Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using...
Transcript of Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using...
![Page 1: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Haiyan Zhang, Arthur B. Weglein, Robert Keys, Douglas Foster and Simon Shaw
M-OSRP Annual Meeting University of Houston
May 10 –12, 2006
Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using direct non-linear inversion method: an application to time-lapse seismic data
The image cannot be displayed. Your comput
![Page 2: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Statement of the problem
• Distinguishing pressure changes from reservoir fluid changes is difficult with conventional seismic time-lapse attributes.
• Pressure changes or fluid changes? – shear modulus sensitive to pressure changes – Vp/Vs sensitive to fluid changes
• A direct non-linear inversion method may be useful for accomplishing this goal.
![Page 3: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Reference medium L0 Initial reservoir condition
Actual medium L Current reservoir condition
Earth property changes in space V=L0-L
Reservoir property changes in time
Reference wave field G0 Baseline survey
Actual wave field G Monitor survey
Scattered wave field D=G-G0
Monitor-Baseline
Inverse scattering series Time-lapse seismic monitoring
Introduction of the method
![Page 4: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Outline
• Comparing the first and second order algorithms in estimating shear modulus and Vp/Vs contrasts.
– Core data tests (A. R. Gregory, 1976) – Heidrun well log data tests
• Conclusions and Plan • Acknowledgements
![Page 5: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Core data tests
Fixing the pressure at 5000psi, while the fluid changes from 0 to 100 percent. – Baseline: 100% saturation – Monitor: other different water saturations
Fixing the fluid as 100% water saturation, while the pressure changes from 1000 to 9000psi.
– Baseline: pressure = 5000psi – Monitor: other different pressures
![Page 6: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Core data tests
• Compare effects of pressure and fluid changes on the elastic properties.
• Compare first order and second order approximations.
![Page 7: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
-4000 -2000 0 2000 4000
-0.20-0.18-0.16-0.14-0.12-0.10-0.08-0.06-0.04-0.020.000.020.040.060.080.100.12
Pressure change (psi)
Rel
ativ
e ch
ange
Shear modulus Velocity ratio Vp/Vs P impedance ρVp
Increase in confining pressure
Baseline: 5000 psi
Decrease in confining pressure
Effects of pressure changes on the elastic properties Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976
![Page 8: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Water saturation, percent
Rel
ativ
e ch
ange
Shear modulus Velocity ratio Vp/Vs P impedance ρVp
Baseline: 100% Sw
Pressure fixed (5000 psi) A. R. Gregory 1976
Effects of fluid changes on the elastic properties
![Page 9: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
-4000 -3000 -2000 -1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
-0.20-0.18-0.16-0.14-0.12-0.10-0.08-0.06-0.04-0.020.000.020.040.060.080.100.12
Actual value First order approximation Second order approximation
rela
tive
chan
ge in
she
ar m
odul
us
Pressure change (psi)
Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976
Comparison of 1st and 2nd order approximation for pressure changes
![Page 10: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
-4000 -3000 -2000 -1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
-0.04
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
Pressure change (psi)
Rel
ativ
e ch
ange
in v
eloc
ity ra
tio (V
p/Vs)
Actual value First order approximation Second order approximation
Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976
Comparison of 1st and 2nd order approximation for pressure changes
![Page 11: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
-0.06
-0.05
-0.04
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
Water saturation, percent
rela
tive
chan
ge in
she
ar m
odul
us
Actual value First order approximation Second order approximation
Pressure fixed (5000 psi) A. R. Gregory 1976
Comparison of 1st and 2nd order approximation for fluid changes
![Page 12: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100-0.12
-0.10
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02 Actual value First order approximation Second order approximation
Water saturation, percent
Rel
ativ
e ch
ange
in v
eloc
ity ra
tio (V
p/Vs)
A. R. Gregory 1976
Comparison of 1st and 2nd order approximation for fluid changes
Pressure fixed (5000 psi)
![Page 13: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Outline
• Comparing the first and second order algorithms in estimating shear modulus and Vp/Vs contrasts.
– Core data tests (A. R. Gregory, 1976) – Heidrun well log data tests
• Conclusions and Plan • Acknowledgements
![Page 14: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Synthetic Modeling -- A-52
Garn
Ile
90 % oil 10% water
90 % oil 10% water
Initial (1986)
50 % gas 50% water
20 % oil 80% water
100 % water
2001 Wet
100 % water
3150
Depth (m)
3185
3200
3220
3245
Baishali Roy (ConocoPhillips)
![Page 15: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Heidrun well log data tests
• Compare effects of pressure and fluid changes on the elastic properties.
• Compare first order and second order approximations.
![Page 16: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
3160 3180 3200 3220 3240 3260 3280
-0.10
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
Depth (m)
Shear modulus Velocity ratio Vp/Vs P impedance ρVp
Rel
ativ
e ch
ange
Heidrun well log data tests
![Page 17: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
3160 3180 3200 3220 3240 3260 32800.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020 Actual value First order approximation Second order approximation
rela
tive
chan
ge in
she
ar m
odul
us
Depth (m)
Heidrun well log data tests
![Page 18: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
3160 3180 3200 3220 3240 3260 3280
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10 Actual value First order approximation Second order approximation
Rel
ativ
e ch
ange
in v
eloc
ity ra
tio (V
p/Vs)
Depth (m)
Heidrun well log data tests
![Page 19: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
3150 3160 3170 3180 3190-0.060
-0.056
-0.052
-0.048
-0.044
-0.040 Actual value First order approximation Second order approximation
Rel
ativ
e ch
ange
in v
eloc
ity ra
tio (V
p/Vs)
Depth (m)
Heidrun well log data tests
![Page 20: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Observations
• The second order approximation provides improvements in the earth property predictions.
• In this well log data case, the second order approximation is more helpful for predicting shear modulus compared to Vp/Vs.
![Page 21: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Plan
• Comparing the first and second order algorithms in estimating shear modulus and Vp/Vs contrasts. – Heidrun synthetic data – Real seismic data tests (Heidrun)
![Page 22: Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using ...mosrp.uh.edu/content/06-events/02-annual-meetings/...Fluid fixed (100% water saturation) A. R. Gregory 1976 Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071503/6122997cb63ecd29a621a537/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Acknowledgements
• Baishali Roy (ConocoPhillips) • Thanks to ConocoPhillips for providing
the opportunity.
• The M-OSRP sponsors are thanked for supporting this research.