Developing Document Image Retrieval System

19
K. Zagoris, K. Ergina and N. Papamarkos Developing Document Image Retrieval System Image Processing and Multimedia Laboratory Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Democritus University of Thrace, 67100 Xanthi, Greece

description

A system was developed able to retrieve specific documents from a document collection. In this system the query is given in text by the user and then transformed into image. Appropriate features were in order to capture the general shape of the query, and ignore details due to noise or different fonts. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of our system, we used a collection of noisy documents and we compared our results with those of a commercial OCR package.

Transcript of Developing Document Image Retrieval System

Page 1: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

K. Zagoris, K. Ergina and N. Papamarkos

Developing Document Image Retrieval System

Image Processing and Multimedia LaboratoryDepartment of Electrical & Computer

EngineeringDemocritus University of Thrace,

67100 Xanthi, Greece

Page 2: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

Phenomenal growth of the size of multimedia data and especially document images

Caused by the easiness to create such images using scanners or digital cameras

Huge quantities of document images are created and stored in image archives without having any indexing information

The Document Retrieval Problem

Page 3: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

The overall structure of the Document Image Retrieval System

Page 4: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

Binarization (Otsu Technique)

Original Document

Preprocessing stage

Median Filter

Page 5: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

Indentify all the Connected Components (CCs)

Calculate the most common height of the document CCs (CCch)

Reject the CCs with height less than 70% of the CCch. That only reject areas of punctuation points and noise.

Expand the left and right sides of the resulted CCs by 20% of the CCch

The words are the merged overlapping CCs

Using the Connected

Components Labeling

and Filtering method

Word Segmentation

Page 6: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

Width to Height RatioWord Area Density. The percentage of the

black pixels included in the word-bounding box

Center of Gravity. The Euclidean distance from the word’s center of gravity to the upper left corner of the bounding box:

Features

(1,0) (0,1)

(0,0) (0,0)

,x y

M MC C

M M

( , )qp

pqx y

x yM f x y

width height

Page 7: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

Vertical Projection. The first twenty (20) coefficients of the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) of the smoothed and normalized vertical projection.

Features

Original Image

The Vertical Projection

Smoothed and normalized

Page 8: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

Top – Bottom Shape Projections. A vector of 50 elementsThe first 25 values are the first 25 coefficients of the

smoothed and normalized Top Shape Projection DCT The rest 25 values are equal to the first 25 coefficients of the

smoothed and normalized Bottom Shape Projection DCT.

Features

Page 9: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

Upper Grid Features is a ten element vector with binary values which are extracted from the upper part of each word image.

Down Grid Features is a ten element vector with binary values which are extracted from the lower part of the word image.

Features

Page 10: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

Upper – Down Grid Features

[0,0,0,1195 ,0,0,0,0,0,0][0,0,0,1 ,0,0,0,0,0,

0]

[0,0,0,0 ,0,0,0, 598 , 50 , 33 ]

[0,0,0,0 ,0,0,0,1,1,0]

Page 11: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

Descriptor

The Structure of

the Descriptor

Page 12: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

User enters a query word The proposed system creates an image of the

query word with font height equal to the average height of all the word-boxes obtained through the Word Segmentation stage of the Offline operation.

For our experimental set the average height is 50

The font type of the query image is ArialThe smoothing and normalizing of the various

features described before, suppress small differences between various types of fonts

Query Image Creation

Page 13: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

The Matching Process

Page 14: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

100 image documents created artificially from various texts

Then Gaussian and “Salt and Pepper” noise was added

Implement in parallel a text search engine which makes easier the verification and evaluation of the search results of the proposed system

Experimental Document Database

Page 15: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

Implementation

o Visual Studio

2008

o Microsoft .NET

Framework 2.0

o C# Language

o Microsoft SQL

Server 2005

http://orpheus.ee.duth.gr/irs2_5/

Page 16: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

Evaluation

o Precision and

the Recall metrics

o 30 searches in

100 document

images

o Font Query:

Arial

Mean Precision: 87.8% Mean Recall: 99.26%

Page 17: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

FineReader® 9.0 OCR Program

EvaluationQuery Font Name “Tahoma”.

Mean Precision: 76.67% Mean Recall: 58.42%

Mean Precision: 89.44% Mean Recall: 88.05%

Page 18: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

The query word is given in text and then transformed to word image

The proposed system extract nine (9) powerful features for the description of the word images

These features describe satisfactorily the shape of the words while at the same moment they suppress small differences due to noise, size and type of fonts

Based on our experiments the proposed system performs better in the same database than a commercial OCR package

Conclusion

Page 19: Developing Document Image Retrieval System

Thank you!