Diffractive dijets atDiffractive dijets at HERA · Diffractive Event Selection 1) Proton...
Transcript of Diffractive dijets atDiffractive dijets at HERA · Diffractive Event Selection 1) Proton...
Diffractive dijets atDiffractive dijets at HERA
Representing H1 and ZEUS experiments
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
Alice ValkárováCh l U i it P
1
Charles University, Prague
HERA collider experiments• 27.5 GeV electrons/positrons on 920 GeV protons →√s=318 GeV• two experiments: H1 and ZEUS
HERA I 16 b 1 120 b 1• HERA I: 16 pb-1 e-p, 120 pb–1 e+p• HERA II: ∼ 550 pb-1, ∼ 40% polarisation of e+,e-• closed July 2007, still lot of excellent data to analyse……
X
ee'
p
⎫⎬⎭
X
ee'
p
⎫⎬⎭
X
ee'
p
⎫⎬⎭
e
DIS: Probe structure of proton → F2
Diffractive DIS: Probe structure of
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
2
Diffractive DIS: Probe structure of color singlet exchange → F2
D
Diffraction and diffraction kinematics
´
Two classes of diffractive events:
Q2~0 → photoproductionQ2>>0 → deep inelastic scattering (DIS)
2HERA: ~10% of low-x DIS events are diffractive
Q >>0 → deep inelastic scattering (DIS)
( )22
22
IP WQMQ
pqppqx X
++≈
⋅′−⋅=
βW momentum fraction of color singlet exchange
22
2
XIP MQQ
xx
+≈=β
W m m m f f g g
XQfraction of exchange momentum, coupling to γ*
2, )( ppt −=t
4-momentum transferd
My
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
3
)( ppt squared
Diffractive Event Selection1) Proton Spectrometers: ZEUS: LPS (1993-2000) H1: FPS (1995-2007),VFPS (2004-07)t measurementaccess to high xIP rangefree of p-dissociation background at low xIPsmall acceptance low statistics ☠small acceptance low statistics ☠
2) Large Rapidity Gap, H1, ZEUS:Require no activity beyond η max
e p
t not measured, some p-diss background ☠
3) Mx method, ZEUS:Diffractive vs non diffractive: exponential
)ln(tan- η 2θ=
Diffractive vs non-diffractive: exponential fall off vs constant distribution in ln Mx
2
Some p-diss contribution ☠2lnMBdN
diff. non-diff
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
4
ln2ln
xMB
x
CeDMd
dN +∝
QCD factorizationGet PDF from inclusive diffraction predict cross sections for exclusive diffraction
H d tt i QCDHard scattering QCDmatrix element,perturbativelycalculated, process dependent
Universal diffractive partondensities, identical for all
processesprocesses
),(),,,()( 2*2* QxtxQxfXpp iIP
D
ipartoni
D γσγσ ⋅=→ ∑_ iparton
Dif
*
→ DPDFs – obey DGLAP, universal for diff. ep DIS (inclusive,dijet,charm)
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
5
i*γσ → universal hard scattering cross section (same as in inclusive DIS)
Proton vertex (Regge) factorizationProton vertex (Regge) factorizationAdditional assumption – there is no proof!
Bte
),/(),(),,,( 2/
2 QxxftxftxQxf IPIP
iIPpIPIPD
i =⋅= β
1)(2/ ),( −= tIP
Bt
IPpIP xetxf α pomeron flux factor pomeron PDF
Exctracted from inclusive diffraction!Fits 2006 A and BFits 2006 A and B
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
6
H1 2006 fits -resultsH1 2006 fits resultsz (zIP)- longitudinal momentum fraction of gluon rel. to
Two fits, A and BFi B l i d
colorless exchange
Fit B: gluon parameterised as aconstant at starting scale
• quarks are very stable• gluons carries ~75% ofgluons carries ~75% ofpomeron momentum
• gluons similar at low z• no sensitivity to gluon
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
7
no sens t v ty to gluonat high z
Dijets in diffractive DIS, H14 < Q2 < 80 GeV2
0.1 < y < 0.7x 0 03xIIP < 0.03
P*tjet1 > 5.5 GeVP* > 4 GeV
Data 99/00
P tjet2 > 4 GeV-3. < η*jets < 0.
zIP is the most sensitive variable to test gluonic part of DPDFs –difference between fits A and B at high zIP.
Data agree with NLO prediction, NLO with fit B is more close to data
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
8
Dijets in diffractive DIS, H1j ff ,
For zIP < 0.4 NLO predictionsusing fits 2006 A and B agree with data very wellagree with data very well
Combined QCD fit for inclusive and dijet DIS data…..
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
9
H1 QCD jet fit
Low sensitivity of fits toinclusive cross section to gluonPDF especially at large zIP →DF sp c a y at arg zIPuse jets to combined fits!
JHEP 0710:042,2007
Largestdifference Largest
differenceAA
B Ajets
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
10
Dijets in diffractive DIS, ZEUS
Eur.Phys.J.C52: 83 (2007)
Data 99/00E*tjet1 > 5 GeV
R=data/NLO(ZEUS LPS)
The best agreement ofThe best agreement of data and NLO for H1 2006 fit B andMRW 2006
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
11H1, ZEUS: for DIS dijets factorization holds…..
Hadron-hadron collisions
γ*p
Exporting DPDFs fromHERA to Tevatron…..
pp
γ pxIP integrated effective DPDFsfrom CDF single diff. dijets (run I)
Effect is known since 10 years!
Factorization broken by
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
12
Factorization broken by β-dependent factor ~ 10 !
Photoproduction, γ⋆p, Q2→0
xγ - fraction of photon’s momentum in hard subprocess
jetszOBS
pEpE
xx)()( −
== ∑γγ
hadronszpE )( −
direct photoproduction (Q2≃0):photon directly involved in hard scattering
1
resolved photoproduction (Q2≃0): photon fluctuates into hadronic
system, which takes part in hadronicscattering,dominant at Q2≃0
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
13
xγ=1(at parton level)
g, Qxγ<1(at parton level)
Photoproduction as hadronic process
HERA resolved photoproduction
Secondary interactionsbetween spectatorsp
Typical models that describe suppression at Tevatron assume secondaryinteractions of spectators as the cause:
resolved contribution expected to be suppressed by factor 0 34
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
14
resolved contribution expected to be suppressed by factor 0.34 (Kaidalov,Khoze,Martin,Ryskin:Phys.Lett.B567 (2003),61)
Photoproduction, γ⋆p, Q2 ⋍ 0
xγ - fraction of photon’s momentum in hard subprocessExpectation: Gap Survival Expectation: Gap Survival
P b bili 1
jetszOBS
pEpE
xx)()( −
== ∑γγ
p pProbability =1 Probability < 1
hadronszpE )( −
direct photoproduction (Q2≃0):photon directly involved in hard scattering
1
resolved photoproduction (Q2≃0): photon fluctuates into hadronic
system, which takes part in hadronicscattering,dominant at Q2≃0
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
15
xγ=1(at parton level)
g, Qxγ<1(at parton level)
One year ago….
H1 E 5 G V i f f t 0 5H1: Etjet1 > 5 GeV suppression of factor ~0.5ZEUS: Etjet1 > 7.5 GeV weak (if any) suppression (0.6-0.9)
Neither collaboration sees difference between the resolved and direct regions, in contrast to theory!
Possible explanation of differences between H1 and ZEUS (DIS 2007)Different phase space of both analyses ?
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
16
Different phase space of both analyses ……..?
Et dependence of suppression?Et dependence of suppression?H1 ZEUS
From the DIS 2008 talk of W SlomińskiFrom the DIS 2008 talk of W.Slomiński,ZEUS results
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
17H1 and ZEUS observe the data have harder Et slope than NLO
Double ratios of γ⋆p & DIS(d t /NLO)(data/NLO)
H1 collab. Eur.Phys.J,C51 (2007),549
Very useful – full or partial cancellation of many uncertainties (energy scales for data, DPDFs used…etc ).
There is no clear W dependencebut
what about Etj t1 dependence??what about Etjet1 dependence??
Etjet1>5 GeV
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
18
H1 – double ratio, Et dependenceH1 double ratio, Et dependence Double ratio of Data/NLO for h d i d DISphotoproduction and DIS
→
Figure extracted from published results
Double ratio is within errors Et dependent!
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
19
New H1 analysis – data 99/00New H1 analysis data 99/00Tagged photoproduction, luminosity 3x larger than for 97diffractive events found by Large Rapidity Gap method (LRG)diffractive events found by Large Rapidity Gap method (LRG)
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
20
Two cut scenariosTwo cut scenariosTo crosscheck previous H1 results To approach closest to ZEUS cuts
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
21
Theoretical predictionsTheoretical predictions
2 programs for NLO calculations, 3 sets of DPDFs:2 programs for NLO calculations, 3 sets of DPDFs
Frixione/Ridolfi → H1 2006 Fit Ainclusive measurement
H1 2006 Fit BH1 2007 Fit Jets →
inclusive measurement
DIS dijets
Kramer/Klasen → H1 2006 Fit B
The aim was to estimate the effect on DPDF used and to crosscheckNLO programs
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
22
Lower Et cut scenario
Integrated survival probabilities (ISP)
Within errors no difference in ISPusing different DPDFs
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
23
No difference in survival probabilitiesfor resolved and direct regions of xγ,like in previous H1 and ZEUS analyses
Lower Et cut scenario
Another hint of Et harder slope for datah NLOthan NLO
Hadronization corrections
δ =MC(hadr)/MC(parton)δhadr=MC(hadr)/MC(parton)
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
24
Higher Et cut scenario
Now much more direct-like“ events thanNow much more „direct like events thanin low Et analysis, peak at higher xγ
Integrated survival probabilities (ISP)Integrated survival probabilities (ISP)
Larger ISP than for lower Et cut scenario → more close to ZEUS results!!!
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
25
more close to ZEUS results!!!
Higher Et cut scenario
Et dependence not excluded but cannotbe independently verified
ZEUS – W.Slomiński
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
26
What DPDF is the „best“?
The most sensitivevariable → zIP
Fits 2006 A,B valid onlyto zIP =0.8Fit 2007 jets to z P = 0 9Fit 2007 jets to zIP = 0.9
Poorly constraint DPDFsgive large uncertainties atgive large uncertainties atlarge zIP.Fits 2006 A and 2007 Jetsrepresent extremes.p
Fit 2006 B is in the middle….
L E t i
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
27
Lower Et cut scenario Higher Et cut scenario
Summary1 d h d d ld 1 l f d• new H1 dijet photoproduction data – older H1 results confirmed
– within errors is gap survival probability (GSP) ~ 0.5.
i hi h E t s i (si il t ZEUS) GSP is 0 6• in higher Et cut scenario (similar to ZEUS) GSP is ~ 0.6, more close to ZEUS results.
• hint that GSP is dependent on E of the leading jet• hint that GSP is dependent on Et of the leading jet, for low Et jets seems to be suppression more significant.
• the evidence that GSP is not different for direct andthe evidence that GSP is not different for direct andresolved events remains (originally not expected )
• the problem is rather the theoretical uncertainties than pthe lack of experimental results! NNLO????
• important for LHC predictions….(depend on DPDFs from HERA,d G P)
HERA/LHC workshop May 2008
28
and GSP)