Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

22
Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field Warfare Agents using Field - - Portable Portable Gas Chromatography Gas Chromatography - - Mass Mass Spectrometry Systems: Instrument Spectrometry Systems: Instrument and Sampling Strategy and Sampling Strategy Considerations Considerations

Transcript of Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

Page 1: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using FieldWarfare Agents using Field--Portable Portable

Gas ChromatographyGas Chromatography--Mass Mass Spectrometry Systems: Instrument Spectrometry Systems: Instrument

and Sampling Strategy and Sampling Strategy ConsiderationsConsiderations

Page 2: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

Capabilities without InstrumentationM8 PaperM8 Paper(simple)(simple)

M256 KitM256 Kit(complicated)(complicated)

P

O

O

CH3

H3C CH3S Cl

Page 3: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

Why use GC-MS?

(1) “Gold standard” orthogonal data provided

(2) Capable of identifying unknown compoundsby mass spectrum match

Arguing against GC-MS use:

(1) Large, power-hungry instrument

(2) Spectral interpretation can be difficult

(3) Sample prep, analysis can take considerable time

Page 4: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

GC-MS “guts”-two approaches

Man-portable instrument

Resistively-heated LTM GC column

Field-portable instrument

Page 5: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

Field-portable instrument

Page 6: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

GB

GD HD

GF

Man-portable GC-MS system

Page 7: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME)as field sampling method, followedby GC-MS analysis in a more capablefield instrument package

2 of 3 fibers extended for sampling;Circled area has sorbent coating of1 fiber

Alternate Approach

Page 8: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

CW/DVB & PA Fiber UptakeHD, 12 µg in 15 mL vial

Headspace, Ambient Temperature

ClS

Cl

GC

/MS

TIC

Are

a R

espo

nse

HD

Pea

k

10 30 40 50 60 700 20

Sampling Time (min)

Page 9: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

Sarin (GB)

1 minute passive gas-phase SPME sample, mobile-lab analysis

Page 10: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

Sulfur Mustard (HD)

1 minute passive gas-phase SPME sample of contaminated cloth-mobile-lab analysis

Page 11: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

VX

1 µL VX applied to 5 cm2 undershirt material1 minute passive headspace SPME sample, 50 °CMobile-lab field analysis

Page 12: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

VX Degradation SPME Method

30 minute passive SPME sampleMobile-laboratory field analysis

Safer –degraded VX

Reliable –Intact VX in soil ishighly unpredictable

Page 13: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

Fast Sampling has been shown with SPMECan we Speed up Analysis?

Resistively heated LTM GC column(externally mounted)

Page 14: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

Rapid Combined Sampling/Analysis5 min SPME samples from contaminated air

Use low thermal mass resistivelyheated columnIn place of airBath GC oven

2.0Retention time (min)

120 °C/min

40° C/min

GB GDHD

GF

Page 15: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

30s SPMEHeadspace

AboveContaminated Cloth

2.5 min total analysis

Sarin SomanSulfurmustard

GF1s SPME

2s SPME

15s SPME

LTM resistivelyheated columnIn place of airBath GC oven

Page 16: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

Rapid Combined Sampling/Analysis5 min SPME samples from contaminated water

GB140 AMU

GD182 AMU

HD158 AMU

GA162 AMU

VX267 AMU

T2 Toxin466 AMU

LTM resistivelyheated columnIn place of airBath GC oven

Page 17: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

Need: Test atmosphere with a wide rangeof chemicals having different properties

Hapsite and SPME sampling selectivity can be studied with

such an atmosphere

Page 18: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

(CS)

CH3Cl

C

N

ClCN

ClCNNC

Cl

CH

O

Hapsite sampledsuccessfully for

Volatiles in this range(next slide)

5 min passive SPMESample shown here,field GC/MS analysis

Page 19: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

Cl

C8H10 isomers(ethylbenzene, xylenes)

CH3

Benzonitrile not observed

TenaxConcentratorSampleIntroduction

Hapsite SelectivitySame atmosphere sampled as previous

slide only light compounds observed

Cl

Gas LoopSample Introduction

Page 20: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

(CS)

CH3Cl

C

N

ClCN

ClCNNC

Cl

CH

O

Hapsite sampledsuccessfully for

Volatiles in this range(previous slide)

5 min passive SPMESample shown here,field GC/MS analysis

Page 21: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

Hapsite Hapsite SPME/GC-MS(MS-only)

Mass of sampler 16 kg 16 kg 0.035 kg

Sample throughput 3/hr >10/hr? >10/hr?

GC/MS systems 3 1 1and operatorsneeded for 10samples/hr

Cost for GC-MS $300k+ $100k+ $140kSystem(s) sufficientfor 10 samples/hr

Page 22: Detection of Gas Phase Chemical Warfare Agents using Field

Next?Next?

Build prototype low thermal mass GC columnmated directly to a mass spectrometer –a drastic reduction ofmass, footprint, and volume with superior heating/coolingcharacteristics

Laboratory-gradeinstrument capabilitieswithout the van