Different evaluations for different kinds of hearing

39
Different evaluations for different kinds of hearing Matthew B. Winn Au.D., Ph.D. Waisman Center, UW-Madison Dept. of Surgery

description

Different evaluations for different kinds of hearing. Matthew B. Winn Au.D ., Ph.D. Waisman Center, UW-Madison Dept. of Surgery. Different kinds of hearing?. Using both ears together Listening for information / listening for clarity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Different evaluations for different kinds of hearing

Page 1: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Different evaluationsfor different kinds of hearingMatthew B. Winn Au.D., Ph.D.Waisman Center,UW-Madison Dept. of Surgery

Page 2: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Different kinds of hearing?• Using both ears together

• Listening for information / listening for clarity

• The ears as part of the brain & part of the whole person

Page 3: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

The challenge of using a cochlear implant•Sound distortion•Pitch shifting•Abnormal loudness•Neural atrophy

Page 4: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Imagine the inner ear as a piano…

Low notes High notesMiddle notes

Page 5: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Imagine the inner ear as a piano…

Low notes High notesMiddle notes

Page 6: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Imagine the inner ear as a piano…

Low notes High notesMiddle notes

Page 7: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Imagine the inner ear as a piano…

Low notes High notesMiddle notes

Page 8: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

In real life…

Page 9: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Listening for information,listening for clarity

Page 10: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Listening for information,listening for clarity

Restaurant

Restaurant

RestaurantRestaurant

Page 11: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Testing for clarity in hearing

Page 12: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Testing for clarity in hearing• Speech sounds are morphed from one sound to another• Listeners label each sound as it is heard• Labeling consistency and confidence is modeled statistically

Page 13: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Different listeners have different levels of clarity in their hearing

(clarity)

Page 14: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Context and adaptation

14

Page 15: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Context and adaptation

15

Page 16: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Some voices have predictable patterns of differences• Pitch, duration, voice quality, articulation, etc.

• We can form categories• High / low pitch • Creaky / smooth voice quality• “eee” / “ooo”• “sss” “sh”

Page 17: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Some voices have predictable patterns of differences

A “low” pitch for one voice may be higher than a “high” pitch for another voice

Page 18: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Testing adjustment to different voices• Low pitch / High pitch

“sh” “ss”

• The difference between low “sh” and high “ss” depends on whether the voice is female or male.

male voicesh ss

female voice

boundary

Page 19: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Testing for a boundaryFocus on a region of interest

Label the sounds

“sh” “ss”

Page 20: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Accommodation to talker voice

20(CI Listener data)

Page 21: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Accommodation to talker FACE

21(CI Listener data)

Page 22: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Accommodation to talker voice with face

22(CI Listener data)

Page 23: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

A change of [this context]is worth [this much change]in auditory frequency boundary

23

Bou

ndar

y sh

ift (H

z)

Page 24: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Listeners with normal hearing adjust to the talker’s voice

Page 25: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Listeners with cochlear implants adjust to the talker’s voice and face

Page 26: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Adjusting on the fly• Listeners with normal hearing can adjust to the

speech of various talkers on-the-fly using their ears

• Listeners with cochlear implants can adjust using their ears AND their eyes,• So they may benefit from learning some audio+visual

associations between faces and vocal styles

Page 27: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Binaural and Bilateral• People with normal hearing enjoy binaural hearing,

which means the two ears work together and compare inputs.

• This lets us do many things, including locate a sound in space and separate speech from background noise

Page 28: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Using two cochlear implants

• Two cochlear implants are independent systems that may or may not work well together

Page 29: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Binaural and Bilateral• People with bilateral cochlear implants

generally report benefit from the second device• Better sound localization• Better hearing in noise

Page 30: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Some abilities are easily quantifiable…• Word recognition over the first two years

• Sound localization

Page 31: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Other abilities are not-so-easily quantifiable.(From the Cochlear Corp. website)Benefits of bilateral implantation:• More connected• More confident• More balanced and relaxed• Peace of mind

Bilateral implants make it “easier to hear everyday sounds… without the constant strain associated with a hearing loss.”

Page 32: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Listening fatigue and hearing loss:why it matters

• Individuals with hearing loss (HL) have to "work harder" cognitively to process sounds compared to people without hearing loss

• Increased reports of stress, tension & fatigue [1]

• Higher "need for recovery" from work [2]

• Individuals with HL are more likely to miss work due to "fatigue, strain or burnout" than individuals without HL working at a similar or the same job [3]

Page 33: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Effort Pupil dilation • Task-evoked pupil dilation corresponds to cognitive effort

33

Page 34: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Listening effort test• Listen to sentences with the right implant only

• Listen to sentences with the left implant only

• Listen to sentences with both implants

• Hear the sentence, wait a moment, then repeat

• We measure pupil size as the sentence ends, and during the time before you repeat it back

Page 35: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Right ear CI only

Page 36: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Right and Left CIs

Page 37: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Bilateral CIs

Page 38: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

New directions• Technology exists to improve sound clarity

• Efforts can be made to synchronize both ears

• CI recipients undergo auditory training

• We can evaluate the effects of these efforts on the listener’s experience of mental effort required to listen

Page 39: Different evaluations for  different kinds of hearing

Questions and comments are welcome!• Matthew Winn• [email protected]