Disaster Epidemiology Lessons From Bam Earthquake Dec 26, 2003 Iran Part 6: Buildings structure and...
-
Upload
ariel-dennis -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Disaster Epidemiology Lessons From Bam Earthquake Dec 26, 2003 Iran Part 6: Buildings structure and...
Disaster Epidemiology Lessons From Bam
Earthquake Dec 26, 2003 Iran
Part 6: Buildings structure and death in Bam earthquake
1
Ali Ardalan MD, MPH, PhD student in Epidemiology
Learning objectives:
To learn about the main structure of buildings in Bam
To understand the importance of supervision on considering the
seismic code
To understand the association of buildings structure and death in
Bam earthquake 2
4%
22%
75%
8%
42%
50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Old style Modern style
None / Damaged but not collapsed
Partial collapse
Total collapse
3
Collapse state of houses based on a cross-sectional study on 19th and 20th days
of post-disaster period in Bam
4
Total collapse of a clay and mud brick building in Bam
5
Resistance of the curved roof in an old-style building in Bam
6
Other examples of curved roofs resistance in the old-style buildings in Bam
7
Other examples of curved roofs resistance in the old-style buildings in Bam
8
A collapsed old-style building in Bam: Mud bricks bearing walls, with steel roof
9
A collapsed modern-style building with lack of adequate lateral resistance
10
Comparing resistance of buildings with and without bracing in Bam
11
Collapse of the attic on to a house entrance in Bam
12
Appropriate bracing on two sides of “Kimia building” in Bam
& formation of soft ground
13
Two buildings opposite each other in one street in Bam
14
Non-damaged steel framed buildings with bracing in Bam
15
Non-damaged Central mosque of Bam
Death and injuries in direct relation to Bam earthquake based on a
cross-sectional study
16
Death: 18%
Injuries: 48%
Hospitalization of injured: 32 %
Hospitalization of total: 13 %
The most important determinant variable of direct related death to Bam earthquake,
based on a cross-sectional study
Building collapse status
(Total / Partial-
None)
OR = 5.15
(CI 95%: 3.85-6.88 )
17
Conclusion:
Because structural collapse is
the single greatest risk factor,
priority should be given to
seismic safety in land-use
planning and in the design and
construction of safer buildings.
18