Detect MSSM neutral Higgs bosons at LHC
description
Transcript of Detect MSSM neutral Higgs bosons at LHC
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Detect MSSM neutral Higgs bosons at LHC
Simonetta Gentile Università di Roma, La Sapienza, INFN
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Outline
Motivation Supersymmetric (SUSY) Higgs Experimental status Search at LHC,what can be done:
few examplesConclusions
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
The MSSM is the most investigated extension of SM provides:
The unification of coupling constants SUSY provides a ColdDarkMatter candidate
Three neutral Higgs bosons: A, CP-odd, and CP-even H, h the lightest. Two charged H+, and H-.
Large loop corrections depend on SUSY parameters
Minimal Super Symmetric Model
Unconstrained MSSM has huge number (105) of parametersin addition SM ones, making any phenomenogical analysis very complicated A simplified version at some GUT scale: CMSSM/mSUGRA Most of phenomenogical analysis models are based on that.
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
MSSM parameters constrains Msusy,sfermion mass at EW scale M2, SU(2)L gaugino mass at EW scale , supersymmetric Higgs boson mass parameter. tan , the ratio of the two Higgs fields doublets A0, a universal trilinear higgs-squarks coupling at EW scale. It is
assumed to be the same for up-type squarks and for down types quarks.
mA, mass of CP-odd Higgs boson. Mgluino, it affects loop corrections for stop and bottom
Phenomenology decribed at Born level by tan ,mA
ξ t b/ W/Zh cos/sin -sin/cos sin(-)H sin/sin cos/cos cos(-)A cot tan -----
: mixing angle between CP even Higgs bosons (calculable from tanand MA)
couplings: gMSSM = ξ · gSMno coupling of A to W/Zlarge tan: large BR(h,H,A,bb)
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Masses For MA> 150 GeV (decoupling
limit)The heavy MSSM Higgsess:
MA≈ MH ≈MH±
Sven HeinemeyerAtlas meeting 29.01.2008
Pythia 6.226 FeynHiggs2.2S.G, H.Bilokon,V.Chiarella,G.NicolettiATL-PHYS-PUB-2007-001
For MA< 135 GeV (Mhmax scenario)
The ligth MSSM Higgs is SM-like
MA≈ Mh
Pythia 6.226
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
•Main production mechanism ~SM•For high and moderate tan the production with b quarks is enhanced•For mA >>mZ A/H behave very similar →decoupling region
•A, H, H± cross section ~tan2
MSSM Higgs Production
V*=W/Z
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Production cross section
•At small tan gg→h,H,A dominant•Vector boson fusion process•pp→qq→qq+WW/ZZ→qq+h/H important at m h ~ m hmax
•Higgsstrahlung neglegible•At high tanassociatedb quarks production dominatespp → bb →h/H/A+ bb
=h,H,A
Abdelhak Djouadi arXiv:hep-ph/0503173v2 (2005)
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Branching ratio
Production rate
•Decay bb dominates,lower backgroundweaker sensitivy on SUSY parameters
2),,( fmAHh
•Decoupling region MA≥ 150 GeV tanb ≈30or MA≥ 400-500 GeV tan=3
Abdelhak Djouadi arXiv:hep-ph/0503173v2 (2005)
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Branching ratio
•Decay bb, dominates•Decay possible
•Intense coupling region tanb ≈30 MA~ 120-140 GeV Coupling to W,Z up quarks suppressedCoupling down quark (b) and enhanced
Abdelhak Djouadi arXiv:hep-ph/0503173v2 (2005)
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Benchmark scenarios mh max scenarioIt allows the maximum value for mh(Xt =2MSUSY).It can be obtained conservative tan exclusion bounds no-mixing scenarioNo mixing in scalar top sector (Xt =0)
small eff scenario
Hb coupling~ sin eff/ cos can be zero: eff→0:
Main decay mode vanishes, important search channel vanishes gluophobic Higgs scenariohgg coupling is small: main LHC production mode vanishes.
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
MSSM
Constrained: Two Higgs doublets →h0, H, A, H+, H-
Three neutral Higgs bosons: H, A, CP-odd, and hthe lightest CP-even.
Large loop corrections depend on SUSY parameters (expecially stop): Msusy, M2, , tan , A, mA,mgluino
Xt~ A= 61/2 Msusy , ||<< Msusy for maximal top mixing
Xt=0 no mixing scenario Measurement of Higgs masses, coupling and Br test of theory
Varying mA tanβ, keeping all other SUSY parameters fixed.
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
LEP legacy
Excluded: (mh
maxscenario)mh>92.8 GeV mA>93.4 GeV
Eur.Phys. J C 47, 547
Low tan is not completely excluded: search for LHCwith pp->A; A->Zh, , tt
Mt [GeV]=169.3174.3179.3183.0
tan 0.7 2.0 Excluded
High tan area for search at LHCwith pp->bb h/ H/Ah/H/A->, decays
MH±>78.6 GeV
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Exclusion Limits @ 95% CL
Interpretation of the limits
Anton Anastassov Aspen 2008
CDF & D0 have not observed a Higgs signal yet
Tevatron results
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Quest & strategy Look for MSSM bosons in the entire parameter space.Using the same analysis strategy for SM ,MSSM Among all channels studied from ATLAS and CMS
focus on:pp→bb h/ H/ A– moderate and high tan
h/ H/ A -> h/ H/ A ->
pp→A at low tan A→Zh
Z→ ( =e, ) h→bb
pp→A/H→ 02,3,4
02,3,4
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Light higgs bosonL =30fb-1
L =300fb-1
•VBF dominates at low luminosity•Large space covered by several channel•Region around mh~ 95GeV difficult•h→ channel at low masses
NOT UPDATED
h
h/A/HCMS TDR
ATLAS
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
bb h/A→bb
2
2
m
mProduction rateh→ and h →
•Associated h/A/H production with b-jets → large •The adavange of channel due to the mass is counterbalanced by difficulty of identify decays (smaller detector acceptance, in final state)• Excellent resolution of detectors
S.G., H.Bilokon, V.Chiarella,G.Nicoletti, Eur.Phys. J. C. 52, 229-245 (2007)
signal background
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
bb→h/A
• 2 pT>20GeV• 2 jets pT>10GeV• 1 b-jet (pT>15GeV)• M • -isolation,no hadronicactivity
Full detector simulationCorresponding to L=300fb-1
•Background bbZ→bb tt →bb ZZ→bb
Atlas : tan 15-50 mA 95-130 GeV
MA=110.31 GeV, Mh= 110 GeV, tan=45
Atla
s
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Background evaluation bbZ→bblarge cross section (≈ 22.8 pb) large theoretical uncertainties (≈ 25%) Proposed data driven method based on bbZ→bbee Rate of signal suppresed by Background same rate: same production diagram, and lepton universality different inner bremsstrahlung and detector reconstruction
Ratio stable & without large corrections factor
Atla
s
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
h/A/H significance reach
Mh max scenario
L=10 fb-1 L=30 fb-1 L=300 fb-1
Atla
s
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Discovery contours
---- no systematic
5 at L =30 fb-1
CMS TDR
H+A
h+H+Ah+A
ATLAS
Atla
s
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Others channel: decays Full leptonic: bbH→bb→e+ET
miss
Lower rate than full hadronic or hadronic/lepton Br(→l) ~0.17 Clean signal and easy trigger Higgs mass reconstruction using collinear approxomation Approssimation method requires excellent missing ETresolution Main background:Z+jet,ttbar,Zbb
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Higgs Search in A→ Zh channel
•Low tan region•Final state Z→ ll (l = e,m) h →bb•Low tan Mz+mh ≤ MA≤2mtop (highest Br)•Depends strongly on MSSM parameters•Main backgrounds: Zbb,ttbar and Z+jet•Systematic can be important
At Large value of M2 and can dominate→
L=30fb-1
signal
Zbb
tt
Z+jet
5 contour
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Summary of CMS reach in MA-tan
Associated production
Inclusive production
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
whole plane covered in CP conserving benchmark scenarios
significant area where only h is observable
ATLAS reach for MSSM Higgs bosons
L=300fb-1
At least one Higgs boson observable
significant area where only h is observable
Difficult to distinguish from SM
Not updated
Atla
s
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
LHC searches for MSSM higgsesOther discovery channels possible .. : h→ inclusive production and production in association tth final
states h,A,H → inclusive and bb associated H →bb in association with bb
h,A,H → with 2 , + -jet and 2 -jet final states. ..... gb → t H±, H± → gg →tt → H± bWb
Note:•They only include SM-particles to Higgs interactions•This assumes no interaction between Higgs & sparticle sectors:i.e., SUSY mass scales are heavy
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
SUSY & Higgs interplayIf SUSY kinematically accessible, then real production of
sparticles.
Higgs can decay directly to or come from decay of SUSY particles
Associated production modes: e.g, squark-squark-Higgs SUSY particles suppress or enhance loop induced
production or decays Higgs into sparticle decay modes can compete with SM modes:
H/A →0
202→ 4 ± X
H± →±
1→ 3 ± X
[1] F. Moortgat, S. Abdullin, D. Denegri”. hep-ph/0112046[2] M.Bisset, F. Moortgat and S. Moretti “Eur.Phys.J.C30:419-434,2003.[3] C. Hansen, N. Gollub, K. Assamagan, T. Ekelof Eur.Phys.J.C44S2:1-9,2005.
Pioneering papers:
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Access to low tan with
A/H->202
0->4 + ETmiss
BackgroundBackgroundSUSY, SM: tt, ZZ, ZbbSUSY, SM: tt, ZZ, Zbb
Selections:Selections:Lepton isolationLepton isolationJet vetoJet vetoEETT
missmiss, p, pTT4l4l < 80 GeV < 80 GeV
Z vetoZ veto
Chosen points in mSUGRAChosen points in mSUGRAPoint C after selectionsPoint C after selections
CMS
A/H susy decays
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Access to low tan with
A/H->202
0->4
tan = 10 150<m½ <250 m0 <120
tan = 5 150<m½ <250 30<m0 <120
CMS
A/H susy decays
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
A/H susy decaysA,H →
2,3,4 0
2,3,4→4 ±+ Emiss T
A,H →+2-
1,2 →4 ±+ Emiss T
M.Bisset,N.Kersting,F.Moortgat,S.Moretti,arXi:0709.10029[hep –ph]
=eμ
(pp →H/A) Br(A,H →4 ±+ N)
tan = 20 MA=500GeV
M2[
GeV
]
[GEV]
202
0
3,403,4
0
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Search in a LHC detector
Representive points studied: MSSM representative Points MSugra representative Points
Discovery potential in a typical LCH detector investigated with this selections:
4 leptons > 7.4 GeV
lepton Isolation 2pairs of opposite sign |MZ ±10 GeV| veto GeV
< 80 GeV
jet < 50 GeV
Point A M0=125 GeV tan=20Point B M0=400 GeV tan=20M½=165GeV sign()=+1 A0=0
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Reach for MSSM Higgs bosons in 0
2,3,402,3,4or 1,2
+2- pairs
Point 1 MA=500 GeV tan=20M1=90GeV M2=180 GeV =-500GeVMl=M= 250GeV mg=Mq=1000GeV
Point 2 MA=600 GeV tan=35M1=100GeV M2=200 GeV =-200GeVMl=150GeVM= 250Gev mg=800GeV Mq=1000GeV
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
SM decays limit derived with hypotesis that H/A can’t decay in SUSY particles. DIFFERENT parameter!!
1.H → ZZ* →4 2.tH →bH+,H+ → +cc3.tth ,h →bb4.h →5.bbH/A, H/A →bb6.H+ →tb +c.c.7.H/A →
8.H/A →
9.gb →tH+, H+ →→hh →bb→Zh →-bb12.H/A →tt
Discovery region for H/A →02,3,40
2,3,4 1,2+2
- Set 1 superimposed to Atlas discovery reach with SM particles
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
1.H → ZZ* →42.tH →bH+,H+ → +cc3.tth ,h →bb4.h →5.bbH/A, H/A →bb6.H+ →tb +c.c.7.H/A →
8.H/A →
9.gb →tH+, H+ →→hh →bb→Zh →bb12.H/A →ttSM decays limit derived with
hypotesis that H/A can’t decay in SUSY particles. DIFFERENT parameter!!
Discovery region for H/A →02,3,40
2,3,4 1,2+2
- Set 2 superimposed to Atlas discovery reach with SM particles
Simonetta Gentile, Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d’Aoste, 29 February.
Conclusions Atlas & CMS are preparing for first collision data Discovery potential of MSSM Higgs bosonhas been estimated by ATLAS and CMS. A early discovery of a neutral MSSM boson in somechannels (e.g.bb h/A→looks possible with integrated
luminosity =10 fb-1 , i.e. after only one year of data taking. First data has the possibilty to exclude/or confirm the entire
MSSM Others decay channel (as 2
020) can be explored later for
unexplored region of parameter plane.