Detecting Quotations in Spoken...

1
Aim of the research ARs in Spoken Dialogues VS Written Text The importance of prosody for detecting quotations Attribution Relations in Written Texts Annotation scheme for ARs customized for dialogues ARs in Spoken Dialogues Attribution Relations (ARs) connect quotations, opinions and other third party information to their rightful source. The work done so far for automatic detection of ARs has dealt only with written text. Detecting Attributions in speech is important for: speaker identification dialogue structure extraction of references to named entities dialogue parsing The crucial role played by punctuation in written texts is replaced in speech by prosody. To detect ARs in speech we should consider both the linguistic and the acoustic levels. Knowing the source of a given piece of information changes the way we intepret and rely on it. Current approaches to automatic ARs extraction rely on lexical cues and punctuation, which can be crucial to detect the extent of the attributed span (Content). PARC (Pareti 2012) is a corpus of news articles. The Speech Attribution Relations Corpus (SARC) is a corpus of informal telephone conversations. Differences punctuation absent and replaced by prosody different cue verbs (he's like, he goes) syntax less reliable since it's all fragmented I'd like to thank Bonnie Webber for her suggestions and comments. Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1993). English speech rhythm: Form and function in everyday verbal interaction (Vol. 25). John Benjamins. Bolden, G. (2004). The quote and beyond: defining boundaries of reported speech in conversational Russian. Journal of pragmatics, 36(6), 1071-1118. References In spoken language, prosody replaces the role of punctuation. Klewitz & Couper-Kuhlen (1999) found prosodic features which are “flags” of reported speech: 2. Quotations without Cue. Which is the Content of the quotation and who is the author? Detecting Quotations in Spoken Dialogues Building the Corpus Alessandra Cervone [email protected] Acknowledgements Speaker 2: outLine Speaker 1: inLine DATA: Telephone conversations with each speaker recorded on a different track ACOUSTIC ANNOTATION: Transcription Annotation of the Content of the quotations TOKENIZATION LINGUISTIC ANNOTATION: Annotation of the remaining ARs: Sources, Cues and Supplements SARC PARC REGISTER Informal Formal MEAN Oral Written GENRE Dialogue News(WSJ) TOKENS 12k, 1h30 1.139k AR/1k TOKENS 12,4 9,2 The authors have not supported their claims with any statistics. Can these “flags” be identified and what is their role in marking the presence of reported speech? Klewitz, G., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1999). Quote-unquote? The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences. Universität Konstanz, Philosophische Fakultät, Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft. Pareti, S., & Prodanof, I. (2010). Annotating Attribution Relations: Towards an Italian Discourse Treebank. In LREC. Pareti, S., (2012). A Database of Attribution Relations. In Proceedings of the Eighth conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation LREC12, Istanbul, 23-25 May 2012. Conclusions and Future Work The examples presented shows that prosody plays a crucial role in determining presence and extent of ARs in speech. Future work: Annotate other 3 hours of dialogues Acoustic Analysis: Test the claims made by Klewitz & Couper-Kuhlen (1999) Linguistic Analysis: Contrastively evaluate the lexical realisation of ARs in speech (SARC) and written texts (SARC) Shifts in pitch register Shifts in intensity Shifts in the rhythm Peter Bell [email protected] Silvia Pareti [email protected] *“Fading out” (Bolden 2004) are cases where the ending boundary of a quotation is not clear. . Università degli Studi di Pavia 1. It seems a quotation but it is not: so I said to him when you left do you remember I told you I said to him don't forget Dave if you ever get in trouble give us a call you never know your luck outLine: so I said to him when you left do you remember I told you I said to him don't forget Dave if you ever get in trouble give us a call you never know your luck No No No No S1 S1 60 65 70 75 80 85 she wouldn't I said well but I said at the end of the day I said you could sell your house what for a loft and I said well yes if you really didn't have any money you'd have to sell it for a loft buy something smaller well I'm not going to do that and I thought well then you haven't not got any money then have you it's not really the same thing inLine: By only considering linguistic cues we would miss reported Speaker2 quotations. Prosody gives us the key to the correct interpretation. LEGENDA: Quotes reported Speaker 1 AR set Quotes reported Speaker 2 AR alone in its set Prasad, R., Dinesh, N., Lee, A., Joshi, A., & Webber, B. (2006, July). Annotating attribution in the penn discourse treebank. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Sentiment and Subjectivity in Text (pp. 31-38). Association for Computational Linguistics. 400 Hz 50 dB 100 dB 75 Hz PULSES INTENSITY PITCH TEXT No No No No S1 S1 125,0 145,0 165,0 185,0 dB Hz PAUSES Long pause just before the beginning of the Content PITCH Decrease of the pitch register with a stabilisation when the Content begins INTENSITY Decrease in the intensity with a stabilisation when the Content begins Data suggest a difference in the prosodic marking between the Content of the AR and the rest of the text. Preliminary Acoustic Analysis Mean PITCH Mean INTENSITY No No S1 No S1 No S1 S2 No S1 S1 S1 S2 No S1 S1(F) 60 65 70 75 80 PULSES PITCH INTENSITY TEXT 50 dB 100 dB 75 Hz 400 Hz Preliminary Acoustic Analysis PAUSES Long pause before both switches between the two reported speakers Long pause before the Fading out INTENSITY Shift to a higher Intensity before switches between normal text and Contents. The intensity gets particularly high in the two cases in which two different speakers are reported. Mean INTENSITY Annotation scheme for ARs (Pareti, 2010) * ] [ [ [ ] ]

Transcript of Detecting Quotations in Spoken...

Page 1: Detecting Quotations in Spoken Dialogueshomepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/s1052974/files/CervoneARSpokenDialogues.pdf · ARs in Spoken Dialogues VS Written Text ... defining boundaries of reported

Aim of the research

ARs in Spoken Dialogues VS Written Text

The importance of prosody for detecting quotations

Attribution Relations in Written Texts

Annotation scheme for ARs customized for dialogues

ARs in Spoken Dialogues

Attribution Relations (ARs) connect quotations, opinions and other third party information to their rightful source. The work done so far for automatic detection of ARs has dealt only with written text.

Detecting Attributions in speech is important for:● speaker identification● dialogue structure● extraction of references to named entities● dialogue parsing

The crucial role played by punctuation in written texts is replaced in speech by prosody. To detect ARs in speech we should consider both the linguistic and the acoustic levels.

Knowing the source of a given piece of information changes the way we intepret and rely on it. Current approaches to automatic ARs extraction rely on lexical cues and punctuation, which can be crucial to detect the extent of the attributed span (Content).

PARC (Pareti 2012) is a corpus of news articles.The Speech Attribution Relations Corpus (SARC) is a corpus of informal telephone conversations.

Differences ● punctuation absent and replaced by prosody● different cue verbs (he's like, he goes)● syntax less reliable since it's all fragmented

I'd like to thank Bonnie Webber for her suggestions and comments.

Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1993). English speech rhythm: Form and function in everyday verbal interaction (Vol. 25). John Benjamins.

Bolden, G. (2004). The quote and beyond: defining boundaries of reported speech in conversational Russian. Journal of pragmatics, 36(6), 1071-1118.

References

In spoken language, prosody replaces the role of punctuation.

Klewitz & Couper-Kuhlen (1999) found prosodic features which are “flags” of reported speech:

2. Quotations without Cue. Which is the Content of the quotation and who is the author?

Detecting Quotations in Spoken Dialogues

Building the Corpus

Alessandra Cervone [email protected]

Acknowledgements

Speaker 2: outLineSpeaker 1: inLine

DATA: Telephone conversations with each

speaker recorded on a different track

ACOUSTIC ANNOTATION:● Transcription

● Annotation of the Content of the quotations

TOKENIZATION

LINGUISTIC ANNOTATION: Annotation of the remaining ARs: Sources, Cues and Supplements

SARC PARC

REGISTER Informal Formal

MEAN Oral WrittenGENRE Dialogue News(WSJ)

TOKENS 12k, 1h30 1.139kAR/1k TOKENS 12,4 9,2

The authors have not supported their claims with any statistics. Can these “flags” be identified and what is their role in marking the presence of reported speech?

Klewitz, G., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1999). Quote-unquote? The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences. Universität Konstanz, Philosophische Fakultät, Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft.

Pareti, S., & Prodanof, I. (2010). Annotating Attribution Relations: Towards an Italian Discourse Treebank. In LREC.

Pareti, S., (2012). A Database of Attribution Relations. In Proceedings of the Eighth conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation LREC12, Istanbul, 23-25 May 2012.

Conclusions and Future WorkThe examples presented shows that prosody plays a crucial role in determining presence and extent of ARs in speech.

Future work: ● Annotate other 3 hours of dialogues● Acoustic Analysis: Test the claims made by Klewitz & Couper-Kuhlen (1999) ● Linguistic Analysis: Contrastively evaluate the lexical realisation of ARs in speech (SARC) and written

texts (SARC)

● Shifts in pitch register● Shifts in intensity● Shifts in the rhythm

Peter Bell [email protected]

Silvia Pareti [email protected]

*“Fading out” (Bolden 2004) are cases where the ending boundary of a quotation is not clear..

Università degli Studi di Pavia

1. It seems a quotation but it is not:

so I said to him when you left do you remember I told you I said to him don't forget Dave if you ever get in trouble give us a call you never know your luck

outLine: so I said to him when you left do you remember I told you I said to him don't forget Dave if you ever get in trouble give us a call you never know your luck

No No No No S1 S1606570758085

she wouldn't I said well but I said at the end of the day I said you could sell your house what for a loft and I said well yes if you really didn't have any money you'd have to sell it for a loft buy something smaller well I'm not going to do that and I thought well then you haven't not got any money then have you it's not really the same thing

inLine:

By only considering linguistic cues we would miss reported Speaker2 quotations. Prosody gives us the key to the correct interpretation.

LEGENDA: Quotes reported Speaker 1 AR set Quotes reported Speaker 2 AR alone in its set

Prasad, R., Dinesh, N., Lee, A., Joshi, A., & Webber, B. (2006, July). Annotating attribution in the penn discourse treebank. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Sentiment and Subjectivity in Text (pp. 31-38). Association for Computational Linguistics.

400 Hz

50 dB

100 dB

75 Hz

PULS

ESIN

TEN

SITY

PITC

HTE

XT

No No No No S1 S1125,0

145,0

165,0

185,0

dB

Hz

PAUSES ● Long pause just before the

beginning of the Content

PITCH● Decrease of the pitch

register with a stabilisation when the Content begins

INTENSITY● Decrease in the intensity

with a stabilisation when the Content begins

Data suggest a difference in the prosodic marking between the Content of the AR and the rest of the text.

Preliminary Acoustic Analysis

Mea

n PI

TCH

Mea

n IN

TEN

SITY

No No S1 No S1 No S1 S2 No S1 S1 S1 S2 No S1 S1(F)60

65

70

75

80

PULS

ESPI

TCH

INTE

NSI

TYTE

XT

50 dB

100 dB

75 Hz

400 Hz

Preliminary Acoustic Analysis

PAUSES● Long pause before both switches between the two reported speakers● Long pause before the Fading out

INTENSITY● Shift to a higher Intensity before switches between normal text and Contents. ● The intensity gets particularly high in the two cases in which two different speakers are reported.

Mea

n IN

TEN

SITY

Annotation scheme for ARs (Pareti, 2010)

*

]

[

[

[

]

]