Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

23
Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we? Gillian Fielding Chair of the UCISA User Skills Group g_fielding [email protected] ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Transcript of Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

Page 1: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

Gillian Fielding

Chair of the UCISA User Skills Group

g_fielding [email protected]

ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Page 2: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

Background

• From the UCISA Technology Enhanced Survey (TEL) Survey

• Development of digital capabilities across the UK HE sector

• Benchmark

• Inaugural biennial study

• International opportunities

• Stimulate discussion

Page 3: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

Coverage

• 156 UK HEIs institutions invited

• 96 institutions provided a survey rep

• Ran 1st August - 19th September 2014 – (5 weeks + 1 week extra)

• 63 surveys returned – 41% response rate

• Online survey (used licensed UCISA survey tool Vovici)

Page 4: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

Survey sections

• Definition

• Strategy

• Delivery, Implementation and Practice

• Bring Your Own

• Supporting Differentiation and Inclusion

• Looking to the Future

Page 5: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

5

www.ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Definitions: Findings

Page 6: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

6

Definition: Recommendations

• Adopt a standard definition

• Use for benchmarking

• Make sharing resources and exemplars using common terms and standards more easy

• Specific competencies and baseline measures can be developed from this, to enable competency or fluency to be demonstrated

www.ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Page 7: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

Strategy: Findings

• Most important factors driving digital capability development:– Student expectations and requirements (for staff and students)– Student Experience Survey (for staff and students)– Development of innovative pedagogic practices (3rd for students)

• Of low importance:– Develop a unique selling point or use as a marketing tool

• Other strategies– Estates and Staff development (mid-table)– Marketing was least important

• Only 11 institutions expressly cited a member of their senior management team as having responsibility for digital capabilities.

www.ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Page 8: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

8

Use of resources

NUS Charte

r on T

echnology in

HE

Jisc I

nfoNet '

Developing D

igital L

itera

cies'

info

Kit

Jisc S

tudents

as Change A

gents re

sourc

es

Jisc '

Learnin

g in a D

igital A

ge' report

Jisc D

igital S

tudent r

esourc

es

HEA Digita

l Lite

racy

in th

e disc

iplin

es reso

urces

HEFCE 'Stu

dent Pers

pectives o

n Tech

nology' report

Other

Independent '

Towards m

aturit

y' reso

urces

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

1.80

2.00

Students Staff

Page 9: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

9

Strategy: Recommendations

• “Institutions should adopt a whole-institutional approach and embed digital capabilities into all strategies, including Estates, HR, Finance, as well as Library, IT, Academic Development etc.”

• “Institutions must obtain active senior management sponsorship to drive the successful embedding of digital capabilities throughout the organisation.”

• Utilise existing resources, Jisc, NUS, HEA, UCISA, Horizon Report

www.ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Page 10: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

Delivery, implementation and practice: Findings

• Emerging practices in:– students - curriculum-based initiatives, integrating digital capabilities into

learning outcomes, inclusion in handbooks and the curriculum, and extra-curricular activities, including using students as change agents and digital champions

– staff - included integration into annual appraisals, managing a digital profile, digital scholarship practices and induction processes

• Mandatory training– Students (40%) - on VLEs and Turnitin, IT and Library induction– Staff (41%) - systems training before access is granted, IT induction and mobile

learning/VLE

• Certified training– Students – 54% offered no certified training– Staff – 38% offered no certified training – ECDL was the most popular for staff

www.ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Page 11: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

11

Delivery, implementation and practice: Recommendations

• “Institutions should develop digital capabilities through a range of opportunities and emerging practices which motivate and reward students and staff and positively change culture. Impact can be maximised through the sharing of resources and working in partnership.”

• “Institutions should create digital curricula which is holistic, relevant and innovative for students and all staff, i.e. academic programmes and development activities, to encourage effective study, work and digital citizenship.”

www.ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Page 12: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

12

BYO: Findings

• BYO practices vary

• % of learning spaces available for BYO use (table)

• AV facilities becoming increasingly flexible

• Easy and secure access to campus networks largely available

• Challenges remain in some areas:– network or code of connection policy restrictions (75%)– (in)flexibility of space and furniture– wi-fi saturation and bandwidth– accessible wi-fi printing– support provided to users

• Admin rights cited frequently as a barrier

www.ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Option Avail.

100% 32%75-99% 50%50-74% 5%25-49% 10%1-24% 3%

Page 13: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

13

BYO: Findings

• BYO practices vary

• % of learning spaces available for BYO use (table)

• AV facilities becoming increasingly flexible

• Easy and secure access to campus networks largely available

• Challenges remain in some areas:– network or code of connection policy restrictions (75%)– (in)flexibility of space and furniture– wi-fi saturation and bandwidth– accessible wi-fi printing– support provided to users

• Admin rights cited frequently as a barrier

www.ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Option Avail.

100% 32%75-99% 50%50-74% 5%25-49% 10%1-24% 3%

Page 14: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

14

BYO: Recommendations

• “National organisations should collaborate with heads of service and users to develop coherent policy guidelines for the use of personal devices. Institutions should review how to provide a robust and flexible digital environment to enable personalised ways of working.”

www.ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Page 15: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

15

Looking to the future: Findings

• Most significant barriers for future development of digital capabilities:– Students - lack of money, department culture, competing strategic

initiatives and institutional culture.– Staff - competing strategic initiatives, institutional culture, lack of

money, and department culture.

• Key initiatives coming up:– Reviews of teaching and learning systems– A range of digital literacy projects– Infrastructure, training and development projects

• Key agents (depts) of change:– IT Services, Academic Development/Learning Technologies, Library

www.ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Page 16: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

16

Faculties/Schools

TEL/eLearning Units

SMT

Library

IT Depts

Academic Development Unit/Teaching Enhancement Units

Human resources Depts

Research/Graduate Units

Careers, Employability & Enterprise

Student services/study skills

Other

Where responsibility sits

www.ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Page 17: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

18

Looking to the future: Recommendations

• “Institutions should encourage staff-staff and staff-student partnership to co-create digital resources and experiences in learning, teaching, assessment, research and administrative practices.”

www.ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Page 18: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

Survey Expectations

• Yes, findings and recommendations

• But also:

• Encourage dialogue within responding institutions

• Highlight the importance of digital capabilities for both students and staff

• Empower and support change

www.ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Page 19: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

20

Drop-in

clin

ics or a

ppointm

ents fo

r stu

dents

Telephone/email/

online ch

at

Remote

access

Twitter/

socia

l media

Videos (

e.g. YouTube, V

imeo, in

house

etc.)

An online knowledge b

ase

Other m

ethod

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

library IT Services Ac/StudySkills eLearning

Key finding: Differentiation and Support

www.ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Page 20: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

21

• See the full report – published in May

• Watch the webinar

• Join our Training Community:– http://digitalskillsanddevelopment.ning.com/

• Future events: – “Spotlight on Digital Capabilities” – 3 & 4 June

http://www.ucisa.ac.uk/groups/dsdg/Events/2015/digcaps.aspx

– Change Agents Network webinar – 27 Aprilhttp://can.jiscinvolve.org/wp/webinars-upcoming-webinars-and-recordings-of-past-webinars/

Finding out more

www.ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Page 21: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

22

Thank you

Page 22: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

23

Discussion

• What can you as an individual, and your team do to further the digital capabilities agenda?– Discuss your ideas.– Tweet your plans to #ucisadigcap.

www.ucisa.ac.uk/digcap #ucisadigcap

Page 23: Digital Capability: How digitally capable are we?

24