Developing Seen 19.11.10

download Developing Seen 19.11.10

of 23

Transcript of Developing Seen 19.11.10

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    1/23

    Developing Laws in Electronic Commerce -

    What Every Purchaser Should Know

    Presented by:

    Martin J. Carrara, J.D., C.P.M.

    & Christine A. Haberle, J.D.

    NAPM 85TH ANNUALINTERNATIONAL PURCHASING CONFERENCE

    May 1, 2000

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    2/23

    2

    WHAT IS ELECTRONIC COMMERCE?

    Use of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)

    Use of E-mail

    Internet buying

    Downloading software

    On-line bidding and electronic auctions

    Knowledge agents

    Other examples

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    3/23

    3

    CONSIDER THESE HYPOTHETICALS

    You send an email message to a supplier stating that you accept

    its offer contained in an email the supplier had previously sentto you

    You purchase an off-the-shelf software application that contains

    terms and conditions in the box You place an order over the Internet by completing an on-line

    order form on the suppliers website

    Your computer places an order automatically following pre-programmed instructions

    Which of these interactions result in binding agreements?

    What are the terms of the resulting agreement?

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    4/23

    4

    WHY ARE NEW LAWS NECESSARY?

    Contract Formation Issues:

    Mutual Assent

    Offer and Acceptance

    Statute of Frauds Writing requirement

    Signature requirement

    Purchase of Goods vs. License of Software

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    5/23

    5

    EMERGING LAWS AFFECTING

    ELECTRONIC COMMERCE

    Case Law

    Enforceability of shrink-wrap agreements ProCD v. Zeidenberg, 86 F.3d 1447 (7th Cir. 1996)

    Enforceability of click-wrap agreements

    Hotmail Corp. v. Van$ Money Pie,

    47 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1020 (N.D. Cal.1998) Storm Impact v. Software of the Month Club,

    13 F. Supp. 2d 782 (N.D. Ill. 1998)

    America Online v. LGGM, Inc.,

    1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20144 (E.D. Va. 1998)

    Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA)

    Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act (UCITA)

    Digital Signature Statutes

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    6/23

    6

    UNIFORM ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS

    ACT (UETA)

    Adopted by the National Conference of Commissioners on

    Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) on July 29, 1999

    UETA is designed to support the use of electronic

    commerce by establishing the equivalence of: electronic records with paper writings

    electronic signatures with hand-written signatures

    UETA is a Procedural statute; the basic general and

    statutory rules of contract law continue to apply

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    7/23

    7

    SCOPE OF UETA

    UETA applies to electronic records and signatures in the

    business, commercial or government contract setting (3(a))

    Parties must agree (in writing, via conduct etc.) to conduct

    one or more transactions using electronic communications( 5(b))

    Relationship" agreementparties agree that all or a portion of

    transactions will be done electronically

    UETA is preempted by:

    UCC (but not Article 2)

    UCITA (narrower scope than UETA)

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    8/23

    8

    RECOGNITION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS

    AND SIGNATURES UNDER UETA

    Definitions:

    "Record" means information that is inscribed on a tangible

    medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and is

    retrievable in perceivable form ( 2(13))

    "Electronic record" means a record created, generated, sent,

    communicated, received, or stored by electronic means ( 2(7))

    "Electronic signature" means an electronic sound, symbol, orprocess attached to or logically associated with a record and

    executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record

    ( 2(8))

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    9/23

    9

    RECOGNITION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS

    AND SIGNATURES - CONTINUED

    Record or signature not denied legal effect or

    enforceability because in electronic form ( 7(a))

    Contract not denied legal effect or enforceability because

    electronic record used in its formation ( 7(b))

    If law requires writing, electronic record sufficient ( 7(c))

    If law requires signature, electronic signature sufficient( 7(d))

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    10/23

    10

    ATTRIBUTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS

    AND ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES

    Attribution of electronic records and electronic signatures:

    An electronic record or electronic signature is attributable to a

    person if it was the act of the person. The act of the person may be

    shown in any manner, including a showing of the efficacy of any

    security procedure applied to determine the person to which the

    electronic record or electronic signature was attributable.

    ( 9(a))

    Electronic Agents/Automated Transactions ( 2(6)) Transactions controlled by electronic means without human

    intervention

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    11/23

    11

    OTHER KEY UETA PROVISIONS

    Admissibility in Evidence ( 13)

    Evidence of record/signature will not be excluded solely becausein electronic form

    Retention of Electronic Records ( 12)

    Electronic record satisfies record retention requirement

    Requirement to Provide Information in Writing ( 8(a))

    Information can be provided, sent or delivered electronically if theinformation is capable of retention

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    12/23

    12

    STATUS OF UETA

    (AS OF APRIL 14, 2000)

    State adoptions

    - California

    - Indiana

    - Kentucky

    - Nebraska

    - Pennsylvania

    - South Dakota

    - Utah

    Introductions in 2000

    - Alabama - Kansas

    - Arizona - Maryland

    - Colorado - Minnesota

    - Delaware - Ohio- DC - Oklahoma

    - Florida - Rhode Island

    - Hawaii - Vermont- Idaho - Virginia

    - Iowa - West Virginia

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    13/23

    13

    UNIFORM COMPUTER INFORMATION

    TRANSACTION ACT (UCITA)

    Formerly known as Proposed UCC Article 2B

    Adopted by National Conference of Commissioners on

    Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) on July 29, 1999

    Scope of UCITA: Applies substantive law to computer information transactions

    ( 103(a))

    Agreements to create, modify, transfer or license computerinformation or informational rights in computer information

    E.g., contracts to license or buy software; create computer

    programs, on-line access to databases; and distribute information

    over the Internet

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    14/23

    14

    CONTRACT FORMATION UNDER UCITA

    Manifesting Assent

    Examine surrounding circumstances

    Opportunity to Review Terms ( 112(e))

    Authentication and the Signature Requirement ( 102(6))

    Must have intent to sign record

    Records and the Writing Requirement ( 201) Statute of Frauds: requires writing for contracts requiring payment

    of $5,000 or more

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    15/23

    15

    CERTAIN KEY UCITA PROVISIONS

    Default rules for when parties do not deal with a matter in

    their contracts for computer information transactions

    Opt in/Opt Out ( 103(e))

    Parties can choose whether UCITA will govern the transaction, in

    whole or in part

    Relationship with Federal law (preemption)

    State consumer protection statutes and regulations notaltered; they control over UCITA ( 105(c))

    Choice of Law/Forum Provisions ( 109, 110)

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    16/23

    16

    CONTRACT PERFORMANCE

    Perfect Tender vs. Material Breach of Substantial

    Performance ( 601))

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    17/23

    17

    STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ( 805)

    One year after right of action accrues or one year after

    breach was/should have been discovered.

    In non-consumer contracts, can reduce statute of

    limitations period to one year but cannot extend it.

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    18/23

    18

    MASS MARKET/SHRINKWRAP LICENSES

    Mass market licenses

    Shrinkwrap licenses

    Enforceable under UCITA with certain limitations.

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    19/23

    19

    WARRANTIES UNDER UCITA

    Express Warranty ( 402)

    Affirmation of fact, promise or description.

    Implied Warranty of Non-Infringement & Quiet

    Enjoyment ( 401)

    Implied Warranty of Merchantability of a Computer

    Program ( 403)

    End user vs. distributor

    Implied Warranty of Fitness for Licensees Particular

    Purpose; System Integration ( 405)

    Implied Warranty of Data Accuracy ( 404)

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    20/23

    20

    WARRANTY DISCLAIMERS

    Course of performance or usage or trade

    Must be conspicuous for:

    Implied Warranty of Merchantability of a Computer Program

    Implied Warranty of Fitness for Licensees Particular Purpose;System Integration

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    21/23

    21

    STATUS OF UCITA

    (AS OF APRIL 14, 2000)

    State adoptions

    - Virginia

    Introductions in 2000

    - Delaware

    - District of Columbia

    - Hawaii

    - Illinois

    - Maryland

    - Oklahoma

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    22/23

    22

    OTHER LAWS AFFECTING ELECTRONIC

    COMMERCE

    Pending Federal Laws

    The Third Millenium Electronic Commerce Act

    The Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act

    Electronic Signature vs. Digital Signature

    Digital signature: one type of electronic signature that utilizes a

    specific technology (e.g., dual key cryptography)

    Revisions to UCC Article 2 - Sales March 2000 is latest NCCUSL draft; not yet adopted

  • 7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10

    23/23

    23

    RELEVANT WEB SITES

    UCITA:

    UETA:

    Revised UCC Article 2:

    NCCUSL: