Developing Seen 19.11.10
Transcript of Developing Seen 19.11.10
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
1/23
Developing Laws in Electronic Commerce -
What Every Purchaser Should Know
Presented by:
Martin J. Carrara, J.D., C.P.M.
& Christine A. Haberle, J.D.
NAPM 85TH ANNUALINTERNATIONAL PURCHASING CONFERENCE
May 1, 2000
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
2/23
2
WHAT IS ELECTRONIC COMMERCE?
Use of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)
Use of E-mail
Internet buying
Downloading software
On-line bidding and electronic auctions
Knowledge agents
Other examples
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
3/23
3
CONSIDER THESE HYPOTHETICALS
You send an email message to a supplier stating that you accept
its offer contained in an email the supplier had previously sentto you
You purchase an off-the-shelf software application that contains
terms and conditions in the box You place an order over the Internet by completing an on-line
order form on the suppliers website
Your computer places an order automatically following pre-programmed instructions
Which of these interactions result in binding agreements?
What are the terms of the resulting agreement?
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
4/23
4
WHY ARE NEW LAWS NECESSARY?
Contract Formation Issues:
Mutual Assent
Offer and Acceptance
Statute of Frauds Writing requirement
Signature requirement
Purchase of Goods vs. License of Software
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
5/23
5
EMERGING LAWS AFFECTING
ELECTRONIC COMMERCE
Case Law
Enforceability of shrink-wrap agreements ProCD v. Zeidenberg, 86 F.3d 1447 (7th Cir. 1996)
Enforceability of click-wrap agreements
Hotmail Corp. v. Van$ Money Pie,
47 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1020 (N.D. Cal.1998) Storm Impact v. Software of the Month Club,
13 F. Supp. 2d 782 (N.D. Ill. 1998)
America Online v. LGGM, Inc.,
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20144 (E.D. Va. 1998)
Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA)
Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act (UCITA)
Digital Signature Statutes
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
6/23
6
UNIFORM ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS
ACT (UETA)
Adopted by the National Conference of Commissioners on
Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) on July 29, 1999
UETA is designed to support the use of electronic
commerce by establishing the equivalence of: electronic records with paper writings
electronic signatures with hand-written signatures
UETA is a Procedural statute; the basic general and
statutory rules of contract law continue to apply
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
7/23
7
SCOPE OF UETA
UETA applies to electronic records and signatures in the
business, commercial or government contract setting (3(a))
Parties must agree (in writing, via conduct etc.) to conduct
one or more transactions using electronic communications( 5(b))
Relationship" agreementparties agree that all or a portion of
transactions will be done electronically
UETA is preempted by:
UCC (but not Article 2)
UCITA (narrower scope than UETA)
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
8/23
8
RECOGNITION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS
AND SIGNATURES UNDER UETA
Definitions:
"Record" means information that is inscribed on a tangible
medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and is
retrievable in perceivable form ( 2(13))
"Electronic record" means a record created, generated, sent,
communicated, received, or stored by electronic means ( 2(7))
"Electronic signature" means an electronic sound, symbol, orprocess attached to or logically associated with a record and
executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record
( 2(8))
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
9/23
9
RECOGNITION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS
AND SIGNATURES - CONTINUED
Record or signature not denied legal effect or
enforceability because in electronic form ( 7(a))
Contract not denied legal effect or enforceability because
electronic record used in its formation ( 7(b))
If law requires writing, electronic record sufficient ( 7(c))
If law requires signature, electronic signature sufficient( 7(d))
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
10/23
10
ATTRIBUTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS
AND ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES
Attribution of electronic records and electronic signatures:
An electronic record or electronic signature is attributable to a
person if it was the act of the person. The act of the person may be
shown in any manner, including a showing of the efficacy of any
security procedure applied to determine the person to which the
electronic record or electronic signature was attributable.
( 9(a))
Electronic Agents/Automated Transactions ( 2(6)) Transactions controlled by electronic means without human
intervention
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
11/23
11
OTHER KEY UETA PROVISIONS
Admissibility in Evidence ( 13)
Evidence of record/signature will not be excluded solely becausein electronic form
Retention of Electronic Records ( 12)
Electronic record satisfies record retention requirement
Requirement to Provide Information in Writing ( 8(a))
Information can be provided, sent or delivered electronically if theinformation is capable of retention
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
12/23
12
STATUS OF UETA
(AS OF APRIL 14, 2000)
State adoptions
- California
- Indiana
- Kentucky
- Nebraska
- Pennsylvania
- South Dakota
- Utah
Introductions in 2000
- Alabama - Kansas
- Arizona - Maryland
- Colorado - Minnesota
- Delaware - Ohio- DC - Oklahoma
- Florida - Rhode Island
- Hawaii - Vermont- Idaho - Virginia
- Iowa - West Virginia
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
13/23
13
UNIFORM COMPUTER INFORMATION
TRANSACTION ACT (UCITA)
Formerly known as Proposed UCC Article 2B
Adopted by National Conference of Commissioners on
Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) on July 29, 1999
Scope of UCITA: Applies substantive law to computer information transactions
( 103(a))
Agreements to create, modify, transfer or license computerinformation or informational rights in computer information
E.g., contracts to license or buy software; create computer
programs, on-line access to databases; and distribute information
over the Internet
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
14/23
14
CONTRACT FORMATION UNDER UCITA
Manifesting Assent
Examine surrounding circumstances
Opportunity to Review Terms ( 112(e))
Authentication and the Signature Requirement ( 102(6))
Must have intent to sign record
Records and the Writing Requirement ( 201) Statute of Frauds: requires writing for contracts requiring payment
of $5,000 or more
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
15/23
15
CERTAIN KEY UCITA PROVISIONS
Default rules for when parties do not deal with a matter in
their contracts for computer information transactions
Opt in/Opt Out ( 103(e))
Parties can choose whether UCITA will govern the transaction, in
whole or in part
Relationship with Federal law (preemption)
State consumer protection statutes and regulations notaltered; they control over UCITA ( 105(c))
Choice of Law/Forum Provisions ( 109, 110)
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
16/23
16
CONTRACT PERFORMANCE
Perfect Tender vs. Material Breach of Substantial
Performance ( 601))
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
17/23
17
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ( 805)
One year after right of action accrues or one year after
breach was/should have been discovered.
In non-consumer contracts, can reduce statute of
limitations period to one year but cannot extend it.
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
18/23
18
MASS MARKET/SHRINKWRAP LICENSES
Mass market licenses
Shrinkwrap licenses
Enforceable under UCITA with certain limitations.
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
19/23
19
WARRANTIES UNDER UCITA
Express Warranty ( 402)
Affirmation of fact, promise or description.
Implied Warranty of Non-Infringement & Quiet
Enjoyment ( 401)
Implied Warranty of Merchantability of a Computer
Program ( 403)
End user vs. distributor
Implied Warranty of Fitness for Licensees Particular
Purpose; System Integration ( 405)
Implied Warranty of Data Accuracy ( 404)
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
20/23
20
WARRANTY DISCLAIMERS
Course of performance or usage or trade
Must be conspicuous for:
Implied Warranty of Merchantability of a Computer Program
Implied Warranty of Fitness for Licensees Particular Purpose;System Integration
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
21/23
21
STATUS OF UCITA
(AS OF APRIL 14, 2000)
State adoptions
- Virginia
Introductions in 2000
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Hawaii
- Illinois
- Maryland
- Oklahoma
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
22/23
22
OTHER LAWS AFFECTING ELECTRONIC
COMMERCE
Pending Federal Laws
The Third Millenium Electronic Commerce Act
The Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act
Electronic Signature vs. Digital Signature
Digital signature: one type of electronic signature that utilizes a
specific technology (e.g., dual key cryptography)
Revisions to UCC Article 2 - Sales March 2000 is latest NCCUSL draft; not yet adopted
-
7/30/2019 Developing Seen 19.11.10
23/23
23
RELEVANT WEB SITES
UCITA:
UETA:
Revised UCC Article 2:
NCCUSL: