Design and Implementation of Vibration Data Acquisition in ... · DRAFT NOV. 12, 2008: Gail...
Transcript of Design and Implementation of Vibration Data Acquisition in ... · DRAFT NOV. 12, 2008: Gail...
Design and Implementation of Vibration Data Acquisition inGoodwin Hall for Structural Health Monitoring, Human Motion,
and Energy Harvesting Research
Joseph M. Hamilton
Thesis submitted to the Faculty of theVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Master of Sciencein
Mechanical Engineering
Pablo A. Tarazaga, ChairMary E. Kasarda, Co-ChairKevin B. Kochersberger
April 28, 2015Blacksburg, Virginia
Keywords: Building Instrumentation, Structural Health Monitoring, Human Motion,Energy Harvesting, Vibration, Accelerometers, Data Acquisition
Copyright 2015, Joseph M. Hamilton
DRAFT NOV. 12, 2008: Gail McMillan, Digital Library and Archives 8
DRAFT Fair Use Checklist adapted from the Copyright Management Center at IUPUI
http://www.copyright.iupui.edu/checklist.htm (accessed Oct 28, 2008). See also the University of
Minnesota’s “Fair Use Analysis Tool” at http://www.lib.umn.edu/copyright/checklist.phtml
As a test of fair use in ETDs at Virginia Tech: ______________________________________________test of
Fair Use Factor In Favor of Fair Use
In Favor of Copyright
Holder (not fair use)
Purpose and Character of Use
commercial or educational use Research Commercial activity
for profit or not Scholarship Profit (monetarily) from use
degree of transformation; value
added Nonprofit university Entertainment
for criticism, commentary, news
reporting, teaching, scholarship, research Criticism Bad-faith behavior
Comment
Denying credit to original
author
Transformative: changes the
original work for new purpose
Parody
Nature of the Copyrighted
Work
character of the work Published work Unpublished work
for example, fact or fiction Factual or non-fiction based
Highly creative work (art,
music, novels, films, plays)
worthy of (extensive) protection?
Important to favored
educational objectives Fiction
Amount and Substantiality
use only what's necessary Small quantity of the work
Large poprtion or whole work
used
quantity and quality in relation to
the whole work
Portion used is not central or
significant to entire work
Portion used is central to
work or "heart of the work"
Amount is appropriate for
favored educational purpose
Effect
harm to potential market or value
of a work after a portion has been
used separately from the whole
User has lawfully acquired
copy of the original work
Could replace sale of
copyrighted work
One or fewer copies made
Significantly impairs market or
potential market for copyright
work or derivative
No significant effect o the
market or potential market of
copyrighted work
Reasonably available
licensing mechanism for use
of the copyrighted work
No similar product marketed
by the copyright holder
Affordable permission
available for using work
Lack of licensing mechanism Numerous copies made
You made it accessible on
Web or in other public forum
Repeated or long term use
6/3/2015 Virginia Tech Mail Fwd: Images from output model
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e5dfc401e9&view=pt&search=inbox&type=14d9840d8cacd8ca&msg=14dbadae03b1401c&siml=14dbadae03b1401c 1/2
Joseph Hamilton <[email protected]>
Fwd: Images from output model
Pablo Tarazaga <[email protected]> Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 3:16 PMTo: Joseph Joe Hamilton <[email protected]>Cc: Mary Kasarda <[email protected]>
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Drake, Peter" Subject: RE: Images from output model
Date: June 3, 2015 at 3:14:13 PM EDTTo: Pablo Tarazaga
He Pablo Good to hear from you. Your student may use the mode shape images we sent. I lookforward to catching up soon.
Peter C Drake, P.E., LEED APAssociateThornton Tomasetti2000 L Street, NW, Suite 840Washington, DC 20036www.ThorntonTomasetti.com
Original MessageFrom: Pablo Tarazaga [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 3:08 PMTo: Drake, PeterSubject: Images from output model
Hey Peter,
Hope things are going well for you. It has been a while since we have talked. We should probablycatch up again. Things are going well here and we are still moving full speed with theinstrumentation.
I have the student that started the instrumentation graduated and he wanted to use some of theimages you guys sent us in his thesis. The ones about the mode shapes. Do you think that it isok? We of course plan to use proper credit to Thornton Tomasetti.
Let me know as I dropped the ball on this and we need to know ASAP so that his thesis can beapproved.
CheersPablo
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>The information in this email and any attachments may containconfidential information that is intended solely for theattention and use of the named addressee(s). This message or
5/12/2015 VT Fair Use Analysis Results
http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2
Draft 09/01/2009
(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])
(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)
Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results
This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.
Name: Joseph Marshall Hamilton
Description of item under review for fair use: Figures 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4. Jessica Thangjitham. Investigating
Dynamic Properties of Goodwin Hall and their Sensitivity to Modeling Parameters. M.S. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic
Institute and State University, 2015.
Report generated on: 05122015 at : 20:46:01
Based on the information you provided:
Factor 1
Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyright
work weighs: in favor of fair use
Factor 2
Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use
Factor 3
Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of the
copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use
Factor 4
Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use of
the copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use
Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use
DRAFT NOV. 12, 2008: Gail McMillan, Digital Library and Archives 8
DRAFT Fair Use Checklist adapted from the Copyright Management Center at IUPUI
http://www.copyright.iupui.edu/checklist.htm (accessed Oct 28, 2008). See also the University of
Minnesota’s “Fair Use Analysis Tool” at http://www.lib.umn.edu/copyright/checklist.phtml
As a test of fair use in ETDs at Virginia Tech: ______________________________________________test of
Fair Use Factor In Favor of Fair Use
In Favor of Copyright
Holder (not fair use)
Purpose and Character of Use
commercial or educational use Research Commercial activity
for profit or not Scholarship Profit (monetarily) from use
degree of transformation; value
added Nonprofit university Entertainment
for criticism, commentary, news
reporting, teaching, scholarship, research Criticism Bad-faith behavior
Comment
Denying credit to original
author
Transformative: changes the
original work for new purpose
Parody
Nature of the Copyrighted
Work
character of the work Published work Unpublished work
for example, fact or fiction Factual or non-fiction based
Highly creative work (art,
music, novels, films, plays)
worthy of (extensive) protection?
Important to favored
educational objectives Fiction
Amount and Substantiality
use only what's necessary Small quantity of the work
Large poprtion or whole work
used
quantity and quality in relation to
the whole work
Portion used is not central or
significant to entire work
Portion used is central to
work or "heart of the work"
Amount is appropriate for
favored educational purpose
Effect
harm to potential market or value
of a work after a portion has been
used separately from the whole
User has lawfully acquired
copy of the original work
Could replace sale of
copyrighted work
One or fewer copies made
Significantly impairs market or
potential market for copyright
work or derivative
No significant effect o the
market or potential market of
copyrighted work
Reasonably available
licensing mechanism for use
of the copyrighted work
No similar product marketed
by the copyright holder
Affordable permission
available for using work
Lack of licensing mechanism Numerous copies made
You made it accessible on
Web or in other public forum
Repeated or long term use
5/12/2015 VT Fair Use Analysis Results
http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2
Draft 09/01/2009
(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])
(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)
Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results
This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.
Name: Joseph Marshall Hamilton
Description of item under review for fair use: Figure of Goodwin Hall. Goodwin Hall, vt.edu Website.
https://www.vt.edu/about/buildings/signatureengineering.html, 2015.
Report generated on: 05122015 at : 20:55:43
Based on the information you provided:
Factor 1
Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyright
work weighs: in favor of fair use
Factor 2
Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use
Factor 3
Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of the
copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use
Factor 4
Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use of
the copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use
Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use
DRAFT NOV. 12, 2008: Gail McMillan, Digital Library and Archives 8
DRAFT Fair Use Checklist adapted from the Copyright Management Center at IUPUI
http://www.copyright.iupui.edu/checklist.htm (accessed Oct 28, 2008). See also the University of
Minnesota’s “Fair Use Analysis Tool” at http://www.lib.umn.edu/copyright/checklist.phtml
As a test of fair use in ETDs at Virginia Tech: ______________________________________________test of
Fair Use Factor In Favor of Fair Use
In Favor of Copyright
Holder (not fair use)
Purpose and Character of Use
commercial or educational use Research Commercial activity
for profit or not Scholarship Profit (monetarily) from use
degree of transformation; value
added Nonprofit university Entertainment
for criticism, commentary, news
reporting, teaching, scholarship, research Criticism Bad-faith behavior
Comment
Denying credit to original
author
Transformative: changes the
original work for new purpose
Parody
Nature of the Copyrighted
Work
character of the work Published work Unpublished work
for example, fact or fiction Factual or non-fiction based
Highly creative work (art,
music, novels, films, plays)
worthy of (extensive) protection?
Important to favored
educational objectives Fiction
Amount and Substantiality
use only what's necessary Small quantity of the work
Large poprtion or whole work
used
quantity and quality in relation to
the whole work
Portion used is not central or
significant to entire work
Portion used is central to
work or "heart of the work"
Amount is appropriate for
favored educational purpose
Effect
harm to potential market or value
of a work after a portion has been
used separately from the whole
User has lawfully acquired
copy of the original work
Could replace sale of
copyrighted work
One or fewer copies made
Significantly impairs market or
potential market for copyright
work or derivative
No significant effect o the
market or potential market of
copyrighted work
Reasonably available
licensing mechanism for use
of the copyrighted work
No similar product marketed
by the copyright holder
Affordable permission
available for using work
Lack of licensing mechanism Numerous copies made
You made it accessible on
Web or in other public forum
Repeated or long term use
5/12/2015 VT Fair Use Analysis Results
http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2
Draft 09/01/2009
(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])
(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)
Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results
This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.
Name: Joseph Marshall Hamilton
Description of item under review for fair use: 1032 Connector Assembly Instructions, Diagram No. 1460068,
Dytran Instruments, Inc., 2011
Report generated on: 05122015 at : 23:50:11
Based on the information you provided:
Factor 1
Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyright
work weighs: in favor of fair use
Factor 2
Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use
Factor 3
Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of the
copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use
Factor 4
Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use of
the copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use
Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use
DRAFT NOV. 12, 2008: Gail McMillan, Digital Library and Archives 8
DRAFT Fair Use Checklist adapted from the Copyright Management Center at IUPUI
http://www.copyright.iupui.edu/checklist.htm (accessed Oct 28, 2008). See also the University of
Minnesota’s “Fair Use Analysis Tool” at http://www.lib.umn.edu/copyright/checklist.phtml
As a test of fair use in ETDs at Virginia Tech: ______________________________________________test of
Fair Use Factor In Favor of Fair Use
In Favor of Copyright
Holder (not fair use)
Purpose and Character of Use
commercial or educational use Research Commercial activity
for profit or not Scholarship Profit (monetarily) from use
degree of transformation; value
added Nonprofit university Entertainment
for criticism, commentary, news
reporting, teaching, scholarship, research Criticism Bad-faith behavior
Comment
Denying credit to original
author
Transformative: changes the
original work for new purpose
Parody
Nature of the Copyrighted
Work
character of the work Published work Unpublished work
for example, fact or fiction Factual or non-fiction based
Highly creative work (art,
music, novels, films, plays)
worthy of (extensive) protection?
Important to favored
educational objectives Fiction
Amount and Substantiality
use only what's necessary Small quantity of the work
Large poprtion or whole work
used
quantity and quality in relation to
the whole work
Portion used is not central or
significant to entire work
Portion used is central to
work or "heart of the work"
Amount is appropriate for
favored educational purpose
Effect
harm to potential market or value
of a work after a portion has been
used separately from the whole
User has lawfully acquired
copy of the original work
Could replace sale of
copyrighted work
One or fewer copies made
Significantly impairs market or
potential market for copyright
work or derivative
No significant effect o the
market or potential market of
copyrighted work
Reasonably available
licensing mechanism for use
of the copyrighted work
No similar product marketed
by the copyright holder
Affordable permission
available for using work
Lack of licensing mechanism Numerous copies made
You made it accessible on
Web or in other public forum
Repeated or long term use
5/12/2015 VT Fair Use Analysis Results
http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2
Draft 09/01/2009
(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])
(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)
Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results
This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.
Name: Joseph Marshall Hamilton
Description of item under review for fair use: Outline/Installation Drawing 1032 to BNC, Diagram No. 1276011A,Dytran Instruments, Inc., 2002
Report generated on: 05122015 at : 23:49:14
Based on the information you provided:
Factor 1
Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyrightwork weighs: in favor of fair use
Factor 2
Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use
Factor 3
Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of thecopyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use
Factor 4
Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use ofthe copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use
Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use
DRAFT NOV. 12, 2008: Gail McMillan, Digital Library and Archives 8
DRAFT Fair Use Checklist adapted from the Copyright Management Center at IUPUI
http://www.copyright.iupui.edu/checklist.htm (accessed Oct 28, 2008). See also the University of
Minnesota’s “Fair Use Analysis Tool” at http://www.lib.umn.edu/copyright/checklist.phtml
As a test of fair use in ETDs at Virginia Tech: ______________________________________________test of
Fair Use Factor In Favor of Fair Use
In Favor of Copyright
Holder (not fair use)
Purpose and Character of Use
commercial or educational use Research Commercial activity
for profit or not Scholarship Profit (monetarily) from use
degree of transformation; value
added Nonprofit university Entertainment
for criticism, commentary, news
reporting, teaching, scholarship, research Criticism Bad-faith behavior
Comment
Denying credit to original
author
Transformative: changes the
original work for new purpose
Parody
Nature of the Copyrighted
Work
character of the work Published work Unpublished work
for example, fact or fiction Factual or non-fiction based
Highly creative work (art,
music, novels, films, plays)
worthy of (extensive) protection?
Important to favored
educational objectives Fiction
Amount and Substantiality
use only what's necessary Small quantity of the work
Large poprtion or whole work
used
quantity and quality in relation to
the whole work
Portion used is not central or
significant to entire work
Portion used is central to
work or "heart of the work"
Amount is appropriate for
favored educational purpose
Effect
harm to potential market or value
of a work after a portion has been
used separately from the whole
User has lawfully acquired
copy of the original work
Could replace sale of
copyrighted work
One or fewer copies made
Significantly impairs market or
potential market for copyright
work or derivative
No significant effect o the
market or potential market of
copyrighted work
Reasonably available
licensing mechanism for use
of the copyrighted work
No similar product marketed
by the copyright holder
Affordable permission
available for using work
Lack of licensing mechanism Numerous copies made
You made it accessible on
Web or in other public forum
Repeated or long term use
5/12/2015 VT Fair Use Analysis Results
http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2
Draft 09/01/2009
(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])
(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)
Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results
This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.
Name: Joseph Marshall Hamilton
Description of item under review for fair use: Assembly Instructions BNC Connector, Diagram No. 1460038, Dytran
Instruments, Inc., 2004
Report generated on: 05122015 at : 23:48:03
Based on the information you provided:
Factor 1
Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyright
work weighs: in favor of fair use
Factor 2
Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use
Factor 3
Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of the
copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use
Factor 4
Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use of
the copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use
Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use
DRAFT NOV. 12, 2008: Gail McMillan, Digital Library and Archives 8
DRAFT Fair Use Checklist adapted from the Copyright Management Center at IUPUI
http://www.copyright.iupui.edu/checklist.htm (accessed Oct 28, 2008). See also the University of
Minnesota’s “Fair Use Analysis Tool” at http://www.lib.umn.edu/copyright/checklist.phtml
As a test of fair use in ETDs at Virginia Tech: ______________________________________________test of
Fair Use Factor In Favor of Fair Use
In Favor of Copyright
Holder (not fair use)
Purpose and Character of Use
commercial or educational use Research Commercial activity
for profit or not Scholarship Profit (monetarily) from use
degree of transformation; value
added Nonprofit university Entertainment
for criticism, commentary, news
reporting, teaching, scholarship, research Criticism Bad-faith behavior
Comment
Denying credit to original
author
Transformative: changes the
original work for new purpose
Parody
Nature of the Copyrighted
Work
character of the work Published work Unpublished work
for example, fact or fiction Factual or non-fiction based
Highly creative work (art,
music, novels, films, plays)
worthy of (extensive) protection?
Important to favored
educational objectives Fiction
Amount and Substantiality
use only what's necessary Small quantity of the work
Large poprtion or whole work
used
quantity and quality in relation to
the whole work
Portion used is not central or
significant to entire work
Portion used is central to
work or "heart of the work"
Amount is appropriate for
favored educational purpose
Effect
harm to potential market or value
of a work after a portion has been
used separately from the whole
User has lawfully acquired
copy of the original work
Could replace sale of
copyrighted work
One or fewer copies made
Significantly impairs market or
potential market for copyright
work or derivative
No significant effect o the
market or potential market of
copyrighted work
Reasonably available
licensing mechanism for use
of the copyrighted work
No similar product marketed
by the copyright holder
Affordable permission
available for using work
Lack of licensing mechanism Numerous copies made
You made it accessible on
Web or in other public forum
Repeated or long term use
5/12/2015 VT Fair Use Analysis Results
http://etd.vt.edu/fairuse/analyzer/results.php 1/2
Draft 09/01/2009
(Questions? Concerns? Contact Gail McMillan, Director of the Digital Library and Archives at Virginia Tech'sUniversity Libraries: [email protected])
(Please ensure that Javascript is enabled on your browser before using this tool.)
Virginia Tech ETD Fair Use Analysis Results
This is not a replacement for professional legal advice but an effort to assist you inmaking a sound decision.
Name: Joseph Marshall Hamilton
Description of item under review for fair use: Coax Cable Diagram No. 1450129, Dytran Instruments, Inc., 2004
Report generated on: 05122015 at : 23:46:57
Based on the information you provided:
Factor 1
Your consideration of the purpose and character of your use of the copyright
work weighs: in favor of fair use
Factor 2
Your consideration of the nature of the copyrighted work you used weighs: infavor of fair use
Factor 3
Your consideration of the amount and substantiality of your use of the
copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use
Factor 4
Your consideration of the effect or potential effect on the market after your use of
the copyrighted work weighs: in favor of fair use
Based on the information you provided, your use of the copyrighted work weighs: infavor of fair use