Developing Speed-flow-density Relationship for the...

28
Developing Speed - flow - density Relationship for the Segregated Motorcycle Lane Associate Professor Dr. Law Teik Hua Road Safety Research Center Road Safety Research Center, UPM

Transcript of Developing Speed-flow-density Relationship for the...

  • Developing Speed-flow-density Relationship for the Segregated

    Motorcycle Lane

    Associate Professor Dr. Law Teik HuaRoad Safety Research Center

    Road Safety Research Center, UPM

  • High Motorcycle Population Countries

    85%

    55%

    46%

    93%

    77%

    60%

    72%

    73%

  • World Road Deaths Statistics

    Source: WHO, 2018

  • Malaysia Registered Motorcycles

    8 m, 2008 12 m, 2017

  • Malaysia Motorcycle Deaths

    2008 : 3,898 deaths

    2017 : 4,348 deaths

  • Malaysia Motorcycle Deaths

    • 68% of all road crash injuries

    • 20x higher risk than cars

  • Motorcycle Lanes

    • First exclusive MC lane in the world

    • 30 km long (per direction)

    • -39% mc crashes

  • MC lane in Kedah, Malaysia

  • MC lane in Quezon City, Philippines

  • MC lane in Taipei, Taiwan

  • MC lane in Taipei, Taiwan

  • MC lane in Phnom Penh, Cambodia

  • Research Gap

    - Max flow

    - Jam density

    - Critical density

    - Critical speed

  • Speed – Flow – Density Relationship

  • Experiment Design & Data Collection

    Stage 1

    • Federal Highway (Route 2)

    • 2.4, 3.0 and 3.3 m

    • Initial portion of a stable flow

    (Low density, high speed)

    • Flow at capacity or near-jam density

  • Experiment Design & Data Collection

    Stage 2

    • Experimental study

    • UPM

    • 1.5, 1.7 and 1.9 m

  • Experiment Design & Data Collection

    Stage 3

    • Experimental study

    • Federal Highway (Route 2)

    • 1.4, 1.6 and 2.0 m

  • Speed – Flow – Density Relationship

  • Headway and Space Riding Patterns

    1.7 m

    Headway

    Space

  • Mc Speed vs Mc Density (Headway Pattern)

    SJam density = 640

  • Mc Flow vs Mc Density (Headway Pattern)

    Max Flow = 3060

    Critical density = 235

  • Mc Speed vs Mc Flow (Headway Pattern)

    Critical Speed = 13Unstable flow

    Stable flow

  • Mc Speed vs Mc Density (Space Pattern)

    Jam density = 0.46

  • Mc Flow vs Mc Density (Space Pattern)

    Max Flow = 2207

    0.166 mc/m-sq(6 m-sq/mc)

  • Mc Speed vs Mc Flow (Space Pattern)

    Critical Speed = 13

    Stable flow

    Unstable flow

  • Conclusions

    Headway Riding Pattern (1.4 m – 1.7 m)

    Max flow : 3,060 mc/hr/laneCritical speed : 13 km/hrCritical density : 235 mc/km/lane

    Headway Riding Pattern (2.8 m – 3.4 m)Max flow : 6,120 mc/hr

  • Conclusions

    Space Riding Pattern (> 1.7 m)

    Max flow : 2,207 mc/hr/mCritical speed : 13 km/hrCritical density : 0.166 mc/m-sq

    Space Riding Pattern (> 1.7 m)Motorcycle lane width : 2.0 m Max flow : 4,414 mc/hr

  • Email: [email protected]