Diesel Emission Control by Oxidation Catalyst and Particle ... · PDF fileDiesel Emission...
Transcript of Diesel Emission Control by Oxidation Catalyst and Particle ... · PDF fileDiesel Emission...
Diesel Emission Control by Oxidation Catalyst andParticle Oxidation Catalyst (DOC+POC ® )
ECT 2009, New DelhiNovember 6-7, 2009
Dr Toni KinnunenCTO, Ecocat Group
Ecocat Group
Ecocat is an international and growing cleanair technology company headquartered inFinland.
Ecocat develops and manufactures catalyticconverters, in other words mechanicalsubstrates with chemical coatings forautomotive industry, small engines andindustrial applications.
Ecocat’s global market share is close to 20%of metallic substrates and 3% of all substrates.
The company has manufacturing plants inFinland, India, Italy and the U.S.
Ecocat cleans the airfor the world
52,2
80,9
93,1
70,0
0,0
10,0
20,030,0
40,0
50,0
60,0
70,080,0
90,0
100,0
2005A 2006A 2007A 2008A
Revenue (€million)
•Low back pressure•Size benefit•Flexibility in shape•Durability•Immediate catalytic performance
Formulas for several applications- Gasoline- Diesel- Natural Gas- VOC
•Fast and highly effectiveresponse to meet applicationrequirements•Easy integration into exhaustsystem
Metallic substrate Chemical know-how
Catalytic converter
•Ecocat has been active in the catalyst market since the early stages of the regulation of exhaustemission controls internationally and has over 20 years of know-how in all three processes
Coating process
What are diesel particulates?
- Soot is formed in the engine through theincomplete combustion process
- VOF condensates on soot particles duringexhaust gas cooling and dilution
- In addition sulfates can be found in dieselparticulate matter
How to decrease particle emissions?
- Diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC)- effective reduction of HC and CO- some reduction of PM (reduction of VOF)- typical PM reduction 10-30%
- Diesel particulate filter (DPF)- effective reduction of PM (soot)- typical PM reduction 80-95%- regeneration of filter needed (to avoid backpressure increase, blocking risk)
- Particle oxidation catalyst (POC)- first target: to increase particle depositionin oxidation catalyst without significant backpressure increase
POC® open filter
• POC is an open filter structure, developedto trap Particulate Matter in LD and HDdiesel vehicles.
• Maintenance free flow throughconstruction.
• 100% stainless steel structure, coatedwith specific washcoat.
• Flexible size and low weight - easy tointegrate into exhaust system.
• In combination with Ecocat pre-oxicat ororiginal oxidation catalyst.
• High resistance against thermal andmechanical shocks.
Typical lay-out of the DOC+ POC combination
DOC (Pt or Pt-Pd) POC (Pt)oxidation of THC &CO PM collectionpartial oxidation of VOF additional oxidation of THC & CONO2 formation for regeneration total oxidation of VOF
NO2 formation and utilisationfor soot oxidation (= regeneration)
Two alternative structures of POCPOC-X and POC-L
Basic POC-X vs POC-L
- Basic POC-X structureSubstrate channels are designed with severalcorrugated screen layers which are subsequentlywelded together [EP 1 230 978 B1, 2002].
- POC-L structurePlacing additional straightmesh between corrugated wire meshes
Test results of POC-X and POC-L
LDD-results: Emissions downstream of DOC+POC-X vs DOC+POC-L
Error bars in figure show thestandard deviation of thetest results (minimum 3 testrepetitions are made)
Test vehicle:VW Touran 1.9 TDI, Euro 4
Basics of POC samples:Basics of POC samples:D127, L152,D127, L152,POCPOC--X 400cpsi,X 400cpsi,POCPOC--L 300cpsiL 300cpsi10g/m10g/m22, Pt10g/ft, Pt10g/ft33
PM Emissions downstream of DOC+POC-X
Test vehicle:VW Touran 1.9 TDI, Euro 4
With POC we can reduce both volatile and non-volatile (soot) fraction of PM.
Basics of POC samples:Basics of POC samples:D127, L152,D127, L152,POCPOC--X 400cpsi,X 400cpsi,10g/m10g/m22, Pt10g/ft, Pt10g/ft33
Dynamometer tests/ HDD
PM emissions and reductions over POC-X and POC-L
DOC = 350cpsi,d334 L150,30g/m2, 40g/ft3
POC =300cpsi/30°, d334L150, 10g/m2,10g/ft3, Aisi 310
HD Scania, PM emissions, ESC-test
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
0.045
RAW DOC+POC-X DOC+POC-L
g/k
Wh 48%
62%
PM Total PM Total NVF VOF CO THCmg g/kWh mg mg g/kWh g/kWh
Raw emission 0,651 0,0527 0,411 0,24 4,33 0,258After POC emission 0,217 0,0176 0,205 0,012 0,025 0,013POC Efficiency [%] 66,7 66,7 50,1 95,0 99,4 95,0
ETC Results
PM Total PM Total NVF VOF CO THCmg g/kWh mg mg g/kWh g/kWh
Raw emission 0,429 0,0347 0,309 0,12 2,808 0,133After POC emission 0,1705 0,0138 0,162 0,0085 0,013 0,005POC Efficiency [%] 60,3 60,3 47,6 92,9 99,5 96,2
ESC Results
Euro4 - 5L - 4 CylinderPOC: 180x304 mm (7,8 dm3) 300 cpsiDOC: 180x74,5 mm (1,9 dm3) 200 cpsi 20g/ft3
MAN D0826 LOH 17, 6.9L, Euro II -- ESC-test -- Mass emissions
0.0E+00
5.0E+03
1.0E+04
1.5E+04
2.0E+04
2.5E+04
3.0E+04
3.5E+04
4.0E+04
4.5E+04
5.0E+04
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800time (s)
mas
sco
nce
ntr
atio
n( µ
g/m
3)
raw-1DOC+POC-L -1DOC+POC-L -2DOC+POC-L -3raw-2
ESC 1 = idle
ESC 2
ESC 3 ESC 4
ESC 5
ESC 6
ESC 7ESC 8
ESC 9ESC 10
ESC 11ESC 12
ESC 13
Example of mass concentration in ESC –upstream and downstream of ’DOC+POC-L’
Measurements upstream of the ’DOC+POC’are made before (raw-1) andafter (raw-2) the measurements downstream of ’DOC+POC’(3 test repetitions)
Particle collection efficiency of POC-L substrate
Test engine:Cummins, 4,5 Litre, Euro 4
Basics of POC sample:Basics of POC sample:D240, L300, 300cpsi,D240, L300, 300cpsi,10g/m10g/m22, Pt10g/ft, Pt10g/ft33 (POC(POC--L)L)
ESC 11 –load 25%ESC 3 –load 50%ESC 12 –load 75%ESC 10 –load 100%
SOF emissions after POC –comparison to DPF
Note:SOF and VOF are typically parts of the nucletion mode,ie. they are small healthy-hazardous nano-particles
Regeneration of POC
• Test plan: (Engine: MAN D0826 LOH 17, 6.9L, Euro II)
1. Soot collection phase- Weighing of POC substrate- Exhaust T < 250°C (no passive regeneration)- Test time 60 h- Continuous back pressure and temperature measurement- Emissions measurements 0h, 20h, 40h, 60h- Weighing of POC substrate
2. Regeneration phase :- Weighing of POC substrate- Exhaust T 350-400°C (regeneration should happen)- Test time 2 h- Continuous back pressure and temperature measurement- Continuos NO/NOx measurement, PM measurement (30 min each), particle mass
concentration in real time with DMM- Weighing of POC substrate
• Samples DOC+POC– DOC (d220, L74.5, 350cpsi, 30g/m2, 40g/ft3) + POC (d220, L304, 400cpsi/30°, 10 g/m2)– 3 different Pt loading in POC (0, 10 and 20 g/ft3)
Back pressure 0h-20h-40h-60hWeighing POC after 60h - POC (Pt 0) +65g
- POC (Pt 10) +64g
The back pressure increases during the 60 h driving,the Pt level of POC has no effect on the soot collection at this phase
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
time (h)
dp
(mb
ar)
Pt 10
Pt 0
Regeneration phase... POC (Pt 10) weighing after regeneration phase: - 64g (all soot collected is oxidized)
Back pressure & NO2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
time (s)
dp(m
bar
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
pp
m
dp (mbar)
NO2 (ppm)
dp~70mbar
dp(max)~94mbar
dp~36mbar
NOx measurement starts
NO2 measurements upstream of DOC
The soot collected in POC is oxidized by NO2 –the back pressuredecreases as the amount of soot collected deacreases and the NO2 levelincreases as it is no more consumed in oxidizing the soot
Regeneration phase... POC-X with different Pt loading(the same DOC is utilized upstream of each POC substrate)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
time
dp(m
bar)
dp POC (Pt0)
dp POC (Pt10)
dp POC (Pt20)
When using Pt in POC substrate the soot collected is more easilyoxidized –the back pressure is seen to deacrease more quickly
With Pt 10g/cft all the PM oxidised in 15 minutes
The back pressure comparison at constat speed testPOC- X D140 mm L150 mm vs Notox 200 D144 L154 mm
VW Touran constant speed tests- 3 repetitions by using same DOC pr 20882
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
60 km/h 80 km/h 120 km/h 60 km/h 80 km/h 120 km/h 60 km/h 80 km/h 120 km/h
Pres
sure
,mba
r
DOC + POC X 400 cpsiD 140 L150 Pt10 DOC + POC L D140 L150 pr 21878, RSC DOC + SiC DPF 200 D144 L154 mm pr 19689, dummy
POC (140x150mm) vs SiC DPF (144x154 mm)
On-road tests
On-road tests / HDD –two different trialsFirst trial by using truck (Scania F124, Euro II) equipped with ‘DOC+POCDOC+POC--XX’
DOC=d334 L74.5 120cpsi 40g/m2 Pt 40g/ft3
POC=d334 L152 400cpsi 10g/m2 Pt 10g/ft3
Second trial by using truck (Volvo F13, Euro III) equipped with ‘DOC+POCDOC+POC--LL’DOC=d334 L152 350cpsi 30g/m2 Pt 40g/ft3
POC=d334 L152 300cpsi 10g/m2 Pt 10g/ft3
Data acquisition by Futecontrol unit, based on GSM /GPRS –data
• Temperature, 4 channels:– Environment temperature– Inlet temperature– Outlet temperature– Substrate temperature
• Pressure, 1 channel
• Sampling rate 1/h
On-road tests / HDD
Example of canning:DOC+POC-X inside theScania muffler
HDD road aging Scania R124 (E II), 200 000 km, DOC+POC-X
0 4000 8000 12000 160000
100
200
300
400
500
Tem
p1(°
C)
0 100 200 300 400 5000
4
8
12
16
20
His
togr
am[%
]
Exhaust gas average temperature was 142.5 °C
Mainly highway driving (80km/h)
HDD road aging Scania R124 (E II), 100 000 km, DOC+POC-X
Pressure August of 2007Pressure April of 2007
0 6000 120000
50
100
150
pako
put k
en_p
aine
(mba
r)
0 10000 20000 30000 400000
50
100
150
pako
put k
en_p
aine
(mba
r)
No dramatic pressure gain during aging from 40 000 km to 100 000 km
Visual checking after 200 000 km- DOC + POC-X
Inlet side, DOC Outlet side, POC-X
On-road tests / HDD
Example of canning:DOC+POC-L inside theVolvo muffler
HDD road aging Volvo F13 (E III), 100 000 km, DOC+POC-LDaily route of HDD truck
Both highway + non-highwaydriving, with frequent stops
HDD road aging Volvo F13 (E III), 100 000 km, DOC+POC-L
Typical Exhaust gas (Temp 1)histogram
Average value 192 °C
0 6000 12000 18000 24000
050
100
150
200
Pre
ssur
e(m
bar)
0
200
400
600
Tem
p era
ture
1(C
)
0100200300400500
Tem
p era
ture
2(C
)
0
30
60
90120
SP
D( k
m_h
)
35.9250- 450
64.10- 250
%Temperature, °C
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
[%]
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
Are
aUnd
erC
urve
[%]
HDD road aging Volvo F13 (E III), 100 000 km, DOC+POC-LThe calculated fuel consumption (l/100 km)The calculated fuel consumption (l/100 km)
Volvo F 13 (EIII) road aging DOC pr 21530 POC L pr 21532 (Installed on 18.01.2008)106 000 km
0,0
50,0
100,0
2007-11-14 2008-02-22 2008-06-01 2008-09-09 2008-12-18 2009-03-28 2009-07-06
fuel
cons
umpt
ion
l/100
km
fuel consumption l/100 km
Winter time
On-road tests / HDD –emission testing
Emission tests are done in engine test bench over ESC-test
- Testing place: VTT Technical research center on Finland
- Engine: Scania DT 1211 420, model year 2005, Euro IV, 11.7L
Tested:- as fresh- after ~100 000km on road trial- after ~200 000km on road trial
DOC+POC-X, Emission test results: particle emissions
PM emissions, ESC-test
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
RAW DOC+POC-X(0km)
RAW DOC+POC-X(100 000km)
RAW DOC+POC-X(200 000km)
g/k
Wh
35% 45% 45%
Error bars in figure show thestandard deviation of thetest results (minimum 3 testrepetitions are made)
DOC+POC-X, Emission test results: gaseous emissions
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
RAW DOC+POC RAW DOC+POC RAW DOC+POC
CO
g/k
Wh
0 km 100 000 km 200 000 km
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
RAW DOC+POC RAW DOC+POC RAW DOC+POC
HC
g/k
Wh
0 km 100 000 km 200 000 km
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
RAW DOC+POC RAW DOC+POC RAW DOC+POC
NO
xg
/kW
h
0 km 100 000 km 200 000 km Note: Detection limitfor CO and HC 0.02g/kWh
DOC+POC-L, Emission test results: particle emissions
Error bars in figure show thestandard deviation of thetest results (minimum 3 testrepetitions are made)
PM emissions, ESC-test
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
RAW DOC+POC-L (0km) RAW DOC+POC-L (100 000km)
g/k
Wh
61%
54%
DOC+POC-L, Emission test results: gaseous emissions
Note: Detection limitfor CO and HC 0.02g/kWh
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
RAW DOC+POC RAW DOC+POC
CO
g/k
Wh
0 km 100 000 km
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
RAW DOC+POC RAW DOC+POC
HC
g/k
Wh
0 km 100 000 km
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
RAW DOC+POC RAW DOC+POC
NO
xg
/kW
h
0 km 100 000 km
Conclusions from HDD on-road trial(For both POC-X on road 200 000km and POC-L on road 100 000km)
No significant pressure increase during aging
No increase of average fuel consumption
No mechanical failure of substrates
PM efficiency as well as CO and HC efficiencies at the same level asthey were before aging
Summary
Designed novel structures, optimized for both numerical and mass-basedtargets –two alternative structures
Proven efficiency in both LDD and HDD applications
Tailored coating needed for PM efficiency, regeneration and enhancedoxidation
Proven thermal and mechanical durability
No significant backpressure increase
Several running projects and commercial references in both OE andretrofit
SAE 2007-24-0093SAE 2009-01-2705EP 1230978