Discretization Methods for Multiphase Flow Simulation...
Transcript of Discretization Methods for Multiphase Flow Simulation...
www.bhrgroup.co.uk
14th International Conference Multiphase Production Technology
Cannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Discretization Methods for Multiphase Flow Simulation of Ultra-Long Gas-Condensate Pipelines
Erich Zakarian & Henning HolmShtokman Development A.G.
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Contents
• The Shtokman field development
• Profile discretization of gas-condensate pipelines• Objective and requirements• Method 1 – concept of pipeline profile indicator• Method 2 – concept of lumping and redistribution• Comparison and simulation
• Conclusions
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Integrated Development of the Shtokman Gas-Condensate Field – Phase 1
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Cannes
ParisMurmansk
Teriberka
Shtokman
Gas export to shore • 70 MSm3/d (2.5 BCFD) – Phase 1• 2 x 36” ND trunklines (0.86 m ID)• Length 558 km (347 miles)• Dry two-phase flow• CGR = from 2 to 16 Sm3/MSm3
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
0 100 200 300 400 500Distance [km]
Elev
atio
n [m
]
Shtokman pipeline profile
• Detailed pipeline profile from seabed bathymetry survey (2007)
• Free span analysis and seabed intervention taken into account
108,785 points
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Given either as-built profile or detailed terrain survey
• In transient multiphase flow simulation, the actual or expected pipeline geometry must be simplified to achieve reasonable CPU time
• For long pipelines (> 100 km) laid on rough terrain, compression of a large set of data points is required typically from 104-105 points to few 103 points
Pipeline profile discretization: objective
Target Simulation time ≥ 24 x CPU time
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
The Shtokman case
• Average pipe length will be approximately 200 m
• Avoid small pipe sections to maximize numerical time steps
Δt < min (Δx/U)i
Target ≈ 2500 pipesfor a total length of 554 km
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Pipeline profile discretization: requirements1. The total pipe length must be conserved
2. The simplified geometry must have the same overall shape (large and small scale undulations)
3. The pipe angle distribution of the discretized profile must be as close as possible to the original distribution
4. The total climb (cumulative length of uphill pipes) must be conserved to predict the same overall liquid content in steady-state flow conditions
1
24
3
Original profile
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Liquid holdup vs. pipe inclination
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Pipe inclination [deg]
Liqu
id h
oldu
p [-]
USG = 1.00 m/s
USG = 1.50 m/s
USG = 2.00 m/s
USG = 2.50 m/s
USG = 3.00 m/s
USG = 3.50 m/s
USG = 4.00 m/s
USG = 4.50 m/s
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Two methods for a single objectiveMethod 1: concept of pipeline profile indicator
• Select, simplify and complexify relevant sub-profiles
• Use the pipeline profile indicator and the total climb to match the original angle distribution
Method 2: concept of lumping elements with similar inclination
• Redistribution to match the original large & small scale topographies
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Method 1
Concept of pipeline profile indicator
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Definition: pipeline profile indicator
θi = inclination of pipe i with respect to horizontal [%]Li = length of pipe i [m]N = number of pipes
B. Barrau, “Profile indicator helps predict pipeline holdup, slugging”, Oil & Gas Journal Vol. 98, Issue 8, p. 58-62, Feb 21, 2000
( ) ( )[ ] 25066091490 ...tan.+−×= ii ArcHoldup θ
πθ
( ) ( )[ ]1000
0
1
1 ××−
=
∑
∑
=
=N
ii
N
iii
L
LHoldupHoldupPI
θ
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Holdup function vs. OLGAS
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Pipe inclination [deg]
Liqu
id h
oldu
p [-]
Holdup function
USG = 1.00 m/s
USG = 1.50 m/s
USG = 2.00 m/s
USG = 2.50 m/s
USG = 3.00 m/s
USG = 3.50 m/s
USG = 4.00 m/s
USG = 4.50 m/s
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Pipeline profile indicator scale
PI < 0 Pipeline profile is globally sloping downwardsNo particular operating problem to be expected
0 < PI < 20 Pipeline profile is nearly horizontal or over-simplifiedNo particular operating problem to be expected
20 < PI < 40 Pipeline profile is relatively flat or slightly hillyPossible troubles at very low flow rates or during restart
40 < PI < 80 Pipeline crosses hilly terrainDesign & Operation needs particular attention
80 < PIPipeline profile is very hilly or very steepDesign & Operation needs very careful attentionValidity of simulation software to be checked
From Total E&P experience in gas-condensate pipelinedesign and operation
Shtokman pipeline profile indicator = 79.7
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Step 1: sub-profile selection
020406080
100120140160180
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000
Pipe
line
indi
catto
r [-]
Distance from offshore platform [m]
-10-8-6-4-202468
10
230000 240000 250000 260000 270000 280000
Incl
inat
ion
[deg
]
Distance from offshore platform [m]
Pipe inclination
-10-8-6-4-202468
10
410000 420000 430000 440000 450000 460000
Incl
inat
ion
[deg
]
Distance from offshore platform [m]
Pipe inclination
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
• Final average pipe length should be about 200 m (target ≈ 2500 pipes)
• For example, use the Box Filter from OLGA®
Geometry Editor
• Or simply select one point every 1 km
Step 2: simplification of the original profile
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
0500100015002000250030003500400045005000
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000
Total climb [m
]Elev
atio
n [m
]
Distance from offshore platform [m]
Pipeline geometryPipe elevation (simplified profile) [m]Pipe elevation (original profile: 108,785 points) [m]Total climb (original profile: 108,785 points) [m]Total Climb (simplified profile) [m]
-15-10
-505
101520
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000
Incl
inat
ion
[deg
]
Distance from offshore platform [m]
Pipe inclinationPipe inclination (original profile: 108,785 points) [deg]Pipe inclination (simplified profile) [deg]
PI = 79.7 25.8
Step 2: result
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Step 3: complexification
-340
-335
-330
-325
-320
-315
-310
-305
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
Distance from offshore platform [m]
Elev
atio
n [m
]
Complexified profile
Simplified profile
For each sub-profile• Keep original pipeline
indicator within +/-1%• Keep original total climb
within +/- 1%
• Split the simplified profile into smaller pipes5 smaller pipes per simplified pipe pipe length ≈ 200 m
• Move new points up and down with a random process
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
0500100015002000250030003500400045005000
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000
Total climb [m
]Elev
atio
n [m
]
Distance from offshore platform [m]
Pipeline geometryPipe elevation (complexified profile) [m]Pipe elevation (original profile: 108,785 points) [m]Total climb (complexified profile) [m]Total climb (original profile: 108,785 points) [m]
-15-10
-505
101520
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000
Incl
inat
ion
[deg
]
Distance from offshore platform [m]
Pipe inclinationPipe inclination (original profile: 108,785 points) [deg]Pipe inclination (complexified profile) [deg]
Step 3: result
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Method 2
Concept of lumping elements with similar inclination
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Method 2 – “Lumping and redistributing”
1. Define the criteria (in priority) to determine the pipe length to be used for the simplified profile :1. minimum pipe length2. maximum elevation change for a pipe element3. maximum pipe length
2. Sort all elements in the detailed profile by inclination in ascending order
3. Lump together the sorted elements to longer pipes, starting with the element with the steepest downhill inclination. The length of each pipe element is then limited by dominating criteria in 1).
4. Distribute the pipe elements in the simplified profile to match the large scale and small scale topography of the detailed profile.
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Pipelength (m)
Pipe
ele
vatio
n ch
ange
(m)
Xmin Xmax
Maximum elevation change
-25-20-15-10
-505
10152025
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8Pipe inclination (deg)
Elev
atio
n ch
ange
(m)
01002003004005006007008009001000
Pipe
leng
th (m
)
Elevation change of single pipePipe length
Step 1)Define the criteria (in priority) to determine the pipe length to be used for the simplified profile :1. minimum pipe length (200 m)2. maximum elevation change for a pipe element (5 m)3. maximum pipe length (1000 m)
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Step 3)Lump together the sorted elements to longer pipes, starting with the element with the steepest downhill inclination. The length of each pipe element is then limited by dominating criteria in 1).
-1200
-1000
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000
Distance (m)
Ele
vatio
n (m
)
-1200-1100-1000-900-800-700-600-500-400-300-200
0 50000 100000
Distance (m)
Elev
atio
n (m
)
-5-4-3-2-1012345
Incl
inat
ion
(deg
)Original profile
Inclination
Lumped, but not redistributed profile
Step 2) Sort elements in the detailed profile by inclination in ascending order – divide into subsections if required
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
”Inclination classes” versus ”lumping by inclination in ascending order ”
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
Inclination (deg)
Acc
umul
ated
leng
th (m
)
grouping by inclination classes
Lumping by inclinations inascending order
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Export flow rate [MSm3/d]
Con
dens
ate
cont
ent [
m3]
Original profile 20-70 km'lumping by inclination in ascending order'
'Sorted by inclination classes'
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Step 4)Redistribution of elements by “Simulated Annealing” (Travelling salesman problem)“minimize distance between detailed profile and simplified profile”
yi : values from the simplified profile
ŷi : values from the detailed profile
wi : weight factor
where as “i” denotes:
1) Elevation
2) “Total Climb”
3) “Pipeline Indicator” *
2)()( ii ii yywyF −⋅=∑Cost function:
-1200
-1000
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000
Distance (m)
Elev
atio
n (m
)
-400-350-300-250-200-150-100-50
0
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000
Distance (m)
Ele
vatio
n (m
)
-300-290-280-270-260-250-240-230
70000 75000 80000 85000 90000 95000 100000
Distance (m)
Elev
atio
n (m
)
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Original profile
Simplifiedprofile
Method 1profile
Method 2profile
Number of pipes 108,784 554 2,766 2,550Pipeline profile indicator 79.7 25.8 80.3 80.3Total climb [m] 4,187 1,235 4,180 4,187Total length [m] 554,505 554,400 554,507 554,505
Comparison
Pipeline geometry
-300-290-280-270-260-250-240-230
70000 75000 80000 85000 90000 95000 100000
Distance from offshore platform [m]
Elev
atio
n [m
]
Original profileSimplified profileDiscretized profile (method 1)Discretized profile (method 2)
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Angle distributionsPipe angle distribution
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
(-90,
-60)(-3
0, -20)
(-10,
-5)(-2
, -1)
(-0.5,
-0.25
)(0,
0.01
)(0.
1, 0.2)
(0.3, 0
.4)(0.
5, 0.75
)(1,
1.25
)(1.
5, 2)
(2.5, 3
)(4,
5)(6,
7)(8,
9)(10
, 20)
(30, 9
0)
Pipe angle group [deg]
Tota
l pip
e le
ngth
per
ang
le g
roup
[m]
Original profileDiscretized profile (Method 2)Discretized profile (Method 1)Simplified profile
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Steady-state simulation: original vs. discretizationCondensate content vs. export flow rate
42" ND pipeline - Fluid: 50%J0/50%J1 - OLGA steady-state pre-processor
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70Export flow rate [MSm3/d]
Con
dens
ate
cont
ent [
m3]
Original profile 20-70 km
Discretized profile 20-70 km (Method 1)
Discretized profile 20-70 km (Method 2)
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Steady-state simulation: simplified vs. discretizationTotal condensate content vs. export flow rate
42" ND pipeline - Fluid: 50%J0/50%J1 - OLGA steady-state pre-processor
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Export flow rate [MSm3/d]
Tota
l con
dens
ate
cont
ent [
m3]
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Inlet pressure [bara]
Total condensate content (simplified profile)Total condensate content (method 1)Total condensate content (method 2)Inlet pressure (simplified profile)Inlet pressure (method 1)Inlet pressure (method 2)
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Conclusions• Simplification of long and rough gas-condensate pipeline profiles is a key issue for correct design
• Two methods were introduced for the development of the Shtokman field – Phase 1
• Essential characteristics of the original detailed pipeline profile are conserved:
Length + Topography + Angle distribution + Total climb
• The hydrodynamic behavior of the original profile is conserved through both methods despite significant data compression
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Discretization Methods for Multiphase Flow Simulation of Ultra-Long Gas-
Condensate Pipelines
Erich Zakarian, Henning HolmShtokman Development A.G., Russia
[email protected], [email protected]
Dominique LarreyTotal E&P, Process Department, France
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Back-up
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Why discretization is so important?Poor discretization
Incorrect design of receiving facilitiesWrong operating envelopeReduced operating flexibilityHigher risk of continuous flaringWrong model tuning against field data
Poor discretizationIncorrect design of receiving facilitiesWrong operating envelopeReduced operating flexibilityHigher risk of continuous flaringWrong model tuning against field data
Total condensate content vs. export flow rate42" ND pipeline - Fluid: 50%J0/50%J1 - OLGA steady-state pre-processor
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
20 30 40 50 60 70Export flow rate [MSm3/d]
Tota
l con
dens
ate
cont
ent [
m3]
Simplified profile
Discretized profile (Method 1)
Discretized profile (Method 2)
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Seabed profile
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
0 100 200 300 400 500Distance [km]
Elev
atio
n [m
]
Ice scours & depressions Elongated pockmarks
PockmarksRidges & ice scours3D
Sid
e S
can
Son
ar im
ager
y
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Total climb• Total climb = cumulative length of uphill pipes
• Helpful indicator as a first check
• Relevant indicator in addition to the pipeline profile indicator to match the original angle distribution
Shtokman original pipeline profile (2007 survey)Total climb = 4187 m
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Comparison of the discretization methodsPipeline geometry
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000
Distance from offshore platform [m]
Elev
atio
n [m
]
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
Total climb [m
]
Pipe elevation (discretized profile: first method) [m]Pipe elevation (discretized profile: second method)[m]Total climb (discretized profile: first method) [m]Total climb (discretized profile: second method) [m]
Pipe inclination
-10-8-6-4-202468
10
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000
Distance from offshore platform [m]
Incl
inat
ion
[deg
]
Pipe inclination (discretized profile: first method) [m]Pipe inclination (discretized profile: second method) [m]
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
OLGA® Geometry Editor
Box filterBox filter
Angle distribution
preservation
Angle distribution
preservation
• Ok for removing noise from as-built pipeline survey• Not recommended for hilly pipelines
• Requires pre-definition of angle groups• Several tries are necessary • Extremely difficult or even impossible to satisfy the four criteria
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Next?• Improve the simplification step (method 1) to keep as many original high & low points as possible
• Sensitivity analysis to pipe sectioning (meshing) in dynamic simulation
• Seabed topography characterization with pipeline profile indicator
Build realistic profile when no detailed survey is available
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Hydraulic/level gradients at low flow rate
Keep as many original high & low points as possible to match hydraulic gradients
• Level gradients included in OLGA 6 (steady-state pre-processor)
• Implicitly included in dynamic mode but fine mesh is required
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Pipeline route
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
0 100 200 300 400 500Distance [km]
Elev
atio
n [m
]
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
The devil is in the details…
‐360‐340‐320‐300‐280‐260‐240‐220
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Elevation [m
]
Distance from offshore platform [km]
‐285
‐280
‐275
‐270
‐265
50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
050010001500200025003000350040004500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000
Total climb [m
]Elev
atio
n [m
]
Distance from offshore platform [m]
Pipe elevation (original profile: 108,785 points) [m]Total climb (original profile: 108,785 points) [m]
Pipe elevation & total climb vs. seabed topologyBe
nign Ice
scou
rs
& de
pres
sions
Pock
mar
ksEl
onga
ted
pock
mar
ks
Beni
gn
Elon
gate
d po
ckm
arks
Beni
gn
Beni
gnPo
ckm
arks
Ice
scou
rs
& po
ckm
arks
Beni
gn
Pock
mar
ksLa
ndfa
ll - S
hore
Ridg
es
& Ic
e sc
ours
Ice scours & depressions Elongated pockmarks
PockmarksRidges & ice scours3D
Sid
e S
can
Son
ar im
ager
y
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Pipeline profile indicator vs. seabed topology
020406080
100120140160180
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000
Pipe
line
indi
catto
r [-]
Distance from offshore platform [m]
Pock
mar
ks
Ice scours & depressions Elongated pockmarks
PockmarksRidges & ice scours
Beni
gn Ice sc
ours
& de
pres
sions
Elon
gate
d po
ckm
arks
Beni
gn
Elon
gate
d po
ckm
arks
Beni
gn
Beni
gnPo
ckm
arks
Ice
scou
rs
& po
ckm
arks
Beni
gn
Pock
mar
ksLa
ndfa
ll - S
hore
Ridg
es
& Ic
e sc
ours
3D S
ide
Sca
n S
onar
imag
ery
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Method 1: sub-profile indicator and total climb
Length range [km] 0-10 10-20 20-70 70-140 140-180 180-200Pipeline indicator [-] 58.48 89.24 104.83 82.48 61.97 80.77Total climb [m] 55.04 75.12 483.90 612.43 199.31 131.14Length range [km] 200-220 220-230 230-280 280-320 320-360 360-410Pipeline indicator [-] 97.95 63.40 45.57 77.01 100.03 67.64Total climb [m] 189.26 58.97 171.22 273.30 386.93 254.57Length range [km] 410-460 460-500 500-510 510-540 540-554
Pipeline indicator [-] 106.54 38.09 64.23 85.74 151.63Total climb [m] 599.81 144.93 49.85 195.13 306.09
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
‐4
‐3
‐2
‐1
0
1
2
3
4
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Probability
NormStd‐
1
Inverse of the standard normal cumulative distribution
Cx = complexification coefficient
Rnd = random value between 0 and 1
( )RndNormStdCyy xoldi
newi
1−×+=
( ) ∫∞−
−
=x z
dzexNormStd 2
2
21π
Method 1: profile complexification
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Steady-state simulation: original vs. discretizationInlet pressure vs. export flow rate
42" ND pipeline - Fluid: 50%J0/50%J1 - OLGA steady-state pre-processor
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
10 20 30 40 50 60 70Export flow rate [MSm3/d]
Inle
t pre
ssur
e at
KP
20 [b
ara]
Original profile 20-70 kmDiscretized profile 20-70 km (Method 1)Discretized profile 20-70 km (Method 2)Back-pressure - Kilometer Point 70
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Steady-state simulation: original vs. discretizationCondensate content vs. export flow rate
42" ND pipeline - Fluid: 50%J0/50%J1 - OLGA steady-state pre-processor
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
10 20 30 40 50 60 70Export flow rate [MSm3/d]
Con
dens
ate
cont
ent [
m3]
Original profile 20-70 km
Discretized profile 20-70 km (Method 1)
Discretized profile 20-70 km (Method 2)
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Dynamic simulationTotal condensate content vs. export flow rate
42" ND pipeline - Fluid: 50%J0/50%J1
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Export flow rate [MSm3/d]
Tota
l con
dens
ate
cont
ent [
m3]
First discretization method - OLGA SS pre-processorSecond discretization method - OLGA SS pre-processorFirst discretization method - OLGA dynamicSecond discretization method - OLGA dynamic
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
CPU time
30 days
20 days
7 days5 days
28 35 49 70
Export flow rate [MSm3/d]
Required simulation time to reach steady‐state flow conditions
Simulation time
21 h 20 h
10 h
5 h
33 h
21 h
10 h6 h
28 35 49 70
Export flow rate [MSm3/d]
Required computation time to reach steady‐state flow conditions
First discretization method
Second discretization method
DELL OptiPlex 755 - Intel® Core TM 2 Duo Processor E6750 (2.66 GHz) and 3.25 GB of DDR2 RAM.
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Dynamic simulationTotal condensate content and inlet pressure vs. time
Winter conditions - Fluid 50%J0 / 50%J1 - Flowrate = 49MSm3/d
1,038
1,040
1,042
1,044
1,046
1,048
1,050
1,052
1,054
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time [d]
Tota
l con
dens
ate
cont
ent [
m3]
139.3
139.4
139.5
139.6
139.7
139.8
139.9
140.0
140.1
Inlet pressure [bara]
Total condensate content [m3]
Inlet pressure [bara]
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Ramp-up from unpacked conditions
Transient
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
3D Side Scan Sonar imagery
Objective: to detect potentially dangerous objects and seabed features
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Characterization
• Iceberg scours 46% - typically 250m across x 8m deep
• Pockmarks 20% - mostly ’elongated’ - 150m long x 5m deep
• Benign 34% - posing no problem for pipeline
Water depths
• Maximum 346m - mostly 200-250m
• Minimum 123m - except for final 3km shore approach
Seabed
• Generally soft clay
Shtokman pipeline route
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Pockmarks• Local craters/depressions of conical form• Related to fluid expulsion from seabed,
either liquid (water) or gas from natural or biogenic origin
• Apart from iceberg scours, the most prominent features found on the seabed
• Diameters from 5 to 120 m• Depths from 0.5 m to 8 m• Wall inclinations from 1.5° to 25°• Densities from 16 to 350 per km²• Can form chain-like features• Approximately 13,500 along trunkline
corridor
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Elongated pockmarks• Local elongated craters/depressions
• Lengths 60 – 400m,
• Widths 25 – 120m
• Depths 0.5 – 10m
• Wall inclinations in the main direction from 0.5° to 3.5°
• Opposite wall inclination from 2° to 7°
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Iceberg scours• Crisscrossing scours
• Depths 0.8 – 16 m
• Widths 37 – 300 m
• Lengths 3.5 – 6 km
• V-shaped or U-shaped cross-sections
• Wall inclinations 2.5° – 37.5°
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Gas export system
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Pipe wall thickness – 2x36” trunkline (X65)
14th International Conference Multiphase Production TechnologyCannes, France - 17th - 19th June 2009
SDAG
Pipe stability – 2x36” trunkline (X65)