Direct Transcatheter Valve in MAC: A new solution for an ...€¦ · Prior CV Surgery Baseline LVOT...
Transcript of Direct Transcatheter Valve in MAC: A new solution for an ...€¦ · Prior CV Surgery Baseline LVOT...
Direct Transcatheter Valve in MAC: A new solution for an old problem
Hyde M. Russell, MD
Chief, Cardiac Surgery
NorthShore University HealthSystem
The fishing was good; it was the catching that was bad.-A.K. Best
"Do not tell fish stories where the people know you. Particularly, don't tell them where they know the fish."Mark Twain
Disclosures
• Financial Disclosures: none
• Off Label: yes
• Credits: many
Mitral Annular Calcification
• First Described 1908• Occurs in 10% pts in large autopsy series• Higher prevalence and more severe disease
in women.• Associated Complications:
• Mitral stenosis / regurgitation• Embolic phenomenon• Atrial Fibrillation• Conduction Defects• Endocarditis
• Associated Conditions:• Hypertension• Aortic Stenosis
Carpentier AF, Pellerin M, Fuzellier JF, et al. JTCVS 1996; 111;718-30
Surgical Treatment: Resect or Respect
• Resection of calcium bar with annular reconstruction
• Atrial sliding plasty
• Anterior leaflet foldover
• LA to LV conduit
• Cusa ultrasonic debridement
Surgical Challenges
• Safely dealing with calcium• AV groove disruption
• Circumflex artery injury
• Obtaining large enough orifice
• Seating the prosthesis
• Para-Valve Leak
• LVOT obstruction
Transcatheter Valve in MAC - History
• 2012: Prof Thierry Carrel – Berne, Switzerland• Sapien XT Valve in MAC
• 2013: El Khoury – Brussels, Belgium• Bailout use of Sapien XT during complex mitral operation
• Bovine pericardium reinforcement after valve deployment to treat paravalve leak
Workup
• Echo
• TEE
• Cath
• CT Scan
Imaging – CT Scan
• Minimum 64 slice CT scanner with retrospective gating.
• Images obtained at 5-10% increments of cardiac cycle• Mitral area & diameter made in diastolic phase
• LVOT measurements usually made at 30-45% systolic phase, when LVOT is smallest.
• 3Mensio analysis
• Simulation of valve overlay to assess Neo-LVOT
• Neo-LVOT of 250mm2 should have low risk of LVOT obstruction
CT Imaging
LVOT Obstruction with TMVR
Surgery
• Exposure:• Sternotomy, Bi-Caval Cannulation, Standard Mitral Exposure
• Right Thoracotomy• Axillary arterial cannulation, Femoral Venous, Trans-venous Pacer, 4th ICS
• Maze Procedure when necessary / desired
• Tricuspid ring if TR ≥ 2+
Valve Preparation
Valve Prep Video
Implantation
• Anterior Leaflet resection; resection of subvalvular chords.
• Annular Sutures
• Marks
• Commisure suture to make circular
• Guiding Sutures
• Inflation volume – extra 5-10cc above nominal.
Implant Video
Post-Implantation Assessment
• Intra-op TEE• Regurgitation
• Gradient
• Leaflet mobility
• LVOT
• Post-op Echo
• Post-op CT
Intra-op Echo - Post-Implant
Intra-op Echo - Post-Implant
PRE
POST
Results• Multi-Center - multiple techniques
• 26 Patients• 100% Technical success• 81% Survival to Discharge• 73% 30-day Survival
• Single Center - uniform technique, pt selection• 10 Patients• 100% Technical and Procedural success
• No pt with more than mild PVL, No LVOT obstruction.
• 100% Survival to Discharge• Average LOS 7.9 days• 100% 30-day survival
Date of
SurgeryAge Sex STS LVEF
Prior CV
Surgery
Baseline
LVOT
(mm2)
Predicted
Neo-LVOT
(mm2)
Valve SizeConcurrent
AVR
Concurrent
TV RepairCPB Time
Cross
Clamp
Time
ICU Days Vent Hours
Patient 1 3/3/2017 65 M 12.0% 65% Yes 357 120 29 mm No No 103 70 3 9
Patient 2 6/8/2017 78 F 6.3% 66% Yes 400 213 29 mm No Yes 112 88 2 9
Patient 3 7/3/2017 74 M 8.0% 65% Yes 512 292 29 mm No No 185 90 3 7
Patient 4 10/5/2017 87 F 8.5% 60% No 352 109 29 mm No No 89 55 3 6
Patient 5 10/11/2017 80 M 13.0% 37% Yes 517 299 29 mm No No 151 N/a* 2 10
Patient 6 12/14/2017 77 M 5.8% 65% Yes 472 335 29 mm No No 187 N/a* 3 10
Patient 7 1/25/2018 75 F 8.0% 65% No 249 53 26 mm No Yes 151 104 2 5
Patient 8 4/12/18 69 F 3% 69% No 293 37 26mm No Yes 180 160 2 13
Patient 9 67 F 5% 62% Yes 29mm No No * *
Patient 10 83 F 8% 60% Yes 29mm No No 6 24
Evanston Hospital
MITRAL Trial
Inclusion Criteria
Severe MS (MVA ≤1.5 cm2)
Severe MR + Moderate MS
Native MV (MAC)
n=30
Valve-in-Ring
n=30
Valve-in-Valve
n=30
Severe MS (MVA ≤1.5 cm2)
At least Moderate-Severe MR
90 patients extremely high surgical risk (STS PROM >15% or M&M >50%)
SAPIEN XT SAPIEN 3
Results of MViR
Presented at TCT
Nov 1st, 2017
NYHA II or greater
Severe MS (MVA ≤1.5 cm2)
At least Moderate-Severe MR
Results of MViMAC
Presented at TCT
Nov 1st, 2017
Results of MViV
Presented at AHA
Nov 13th, 2017
Evanston Hospital
MAC Procedural Outcomes
OutcomesIn-Hospital
n=31
30 Days
n=30
All-Cause Mortality
5 (16.1%)Transeptal=1
Transapical=1
Transatrial=3
5 (16.6%)
Cardiovascular death 1 (3.2%) 1 (3.3%)
Non-Cardiac death4 (12.9%)
MOF=44 (13.3%)
1 patient withdrew consent while being discharged after successful transatrial TMVR
50% Transseptal or TA(TS=15, TA=1)
Difficult anatomy for TS=1
50% Transatrial (n=15)Risk of LVOTO=3
Risk of embolization=6
Both=6
Evanston Hospital
SITRAL TrialSurgical Implantation of TRAnscatheter vaLve in Native MAC
Baylor Research Institute
PI Robert Smith, MD
30 patients
Start April 2016
Transatrial TMVR with SAPIEN 3
www.clinicaltrials.gov
Conclusions
• Reproducible, effective technique
• Allows for larger prosthesis with safer implant (lower risk of AV groove disruption, circumflex injury).
• Promising early results
• Sizing is critically important to avoid PVL, LVOT obstruction• This is a planned operation, not a bailout procedure
• This is still an open procedure! Patient selection remains crucial…
• Questions? - [email protected]