Designing Blended Degree Programs: Theoretical Assumptions and Practical Experience Jay Halfond,...
-
date post
18-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Designing Blended Degree Programs: Theoretical Assumptions and Practical Experience Jay Halfond,...
Designing Blended Degree Programs: Theoretical Assumptions and
Practical Experience
Jay Halfond, Tanya Zlateva, Leo Burstein
The 15th Sloan-C International Conference on Online LearningOctober, 2009
Outline1. BU History of Blended Learning2. Definitions and Perspectives3. Value Proposition4. Building Blocks5. Technology Overview6. Future of Blended Learning7. Q & A
© 2009 Boston University Metropolitan CollegeOctober 2009 2
BU History of Blended LearningLarge online operation - more than 20 grad & undergrad degree programs +- 10+ years history- student population ~ 5,000Blended (eLive) program- Two years old- Leverages online and on-campus experienceInitially struggled with definition of “blended learning”
© 2009 Boston University Metropolitan College
Promise of blended learning
– creating a better package
October 2009 3
Definitions of Blended – It All DependsDefinitions based on allocating percentages “Blended programs are programs where 30 to 79% of content is delivered online,
while in on-campus programs all content is delivered in writing or orally”.
Definitions based on allocating time“Blended courses are courses with reduced contact hours.”
Definitions using dichotomies based on: educational technologies, physical proximity, content media, learning objectives, pedagogical theories, etc.
No universally accepted practical definitions! © 2009 Boston University Metropolitan CollegeOctober 2009 4
Blended from School Administrators’ Perspective
© 2009 Boston University Metropolitan College
Distance Blended Learning ClassroomNational & International coverage
Regional reach; other opportunities depending on program design
Requires local residency
Designed for self-learners who prefer flexible schedule
Good fit for students who are working professionals who appreciate flexibility
Designed for students who prefer F2F interactions
Proven business model with high scalability
Attract distinguished non-local faculty
Marketing partnerships
Defensive strategy against local competitors; Innovation while maintaining school brand
Opportunity to increase faculty efficiency with reduced contact hours (???), reusable online content, recordings, etc.
Challenging business model, with initial investment and associated risks, complex implementation framework (Khan’s Octagonal).
October 2009 5
Blended from Faculty Perspective
© 2009 Boston University Metropolitan College
Distance Blended Learning Classroom
Typically large classes
More work; significant out-of-classroom participation; online office hours (time and technology aspects).
Typically smaller classes
Online content development
Develop online content AND new classroom activities (students come prepared)
"Death by PowerPoint"
Working with IDs Smaller (comparing to DE) classes
“Easy to follow-up on absences”
Indirect interactions guiding TAs
Choice of teaching modalities, e.g. combining spontaneous classroom and in-depth online discussions
Directions not always clear
Increased opportunity to explore (distributed) teamwork, real-life projects, decision making.
October 2009 6
Business World Realities
Jr. Programmer, Jr. Analyst, Jr. Researcher
Sr. Programmer, Consultant, Project Lead, Subject Matter Expert
Manager, Director
MS Degree
MS Degree + Practical Skills (Certificates)
MS Degree + Practical Skills + Core Business Competencies
© 2009 Boston University Metropolitan CollegeOctober 2009 7
Information Age Realities
© 2009 Boston University Metropolitan College
Fish Teach how to
fish
Teach how to learn to
fish
October 2009 8
Blended Learning - The Students’ Perspective
October 2009 © 2009 Boston University Metropolitan College 9
BlendedLearning –Student
View
By L
eo B
urst
ein
Academic FoundationP
ract
ical
Ski
lls
Business C
ompetencies
succeedtoneed
studentswhat
REASON FOR EXISTENCE – “Exceeding Comparability”
Empower Teachers: enhance the variety of teaching approaches design programs for multi-modal delivery use multimedia and new collaboration technologies streamline course logistics create a sense of community for students
and facultyo more than just making content available online; create new learning
opportunities by combining classroom activities with independent study and working in virtual teams
o optimal blend of online/classroom modules based on taxonomy of learning objectives (come prepared for F2F meetings!)
© 2009 Boston University Metropolitan CollegeOctober 2009 10
Exceeding Comparability (cont.)
Broaden the Audience: Increase student quality and diversity Meet student expectations Provide flexibility and choice
- accommodate different lifestyles and personal preferences
Support for new communication paradigms - welcome “digital natives”)
Maintain workplace relevance
© 2009 Boston University Metropolitan CollegeOctober 2009 11
Instruments for Building an Effective Blended Program
StructureCourse materials, well defined activities, schedules, etc.
Dialogf2f sessions, online discussions, video collaboration
Impact
Answer is an area and depends on student’s independent learning ability
Moore’s TD TheoryMaintain optimal “transactional distance” using both structure (CMS-supported) and dialog (both async and sync communications).
0
© 2009 Boston University Metropolitan CollegeOctober 2009 12
F2F
DE
Technology Landscape
© 2009 Boston University Metropolitan CollegeOctober 2009 13
Learning
Management
Systems
• Blackboard• Vista• Course Info• Angel• Moodle• Sakai• Mobile Academy• Learning Gateway• …
MultimediaCollaboration
• Discussions• Blogs, Wikis• SharePoint, Groove• Webinars• Video conferences• Citrix/app sharing• Social Networking• Second Life
Authoring
• MS Office• Dreamweaver• Expression Studio• Google Tools• Respondus• Camtasia• DRM• PHP, Ajax …
How do we know w
hen students
should
constr
uct a w
iki entry
rather th
an
to have a virtu
al disc
ussion
or a
face-to
-face
d
ialog?
• Video• Flash• Silverlight• Animations• Voiceovers• Podcasting• iTunesU• iPOD, Zune, …
Technology Architecture
October 2009 © 2009 Boston University Metropolitan College 14
Abstract vision … and the reality (over)
Lecture Notes, Syllabus
CD/DVD
Real-Time Webcasts
Recorded Video(Introduction)
Audio NotesSlide
Presentation
Discussion Boards
Assignments
Assessments, Exams
MS Office
Deploy Stream Server
Send Link
Recorded Lectures w/slides
Articles, Links
Recorded Video with Slides
Embed LMS
AnimationSurveys
Audacity(?), Microphone
Live/Sync Collaboration
Online Meetings (Wimba)
Live Video
Co
nte
nt/
Act
ivit
yD
eliv
ery
LMS (Vista)
Deploy iTunesU
Deploy podcasting
server
Headset
Camtasia
Webcam, headset,
laptop
Camera kit
Service or Instructions Service
Echo 360 Station
Video Collaboration
(IOCOM)
Webcam, headset
Training
Copyright check
Edit Update
QABuild
ERT Internal technologies:
* Procedures* Workflows* Instructions* Templates* Documentation* Collaboration
SharePointS
ilver
light
Cla
ssro
om
Pre
sent
er
Pho
ne/W
ebE
x
Online Labs, Group Projects
Virtual Environments Social Networking
Au
tho
rin
gP
roce
ssin
g
ClassroomPodcast
ITunesU
Lab Development
Lab Development
and Deployment
Group Projects
© Education Technology Research, Boston University
Online Office Hours
Edit and Encode
Premier Pro
Open Source
LMS
Dreamweaver RespondusAdobe Flash
Photo-shop
Adobe Acrobat
MSOffice
LMS Designer Kit
Simulation
Technology Architecture (cont)
© 2009 Boston University Metropolitan CollegeOctober 2009 15
Technology Wish List
- Low cost - match business model (open source is good, but remember TCO)
- Ubiquitous - routine use to preserve cognitive focus for faculty & students
- Supported - delivered through well defined services
You will know when you are successful!
© 2009 Boston University Metropolitan CollegeOctober 2009 16
Structure Need more structure
comparing to F2F Use of CMS to structure
content and deliverables – a must
© 2009 Boston University Metropolitan CollegeOctober 2009 17
You are successful if:- Faculty beyond CS department start using the system- No complaints about inability to change content in a timely manner
Dialog Need more dialog comparing
to Distance programs (and “typical” f2f programs?!)- Introduce sync elements in off-campus weeks
© 2009 Boston University Metropolitan CollegeOctober 2009 18
You are successful when students start inviting others to listen to their presentations!
Use lecture/mini-lecture recording (async) – “frozen” dialog - useful to ensure flexibility, but split into modules- use appliances to minimize overhead
Motivation for Using Video Collaboration• Challenge: maintaining learning
momentum and the connection with the students when off-campus (“an energy conduit”)
• Synchronous video conferencing closest to face-to-face communication
© 2009 Boston University Metropolitan College
Pay close attention if you plan for international programs!
October 2009 19
•In addition to Moore, other researches indicate the importance of distance for communication in general and learning in particular and give indirect support for VC.
Classic work by Tom Allen on communication patterns in the 1970s:• frequency of communication diminishes with increased distance and that this holds true for all types of communication (phone and e-mail)
• important decisions tend to be made in face-to-face meetings
Virtual Lab Example
© 2009 Boston University Metropolitan College
Hardware Platform
Virtualization Layer
Application Server
Certification Authority
Network Protocol Analyzer
Client Workstation
vii
viii
ix
iii iv v
x
ii
vi
i
Example: “online banking” scenario (simulation of a distributed computing environment in a Cryptography/PKI Lab, linking to crypto algorithms, network protocols and security models)
October 2009 22
Business AspectsOrganizational placement:
DE/CET/School, business ventures, serendipity.
Staffing with students: content development, administration, technology. Integration. started out of necessity but observed
great enthusiasm from students assisting with content and lab development.
© 2009 Boston University Metropolitan CollegeOctober 2009 23
The King is Dead. Long Live the King!
Online banking and “blended” banks?
What is “flexibility”? Our “blended” future
October 2009 © 2009 Boston University Metropolitan College 24