Haroldo Ribeiro Haroldo Ribeiro MultiplicadoresMultiplicadores.
Development Partnership By Carlos Ribeiro – ANOP Portugal A permanent building process.
-
Upload
brian-calhoun -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Development Partnership By Carlos Ribeiro – ANOP Portugal A permanent building process.
Development Partnership
By Carlos Ribeiro – ANOP Portugal
A permanent building process
A practical experience of
Engaging partners.
Complementarily and Networking.
New ways to disseminate products and practices
A summary presentation of the Partnership
15 institutionsA very diversified institutional partnership
with Local Authorities; enterprises associations; development and youth associations (3); entrepreneurship and innovation support structures (2)
Intervention Territory- A region in the North of
Portugal: Entre Douro e Vouga
- Population: 277 000- An important and strategic
region with small business but also medium and big enterprises in cork, paper, steel and shoes
Project purpose
•Promoting networks between SMEs and local institutions
Procura
Serviços
Meios
Funções
Informação geral
Inf. Especializada
Aconselhamento DP
Aconselhamento NET
Acções prospectivas
Acções Prosp. Esp.
Atendedor DP
Conselheiro DP
Atendedor Net
Conselhiero Net
Misto
Portal Net
Intranet
Balcões especializados
Pontos de apoio
INFOVAN
Criação legislação
Oportunidades
Alterações fiscais
Apooio e incentivos
Redes de cooperação
AD
AT
M
E
Anop/CR/Março04/inforloca
Partnership Generic activities
• Policy and strategy development• Negotiation and liaison with partners
and stakeholders• Project development and management• Performance management• Financial management and funding
acquisition• Communication and public engagement• Data collection and analysis• Monitoring and evaluation
Problems
• Insufficient knowledge of target-goals • Disengagement/ non appurtenance
feeling• Lack of cooperation between partners• Inadequate resources• Self-centred functioning of partnership,
that ignores users needs• Feeble propensity to learn collectively
and to develop skills along with project implementation
Key skills
• Management skills• To organize meetings • To plan activities• To control financial resources
• Relationship skills• Project team working• To cope with formal and informal situations • To promote consensus
• Researching skills• Bibliography researching disposal• To coordinate field-working• To systematize debates and moments of
thematic reflection
Specific project skills
• Communication skills• To organize debates and divulgation;• To edit key documentation;• To set up information in electronic devices
(web, e-mail)web, e-mail)
• Cooperation Skills• To negotiate target goals and achievements• Knowledge, techniques and tools transfers • Co-learning engagement
First group of activities
• Bringing people and institutions closer
• Favouring mutual knowledge• Promoting informal relationships• Opening new channels of
communication
Shared Portfolio Activities to built the Partnership Portfolio
Cross – interviews; individual members• Explore: what links in Internet show about
partners• Skills show-room: a gallery of key skills;
dynamic presentation and debateOutput• Puzzle of key skills for the project and the
further actions
Who are we and what skills can we bring to the project….?
Partnership development
•Investment in mutual knowledge and relationship
Second group of activities
• Quality and networking
Quality management game
• Projects competition between groups composed by every members of the partnership
• Definition of an action plan and the conditions for installing and functioning of a quality system.
• Making of a Guide of Collective SkillsOutput• Involvement and collective definition of
the partnership development goals
What kind of services can we develop in partnership in an efficient basis, with effectiveness and insuring quality criteria?
A partnership oriented to take action
Third group of activities
• Networking
Communication and interaction
• Web site with shared back-office• Group assembly to develop web sites skills• Interactive platform of documents and
communication.• A simulator of possible responses to some
common answers of network users, to improve attending.
• Group assembly in an all-day simulator testing and improvement activities.
• Output• Effectiveness and efficiency in
communication processes
All-day simulator testing and improvement activities
Are we prepared to respond in a synchronized way to answers from the network users?
www.informarlocal.pt
Instalação pedreira
área
Temas críticos
Temas complementares
HST
Sinaléticas
ambiente
Poluição Solos
Resposta
Atend. Geral
Acons. geralEntidade pivot
-----
Entidades
Complementares
--------
Meios
Meios
Meios
SIR
Sistema Integrado de Resposta
Anop/ CR/ inforloca/ março 2004
Forth group of activities
• Dissemination • To make the mainstream of the
network in a regional level
Interactive Network Program• Enlarged and specialized Partnership • Inclusion of Incorporators - Enterprise
Associations Network and Social City Council Network
• Goal: To promote social and enterprises network’s development
• To share experience and adapt networking models and tools
Output• Enlargement of initial network• To improve networking support devices
Informar
local
Experiên-cias
sistematização
1
2
3
empresarial
social
Estruturar
Rede
Ciclo
Inicial de
implementação
sistematização
sistematização
Sistematização
final
Preparação e experimentação
em contexto Formativo
(formação-acção)
Acompanhamento e avaliação
Could the Informar Local Network be adopted by the social and entrepreneurial networks?
Fifth group of activities
• To promote really existing communities of practice
The new world of Web2•Debate groups•The wiki –in wikispace•Exchange of documents and photos•To share links and organizing feed •Cooperative work in documents and projects OutputGroupings and interactions for personal and professional interests Systematic and methodical knowledge production concerning common interest subjectsOrganized Partnerships for Knowledge (gains) and not only for the project (pragmatism)
• The development partnerships should, by complementarily to its structural goals, incorporate self-development monitorship programs.
• The modalities of institutional and individual interaction should cause ruptures in existing habits and assume a progressive development character, if exhaustively programmed and firmly overviewed.
• The investment in the dynamization of Partnership development should focus priory in relationship and in logistics, namely in tools that promote the cooperative work and assistance between the network members.
Conclusions
Carlos Valentim [email protected]
www.anop.com.pt