

232

mm

268mm 25C 45C 10C 35C 10C 45C 6-9 mm 2-3

mm

1-2

mm

10-11

mm

Source: KVK, Boudh

Table 1.4.1. ACS and AES of Boudh District

Sl. No Agro-climatic Zone Agro-ecological situations Blocks covered Broad Soil groups

1 Western Central Table Land Plain land irrigated Boudh Red and Yellow, Red & Black,

Black, Brown Forest, Lateritic

2 Plateau rainfed Harabhanga

3

Plain land rainfed Kantamal

Source: KVK, Boudh

37

The Table 1.4 shows that the monthly average rainfall of the district is

135.26 mm with 68.10 numbers of rainy days per year. The maximum rainfall

intensity upto 15 minutes is 221 mm, beyond 15 minutes but upto 30 minutes is 232

mm and beyond 30 minutes but upto 60 minutes is 268 mm. The average weekly

maximum temperature in summer season (April-May) 450 C and minimum

temperature is 250 C. During winter season (October-March) the maximum weekly

temperature is 350 C and minimum temperature is 10

0 C. During rainy season (June-

September) the maximum and minimum weekly temperature is 450 C and 10

0 C,

respectively. The potential evapo- transpiration (PET) for summer, winter and rainy

seasons are 6-9 mm, 2-3 mm and 1-2 mm, respectively. The cumulative annual PET for

the district is 10-11 mm.

Table- 1.4.2. Block Wise Monthly Rainfall Data of the Year 2014-15 in mm.

S.No Block Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec

1 Boudh 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 73.00 34.20 470.40 479.00 357.30 65.30 0.00 0.00

2 Kantamal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 143.00 57.00 993.90 549.30 327.20 22.20 0.00 0.00

3 Harabhanga 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 160.40 18.20 543.70 347.60 344.40 85.80 0.00 0.00

Total (District) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 376.40 109.4 2008 1375.9 1028.9 173.3 0.0 0.0

Source: DDA,Boudh

Fig. 1.4.1. Rainfall trend of Boudh District from 2006-2015

38

Most part of the district has black alluvial soil. The district Boudh covers

fertile plains and hilly zones. This area consists of a long strip of level land running

parallel to the Mahanadi. Many small streams, tributary rivers, fountain (locally called

jhor) find their way to the Mahanadi. The river line plains of Boudh are drained by the

tributaries of the Mahanadi while the southern and the western region are drained by

the tributaries of the Tel. The referring blocks of Kantamal, Boudh and Harbhanga is

full of black alluvial soil which is most fertile due to deposit of salt. Out of 3 blocks, 2

blocks have plain lands and one block has got mixture of plain and hilly ranges.

1.5. Soil Profile

The major soil class of the district is mixed grey soil (inceptisols) with an area of

275453.29 ha followed by black soil with more clay content (vertisol). The other soil

classes are entisols (unaltered soils with coarse parent materials with some

unclassified soil (light mud flats).

39

Table 1.5. Major Soil classes and type of the District and Blocks .

Soil type Land slope Sl.

No. Block

Major soil classes Area

(ha)

0 - 3 %

(ha)

3 - 8 %

(ha)

8 - 25 %

(ha)

> 25 %

(ha)

1 Boudh

2 Black soil with more clay

content (vertisols) 4162.11 3821.57 225.19 81.66 0.08

3 Mixed grey soil

(inceptisols) 88969.29

51065.7

0 7199.74 28211.35 1183.67

4 Unaltered soils with coarse

parent materials (entisols) 1309.18 934.10 250.67 113.03 0.00

5 Unclassified soil( like mud

flats) 930.20 784.62 35.51

6 Waterbody 4622.34

7 Habitation 142.46

8 Total 100135.5

8

9 Harabhanga


content (vertisols) 3456.30 3238.07 71.07 27.29

11 Mixed grey soil

(inceptisols)

104837.8

0

35160.2

3

13261.3

4 51267.31 4221.61


parent materials (entisols) 2870.61 1476.05 759.96 623.19 2.98


flats) 1635.46 1257.45 158.03 17.10

14 Waterbody 4621.48

15 Habitation 380.50

16 Total 117802.1

4

17 Kantamal


content (vertisols) 4408.69 4104.39 147.56 62.34

19 Mixed grey soil

(inceptisols) 81646.56

57100.9

1 7341.55 15801.78 290.73


parent materials (entisols) 2163.58 1749.16 310.74 101.96


flats) 270.19 208.48 46.45

22 Waterbody 3165.88

23 Habitation 207.36

24 Total 91862.28

Source: P.D, Watershed, Boudh

40

The percentage of insceptisols (Mixed grey soil ) is more in Harbhanga Block (88.99% )

followed by Kantamal (88.87%and Boudh (88.84%). The percentage of vertisols is more in

Kantamal ( 4.7%) followed by Boudh ( 4.15%) and lowest is in Harbhanga Block (2.93%) .

But the area under entsols (Unaltered soils with coarse parent materials) is more in

Harbhanga Block (2870.61 ha ) followed by Kantamal (2163.58ha ) and Boudh (1309.18ha) .

The water body in Boudh and Harbhanga are approximately equal.

The soil of the district is mostly black alluvial and is generally fertile with low status of

nitrogen and available Phosphorus at certain places. The revering blocks of Kantamal, Boudh

and Harbhanga is full of black alluvial soil which is most fertile due to deposit of silt (Fig. 1.5.6,

1.5. and 1.5.8) . Out of 3 blocks, 2 blocks have plane lands and one block has the combination

of plane and hilly ranges. The soil of the district has high moisture retention capacity.

Fig. 1.5.1. Soil Classification Map of Boudh

41

Table 1.5.1. Soil types in Boudh

Sl.

No Soil type Characteristics Area (000ha)

1 Black soil Clay loam 96.1

2 Mixed red & black Sandy clay loam 164.3

3 Red soil Sandy loam 49.6

Fig. 1.5.2. The Soil Status in Boudh

The soils are mostly acidic in nature and some part of district has neutral soil.

The availability of Phosphorous (P) and Potash (K) in soils are high whereas the

Nitrogen status is medium in two blocks except Kantamal block. The status of Nitrogen

is low in Kantamal block but with more phosphorous and potash content

Table 1.5.2. The block wise soil reaction and fertility status in percent

Soil Reaction Fertility Index S.

No

Name of

Block Acid Normal Alkaline N P K

1 Boudh 89% 11% - 1.18 1.43 1.32

2 Harabhanga 70% 30% - 1.27 1.54 1.23

3 Kantamal 90% 10% - 1.16 1.70 1.59

42

Fig. 1.5.3. Land Slope Classification of Boudh Block

43

Fig. 1.5.4. Land Slope Classification of Harabhanga Block

44

Fig. 1.5.5. Land Slope Classification of Kantamal Block

45

Fig. 1.5.6.Soil Classification of Boudh Block

46

Fig. 1.5.7.Soil Classification of Harabhanga Block

47

Fig. 1.5.8. Soil Classification of Kantamal Block

48

The Table 1.5 shows the land slopes of different blocks of Boudh district. The

land slope with 0-3% for mixed grey soil is highest in Kantamal block with coverage

area of 57100.91 ha followed by Boudh with 51065.70 ha and lowest in Harabhanga

block (35160.23 ha.). The vertisol in t6he corresponding slopes is highest in Kantamal

block (4104.39 ha.) followed by Boudh (3821.57 ha.) and lowest in Harabhanga (3238.

07 ha.). The land slope 3-8 % covers highest area in Harabhanga block (13261.34 ha)

followed by Kantamal block (4341.55 ha.). The Harabhanga block also has land slope

8-25% and more than 25% with corresponding area of 5127.31 ha and 4221.61 ha,

respectively (Fig. 1.5.3, 1.5.4 and 1.5.5).

1.6. Soil Erosion and Runoff Status

Table 1.6. Soil Erosion and Run Off Status of the Boudh District

Runoff

Time of return of

maximum flood Sl.

No

Name

of

micro

water

shed

Name of

sediment

monitori

ng

station

Longi

tude Latitude

Soil

erosion

(tone /

ha)

Peak

rate

(cum /

hr)

Frequen

cy of

peak

(no. In

months)

Total

runoff

volume

of rainy

season

(ha-m)

5

years

10

years

In

years

Drought

frequency

Data not available

1.7. Land Use Pattern

The table 1.7 indicates that the Kantamal block is having highest geographical

area (35.1%) followed by Harabhanga (35%) and then Boudh (29.80%). Forest area is

51% of total geographical area. Around 37% of the total forest land is found in

Kantamal block which is maximum followed by Boudh and Harabhanga. Cropping

Intensity is maximum in Harabhanga (169%) and the cropping intensity of the district

is 146 %. The total geographical area of Boudh district is 310 thousand ha. Of which

the block wise distribution of Boudh, Harabhanga and Kantamal block is 101.496,

102.076 and 106.428 thousand ha., respectively (Table 1.7 and Fig. 1.7.1., 1.7.2 and

1.7.3). The area under forest land is 182.995 thousand ha. which is 51.21% of total

geographical area. The area under waste land is 2.04% of the total geographical land.

49

Table 1.7. Land Use Pattern of Boudh District (Area in thousand ha.)

Area Under Agriculture

Block Gram

Panchayat

Villages

Covered

Total

Geograp

hical

Area

Gross

Cropped

Area

Net

Sown

Area

Area

Sown

More

Than

Once

Crop

Intensity

Area

Under

Forest

Area

Under

Waste

land

Area

Under

Other

Uses

Boudh 21 384 101.496 49.696 32.396 14.300 153% 62.966 0.372 10.762

Harabhanga 18 340 102.076 42.662 25.207 14.455 169% 50.816 3.323 45.730

Kantamal 24 393 106.428 40.422 27.577 10.621 146% 69.213 3.612 25.318

Total 63 1117 310 132.78 85.180 39.376 182.995 7.307 81.810

Source: DDA,Boudh

Fig. 1.7.1. Land Utilisation Pattern of the Boudh District

50

Fig. 1.7.2. Land Use Pattern of Boudh Block( Area in thousand Ha. )

51

Fig. 1.7.3. Land Use Pattern of Harabhanga Block (Area in thousand Ha. )

52

Fig. 1.7.4. Land Use Pattern of Kantamal Block (Area in thousand Ha.)

53

CHAPTER-II

DISTRICT WATER PROFILE

A scarce natural resource, water is fundamental to life, livelihood, food

security and sustainable development. The National Water Policy (2002) document

very categorically states that water is a prime natural resource, a basic human need

and a precious national asset. It further states that it is one of the most crucial

elements in developmental planning. Agricultural sector in India in general and in

Odisha in particular has been and is likely to remain the major use of water.

Undoubted, irrigation has been one of the pillars of green revolution and key factor in

imparting resilience and drought proofing to agriculture.

Realizing the importance of the water resources and the role, it would play in

enhancing agricultural production in a sustainable manner, Government has

developed irrigation resources. The district water profile particularly for agricultural

use for raising different crops are presented in this section. Understanding the area

under irrigated by different crops provides making strategies for efficient utilization

of scare water resources for bringing rainfed areas under irrigation

The principal rivers are the Mahanadi and Tel, which flow around the North

Western side bordering Kantamal, Boudh and Harbhanga Blocks, and few small rivers

such as Sunamodi, Salur, Khadog and Bagh are originated from the hilly regions of

Kandhamal district and flow towards Boudh district and meet with Mahanadi and Tel

river. Major portion of this district is flood prone as many rivers pass through this

district. The different rivers flowing within the district is given in the map below.

55

Table 2.1. Area Wise Crop Wise Irrigation Status

Kharif (area in ha) Rabi (area in ha) Summer

(area in ha)

Total

(area in ha)

Horticulture & plantation

crops (area in ha) Crop type

Irrg Rainfed Total Irrg Rainfed Total Irrg Rainfed Total Irrg. Rainfed Total Irrigated Rainfed Total

A) Cereals 24410 41570 65980 2290 0 2290 0 0 0 26700 41570 68270

B) Coarse Cerels 500 30 530 80 0 80 0 0 0 580 30 610

C) Pulses 0 13950 13950 980 22460 23440 0 0 0 980 36410 37390

D) Oilseeds 660 2490 3150 1560 2170 3730 0 0 0 2220 4660 6880

E) Fibres 0 250 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 250

F) Vegetables 5100 3290 8390 9050 0 9050 0 0 0 14150 3290 17440

G) Spices &condiments 910 0 910 990 0 990 0 0 0 1900 0 1900

H) Others 0 0 0 40 0 40 0 0 0 40 0 40

I) Mango 2545 0 2545

J) Banana 287 0 287

K) Cashew 0 774 774

L) Citrus 0 297 297

M) Sapta 0 10 10

N) Guava 0 232 232

O) Pineapple 8 0 8

P) Coconut & Papaya 471 0 471

Total 31580 61580 93160 14990 24630 39620 0 0 0 46570 86210 132780 3311 1313 4624

Source: DDA & ADH, Boudh

56

Table 2.1 shows that the irrigation percentage of Boudh district is 35% while

the rainfed area is 65% of the total cultivable area (132780 ha). The Kharif season

irrigated area is 46570ha which is 65.67% of the total area covered for cultivation.

During Rabi season the irrigated area is 16115 ha which is 37.42% of the total land

covered under cultivation. The district does not take any crop during summer season

due to lack of assured irrigation during the season. The horticultural and plantation

crops are taken in 4624 ha of land of which assured irrigation is provided to 71.60% of

horticultural crops.

Substantial investments have been made over the plan period for construction

of irrigation infrastructure and creation of irrigation potential in the district. The

district has about 51.54 percent land are irrigated . Many major, medium and minor

irrigation projects have been constructed during the plan period in the district. To create

additional irrigation facilities, the Agriculture Department provided subsidy to farmers for

digging of bore wells, dug wells and purchase of pump sets etc. Scrutiny revealed that 18

bore wells, 65 dug wells and 2077 pump sets were provided during 2007-12 to the farmers

at subsidized cost. Boudh district is rich in both groundwater and surface water resources.

The groundwater utilisable resource for irrigation use is at 35618 ha, annual draft for

irrigation use is 4938 ha. The current level of exploitation of groundwater potential is only

15.6% of the utilizable recharge as against state average of 18.3%.

Table 2.1.1. Source wise Area Irrigated (Area in hectares) of the Year

2014-15

Dug/ Tube /

Bore Wells

Lift

Irrigation Medium Minor Total

Block

Nos. Area Nos. Area Nos. Area Nos. Area Area

Boudh 1181 796 147 3366 2 14884 21 2695 22489

Harabhanga 1494 904 137 2737 1 6989 26 7063 18464

Kantamal 1607 1158 206 5354 1 6853 27 3970 17896

Total 4282 2858 490 11457 4 28726 74 13728 58849

Source: Irrigation Dept.,Boudh

57

Among the different Kharif crops, the upland rice is most affected by drought.

Therefore, diversified land use with low duty non-paddy crops is the best option in

these lands. The technology so far available to mitigate drought are mostly preventive

in “nature and requires early planning. The age-old adage “Prevention is better than

cure” thus holds good in drought management. Therefore, it is imperative to have a

long-term policy and planning at the beginning of the season for judicious use of

water, land and crops in a particular locality for best results. The major thrust in

drought mitigation in rain fed areas should be on rainwater management through in-

situ conservation and water harvesting through on-farm reservoirs capturing runoff

and flash flood to recycle at the time of need.

Fig. 2.1.1. Block wise Irrigated Area

2.2. Production and Productivity of Major Crops

The area under cereals ,coarse cereals, pulses, oilseeds, fibres, vegetables,

spices constitute 68270ha,610ha, 37310ha, 6880ha, 250ha, 17440 ha and 1900ha,

respectively in the district. The paddy area in the district covers 59335 ha. The total

fruit area in the district 4393ha. The major crop of the district is paddy. The total

production of rainfed paddy is 20742.65 MT whereas irrigated paddy is 212910.96MT.

58

The productivity of rainfed paddy and irrigated paddy in kharif season is 27.54qt/ha

and 41.75qt/ha respectively as compared with the average productivity of paddy is

39.92qt/ha. The productivity of irrigated paddy in rabi season is 45.37qt/ha.

Table 2.2.1 shows that mango is the major fruit crop of the district followed by

banana and lemon. The climate is conducive for fruits and vegetables. Other crops like

onion has high potential for promotion in the district. More area to be covered under

onion, mango and banana in all three blocks. Table. 2.2.3. shows that during 2012-13

and 2013-14 maximum area covered under Banana, Potato, Tomato and onion in the

district is less during the year 2015-16.

59

Table 2.2. Production and Productivity of Major Crops

Crop Sown Rainfed - Paddy Irrigated-Paddy Total

Sl.

No.

Name of

the Block Season

Cereals Coarse

Cerals Pulses

Oil

seeds Fibres

Veget

ables Spices

Oth

ers

Area

(Ha)

Prod. in

MT

Product

ivity in

Qtls/

Hect

Cost of

cultivati

on on

Rs/Ha

Area

(ha)

Prod. in

MT

Produ

ctivity

in

Qtls/

Hect.

Cost of

cultivati

on on

Rs./Ha

Area

(Ha)

Prod. in

MT

Produc

tivity

in Qtls/

Hect.

Cost of

cultivati

on on

Rs./Ha

1 Boudh Kharif 26480 100 4825 915 95 2748 430 0 2484 7265.70 29.25 23500 20796 90150.66 43.35 23500 23280 97416 41.85 23500

Rabi 777 55 8168 920 0 4409 260 15 0 0.00 0 23500 277 1256.20 45.35 23500 277 1256.2 45.35 23500

2 Harabhanga Kharif 18690 205 4855 1950 45 2320 380 0 314 863.50 27.5 23500 15176 60172.84 39.65 23500 15490 61036 39.40 23500

Rabi 753 75 8217 1269 0 3377 343 15 0 0.00 0 23500 253 1132.18 44.75 23500 253 1132.2 44.75 23500

3 Kantamal Kharif 20810 90 5110 1285 90 1580 233 0 4733 12613.45 26.65 23500 15027 62587.46 41.65 23500 19760 75201 38.06 23500

Rabi 760 85 6215 541 0 3006 254 10 0 0.00 0 23500 275 1263.63 45.95 23500 275 1263.6 45.95 23500

TOTAL Kharif 65980 395 14790 4150 230 6648 1043 0 7531 20742.65 27.54 23500 50999 212910.96 41.75 23500 58530 233654 39.92 23500

Rabi 2290 215 22600 2730 0 10792 857 40 0 0 23500 805 3651.995 45.37 23500 805 3652 45.37 23500

G, Total 68270 610 37390 6880 230 17440 1900 40 7531 - - - 51804 59335

Source: DDA & ADH, Boudh

60

Table. 2.2.1: The Production and Productivity of Major Horticultural Crops During 2015

Crop Sown Rainfed Irrigated Total SI.

No

District Season

Ma

ng

o

Ca

she

w

Ba

na

na

Cit

rus

Sa

pta

Gu

av

a

Pin

ea

pp

le

Oth

ers

(Co

con

ut

&

Pa

pa

ya

) A

rea

(H

a)

Pro

d.i

n M

T

Pro

du

ctiv

ity

in Q

tls/

He

ct

Co

st o

f

cult

iva

tio

n

on

Rs/

Ha

Are

a (

ha

)

Pro

d.i

n M

T

Pro

du

ctiv

ity

in Q

tls/

He

ct.

Co

st o

f

cult

iva

tio

n

on

Rs.

/Ha

Are

a (

Ha

)

Pro

d.i

n M

T

Pro

du

ctiv

ity

in Q

tls/

He

ct.

Co

st o

f

cult

iva

tio

n

on

Rs.

/Ha

1 Boudh 2545 774 287 297 10 232 8 471 1313 558.05 7.21 46951 3311 715.25 9.241 114354 4624 1273.3 8.23 114354

Source: ADH, Horticulture, Boudh

Table. 2.2.2. Area, Production and Yield of Major Horticulture Crops During 2013

Area Production Yield t/ha Sl.

No Block Crop

Irrigated % Rain fed % Total Irrigated % Rain fed % Total Irrigated Rain- fed Average

1 Boudh Mango -- -- 1370 Ha 100 1370 Ha -- -- 3205.8 MT 3205.8 MT -- 2.34 MT 2.34 MT

2 Kantamal Mango -- -- 1400 Ha 100 1400 Ha -- -- 3276 MT 3276 MT -- 2.34 MT 2.34 MT

3 Harabhanga Mango -- -- 1341 Ha 100 1341 Ha -- -- 3137.94 MT 3137.94

MT

-- 2.34 NT 2.34 MT

4 Boudh Bananana 120 Ha 100 -- -- 120 Ha 28 MT -- -- -- 28 MT 0.23 MT -- 0.23 MT

5 Kantamal Bananana 75 Ha 100 -- -- 75 Ha 17.5 MT -- -- -- 17.5 MT 0.23 MT -- 0.23 MT

6 Harabhanga Bananana 100 Ha 100 -- -- 100 Ha 23.3MT -- -- -- 23.3MT 0.23 MT -- 0.23 MT

7 Boudh Onion 446 Ha 100 -- -- 446 Ha 6338 MT -- -- -- 6338 MT 14.21 MT -- 14.21 MT

8 Kantamal Onion 150Ha 100 -- -- 150Ha 2131 MT -- -- -- 2131 MT 14.20 MT -- 14.20 MT

9 Harabhanga Onion 350 Ha 100 -- -- 350 Ha 4969 MT -- -- -- 4969 MT 14.19 MT -- 14.19 MT

Source: ADH, Boudh

61

Table 2.2.3. Area, Production and Productivity Trend of Main Crops in the District

(Area – ha, Production–q, productivity –q/ha)

2012-13(Actual) 2013-14 (Actual) 2014-15 (Actual) 2015-16 (Projected) 2016-17 (Projected)

Sl.

No.

Name

of the

Crop A P Y A P Y A P Y A P Y A P Y

1 Banana 234 53.55 0.22 295 68.8 0.23 274 62

0.22 300 67.88 0.22 350 79.20 0.22

2 Potato 157 6497 41.38 175 1324.63 7.56 361 10362 28.70 400 11488 28.70 450 12916.62 28.70

3 Tomato 1950 19145 9.81 2100 21452 10.21 2376 32884 13.84 2500 34600 13.84 2550 35292.17 13.84

4 Onion 890 12646 14.20 920 1063.74 1.15 946 13443 14.21 1000 14210 14.21 1050 14920.88 14.21

Source: ADH, Boudh

62

2.3. Irrigation Based Classification

Irrigation is the lifeline for crop production. Massive efforts are geared towards

increasing the irrigation potential of the district. This endeavour has resulted in

creating a potential of irrigation area of 31580 hectares during Kharif season and

14990hectares during Rabi season. Further, It is proposed to exploit the vast ground

and surface water potentials by establishment of more number of shallow tube well,

bore wells, dug wells and river/ surface lift points. The Table 2.3 reflects the irrigation

sources for the district of Boudh. It is observed that the major, medium and minor

irrigation project irrigates 17269 ha, 7336 ha and 14169 ha of land, respectively. The

irrigation area covered under lift irrigation is around 9796 ha. The emphasis will be

given to enhance the command area under major, medium and minor irrigation

projects in Boudh district. There is also great scope to increase area under lift

irrigation points as the ground water has not been properly exploited.

Table 2.3. Irrigation Based Classification of Boudh District

Irrigated area ( in ha) Rainfed area ( in ha)

Sl.

No. Block / department

Gross

irrigated

area

Net

irrigated

area

Partially

irrigated /

protective

irrigation

Un

irrigated /

totally

rainfed

1 Major Irrigation (SIP) 18074.50

a Boudh 10,678 8,995 -

b Harabhanga 6,591 4,655 -

c Kantamala - - - -

2 Medium Irrigation

(BAGH) 18434.30

a Boudh 2,039 -

b Harabhanga - - -

c Kantamala 5297 3297 -

3 Minor Irrigation 18861.20

a Boudh 3,470 2,690 168

b Harabhanga 3438 2063 364

c Kantamala 4,261 2,084 284

4 Lift Irrigation

a Boudh 3,228 2,228 -

b Harabhanga 3,812 2,812

c Kantamala 3.756 2,756 - -

46570 31580 816 86,210

Source : Irrigation Department, Boudh

63

CHAPTER III

WATER AVAILABILITY

Substantial investments have been made over the plan period for construction

of irrigation infrastructure and creation of irrigation potential in the district. The

district has about 35 percent land are irrigated. Many major, medium and minor

irrigation projects have been constructed during the plan period in the district. To

create additional irrigation facilities, the Agriculture Department provided subsidy to

farmers for digging of bore wells, dug wells and purchase of pump sets etc. The district

level data reveal that 18 bore wells, 65 dug wells and 2077 pump sets were provided

during 2007-12 to the farmers at subsidized cost. Boudh district is rich in both

groundwater and surface water resources.

Table 3.1. Status of Water Availability

Sl. No. Sources Kharif Rabi Summer Total Remarks

1 Surface Irrigation

(i) Canal (Major Irrigation) (Salki)

(ii) Boudh 14995 2850 - 17845

(iii) Harabhanga 6655 1200 - 7855

(iv) Kantamala - - - -

(v) Canal (Medium Irrigation) (Bagh)

(vi) Boudh - - - -

(vii) Harabhanga - - - -

2 Kantamala 12,834 - - 12,834

(i) Minor Irrigation tanks

(ii) Boudh 3,286 1015 - 4301

(iii) Harabhanga 4,430 1253 5683

(iv) Kantamala 5,555 1205 6760

(V) Minor Irrigation (Diversion Weir)

(VI) Boudh 3,644 32 - 3676

(VII) Harabhanga 6228 117 6345

(IX) Kantamala 2583 - 2583

(X) Lift Irrigation / Diversion

(XI) Boudh 5228 5,050 - 10278

(Xii) Harabhanga 5,812 4,220 - 10032

(Xiii) Kantamala 5,472 5,154 - 10626

TOTAL 76722 22096 - 98818 -

source : Irrigation Department, Boudh

64

The Table 3.1 shows that the total water available from different sources is

98818 ha. The Salki dam feeds the water to canals under major irrigation project while

Bagh dam feed water to canal system in medium irrigation projects. The total

irrigation potential of the district is 73.

3.2. Status of Ground Water Availability

Status of block as per CGWB

notification Ground water (BCM)

Sl.

No. Block

Critical Semi-critical Safe Draft Recharge Gap

1 BOUDH √√√√ 0.0179 0.0769 0.0591

2 HARABHANGA √√√√ 0.0181 0.1353 0.1172

3 KANTAMAL √√√√ 0.0201 0.0661 0.0460

TOTAL √√√√ 0.0561 0.2783 0.2223

Source: P.D., Watershed, Boudh

The Table 3.2 shows that the ground water availability in the three blocks of

the district has great potential for exploitation. The ground water status is safe and it

is fit for further exploitation. The data shows that the ground water exploitation in

the district is 15.34 % against the national average of 18.24%. Hence promotion of lift

irrigation points could be taken up in all three blocks for enhancing the area under

irrigation.

3.3. Status of Command Area

Information of canal

command

Information on the other

services command Total area

Sl.

No.

Name of

the block Total

area

Develop

ed area

Undeve

loped

area

Total

area

Devel

oped

area

Undevelo

ped area

Developed

command

Undevelo

ped

command

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4+7 5+8

1 Boudh 11465 10435 1030 3470 - 3470 10435 4500

2 Harabhanga 8426 7395 1031 7836 7836 7395 8867

3 Kantamal 4261 4261 4261

Total 19891 17830 2061 15567 15567 17830 17628

Source : PD, Watershed, Boudh

65

The Table 3.3 shows that the total developed command area in the district is

17830 ha while the total undeveloped command area is 17628 ha. The Salki and Bagh

river systems passing through the district is presently providing irrigation to mostly

Boudh and Harabhanga blocks. The Kantamal block is not connected to any irrigation

dams and its canal system. Hence provision to be made to develop minor irrigation

projects in Kantamal block.

3.4. Existing Type of Irrigation

The Table 3.4 indicates that there are 393 numbers of government canals

having length of 1256.63 km. The total number of community ponds in the district is

around 1794 and there are 681 numbers of private ponds. There are 233 numbers of

government reservoirs and 36 numbers of diversion weirs existing in the district for

providing surface irrigation. There are 49o numbers of government tube wells and

1571 numbers of private tube wells. The district is also having 1787 numbers of open

wells, 3564 numbers of government bore wells and 924 numbers of private bore wells

for ground water exploitation. There 1050 numbers of traditional WHS/ river lifts for

the lift irrigation. There are 4614 numbers of electric pumps for water extraction in

the district. For repair and maintenance the proposed budget is 71.28 and 52.5 lakhs

for bore wells and river lifts.

66

Table 3.4 Existing type of irrigation

Surface irrigation Ground water Water extraction

devices / lift Total

Canal based Tanks / ponds / reservoirs Tube wells Open

wells Borewell

Repair &

mantainane each

year (rs) (in lakhs)

Sources of

irrigation

Govt canal no

(length in kms)

Co

mm

un

ity

/ p

vt

can

al

Co

mm

un

ity

po

nd

s

incl

ud

ing

sm

all

Ind

ivid

ua

l /

pv

t

po

nd

s

Go

vt

rese

rvo

irs

/

da

ms

Div

ers

ion

we

irs

Go

vt

Pv

t

Co

mm

un

ity

/ g

ov

t

Pv

t

Go

vt

Pv

t

Oth

er

sou

rce

s in

clu

din

g

tra

dit

ion

al

wh

s/ r

ive

r li

ft

Tre

ate

d e

fflu

en

t d

isch

arg

ed

fro

m s

tp

Ele

ctri

city

pu

mp

Die

sel

pu

mp

Oth

ers

Irri

ga

tio

n s

ou

rce

s

Wa

ter

ex

tra

ctin

g u

nit

s

Bo

re w

ell

Riv

er

lift

Major (SIP) 99 270.23 59 1 60

Boudh 61 158.56 44 1 45

Harabhanga 38 111.67 15 15

Kantamala - - - -

Medium (Bagh)

Boudh 15 40.05 0 0

Harabhanga 0 - 0 0

Kantamala 62 103.82 1 1

Minor Irrigtion 59 286.15 57 17 74

Boudh 13 52.52 15 6 21

Harabhanga 24 165.41 16 10 26

Kantamala 22 68.22 26 1 27

Lift Irrigation 1782 525 2307 2307 35.64 26.25

Boudh 392 170 562 562 7.84 8.50

Harabhanga 326 148 474 474 6.52 7.40

Kantamala 1064 207 1271 1271 21.28 10.35

TOTAL 393 1256.63 0 0 0 233 36 0 0 0 0 3564 0 1050 0 4614 0 0 269 4614 71.28 52.5

Source: Irrigation Dept , Boudh

67

CHAPTER IV

WATER REQUIREMENT/ DEMAND

4.1. Domestic Water Demand

The total population in 2015 was estimated and was found to be 452480 and

the projected population in 2020 would be 507894 and accordingly the gross water

demand will be 0.000051. The data in 4.1 revealed highest number of population in

Boudh Block in 20015 & 2020 was calculated to be 183348 and 194631 respectively

followed by Kantamal (159455, 161909) and lowest in Harbhanga (109677, 151354) .

Accordingly the gross water demand in Boudh, Kantamal and Harbhanga will be

0.00002 , 0.000016 and 0.000015, respectively .

Table 4.1. Domestic Water Demand

SL.

NO. BLOCKS

Population in

2015

Projected population

in 2020

Gross water

demand (BCM)

1 Boudh 183348 194631 0.00002

2 Harbhanga 109677 151354 0.000015

3 Kantamal 159455 161909 0.000016

Total 452480 507894 0.000051

Source: EE, RWSS, Boudh

Fig. 4.1.1 Domestic Water Demand

68

4.2. Crop Water Requirement

The Table 4.2 indicated that the total water potential required for the Boudh

district would be 8.49 CM. The existing water potential in the district is calculated to

be 3.05and accordingly the water potential to be created would be 5.44B CM. The

water potential required is calculated to be 3.09, 2.65 and 2.75 for Boudh, Harbhanga

and Kantamal blocks, respectively. The corresponding existing water potential for

Boudh, Harbhanga and Kantamal blocks are calculated to be1.10, 0.90 and 1.05 BCM,

respectively. The water potential to be created for Boudh block is calculated to be

1.99 and 1.75,1.70 BCM for Harbhanga and kantamal blocks.

Table. 4.2 Crop Water Requirement

Block Crop

Area

Sown

in

Hects.

Irrigation

Area in

Hects.

Crop

water

Demand

in mm

Water

potential

required

BCM

Existing

water

potential

BCM

Water

Potential

to be

created

Cereals 25557 10073 1250

Coarse Cerals 215 80 500

Pulses 13023 300 350

Oilseeds 1935 868 550

Fibres 95 0 550

Vegetable 6657 4119 700

Spices 803 596 500

Others 10 10 2000

3.09 1.10

1.99 Boudh

Total 48295 16736

Cereals 18743 6000 1250


Pulses 13259 400 350

Oilseeds 2919 660 550

Fibres 45 0 550

Vegetable 5697 5442 700

Spices 623 673 500

Others 15 15 2000

2.65 0.90

1.75

Harabhanga

Total 41481 13390

Cereals 23970 10627 1250


Pulses 11108 280 350

Oilseeds 2026 692 550

Fibres 110 0 550

Kantamal

Vegetable 5086 3889 700

2.75 1.05

1.70

69

Block Crop

Area

Sown

in

Hects.

Irrigation

Area in

Hects.

Crop

water

Demand

in mm

Water

potential

required

BCM

Existing

water

potential

BCM

Water

Potential

to be

created

Spices 474 631 500

Others 15 15 2000

Total 43004 16444

Cereals 68270 26700 1250


Pulses 37390 980 350

Oilseeds 6880 2220 550

Fibres 250 0 550

Vegetable 17440 14150 700

Spices 1900 1900 500

Others 40 40 2000

8.49 3.05

5.44 Total

Total 132780 46570

Source: DDA, Boudh

4.3. Livestock Water Demand

The table 4.3 depicts the livestock water demand for the district of Boudh. The

data for the livestock population has been obtained from the Project Director,

Watershed Mission Boudh, Govt. Of Orissa. It has been found that the water demand

for livestock for Boudh, Harbhanga and Kantamal block s are 0.00038, 0.000050,

0.0000471 BCM , respectively. The total water requirement for the livestock sector is

0.000901 BCM. The water potential to be created as per the irrigation plan is 0.001411

BCM for the district. The gap of 0.00051 BCM is to be created within the 5 years of

plan period in the district for sustainable provision of water for livestock population of

the district.

70

Table 4.3. Livestock Water Demand for the Boudh District

BLOCKS TOTAL NO. OF

LIVESTOCK

PRESENT WATER

DEMAND (BCM)

WATER DEMAND IN

2020 (BCM)

EXISTING

POTENTIAL

(BCM)

WATER

POTENTIAL TO

BE CREATED

(BCM)

BOUDH

1,25,822(LA-

24885

SA-67141

Poult.-33931)

LA-14,21,475lit/day

SA-6,71,410lit/day

poult.-

8,482,75lit/day

LA-1705770lit/day

SA-805692lit/day

poult.-10604lit/day

2522066 lit/per day

0.00038 0.00043

HARABHANGA

1,04,949(LA-

37145

SA-46395

poult.-21400)

LA-20,42,975lit/day

SA-4,63,950lit/day

poult.-5,350lit/day

LA-2451570lit/day

SA-556740lit/day

poult.-6420lit/day

3014730 lit/per day

0.000471 0.000541

KANTAMAL

1,43,961(LA-

24885

SA-67534

poult.-51542)

LA-13,68,675lit/day

SA-6,75,340lit/day

poult.-12,886lit/day

LA-1642410lit/day

SA-810408lit/day

poult.-16108lit/day

24689261 lit /per

day

0.00038 0.000440

Total 0.000901 0.001411

Source: CDVO, Boudh

Fig. 4.3.1 Livestock Water Demand for the Boudh District

71

4.4 Industrial Water Demand

The table 4.4 reflects the industrial water demand for the district of Boudh .

The district does not have any heavy industries. The nature of industries are mostly

limited to fly ash brick making, rice meal, packaging, soft drinks and other trivial

industries like ice-cream and hotels. The employment generation in these industries is

very limited. The water demand by these industries is also very less. The data on

industrial water demand given in Table 4.4, shows that the total industrial water

demand is 0.000021. It is predicted that by the year 2020, the total industrial water

demand would inflate to 0.000024 BCM. The present water potential is 0.0000117

BCM as per the data given by the District Industrial Corporation , Boudh. Therefore

there is a gap of 0.0000096 BCM of water potential which needs to be created for the

sustainable supply to the industries by the year of 2020.

Table 4.4 Industrial Water Demand for Boudh District

SL.

NO. BLOCKS

NAME OF THE

INDUSTRY

WATER

DEMAN

(BCM)

WATER

DEMAND

IN 2020

(BCM)

EXISTING

WATER

POTENTIAL

(BCM)

WATER

POTENTIAL

TO BE

CREATED

(BCM)

1 Fly ash brick 0.000018 0.000018 0.0000012 0.0000006

2 Rice mill 0.0000006 0.0000006 0.0000003 0.0000003

3 Packaged drinking

water 0.0000006 0.0000006 0.0000006

_

4 Soft drinks 0.0000003 0.0000003 _ 0.0000003

5 Hotel 0.000006 0.000006 0.0000036 0.0000024

6

BOUDH

Ice and ice cream Ind. 0.0000003 0.0000003 _ 0.0000003

7 Rice mill 0.0000012 0.0000012 0.0000009 0.0000003

8 Fly ash brick 0.0000009 0.0000009 _ 0.0000009

9 Soft drinks 0.0000003 0.0000003 _ 0.0000003

10 Ice and ice cream Ind. 0.0000003 0.0000003 _ 0.0000003

11

KANTAMAL

Hotel 0.0000012 0.0000012 _ 0.0000012

12 Rice mill 0.0000021 0.0000021 0.0000018 0.0000003

13 Fly ash brick 0.0000048 0.0000048 0.000003 0.0000018

14

HARABHANGA

Cement products 0.0000006 0.0000006 0.0000003 0.0000003

TOTAL 0.000021 0.000024 0.0000117 0.0000096

Source: DIC, Boudh

72

Fig. 4.4.1 Industrial Water Demand for Boudh District

4.5 Water Demand for Power Generation

The water demand for power generation is given in Table 4.5 . The data shows

the Boudh district does not have hydro power generation industry. Therefore water

requirement for power generation sector is negligible or nil.

Table. 4.5 . Water Demand for Power Generation

SL. NO. BLOCKS

POWER

REQUIREMENT,

MW

WATER

DEMAND

(BCM)

WATER

DEMAND IN

2020 (BCM)

EXISTING

WATER

POTENTIAL

(BCM)

WATER

POTENTIAL

TO BE

CREATED

(BCM)

1 Boudh

2 Harbhanga NA NA NA NA

3 Kantamal

30 Mw

Source: EE, Electrical, Boudh

73

4.6. Total Demand of the District for Various Sectors

The Table 4.6 depicts the total water demand of the district to be used by

various sectors. It has been observed from the above said table that the domestic ,

crop, livestock and industrial water demand for the district is 0.000051, 8.42,

0.001411 and 0.000021 BCM, respectively. The water requirement for the power

generation sector is negligible as there is no hydro power generation industry in the

district. The block wise water demand is 3.194 BCM for Boudh, 2.62 BCM for

Harbhanga and 2.61 BCM for Kantamal blocks . The total water demand for the

district is 8.421 BCM.

Table. 4.6 . Total Water Demand of the District for Various Sectors

COMPONENTS SL.

NO. BLOCKS

DOMESTIC CROP LIVESTOCK INDUSTRIAL POWER

GENERATION

TOTAL

BCM

1 Boudh 0.00002 3.09 0.00043 0.00000096 3.09

2 Harbhanga 0.000015 2.65 0.000541 0.00000039 NA 2.65

3 Kantamal 0.000016 2.75 0.00044 0.00000075 2.75

Total 0.000051 8.49 0.001411 0.000021 8.49

Source: PD, Watershed, Boudh

Fig;4.6.1 Total Water Demand of the District for Various Sectors

74

4.7. Water Budget

The Table 4.7 depicts the water budget of the district of Boudh. The data

shows that the existing water available under surface and ground water is 1.21 and

0.2783 BCM, respectively. The total existing water availability for the district is 1.4883

BCM. The water demand for the present operations which includes domestic,

industry, livestock and agriculture is 8.49 BCM. It has been projected that the water

demand by the year 2020 is projected to be 9.642 BCM. There is an increase of 13.5%

of water potential over the existing status. The gap in water potential in present

scenario is 7.00 BCM and by the year 2021 this gap will enhance to 8.152 BCM. Hence

there is an urgent need to enhance the water potential for the district.

Table. 4.7. Water Budget

EXISTING WATER

AVAILABILTY (BCM)

WATER DEMAND

(BCM) WATER GAP (BCM)

SL.

NO.

NAME OF

BLOCKS SURFACE

WATER

GROUND

WATER

TOTAL

(BCM)

PRESENT PROJECTED

(2020) PRESENT

PROJECTED

(2020)

1 BOUDH 0.37 0.0769 0.4467 3.09 3.511 2.643 3.064

2 HARBHANGA 0.46 0.1353 0.5953 2.65 3.011 2.054 2.415

3 KANTAMAL 0.38 0.0661 0.4461 2.75 3.120 2.303 2.673

TOTAL 1.21 0.2783 1.4883 8.49 9.642 7.00 8.152

Source: PD, Watershed, Boudh

75

Fig. 4.7.1 Water Budget

76

CHAPTER- V

STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN FOR IRRIGATION IN BOUDH

DISTRICT (ODISHA) UNDER PMKSY)

The strategic action plan aims to provide irrigation for higher crop production

and productivity in three blocks of Boudh district. The district is having nearly 65% of

the Gross Cultivated Area as rain fed area and subjected to high risk in crop

production due to extreme weather conditions like drought, flood and other climatic

variations. This extreme weather conditions is threatening the livelihood security of

rural mass and weakening their socio-economic conditions leading to instability in

livelihood generations in agricultural sector. In view of these, providing assured

irrigation water to overcome the drought like situation through creation of irrigation

infrastructures through District Irrigation Plan formulated by DLIC and TSA through

PMKSY.

The present irrigated area of the district is 35 % of the total cultivable area

(1,32,780 ha )cultivated area. The strategic approach in DIP planning is to enhance the

irrigated area to 56%, an increase of 21% over the existing irrigated area. To achieve

the propose target, the DIP has emphasised to convert 29000 ha of rain fed land to

irrigated land by an estimated expenditure of Rs. 814 crore spread over 5 years period

from 2016-17 to 2020-21. To achieve the propose target, DIP has emphasized

to convert 12880 Ha of rainfed to irrigated land by an estimated

expenditure of Rs 1531 crore over a period of 20years.

77

ABSTRACT OF PLAN-A (5 YEARS BUDGET)

Irrigation potential to be created(Ha)

PMKSY AIBP 6400

HKBP 2820

WD 2250

PMKSY-other components

Total 11470

Minor 16480

Medium 0

Agriculture 23

NABARD 300

State plan

Total

G.total 16803

Extension, Strengthening and Restoraration of Ayacut(Ha)

RRR 80 HKKP

Lined channel 1700

Watershed Renovation 950

Total 2730

Drip & Sprinkler Irrigation(Ha)

Non-DPAP Drip 200 PDMC

Non-DPAP Sprinkler 400

Total 600

78

ABSTRACT (5years budget)

(Command area & estimated cost scheme wise)

S No

Name of

the

Districts

Name of the

scheme Component

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

(Ha)

Total

Estimated

Cost

(Rs in Lakh)

1 BOUDH PMKSY AIBP 6400 4347.00

HAR KHET KO PANI 2820 16911.90

PER DROP MORE

CROP

930 7075.80

WATERSHED

DEVELOPMENT

2250 10556.00

T0TAL 12400 38890.70

BOUDH Other schemes CONVERGENCE

WITH

MGNREGS

197 678.40

STATE IRRIGATION

PLAN

14500 26175.00

NABARD 300 300.00

OTHER IRRIGATION

SCHEMES

2003 15430.00

TOTAL 17000 42583.40

GRAND

TOTAL

PMKSY+OTHER

SCHEMES

29400 81474.10

ABSTRACT OF PLAN-B

(20 YEARS LONGTERM BUDGET)

S No

Name of

the

Districts

Name of

the

scheme

Component

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

(Ha)

Total

Estimated

Cost

(Rs in Lakh)

1 BOUDH LONG

TERM

SCHEMES

LAXMIPATHAR DAM

(1/0.014

3880 46120

SALKI HE(1/1.25MW) 9000 106980

T0TAL 12880 153100

79

Table. 5.1. PLAN-A: Component 1 Strategic Action Plan for Irrigation in Boud District ( Odisha ) under PMKSY

Estimated cost (Rs. in Lakh ) Yr Wise

Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh ) S.No

Name of

the Blocks/

Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Canal Lining of SIP 6 2243.4 307 300 400 300 536.2 1843.2 MoWR/

WR(Odisha ) Canal lining of Bagh 6 688.2 80 60 70 80 88 378

Boudh

M.I (Odisha)

AIBP

Diversion weir 1/0.00456 314 40 40 40 50 40 210

1

Total 12 3245..6 427 400 510 430 664.2 2431.2


Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh ) S.No

Name of

the Blocks/

Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

MoWR/

WR(Odisha ) Canal Lining of SIP 4 1495.6 300 300 140 200 288.8 1228.8

Harbhanga

M.I (Odisha)

AIBP

Diversion weir 1/0.0061 425 101 110 120 50 54 435 1

Total 4 1920.6 401 410 260 250 342.8 1663.8

80


Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh )

S.No

Name of

the Blocks/

Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

4 1234.6 50 60 40 60 42 252

Kantamal

MoWR/ WR

(Odisha )

AIBP

1

Total

Canal lining of Bagh

4 1234.6 50 60 40 60 42 252

Subtotal AIBP 6400 4347

Component 2 Har Khet Ko Pani Under PMKSY


Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh ) S.No

Name of

the Blocks/

Sub-Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential (

Ha)

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

MoWr/Li (Odisha) Lift Irrigation (River Lift ) 50 50 250 200 150 160 240 1000

SC & DW Dept,

Odisha Ground water Development 150 20 80 60 60 90 110 400

RRR Water boies (WHS) 100/0.0013 10 60 80 60 110 90 400

RRR Water boies (Tank) 2/0.0022 10 20 10 15 15 20 80

Renovation of water bodies 1/0.0038 15 20 20 25 25 30 120

1 Boudh

M.I (Odisha )

Har Khet Ko Pani

Total - 105 430 370 310 400 490 2000

81


Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh ) S.No

Name of

the Blocks/

Sub-Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential (

Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21


SC & DW Dept,



RRR water bodies (WHS) 50/0.00056 20 50 40 60 40 54 244

1 Harbhanga

M.I (Odisha )

Har Khet Ko Pani

Total 98 150 350 370 320 300 376 1716


Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh ) S.No

Name of

the Blocks/

Sub-Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential (

Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21


SC & DW Dept,



RRR water bodies (WHS) 25/0.00028 10 20 25 20 24 33 122

1 Kantamal

M.I (Odisha )

Har Khet Ko Pani

Total 140 150 280 295 770 259 348 1482

82


Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh ) S.No

Name of

the Blocks/

Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Lined Channels 0.0283 500 600 650 700 600 600 3150

Boudh Unlined Channels 0.0283 100 2 2 3 2.5 2.57 12.07

MoRD/ Water

Resources

(CADA)

Har Khet ko Pani

Micro Irrigation 0.005 40 11 15 15 15 20 76 1

Total 640 613 667 718 617.5 472.57 3238.07


Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh ) S.No

Name of

the Blocks/

Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Lined channels .0283 600 800 800 800 800 686.20 3000

Harbhanga Unlined Channels 0.0283 100 5 7 6 5 10.6 33.6


Total

MoRD/ Water

Resources

(CADA)

Har Khet ko Pani

775 835 847 846 845 736.8 4109.8

83


Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh ) S.No

Name of

the Blocks/

Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Lined channels 0.00283 600 800 800 800 800 916 4116

Kantamal Unlined Channels .0283 350 12 10 12 15 21 60


Total

MoRD/ Water

Resources

(CADA)

Har Khet ko Pani

1000 42 850 852 855 977 4366

Subtotal Hark het ko Pani 2820 16911.9

Component No.3 Per Drop More Crop (Micro Irrigation) under PMKSY


Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh ) S.No

Name of

the

Blocks/

Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

DPAP Drip 160 20 80 85 80 80 107 432

DPAP Sprinkler 350 100 15 15 12 20 26.6 68.6

Non- DPAP Drip 80 20 5 4 4 5 3.6 21.6 Boudh

MOA & FW- DAC

& FW/

Agril,Horticulture,

Odisha

Non- DPAP Sprinkler 150 60 60 70 60 65 39 294

Total 740 200 160 174 156 170 176.2 816.2

84


Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh ) S.No

Name of

the

Blocks/

Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

DPAP Drip 150 40 8 8 7 9 8.5 40.5

DPAP Sprinkler 320 60 10 12 15 12 13.7 62.7

Non- DPAP Drip 50 20 3 3 4 2 1.5 13.5 Harbhanga

MOA & FW-

DAC & FW/

Agril,Horticulture,

Odisha


Total 670 150 81 93 86 88 62.7 410.7


Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh ) S.No

Name of

the

Blocks/

Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

DPAP Drip 190 50 10 11 12 10 8.3 51.3

DPAP Sprinkler 330 60 12 13 15 10 14.6 64.6

Non- DPAP Drip 70 20 5 4 3 4 3 19 Kantamal

MOA & FW-

DAC & FW/

Agriculture, Horticulture,

Odisha


Total 790 180 127 108 110 94 87.9 526.9

85


Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh ) S.No

Name of

the

Blocks/

Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Agril/Horticulture Farm Ponds 500 50 100 105 95 130 95 525

Boudh SC & DW Dept.,

Odisha

Per drop more crop

(Supplementary

water

management

activities)

Check Dams/ Diversion

Weir 305/0.0023 150 500 600 400 480 339 2319

Total 500 200 600 705 495 610 434 2844


Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh ) S.No

Name of

the

Blocks/

Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Agril/Horticulture

Harbhanga SC & DW Dept.,

Odisha

Per drop more crop

(Supplementary

water

management

activities)


Weir 128/0.0009 132 200 200 300 300 240 1240

Total 128/0.0009 100 200 200 300 300 240 1240

86


Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh ) S.No

Name of

the

Blocks/

Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Agril/Horticulture

Kantamal SC & DW Dept.,

Odisha

Per drop more crop

(Supplementary

water

management

activities)


Weir 125/0.0001 100 240 200 300 300 398 1238

Total 125/0.0001 100 240 200 300 300 398 1238

Subtotal Per drop more crop 930 7075.8

87

Component No-4 PMKSY Watershed


Total

estimated

cost (Rs

in lakh ) S.No

Name of the

Blocks/ Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command Area/

Irrigation Potential (

Ha)

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Newly created WHS

Farm Ponds 789/0.00102 180 200 200 300 300 200 1200

Check Dams

(Diversion Weirs) 160/0.0005 30 200 100 200 300 300 1100

Nallah Bunds 150/0.00015 10 25 50 50 40 60 225

Percolation Tanks 1075/0.0007 180 200 100 200 300 300 1100

Other ground

Water Recharge

Structure

135/0.001566 370 200 300 400 300 120 1320

Water Harvesting

Structure 98/0.0009 180 100 125 100 90 173 588

Fishery ponds/

cattle pond 120/0.000263 50 100 100 100 50 10 360

Boudh DoLR-

MoRD/

Department of

Soil

Conservation

& Watershed

Development,

Odisha

PMKSY

Watershed

Total - 1000 1025 975 1350 1380 1163 5893

88

Renovated WHS

Farm Ponds

100/0.000121 31 15 20 15 10 11 71

Nallah Bunds 52/0.00005 26 5 6 5 8 7 31

Percolation

Tanks 53/0.00003 60 5 6 5 8 8 32

Fishery ponds /

cattle ponds 129/0.00035 80 50 50 60 40 50 258

Water Harvesting

Structure 210/0.002958 243 190 200 150 140 160 840

Total - 430 1232

Newly created WHS

Farm Ponds 998/0.00130 100 200 200 300 400 140 1240

Renovated WHS

Farm Ponds 92/0.00011 28 15 10 15 20 7 67

Water Harvesting

Structure 135/0.001901 272 100 105 100 50 50 405

Harbhanga

DoLR-

MoRD/

Department of

Soil

Conservation

& Watershed

Development,

Odisha

PMKSY

Watershed

Total - 300 1712

89


Total

estimated

cost (Rs

in lakh ) S.No

Name of the

Blocks/ Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command Area/

Irrigation Potential (

Ha)

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Newly created WHS

Farm Ponds 998/0.00129 200 200 200 300 300 234 1234

Renovated WHS

Farm Ponds 72/0.00001 20 10 10 10 10 15 55

Water Harvesting

Structure 142/0.0021 200 100 100 90 70 70 430

Kantamal

DoLR-

MoRD/

Department of

Soil

Conservation

& Watershed

Development,

Odisha

PMKSY

Watershed

Total - 220 1719

Subtotal PMKSY

Watershed 2250 10556

Grand

total(PMKSY) PMKSY 12400 38890.7

90

State Plan & Other Schemes

Convergence with MGNREGA


Total

estimated

cost (Rs

in lakh )

S.No

Name of

the

Blocks/

Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

( Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Newly Created

Water Conservation

(Contour Bund, Contour Trench &

Stagard Trench)

Water Harvesting Structure 45/0.000068 50 16.20 16.20 16.20 16.20 16.20 81

Creation of Irrigation canals and

Drains

Providing infrastructure for

irrigation

Land Development

(Field Bunding)

Total - 50 81

Renovation

Renovation of water bodies

including desilting 50/0.00035 56 30 30 30 30 30 150

Renovation & Maintenance of

Irrigation Canals & Drains

Boudh

Convergence

with

MGNREGA

Sub Total - 106 231

91



Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh )

S.No

Name of the

Blocks/ Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential (

Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Newly Created

Water Conservation

(Contour Bund, Contour Trench

& Stagard Trench)

200 ha.

(240000 rmt) 14 15 14 15 12 70

Water Harvesting Structure 50/ 0.000025 21 2 2 2 2 2.3 10.43

Creation of Irrigation canals

and Drains


irrigation

Land Development

(Field Bunding) 500 ha. 60 70 50 60 60 300

Total - 21

Renovation


including desilting 25/ 0.00025 25 25 30 10 25 10 100



Harbhanga

Convergence

with

MGNREGA

Total - 25 480.43

92


Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh )

S.No

Name of the

Blocks/ Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential (

Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Newly Created

Water Conservation

(Contour Bund, Contour

Trench & Stagard Trench)

100ha.(40000

rmt) 5 5 6 7 12 35

Water Harvesting Structure 50/0.0000069 17 2 2 4 3 5 16


and Drains


irrigation

Land Development

(Field Bunding) 50 6 5 5 5 9 30

Total - 17

Renovation


including desilting 30/0.000078 28 30 25 30 24 8 117

Kantamala

Convergence

with

MGNREGA

Total - 28 198

Subtotal

Convergence

with

MGNREGA

197 6784

93

Strategic Action Plan for Irrigation in Boudh District under STATE IRRIGATION PLAN

Estimated cost(Rs in Lakh year wise) S No Name of

the

Blocks/Sub

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activity Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

(Ha)

2016-17 2017-18 2018-

19

2019-

2020

2020-

2021

Total

Estimated

Cost

(Rs in

Lakh)

1 Boudh 1500 270 737 800 900 2707

2 Harbhanga 6000 1323 2707 3200 3600 10830

3 Kantamal

MoWR/

Odisha SIP

Mega lift

Project

HIlung-

Tel river

Dhalapur-

Mahanadi

Ramgarh-

Mahanadi

Sampoch-

Mahanadi

Tirod-

Mahanadi

5

HIlung-Tel

river

Dhalapur-

Mahanadi

Ramgarh-

Mahanadi

Sampoch-

Mahanadi

Tirod-

Mahanadi

7000 2082 5556 5000 - 12638

Total 14500 3675 9000 9000 4500 26175

94

PLAN-A: Strategic Action Plan for Irrigation in Boud District ( Odisha) Under NABARD


Total

estimated

cost (Rs in

lakh ) S.No

Name of the

Blocks/ Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential (

Ha) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

01 Boudh 5 100 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 100.00

02 Harabhanga 5 100 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 100.00

03 Kantamal

M.O.W.R NABARD Odisha Lift Irrigation

5 100 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 100.00

Total 300 300.00

95

Strategic Action Plan for Irrigation in Boudh District under OTHER IRRIGATION SCHEMES

Estimated cost (Rs. In lakh Yr wise )

Sl.

No

Name of the

Blocks/Sub

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activity

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

(Ha)

2016-

17

2017-

18

2018-

19

2019-

2020

2020-

2021

Total

Estimated

Cost

(Rs in

Lakh)

1 Boudh

MIPs

(Balibeda-2

Nalikumpa-2)

3 200

1080

300

2000

300

1000

300

3334

300

1000

344

1000

1544

8334

2 Harbhanga

DoWR ,M.I

Odisha

OIS

Rajabasa 1 700 1000 1000 1000 1000 1402 5402

Total 1980 3300 2300 4634 2300 2746 15280

1 Boudh 5plips 4 3 6 5 5 15 34

2 Harabhanga 5plips 4 3 6 5 5 15 34

3 Kantamal

Agriculture/lift

irrigation OIS Jalanidhi

21plips 15 14 14 14 24 16 82

Total 31 23 20 26 24 34 46 150

Subtotal 2003 15430

Grand Total

(State plan &

other schems)

State plan &

other

schems)

17000 42583.4

Grand

total(PMKSY+

Otherscheme)

PMKSY

+

Other

Scheme

29400 81474.1

96

ABSTRACT OF PLAN-B

(20 YEARS LONGTERM BUDGET)

S No Name of the

Districts

Name of the

scheme Component

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

(Ha)

Total

Estimated

Cost

(Rs in Lakh)

1 BOUDH LONG TERM

SCHEMES

LAXMIPATHAR DAM

(1/0.014 3880 46120

SALKI HE(1/1.25MW) 9000 106980

T0TAL 12880 153100

97

PLAN - B

Long term Schemes (20 years) 2021-22 to 2034-2035

Name of

the Blocks/

Sub-Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command Area/ Irrigation

Potential ( Ha)

Period of

Implementation (20 Yrs)

Estimated

cost ( in Rs.

In lakh)

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Laxmipathar

Dam 1/0.014 3880 20

46120

Harabhanga

Salki HE 1/125MW 9000 20 106980

Boudh &

Harabhanga

MoWR/

WR

(Odisha)

AIBP

Total 12880 153100

Major& medium Irrigation Project (Long term 2021-22 to 2034-35)

Command area 12880 Ha, Budget provision 153100 Lakh, Duration-20years

Other Schemes

Budget Provision (20 Years) – 644000 Lakh

98

PLAN- B

Table. 5.2. Strategic Action Plan for Irrigation in Boudh District (Odisha) under PMKSY

Component No.1 AIBP

S.No

Name of the

Blocks/ Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/ Irrigation

Potential ( Ha)

Period of

Implementation

(20 Yrs)

Estimated cost

( in Rs. In lakh)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Boudh Barage of Sattighat in

Boudh District** 1/ 0.124 1000 20 400000.00

Boudh Construction of Barage

upstream of Boudh Town 1/ 0.62 5000 20 150000.00

Boudh/

Harabhanga Canal Lining of SIP 32 11965 20 9830.00

Boudh/

Kantamal Canal Lining of Bagh 77 8834 20 4850.00

Kantamal

Construction of Barage

across Khadag River in

Kantamala Block

1/2.26 15929 20 8000.00

Kantamal

MoWR/

WR (Odisha)

Megalift Project at

Kanatamala Block 1 7500 20 8000.00

Boudh Diversion Weir 1/ 0.00456 314 20 210.00

Harabhanga M.I (Odisha)

AIBP

Diversion Weir 1/ 0.0061 425 20 435.00

99

Component No.2 Har Khet Ko Pani

S.

No

Name of the

Blocks/ Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/ Irrigation

Potential ( Ha)

Period of

Implementation

(20Yrs)

Estimated cost

( in Rs. In lakh)

Lift Irrigation (River Lift) 150 3600 20 3000.00

MoWR/ L.I (Odisha)

Ground Water

Development 350 700 20 1400.00

SC & DW

Dept., Odisha

RRR of Waterbodies

(WHS) 210/ 0.0023 425 20 840.00

Boudh

RRR of

Waterbodies(Tank) 5/ 0.0056 300 20 200.00

Harabhanga

M.I (Odisha) Renovation of

Waterbodies 4/ 0.0155 392 20 480.00


L.I (Odisha) Ground Water

Development 200 400 20 800.00

M.I (Odisha) RRR of

Waterbodies(Tank) 7/ 0.0078 420 20 280.00

Harabhanga

SC & DW

Dept., Odisha

RRR of Waterbodies

(WHS) 160/ 0.0018 400 20 780.00


L.I (Odisha) Ground Water

Development 500 1000 20 2000.00

M.I (Odisha) RRR of Waterbodies

(Tank) 6/ 0.0067 360 20 240.00

Kantamal

SC & DW

Dept., Odisha

Har

Khet Ko

Pani

RRR of Waterbodies

(WHS) 160/ 0.0018 385 20 780.00

100

S.No

Name of the

Blocks/ Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/ Irrigation

Potential ( Ha)

Period of

Implementation

(20 Yrs)

Estimated cost

( in Rs. In lakh)

Construction of Field Channels

Lined Field Channels 0.0283 7135 20 2996.70

Unlined Channels 0.0283 503 20 12.07

Boudh

Micro- Irrigation 0.005 347 20 329.65



Harabhanga





Kantamal

MoRD/

Water

Resources

(CADA)

Har

Khet Ko

Pani

Total - 38236 15093.95

SubTotal - 54418 32393.95

101

Component No.3 Per Drop More Crop (Micro Irrigation)

S.No

Name of the

Blocks/ Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential

( Ha)

Period of

Implementation

(20 Yrs)

Estimated

cost ( in Rs.

In lakh)

DPAP Drip 500 ha. 500 20 135.125

DPAP Sprinkler 1000 ha. 1001 20 196.00

Non- DPAP Drip 200 ha. 200 20 54.05

Boudh,

Harabhanga &

Kantamal

MOA & FW-

DAC & FW/ Horticulture,

Odisha Non- DPAP Sprinkler 500 ha. 500 20 980.00

DPAP Drip - - - -

DPAP Sprinkler - - - -

Non- DPAP Drip 200 200 20 200.00

Boudh

Non- DPAP Sprinkler 400 400 20 80.00

DPAP Drip - - - -


Non- DPAP Drip 200 200 20 200.00

Harabhanga


DPAP Drip - - - -


Non- DPAP Drip 200 200 20 200.00

Kantamal

Agriculture,

Odisha


Per drop more

crop (micro

irrigation)

Total - 4001

2205.18

102

S.No

Name of the

Blocks/ Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/

Irrigation

Potential (

Ha)

Period of

Implementation

(5/7 Yrs)

Estimated

cost ( in Rs.

In lakh)

Topping up of

MGNREGA

Boudh Horticulture Farm Ponds 500 nos. 500 20 525.00

Boudh 305/ 0.0023 1297 20 2319.00

Harabhanga 125/ 0.0009 532 20 1240.00

Kantamal

SC & DW Dept.,

Odisha

Check Dams/

Diversion Weir

125/ 0.0001 531 20 1238.00

Secondary Storage

structures

Per drop more crop

(Supplementary water

management activities)

On Farm

Development

(distribution pipe /

raised bed and furrow

system etc.)

Total - 2860 5322.00

Sub Total - 6861 7527.18

103

Component No.4 PMKSY Watershed

S.

No

Name of the

Blocks/ Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy Total Number/ Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/ Irrigation

Potential ( Ha)

Period of

Implementation

(20 Yrs)

Estimated cost

( in Rs. In lakh)

Newly created WHS

Farm Ponds 789/ 0.00102 333 20 1200.00

Check Dams (Diversion

Weirs) 160/ 0.0005 240 20 1100.00

Nallah Bunds 150/ 0.00015 50 20 225.00

Percolation Tanks 1075/ 0.0007 268 20 1100.00

Other ground Water

Recharge Structure 135/ 0.001566 678 20 1320.00

Water Harvesting Structure 98/ 0.0009 395 20 588.00

Fishery ponds/ cattle pond 120/ 0.000263 67.5 20 360.00

Total - 2031 5893.00

Renovated WHS

Farm Ponds 100/ 0.000121 31 20 71.00

Check Dams

Nallah Bunds 52/ 0.00005 26 20 31.00


Other Ground Water

Recharge Structure

Fishery ponds / cattle ponds 129/ 0.00035 51 20 258.00


Boudh

DoLR-MoRD/

Department of

Soil Conservation

& Watershed

Development,

Odisha

PMKSY

Watershed

Total - 859 1232.50

104

S.No

Name of the

Blocks/ Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department


(BCM)

Command

Area/ Irrigation

Potential ( Ha)

Period of

Implementation

(20Yrs)

Estimated cost

( in Rs. In lakh)

Newly created WHS

Farm Ponds 998/ 0.00130 421 20 1240.00


Weirs) 90/ 0.0003 120 20 520.00

Nallah Bunds 180/ 0.0005 80 20 270.00


Other ground Water


Fishery ponds/ cattle pond 180/ 0.000394 101 20 540.00

Total - 1417 4570.00

Renovated WHS

Farm Ponds 92/ 0.00011 28 20 67.00

Check Dams

Nallah Bunds

Percolation Tanks

Other Ground Water

Recharge Structure



Harabhanga

DoLR-MoRD/

Department of

Soil Conservation

& Watershed

Development,

Odisha

PMKSY

Watershed

Total - 592

1012.00

105

S.No

Name of the

Blocks/ Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department


(BCM)

Command

Area/ Irrigation

Potential ( Ha)

Period of

Implementation

(20 Yrs)

Estimated cost

( in Rs. In lakh)

Newly created WHS

Farm Ponds 998/ 0.00129 421 20 1234.00


Weirs) 90/ 0.0003 120 20 520.00

Nallah Bunds 182/ 0.0005 94 20 272.00


Other ground Water


Fishery ponds/ cattle pond 190/ 0.0005 110 20 550.00

Total - 1441 4576.00

Renovated WHS

Farm Ponds 72/ 0.00001 20 20 55.00

Check Dams

Nallah Bunds


Other Ground Water

Recharge Structure



Kantamal

DoLR-MoRD/

Department of

Soil Conservation

& Watershed

Development,

Odisha

PMKSY

Watershed

Total - 627 1060.00

Sub Total - 6967 18343.50

106


S.No

Name of the

Blocks/ Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department


(BCM)

Command

Area/ Irrigation

Potential ( Ha)

Period of

Implementation

(20 Yrs)

Estimated cost

( Rs. In lakh)

Newly Created

Water Conservation



625 ha.

(250000 rmt) 20 212.00



and Drains


irrigation

Land Development

(Field Bunding) 1550 ha. 20 925.00

Total - 250 1542.00

Renovation


including desilting 155/ 0.0011 170.00 20 465.00

Renovation & Maintenance

of Irrigation Canals & Drains

Boudh

Convergence

with

MGNREGA

Total - 170.00

465.00

107

S.No

Name of the

Blocks/ Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department


(BCM)

Command

Area/ Irrigation

Potential ( Ha)

Period of

Implementation

(20 Yrs)

Estimated cost

( Rs. In lakh)

Newly Created

Water Conservation



600 ha.

(240000 rmt) 20 210.00



and Drains


irrigation

Land Development

(Field Bunding) 1500 ha. 20 900.00

Total - 98 1158

Renovation


including desilting 100/ 0.00025 103 20 400.00

Renovation & Maintenance

of Irrigation Canals & Drains

Harabhanga

Convergence

with

MGNREGA

Sub Total 103.00 400.00

108

S.No

Name of the

Blocks/ Sub-

Districts

Concerned

Ministry/

Department

Component Activitiy

Total

Number/

Capacity

(BCM)

Command

Area/ Irrigation

Potential ( Ha)

Period of

Implementation

(20 Yrs)

Estimated cost (

in Rs. In lakh)

Newly Created

Water Conservation



600 ha.

(240000 rmt) 20 212.00

Water Harvesting 252/

0.000035 85 20 81.00


and Drains


irrigation

Land Development

(Field Bunding) 250 20 150.00

Total - 85 443

Renovation


including desilting 115/ 0.0003 108 20 450.00



Kantamal Convergence with

MGNREGA

Total - 108.00 450.00

Sub Total (Convergence with MGNREGA) 814.00 4458.00

GRAND TOTAL(20 years Budget) 120027.5 644047

109

Annexure-I

Water requirement of crops (mm) for its estimation

under PMKSY

Sl. No. Crop Water requirement (mm)

1 Rice 1100

2 Wheat 350

3 Barley 350

4 Oats 400

5 Sugarcane 2000

6 Maize 500

7 Sorghum 450

8 Pearlmillet 450

9 Ragi 400

10 Blackgram 400

11 Greengram/Horsegram/Cowpea 350

12 Pea 350

13 Bengalgram 350

14 Redgram 450

15 Lentil 450

16 Beans 450

17 Soybean 450

18 Groundnut 400

19 Rapeseed / Mustard 350

20 Sunflower 350

21 Saffflower 300

22 Sesamum 400

23 Castor 350

24 Linseed 400

25 Jute 500

26 Cotton 550

27 Tobacco 600

28 Mirchi 600

29 Potato 550

30 Tomato 600

31 Onion 550

32 Cabbage 450

33 Other vegetables 550

110

Common values of water requirement for different livestock

SL.

No.

Name of livestock

Water requirement

(litres) / livestock

Total water

demand

(litres/day)

1. Cattle / Cow / Buffalo (365 days) 30 10950

2. Sheep (270 days) 3.0 810

3. Hen (Broiler) (42 days) 0.2 8.4

4. Hen (layer) (365 days) 0.2 73

5. Pig (365 days) 4.5 1643

6. Goat (270 days) 3.0 810

111

Annexure-II

List of projects

Major Medium projects

Name of the

district

Name of the

project

Blocks

benefited CCA(Th. Ha) Remarks

Boudh Laxmi pathar

dam

Harabhanga 3.88 Long term

Boudh Salki H.E Boudh &

Harabhanga

9.0/125MW Long term

Mega lift project

Name of the

scheme

Name of the

river District

District

wise CCA in

Ha

Block Block wise

CCA Ha

Hilung Tel Boudh Boudh 1500

Dhalpur Mahanadi Boudh Harbhanga

Ramgarh Mahanadi Boudh Harbhanga

Sampoch Mahanadi Boudh Harbhanga

Tirod Mahanadi Boudh

7500

Harbhanga

6000

New MIPs to be taken up

Name of the Block Name of the project Ayacut in Ha

Boudh Bailbeda 200

Boudh Nalikumpa 1988

Boudh Bailbeda 200

Boudh Nalikumpa 1988

Harbhanga Rajabasa 700

CADA , Boudh

Name of the command Name of the block Total CCA(Ha)

Salki Harabhanga 8426

Salki Boudh 11465

112

Tables for collating information on DIP

(for the ERM Programme of where CAD work has been taken up & now non-functional)

Area in

Ha.

Sl.No

Name

of the

District

Name of

the

Command

Name of

the Block

Total

CCA

Total

Developed

Area (OFD

Completed)

OFD

dilapidated

/ damaged

OFD

already

Restored

Programme for

Strengthening/Restoration

Year of

inclusion

Year of

Completion Remarks

1 Harbhanga 8426.00 7395.0 5800.00 1200.00 4600.00

Boudh Salki

Boudh 11465.00 10435.0 6800.00 1600.00 5200.00

2019-20 2021-22

Total 19891.00 17830.00 12600.00 2800.00 9800.00

Tables for collating information on DIP (for the new irrigation Project) Area in Ha.

Sl.No Name of the

District

Name of the

Command

Name of the

Block

Total Area

(CCA)

OFD work to be

taken up

Year of

Inclusion

Year of

completion Remarks

1 Bagha Kantamal 11000.0 11000.00 2019-20 2021-22

Total 11000.0 11000.0

2 Boudh 3470.00 3470.00

3 Harabhanga 7836.00 7836.00

4 Kantamal 4261.00 4261.00

2020-21 2022-23

Boudh Minor

Irrrigation

Total 15567.00 15567.00

Grand Total 26567.00 26567.00

113

Phone Numbers of DLIC Members

SL.

NO. NAME DESIGNATION

MOBILE

NO. E Mail id

1 Sri Madhusudan Mishra Collector, Boudh 9937896188 [email protected]

2 Sri Sridhar Das Deputy Director,

Agril.-cum-PD, ATMA

9437082128 [email protected]

3 Sri Raghab Mallick Project Director,

Watersheds, Boudh


4 Sri S. Maharana ASST. Director of Horticulture,

Boudh


5 Sri Bimal Mal Representative

PD, DRDA, BOUDH


6 Dr. Debabrata Panigrahi Senior Scientist

RRTTS, G. Udayagiri


7 Dr. D. K Debata Senior Scientist

RRTTS, G. Udayagiri


8 Sri A. K. Sahu Executive Engineer,

OLIC, Boudh


9 Sri G. P. Prusty Executive Engineer,

MIP, Boudh


10 Sri A. K Sethy Executive Engineer,

Irrigation Div., Boudh


11 Sri AK.Sethy. ADR, RRTTS,

G. Udayagiri, OUAT


12 Dr A.Parida Professor & Head,

Dept. of Statistics, OUAT


114

For more information please contact:

Collector & District Magistrate

At/Po/Dist: Boudh

Phone: 06841-222203

Fax: 06841-222204

Email: [email protected]

Deputy Director Agriculture

At/Po/Dist: Boudh

Phone: 9437082128

Project Director, Watersheds

At/Po/Dist: Boudh

Phone: 9437585561

[email protected]

DISTRICT IRRIGATION PLAN · At length, I bow down my head with devotion and selfness before the...

Documents

Transcript of DISTRICT IRRIGATION PLAN · At length, I bow down my head with devotion and selfness before the...