Developing Modern Mathematical Methods and Computational...
Transcript of Developing Modern Mathematical Methods and Computational...
Developing Modern Mathematical Methods and Computational Tools
for Biological Physics
Bo Li Math and CTBP, UCSD
CTBP EAC meeting, Rice Univ., Jan. 10 & 11, 2013
2 fast algorithms
multiscale models surfaces/interface
simulations soln’s of diff. eqns
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 100002
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
stochastic models
Projects § Variational implicit solvation (with McCammon) § Electrostatics: Dielectric boundary forces, Ionic
size effects, etc. § A two-scale model: Brownian particles and
diffusion equation (with McCammon) § Diffusion of RNA molecules (with Levine) § Cell shapes and dynamics (with Levine/Rappel) § Fast algorithms: multigrid, GPU computing, etc.
3
4
Free-energy functional
€
r i
€
Ωm
Γ
€
Qi
€
Ωw
€
c j∞,
€
q j , wρG[Γ]= Pvol(Ωm )+γ0 (1− 2τH )dSΓ
∫
€
+ρw ULJ ,ii∑
Ωw
∫ (| r − r i |)dV + Gelec[Γ]
1. Variational Implicit Solvation
(McCammon group, 2006)
The level-set method
5 !! !" # " ! $ % &#"#!
"#$
"#%
"&#
"&"
"&!
"&$
'()*+,
-./010.(
'()*+,23/240+5(627./010.(
0(010542.8219.2/:5442)(3)4.7)0(010542.82.()245*+)2)(3)4.7)
PMF
wall-particle distance
A receptor-ligand system p53/MDM2
uncharged charged
A host-guest system
6
Dielectric boundary force
€
Fn = −δΓGelec[Γ]
€
r i
€
Ωm
Γ
€
Qi
€
Ωw
€
c j∞,
€
q j , wρ€
εm =1
€
εw = 80
€
∇ ⋅εε0∇ψ − χwB'(ψ) = −ρ f
€
Gelec[Γ] = −εε02|∇ψ |2 +ρ fψ − χwB(ψ)
)
* + ,
- . ∫ dV
δΓGelec[Γ]=ε02
1εm
−1εw
#
$%
&
'( |ε∂nψ |
2 +ε02εw −εm( ) (I − n⊗ n)∇ψ 2
+B(ψ)
Electrostatic force points to solutes!
2. Electrostatics
Surface energy vs. electrostatic energy Stability of water-protein interface
7
8R
K: r=u(z)
LO
x
y
z1_
1+ 1 2 3 4 5k
!1.5
!1.0
!0.5
0.5
"2"1"
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1.342
1.344
1.346
1.348
1.35
1.352
1.354
1.356
1.358
1.36
t = 0
t = 2
t = 4
t = 6
z
r
water
protein
Water molecules inside a protein are unhappy!
8
Ionic size effects: A mean-field model
€
F[c] =12ρψ + β−1 ci ln(ai
3ci)i= 0
M
∑ − µicii=1
M
∑'
( )
*
+ , ∫ dV
€
ρ = ρ f + qicii=1
M
∑
€
∇ ⋅εε0∇ψ = −ρ
€
a03c0 =1− ai
3cii=1
M
∑
€
δiF[c] = 0 Generalized Boltzmann distributions
With a uniform size
€
ci =ci∞e−βqiψ
1+ a3 c j∞ e−βq jψ −1( )j=1
M∑
With nonuniform sizes
€
aia0
"
# $
%
& '
3
ln a03c0( ) − ln ai3ci( ) = β qiψ −µi( )
No explicit formulas. Constrained optimization!
Mean-field Theory and Monte Carlo Simulations
0 5 10 150
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Distance to the charged surface (A)
Rad
ialde
nsity
! i(r
)(M
)
z1=+1, R
1=3.0, N
1=100
z2=+2, R
2=2.5, N
2=100
z3=+3, R
3=3.5, N
3=100
5 10 15 200
5
10
15
20
25
Distance to the charged surface (A)
Radia
ldensity
c i(r)(M
)
z1=+1, R
1=3.0, N
1=100
z2=+2, R
2=2.5, N
2=100
z3=+3, R
3=3.5, N
3=100
" counterion stratification " key parameters:
€
Zi /ai3
9
10
Cluster 1 § Housed in San Diego Supercomputer center § 1500+ processors, ~ 600 nodes § HHMI donation of 200 2-year old nodes in 2012 § Serial and small parallel jobs
Cluster 2 § Housed in the Physics Server Room § 48 cores, 24 GPUs
Software: AMBER, APBS, AutoDock, CHARMM, GAMESS, Gaussian, Gromacs, MMTSB, NAMD, Python, Rasmol, VMD
CTBP Computational Resources at UCSD
11
§ 377th in the Top 500 supercomputer list of June 2012
§ 84 teraflops of performance § 24,576 cores § Massively parallel
IBM Blue Gene/P at Rice University
6 racks 192 cards 6,144 cards 24,576 cores
MBB (Math & Biochem-Biophys) Group § Initiated in 2007. § Current: 4 graduate students, 2 postdocs, and 2
visitors, 2 faculty members. § Former members: postdocs, graduate students,
2 undergrads, and 2 high school students. § Graduate students: San Diego Fellowship
through CTBP, UCOP Computational Science Fellowship, HHMI Fellowship UCSD nominee.
§ Weekly MBB seminars. § Brainstorming workshops (with CTBP groups).
12
Thank you !
13