Discriminant Analysis Dr. Satyendra Singh Professor and Director University of Winnipeg, Canada

download Discriminant Analysis Dr. Satyendra Singh Professor and Director University of Winnipeg, Canada

If you can't read please download the document

description

Data Integrity Run as usual checks: mean, median, outlier… Ensure all variables have complete information Careful when deleting cases with missing information. Instead check for pattern o eg. educated people gave complete info How many cases do we need? 20 cases per IV as a thumb rule SPSS produces case summary for eligible cases 2

Transcript of Discriminant Analysis Dr. Satyendra Singh Professor and Director University of Winnipeg, Canada

Discriminant Analysis Dr. Satyendra Singh Professor and Director University of Winnipeg, Canada What is a Discriminant Analysis? It forms linear combination of the independent or predictor variables to serve as a basis for classifying cases into one of the groups DV: Market Orientation of firms (7-pt Scale) o Low and High (Must be on nominal Scale) IV: Culture o Market, Adhocracy, Clan, Hierarchical (Constant sum = 100) 1 Data Integrity Run as usual checks: mean, median, outlier Ensure all variables have complete information Careful when deleting cases with missing information. Instead check for pattern o eg. educated people gave complete info How many cases do we need? 20 cases per IV as a thumb rule SPSS produces case summary for eligible cases 2 Mean Summary for Eligible Cases 3 Analyze IV (group)mean Differences Wilks Lambda: = 0 (gr. mean is unequal) o We want lower and p.3 Can be used for ranking with caution Same unit is better By default, SPSS assumes that all groups have equal prior probabilities So for 2 gr.5 and for 3 gr.33 so on 7 Centroid Distance =.23 (-.20) =.43 Group 1 Distribution 8 Group 2 Distribution 9 All-groups Distribution 10 Interpretation: Means and Structure Matrix Adhocracy culture contributes most to making firms market oriented, followed by market, hierarchical and clan culture. 11 Classification Results For example, if beer 12 Predictive Power of the Model Maximum Chance Criterion: o it calculates the percentage of correctly classified cases if all the cases were placed in one group with the greatest possibility of occurrence o Because high market oriented group (ie. largest group) occurs 53.7% (ie 50/93) of time, it could be correct if all cases were assigned to this group. o C max = 53.7% 13 Predictive Power of the Model Proportional Chance Criterion: o it compares the model with the priori chance of classifying cases correctly without the discriminant function o Because weve unequal group (low = 43, High = 50, Total = 93), we use the formula o Proportion Chance Criterion (C prop)= p*p + (1-p) * (1-p) o proportion of cases in gr 1 (p) o Proportion of cases in gr 2 (1-p) o C prop = (43/93) * (43/93) + (1-(43/93)) * (1-(43/93)) =.5017 = 50.17% 14 Predictive Power Comparison Our discriminant model has the highest discriminatory power because So we accept the model. 15 Questions?