Revision 2.0 3 November 2016 / For Official Use Only Uncontrolled when printed or downloaded

Developer / Project Details

Developer Name

Development Name / Stage

Number of Allotments

Suburb

Drawing Number

Contract Number

SA Water Docket Number

Audit Submission Number (e.g. 1,2 etc)

Accredited Consultant details

Designer name

Phone

Email

Note: All below items require a response. Any requirements marked ‘No’ should be supported by a comment to help determine if SA Water audit should proceed.

Requirements for Audit

Has the concept design been considered?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐ Is stage boundary clearly defined?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐

Is the Safety in design report attached?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐ Are all allotments serviced?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐

Have drawings been checked and signed?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐ Is main correctly located (allocation of space)?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐

Is the drawing title block completed?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐ Are main sizes and materials correct? For >300 has approval been sought for pipe and fittings?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐

Revision 2.0 3 November 2016 / For Official Use Only

Uncontrolled when printed or downloaded

Requirements for Audit (cont)

Are appurtenances correctly used and spaced?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐ Have WSA02 service clearances been achieved?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐

Is stage boundary clearly shown?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐ Are ties shown to all appurtenances and bends?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐

Are drawings at correct scale?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐ Are SWD’s shown? Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐

Are contract and connection notes completed?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐ Are Existing/Design levels shown on plan?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐

Are Existing/Future mains shown and labelled?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐ Has availability been considered and shown?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐

Is a Detail included for ‘non-standard’ locations? E.g. Crossings or bored installations.

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐ Does Long Section detail the sewer, connections, inverts, grades etc?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐

Are details consistently referenced on all sheets?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐ Is Fitting Schedule complete and correct?

Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A ☐

Comments

Revision 2.0 3 November 2016 / For Official Use Only

Uncontrolled when printed or downloaded

Note: Signing of this document signifies designs have been developed in compliance with SA Water standards, the Accredited Consultant has undertaken their own internal quality audit, and drawings are considered of an appropriate standard for the audit to proceed.

Chartered Engineers sign-off

Chartered Engineer name

Phone

Email

Signature

For internal use

Reviewing Officer

Date

SA Water audit can proceed Yes ☐ No ☐

Notes: 1. The Accredited Consultant’s Chartered Engineer is responsible for:

a. ensuring each drawing has been designed to SA Water standardsb. reviewed for quality and consistency prior to submission to SA Water.

2. For all design submissions this checklist shall be: a. completed and signed by the Chartered Engineer responsible for the technical content of the Design Drawings.b. provided to SA Water with the Design Drawings.

Version 1.00 17/11/16 Issued Document ID:SAWL-ENG-0001For Official Use Only Uncontrolled when printed or downloaded