Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

22
higher education – what are the barriers to participation? Eva Magnus Research fellow NTNU Social Research Ltd./Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

description

Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?. Eva Magnus Research fellow NTNU Social Research Ltd./Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway. Introduction. Since 1981 political goals of equality and participation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

Page 1: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

Disability and higher education –

what are the barriers to

participation?Eva Magnus

Research fellow NTNU Social Research

Ltd./Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

Page 2: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

Introduction Since 1981 political goals of equality and

participation Universal design as a strategy in key areas

in society Higher education as a strategy to increase

participation at the labour market New reforms in higher education

Page 3: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

The known barriers Lacking practical adjustments Missing literature for visually impaired Learning management systems not

available for all Lacking knowledge of how to meet theese

students need

Page 4: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

Intention To explore and describe the eyeryday life of disabled students in Norway.

What obstacles are found?What are the concequences for participation?What strategies do they use to minimise the impact of existing barriers?

Page 5: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

Method Participants – 12 students’ in higher

education, 9 women and 3 men, aged 22-43.

Data collection – time-geographic diary, in-depth interview, focus groups.

Data collection and analysing inspired by grounded theory and method (Charmaz 1995, 2000).

Page 6: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

Three preliminary categories ’Organising must be in place’ ’When support is experienced as a threat

or as suspiciouness’ ’To be met gives energy’

Page 7: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

’Organising must be in place’ All the work that has to be done to make

the everyday life function. Learn what your possibilities for support

are. Collaborate, communicate, make changes.

Page 8: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

Heidi said:I would like to be a part of the social life and make myself a network. But organising the everyday life takes all my time and energy.

Page 9: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

Heidi add: I have a feeling of having to make the road I’m on by myself. I have spent my time trying to survive.

Page 10: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

Helga said: Nobody told me about the support service at the university. I thought it was meant only for students that could not walk. One day I read about it in the university newspaper, and contacted them. They helped me getting extended time during exams and I got an office for myself where I can read and take the rest I need during the day.

Page 11: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

When support is experienced as a threat or as suspiciousness The intention of the Scandinavian welfare

system is to enable people to participate and taking care of themselves on equal terms.

The other side of support.

Page 12: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

Helen, on vocational rehabilitation:I do not look sick, instead I look quite well. If I had come there with crutches, it would have been different. I understood when I talked to him (the councellor) that he did not trust me being sick. I think he believes I have fooled them. He asked me a lot of questions on why I was on rehabilitation, why I needed it.

Page 13: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

And she continued:It seems like he had not bothered to look into my papers, really sat down and read them, and then he gave more trust in his own observartions than in what the papers could have told him.

Page 14: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

Kamilla needed adjustments during exams:I can understand why they have to be suspicious, because there is some cheating. But for me it all gave this negative impression. You are new in town and have to find your way around and fix it all by yourself. And she was so negative … I found it really stressing.

Page 15: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

’To be met gives energy’ Good and bad experiences meeting people

that are of importance to you in handling the study situation

Staff members; administrative and professional

Page 16: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

Helen told me: A resource person is good at seeing. I talked to one of them about the last paper that I failed, and she said, ’that is not a problem. You have to do what is the right thing for yourself, and tell me if you need me’.That was great for me. Meeting a person like that makes things a little bit easier, and that is one of the main reason why I still am a student at that institute.

Page 17: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

And she added: Meeting kindness is central in how much energy you put into it. It gives you vitality, and makes you want to pass. When people try to understand and make adjustments, it gives you a push and a help to put up with the challenges … you can’t continue at an institute, and you can’t bear it if you know you are met by a face telling you: ’oh, is it you again. Are you coming to make it even more complicated for us!’

Page 18: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

Helga, about the social advisor:I could talk to her, she had experience, and she understood more than I did. She helped me finding ways to handle the situation.

Page 19: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

Participation (Martin Molin 2004) Interaction is dependent on both internal

conditions (willingness and capacity to participate) and external conditions (the social and physical environment, rules, norms and opportunity given to the person).

Page 20: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

Strategies to participation To study at the faculty were they are met

with an understanding attitude. ’Call my mother’. Physical training or outdoor life. Regular talks with the councellor for

disabled students. Being as kind as possible. Competence, knowing the legislation and

support systems.

Page 21: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

Consequences Extra time spent in communication with

official services and university staff members

Less time and energy for studies and leisure activities

Studies came first and friendship were suffering

Page 22: Disability and higher education – what are the barriers to participation?

References Bliksvær, Trond og Hansse, Jan-Inge (2006). Funksjonshemming, utdanning og

arbeidsmarkedsdeltakelse. Bodø: Respekt, Vol. 2, pp. 52-55. Brandt, Synnøve (2005). Høyere utdanning – tilgjengelig for alle? Studenter med

funksjonsnedsettelse og funksjonshemming i høyere utdanning – Kvalitetsreformens betydning og lærestedenes strategier for inkludering. Oslo: NIFU STEP

Brattstrøm, Malin (1998). Likestilling for funksjonshemmede. Sammenlikning av ulike strategier i Danmark, Norge, Sverige og USA. Oslo: Rådet for funksjonshemmede.

Charmaz, Kathy (1995). Grounded Theory. In A. Smith, R. Harre and L. van langenhove. Rethinking methods in psychology. Pp. 27-49. London: Sage.

Charmaz, Kathy (2000). Grounded theory. Objectivist and constructivist methods. In n.k. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). pp. 509-535.

Ellegård, K. og Nordell, K. (1997). At byta vanmakt mot egenmakt. Metodbok. Stockholm: Johansson & Skyttmo förlag.

Molin, Martin (2004). Delaktighet innom handikapområdet – en begrepsanalys. In A. Gustavsson. Delaktighetens språk. Lund Studentlitteratur, pp. 61-81.

Norges Handikapforbund (2000). Fakta og erfaringer. Oslo: Norges Handikapforbund. Sørheim, Torun Arntsen (1998). Vanlige kvinner – Uvanlige utfordringer. En studie av

kvinner med funksjonshemning. Oslo: Institutt for allmennmedisin og samfunnsmedisinske fag, Universitetet i Oslo.