Developing Key Performance Indicators and Productivity ...
Transcript of Developing Key Performance Indicators and Productivity ...
148
III. Developing Key Performance Indicators and Productivity/Performance Benchmarks
for Performance Based Remuneration Systems in Malaysia
By MR EDDIE ONG
MS LEE SAW HOON
149
1.0 Malaysia’s Economic Development
Malaysia had made significant strides in nation-building, in developing its
economy and in improving the quality of life of its people. Since
independence, real gross domestic product (GDP) has grown by an
average of 6.5% per annum for the period 1957-20055, one of the highest
growth rates achieved by sovereign nations of similar age and size.
Within the same period, GDP per capita in current prices grew by 7.0%,
which has translated into substantial improvements in the people’s quality
of life. The Malaysian economy grew at an average rate of 6.2% per
annum for the period 1991-20056. This strong rate of growth was
achieved despite the challenges faced from events such as the 1997-98
Asian financial crisis, the September 11 incident in 2001, wars in
Afghanistan and Iraq, outbreaks of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
(SARS) and avian flu, as well as increases in world oil prices.
Economic fundamentals remain strong. Growth was achieved with
inflation averaging a low 2.9% per annum and similarly low unemployment
averaging 3.1% over the period. Malaysia’s economic structure continued
to develop from manufacturing to services as shown in Table 1. Growth of
knowledge-based service industries was expanded with the establishment
of the Multimedia Super Corridor in 1996, followed by other initiatives such
as the National Biotechnology Policy launched in 2005 and the Iskandar
joint project carried & North Carrider Project launched recently.
5 Ninth Malaysia Plan, 2006-2010 6 Ibid
150
Table 1 : Structure of the Economy, 1990-2005
% to GDP 1990 2005
Services 46.8 58.1
Manufacturing 24.6 31.4
Agriculture 16.3 8.2
Mining 9.4 6.7
Construction 3.5 2.7 Source: Department of Statistics
The growth momentum of the Malaysian economy continued in 2006, with
a GDP growth of 5.9%. This was attributed to the diversified economic
structure, strong public and private sector expenditures, enhanced
delivery system and an impressive trade performance. Malaysia had
been registering trade surpluses since 1997, Strong fundamentals in
terms of low unemployment, low interest and inflation rates further
enabled Malaysia to strengthen amidst global volatilities. This strong
economic background coupled with the intensified implementation of
productivity and quality initiatives by industries have contributed to a
productivity growth of 3.7%7. All sectors of the economy recorded an
upward trend in productivity ranging form 0.5% to 4.5%.
2.0 Competitiveness Environment Factors
The competitiveness environment of a nation can be seen through four
main areas, namely; Macroeconomic Perspective, Government Efficiency,
Business Efficiency and Infrastructure. The macroeconomic factor
7 Productivity Report, 2006
151
captures the macroeconomic evaluation of the domestic economy. It
encompasses international trade, international investment, employment
and prices. For this factor, Malaysia was ranked 11th position among 61
economies. Malaysia also performed relatively well in terms of exports
and was ranked 3rd. Exports picked up strongly in 2006, rising by 11.4%
to US$140.9 billion from US$126.5 billion in 2005. Malaysia’s current
account balance placed the economy in 4th position at 15.7% of GDP
compared to the 61 country average of 0.3%.
Competitiveness Input Factors 2006 2005 (61 economies) (60 economies)
Economic Performance 11 8
Government Efficiency 20 26
Business Efficiency 20 25
Infrastructure 31 34 Source : World Competitiveness Yearbook (WCY) 2006
The Government Efficiency factor assesses the extent to which
government policies are conducive to competitiveness. The sub-factors
are public finance, institutional framework, business legislation and
societal framework. For Government Efficiency, Malaysia improved to 20th
position from 26th previously. Malaysia performed well and ranked 6th
position in terms of perceptions on the Government Efficiency factor for
the following areas; policy makers being able to understand economic
challenges; exchange rate policy supporting the competitiveness of
enterprises; and labour legislation which provides an incentive to look for
work.
The Business Efficiency factor examines the extent to which enterprises
are performing in an innovative, profitable and responsible manner. It is
measured through the five sub-factors of productivity and efficiency,
152
labour market, finance, management practices, as well as attitudes and
values. The ranking for Business Efficiency improve to 20th position from
25th previously. Labour cost in Malaysia continues to be competitive, as
wage increase commensurates with productivity growth. Malaysia
continued to record top ranking in unit labour cost in the manufacturing
sector. The favourable increase in labour force growth of 4.1% compared
to the 1.7% growth recorded the previous year led to Malaysia being
ranked 3rd.
The Infrastructure factor looks at the extent to which technological,
scientific and human resources meet the needs of business. It
encompasses basic infrastructure, technological infrastructure, scientific
infrastructure, health, environment and education. Malaysia improved its
infrastructure ranking to 31st position from 34th position previously. For
internet cost, progress in the state of information technology,
telecommunications and internet capabilities, Malaysia is ranked 3rd. The
role of science and technology in the economy, and more specifically in
education was favourable and was also ranked 3rd. This is reflective of the
perception that science in schools is sufficiently emphasized.
3.0 Human Resource Issues and Challenges
The Industrial Master Plan (IMP3), 2006-2020, emphasizes two aspects of
human resource requirements, namely, ensuring sufficient availability of
the human resources, as well as providing a facilitative environment for
the workforce to acquire the necessary skills in the professional and
technical fields to drive the economy into higher value-added activities.
Strategies for human resource management, including human resource
planning and development, will focus on the roles of education, training,
lifelong learning, capacity building and operating environment to enhance
Malaysia’s competitive position as outlined above. In the longer term,
153
strategies adopted on human resources will lead to a more equilibrium
labour market, as well as more competitive business operating
environment. Appropriate systems and structures for human resources
planning will enable Malaysia to respond to the changing global
environment and enhance competitiveness at the national and enterprise
levels.
3.1 Human Resource Policy Thrusts
Human resource development continued to be given priority in support of
the implementation of a productivity-driven growth which required highly
skilled, trainable and knowledge manpower. Emphasis continued to be
given to increase accessibility to education to all levels in line with the
democratisation of the education policy. In addition, the education and
training programmes focused on improving the quality of teaching and
learning materials, teacher training the educational support services. At
the tertiary level, the capacity of public tertiary institutions expanded
substantially. However, it was still inadequate to meet the demand.
Consequently, enrolment in private educational and training institutions
also expanded significantly, which was facilitated by the liberalization of
the education sector.
A trained workforce with the potential and ability to optimize the use and
development of new technologies and materials will continue to be
important in ensuring the growth and resilience of the economy. There will
be increasing investment in human capital, with greater emphasis on
nurturing creativity and cognitive skills to provide the impetus for the K-
based economy. The education and training system will be geared to
produce multi-skilled and knowledge manpower that is versatile, willing to
learn continuously. Entrepreneurial as well as with the ability to acquire
154
and apply knowledge particularly in modern technology. In this regard, the
human resource policy thrusts will be as follows:
• Expanding the supply of highly skilled and knowledge manpower to
support the development of a K-economy;
• Increasing the accessibility to quality education and training to
enhance income generation capabilities and quality of life;
• Improving the quality of education and training delivery system to
ensure that manpower supply is in line with technological change
and market demand;
• Promoting lifelong learning to enhance employability and
productivity of the labour force;
• Optimizing the utilization of local labour;
• Increasing the supply of Science and Technology manpower;
• Accelerating the implementation of the productivity-linked wage
system;
• Strengthening labour market information system to increase labour
mobility;
• Intensifying efforts to develop and promote Malaysia as a regional
centre of educational excellence; and
• Reinforcing positive values.
To support the above, industrial harmony is of utmost importance.
Concerted efforts by all parties involved in ensuring harmonious industrial
relations in the country such as the Government, Employers and
Employees is of paramount importance.
3.2 Human Resource Practices at the Organisational Level
3.2.1 Managing and Enhancing the Value of Human Capital to increase Productivity
155
Challenges of today’s organizations To demonstrate the linkage between employee resilience and
business performance.
To articulate best practices in diversity strategy and leadership.
To explore the frontier of work-life integration.
To shift the focus from financial capital to human capital.
To attract and retain the best possible workforce.
To motivate, satisfy and challenge the workforce.
To define the workforce requirements to support organizational
objectives.
To improve client or shareholder value.
Creating value through people Repositioning of the HR function − HR integral part of the senior executive team.
− Role elevated to strategic business partner.
− Introduction of HR consultancy or advisory model.
Shifting Organisational Culture − Integral role of culture, values and principles.
− Model has shifted from employment security to an
“employability” model.
− Integrated leadership and accountability.
Two sides to the coin ….. Employer branding
A better work place
156
growth
8
Brand Positioning Committed to delivering products and solutions that are :
Designed around you
Easy to experience
Advanced
The pressure on HR ….. Lean – focus on outcomes rather than activities
Not a cost centre
Employee champions
− Deliver competent and committed employees
− ISO, HRPST, PBE, ICS
Administrative experts
− Deliver efficient HR practices
− E-tools (salary planning, leave, requisition, HR policies &
procedures, recruitment, talent track, job descriptions, etc.)
Change agents
− Deliver capacity for change in individual behavior and
organizational culture
− PPM, EES, talent management, rewards communication, value
statements
Strategic partner
− Deliver business results
157
− Part of Executive Management Committee & Management
Team
− One page strategy supports Management agenda
− Country BSC and HR BSC
“Do more with less”
Building our employer brand from the inside out
Key Objectives: To be certain that we are able to attract, recruit and retain the sort of talent that
will give our business competitive edge.
To be sure that our employer experience will enable and motivate our talent to
work in a way that is “one Organisation”, providing maximum satisfaction for
both the organization and the individual”.
On-Line Interaction for New Employees
The introduction period lasts 3 months and the new hire is supported by :
HR, line manager and buddy
CD-ROM
Website / System
What does it do?
Makes new employees feel welcome!
Helps new employees get started quickly, by providing basic company
information right from the start.
Provides new employees with personal guidance by assigning them a
buddy.
Gives manages a proven, easy procedure for introducing new
employees successfully.
Clearly defines the roles and responsibilities of HR and line
158
management.
What is the role of HR?
Recruitment phase
Initiating the introduction process by entering the details of a new
employee on the website and sending a welcome package.
Running through administrative issues with the new employee on the
first day.
Explaining the buddy system and monitoring progress.
Evaluate the introduction period after 3 months with the new hire.
What is the role of the Line Manager? Assign a buddy to the new hire.
Welcome the new hire on his or her first day.
Introduce him / her to the organization, colleagues and department.
Explain the organizational structure and strategy of the department.
Formulate performance expectations.
Discuss training opportunities.
Evaluate the introduction period after 3 months.
What is the role of the Buddy? The buddy should be a close colleague with a similar job grade (not to
be confused with the role of a mentor, who is normally a more senior
manager).
The buddy is responsible for :
− Welcoming the new hire on the first day (develop a first day
schedule).
− Helping the new employee with practical issues (reslurces
necessary to start working, canteen, coffee machine, etc.)
− Explaining social rules and customs.
− Being available for questions.
159
− Keeping in Touch with the new hire on a regular basis.
A better workplace ….. The Organisation is you Simplicity is the name of the game
− HR automation
− Performance Management
− Learning
− Our website
Communicate! Communicate!
− Organisation values
− Leadership competencies
− Business principles
It’s about being open
− Compensation and you
− Talent management
Employee Engagement Survey
3.3 People Performance Management 3.3.1 The People Performance Management philosophy …….
The essence of PPM is to create quality dialog between the employee
and manager, which is truly focused on an employee’s performance
and development.
PPM is a global process that aligns the employee’s personal
objectives with those of the business.
PPM is about looking back at the past period and looking forward to
the coming period.
Performance focuses on what has been achieved (results), but also
how it has been achieved.
Development focuses on the employee becoming better at their
160
current job and growing into other roles in the future.
The PPM process starts with a self-evaluation by the employee and
can include co-assessment (s).
Calibration is used to ensure a fair and realistic assessment and to
increase the level of objectivity.
The performance rating is used as input for reward decisions.
PPM is web-based.
3.3.2 What’s in it for me? As an employee You have a clear understanding of how you contribute to realizing business
goals.
You know what is expected from you in your job.
You learn to what extent you meet these expectations.
3.3.3 As a manager You deploy and realize business goals with your team.
You have the opportunity to improve the effectiveness of your team members
and establish a performance culture.
You set clear objectives for your employee and evaluate your team members
on what they do in their job and how well they do their job.
Performance Review
Personal Details Performance Review 2006 Performance Plan 2007 Development
3.3.4 Key Areas of Responsibility Leading account management team for product range X .
Simple tab structure
X Cancel Save & Close Print
Meng Manager Input
161
Planning and driving customer service initiatives for key accounts.
Setting the strategic direction for product range X.
Strengthen marketing capabilities in the organization for all new product
launches.
Work together with ABC to identify product and marketing requirements for
product range XYZ.
Take ownership for managing the commercial processes between business
units and the different regions to achieve the business targets.
3.3.5 Employee comments on last year’s performance My key areas of reasonability were the same as last year. However, this year I
have been able to better lead my account management team as this is my
second year in the job. Also, this year I focused more on identifying customer
service initiatives for our key accounts. Based on client feedback I managed to
create well received initiatives.
3.4 SMART Personal Objectives (including Measurable Targets) Employee review
Manager feedback
Objective 1 Realize @ 8.2 million sales with accounts identified in the account plan 1/1/2006 and 31/12/2006
Rating Met Annual Incentive achieved
(Agreed maximum : 25) 25 (Agreed maximum : 25)
Comments For all the key accounts I identified in my account plan, I achieved more than the @ 8.2 million sales this year.
Objective 2 Improve client satisfaction for product range X by a full point to 4.3 as measure by the annual customer survey in Q4, 2006.
Rating Partially met. Annual Incentive achieved
(Agreed maximum : 15) 10 (Agreed maximum : 15)
Comments This year, our client satisfaction was was 4.1. This is already significantly
162
higher than last year, when our score was 3.3. Also, we received informal feedback from clients who mentioned to be very satisfied. Based on this, I have partially met my objective.
Objective 3 Setting the strategic direction for product range X and deliver a strategic business plan before 1/3/2006 which is approved by the MT.
Rating Met Annual Incentive achieved
(Agreed maximum : 25) (Agreed maximum : 25)
Comments My strategic business plan was approved by the MT.
Leadership Competencies Excels Exceeds Fully Meets
Partially Meets
Requires Action
Pursue market insight Create innovative strategies Inspire commitment Leverage capabilities Champion people’s growth Drive for results
Employee review
Manager feedback
Strengths What went well this year, that
Minimum of entry boxes
Employee fields on the left side of the document manager fields on the right side
Via this button leveling guidance will be offered in terms of example behaviors in relation to corporate
d
The new Philips Leadership Competencies, in which the Values
have been integrated, are now part of performance evaluation. Separate
information will follow soon.
163
in my team sales objectives have been met. We created innovative strategies and I am aware of the market situation.
Areas of improvement
However, my area for improvement is my focus on client improving the client satisfaction score, I should focus more on this. Also, I could focus more on champion people’s growth. Maybe best to share my views and learning from client situations with my team.
3.4.1 Summary of Evaluation Please click in the grid to indicate your proposed rating.
Manager comments regarding performance and promotability.
Excels Exceeds Fully
Meets Partially Meets
Requires Action
Fast Track
Growth Path
Well Placed
Focus on strengths and areas for improvement
Minimum of entry boxes
164
3.4.2 Performance Plan Personal Details Performance Review 2006 Performance Plan 2007 Development
Key Areas of Responsibility New Period Below you will find the adjusted key areas of responsibility as proposed by the employee. You can update these directly. Leading account management team for product range X for the EMEA region. Planning and driving customer service initiatives for key accounts in EMEA. Setting the strategies direction for product range X. Strengthen marketing capabilities in the organization for all new product launches. Work together with ABC to identify product and marketing requirements for product range XYZ. Take ownership for managing the commercial processes between business units and the different regions to achieved the business targets. Proposed SMART Personal Objectives (including Measurable Targets) Below you will find the personal objectives as proposed by the employee. You can update these objectives directly.
Employee review Manager feedback
A1 Distribution
A1 Distribution
Realize @ 9.0 million sales with accounts identified in the account plan between 1/1/2007 and 31/12/2007.
30 Realize @ 9.0 million sales with accounts identified in the account plan between 1/1/2007 and 31/12/2007.
30
Improve client satisfaction for product range X to 4.5 as measured by the annual customer survey in Q4,, 2006 and conduct a midyear client satisfaction survey to track progress.
15 Improve client satisfaction for product range X to 4.5 as measured by the annual customer survey in Q4,, 2006 and conduct a midyear client satisfaction survey to track progress.
15
Set up a system to share findings and learning within my team to be better prepared for client meetings.
10 Set up a system to share findings and learning within my team to be better prepared for client meetings.
10
Manager can edit employee’s proposal in order to define the final
wording for the KARs and objectives John Doe
Manager Input
165
Hold a bi-monthly meeting with the top 10 key accounts to inform them of the latest products.
25 Hold a bi-monthly meeting with the top 10 key accounts to inform them of the latest products.
25
Coach my account team by having regular meetings with my team members.
20 Coach my account team by having regular meetings with my team members.
20
Personal Details Performance Review 2006 Performance Plan 2007 Development
3.4.3 Development Development Activities Previous Period
Follow the training “focus on the markets”
Work together with the account manager for product range X in region APAC
to learn from him.
Employee review
Manager feedback
I have followed a training “focusing on the markets” and based on that one of my objectives is to create regular meetings with key accounts. I also worked together with the APAC regional account manager. This was very successful and made me aware of a lot of important issues.
Development Activities New Period based on strengths ad areas for improvement Below you find the new development activities as proposed by the employee. These activities are based on the employees strengths and areas of improvement derived from
Minimum of entry boxes Maximum of 6 objectives
Employee fields on the left side of the document manager fields on the right side
John doe Manager Input
People Performance Management
Minimum of entry boxes
166
the employees (Functional) Competencies. You can update these new activities directly. I can still develop myself by using what I have learned from the training “focusing on the markets”. Further on I want to develop myself on “champion people’s growth”. For this reason I will follow a training for coaching. 3.4.4 Career Employee
Manager
Career Aspirations
Manager comments on career
I would like to grow to a role where I have the responsibility for product XYZ in the APAC region. I know the EMEA region very well and am very interested in working in the APAC regions because of the dynamics going in here.
My Mobility Mobility Regional Regions Asia-Pacific Rim & Australia Restrictions Midyear development conversation Please Indicate if you foresee the need for an additional specific midyear development conversation. If the employee and / or manager indicate “yes” and email will be sent to both parties halfway the year to indicate them to start the development process. Employee
Manager
No
Yes No
Manager can edit employee’s proposal in order to define the
final wording for the development activities
Functional Competencies will be available via a web link to serve as inspiration for indicating the strengths and areas for improvement, but
will not be rated anymore
Employee fields on the left side of the document manager fields on the right side
Minimum of entry boxes
167
3.4.5 What else will be new?
Tool will be available throughout the year to work on development
and to define KPIs and objectives e.g. for new employees (manager
formally accepts, HRM receives copy).
No colleague feedback option anymore (only 9% made use of this).
Co-assessor input will be much more focused and co-assessor can start immediately after employee has submitted input.
More flexibility for HRM Manager in creating and importing calibration
grid at all times before PPM meeting phase (administrative
unburdening HRM managers).
Please note all relevant data of the last PPM cycle will be transferred to PPM light.
Default mode : end-year meeting focused on performance as well as development. There is an
option to choose for an additional mid-year development meeting
168
3.5 Rewards & Communication 3.5.1 Overview of rewards programs offered
− Sports/social activities − Annual dinner/family day − Corporate sustainability programs
− Outpatient medical benefits − GH&S insurance − Executive Screening Program (CG 60 & above) − Dental / eye care − Group Term Life − Group Personal Accident − Retirement gratuity
Club
Leave with Pay
Other Benefits
Supplementary Benefits
Statutory Contributions
Incentive Programs
Fixed Allowance
13th Month Salary
Base Salary
− Annual leave − Medical leave − Compassionate leave − Examination leave
− Festival advance − Education assistance − Service awards − Phil Shares − Flexi time − Maternity benefits
− EPF − SOCSO
− Annual incentive (non- sales) − Sales incentive/ commission (sales) − Restricted Shares/SO
Car allowance CG60 & above
169
3.6 Talent / Management Development 3.6.1 Developing talents
Career planning with our Career Center
Single website with all Philips’ vacancies
Offers hints and tips on career and development
People Development
Performance Management :
Assess : not only what you do but also how you do it
Core Curricula :
‘One Organisation’ way of learning
3.6.2 The Management Development Process
Who will fill our key positions now and in the future?
Succession planning
Performance reviews
How have they performed against business objectives and
competencies or values?
Competencies
Talent Identification: What is their potential? What steps do they need
to take to develop?
Management Development is a Partnership with Joint Accountability between : Company / HR Provide tools, processes and systems to enable
and support development and succession planning.
Managers Recognize, plan, coach, develop and monitor the
170
skills and talents of employees.
Employees Contribute to and plan for the future. Have a self-managing mindset about careers.
3.6.3 Learning & Development
3.6.4 Diversity & Inclusion
The total blended learning solution
Experience On the job
Working with different managers Networking
Networking opportunities
Special assignments
Classroom activities
E-learning
Guidelines for on the job coaching/ instruction
Company
Gross Culture Age
Skills
Personal Style
Orientation
Country Knowledge
Personality
Community Experience
Electricity
Perspective
Business Experience
Educational Background
171
Diversity The term “diversity” symbolizes our recognition that our workplaces,
marketplaces and communities are made up of individuals: men and
women from different nations, cultures, ethnic groups, generations,
background, skills, abilities and all the other unique characteristics
that make each of us who we are.
We can better understand our customers and better identify their
needs when we have a diverse workforce that mirrors our worldwide
customer base.
Inclusion The term “inclusion” symbolizes an environment where everyone can
fully participate in creating business success, and where each person
is valued for his or her distinctive talents (skills, experiences,
perspectives, etc.)
An inclusive working environment engages people, enhances decision
making and increases creativity and innovation in support of our vision
and brand positioning.
3.7 Employee Engagement Survey 3.7.1 Engagement is essential to achieve our business agenda
As a company, we know where we want to be and what we need to
get there.
Engaged employees are, just like happy clients, a condition for
Physical Abilities
Life Experience
Thinking Style
Gender Passion Language
Faith Religion
172
growth.
Yet, there is a gap between where we want to be and what our people
tell us.
Topics that keep coming back are consistent through all sources;
strengthen people leadership to get the best out of people, ensure
alignment on direction and reduce complexity to enhance people
ability to contribute, create and environment of trust and open dialog
to offer space for people to add value, behave consistently to
accelerate the pace of change.
Improvement to be done in these areas is a key to increasing
engagement.
3.7.2 Positioning engagement?
Engagement is about creating an inclusive and high-energy working
environment, where all employees are aligned to and energized to contribute to
our business success. An engaged workforce delivers a competitive
advantage – our people are highly motivated to give their best every day.
Someone who is engaged typically :
- goes above and beyond the normal demand of the job
- helps others with heavy workload
- volunteers for extra duties
- looks for way to perform jobs more effectively
- has higher level of customer satisfaction
173
3.7.3 We need our workforce to say things like ………. 3.7.4 Key themes of Engagement
Me
Me & My Manager
Me & My Organisation
Me & Company
I am proud to work for Philips
I trust our leader ship
I believe in our Philips values
I I am inspired by the vision of Philips, I believe Philips has an outstanding future
I am an ambassador for Philips and its products
I matter, I can make a difference in this company
I care for my colleagues, my colleagues care for me
I belong to this group of people
I feel connected to my co-workers around the world
I believe we will achieve our goals
I am clear about our direction and how to contribute
I touch lives everyday
I do my job with passion
I enjoy going to work in the morning
My boss helps me to develop and grow
My boss brings the best out of me
My boss engages our team and is a leader
Being passionate and proud
This is about being an advocate for Philips, believing in what Philips stands for and its future. This is about being outspoken, taking a stand for what we believe in. This is about having a positive attitude. This is about individuals
Bringing out the best in each other
This is about making a personal commitment and using individual talent to play a role and contribute (Skill & Will) This is about building on motives, values and goals of each individual to help them contribute to the best. This is about
Trusting and being trusted
This is about being authentic and consistent between what we say and do. This is about communicating and measuring progress on what we say we will do. This is about earning trust by acting as role model. This is about trusting
174
3.7.5 Process of Engagement in 2006? 3.7.6 Whose responsibility is it?
Engagement is a collective responsibility which needs to happen daily.
− Be passionate and proud, bring the best in each other, trust and
be trusted in all the things we do.
Demonstrate these behaviors of good people managers in daily work. Reinforce that engagement is a collective responsibility. If lots of people change just a little bit, a lot will change.
A few things done well, having an impact on the engagement at Philips, business unit, department or team level. Regular update to employees on progress using mix of communication
The survey will run for 136,500 employees with the same set of questions, primarily through the web. Every targeted employee will be pre-informed by local HRM and Manager about the importance to participate and invited per mail or paper.
4,000 reports will be generated. Based on these reports, deep dive sessions will be held across Philips, where managers, employees and HR discuss the outcomes and understand strengths and weaknesses.
In order to maximize the strengths and improve on weaknesses, teams will work on possibilities to offers.
Communicate/Educate: What is engagement and why is it important, how does it fit with the management agenda context, how does it fit with the leadership competencies.
Understand purpose and
context of engagement (now
to Sept).
Conduct the survey
(Sept. 6th to 20th)
175
− Every individual can impact engagement within their own team.
− These changes at a local level then multiply to create significant
organizational shifts.
3.7.7 List of Questions from the Engagement Survey
1. I believe the company has an outstanding future
2. I trust the leadership of the Company
3. I trust my manager
4. My manager is an active role model for the company’s values
5. The leadership of the company has communicated a vision of the
future that motivates me
6. I have a clear picture of the direction in which the company is headed
7. My organization has a climate in which diverse perspectives are value
8. The management style in this organization brings out the best in
employees
9. My management has acted on issues identified in the previous
employee engagement survey
10. I feel adequately informed by my management on our business goals
11. There is good cooperation between my department and other
departments
12. I rarely think about looking for a new job with another company
13. I would gladly refer a good friend or family member to the company
for employment
14. Overall, I am extremely satisfied with the company as a place to work
15. I feel proud to work for the company
16. My job makes good use of my talents and abilities
17. I have the training I need to do my job effectively
18. My manager has facilitated my growth and development
19. My manager provides me with coaching that is helpful in improving
my performance
176
20. I receive the information and communication I need to do my job
effectively
21. In my organization there is open and honest two-way communication
22. My manager clearly communicates what is expected of me
23. My manager is usually receptive to suggestions for change from
employees
24. I feel that I am part of a team
25. My ideas and suggestions count
26. My manager really cares about my well being
27. I am encouraged to come up with new and better ways of doing things
28. All employees in the company are treated as individuals regardless of
age, race, gender, physical capabilities etc
29. I am involved in decisions that affect my work
30. I am given sufficient authority and freedom by the organization to do
my job well
31. My manager provides me with timely and helpful feedback
32. I think my performance is evaluated fairly
33. I regularly receive appropriate recognition when I do a good job
34. My organization provides equal opportunities to all employees
35. The compensation plans of Philips reward outstanding job
performance
36. In my current job, I am satisfied with my pay and benefits
3.7.8 How should the process look like?
Understanding
Re-measure Discussion and
Ownership
Re-survey Share results Set goals
177
As a result : We create the readiness for the organisation to seize business opportunities and
gain competitive edge through workforce globalization.
4.0 Labour Market Situation
During the first half of the Second Industrial Master Plan (IMP2), 1996-
2005, the manufacturing sector recorded a tight labour market, largely due
to the full employment situation and the robust performance of the sector.
The Asian financial crisis adversely affected economic growth and
employment. In response, measures were undertaken to accelerate
economic recovery and address unemployment. These included
Government initiated programmes to improve employability through
retraining and skills upgrading, as well as greater emphasis on productivity
and competitiveness.
While Malaysia offers a pool of talented human resources, there is
presently a shortage of skilled workforce in specialized fields in
engineering, information and communication technology (ICT) and high
technologies. To overcome this shortage, companies engaged foreign
experts and specialists. As of 2005, there were 35,480 expatriates
employed in Malaysia, with 18,679 (52.6%) in the services sector, 40.6 %
in the manufacturing sector, 2.8% in the construction sector and 0.2% in
the plantation sector. Expatriates were generally employed in the higher
managerial category and specialized fields, such as oil and gas,
biomedicine, research and development (R&D), ICT consultancy and
Action and commitment Review
Monitor and support progress
Develop an action plan Share the plan
178
software management. To increase the availability of local experts, the
Government implemented the Brain Gain Programme to attract Malaysian
talents abroad to return.
A large number of foreign workers are employed in tasks which require
lower skills. As at 2005, there were 1.8 million foreign workers in the
country, with 581,379, or 32%, in the manufacturing sector, 26.1% in the
plantation sector, 15.5% in the construction sector and 8.8% in the
services sector. These workers were employed in jobs for which
Malaysians were not available or not willing to fill.
4.1 Industrial Relations in Malaysia
Generally, the extent of unionization in Malaysia is low for two main
reasons, first the predominance of small-scale manufacturing and services
establishments; second the prevalence of contract labour. The Labour
Law in Malaysia is well established. Among the Labour Laws in Malaysia
are the Employment Act 1955, Workers Housing and Amenities Minimum
Standards Act 1990, Workers Compensation Act 1952, Young Person and
Children Act 1966, Wages Determination Council 1947, Weekly Holiday
Act 1950, Employment Information Act 1953, Employment Limitation Act
1968, Industrial Relation Act 1967 and Trade Union Act 1959.
The extent of unionization in Malaysia is low for two main reasons, the
predominance of small–scale industries and service establishments; as
well as the prevalence of contract labour. The Congress of Union of
Employees in the Public and Civil (CUEPACS) represent the public sector
while the Malaysia Trade Union Congress (MTUC), registered with the
registrar of societies functions as the voice of Malaysian trade unions at
both the national and international levels. It also represents workers on
179
tripartite organizations such as the National Labour Advisory Council
(NLAC),
Private sector employers in Malaysia are represented in the central
organization known as the Malaysian Employers Federation (MEF).
Established in 1978 following the dissolution of the Malaysian Council of
Employers’ Organisation, the MEF is registered under the Societies Act
1986 and includes both ordinary and associate members. The MEF
advises its members on how to deal with trade union claims, helps to
prepare counter-proposals and assists in negotiations of collective labour
agreements. It also represents employees in the NLAC and Wages
Council.
It is important to note that matters pertaining to labour and industrial
relations come within the jurisdiction of the federal government as
stipulated by the Malaysian constitution. Hence the Trade Unions
Ordinance and the Industrial Relations Act apply throughout the country.
Voluntarism is the basis of collective bargaining in Malaysia. When an
employer or a trade union serves notice of its intention to commence
collective bargaining, the receiving party is required to respond within 14
days. If the response is positive, collective bargaining should commence
within 30 days of the reply. If negative or if the bargaining otherwise does
not commence within the 30 days period, the party serving notice may
notify the Director General of Industrial Relations who may then take the
necessary action to persuade both parties to the commence bargaining. If
there is still no success at that stage, then a trade dispute will legally exist.
180
4.2 Legal Environment for Employment The present labour laws include:
Act Major Provisions Employment Act 1955 - all manual and non-manual workers earning
RM1,500 and below;
- minimum benefits and rights of employees,
including working hours, annual leave and
public holidays, overtime rates and sick
leave;
- issues such as termination and
retrenchment
The act was amended in 1998 to allow, among others, for workers earning
RM5,000 and below to complain to the Labour Department for violation by the
employer of any term and condition of the employee’s contract of service. The
Act was last amended in 2000.
Industrial Relations Act 1967 Governs the relationship between employers
and employees and their trade unions, and the
prevention of settlement of differences of
disputes arising from the relationship.
Social Security Act 1969 Covers workers who earn RM3,000 and below.
The act provides for benefits and pension if a
worker is injured or disabled during working
181
hours, or while traveling to and from work. It
was last amended in 2005.
Occupational Health and Protects the worker against unsafe work sites
Safety Act 1994 and unhealthy work practices.
4.2.1 Industrial Relations Act, 1967
The Industrial Relations Act regulates relations between employers and
employees and their Unions. The main objective of the IR Act is to
resolve trade disputes. The Act embodies four important principles:
• The principle of trade unionism
• The principle of recognition
• The principle of collective bargaining
• The principle of resolving disputes
The Industrial Relations Act requires that a collective labour agreement
be concluded and deposited with the Industrial Court every three years.
Once the court takes cognizance of the agreement it becomes bindings,
and any violation of its provisions constitutes an offence under the law.
However, before taking cognizance of the agreements, the court sends
some of them back to parties for amendments.
The dispute settlement machinery in Malaysia provides for conciliation and
arbitration. The Industrial Relations Act empowers the Director General of
Industrial Relations and the Minister of Human Resource to conciliate
labour disputes. The Director-General can inquire into the causes and
circumstances surrounding the dispute and bring the parties together or
appoint an arbitrator if both parties agree. The Minister can intervene in
any dispute for the purpose on conciliation and if appropriate, may refer
the case to the industrial court of arbitration.
182
The Industrial Court, constituted under section 30 of the Industrial
Relations Act, 1967, hears cases brought by the parties or referred by the
Minister. The Court has jurisdiction over four types of cases : (a) unfair
dismissed claims, (b) interest disputes, (c) interpretation of collective
agreements or awards and (d) complaints of non-compliance. The
mechanism through which labour disputes are heard by the Industrial
Court is illustrated in Figure I.
Figure 1 Industrial Relations Process in Malaysia
Labour Legislation
Employer Trade Union
Employer Negotiation
Dispute
Conciliation
Minister act as conciliator Collective
Agreement
Industrial Court
183
4.3 Industrial Relations: Issues and Challenges
The industrial relations in Malaysia is increasingly moving towards
cooperation and collaboration rather than confrontation. It has been
recognized that in the context of changing times, there is a need to work
together to survive. In any society, there is necessarily conflict in industry
between employers and employees, between the owners of goods and
services and those who work to produce these goods and services. The
objective of Malaysia’s industrial relations system is to direct the forces
producing conflict towards constructive ends.
In accordance with this philosophy, employers and workers have grouped
together to advance and protect their separate interests. Trade Unions have
long been accepted as lawful, and the rights to strike and bargain collectively
have been similarly recognized. Likewise, employers have been allowed to
organize themselves into groups and to take legitimate action to protect their
interests. It has also been accepted that the Government should provide the
facilities to help the parties agree, but not to actively interfere to impose a
settlement on them .The issues surrounding industrial relations should be
centred on employability.
In the process, the following key challenge has to be resolved:
• Enhancing Employability
In line with the human resource policy thrusts mentioned earlier,
knowledge and skills of workers must be continuously enhanced.
High Court
Court of Appeal (final)
184
Specifically, generic skills are a pre-requisite for employability and
workers must be more oriented towards technical skills and utilization
of high level technology. Management and Unions must work together
to develop a trained workforce who has the potential and ability to
optimize the use and development of new techniques and materials as
this will continue to be important in ensuring the growth and resilience
of the economy.
Human resource development facilities provided by both public and
private sectors in ensuring that workers are adequately trained must be
utilized. Negotiations between employers and unions must make this
issue a priority.
• Information Sharing
There is insufficient sharing of information between employers and
unions especially on financial issues. For the purpose of carrying out
his functions, the Director General for Industrial Relations under
subsection (4A) of the Act shall have the power to require the trade
union of workmen, the employer or the trade union of employers
concerned to furnish such information as he may consider necessary
or relevant.
• Conflict in Collective Agreements
Trade Unions would normally maintain their rights as per collective
agreement which is concluded once in three years. The Trade Unions
main concern is to protect the workers in terms of wage increments
and benefits while Employers normally plead understanding in the
context of intense competition and affordability. The Government had
proposed a wage system that is linked to performance as a fair way to
accord wage increments and bonuses. There is also a call to review
the Industrial Relations Act, to make it more in tune with the current
economic developments.
185
• Outsourcing and Mergers
In the face of globalization and more intense competition, more and
more firms are going for outsourcing and mergers. In the process,
employees find that they have to cope with new environment, new
conditions of employment and security of tenure. The industrial
relations is currently inadequate in coping with this new trend. The
Industrial Relations Department is thus undergoing a reorganization of
their structure to be in line with the current economic scenario.
• Minimum Wages
The Malaysian Trade Union Congress (MTUC) has made a request
to the Government for establishing a minimum wage. A decision on
the matter is yet to be made. Another alternative to minimum wages
is to establish a wage system that is linked to
performance/productivity, where the wage system consist of two
components; the fixed component that ensures wage stability and the
variable component that ensures enhance performance.
5.0 Productivity and Wages
5.1 International Productivity Comparison In 2006, the productivity growth of Malaysia at 3.7% surpassed many of
the Organisation of Economic Cooperation (OECD) countries such as
Sweden (2.8%), Japan (2.5%), Germany (2.0%), Denmark (1.8%), USA
(1.5%), United Kingdom (1.7%), France (1.4%), Australia (1.0%), Canada
(1.0%) and Ireland (1.0%). Amongst Asian countries, Malaysia registered
higher productivity growth than Thailand (3.5%), Chinese Taipei (2.7%)
and Singapore (1.2%). However, China (9.7%), Indonesia (6.4%), India
(6.0%) experienced higher growth. The ongoing shift of the economy
towards higher value added and knowledge based activities, adoption of
186
new technologies and innovations into business applications, strong
economic growth, increasing inflow of foreign investment and intensive
utilization of information and communication technology (ICT) had
contributed to the productivity performance.
The productivity level of Malaysia at US$11,716, was higher than that of
India (US$ 2,128), China (US$2,885) and the Philippines (US$2,914).
However, highly industrialized and matured economies such as Japan,
Norway, USA and Ireland with high GDP per capita, high degree of
innovation and a large pool of educated workforce recorded higher
productivity levels. Total research and development (R&D) expenditure as
a percentage of GDP of the OECD countries such as Sweden (3.9%),
Finland (3.5%) and Japan (3.2%) was higher than that of Malaysia (0.6%).
In addition, almost all the selected OECD countries showed higher
education achievement.
Table 4.1 Productivity Levels and Productivity Growth, 2006
Country Productivity Level Productivity Growth (2000 Constant Prices, US$) (%) Malaysia 11, 9716 3.7 Selected OECD Countries Japan 79,907 2.5 United States 77,989 1.5 France 58,190 1.4 United Kingdom 53,764 1.7 Canada 50,029 1.0 Australia 46,681 1.0
187
Korea 28,956 3.7 Selected Asian Countries Singapore 48,782 1.2 Chinese Taipei 38,622 2.7 Thailand 4,202 3.3 Philippines 2,914 1.6 China 2,885 9.7 Indonesia 2,128 6.4 Source : National Productivity Corporation, Annual Productivity Report 2006.
The productivity growth of Malaysia which was higher than the OECD
countries was indicative that Malaysia is progressing towards achieving better
competitiveness globally. Malaysia has to continuously ensure that productivity grows at
a faster rate than the developed economies to achieve a higher productivity level which is
on par with these economies.
5.2 Labour Cost Competitiveness of the Manufacturing Sector, 2006
The manufacturing sector continued to improve its Labour Cost Competitiveness
by registering a 3.1% growth in Sales Value per Employee as compared to a
2.5% growth in Labour Cost per Employee (Table 2). Human resource
development, cost rationalisation initiatives and productivity and quality
improvement programmes undertaken by the manufacturing industries
188
contributed to this performance. Unit Labour Cost (ULC) which is the labour cost
of producing one unit of product or service declined and thus enhanced
competitiveness as it is now cheaper to produce a unit of output. Unit Labour
Cost declined by 0.7%.
Table 4.2 shows the sales value per employee (proxy for productivity, Labour
cost per employee (proxy for wages) and unit labour cost. It is observed that in
situations where labour cost per employee grows faster than sales value per
employee, unit labour cost will increase such as in year 2002. It is therefore
imperative that wage increases should be commensurated with higher
productivity growth to enhance competitiveness.
Table 4.2: Labour Cost Competitiveness, Manufacturing Sector
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Labour Cost per Employee
4.47 4.42 3.14 4.42 2.5
Unit Labour Cost 0.68 -3.40 -12.04 -3.40 -0.7
Sales Value per 3.69 8.11 17.24 8.11 3.1
Employee Source : National Productivity Corporation, Malaysia 5.3 Wage System in Malaysia In the private sector, the wage structure may be in the form of a salary scale.
There is also a system of using the salary range. Minimum and maximum annual
increment may or may not be pre-determined until the employee reaches the
maximum in the salary range. In the unionized sector, employees have their
wages and other conditions of employment determined through collective
bargaining. At each renewal of a collective agreement there is always upward
revision of the starting salary, followed by annual increments in predetermined
steps which usually, but not necessarily, ends with a maximum. Besides the
189
annual increment there is also the salary adjustment at the end of each three-
year period when a new agreement begins. An employee therefore receives an
annual increment each year and a salary adjustment once every three years.
The total increase over a six-year period was 81 per cent. The increase is not in
any way related to the company’s performance or the employee’s productivity.
The increase will be permanently built into the employee’s salary.
The main weakness of such a wage system is it’s inflexibility of any adjustments
either to the company or employee performance. Among the inhibiting features
are:
The general trend of wage increase is rapid and not related to productivity
improvement;
Collective agreements are usually fixed for a period of three years and
binding on both parties. The phasing in of wage increments is often out of
synchronization with economic reality at the time of implementation
because of the protracted delays in many wage negotiations;
Annual increments are pre=determined and are given automatically to all
workers regardless of the level of performance;
Remuneration is not related to company performance;
Terms in the collective agreement cannot be reduced even when a new
agreement is being concluded on the premise that once a benefit is
granted, it cannot be subsequently withdrawn even through in lean times.
Recognising the weaknesses of the current wage system; the Government
initiated a tripartite task force to develop guidelines on a Wage Reform System
which is linked to productivity in 1997 and in 2004, a Guiding Principles for the
implementation of Performance Linked Compensation among Government
Linked Corporations (GLC) had been developed.
190
5.4 Performance Linked Compensation: Guidelines and Implementation “From a human capital standpoint, the right Performance Linked Compensation
(PLC) programme will enable corporations to attract, retain and motivate the best
people. From a corporate viewpoint, PLC programme is consistent with the
economic ownership model whereby ownership is institutionalized and
management is left to professionals who are to be adequately incentivised to
drive performance. The alignment of shareholder and management’s interest is
in the interest of both. From a national perspective, the pressure for better
accountability and performance in Corporations has never been greater. New
engines of growth need to be identified and existing economic engines need to
be competitive if we are to survive in the global economic order. In the period
immediately following the financial crisis, we have spent much effort
restructuring. But we cannot stop there; all the past efforts would be for nothing if
we do not move on to the next level. Bu driving GLCs towards higher
performance and global competitiveness, GLCs will lead the private sector in
generating long term sustainable growth for Malaysia.”
Speech by YB Tan Sri Nor Mohamed Yakcop,
Finance Minister II, Malaysia, 14 May 2004.
191
The focus of the Guiding Principles8 has been on the implementation of Key
Performance Indicators (KPIs), and the introduction of Performance Linked
Compensation (PLC). PLC is not about compensation structure alone, it is an all
encompassing process of:
• Identifying the strategic direction and targets for the company,
• Aligning management’s focus towards these goals,
• The ongoing process of review and appraisal to keep the company on
track, and
• In the process, sharing the success of the company in terms of
rewarding employees.
The governance structure of each company will be the proper channel for
implementing the PLC programme. There are four main areas:
• KPI Design
• Base Pay
• Performance Bonus
• Eligibility
5.4.1 KPI Design
Balanced and wholistic set of KPs
As a business foundation, any organization will have its corporate mission and
strategy. In formulating the KPIs, there should be a clear link with corporate
mission and specifically business plans. The choice and selection of the right
KPIs cannot be overemphasized and has to be developed with the corporate
strategy and mission in mind:
8 Performance Linked Compensation: Guidelines & Implementation by YB Tan Sri Nor Mohamed Yakcop, Finance Minister II, Culture of High Performance for Government Linked Companies, Seminar on 14 May 2004, Ministry of Finance, Putrajaya.
192
i. KPIs selected must be actionable; that is they should be within the
control of management and the outcome is capable of being influenced
by management’s action or inaction.
ii. KPIs must be measurable. The objectivity of measurements is critical
but it does not mean that KPIs should not include subjective areas. In
areas such as customer satisfaction, independent surveys may be
used as a proxy measure
iii. Avoid KPIs that encourage short term outlook. KPIs design must allow
for progressive growth. Do not for example, sacrifice efforts which
bring benefits in the long-run such as training and research, just to
show better results.
Targets should be benchmarked against industry peers, either domestically or if
available, internationally. It is not sufficient that targets are based on historical
trends if those trends have not been up to the mark. In many cases, industry-
wide data are available as comparisons. The number of KPIs should not be too
many to ensure clarity and focus. Best practice would suggest scorecards
containing between five to eight KPIs. The KPIs selected should also be
weighted to ensure that more important business objectives are given emphasis.
Targets should be set annually in line with changes in business objectives
Where actual results to-date are behind targets, remedial action should be taken
to review and address the situation.
5.4.2 Base Pay
As a guide, executives base pay should be set at the market average of
comparator companies. The choice of comparator companies is critical as the
results may be skewed depending on the companies selected. The companies
selected should have common operational characteristics such as size and
markets. There should not be indiscriminate use of data to justify higher
193
compensation without regard to the local conditions. Nevertheless, in the quest
for specific talent, specific compensation package which is personal to holder
could be offered; such situation should be referred to the major shareholder.
5.4.3 Performance Bonus Achieving minimum threshold When setting performance threshold, there should be a minimum threshold
below which no performance bonus should be made. There should not be a
situation where an executive achieves 20% of the target and still be entitled to
receive 20% of the performance bonus. The guidelines suggest that bonuses
should not be payable for performance below 50% of the KPIs targets.
Linking payout to KPI score There should be correlation between KPI score and payout. Nonetheless, a
“modifier” should be introduced to limit the performance payout for exceptional
situations arising in the year. For example, it may be decided that despite
management achieving the KPIs, the business reputation has suffered as a result
of a major negative event such as a major industrial accident that could have
been avoided. In this situation, it is appropriate to limit the extent of the pay-out.
Market Competitive Bonus To attract the best candidate and ensure the best performance, the performance
bonus should be a real incentive. Good performance should be rewarded.
However, there should not be an over-skewed compensation where there is no
internal equity and the payout has no linkage to performance. Perverse
behaviour focusing on short term gains, non-congruence of overall corporate
goals and manipulation of results should be avoided.
Use of Cash Rewards
194
Rewards can be a combination of cash or shares and the concept of “self-
funded” performance bonus should be used. The ability to afford the payout is a
given. Hence, performance bonus should only be given out from profits earned
out of superior performance. If the base financial targets are set at, say, 12%
ROE, no performance bonus may be paid out if this is not achieved. The bonus
pool established should be shared between executives and shareholders to
preserve equity to the providers of capital.
Use of Shares Typically long term incentives comprise shares provided this is applicable to the
company and the major shareholder can afford to dilute the shareholding. No
discounts from market are to be given for share options under the scheme as the
value to the staff needs to be earned from improved market price of the shares in
the future rather than existing shareholders at the present.
5.4.4 Eligibility
Senior Management Senior management typically comprises the CEO, the direct reports and those
immediately below that. However, the definition of senior management will vary
depending on the organization structure. What is key is that this group of people
have a direct influence on the company’s performance. It is expected that the
CEO and direct reports, should gradually become contract positions. The
possibility of non-renewal of contract is one way to encourage performance; and
any vacancies should be made available to internal and external candidates.
Terminations should be exercised for non-performance.
Other Employees The principles of performance linked compensation must be applied to all levels
of the organization. It is however recognized that there is a difference in risk and
return between management and other employees. Under the scheme, senior
195
management will be subject to employment contracts, a high variable element to
wages and very much tied to the company’s performance. Other employees
whilst subject to performance will not be burdened with as much risk.
Non Executive Directors Non-executives such as non-executive Directors are not eligible under this
scheme; however they may participate in the standard ESOS scheme. This
prohibition is to ensure proper check and balance.
5.4.5 Implementation
A project Steering Committee for the implementation of the PLC should be set
up. This committee would report to the Board or Board of Remuneration
Committee. The Guiding Principles should be used in the implementation and
any variation has to be refered to the PLC Steering Committee for clarification
and guidance.
5.4.6 Performance Based Elements in Collective Agreements
In 2006, the National Productivity Corporation9, Malaysia carried out a study to
gauge the extent of performance-based elements adopted by unionised firms. It
is encouraging to note that 61% of 373 unionised firms had incorporated
performance criteria in their Collective Agreements as follows:
Performance Elements % Discretionary bonus that is based on individual, 22.5
department or overall company performance
Commitment in ensuring timeliness, discipline 20.6
9 Performance Based Elements in Collective Agreements, NPC Malaysia, 2006
196
and ensuring quality of output
Merit increment whereby the quantum of increment 12.8
Varies according to employees performance
Profit-based Bonuses 10.2
Service or performance incentives that are 7.5
Distributed based on performance of employees
Skills allowance that provides additional incentives 3.0
For utilization of skills and knowledge acquired
6.0 Case Experience: Performance Management System of Corporation XYZ
The challenges facing Corporation XYZ include:
• To be a global player
• To realize full potential of the Corporation with competent leadership
• To become a value added organization with high performance culture
• To sustain 15% dividend from our investment
197
6.1 OVERALL APPROACH OF THE GLC
Felda Group Business Strategy
Strategic Intent
Business Strategies
Business
Performance Driver
Analysis
Understanding primary factors that impact
FELDA Group’s success
Organisation Design
Organisation Capabilities
Manpower Modelling Selection
Value Driver Analysis
Organisation
core competencies
Learning Organisation
Key Performance
Indicators (Organisation Scorecard)
O R G A N I S A T I O N
C U L T U R E
“How”
“What”
Succession Planning
Career Development
Performance Management
System
Reward System
198
Performance Management is a shared responsibility between the organization,
staff, reporting managers and reviewing managers.
Staff who is the appraisee, takes responsibility for self in the process, sees
feedback on performance and uses organizational resources for self
development. Reporting Manager who is the direct superior of the appraisee
and is accountable for his/her performance evaluation and reviewing manager
who is the direct or indirect superior of the reporting manager and is
responsible for the overall performance of the business unit/group function and
department.
Performance management should reinforce the importance of both results and
behaviours/skills. The focus is on both results (Key Performance Indicators)
and behaviours and skills (competencies).
6.2 The “What” and “How” of Performance Management System
If what people achieve is important … If how people achieve it is important ..
…. Focus on results
…. Focus on
behaviors and skills
Key performance Indicators
Competencies
Performance Management (PM) should reinforce the importance of both results AND behaviors / skills
Performance = “what” + “how”
199
Performance = KPIs (60%) + Competencies (40%)
Results Based Goals (KPIs) Competency Indicators
Financial Communication
• ROE Teamwork
• Revenue Growth Innovation and Change
Customer Leadership & nurturing talent
• Customer Satisfaction Index Drive & resilience
Internal Process Cultural sensitivity
• Cost to income ratio Business Acumen, negotiation
Learning and Innovation & deal making
• Employee Engagement Index Strategic thinking
• High Performer Attrition Rate
Project Goals
• IT Project
• HR Strategy Project
The Corporation’s definition of performance includes both KPIs and
Competencies in the PMS to ensure that both leading and lagging indicators of
performance are measured which will lead to long-term sustainable
performance:
• Measuring results help strengthen the link between individual goals and
business strategy
• Measuring competencies increases the focus on employee development
to enable the to achieve individual goals and align their behaviour to the
organisation’s values
• Both of these outcomes increase employee motivation to improve
business performance.
200
6.3 The Performance Management System Cycle
Step 1 : Performance Planning
• Business goals, KPIs and targets set upfront and cascaded down the
organization
• Competencies are reviewed and development objectives identified
• Mid-year reviews conducted
Step 2 : Performance Assessment
• Quantitative targets independently computed
• Supervisor solicits inputs from peers, subordinates, clients
Step 2 : Performance Rewarding Performance results determine:
• Annual increments
• Bonuses and options
• Promotions
201
6.4 LINKING PERFORMANCE WITH REWARDS The value drivers at business unit level are “translated” into focused performance objectives, which can be measured and
rewarded.
Value Driver
Business
Performance Drivers Analysis
Customer
KPI 1
Financial
KPI 2
pe r P f l o a r n m a n c e
Processes
KPI 3
People KPI4
Benefits
Base Salary
Increments
Bonus
REWARDS
“WHAT”
Measurement
Communication Teamwork Innovation & Change Accountability Organising, Planning & Decision Making Composure Business Acumen Service Orientation
+ “HOWS”
6.4.1 Overall Performance Rating for Salary Planning Purposes
The overall performance rating shall be based on the performance matrix ranging
from 1.0 – 5.0:
Performance Range
1.0 – 1.5 1.6 - 2.5 2.6 – 3.5 3.6 – 4.5 4.6 – 5.0
Needs most Need some Meets Exceeds Exceed
Improvement Improvement Requirement Some All
6.4.2 Assigning Rating
Each goals/target is assessed according to the employee’s level of achievement
• Quantitative goal : % of target achieved
• Qualitative goal : Assessment of goal and to what extent it was achieved
eg; full, partial etc.
An appropriate rating (1-5) is assigned for each goal
Only whole number ratings to be assigned
The weight rating for that category is derived.
203
6.5 Simplified Example of Performance Appraisal Calculation : Top Management
6.5.1 Performance Goals (KPI Weightage : 60%)
KPI Weight Actual Rating Weighted Score (Min 10%) Achieved (1-5)
Profit before 30% 13.1 5 1.5
Tax
Total Production 20% 1008 5 1
Yield 15% 21.9 3 0.45
Cost 15% 110 3 0.45
Participation 10% 95 4 0.4
Mechanisation 10% 5 3 0.3
100% TOTAL 4.1
KPI Score 2.46 6.5.2 Competencies Competencies Weightage : 40% Competency Required Rating Comments Level Communication A1+ 4
Team Work A1+ 4
Innovation & Change A1+ 3
Leadership A1+ 4
Drive & resilience A1+ 4
Cultural sensitivity A1+ 4
Business Acumen A1+ 5
204
Strategic Thinking A1+ 4
Total 32 Average Score 4 Competency Score 1.6 6.5.3 Overall Rating KPI Score + Competency Score = Overall Rating 2.46 + 1.6 = 4.06 The staff who achieves the overall rating of 4.06 falls into the category “exceeds
some requirements” and the salary increment and the bonus for the year will be
paid accordingly to pre-determined levels, which will be less than those who
“meet all” but more than those who just “meet requirements”, “need some
improvement” and “need most improvement”.
6.5.4 Success Criteria The system enables the corporation to achieve the following:
• Demonstrate that the performance management is a shared responsibility
between the employer and staff
• Increase focus on performance
• Align individual staff goals/KPIs with Group, Company and Departmental
objectives
• Improve rigor and calibration when setting target for the KPIs
• Set mutual performance expectations
• Increase focus on ongoing feedback and coaching
• Identify opportunities for staff development
• Increase focus on evaluating actual performance
• Improve the linkage between individual staff performance and rewards
205
6.5.5 Common challenges faced:
• Projects are often given in the course of the year
• Goals keep changing throughout the year
• Too many external factors beyond my control
• Inappropriate targets
• The boss keeps giving me new things to do
7.0 The Productivity Linked Wage System
The Productivity-Linked Wage System (PLWS) has been recognized as
one of the measures to enhance Malaysia’s competitiveness. This system
will ensure that wage increases commensurate with productivity
increases. With higher productivity or performance, both employees and
firms should enjoy higher returns in terms of wages and profitability
respectively and ultimately contribute to higher standard of living and
better quality of life. The PLWS takes into account workers’ basic needs
and recommends that those who excelled in productivity are rewarded for
their efforts. Companies should strategize and link wages to productivity
to ensure that they remain competitive in a globalised economy.
The importance of PLWS has been mentioned in several National Plans.
One of the human policy thrusts in the Eighth Malaysia Plan, 2001-2005
emphasises the need to accelerate the implementation of PLWS to ensure
that wages are closely linked with productivity. The Third Outline
Perspective Plan, 2001-2010 (OPP3) stresses that wage increases should
commensurate with improvement in productivity to enhance the
competitiveness of the economy. It was also stated in the National
Economic Recovery Plan (1998) that wage increases should reflect
productivity gains of the country in order to remain competitive and
206
recommended the implementation of a flexible wage system that is linked
to productivity/performance.
There is a need to accelerate implementation of the PLWS, so as to
ensure that wages are closely linked with productivity. By implementing
the PLWS, employers will be able to develop a wage structure that is able
to withstand economic changes and improve its competitive edge. At the
same time, a wider and systematic approach towards improving
productivity and wages through the active involvement and cooperation of
employees can be developed. The system also provides the motivating
factor, as employees will be rewarded for their efforts and will obtain a fair
share of the gains for productivity improvements.
7.1 Productivity-Linked Wage System Models
PLWS provides a formal framework linking wage increases to productivity
growth and comprises two main components namely the fixed and variable
components. The fixed component comprises the basic wages and annual
increment which provides income stability, acts as an indicator of the value for
of the job in the market and reflects the cost of living. The variable
components provide the variability determined by workers’ performances,
company’s profitability and performance of the economy. Three generic
models were developed for companies to adapt and adopt:
• Profitability model
• Productivity model
• Profitability/Productivity Matrix
207
7.1.1 Profitability Model In this model, the variable performance bonus payment is dependent on the
company’s profitability. The quantum to be paid will be determined by a profit-
sharing formula that is agreed upon by management and union/workers
representative which is reviewed periodically. Wage incentives are paid if profits
exceed a pre-determined or threshold level.
7.1.2 Productivity Model Companies can also adopt the productivity model. A variable productivity
payment will be paid based on productivity improvement of the company or
individual. Wage incentives for the year would commensurates with productivity
increases. The formula for productivity measurement should be discussed and
agreed upon by both management and workers.
7.1.3 Profitability Productivity Matrix This two dimensional model links profitability and productivity. The bonus
payment made is dependent on both the worker’s productivity and company’s
profitability.
7.2 Steps in Implementing PLWS To encourage firm level implementation of a wage system that is linked to
productivity or performance, concerted efforts from the government, employers
and employees are required. There are various steps which a firm needs to fulfill
before PLWS can be successfully implemented. The following flowchart will
provide a guide for firms intending to implement PLWS (figure 5.1).
208
Feedback from
workers/
Figure 5.1: Steps in Implementing PLWS
Create awareness on PLWS among top management of the firm through briefings/seminars
Educate workers on PLWS: - The importance of PLWS - The need for its implementation
Set up in-house committee to develop PLWS. Committee should include management
and employees
Compile data for measurement at firm level - Productivity & wages data - Develop a formula which best suits the firm
Review and adjust
Implement the system
Verify the measurement
to be used
Implement the measurement on
a trial basis
209
Source: Handbook on Productivity Linked Wage System, National Productivity Corporation, 2005
The steps in implementing PLWS are as follows: Step 1: Creating Awareness of PLWS To encourage firms to adopt the PLWS, all employees must be made aware of
the system and educated on the rationale of the benefits of the system.
Employees must be convinced of the gains that will be shared by both parties in
the long run. Frequent discussions need to be organized over a period of time to
ensure that everyone in the organization is aware of the new system. A
feedback mechanism must also be established to accept views and opinions
from employees. An in-house /working committee or taskforce responsible for the
implementation of the system should be set up to facilitate the process. Ideally,
the committee should comprises representatives from different departments and
different levels of employees to ensure that everyone’s concerns are
incorporated and understood.
Step 2: Development of Measurement Tools One of the easiest ways to integrate productivity as part of an organizational
culture is to constantly make reference to it in quantitative terms. When
measurable, it becomes easier to monitor progress, provide feedback, evaluate
performance and set quantifiable productivity objectives. Management and
workers should work together to develop the best formula for linking wages to
productivity. This can also be linked to their profitability or other performance
indicators that are deemed suitable for the company. By having a measurement
system in place, the variable component can be adjusted according to the
company’s performance. These measurements does not need to be too technical
but must be agreed upon by both management and workers. The key for
developing the measurement will be to identify the key areas for improvement
and link them to the wage system. Any improvement in the key areas identified
will lead to an increase in the variable component of wages. For firm level
210
measurement, National Productivity Corporation (NPC) has developed the
Company Productivity Assessment (COMPASS) which is a software containing a
host of measures for firms to adopt and adapt.
Step 3: Transition Period The transformation of the present wage system to a more variable one needs to
be facilitated. A phasing-in period should be allowed to put the PLWS into
practice and periodic reviews need to be made to rectify any discrepancies.
Normally, during the phasing-in period, employees will not suffer any undue loss
in income. Employees will still be getting wages from the present system while a
simulation of the new system is being carried out. An effective communication
channel needs to be established to keep employees informed of the development
and to give feedback on any suggestions for improvements. Management and
unions should appreciate the constraints in implementing the PLWS and should
work together during the transition period to sort out any differences and allow
provision for adjustments from time to time.
Step 4: Implementation of PLWS After the phasing-in period, increment in wages could be freely negotiated on an
annual basis at firm level. By then, management and workers should have
prepared themselves for such enterprise level negotiations and the wage
determination formula and data would also have been developed by them. The
choice of the method to link wages to productivity depends on the nature of the
enterprise and on the consensus between employers and employees on the
formula to be used. The following factors are relevant for the successful
implementation of the system at firm level:
There must be harmonious labour management relations and
mutual trust, information sharing and understanding.
Ensure annual increments are realistic after taking into account
inflation, economic growth and productivity growth when
determining annual increments.
211
Document a formula to determine the variable payment. Any
system developed must be simple to administer and the process of
determining the formula should be consulted between employers
and employees.
The wage system should be applicable to the whole company.
There must be sufficient dissemination for the employees on the
formula developed, to ensure that employees understand how their
variable payments are calculated.
Allow for transition period where both the present and new systems
run at parallel levels and are constantly monitored. During this
period, there must be willingness to review and make adjustments
and changes.
Overall, the wage system should be specific, measurable,
achievable, realistic and time specific.
7.3 Criteria for Successful PLWS Implementation
Awareness and Commitment from Top Management Top management should be made aware of PLWS, and how the system can
contributes to improve the company’s competitive edge. Commitment from
management is mandatory to ensure that the system can be successfully
implemented at company level.
Information Sharing and Element of Trust Effective implementation of the system requires, management disclose
relevant financial information, future prospects of the company as well as the
company’s and industry’s performance. This is to avoid unwarranted union
resistance and employees’ suspicion.
212
Consideration for Workers Welfare A major concern among workers is job stability and stable income. The
general consensus among workers is the unwillingness to change from a
wage system which incorporates automatic wage increases to a system that
is based on performance/productivity. An acceptable wage system should
also take into account the workers’ welfare and livelihood.
Reward for Improved Performance The PLWS basically consists of two components, the fixed component which
comprises the basic salary and an annual increment plus an additional
component in the form of variable payment. Thus, the fixed component would
serves as the measure of stability while the variable component ensures that
improved performance is properly rewarded.
Collaborative Effort The productivity/performance measurement should be collaboratively
developed by both employer and employee. The key indicators to be used
should be agreed upon by both parties to avoid any misunderstandings.
Assurance of the New System A transition period where the PLWS is phased-in is encouraged during the
implementation of the system. During this period, the PLWS could be
simulated and reviews should be made to ensure that the system is fair to
both employer as well as the employee.
Global Competition Employees should be exposed to the reality of global competition and its
effect on competitiveness at both national and firm level. Lack of knowledge
and exposure of the international market scenario will create unnecessary
resistance and rejection towards the system.
213
Human Resource Development Human Resource Development is important in ensuring that a wage system
linking to productivity is successful. Staff training in areas of productivity
improvement and skills enhancement will enable workers to contribute
significantly to both output and productivity enhancement.
8.0 Company Case Experiences
It is imperative for companies to enhance competitiveness. This can be
achieved through the implementation of PLWS which link the payment of
wages to productivity and or performance. Two case studies of
companies who had implemented the system are presented:
• SKF Bearing Industries (M) Sdn. Bhd
• Maestro Swiss Management Services Sdn. Bhd.
8.1 SKF Bearing Industries (M) Sdn. Bhd 8.1.1 Overview of the Company
SKF bearing industries (M) Sdn. Bhd. was established in 1992. It is a
Swedish owned company that produces deep grove ball bearings and
spherical roller bearings that are used in elevators, paper making
machinery, electric motors, excavators, industrial fans, cars and
household appliances. The products are marketed to Japan, the Asia
Pacific and Europe. The company uses state of the art equipment for
producing quality bearings. The company adopted the Total Quality
Management (TQM) concept which emphasized on improving customer
satisfaction and expectations. Among the TQM activities which were
practiced by the company included Quality Improvement Teams, KAIZEN
214
activities, and the Just In Time system which resulted in cost and quality
improvements.
To further improve these processes, the company benchmarked against
other SKF factories around the world and is now a benchmark for many
Malaysian industries. The company also emphasized the human factor
which includes facilities for staff and allowances as well as opportunities
for career advancements. An intensive start up human resource
development programme for staff was provided for the employees in
Europe while 2% of the company’s budget is allocated for human resource
development. The company has in-house trainers and provides on the job
training. Employees are encouraged to contribute innovative ideas and
rewards given for feasible ideas.
8.1.2 SKF’s Wage System
To improve productivity and company performance, the company has
shifted from an automatic annual increment system to one that is linked to
performance. The system comprised of the following:
Total Salary = Base Salary + Fixed Bonus + Variable Bonus.
The new model was developed in line with the SKF’s group renewal
mission “To contribute to SKF shareholders value expectation”. In this
model, bonus schemes were developed the both non-management and
management groups.
215
Non-Management Group Variable Bonus The variable bonus was paid based on
• Company’s Profits
• Business Operating Income (BOI)
And is payable at the end of each financial year. Example of variable bonus calculation: Variable Bonus = BOI Threshold one month (X) + Over and above normal performance (Y). The bonus is then determined on the X and Y factors. If for a certain year
the company’s profits are below par, then each employee will receive one
month bonus. However, if the profit level is above the threshold level set,
then the management will pay according based on the performance:
8.1.3 Performance Based Bonus System Business Operating Income Fixed Bonus Variable Bonus Total (RM Million) (X) (Y) Months) Less than 10 1 0 1 11 1 0.25 1.25 12 1 0.5 1.5 13 1 0.75 1.75 14 1 1.0 1.0 15 1 1.25 2.25 16 1 1.5 2.5 17 1 1.75 2.75 18 1 2.0 3.0
216
Management Group Variable Bonus Total Bonus = Fixed Bonus + Variable Factors Variable Factors and weighted and these include:
• BOI
• Productivity
• Zero Accident
• Efficiency
• Working Climate Analysis : level of improvements
8.1.4 Factors for Successful Implementation
• Objectives of the organization are defined to suit employees
scheme
• Employees are encourage to develop their own performance level
in line with business objectives
• Communication and transparency is important. This has helped
employees accept the system
• Identify gaps in performance
• Performance gaps identified and human resource development
undertaken to enhance performance.
217
8.2 Maestro Swiss Management Services Sdn. Bhd.
Overview of the Company
Maestro Swiss Group is a leading manufacturer and marketer of chocolates and
chocolate products namely cocoa powder, cocoa butter, other cocoa based
products including chocolate malt food drinks, sweets, watfers and other
confectioneries in Malaysia. It has been in the business for over 27 years and
currently, the group is ISO 9001 certified. Prior to 1999 it was known as
Chocolate Products (M) Bhd. Among the brands that the company produces are
“Vochelle”, “Darry”, “CP”, “Maestro Swiss”, and “Vico”.
The group has about 350 employees comprising 50% males and 50% females.
Most of the employees have been with the company between 10 – 30 years and
have vast working experience in the industry. The workers are unionesed under
the Food Industry Employees Union. The company’s wage system before the
group was formed was based on fixed annual increments and the number of
years of service.
Maestro Swiss Wage System
Since the inception of the new group “Maestro Swiss”, the company embarked
on a new wage system which takes into account productivity of the company and
links this productivity towage increments. This is to ensure that competitiveness
of the company is sustained and employees are rewarded according to their
performance. To calculate productivity the company adopts the Added Value
concept.
218
Added Value Concept
Added Value measures the wealth created through the production process and is
distributed to those who have contributed to the value creation. The Added value
formula is as follows :
Added Value = Total Output with less Bought-in Materials and Services
From this added value, productivity is calculated. The company uses labour
competitiveness to obtain its productivity ration.
Labour Competitiveness = Added Value / Labor Cost
= Added Value / Number of Employees
Labor Cost/Number of Employees
= Labor Productivity
Wage Rate
For Example : If added value = RM1,650,000 and number of employees is 200,
labour productivity will be : RM1,650,000/200 = RM8,250 per employee
If labour cost = RM200,000 then average wage rate for each employee will be :
RM200,00/200 = RM1,000 per employee
The company’s productivity will therefore be :
FM8,250/RM1,000 = RM8.25
For every RM1.00 of labour cost, RM8.25 of value added is generated.
219
Productivity Model
The Productivity model is used to link productivity to wage increments. The
formula used is as flows : T = A + P where, T = Salary Increment
A = CPI Adjustment Based on 2/3 of Average increase of last 3
calendar years of CPI x Basic Salary
P = % P (% variable increment x Basic Salary (Refer to Table
1) where maximum CPI taken for any particular year is
6.0%
Example of Productivity Model Year 1 If a worker’s basic salary is RM1,000.00 per month and the CPI for the past 3
years is 2.5, 3.5 and 4.0 respectively and productivity improvement of the worker
is >4-8% (Table 1), then based on the productivity model his salary increment will
be as follows :
T = A + P A = (2/3 x 3.33% (average CPI for 3 years)) x RM1,000.00 (base salary) =
RM22.00 + P = (3% (variable productivity payment) x RM1,000) = RM30.00
New Salary = RM1,000.00 + RM22.00 + RM30.00 = RM1,052.00
Year 2 Based on an average 3 years CPI of 3.5% and a variable productivity payment of
>8-12% (Table 1), his salary increment will be :
T = A + P
220
A = RM1,052.00 x (2/3 x 3.5% (average CPI for 3 years)) + P = RM25.00 +
(RM1,025 x 5% = RM53.00)
New Salary = RM1,052.00 + RM78.00 = RM1,130.00
In year 2, productivity has improved, therefore, the increment is higher :
Table 1 : Productivity Improvement / Variable Increment Table
Peformance
Productivity Improvement (Current
period vs. Previous Period) %
% P = Variable
Increment
Excellent > 12 9
Good > 8 – 12 5
Average > 4 – 8 3
Improvement Needed < 4 or = 4 1
Based on Table 1, if the company achieves a productivity improvement of
between > 4-8% then an employee will receive a 3% increase in the variable
payment. The higher the productivity improvement, the higher the variable
increments thus rewarding an employee with a bigger quantum. No matter wht
the productivity increments, the employee is still guaranteed his basic salary plus
annual increment which will not be less than 2/3 of the average increase of the
CPI over the previous three year period.
221
Based on the above examples, the table for the Salary Structure is as follows:
SALARY STRUCTURE
JOB GRADE
POSITION MINRM
FORMULA FOR ANNUAL INCREMENT
MAX RM
PROMOTION INCREMENT QUANTUM
1 Senior Technician 1 Senior clerk
900 2,000 120
2 Senior Technician II Senior Clerk II
800 1,800 100
3 Technician Clerk II
700 1,700 80
4 Clerk I Production Worker 1
600
T = A+P where, T = Salary Increment A = CPI Adjustment based on 2/3 of average increase of Last 3 calendar years of CPI X basic Salary; P = % P (% variable increment : Refer to productivity table) X basic Salary; Where maximum CPI taken for any particular calendar year is 6.0%.
1,400 50
Factors for Successful Implementation
Good relations with the union and continuous negotiations helped the
company introduce the new wage system.
The company was transparent in its dealings with the workers and this
made the workers willing to accept the system
The company used a step-by-step approach whereby the workers were
given time to absorb the intricacies of the new system. The workers were
also well informed of any changes to the new system.
222
9.0 Conclusion
The implementation of the Performance based Remuneration System among
enterprises in Malaysia had been identified as one of the initiatives to enhance
productivity and competitiveness of the country. The economy will be more
competitive if companies rationalize cost through higher productivity. Various
national development plans had also emphasized the need for linking wages to
performance, specifically the Productivity Linked Wage System (PLWS).
The PLWS will enable enterprises to adopt a systematic approach in linking
wages to productivity and to sustain labour cost competitiveness. Three
approaches had been developed to linke wages to productivity based on
Profitability, Productivity and the Productivity/Profitability Matrix. By
implementing the PLWS, performance of the enterprise will improve and
adjustments to accommodate changes in the business environment can be made
promptly. The system will ensure a Win-Win situation for both employers and
employees.
223
References:
Annual Productivity Report 2006, National Productivity Corporation, Malaysia;
Productivity-Linked Wage System, 2005, National Productivity Corporation,
Malaysia;
Handbook on Productivity Linked Wage System, 2000, National Productivity
Corporation, Malaysia;
Economic Report, Malaysia, various issues, Ministry of Finance;
Ninth Malaysia Plan, 2006-2010, Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s
Department, Malaysia;
Third Outline Perspective Plan, 2001-2010, Economic Planning Unit, Prime
Minister’s Department, Malaysia.
Third Industrial Master Plan (IMP3, 2006-2020)
World Competitiveness Year book (WCY), Institute for Management
Development (IMD), Lausanne, Switzerland various issues.