Urban Retail Solutions:Catherine Timko: Developing a Winning Retail Strategy
Dielectric properties of magnetic fluid F. HERCHL, P. KOPČANSKÝ, M. TIMKO M. KONERACKÁ, I....
-
Upload
edwin-fisher -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Dielectric properties of magnetic fluid F. HERCHL, P. KOPČANSKÝ, M. TIMKO M. KONERACKÁ, I....
Dielectric properties of magnetic fluid
F. HERCHL, P. KOPČANSKÝ, M. TIMKO
M. KONERACKÁ, I. POTOČOVÁ,
Institute of Experimental Physics
Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice
K. MARTON
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and
Informatics, Technical University, Košice
L. TOMČO
Faculty of Aviation, Technical University, Košice
Magnetic fluids –- both thermal and dielectric benefits to transformers- improve cooling by enhancing fluid circulation within transformer windings- increase transformer capacity to withstand lightning impulses- minimize the effect of moisture on typical insulating fluids
to design smaller, more efficient new transformers, or to extend the life or loading capability of existing units
Magnetic fluids in power transformers
HOWEVER – V.Segal, K.Raj, Indian J. Eng. Mater. Sci. 5 (1999) 416.
Presence of magnetic particles (magnetite particles coated by Si) in transformer oil (Exon Univolt 60) improved its dielectric breakdown properties for IS < 5 mT.
DC impulse breakdown voltage: from 78 108 kV for example.
Measuring gap 25.4 mm
Dielectric breakdown strength of magnetic fluids
EXPERIMENT
Up to 10 kV
properly shaped electrodes of a uniform gap of electric field – - Rogowski profile- diameter 1.5 cm;- distance between 0.1 – 1 mm
up to 50 mT
Measurement of breakdown voltage
The evaluation was realized according to high-voltage technique: (Kuffel et.al. Oxford 1984)
breakdown voltage has to be measured 7 times in the same point
the lowest and highest values are omitted
the mean value of breakdown voltage is calculated
The error of measurements was ± 5 %
Used magnetic fluid: - particles - Fe3O4
- surfactant - oleic acid - liquid carrier - transformer oil TECHNOL US 4000 (r = 2.15)
- volume concentrations of magnetic particles = 0.0025-0.02 - saturation magnetizations Is= 1–8 mT
- mean magnetic diameter: Dm=8.6 nm (VSM magnetization measurements)
DTEM=10.2 nm (transmission electron microscopy (TEM))
- observation of the agglomeration processes - a drop of MF sandwiched between two parallel glass cover slips (10-50m) placed into magnetic field up to 50 mT (Helmholtz coils, parallel to MF film plane) observed by microscope equipped with a video camera
- time dependencies of the breakdown development - measured by inductive probe and a programmable oscilloscope with its own memory
RESULTS
Observation of the agglomeration processes - needle like aggregation; -saturation of average length of aggregates - 100-300 m (depending on the volume concentration of magnetic particles and applied external magnetic field)
Effect of aggregation of magnetic particles in magnetic fluid (0H=10mT, = 0.01)
40 m
0 50 100 150 200
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Ave
rag
e L
en
gth
[m
]
Time [s]
= 0.01
= 0.02
The average length of needle like clusters vs. time after application of B=10 mT.
The DC and AC dielectric breakdown strengths of magnetic fluid
( = 0.0025) and pure transformer oil.
0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10E
[M
Vm-1
]
d [mm]
DC, MF, = 0.0025 DC, Oil AC, MF, = 0.0025 AC, Oil
(B = 0 T)
The DC dielectric breakdown strength vs. distance between the electrodes for magnetic fluid ( =0.0025 and =0.02) transformer oil Technol in B=0 and 31mT
Crossover concentration of MPs
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,05
6
7
8
9
10 MK =0.0025 B=0mT MK =0.0025 B||E MK =0.0025 BE Technol B=0mT MK =0.02 B=0mT MK =0.02 B||E MK =0.02 BE
E [
MV
m-1]
d [mm]
The crossover from better to worse dielectric properties was found to appear in MF with Is = 4 mT what is in agreement of Segal observations (V. Segal, K. Raj, Ind. J. Eng. Mater. Sci. 5 (1998) 416
Discharge currents in MFs
0 0,01 0,02 0,030
3
6
9
12
B=0mT d[mm]
0,05 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5
I/
I 0.00
24
The discharge currents vs. magnetic particles concentration in B = 0.
The aproximation an average breakdown field as a function of electrode distance by expressions
corresponding to Duxbury-Leath model and Weibull model.
The breakdown electric field decreases with increasing distance of the electrodes what corresponds to the
theory.
Breakdown electric field vs. electrode
distance d by DC conditions.
Electric conductivity of MFs
0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5
50
100
150
200
250
300
350 MK na baze ITO 100 B=0mT B=40mT B||E B=40mT BE
.1
09 [S
.m-1]
The AC electric conductivity vs. magnetic particles concentration in B = 0, B E and B E.
Permittivity of MFs
0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,52,10
2,12
2,14
2,16
2,18
2,20MF = 0.0019
B=0mT B=40mT B||E B=40mT BE
r
E[MV/m]0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5
2
3
4
5MF = 0.019
r
E[MV/m]
B=0mT B||E B=40mT BE B=40mT
Permittivity vs. electric field intensity in B = 0, B E and B E.
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
Acta Physica Polonica A