diagnosis & treatment planning
-
Upload
drkapilsaroha -
Category
Education
-
view
46 -
download
5
Transcript of diagnosis & treatment planning
1
Diagnosis & Diagnosis & Treatment PlanningTreatment Planning
Dr. KAPIL SAROHABDS, MDS
Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopaedics
www.drdentiste.comMonday, May 1, 2023
2
“The first step towards cure is to know what the
disease is......”www.drdentiste.com
3
A century ago EDWARD. H. ANGLE rightly said:“In studying a case of malocclusion, give no
thought to the – methods of treatment or appliances
until the case shall be classified with all peculiarities and variations from the normal in – type, occlusion and – facial lines that have been
thoroughly comprehended. Then the requirements and proper plan of
treatment become apparent”. www.drdentiste.com
4
Human head is the most most complicatedcomplicated anatomical complex in all creation.
The interrelationships are infinite and the causes and effects of these relationships are almost imponderable.
www.drdentiste.com
5
A thorough understanding of the normal variations in the – Growth and development of
dentofacial structures,– Their anatomical fit into each other
and – Their reaction to intrinsic and
extrinsic factors /stimuli (genetic and environmental) itself is
Orthodontic diagnosis.
www.drdentiste.com
6
Problem Oriented Problem Oriented &&
Evidence Based DiagnosisEvidence Based Diagnosis
www.drdentiste.comMonday, May 1, 2023
7
The goal of the diagnostic process is to produce a complete description of the patient’s problems and make a problem list.
To obtain the problem list, a collection of relevant information is required. This collection is called a database.
www.drdentiste.com
8
Mechano-Mechano-therapytherapy
Diagnosis & Treatment Planning - StepsPatient History
Clinical Examination
Analysis of Diagnostic Records
Classification Problem List = Diagnosis
Treat pathology(caries, gingivitis etc.)
Problems in
priorityorder
ABCD
Possiblesolution toindividualproblems
Optimal Optimal Treatment Treatment
PlanPlan
DataBase
ABCD
www.drdentiste.com
9
Patient history, & Patient history, & interview datainterview data1. Family history2. Motivation of patient for treatment
Internal External
3. Reasons for taking treatment Functional Hygiene Esthetics Speech
4. Pubertal status5. Prenatal History
1. Health of mother during pregnancy Diseases : Bacterial / Viral Medication Radiation Trauma
Clinical Examination:Clinical Examination:1. General examination2. Extraoral
• Head shape• Frontal symmetry• Profile convexity• Facial divergent• Lip competency• Incisor visibility,
3. Functional • Mastication • Deglutition• Speech• TMJ
4. Intraoral• Hard tissues• Soft tissues
Analysis of Analysis of diagnostic records:diagnostic records:
1. Study Models • Upper• Lower
2. Radiographs • Lateral Ceph.• OPG• A-P Ceph.• IOPA• Hand Wrist• Occlusal
3. Photographs • Extra-oral (3 + 2 smiling)• Intra-oral (5)
Problem List
Problem List
Pathology:
1.Ging
iva (A
ttach
ed gi
ngiva
)
2.Fren
um (L
ab. /
Ling.)
3.Ton
sils / A
deno
ids
4.Ton
gue
5.Den
tal C
aries
Develo
pmental
Problems:
1.Profile
and Esth
etics
•Profile
(Conve
x, Stra
ight, Conca
ve)
•Frontal
( Sym
metrica
l, Asy
mmetry)
•Lips
2.Alig
nment
•Upper
(Crowding / S
pacing)
•Lower
(Crowding / S
pacing)
3.A-P
•Ske
leton (C
lass I
, II, II
I)
•Den
tal ( C
lass I
, II, II
I)
4.Vert
ical
•Ske
leton (V
GP /Ave
rage /
HGP)
•Den
tal (D
eep Bite
/ Norm
al / O
pen Bite
5.Tran
svers
e
•Ske
leton (W
ide / Norm
al / N
arrow)
•Den
tal (W
ide / Norm
al / N
arrow)
www.drdentiste.com
10
Timing of Orthodontic Treatment: Pubertal growth spurts Peak Height Velocity (PHV) The importance of the body type
www.drdentiste.com
11
If all the structures of the craniofacial complex like the skeletal units , the dentition and the soft tissue components grow in harmony , then the result would be a good occlusion with a well balanced face.
But the human face like most of our other specialized anatomic parts, certainly has its share of variations.
www.drdentiste.com
12
Class II Malocclusion
www.drdentiste.com
13
Since Class II malocclusion is recognized easily by health professionals as well as by patients and their families, especially in cases of excessive over jet, the correction of class II problems may constitute more than half of the treatment protocolhalf of the treatment protocol in a typical orthodontic practice.
www.drdentiste.com
14
It is interesting to note that the process of evolution in orthodontic diagnosis and diagnosis and treatment planningtreatment planning has been gradual.
Now, let us trace through let us trace through historyhistory, the changing perceptions on the etiology of class II malocclusion.
www.drdentiste.com
15
For decades together class II was erroneously considered a purely sagittal problem. sagittal problem.
Pioneered by Dr. Angle’s classificationDr. Angle’s classification of malocclusion based on anteroposterior relationship of first first molarmolar, probably thousands of class II of all hues and varities were treated as basically sagittal discrepancies, often with disastrousdisastrous results.
www.drdentiste.com
16
It was not the orthodontists alone who were guilty of nescience, but even the surgeons jumped onto the bandwagon and restricted themselves to sagittal correction of what was actually a problem involving more than one plane.
www.drdentiste.com
17
The Angle system of classification still remains at the core of orthodontic diagnosis a century after its development, even though this classification scheme is not sensitive to imbalances in the vertical and transverse dimensions.
www.drdentiste.com
18
First, let us see, how malocclusions such as Class II develop as sagittal discrepancy.
www.drdentiste.com
19
SAGITTAL PLANE
Prognathic MaxillaRetrognathic Mandible Combination of the two
www.drdentiste.com
202
Normal Mandible, Prognathic Maxilla
www.drdentiste.com
212
Prognathic Maxillary Dentition
www.drdentiste.com
22
Normal Maxilla, Retrognathic Mandible.
www.drdentiste.com
232
Prognathic maxilla, Retrognathic mandible.
www.drdentiste.com
24
Can also be because of decreased cranial flexure, the posterior positioning of glenoid fossa which neutralizes the horizontal growth of mandible ending up in Class II.
www.drdentiste.com
25www.drdentiste.com
26 www.drdentiste.com
27 www.drdentiste.com
28 www.drdentiste.com
29 www.drdentiste.com
30 www.drdentiste.com
31 www.drdentiste.com
32 www.drdentiste.com
33 www.drdentiste.com
34 www.drdentiste.com
35 www.drdentiste.com
36 www.drdentiste.com
37 www.drdentiste.com
38 www.drdentiste.com
39 www.drdentiste.com
40 www.drdentiste.com
41 www.drdentiste.com
42 www.drdentiste.com
43 www.drdentiste.com
44 www.drdentiste.com
45www.drdentiste.com
46 www.drdentiste.com
47
VERTICAL DISCREPANCY With the passage of time, inevitably
there was gain of knowledge and wisdom and the focus now began to shift towards other etiologic possibilities of class II malocclusion
It was schudy in 1964, who brought into focus the vertical dysplasia causing and affecting the class II malocclusion.
Until then, investigators had never explored the vertical dimension of the posterior aspect of the face. But here were the secrets to be found.
www.drdentiste.com
482
Vertical Discrepancies Discrepancies in the vertical dimension occur in the
form of a long facelong face or a short faceshort face syndrome.
www.drdentiste.com
49
Rotations of Mandible
The rotationrotation of the mandible due to vertical growth discrepancies also has to be distinguished.
3 www.drdentiste.com
50
Vertical Maxillary Excess Vertical maxillary excess brings about a clockwise
rotation of the mandible and a class II situation.
www.drdentiste.com
51
Decreased Condylar Growth Decreased condylar growth and decreased ramal
height swings the mandible backward.
www.drdentiste.com
52
Excess Condylar Growth
Excessive condylar growth causes forward rotation of the mandible leading to a class II deep bite situation.
www.drdentiste.com
53
Now the concept changed such that when facial morphology indicated that vertical growth had been excessive or that condylar growth had been deficient, the plan was to inhibit the downward growth of the maxillary molars.
When it is determined that vertical growth is deficient, the choice is to stimulate the vertical growth of the alveolar processes.
www.drdentiste.com
54
This quantum shift in knowledge about the causative factors of class II malocclusion brought into light an entirely new gamut of treatment possibilities.
www.drdentiste.com
55
Now let us look at some class II cases with predominant vertical vertical discrepancydiscrepancy and their treatment options.
www.drdentiste.com
56
www.drdentiste.com
57 www.drdentiste.com
58
www.drdentiste.com
59
Pre-expansion Post-expansion
www.drdentiste.com
60
www.drdentiste.com
61
www.drdentiste.com
62 www.drdentiste.com
63 www.drdentiste.com
64 www.drdentiste.com
65
PretreatmentA.T.www.drdentiste.com
66
www.drdentiste.com
67
Pre-surgicalA.T.
www.drdentiste.com
68
Lefort I Osteotomy Premaxillary setback
Genioplasty www.drdentiste.com
69 www.drdentiste.com
70 www.drdentiste.com
71
A.T. Post-Treatment
www.drdentiste.com
72
www.drdentiste.com
Monday, May 1, 2023
73
www.drdentiste.com
74
www.drdentiste.com
75 www.drdentiste.com
76 www.drdentiste.com
77 www.drdentiste.com
78
TRANSVERSE DISCREPANCY It has only been during the last
two decades or so that the role of transverse dimensiontransverse dimension has been a topic of interest to the typical practicing orthodontist.
Until then it was a classical illustration of, “the eyes cannot see what the mind does not know.”
www.drdentiste.com
79
Many class II malocclusions, when evaluated clinically have no obvious maxillary constriction.
www.drdentiste.com
80
When a set of study models of the patient are “hand articulated", how-ever, it becomes obvious that when the dental casts are placed with the posterior dentition in a Class I relationship, a unilateral or a bilateral cross bitecross bite is produced.
This indicates the presence of maxillary constrictionmaxillary constriction as a component of class II malocclusion.
www.drdentiste.com
81
FOOT AND SHOE MECHANISM
Richen Bach and Taatz in 1971 used the example of a foot and a shoe, with the foot representing the mandible and the shoe representing the maxilla.
If the shoe is too narrow, it is impossible for the foot to slide fully into the shoe. By widening the shoe, the foot slides forward into its usual position.
www.drdentiste.com
82
When treating in the mixed dentition, the first step in the treatment of mild to moderate Class II malocclusions characterized, by mild mandibular skeletal retraction and maxillary constriction may be expansion of maxilla.
www.drdentiste.com
83
The patients can be left in a over expanded position with contacts still being maintained between the upper lingual cusps and lower buccal cusps of the posterior teeth.
www.drdentiste.com
84
Widening the maxilla often leads to a spontaneous forward posturing of the mandible during the retention period.
After 6 to 12 months, the spontaneous correction of the class II relationship can be seen in many mild to moderate class II patients.
www.drdentiste.com
85
The net result of this change in outlook has been a reduction in the number of functional jaw orthopedic appliances that now are used in the treatment of mild to moderate class II malocclusion.
www.drdentiste.com
86
www.drdentiste.com
87 www.drdentiste.com
88 www.drdentiste.com
89
www.drdentiste.com
90
www.drdentiste.com
91
www.drdentiste.com
92
www.drdentiste.com
93 www.drdentiste.com
94
Class III malocclusionClass III malocclusion
www.drdentiste.comMonday, May 1, 2023
95
SAGITTAL PLANE
Retrognathic maxilla Prognathic mandible Combination of the two
www.drdentiste.com
96
Retrognathic Maxillary Dentition
www.drdentiste.com
972
Retrognathic Maxilla
www.drdentiste.com
982
Prognathic Mandible
www.drdentiste.com
992
Combination
www.drdentiste.com
100
During the1940’s and 50’s mandibular prognathism was believed to be the sole etiological cause for Class III malocclusions.
www.drdentiste.com
101
All clinical efforts were concentrated in correcting the mandibular prognathism using Chin cup therapy or surgical correction by mandibular set back was the only alternative practiced.
www.drdentiste.com
102
A lack of a clear understanding of the underlying etiology often compounded by adressal of wrong treatment objectives resulting in disastrous treatment results often accentuating the problem rather than solving it.
www.drdentiste.com
103
With the advent of newer diagnostic aids such as cephalometrics identification of the role of maxilla in the development class III malocclusion came into picture completely revolutionizing the present treatment philosophy.
www.drdentiste.com
104
www.drdentiste.com
105
www.drdentiste.com
106
www.drdentiste.com
107 www.drdentiste.com
108www.drdentiste.com
109
www.drdentiste.com
110 www.drdentiste.com
111
www.drdentiste.com
112 www.drdentiste.com
113
www.drdentiste.com
114 www.drdentiste.com
115
116
117 BSSO-Setback
118
Genioplasty
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
www.drdentiste.com
126
www.drdentiste.com
127 www.drdentiste.com
128
www.drdentiste.com
1298 mm.Downward & 6.5mm. Advancement of Maxilla
www.drdentiste.com
130
www.drdentiste.com
131 www.drdentiste.com
132 www.drdentiste.com
133 www.drdentiste.com
134 www.drdentiste.com
135
www.drdentiste.com
136
Conclusion
But as the philosopher Fredrick Jensen has said, “What we think we know today shatter the errors and blunders of yesterday and is tomorrow discarded as worthless. So we go from larger mistakes to small mistakes so long as we do not loose courage. This is true of all therapy, no method is final”.
www.drdentiste.com
137
Thus even with tremendous progress in basic research and mind boggling improvement in appliance systems, class II & III malocclusion has still remained an enigma
www.drdentiste.com
138
ORTHODONTICS AS OF TODAY
Creates Creates WONDERSWONDERSwww.drdentiste.com
139www.drdentiste.com