DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

16
DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

description

DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG. Motivation. Uncoordinated / piece-meal approach lead to rework, inefficiencies, instability and no final delivery Coordinated project to complete what we started Can be built on / used by others. Project Objectives. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

Page 1: DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

DEX Project Proposal23 May 2006TOG

Page 2: DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

2PLCS Inc. (c) 2002

Motivation

Uncoordinated / piece-meal approach lead to rework, inefficiencies, instability and no final delivery

Coordinated project to complete what we started Can be built on / used by others

Page 3: DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

3PLCS Inc. (c) 2002

Project Objectives

Develop a core set of capabilities + ref data for use in business deployments

Develop and publish two sets of DEXs (generic + business) and related capabilities

Test and deploy

Page 4: DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

4PLCS Inc. (c) 2002

Project Approach

It would be nice to have: A coherent international project

One central Contract Dedicated resources Full time Project Manager Direct costs covered centrally

Pragmatic approach: A coherent work plan National contracts Direct costs for standardization to be factored in to the work on

contract TOG suggestion:

A set of national awarded contracts addressing the coherent work plan managed by a dedicated person

Direct costs factored into the contracts

Page 5: DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

5PLCS Inc. (c) 2002

Short term: Project Phases & Milestones

Phase 0 – Establish the project Establish the project

Phase I - Develop a core set of capabilities and two sets (generic and business) of DEXs M1 - Necessary DEXLib infrastructure established M2 - Core capabilities + ref data ready for review M3 - DEX(s) to be developed for publication decided M4 - Capabilities used in chosen DEX(s) ready for review M5 - Prioritized DEX(s) ready for review M6 - DEX(s) reviewed M7 - Software vendors / implementations identified for implementer forum participation

Phase II – Test and deploy M1 - Test data for DEX(s) from Phase I established M2 - Implementers Forum established M3 - Testing environment established M4 – Applications implemented DEX(s) from Phase I M5 - First test rally established M6 - DEX(s), capabilities and reference data from Phase I balloted & standardized

Page 6: DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

6PLCS Inc. (c) 2002

Medium term: Project Phases & Milestones

Phase III – Service Oriented Architecture M1 - Web services for templates defined M2 - Business level services defined

Phase IV – More DEXs Additional DEXs identified DEXs published

Phase V – ISO 10303 239 - Maintenance

Page 7: DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

7PLCS Inc. (c) 2002

Project Phases and Schedule

Phase

Months

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

0 X

I X X X X X X X X

II X X X X X X X X

III

IV

V

Phase 0 - Establish the project

Phase I - Develop a core set of capabilities and two sets (generic and business) of DEXs

Phase II - Test and deploy

Phase III – Service Oriented Architecture

Phase IV - More DEXS

Phase V – ISO 10303-239 maintenance

Page 8: DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

8PLCS Inc. (c) 2002

Main activities – Phase 0

Establish the project Agree scope, budget and schedule Identify a project leader Identify resources

Phase 1 will start when deliverables from Phase 0 are completed.

Page 9: DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

9PLCS Inc. (c) 2002

Costs – Phase IDevelopment

# Activity Costs [hours]

1 Project management 500

2 Kick-off workshop 200

3 Establish TOG support management 100

4 DEXLib infrastructure 2310

5 DEXLib Help section 300

6 Develop Core capabilities + ref data 1860

9 Decide which DEXs to be standardized (in this project) 10

10 Develop capabilities for completion of 2 sets of DEXs 460

11 Review and update capabilities for completion of 2 sets of DEXs 40

12 Develop 2 sets of DEXs + ref data 560

13 Reference data content 140

14 Review the 2 sets of DEXs 120

15 Preparation for establishing Implementers Forum 100

TOTAL 6700

Page 10: DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

10PLCS Inc. (c) 2002

Costs – Phase IITest and deployment

# Activity Costs [hours]

1 Project management 100

2 Establish Implementers Forum 200

3 Develop test data 200

4 Implementing testing tool support 400

5 Implement applications using DEXs developed in Phase I

-

6 Test DEXs developed in Phase I 160

7 Ballot & publish capabilities developed in Phase I 40

8 Ballot & publish DEXs developed in Phase I 40

9 Ballot & publish Reference data developed in Phase I 40

TOTAL 1180

Page 11: DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

11PLCS Inc. (c) 2002

Main activities – Phase IIIService Oriented Architecture

Specify template based web services Based on templates

Test template based web services Develop test specification Develop a client to use to test / validate services

Specify business level web services Based on business process models

Test business level web services Develop test specification Develop a client to use to test / validate services

Page 12: DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

12PLCS Inc. (c) 2002

Main activities – Phase IVAdditional DEXs

Define DEXs to be developed Develop outstanding capabilities + ref data Develop DEXs + ref data Review DEXs + capabilities Test DEXs + capabilities Ballot

Page 13: DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

13PLCS Inc. (c) 2002

Main Activities – Phase VISO 10303-239 - maintenance

Address PLCS SEDS Review modified modules Adopt new modules (risk, descriptors) Develop new AP Submit for ISO Ballot Publish

Page 14: DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

14PLCS Inc. (c) 2002

Steering Committee

The Steering Committee should comprise of those paying CDIP:

Tor Arne Irgens (NDLO) Martin Gibson (UK MoD) Mats Elgh (FMV) US DoD ?

Howard Mason (Chair of PLCS TC)

Page 15: DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

15PLCS Inc. (c) 2002

The Team (proposal)

Project manager? Trine Hansen (DNV) Leif Gyllström (Combitech) Rob Bodington (Eurostep) Sean Barker (BAE System) Tim Turner (LSC) Per-Åke Ling (Eurostep) Johan Nilsson (Eurostep) Mike Ward (Eurostep) Peter Bergström (Eurostep) Väino Tarandi (Eurostep) Tore Christiansen (DNV) Fredrik Axelson (Combitech) Mats Nilsson (FMV)

Page 16: DEX Project Proposal 23 May 2006 TOG

16PLCS Inc. (c) 2002

Business DEX

Business DEX

Reference data ‘Taxonomies’

PLCS foundation

ref data

PLCS business

PLCS ARM

CapabilityAP239 Generic DEX(PLCS upper level business ontology)

Business DEX

Business DEX

Each ’oval’ represents an OWL reference data file

Phase I