Differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism: imaging versus laboratory
-
Upload
massimiliano-andrioli -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
3
Transcript of Differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism: imaging versus laboratory
Differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism:imaging versus laboratory
Massimiliano Andrioli Æ Francesca Pecori Giraldi ÆMartina De Martin Æ Agnese Cattaneo ÆChiara Carzaniga Æ Francesco Cavagnini
Published online: 18 March 2009
� Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009
Abstract Differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent
Cushing’s syndrome often presents major difficulties.
Diagnostic troubles are increased by suboptimal specificity
of endocrine tests, the rarity of ectopic ACTH secretion
and the frequent incidental discovery of pituitary adeno-
mas. A 43-year-old female reported with mild signs and
symptoms of hypercortisolism, and initial hormonal tests
and results of pituitary imaging (7-mm adenoma) were
suggestive for Cushing’s disease. However, inadequate
response to corticotrophin-releasing hormone and failure to
suppress after 8 mg dexamethasone pointed towards an
ectopic source. Total body CT scan visualized only a small,
non-specific nodule in the right posterior costophrenic
excavation. Inferior petrosal sinus sampling revealed an
absent center:periphery ACTH gradient but octreoscan and18F-FDG-PET-CT failed to detect abnormal tracer accu-
mulation. We weighed results of the laboratory with those
of imaging and decided to remove the lung nodule.
Pathology identified a typical, ACTH-staining carcinoid and
the diagnosis was confirmed by postsurgical hypoadrenal-
ism. In conclusion, imaging may prove unsatisfactory or
even misleading for the etiologial diagnosis of ACTH-
dependent Cushing’s syndrome and should therefore be
interpreted only in context with results of hormonal dynamic
testing.
Keywords Cushing � Pituitary adenoma �Ectopic ACTH secretion � Carcinoid
Introduction
Ectopic ACTH secretion, although a rare occurrence,
always has to be excluded when dealing with ACTH-
dependent Cushing’s syndrome and suboptimal specificity
of hormonal and imaging procedures often makes this dis-
tinction difficult. Marked Cushingoid features, e.g., severe
hypertension, hypokalemia, hyperpigmentation, had been
considered highly suggestive of ectopic ACTH secretion in
the past but the experience accrued in recent years revealed
that mild hypercortisolism is not so rare among patients
with ectopic ACTH secretion. Diagnostic problems are also
increased by the frequent incidental discovery of incidental
pituitary masses [1] and by the difficulties in visualizing
small neuroendocrine tumors.
We herein describe a case of an ACTH-dependent
Cushing’s syndrome in which imaging was not discrimi-
natory and, even, misleading and the correct diagnosis was
established essentially through laboratory testing.
Clinical case
A 43-year-old woman with signs and symptoms of mild
hypercortisolism (i.e., modest weight gain, hypertension,
hypertrichosis, secondary amenorrhea, hypokalemia, mood
changes) was evaluated for Cushing’s syndrome. Initial
investigations were suggestive for Cushing’s disease (urinary
free cortisol 1,147–2,088–2,440 nmol/24 h, normal \220;
serum cortisol after 1 mg dexamethasone 744 nmol/l, normal
\50 nmol/l; plasma ACTH 33 pmol/l, normal \10 pmol/l
and 7-mm left paramedian pituitary adenoma at MRI; Fig. 1a)
and transsphenoidal adenomectomy had been advised.
Our reassessment confirmed ACTH-dependent hyper-
cortisolism and revealed a borderline cortisol response to
M. Andrioli � F. Pecori Giraldi � M. De Martin � A. Cattaneo �C. Carzaniga � F. Cavagnini (&)
Chair of Endocrinology, Ospedale San Luca IRCCS, Istituto
Auxologico Italiano, University of Milan, Via Spagnoletto 3,
20149 Milan, Italy
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Pituitary (2009) 12:294–296
DOI 10.1007/s11102-009-0174-2
CRH (ACTH: from 35 to 41 pmol/l, increase by 18%;
cortisol from 938 to 1,131 nmol/l, increase by 23%) and
failure of cortisol to suppress after 8 mg dexamethasone
(from 882 to 800 nmol/l, decrease by 10%). These findings
challenged the diagnosis of Cushing’s disease and favored
an extrapituitary ACTH source. Total body CT scan visu-
alized only a small (8 9 11 mm), contrast-enhanced, non-
specific intraparenchymal lung nodule in the right posterior
costophrenic excavation (Fig. 1b). Inferior petrosal sinus
sampling (IPSS) was performed and revealed an absent
center:periphery ACTH gradient (basal 1.3 and after
CRH 1.6), thus upholding an extrapituitary ACTH
source. However, 111Indio-octreotide Octreoscan and even
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT failed to detect any
abnormal tracer accumulation. The results of the diagnostic
work-up were therefore discordant, with laboratory inves-
tigations pointing towards ectopic ACTH secretion and
imaging studies favoring Cushing’s disease. Summarizing,
our patient presented mildly symptomatic ACTH-depen-
dent Cushing’s syndrome, a pituitary microadenoma,
hormonal testing and IPSS suggesting an extrapituitary
ACTH source and a non-specific lung lesion which failed
to label with either octreotide or glucose. On balance, we
reasoned that (a) hormonal testing should carry more
weight than imaging in the differential diagnosis of
Cushing’s syndrome, and (b) missing a neuroendocrine
tumor could be more dangerous than failure to immediately
remove a pituitary ACTH-secreting microadenoma. Thus,
we referred the patient to a lung surgeon for thoracic
exploration and right inferior lung lobectomy was per-
formed. Pathology of the nodule revealed an ACTH-
staining typical carcinoid and the diagnosis of ectopic
ACTH secretion was confirmed by immediate postsurgical
hypoadrenalism. Features of Cushing’s syndrome disap-
peared and follow-up imaging of the pituitary adenoma at
3 years was superimposable.
Discussion
This case is paradigmatic for the ongoing problems with
imaging in ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. As
Cushing’s disease is far more frequent than ectopic ACTH
secretion, pituitary imaging has been recommended during
the initial diagnostic work-up [2] and, in fact, imaging
revealed a pituitary microadenoma in our patient thus
strengthening the a priori most likely diagnosis, i.e.,
Cushing’s disease. At this point, the patient was referred to
the neurosurgeon and only a more accurate endocrine
evaluation spared her unnecessary pituitary surgery.
The diagnostic accuracy of tests used for the differential
diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome is not
absolute and there is no uniformly accepted flowchart for
the distinction between pituitary and ectopic ACTH
secretion but, rather, recommendations based upon each
center’s experience. Even IPSS does not achieve absolute
sensitivity as patients with Cushing’s disease may present
false negative results [3, 4]. Pituitary-dependent hyper-
cortisolism can therefore not be completely ruled out after
negative test responses although, in our patient, concordant
negative responses to at all three diagnostic procedures
(CRH stimulation, dexamethasone suppression test and
IPSS) argued against Cushing’s disease.
On the other hand, 10% of the general population is
known to present incidental pituitary microadenomas [1]
Fig. 1 Pituitary MRI showing a 7-mm left paramedian adenoma and
slight ipsilateral stalk deviation (a). Chest CT. Arrow indicates a
small (8 9 11 mm), contrast-enhanced, apparently non-specific nod-
ule in the right posterior costophrenic excavation (b)
Pituitary (2009) 12:294–296 295
123
and incidental pituitary findings can therefore be expected
also among patients with ectopic ACTH secretion. Indeed,
coexistence of incidental pituitary tumors with ACTH-
secreting extrapituitary tumors, although rare, has been
observed both in large series and isolated case reports.
Most lesions were small (\5 mm), low signal areas
deemed inconclusive or ‘‘possible pituitary microade-
noma’’ [2, 4, 5] whereas an indisputable microadenoma
was detected in the present case. Pituitary macroadenoma
and ectopic ACTH secretion coincided in one patient but
Cushing’s syndrome developed some years after the non-
secreting pituitary macroadenoma had been removed, thus
imaging did not cloud the diagnostic work-up [6]. It fol-
lows that pituitary imaging should be used to substantiate
hormonal tests indicative of pituitary ACTH source and not
as an aid to the etiological diagnosis.
In our patient, the ectopic neuroendocrine ACTH-
secreting tumor itself proved difficult to visualize as its
appearance at CT scan was considered non-specific and
negative results of both octreoscan and PET-CT cast seri-
ous doubts as to its functionality. It is known, however, that
sensitivity of these procedures for ectopic ACTH secretion
is far from absolute and negative scans do not rule out
small neuroendocrine tumors [7, 8].
In conclusion, imaging may prove unsatisfactory or even
misleading in the evaluation of ACTH-dependent Cush-
ing’s syndrome, as in our patient, and should therefore be
interpreted only in context with results of hormonal
dynamic testing. Diagnosis of ectopic ACTH secretion
requires exhaustive diagnostic procedures and a certain
degree of clinical experience and boldness.
References
1. Hall WA, Luciano MG, Doppman JL, Patronas NJ, Oldfield EH
(1994) Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging in normal human
volunteers: occult adenomas in the general population. Ann Int
Med 120:917–920
2. Friedman TC, Zuckerbraun E, Lee ML, Kabil MS, Shahinian H
(2007) Dynamic pituitary MRI has high sensitivity and specificity
for the diagnosis of mild Cushing’s syndrome and should be part of
the initial workup. Horm Metab Res 39:451–456. doi:10.1055/
s-2007-980192
3. Swearingen B, Katznelson L, Miller K, Grinspoon S, Waltman A,
Dorer DJ, Klibanski A, Biller BM (2004) Diagnostic errors after
inferior petrosal sinus sampling. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
89:3752–3763. doi:10.1210/jc.2003-032249
4. Invitti C, Pecori Giraldi F, De Martin M, Cavagnini F, The Study
Group of the Italian Society of Endocrinology on the Pathophys-
iology of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis (1999)
Diagnosis and management of Cushing’s syndrome: results of an
Italian multicentre study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:440–448.
doi:10.1210/jc.84.2.440
5. Ilias I, Torpy DJ, Pacak K, Mullen N, Wesley RA, Nieman LK
(2005) Cushing’s syndrome due to ectopic corticotropin secretion:
twenty years’ experience at the National Institutes of Health. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 90:4955–4962. doi:10.1210/jc.2004-2527
6. Wong M, Isa SH, Kamaruddin NA, Khalid BA (2007) ACTH
producing pulmonary carcinoid and pituitary macroadenoma: a
fortuitous association? Med J Malaysia 62:168–170
7. Kumar J, Spring M, Carroll PV, Barrington SF, Powrie JK (2006)
18Flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the local-
ization of ectopic ACTH-secreting neuroendocrine tumours. Clin
Endocrinol (Oxf) 64:371–374
8. Pacak K, Ilias I, Chen CC, Carrasquillo JA, Whatley M, Nieman
LK (2004) The role of [(18)] Flurodeoxyglucose positron emission
tomography and [(111)In]-diethylenetriaminepentaacetate-D-Phe-
pentetreotide scintigraphy in the localization of ectopic adrenocor-
ticotropin-secreting tumours causing Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 89:2214–2221. doi:10.1210/jc.2003-031812
296 Pituitary (2009) 12:294–296
123