DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (DPR) -...

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT

IWMP-2011-12

IWMP-VII (CHIMER)

District Watershed Developing Unit, Tapi

Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency

2

CONTENTS

Chapter 1 - Project Background

1.1 Project Background........................................... ........................................................ ................................................................... ...................................... ..12

Table no.1: Basic project information..................................................... .................................................................................................... ..............14

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programs....................................................................................... .............................................................. ............15

Table no.2: Weight age of the project ............................................................................................................................................................. ......15

Table no.3: Watershed information............................................................................................ ......................................................................... ......16

1.3 Other development projects/schemes running in the Bhintkhurd Project.........................................................................................................17

Table no.4: Developmental programs running in the project area................. ........................................................................................... ......17

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area................................................................ ............................................ ..............17

Chapter 2 - Project Implementing Agency

2.1 Project Implementing Agency.............................................................................................. ............................ ...........................................................19

2.2 About District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Tapi................................................................... ..........................................................19

2.2.1 The Organization & its objectives.............................................................................................. ......................................................................19

2.2.2 Objectives of the Forest Dept……… ................................................................................................................................................. .................19

2.3 SWOT Analysis of the DWDU.................................................................................. ..................................................................................................... 22

Table no. 6: PIA: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................24

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ............................................................................................ .............................................................. .....................24

Chapter 3 - Basic Information of the Project Area

3.1 Basic Information of the Project Area......................................................................................................................................................................26

Table no. 8: Land use pattern................................................................................................ ................................................................................27

3.1.2 Soil & Topography.......................................................................................................................... ......................................................................27

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography.................................................................................................................................................. ...............27

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition........................................................................ ...............................................................................28

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion................................................................................................. ................................................. ..................................28

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress).................................................................. .............................................. .............29

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions..........................................................................................................................................................29

3

3.2 Land & Agriculture.......................................................................................................................... ............................... ..................................... ...........30

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions........................................................................................ ...................................................................... ...........30

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief....................................................................................... .............................. ..........................................30

Table no. 14: Land ownership details.................................................................................................................................................................30

Table no. 15: Agriculture........................................................................................................................................................................................31

3.3 Irrigation....................................................................................................................................................... ............................... .................................... .31

Table no. 16: Irrigation.................................................................... ....................................................................................................................... .31

Table no. 17: Crop details................................................................................................... ....................................................................................32

3.4 Livestock............................................................................................................................................................ ...............................................................33

Table no. 18: Livestock............................................................................................................................................................................................33

3.5 Infrastructure Facilities................................................................................................................................................................................................33

Table no. 19: Drinking water.................................................................................................................................................................................33

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources................................................................................................................................... 34

3.6 Socio-Economic Profile................................................................................................................................................................................................. 36

Table no. 21: Demographic information............................................................................................................................................................36

Table no. 22: Literacy rate.....................................................................................................................................................................................36

3.7 Migration Pattern...................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................... 37

Table no. 23: Migration details.............................................................................................................................................. ...............................37

3.8 Poverty...................................................................................... ......................................................................................................... ...............................38

Table no. 24: Poverty................................................................................................ .............................................................................................. .38

3.9 Infrastructure Facilities............................................................................................................................................................................................. ...39

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure.......................................................................................................................................................... ..........39

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets......................................................................................................................................................................40

3.10 Livelihood Pattern........................................................................................................................................... .............................................................42

Table no. 27: Per Capita Income................................................................................................................................................................. ..........42

3.11 Dependence on Forest/CPR............................................................................................................................................................................... .......43

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR..........................................................................................................................................................43

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution).....................................................................................................................44

4

Chapter 4 - Watershed Activities

4.1 Scientific Planning........................................................................................................................................................................ ..................................52

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects................................................................................................54

Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area............................................................................................................................57

4.2 Institution building........................................................................................................................................................................................................ .60

4.2.1 Watershed Committee.................................................................................................... ..................................................... ................................60

Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details......................................................................................................................................................60

4.2.2 Shelf Help Group.......................................................................................................................................................... ......................................... .66

Table no. 33: SHG details......................................................................................................................................................... ................................67

4.2.3 User group....................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................68

Table no. 34: User group detail.............................................................................................................................................................................68

4.3 Physical Activities to be undertaken under IWMP...............................................................................................................................................69

4.3.1 Entry Point Activities (EPA).................................................................................................................................................................... ..........69

Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)...........................................................................................69

Table no.36: Details of engineering structures in watershed works………………………………………………………………………………………….71

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakhs Rs.) .................................74

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............75

Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises………………………………….…….…….76

Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas........................................................................79

Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..80

Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works……………………………………………………………..82

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas……………………………………………………………………………………..……….83

4.4 Capacity Building........................................................................................................ .........................................................................................................................................84

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution..............................................................................................................................................................................................85

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan...........................................................................................................................................................................................................85

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities...........................................................................................................................................86

5

Chapter 5 - Budgeting

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................88

Table no. 48: Village component wise budget available under IWMP.................................................................................................................................................89

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirements................................................................................................................................................................................90

Table no. 50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes....................................................................................................................................................91

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects.............................................................................................................................................................93

Chapter 6 - Expected Outcomes

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area...............................................................................................................................................................................................95

6.1.2 Migration: ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................96

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area.......................................................................................................................................................96

Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)...........................................................................................97

6.1.3 Status of Drinking water.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................97

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water............................................................................................................................. ........................................................................97

6.1.4 Crops............................................................................................................................. .......................................................................................................................................98

Table no. 56: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas....................................................................................................................................98

6.1.5 Horticulture............................................................................................................................. ........................................................................................................................100

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture............................................................................................................................. ........................................................................100

6.1.6 Vegetative cover............................................................................................................................. ...............................................................................................................101

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover............................................................................................................................. .......................................................................101

6.1.7 Livestock............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 102

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas............................................................................................................................. .................................................102

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages............................................................................................................................. ......................................................................104

Chapter 7 - Quality and Sustainability Issues

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation...................................................................................... .................................................................................................................106

7.2 Plans for Project Management....................................................................................................................................................................................................................107

7.3 Watershed Development Fund...................................................................................................................................................................................................................107

7.4 User Charges.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................107

6

Chapter 8 – Mapping

1. Cadastral Map……………………………………………………………………………………….……………............................................…………..……….....……… 131

2. Drainage Map………………………………………………………………………………………………………..............…………………................................... ....……132

3. Slop Map…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...................................................…… .133

4. Geomorphology Map…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..............................................……………… 134

5. Soil Map………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….................................................………………. 135

6. Land Use / Land Cover Map……………………………………………………………………………………..........................................…………………........…… 136

7. Ground Water Map..……………………………………………………………………………………………………............................................………………...…… .137

8. Propose Action Plan Map………………………………………….................................................................................. ........................................ .......……138

7

Tapi District

Tapi district is one of the 26 districts of Gujarat state in western India. Vyara town is the district headquarters. The area of the district is

2951.10 km². The district has a population of 719,634 (2001 census).It is Located in the southern part of Gujarat. On 27th September

2007, the district of Surat was bifurcated into two new districts, viz. Surat district with it's headquarter at Surat and Tapi district with its

headquarter at Vyara. The newly constituted Tapi district consists of five talukas viz. Vyara, Songadh, Uchchal, Nizar and Valod. Vyara

and Songadh in Tapi district are known for dense forests with a major production of bamboos

(Source: http://www.vibrantgujarat.com/district-profiles/tapi-district-profile.aspx)

Geographical location : 73.5° to 74.23 ° East (Longitude) 21.0 ° to 21.23 ° North (Latitude)

Temperature : 45 ° Centigrade (Maximum)

Average Rainfall : 1926 mm

Rivers : Tapi, Midoda, Purna and Ambika

Area : 3434.64 Sq Km

District headquarter : Vyara

Population : 7,19,634 (As per 2001 Census)

Population density : 210 persons per Sq Km

Sex ratio : 996 females per 1000 males

Literacy Rate : 57.05 %

Languages : Gujarati and Hindi

Seismic Zone : Zone III (Moderate damage risk zone)

http://www.vibrantgujarat.com/district-profiles/tapi-district-profile.aspx

8

District: Tapi

Fig1. Geographical location of Dist Tapi

9

Famous Places in Fort Songadh

1. Ukai Dam,

2. Rokadia Hanuman Mandir,

3. Kalyanraiji Mandir,

4. Fort of Songadh,

5. Gaumukh,

6. Dosvada Dam,

7. Hindustan Bridge,

8. The Central Pulp Mills (CPM) (now part of JK Singhania

Group), The Tps & Hydro power station

9. Bhagwan Parsuramji Mandir and Agni Mandir at CPM,

10. Gayatrimata & Sai baba Mandir,

11. Suryatapeshwar Mandir,

12. Firangi Mataji - Jalaram Mandir,

13. Mari Mata Mandir,

14. Tapi Nadi,

15. V.I.P., Ukai National Gate, Bhurival, chamri guest house, Bhimpura

16. Thermel power stastion Ukai

10

The Fort of Songadh literally means 'Son' stands for Gold & 'Gadh' stands for fort which means that the 'Fort of Gold'. Songadh is

located at 21.17°N73.57°E[1]. It has an average elevation of 112 metres (367 feet). The town is located at the foot of a solitary mountain

which can be seen from miles round, particularly as the surrounding area has been almost completely flattened by almost 30 local stone

quarries. Due to these stone quarries, Songadh has very good road links to the city of Surat to its west and the state of Maharashtra to its

east.

The main town of Songadh is split into two parts; Junagam (old town) and Navagam (new town). Due to rapid expansion of the town in

recent times, Navagam has outgrown the original Junagam and is characterised by the hustle and bustle of the Main Road almost any

time of the day. This is largely due to the Bus Terminal which acts as a hub for cross country buses which are en route to the city of Surat.

This passing traffic has bought much trade into Songadh as it is the first town as you enter Gujarat from the East (or the last before you

leave from the West). To the west of Songadh is the district capital of Vyara which has a slightly smaller population but substantially more

industry. Vyara has grown faster than Songadh due to the higher work ethic of the Vyara population in comparison to the younger

population of Songadh, this is in part due to the practice of intermarrying of cousins in Songadh.

http://toolserver.org/~geohack/geohack.php?pagename=Songadh&params=21.17_N_73.57_E_

http://toolserver.org/~geohack/geohack.php?pagename=Songadh&params=21.17_N_73.57_E_

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metre

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot_(length)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maharastra

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surat

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vyara

11

Chapter 1

Project Background

12

1.1Project Background

Chimer (IWMP-VII) project is located in Songadh Taluka, Tapi district of Gujarat state. The project is a cluster of four micro-watersheds

with 5B2D8c2e ,5B2D8c1d,5B2D8c1f,5B2D8c2c being their respective codes. The total area of the project is 5333.70 Ha, of which

50000Ha has been proposed to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) starting year 2010-11.

The nearest town is Vyara which is well connected by project area. The project area lies in the edges off forest. The livelihood of

these people is primarily based on rain fed agriculture, animal husbandry, wage labour, cows and buffalos for the milk production. The

project contains three gram panchayat (Chimer, Medha ). In Kaksala there are two project villages and Keshbandh have four villages. The

watershed area of the six villages is taken under the area proposed to be treated for the Kaksala project. The PIA (project implementation

agency) for the IWMP1-Kaksala project is North Dang Division, Forest Department.

Latitude 21.1667 Longitude 73.5667 Altitude (feet) 367

Lat (DMS) 21° 10' 0N Long (DMS) 73° 34' 0E Altitude (meters) 111

13

Fig. 2. Geographical location of Chimer

IWMP-7 Chimer Project

14

Table no.1: Basic project information

Sl

No.

Name of

the

project

Villages Gram

Panchayats Taluka District

Area of

the

project

Area

proposed to

be treated

Total

project

cost

PIA Name

Census

code

1 IWMP 7

Chimer

Chimer

Chimer

Songadh Tapi

1595.90 1448.40 173.808

2 Shravaniya 1695.30 1612.90 193.548

3 Lavchali 424.90 393.20 47.184

4 Nana

Tarpada 702.10 683.60 82.032

Forest Dept,

Vyara

5 Ojhar 642.20 619.20 74.304

6 Hindla 273.30 242.70 29.124

5333.70 5000.00 600.000

15

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programs Area proposed to be treated

Table no.2: Weightage of the project Project name

Project type

Weightage

IWMP-VII CHIMER PROJECT

i ii iii Iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii

7.5 10 5 5 3 10 15 5 10 10 5 10 10

Table no: 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed

S.

No.

Criteria Maximum

Score

Ranges & scores

I Poverty index (% of poor to population)

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 %(7.5) 50 to 20%(5) Below 20

ii % of SC/ST population 10 More than 40%(10) 20 to 40%(5) Less than 20%(3)

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly lower than

minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or higher than

minimum wages (0)

iv % of small and marginal farmers

10 More than 80%(10) 50 to 80%(5) Less than 50 %(3)

V Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Criteria (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0) V Moisture index/DPAP

/DDP Block 15 -66.7 & Below (15)

DDP Block -33.3 to -66.6(10)

DPAP block 0 to -33.2 (0)

Non DPAP/DDP Block

vi Area under rain-fed agriculture

15 More than 90% (15) 80 to 90 %(10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70%(Reject)

vii Drinking water 10 No Source (10) Problematic Village(7.5)

Partially covered(5) Fully Covered(0)

ix Degraded land 15 high-above 20%(15) Medium-10 to 20% (10)

Low-less than 10% of TGA (5)

X Productivity Potential of 15 Land with low production Lands with moderate Lands with high

16

the land &where productivity can be significantly enhanced with

reasonable efforts (15)

production & where productivity can be

enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)

production & where productivity can be

marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)

xi Contiguity to another watershed that has

already been developed/treated

10 Contiguous to previously treated watershed &

contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project

(10)

Contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project but non

contiguous to pre4ously treated

watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to previously treated

watershed nor contiguity within the micro

watersheds in the project (0)

xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one

contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 Above 6 micro –watersheds in cluster (15)

4 to 6 micro watersheds in cluster

(10)

2 to 4 micro watersheds in cluster (5)

xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro-

watersheds in the project)

15 Above 5 micro –watersheds in cluster (15)

3 to 5 micro watersheds in cluster

(10)

2 to 3 micro watersheds in cluster (5)

Total 150 150 90 41 2.5

Project type: Hilly/desert/Other Table no.3: Watershed information

Name of the project

No. of watersheds to be treated

Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order


4 5B2D8c2e,5B2D8c2d,5B2D8c1f,5B2D8c2c

Others

17

1.3 Other development projects/schemes running in the Bhintkhurd Project

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area:

Sl

no

Name of the

programme/scheme Sponsoring agency

Objectives of the

programme/scheme

Year of

commencement

Villages

covered

Estimated

number of

beneficiaries

MGNREGS Gram Panchayat, Forest

Dept

S.B. ,S.S.B., C.C.T, G.P,

Plantation 2013 6 1250

G.F.D.P Forest Dept Land Lavaling 2013 6 185

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area:

Sl no

Project name

Year started

Name of Villages

No. of micro watershed

Watershed codes

Area under treatment

Funding source

Nodal agency

PIA Total cost

Expenditure incurred up to start of IWMP

% financial completion

% physical completion


18

Chapter 2

Project Implementing Agency

19

2.1 Project Implementing Agency

The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management

Agency (GSWMA), the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The

PIAs are responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous

organizations under State / Central Governments, Government Institutes/Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, voluntary

Organization (VOs). The PIA for Malangdev watershed project is the Gujarat Forest Department (Vyara Division)

2.2 About Gujarat Forest Department as a PIA

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives:

Gujarat state was constituted as the Union of India on May1, 1960 after the bifurcation of the State of Bombay. Gujarat Forest

department is entrusted with the prime responsibility of protection, conservation and development of the forests and wildlife of the state.

The total geographical area of the state is 196024 sq. kms out of which 18961.56 sq. kms (9.67%) is the declared forest area with 7.72%

of area as forest cover. Whereas, the unique features of the state are the climatic and geomorphologic conditions, the largest coastline in

the country, the saline deserts of Rann, grasslands, wetlands. These factors have bestowed the state with the diversity of flora and fauna.

The faunal biodiversity consists of 14% fishes, 18 % reptiles, 37% avifauna and 25% of the mammal population of the country.

2.2.2 Objectives of the Forest Dept.:

1. Protection, Conservation and development of forests and wild life, the adoption of measures of soil conservation, moisture

conservation and increasing soil fertility.

2. The utilization of the forest so as to obtain the maximum yield consistent with their permanent maintenance and the supply of the

needs of the people, agriculture, industry and defence.

3. To conduct research into silviculture, utilization and other problems affecting the regeneration and development of the forests.

http://gujaratforest.gov.in/about_us/mandate.htm

20

4. To achieve the goals of National Forest policy 1988 and to cover the maximum area under forests.

5. To create awareness among the people about the forests and environment.

6. To increase active participation of local people in protection & conservation of forest with special emphasis on tribal, poor & women.

2.2.3 Status of Working Plans in Gujarat state

Gujarat state is situated along the western coast of the country with a total geographical area of 1,96,024 sq km having only 9.8%

designated forest lands, divided by the Tropic of Cancer. The forests of Gujarat consist of four major types, namely (1) Tropical Moist

Deciduous, (2) Tropical Dry Deciduous, (3) Littoral and Swamp and (4) Northern Tropical Thorny Forests. Most of the forest area is

confined mainly in the districts of The Dangs, Valsad, Tapi, Rajpipla, Chhotaudepur, Baria, Godhra, Sabarkantha, Banaskantha,

Junagadh and Kachchh.

For forestry management purpose, the forests of the State are divided into 20 territorial forest divisions and 2 forest sub-divisions

and these are covered under 14 approved Working Plans. All of these Working Plans have basically been formulated for improving

conservation and development of forest resources of the state. Much higher emphasis has been given to conservation, people’s

involvement for regeneration of forests, increasing the NTFP (non timber forest products) outputs, bio-diversity conservation, and

medicinal plants. (Source: http://gujaratforest.gov.in/forests/work_plan.htm)

The PIA has experienced staff comprising Watershed Development Team of: Civil Engineer, Agriculture Expert and Community

Mobilization and other staff as Data Entry Operator, Surveyor, Accountant and Messenger. This team has a role of planning,

implementing, supervising, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related developmental activities in the

district as per The New guidelines 2008.

21

2.2.4 Programs/projects of DWDU, Tapi:

The total 4 IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India in the year 2010-11 for Tapi district. The entry point

activities of all the 4 IWMP projects have been identified by the respective PIAs in the district. The DWDU, Tapi implements one project

namely; IWMP-6 IWMP- , Bedchit l while Vyara Forest Division implements three projects namely; IWMP8- Dhanmauli, IWMP7- Chimer

22

2.3 SWOT Analysis of the DWDU, Tapi:

Strength:

(1) Ample forest wealth in the forms of Timber, Minor Forest Produce

(2) Possibilities for taking up horticulture and food processing due to suitable agro-climatic conditions

(3) Independent District Level Nodal Agency.

(4) Linkages with State level institutions, agricultural universities and NGOs for capacity building and technical guidance

(5) Appropriate topographic conditions for water conservation

(6) Scientific planning in watershed projects with help of GSWMA & BISAG

(7) District level monitoring, coordination & co-operation Committee

Weakness:-

(1) The project areas are located at extreme remote places.

(2) Inadequate livelihood opportunities

(3) Heavy rainwater runoff due to hilly terrain

(4) Inadequate secondary and higher level educational infrastructure

(5) Low literacy rate and Seasonal Migration

(6) Limited employment and economic activities due to absence of major industries

(7) Poor connectivity in interior areas

(8) Irregular electric supply

23

(9) Lack of skilled manpower and specialized services

(10) Low production and lack of marketing infrastructure.

Opportunities:

(1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal integration and

convergence of programmes

(2) Better financial provision under IWMP

(3) Usage of new ICT tools like GIS,GPS

(4) Sustainable community forest management through Joint Forest Management Committee can be strengthen with diagnostic and

focused intervention

Threats:

(1) Rainfall being unreliable in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited impact

(2) Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth functioning

(3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local people

(4) Low literacy rate in the project area

24

Table no. 6: PIA:

Sl. No.

Names of project Details of PIA

1 IWMP-VII

CHIMER PROJECT

(i) Type of organization District Level Nodal Agengy

(ii) Name of organization Vyara Forest Department

(iii) Designation & Address

Deputy Conservator of Forest Office, Near-Sayajirav Statue, Vyara.

(iv) Telephone (02626)-222019

(v) Fax (02626)-222339

(vi) E-mail [email protected]

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: Sl no

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experie

nce Job assigned

Monthly remuneration

1 B. G. Prajapati

Male District Forest

Officer I.F.S.

Project Management 50400

2 R.K.Chaudhari 57 Male Range Forest

Officer S.Y B.sc. 34 Team leader 37189

3 Chaudhari Niteshbhai S 25 Male Agriculture & Soil Expert

M.R.S. – Agro. 2.5 Field Work 8000

4 Chaudhari

Dharmisthaben K. 27 Female

Community Mobilization

B.R.S. B ed 3.0 Field Work 8000

5 Patel Manishaben 26 Female Civil Diploma in civil 3.5 Field Work 8000

5 Chaudhari Sujataben 29 Male Accountant B.Com, M.Com,

B ed 3.00 Office Work 7000

7 Chaudhari Sangitaben

G. 29 Female

Data Entry Operator

B.A. - Office Work 5000

mailto:[email protected]

25

Chapter 3

Basic Information of the Project Area

26

3.1. Geography & Geo-hydrology

3.1.1. Land use pattern:

The Net geographical area of Malangdev project is about 6453.01 ha. The total forest area is about 39.96%. 56.24% land is under

cultivation in Malangdev Project is which is 70% rain-fed and mainly Kharif crop is taken. In Malangdev project, about 14.12% of the total

geographical land is classified under wasteland of which 73.52% is cultivable land & 26.48% is no-cultivable. The land under cultivation in

Malangdev Project is completely rain-fed and mainly Kharif crop is taken.The traditional cropssuch as paddy, figer millet, Bengal gram is

cultivated under maximum area.

27

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

S. No. Names of Villages Geographical

Area of the Village

Forest Area

Land under agricultural use

Rainfed area

Permanent pastures

Wasteland

Cultivable Non-

cultivable

Chimer 1595.90 1068.70 379.70 373.20 91.50 91.50 56.00

Shravaniya 1695.30 1489.80 166.70 157.50 0.00 0.00 38.80

Lavchali 424.90 288.50 104.70 101.10 12.10 12.10 19.60

Nana Tarpada 702.10 629.40 54.20 50.00 7.60 7.60 10.90

Ojhar 642.20 519.90 99.30 92.30 11.50 11.50 12.50

Hindla 273.30 109.20 133.50 114.90 15.00 15.00 14.70

Total 5333.70 4105.50 938.10 889.00 137.70 137.70 152.50

3.1.2. Soil & Topography : Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:

S. No. Name of the Agro-climatic zone covers project area

Area in ha Names of the

Villages

Major soil types Topography

a)Type b) Area in ha

Agro-climatic sub zones - southern Hills

1595.90 Chimer 1595.90

1695.30 Shravaniya 1695.30

424.90 Lavchali Red, Black

Cotton, Goradu 424.90 Undulating

moderate slope 702.10 Nana Tarpada 702.10

642.20 Ojhar 642.20

273.30 Hindla 273.30

5333.70 5333.70

# Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope

28

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:

Sl no Name of Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1 Chimer

No No

2 Shravaniya

3 Lavchali

4 Nana Tarpada

5 Ojhar

6 Hindla

11. Edaphic Factors

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run off

(mm/ year) Average soil loss

(Tonnes/ ha/ year) Water erosion

a Sheet 300

200

4.65%

b Rill 950 14.72%

c Gully 1550 24.02%

d Ravenous 2200

34.09%-

Sub-Total 5000 77.48%

Wind erosion 34.09%

Total 5000 77.48%

29

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity

(Inherent/Ingress)

Chimer 36 6.5 0.24

Shravaniya 58 6.7 0.24

Lavchali 79 6.8 0.23

Nana Tarpada 46 6.6 0.24

Ojhar 72 6.9 0.31

Hindla 52 6.8 0.28

Table no. 11.3: Waterlogging Conditions

Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons

Chimer

NIL -

Shravaniya

Lavchali

Nana Tarpada

Ojhar

Hindla

30

3.2 Land & Agriculture :- Table no. 12: Climatic conditions:

Name of project Average rainfall- last 5 years

(mm) Average temperature

IWMP-VII

CHIMER PROJECT 89.6 Inch

Summer Winter

Max Min Max Min

38 33 30 25

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief

Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams

IWMP-VII

CHIMER PROJECT 500mt 25-30% Zakari River

Table no. 14: Land ownership details

Sl

no Village

Total owned land HHs giving

land on lease

HHs taking

land on lease Gen OBC SC ST

Chimer 0.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 12

Shravaniya 0.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 5

Lavchali 0.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0

Nana Tarpada 0.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0

Ojhar 0.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 6

Hindla 0.00 0.00 0.1 99 0 12

31

Table no. 15: Agriculture

Sl no Name of Village Net sown area

One time Two times Three times

1 Chimer 90.10 22.50 -

2 Shravaniya 248.90 62.20 -

3 Lavchali 362.70 90.70 -

4 Nana Tarpada 227.60 56.90 -

5 Ojhar 237.20 59.30 -

6 Hindla 259.90 65.00 -

Total 2958.9 739.6 -

3.3 Irrigation Table no. 16: Irrigation

Sl

no Village

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well

Availability

months Net area

Gross

area

Availability

months Net area

Gross

area

Availability

months Net area

Gross

area

1 Chimer - - - 4 1.4 7 12

2 Shravaniya - - - 4 5.1 7 11

3 Lavchali - - - 4 5.2 9 30

4 Nana Tarpada - - - 4 3.2 9 33

5 Ojhar - - - 4 4.4 10 42

6 Hindla - - - 4 3.8 7 16

32

Table no. 17: Crop details:

Sl

no Name of Village

Kharif (Monsoon)

Crop 1 Crop 2

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity

1 Chimer 22.5 20970 932.00 4.5 4840 1075.56 29.7 102610 3454.88

2 Shravaniya 62.2 53490 859.97 12.4 11790 950.81 82.1 228970 2788.92

3 Lavchali 90.7 74730 823.93 18.1 16070 887.85 119.7 293980 2455.97

4 Nana Tarpada 56.9 50290 883.83 11.4 11320 992.98 75.1 226120 3010.92

5 Ojhar 59.3 51700 871.84 11.9 11560 971.43 78.3 227070 2900.00

6 Hindla 65 55120 848.00 13 12090 930.00 85.8 229770 2677.97

Total 739.6 636560 895.81 147.9 141800 1015.6 976.3 2689950 3072.06

Sl no

Name of Village Rabi (Winter)

Crop 1 Crop 2 Crop 3 Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity

1 Chimer 9.9 5200 525.25 7.7 3630 471.43 4.4 1870 425.00

2 Shravaniya 27.9 13500 483.87 21.7 9460 435.94 12.4 4840 390.32

3 Lavchali 40.5 18750 462.96 31.5 13160 417.78 18 6710 372.78

4 Nana Tarpada 25.2 12540 497.62 19.6 8780 447.96 11.2 4510 402.68

5 Ojhar 26.5 13010 490.94 20.6 9100 441.75 11.8 4680 396.61

6 Hindla 28.8 13730 476.74 22.4 9630 429.91 12.8 4920 384.38

Total 328.7 159100 504.54 255.6 111430 453.58 146.2 57120 408.22

33

3.4 Livestock :

Table no. 18: Livestock

Sl no

Name of Village Buffalo Cow Total Milk

(Buffalo+Cow)

Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others

No milk No Milk No Milk

1 Chimer 60 120 80 240 360 30 - - 90 215 - 2 Shravaniya 77 190 100 150 340 152 - - 158 389 - 3 Lavchali 30 65 25 75 140 20 45 50 - 4 Nana Tarpada 45 135 16 20 170 25 - - 45 70 - 5 Ojhar 78 190 11 10 200 46 - - 90 303 - 6 Hindla 57 140 19 20 160 76 - - 123 162 -

Total 347 840 251 515 1355 303 - - 551 1189 -

3.5 Infrastructure Facilities : Table no. 19: Drinking water

Sl no

Name of Village Ground water table

(mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months

Quality Tube well Well Tube well Well

1 Chimer 46 Both use

12 month 12 month Slightly saline

2 Shravaniya 24 Both use

3 Lavchali 40 Both use

4 Nana Tarpada 34 Both use

5 Ojhar 40 Both use

6 Hindla 37 Both use

34

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

S. No.

Names of

project

CPR Particulars

Total Area (ha) Area owned/ In possession of

Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt. persons Govt.

(specify dept.)

PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

Pvt. persons

Govt. (specify

dept.) PRI

Any other (Pl.

Specify)

Wasteland/ degraded land 911.32 4.12

Pastures 436.30 30.97

Orchards

Village Woodlot

Forest 2578.45 1956.12

Village Ponds/ Tanks

Community Buildings

Weekly Markets

Permanent markets

Temples/ Places of worship

Others (Pl. specify)

3489.77 436.30 1960.24 30.97

35

Malangdev project has a total population of 7756 out of which 3907 are male and 3849 female. The sex ratio is 985 females to

1000 males. There are 893 BPLs HH for Malangdev project and average family size is 5. There are total 547HH with no land. The literacy

rate is 30.10% (of total male population) and female literacy rate is as low as 21.20% (of total female population). The total population

belongs to ST caste & mainly involved in agriculture and animal husbandry.

36

3.6 Socio-Economic Profile :

Table no. 21: Demographic information

Sl

no

Name of

Village

Population SC ST

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %

1 Chimer 1750 910 840 0 0 0 0.00 1750 910 840 100.00

2 Shravaniya 600 312 288 0 0 0 0.00 600 312 288 100.00

3 Lavchali 454 236 222 5 1 4 0.77 449 235 218 98.77

4 Nana Tarpada 284 147 137 0 0 0 0.00 284 147 137 100.00

5 Ojhar 601 312 289 0 0 0 0.00 601 312 289 100.00

6 Hindla 757 393 364 0 0 0 0.00 757 393 364 100.00

Total 4446 2312 2134 6 1 5 0.07 4446 2312 2134 99.33

Table no. 22: Literacy rate

Sl no Name of Village Literacy Literacy %

above age 14

Literacy %

below age 14 Total % Male % Female %

1 Chimer 750 42.85 475 63.40 275 36.60 35 65

2 Shravaniya 210 35 147 70.40 63 29.60 27.70 72.30

3 Lavchali 146 32.15 93 63.45 53 36.55 29.40 70.60

4 Nana Tarpada 142 50 81 57.16 61 43.84 21.50 78.50

5 Ojhar 232 38 129 55.65 103 44.35 28.60 71.40

6 Hindla 258 34.08 148 57.45 110 42.55 20.80 79.20

Total 1738 39.09 1073 61.73 665 38.56 27.16 72.84

37

3.7 Migration Pattern

Table no. 23: Migration details

Sl no

Village Total

population

Migration Migration by months Main reason

for migration

Income during

migration / month Total Male Female

Up to 3 months

3-6 months

More than 6 months

1 Chimer 252 151 136 15 64 50 37

Lack of Employment

3000 to 5000

2 Shravaniya 533 319 288 32 134 107 80

3 Lavchali 650 390 351 39 163 130 97

4 Nana Tarpada 632 379 341 38 158 127 94

5 Ojhar 708 424 383 43 178 142 106

6 Hindla 608 365 328 37 152 121 92

Total 8391 5033 4530 505 2101 1678 1258

38

3.8 Poverty : Table no. 24: Poverty

Sl no Village Total

Household

BPL

% of BPL HH Total Land less HH % of land less

HH 0-16 16-20 Total

1 Chimer 375 95 142 237 63.20 70 18.66

2 Shravaniya 105 4 16 20 19.04 15 14.28

3 Lavchali 73 0 9 9 12.32 0 0

4 Nana Tarpada 71 0 4 4 5.63 0 0

5 Ojhar 116 7 18 25 21.55 12 10.34

6 Hindla 146 14 62 76 52.05 28 19.17

Total 886 120 251 371 41.87 125 14.10

39

3.9 Infrastructure Facilities :

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

Sl

no Village

Pucca

road

to the

Village

(Y/N)

Schools

Colleges

(Number)

Post Office

(Distance)

Banks

(Number)

Distance

from

nearest

market

yard

Milk

collection

centre

(Number)

Milk

cooperative

(Number)

Other

cooperative

s / CBIs

(Number)

Any

other

instituti

on

LP UP HS

1 Chimer Y Y Y N N N N N Y N N N

2 Shravaniya Y Y N N N N N N Y N N N

3 Lavchali Y Y N N N N N N Y N N N

4 Nana

Tarpada Y Y N N N N N N Y N N N

5 Ojhar Y Y N N N N N N Y N N N

6 Hindla Y Y Y N N N N Y (every

moday) Y N N N

40

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets

Sl

no Village

HHs with

electricity

HHs with

safety

latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle

HHs with

TV set

HHs with

cooking

gas

HHs with

Drinking

water

HHs

with

freedge Land line Mobile 2-wheeler 4-wheeler

1 Chimer 300 170 0 100 30 3 42 10 125 8

2 Shravaniya 113 80 0 45 40 1 25 8 70 3

3 Lavchali 74 20 0 45 12 1 22 3 32 0

4 Nana Tarpada 57 22 0 25 20 0 26 8 25 0

5 Ojhar 98 30 0 69 40 0 29 12 33 2

6 Hindla 135 90 0 96 56 1 40 17 58 2

Total 777 432 0 380 198 6 184 58 383 15

41

3.3 Livelihood pattern: The livelihood of the villagers depends on agriculture and animal husbandry & during lean seasons

they migrate for daily wages to other parts of the state. There are few people who are engaged in

42

3.10 Livelihood Pattern :

Table no. 27: Income

Sl no Name of Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others/ Services

Total

1 Chimer 200500 117500 70500 10000 398500

2 Shravaniya 498800 254000 152400 20000 925200

3 Lavchali 436000 230000 138000 20000 824000

4 Nana Tarpada 368600 197100 118200 15000 698900

5 Ojhar 451800 244000 146400 25000 867200

6 Hindla 342100 189600 113700 18000 663400

Total 2297800 1232200 739200 108000 4377200

43

3.11 Dependence on Common Property Resource :

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sl no Name of Village

Benefit type 1 Benefit type 2 Benefit type 2

Total income

% sells Income % sells Income % sells Income

1 Chimer - 65000 - 20000 - 10500 95500

2 Shravaniya - 100000 - 35000 - 15000 150000

3 Lavchali - 20000 - 15000 - 5000 40000

4 Nana Tarpada - 15000 - 10000 - 15000 40000

5 Ojhar - 95500 - 40000 - 20000 155500

6 Hindla - 42000 - 35000 - 15000 92000

Total 337500 155000 80500 573000

44

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sl

no Name of Village

Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal

husbandry

(AH)

Agriculture +

AH

Casual

labour Ser4ces Handicraft Others

1 Chimer 720 410 108 137 58 7 - -

2 Shravaniya 550 313 82 105 45 5 - -

3 Lavchali 200 114 30 38 16 2 - -

4 Nana Tarpada 125 71 19 24 10 2 - -

5 Ojhar 320 182 48 61 26 3 - -

6 Hindla 475 271 71 90 38 5 - -

Total 2390 1361 358 554 193 24 - -

45

Chart 3.4.1 showing comparative productivity of Finger Millet:

Finger Millet is one of the major crops grown in Tapi district with having the productivity of 1500kg/ha approx. which is higher than the total

productivity of the state and country. Whereas, there is an appreciable productivity of the finger millet in the malangdev project area i.e.

1015.60 kg/ha and even it can be increased with an adequate source of irrigation.

46

Chart 3.4.2 showing comparative productivity of Ground nut:

The Groundnut production has been increased last from 2 years in Tapi district, its productivity is about 1200 kg/ha. The

productivity of project area is 1064.87 kg/ha. The state and country productivity is comparatively less than tapi district.

Chart 3.4.3 showing comparative productivity of Paddy:

Paddy is the major kharif crop which is cultivated in Tapi district. The ekdandi variety of paddy is found to be most

popular recently due to maximum production compared to other indigenous/local varieties, thus there is appreciable

productivity all over the district. The productivity in project area is about 3072.06 kg/ha, whereas, in Tapi it is 4000 kg/ha.

47

But in the other parts of Gujarat, the productivity is less resulting in overall less productivity i.e. 1698.06 kg/ha. The

productivity of paddy in India is 2178 kg/h

Chart 3.4.4 showing comparative productivity of Black gram:

The productivity of black gram in project area is 858.42 kg/ha, which is much higher compared to, state and country. The productivity of

black gram in Tapi district is 800 kg/ha.

48

Chart 3.4.5 showing comparative productivity of Tuwar:

The productivity of the Tuwar is 895.81 kg/ha which is much less as compared to the district (1000 kg/ha). The southern villages in

Tapi has appreciable amount of productivity. Gujarat has low productivity followed by the country.

49

The Malangdev project area has low productivity because of the following reasons:

I. Full dependence on monsoon:

Malangdev village is dependent on monsoon for the cultivation. Water is being essential input in agriculture thus, shortage of water

results in lower productivity. Due to the absence of irrigation facility, 100% of the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain

monsoon. Therefore, the success or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure of agriculture production.

II. Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area:

Farmers do not use fertilizer due to insufficient money and poor irrigation facility which result in lower production.

III. Traditional farming methods:

The traditional methods such as monocropping, taking same crop every year results in lower productivity. The ignorance about the use

of new farming methods and technologies such as multiple cropping are not followed.

IV. Lack of adequate farm machinery:

Even today a large number of farmers use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don't have adequate machinery like tractor for

cultivation.

V. Lack of finances for farmers:

Most of the farmers are marginal and small. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds, machinery and other inputs.

VI. Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing:

50

5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he sells to local

traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face problems in means of transportation due to kachha roads. And other problem of farmers

is the lack of proper storage facilities.

51

Chapter 4

Watershed Activities

52

4.1 Watershed Activities

Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid

tropics. These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and

high incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with

watershed development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.

4.1. Scientific Planning:

i) Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Malangdev

Project consists of 7 micro- watersheds namely 5B2D8d2l, 5B2D8d1g, 5B2D8d2k, 5B2D8d1h, 5B2D8d1k, 5B2D8d1l, 5B2D8d2j as their

respective codes.

ii) Base line Survey

To access the impact of any watershed development program a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a

benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development program. A detailed baseline survey was undertaken

which involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey, Field to field survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum

mantri. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the

village. This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL

53

household, cattle population, and net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running

and their benefits. Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil

typology, wells in the area, crops cultivation, Cropping pattern, fertilizer application and various sources of irrigation in the field.

iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the

program. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological

Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, and monitoring

and post- withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social

mapping, and season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in

specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn diagram were

used to identify various local vegetations, fodders crops and even various institutions to identify their significance in the life of the farmers.

iv) Use of GIS and remote sensing for planning

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development which include GPS, satellite

maps through BISAG.

54

a) Prioritization: Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were

created like Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent.

These were all given proper weight-age according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.

b) Planning: A action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the

slope percent, soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global positioning System

(GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map.

Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation

structures.

c) Hydrological modeling: Hydrology modeling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, and

Flow accumulation. This model overlaid over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc.

This has helped to remove the human error which generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific

criteria was used

(A) Planning

Cluster approach Yes

55

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute Yes

Baseline survey Yes

Hydro-geological survey Yes

Contour mapping Yes

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover -

Ridge to Valley treatment Yes

Online IT connecti4ty between

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes

Availability of GIS layers

1. Cadastral map Yes

2. Village boundaries Yes

3. Drainage Yes

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes

56

5. Land use Yes

6. Ground water status Yes

7. Watershed boundaries Yes

8. Activity Yes

Crop simulation models#

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil

nutrient analysis

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)#

Weather Station

(B) Inputs

1. Bio-pesticides Yes

2. Organic manures Yes

3. Vermicompost Yes

4. Bio-fertilizer Yes

5. Water saving devices Yes

6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes

57

7. Bio-fencing Yes

8. Nutrient budgeting Yes

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers Yes

Any other (please specify)

#NDVI - Ratio of the differences of the response of vegetation in the near infrared & red regions of the electromagnetic spectrum

Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area

Sr.

No.

Name of the PRA

Activity / FGD Date

Number

of people

present

Lessons learnt / Understanding of the problem/situation

Problem

Identification

Transent Walk

-Chapati Diagram

-Village Mapping

-Seasonal

Calender

-Boundary

Mapping.

20/06/2010

To

9/07/2010

841

Major Problem is Drinking Water facility

Education Problem

Transportation Problem

People migration for income

Note:

1. After this table, add the problem tree analysis

2. Then add the object tree analysis

60

4.2 Institutional formation in Watershed 4.2.1 Watershed Committee

Table no. 32.:1 Watershed Committee details

Sl. No.

Names of

Village

Date of Registrati

on as a Society

Name of Member Designation M/F

SC ST

SF

MF

LF Landless

UG

SHG

GP Any

other Educational qualification

Function/s

assigned#

1 Chimer under

process

Shri Samaji bhai NathubhaiKokani

President M Y Y 38 B.A Pass

Watershed

Committee

Shri Kantilal Jamshibhai Gamit

Secretary M Y Y Forester 8 Pass

Shri Hadgiyabhai Maharbhai kokani

Member M Y Y 30 B.A.Pass

Shri Maganbhai Chhetriyabhai Gamit

Member M Y Y 36 4 Pass

Shri Soniyabhai balubhai Gamit


Shri Vaniyabhai Ratnabhai Kokani

Member M Y Y Y 38 4 Pass

Shri Ambubhai Ishariyabhai Kokani


Shri Nitesh.s chaudhri

WDT Member M Y Y B.R.S

Shri Fulajibhai Afakunyabhai Kokani

Member M Y Y Y 39 7. Pass

Smt Taraben Prabhubhai Kokani

Member F Y Y Y 39 S S C

Smt Simaguben Dashrubhai Kokani

Member F Y Y 50 10 Pass

61

Table no. 32.2: Shravaniya Watershed Committee details

Sl. No.

Names of Village

Date of Registra

tion Name of Member

Designation

M/F

SC

ST

SF

MF

LF

Landless

UG

SHG

GP

Any other

Educational

qualification

Function/s

assigned#

2 Shravaniy

a

Shri Mirajibhai

Nuryabhai Gamit President M Y Y 30 10 Pass

Watershe

d

Committe

e

Shri Vasanjibhai

Ratanabhai Gamit Secretary M Y Y Forester 9 Pass

Shri Umedbhai

Manshingbhai

Gamit


Shri Maganbhai

Micharabhai Gamit Member M Y Y 32 10 Pass

Shri Pantubhai

Bhiliyabhai Gamit Member M Y Y 42 7 Pass

Shri Kunvarjibhai

Maganbhai Gamit Member M Y Y Y 29 9 Pass

Shri Samalabhai

Kuthiyabhai Gamit Member M Y Y Y 30 8 Pass

Manisha m. patel wdt M Y Y 25 D.C.E.

Shri Isapbhai

Paslyabhai Gamit Member M Y Y Y 40 5 Pass

Smt Urmilaben

Shurapshingbhai

Gamit

Member F Y Y 50 4 Pass

Smt Maganiben

Tulajibhai Gamit Member F Y Y 25 9 Pass

62

Table no. 32.3:Lavachali Watershed Committee details

Sl.

No. Village

Date of

Registrati

on

Name of Member Designation M/F S

C ST SF MF LF

Landles

s UG

SH

G GP

Any

other

Educatio

nal

qualificati

on

Function/s

assigned#

3 Lavchali

Shri Santubhai

Babubhai Gamit President M Y Y 42 10 Pass

Watershed

Committee

Shri Nageshbhai

Ratanjibhai Gamit Secretary M Y

Y

Fores

ter 9 Pass

Shri Ilambhai

Fatiyabhai Gamit Member M Y

Y 39 10 Pass

Shri Mirajibhai

Dhedabhai Gamit Member M Y

Y 46 7 Pass

Shri Ranajitbhai

Divanjibhai Gamit Member M Y Y 35 7 Pass

Shri Rameshbhai

Chemabhai Gamit Member M Y Y Y 32 9 Pass

Shri Fatesingbhai

Rameshbha

Gamit


Smt Darmishta

ben k. WDT F Y

Y 27 B.R.S.

Smt Sangatiben

Kantilal Gamit Member F Y

Y Y 52 4 Pass

Smt Paluben

Jayntibhai Gamit Member F Y Y 42 10 Pass

Smt Premilaben

Maganbhai Gamit Member F Y Y 45 4 Pass

63

Table no. 32.4: NanaTarpada Watershed Committee details

Sl. No.

Names of WCs

Date of Registration as a Society

Name of Member

Designation

M/F

SC

ST

SF

MF

LF Landle

ss UG

SHG

GP

Any other

Educational qualification

Function/s

assigned#

4

Nana Tarpad

a

Shri Chhaganbhai Radtiyabhai Gamit

President M Y Y 39 10 Pass

Watershed

Committee

Shri Shaileshbhai Vadiyabhai Gamit

Secretary M

Y Y Foreste

r 9 Pass

Shri Dhnubhai Navgiyabhai Gamit

Member M

Y Y

32 10 Pass

Shri Lajreshbhai Jedadabhai Gamit

Member M

Y Y

45 7 Pass

Shri Rameshbhai Akhatiyabhai Gamit

Member M

Y Y 28 10 Pass

Shri Nitesh s chaudharii

W.D.T M Y Y Y 24 B.R.S

Smt Gitaben jayantilal Gamit

Member F Y Y

Y 35 5 Pass

Smt Vanitaben Rajubhai Gamit

Member F Y Y

31 12 Pass (I T I)

Smt Tesalaben Jivabhai Gamit

Member F

Y Y

Y 42 4 Pass

Smt Ishudiben Rusimbhai Gamit

Member F

Y Y 38 Illiterate

Shri M. N Vanaraj


64

Table no. 32.5 Ojhar Watershed Committee details

Sl.

No.

Names

of

Village

Date of

Registration

Name of

Member Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Landless UG SHG GP

Any

other

Educational

qualification

Function/s

assigned#

5 Ojhar

Shri Anijbhai

Jethiyabhai

Gamit President M Y Y 50 8 Pass

Watershed

Committee

Shri Bhimjibhai

Motiyabhai

Gamit Secretary M Y Y Forester 9 Pass

Shri Jayantilal

Maganbhai

Gamit Member M Y

Y

Y 55 Illiterate

Shri

Dhrmeshbhai

Chhidiyabhai

Gamit

Member M Y

Y 38 10 Pass

Shri Nileshbhai

Babubhai

Gamit Member M Y

Y

33 10 Pass

Shri Nalinbhai

Bhimajibhai

Gamit Member M Y Y Y 30 5 Pass

Shri Revajibhai

Bodliyabhai

Gamit Member M Y Y Y 39 10 Pass

Smt Manisha

ben.m patel WDT F Y Y 25 D.C.E

Smt Ruthaben

Aravindbhai

Gamit Member F Y Y Y 35 9 Pass

Shri Vinodbhai

Kikabhai Gamit Member M Y Y 38 4 Pass

Shri

Maheshbhai

Shukkariyabhai

Gamit


65

Table no. 32.6: Hindla Watershed Committee details

Sl.

No

.

Names

of

Village

Date of

Registr

ation as

a

Society

Name of Member Designatio

n

M/

F

S

C

S

T

S

F

M

F

L

F

Landles

s

U

G

SH

G

G

P

Any

other

Educational

qualificatio

n

Function/

s

assigned#

6 Hindla

Shri Kanjibhai

Chemabhai Gamit President M Y Y 39 12 Pass

Watershed

Committee

Shri Tulajibhai

Kalidasbhai Gami Secretary M Y Y Foreste

r 9 Pass

Shri Ajitbhai

Ganabhai Gamit Member M Y Y

32 10 Pass

Shri Rameshbhai

Dhanubhai Gamit Member M Y Y

26 10 Pass

Shri

Mahendrabhai

Navagiyabhai

Gamit


Shri Rogiyabhai

Agariyabhai Gamit Member M Y Y Y 24 10 Pass

Shri Jayantbhai

Ganiyabhai Gamit Member M Y Y Y 26 Illiterate

Darmishta ben k WDT

Member M Y

Y 27 B.R.S

Smt Lalitaben

Surajibhai Gamit Member F Y Y

Y 39 Illiterate

Smt Vingiben

Tulajibhai Gamit Member F Y Y 32 10 Pass

Shri Maganbhai

Javabhai Gamit Member M Y Y 25 10 Pass

66

# Only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned. A. PNP and PRA B. Planning C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments E. Super4sion of construction acti4ties F. Cost Estimation G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).

i) Self Help Group

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help group

initiative especially for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women. Before formation of

the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focused Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up with the following

observations:

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders

c) Lack of knowledge on credit facility and banking.

With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like BAIF, it was planned to have some capacity

building training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women empowerment

such as Wadi Project.

67

Table no. 33: SHG detail

S. No.

Village

Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of ST in each

category No. of BPL in each category

With only Men

With only Women

With both

Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 Chimer 1 1 0 2

(i) Landless 3 1 4

13 16 29 8 6 14 (ii) SF 3 4 7

(iii) MF 7 10 17

(iv) LF 0 15 15

2 Shravaniya 1 1 0 2

(i) Landless 3 2 5

15 15 30 7 6 13 (ii) SF 8 4 12

(iii) MF 1 9 10

(iv) LF 8 0 8

3 Lavachali 2 0 0 2

(i) Landless 0 0 0

0 22 22 0 10 10 (ii) SF 0 7 7

(iii) MF 0 14 14

(iv) LF 0 1 1

4 Nanatarpada 0 2 1 3

(i) Landless 0 4 4

0 27 27 0 12 12 (ii) SF 0 7 7

(iii) MF 0 14 14

(iv) LF 0 2 2

5 Ojhar 1 0 0 1

(i) Landless 2 0 2

14 0 14 6 0 6 (ii) SF 2 0 2

(iii) MF 8 0 8

(iv) LF 2 0 2

6 Hindala 0 0 1 1

(i) Landless 1 0 1

7 4 11 4 2 6 (ii) SF 3 1 4

(iii) MF 3 3 6

(iv) LF 0 0 0

Total 5 4 2 11 49 84 133 49 84 133 25 36 61

68

iii) User Group: User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user

group collect user charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits. It was decided that each group would

formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.

Table no. 34: UG detail

S. No.

Name of Village

Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of ST in each

category No. of BPL in each

category

With only Men

With only Women

With both

Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 Chimer 2 0 2 4

(i) Landless 0 0 0

14 6 20 12 4 16 (ii) SF 6 2 6

(iii) MF 8 4 12

(iv) LF 6 0 6

2 Shravaniya 3 0 1 4

(i) Landless 0 0 0

20 10 30 12 4 16 (ii) SF 8 2 10

(iii) MF 10 6 16

(iv) LF 2 2 4

3 Lavachali 1 1 0 1

(i) Landless 0 0 0

12 0 12 2 2 4 (ii) SF 3 0 3

(iii) MF 7 0 7

(iv) LF 2 0 2

4 Nanatarpada 3 0 0 3

(i) Landless 0 0 0

20 0 20 6 2 8 (ii) SF 8 0 8

(iii) MF 10 0 10

(iv) LF 2 0 2

5 Ojhar 0 0 1 1

(i) Landless 0 0 0

7 3 10 4 1 5 (ii) SF 7 3 10

(iii) MF 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0

6 Hindala 0 0 1 1

(i) Landless 0 0 0

7 3 10 3 1 4 (ii) SF 7 3 10

(iii) MF 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0

Total 9 1 4 14

80 22 102 80 22 102 39 14 53

69

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP, Malangdev Project

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA)

EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community at the beginning of the project;

generally, certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group discussion was conducted

with watershed Development Committee regarding the EPA activity, It was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 24.00 Lakh was

allotted for EPA activity, which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is

important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken, which revive the common natural

resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.

Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Names of Villages

Amount earmarked for EPA

Entry Point Activities planned

Estimated cost Expected outcome

1 Chimer 6.95 Underground watertank-2 3.475 *2 no. Drinking water for Villegers

Total 6.95

2 Shravaniya

7.74 Well Repair 3.87 Drinking & irrigation Facilities

Well Repair 3.87 Drinking & irrigation Facilities

Total 7.74

3 Lavchali 1.88 Drinking water faselities 1.88 Drinking water for Villegers

Total 1.88

4 Nana Tarpada 3.28 Drinking water faselities 3.28 Drinking water for Villegers

Total 3.28

5 Ojhar 2.97

Drinking water faselities 2.40 Drinking water for Villegers

Milk shed 0.57 for Villegers

Total 2.97

6 Hindla 1.16 pond 1.16 Water storeg ,

Total 1.16

Total 24.00

24.00

70

4.3.2. Watershed Development Works:

Watershed development works are to be done during second phase of watershed project. A multi-tier ridge to valley sequence approach

should be approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 50 percent is allotted for this work.

Ridge Area Treatment Plans: The main purpose is to harvest the

water at ridge level first as this is where the major water resources

originate. It would allow the water to percolate underground and recharge

the natural aquifers. Other benefits would be the reduction in the velocity

of the water which is flowing with high velocity due to heavy rain and steep

slope. The reduced Kinetic energy would allow the soil particle to

accumulate in the trenches and furrows, minimizing the soil erosion as

well. The Kamad watershed had been identified as one of the most eroded

part of the South Dang. Thus, SMC treatment in that region would benefit

the villagers for drinking purpose and help them to increase the

productivity. The gradual process would also help us to retain GWT of the same region. In order to overcome above hurdles, following

structure had been proposed after interaction between the watershed committee, Range Forest Officer (RFO) and other field staff of

forest.

71

Table no.36.: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works*

S.

No. Village name

Name of

structures

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i)

Ridge

area

(R)

(ii)

Drainag

e line

(D)

(iii)

Land

dev. (L)

(i)

Private

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Forest

(i) UG

(ii)SHG

(iii) Others

No. of

units

(No./

cu.m./

rmt)

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

M W O T

1 Chimer

Stone Bund D P F 345 cmt 0.43225

S.S.B R F 550 cmt 0.6897

Land levelling L P 56 hac 9.842

C.C.T D P 380 cmt 0.4769

M.F.O 185

sq.m 7.733

GABIUN STCTER

85 cmt 0.14535

GALLY PLUGE

270 cmt 0.3382

Protection wall

132

sq.m 10.68

2

Shravaniya


S.S.B R F 450 cmt 0.5643

Land levelling L P 45 hac. 7.90875

C.C.T D P 390 cmt 0.48925

M.F.O 278 sq.m

11.6204

72

GABIUN STCTER

75 cmt 0.12825

GALLY PLUGE

275 cmt 0.34485

Protection wall

75 sq.m 6.05625

3 Lavchali


S.S.B 73 cmt 0.0912

Land levelling R F 30 hac. 5.2725

C.C.T 85 cmt 0.1064

M.F.O L P 30 sq.m 1.254

GABIUN STCTER

25 cmt 0.04275

GALLY PLUGE

55 cmt 0.06935

4

Nana

Tarpada

Stone Bund D P F 425.5 cmt

0.5339

S.S.B R F 44 cmt 0.0551

Land levelling 9.5 hac. 1.6701

C.C.T 470 cmt 0.589

M.F.O 38 sq.m 1.5884

GABIUN STCTER

95 cmt 0.68115

GALLY PLUGE

380 cmt 0.4769

Protection wall

40 sq.m 3.23

5

Ojhar


S.S.B 435 cmt 0.5453

Land levelling 43 hac. 7.55725

73

C.C.T 390 cmt 0.48925

M.F.O 65 sq.m 2.717

GABIUN STCTER

85 cmt 0.14535

GALLY PLUGE

320 cmt 0.4009

6 Hindla


S.S.B 250 cmt 0.3135

Land levelling 34 hac. 5.9755

C.C.T 250 cmt 0.3135

M.F.O 45 sq.m 1.881

GABIUN STCTER

35 cmt 0.05985

GALLY PLUGE

250 cmt 0.3135

Protection wall

15 sq.m 1.21125

Total

Stone Bund D P F 2926 cmt

3.6689

S.S.B R F 1802 cmt

2.26005

Land levelling 217.5 hac.

38.228

C.C.T 1965 cmt

2.46715

M.F.O 641

sq.m 26.7938

GABIUN STCTER

400 cmt 0.684

GALLY PLUGE

1550 cmt

1.9437

Protection wall

262

sq.m 211565

74

5% increase

(Estimated

SOR of the

year 2011-

12)

Stone Bund 3.862

S.S.B 2.379

Land levelling 40.24

C.C.T 2.594

M.F.O 28.204

GABIUN STCTER

0.72

GALLY PLUGE

2.046

Protection wall

22.27

TOTAL 102.315

(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No.

Village name

Type of structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing structures

Construction of new structures Total target

NO.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

NO.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

m3

Estimated cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

1

Chimer

CheckWall - - - - 8 16 19200 10.089 16 19200 10.089

Check dam - - - - 7 35 28350 49.14 35 28350 49.14

2 Shravaniya Check wall - - - - 9 18 21600 10.62 18 21600 10.62

Check dam - - - - 9 45 36450 58.59 45 36450 58.59

75

3

Lavchali

Check wall - - - - 2 5 4800 2.97 5 4800 2.97

Check dam - - - - 1 6 4050 8.694 6 4050 8.694

4

Nana

Tarpada

Check wall - - - - 4 9 9600 5.31 9 9600 5.31

Check dam - - - - 4 20 16200 30.24 20 16200 30.24

5

Ojhar

Check wall - - - - 3 7 7200 3.717 7 7200 3.717

Check dam - - - - 4 18 16200 24.57 18 16200 24.57

6 Hindla Check wall

3 7 720 3.717 7 720 3.717

Check dam

2 12 8100 11.34 12 8100 11.34

Total

Check wall - - - - 29 62 69600 36.423 62 69600 36.423

Check

dam - - - - 27 136 109350 182.574 136 109350 182.574

Total 218.997

10% increase (Estimated SOR of the year 2011-12) 240.8967

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Name of Villages Type of

structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing

recharging structures

Construction of new

recharging structures Total target

No. Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Estimated

cost No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Estimated

cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Estimated

cost

1 Chimer Open wells 10 25 10.80 - - - 25 10.80

2 Shravaniya Open wells 8 20 8.64 - - - 20 8.64

76

3 Lavchali Open wells 1 3 1.08 - - - 3 1.08

4 Nana Tarpada Open wells 1 2 1.08 - - - 2 1.08

5 Ojhar Open wells 6 10 6.48 - - - 10 6.48

6 Hindla Open wells 5 9 5.4 - - - 9 5.4

Total

Nana

Tarpada

31 69 33.48 - - - 69 33.48

10% increase (Estimated

SOR of the year 2010-11) 37.2 37.2

Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises

S. No.

Name of village

Name of activity

Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Private (ii)

Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl. specify)

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of

completion (mm/yyyy)

1 Chimer

Agriculture productivity enhancement Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) P Individual 3.30 Horticulture (Mango Plot) P Individual 2.99 / Seeds of ledy finger fartilizer Individual 1.34 Green house-2 p 1.00

77

Trector UG (10) 7.15 Tresher p UG (10) 1.60 Silvey Pasture/ chap cutter Forest SHG 0.50 Agriculture tools kit Individual 0.50 BIO-gas other 1.80 Fartilazar depo SHG 5.00 Mandap deco. Kit & janreter SHG 3.64 Catet camp, catel food Other 2.10 Narshari kit for vagitabels seed, berol dreep, Honda pupm machine

UG (10) 1.40

Agriculture tools kit Individual 0.50

2 Shravaniya

Agriculture productivity enhancement Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) Individual 1.32 Horticulture (Mango Plot) Individual 2.14 Honda machine P SHG 1.40 Lifttio Irrigan-2 UG (24) 9.00 Green house-2 1.00 Vegitabel crop -8 Individual 2.80 Seeds of ledy finger fartilizer Individual 2.00 Silvey Pasture/chap cutter Forest UG 1.60 Baj-daliya & FOREST SEED COLLECTION SHG 1.75 Fay-ase plant unite SHG , (20) 5.00 Floor Mill SHG 0.91 Catet camp, catel food other 1.80 BIO-gas Individual 2.80 Mini trector UG(10) 2.80 Agriculture tools kit Individual 1.36

3 Lavchali

Agriculture productivity enhancement

Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) Individual 0.66 Horticulture (Mango Plot) Individual 1.28 Mini trector UG(10) 2.78 Lift Irrigation UG 3.00

78

cement- poll making unite SHG 2.50 irrigation facilety & Aggri culere seed kit SHG (1) 2.94 catel camp Others 0.80

4 Nana

Tarpada

Agriculture productivity enhancement Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) Individual 1.32 Lifttio Irrigan- UG 3.80 Honda machine P UG 0.70 Vegitabel crop Individual 1.10 Horticulture (Mango Plot) P Individual 1.28 Fartilazar depo SHG 4.00 Baj-daliya & FOREST SEED COLLECTION SHG 2 Narshari kit for vagitabels seed, berol dreep, Honda pupm machine

UG(10) 1.38

5 Ojhar

Agriculture productivity enhancement Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) Individual 1.98 Horticulture (Mango Plot) P Individual 1.32 Lift Irrigation UG 2.00 Green house-2 1.00 Agrricaluer tools UG 0.67 Dreep irrigation Individual 0.50 Sound system & janareter SHG 4.10 Catet camp, catel food Others 1.20 Bio- gas Individual 1.00 Silvey Pasture/chap cutter UG (15) 0.39

6 Hindla

Agriculture productivity enhancement Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) P Individual 1.32 Horticulture (Mango Plot) P Individual 1.07 Green house UG 0.52 Threser SHG 1.75 Tea- sank stoll& sugarcan juse machine with lory

SHG 1.82

catel camp Others 0.80

79

Note: 1. Please provide the list of works and names beneficiaries in the annexure]

Sr. No. Name of Village Name of Activity Name of Beneficiaries

Production System and Microenterprise Development (13%)

1

Livelihood Activities for landless people. (10%)

2. Ensure that 10% of the total project funds go to the assetless give separate list in the annexure

Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

S. No. Names of

Villages

Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from

activity per SHG

1 Chimer

Silvey Pasture/ chap cutter 2 1.20

Fartilazar depo

Mandap deco. Kit & janreter

2 Shravaniya Baj-daliya & FOREST SEED COLLECTION 2 2.80

80

Fay-ase plant unite

3 Lavachali

cement- poll making unite 2 2.50

irrigation facilety & Aggri culere seed kit

4 Nanatarpada

Baj-daliya & FOREST SEED COLLECTION 2 1.70

Narshari kit for vagitabels seed, berol dreep, Honda pupm machine

5 Ojhar Sound system & janareter 1 2.10

6 Hindala Threser 1 1.80

Table no. 41: Linkages developed at Village level

Sr.

No. Village Name of activity

Forward/Backward

linkage Linkage with Outcome

1 Chimer

Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) Krushi University Navshari Vyara & songadh 4.20

Horticulture (Mango Plot) BAIF Trust Vyara & songadh 3.00

/ Seeds of ledy finger fartilizer KVK VYARA Vyara & songadh, 2.70

Green house-2 KVK VYARA Vyara & songadh Local Area 1.10

Fartilazar depo GINC Vyara & songadh Local Area 3.80

Mandap deco. Kit & janreter SURAT Vyara & songadh Local Area 2.00

2 SHRAVNIYA Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) Krushi University Navshari Vyara & songadh 1.80


81

Green house-2 KVK VYARA Vyara & songadh Local Area 1.10

Vegitabel crop -8 KVK VYARA Vyara & songadh Local Area 2.90

Seeds of ledy finger fartilizer KVK VYARA Vyara & songadh 2.50

Baj-daliya & FOREST SEED

COLLECTION SURAT & FORST AREA Vyara & songadh Local Area 3.00

Fay-ase plant unite SURAT & UKAI THARMAL Vyara & songadh 4.00

Floor Mill SURAT Vyara & songadh 3.00

3 Lavchali




cement- poll making unite SURAT Vyara & songadh Local Area 2.50

4

Nana

Tarpada

Agriculture productivity

enhancement


Horticulture (Mango Plot) Vyara & songadh Local Area 1.20

Fartilazar depo Vyara & songadh Local Area 3.80

Baj-daliya & FOREST SEED

COLLECTION Vyara & songadh Local Area 2.10

Narshari kit for vagitabels seed,

berol dreep, Honda pupm machine KVK VYARA Vyara & songadh Local Area

5 Ojhar Agriculture productivity

enhancement

82



Green house-2 KVK VYARA Vyara & songadh 1.20

Sound system & janareter SURAT Vyara & songadh 3.00

6 Hindla



Horticulture (Mango Plot) BAIF Trust Vyara & songadh Local Area 1.40

Green house KVK VYARA Vyara & songadh 1.20

Tea- sank stoll& sugarcan juse

machine with lory SURAT Vyara & songadh, Local Area 2.00

Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

S. No.

Name of village

Name of structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land

dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Forest

(i) UG (ii) SHG (iii) Indi.

Area (ha)

No. of plants

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year

of completion (mm/

yyyy)

1 Chimer Tree Plantation R P Individual 1100 0.066

Bamboo Plantation R F SHG 5 hac 2000 0.673

2 Shravaniya Tree Plantation R P Individual 2830 0.170


83

TKB Plantation R F SHG 7 hac 12439 2.375

3 Lavchali

Tree Plantation R P Individual 4240 0.254



4 Nana

Tarpada



5 Ozar




6 Hindla Tree Plantation R P Individual 3330 0.400

Total


Bamboo Plantation R F SHG 315 hac 12600

0 42.399

Teak Kher Bamboo

Plantation R F SHG 89 hac

15815

3 30.202

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

S. No.

Name(s) of the villages

CPR particulars Activity

proposed

Target

Area under the activity (ha)

Estimated expenditure (Rs. in Lakh)

Expected no. of beneficiaries

1 Chimer Pasture / Waste Land Pond 1.00 0.80

2 Hindla Pasture / Waste Land Pond 0.49 0.60

84

4.4 Capacity Building:

Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights,

knowledge and experience needed to solve problems and implement change.

There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going

beyond the conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g. in the form of commodities, goods and services) to take into

account improvements to human potential. Capacity building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in

developmental projects that involve participation of stakeholders at all levels for effective implementation of projects.

Scope of capacity building at Malangdev Village

Alternative Land Use Plan

Scientific technique of Soil and Moisture conservation

Improved and Scientific agriculture practices

Fodder development and Management

Dairy Development and Management

Rural Craft.

85

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution:

S. No

.

Name of the

Training Institute

Full Address with contact no., website & e-

mail

Type of Institute#

Area(s) of specialization$

Accreditation details

Trainings

Reference Year

No. of trainings assigned

No. of trainees to be

trained

1 Krishi

Vigyan Kendra

Navsari Agri. University, Vyara, Dist. Tapi.

02626-220212

Research Institute

Agriculture, Horticulture, Animal Husbandry,

Cropping Techniques, Dairy, Nursery

GoI 2012-14 4 100

2 BISAG Gandhinagar Space

Application Remote sensing GoG 2010-15 3 3

3 BAIF Griserve, Vyara NGO Agriculture, Watershed Structures, Accounts

NGO 2010-15 10 200

# Central govt. Dept./ State govt. Dept./ Autonomous Body/ Research Institutes/ Universities/ Others (pl. specify) $ Capacity Building/ Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry/ Pisciculture/ Remote Sensing/ Water conservation/ Ground water/

Forestry/ livelihoods/ entrepreneurship development/ others (pl. specify)

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

S. No.

State Project

Stakeholders Total no. of

persons No. of persons to be

trained No. of training programmes

Estimated cost

PIA 10 10 5

Under Process

WDTs 28 28 10

UGs 200 200 20

SHGs 1052 1052 20

WCs 165 165 15

GPs 25 25 5

86

Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities:

S. No.

Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) Outcome (may quantify, wherever

possible)

1 Street Plays Forest Dept, Vyara 0.15

Awareness for the importance of Integrated

Watershed Development Programme (IWMP)

2 Video Shows Forest Dept, Vyara 0.25

3 Pamphlets & Posters Forest Dept, Vyara 1.10

4 Banners & Hoardings Forest Dept, Vyara 1.50

Total 3.00

87

Chapter 5

Budgeting

88

Budgeting

The first step in budgeting is dividing the cost of the project into various components as detailed in the common guidelines and done

accordingly in table No.47. It helps us in further identifying activities under different components and allocate appropriate funds .

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project

Sl no Budget component Cost requirement

1 Administrative costs 10 % 60.00

2 Monitoring 1 % 6.00

3 Evaluation 1 % 6.00

4 Entry Point activity 4 % 24.00

5 Institution and Capacity Building 5 % 30.00

6 Detailed Project Report 1 % 6.00

7 Watershed Development Works 56% 336.00

8 Livelihood acti4ties for asset less 9 % 54.00

9 Production systems and micro-enterprises 10 % 60.00

10 Consolidation phase 3 % 18.00

TOTAL 100 % 600.00

89

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP

Sl

no Village

Activity

EPA Institution

and CB DPR

Watershed

development Work

Livelihood for

asset less

Production

system and

Microenterprises

Consolidation Total

1 Chimer 6.95 8.69 1.73 97.33 15.64 17.38 5.21 152.93

2 Shravaniya 7.74 9.67 1.93 108.38 17.42 19.35 5.80 170.29

3 Lavchali 1.88 2.36 0.47 26.42 4.24 4.71 1.41 41.49

4 Nana Tarpada 3.28 4.10 0.82 45.93 7.38 8.20 2.46 72.17

5 Ojhar 2.97 3.71 0.74 41.61 6.69 7.43 2.23 65.38

6 Hindla 1.16 1.46 0.29 16.30 2.62 2.91 0.87 25.61

Total 24 30 6 336 54 60 18 528

90

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement

Sl no Name of Village Total cost requirement Total funds available under IWMP Gap in funds requirement

1 Chimer 187.848 173.808 14.04

2 Shravaniya 203.488 193.548 9.94

3 Lavchali 47.644 47.184 0.46

4 Nana Tarpada 82.602 82.032 0.57

5 Ojhar 88.974 74.304 14.67

6 Hindla 46.974 29.124 17.85

Total 657.53 600.00 57.53

91

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

S. No. Village Phase/ Type of work* Activity to be

carried out

Fund made available to IWMP due

to convergence (Rs. in lakh)

Scheme with which convergence took

place

Reference no. of

activity/ task/

structure in DPR

Level at which

decision for convergence

was taken

1 Chimer

Vegetative and Engineering Structure

S.B. 0.455 MGNREGS Table no. 36 Under

Process

Plantation 0.33

S.S.B 0.726 MGNREGS

C.C.T 0.502

G.P, 0.356

Land Development (Productive use

Land Lavaling 10.36

2 Shravaniya


S.B. 1.247 MGNREGS Table no. 36

Plantation 0.27

S.S.B 0.594 MGNREGS

C.C.T 0.515

G.P, 0.363

Land Development (Productive use

Land Lavaling 8.325

92

3

Lavchali



Plantation 0.21

S.S.B 0.096 MGNREGS

C.C.T 0.112

G.P, 0.073

Land Development

(Productive use Land Lavaling 5.55

4

Nana Tarpada



Plantation 0.15

S.S.B 0.058

C.C.T 0.62

G.P, 0.502

Land Development


5

Ojhar


S.B. 0.647 MGNREGS Table no. 36 Under

Process

Plantation 0.06

S.S.B 0.574 MGNREGS

93

C.C.T 0.515

G.P, 0.422

Land Development


6

Hindla



Plantation 0.18

S.S.B 0.33 MGNREGS

C.C.T 0.33

G.P, 0.33

Land Development


Total 57.53

*Phase/Type of work: EPA, Land base, Surface water, Ground water, Livelihood

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects

S. No.

Name of Private Sector

Partner Agency

Type of agreement signed Financial

contribution Partnership

Interventions Expected Outcomes

Comments a)MoU b)Contract

c) Any other (pl. specify)

IWMP Private sector

- - - - - - -

94

Chapter 6

Expected Outcomes

95

6.1 Expected Outcomes.

6.1.1 Employment

Employment has always been a problem in the village. The principal occupations of the people are dry land agriculture, animal

husbandry and casual labour work. However, rain fall being very limited and erratic, agriculture suffers, i.e. at best they can take only a

single crop, which keeps them partially engaged for about 4 months. Lack of fodder makes animal husbandry very difficult too. So, animal

husbandry does not keep tem engaged full time. Thus the People mainly depend upon casual labour, either in the village itself or outside

it. The project plans for creation of both wage employment and self employment opportunities. Wage employment would be created by

engaging people in watershed physical works like construction of earthen bunds, village pond, plantation, etc. self employment would be

created by providing the people with cash support in the form of direct livelihood like agriculture, animal husbandry and enterprise

development.

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area:

S. NO.

Names of Villages

Wage employment Self employment

No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total

1 Chimer

0 6733 0 3367 6733 0 673

0 337 673

0 20

0 10 20

2 Shravaniya 0 15133 0 7567 15133 0 1513 0 757 1513 0 45 0 23 45

3 Lavchali 0 18667 0 9334 18667 0 1867

0 933 1867

0 56

0 28 56

4 Nana Tarpada 0 20200 0 10100 20200 0 2020

0 1010 2020

0 61

0 30 61

5 Ojhar 0 19700 0 9850 19700 0 1970

0 985 1970

0 59

0 30 59

6 Hindla 0 16567 0 8284 16567 0 1657

0 828 1657

0 50

0 25 50

Total 0 256434 0 128222 256434 0 25644 0 12821 25644 0 770 0 384 770

96

6.1.2. Migration

Heavy rainfall results in Malangdev and their is fodder availability in monsoon and winter but there is a problem for a summer.

There is a problem of water in summer. On account of agriculture and animal husbandry providing only part time employment for some

part of the year, the people migrate for a better half of the year for wage labour in sugar factory.Employment opportunities in the local area

as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal migration from the area.

Table no. 53: Seasonal migration from Project area

Sl. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project

1 Chimer 121 85

240 120

2 Shravaniya 272 191

3 Lavchali 340 238

4 Nana Tarpada 365 256

5 Ojhar 356 249

6 Hindla 298 209

Total 4652 3258

97

Table no. 54: Average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)

S. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre-Project level Expected Increase/decrease

(Post- Project)

Open wells

Bore wells

Others (specify)

1 Chimer 35 27

2 Shravaniya 28 21

3 Lavchali 26 20

4 Nana Tarpada 35 28

5 Ojhar 30 22

6 Hindla 40 33

6.1.3 Status of Drinking Water Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water

Production Productivity Area Production

Productivity Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project

98

6.1.4 Crops : Agriculture primarily depends upon water; but this is heavy rain fall in the Malangdev village. The surface water is scanty

due for only 4 months and land with stone which is not preferable for recharging the ground water level. So, there is lacking of water in the

summer which is affect to the crop production. All this can change with the integrated land and water management during the watershed

project. The planned earthen bunds would prevent the saline water from the Hill to river and stop water for increasing the water level for

water underground, and preserve some moisture in the soil. This will help in additional area coming under cultivation and increasing

productivity too. The farmer can take more than one season of crops. Different varieties of crops can be taken.

Table no. 56: Crop area and yield in the project area

Sr.

No. Name of village

Name of

crops

Pre-project Expected Post-project

Area

(ha)

Production in

Qtl

Average Yield (Qtl) per

ha.

Area

(ha)

Production in

Qtl

Average Yield

per ha (qtl)

1 Chimer

Tuwer 22.5 209.70 9.32 22.5 395.70 11.15

Nagali 4.5 48.40 10.75 4.5 90.70 20.15

Paddy 29.7 1026.10 34.54 29.7 2026.5 68.23

Groundnut 20 229.20 11.46 20 420.30 21.01

Black Gram 13.5 75.10 5.56 13.5 150.5 11.14

2 Shravaniya

Tuwer 62.2 534.90 8.59 62.2 980.90 15.77

Nagali 12.4 117.90 9.50 12.4 250.30 20.18

Paddy 82.1 2289.70 27.88 82.1 4479.60 54.56

Groundnut 55 541.20 9.84 55 1000.10 18.18

99

Black Gram 37.3 187.60 5.02 37.3 300.60 8.05

3 Lavchali

Tuwer 90.7 747.30 8.23 90.7 1400.80 15.44

Nagali 18.1 160.70 8.87 18.1 320.80 17.72

Paddy 119.7 2939.80 24.55 119.7 6570.50 54.89

Groundnut 80 722.40 9.03 80 1800.60 22.50

Black Gram 54.4 258.90 4.75 54.4 620.50 11.40

4 Nana tarpada

Tuwer 56.9 502.90 8.83 56.9 900.60 15.82

Nagali 11.4 113.20 9.92 11.4 205.50 18.02

Paddy 75.1 2261.20 30.10 75.1 3500.10 46.60

Groundnut 50 519.00 10.38 50 1000.30 20.00

Black Gram 34.1 177.60 5.20 34.1 360.80 10.58

5 Ozar

Tuwer 59.3 517.00 8.71 59.3 1000.10 16,86

Nagali 11.9 115.60 9.71 11.9 175.40 14.73

Paddy 78.3 2270.70 29.00 78.3 3950.40 50.45

Groundnut 52 525.70 10.10 52 890.80 17.13

Black Gram 35.6 182.20 5.11 35.6 270.40 7.59

6 Hindla

Tuwer 65 551.20 8.48 65 900.10 13.84

Nagali 13 120.90 9.30 13 420.20 32.32

Paddy 85.8 2297.70 26.77 85.8 3325.60 38.75

Groundnut 57 545.40 9.56 57 850.30 14.91

Black Gram 39 192.60 4.93 39 280.60 7.19

100

6.1.5 Horticulture :

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture

S. No. Name of Village Crop Existing area under the crop Area post project

1 Chimer Holticulture (Amba Wadi ) 1.5 2.5

Crop (Turmeric , Yam, Paddy, Wheet, Garlic) 2 4.5

2 Shravaniya Holticulture (Amba Vadi ) 4.5 7.5


3 Lavchali Holticulture (Amba Vadi ) 5.28 10.5

Crop (Turmeric , Yam, Paddy, Wheet, Garlic) 2 3

4 NanaTarpada Holticulture (Amba Vadi ) 3.5 7

Crop (Turmeric , Yam, Paddy, Wheet, Garlic) 2 3

5 Ozar Holticulture (Amba Vadi ) 4 7.5


6 Hindla

Holticulture (Amba Vadi ) 1.5 3

Crop (Turmeric, Garlic) 1.60 5.00

Crop (Turmeric, Garlic) 2 3.5

101

Drinking water

The village has open wells and bore wells which they depend for their drinking water. Many an effort at finding sweet water at

different other places in the same village has failed. A farmer uses an open well in the farm and allows the villages to take water from the

well. There is another well in a common land too; but the water is not as good as the other well. WASMO has constructed a take to store

water brought pipeline from Bore well.As a result of the watershed activities, it is expected that the quality of drinking water would improve.

6.1.6 Vegetative Cover :

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed

1 Chimer 35 5

2 Shravaniya 185 32

3 Lavchali 60 6

4 Nana Tarpada 15 5

5 Ojhar 85 26

6 Hindla 55 10

Total 435 84

102

6.1.7 Livestock

The Village has quite a good of livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats and hens. The interventions

like provision of good quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment of a fodder bank and other such related activities would spur up the

dairy development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and

yield from them.

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

S. No. Name of Village Type of Animal Pre-Project Expected Post-project

Remarks No. Yield Income No. Yield Income

1 Chimer

Milch-animals 60 110 2680 100 220 6600

Draught Purpose animals 89

Animals for other purpose 164 150 3000 210 300 36000

2 Shravniya

Milch-animals 177 340 8020 390 670 21100



103

3 Lavchali

Milch-animals 132 260 6480 240 450 13500



4 Nana Tarpada

Milch-animals 78 170 4560 145 280 8400



5 Ozar

Milch-animals 89 200 5500 170 420 12600



6 Hindla

Milch-animals 76 160 4280 180 370 11100


Animals for other purpose 61+162 900+130 162000+1

5600

80+2

30 1200+280

14400+32

200

104

No. 60: Backward-Forward linkages

S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)

IWMP-VII

Chimer

Backward linkages

Seed certification NIL - -

Seed supply system “ Local Market Local Market

Fertilizer supply system Local Market Local Market Pesticide supply system - -

Credit institutions - - Water supply Village Area Village Area

Extension services - - Nurseries Forest & local area Forest & local area

Tools/machinery suppliers - -

Price Support system - -

Labour Local Village Local Village

Any other (please specify) - -

Forward linkages

Harvesting/threshing machinery Local Local & Near

Villages

Storage (including cold storage) - -

Road network - -

Transport facilities - -

Markets / Mandis Local Local

Agro and other Industries - -

Milk and other collection centres Local Local

Labour Local Local

Any other (please specify) - -

105

Chapter 7

Quality and Sustainability Issues

106

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation

A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases.

The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the

entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom on to one particular project.

Details related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise

details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for

pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help

the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for

the further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception stage to

the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the

project area. The system would serve as and aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project.

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the

ground staff alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any

higher-up official in charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS.

The system works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various

treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in

107

the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view

the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of time.

7.2 Plans for Project Management:

The Project management of any Watershed programme is very important; it mainly depends upon the community organization and

the village level institutes. In chimer, watershed committee and various user groups have been formulated for post project operation and

maintenance of assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after

implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organization. They

will act as a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.

7.3 Watershed Development Fund:

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is a Watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it

will comes mainly fund the following:

7.4 User Charges:

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed

during the formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. There secretary of

watershed committee (WC) shall maintain the records of the following.

108

Chapter 8

Maps

109

1. Cadastral Map

2. Drainage Map

3. Slop Map

4. Geomorphology Map

5. Soil Map

6. Land Use / Land Cover Map

7. Ground Water Map

8. Propose Action Plan Map

9. Contour maps

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (DPR) -...

Documents

Transcript of DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (DPR) -...