DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY - Home - Secretariat€¦ · fuel farm western taxiway ... nas oceana va nas...
Transcript of DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY - Home - Secretariat€¦ · fuel farm western taxiway ... nas oceana va nas...
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
February 2007
Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 / FY 2009
BUDGET ESTIMATES
FY 2008 Program
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND
FAMILY HOUSING PROGRAMS
JUSTIFICATION DATASubmitted to Congress
Blank Page
Table of Contents
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing ProgramDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
STATE LIST
INDEX OF LOCATIONS
INDEX OF LOCATIONS (NAVY)
INDEX OF LOCATIONS (MARINES)
MISSION STATUS INDEX
INSTALLATION INDEX
APPROPRIATION LANGUAGE
SPECIAL PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS
PROJECT JUSTIFICATIONS - INSIDE THE UNITED STATES
PROJECT JUSTIFICATIONS - OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES
PLANNING AND DESIGN
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION
FAMILY HOUSING
i
iii
ix
xv
xvii
xxi
xxiii
xxv
1
311
389
391
1
Blank Page
i
ALABAMA
ARIZONA
CALIFORNIA
FLORIDA
HAWAII
ILLINOIS
MARYLAND
NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTH CAROLINA
TEXAS
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
9,560
33,720
224,109
21,440
203,231
26,871
90,429
247,490
37,652
14,290
119,329
230,660
Inside The United States
Subtotal 1,258,781
Summary of Locations
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing Program
Outside the United States
BAHRAIN
DIEGO GARCIA
DJIBOUTI
GUAM
JAPAN
35,500
7,150
22,390
278,818
8,750
Subtotal 352,608
Various Locations Various Locations 492,887
Subtotal 492,887
2,104,276
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Total - FY 2008 Military Construction Program
9,560
33,720
224,109
21,440
203,231
10,221
38,360
237,430
37,652
14,290
119,329
143,670
1,093,012
35,500
7,150
22,390
278,818
343,858
372,720
372,720
1,809,590
State/CountryAppropRequest
AuthRequest
ii
Blank Page
iii
ALABAMA
ARIZONA
CALIFORNIA
NAS WHITING FLD MILTON FL
MCAS YUMA AZ
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLETON
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
SUBASE SAN DIEGO CA
MARINE CORPS BASE TWENTYNINE PALMS
252
498
519
070
079
009
097
115
170
215
352
608
637
118
135
906
9,560
22,980
10,740
4,400
6,050
17,980
29,050
31,980
26,530
17,730
5,830
8,510
18,090
9,040
14,590
34,329
Clearzone Acq. & Runway Ext., NOLF Evergreen
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Main Base
Tow Way "G"
Hanger 02 Additions-MCAS Pendleton
Tactical Support Van Pad Expansion
ISR Camp - Intel Battalion
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, 22 Area
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Headquarters Area
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Margarita(33)Area
MARSOC Supporting Facilities
Traffic Improvements
Fitness Center, Camp Pendleton
Infantry Squad Battle Course
Pier 5002 Sub Fender Installation
Magnetic Silencing Facility Modification
BEQ & POV Parking Structure
3
9
13
19
23
29
35
41
47
51
55
61
65
73
77
83
EVERGREEN, ALABAMA
YUMA, ARIZONA
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA
Inside the United States
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing ProgramDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Index of Locations for Navy and Marine Corps
9,560
33,720
10,450
155,700
23,630
34,329
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Total - ALABAMA
Total - ARIZONA
Total - CALIFORNIA
9,560
33,720
224,109
State/Cntry
ProjNo. Location
9,560
22,980
10,740
4,400
6,050
17,980
29,050
31,980
26,530
17,730
5,830
8,510
18,090
9,040
14,590
34,329
New
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
New
Current
Current
Current
Current
New
Current
AuthRequest Mission
Page No.
9,560
33,720
10,450
155,700
23,630
34,329
9,560
33,720
224,109
AppropRequest
iv
FLORIDA
HAWAII
ILLINOIS
MCLB ALBANY GA
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITY
MARINE CORPS BASE HAWAII
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HI
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HI
NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES IL
003
388
749
587
173
748B
801
7,570
13,870
37,961
99,860
65,410
0
10,221
Maingate Improvements - Blount Island
Littoral Warfare Systems Facility
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters
Sub Drive-in MSF, Beckoning Point
Communication Center
RTC Infrastructure Upgrades Inc 3 of 3
Small Arms Marksmanship Trainer (SAMT)
89
95
103
109
115
123
127
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA
KANEOHE, HAWAII
PEARL HARBOR, HAWAII
WAHIAWA, HAWAII
GREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS
Inside the United States
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing ProgramDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Index of Locations for Navy and Marine Corps
7,570
13,870
37,961
99,860
65,410
10,221
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Total - FLORIDA
Total - HAWAII
Total - ILLINOIS
21,440
203,231
10,221
State/Cntry
ProjNo. Location
7,570
13,870
37,961
99,860
65,410
16,650
10,221
Current
New
Current
New
New
Current
Current
AuthRequest Mission
Page No.
7,570
13,870
37,961
99,860
65,410
26,871
21,440
203,231
26,871
AppropRequest
v
MARYLAND
NORTH CAROLINA
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MD
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY WASH
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
MCAS CHERRY POINT NC
NAS OCEANA VA
156
558
977
339A
002
1063
1087
1183
1185
1186
1187
137
634
651
670
828
122
809
689D
13,650
17,990
6,720
0
16,460
14,120
29,970
21,720
12,590
14,480
9,170
27,800
22,530
17,330
14,570
8,080
12,110
16,500
0
E-2 Advanced Hawkeye RDT&E Facility
Aircraft Prototype Facility
JPALS Addition to Buildimg 2110 / 2122
National Maritime Intel Center Inc 2 of 3
Academic Instruction Facility, Camp Geiger
MOUT Enhancements
Bachelors Enlisted Quarters
MARSOC Special Ops Support Facilities
MARSOC Training Facilities
MARSOC Fitness Center/Training Pool
MARSOC Community Support Facilities
Bachelors Enlisted Quarters, French Creek
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, New River
Aircraft Maint Hangar, New River Phase 2
Jet Engine Test Cell, New River
Field Medical Services School
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Storage/Maint Fac
Hangar Renovation, Fac Upgrades Navy F/A18E/F
Outlying Landing Field Facs, Land Acq Inc 5-7
133
137
143
151
157
161
167
171
175
179
183
187
191
195
199
203
209
215
223
PATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
SUITLAND, MARYLAND
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
PLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA
Inside the United States
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing ProgramDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Index of Locations for Navy and Marine Corps
38,360
0
208,820
28,610
0
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Total - MARYLAND
Total - NORTH CAROLINA
38,360
237,430
State/Cntry
ProjNo. Location
13,650
17,990
6,720
52,069
16,460
14,120
29,970
21,720
12,590
14,480
9,170
27,800
22,530
17,330
14,570
8,080
12,110
16,500
10,060
New
New
New
Current
Current
Current
New
New
New
New
New
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
New
New
AuthRequest Mission
Page No.
38,360
52,069
208,820
28,610
10,060
90,429
247,490
AppropRequest
vi
SOUTH CAROLINA
TEXAS
VIRGINIA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION BEAUFORT
MCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SC
NAS CORPUS CHRISTI TX
NAVSUPPACT NORFOLK VA
NAVSTA NORFOLK VA
MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO
434
363
366
353
131
014
767
545
546
6,800
25,322
5,530
14,290
8,450
11,510
53,850
18,839
26,680
Structural Fire Station
Third Recruit Training BN Complex Phase 1
Motor Transport Facility
Aviation Trainer Facility
Mobile User Objective System Installation
E2/C2 Aircrew Training Facility
MH-60S Hangar & Airfield Improvements
MSGBN HQ & BEQ, Phase 1
Student Officer Quarters,TBS, Phase 2
231
237
243
249
255
261
265
273
277
BEAUFORT, SOUTH CAROLINA
PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA
NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
Inside the United States
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing ProgramDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Index of Locations for Navy and Marine Corps
6,800
30,852
14,290
8,450
65,360
45,519
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Total - SOUTH CAROLINA
Total - TEXAS
Total - VIRGINIA
37,652
14,290
119,329
State/Cntry
ProjNo. Location
6,800
25,322
5,530
14,290
8,450
11,510
53,850
18,839
26,680
Current
Current
Current
Current
New
New
New
Current
Current
AuthRequest Mission
Page No.
6,800
30,852
14,290
8,450
65,360
45,519
37,652
14,290
119,329
AppropRequest
vii
WASHINGTONNAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WA
NAS WHIDBEY ISLAND WA
305A
356
973C
978
193
0
91,070
0
28,690
23,910
BEQ Homeport Ashore Inc 2 of 2
CVN Maintenance Pier Replacement
Limited Area Prod & Strg Complex Inc 4 of 5
Missile Assembly Building 3
EA-18G Facility Improvements
285
289
295
299
305
BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS, WASHINGTON
Inside the United States
1,093,012Total - Inside The United States
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing ProgramDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Index of Locations for Navy and Marine Corps
BAHRAIN
DIEGO GARCIA
DJIBOUTI
BAHRAIN IS, BAHRAIN
DIEGO GARCIA
DJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI
925
158
906
908
914
Waterfront Development Phase 1
Wastewater Treatment Facility
FUEL FARM
Western Taxiway
FULL LENGTH TAXIWAY
35,500
7,150
4,000
2,900
15,490
313
321
327
331
335
NAVSUPPACT BAHRAIN
NAVSUPPFAC DIEGO GARCIA IO
CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTI
Outside the United States
35,500
7,150
22,390
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
119,760
23,910
Subtotal
Subtotal
Total - WASHINGTON 143,670
Total - BAHRAIN
Total - DIEGO GARCIA
Total - DJIBOUTI
35,500
7,150
22,390
State/Cntry
ProjNo. Location
47,240
91,070
39,750
28,690
23,910
Current
Current
Current
New
New
AuthRequest Mission
Page No.
206,750
23,910
230,660
1,258,781
35,500
7,150
4,000
2,900
15,490
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
35,500
7,150
22,390
35,500
7,150
22,390
AppropRequest
viii
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing ProgramDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Index of Locations for Navy and Marine Corps
GUAM
JAPAN
AGANA, GUAM
YOKOSUKA, JAPAN
262
494
502
530
532
998B
Waste Wtr Treatment Plant Rprs & Upgrade
Harden Electrical System, Main Base
Kilo Wharf Extension
Fitness Center, Guam
Potable Water System Recap, Phase 1
Wharf Upgrades, Inc 3 of 3
40,870
59,420
101,828
45,250
31,450
0
341
347
351
357
361
367
NAVBASE GUAM
COMFLEACT YOKOSUKA JA
Outside the United States
343,858Total - Outside The United States
108
180
600
218
208
Grow the Force
Wharf Utilities Upgrades
Host Nation Infrastructure
Planning and Design
Unspecified Minor Construction
361,120
8,900
2,700
0
0
375
379
385
389
391
Grand Total 1,809,590
Total - Various Locations 372,720
278,818
0
Subtotal
Subtotal
Total - GUAM
Total - JAPAN
278,818
0
State/Cntry
ProjNo. Location
AuthRequest Mission
Page No.
40,870
59,420
101,828
45,250
31,450
8,750
Current
Current
New
Current
Current
New
278,818
8,750
278,818
8,750
352,608
361,120
8,900
2,700
110,167
10,000
New
New
Current
Current
Current
492,887
2,104,276
AppropRequest
Various Locations
ix
ALABAMA
CALIFORNIA
FLORIDA
HAWAII
ILLINOIS
NAS WHITING FLD MILTON FL
SUBASE SAN DIEGO CA
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITY
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HI
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HI
NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES IL
252
118
135
388
587
173
748B
801
9,560
9,040
14,590
13,870
99,860
65,410
0
10,221
Clearzone Acq. & Runway Ext., NOLF Evergreen
Pier 5002 Sub Fender Installation
Magnetic Silencing Facility Modification
Littoral Warfare Systems Facility
Sub Drive-in MSF, Beckoning Point
Communication Center
RTC Infrastructure Upgrades Inc 3 of 3
Small Arms Marksmanship Trainer (SAMT)
3
73
77
95
109
115
123
127
EVERGREEN, ALABAMA
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA
PEARL HARBOR, HAWAII
WAHIAWA, HAWAII
GREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS
Inside the United States
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Index of Locations for Navy
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing Program
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
9,560
23,630
13,870
99,860
65,410
10,221
Total - ALABAMA
Total - CALIFORNIA
Total - FLORIDA
Total - HAWAII
Total - ILLINOIS
9,560
23,630
13,870
165,270
10,221
AuthRequest
AppropRequest Mission
9,560
9,040
14,590
13,870
99,860
65,410
16,650
10,221
New
Current
New
New
New
New
Current
Current
9,560
23,630
13,870
99,860
65,410
26,871
9,560
23,630
13,870
165,270
26,871
Location ProjNo.
State/Cntry
Page No.
x
MARYLAND
NORTH CAROLINA
TEXAS
VIRGINIA
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MD
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY WASH
NAS OCEANA VA
NAS CORPUS CHRISTI TX
NAVSUPPACT NORFOLK VA
NAVSTA NORFOLK VA
156
558
977
339A
689D
353
131
014
767
13,650
17,990
6,720
0
0
14,290
8,450
11,510
53,850
E-2 Advanced Hawkeye RDT&E Facility
Aircraft Prototype Facility
JPALS Addition to Buildimg 2110 / 2122
National Maritime Intel Center Inc 2 of 3
Outlying Landing Field Facs, Land Acq Inc 5-7
Aviation Trainer Facility
Mobile User Objective System Installation
E2/C2 Aircrew Training Facility
MH-60S Hangar & Airfield Improvements
133
137
143
151
223
249
255
261
265
PATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
SUITLAND, MARYLAND
PLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA
NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
Inside the United States
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Index of Locations for Navy
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing Program
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
38,360
0
0
14,290
8,450
65,360
Total - MARYLAND
Total - NORTH CAROLINA
Total - TEXAS
Total - VIRGINIA
38,360
0
14,290
73,810
AuthRequest
AppropRequest Mission
13,650
17,990
6,720
52,069
10,060
14,290
8,450
11,510
53,850
New
New
New
Current
New
Current
New
New
New
38,360
52,069
10,060
14,290
8,450
65,360
90,429
10,060
14,290
73,810
Location ProjNo.
State/Cntry
Page No.
xi
WASHINGTON
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WA
NAS WHIDBEY ISLAND WA
305A
356
973C
978
193
0
91,070
0
28,690
23,910
BEQ Homeport Ashore Inc 2 of 2
CVN Maintenance Pier Replacement
Limited Area Prod & Strg Complex Inc 4 of 5
Missile Assembly Building 3
EA-18G Facility Improvements
285
289
295
299
305
BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS, WASHINGTON
Inside the United States
492,681Total - Inside The United States
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Index of Locations for Navy
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing Program
Subtotal
Subtotal
119,760
23,910
Total - WASHINGTON 143,670
AuthRequest
AppropRequest Mission
47,240
91,070
39,750
28,690
23,910
Current
Current
Current
New
New
206,750
23,910
230,660
658,450
Location ProjNo.
State/Cntry
Page No.
xii
BAHRAIN
DIEGO GARCIA
DJIBOUTI
GUAM
JAPAN
BAHRAIN IS, BAHRAIN
DIEGO GARCIA
DJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI
AGANA, GUAM
YOKOSUKA, JAPAN
925
158
906
908
914
262
494
502
530
532
998B
Waterfront Development Phase 1
Wastewater Treatment Facility
FUEL FARM
Western Taxiway
FULL LENGTH TAXIWAY
Waste Wtr Treatment Plant Rprs & Upgrade
Harden Electrical System, Main Base
Kilo Wharf Extension
Fitness Center, Guam
Potable Water System Recap, Phase 1
Wharf Upgrades, Inc 3 of 3
35,500
7,150
4,000
2,900
15,490
40,870
59,420
101,828
45,250
31,450
0
313
321
327
331
335
341
347
351
357
361
367
NAVSUPPACT BAHRAIN
NAVSUPPFAC DIEGO GARCIA IO
CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTI
NAVBASE GUAM
COMFLEACT YOKOSUKA JA
Outside the United States
343,858Total - Outside The United States
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Index of Locations for Navy
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing Program
Total - BAHRAIN
Total - DIEGO GARCIA
Total - DJIBOUTI
Total - GUAM
Total - JAPAN
35,500
7,150
22,390
278,818
0
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
35,500
7,150
22,390
278,818
0
AuthRequest
AppropRequest Mission
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
New
Current
Current
New
35,500
7,150
4,000
2,900
15,490
40,870
59,420
101,828
45,250
31,450
8,750
35,500
7,150
22,390
278,818
8,750
35,500
7,150
22,390
278,818
8,750
352,608
Location ProjNo.
State/Cntry
Page No.
xiii
108
180
600
218
208
Grow the Force
Wharf Utilities Upgrades
Host Nation Infrastructure
Planning and Design
Unspecified Minor Construction
361,120
8,900
2,700
0
0
375
379
385
389
391
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Index of Locations for Navy
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing Program
Total - Various Locations 372,720
AuthRequest
AppropRequest Mission
361,120
8,900
2,700
110,167
10,000
New
New
Current
Current
Current
492,887
Various Locations
Location ProjNo.
State/Cntry
Page No.
xiv
Blank Page
xv
ARIZONA
CALIFORNIA
FLORIDA
HAWAII
MCAS YUMA AZ
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLETON
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
MARINE CORPS BASE TWENTYNINE PALMS
MCLB ALBANY GA
MARINE CORPS BASE HAWAII
498
519
070
079
009
097
115
170
215
352
608
637
906
003
749
22,980
10,740
4,400
6,050
17,980
29,050
31,980
26,530
17,730
5,830
8,510
18,090
34,329
7,570
37,961
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Main Base
Tow Way "G"
Hanger 02 Additions-MCAS Pendleton
Tactical Support Van Pad Expansion
ISR Camp - Intel Battalion
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, 22 Area
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Headquarters Area
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Margarita(33)Area
MARSOC Supporting Facilities
Traffic Improvements
Fitness Center, Camp Pendleton
Infantry Squad Battle Course
BEQ & POV Parking Structure
Maingate Improvements - Blount Island
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters
9
13
19
23
29
35
41
47
51
55
61
65
83
89
103
State/Cntry
ProjNo. Location
PageNo.
YUMA, ARIZONA
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
KANEOHE, HAWAII
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Index of Locations for Marines
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing Program
Inside the United States
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
33,720
10,450
155,700
34,329
7,570
37,961
Total - ARIZONA
Total - CALIFORNIA
Total - FLORIDA
Total - HAWAII
33,720
200,479
7,570
37,961
MissionAppropRequest
AuthRequest
22,980
10,740
4,400
6,050
17,980
29,050
31,980
26,530
17,730
5,830
8,510
18,090
34,329
7,570
37,961
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
New
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
33,720
10,450
155,700
34,329
7,570
37,961
33,720
200,479
7,570
37,961
xvi
NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTH CAROLINA
VIRGINIA
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
MCAS CHERRY POINT NC
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION BEAUFORT
MCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SC
MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO
002
1063
1087
1183
1185
1186
1187
137
634
651
670
828
122
809
434
363
366
545
546
16,460
14,120
29,970
21,720
12,590
14,480
9,170
27,800
22,530
17,330
14,570
8,080
12,110
16,500
6,800
25,322
5,530
18,839
26,680
Academic Instruction Facility, Camp Geiger
MOUT Enhancements
Bachelors Enlisted Quarters
MARSOC Special Ops Support Facilities
MARSOC Training Facilities
MARSOC Fitness Center/Training Pool
MARSOC Community Support Facilities
Bachelors Enlisted Quarters, French Creek
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, New River
Aircraft Maint Hangar, New River Phase 2
Jet Engine Test Cell, New River
Field Medical Services School
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Storage/Maint Fac
Hangar Renovation, Fac Upgrades Navy F/A18E/F
Structural Fire Station
Third Recruit Training BN Complex Phase 1
Motor Transport Facility
MSGBN HQ & BEQ, Phase 1
Student Officer Quarters,TBS, Phase 2
157
161
167
171
175
179
183
187
191
195
199
203
209
215
231
237
243
273
277
State/Cntry
ProjNo. Location
PageNo.
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
BEAUFORT, SOUTH CAROLINA
PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
600,331Total - Inside The United States
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Index of Locations for Marines
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing Program
Inside the United States
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
208,820
28,610
6,800
30,852
45,519
Total - NORTH CAROLINA
Total - SOUTH CAROLINA
Total - VIRGINIA
237,430
37,652
45,519
MissionAppropRequest
AuthRequest
16,460
14,120
29,970
21,720
12,590
14,480
9,170
27,800
22,530
17,330
14,570
8,080
12,110
16,500
6,800
25,322
5,530
18,839
26,680
Current
Current
New
New
New
New
New
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
New
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
208,820
28,610
6,800
30,852
45,519
237,430
37,652
45,519
600,331
xvii
ALABAMA
ARIZONA
CALIFORNIA
FLORIDA
HAWAII
Installation/Location ProjNo.
Cost ($000)
MissionStatus
NAS WHITING FLD MILTON FL
MCAS YUMA AZ
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLETON
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
SUBASE SAN DIEGO CA
MARINE CORPS BASE TWENTYNINE PALMS
MCLB ALBANY GA
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITY
MARINE CORPS BASE HAWAII
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HI
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HI
EVERGREEN, ALABAMA
YUMA, ARIZONA
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA
KANEOHE, HAWAII
PEARL HARBOR, HAWAII
WAHIAWA, HAWAII
Inside the United States
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Mission Status Index
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing Program
Project Title
New
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
New
Current
Current
Current
Current
New
Current
Current
New
Current
New
New
252
498
519
070
079
009
097
115
170
215
352
608
637
118
135
906
003
388
749
587
173
Clearzone Acq. & Runway Ext., NOLFEvergreen
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Main Base
Tow Way "G"
Hanger 02 Additions-MCAS Pendleton
Tactical Support Van Pad Expansion
ISR Camp - Intel Battalion
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, 22 Area
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,Headquarters AreaBachelor Enlisted Quarters,Margarita(33)Area MARSOC Supporting Facilities
Traffic Improvements
Fitness Center, Camp Pendleton
Infantry Squad Battle Course
Pier 5002 Sub Fender Installation
Magnetic Silencing FacilityModification
BEQ & POV Parking Structure
Maingate Improvements - BlountIsland
Littoral Warfare Systems Facility
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters
Sub Drive-in MSF, Beckoning Point
Communication Center
9,560
22,980
10,740
4,400
6,050
17,980
29,050
31,980
26,530
17,730
5,830
8,510
18,090
9,040
14,590
34,329
7,570
13,870
37,961
99,860
65,410
xviii
ILLINOIS
MARYLAND
NORTH CAROLINA
Installation/Location ProjNo.
Cost ($000)
MissionStatus
NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES IL
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MD
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY WASH
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
MCAS CHERRY POINT NC
NAS OCEANA VA
GREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS
PATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
SUITLAND, MARYLAND
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
PLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA
Inside the United States
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Mission Status Index
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing Program
Project Title
Current
Current
New
New
New
Current
Current
Current
New
New
New
New
New
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
New
New
748B
801
156
558
977
339A
002
1063
1087
1183
1185
1186
1187
137
634
651
670
828
122
809
689D
RTC Infrastructure Upgrades Inc 3 of 3
Small Arms Marksmanship Trainer(SAMT)
E-2 Advanced Hawkeye RDT&EFacilityAircraft Prototype Facility
JPALS Addition to Buildimg 2110 /2122
National Maritime Intel Center Inc 2 of3
Academic Instruction Facility, CampGeigerMOUT Enhancements
Bachelors Enlisted Quarters
MARSOC Special Ops SupportFacilitiesMARSOC Training Facilities
MARSOC Fitness Center/Training Pool
MARSOC Community SupportFacilitiesBachelors Enlisted Quarters, FrenchCreekBachelor Enlisted Quarters, New River
Aircraft Maint Hangar, New RiverPhase 2Jet Engine Test Cell, New River
Field Medical Services School
Unmanned Aerial VehicleStorage/Maint FacHangar Renovation, Fac UpgradesNavy F/A18E/F
Outlying Landing Field Facs, Land AcqInc 5-7
16,650
10,221
13,650
17,990
6,720
52,069
16,460
14,120
29,970
21,720
12,590
14,480
9,170
27,800
22,530
17,330
14,570
8,080
12,110
16,500
10,060
xix
SOUTH CAROLINA
TEXAS
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
Installation/Location ProjNo.
Cost ($000)
MissionStatus
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION BEAUFORT
MCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SC
NAS CORPUS CHRISTI TX
NAVSUPPACT NORFOLK VA
NAVSTA NORFOLK VA
MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WA
NAS WHIDBEY ISLAND WA
BEAUFORT, SOUTH CAROLINA
PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA
NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS, WASHINGTON
BAHRAIN
DIEGO GARCIA
DJIBOUTI
NAVSUPPACT BAHRAIN
NAVSUPPFAC DIEGO GARCIA IO
CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTI
BAHRAIN IS, BAHRAIN
DIEGO GARCIA
DJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI
Outside the United States
Inside the United States
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Mission Status Index
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing Program
Project Title
Current
Current
Current
Current
New
New
New
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
New
New
434
363
366
353
131
014
767
545
546
305A
356
973C
978
193
Structural Fire Station
Third Recruit Training BN ComplexPhase 1Motor Transport Facility
Aviation Trainer Facility
Mobile User Objective SystemInstallation
E2/C2 Aircrew Training Facility
MH-60S Hangar & AirfieldImprovements
MSGBN HQ & BEQ, Phase 1
Student Officer Quarters,TBS, Phase 2
BEQ Homeport Ashore Inc 2 of 2
CVN Maintenance Pier Replacement
Limited Area Prod & Strg Complex Inc4 of 5Missile Assembly Building 3
EA-18G Facility Improvements
6,800
25,322
5,530
14,290
8,450
11,510
53,850
18,839
26,680
47,240
91,070
39,750
28,690
23,910
925
158
906
908
914
Waterfront Development Phase 1
Wastewater Treatment Facility
FUEL FARM
Western Taxiway
FULL LENGTH TAXIWAY
35,500
7,150
4,000
2,900
15,490
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
xx
Installation/Location ProjNo.
Cost ($000)
MissionStatus
GUAM
JAPAN
NAVBASE GUAM
COMFLEACT YOKOSUKA JA
AGANA, GUAM
YOKOSUKA, JAPAN
Outside the United States
Various Locations
108
180
600
218
208
Grow the Force
Wharf Utilities Upgrades
Host Nation Infrastructure
Planning and Design
Unspecified Minor Construction
361,120
8,900
2,700
110,167
10,000
New
New
Current
Current
Current
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Mission Status Index
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing Program
Project Title
262
494
502
530
532
998B
Waste Wtr Treatment Plant Rprs &UpgradeHarden Electrical System, Main Base
Kilo Wharf Extension
Fitness Center, Guam
Potable Water System Recap, Phase 1
Wharf Upgrades, Inc 3 of 3
40,870
59,420
101,828
45,250
31,450
8,750
Current
Current
New
Current
Current
New
Various Location
Various Location
Various Location
Various Location
Various Location
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
xxi
Installation Location DD1390 PageNo.
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION BEAUFORTNAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WA
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNEMARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLETONMARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETONMCAS CHERRY POINT NCNAVSUPPACT NORFOLK VANAS CORPUS CHRISTI TX
NAS WHITING FLD MILTON FL
NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES IL
MCLB ALBANY GA
MARINE CORPS BASE HAWAII
NAVSTA NORFOLK VA
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITYMCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SCNAS PATUXENT RIVER MDNAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HINAS OCEANA VA
MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO
SUBASE SAN DIEGO CANAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY WASH
MARINE CORPS BASE TWENTYNINE PALMS
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HINAS WHIDBEY ISLAND WA
MCAS YUMA AZ
BEAUFORT, SOUTH CAROLINABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINACAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIACAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIACHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINACHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIACORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
EVERGREEN, ALABAMA
GREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
KANEOHE, HAWAII
NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
PANAMA CITY, FLORIDAPARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINAPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLANDPEARL HARBOR, HAWAIIPLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIASUITLAND, MARYLAND
TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA
WAHIAWA, HAWAIIWHIDBEY ISLAND NAS, WASHINGTON
YUMA, ARIZONA
229283
1551727
207253247
1
121
87
101
259
93235131107221
271
71149
81
113303
7
B
C
E
G
J
K
N
P
Q
S
T
W
Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Installation Index
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing Program
xxii
Blank Page
xxiii
FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing Program
SECTION 1 - APPROPRIATION LANGUAGE
SECTION 2 - EXPLANATION OF LANGUAGE CHANGES
For acquisition, construction, installation, and equipment of temporary or permanent public works, navalinstallations, facilities, and real property for the Navy as currently authorized by law, including personnel in theNaval Facilities Engineering Command and other personal services necessary for the purposes of this appropriation,[$1,129,000,000] $2,104,276,000 to remain available until September 30, [2011] 2012. Provided, that of thisamount, not to exceed [$67,861,000] $110,167,000 shall be available for study, planning, design, architect andengineer services, as authorized by law, unless the Secretary of Defense determines that additional obligations arenecessary for such purposes and notifies the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress of hisdetermination and the reasons therefor.
1. Deletion of FY 2007 appropriations shown in brackets.
Appropriation Language
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
xxiv
Blank Page
xxv
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing Program
Special Program ConsiderationsPOLLUTION ABATEMENT:
ENERGY CONSERVATION:
FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AND WETLANDS PROTECTION:
DESIGN FOR ACCESSIBILITY OF PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED PERSONNEL:
PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL SITES AND STRUCTURES:
PLANNING IN THE NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION:
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS:
CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA MANUAL:
The military construction projects in this program will be designed to meet environmental standards. The Militaryconstruction projects proposed are primarily for the abatement of existing pollution problems at Naval and MarineCorps installations and have been reviewed to ensure that corrective design is accomplished in accordance withspecific standards and criteria.
The military construction projects proposed in this program will be designed for minimum energy consumption.
Proposed land acquisition, disposals, and installation construction projects have been planned to allow the propermanagement of floodplains and the protection of wetlands by avoiding long and short-term adverse impacts,reducing the risk of flood losses, and minimizing the loss or degradation of wetlands. Project planning is inaccordance with the requirements of Executive Order Numbers 11988 and 11990.
In accordance with Public Law 90-480, provisions for physically handicapped personnel will be provided for, whereappropriate, in the design of facilities included in this program.
Facilities included in this program do not directly or indirectly affect a district, site, building, structure, object orsetting listed in the National Register of Historic Places, except as noted on the DD Form 1391.
Projects located in the National Capital Region are submitted to the National Capital Planning Commission forbudgetary review and comment as part of the commission's annual review of the Future Years Defense Program(FYDP). Construction projects within the District of Columbia, with the exception of the Bolling/Anacostia area,are submitted to the Commission for approval prior to the start of construction.
In accordance with Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Public Law 91-190), theenvironmental impact analysis process has been completed or is actively underway for all projects in the militaryconstruction program.
Economics are an inherent aspect of project development and design of military construction projects. Therefore, allprojects included in this program represent the most economical use of resources. Where alternatives could beevaluated, a primary economic analysis was prepared.
Project designs conform to Part II of Military Handbook 1190, "Facility Planning and Design Guide."
xxvi
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 11390
Scope
91110
Cost
($000)Start
Clearzone Acq. & Runway Ext,
NOLF Evergreen
Complete
0 LS 9,560
Design Status
12/2005
8. Projects Requested In This Program
09/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(440 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 17,361
4,670
0
0
9,560
0
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 117,727
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:
TOTAL
NAS WHITING FLD MILTON FL
EVERGREEN, ALABAMA
3. Installation and Location: N60508
9,560
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
To maintain and operate facilities and provide services and material to
support operations of aviation activities and units of the Naval Air
Training Command and other activities and units as designated by the Chief
of Naval Operations. The Joint Primary Aircraft Training System (JPATS) T-
6A Texas II aircraft began replacing the T-34C as the primary and
intermediate trainer aircraft in 2002.
31,591
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.82
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
1586
1701
1079
1113B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 311
369
118
118
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
44
50
57
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 21390
4. Command
NAS WHITING FLD MILTON FL
EVERGREEN, ALABAMA
3. Installation and Location: N60508
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.82
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommander Navy
Installations Command
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 31391
This project will purchase land to construct 1000 feet of runway extensions
on two existing 4000 foot runways 10/28 and 1/19 at NOLF Evergreen,
Evergreen, Alabama, for a total of 5000 linear feet each.
PROJECT:
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
CLEARZONE ACQ. & RUNWAY EXT., NOLF
EVERGREEN
RUNWAY EXTENSION (340,000 SF)
LAND PURCHASE (ACQUISITION)
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
LS
m2
AC
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
31,587
165
108.81
2,733.13
3,890
(3,440)
(450)
4,420
(410)
(970)
(2,440)
(80)
(520)
8,310
420
8,730
500
9,230
330
9,560
9,560
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
9,5600203576N 91110
Clearzone Acq. & Runway Ext.,
NOLF Evergreen
NAVY 2008FY
P252
NAS WHITING FLD MILTON FL
EVERGREEN, ALABAMA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 31,857
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: NAS WHITING FLD
MILTON FL.
N60508(EV)
(NOLF EVERGREEN)
Extend runways at Navy Outlying Landing Field (NOLF) Evergreen 10/28 and
1/19 each 1000 linear feet, and purchase 165 acres of land. The project
includes removing and installing new fencing, clearing and grubbing,
excavating and installing new fill in low unstable areas, paved shoulders,
storm drainage, environmental mitigation for minor wetland areas,
relocation of two existing access roads, construction of two Runway Duty
Officer pads (RDO), replacement of existing airfield lighting systems, new
edge lights, threshold lighting, wind socks, distance markers, airfield
striping, minor demolition, and electrical utilities.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 41391C
In addition to it's 6000 feet runways at North and South Fields, NAS
Whiting Field has two solo outlying landing fields, NOLF Brewton and NOLF
Choctaw (5000 and 8000 feet in length respectively), and three dual
outlying landing fields NOLF Barin, NOLF Evergreen and NOLF Saufley, which
are 4000 feet in length each. NAS Whiting Field conducts T-34C split field
operations at North Field and helicopter training and T-34C instrument
recovery at South Field. The increased runway length requirement of the T-
6A will not allow split field operations. The station is a joint-use
installation that provides sixty percent of the Navy's primary flight
training, thirteen percent for Air Force and nine and one half percent for
Coast Guard pilots. Trying to accommodate the T-6A at North & South fields
would increase traffic to a level jeopardizing the safety of all
inbound/outbound and recovery aircraft. NOLF's Brewton and Choctaw meet the
specified JPATS requirement with the exception of the crosswind at Choctaw,
but additional airfields are required to meet the flight training
throughput. NOLF Choctaw is primarily a joint-use runway occupied by the
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle detachment and encumbered by fleet and special
operations and other than trainer type aircraft. Extending the runways at
NOLF Evergreen will continue to allow dual operations at the other NOLF's,
provide future capacity for required solo operations that are safe and
efficient at Whiting Field's primary solo airport, and have less impact on
the environment and local community during construction.
There will be an insufficient number of solo airfields available when the
new T-6A trainer arrives at NAS Whiting Field in 2008, jeopardizing mission
readiness and flight training. Operations on runways with a Runway
The T-6A has been selected as the Joint Primary Aircraft Traing System
(JPATS) aircraft. The first T-6A will arrive at NASWF in 2008. The T-6A
will gradually replace the T-34C during the period years of FY-08 through
FY-15. The T-6A requires a minumum runway length of 4000 feet for dual
operations and 5000 feet for solo student operations for normal dry
operations at sea level up to 3500 feet pressure altitude. This is the
tested safe distance required under stated conditions and within this range
of altitudes. NOLF Evergreen is located at an elevation of 258.7 feet
thereby establishing within the constraints of this criteria, the minimum
runway length of 5000 feet. The weight of the T-6A exceeds the requirement
for the 4000 foot length. The T-6A aircraft engines do not have thrust
reversers to slow the aircraft upon landing. Wet runway conditions
significantly increases the stopping distance required.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
9,5600203576N 91110
Clearzone Acq. & Runway Ext.,
NOLF Evergreen
NAVY 2008FY
P252
NAS WHITING FLD MILTON FL
EVERGREEN, ALABAMA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N60508(EV)
(NOLF EVERGREEN)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 51391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
Condition Recording of other than dry will significantly increase the
distance required to bring the T-6A to a safe and complete stop. Other than
NOLF Choctaw, NOLF Brewton is the only field available that meets the
minimum runway requirements. In order to meet the JPATS training schedule,
this project must be funded in FY 2008. If not, the Navy's training
mission at NAS Whiting will not be met with the arrival of the first T-6A's
in 2008.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
9,5600203576N 91110
Clearzone Acq. & Runway Ext.,
NOLF Evergreen
NAVY 2008FY
P252
NAS WHITING FLD MILTON FL
EVERGREEN, ALABAMA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This
Facility can be used by other components on an as available basis;
however, the scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.
Dave Garner, PWD NAS
Whiting Field, Milton, Fl.
850-623-7181 ext 46Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
$225
$150
$75
04/2008
01/2008
06/2009
12/2005
06/2007
09/2007
5%
15%
$75
$150
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
N60508(EV)
(NOLF EVERGREEN)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 61391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
9,5600203576N 91110
Clearzone Acq. & Runway Ext.,
NOLF Evergreen
NAVY 2008FY
P252
NAS WHITING FLD MILTON FL
EVERGREEN, ALABAMA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Blank Page
N60508(EV)
(NOLF EVERGREEN)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 71390
Scope
72124
11650
Cost
($000)Start
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
Main Base
Tow Way "G"
Complete
6439 m2
46000 m2
22,980
10,740
Design Status
09/2005
09/2005
8. Projects Requested In This Program
09/2007
09/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(8660 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 1,527,933
46,947
17,930
76,423
33,720
147,147
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 23,820
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:17120 MAWTS-1 Applied Instruction Facility 4484 m2 17,930
TOTAL
TOTAL
MCAS YUMA AZ
YUMA, ARIZONA
3. Installation and Location: M62974
33,720
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
17,930
76,423
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
To maintain and operate facilities and provide services and material to
support operations of a Marine Aircraft Wing and other activities and units
as designated by the Commandant of the Marine Corps in connection with the
Chief of Naval Operations.
1,850,100
21105
85110
72124
74043
17955
17135
276148 SF
LS
LS
0 LS
1 EA
LS
20,823
5,986
25,109
6,908
5,565
12,032
Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Phase 1
South Entry Gate
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters
Physical Fitness Center Addition
Water Survival Training Tank
Flight Simulator (JSF)
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.25
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
6707
5557
51
41B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 720
390
355
384
146
146
65
65
0
0
675
428
3809
3237
886
866
Commandant of the
Marine Corps
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 81390
4. Command
MCAS YUMA AZ
YUMA, ARIZONA
3. Installation and Location: M62974
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.25
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommandant of the
Marine Corps
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 91391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS, MAIN
BASE (69,309 SF)
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS
(68,620 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (689
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
6,439
6,375
64
2,410.32
4,598.6
17,110
(15,370)
(290)
(510)
(270)
(220)
(450)
2,870
(100)
(480)
(420)
(830)
(990)
(50)
19,980
1,000
20,980
1,200
22,180
800
22,980
22,980
(1,325)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
22,9800216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
Main Base
NAVY 2008FY
P498
MCAS YUMA AZYUMA, ARIZONA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M62974
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MCAS YUMA AZ.
Construct a multi-story reinforced Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) building
with seismic upgrades, concrete foundation, reinforced concrete slab and
floors, and standing seam metal roofing, providing 150 rooms with semi-
private bathrooms in the standard 2X0 room configuration and 64 m2
telecommunications (NMCI) room. Built-In equipment includes an elevator.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 101391C
This project supports the Marine Corps' goal of achieving the 2X0 standard
by 2012. This project is needed to provide billeting for enlisted
personnel at MCAS Yuma to support the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC)
goal to replace all inadequate bachelor quarters with the new 2x0
configured barracks that meet modern quality of life standards.
REQUIREMENT:
This project provides 300 man spaces (150 two-person rooms) for bachelor
enlisted personnel using the 2X0 room design Quality of Life (QOL)
standards for permanent party enlisted personnel at Marine Corps Air
Station (MCAS) Yuma.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
22,9800216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
Main Base
NAVY 2008FY
P498
MCAS YUMA AZYUMA, ARIZONA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M62974
11. Requirement:
36,295 2,125Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 46,644
Electrical systems include fire alarms, energy saving Electronic Monitoring
and Control System (EMCS), and information systems. Mechanical systems
include plumbing, fire protection systems, heating ventilation and air
conditioning.
Supporting facilities work includes stormwater retention ponds, electrical
utilities (exterior lighting, electrical distribution including telephone,
local area network (LAN), and cable television, transformers and
substations), mechanical utilities (water, natural gas, sanitary, storm
sewer, manholes, and replacement of sanitary sewer main in Shaw Avenue),
paving and site improvements (concrete curb & gutters, sidewalks, new and
relocated street entrance drives, landscaping, basketball and volleyball
courts, sunshade structures, and site furnishings.) Site preparation
includes removal of unsuitable soils, removal of all existing concrete
foundations, concrete vehicle parking pads, existing sidewalk along Shaw
Avenue, and abandoned site utilities, plus excavation/grading and storm
water pollution best management measures. Demolition includes Bldg-876 a
CMU guardhouse, Bldg 868 a pre-engineered metal shed, chain link fencing
and light poles. Also included are Technical Operating Manuals and Anti-
Terrorism/Force Protection features. Sustainable principles will be
included into the design, development, and construction of the project in
accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders.
Rooms: 150 two-person rooms.(2x0 configuration)
Maximum utilization: 300 E1-E3.
Intended Grade Mix: 226 E1-E3, 50 E-4, 24 E-5
Total: 300 persons.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 111391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
MCAS Yuma lacks safe, sufficient and adequate quarters for all grades of
enlisted personnel. The existing buildings are not in compliance with
life-safety/fire and seismic/structural requirements, and are classified as
inadequate facilities for personnel. The existing facilities are gang-head
configured.
If this project is not provided a shortfall of billeting quarters will
continue to exist. Personnel will continue to be billeted in inadequate,
unsafe buildings.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
22,9800216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
Main Base
NAVY 2008FY
P498
MCAS YUMA AZYUMA, ARIZONA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M62974
COLLATERAL EQUIPMENT
NMCI Connection
PMC
PMC
2008
2008
1,280
45
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
Yes
MCAS Yuma, AZ.
$300
$50
$250
04/2008
01/2008
10/2009
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15%
$250
$50
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
2006 R&M Conducted ($000):2007 R&M Conducted ($000): 2,220
23,820
C. FY D. FY E. Future R&M Requirements ($000):
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 121391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
22,9800216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
Main Base
NAVY 2008FY
P498
MCAS YUMA AZYUMA, ARIZONA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M62974
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
Richard A. Samrah, AIA 928-269-3163Activity POC: Phone No:
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 131391
PROJECT:
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
TOW WAY "G" (495,140 SF)
TOW WAY (495,140 SF)
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
46,000
46,000 88.78
4,080
(4,080)
5,260
(1,240)
(590)
(200)
(3,120)
(110)
9,340
470
9,810
560
10,370
370
10,740
10,740
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
10,7400216496M 11650
Tow Way "G"
NAVY 2008FY
P519
MCAS YUMA AZYUMA, ARIZONA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M62974
11. Requirement:
Adequate: Substandard:m2 46,000
This project constructs a 1880 meters by 24 meters (6,615 lineal foot by 80
feet) tow way to provide a safe and efficient route to tow aircraft from
aircraft parking areas to the newly constructed Combat Aircraft Loading
Apron (CALA) for ordnance loading. Special construction features includes
tow way shoulder, connection to taxiway, turnouts, and a paved security
road. Electrical Utilities includes tow way lighting , underground
electric conductors, ductbanks, manholes and handholes. Paving and Site
Improvements includes fencing, irrigation canal relocation, storm drainage
swatle and other storm sewer piping. Site preparations include clearing and
earthwork. During construction there will be scheduling restrictions and
Foreign Object Damage (FOD) control as the site is adjacent to a working
taxiway. Demolition costs are associated with the demolition and saw
cutting of existing asphalt pavement road, existing concrete headwalls, and
a portion of an existing concrete canal, demolition of existing slab on
grade, relocation of existing fencing and irrigation canal, hauling and
dump charges, and distributed general requirements.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 141391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
The inboard taxiway, Taxiway "E", is the only way for aircraft to be towed
to the new Combat Aircraft Loading Apron (CALA)for ordnance loading. Using
Taxiway "E" as both a taxiway and a tow way causes a bottleneck, slowing
traffic (See attachment 1). The speed limit for vehicles towing aircraft
is 5 mph (4.3 knots) and the taxiing speed is 15 mph (13 knots). Taxing
aircraft must wait for the slower towed vehicles causing unnecessary delays
in airfield operations. These delays cause unnecessary fuel consumption
and add the risk of heat stress to the pilots as they wait in the desert
sun.
Taxiway "E" on the Air Station will be used as both a taxiway and a tow
way. The dual use of the taxiway will cause delays and inefficiencies in
airfield operations. The addition of towed vehicles on the taxiway will
create an unsafe operational environment.
Air Station operations requires a facility adequate to tow aircraft to the
newly constructed CALA without delaying or interrupting normal airfield
operations. The construction of Tow Way "G" will provide a safe and
efficient solution to tow aircraft from the aircraft parking area to the
CALA without disrupting normal taxiing traffic on Taxiway "E".
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
This project will construct 1,880 lineal meters Tow Way "G". Tow Way "G"
will be constructed of Portland Cement Concrete (PCC). Constructing Tow
Way "G" will provide a facility to tow aircraft from the aircraft parking
area to the new Combat Aircraft Loading Apron (CALA). The project includes
two (2) Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) turn outs connecting Tow Way "G" to
Taxiway "E", 9,300 square meters of asphalt concrete perimeter road, the
removal and replacement of 1310 lineal meters of chain link fence, 403
lineal meters of irrigation canal realignment, siphon relocation, edge
lighting, paint striping and signage.
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
10,7400216496M 11650
Tow Way "G"
NAVY 2008FY
P519
MCAS YUMA AZYUMA, ARIZONA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M62974
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started 09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15% (E) Percent completed as of
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 151391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
10,7400216496M 11650
Tow Way "G"
NAVY 2008FY
P519
MCAS YUMA AZYUMA, ARIZONA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M62974
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
Ron Kruse 928-269-3523Activity POC: Phone No:
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
No
$570
$0
$570
04/2008
01/2008
08/2009
$490
$80
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 161391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
10,7400216496M 11650
Tow Way "G"
NAVY 2008FY
P519
MCAS YUMA AZYUMA, ARIZONA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M62974
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 171390
Scope
21107
11665
Cost
($000)Start
Hangar 02 Additions
Tactical Support Van Pad
Expansion
Complete
1002 m2
3435 m2
4,400
6,050
Design Status
09/2005
09/2005
8. Projects Requested In This Program
09/2007
09/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(411 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 403,878
12,920
0
19,270
10,450
102,419
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 1,730
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:
TOTAL
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLET
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation and Location: M67604
10,450
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL 19,270
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
As a key component of the Commander, Marine Corps Air Bases, West, provides
airfield facilities and material to support operations of the Third Marine
Aircraft Wing Unit.
548,937
21110
21105
11210
43349 SF
LS
LS
5,744
10,026
3,500
Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Modification
UAV Operations And Maintenance
Taxiway Addition
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.12
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
71
68
3
3B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 68
65
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commandant of the
Marine Corps
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 181390
4. Command
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLET
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation and Location: M67604
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.12
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommandant of the
Marine Corps
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 191391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
HANGER 02 ADDITIONS-MCAS PENDLETON
(10,783 SF)
EXPAND HANGAR 2386 (3,265 SF)
EXPAND HANGAR 2396 (4,356 SF)
EXPAND HANGAR 2397W (3,162 SF)
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SPECIAL COSTS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION
COMMUNICATION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
1,001.78
303.33
404.69
293.76
2,824.84
2,868.41
2,916.38
3,680
(860)
(1,160)
(860)
(40)
(210)
(160)
(390)
150
(20)
(30)
(30)
(40)
(30)
3,830
190
4,020
230
4,250
150
4,400
4,400
(690)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
4,4000216496M 21107
Hanger 02 Additions-MCAS
Pendleton
NAVY 2008FY
P070
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLETONCAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67604
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION CAMP PENDLETON.
Constructs second-story squadron administrative spaces to hangars 2386,
2396 and 2397W on top of existing first floor additions. Second floor
additions are constructed of reinforced concrete masonry unit (CMU) with
concrete structural roof over metal deck, steel trusses and modified
bituminous roofing to support utilities installed on the roofs. Operation
and Maintenance Support Instruction (OMSI) manuals will be provided as part
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 201391C
Provide sufficient administrative space for squadron personnel co-located
near hangar administration and maintenance spaces. MCAS Camp Pendleton
supports Marine Aircraft Group (MAG)-39, which composes the entire West
Coast Active Helicopter Marine Light Attack (HMLA) community and 3 CH-46
squadrons. MAG-39 contains 104 AH-1W's, 56 UH-1N's and 36 Ch-46's for a
total of 196 aircraft. HMLA 775 from MAG-46 contains 11AH-1 and UH-1
aircraft. The HMLA community provides close air support, anti-armor,
reconnaissance, forward air control (airborne naval gunfire control),
airborne command post, small unit vertical insertion, light transport, air
search and rescue, medical evacuation, medium transport and aerial combat
troop transport missions to the Fleet Marine Force Pacific Command
(FMFPAC). These units are used for humanitarian assistance, forward
presence, deterrence, peace-keeping operations short of war, and warfare as
defined by the National Command Authority (NCA). Due to the
reconfiguration that combined UH-1 squadrons with AH-1 squadrons to form
HMLAs, the existing HMLA hangar space does not meet the Hangar 02 space
requirement for the additional personnel.
REQUIREMENT:
Construct second story additions to three aircraft hangars for HMLA
squadron additional administrative space requirements. Additions will be
constructed on top of recently completed first story additions. Second
story additions shall be built on top of load bearing foot print.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
4,4000216496M 21107
Hanger 02 Additions-MCAS
Pendleton
NAVY 2008FY
P070
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLETONCAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67604
11. Requirement:
1,703 792Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 3,303
of this project. Information systems include local area network wiring,
fiber optic wiring, telephone wiring, intrusion detection wiring, cable TV
and public address system wiring. Anti-terrorism/force protection measures
include blast resistant windows are included. Special cost features include
seismic adjustment. Electrical utilities include switchboards, internal
lighting, fire alarms and HVAC connections. Paving and site improvement
will include A/C perimeter damage patching. Demolition consists of
demolishing roof decks of lower story additions and some second story
exterior and interior walls. Communications consist of outside
communication lines. Sustainable features are included in the design,
development and construction of this project in accordance with executive
Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 211391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
When the Huey squadrons were split and added to the Cobra squadrons,
resulting in the HMLA squadrons, 150 personnel were added to each squadron.
The existing administrative offices for squadron personnel are located on
the second decks of Buildings 2386, 2396, and 2397 West. Administrative
responsibilities include correcting problems with paychecks, updating
identification card information for personnel and dependents, transfers,
etc. Some other departments in admin spaces are Operations, Safety,
Logistics, Intelligence, Commanding Officer, Executive Officer, Sergeant
Major, mail clerk, Key Wives, medical doctor, chaplain, etc. Personnel are
currently located in overcrowded spaces. Also due to the lack of space,
disparate functions share the same inadequate space. For example, in
Hangar 2386, the Safety Office and the Flight Equipment Section share the
same space. There is not enough space for either section to "house" all
their personal and required equipment. Some operational briefing rooms and
training spaces are also occupied by administrative personnel. This over
crowding impedes efficient pre-flight procedures such as briefs and de-
briefs and other military training requirements. Reconfiguration of
existing hangar spaces would not meet space requirements; expansion is the
only option. Existing administrative space "surplus" is not logistically
sited for use by the HMLA squadrons.
Continued current situation will impede squadrons from operating at their
optimal efficiency and effect overall MAG-39 operational readiness.
Privacy for counseling and personnel issues will remain nonexistent.
Administrative personnel will continue to occupy spaces allocated for
training and briefings, thus reducing flight readiness.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
4,4000216496M 21107
Hanger 02 Additions-MCAS
Pendleton
NAVY 2008FY
P070
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLETONCAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67604
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
N/A
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15% (E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 221391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
4,4000216496M 21107
Hanger 02 Additions-MCAS
Pendleton
NAVY 2008FY
P070
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLETONCAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67604
Office Furniture and Communications O&MMC 2009 690
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
Patt Reed DSN 361-0020Activity POC: Phone No:
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
$150
$50
$100
03/2008
12/2007
03/2009
$100
$50
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 231391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
TACTICAL SUPPORT VAN PAD EXPANSION
(36,974 SF)
TACTICAL VAN PAD (MAINTENANCE)
(34,692 SF)
STORAGE SHED (398 SF)
UTILITY / PUBLIC RESTROOM
BUILDING (1,884 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SPECIAL COSTS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
3,435
3,223
37
175
527.97
1,620.98
3,021.27
2,990
(1,700)
(60)
(530)
(120)
(10)
(30)
(540)
2,270
(30)
(1,130)
(460)
(380)
(80)
(190)
5,260
260
5,520
310
5,830
210
6,040
6,050
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
6,0500216496M 11665
Tactical Support Van Pad
Expansion
NAVY 2008FY
P079
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLETONCAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67604
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION CAMP PENDLETON.
PRIMARY FACILITY - Construct expansion of concrete van pad for a total of
160 vans (concrete slab with thickness suitable for the double stacks
configuration), with utilities connections, chain link fencing, and area
lighting. Provide road access for van delivery to Airfield area. Built in
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 241391C
Adequate, safe and secure van pad space with sufficient power;
infrastructure to house and support 160 mobile facilities vans used for the
avionics, calibration, and repair of tactical equipment supporting aircraft
maintenance.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Project constructs expansion of Tactical van pads (concrete pads on which
the vans sit), relocates utilities connections in existing van pads to
support additional vans, and provide manuever space for the Rugged All
Terrain Cargo Handler (RATCH) equipment.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
6,0500216496M 11665
Tactical Support Van Pad
Expansion
NAVY 2008FY
P079
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLETONCAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67604
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 9,368
equipment includes EMCS and central compressed air system. Technical
Operating Manuals will be required for this project. Special costs include
turnstile gates with card readers for pedestrian access, new utilities pop
ups, airfield dust control, ADA compliance of head and shower, expansion of
Women's Restroom at building 23126.
SUPPORTING FACILITIES - Electrical utilities include concrete encased
electrical ducts, provide a new 3000 KVA, 12KV-208/120V, 60HZ substation, a
350KVA, 400Hz frequency converter, service panels, lighting, grounding,
telephone, fiber optic, and fire alarm cabling. Upgrade existing unit
substation located in building 23126 (each transformer shall be rated at
2000KVA, 12.47KV-208/120V, 60HZ, and new 400HZ frequency converter) and
other asssociated devices. Convert existing "guard shack" (building 23127)
to "Communication Hub" and modify the existing communication/data cables
inside this building. Mechanical utilities include water lines, air
couplers, sewage lines, storm drain system, manholes, fire hydrants, and
gas lines. Paving and site improvements include trenching of existing pads
to relocate and increase utilities, restriping of pavement, curbs and
gutters, and sidewalks. Demolition includes removal of the existing fence,
pavement and edge of existing van pad. Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection
measures include concrete block walls at locations accessible to vehicles
and upgrading the existing fencing, per UFC-4-010-01 DOD Minimum Anti-
Terrorism Standards for Buildings dated 8 OCT 2003. Sustainable features
are included in the design, development, and construction of the project in
accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 251391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
Due to insufficient van pad space, vans are being stored outside the safety
perimeter of the Marine Aviation Logistic Squadron (MALS) compound, leaving
them vulnerable to damage. Vans are stored on asphalt surfaces not capable
of adequately supporting the weight of the vans, resulting in structural
damage to the vans and destruction of the asphalt paving that they sit on.
Consolidation of the existing vans into one operational area cannot be
accomplished in the existing space, forcing the stacking of vans in hangars
and on the flightline. Lack of sufficient aisle space between the vans
limit the use of Rugged All Terrain Cargo Handler (RATCH) equipment that
safely move the vans for operational deployment purposes. Futhermore,
existing electrical power distribution system is outdated, deteriorated,
and insufficient to support the quantity and type of new van
configurations. Frequent power outages occur and therefore, due to the
deficient and unreliable power distribution systems, emergency generators
are used to power most of the vans for normal daily operations.
Consolidation of the activity into one operational area will not be
possible and vans will continue to be exposed, possibly resulting in damage
to the equipment. Existing facilities will continue to not have adequate
space for the current equipment, as well as any additional equipment
procured in the future.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
6,0500216496M 11665
Tactical Support Van Pad
Expansion
NAVY 2008FY
P079
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLETONCAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67604
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
4. Contract award:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
N/A
$280
$210
$70
01/2008
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15%
$210
$70
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 261391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
6,0500216496M 11665
Tactical Support Van Pad
Expansion
NAVY 2008FY
P079
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLETONCAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67604
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
Pat Reed (760)763-0020Activity POC: Phone No:
5. Construction start:
6. Construction complete:
04/2008
04/2009
NONE
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 271390
Scope
61073
72124
72111
72124
17950
73025
74044
17940
Cost
($000)Start
ISR Camp - Intel Battalion
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, 22
Area
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
Headquarters Area
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
Margarita(33)Area
MARSOC Supporting Facilities
Traffic Improvements
Fitness Center, Camp Pendleton
Infantry Squad Battle Course
Complete
4330 m2
8583 m2
12083 m2
8583 m2
0 LS
494 m2
2410 m2
0 LS
17,980
29,050
31,980
26,530
17,730
5,830
8,510
18,090
Design Status
09/2005
09/2005
09/2005
09/2005
09/2005
09/2005
09/2005
09/2005
8. Projects Requested In This Program
09/2007
09/2007
09/2007
09/2007
09/2007
09/2007
09/2007
07/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(126749 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 6,070,086
192,916
175,510
7,554
155,700
570,936
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 108,980
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:72124
72112
85110
72124
72124
17945
72124
21820
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Pico (24) Area
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, San Mateo Area
Operations Access Points, Red Beach
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Del Mar (21) Area
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, San Mateo Area
Force Reconnaissance Tower
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Margarita(33)Area
Regimental Maintenance Complex Phase 3
92387 SF
92387 SF
LS
0 LS
92387 SF
LS
96692 SF
72947 SF
26,970
26,590
9,210
27,900
30,420
5,820
25,170
23,430
TOTAL
TOTAL
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation and Location: M00681
155,700
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
175,510
7,554
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
7,172,702
73010 16759 SF 7,554Fire Station - HQ Area
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.12
5. Area Const
Cost Index
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
42372
44458
148
132B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 1148
824
1527
1321
41
60
3333
6299
0
1
2435
2570
28874
29203
4866
4048
Commandant of the
Marine Corps
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 281390
4. Command
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation and Location: M00681
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
To provide housing, training facilities, logistical support, and certain
administrative support for Fleet Marine Force units and other activities
and units designated by the Commandant of the Marine Corps. To conduct
specialized schools and other training as directed. To receive and process
students in order to conduct field training in basic combat skills.
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.12
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
Commandant of the
Marine Corps
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 291391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
ISR CAMP - INTEL BATTALION (46,609
SF)
COMPANY - BATTERY HQ (41,444
SF)
ACADEMIC INSTRUCTION FACILITY
(4,833 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (332
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SPECIAL COSTS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
4,330.11
3,850.27
449
30.84
2,528.93
2,273.11
4,087.64
13,290
(9,740)
(1,020)
(130)
(530)
(60)
(350)
(570)
(890)
2,340
(50)
(600)
(300)
(690)
(410)
(150)
(140)
15,630
780
16,410
940
17,350
630
17,980
17,980
(673)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,9800206496M 61073
ISR Camp - Intel Battalion
NAVY 2008FY
P009
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
M00681(AB)
(HQ AREA)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 301391C
PROJECT:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,9800206496M 61073
ISR Camp - Intel Battalion
NAVY 2008FY
P009
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 4,330
CAMP PENDLETON.
M00681(AB)
(HQ AREA)
Construct two (2) structures (two-story Company Headquarters building and a
single-story Academic Instruction Facility) reinforced integral-colored
concrete masonry unit (CMU) building with seismic upgrades, spread footing
foundations, reinforce concrete spread footing and slab on grade,
structural steel framing, steel truss and standing seam metal roof.
Project will provide facilities for the Intelligence Battalion in the Force
Intelligence Operations Center (FIOC). Project will provide facilities to
serve as the state-of-the art Force Intelligence Operations Center (FIOC)
Company Headquarters and Instruction Facility. Construction will include
Co Hq operational and administrative space, Intel Bn classroom space,
indoor storage and open storage, pollution prevention measure, HAZMAT
storage area, and pave parking. Special construction features include
seismic construction including anti-terrorism/force protection measures,
vault, and hazardous material storage area. Sustainable design principles
will be included into the construction of the project in accordance with
Executive Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders. Built-in
equipment includes personnel/freight elevator and public address system.
Electrical systems include fire detection and protection, energy saving
electronic monitoring and control system (EMCS), and information systems.
Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire detection and protection system,
heating ventilation and air conditioning. Supporting facilities work
includes site and building utility connection (water, natural gas, sanitary
and storm sewers, electrical, pulling additional 900-pair telephone line,
Local Area Network (LAN), and satellite/cable television). Paving and site
improvements include exterior site and building lighting, paved parking,
sidewalks, ramps, permanent signs, concrete block screen walls for trash
and utilities, storm water management, earthwork, grading, landscaping, and
automatic irrigation system. Demolition of three existing buildings (13144,
13145, 1619) and existing asphalt, concrete drives and parking lots are
required. Enviromental mitigation will include asbestos removal and lead
based paint abatement as well as execution of a storm water prevention plan
(SWPP). Also included are Technical Operating Manuals and Anti-
Terrorism/Force Protection features in accordance with UFC 4-010-01 dated
08 October 2003. Sustainable principles will be integrated into the
design, development, and construction of the project in accordance with
Executive Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 311391C
Intel Bn consists of four companies, which are located in 4 buildings in 4
different base areas. The intent is to consolidate the Battalion to one
area in order to enhance unit integrity, cohesion and teamwork. Interaction
between these Company HQ's and their working spaces is essential.
Currently, the lack of available space has forced 81 Marines to have to
"double up" sharing work/desk space. Consolidating the Company HQ's into a
seismically and electrically adequate structure that meets the BFR will
result in improved intelligence support to I MEF by generating focus of
efforts and unit cohesion.
Intelligence Battalion currently occupies three (3) buildings built in
1952, two (2) are inadequate. All existing structures require major
renovation if these facilities are to remain occupied for their existing
uses. The deteriorated structures create unhygienic conditions due to the
infestation of insects, rats, and other pests. The breakdown in supporting
electrical and mechanical systems in these structures has resulted in loss
of efficiency in operations and training of the Marines. The structures
are seismically unsafe. The lack of adequate electrical service cannot
support the daily operations of test equipment and computers.
If Radio, Intelligence and 9th Communications Battalions could not be co-
located in the Operations Center, the functional benefits of shared common
training, conference, shops, storage, and other areas would be eliminated.
Co-located, adequate and efficiently configured facilities are required for
the consolidation of shared activities and operations of Radio,
Intelligence and 9th Comms. Battalions. The ISR compound, when completed,
will enhance the interoperability between the three Battalions. This
project will fulfill phase two requirements for development of the ISR
compound.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
This project is the second of two phases, the first phase was P-009A of
FY05. This project, is the second of a series of three construction
projects (P-008, P009A/P009, P-003) for the synergistic co-location of
activities and operations between Radio, Intelligence and 9th
Communications Battalions. New Company administration space will be
provided for Intelligence Battalion as an addition to shared facilities
constructed by MCON P-008 and MCON P-009A.
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,9800206496M 61073
ISR Camp - Intel Battalion
NAVY 2008FY
P009
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00681(AB)
(HQ AREA)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 321391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
If the existing facilities occupied by Intel Bn were to continue in the
same locations, severe loss of efficiency, security and quality of life
will result. The Marines will continue to work in inefficient, outdated,
and unhealthy environments.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,9800206496M 61073
ISR Camp - Intel Battalion
NAVY 2008FY
P009
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
A/V equipment
Collateral Equipment
NMCI Connections
Physical security equipment
Telecommunications
PMC
PMC
PMC
PMC
O&MMC
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
12
600
45
6
10
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
$192
$45
$147
04/2008
12/2007
10/2009
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15%
$160
$32
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
M00681(AB)
(HQ AREA)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 331391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,9800206496M 61073
ISR Camp - Intel Battalion
NAVY 2008FY
P009
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
based on Navy requirements.
Bob Song (760) 725-5366Activity POC: Phone No:
M00681(AB)
(HQ AREA)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 341391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,9800206496M 61073
ISR Camp - Intel Battalion
NAVY 2008FY
P009
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Blank Page
M00681(AB)
(HQ AREA)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 351391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS, 22
AREA (92,387 SF)
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS
COMPLEX E1/E4 (91,493 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (893
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SPECIAL COSTS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
8,583
8,500
83
2,017.26
4,087.64
18,980
(17,150)
(340)
(290)
(160)
(260)
(500)
(280)
6,290
(390)
(2,440)
(1,930)
(1,260)
(160)
(110)
25,270
1,260
26,530
1,510
28,040
1,010
29,050
29,050
(1,319)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
29,0500216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, 22
Area
NAVY 2008FY
P097
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
CAMP PENDLETON.
M00681(AE)
(CHAPPO AREA (22/24))
Construct a multi-story reinforced concrete masonry unit block (CMU)
building with CMU interior walls, seismic requirements, reinforced concrete
foundation and floors, and standing seam metal roof. Project will provide
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 361391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
29,0500216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, 22
Area
NAVY 2008FY
P097
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00681(AE)
(CHAPPO AREA (22/24))
200 rooms with private bathrooms in the standard 2x0 room configuration.
Community and service core areas will consist of laundry facilities,
multipurpose rooms, lounges, administrative offices, NMCI space,
housekeeping areas, and public restrooms. Built-in equipment includes a
service elevator. Technical operating (OMSI) Manuals will be provided.
Information systems including telephone, LAN, and cable TV will be
provided. Anti-terrorism Force protection features will be provided in
accordance with UFC 4-010-01, Appendix B. Special costs include the
additional concrete & steel required for compliance with seismic codes.
Sustainable features will be included in the design, development, and
construction for the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and
other laws and Executive Orders.
Supporting Facilities - Include electrical systems such as fire alarms,
energy saving electronic monitoring and control system (EMCS), and
information systems. Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire protection,
heating & ventilation. Building utility connections and related site work
for water, natural gas, sanitary and storm sewers, electrical, telephone,
LAN, and cable television are included. Paving and site improvements
include paved parking, hardscape, sidewalks, outdoor recreation
facilities/courts, roadways access, bus shelter/turnouts, earthwork,
grading, landscaping, fencing, lighting, signage, area signs, constructed
seating, shade structures, landmarks, demolition of existing paving,
fencing, and lighting. Demolition includes existing paving and removal and
replacement of existing power poles and electrical distribution.
Environmental mitigation includes California Gnatcatcher (CAGN) surveys,
bio-monitoring, and coastal sage scrub. Sewer system improvements include
replacement of the existing Sewage Lift Station (SLS) 22188 with a higher
capacity Class 4, manholes as required, and conveyance pipelines. This
project will upgrade the infrastructure to a level that will allow the
sewage system to support the additional flow generated by the new BEQ. An
additional 600,000 gal Equalization Basin and associated valving for Sewage
Treatment Plant 3 (STP-3) is also included to insure that the wastewater is
properly and compliantly processed.
Rooms: 200 two-person rooms.
Maximum utilization: 400 E1-E3.
Intended Grade Mix: 166 E1-E3, 76 E-4, 41 E5.
Total: 283 persons.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 371391C
Base-wide, bachelor Marines are currently overbilleted in crowded
conditions, many at 3 per room, due to the Camp Pendleton Bachelor Enlisted
Housing deficit.
This overcrowding is a detriment to the quality of life and is far inferior
to the Marine Corps/DoD Billeting Standards of 2 Marines per room for all
enlisted personnel (E1-E3) and one Marine per room for all E4-E5 personnel.
The billeting situation is so critical that many personnel must be billeted
off base even after rooms are assigned at maximum capacity. Off-base
personnel incur substantial out of pocket expenses because the applicable
This project supports the Marine Corps' goal of achieving the 2X0 standard
by 2012. Adequate and efficiently configured barracks facilities to
provide living quarters to reduce the MCB Camp Pendleton programmable
Bachelor Enlisted Housing deficit.
A primary objective of the Marine Corps is to provide new construction to
the 2X0 Standard, addressing all bachelor quarter space deficiencies.
Development in the 22-Area has exceeded the capacity of the existing
Wastewater infrastructure. Planned Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (BEQs) will
add 789 Marines to this already overtaxed sanitary sewer system. The
wastewater system requires the following upgrades to accommodate new BEQ
facilities: increase in size and capacity of the conveyance lines,
increase in pumping capacity of Sewage Lift Station (SLS), increased
capacity of the Force Main (FM) to the main that supplies the STP-3
conveyance line, increase of containment time of STP-3, and three Manholes
that will allow for current and future connections to the system.
These upgrades are necessary to reduce the possibility of sewage overflows
from the 22 Area due the existing sewage treatment capacity deficiency.
Those overflows violate Order 96-04 of the Regional Water Quality Control
Board (RWQCB). MCB is currently under an EPA Notice of Violation (NOV)
(dtd 11 Jan 2000) to reduce sewage overflows. A Federal District Court
Consent Order No. 02-CV-0499 IEG (AJB) (dtd 07 Aug 2003) included sewage
overflow/spill reduction goals. This project improvement is critical to
ensure compliance with the Consent Order.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Provides 400 living spaces (200 two-person rooms) using the 2x0 standard
room design for permanent party bachelor enlisted personnel.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
29,0500216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, 22
Area
NAVY 2008FY
P097
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 8,583
M00681(AE)
(CHAPPO AREA (22/24))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 381391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
BAH rates are insufficient to cover the cost of housing and transportation
in the local community.
The current Sanitary Sewer system serving the 22 Area has insufficient
capacity for the existing conditions. Also, the receiving treatment plant,
STP-3, cannot process more influent due to a lack of containment time.
This containment time is limited by the flow conditions which occur in a
diurnal cycle and cannot be spread through out the 24-hour period due to
lack of holding capacity; which an EQ Basin would provide.
If this project is not provided, the Commandant of the Marine Corps' goal
to provide new construction addressing all adequate bachelor quarter space
deficiencies will not be achieved. Permanent party personnel will continue
to be billeted in overcrowded conditions with 3 Marines per room, E-1 to E-
5. They will endure a lower quality of life. Furthermore, personnel will
continue to be billeted off base, thereby costing the Marine Corps precious
BAH funds. The Marine Corps unit cohesion will be undermined.
If the SLS, conveyance lines, Force Main, and STP-3 Containment upgrades
are not provided, the 22 Area's infrastructure will not be able to support
the new BEQ and the 22 Area will continue to have a bachelor housing
deficit.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
29,0500216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, 22
Area
NAVY 2008FY
P097
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
N/A
$300
$300
$0
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15%
$150
$150
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
M00681(AE)
(CHAPPO AREA (22/24))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 391391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
29,0500216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, 22
Area
NAVY 2008FY
P097
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
BEQ Furniture
NMCI Connections
O&MMC
OPN
2009
2009
1,262
57
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
Mr. Tim Busser 760-725-6073Activity POC: Phone No:
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
04/2008
01/2008
10/2009
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
2006 R&M Conducted ($000): 15,6452007 R&M Conducted ($000): 17,202
108,980
C. FY D. FY E. Future R&M Requirements ($000):
M00681(AE)
(CHAPPO AREA (22/24))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 401391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
29,0500216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, 22
Area
NAVY 2008FY
P097
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Blank Page
M00681(AE)
(CHAPPO AREA (22/24))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 411391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS,
HEADQUARTERS AREA (130,060 SF)
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS
(91,493 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (893
SF)
MAIL INSPECTION AND PROCESSING
CENTER (37,674 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SPECIAL COSTS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
12,083
8,500
83
3,500
2,017.26
4,087.64
1,731.55
24,800
(17,150)
(340)
(6,060)
(130)
(160)
(340)
(520)
(100)
3,020
(750)
(330)
(1,220)
(340)
(10)
(340)
(30)
27,820
1,390
29,210
1,660
30,870
1,110
31,980
31,980
(3,036)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
31,9800216496M 72111
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
Headquarters Area
NAVY 2008FY
P115
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
M00681(AB)
(HQ AREA)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 421391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
31,9800216496M 72111
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
Headquarters Area
NAVY 2008FY
P115
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
CAMP PENDLETON.
M00681(AB)
(HQ AREA)
PRIMARY FACILITY - Construct a multi-story reinforced concrete masonry unit
block (CMU) building with CMU interior walls, seismic requirements,
reinforced concrete foundation and floors, and standing seam metal roof.
Project will provide 200 rooms with private bathrooms in the standard 2x0
room configuration. Community and service core areas will consist of
laundry facilities, multipurpose rooms, lounges, administrative offices,
NMCI space, housekeeping areas, and public restrooms. Built-in equipment
includes a service elevator. Project includes demolition of the existing
Mail Inspection and Processing Center in the Headquarters Area (Bldg. 1674)
and repair and improvement of building 22103 for the mail inspection and
processing requirement. Demolition of the existing facility includes
asbestos and lead based paint abatement. Renovation includes seismic
upgrades, new floors and walls, structural steel framing upgrades, steel
truss and standing seam metal roof. Project will provide facilities for
mail handling area, administrative and classroom space, truck loading and
unloading, and pre-inspection area for incoming mail. Built-in equipment
includes X-Ray and Bomb Sniffing, Irradiation and Biological equipment,
audiovisual, and intercom equipment. Special construction features include
electronic gates and posts, security lighting, wiring, and sensors.
Technical operating (OMSI) Manuals will be provided. Information systems
including telephone, LAN, and cable TV will be provided. Anti-terrorism
Force protection features will be provided in accordance with UFC 4-010-01,
Appendix B. Special costs include keyless lock sets and alcove. SUPPORTING
FACILITIES - Include Electrical systems such as fire alarms, energy saving
electronic monitoring and control system (EMCS), and information systems.
Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire protection, heating &
ventilation. Building utility connections and related site work for water,
natural gas, sanitary and storm sewers, electrical, telephone, LAN, and
cable television are included. Paving and site improvements include paved
parking, sidewalks, outdoor recreation facilities/courts, roadways access,
bus shelter/turnouts, earthwork, grading, landscaping, demolition of
existing paving, fencing, and lighting. Demolition includes existing power
poles and relocation of existing electrical utilities. Environmental
mitigation includes California Gnatcatcher (CAGN) surveys, bio-monitoring,
and Coastal Sage Scrub restoration. Sustainable features will be included
in the design, development, and construction for the project in accordance
with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and Executive Orders.
Rooms: 200 two-person rooms
Maximum utilization: 400 E1-E3
Intended Grade Mix: 164 E1-E3, 75 E-4, and 43 E5
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 431391C
Base-wide, bachelor Marines are currently overbilleted in crowded
conditions, many at 3 per room, due to the Camp Pendleton Bachelor Enlisted
Housing deficit.
This overcrowding is a detriment to the quality of life and is far inferior
to the Marine Corps/DoD Billeting Standards of 2 Marines per room for all
enlisted personnel (E1-E3) and one Marine per room for all E4-E5 personnel.
The billeting situation is so critical that many personnel must be billeted
off base even after rooms are assigned at maximum capacity. Off-base
personnel incur substantial out of pocket expenses because the applicable
BAH rates are insufficient to cover the cost of housing and transportation
in the local community.
The existing Post Office, Building 1674, was constructed in 1943 as a SNCO
club. There have been few improvements to this wood structure over the
years. It is inadequately sized and the floor plan is configured
improperly for postal operations. Its inadequate size compromises security
This project supports the Marine Corps' goal of achieving the 2X0 standard
by 2012. Adequate and efficiently configured barracks facilities to
provide living quarters to reduce the MCB Camp Pendleton programmable
Bachelor Enlisted Housing deficit. A primary objective of the Marine Corps
is to provide new construction to the 2X0 Standard, addressing all bachelor
quarter space deficiencies.
Adequate and efficiently configured facility to enable 1st Marine Logistics
Group (MLG), the United States Postal Service, and civilian postal workers
to serve bachelor enlisted personnel and all other customers on MCB Camp
Pendleton.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Provides 400 living spaces (200 two-person rooms) using the 2x0 standard
room design for permanent party bachelor enlisted personnel. Demos
existing inadequate mail facility and constructs a secure, state-of-the-art
Central Postal Facility.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
31,9800216496M 72111
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
Headquarters Area
NAVY 2008FY
P115
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
Adequate: Substandard:
M00681(AB)
(HQ AREA)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 441391C
September 2006
12. Supplemental Data:
when mail has to be stored in a classroom space, on the loading dock, or in
trucks outside of the building. The present loading dock cannot accommodate
military mail vehicles, vans or 3-ton trucks, causing extensive manual
handling of mail. The mail carts have destroyed the wood floors. Steel
plates have been installed over the damaged wood floors to prevent further
damage; however, this has resulted in excessive noise and highly
deteriorated working conditions. The non-functioning steam system is
forcing the use of uneconomical and non-energy efficient space heaters.
Maintenance of all utilities, sewage lines, etc. has become extensive and
costly. Public space is nonexistent and entry is from the loading dock.
All parking is very limited. There are fire and seismic violations plus
lead and asbestos hazards throughout the building. Building 1674 cannot be
renovated in its present condition. Security and anti terrorism needs and
setbacks are impossible for a wood structure.
If this project is not provided, the Commandant of the Marine Corps' goal
to provide new construction addressing all adequate bachelor quarter space
deficiencies will not be achieved. Permanent party personnel will continue
to be billeted in overcrowded conditions with 3 Marines per room, E-1 to E-
5 and will continue to have a lower quality of life. Furthermore,
personnel will continue to be billeted off base, thereby costing the Marine
Corps precious BAH funds and well as unit cohesion potentially being
undermined.
The Central Post Office will continue to be located in an inadequte wood
building, threatening the safety, reliability, and continuity of mail
service to bachelor enlisted Marines and all other Camp Pendleton
customers. Mail will continue to be handled in a unsecure facility.
Structural, life safety, and environmental violations will continue to
exist for Camp Pendleton's central post office. Maintenance costs for this
wood structure and all of its environmental, electrical, plumbing, heating,
ventilating, sewage problems, and code violations will continue to drain
Camp Pendleton's FSRM funds.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
31,9800216496M 72111
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
Headquarters Area
NAVY 2008FY
P115
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started 09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
M00681(AB)
(HQ AREA)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 451391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
January 2007
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
31,9800216496M 72111
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
Headquarters Area
NAVY 2008FY
P115
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
COLLATERAL EQUIPMENT
COLLATERAL MAIL PROCESSIN/INSPECTION
EQUIP.
NMCI Connections
PMC
PMC
O&MMC
2009
2009
2009
1,262
1,714
60
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other components
on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is based on
Navy requirements.
Mr. Bob Song 760-725-5366Activity POC: Phone No:
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
No
N/A
$580
$80
$500
04/2008
01/2008
12/2009
15%
$500
$80
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
2006 R&M Conducted ($000): 15,6452007 R&M Conducted ($000): 17,202
108,980
C. FY D. FY E. Future R&M Requirements ($000):
M00681(AB)
(HQ AREA)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 461391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
31,9800216496M 72111
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
Headquarters Area
NAVY 2008FY
P115
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Blank Page
M00681(AB)
(HQ AREA)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 471391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS,
MARGARITA(33)AREA (92,387 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATION ROOM (893
SF)
BACHELOR ENLISTEDQUARTERS
(91,493 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SPECIAL COSTS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
RELOCATE NBC BLDG TO 33 AREA
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
8,583
83
8,500
4,087.64
2,017.26
19,010
(340)
(17,150)
(280)
(160)
(360)
(510)
(210)
4,070
(520)
(640)
(240)
(1,800)
(70)
(110)
(690)
23,080
1,150
24,230
1,380
25,610
920
26,530
26,530
(1,170)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
26,5300216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
Margarita(33)Area
NAVY 2008FY
P170
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
CAMP PENDLETON.
M00681(AG)
(MARGARITA AREA (33))
Construct a multi-story reinforced concrete masonry unit block(CMU)
building with CMU interior walls, seismic requirements, reinforced concrete
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 481391C
Provides 400 living spaces (200 two-person rooms) using the 2x0 standard
room design for permanent party bachelor enlisted personnel.
PROJECT:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
26,5300216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
Margarita(33)Area
NAVY 2008FY
P170
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 8,583
M00681(AG)
(MARGARITA AREA (33))
foundation and floors, and standing seam metal roof. Project will provide
200 rooms with private bathrooms in the standard 2x0 room configuration.
Community and service core areas will consist of laundry facilities,
multipurpose rooms, lounges, administrative offices, NMCI space,
housekeeping areas, and public restrooms. Built-in equipment includes a
service elevator. Technical operating (OMSI) Manuals will be provided.
Information systems including telephone, LAN, and cable TV will be
provided. Anti-terrorism Force protection features will be provided in
accordance with UFC 4-010-01, Appendix B. Special costs include the
additional concrete & steel required for compliance with seismic codes.
Sustainable features will be included in the design, development, and
construction for the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and
other laws and Executive Orders.
Supporting Facilities - Include electrical systems such as fire alarms,
energy saving electronic monitoring and control system (EMCS), and
information systems. Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire protection,
heating & ventilation. Building utility connections and related site work
for water, natural gas, sanitary and storm sewers, electrical, telephone,
LAN, and cable television are included. Relocation of the existing sewer
line for Bldg. 33610, a new sewer line connecting to the new BEQ, new man
holes as required, and connections to the existing sewage conveyance line
are included. Paving and site improvements include paved parking,
hardscape, sidewalks, outdoor recreation facilities/courts, roadways
access, bus shelter/turnouts, earthwork, grading, landscaping, fencing,
lighting, signage, area signs, constructed seating, shade structures,
landmarks, demolition of existing paving, fencing, and lighting.
Demolition also includes the existing Nuclear Biological Chemical (NBC)
training facility (Bldg. 33650) and existing asphalt paving. Supporting
facilities also include the construction of a new NBC replacement building
and paved parking lot.
Rooms: 200 two-person rooms.
Maximum utilization: 400 E1-E3.
Intended Grade Mix: 164 E1-E3, 75 E4, 43 E5.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 491391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
Base-wide, bachelor Marines are currently forced to be overbilleted in
crowded conditions, many at 3 per room, due to the Camp Pendleton Bachelor
Enlisted Housing deficit. This overcrowding is a detriment to the quality
of life and is far inferior to the Marine Corps/DoD Billeting Standards of
2 Marines per room for all enlisted personnel (E1-E3) and one Marine per
room for all E4-E5 personnel. The billeting situation is so critical that
many personnel must be billeted off base even after rooms are assigned at
maximum capacity. Off-base personnel incur substantial out of pocket
expenses because the applicable BAH rates are insufficient to cover the
cost of housing and transportation in the local community.
If this project is not provided, the Commandant of the Marine Corps' goal
to provide new construction addressing all adequate bachelor quarter space
deficiencies will not be achieved. Permanent party personnel will continue
to be billeted in overcrowded conditions with 3 Marines per room, E-1 to E-
5. They will endure a lower quality of life. Furthermore, personnel will
continue to be billeted off base, thereby costing the Marine Corps precious
BAH funds. The Marine Corps unit cohesion will be undermined.
This project supports the Marine Corps' goal of achieving the 2X0 standard
by 2012. Adequate and efficiently configured barracks facilities to
provide living quarters to reduce the MCB Camp Pendleton programmable
Bachelor Enlisted Housing deficit. A primary objective of the Marine Corps
is to provide new construction to the 2X0 Standard, addressing all bachelor
quarter space deficiencies.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
26,5300216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
Margarita(33)Area
NAVY 2008FY
P170
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
NA
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15% (E) Percent completed as of
M00681(AG)
(MARGARITA AREA (33))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 501391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
26,5300216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
Margarita(33)Area
NAVY 2008FY
P170
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
BEQ Furniture
NMCI Connections
O&MMC
PMC
2009
2009
1,125
45
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
Mr. Phil Nguyen 760-725-6040Activity POC: Phone No:
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
$300
$300
$0
03/2008
12/2007
06/2009
$150
$150
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
2006 R&M Conducted ($000): 15,6452007 R&M Conducted ($000): 17,202
108,980
C. FY D. FY E. Future R&M Requirements ($000):
M00681(AG)
(MARGARITA AREA (33))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 511391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
MARSOC SUPPORTING FACILITIES
ARMORY (9,688 SF)
FIELD FIRE KD RANGE
HELO LANDING PAD (44,993 SF)
OBSERVATION TOWER (258 SF)
MOTOR - T (9,149 SF)
RANGE SUPPORT BUILDING (1,593
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SPECIAL COSTS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
LS
m2
FP
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
900
15
4,180
24
850
148
2,412.38
11,485.61
203.4
14,168
2,125.03
1,807.68
6,370
(2,170)
(170)
(850)
(340)
(1,810)
(270)
(230)
(40)
(80)
(190)
(220)
9,050
(2,070)
(540)
(650)
(4,480)
(50)
(1,070)
(190)
15,420
770
16,190
920
17,110
620
17,730
17,730
(300)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,7300216496M 14341
MARSOC Supporting Facilities
NAVY 2008FY
P215
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00681(AH)
(LAS FLORES AREA (41))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 521391C
Adequate and efficiently configured facilities are required to store
weapons both personnel and crew served.
REQUIREMENT:
This project constructs a facility that supports requirements of Marine
Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC)as best defined at this time.
Project constructs a Motor T, Armory, Helicopter landing pad and converts
an existing range into a range that the MARSOC can utilize.
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,7300216496M 14341
MARSOC Supporting Facilities
NAVY 2008FY
P215
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
Adequate: Substandard:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
CAMP PENDLETON.
M00681(AH)
(LAS FLORES AREA (41))
Primary facilities to be constructed in support of MARSOC included in this
project are multi-story armory, vehicle maintenance facility (first and
second echelon maintenance), and helicopter landing pad sized to
accommodate two CH-53's. This project will convert an existing range (Field
Fire KD Range) to meet the requirements of the MARSOC. Construction will
consist of reinforced concrete masonry unit (CMU) with reinforced concrete
foundation and slab, structural steel framing, steel trusses and standing
seam metal roof. Built-in equipment includes Intrusion Detection System
(IDS) and exhaust system. Telecommunication systems include fiber optic
cabling, local area network (LAN) and telephone wiring. Technical
Operating Manuals, Information Systems and Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection
features will be included. Special costs include seismic construction and
automated targets. Supporting facilities include utility infrastructure
improvements to accommodate these facilities (water, natural gas, sanitary
and storm sewers, electrical, telephone, Local Area Network (LAN), and
cable television). Special Construction Features includes a shoot house, a
breacher structure and an automatic target system. Electrical systems
include fire alarms, energy saving electronic monitoring and control system
(EMCS), and information systems. Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire
protection systems, heating, ventilation and air conditioning. Paving and
site improvements include security fencing, exterior site and building
lighting, paved parking and striping, sidewalks, storm water management,
earthwork, grading, landscaping, and automatic irrigation system. Also
includes necessary environmental mitigation. Construction will be in
Seismic Zone 4. Sustainable features will be included in the design,
development and, construction for the project in accordance with Executive
Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 531391C
12. Supplemental Data:
The Secretary of Defense directed the standup of a Marine Corps operational
component of the United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) as a
counterpart to the existing Navy, Army and Air Force Special Operations
component commands. USSOCOM has been charged by the President and by the
Secretary of Defense with the lead on the Global War on Terrorism. Marine
Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC) officially stood up on 24
February 2006 as the newest arm of USSOCOM without benefit of facilities to
specifically support any aspect of this highbred mission assignment for
personnel, equipment, headquarters, operational development, mission
emulation or component security. Obtaining adequate facilities are
paramount to fully develop this extremely complex and demanding MARSOC
capability.
The temporary structures and facilities for Det ONE during the proof of
concept phase are no longer adequate to support the MARSOC as it is
currently defined.
The MARSOC has unique training and operational requirements that are
exclusive of Marine Corps requirements. The MARSOC will require isolated
facilities for training and mission preparation. All operations will be
classified SECRET at minimum and the facilities and compound will have to
accommodate these requirements. Additionally, The Detachment will have
unique connectivity requirements that may not be tied to NMCI. Also, 3rd
echelon maintenance will be required for many non-USMC system end items.
No facilities exist to accommodate the MARSOC.
Facilities to maintain the MARSOC vehicle fleet including 7 ton trucks
(MTR).
Helicopter landing area to accomodate up to 2 CH-53's any one time. The
landing pad will be just outside the compound.
Field Fire KD Range with 1600m capability. Range will be capable of
utilizing power moving targets.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,7300216496M 14341
MARSOC Supporting Facilities
NAVY 2008FY
P215
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started 09/2005
M00681(AH)
(LAS FLORES AREA (41))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 541391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,7300216496M 14341
MARSOC Supporting Facilities
NAVY 2008FY
P215
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Comm/Data/ AV
Furnishings
Special Equipment
PMC
PMC
PMC
2008
2008
2008
50
100
150
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
Ross Davis (760) 725-6034Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
No
N/A
$489
$74
$415
04/2008
01/2008
10/2009
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15%
$415
$74
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
M00681(AH)
(LAS FLORES AREA (41))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 551391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS (5,320 SF)
SECURITY/ PASS & I. D. OFFICE
(5,000 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOMS (80
SF)
MAIN ENTRANCE GATE GUARD
HOUSES (3EA)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
494.23
464.52
7.41
22.3
2,370.84
4,087.64
5,065.81
1,410
(1,100)
(30)
(110)
(40)
(60)
(20)
(50)
3,670
(680)
(40)
(2,130)
(100)
(140)
(580)
5,080
250
5,330
300
5,630
200
5,830
5,830
(54)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
5,8300206496M 73025
Traffic Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P352
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
CAMP PENDLETON.
M00681(AN)
(MAIN GATE AREA (20))
The project includes the construction of one story building with steel
structure, masonry bearing walls, concrete slab and foundations, standing
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 561391C
The proposed work is required to provide the Commanding General the ability
to effectively control ingress/egress through this gate. This offers
important operational advantages for the conduct of AT/FP operations,
particularly under conditions of increased THREATCON. Camp Pendleton Anti-
Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) Plan requires that the installation be
protected from unauthorized access through its perimeter and MCO 5530.14,
The Marine Corps Physical Security Manual, directs that Installation
REQUIREMENT:
Construct a new gate house facility including vehicle inspection lanes,
sentry inspection houses and related supporting facilities at the Main
Gate, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California. This project proposes
security improvements that provide or enhance anti-terrorism and force
protection features at the Main Gate, to protect our peace-time,
warfighting and training assets along with facilities and infrastructure.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
5,8300206496M 73025
Traffic Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P352
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 494
M00681(AN)
(MAIN GATE AREA (20))
seam metal roof and seismic zone 4 requirements in accordance with Camp
Pendleton design standards and the DOD Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 4-
022-01 Entry Control Facilities/Access Control Points. Project also
includes inspection lanes, sentry guardhouses, technical operating manuals,
temporary traffic control during the construction, EMCS (energy
management), and incidental related work. Built-in equipment includes
alarms and wiring in support of Circuit Camera Systems. Utilities work
includes relocation of utilities as required, including water, sanitary and
storm sewer, gas service, electrical, LAN and telephone/comm; closed
circuit camera system, electrical pad-mounted transformer and power
distribution. Mechanical systems include HVAC. Site improvements include
minor grading work, drainage and filtration system, erosion control;
asphalt / concrete pavements, concrete curbs, concrete dividers, traffic
medians, crash barriers, masonry walls, driveways, sidewalks, parking
areas, traffic control devices (cat claws for traffic lanes), overhead
signs, traffic lights, road striping and traffic signs, flag poles, light
poles, bus lane, landscaping and irrigation, and asphalt pavement overlay.
(Demolition includes the existing gatehouse facility (Bldg. 20250) and
related asphalt /concrete pavement, concrete curbs and related supporting
facilities.) Environmental Requirements include mitigation, restoration
plan, and biological monitoring. Anti-terrorism force protection measures
include traffic control devices, cat claws, warning signs, blast resistant
windows and doors.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 571391C
The Main Gate is located on the Western Boundary of the Base which contains
an approximate 20-Mile stretch of the San Diego Freeway (Interstate 5), the
busiest freeway in the United States. This gate, due to insufficient
deterrent measures is a source of substantial unauthorized entry. This
gate is the most recognizable and easily accessible of Camp Pendleton's six
gate-systems. Four of the Base's gate systems (San Luis Rey, San Onofre,
Del Mar, and Las Pulgas gate) were recently or are in the process to be
properly configured to control access/egress, conduct vehicle inspections,
provide reasonable shielding for the guard or safely process routine
traffic flow.
There were several documented cases of unauthorized access to the
installation through Camp Pendleton vehicular gates. In several cases,
Military Police Sentries sustained injury after being assaulted with
vehicles while manning their posts. On several occasions, car thieves
disregarded a Gate guard and drove onto the base in an attempt to avoid
apprehension.
.
Unauthorized personnel will continue to gain access to Camp Pendleton for
unlawful, and possibly terrorist purposes. The Base will not be able to
effectively respond to increased THREATCONS. Critical Base areas/assets,
tenant commands, housing, public schools, and billeting complexes will
Commanders must be able to effectively control installation access.
Additionally, a Joint Staff Integrated Vulnerability Assessment (JSIVA)
conducted at the Base (Jan 1999, Feb 2002) pointed out serious deficiencies
in the ability to control ingress/egress at the Base's perimeter gates.
This gate offers rapid access to potential operational targets such as the
Assault Amphibian School, MEF Operations and Command Center, Bachelors
Officer's Quarters, as well as symbolic and casualty producing targets such
as various officer housing areas and recreational beach facilities.
The project scope was derived from the AT/FP criteria DOD AT/FP
Construction Standards of 16 Dec 1999, the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC
4-022-01) Entry Control Facilities/Access Control Points, DOD Interim
Technical Guidance for Anti-Terrorist Force Protection, Physical Security
of Waterfront Facilities and Installations of June 2001, USPACOM OPORD
5050-01 Iterim Guidance, and Naval Facilities Engineering Services Center
Water Front Barrier Study of PACFLT Ports of May 2001.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
5,8300206496M 73025
Traffic Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P352
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00681(AN)
(MAIN GATE AREA (20))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 581391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
remain at risk to terrorist attack. Compliance with the ATFP and the Marine
Corps Security Manual will not be complete. Sentries will be unnecessarily
vulnerable to vehicle attack and gunfire.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
5,8300206496M 73025
Traffic Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P352
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Collateral Equipment
NMCI Connections
O&MMC
PMC
2008
2008
30
24
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
N/A
$325
$45
$280
04/2008
01/2008
07/2009
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15%
$280
$45
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
M00681(AN)
(MAIN GATE AREA (20))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 591391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
5,8300206496M 73025
Traffic Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P352
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Manuel Alvarez 760-725-6046Activity POC: Phone No:
M00681(AN)
(MAIN GATE AREA (20))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 601391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
5,8300206496M 73025
Traffic Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P352
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Blank Page
M00681(AN)
(MAIN GATE AREA (20))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 611391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
FITNESS CENTER, CAMP PENDLETON
(25,941 SF)
FITNESS CENTER (25,726 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (215
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SPECIAL COSTS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
2,410
2,390
20
1,999.74
4,087.64
5,480
(4,780)
(80)
(90)
(50)
(80)
(170)
(230)
1,920
(180)
(430)
(780)
(460)
(40)
(30)
7,400
370
7,770
440
8,210
300
8,510
8,510
(400)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,5100216496M 74044
Fitness Center, Camp Pendleton
NAVY 2008FY
P608
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
CAMP PENDLETON.
M00681(AG)
(MARGARITA AREA (33))
Construct a single story concrete masonry unit (CMU) building with
reinforced concrete footings and slab on grade, structural steel framing,
standing seam metal roof, factory finished aluminum storefront, and steel
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 621391C
This project will construct a consolidated indoor fitness center in the
Margarita (33) Area, MCB Camp Pendleton.
PROJECT:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,5100216496M 74044
Fitness Center, Camp Pendleton
NAVY 2008FY
P608
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 2,410
M00681(AG)
(MARGARITA AREA (33))
doors and frames with stainless steel hardware. Construction will include
integral colored or glazed concrete block, or finished gypsum board over
metal stud interior partitions; racquetball and basketball courts with wood
floors; telescoping bleachers; aerobics, weight and cardiovascular training
areas; rest rooms, lockers, showers, saunas, equipment storage, laundry and
administrative support areas; suspended acoustical ceiling system and
suspended acoustical sound attenuation panels. The building will be
designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act. Built-in equipment includes an overhead roll-up safety
partition at the basketball court, a high bay motorized operable window
system, and mass notification address system. Also includes Technical
Operation Manuals. Information management systems that include wiring for
the energy monitoring and control system (EMCS), telephone, cable
television (CATV), and fiber optics cable (local area network (LAN).
Sustainable design will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and
other directives. Special costs include a seismic locality factor for
seismic zone four (4), cardio/aerobics cushion flooring, and a floor to
ceiling safety mirror system. Electrical system and utilities include fire
alarm system and wiring, transformer, lighting, and connection of utility
systems to base wide energy monitoring system in the unity room at Bldg.
2249. Mechanical systems and utilities include HVAC, instrumentation and
automatic controls, plumbing, sewage collection and a pumping lift station,
fire protection system, and building site gas, water, sewer, and storm
sewer utility connections. Paving and site improvements include conversion
of existing basketball court into additional parking spaces, improved
access roads, pavement striping and repaving, site grading, directional
signs, concrete sidewalks, curbs and gutters, lighted parking, slope
maintenance, landscaping with automatic irrigation, and concrete block
screen walls for trash and utilities. Site preparations include clear and
grub of brush and grass, spread and compact imported fill, and fine grading
of site. Demolition includes existing concrete pavement, curbs and
gutters. Anti-terrorism protection will be per UFC-4-010-01 DOD Minimum
Anti-Terrorism Standards for building dated 8 Oct. 2003.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 631391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
The existing fitness center shares a 47 year old converted dining facility
with a lethal weapons training classroom. Building 33402 is located at the
southernmost end of the Margarita Area, or a distance of almost 3/4 of a
mile from billeting, and an inconvenient distance from messing and a
majority of the work spaces for the camp. The building is functionally
inadequate with respect to configuration, court size, lockers and showers,
as well as being seismically deficient, and is beyond economical repair.
Seismic zone, dated construction methods, and heavy construction materials
all contribute to a high risk for structural failure during a seismic
event. The restrooms are inadequate and existing load-bearing walls
prevent their expansion. The lethal weapons training classroom occupies
the former galley and separates the lockers and showers from the fitness
center, which occupies the former dining room. An outdated and inadequate
electrical system requires the use of extension cords to supply power to
cardiovascular equipment. There are no racquetball courts or indoor
gymnasiums in the Margarita (33) Area.
If not provided, the safety risks associated with seismic activity and
inadequate electrical systems will continue. Due to the geographical
location of the Margarita Area and the lack of private sector resources
available during the regular work day, some personnel will forego regular
exercise, negatively impacting unit readiness.
Adequate facilities and support services are required to meet the
individual physical fitness, training, skills development, recreation, and
intramural needs of over 2,300 military personnel in the Margarita Area.
When not being used for training, this facility also serves the fitness and
recreation needs of approximately 200 dependents, retirees and authorized
civilians after work hours and on weekends.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,5100216496M 74044
Fitness Center, Camp Pendleton
NAVY 2008FY
P608
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started 09/2005
01/2006
09/2007
10%
15% (E) Percent completed as of
M00681(AG)
(MARGARITA AREA (33))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 641391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,5100216496M 74044
Fitness Center, Camp Pendleton
NAVY 2008FY
P608
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Collateral Equipment
NMCI Connection
O&MMC
PMC
2009
2009
355
45
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other components
on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is based on
Marine Corps requirements.
Bob Song 760-725-5641Activity POC: Phone No:
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
No
N/A
$290
$0
$290
04/2008
01/2008
04/2009
$218
$72
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
M00681(AG)
(MARGARITA AREA (33))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 651391
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE
RANGE CONTROL TOWER 65FT HIGH
(258 SF)
OPERATION STORAGE FACILITY
(797 SF)
ENCLOSED BLEACHER (1,098 SF)
AMMUNITION BREAKDOWN BLDG (194
SF)
GENERAL INSTRUCTION BLDGS 2EA
(1,593 SF)
STATIONARY INFANTRY TARGETS
BZO TARGET PAD
FIRING POSITION STATION
FIRING BERM (FIRING POSITIONS)
HOSTILE FIRE EMPLACEMENTS
REINF.CONCRETE PAD (PORTABLE
TOILETS)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SPECIAL COSTS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
ELECTRICAL AND COMM.
FACILITIES
SITE PREPARATION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (2%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
LS
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
EA
m
EA
m3
EA
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
24
74
102
18
148
168
102
12
2,625
18
33
14,168
1,807.68
937.75
2,727.7
1,770.21
1,871.52
65.07
1,484.23
12.77
431.97
72.49
1,430
(340)
(130)
(100)
(50)
(260)
(310)
(10)
(20)
(30)
(10)
(10)
(10)
(10)
(10)
(10)
(120)
14,750
(3,450)
(3,400)
(470)
(7,430)
16,180
320
16,500
940
17,440
650
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
18,0900216496M 17940
Infantry Squad Battle Course
NAVY 2008FY
P637
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00681(AL)
(SAN MATEO AREA (62))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 661391C
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
18,090
18,090
(2,089)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
18,0900216496M 17940
Infantry Squad Battle Course
NAVY 2008FY
P637
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
CAMP PENDLETON.
M00681(AL)
(SAN MATEO AREA (62))
Construct a 12 firing lane Infantry Squad Battle Range to include control
tower/equipment with environmental control, operation/storage building,
enclosed bleacher facility, ammunition breakdown building, double size
general instruction building, BZO target pad, walk-in fire positions,
safety berms, hostile fire emplacements, concrete pad for portable toilets
and technical operating manuals. Built in equipment includes a public
address system. Infrastructure construction provides support for
installation of Remoted Target System (RETS) including buried electrical
wiring for all targets, installation of stationary targets, Battle Sight
Zero (BZO) targets, related target mechanisms and standing seam metal roof.
Electrical Systems include night training lights at initial position fire
line and lighted lateral limits signs, flag pole with light, electrical
power, transformer, telephone, fire alarm system, and public address
system. Site improvements and preparation includes removal of Unexploded
Ordinances (UXO), site preparation, walks/drainage. Project will included
technical operating manuals provided to the site user at construction
completion.
Range construction will require a balanced site grading, to keep lead
contaminated soil on site. This balanced grading and the steep surrounding
topography will require the construction of storm water retention basins, a
system of drainage channels, swales, underground piping, drop drain inlets,
and energy dissipater structures. Steep slopes will need protection by a
combination of jute netting, geo-textile fabrics, open web plastics, and
other such methods. Storm water pollution prevention (SWPPP) is a
sensitive issue to local government agencies. Extensive SWPPP and drainage
control measures need to be taken during construction and during post
construction re-vegetation work (lasting up to 6 years).
Significant environmental mitigation costs are anticipated including:
biological and cultural monitoring, toad exclusion fencing, wetland
restoration, grassland restoration, coastal sage scrub restoration, exotic
weed control, riparian Oak restoration, and cultural resources recoveries.
A detailed cost estimate is included in the attached documents.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 671391C
The project will partially replace and modernize an antiquated range (Range
314) with a state-of-the-art Remoted Target Systems (RETS); designed to
conditions, tasks, and standards accommodating existing small arms weapons
and training requirements employed by the Marine Corps. Existing Range
314 is a multipurpose training facility. This project will modernize the
part of the existing Range 314 involving individual weapons and
light/medium machine guns. The range is required for infantry squad
offensive training, basic marksmanship training, familiarization with
various weapons and maintenance of proficiency in field firing techniques.
RETS equipment will provide immediate, automated feedback and scoring to
the student and instructor during live-firing and moving target
capabilities. Time spent to complete the course is greatly reduced
resulting in a greater ability to complete training on the few existing
training ranges at Camp Pendleton.
The facility is currently used 2 to 3 days per week during 48 weeks of the
year by the School of Infantry to conduct infantry common skills training
for 12,000 entry level Marines each year, prior to their attending their
primary Military Occupation Specialty (MOS) School. Shifts in
responsibility for common skills within the Marine Corps' entry level
pipeline could increase the use of this facility to 4-5 days per week for
the preponderance of the year. The 35,000 members of the IMEF could use
the range on an as available basis. It is designed to conditions, tasks
and standards accommodating weapons and training requirements employed by
the Marine Corps.
The RETS ranges, designed by the Army Corps of Engineers, offer the
flexibility to integrate the MILES 2000 training system through the use of
REQUIREMENT:
Construct an Infantry Squad Battle Course - Defensive Range. Cost derived
and adjusted from actual historical data and previous PCE data for similar
type projects.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
18,0900216496M 17940
Infantry Squad Battle Course
NAVY 2008FY
P637
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 399
M00681(AL)
(SAN MATEO AREA (62))
Sustainable design will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and
other directives.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 681391C
The existing range is a stop-gap measure of portable targets, timber walls
and simulated foxholes constructed by SOI until P637 is constructed. The
existing range does not provide automated feedback, scoring and only
provides the opportunity to train to the minimum level of the training
standard. It is too small and is incapable of supporting the new more
powerful weapons in the Marine Corps inventory and can not accommodate the
Remoted Target System (RETS) without infrastructure and modernization
proposed by this project.
Entry level Marines receive formal instruction on weapons and techniques,
but can only partially and largely ineffectively simulate live-fire combat
drills on the existing antiquated Base ranges since the range has limited
training applications, fixed targets and provide no instantaneous,
automatic feedback to the instructors and students.
the MILES Target Interface Device (MTID). This instrumentation system
permits simulation of live-fire training scenarios approaching battle
tempo, and will allow significant savings in ammunition expenditure.
The Base currently has 21 adequate and 13 substandard ranges. Per the
Base's Land Training Area Requirements Study (LATAR) dated 1989 and HOMC
approved BFR, dated 28 August 1998, Pendleton should have 52 specialized
small arms ranges in order to effectively train Marines per Individual
Marine Training Standards (ITS). The Acquisition Objective (AO) for the
RETS ranges was based on a study of ITS, Tables of Organization/Equipment,
and Camp Pendleton's range capacity.
CG MCB Camp Pendleton, in a letter to the Marine Corps Combat Development
Command, ltr 1500 O&TTRMD dated 09 Nov 1998, reemphasized the need for
Remoted Target Sytem Ranges (RETS) at Base Pendleton. Additionally, letter
from CG MCB Camp Pendleton, ltr 1500 O&TTRMD dated 23 September 1999 to
COMMARFORPAC, requested Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton receive POM
procurement priority support for this range. Per section III (Equipment
Loading) of the Mar 2000 Facilities Support Requirement Document (FSR),
the RETS equipment for the Infantry Battle Course has been programmed.
Sustainable design features to be utilized in this project include the
following features: restoring site disturbance through native re-vegetation
efforts, using water efficient native vegetation, using energy efficient
equipment for heating and air conditioning, using renewable solar power for
range limit lights, and using daylights for indoor lighting.
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
18,0900216496M 17940
Infantry Squad Battle Course
NAVY 2008FY
P637
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00681(AL)
(SAN MATEO AREA (62))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 691391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton units will continue to train on the
inadequate local ranges which will erode their live-fire proficiency and
ultimately affect their readiness to perform effectively in combat.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
18,0900216496M 17940
Infantry Squad Battle Course
NAVY 2008FY
P637
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Collateral Equip Buildings
Target Mechanisms
O&MMC
PMC
124
1,965
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
Manuel Alvarez 760-725-6046Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
N/A
$660
$0
$660
03/2008
12/2007
09/2009
09/2005
02/2006
07/2007
35%
50%
$300
$360
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
M00681(AL)
(SAN MATEO AREA (62))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 701391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
18,0900216496M 17940
Infantry Squad Battle Course
NAVY 2008FY
P637
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON
CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Blank Page
M00681(AL)
(SAN MATEO AREA (62))
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 711390
Scope
15120
15180
Cost
($000)Start
Pier 5002 Sub Fender
Installation
Magnetic Silencing Facility
Modification
Complete
0 LS
0 LS
9,040
14,590
Design Status
06/2006
06/2006
8. Projects Requested In This Program
08/2007
09/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(2459 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 2,860,061
0
0
48,729
23,630
117,180
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 116,399
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:
TOTAL
SUBASE SAN DIEGO CA
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation and Location: N63406
23,630
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL 48,729
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
Serves as homeport for operations attack submarines of the Pacific Fleet,
providing refit, maintenance, replenishment, training and ordnance support.
3,049,600
31710 109738 SF 48,729C4I System Integration Lab/Comm 3rd Fleet HQ
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.13
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
11463
11565
587
567B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 3251
2934
7057
7379
0
0
113
230
0
0
326
326
129
129
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 721390
4. Command
SUBASE SAN DIEGO CA
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation and Location: N63406
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.13
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommander Navy
Installations Command
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 731391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
PIER 5002 SUB FENDER INSTALLATION
HYDROPNEUMATIC SUBMARINE
FENDERS
FOAM FILLED SHIP FENDERS
CONCRETE PILE FENDER REACTION
STATIONS
REPLACEMENT COMPOSITE FENDER
PILES
REPLACEMENT TIMBER WALE AND
RUBBER FENDER
PIER CORNER PROTECTION
NEW MOORING FITTINGS
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
7,240
(2,670)
(1,230)
(1,720)
(830)
(260)
(300)
(50)
(130)
(50)
900
(340)
(10)
(460)
(90)
8,140
410
8,550
490
9,040
9,040
9,040
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
9,0400203176N 15120
Pier 5002 Sub Fender
Installation
NAVY 2008FY
P118
SUBASE SAN DIEGO CASAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N63406
This project will modify the Submarine Maintenance Pier (Pier 5002). The
pier is approximately 353 meters (1155 LF) long and 38 meters (125 LF) wide
and includes the Submarine Squadron 11 Headquarters Building located
directly on the pier. The current north side berth fender system is only
able to accommodate large surface ships with relatively square hull shapes.
The new submarine fender system will allow direct access to submarines for
maintenance activities being provided by the shops, and personnel located
in the maintenance building and the floating dry-dock ARCO (ARDM-5), both
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 741391C
The Naval Submarine Base has three main piers. Presently only the two
northern piers (5000 & 5003) can moor submarines. The (north) Pier 5003 is
relatively short at 158M (520 FT) and has only two berths for SSNs. The
floating dry-dock ARCO, submarine maintenance shops, and Submarine Squadron
Eleven administrative and training functions are located on the (south)
Pier 5002. Due to the present fender system configuration, (south) Pier
5002 cannot moor any submarines. It is inefficient and difficult to
maintain submarines moored at Piers 5000 or 5003. Excessive time is
An adequate submarine fender system that will allow direct access to
submarines for maintenance activities. Mooring of submarines on pier 5002
is needed to permit work to continue during weapons loading on the other
piers. Currently, civilian contractors perform the majority of the
maintenance effort for the submarines. During weapons loading operations on
Piers 5000 and 5003, no civilian workers or equipment are permitted on the
piers. All maintenance work must be suspended until loading is completed.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
This project upgrades the fender systems to permit submarines requiring
maintenance to moor next to the maintenance building without the need for
packaging of materials or interruption from weapons loading activities.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
9,0400203176N 15120
Pier 5002 Sub Fender
Installation
NAVY 2008FY
P118
SUBASE SAN DIEGO CASAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N63406
11. Requirement:
Adequate: Substandard:
of which are located directly on the pier. This modification will provide
vertical hydropnuematic fender stations to accommodate attack submarines
and visiting submarines on the north side of the pier. Supplemental foam-
filled fenders will be interspaced between the vertical submarine fenders
to accommodate surface ships.
Both types of fenders are backed by concrete reaction piles, which
distribute loads to the pier. Approximately 850-feet of the pier currently
has a timber fender pile system. Work will include replacing the timber
piles with composite (a combination of concrete, fiberglass or plastic)
piling which is impervious to marine borer decay and environmentally
preferred to chemically treated piling.
Power supply booms will be installed to route shore power to the submarines
moored at the pier. Extra phone lines will be provided. All other
utilities are already located on-site.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 751391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Bid Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
required to package and secure parts or equipment that must be transported
between piers and the maintenance shops. The transporting of equipment on
congested roads and through parking lots between the piers increases the
possibility of damage or loss during handling and transport.
If not provided, Maintenance Pier 5002 cannot be used to moor submarines.
The pier will often remain vacant while other piers are congested which
reduces their efficiency. Maintenance work will continue to be
accomplished at distant piers with material and equipment transported
between the facilities. The risk of material loss or damage and reduction
in efficiency of submarine repairs will continue. Weapons loading
activities at Piers 5000 and 5003 will continue to delay completion of
critical maintenance for submarines.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
9,0400203176N 15120
Pier 5002 Sub Fender
Installation
NAVY 2008FY
P118
SUBASE SAN DIEGO CASAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N63406
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
NSB Pier 5000
$978
$612
$366
03/2008
01/2008
03/2009
06/2006
09/2006
08/2007
35%
55%
$734
$244
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 761391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
9,0400203176N 15120
Pier 5002 Sub Fender
Installation
NAVY 2008FY
P118
SUBASE SAN DIEGO CASAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N63406
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This Facility
can be used by other components on an as available basis; however, the
scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.
Robert W. Humphreys (619) 524-8515Activity POC: Phone No:
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 771391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
MAGNETIC SILENCING FACILITY
MODIFICATION
DEPERMING PIER STRUCTURAL
UPGRADES (98 FB)
DEPERMING BUILDING (3,409 SF)
SHIP TO SHORE ELECTRICAL
SERVICE (1,700 LF)
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
SPECIAL COSTS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
LS
mB
m2
m
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
29.87
316.7
518.16
125,147.44
1,487.84
5,244.32
7,110
(3,740)
(470)
(2,720)
(100)
(80)
5,580
(100)
(4,390)
(110)
(30)
(860)
(50)
(40)
12,690
630
13,320
760
14,080
510
14,590
14,590
(22,130)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,5900203176N 15180
Magnetic Silencing Facility
Modification
NAVY 2008FY
P135
SUBASE SAN DIEGO CASAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N63406
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: SUBASE SAN DIEGO CA.
The proposed project includes structural and supporting electrical site
improvements to upgrade the existing deperming pier and building. Replace
timber pile mooring dolphin with two new concrete mooring platforms on
concrete piling, timber catwalks with handrails, and stainless steel
mooring bollards. Replace primary fendering system with foam fenders and
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 781391C
The Navy requires an adequate pier capable of serving the new LPD 17 class
amphibious transport dock ship and other PACFLT surface ships with Advanced
Degaussing Systems (ADS) for deperming.
Ships are depermed (demagnetized) when the magnetic field of the ship
exceeds magnetic signature limits established by the Navy as measured by
the U.S. Naval Degaussing Station in San Diego Bay or Pearl Harbor. Sensors
or magnetometers embedded in the harbor channel measure the magnetic field
of each passing ship. The data is analyzed at the site to determine if
corrective action is needed. New ships require deperming to stabilize their
magnetic properties and in-service ships may require deperming after
construction or rework. Deperming involves wrapping the ship with cables
and applying current to expose the ship to larger, counterbalancing
magnetic fields. A new degaussing system, termed Advanced Degaussing
System, will be installed on the new LPD-17 and later ship classes to
reduce magnetic signature. The implementation of these systems is in
response to an increased threat to sea mines in the littoral environment. A
significant increase in support will be required for ADS capable ships.
Besides the existing requirement for magnetic treatment, a new requirement
is needed to magnetically calibrate the ships every 1-2 years to maintain
REQUIREMENT:
Upgrade existing Magnetic Silencing Facility (MSF) to support ships with
advanced degaussing systems (ADS), including the new LPD 17 class
amphibious transport dock ship and other large Pacific Fleet (PACFLT) ships
(with the exception of CVN). Increase power supply from 4.4 MW to 8.3 MW
at 600VDC.
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,5900203176N 15180
Magnetic Silencing Facility
Modification
NAVY 2008FY
P135
SUBASE SAN DIEGO CASAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N63406
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:mB mB mB 30
concrete reaction piles, and wales. OMSI Technical Manuals will be
provided. Deperming building will be un-inhabited. Project includes
special cost for delays due to least tern nesting.
Demolition includes removal of the existing diesel generators, water
cooling system, Buildings 4, 6, 15, 46 and a portion of building 2 (total
m2 for all buildings: 205.87).
This project is in compliance with current seismic requirements.
Environmental mitigation includes eel grass surveys and removal of
contaminated soil.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 791391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
The existing deperming pier located at Naval Base Point Loma was built in
1987. A bank of four 60-year old ex-WWII submarine diesel generators
provides up to 4.4 MW of DC power required for the current deperming
process, which is not sufficient for the new ADS mission requirements. No
"hotel" power is available for ships currently berthed at this pier.
Without the stuctural upgrades proposed by this project, the current pier
cannot support the larger class of ships, including the LHD and new LPD-17.
The existing MSF and current power supply cannot support the ADS capable,
or larger class, ships. All new LPD class ships, T-AKE, CG-X, and DD-X will
have ADS. The basis of the new ADS is to significantly reduce a ship's
magnetic signature beyond current limits.
If this project is not provided San Diego Deperming Pier will not meet the
electrical and structural requirements to demagnetize larger classes of
ships and new ships with the ADS.
ships within the new OPNAV ship signature limits.
All PACFLT surface ships must be magnetically treated in San Diego. With
this project, the Point Loma MSF will be the single-site surface ship
treatment facility for the Pacific Fleet. MSF San Diego will be the only
PACFLT site with special test systems to support ADS shipboard systems.
The deperming pier must be structurally able to provide berthing for the
range of ships supporting SURFPAC fleet and be capable of providing both
legacy and advanced deperming treatment requirements.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,5900203176N 15180
Magnetic Silencing Facility
Modification
NAVY 2008FY
P135
SUBASE SAN DIEGO CASAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N63406
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
N/A
06/2006
09/2006
09/2007
5%
15%
$320
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 801391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,5900203176N 15180
Magnetic Silencing Facility
Modification
NAVY 2008FY
P135
SUBASE SAN DIEGO CASAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N63406
Boat Security Barrier (includes
moorings)
DC Power Supplies and LI Switches
Physical Security Equipment
Treatment Electronics
Y & Z Loop Calibration
Z Loop Sensors
OPN
OPN
OPN
OPN
OPN
OPN
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
1,528
3,787
15
5,700
8,500
2,600
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. Mission
requirements, operational considerations, and location are incompatible
with use by other components.
Robert W. Humphreys (619) 524-8515Activity POC: Phone No:
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
$427
$350
$77
05/2008
01/2008
05/2009
$107 (B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 811390
Scope
72124
Cost
($000)Start
BEQ & POV Parking Structure
Complete
36789 m2 34,329
Design Status
12/2007
8. Projects Requested In This Program
05/2008
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(605602 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 3,133,054
78,718
27,939
0
34,329
300,528
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 76,240
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:72124 Bachelor Enlisted Quarters 88360 SF 27,939
TOTAL
TOTAL
MARINE CORPS BASE TWENTYNINE PALMS
TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation and Location: M67399
34,329
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
27,939
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
To provide housing, training facilities, logistical and administrative
support for Fleet Marine Force units and other organizations or activities
designated by the Commandant of the Marine Corps.
To provide combined arms training for Fleet Marine Force units, both active
and reserve.
To provide formal school training for personnel in the field of
communications-electronics and conduct other schools and training as
directed by the Commandant of the Marine Corps.
3,574,568
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.29
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
13096
13827
280
125B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 1498
619
1454
647
5
10
1832
2502
0
1
464
648
7541
7742
22
1533
Commandant of the
Marine Corps
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 821390
4. Command
MARINE CORPS BASE TWENTYNINE PALMS
TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation and Location: M67399
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.29
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommandant of the
Marine Corps
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 831391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
BEQ & POV PARKING STRUCTURE
(395,992 SF)
PARKING GARAGE (307,633 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (440
SF)
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS
(87,920 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SPECIAL COSTS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
COMMUNICATIONS AND DATA
OUTSIDE PLANT
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
36,788.88
28,580
40.88
8,168
121.91
4,708.09
2,545.54
26,810
(3,480)
(190)
(20,790)
(400)
(350)
(190)
(660)
(750)
3,050
(310)
(900)
(870)
(280)
(630)
(60)
29,860
1,490
31,350
1,790
33,140
1,190
34,330
34,329
(1,060)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
34,3290815796M 72124
BEQ & POV Parking Structure
NAVY 2008FY
P906
MARINE CORPS BASE TWENTYNINE PALMSTWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67399
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
TWENTYNINE PALMS.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 841391C
This project supports the Marine Corps' goal of achieving the 2X0 standard
by 2012. This project is needed to provide adequate billeting and a
centrally located BEQ parking garage for enlisted personnel at MCAGCC,
REQUIREMENT:
Provides 384 living spaces for bachelor-enlisted personnel (192 two-person
rooms) using the 2+0 Quality of Life (QOL) standard room design for
permanent party enlisted personnel. Provides 546 parking spaces in a
multi-level parking garage and 194 additional parking spaces on adjoining
parking lots for the existing and planned bachelor enlisted personnel.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
34,3290815796M 72124
BEQ & POV Parking Structure
NAVY 2008FY
P906
MARINE CORPS BASE TWENTYNINE PALMSTWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67399
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 36,757
Constructs a multistory reinforced concrete masonry Bachelor Enlisted
Quarters (BEQ) building with seismic zone 4 construction, concrete
foundation and floors, and standing seam metal roofing. Provides 192 rooms
in the 2+0 configuration. Building will be moment resisting steel frame
with marginally reinforced double wythe concrete masonry unit (CMU) in fill
walls (split faced block exterior), single wythe interior CMU walls,
concrete floor slab reinforcement run continuously through both faces of
the slab and into beams and columns and open web steel joist roof support.
Community and service core areas consist of laundry facilities, lounges,
administrative offices, multipurpose rooms, housekeeping areas and public
restrooms. Electrical systems include fire alarms, energy saving
electronic monitoring and control system (EMCS), and information systems.
Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire protection systems, heating
ventilation and air conditioning. Supporting facilities work includes site
and building utility connections (water, sanitary sewers, electrical,
telephone, local area network and cable television). Provides a 650 ton
chiller, pumps and controls in Bldg 1461 and connects to a central chilled
water plant and high temperature hot water lines with secondary
distribution loops.
Constructs a multilevel parking garage for BEQ providing 546 parking
spaces, with seismic upgrades, reinforced concrete foundation, floors, and
columns with CMU walls and paved parking lots for 194 vehicles. Paving and
site improvements include sidewalks, outdoor recreation facilities /
courts, roadway access, earthwork, grading and landscaping. Also includes
OMSI manuals, anti-terrorism / force protection measures, the demolition of
Buildings 1425 and 1426 (13,260 SF) of inadequate facilities including
necessary asbestos and lead removal along with 10 light poles.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 851391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
Current billeting requirements have exceeded maximum available capacity.
The buildings to be replaced were built in 1953 and although they have been
modified from open-bay barracks, they still retain the gang head and shower
configuration. These buildings are not in compliance with current
life/safety/fire/seismic and quality of life standards and do not meet
basic anti-terrorism/force protection standards of construction and set
back distances from adjacent roadways and parking. Available horizontal
space for parking is non-existent and requires vertical construction to
satisfy minimum requirements for new BEQ construction. Recent increases in
energy costs and the reduction of maintenance capabilities have made these
dated facilities costly to operate and maintain.
If this project is not provided, personnel will continue to be billeted in
crowded, inadequate, and unsafe buildings. They will endure a lower
quality of life to the detriment of morale and retention efforts. Higher-
ranking personnel will continue to be billeted in town, costing the Marine
Corps BAQ funds. Loss of trained Marines continues to deplete the Marine
Corps ranks of qualified personnel and operational dollars.
Twentynine Palms, to make up for a deficiency of BEQ billeting and
associated vehicle parking space. This project also supports the CMC goal
to replace all inadequate bachelor quarters with the new 2+0 configured
barracks.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
34,3290815796M 72124
BEQ & POV Parking Structure
NAVY 2008FY
P906
MARINE CORPS BASE TWENTYNINE PALMSTWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67399
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
Marine Corps Base 29 Palms, CA
$491
$100
12/2007
02/2008
05/2008
0%
0%
$
$491
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 861391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
34,3290815796M 72124
BEQ & POV Parking Structure
NAVY 2008FY
P906
MARINE CORPS BASE TWENTYNINE PALMSTWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67399
Collateral Equipment
NMCI Connections
O&MMC
PMC
2008
2008
1,005
55
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
Tony Martone (760)830-5188Activity POC: Phone No:
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
$391
06/2008
12/2007
06/2009
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
2006 R&M Conducted ($000): 6002007 R&M Conducted ($000):
76,240
C. FY D. FY E. Future R&M Requirements ($000):
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 871390
Scope
73025
Cost
($000)Start
Security Improvements
Complete
285 m2 7,570
Design Status
09/2005
8. Projects Requested In This Program
09/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..( Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 0
5,840
2,600
14,278
7,570
55,534
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 700
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:16910 Slipway Barrier 1400 LF 2,600
TOTAL
TOTAL
MCLB ALBANY GA
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
3. Installation and Location: M67004
7,570
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
2,600
14,278
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
To provide the organization and resources necessary to plan and conduct the
scheduled maintenance of Maritime Prepositioning Force (MPF) assets at both
the Blount Island facility and aboard MPF ships. Additionally, assets
associated with the Norway Air-Landed marine Expeditionary Brigade (NALMEB)
are rotated through BIC for planned maintenance. To oversee augmentation
of MPF efforts by Fleet Marine Forces personnel and to provide the
requisite coordination among the Command, the appropriate supported
commander, and supporting Navy, Army and Cost Guard personnel.
85,822
85240
11320
LS
LS
7,069
7,209
Lay Down Area
Hardstand Extension
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.91
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
102
104
8
4B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 94
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commandant of the
Marine Corps
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 881390
4. Command
MCLB ALBANY GA
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
3. Installation and Location: M67004
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.91
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommandant of the
Marine Corps
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 891391
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
MAINGATE IMPROVEMENTS - BLOUNT
ISLAND (3,073 SF)
PASS & ID OFFICE (500 SF)
REAR ENTRANCE/SECURITY GATE
(161 SF)
MAIN ENTRANCE/SECURITY GATE
(161 SF)
CANOPIES FOR ENTRANCE/SECURITY
GATES (2,196 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (54
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
285.45
46.45
15
15
204
5
3,500
5,510
5,510
1,800
3,649.68
1,590
(160)
(80)
(80)
(370)
(20)
(820)
(30)
(10)
(20)
5,000
(10)
(1,430)
(370)
(1,010)
(240)
(400)
(30)
(1,510)
6,590
330
6,920
390
7,310
260
7,570
7,570
(33)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
7,5700702896M 73025
Maingate Improvements - Blount
Island
NAVY 2008FY
P003
MCLB ALBANY GA
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67004(BI)
(BLOUNT ISLAND JAX FL)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 901391C
The project upgrades the two vehicle entrances and traffic control points
to the Blount Island Command to meet current safety and security
requirements and installs security fencing and lighting.
PROJECT:
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
7,5700702896M 73025
Maingate Improvements - Blount
Island
NAVY 2008FY
P003
MCLB ALBANY GA
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 285
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: BLOUNT ISL CMD
JACKSONVILLE FL.
M67004(BI)
(BLOUNT ISLAND JAX FL)
This project constructs security improvements to the main and rear
entrances to the MC Blount Island Command that include hardened and non-
hardened security/ID checkpoints. Project provides a total of 3,073 SF
that includes at the main entrance a Pass/ID office, security gate,
security fencing, site lighting, sentry house and canopies and at the rear
entrance a security gate, security fencing, site lighting and sentry house.
Construction includes a covered POV entrance, covered truck inspection
station, additional traffic lanes, traffic control devices and
active/passive traffic barriers. Special construction features include a
protective canopy and raised concrete islands. Pass/ID office shall
consist of shallow foundation/slab on grade, split face exterior cavity
wall and standing seam metal roof. Pass/ID provides open office space,
control counter, visitors space and male/female restroom facilities off the
visitor's space. Electrical systems include duress alarms with remote
control, closed circuit television cameras, site communications and power,
and raceways/conduits for Government provided equipment. Emergency power
will be provided for critical equipment. Paving and site improvements
include additional lanes for traffic control, raised concrete curbing, lane
control signals, roadway striping, signage, and other controls. Storm
drain culverts, pipes and catch basins will be installed to accommodate
drainage from the new layout. AT/FP measures include vehicle barriers,
tire shredders, and security fencing/gates and security lighting on the
perimeter fencing and upgrading all perimeter fencing to meet AT/FP with
cable reinforcing and dead man anchors as required by UFC's and NAVFAC
Definitive Drawings. Technical Operating manuals are also included. This
project also includes the demolition of the existing guardhouse and
existing pavement and any necessary environmental protection requirements.
Sustainable features will be included in the design, development, and
construction for the project in accordance with Executitve Order 13123 and
other laws and executive orders.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 911391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
The current entrances to Blount Island Command are poorly configured and
provide no means of stopping traffic. It requires security personnel to
stand in the roadways to conduct security checks of inbound vehicles. This
situation is absolutely unsatisfactory since access control is a DOD
requirement. Currently there are no barriers (active or passive) in place
to stop unauthorized vehicles from entering or exiting the station. At
present the security personnel are not armed and the barriers are critical
for stopping unauthorized vehicles.
Blount Island will fail to meet current DOD/Marine Corps security
directives/requirements for station access. Security personnel will
continue to be placed in an unsafe environment with the inability to shut
down access to the installation should the security posture warrant it.
This project is needed to correct a number of security and safety
deficiencies found throughout Blount Island Command. The existing guard
station and traffic patterns entering Blount Island fail to comply with DOD
directives. In addition, security barriers (active and passive) are
required to stop unauthorized vehicles from entering the station during
increased threat conditions and security fencing and lighting needs to be
placed at strategic locations to comply with ATFP requirements.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
7,5700702896M 73025
Maingate Improvements - Blount
Island
NAVY 2008FY
P003
MCLB ALBANY GA
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
$540
$120
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15%
$420
$120
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
M67004(BI)
(BLOUNT ISLAND JAX FL)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 921391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
7,5700702896M 73025
Maingate Improvements - Blount
Island
NAVY 2008FY
P003
MCLB ALBANY GA
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Collateral Equipment
NMCI Connections
MPMC
MPMC
2009
2009
8
25
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This is an installation
utility/infrastructure project and does not qualify for joint use at this
location, however, all tenants on this installation are benefited by this
project.
Mr. Kim Weisenburger 904-696-5154Activity POC: Phone No:
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
$420
04/2008
01/2008
07/2009
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
M67004(BI)
(BLOUNT ISLAND JAX FL)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 931390
Scope
31023
Cost
($000)Start
Littoral Warfare Systems
Facility
Complete
4193 m2 13,870
Design Status
10/2005
8. Projects Requested In This Program
09/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(1117 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 302,654
9,678
0
21,436
13,870
38,599
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 42,297
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:
TOTAL
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITY
PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA
3. Installation and Location: N61008
13,870
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL 21,436
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
Train officer and enlisted personnel in diving, ship salvage, and submarine
rescue.
386,237
72114
31023
42250 SF
29999 SF
10,658
10,778
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters
Expeditionary Warfare Systems Facility
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.82
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
2410
2728
129
145B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 738
821
1324
1346
0
0
0
140
0
0
39
47
180
229
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 941390
4. Command
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITY
PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA
3. Installation and Location: N61008
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.82
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommander Navy
Installations Command
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 951391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
LITTORAL WARFARE SYSTEMS FACILITY
(45,135 SF)
LITTORAL WARFARE SYSTEMS
FACILITY (45,135 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
TEMORARY FACILITIES
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
4,193.16
4,193.16 2,020.03
9,560
(8,470)
(770)
(100)
(120)
(100)
2,510
(680)
(260)
(90)
(430)
(10)
(640)
(40)
(50)
(310)
12,070
600
12,670
720
13,390
480
13,870
13,870
(6,725)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
13,8700805376N 31023
Littoral Warfare Systems
Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P388
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITYPANAMA CITY, FLORIDA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61008
Construct a two-story building with pile foundation and grade beams,
structural steel and/or concrete frame, metal and/or built-up roofing, and
masonry/stucco exterior walls. The building includes an automatic fire
sprinkler system, technical operating manuals, intrusion alarm system,
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 961391C
The Navy initiated a rapid development program for a fast maneuverable,
shallow draft Littoral Combat Ship LCS). These ships are being designed to
be mission reconfigurable for Mine Warfare (MIW), Anti-Submarine Warfare
(ASW) and Surface Warfare (SUW) missions to start with. Funding for the
initial ship design concept began in FY2004, with the first Littoral Combat
Ship (Flight 0) scheduled for delivery in 2007. There will be a total of
four Flight 0 LCS ships between 2007 and 2009. Due to its rapid development
schedule, these first four Flight 0 ships will have stand-alone mission
modules with individual control systems hosted in a variety of computer
platforms. The remaining Flight 0 ships and the follow-on Flight 1 ships
will reflect design refinements resulting from the lessons learned from the
first four Flight 0 ships and will require fully integrated and certified
reconfigurable mission packages. There will be approximately 9 Flight 0
ships and 30 Flight 1 ships delivered beyond 2010.
The Naval Surface Warfare Center Panama City (NSWC-PC) is the designated
Mission Package lead certification laboratory for the Littoral Combat Ship.
This project is required to support continuing Mission Package baseline
definition, integration and certification and follow-on technology spiral
development evolutions. Key functional areas include Mission Package
REQUIREMENT:
The project provides laboratory and support space for Littoral Combat
Systems Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), acquisition
support, command and control (C2) systems integration and fleet service
life cycle sustenance for the modular mission packages associated with the
new Littoral Combat Ship (LCS).
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
13,8700805376N 31023
Littoral Warfare Systems
Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P388
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITYPANAMA CITY, FLORIDA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61008
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 4,193
heating, ventilation and air conditioning, and an elevator. Special
features include exterior roll-up doors, high bays with overhead crane,
loading dock, forklift-rated floors, local area network wiring, 400 cycle
power, 220V power connections, raised flooring for the computer labs an
emergency generator, paving and site improvements. The building will be a
secure facility with limited access. The project will demolish buildings
(76, 79, 376, 404, 409, 412, 451, 491) approximately 3,136 m2 (33,763 SF)
of existing facilities. Temporary facilities (trailers) will accomodate
the relocated personnel from the demolished buildings of this project. The
project will conform to Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection standards and
incorporate sustainable features.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 971391C
The RDT&E of the mission modules and associated systems selected for the
Littoral Combat Ship Spiral Alpha mission packages is currently performed
in buildings that are ill configured to meet the LCS objective of a fully
integrated yet interchangeable focused mission packages.
There is no available space to house and work on large-scale equipment,
modules, and components which is required to fully integrate and certify
Mine Countermeasures (MCM) Mission Packages. Program elements are scattered
accross the station in ten to twelve separate buildings at any one time.
Some laboratory tasks are being performed in office spaces, inhibiting
coordination and communication. A large portion of research is performed on
a space available basis.
There is no available high-bay area equipped with an overhead crane so
selected work on large-scale MCM modules and equipment must be performed
outside. Personnel working on these modules must rely on the intermittent
availability of the Public Works mobile crane to lift and move modules and
computer program engineering, lifetime software engineering support,
distance support (help desk), mission module engineering, mission systems
integration and Mission Packages certification. The prototyping and
definition of Mission Package configurations occuring in this facility
fully complements the physical assembly and issue of Mission Packages at
proposed LCS Support Facilities in fleet concentration areas.
The Program Executive Office, Littoral and Mine Warfare (PE0-LMW) has
assigned to the Naval Surface Warfare Center Panama City (NSWC PC) the role
as Engineering Agent (EA) for the LCS Mine Countermeasures mission modules
and the Certification Agent (CA) for all LCS Mission Packages (MPs). This
function is critical to delivering certified ready-for-use focused combat
capability to the LCS ships and enable the program to meet the requirements
for the last 9 Flight 0 ships and the Flight 1 ships. Mission Packages
consist of a number of mission modules (including functions such as
sensors, Unmanned Aerial and Undersea Vehicles, weaponds and support
systems), which in total will fit into a 10-11 twenty foot equivalent unit
(TEU) ISO shipping containers.
NSWC PC requires an adequately configured and designed facility to support
the integration of the mission modules into Mission Packages (MPs),
certification of all focused MPs and to provide life cycle support to the
MPs. This facility will enable NSWC PC to fullfill its role as the LCS
Mission Module Engineering Agent.
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
13,8700805376N 31023
Littoral Warfare Systems
Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P388
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITYPANAMA CITY, FLORIDA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61008
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 981391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
equipment, a situation that will grow worse as this new mission progresses.
This compromises both security and safety and adds man-hours to these
tasks.
Without this project, development, integration, and certification of state-
of-the-art Littoral Combat Ship fully integrated mission packages will lag
LCS ship development and delivery. LCS mission module testing and Mission
Package integration and certification will have to be done shipboard. This
situation will not provide the necessary controls to certify results and
ensure repeatability, it will require to tie-up LCS platforms at pierside
for testing, and will consequently increase costs and delay the ship's IOC.
Delays in delivery of these critical mission packages for use on the new
ships will prolong an untenable situation regarding lack of adequate
capabilities in the littoral combat arena. Without the Mission Packages
slated to be supported in this proposed facility, the Navy will not be able
to utilize the new Littoral Combat Ship class as intended and must continue
to utilize and put at risk multi-million dollar large ships optimized for
deep water operations.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
13,8700805376N 31023
Littoral Warfare Systems
Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P388
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITYPANAMA CITY, FLORIDA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61008
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
$670
$160
$510
04/2008
12/2007
03/2009
10/2005
12/2006
09/2007
5%
35%
$510
$160
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 991391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
13,8700805376N 31023
Littoral Warfare Systems
Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P388
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITYPANAMA CITY, FLORIDA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61008
15 Metric Ton Crane
Fiber optic cables and tranceiver
Intrusion Detection System
Mission Package Computing Equipment
Network Analyzer
Network Hub in rack
Tactical Consoles
OPN
OPN
OPN
RDT&E
OPN
OPN
RDT&E
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
250
15
350
3,250
20
40
2,800
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. Mission
requirements, operational considerations, and location are incompatible
with use by other components.
Leslie Lugo (850)235-5570Activity POC: Phone No:
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1001391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
13,8700805376N 31023
Littoral Warfare Systems
Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P388
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITYPANAMA CITY, FLORIDA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61008
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1011390
Scope
72124
Cost
($000)Start
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters
Complete
6375 m2 37,961
Design Status
09/2006
8. Projects Requested In This Program
01/2008
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(3145 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 3,119,879
15,200
13,850
63,393
37,961
327,246
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 87,660
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:15964 Waterfront Operations Facilities 1877 m2 13,850
TOTAL
TOTAL
MARINE CORPS BASE HAWAII
KANEOHE, HAWAII
3. Installation and Location: M00318
37,961
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
13,850
63,393
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
To maintain and operate facilities and provide services and material to
support operations of tenant Marine and Navy units and other activities and
units designated by the Commandant of the Marine Corps.
To provide aviation support for Headquarters, Fleet Marine Force, Pacific.
3,577,529
72124
72124
44112
LS
LS
20010 SF
32,270
24,104
7,019
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters
Equipment Maintenane & Storage Facility, PTA
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.74
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
13277
13506
303
58B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 940
437
456
514
0
3
199
66
0
0
1399
1779
8928
8381
1052
2268
Commandant of the
Marine Corps
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1021390
4. Command
MARINE CORPS BASE HAWAII
KANEOHE, HAWAII
3. Installation and Location: M00318
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.74
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommandant of the
Marine Corps
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1031391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS (68,620
SF)
BACHELORS ENLISTED QUARTERS
(67,931 SF)
TELECOMM ROOM (689 SF)
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (6.2%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
6,375
6,311
64
3,460.32
6,563.62
23,510
(21,840)
(420)
(270)
(300)
(680)
9,360
(2,730)
(920)
(560)
(840)
(2,480)
(1,730)
(100)
32,870
1,640
34,510
2,140
36,650
1,310
37,960
37,961
(1,621)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
37,9610206496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters
NAVY 2008FY
P749
MARINE CORPS BASE HAWAIIKANEOHE, HAWAII
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00318
Construct a multi-story building of reinforced concrete or masonry
construction matching adjacent existing BEQ buildings, and providing 150
rooms with semi-private baths in the standard 2x0 room configuration per
UFC 4-721-10, dated 31 July 2002. Community and service core areas consist
of laundry facilities, lounges, administrative offices, multipurpose
recreation rooms, housekeeping areas, and public restrooms. Mechanical
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1041391C
PROJECT:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
37,9610206496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters
NAVY 2008FY
P749
MARINE CORPS BASE HAWAIIKANEOHE, HAWAII
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00318
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 6,375
systems include plumbing, fire protection systems, heating ventilation and
air conditioning. Electrical systems include fire alarm, energy saving
Electronic Monitoring and Control System (EMS). A telecommunications
infrastructure room will be provided on each floor, to house
communications, and security system infrastructure. This area is in
addition to the functional areas allowed for the facility. Technical
Operating manuals will be provided. Information systems include telephone,
data, and cable television (CATV). ATFP protection measures include the
required standoff distances to existing inhabited buildings in the area.
Project includes AT/FP building and site measures in compliance with
Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 4-010-01, dated 8 Oct 2003. Sustainable
principles will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and
other laws and executive orders.
Supporting facilities work includes site and building utility connections
(water/fire, sanitary and storm sewers), electrical, communications voice
and data, Local Area network (LAN), and cable television (CATV). Paving
and site improvements includes paved parking, privately owned vehicle (POV)
parking, access roads/fire access lanes, sidewalks, outdoor recreation
facilities/courtyards/equipment and bike shelters, earthwork/fill/grading
and landscaping.
Demolition includes the demolition of the following existing inadequate
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters:
BUILDING NO. BUILDING SIZE PROPERTY RECORD NO.
225 1,467 M2, 84 MS 200223
226 1,480 M2, 84 MS 200224
227 1,480 M2, 84 MS 200225
228 1,480 M2, 84 MS 200226
229 1,480 M2, 84 MS 200227
230 1,480 M2, 84 MS 200228
A total of 6 buildings (8,867M2, 504MS) will be demolished to support the
construction of 6,375M2 (a 28% reduction in space). The buildings to be
demolished are assumed to contain lead paint and asbestos. Environmental
mitigation will be provided to protect the environment.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1051391C
12. Supplemental Data:
The BEQ facilities which will be replaced at MCBH Kaneohe Bay were built in
the late 1940's and early 1950's as open squad bay facilities. These
facilities were renovated into room configurated barracks in the 1970's.
Due to 50 years of aging and degradation, these BEQ facilities need
continuous repair and maintenance in order to maintain minimum
habitability. Per NAVFAC P-80, the OSD minimum billeting standard net
living area per person for E1 to E4 is 8.36 sq. m. The minimum net living
area for E5 is 12.54 sq.m. Accordingly, existing 3-man room BEQ's with
less than 25.08 sq.m of net living area should only house a maximum of 2
Marines or Sailors of E1 to E4 rank or only one of E5 rank.
Junior Enlisted personnel will continue to be housed in deteriorated, over-
crowded and inadequate barracks to the detriment of their morale, retention
and readiness. Training time will continue to be diverted for large scale
self-help projects to maintain minimum livability standards. An
inequitable amount of maintenance dollars will continue to be diverted from
training facilities to barracks, which will exacerbate growing readiness
problems, and will increase exponentially over time as existing buildings
deteriorate further.
This project supports the Marine Corps' goal of achieving the 2X0 standard
by 2012. Sufficient and adequate housing at MCBH Kaneohe Bay is required
for 300 manspaces (E1 to E5 bachelor enlisted personnel).
As supported by the MCBH BEQ Requirements worksheet, and validated by HQMC,
MCBH currently has 3,824 adequate manspaces, against a requirement of
4,130.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Constructs a new permanent party Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (BEQ) facility
sited at MCBH Kaneohe Bay for E1 to E5 personnel to support billeting
requirements of MCBH Kaneohe Bay, and moves toward the elimination of
inadequate BEQ spaces at MCBH. The end result will be the replacement of
high maintenance, 1940, 1950 and 1970 vintage BEQs at MCBH Kaneohe Bay with
modern lower cost facilities meeting the 8.36 sq m. net living area per
person standard for E1 to E5 personnel. The new facility will be built
with high degree of durability to resist the corrosive environment of
Kaneohe.
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
37,9610206496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters
NAVY 2008FY
P749
MARINE CORPS BASE HAWAIIKANEOHE, HAWAII
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00318
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1061391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
37,9610206496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters
NAVY 2008FY
P749
MARINE CORPS BASE HAWAIIKANEOHE, HAWAII
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00318
COLLATERAL EQUIPMENT
NMCI EQUIPMENT AND CONNECTION
O&MMC
OPN
2008
2008
1,558
63
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other components
on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is based on
Navy requirements.
LCDR Charlene Mowery 808-257-2171Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
Yes
N/A
$550
$500
$50
02/2008
12/2007
08/2009
09/2006
02/2007
11/2007
10%
15%
$350
$200
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
2006 R&M Conducted ($000): 1,3462007 R&M Conducted ($000):
87,660
C. FY D. FY E. Future R&M Requirements ($000):
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1071390
Scope
15180
Cost
($000)Start
Sub Drive-In MSF, Beckoning
Point
Complete
3391 m2 99,860
Design Status
08/2006
8. Projects Requested In This Program
09/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(8034 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 7,406,905
49,100
39,330
147,222
99,860
1,641,682
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 1,586,316
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:15310
74044
Joint Forces Deployment Staging Area
Fitness Center, Pearl Harbor
10400 m2
6236 m2
5,310
34,020
TOTAL
TOTAL
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HI
PEARL HARBOR, HAWAII
3. Installation and Location: N62813
99,860
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
39,330
147,222
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
Homeport for approximately 40 surface combatants and submarines. This
station operates and controls the harbor and maintains and operates shore-
based support faclities such as shore intermediate maintenance, housing,
recreation, and personnel assistance for afloat surface units and most of
the shore tenant activities in the Pearl Harbor area.
9,384,099
17110
61010
42172
15220
15310
10323 SF
103000 SF
27071 SF
LS
LS
13,067
53,626
20,621
37,118
22,790
Conference & Technology Learning Center
Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command
Missile Magazines (5), West Loch
Waterfront Upgrades Bravo 21
Dry Dock Ship Support Services
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.7
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
19555
18296
1688
1562B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 9751
8614
7472
7476
0
0
0
0
0
0
282
282
362
362
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1081390
4. Command
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HI
PEARL HARBOR, HAWAII
3. Installation and Location: N62813
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.7
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommander Navy
Installations Command
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1091391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
SUB DRIVE-IN MSF, BECKONING POINT
(36,500 SF)
DEPERMING PIER (32,076 SF)
RECTIFIER BUILDIING (4,424 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (6.2%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
3,391
2,980
411
13,174
4,523
42,430
(39,260)
(1,860)
(850)
(420)
(40)
44,020
(20,620)
(4,180)
(50)
(16,110)
(3,060)
86,450
4,320
90,770
5,630
96,400
3,460
99,860
99,860
(19,700)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
99,8600203176N 15180
Sub Drive-in MSF, Beckoning
Point
NAVY 2008FY
P587
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HIPEARL HARBOR, HAWAII
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62813
The proposed project will construct a new 213-meter (700-foot) non-magnetic
concrete slip at Beckoning Point to support a drive-in solenoid structure.
The work will include demolition of the existing two-story wooden pier and
walkway bridge, and the existing marine rail with winch, shed and
compressor; construction of new piers with overhead trusses at 14.78 meters
(48.5 feet) above mean high water; construction of a pedestrian bridge;
construction for forklift accessibility; constructions of sewer connections
on pier and sewer piping from pier to holding tank on shore; construction
of a 411 square meter (4,425-square foot) Rectifier and Substation
Building. The deperming operation produces high-intensity magnetic fields
during the treatment of the submarine. The operation requires structures
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1101391C
A submarine is susceptible to detection by enemy sensor systems and
magnetic influence bottom and moored mines if its magnetic signature is not
controlled and managed within the limits specified. The magnetic signature
of a submarine is measured on a Magnetic Silencing Facility (MSF) sensor
range, and if the signature is out-of-specification, the submarine must be
treated or depermed (demagnetized) at a Magnetic Silencing Facility (MSF).
In PACFLT, there are two MSF sensor ranges, (located in San Diego CA, and
Yokosuka Japan) that are capable of measuring the magnetic signatures of
all classes of Submarines. None of the existing PACFLT MSF sensor ranges
are capable of measuring the electric signatures of the newer SSN-21 and
774 Class submarines. The MSF located in Pearl Harbor HI can only deperm
SSN-688 Class, and requires the hull of the submarine to be manually
wrapped with heavy high-current cables. This type of MSF is referred to as
a wrap facility, and takes approximately 3-days to complete the deperming
process. A drive-in facility does not require manual wrapping and because
of this the process can be completed in less than 24-hours. None of the
existing PACFLT MSFs are capable of deperming a SSN-21 or SSN-774 Class
submarine.
SSN-774 and SSN-21 class submarines contain on-board active magnetic and
electric signature silencing systems that require initial calibration and
periodic monitoring. Existing PACFLT facilities do not have the capability
to calibrate these advanced systems or measure their complex signatures.
In addition, the SSN-774 Class submarine cannot be depermed by the current
method of wrapping cables around the hull. Sensitive electronic equipment
installed in the submarine requires a ¿drive-in¿ MSF, where no physical
REQUIREMENT:
This project constructs a new non-magnetic concrete drive-in magnetic
silencing facility (deperming pier).
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
99,8600203176N 15180
Sub Drive-in MSF, Beckoning
Point
NAVY 2008FY
P587
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HIPEARL HARBOR, HAWAII
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62813
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 3,391
to be constructed with materials that have a low magnetic permeability
property. Local common concrete aggregates were tested and were not
acceptable. Aggregates with low magnetic permeability property may have to
be imported from out of state. Other materials affected include concrete
rebars, fenders, mooring, cleats, cable supports and all steel hardware.
Construction dredging will be required to obtain a project depth of 14.0
+0.610 meter (46 +2 feet) and 12.8 +0.610 meter (42 +2 feet) for the pier
area and the approach area, respectively.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1111391C
12. Supplemental Data:
The current wrap MSF at Beckoning Point (Pearl Harbor) is a two story
wooden facility approximately 113 m (372 ft) long and 3 m (10 ft) wide, and
positioned about 27 m (90 ft) off shore. It is servicing ships that are
about 250 m (820 ft) long (more than double its berthing length). Cables
are brought from a shore side storage facility, placed on floats and are
staged at a predetermined location around the wharf. Due to the design of
the pier, the floats are used to move the cables to the side of the ship
where it is wrapped around the ship. It is extremely difficult work to
wrap the cables around the ship from the moving floats in the ocean. There
is no forklift accessibility to the existing pier, to lug heavy cables.
All heavy cable work is labor intensive and time consuming.
Due to the age of the existing wharf (constructed circa 1942) and being
subjected to wood-rot and marine borers, constant and expensive
repair/maintenance is required to replace the decayed structure in order to
insure a safe working environment for personnel handling the heavy cables
on the wharf.
SSN-774 Virginia Class submarines require a drive-in facility and can not
be depermed with the current method available at Beckoning Point. The
existing facility does not have the capability to calibrate on-board
signature silencing systems of the SSN 21 and SSN 774 Class Submarines.
These submarines will not have their magnetic signatures minimized. This
will have adverse impact on Fleet readiness, mission effectiveness,
increased susceptibility to mines and detection, and an increased risk to
the war fighters.
contact is made between the submarine and the high current cables.
Building a new single PACFLT Submarine drive-in MSF located at Pearl Harbor
to support SSN-688, SSBN-726, SSGN, SSN-21, and SSN-774 Class submarines,
is the best business solution for the Navy. Having a single PACFLT
Submarine drive-in MSF at Pearl Harbor that supports ALL classes of
submarines will allow closure of the existing submarine MSFs located in San
Diego CA, Pearl Harbor HI, and Bangor WA, resulting in cost savings.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
99,8600203176N 15180
Sub Drive-in MSF, Beckoning
Point
NAVY 2008FY
P587
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HIPEARL HARBOR, HAWAII
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62813
A. Estimated Design Data:
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1121391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
99,8600203176N 15180
Sub Drive-in MSF, Beckoning
Point
NAVY 2008FY
P587
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HIPEARL HARBOR, HAWAII
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62813
Controls Between Rect/Sub Bldg & B54
Data Acquisition System
Deperm Control System and Sensors
Loop Power Rectifier and Y-Loop Supply
MTMS Sensor Array/Keel Row Magnetometer
NSWC/NUWC/NFESC Equip and Support
X-, Y-, and Z-Loop Cables and
Installation
OPN
OPN
OPN
OPN
OPN
OPN
OPN
2009
2010
2010
2008
2009
2010
2010
30
341
56
1,300
5,400
1,100
11,473
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander or the Installation Management Claimant certifies
that this project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
construction is recommended. Mission requirements, operational
considerations, and location are incompatible with use by other
components.
Mr. Stuart Hara 474-4254Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
Yes
King's Bay, GA
$2,910
$2,710
$200
05/2008
12/2007
05/2010
08/2006
12/2006
09/2007
5%
15%
$2,710
$200
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1131390
Scope
13115
Cost
($000)Start
Communication Center
Complete
6895 m2 65,410
Design Status
08/2006
8. Projects Requested In This Program
09/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(743 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 359,897
49,100
0
15,089
65,410
11,000
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 1,586,316
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:
TOTAL
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HI
WAHIAWA, HAWAII
3. Installation and Location: N62813
65,410
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL 15,089
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
The Naval Computer and Telecommunications Area Master Station Pacific
(NCTAMSPAC) provides operational direction and management to all Pacific
Naval Telecommunication System users. In addition to this function,
NCTAMSPAC manages, operates, and maintains Defense Communication System and
Naval Telecommunication System assets, and offers a full range of ADP and
Information Resource Services, Maintenance and Repair, and
Communication/Electronic and Defense Message System coordination to the
Navy and other DOD activities in the Pacific.
500,496
13115 70708 SF 15,089Consolidate Command Support Facilities
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.74
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
19555
18296
1688
1562B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 9751
8614
7472
7476
0
0
0
0
0
0
282
282
362
362
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1141390
4. Command
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HI
WAHIAWA, HAWAII
3. Installation and Location: N62813
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.74
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommander Navy
Installations Command
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1151391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
COMMUNICATION CENTER (74,217 SF)
COMMUNICATION CENTER (70,008
SF)
TELECOMMUNICATION ROOM (700
SF)
NCTAMS SWITCHING STATIONS
(3,509 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (6.2%)
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
6,895
6,504
65
326
5,734.97
5,950
4,472
51,350
(37,300)
(390)
(1,460)
(11,150)
(390)
(280)
(380)
7,310
(4,080)
(240)
(2,850)
(140)
58,660
2,930
61,590
3,820
65,410
65,410
65,410
(77,704)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
65,4100301376N 13115
Communication Center
NAVY 2008FY
P173
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HI
WAHIAWA, HAWAII
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62813(WW)
(WAHIAWA)
Construct a single-story, steel framed building with exterior concrete
paneling for the Communication Center at Naval Computer and
Telecommunications Area Master Station Pacific (NCTAMS PAC). Building
spaces will be equipped with raised floors, moveable interior walls, under-
floor fire suppression system, storage spaces, staging areas, conference
rooms, showers/toilets, access control system, climate control system,
emergency electrical power, uninterrupted power supply (UPS) all with
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1161391C
Current mission and operations - Safe, secure, efficient, and adaptable
facilities from which to provide reliable and enduring C4I and Information
Transfer (IT) services now and in the future to PACOM, DISA, COMPACFLT
Headquarters and its units afloat, shore facilities of Commander Navy
Region Hawaii, tactical units of all Service Components and transmission
continuity throughout the Pacific area of responsibility.
Mission Growth - NCTAMS PAC will become the Region Network Operations and
REQUIREMENT:
This project constructs a new consolidated, secure, state-of-the-art,
Command & Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I)
Service Center at NCTAMS PAC.
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
65,4100301376N 13115
Communication Center
NAVY 2008FY
P173
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HI
WAHIAWA, HAWAII
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 6,895
N62813(WW)
(WAHIAWA)
reserve back up/surge capacity. Building roof will be constructed to
accommodate radio frequency antennas and an antenna distribution system.
This project will include adequate space for emergency generator, UPS, fire
protection, access control system, and air conditioning equipment. N+1
redundancy will be provided for main transformers serving the
communication center, generators, and air conditioning systems for
equipment room spaces. Supporting facilities work will include parking
lot, site improvements, sidewalks, landscaping, pavement work, electrical
and communication ducts, fencing, and security lighting.
Sustainable design will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and
other directives. The new facility will be designed to resist seismic and
wind forces as per IBC 2003. It will meet antiterrorism/force protection
(AT/FP) standards and will comply with security requirements as set forth
in OPNAV Instruction 5530.14. The project will provide greater than
minimum antiterrorism measures in its site planning, building location and
setbacks, and architectural/structural design. The entire building will
meet the requirements for the open storage of Secret material with specific
areas that meet Top Secret and SI requirements.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1171391C
Presently, the main communications building and operational control center
is located in Building 261, built in 1959 and with portions renovated in
1998. In the past few years, frequent advances in transmission equipment
and computer technology have resulted in numerous new equipment
installations/replacements and manpower adjustments. These changes have
been accommodated by "make-do" methods of 1) placing equipment in vacant
spaces and modifying the spaces and utilities as needed, or 2) relocating
existing equipment and making extensive modifications in the space to
accommodate the new equipment. Although these methods of facilitating the
new equipment installs were made to work, they were generally costly and
time consuming. In many instances, the space available was generally
limited by the presence of permanent walls. It was not uncommon for
equipment and their operators to be located in different spaces - not an
efficient arrangement when "hands-on" operation of the equipment was
necessary.
Moreover, constant advances in technology and increasingly shortened life
cycles of communications equipment means that upgrades, modernizations, and
renovations to operating spaces will continually be required and, perhaps,
increase in frequency. These renovations and upgrades should strive to
configure equipment optimally to use available manpower efficiently and
effectively. Currently in B-261, this can seldom be achieved, even at
great expense and time.
If not constructed, NCTAMS PAC would be forced to maintain the status quo
and begin major renovations to the existing facility to meet current and
projected needs. The complex nature of conducting major renovations to
power and air handling equipment in an operational C4I facility may create
significant outages and negative impacts on daily operations. To allow the
facility to remain operational, renovations would be protracted over many
Security Center West (RNOSC West) - one of only two in the world - to
support the Joint Task Force Global Network Operations and NETWARCOM Global
Network Operations and Security Center (GNOSC). RNOSC West is scheduled
for Initial Operating Capability (IOC) in FY07 with a modest 3-5 person
staff, and increasing until Full Operational Capability (FOC) by FY-10 as
funding permits.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
65,4100301376N 13115
Communication Center
NAVY 2008FY
P173
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HI
WAHIAWA, HAWAII
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62813(WW)
(WAHIAWA)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1181391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Bid Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
years. Operational support facilities and personnel will remain dispersed
throughout the base, impairing efficiency, maintaining (likely increasing)
leased terrestrial transmissions costs and the potential for damage from
manmade or natural disaster. Enclave security concept cannot be achieved
without a well-defined and protected perimeter well within the installation
boundary. Personnel and vehicle movement in and around vital operations
facility will remain difficult to control. C4I building with its
associated antennae, external auxiliary equipment, and personnel activities
remain in plain view of general public.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
65,4100301376N 13115
Communication Center
NAVY 2008FY
P173
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HI
WAHIAWA, HAWAII
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Base Electronics System Engineering Plan
(BESEP)
C4I Equipment Installation Labor
C4I Equipment Installation Labor
C4I Equipment Procurement/Installation
Labor
OPN
OPN
OMN
OPN
2006
2010
2010
2009
1,927
197
7,108
10,783
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
$2,600
$2,300
$300
01/2008
12/2007
01/2010
08/2006
01/2007
09/2007
5%
35%
$1,000
$1,600
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
N62813(WW)
(WAHIAWA)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1191391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
65,4100301376N 13115
Communication Center
NAVY 2008FY
P173
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HI
WAHIAWA, HAWAII
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
C4I Pre-Planning Coord/MILCON BESEP
C4I Systems
Engineering/Design/Procurement
C4I Equipment Procurement/Installation
Labor
C4I Systems Engineering/Design
C4I Systems
Engineering/Design/Procurement
Collateral Equipment
IDS
Material Cost
NMCI Connection Costs
Physical Security System (Electronics)
Phase A
Physical Security System (Electronics)
Phase B
Under Floor IDS
OMN
OPN
OMN
OMN
OMN
OMN
OPN
OMN
OPN
OPN
OPN
OPN
2005
2008
2009
2007
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2009
2008
240
16,611
22,052
2,777
7,580
658
825
5,083
136
725
500
501
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This
Facility will be used to support joint commands. The scope of this
project includes equipment spaces to meet joint requirements.
Tim Dubois 808-653-0092Activity POC: Phone No:
N62813(WW)
(WAHIAWA)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1201391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
65,4100301376N 13115
Communication Center
NAVY 2008FY
P173
NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HI
WAHIAWA, HAWAII
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Blank Page
N62813(WW)
(WAHIAWA)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1211390
Scope
85110
17120
Cost
($000)Start
RTC Infrastructure Upgrades
Inc 3 of 3
Small Arms Markmanship Trainer
(SAMT)
Complete
2307 m2
3156 m2
16,650
10,200
Design Status
08/2003
08/2006
8. Projects Requested In This Program
11/2005
10/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(1697 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 3,838,606
167,750
63,360
4,181
26,850
259,187
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 633,742
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:72115 RTC Special Programs Barracks 19809 m2 63,360
TOTAL
TOTAL
NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES IL
GREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS
3. Installation and Location: N00128
26,850
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
63,360
4,181
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
Provide basic indoctrination (recruit training) for enlisted personnel;
primary, advanced, and specialized training for officer and enlisted
personnel at recruit Training Command Service School. Support commands
include the Naval hospital and Dental Center, the Navy Band, Public Works
and Seabee Construction Battalion Unit 401.
4,359,934
85120 711 SY 4,181Bridge S2 Replacement
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.27
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
15452
16873
778
762B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 4146
3739
1711
1711
0
0
6426
8270
0
0
756
756
1635
1635
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1221390
4. Command
NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES IL
GREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS
3. Installation and Location: N00128
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.27
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommander Navy
Installations Command
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1231391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
RTC INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES INC 3
OF 3 (24,838 SF)
VISITORS CENTER (24,154 SF)
NMCI SERVICE ROOM (12 SF)
GATE/SENTRY HOUSE (671 SF)
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION
SITE ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
COMMUNICATION SYSTEM IMPACT
FEE
SITE MECHANICAL UTILITIES
OTHER SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
LESS INCREMENT I & II FUNDING
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
2,307.49
2,244
1.15
62.34
2,056
2,611.12
10,471.02
5,520
(4,610)
(10)
(650)
(70)
(50)
(130)
57,710
(20,810)
(750)
(21,240)
(1,980)
(12,710)
(220)
63,230
3,160
66,390
3,780
70,170
2,530
-56,041
16,659
16,650
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 16,650
Auth for Approp 16,650
0203576N 85110
RTC Infrastructure Upgrades Inc
3 of 3
NAVY 2008FY
P748B
NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES ILGREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00128
Relocate and upgrade existing infrastructure systems to support the
recapitalization of buildings and increase security at Recruit Training
Command. Includes roads, sidewalks, parking areas, parade fields,
landscaping, exterior lighting, security fence, potable water, fire mains,
storm and sanitary collection systems, electrical, telecommunications, site
signs, natural gas, and steam/condensate distributions systems. All
utility system pricing has been adjusted to reflect the increased cost of
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1241391C
Existing barracks and training facilities, with associated infrastructure
(roads and utility systems), are dispersed inefficiently throughout the RTC
campus. Vehicular traffic is not separated from pedestrian traffic and
marching time between facilities is excessive. The new base master plan
consolidates like facilities into separate zones and utilizes perimeter
roads and interior recruit sidewalks to separate vehicular and pedestrian
traffic. This master plan is currently being implemented through the
construction of previously authorized projects to replace recruit barracks
This project will provide roads and utility systems with adequate capacity
to support the recapitalization of RTC facilities. The Recruit Training
Command, Great Lakes is the Navy's sole recruit training base. It
processes approximately 50,000 to 55,000 recruits per year with peak loads
of 16,000 recruits during summer months. RTC is currently undergoing an
extensive multi-year recapitalization program of existing barracks, drill
halls, and other facilities. This recapitalization program will require
the demolition and reconstruction of much of the existing base
infrastructure. It will also include the relocation of the existing non-
Navy owned communication system to mitigate the impact of telephone and
cable TV rate increases to Navy customers. Also provides adequate parking
for visitors to recruit graduations, improves traffic flow, and improves
base security. The result of the recapitalization program and
infrastructure upgrades will be improved and more efficient recruit
training.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Relocates and upgrades existing roads, sidewalks and utility systems to
support the recapitalization of RTC Great Lakes facilities and provides
adequate parking facilities for staff and visitors.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 16,650
Auth for Approp 16,650
0203576N 85110
RTC Infrastructure Upgrades Inc
3 of 3
NAVY 2008FY
P748B
NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES ILGREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00128
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 2,307
contractors concurrently working on multiple systems in a congested
underground area, without disrupting operations to house, train and
graduate 50,000 recruits each year. Sustainable principles will be
integrated into the design, development, and construction of the project in
accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and Executive Orders.
Security improvements include Entry Control Facilities improvements at Gate
8 and Visitors Security Screening facilities. Demolition of Buildings #909
(100 M2), 1209 (100 M2), 929 (613 M2), 1212 (4602 M2), 912 (1115 M2).
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1251391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
and drill halls and provide a new physical training facility. Additional
projects will replace the remaining recruit barracks and provide a new
Battle Stations facility.
The recapitalization of RTC Great Lakes cannot be implemented in accordance
with the new base master plan without relocation and upgrade of
infrastructure. Separate berthing, training, and public areas cannot be
created and vehicular and pedestrian traffc cannot be separated. Recruit
training efficiency would not be improved. Utility systems would not have
adequate capacity for the new barracks. Parking for visitors to recruit
graduations will be insufficient.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 16,650
Auth for Approp 16,650
0203576N 85110
RTC Infrastructure Upgrades Inc
3 of 3
NAVY 2008FY
P748B
NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES ILGREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00128
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This Facility
can be used by other components on an as available basis; however, the
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
$580
$580
$0
09/2006
06/2006
09/2010
08/2003
09/2005
11/2005
100%
100%
$500
$80
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1261391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 16,650
Auth for Approp 16,650
0203576N 85110
RTC Infrastructure Upgrades Inc
3 of 3
NAVY 2008FY
P748B
NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES ILGREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00128
scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.
Jeff Markey (847) 688-5395 x121Activity POC: Phone No:
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1271391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
SMALL ARMS MARKSMANSHIP TRAINER
(SAMT) (33,972 SF)
APPLIED INSTRUCTION BLDG
(33,972 SF)
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FOR
FIRING RANGE
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SPECIAL COSTS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
HAZMAT SITE MATERIAL
REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT
SITE UTILITIES
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
3,156.11
3,156.11 1,764.07
6,200
(5,570)
(230)
(70)
(110)
(110)
(110)
2,690
(560)
(560)
(210)
(100)
(860)
(160)
(240)
8,890
440
9,330
530
9,860
360
10,220
10,221
(3,495)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
10,2210805976N 17120
Small Arms Marksmanship Trainer
(SAMT)
NAVY 2008FY
P801
NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES ILGREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00128
Construct one story structure consisting of concrete slab on grade floor,
masonry and steel wall framing system, sloped steel roof structural system,
brick and masonry exterior walls, sloped metal roofing system, insulated
metal windows and exterior doors, painted concrete block interior walls,
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1281391C
With more than 50,000 recruits passing through RTC each year it is
essential that an adequate Small Arms Marksmanship Trainer (SAMT) with the
required technology infrastructure and functional training spaces be
provided. The requirements for the SAMT are as follows: (1) SAMT should be
located adjacent to the Small Arms Range for increased staff and
operational efficiencies: (2) modernized SAMT training equipment must be
provided to properly train recruits; (3) a two division classroom is
necessary to adequately train the recruits: (4) a holster draw
instructional training area must be provided to teach recruits how to
properly and safely remove a weapon from the holster: (4) a barrel cleaning
instructional area must be provided to train recruits on knowing when a
barrel is clear and safe: (5) armory to house weapons is required: and (6)
adequate support spaces such as heads, maintenance support, administrative
and building services must be provided.
The electronic SAMT simulates the live-fire small arms range, but is more
economical, faster and safer. Thus the combination of the electronic SAMT
for the early stage of training followed by the live-fire range for the
final stage provides the most effective and efficient curriculum. SAMT not
only provides economic relief but also is critical in the training process.
The marksmanship trainer allows for compressed training time giving its
users immediate feedback while instilling proper shooting techniques
critical in effective war-fighting.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
This project constructs a building to house a Small Arms Training Simulator
that serves over 50,000 recruits annually at the Recruit Training Command,
Naval Station Great Lakes, IL.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
10,2210805976N 17120
Small Arms Marksmanship Trainer
(SAMT)
NAVY 2008FY
P801
NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES ILGREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00128
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 3,156
vinyl composition flooring and acoustical ceilings. Includes site
improvements consisting of roads, parking area, sidewalks, site signs,
landscaping, storm water management improvements, exterior lighting, and
site utilities connections for sanitary collection system, potable water,
fire protection, steam and condensate, electrical power, data, voice, and
TV systems. Sustainable principles will be integrated into the design,
development, and construction of this project in accordance with Executive
Order 13123 and other laws and Executive Orders. The project includes the
demolition of one existing 1100 series Recruits Barracks.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1291391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
The current SAMT is inadequate in size and cannot train a two full
divisions at one time. With only 60 training stations versus the 88
stations and no designated training space for holster training and clearing
training to train two full divisions, the training schedule is interrupted
and each recruit is not given the proper attention and instruction time
necessary. The existing facility is located on the opposite side of the
Small Arms Range resulting in staff inefficiencies and increased travel
times. The SAMT should be sited adjacent to the Live Fire Range to improve
staff and training cost facilitate effective cross training, and
operational efficiencies. The SAMT is housed in an old warehouse built in
1943, which has outlived its useful life as a functional building. The
facility itself is lacking modern infrastructure (data, technology systems,
etc).
It is essential that SAMT be modernized and sized to properly train
recruit divisions within the 9.2 week boot camp time frame. If a new
facility is not constructed for the SAMT, then the training of recruits
will remain inefficient and costly in an undersized facility. Training
days will have to be extended for RTC due to live-fires inability to cover
the appropriate material required.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
10,2210805976N 17120
Small Arms Marksmanship Trainer
(SAMT)
NAVY 2008FY
P801
NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES ILGREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00128
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
N/A
$110
$110
$0
03/2008
01/2008
08/2006
12/2006
10/2007
3%
5%
$100
$10
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1301391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
10,2210805976N 17120
Small Arms Marksmanship Trainer
(SAMT)
NAVY 2008FY
P801
NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES ILGREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00128
Collateral Equipment
New Fire Arms Trainer Equipment for New
Trainer
Physical Security Equipment
Relocation of Existing SAMT Equipment
OMN
OMN
OMN
OMN
2008
2008
2008
2008
450
2,500
45
500
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This Facility
can be used by other components on an as available basis; however, the
scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.
David D. Lindsey 847 688 5395 x153Activity POC: Phone No:
6. Construction complete: 06/2009
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1311390
Scope
31125
31125
31115
Cost
($000)Start
E-2 Advanced Hawkeye RDT&E
Facility
Aircraft Prototype Facility
JPALS Addition To Building
2110/2122
Complete
3017 m2
2641 m2
1902 m2
13,650
17,990
6,720
Design Status
08/2006
10/2006
08/2006
8. Projects Requested In This Program
09/2007
09/2007
09/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(6424 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 2,392,491
5,800
32,450
32,144
38,360
400,334
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 307,185
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:31125
31125
Aircraft Prototype Facility
Aircraft Prototype Facility Phase 3
3165 m2
6766 m2
11,450
21,000
TOTAL
TOTAL
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MD
PATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation and Location: N0428A
38,360
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
32,450
32,144
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
Supports the Navy by providing the warfighter with technologies that
deliver dominant combat effects and matchless capabilities. As the host,
NAS Patuxent River provides effective and affordable integrated warfare
systems and life cycle support by performing RDT&E, acquisition,
engineering and fleet support for manned and unmanned aircraft, engines,
avionics, aircraft support systems and ship/shore/air operations.
2,901,579
74044
61010
LS
32000 SF
24,404
7,740
Fitness Center Patuxent River
Cost Analysis Center
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.06
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
9706
9858
848
910B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 2102
2192
6648
6648
0
0
0
0
0
0
81
81
27
27
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1321390
4. Command
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MD
PATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation and Location: N0428A
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.06
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommander Navy
Installations Command
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1331391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
E-2 ADVANCED HAWKEYE RDT&E
FACILITY (32,473 SF)
BUILDING (32,152 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (322
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
3,016.87
2,987
29.87
2,296.16
3,921.29
8,470
(6,860)
(120)
(1,030)
(140)
(80)
(240)
3,410
(620)
(800)
(40)
(620)
(340)
(870)
(120)
11,880
590
12,470
710
13,180
480
13,660
13,650
(850)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
13,6500805376N 31125
E-2 Advanced Hawkeye RDT&E
Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P156
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MDPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N0428A
Construct a multi-story secure facility with structural steel frame, pile
foundation with grade beams, slab on grade and elevated concrete slab,
insulated metal wall exterior panel system, built-up insulated roof on
metal decking with steel joist framing, including engineering workspace,
secure aircraft data laboratory, engineering analysis workstations,
elevator, and emergency power generation. Sustainable principles will be
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1341391C
Existing facilities that house the RDT&E teams supporting E-2 & C-2 are
spread throughout 16 different facilities including the use of MILVANS and
Leased Relocatables. Existing lab space is too small and does not allow
the required growth to support the E-2 Advanced Hawkeye mission. MILVANS
have been utilized as office space for over 20 years and the material
condition of these units is unacceptable for continued use. Existing rodent
and other wild animal infestations continue to make workplace conditions
unsafe and unhealthy.
If this project is not provided, the E-2 Advanced Hawkeye Integrated Test
Team will have inadequate facilities (including lab space) to conduct an
efficient test program resulting in delays to the overall program. The E-2
NCW team will have to continue to use Leased Relocatables for an extended
Adequate and efficiently configured facility that will provide RDT&E
support to the E-2 Advanced Hawkeye, E-2 Network Centric Warfare (NCW), E-2
Legacy Systems, and C-2 Legacy Systems missions. The E-2 Advanced Hawkeye
Initial Operational Capability (IOC) is in FY11 and Operational Evaluation
(OPEVAL) is in FY12. The facility will house the Advanced Hawkeye
Integrated Test Team and will provide consolidated infrastructure to allow
efficient and effective testing of the new radar technologies, modernized
communications and navigation systems, and improved surveillance system for
Navy's theater air missile defense. The NCW teams closely collaborate with
the flight test teams and the E-2 Systems Test & Evaluation Lab.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
This recapitalization project will consolidate existing facilities by
constructing a new Advance Hawkeye Test and Evaluation facility for E-2 &
C-2 aircraft flight test operations, personnel, integration laboratories,
and equipment. It must be located in the vicinity of Hangar 306.
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
13,6500805376N 31125
E-2 Advanced Hawkeye RDT&E
Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P156
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MDPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N0428A
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 3,017
included into the design, development, and construction of the project. The
project will include the demolition of 7 buildings: 222, 310, 1729, 2044,
2071, 2072, and 2205 (2,971 m2); the disposal of 18 MILVAN units configured
to 7 groups of office spaces: 3003, 3208, 3209, 3210, 3211, 3213, 3215 670
m2 (7,212 SF); and the termination and removal of 2 leased relocatable
units: LR-120 and 3165A at 816 m2 (8,783 SF).
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1351391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2007
January 2008
12. Supplemental Data:
period of time. The long-term requirement for Leased Relocatables (NCW &
MILVAN replacement) will exceed the allowed time frame for sustained use of
relocatables.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
13,6500805376N 31125
E-2 Advanced Hawkeye RDT&E
Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P156
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MDPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N0428A
ADT Wiring & Equipment
Fiber / Tlephone Equip. & Wiring
Furniture / Systems & Equipment
OPN
OPN
OMN
2008
2008
2008
250
100
500
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This
Facility can be used by other components on an as available basis;
however, the scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.
Pete Mora 301-757-3302Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
N/A
$1,227
$736
$491
04/2008
01/2008
10/2009
08/2006
12/2006
09/2007
5%
15%
$818
$409
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1361391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
13,6500805376N 31125
E-2 Advanced Hawkeye RDT&E
Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P156
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MDPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N0428A
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1371391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
AIRCRAFT PROTOTYPE FACILITY
(28,431 SF)
AIRCRAFT PROTOTYPE FACILITY
(16,146 SF)
MAINTENANCE HANGAR TYPE I
(12,002 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (283
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUSTAINABLE DESIGN
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
2,641.3
1,500
1,115
26.3
2,428.67
2,509.59
3,828.15
8,230
(3,640)
(2,800)
(100)
(1,420)
(90)
(70)
(80)
(30)
7,410
(80)
(480)
(1,350)
(420)
(3,890)
(610)
(580)
15,640
780
16,420
940
17,360
630
17,990
17,990
(2,500)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,9900805376N 31125
Aircraft Prototype Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P558
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MDPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N0428A
Construct a single-story modified Type I hangar module with adjacent two-
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1381391C
Adequate and efficiently configured facilities for use as a secure aircraft
prototyping facility to support critical mission requirements for
classified RDT&E, and rapidly transition new and specialized aircraft
systems, subsystems, and technologies to fleet tasking. RDT&E mission
requirements include Network Centric Warfare (NCW), the Unmanned Combat Air
Vehicle (UCAV), the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) and compartmentalized
REQUIREMENT:
This is Phase I of a three phase project to construct secure facilities to
augment and improve naval aviation research, development, and test and
evaluation (RDT&E) capabilities at the Naval Air Warfare Center, Air
Division, NAS Patuxent River, MD. This phase of the project provides a
secure hangar, machine shop, assembly area, and accredited work areas for
support of five or more classified projects annually. Subsequent phases of
the project (MILCON projects P-559 and P-561) shall construct additional
secure hangars, laboratories, and accredited work space to increase the
capacity of the facility to support up to fourteen classified programs
annually. The completed project shall deliver advantages that are
consistent with naval aviation goals to reduce costs and improve the
process cycle time required to deliver mission critical combat systems to
the Fleet.
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,9900805376N 31125
Aircraft Prototype Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P558
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MDPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N0428A
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 2,641
story technical support area with structural steel frame, insulated metal
panel exterior wall system, concrete pile and grade beam foundations,
concrete slab on grade, elevated slab, roofing system over insulated
structural metal deck and steel joist roof framing, a technical service
laboratory (machine shop), assembly area, tool crib, a secure video
teleconference center, a security control center, secure project and
engineering workspaces for compartmentalized programs, and office and
administrative spaces for support personnel, Aqueous Film Forming Foam
(AFFF), freight elevator, information systems, computer flooring, heating,
ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC), laboratory cooling units, fire
protection and alarm systems, plumbing, electrical power distribution,
lighting, sliding hangar doors, utility development, aircraft apron and
taxiway access, jet blast barriers, security fencing, access control,
surveillance and intrusion detection, vehicle parking, roadways, sidewalks,
and landscaping. Sustainable principals will be included into the design,
development, and construction of the project.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1391391C
The Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB) at Patuxent River is the
only location in the country that can provide the total RDT&E package for
reduced signature (LO/VLO) and other classified aircraft systems and
subsystems. No other location or facility in the country can offer direct
and immediate access to national level experts in survivability and related
materials technologies, prototype design and fabrication, and the full
range of required T&E resources, capabilities and services. National level
experts in all competencies necessary to demonstrate, validate and verify
new aircraft design concepts, materials and technologies, and improve the
survivability of Navy and Joint Service tactical aircraft and other air
vehicles, are currently consolidated under the MRTFB at NAS Patuxent River.
However, due to a shortage of adequate secure facilities capable of
supporting prototype development at Patuxent River, these experts must
deploy elsewhere and establish temporary remote detachments to complete
assigned Demonstration/Validation (DEM/VAL) tasks for classified programs.
These deployments impact program continuity, and add unnecessary time and
cost to already expensive programs. With up to 14 programs and projects
impacted annually, the costs associated with such deployments currently
exceed $7 Million per year.
and classified Survivability and Vulnerability (S&V) programs. Recurring
requirements for these facilities in FY09 and beyond include:
~ Multi-Spectral Operations Aircraft (Systems Integration and Developmental
Test and Evaluation & DT&E)
~ Airship Program (Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E)
~ Classified NCW Platforms (Systems Integration and DT&E)
~ Classified S&V Projects (Systems Integration and DT&E)
~ Multiple Classified GWOT Projects (Systems Integration and DT&E)
~ UCAV (Block Testing)
The facilities will be utilized on a space available basis to support
testing for JSF, the F18E/F and UH-1 and H1 helicopter upgrades, and other
RDT&E requirements for projects or special operations involving manned and
unmanned air vehicles that require special security provisions or access
restrictions. The facility shall also meet requirements for in-service
engineering support necessary to quickly trouble shoot fleet problems and
issues involving Low Observable/Very Low Observable (LO/VLO) technologies,
and to integrate specialized systems and subsystems onto Navy platforms for
Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) missions and special
operations.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,9900805376N 31125
Aircraft Prototype Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P558
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MDPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N0428A
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1401391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
This project supports Aircraft Division classified research, development,
and testing necessary to demonstrate, validate, and deliver critical combat
systems to the fleet. Deferral of this project will introduce unnecessary
complexities to already tight program budgets and schedules. Program costs
will increase to accommodate remote detachments at diverse locations to
complete RDT&E tasks that could otherwise be accomplished by Aircraft
Division Personnel at Patuxent River. Critical path milestones will be
impacted and costs will be added when delays are incurred because test
aircraft must be deployed to alternate, remote locations for classified
testing due to a shortage of secure hangar and support space for classified
test programs (the cost risk to major platform programs in the Engineering
and Manufacturing Development (E&MD) stage can easily exceed $1 Million per
day).
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,9900805376N 31125
Aircraft Prototype Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P558
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MDPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N0428A
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
Yes
NA
$1,650
$990
$660
03/2008
12/2007
03/2010
08/2006
02/2007
09/2007
5%
15%
$1,100
$550
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring FY Approp
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1411391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,9900805376N 31125
Aircraft Prototype Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P558
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MDPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N0428A
COLLATERAL EQUIPMENT
LAB EQUIPMENT
OPN
OPN
2008
2008
1,500
1,000
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Joint Use is recommended.
Teena Wettengel (301)757-4924Activity POC: Phone No:
Approp or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1421391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,9900805376N 31125
Aircraft Prototype Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P558
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MDPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N0428A
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1431391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
JPALS ADDITION TO BUILDIMG 2110 /
2122 (20,472 SF)
BUILDING (20,270 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (203
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
1,901.93
1,883.1
18.83
2,248.99
3,921.29
4,900
(4,240)
(70)
(420)
(70)
(50)
(50)
950
(330)
(90)
(210)
(250)
(70)
5,850
290
6,140
350
6,490
230
6,720
6,720
(1,379)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
6,7200805376N 31115
JPALS Addition to Buildimg 2110
/ 2122
NAVY 2008FY
P977
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MDPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N0428A
Construct a single-story addition to existing building 2110 with structural
steel frame, masonry exterior walls, reinforced concrete spread footings,
slab on grade, EPDM roofing system over insulated structural metal deck and
steel joist framing system,integration and repair labs, a Carrier Air
Traffic Control Center (CATCC) Mock-Up area, Flight Test Control area,
offices for technical personnel, a secured area, a conference room, a test
vehicle support area, receiving area,heating ventilation and air
conditioning, fire protection and alarm systems, plumbing, electrical power
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1441391C
Adequate, efficiently configured facilities are required to support JPALS
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) activities in
preparation for the system's initial operating capability (IOC), FY13.
After JPALS becomes operational these facilities will be used for fleet
support activities throughout the system's lifecycle and RDT&E activities
to incorporate JPALS into new aircraft types.
Shore based development flight test activities will be conducted using F-18
aircraft with JPALS developmental equipment. When the JSF (F35) is
delivered, development flight test activities will continue with this
aircraft. The JPALS IOC is planned to coincide with the F-35 (JSF) IOC.
The fleet support activities, currently being conducted in Buildings 2110
and 2122, supporting the Army/Navy Water Radar Navigation Aid 46, AN/SPN-46
(V) and Air Surveillance Precision approach Radar Control System (ASPARCS)
occupy all available space. This work must continue until the end of
AN/SPN-46's service life, 2024 or beyond. ASPARCS service life will end in
2030.
An F/A-18 test aircraft will be used to develop, test, and certify the
REQUIREMENT:
Construct an addition to Buildings 2110 and 2122 to provide space to
support new mission requirements for Joint Precision Approach and Landing
System (JPALS) testing, development, and fleet support activities.
Additionally, these spaces will support new mission requirements related to
usage of JPALS equipment in the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) (F-35), Joint
Unmanned Combat Air System (J-UCAS), and CVN-21 programs. The proposed
addition will provide workspaces for 60 fulltime employees.
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
6,7200805376N 31115
JPALS Addition to Buildimg 2110
/ 2122
NAVY 2008FY
P977
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MDPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N0428A
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 1,902
distribution, lighting, communication system, utility development, and site
improvements. Building addition to existing Building 2122 will be a
poured-in-place concrete vault type structure for electronic monitoring
equipment. Sustainable principals will be included into the design,
development, and construction of the project. Portions of exterior walls
of buildings 2110 and 2122 shall be demolished for connection of the new
additions. In addition an existing pre-engineered metal building will be
demolished; Building 2820 at 111.48 m2 (1,200 SF).
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1451391C
The AN/SPN-46 in Buildings 2110 and 2122 will be used during JPALS flight
tests as a baseline standard to test the suitability of precision
approaches using JPALS. There is insufficient space in B-2110/B-2122 to
support new mission tasking for JPALS, and no facilities are available in
the local area to support JPALS, JSF, J-UCAS, and CVN-21 flight-testing.
If P-977 is not funded, NAVAIR will evaluate various alternatives for
housing the support activities required to develop and deploy the Joint
Precision and Landing System (JPALS). The only viable alternative is
continuing to lease temporary facilities located near B-2110 at Patuxent
River, MD. Current plans include leasing two temporary facilities (LR-75
@3,024 and LR-101 @8,615 sq-ft) to house JPALS developmental test and
JPALS equipment for fleet operations. It must be flight tested under
conditions that replicate the shipboard environment as closely as possible.
The Landing System Test Facility (LSTF), Buildings 2110 and 2122, are
uniquely able to provide the mission essential replication of an over-water
approach to a runway similar to that experienced when landing aboard an
aircraft carrier. After the JPALS equipment is certified for operational
use, each aircraft type (fixed and rotary wing) will be tested and
qualified for shipboard JPALS precision approach and landing operations.
The LSTF is the Navy's only integrated shipboard landing system test
facility, conducting test and evaluation operations on runway 32. Runway 32
provides an over-water approach along with simulated carrier lighting. The
Navy's current landing systems are installed in the LSTF. It contains a
common real-time instrumentation system and Carrier (Variant) (CV)/CVN
visual landing aids and a night lighting package that is representative of
the shipboard environment.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
6,7200805376N 31115
JPALS Addition to Buildimg 2110
/ 2122
NAVY 2008FY
P977
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MDPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N0428A
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1461391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
evaluation efforts until P-977 can be constructed. Additional facilities
will be required to accommodate engineers, technicians and lab space for
installation, support and maintenance of Low Rate Initial Productions
(LRIP) that are scheduled to begin in FY11.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
6,7200805376N 31115
JPALS Addition to Buildimg 2110
/ 2122
NAVY 2008FY
P977
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MDPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N0428A
Collateral Equipment (Various)
Temp. Fac. (VSF) Vehicle Support Fac.
OPN
OPN
2008
2008
1,094
285
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
N/A
$600
$360
$240
04/2008
01/2008
07/2009
08/2006
12/2006
09/2007
5%
15%
$400
$200
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1471391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
6,7200805376N 31115
JPALS Addition to Buildimg 2110
/ 2122
NAVY 2008FY
P977
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MDPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N0428A
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Joint Use is recommended.
Mrs. Ann Combs (301) 995-6018Activity POC: Phone No:
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1481391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
6,7200805376N 31115
JPALS Addition to Buildimg 2110
/ 2122
NAVY 2008FY
P977
NAS PATUXENT RIVER MDPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N0428A
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1491390
Scope
61010
Cost
($000)Start
National Maritime Intel Center
Inc 2 of 3
Complete
47768 m2 52,070
Design Status
09/2003
8. Projects Requested In This Program
06/2006
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(84 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 139,511
0
4,090
0
52,070
0
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 0
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:61010 National Maritime Intel Center Inc 3 of 3 47768 m2 4,090
TOTAL
TOTAL
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY WASH
SUITLAND, MARYLAND
3. Installation and Location: N68469
52,070
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
4,090
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
The Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) provides one-stop-shopping at the
National Maritime Intelligence Center (NMIC) for national level maritime
intelligence. NMIC hosts the Marine Corps Intelligence Activity (MCIA), the
Coast Guard Intelligence Coordination Center (ICC) and the Naval
Information Warfare Activity (NIWA).
195,671
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.02
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
2305
3025
339
444B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 596
791
1370
1790
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1501390
4. Command
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY WASH
SUITLAND, MARYLAND
3. Installation and Location: N68469
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.02
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommander Navy
Installations Command
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1511391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
NATIONAL MARITIME INTEL CENTER INC
2 OF 3 (514,170 SF)
NMCI INFRASTRUCTURE (1,539 SF)
GARAGE REPAIRS (121,632 SF)
NMIC ADDITION (198,465 SF)
NMIC RENOVATION (151,997 SF)
4TH FLOOR GARAGE ADDITION
(40,537 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
LESS INCREMENT 1 AND 3 FUNDING
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
47,768
143
11,300
18,438
14,121
3,766
1,788.1
320.77
1,593.97
887.49
502.57
56,040
(260)
(3,620)
(29,390)
(12,530)
(1,890)
(2,740)
(310)
(1,170)
(4,130)
3,100
(10)
(1,560)
(1,220)
(190)
(90)
(30)
59,140
2,960
62,100
3,540
65,640
2,370
-15,941
52,069
52,069
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 52,069
Auth for Approp 52,069
0901376N 61010
National Maritime Intel Center
Inc 2 of 3
NAVY 2008FY
P339A
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY WASH
SUITLAND, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68469(MI)
(NMIC SUITLAND)
Design and construct an addition (another wing) to the existing National
Maritime Intelligence Center (NMIC). Renovations and construction will
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1521391C
The NMIC houses the Office of Naval Intelligence and its sub-tenants.
Continued expansion of ONI's mission to include its sub-tenants has
dramatically increased staffing and mission requirements. The NMIC is
Provide adequate secured facility to accommodate additional personnel in an
efficiently configured facility addition (wing) providing command support
for administrative functions, analytical areas, fitness center,
laboratories, conference center, security operations center, to support
mission processes related to the Office of Naval Intelligence and its sub-
tenants. This project will accommodate the additional 700 personnel. The
NMIC is currently located on 42 acres in Suitland, Maryland. The NMIC
currently consists of 600,000 square feet with an 870 space-parking garage.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Constructs a secure wing attached to the existing facility to house
additional personnel in support of increased mission of the Office of Naval
Intelligence and its sub-tenants, and renovates 14,190 m2 of space in the
existing NMIC facility.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 52,069
Auth for Approp 52,069
0901376N 61010
National Maritime Intel Center
Inc 2 of 3
NAVY 2008FY
P339A
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY WASH
SUITLAND, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 47,768
N68469(MI)
(NMIC SUITLAND)
include new interior partitions, new elevators, cooling tower, heating,
ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) upgrades, electrical systems,
plumbing, fire protection systems, site utilities, paving, site
improvements, emergency generators, uninterruptible power supply (UPS),
laboratories, shielded spaces, conference rooms, state of the art
conference center, small storage areas, cafeteria, fitness center,
automatic data processing (ADP) center, security operations center,
repairs/upgrades to existing parking garage and/or additional parking and
landscaping. NMIC currently has emergency generators, UPS, cafeteria and
fitness center that potentially could service the addition. Built in
equipment includes elevators, raised floor, and galley equipment.
Sustainable principles will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and
other laws and Executive Orders.
Anti-terrorism/Force Protection standards will be integrated into the
design, development, and construction of the project in accordance with
current standards.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1531391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
currently exceeding design constraints to include housing personnel in
common spaces and conference and huddle rooms. In addition, many of the
work-stations have been downsized in an effort to meet personnel increases.
Without an addition to the NMIC, operations and mission requirements will
not be met and ONI its sub-tenants will not be able to perform their unique
command mission. There will be a continued strain on the NMIC to house
personnel in over utilized spaces.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 52,069
Auth for Approp 52,069
0901376N 61010
National Maritime Intel Center
Inc 2 of 3
NAVY 2008FY
P339A
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY WASH
SUITLAND, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Joint Use is recommended.
Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
N/A
$580
$80
$500
08/2007
05/2007
06/2009
09/2003
02/2006
06/2006
3%
15%
$500
$80
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
N68469(MI)
(NMIC SUITLAND)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1541391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 52,069
Auth for Approp 52,069
0901376N 61010
National Maritime Intel Center
Inc 2 of 3
NAVY 2008FY
P339A
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY WASH
SUITLAND, MARYLAND
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Blank Page
N68469(MI)
(NMIC SUITLAND)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1551390
Scope
17110
17945
72124
14345
17945
17955
73010
72124
72124
21105
21181
17120
Cost
($000)Start
Academic Instruction Facility,
Camp Geiger
MOUT Enhancements
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, AT
Battalion
MARSOC Special Operations
Support Facility
MARSOC Training Facilities
MARSOC Fitness Center/Training
Pool
MARSOC Community Support
Facilities
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
French Creek
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,
New River
Aircraft Maint Hangar, New
River Phase 2
Jet Engine Test Cell, New
River
Field Medical Services School
Complete
6827 m2
4613 m2
9090 m2
4262 m2
0 LS
3497 m2
1723 m2
9276 m2
7727 m2
4382 m2
850 m2
2569 m2
16,460
14,120
29,970
21,720
12,590
14,480
9,170
27,800
22,530
17,330
14,570
8,080
Design Status
09/2005
09/2005
08/2006
09/2005
09/2005
09/2005
08/2006
09/2005
09/2005
09/2005
09/2005
09/2005
8. Projects Requested In This Program
09/2007
09/2007
03/2007
09/2007
09/2007
08/2007
08/2007
09/2007
09/2007
09/2007
09/2007
09/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(159094 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 5,934,091
190,348
167,920
0
208,820
563,784
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:17940
72124
72124
17940
Infantry Platoon Battle Course SR-1
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, French Creek
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Hadnot Point
Modifications of K-Ranges Phase 2
LS
103958 SF
100757 SF
LS
9,480
27,730
30,830
15,810
TOTAL
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation and Location: M67001
208,820
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
7,064,963
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.95
5. Area Const
Cost Index
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
44247
48348
149
110B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 1007
608
1518
1628
37
127
5679
5493
0
21
3140
2746
29746
33610
2971
4005
Commandant of the
Marine Corps
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1561390
4. Command
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 54,740
74074
72124
11320
72210
72124
MARSOC Child Development Center
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Hadnot Point
Aircraft Parking Apron Expansion, New River
Enlisted Dining Facility, New River
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, New River
27771 SF
96757 SF
38013 SY
31205 SF
99803 SF
10,170
26,870
6,100
13,300
27,630
TOTAL
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation and Location: M67001
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
167,920
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
MCB Camp Lejeune supports the combat readiness of expeditionary forces by
providing training, logistic, garrison support, mobilization and deployment
support and a wide range of quality of life services including housing,
safety and security, medical and dental care, family services, off-duty
education and recreation.
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.95
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
Commandant of the
Marine Corps
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1571391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
ACADEMIC INSTRUCTION FACILITY,
CAMP GEIGER (73,485 SF)
ACADEMIC INSTRUCTION FACILITY
(72,764 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (721
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
6,827
6,760
67
1,594.53
3,503.5
11,730
(10,780)
(230)
(220)
(190)
(190)
(120)
2,580
(840)
(330)
(280)
(550)
(170)
(410)
14,310
720
15,030
860
15,890
570
16,460
16,460
(2,490)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
16,4600206496M 17110
Academic Instruction Facility,
Camp Geiger
NAVY 2008FY
P002
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67001(GA)
(CAMP GEIGER)
Construct a multi-story academic instruction facility with classrooms,
offices, restrooms, auditorium, storage spaces, and mechanical spaces.
Interior of the facility will be finished with a combination of tile,
carpet, painted CMU walls, suspended gypsum board, and acoustical tile
ceilings. Built in equipment includes an elevator. Information systems
include wiring for telephone and local area network (LAN). Anti-
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1581391C
The School of Infantry is required to train approximately 25,000 Marines
per year in the infantry skills necessary to operate and survive in a
combat environment; to provide advanced training in weapons and combat
skills necessary to lead Marines in combat while functioning as infantry
squad leaders or infantry platoon sergeants; and to enhance their
professional qualifications.
Infantry Training Battalion's current classrooms, headquarters, and
instructor office spaces are located in 6 substandard 50-60 year old
buildings that are functionally obsolete and supported by (1) head facility
that contains (1) toilet, (1) urinal, (1) sink, and (1) shower for
approximately (70) Marines per day. Classes are being held in open squad
Provide administrative and classroom instruction space for the School of
Infantry's staff, Headquarters and Service Battalion, Infantry Training
Battalion, and Advanced Infantry Training Company.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Construct a consolidated Academic Instruction Facility for the School of
Infantry (east) at Camp Geiger, MCB Camp Lejeune.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
16,4600206496M 17110
Academic Instruction Facility,
Camp Geiger
NAVY 2008FY
P002
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 6,827
M67001(GA)
(CAMP GEIGER)
Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) features and Technical Operating Manuals
are included. Facility will be constructed with pile-supported concrete
slab on grade, reinforced concrete masonry unit (CMU) insulated cavity wall
with exterior brick veneer, and standing seam metal roofing system.
Electrical utilities include electrical distribution and an intrusion
detection system (IDS). Mechanical utilities include fire protection, heat
distribution, water distribution, and heating, ventilation, and air
conditioning. Paving and site improvements include security fencing,
asphalt roads, paved parking lot, exterior lighting, storm water pond,
sidewalks, landscaping, relocation of an entry flagpole and monument
plaques. Site preparations work includes site and building utility
connections (water, natural gas, sanitary and storm sewer, electrical,
telephone, and LAN). Demolition of the following buildings and structures,
as well as any required mitigation, is also included: TC704,TC705, TC706,
TC707, TC708, TC470, TC709, TC830, TC831, TC860, TC861, TC1026, TC752,
TC754, TC846, TC848. Sustainable features will be integrated into the
design, development, and construction of the project in accordance with
Executive Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1591391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
bays that are technologically inadequate with limited multi-media
capability. The climate control systems are constantly being repaired.
These classrooms are supported by (5) Port-a-Johns used by over 3000
students. The current facilities do not meet the standards set forth in
the Course Descriptive Data (CDD), requiring Programs of Instruction (POI)
to take place in climate controlled, multi-media capable, head-equipped
facilities.
If not provided, students will continue to be taught in inadequate
facilities without the climate control, technology, and head facilities
necessary to satisfy the requirements set forth in the Course Description
Data (CDD). The ineffciencies and ineffectiveness of training two commands
in the same disciplines from separate facilities will continue.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
16,4600206496M 17110
Academic Instruction Facility,
Camp Geiger
NAVY 2008FY
P002
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Collateral Equipment
NMCI Connections
O&MMC
PMC
2008
2008
2,390
100
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
$492
$80
$412
04/2008
01/2008
12/2009
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15%
$412
$80
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
M67001(GA)
(CAMP GEIGER)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1601391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
16,4600206496M 17110
Academic Instruction Facility,
Camp Geiger
NAVY 2008FY
P002
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other components
on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is based on
Navy requirements.
Larry Brant (910) 451-3034Activity POC: Phone No:
M67001(GA)
(CAMP GEIGER)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1611391
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
MOUT ENHANCEMENTS (49,654 SF)
BLDG 20 ADDITION-RANGE CONTROL
TOWER AND HEAD (1,744 SF)
URBAN TRAINING AREA, MIDDLE
AND UPPER CLASS (7,998 SF)
OPEN MARKET TRAINING AREA
(4,994 SF)
RAILROAD STATION AND WAREHOUSE
TRAINING AREA (31,215 SF)
NATIONAL GUARD/HELICOPTER
COMPOUND TRAINING AREA (2,519 SF)
360 DEGREE SHOOT HOUSE
TRAINING AREA (1,012 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (172
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
4,613
162
743
464
2,900
234
94
16
1,973.12
1,338.12
806.1
875.96
1,735.79
1,377.75
3,467.2
8,830
(320)
(990)
(370)
(2,540)
(410)
(130)
(60)
(3,790)
(130)
(50)
(40)
3,450
(160)
(1,390)
(240)
(670)
(750)
(240)
12,280
610
12,890
730
13,620
490
14,110
14,120
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,1200216496M 17945
MOUT Enhancements
NAVY 2008FY
P1063
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67001(KA)
(BASE WIDE-MISCEL)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1621391C
REQUIREMENT:
This project will enhance the existing Urban Training Area with 75
additional multi-story training structures of various sizes and shapes.
New structures will be designed to accommodate audio and video displays,
remotely controlled pop-up targets, and reconfigurable interior walls. The
new urban training area will be designed to allow tank access. Building 20
will be modified to provide two control rooms, an equipment support room
and male/female heads.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
(916)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,1200216496M 17945
MOUT Enhancements
NAVY 2008FY
P1063
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
Adequate: Substandard:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
CAMP LEJEUNE.
M67001(KA)
(BASE WIDE-MISCEL)
Construct an Urban Training Area and a multi-story addition to Building 20,
to serve as a range control tower and field service head. The training
facility includes Middle and Upper Class areas, an Open Air Market,
National Guard compound, a Train Station area, and a 360 Degree Shoot
House. Construct 75 buildings and structures of various sizes and shapes.
Construction shall be combination of CMU, concrete, and steel frame: roofs
shall be standing seam, concrete, or roofless; training areas will include
electrical and mechanical connections and controls for special effects used
in training exercises, such as lights, sound, and compressed air; utilities
will include water, sanitary, power, electrical, telecom, and HVAC;
permanent ten feet high walls; fixed permanent tables, seats, awnings;
interior and exterior lighting for entire training areas; shoot house to
include rubber and steel armor bullet entrapment walls; changeable and
movable modular wall partitions and panels; simulated kitchens and
bathrooms; roads and access areas. Information systems include telephone,
Local Area Network (LAN), voice and data communications systems. Paving
and site improvements include exterior site and building lighting, paved
parking and roadways, storm water management, environmental protection
measures, clearing and grubbing, earthwork, fill, grading, landscaping,
security fencing, and building and roadway signage. Also includes
technical operating manuals, antiterrorism/force protection, and necessary
environmental mitigation.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1631391C
To incorporate lessons learned during the Marine Corps Warfighting
Laboratory (MCWL) experiments and from combat operations, Operation Iraq
Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). An increase in current
urban training facility capabilities must be developed. The urban training
complex must be designed to allow infantry and armor units to train in a
realistic environment as a task-organized combined arms team that
emphasizes all available aspects of our supporting arms doctrine.
Increasing the depth of the training area and restricting the visual sight
lines will reduce the Marine's ability to maintain orientation through the
use of horizonal landmarks. Doing so will force units of the combined arms
team to train with fielded technology such as Blue Force Trackers, GPS
location/targeting devices and current GIS mapping capabilities. The urban
area must contain two and three story buildings, non-linear roads and
broken lines of sight (roadway and vertical placement of buildings). In
order to provide this requirement, a specially configured MOUT training
area complete with special operations training facilities is required to
train Marines. In order to elevate the level of training, exterior
speakers and current technology simulators such as air cannons or air/smoke
blast nozzles will simulate live fire in the area. Remotely Engaged Target
Systems (RETS) or RETS like systems and Portable infantry Targets (pop-up
targets) placed in the area coupled with simulated live fire will place the
Marine in a training environment that more closely replicates a real world
urban area and significantly elevate the state of training. To eliminate
the sense of complacency that develops from repeated training with the
fixed training fixtures within existing urban training buildings, new
buildings are required that incorporate a capability to manipulate or
change the internal floor plan. This will provide Camp Lejeune with the
ability to offer a different, challenging training environment to the same
Marines over multiple training evolutions. The addition of power sub-
station, water treatment facility and septic system will provide much
needed local utilities not presently in this area. These facilities would
significantly prepare Marines for the Three Block War activities associated
with urban conflict not presently available at Camp Lejeune and increase
combat readiness of Marines to answer the current terrorist threat in the
United States and around the world. The latter capabilities will also
increase the difficulty of employing supporting arms (air/ground/sea-based
weapon systems) in a Three Block War scenario and thereby; increase the
training value for the combined arms force.
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,1200216496M 17945
MOUT Enhancements
NAVY 2008FY
P1063
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67001(KA)
(BASE WIDE-MISCEL)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1641391C
The current MOUT facility (32 buildings) was developed in the early 1990's
to provide an environment for teaching small unit basic urban combat
tactics and techniques. The current MOUT is a series of fixed, single and
multi-story building with defined interiors. The layout of the structures
provides the Marine a small cityscape environment with open skyline.
Unfortunately, its lack of depth leads to easy familiarization with
landmarks both inside the MOUT and beyond. The current MOUT does not
contain sufficient visual obstacles to teach the Marine how to fight and
maneuver in an urban cityscape area. These negative features -- a small
training facility, structures with fixed interiors, and ease of orientation
- lead to a level of complacency within the Marines who have trained there
several times before. (And, since MOUT training is a perishable and highly
desired skill, almost all the infantry Marines at Camp Lejeune have trained
there many times before.) This problem of familiarization and Camp
Lejeune's inability to provide an urban canyon texture to the MOUT area is
not just limited to ground unit training; mechanized and air units are
limited as well by the small size, lack of canyon texture, and facility
sustainability concerns.
Based on training and experiments by the MCWL during Urban Warrior and
Project Metropolis, a Training Facilities Summary Report was generated for
the Marine Corps. Although in the draft stage, it identifies inadequacies
with the training facilities at Camp Lejeune. In that report, Camp
Lejeune's MOUT Facility is identified as inadequate for company sized
combined arms task force operations and the conduct of convoy operations.
It also provides little challenge for close air support, no chance for
surprise when conducting force-on-force operations against a live OPFOR.
Additionally, the MOUT provides little, if any, maneuver space for
mechanized/air support training, does not have "urban canyons", and has
little effect on communication and navigation skills. As an end result,
the existing urban area facilities inadvertently provide a "false dominion"
feeling for the Marines during training exercises by not providing all the
environmental challenges the Marines will later face in a true urban combat
situation.
Recent U.S. combat efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan reinforce our critical
need for upgrading our ability to conduct successful military operations in
urban areas. Without this project Marines will continue to train in
inadequate facilities necessary to meet the current terrorist threat on the
United States and around the world therefore increasing casualties in time
of conflicts.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,1200216496M 17945
MOUT Enhancements
NAVY 2008FY
P1063
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67001(KA)
(BASE WIDE-MISCEL)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1651391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,1200216496M 17945
MOUT Enhancements
NAVY 2008FY
P1063
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Collaterial Equipment
NMCI Seats
O&MMC
OPN
2009
2009
894
22
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
Larry Brant 910-451-1833Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
NA
$600
$550
$50
12/2007
10/2007
10/2009
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15%
$350
$250
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
M67001(KA)
(BASE WIDE-MISCEL)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1661391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,1200216496M 17945
MOUT Enhancements
NAVY 2008FY
P1063
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Blank Page
M67001(KA)
(BASE WIDE-MISCEL)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1671391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
BACHELORS ENLISTED QUARTERS
(97,844 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (969
SF)
BEQ 1 (48,438 SF)
BEQ 2 (48,438 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
9,090
90
4,500
4,500
3,467.2
1,761.15
1,761.15
17,730
(310)
(7,930)
(7,930)
(620)
(270)
(220)
(450)
8,340
(1,090)
(310)
(2,600)
(3,520)
(540)
(280)
26,070
1,300
27,370
1,560
28,930
1,040
29,970
29,970
(3,669)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
29,9700216496M 72124
Bachelors Enlisted Quarters
NAVY 2008FY
P1087
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
CAMP LEJEUNE.
M67001(DA)
(HADNOT POINT)
Construct two multi-story BEQs with interior and exterior reinforced
concrete masonry walls, brick masonry exterior veneer, reinforced concrete
slab and standing seam metal roof. Project will provide adequate billeting
facilities for Marines residing in the Hadnot Point area of MCB Camp
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1681391C
Hadnot Point currently has a total of 52 room-configured barracks, 33 of
which are the 3-2-1 configuration and 19 of which are 2x2 configuration.
Based upon current planning criteria, these barracks provide a total
inventory of 10,666 adequate manspaces. Military loading projections for
Hadnot Point equate to a billeting requirement of 13,662 manspaces. Total
This project supports the Commandant of the Marine Corps goal of achieving
the 2X0 standard by 2012 by providing adequate and efficiently configured
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (BEQs) for our enlisted Marines.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Provide facility support infrastructure to those Enlisted Marines in the
Hadnot Point area of MCB Camp Lejeune. P1087 provides a barracks with all
associated utility, road and security upgrades.
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
29,9700216496M 72124
Bachelors Enlisted Quarters
NAVY 2008FY
P1087
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 9,090
M67001(DA)
(HADNOT POINT)
Lejeune. Construction will consist of 200 two-person rooms with semi-
private bathrooms and walk-in closets. Special construction features
include pile foundations with reinforced concrete footings. Sustainable
features will be included in the design, development, and construction of
the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and
Executive Orders. Built in equipment includes a fire pump with generator
backup, and two ADA certified elevators. Electrical systems include fire
alarms, and area lighting. Mechanical systems include fire protection
systems, HVAC system, plumbing, sanitary sewer, and steam distribution.
Information systems include CATV, LAN, telephone, and data communication
systems. This project will require 5 NMCI seats. Supporting facilities
include site and utility connections. Paving and Site improvements include
road extension, bridging over wetlands, recreation areas, sidewalks,
parking and access driveways, signage, storm water management retention
pond, site fill to stabilize and improve site drainage and accessibility,
and landscaping. Also includes Technical Operating Manuals, Anti-
Terrorism/Force Protection features m67001 and necessary environmental
mitigation.
Rooms: 200 two-person rooms.
Intended grade use: 272 E1s-E3s, 46 E-4s, 18 E5s.
Total: 336 Persons.
Maximum utilization: 400 E1s-E3s.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1691391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
area billeting deficiency for Hadnot Point equates to approximately 3,000
manspaces. Due to the above-mentioned billeting deficiencies, this Command
has no option other than to billet the AT battalion in three inadequate
barracks located in the French Creek area of Camp Lejeune (FC304, FC305,
and FC306). These facilities, which have previously been categorized as
"Emergency Troop Billeting," do not meet Minimum Standards of Adequacy
(MSA) as defined in the BEQ Campaign Plan of January 1999. These three
identical structures are all configured with four-man rooms and gangheads.
Use of these facilities to billet bachelor enlisted permanent party
personnel is inconsistent with goals to eliminate inadequate room
configured/ganghead barracks as outlined in the Marine Corps Bachelor
Housing Master Plan of 15 October 2002.
The Marine Corps Bachelor Housing Master Plan goal of eliminating all
inadequate room configured/ganghead barracks will not be achieved. Marines
in the Hadnot Point area will continue to be billeted in inadequate
barracks. Traffic circulation problems in the French Creek and Hadnot
Point areas will continue to cause safety concerns and delays in commute
time. Loss of facilities previously categorized as Emergency Troop Housing
will severely restrict the Base's ability to billet mobilized reserve
forces.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
29,9700216496M 72124
Bachelors Enlisted Quarters
NAVY 2008FY
P1087
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
$450
$350
$100
08/2006
01/2007
03/2007
10%
15%
$250
$200
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
M67001(DA)
(HADNOT POINT)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1701391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
29,9700216496M 72124
Bachelors Enlisted Quarters
NAVY 2008FY
P1087
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Collateral Equipment
NMCI Connection Cost
O&MMC
OPN
2009
2009
3,608
61
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
W. L. Brant 910-451-3034Activity POC: Phone No:
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
02/2008
11/2007
06/2009
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
2006 R&M Conducted ($000): 11,5082007 R&M Conducted ($000): 5,903
54,740
C. FY D. FY E. Future R&M Requirements ($000):
M67001(DA)
(HADNOT POINT)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1711391
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
MARSOC SPECIAL OPS SUPPORT
FACILITIES (45,876 SF)
ARMORY (22,744 SF)
WEAPONS CLEANING (4,306 SF)
MWD KENNEL (6,297 SF)
EOD FACILITY (5,866 SF)
STORAGE FACILITY (797 SF)
CLASSIFIED MATTER INCINERATOR
FACILITY (409 SF)
SMALL ARMS MAGAZINE (3,003 SF)
WATER DISTRIBUTION BUILDING
(2,002 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (452
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
4,262
2,113
400
585
545
74
38
279
186
42
1,584.36
954.65
1,543.17
1,918.46
1,081.54
1,753.58
2,646.26
1,459.39
3,467.2
7,570
(3,350)
(380)
(900)
(1,050)
(80)
(70)
(740)
(270)
(150)
(290)
(110)
(140)
(40)
11,320
(580)
(3,620)
(2,510)
(2,630)
(480)
(150)
(1,350)
18,890
940
19,830
1,130
20,960
760
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
21,7200216496M 14345
MARSOC Special Ops Support
Facilities
NAVY 2008FY
P1183
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67001(HA)
(RIFLE RANGE)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1721391C
Adequate and efficiently configured EOD Operations and Training Facility
for conducting explosive ordnance operation and training requirements. This
facility will include administrative space, security area for document
REQUIREMENT:
This project will provide an armory, weapons cleaning area, military
working dog kennel, small arms magazine, explosive ordnance disposal
facilities, water distribution facility and small craft floating pier in
support of the newly established Marine Special Operations Command (MARSOC)
that will be located aboard Camp Lejeune.
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
21,720
21,720
(1,150)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
21,7200216496M 14345
MARSOC Special Ops Support
Facilities
NAVY 2008FY
P1183
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 4,262
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
CAMP LEJEUNE.
M67001(HA)
(RIFLE RANGE)
This project constructs multi-story and single-story training facilities on
pile foundations with concrete floors, and concrete masonry unit (CMU)
walls with brick veneer. Built-in equipment includes standing seam metal
roof, a bullet trap and fire suppression systems. Information systems
include wiring for telephone and local area network (LAN). Technical
Operating Manuals and Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) features are
also included. Supporting facilities work includes site and building
utility connections (water, sanitary and storm sewer, electrical,
telephone, and LAN). Special construction features include pile
foundations with reinforced concrete footings. Electrical systems include
electrical distribution, transformer, and area lighting. Mechanical systems
include plumbing, compressed air, vacuum system for lead particulate
removal, HVAC, wet pipe sprinkler system, and lightning protection. Paving
and site improvements include culverts, roads, parking lots, and building
and roadway signage. Site preparations include earthwork, security fencing
and gates, and environmental protection. Buildings RR238 and RR239 will be
demolished. Environmental mitigation will be included. Sustainable
features will be included in the design, development, and construction of
the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and
executive orders.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1731391C
September 2006
12. Supplemental Data:
The Secretary of Defense directed the standup of a Marine Corps operational
component of the United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) as a
counterpart to the existing Navy, Army and Air Force Special Operations
component commands. USSOCOM has been charged by the President and by the
Secretary of Defense with the lead on the Global War on Terrorism. Marine
Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC) officially stood up on 24
February 2006 as the newest arm of USSOCOM without benefit of facilities to
specifically support any aspect of this highbred mission assignment for
personnel, equipment, headquarters, operational development, mission
emulation or component security. Obtaining adequate facilities are
paramount to fully develop this extremely complex and demanding MARSOC
capability.
Facilities for the special operational support of MARSOC do not exist. The
MARSOC compound will be completly secure and self serving. Currently Camp
Lejeune can not adequatly accomodate the requirements of Special Operations
Command component.
If these MILCON requirements are not met Camp Lejeune will not be able to
support the mandate of the Secretary of Defense and the guidance of HQMC to
establish the MARSOC's standup at Camp Lejeune. The Marine Corps would have
to seek another location to base this command, or respond to the Secretary
of Defense that they are unable to meet the requirement to fully support
the stand-up MARSOC.
storage, workshop and maintenance area, equipment storage, personnel and
classroom spaces, an armory and weapons cleaning area to secure, preserve,
and maintain crew served weapons, small arms, optical/night vision
equipment, a dog kennel with food preparation area, work/treatment area,
duty room, storage, dog training areas, a classified matter incinerator for
document disposal, and a small arms magazine for ammunition storage during
training. The project will also construct a water distribution facility to
serve the compound and surrounding areas. Also a small water-craft
floating pier will be constructed to adequately serve the newly established
MARSOC.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
21,7200216496M 14345
MARSOC Special Ops Support
Facilities
NAVY 2008FY
P1183
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started 09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
M67001(HA)
(RIFLE RANGE)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1741391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
No
January 2007
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
21,7200216496M 14345
MARSOC Special Ops Support
Facilities
NAVY 2008FY
P1183
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Collateral Equipment
ISMT Targeting Systems
NMCI Seats
O&MMC
O&MMC
OPN
2009
2009
2009
830
250
70
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
W.L. Brant (910)451-5925Activity POC: Phone No:
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
No
$550
$450
$100
04/2008
12/2007
12/2009
15%
$400
$150
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
M67001(HA)
(RIFLE RANGE)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1751391
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
MARSOC TRAINING FACILITIES
INDOOR SMALL ARMS RANGE
SHOOTHOUSE (5,005 SF)
URBAN TRAINER (7,352 SF)
DECONTAMINATION FACILITY
(1,259 SF)
OBSTACLE COURSE
BREACHER FACILITY (1,475 SF)
QUICK REACTION RANGE
RELOCATE TARGET SHEDS (10,000
SF)
ISMT (2,885 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS RM (205 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
LS
EA
m2
m2
m2
EA
m2
EA
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
1,329
465
683
117
1
137
1
929
268
19
1,136.8
1,283.09
2,173.79
1,611.03
47,670.38
1,230.64
537,397.42
1,471.77
2,166.75
3,467.2
7,180
(1,510)
(600)
(1,480)
(190)
(50)
(170)
(540)
(1,370)
(580)
(70)
(450)
(110)
(50)
(10)
3,760
(270)
(1,080)
(340)
(1,460)
(230)
(70)
(210)
(100)
10,940
550
11,490
650
12,140
440
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
12,5900216496M 17150
MARSOC Training Facilities
NAVY 2008FY
P1185
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67001(HA)
(RIFLE RANGE)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1761391C
REQUIREMENT:
This project will provide an indoor small arms range, shoothouse, urban
trainer, decontamination facility, obstacle course, breacher facility,
quick reaction range, indoor simulation marksmanship trainer, and relocate
existing target sheds, in support of the newly established Marine Special
Operations Command (MARSOC) that will be located aboard Camp Lejeune.
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
12,580
12,590
(146)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
12,5900216496M 17150
MARSOC Training Facilities
NAVY 2008FY
P1185
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 2,618
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
CAMP LEJEUNE.
M67001(HA)
(RIFLE RANGE)
This project constructs multi-story and single-story training facilities on
pile foundations with concrete floors, and concrete masonry unit (CMU)
walls with brick veneer. Built-in equipment includes standing seam metal
roof, a bullet trap and fire suppression systems. Information systems
include wiring for telephone and local area network (LAN). Technical
Operating Manuals and Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) features are
also included. Supporting facilities work includes site and building
utility connections (water, sanitary and storm sewer, electrical,
telephone, and LAN). Special construction features include pile
foundations with reinforced concrete footings. Electrical systems include
electrical distribution, transformer, and area lighting. Mechanical systems
include plumbing, compressed air, vacuum system for lead particulate
removal, HVAC, wet pipe sprinkler system, and lightning protection. Paving
and site improvements include culverts, roads, parking lots, and building
and roadway signage. Site preparations include earthwork, security fencing
and gates, and environmental protection. Buildings RR238 and RR239 will be
demolished. Environmental mitigation will be included. Sustainable
features will be included in the design, development, and construction of
the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and
executive orders.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1771391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
The Secretary of Defense directed the standup of a Marine Corps operational
component of the United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) as a
counterpart to the existing Navy, Army and Air Force Special Operations
component commands. USSOCOM has been charged by the President and by the
Secretary of Defense with the lead on the Global War on Terrorism. Marine
Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC) officially stood up on 24
February 2006 as the newest arm of USSOCOM without benefit of facilities to
specifically support any aspect of this highbred mission assignment for
personnel, equipment, headquarters, operational development, mission
emulation or component security. Obtaining adequate facilities are
paramount to fully develop this extremely complex and demanding MARSOC
capability.
Existing facilities at Camp Lejeune can not handle the increased population
nor will they provide the secure compound needed to train MARSOC Marines.
Camp Lejeune training courses are near capacity at it is. The addition of
1900 MARSOC Marines will only cripple training standards and regimins if
additional training facilities are not constructed.
If these MILCON requirements are not met Camp Lejeune will not be able to
support the mandate of the Secretary of Defense and the guidance of HQMC to
establish the MARSOC standup at Camp Lejeune. The Marine Corps would have
to seek another location to base this command, or respond to the Secretary
of Defense that they are unable to meet the requirement to fully support
the stand-up MARSOC
Adequate and efficiently configured training facilities to support the
newly established MARSOC. MARSOC training requirements are intense in
nature and all facilities constructed have to adequatly meet mission
standards and needs.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
12,5900216496M 17150
MARSOC Training Facilities
NAVY 2008FY
P1185
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started 09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15% (E) Percent completed as of
M67001(HA)
(RIFLE RANGE)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1781391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
12,5900216496M 17150
MARSOC Training Facilities
NAVY 2008FY
P1185
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Collateral Equipment
NMCI Seats
O&MMC
OPN
2009
2009
59
88
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
W.L. Brant (910)451-5925Activity POC: Phone No:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
No
$600
$450
$150
06/2008
02/2008
12/2009
$450
$150
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
M67001(HA)
(RIFLE RANGE)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1791391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
MARSOC FITNESS CENTER/TRAINING
POOL (37,642 SF)
FITNESS CENTER (24,542 SF)
COMBAT TRAINING POOL (13,000
SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (100
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
3,497.05
2,280
1,207.75
9.3
1,869.96
2,988.01
3,463.73
9,410
(4,260)
(3,610)
(30)
(1,220)
(120)
(90)
(80)
3,190
(450)
(1,100)
(410)
(570)
(370)
(220)
(30)
(40)
12,600
630
13,230
750
13,980
500
14,480
14,480
(1,037)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,4800216496M 74044
MARSOC Fitness Center/Training
Pool
NAVY 2008FY
P1186
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
CAMP LEJEUNE.
M67001(HA)
(RIFLE RANGE)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1801391C
Adequate fitness facility and training pool in support of MARSOC personnel
working at the Stone Bay area of Camp Lejeune. Training will be of an
intense nature, typical of other Special Forces commands. Close proximity
REQUIREMENT:
This project constructs an indoor fitness center and a training pool in
support of MARSOC military personnel to be stationed at Stone Bay.
Military Construction is required to support SecDef-mandated MARSOC
initiatives recently promulgated as a result of the Marine Corps ever
increasing role in the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT).
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,4800216496M 74044
MARSOC Fitness Center/Training
Pool
NAVY 2008FY
P1186
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 3,497
M67001(HA)
(RIFLE RANGE)
Construct a Fitness Center and Training Pool with reinforced concrete
foundation and floors, structural steel framing, masonry walls, and
standing seam metal roof. Fitness Center will consist of a
basketball/volleyball court, spectator seating, fitness and aerobic areas,
racket ball and handball courts, multipurpose room, staff support spaces,
lockers for men and women, lobby, utility spaces and administrative space.
Training Pool will include an indoor pool, classrooms, administrative
space, storage rooms, filtration and mechanical spaces, male and female
locker rooms, and public bathrooms. Sustainable principles will be
integrated into the design, development and construction of the project in
accordance with Executive Order 13123. Built in equipment includes standing
seam roof, lockers, benches, sauna, bleachers, scoreboards, pool filters
and heater, basketball goals and overhead gantry crane. Information systems
will be included. Supporting facilities work includes site and building
utility connections (water, sanitary sewer, electrical, telephone, Local
Area Network, and Cable Television). Special Construction Features include
pile foundations. Electrical systems include fire alarms, exterior site
and building lighting and a mass notification system. Mechanical systems
include plumbing, fire protection systems, heating ventilation and air
conditioning. Paving and site improvements, and site preparations,
include improvements to access roads complete with pavement striping,
directional signage, concrete sidewalks, curbs and gutters, paved and
lighted parking, earthwork, grading, landscaping, and storm water
management. Also includes technical operating manuals, Anti-
Terrorism/Force Protection features, and demolition of SRR57 Outdoor
Volleyball Court, RR56 General Storage, SRR58 Outdoor Combination Court,
RR8 Gymnasium, SRR59 Outdoor Handball Court, SRR101 Picnic Shelter, SRR53
Steam Valve House and associated asphalt, fencing, and concrete sidewalks.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1811391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
The Secretary of Defense directed the standup of a Marine Corps operational
component of the United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) as a
counterpart to the existing Navy, Army and Air Force Special Operations
component commands. USSOCOM has been charged by the President and by the
Secretary of Defense with the lead on the Global War on Terrorism. Marine
Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC) officially stood up on 24
February 2006 as the newest arm of USSOCOM without benefit of facilities to
specifically support any aspect of this highbred mission assignment for
personnel, equipment, headquarters, operational development, mission
emulation or component security. Obtaining adequate facilities are
paramount to fully develop this extremely complex and demanding MARSOC
capability.
There is currently no fitness center and training pool in the Stone Bay
area of Camp Lejeune. Fitness and under water training will be of great
importance to the MARSOC personnel. Under water training will be very
intense in nature and current training pools at Camp Lejeune are in high
demand by current tenants.
Without these facilities, Marines will have to travel off base or to other
areas of Camp Lejeune to get the needed physical fitness and water survival
training required for their special operation mission. This travel would
impair training effectiveness, supervision capabilities, and workforce
efficiency.
to the MARSOC compound will allow for an efficient training schedule and
better allow MARSOC personnel the intense training and education they
require.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,4800216496M 74044
MARSOC Fitness Center/Training
Pool
NAVY 2008FY
P1186
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
09/2005
01/2007
08/2007
10%
15% (E) Percent completed as of
M67001(HA)
(RIFLE RANGE)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1821391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,4800216496M 74044
MARSOC Fitness Center/Training
Pool
NAVY 2008FY
P1186
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Collateral Equipment Fitness Center
Collateral Equipment Pool
METS Device (Dunker)
NMCI workstations
O&MMC
O&MMC
PMC
OPN
2009
2009
2009
2009
167
50
750
70
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
W.L. Brant (910) 451-1833Activity POC: Phone No:
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
$550
$450
$100
04/2008
01/2008
10/2009
$400
$150
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
M67001(HA)
(RIFLE RANGE)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1831391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
MARSOC COMMUNITY SUPPORT
FACILITIES (18,546 SF)
FIRE STATION (14,456 SF)
LOCATION EXCHANGE (3,498 SF)
TELECOMMUNTION ROOM (301 SF)
POST OFFICE (291 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
1,723
1,343
325
28
27
1,844.21
1,332.05
3,467.2
1,427.52
3,640
(2,480)
(430)
(100)
(40)
(420)
(50)
(30)
(90)
4,330
(210)
(1,020)
(1,280)
(1,290)
(470)
(30)
(30)
7,970
400
8,370
480
8,850
320
9,170
9,170
(648)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
9,1700216496M 73083
MARSOC Community Support
Facilities
NAVY 2008FY
P1187
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
CAMP LEJEUNE.
M67001(HA)
(RIFLE RANGE)
Construct single-story CMU buildings on pile foundations with structural
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1841391C
The Secretary of Defense directed the standup of a Marine Corps operational
component of the United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) as a
counterpart to the existing Navy, Army and Air Force Special Operations
Efficiently configured community support facilities to include a location
exchange, post office, and a fire station are needed to support the newly
established MARSOC. Military Construction (MILCON) is required to support
the stand-up of this command.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
To construct community support facilities to include a location exchange,
post office, and fire station in support of the newly established Marine
Special Operations Command (MARSOC) that will be stationed aboard Camp
Lejeune.
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
9,1700216496M 73083
MARSOC Community Support
Facilities
NAVY 2008FY
P1187
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 1,723
M67001(HA)
(RIFLE RANGE)
steel framing, reinforced masonry walls, brick veneer, reinforced concrete
foundation and floors, and standing seam metal roofs. Project will provide
community support facilities for the MARSOC to include a location exchange,
a post office, and a fire station. Special construction features include
pile foundations with reinforced concrete footings. Sustainable design
features will be included in the design, development, and construction of
the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and
Executive Orders. Built-in equipment includes miscellaneous equipment, and
standing seam metal roof. Electrical systems include fire alarms and
energy saving electronic monitoring and control system (EMCS). Mechanical
systems include plumbing, fire protection systems, fire pump and Heating
Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC). Information Systems will include
telephone, Local Area Network (LAN), voice and data communication systems
and secure information systems. Project will require approximately 25 NMCI
seats. Project will include the demolition of five existing married
officers quarters RR39-43. Paving and site improvements include exterior
site and building lighting, paved parking and roadways, sidewalks, storm
water management, environmental protection measures, clearing and grubbing,
earthwork, fill, grading, landscaping, and building and roadway signage.
Also includes Technical Operating Manuals, Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection
features, and necessary environmental mitigation. Sustainable principles
will be integrated into the design, development, and construction of the
project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and
executive orders.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1851391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
component commands. USSOCOM has been charged by the President and by the
Secretary of Defense with the lead on the Global War on Terrorism. Marine
Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC) officially stood up on 24
February 2006 as the newest arm of USSOCOM without benefit of facilities to
specifically support any aspect of this highbred mission assignment for
personnel, equipment, headquarters, operational development, mission
emulation or component security. Obtaining adequate facilities are
paramount to fully develop this extremely complex and demanding MARSOC
capability.
Adequate community support facilities do not currently exist at Camp
Lejeune to meet the MARSOC requirements for a fire station, and a location
exchange. The existing fire station at Stone Bay (RR6) and the existing
location exchange (RR10 - which includes an approximately 300 SF post
office) were both built in the 1940s and are inadequate to support this
additional 1900 + man command.
If these MILCON facilities requirements are not met, Camp Lejeune will not
be able to provide adequate community support facilities to include a
location exchange/post office, and a fire station for 1900 + additional
MARSOC personnel.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
9,1700216496M 73083
MARSOC Community Support
Facilities
NAVY 2008FY
P1187
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
4. Contract award:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
$550
$450
$100
12/2007
08/2006
01/2007
08/2007
10%
15%
$400
$150
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
M67001(HA)
(RIFLE RANGE)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1861391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
9,1700216496M 73083
MARSOC Community Support
Facilities
NAVY 2008FY
P1187
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Basewide Fire Alarm System Upgrade
Collateral Equipment
NMCI Connection Cost
O&MMC
O&MMC
OPN
2008
2008
2008
250
310
88
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
W. L. BRANT 910-451-5812 (DSN 751)Activity POC: Phone No:
5. Construction start:
6. Construction complete:
06/2008
12/2009
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
M67001(HA)
(RIFLE RANGE)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1871391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
BACHELORS ENLISTED QUARTERS,
FRENCH CREEK (99,846 SF)
BEQ BLDG 1 (48,438 SF)
BEQ BLDG 2 (48,438 SF)
WATER DISTRIBUTION BUILDING
(2,002 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (969
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
9,276
4,500
4,500
186
90
1,761.15
1,761.15
1,459.39
3,467.2
18,040
(7,930)
(7,930)
(270)
(310)
(630)
(280)
(220)
(470)
6,130
(1,070)
(1,620)
(1,950)
(750)
(610)
(50)
(80)
24,170
1,210
25,380
1,450
26,830
970
27,800
27,800
(1,339)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
27,8000216496M 72124
Bachelors Enlisted Quarters,
French Creek
NAVY 2008FY
P137
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
CAMP LEJEUNE.
M67001(EA)
(FRENCH CREEK)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1881391C
This project supports the Marine Corps' goal of achieving the 2X0 standard
by 2012.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Construct two "2x0" bachelor enlisted quarters with a total of 200 rooms
for permanent party enlisted personnel working in the French Creek area of
Camp Lejeune.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
27,8000216496M 72124
Bachelors Enlisted Quarters,
French Creek
NAVY 2008FY
P137
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 9,276
M67001(EA)
(FRENCH CREEK)
Construct two multi-story BEQs with interior and exterior reinforced
concrete masonry walls, interior corridors, brick masonry exterior veneer,
reinforced concrete slab and standing seam metal roof. Construction will
consist of 200, two-person rooms with semi-private bath and built-in
closets. Sustainable features will be included in the design, development,
and construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123
and other laws and Executive Orders. Built-in equipment includes a fire
pump with generator backup, fully sprinkled building spaces, and two ADA
certified combination freight/passenger elevators, one per building.
Information systems include LAN, and data and voice communication systems.
Five NMCI service connections/seats per building are required for this
project. Special Construction Features include pile foundations. Electrical
utilities include area lighting, communication, fire alarms and a telephone
system. Mechanical utilities include heating, ventilating, and air
conditioning (HVAC), a wet pipe sprinkler system, underground steam,
sanitary sewer distribution, and an elevated water tank with water
distribution system. Paving and site improvements include recreation
areas, two lighted volleyball courts, two lighted basketball courts,
sidewalks, parking and access driveways, a traffic light, roadway
directional and operational signs, storm water management for overall site
drainage, site fill to stabilize and improve drainage, accessibility and
landscaping. Project also requires the demolition of existing sidewalks,
lighting, and trees occupying project site. Also included are Technical
Operating Manuals, Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features, and
environmental mitigation.
Rooms: 200 two-person rooms (100 rooms per building).
Intended grade use: 272 E1-E3, 46 E-4, 18 E5.
Total: 336 persons.
Maximum utilization: 400 E1-E3.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1891391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
Currently in the French Creek area there are a total of eighteen 3x2x1
room-configured barracks. Based on current planning criteria, these
barracks provide a total inventory of 3,278 manspaces of adequate
billeting. Military loading projections for the French Creek area equate to
a billeting requirement of 4,916 manspaces. Total area billeting
deficiency for French Creek equates to 1,638 manspaces. Due to current
billeting deficiencies, permanent party Marines in some cases are being
billeted without adherence to the Minimum Standards of Adequacy (MSA).
Marines are being overbilleted in the current barracks causing overcrowded
conditions and resulting in the fraying of morale among the occupants.
In addition to the manspace deficiency noted above, some existing barracks
require periodic renovations. In order to accomplish these renovations,
personnel must vacate the BEQs for months at a time, thus producing
additional overcrowded conditions. Assigning Marines of the same small unit
into rooms in one location cannot be accomplished. Unit cohesion below the
battalion level cannot be achieved due to the large deficiency of billeting
spaces that currently exists.
The Minimum Standards of Adequacy (MCO P11000.18) will not be achieved
without construction of this facility. Quality of life for the Marines of
Fleet Marine Force Units occupying the French Creek area will continue to
decline. Morale, retention, and esprit de corps will be greatly be
reduced. Existing BEQ facilities will continue to be heavily used with
little or no down time for scheduled/cyclic maintenance.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
27,8000216496M 72124
Bachelors Enlisted Quarters,
French Creek
NAVY 2008FY
P137
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
Yes
Camp LeJeune MCB
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15%
$250
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
M67001(EA)
(FRENCH CREEK)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1901391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
27,8000216496M 72124
Bachelors Enlisted Quarters,
French Creek
NAVY 2008FY
P137
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Collateral Equipment
NMCI connection cost
O&MMC
OPN
2009
2009
1,279
61
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. Mission requirements, operational
considerations, and location are incompatible with use by other
components.
William Brant 910-451-3034Activity POC: Phone No:
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
$450
$350
$100
04/2008
01/2008
10/2009
$200 (B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
2006 R&M Conducted ($000): 11,5082007 R&M Conducted ($000): 5,903
54,740
C. FY D. FY E. Future R&M Requirements ($000):
M67001(EA)
(FRENCH CREEK)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1911391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS, NEW
RIVER (83,173 SF)
BEQ (82,344 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (829
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
7,727
7,650
77
1,785.33
3,467.2
15,010
(13,660)
(270)
(310)
(220)
(190)
(360)
4,590
(930)
(410)
(1,240)
(1,520)
(490)
19,600
980
20,580
1,170
21,750
780
22,530
22,530
(799)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
22,5300216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, New
River
NAVY 2008FY
P634
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION NEW RIVER.
M67001(LA)
(MCAS NEW RIVER)
Construct one three-story building on pile foundation with reinforced
concrete slab,
structural steel framing, exterior brick and masonry veneer, interior
concrete masonry
unit (CMU) block walls and standing seam metal roof system to match
adjacent buildings.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1921391C
This project supports the Marine Corps' goal of achieving the 2X0 standard
by 2012. This project is needed to provide adequate billeting for enlisted
personnel assigned to MCAS New River, NC. This project also supports the
Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) goal to build out to 90% using the 2x0
configuration.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Provide 360 living spaces for bachelor enlisted personnel (180 2-person
rooms) using the 2x0 Quality of Life (QOL) standard room design for
permanent party personnel to house up to 360 enlisted personnel stationed
at MCAS New River, NC.
(Current Mission)
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
22,5300216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, New
River
NAVY 2008FY
P634
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 7,727
M67001(LA)
(MCAS NEW RIVER)
Provide 180 rooms with semi-private baths in the standard 2x0 room
configuration.
Community and service core areas consist of laundry facilities, lounges,
administrative
offices, housekeeping areas and public restrooms. Built in equipment
includes an elevator and fire booster pump. Also includes Technical
Operating Manuals and Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features. Electrical
systems include fire alarms, energy saving Electronic Monitoring and
Control System (EMCS), and information systems. Supporting facilities work
includes site and building utility connections (water, sanitary and storm
sewers, electrical, telephone, Local Area network (LAN), and cable
television CATV)). Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire protection
systems, heating ventilation and air conditioning. Paving and site
improvements include paved parking, sidewalks, multi-purpose rooms, outdoor
recreation facilities/courts, roadways access, privately owned vehicle
(POV) parking, earthwork, grading, and landscaping. Sustainable
principles will be included into the design, development, and construction
of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and
executive orders.
Rooms: 180 two-person rooms
Maximum Utilization: 180 E4-E5, or 360 E1-E3.
Intended Grade Mix: E4-E5.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1931391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
MCAS New River current BEQ's are filled to capacity, requiring the
continuous sending of personnel off base with BAH own right. New River is
843 manspaces short of meeting the "Build to 90%" requirement. After the
completion of replacement project FY05 MCON P630, MCAS New River will be
built out to 68%.
MCAS New River, which has a considerable deficiency of adequate Bachelor
Enlisted Quarters, currently has approximately 501 E1-E5 personnel living
off base on BAH own right. Without this project MCAS New River will
continue to be noncompliant with the FY-98 Quality of Life Requirement, and
will continue sending many E1-E5 off base.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
22,5300216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, New
River
NAVY 2008FY
P634
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Collateral Equipment
NMCI Equipment
O&MMC
OPN
2009
2009
744
55
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
Yes
FY2005 P630 BEQ New River
$450
$150
$300
04/2008
01/2008
10/2009
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15%
$200
$250
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
2006 R&M Conducted ($000): 11,0582007 R&M Conducted ($000): 5,903
C. FY D. FY
M67001(LA)
(MCAS NEW RIVER)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1941391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
22,5300216496M 72124
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, New
River
NAVY 2008FY
P634
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
David Turner 910-449-5401Activity POC: Phone No:
54,740 E. Future R&M Requirements ($000):
M67001(LA)
(MCAS NEW RIVER)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1951391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
AIRCRAFT MAINT HANGAR, NEW RIVER
PHASE 2 (47,167 SF)
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR
PHASE II (46,995 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (172
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
4,382
4,366
16
2,251.34
3,467.2
13,170
(9,830)
(60)
(2,870)
(180)
(110)
(120)
1,910
(400)
(110)
(60)
(820)
(100)
(380)
(40)
15,080
750
15,830
900
16,730
600
17,330
17,330
(35)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,3300216496M 21105
Aircraft Maint Hangar, New
River Phase 2
NAVY 2008FY
P651
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION NEW RIVER.
M67001(LA)
(MCAS NEW RIVER)
Construct a multi-story aircraft maintenance hangar addition, to provide
hangar bay, shop space, flight line operations, and maintenance functions
in support of the V-22 aircraft squadrons. The hangar addition will join
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1961391C
Existing Aircraft Maintenence Hangar AS504 is scheduled to be demolished as
part of P526. This project (P-651) is the second phase of the replacement
of AS504. It includes construction of highbay space to house three fully
spread and one folded V-22 aircraft, crew and equipment spaces, and
administration spaces, which will provide VMMT 204 (V-22 Training Squadron)
with adequate space designed to accomplish their mission.
Provide adequate and efficiently configured facilities to accommodate one
MV-22 squadron with 12 aircraft to include hangar bay, crew and equipment
spaces, administration spaces, ready room, and maintenance shops.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
This project is Phase II and constructs an aircraft maintenance hangar
modified type I module to be added to Phase I, FY07 MCON P-526. This
hangar will provide maintenance, crew and equipment, and administration
spaces for one operational squadron.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,3300216496M 21105
Aircraft Maint Hangar, New
River Phase 2
NAVY 2008FY
P651
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 4,382
M67001(LA)
(MCAS NEW RIVER)
the existing aircraft parking apron, and will include a multi-story
crew/equipment/admin area at the rear of the hangar bay. Primary facility
will be steel frame construction with suspended cantilever trusses
supporting the hangar bay roof. Roof will be a standing seam metal roof
over rigid insulation on steel deck supported by steel joists. Second
floor framing will be concrete on steel floor decking. Exterior walls will
be metal siding on the hangar bay and concrete masonry on the
operations/admin. area, with thermally efficient windows and doors. Ground
floor will be slab on grade with embedded grounding grid and floor drainage
system in the hangar bay. Sustainable features will be included in the
design, development, and construction of this project in accordance with
Executive Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders. Electrical
systems will include fire protection (fire pump, sprinkler and AFFF),
electrical distribution, lighting, and communication features to include
NALCOMIS and weather vision systems. Mechanical utilities include water,
sewer, gas distribution, air conditioning, and connection to existing oil
water separator. Site preparations include excavation, grading, pavement,
access roadway,and storm water removal. Demolition of existing aircraft
paving in construction area is included. Site improvements include new
aircraft paving, flightline fencing and POV parking. Built-in equipment
includes an elevator and a 5 ton bridge crane. Pile foundations are also
needed for construction.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1971391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
Due to the demolition of the severely inadequate hangar AS504 and the size
and number of V-22s operating at MCAS New River, this Air Station will be
severely deficient in hangar space and will not be able to provide the
required hangar spaces to the permanently based helicopter squadrons.
Squadrons are currently hot-racking hangar bay spaces. When all squadrons
are present, one squadron will be left without hangar spaces to include
hangar bay, crew and equipment spaces, administration spaces, ready room,
and maintenance shops.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,3300216496M 21105
Aircraft Maint Hangar, New
River Phase 2
NAVY 2008FY
P651
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
NMCI Connections PMC 2009 35
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
N/A
$700
$550
$150
04/2008
01/2008
10/2009
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15%
$300
$400
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
M67001(LA)
(MCAS NEW RIVER)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1981391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
17,3300216496M 21105
Aircraft Maint Hangar, New
River Phase 2
NAVY 2008FY
P651
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
David Turner 910-449-5401Activity POC: Phone No:
M67001(LA)
(MCAS NEW RIVER)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 1991391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
JET ENGINE TEST CELL, NEW RIVER
(9,149 SF)
JET ENGINE TEST CELL (8,321
SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (829
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
INSPECTIONS, TESTING, AND
CERTIFICATIONS
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
850
773
77
12,411.42
3,649.68
10,980
(9,590)
(280)
(870)
(160)
(30)
(50)
1,690
(100)
(290)
(130)
(240)
(30)
(10)
(890)
12,670
630
13,300
760
14,060
510
14,570
14,570
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,5700216496M 21181
Jet Engine Test Cell, New River
NAVY 2008FY
P670
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION NEW RIVER.
M67001(LA)
(MCAS NEW RIVER)
Construct a Jet Engine Test Cell using steel reinforced masonry walls with
reinforced concrete slab on a pile-supported foundation and standing seam
metal roof system. The facility consists of four engine test cell
enclosures, four central control rooms with sound suppression, an engine
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2001391C
MCAS New River has an intermediate engine maintenance facility which
supports squadrons throughout the United States Marine Corps. MALS 26 and
MALS 29 operate expeditionary test cells located between the ramps and
hangars of the operating squadrons and the active runways. NAVAIR has
stated " weather limits the running of engines, especially at New River by
Adequate facilities to support post-maintenance, out-of-airframe testing of
turboshaft engines used by aircraft based at and serviced at MCAS New
River. An acoustically attenuated enclosure with an exhaust system is
required to abate noise and allow year round testing.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Provide one indoor facility which has the capability of testing, out-of-
airframe engines. There are four engine types required by MALS 26 and MALS
29 in their effort to meet fleet requirements (T58, T64, T400, T700).
Facility will also test Auxiliary Power Units.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,5700216496M 21181
Jet Engine Test Cell, New River
NAVY 2008FY
P670
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 850
M67001(LA)
(MCAS NEW RIVER)
prep/maintenance room with sound suppressing doors leading to the test cell
enclosures, two combination offices/tool rooms, ADA restrooms, and a lean-
to for APU tests. Built-in equipment includes the engine test support
items: engine air start, fuel supply system, facility instrumentation,
four 2-ton monorail cranes, 400 HZ power, lubrication skid containment,
electrical start system, control/communication system, and engine exhaust
system to abate noise. Fire protection includes: fire detection system, wet
sprinkler, and the special engine water spray extinguishing system.
Information systems include voice, data, and LAN communications. Special
Construction Features include sound reduction doors, soundproofing of
walls, grounding grid for lightning, lightning protection for building,
pile foundation, and test, evaluation, and operational certification of
cell. Supporting facilities include: LAN, water, sanitary sewer, sewer
lift station, industrial waste water collection system, 5,000 gallon fuel
tank, eyewash stations, bermed areas, and GOV parking. Electrical utilities
include primary and secondary electrical service, a 500 KVA transformer,
exterior lighting, and telephone service. Mechanical utilities include air
conditioning for the control room, offices, and maintenance room; all
remaining spaces have heating and ventilation. This project will demolish
buildings AS520 and AS 522. Sustainable features will be included in the
design, development, and construction for the project in accordance with
Executive Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2011391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
about 66% of the time."
The existing outdoor Jet Engine Test System is limited to operation only
during daylight hours with favorable weather and wind conditions. High
wind (10 knots +), high temperatures, rain, or weather cold enough to cause
icing severely limits MCAS New River's ability to perform outdoor testing.
NAVAIR has stated " weather limits the running of engines, especially at
New River by about 66% of the time." Currently periodic inspections often
reveal broken or deteriorated hardware, plumbing, and cabling due to
weather exposure that usually requires extensive repair and replacement of
parts that are no longer produced. The run cabs, fuel skid, lube skid, and
mounting trailers suffer from weather exposure resulting in corrosion and
contamination. In 2002 alone, New River had two lightning strikes on the
test cell pad that resulted in all of the test cells to be rendered
inoperative for 60-90 day periods after each occurance resulting in nearly
one half of a year that New River was without engine test capability.
Their operation is directly impacted by the weather and production can be
interrupted for weeks by lengthy periods of inclement weather. Air Station
orders also limit night testing from 2200 to 0700 hours, due to noise
complaints. Jet engines are maintained for each specific airframe and
spare engines are usually not available. Over 400 engines may be tested
annually.
Due to insufficient daytime conditions to test repaired engines, the number
of safe operational aircraft will continue to be reduced and mission
readiness will continue to suffer. Each squadron will continue to lose
approximately 60 plus days per year due to downtime associated with weather
and repairs. Additionally, the expeditionary cells and the operators are
at risk due to the weather. The cells have been struck by lightning seven
times in the past ten years resulting in thousands of dollars of destroyed
equipment and test cell downtime.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,5700216496M 21181
Jet Engine Test Cell, New River
NAVY 2008FY
P670
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started 09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15% (E) Percent completed as of
M67001(LA)
(MCAS NEW RIVER)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2021391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,5700216496M 21181
Jet Engine Test Cell, New River
NAVY 2008FY
P670
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
David D. Turner 910-449-5401Activity POC: Phone No:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
Yes
N/A
$625
$500
$125
03/2008
12/2007
03/2009
$250
$375
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
M67001(LA)
(MCAS NEW RIVER)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2031391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
FIELD MEDICAL SERVICES SCHOOL
(27,652 SF)
ACADEMIC INSTRUCTION FACILITY
(27,383 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (269
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
2,569
2,544
25
1,702.57
3,467.2
5,500
(4,330)
(90)
(910)
(80)
(60)
(30)
1,530
(150)
(270)
(220)
(460)
(370)
(60)
7,030
350
7,380
420
7,800
280
8,080
8,080
(277)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,0800206496M 17110
Field Medical Services School
NAVY 2008FY
P828
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
CAMP LEJEUNE.
M67001(FA)
(MONTFORD POINT)
Construct a two-story Academic Instruction Facility of reinforced concrete
on a pile foundation, with concrete floors, exterior CMU walls with brick
veneer, and standing seam metal roof. Facility will consist of classrooms,
offices, a multi-media production suite, instructor workspace, library,
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2041391C
FMSS currently provides three separate courses of instruction: Field
Medical Service Technicians (FMST) Course, Field Medical Service Officers
(FMSO) Course, and the Chaplain and Religious Program Specialist
Expeditionary Skills Training (CREST) course. The School operates out of
ten badly deteriorated wood frame buildings located at Camp Johnson. These
60-year old structures have exceeded their functional life expectancy and
Provide an adequate and efficiently configured Academic Instruction
Facility for FMSS. The School's mission is to train Navy medical personnel
in field medical techniques, Navy religious ministry personnel in field
ministry techniques, and all personnel in the combat survival skills
necessary to support Marine Forces during military operations. FMSS is one
of eleven formal schools operating under the control of Training and
Education Command (TECOM). The combined annual student throughput of these
three courses is approximately 2,200 students per year.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
This project constructs an Academic Instruction Facility for the Field
Medical Service School (FMSS) to train and prepare Navy medical, dental,
and religious personnel for service in support of Marines forces.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,0800206496M 17110
Field Medical Services School
NAVY 2008FY
P828
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 1,313Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 17,178
M67001(FA)
(MONTFORD POINT)
instructor lounge, student break area, rest rooms, and staff locker room.
Interior will be finished with a combination of tile, carpet, painted CMU
walls, suspended gypsum board and acoustical tile ceilings. Built-in
equipment includes lockers, floor drains and accordion doors in classrooms.
Information systems include LAN, telephone, data communication and voice
communication systems. This project requires 13 NMCI seats. Special
construction features include pile foundation with reinforced concrete
footings. Electrical Utilities include primary and secondary electrical
distribution systems, a pad mounted transformer, and a fire alarm site
connection. Mechanical Utilities include plumbing, HVAC, and wet pipe
sprinkler system. Paving and site improvements include storm water
management, paved and lighted parking lot, concrete sidewalks, landscaping,
relocation of existing outdoor classroom and obstacle course, signage, and
all utility connections. Project also includes technical operating manuals
and environmental mitigation. Sustainable features will be included in the
design, development, and construction for the project in accordance with
Executive Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2051391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
can no longer be economically maintained. The buildings exhibit structural
damage to include differential settling, termite damage, and rotting
timbers. Shingle repairs performed on the roofs' unsound plywood
underlayment have resulted in frequent leaks, leading to numerous class
disruptions. The buildings are poorly insulated and lack adequate heating,
ventilation, and air conditioning. The lack of sufficient head facilities
requires excessively long breaks in instruction time to allow students the
time necessary to cycle through the limited facilities. Structural
restrictions will not allow us to wire the existing facilities to support
modern training technology. Having to function out of ten dispersed and
inadequately configured facilities results in excessive
operations/maintenance costs, and negatively impacts the School's training
schedule due to the wasted time marching students to and from the various
events.
FMSS will continue to operate out of inadequate facilities. Buildings will
continue to deteriorate to a point that their structural stability makes
them totally unserviceable for occupancy. The Base will continue to
experience excessive maintenance, cooling and heating costs. The FMSS
training schedule will continue to suffer due to inadequate heads and the
need to rotate students between an excessive number of buildings. Failure
to consolidate the school classroom and administrative facilities into a
single complex will result in continued low morale, frustration and
negatively impact on the mission to provide Marine operational forces with
trained and qualified medical, dental, and religious professionals.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,0800206496M 17110
Field Medical Services School
NAVY 2008FY
P828
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15% (E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
M67001(FA)
(MONTFORD POINT)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2061391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,0800206496M 17110
Field Medical Services School
NAVY 2008FY
P828
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Collateral Equipment
NMCI Connection Cost
O&MMC
OPN
2010
2009
251
26
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
W. L. BRANT (910)451-3034 DSN 751-
3034
Activity POC: Phone No:
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
$600
$450
$150
04/2008
01/2008
10/2009
$350
$250
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
M67001(FA)
(MONTFORD POINT)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2071390
Scope
21105
21105
Cost
($000)Start
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Storage/Maint Fac
Hangar Renovation, Fac
Upgrades Navy F/A18E/F
Complete
2541 m2
12844 m2
12,110
16,500
Design Status
09/2005
09/2005
8. Projects Requested In This Program
09/2007
05/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(13149 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 2,628,191
29,147
23,000
103,164
28,610
241,940
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:42172
61010
Missile And HE Magazine
Engineering Product Support Facility
1082 m2
3320 m2
9,130
13,870
TOTAL
TOTAL
MCAS CHERRY POINT NC
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation and Location: M00146
28,610
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
23,000
103,164
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
3,054,052
72124
11665
21210
61071
14345
21103
21451
21451
61070
73010
21196
21860
21121
83141
21196
80396 SF
LS
17288 SF
12122 SF
24768 SF
1600 SF
23541 SF
21323 SF
49837 SF
14090 SF
LS
LS
LS
24050 SF
37997 SF
24,124
3,013
3,977
2,109
2,712
10,026
7,530
7,369
15,762
3,030
3,509
4,011
5,815
6,367
3,810
*
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters
Electronics Van Pad
Guided Missiles Integration Facility
Magazine Administration Addition
Armory
Corrosion Control Hangar
MACS2 Operations & Maintenance Facility
Motor Transport and Communications Shop
Administrative Facility Consolidation
EMS/Fire Vehicle Facility
Dehumidified Storage
Ground Support Equipment Shop
MWSS Facility
Hazardous Waste Storage & Transfer Facility
Protected Aircraft Maintenance Storage Fac
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.95
5. Area Const
Cost Index
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
13584
16496
73
77B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 549
507
935
806
40
28
344
459
0
0
750
998
6724
7355
4169
6266
Commandant of the
Marine Corps
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2081390
4. Command
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 32,640
MCAS CHERRY POINT NC
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation and Location: M00146
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
Maintain and operate facilities and provide services and materials to
support the operations of a Marine Aircraft Wing, or units thereof, and
other activities and units as designated by the Commandant of the Marine
Corps in coordination with the Chief of Naval Operations.
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.95
5. Area Const
Cost Index
6,367
Commandant of the
Marine Corps
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2091391
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE
STORAGE/MAINT FAC (27,351 SF)
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR
(17,911 SF)
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP,
WHEELED (6,727 SF)
ORGANIC ASSET WAREHOUSE (1,001
SF)
ELECNX/COMMS MAINT SHOP (1,550
SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (161
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
2,541
1,664
625
93
144
15
2,290.34
1,554.01
975.08
1,994.8
3,467.2
5,940
(3,810)
(970)
(90)
(290)
(50)
(520)
(90)
(60)
(60)
4,590
(370)
(1,370)
(680)
(1,590)
(380)
(110)
(90)
10,530
530
11,060
630
11,690
420
12,110
12,110
(40)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
12,1100206496M 21105
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Storage/Maint Fac
NAVY 2008FY
P122
MCAS CHERRY POINT NCCHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00146
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2101391C
Provide adequate facilities to accommodate UAV maintenance and storage
requirements at MCAS Cherry Point. The VMU-2 mission is to operate and
maintain a UAV system to provide unmanned aerial reconnaissance support to
REQUIREMENT:
This project provides the facilities required to adequately support UAV
operations at Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Cherry Point.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
12,1100206496M 21105
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Storage/Maint Fac
NAVY 2008FY
P122
MCAS CHERRY POINT NCCHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00146
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 2,541
Construct a single-story Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) building on slab on
grade foundation with concrete spread footings, structural steel framing,
standing seam metal roof, and brick veneer exterior. Project provides a new
maintenance and storage facility for the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)
squadron at Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Cherry Point. Construction
includes interior CMU partitions throughout the hangar bay, shops, and
vehicle maintenance/storage areas and gypsum wallboard over metal studs at
office and support areas. Facility will include an aircraft parking apron,
tow zones, hangar storage and maintenance space for 8 UAVs and maintenance
space for four each 7-Ton trucks as well as shop, administrative, and
support spaces. Sustainable principles will be included into the design,
development, and construction of the project in accordance with Executive
Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders. Special construction
features include: a Communication Control Link Station (an elevated area
[Minimum Height: 25 ft above existing site grade] for clear, line-of-site
control from a High-Mobility-Multi-Wheeled-Vehicle (HMMWV) mounted Tracking
and Control Unit); an aircraft washrack; fire pump; and a power check pad.
Built-in equipment includes one emergency generator. Supporting facilities
include site and building utility connections (water, electrical,
telephone, sanitary and storm sewers, and Local Area Network (LAN).
Electrical utilities include electrical distribution, transformer
substation, fire alarm, exterior site and building lighting, information
systems, telephone, and energy saving electronic monitoring and control
system (EMCS). Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire protection system,
heating, ventilation and air-conditioning, runoff oil/water separator, and
sanitary sewer pump station. Paving and site improvements include aircraft
tow way, organizational and private vehicle parking, roads, storm water
drainage, earthwork, grading, landscaping, and the demolition of numerous
existing structures. Project also includes Technical Operating Manuals,
Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features and environmental mitigation.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2111391C
The existing facilities do not adequately accommodate the UAVs and have
numerous safety and code violations. Upon completion of the new
facilities, the existing facilities will be demolished with the exception
of Building 1795. The existing VMU-2 facilities are located in a
relatively remote area northeast of the developed Base core. The VMU-2
unit currently contains 176 personnel in two buildings, and is part of the
Marine Air Control Group 28. The VMU-2 fenced compound consists of a small
training building, an administration building, a motor vehicle maintenance
building, two aircraft maintenance structures with an apron/parking area
and a paved area leading to an aircraft taxi strip connected to the main
runways. Building 249 is a cinder block structure built in 1954. It has
approximately 1,540 square feet and has been rated as inadequate. It is
within a 1,250 ft radius Explosive Safety Quantity Distance (ESQD) Arc for
the Ordnance Staging Area (OSA). The OSA is out of use until demolition of
Building 249. The motor vehicle maintenance building (248) is a metal
structure built in 1954. It has approximately 4,000 square feet but, due
to its configuration, it can house only two HMMWVs or one 7-ton MTVR truck.
The building has inadequate ventilation and operating space and, as a
result, most maintenance is performed outside in the parking area or in a
grass area adjacent to the building.
The aircraft maintenance buildings (1372 & 3405) are sheet metal, and are
approximately 40' x 40', with three sides and an overhead clearance of
approximately 16 feet. One of the structures is used for material and
hazardous material storage. The other structure could contain three UAVs,
but the lack of weather protection makes the structures inadequate for
maintenance and storage. These facilities also have generator sheds (3540
& 3345) associated with them which provided stand-by generator power but
have not been in use for many years.
If this project is not provided, the mission readiness of VMU-2 will
continue to be compromised. The existing facilities are wholly inadequate
for meeting garrison mission requirements and do not provide the support
required to effectively conduct UAV maintenance and support operations.
Secure storage of components is provided in another building requiring the
repair technicians to constantly travel between buildings for parts and
classified repair manuals as no available storage is provided in Bldg 248
for this function. Organic Air/Ground storage for VMU-2 will continue to
the Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF). Facilities are required for
maintenance of the aircraft, as well as for supporting equipment and
vehicles.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
12,1100206496M 21105
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Storage/Maint Fac
NAVY 2008FY
P122
MCAS CHERRY POINT NCCHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00146
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2121391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Bid Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
be improperly stored in insufficient and unsecure 3-sided metal shelters,
exposing the contents to the elements. There have been reported incidents
of theft as a result of no existing lockable storage areas for the gear.
Both metal shelters have leaking roofs and the electrical and lighting
systems in both shelters are inadequate as well. Aircraft maintenance on
the Pioneer will continue to be performed in one of the 2 existing 3-sided
metal shelters. The shelters are not equipped to perform aircraft
maintenance and repair. The existing electrical and lighting systems are
outdated and inadequate for the work being performed on the aircraft. The
roof leaks in these shelters. There is no heat in the building and the
shelters cannot be closed off during the winter months. Insufficient room
is available for the assembly and required periodic Preventative
Maintenance and operational checks required for the aircraft - currently,
only 1 to 2 aircraft in lieu of 4 to 5 aircraft systems can be assembled
for these maintenance and operational checks. The tool room, avionics, and
optics functions are located in another building requiring the aircraft
maintenance & repair technicians to travel to another building to check out
gear and spare parts.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
12,1100206496M 21105
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Storage/Maint Fac
NAVY 2008FY
P122
MCAS CHERRY POINT NCCHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00146
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
N/A
$550
$350
$200
04/2008
02/2008
08/2009
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15%
$350
$200
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2131391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
12,1100206496M 21105
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Storage/Maint Fac
NAVY 2008FY
P122
MCAS CHERRY POINT NCCHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00146
NMCI Connections PMC 2008 40
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
Mr. Rudy Smith DSN 582-4769Activity POC: Phone No:
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested
Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2141391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
12,1100206496M 21105
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Storage/Maint Fac
NAVY 2008FY
P122
MCAS CHERRY POINT NCCHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00146
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2151391
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
HANGAR RENOVATION, FAC UPGRADES
NAVY F/A18E/F (138,250 SF)
TACTICAL OPS FLIGHT TRAINER
(3,897 SF)
HIGH EXPLOSIVE MAGAZINE, TYPE
E (5,823 SF)
RENOVATE HANGAR 130 (123,925
SF)
ORDNANCE OPERATIONS BUILDING
(4,004 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS CENTER (601
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
FLIGHTLINE ELECTRICAL
DISTIBUTION SYSTEM (FLEDS)
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
12,843.8
362
541
11,513
372
55.8
2,507.6
2,390.09
419.51
1,992.8
3,649.68
8,450
(910)
(1,290)
(4,830)
(740)
(200)
(100)
(20)
(330)
(30)
5,900
(980)
(360)
(560)
(1,230)
(320)
(100)
(2,350)
14,350
720
15,070
860
15,930
570
16,500
16,500
(13,005)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
16,5000703676N 21105
Hangar Renovation, Fac Upgrades
Navy F/A18E/F
NAVY 2008FY
P809
MCAS CHERRY POINT NCCHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00146
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2161391C
PROJECT:
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
16,5000703676N 21105
Hangar Renovation, Fac Upgrades
Navy F/A18E/F
NAVY 2008FY
P809
MCAS CHERRY POINT NCCHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00146
11. Requirement:
0 11,512Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 12,843
Renovate Hangar 130 to accommodate two F/A-18 E/F squadrons. Renovations
include reconfiguration of spaces to house maintenance, training, and
administrative functions. The renovation will provide a sensitive
compartmented information facility (SCIF), a classified vault, restricted
access, fire sprinkler system renovation, AFFF fire suppression system
installation, refurbishment of fire main water distribution system,
electrical distribution upgrades, secret Internet protocol routing network
(SIPRNET), NMCI inside and outside infrastructure, plumbing and bathroom
renovations, compressed air distribution upgrades, hangar floor resurfacing
and coating, installation of bird netting, interior and exterior finishes,
recoating of the roof, anti-terrorism measures and site improvements,
including replacement of deteriorated aircraft pavements immediately
adjacent to the hangar.
Aircraft parking apron upgrades to accommodate the F/A-18E will include
installation of Flight Line Electrical Distribution System (FLEDS) with ten
point-of-use 400 Hertz frequency converters and related site work,
including a unit substation transformer, and underground secondary power
distribution to the converters. Existing air-starting system service boxes
and associated compressors and storage tanks will be demolished. The
parking apron will be restriped to accomodate twenty parking spaces for
F/A-18 E/F aircraft.
The project also constructs a single-story operational trainer building of
362 square meters (3,997 sf), to include classroom, raised flooring, high
bay space, sensitive compartmented information facility (SCIF), classified
vault, restricted access, fire sprinkler system, electrical distribution,
secret internet protocol routing network (SIPRNET), NMCI inside and outside
infrastructure, mechanical systems, HVAC, sidewalks, anti-terrorism
measures, UPS, and site improvements.
Construct one reinforced concrete box Type 'E', standard earth-covered
magazine of 541 square meters (5,823 sf) with utilities and support
facilities.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2171391C
Hangar 130 was constructed in 1942 and has documented deficiencies in power
distribution, deteriorated and lead-based paint, asbestos, failed exterior
aircraft pavement, no AFFF fire suppression system, no SCIF, insufficient
water main supply for AFFF, and inadequate sprinklers.
MCAS Cherry Point has no fixed-point utility systems available to support
F/A-18E/F aircraft on the parking apron. Each F/A-18E/F requires at its
Provide adequate facilities and infrastructure to support the homebasing
and operation of the new F/A-18 E/F (Super Hornet). Two Navy F/A-18E
operational squadrons will be located at MCAS Cherry Point, as documented
in the "East Coast Basing of the Navy F/A 18 E/F" Environmental Impact
Statement.
Each squadron requires a hangar module adequately and efficiently
configured for particular aircraft squadron functions in which to perform
maintenance, training and administrative functions. Reconfiguration of
administrative spaces to provide a vaulted secure area required for aircrew
briefing/debriefing, loading/unloading the aircraft Memory Unit (MU) with
specific mission data prior to and after each tactics training flight is
required.
Adequate 400 Hertz electrical power is required on the aircraft parking
apron in order to support avionics maintenance checks.
There will be two training simulators (TOFT and DRT)sited at MCAS Cherry
Point to support the Navy F/A-18E operational squadrons. The simulators
provide training in F/A-18 E/F operations, which cannot be safely
accomplished in the aircraft. For those operations that could be
accomplished in the aircraft, the simulators will allow pilots and crew to
spend more time in trainers and less time flying.
A Type "E" magazine is required for storing non-combat munitions required
for Super Hornet pilot training.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Hangar 130 will be renovated to accommodate two F/A-18E squadrons. A
Flight Line Distribution System (FLEDS), a trainer building, one "E"
magazine and an ordnance maintenance facility to store/test "smart" weapons
for F18 aircraft will be built.
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
16,5000703676N 21105
Hangar Renovation, Fac Upgrades
Navy F/A18E/F
NAVY 2008FY
P809
MCAS CHERRY POINT NCCHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00146
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2181391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
parking apron space, for maintenance of the avionics systems. Four
abandoned Wells Air Start units require demolition to clear the space for
parking F/A-18E/Fs.
MCAS Cherry Point has no spare magazine capacity to support Navy Super
Hornet ordnance storage requirements.
There is no facility at MCAS Cherry Point that is capable of housing the
F/A-18 E/F TOFT and DRT.
MCAS Chery Point has no facility available to for storage and testing of
F/A-18 "smart" munitions that utilize the CMBRE test and maintenance
interface.
F/A-18E squadrons will be operationally constrained in maintenance,
training, and administrative functions due to the lack of required support
facilities.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
16,5000703676N 21105
Hangar Renovation, Fac Upgrades
Navy F/A18E/F
NAVY 2008FY
P809
MCAS CHERRY POINT NCCHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00146
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
Magazine only - P075, Ch. Pt.
$700
$600
$100
04/2008
01/2008
11/2009
09/2005
01/2006
05/2007
5%
15%
$500
$200
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2191391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
16,5000703676N 21105
Hangar Renovation, Fac Upgrades
Navy F/A18E/F
NAVY 2008FY
P809
MCAS CHERRY POINT NCCHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00146
Deployable Readiness Trainer
Magazine IDS
NMCI Connectivity
Tactiacl Operational Flight Trainer
APN
PMC
OMN
APN
2007
2007
2007
2007
4,200
80
125
8,600
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. Mission
requirements, operational considerations, and location are incompatible
with use by other components.
Mr. Jim Woods 252-466-4769Activity POC: Phone No:
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested
Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2201391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
16,5000703676N 21105
Hangar Renovation, Fac Upgrades
Navy F/A18E/F
NAVY 2008FY
P809
MCAS CHERRY POINT NCCHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00146
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2211390
Scope
11110
Cost
($000)Start
Outlying Landing Field Facs &
Land Acq 5 of 7
Complete
0 LS 10,060
Design Status
08/2002
8. Projects Requested In This Program
11/2006
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(2738 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 0
24,450
75,800
61,898
10,060
122,394
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 533,267
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:11110 Outlying Landing Field Facs & Land Acq 6 of 7 LS 75,800
TOTAL
TOTAL
NAS OCEANA VA
PLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation and Location: N60191
10,060
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
75,800
61,898
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
Provide logistics and support functions for east coast tactical aircraft
training operations.
294,602
11110 LS 61,898Outlying Landing Field Facs & Land Acq 7 of 7
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.84
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
0
0
0
0B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2221390
4. Command
NAS OCEANA VA
PLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation and Location: N60191
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.84
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommander Navy
Installations Command
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2231391
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
OUTLYING LANDING FIELD FACS, LAND
ACQ INC 5-7
RUNWAY AND LIGHTING
SIMULATED CARRIER DECK
LAND (AIRFIELD)
LAND (BUFFER)
NAVIGATIONAL AIDS (452 SF)
AIRCRAFT ARRESTING GEAR
INSTALLATION
FUEL PUMP HOUSE/QC LAB (2,476
SF)
OPS/FIRE RESCUE/AIR TRAFFIC
CONTROL (17,384 SF)
FIRE TRAINING AREA
ANTENNA TOWERS
SHOPS/FUELER/GUARDSHACK/CANOPY
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
LESS FY 04-07 FUNDING POST
RECISSION
LS
LS
LS
AC
AC
m2
EA
m2
m2
LS
EA
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
3,000
30,000
42
2
230
1,615
2
5,056.6
3,326.67
1,420.01
209,829.9
1,045
2,359
40,000
144,450
(21,140)
(1,210)
(15,170)
(99,800)
(60)
(420)
(240)
(3,810)
(280)
(80)
(390)
(200)
(300)
(50)
(1,300)
29,740
(7,260)
(3,970)
(2,960)
(15,550)
174,190
8,710
182,900
10,430
193,330
-26,426
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 10,060
Auth for Approp 10,060
0203176N 11110
Outlying Landing Field Facs,
Land Acq Inc 5-7
NAVY 2008FY
P689D
NAS OCEANA VA
PLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N60191(WA)
(WASHINGTON COUNTY, NC)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2241391C
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
LESS FY 09 & FUTURE FUNDING
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
LS -156,834
10,070
10,060
(7,625)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 10,060
Auth for Approp 10,060
0203176N 11110
Outlying Landing Field Facs,
Land Acq Inc 5-7
NAVY 2008FY
P689D
NAS OCEANA VA
PLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N60191(WA)
(WASHINGTON COUNTY, NC)
The project funding profile is:
FY 04 funding after recission $ 3,610,000
FY 05 funding after recission $ 14,890,000
FY 06 funding, none received $ 0
FY 07 funding $ 7,926,000
FY 08 funding $ 10,000,000
FY 09 & future funding $156,834,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $193,260,000
Description of Proposed Construction:
Acquire interests in approximately 3,000 acres of land for a new outlying
landing field (OLF), acquire interests in approximately 30,000 acres of
land for protective buffer and provide relocation assistance. Project also
includes construction of a 2,440 m runway with appropriate clear zones, an
aircraft parking apron, taxiway, runway and approach lights, runway
overruns, simulated carrier deck lighting at each end of the runway,
earthwork; clearing and grubbing; landscaping, construction of a
consolidated Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Station, Air
Operations Facility and Aircraft Traffic Control (ATC) Tower; two aircraft
refueling hydrants and one vehicle refueling station with environmental
protection measures, associated fuel storage, piping and dispensing
equipment; a Fuel Pump house with Quality Control Laboratory; a Field
Maintenance Building; a tactical air navigation (TACAN) Navigational Aid
Building with integral antenna support tower; two 10 m2 (110 SF) Landing
Signal Officer (LSO) shacks; a 15 m2 (160 SF) shed for aircraft refueling
personnel; a 8 m2 (85 SF) guard shack at the complex entry control point; a
35 m2 (375 SF) fire pump shelter; a 15 m2 (160 SF) domestic water well
pumphouse; a fire training area with environmental protection measures;
airfield/flightline security fencing and hardened gates; underground
domestic water and fire protection water distribution systems; an elevated
water storage tank for fire protection; underground sanitary sewage
collection, piping, septic tank(s) and drain field(s); roads, parking and
sidewalk paving; electrical power distribution and site lighting;
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2251391C
The Navy will site eight fleet squadrons and the fleet replacement squadron
at Naval Air Station (NAS) Oceana and two fleet squadrons at Marine Corps
Air Station (MCAS) Cherry Point, with an Outlying Landing Field (OLF) to be
built in Washington County, NC. A new OLF is required to provide
operational flexibility, improve the quality of life for Navy personnel and
civilians, and most importantly, to meet surge requirements in support of
the President's National Defense Strategy. The first Super Hornet Squadron
should stand up at NAS Oceana in 2004 with the entire beddown complete by
2010.
In any basing scenario involving NAS Oceana and/or MCAS Cherry Point,
failure to construct an OLF would adversely impact the Navy's ability to
mobilize carrier-based forces quickly, safely, and efficiently in response
to world situations. Without construction of the OLF, extensive and costly
measures are required to ensure all aircrew are properly trained in the
The OLF will provide facilities and functions to support training and
operation of the new F/A-18 E/F (Super Hornet). This includes required
repetitive flight operations to support the Atlantic Fleet. One of the
more important characteristics of an OLF training facility is for field
carrier landing practice. This OLF will allow operations to be conducted
away from the home facility thus improving flexibility of operations,
improved quality of life and quality of service, and noise/population
encroachment mitigation.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Acquire land interests and construct an outlying landing field (OLF).
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 10,060
Auth for Approp 10,060
0203176N 11110
Outlying Landing Field Facs,
Land Acq Inc 5-7
NAVY 2008FY
P689D
NAS OCEANA VA
PLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:AC AC AC 33,000
N60191(WA)
(WASHINGTON COUNTY, NC)
communication system distribution; two antenna support towers; earthwork,
storm drainage, and installation of two sets of bi-directional arresting
gear (government furnished contractor installed - GFCI), signage, drainage,
and fencing. Built-in Equipment includes two TACAN towers. Special
Construction Features include foundation piling for buildings, fuel
distribution and storage and environmental mitigation. Anti-
terrorism/force protection features to meet current standards will be
included. Sustainable principles will be integrated into the design,
development, and construction of the project in accordance with Executive
Order 13123 and other laws and Executive Orders.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2261391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Bid Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
event of a surge requirement. These measures include increased operations
and noise at existing airfields. Flying detachments to other airfields
results in slower attainment of training requirements, additional temporary
assigned duty (TAD) and fuel costs, and increased time away from home for
service members. Operations at existing facilities are also interrupted by
FCLP training.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 10,060
Auth for Approp 10,060
0203176N 11110
Outlying Landing Field Facs,
Land Acq Inc 5-7
NAVY 2008FY
P689D
NAS OCEANA VA
PLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
ARFF Apparatus (vehicles)
ARFF Station Communications
ATC Communications Systems
IFLOLS Landing Systems (2)
Intrusion Dection/CCTV
OPN
OPN
OPN
OPN
OPN
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2,375
400
3,500
1,000
350
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
N/A
$3,050
$2,250
$800
09/2004
04/2004
11/2010
08/2002
09/2004
11/2006
80%
100%
$1,600
$1,450
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
N60191(WA)
(WASHINGTON COUNTY, NC)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2271391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 10,060
Auth for Approp 10,060
0203176N 11110
Outlying Landing Field Facs,
Land Acq Inc 5-7
NAVY 2008FY
P689D
NAS OCEANA VA
PLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This
Facility can be used by other components on an as available basis;
however, the scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.
Mr. Andrew Porter 757-433-2226Activity POC: Phone No:
N60191(WA)
(WASHINGTON COUNTY, NC)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2281391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 10,060
Auth for Approp 10,060
0203176N 11110
Outlying Landing Field Facs,
Land Acq Inc 5-7
NAVY 2008FY
P689D
NAS OCEANA VA
PLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Blank Page
N60191(WA)
(WASHINGTON COUNTY, NC)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2291390
Scope
73010
Cost
($000)Start
Structural Fire Station
Complete
1938 m2 6,800
Design Status
09/2005
8. Projects Requested In This Program
09/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(6482 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 1,298,195
20,660
4,580
35,373
6,800
52,746
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 8,320
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:14320 EOD/Ordnance Operations Building 1251 m2 4,580
TOTAL
TOTAL
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION BEAUFORT
BEAUFORT, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation and Location: M60169
6,800
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
4,580
35,373
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
To administer assigned personnel, maintain and operate facilities, and
provide services and material to support operations of a Marine Aircraft
Group and other activities and units designated by the Commandant of the
Marine Corps in coordination with the Chief of Naval Operations.
1,418,354
74044
17110
91110
0 LS
5232 SF
590 AC
10,847
6,046
18,480
Physical Fitness Center
Nuclear/Biological/Chemical Facility
Land Acquisition Phase 2
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.03
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
4984
4867
48
41B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 442
342
236
285
0
2
18
30
0
16
362
388
3237
3092
641
671
Commandant of the
Marine Corps
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2301390
4. Command
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION BEAUFORT
BEAUFORT, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation and Location: M60169
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.03
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommandant of the
Marine Corps
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2311391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
STRUCTURAL FIRE STATION (20,860
SF)
STRUCTURAL FIRE STATION
(20,656 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (205
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
1,938
1,919
19
1,954.27
3,759.17
4,450
(3,750)
(70)
(370)
(60)
(140)
(60)
1,460
(270)
(150)
(170)
(420)
(230)
(220)
5,910
300
6,210
350
6,560
240
6,800
6,800
(215)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
6,8000206496M 73010
Structural Fire Station
NAVY 2008FY
P434
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION BEAUFORTBEAUFORT, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M60169
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION BEAUFORT.
Construct a single story, high truck bay split-face concrete masonry unit
building with slab on grade floors supported by piles, interior wall
construction of gypsum wall board on metal studs, and standing seam metal
roof. Facility also includes Emergency Command Center, conference and
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2321391C
The existing facility was constructed in 1959 for a smaller equipment
requirement and less restrictive building codes. The facility lacks
adequate storage for rolling equipment, fire fighting equipment and
Adequate and efficiently configured facilities to support a Structural Fire
Fighting mission in support of approximately 3000 buildings and structures
and 4477 Marines, sailors and civilians and 7600 military dependents.
Structural Fire Fighting mission also backs up Aircraft Rescue including
protecting airfield assets including ten aircraft maintenance hangars and
high value aircraft training devices and buildings.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
This project constructs a new Structural Fire Fighting Building away from
the flight line, located closer to the majority of emergency calls coming
from the enlisted barracks, family housing and the child development
center.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
6,8000206496M 73010
Structural Fire Station
NAVY 2008FY
P434
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION BEAUFORTBEAUFORT, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M60169
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 1,938
training room, physical fitness room, restrooms with showers and lockers
for male and female personnel, sleeping area for male and female personnel,
dispatch room, kitchen and break room, administrative space, hazardous
materials response unit space, incident command trailer parking area, and
truck fire fighting water fill apparatus. Anti-terrorism/Force Protection
(AT/FP) measures and Technical Operating Manuals will be included.
Information systems include a mass-notification system and wiring for
telephone and local area network (LAN). Built in equipment includes
emergency equipment storage lockers and a vehicle exhaust system for the
trucks in the fire equipment bays. Special foundation features include
piles. Electrical utilities include exterior flood lighting and emergency
diesel back-up generator and connections. Mechanical utilities include
utilities extensions for communications, electrical, power, water and
sewer, air conditioning, and storm water management system. Paving and site
improvements include landscaping, sidewalks, and vehicle and equipment wash
rack. Demolition of Building #595 is included. Sustainable features have
been included in the design, development, and construction of this project
in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and executive
orders.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2331391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
hazardous materials. As a result, some items are being stored outside,
exposed to the elements. The emergency Hazardous Rolling Response Module,
Rescue Boat and Incidence Command Trailer cannot be stored under cover. The
facility has experienced four renovations and additions in an attempt to
stay current with life safety and building codes and fire fighting support
requirements. Truck bays have been added twice and are now too small to
adequately support modern equipment. Bunkrooms, locker rooms and rest rooms
do not adequately accommodate male and female personnel. There are egress
code violations from the bunk area and other parts of the building. The
facility exterior walls are unreinforced concrete masonry and uninsulated.
The building is subject to a 100 percent structural collapse in a seismic
event as determined by SODIVNAVFACENGCOM Seismic Study conducted in 1985.
The roof is minimally insulated and experiences frequent replacements due
to its nearly flat construction. Air conditioning and heating supply is
substandard. Building layout is inefficient to support operations
efficiently.
Loss of function and ability to respond after a seismic event or high wind
event. Contiuned operation of a facility that currently operates with
seismic, space and codes deficiencies. The building will continue to
decline as the building continues to decay from age and lack of
modernization efforts. Response time will not be improved without a
facility closer to the majority of emergency calls.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
6,8000206496M 73010
Structural Fire Station
NAVY 2008FY
P434
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION BEAUFORTBEAUFORT, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M60169
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
$189
$47
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15%
$142
$47
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2341391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
6,8000206496M 73010
Structural Fire Station
NAVY 2008FY
P434
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION BEAUFORTBEAUFORT, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M60169
COLLATERAL EQUIPMENT LIST
IDS
NMCI CONNECTION FEE
OPN
OPN
OPN
2008
2008
2008
189
6
20
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This is an installation
utility/infrastructure project and does not qualify for joint use at this
location, however, all tenants on this installation are benefited by this
project.
William Snead 843-228-7390Activity POC: Phone No:
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
$142
04/2008
01/2008
10/2009
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2351390
Scope
72115
21420
Cost
($000)Start
Third Recruit Training BN
Complex Phase 1
Motor Transportation Complex
Complete
8312 m2
1941 m2
24,820
5,530
Design Status
09/2005
09/2005
8. Projects Requested In This Program
09/2007
09/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(8080 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 995,026
3,080
34,970
64,783
30,350
93,611
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 61,700
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:72115 Third Recruit Training Battalion Phase 2 13918 m2 34,970
TOTAL
TOTAL
MCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SC
PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation and Location: M00263
30,350
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
34,970
64,783
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
To provide reception, processing and recruit training for enlisted
personnel upon their entry into the Marine Corps; to provide recruits with
battle skills training; to provide schools to train enlisted personnel in
the administrative duities of first sergeant, sergeant major and
administrative chief, drill instructors, and drum and bugle corps members,
and conduct other schools as directed; to conduct reserve training as
directed; to conduct rifle marksmanship training for Marine officers and
enlisted personnel in the southeastern area, and for personnel of other
services, as requested.
1,221,820
72115
72112
72210
44111
LS
91493 SF
0 LS
58685 SF
22,130
17,586
18,048
7,019
Recruit Barracks 3rd Battalion Phase 3
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters
Enlisted Dining Facility Consolidation
Supply And Services Consolidation
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.03
5. Area Const
Cost Index
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
1
1
1
1B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commandant of the
Marine Corps
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2361390
4. Command
MCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SC
PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation and Location: M00263
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.03
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
Commandant of the
Marine Corps
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2371391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
THIRD RECRUIT TRAINING BN COMPLEX
PHASE 1 (89,470 SF)
RECRUIT TRAINING BARRACK
(72,204 SF)
COMPANY HEADQUARTERS (2,702
SF)
BATTALION OPERATION CENTER
(10,000 SF)
CENTRAL MECHANICAL PLANT
(4,133 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (431
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
8,312
6,708
251
929
384
40
1,932.91
2,359.85
2,282.04
1,421.6
3,211.72
17,430
(12,970)
(590)
(2,120)
(550)
(130)
(400)
(270)
(30)
(370)
4,600
(1,160)
(570)
(1,920)
(930)
(20)
22,030
1,100
23,130
1,320
24,450
880
25,330
25,322
(1,161)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
25,3220805796M 72115
Third Recruit Training BN
Complex Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P363
MCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SC
PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00263(BA)
(PARRIS ISLAND)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2381391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
25,3220805796M 72115
Third Recruit Training BN
Complex Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P363
MCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SC
PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00263(BA)
(PARRIS ISLAND)
Construct Phase I of a three phase program for construction of a new Third
Recruit Training Battalion Complex. Phase II (P367) is a proposed FY09
project and Phase III (P371) is a proposed FY10 project and are briefly
described under the Scope section. Phase I primary facilities shall
include a single story Battalion Operations Center, Central Mechanical
Plant sized for the entire complex, Telecommunications Room spaces to
contain all NMCI computer equipment and special HVAC systems, and one three
story recruit barrack with squad bays, head facilities, showers, Drill
Instructor (DI) spaces with locker rooms, storage, squad laundry
facilities, and company headquarter offices all totaling 89,470 square feet
(SF). The project scope shall provide for the following: (1) One three-
story recruit barrack with integral company headquarter offices, a central
mechanical plant building, and a single story Battalion Operations Center;
(2) reinforced concrete frame buildings on pile-supported foundations with
a pier-supported, elevated first floor with crawl space, brick veneer faced
reinforced concrete masonry unit exterior walls that comply with current
seismic requirements and FEMA flood elevation requirements; (3) 22 gauge
standing seam metal roof on steel truss system over concrete decking; (4)
insulated walls and ceilings (5) central heating and air-conditioning; (6)
fire protection; (7) utility connections for sewer, including an area pump
station, water, below-ground steam system, storm water, electrical power,
and communications, data/information systems, LAN (local area network)
connectivity and equipment spaces; (8) site work to include roads, parking,
ATFP construction features, recruit walkways, and storm water filtration
system; and (9) OMSI manuals. No demolition is required.
Special Features: The structures will be fully fire sprinkled in
accordance with the International Building Code (IBC). Central heating and
air-conditioning shall include steam to hot water conversion, an expandable
chiller plant with water-cooled chillers and cooling towers, chilled and
hot water piping, and full direct digital controls. Air conditioning shall
provide an effective humidity control strategy and outside air pre-
conditioning with energy recovery. Steam utilities to the site will be
below-ground, prefabricated, pre-insulated pipe with some pipe trenches.
Interior partitions in DI spaces, recruit areas of the Battalion Ops
Center, and company offices shall be of durable impact resistant systems.
Floors and walls in all shower areas will be ceramic tile. Other toilet
areas will have ceramic tile floors and six feet high wainscot. Toilet
partitions shall be structural glazed tile. Interior squad bay walls will
have six-foot high wainscot of structural glazed tile. Ceilings in the
head and shower areas shall be suspended portland cement plaster.
Sustainable features will be included in the design, development, and
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2391391C
REQUIREMENT:
The project is designed to provide one Recruit Training Barrack, a Central
Mechanical Plant sized for the entire complex, a Battalion Operations
Center, and other items to permit the Marine Corps to effectively achieve
its training goals and objectives. The project scope shall provide the
following: (1) reinforced concrete frame buildings on pile foundation with
a crawl space, brick veneer faced reinforced concrete masonry exterior
walls, compliance with seismic criteria and FEMA flood elevation
requirements (2) 22 gauge standing seam metal roof on steel truss system
over concrete decking (3) insulated walls and ceilings (4) central heating
and air-conditioning (5) fire protection (6) utility connections for sewer,
water, steam, electrical power, and communications wiring and equipment
space, and (7) site work to include roads, parking, and AT/FP features.
Multi: All structures will be fully fire sprinkled in accordance with
International Building Code (IBC). The building will have a chiller plant
as opposed to a direct expansion system. Steam utilities to the site must
be underground with some trenches to avoid encumbering an open
drilling/training area. Floor finishes throughout barracks open bay areas
will be epoxy coated concrete. Floors and walls in the shower areas will
be ceramic tile. Other toilet areas will have ceramic tile floors and six
feet high wainscot. Wall hung plumbing fixtures shall be securely mounted
with structural hangars within the wall structure.
Sustainable features will be included in the design, development, and
construction for the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and
other laws and executive orders.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
25,3220805796M 72115
Third Recruit Training BN
Complex Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P363
MCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SC
PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 8,312
M00263(BA)
(PARRIS ISLAND)
construction for the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and
other laws and executive orders. Special construction feature includes a
pile foundation with crawl space.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2401391C
The Third Recruit Training Battalion resides in the oldest and smallest
barracks on the Depot. The Third Battalion barracks, constructed in 1960,
were originally designed to berth 60 recruits in each squad bay based on
planning criteria of that time. During peak summertime periods, Third
Battalion currently berths 72 recruits per open bay with special waivers to
hold 75 recruits in certain cases. During peak periods (June through
September), the minimum allowable net living space per recruit provided by
current P-80 planning criteria is exceeded. There is an immediate
requirement to provide new facilities to berth 86 recruits per open bay.
The existing space limitation imposes an additional resource strain on the
other two Battalions. The limited functionality of the Third Battalion
Barracks is also a deterrent to training as squad bays and bathroom
facilities are too small and recruit loading frequently exceeds minimum
square footages. Drill Instructor areas are inadequate and not functional
for the high numbers of recruits and speed of throughput.
Additionally, the high demand on the Third Battalion Barracks results in
maximizing efforts by maintenance personnel and shortens the expected life
of the facility. Already, the Third Battalion Barracks are deficient in
more than just recruit loading and square footage requirements. The
barracks are in an overall poor state and this degraded condition has been
referenced in GAO audit 02-786 of June 2002. Specific issues include:
1. Recent inspections have determined that mold and mildew have completely
infiltrated the ceiling to the extent that replacement of those areas is
the only remedy.
The Marine Corps recruit training process is directly limited by the amount
of available recruit barracks space. Each platoon resides in an open bay
configured space. The long-term goal is to provide a complete training
complex of adequate size to hold 86 recruits per platoon squad bay. Eighty-
six (86) recruits per platoon is the average number of recruits during the
peak loading months of June through September. These numbers were based on
recruiting projections to meet force end-strength, dated December 2002.
This project, Phase I, will provide one Company (516 recruits) of the total
Battalion requirement of four Companies (2,064 recruits) with associated
support space for Battalion Headquarters, Company Commanders, and Drill
Instructor operation areas.
A new Battalion Operations Center is required in the near vicinity of the
new recruit training barracks. This facility shall house the Battalion
staff that perform the administrative and command functions for the
Battalion.
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
25,3220805796M 72115
Third Recruit Training BN
Complex Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P363
MCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SC
PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00263(BA)
(PARRIS ISLAND)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2411391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
2. The structural integrity of the barracks is questionable and they are
not built to current seismic criteria.
3. Plumbing and air-conditioning systems are in failing condition.
4. Moisture infiltration from exterior to the interior results in failing
brickwork, not to mention acerbating the mold and mildew problems.
5. Drill instructor huts are crowded and poorly designed for efficient
drill instructor utilization.
6. Recruit central bathroom facilities are inadequate in size and interior
walls and finishes are damaged in numerous locations.
The existing Third Battalion Operations Center is housed in a building that
also has exceeded its life expectancy and the building infrastructure is in
generally in poor condition, comparable to the condition encountered in the
existing barracks.
If not provided, the current situation will worsen and decline. Training
will continue to slow and adversely affect the recruit-training pipeline,
while also diminishing over-all training efficiencies of staff personnel.
Health and Safety issues will persist and be of prime concern. Recruits
assigned to berth in these barracks have a significantly higher incidence
of medical sick call cases. The buildings will further degrade, resulting
in continued costly maintenance and repair expenditures.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
25,3220805796M 72115
Third Recruit Training BN
Complex Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P363
MCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SC
PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
na
$800
$700
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15%
$650
$150
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
M00263(BA)
(PARRIS ISLAND)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2421391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
25,3220805796M 72115
Third Recruit Training BN
Complex Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P363
MCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SC
PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Collateral Equipment
IDS
NMCI Connection
O&MMC
OPN
OPN
1,100
6
55
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
Gregory D. Smith 843-228-2570Activity POC: Phone No:
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
$100
04/2008
01/2008
04/2010
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
2006 R&M Conducted ($000):2007 R&M Conducted ($000):
C. FY D. FY E. Future R&M Requirements ($000):
M00263(BA)
(PARRIS ISLAND)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2431391
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
MOTOR TRANSPORT FACILITY (20,893
SF)
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE (10,473
SF)
VEHICLE HOLDING SHED (4,198
SF)
VEHICLE WASH/REPAIR PLATFORM
(3,918 SF)
VEHICLE GREASE RACK (1,475
SF)
REFUELING VEHICLE SHELTER (721
SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (108
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
1,941
973
390
364
137
67
10
1,640.68
1,917.69
1,323.21
1,137.81
639.79
3,211.72
3,570
(1,600)
(750)
(480)
(160)
(40)
(30)
(450)
(30)
(20)
(10)
1,240
(170)
(120)
(220)
(420)
(190)
(80)
(40)
4,810
240
5,050
290
5,340
190
5,530
5,530
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
5,5300805796M 21420
Motor Transport Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P366
MCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SC
PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00263(BA)
(PARRIS ISLAND)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2441391C
The project constructs a Motor Transport Facility to include a Maintenance
Facility, Holding Shed, Vehicle Wash/Repair Platform, Automated Vehicle
Wash, Refueling Vehicle Shelter, and Grease Racks. The project locates the
motor transportation function near the Depot Fuel Facility and Facility
Maintenance for more efficient operation. Facility Maintenance is the
largest user of motor vehicles on the Depot.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
(80)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
5,5300805796M 21420
Motor Transport Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P366
MCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SC
PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 1,941
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MCRD/BEAUFORT PI,
SC.
M00263(BA)
(PARRIS ISLAND)
Construct a Motor Transport Facility to include; a Maintenance Facility,
Holding Shed, Refueling Vehicle Shelter, Vehicle Wash/Repair Platforms, and
Grease Racks. The Vehicle Maintenance Facility shall be a one story, high
bay steel frame structure on pile foundations with CMU infill and brick
veneer. The maintenance facility shall meet FEMA finish floor elevation
requirements and have vehicle lifts, maintenance and repair bays,
administrative area (including dispatch), tool room, and driver training
area. The shop areas shall be heated and ventilated and shall contain
vehicle exhaust extraction ventilation. Administrative and operational
areas shall be heated and air-conditioned. The roof shall be 22 guage
standing seam metal roofing. Building shall have paved approaches,
parking, and exterior maintenance area. The shop areas and driver areas
shall contain waiting areas and tiled restroom facilities. The Vehicle
Holding Shed and Wash/Repair Platforms shall be covered protected sheds
with brick end walls and metal standing seam roofing. Automated wash racks
and grease racks shall be for large commercial vehicles, buses and
passenger cars. Asphalt paving shall be pervious and the site will have a
storm water sand filtration system. Included shall be all associated
sitework, steam piping, utilities, exterior lighting, roads, parking,
fencing, and compound paving. Demolition includes demo of existing
buildings 176, 156A and 157. Sustainable features will be included in the
design, development, and construction for the project in accordance with
Executive Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders. Energy
conservation and use of renewable resources considerations shall also be
implemented.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2451391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
The existing facilities date back to the 1940's and 1950's. The facilities
were built when vehicles were smaller and before the advent of current
safety standards for shop and maintenance facilities. Damage occurs when
vehicles fail to negotiate tight turns and spaces, creating a danger to the
workers and the vehicles. Facilities have outlived their useful life, and
have unsatisfactory Life/Safety features. Proper vehicle maintenance can
not occur or has to be sent out to off-base facilities. Facilities are
contaminated with lead based paint and asbestos containing coatings.
Structures are not designed to current wind and seismic standards.
Dispatch functions work out of an undersized, cramped facility located in a
dangerous intersection of the vehicle path into and out of the strorage
facility. The storage facility is in the 100 year flood zone and will
require moving all vehicles in the event of a major storm.
Motor transport operations will continue to operate in inadequate spaces
with poor visibility to entering pedestrians and motor traffic. Shops will
continue to function in unsafe and outdated facilities. Storage of
expensive vehicles will continue in structurally inadequate buildings.
The Depot requires adequate maintenance, storage and administration areas
to conduct Motor Transport Operations. The Depot maintains a fleet of
Buses, Trucks, Vans, Automobiles, Tractors and Specialized Vehicles. The
facility also houses the dispatch and driver training facilities for
vehicles requiring special use and licensing.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
5,5300805796M 21420
Motor Transport Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P366
MCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SC
PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15%
$350
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
M00263(BA)
(PARRIS ISLAND)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2461391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
5,5300805796M 21420
Motor Transport Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P366
MCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SC
PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Collateral equipment OPN 80
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
Philip Pearl DSN 335-4831Activity POC: Phone No:
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
$450
$350
$100
04/2008
01/2008
04/2009
$100 (B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
M00263(BA)
(PARRIS ISLAND)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2471390
Scope
17135
Cost
($000)Start
Aviation Trainer Facility
Complete
4836 m2 14,290
Design Status
11/2005
8. Projects Requested In This Program
09/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(4575 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 1,660,778
5,400
0
58,290
14,290
74,935
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 114,777
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:
TOTAL
NAS CORPUS CHRISTI TX
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
3. Installation and Location: N00216
14,290
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL 58,290
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
Maintain and operate facilities and provide service and material to support
operations of aviation facilities and units of the Naval Air Training
Command and other tenant activities and units.
1,813,693
17120
73025
61010
11320
74044
96854 SF
4553 SF
LS
111422 SY
LS
21,543
3,058
6,437
9,244
18,008
Squadron Operations Facility
Main Gate Security Improvement
CNATRA Headquarters
Parking Apron Recapitalization
Fitness Center Corpus Christi
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.9
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
3714
3520
1152
1117B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 1639
1480
784
784
0
0
0
0
0
0
47
47
92
92
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2481390
4. Command
NAS CORPUS CHRISTI TX
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
3. Installation and Location: N00216
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.9
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommander Navy
Installations Command
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2491391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
AVIATION TRAINER FACILITY (52,052
SF)
AVIATION TRAINER FACILITY
(51,796 SF)
GENERATOR BUILDING (256 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
TEMPORARY FACILITIES
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
4,835.79
4,812
23.79
2,022.1
2,751.47
10,500
(9,730)
(70)
(370)
(100)
(130)
(100)
1,930
(100)
(120)
(260)
(200)
(400)
(100)
(300)
(450)
12,430
620
13,050
740
13,790
500
14,290
14,290
(12,725)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,2900805976N 17135
Aviation Trainer Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P353
NAS CORPUS CHRISTI TXCORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00216
Construct a single story steel frame building with a structural slab, pile
foundation, tilt-up concrete wall facing, standing seam metal roof on
insulated metal deck over steel trusses, and high bay simulator trainer
areas (T44, TC12 and T6 simulators). The facility includes spaces for
brief/de-brief, instructors, simulator maintenance, administrative support,
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2501391C
Training Wing Four simulator Flight Training Devices (FTDs) are currently
located in two separate facilities, Buildings 1824 and 89. Building 1824
houses two (2) TC-12 Operational Flight Trainers (OFTs) and one cockpit
orientation trainer. In FY 2008, the number of FTDs in Building 1824 will
increase to three trainers with the addition of one Instrument Flight
Trainer (IFT). Building 89 which houses both the T-34C and T-44A FTDs was
constructed in 1942 and is being used at its maximum capacity. Both of
these facilities will be inadequately sized to meet the proposed
requirement for the T-44 visual modifications trainer and the upgrade to
the TC-12 simulators. Both of these trainers are significantly larger and
require additional height and clearance which does not currently exist in
these buildings. A new facility is required.
Adequately and efficiently configured facilities to provide for
consolidated simulator functions for ground training. Naval Air Station
Corpus Christi is the home of Training Air Wing Four (TW4), whose mission
is to provide primary and advanced multi-engine pilot training for Navy,
Air Force, Marine, Coast Guard and Allied Foreign Military. This requires
an efficient flightline training facility capable of supporting the
approximately 230 flight instructor pilots and 50 contract simulator
instructors who instruct an average of 1014 students per year by FY08.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
This project constructs a flight operational trainer and centralizes all
flight training functions into one location.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,2900805976N 17135
Aviation Trainer Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P353
NAS CORPUS CHRISTI TXCORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00216
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 4,836
computer support, mechanical rooms, and two each 1 1/2 ton bridge cranes.
The facility includes fire protection, environmentally controlled HVAC
system, electrical and mechanical utilities, emergency power back-up,
telephone/LAN system, parking lot and site improvements. The project will
demolish buildings 1822 (8,080sf), 1842 (4,000sf), and 1843 (4,000sf). The
project will relocate/reconstruct storage buildings 365 (600 sf), 366 (1200
sf), aircraft washracks, C-12 simulators from Building 1824, T-44
simulators from Building 89, and provide temporary facilities for the
displaced Squadron Operations personnel after demolishion. The building
will conform to Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection standards and incorporate
sustainable features.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2511391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
Visual modifications to upgrade the five existing T-44 simulators are
planned and this will increase their footprint and height requirements.
Building 89 can accommodate some of these modifications with additional
facility modifications, but can not meet the new clear height requirement
and there is only adequate space to handle four of the five simulators
planned for upgrade. A separate location will be required to house this
fifth trainer and there are no suitable buildings available on the air
station. This new facility will dictate flight simulator training in three
locations, further negatively impacting the training syllabus and possibly
delaying the production of qualified aviators. The potential for loss of
training equipment will continue due to deteriorating and aging utilities
in Building 89 built in 1942, and will not be able to meet the demands of
the new trainers.
If no new facilities are provided, NAS Corpus will not be able to
accomodate the new T-6 trainers. Personnel will continue to operate
inefficiently within the spaces, and will not be able to meet the new
aircraft's training mission.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,2900805976N 17135
Aviation Trainer Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P353
NAS CORPUS CHRISTI TXCORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00216
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
$250
$200
$50
11/2005
12/2006
09/2007
5%
15%
$200
$50
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2521391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
14,2900805976N 17135
Aviation Trainer Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P353
NAS CORPUS CHRISTI TXCORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00216
Bridge Cranes
Furniture
NMCI
Simulators
OPN
OMN
OPN
OPN
2009
2009
2009
2009
150
500
75
12,000
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This
Facility can be used by other components on an as available basis;
however, the scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.
Sharon Hill 361-961-3984Activity POC: Phone No:
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
04/2008
01/2008
12/2009
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2531390
Scope
13122
Cost
($000)Start
Mobile User Objective System
Installation
Complete
8,450
Design Status
06/2006
8. Projects Requested In This Program
01/2008
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(3798 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 194,956
2,260
0
0
8,450
46,170
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 154,094
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:
TOTAL
NAVSUPPACT NORFOLK VA
CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA
3. Installation and Location: N57095
8,450
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
Commanding Officer, NAVSUPPACT, Norfolk serves as the Installation
Commander for what was once known as the Atlantic Fleet Compound. This
installation is home to Commander, United States Joint Forces Command,
Commander in Chief, U.S. Atlantic Fleet, Headquarters, Supreme Allied
Commander Atlantic, Type Commanders for Atlantic Fleet surface ships and
submarines, U.S. Marine Corps Forces, Atlantic and for the Lafayette River
Compound, home to Commander, Navy Region, Mid-Atlantic. The installation
is also host to over 35 Admirals and Generals and their respective
headquarter¿s staffs. Program Manager, Regional Support Services, serves
as Program Manager for all quality of life programs onboard seven different
installations in the Mid-Atlantic region. These regional programs include,
Morale, Welfare and Recreation (over 350 programs); Food Services (seven
Navy Galleys); Family Housing (over 4,000 houses); Bachelor Housing (over
15,000 rooms); Navy Family Service Center; and the Family Advocacy Program.
These programs support over 81,000 active duty personnel, 150,000 family
members and approximately 35,000 retirees within the Mid-Atlantic region.
251,836
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.94
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
4317
4051
1144
1158B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 2007
1727
1166
1166
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2541390
4. Command
NAVSUPPACT NORFOLK VA
CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA
3. Installation and Location: N57095
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.94
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommander Navy
Installations Command
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2551391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
MOBILE USER OBJECTIVE SYSTEM
INSTALLATION
UHF/VHF COMMUNICATION FACILITY
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
()
7,350
(180)
(4,150)
(520)
(2,200)
(210)
(50)
(40)
7,350
370
7,720
440
8,160
290
8,450
8,450
(60,000)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,4500301376N 13122
Mobile User Objective System
Installation
NAVY 2008FY
P131
NAVSUPPACT NORFOLK VA
CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N57095(NW)
(NORTHWEST CHESAPKE VA)
This project will provide the initial site preparation, utility work, and
supporting facilities for the Mobile User Objective System (MOUS) to be
located at Satellite Communications Detachment (SATCOMFAC) Northwest,
Chesapeake, Virginia.
Site improvements will include reinforced concrete foundations and support
structures on which the new antennas and support equipment will be mounted,
paved walkways between the new antennas and equipment shelter space,
roadways to each antenna, parking, fencing, and security lighting for the
entire compound with motor operated gate and push button control.
Utilities will include sewer, water, power and telecommunications. Provide
trenching, concrete duct banks, and conduit for communication fiber. A
recertification of the facility is required after new HEMP penetration has
been provided. Provide transformers, one voltage regulator, and a enclosed
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2561391C
The SATCOM facility located at Building #352 at Satellite Communication
Detachment Northwest does not have adequate space to accomodate the new
operation and equipment. Adequate open land north of Building #352 is
available to accommodate the proposed MOUS operations to include three
Earth Terminals, two Radio Access Facilities, a Switching Facility/Network
Management Facility, and an Operations Facility. Existing utilities and
infrastructure will require increased capacity to support these operations.
The existing Narrow band SATCOM system is nearing the end of its useful
life. The planned replacement Narrow band SATCOM constellation will be the
Mobile User Objective System. The Navy's Communications Satellite
Acquisition Program office, at the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command
Adequate and efficiently configured facilities are required to provide
ground facilities support and operational space for the MUOS. MUOS will
provided real time narrow band satelite communications for military
operations to all branches of the armed services world wide. The MUOS
system will enable warfighters to communicate with command and control
element real time anywhere in the world. Ground facilities are
strategically located across the globe to provide continuous cover for
communications uplink, down-link, satellite control, and connections to
Teleport and terrestial communication networks.
The existing Narrow band SATCOM constellation is UHF Follow-On (UFO). The
planned replacement Narrow band SATCOM constellation will be the Mobile
User Objective System. The first satellite is scheduled for launch in
September 2009.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
The project will install a Mobile Users Objective System (MUOS) ground site
and supporting facilities at Satellite Communications Detachment Northwest,
Chesapeake, Virginia. The ground site consists of a two Radio Access
Facilities (RAFs), three 60-foot (18.4 M) diameter Earth Terminals, a
Switching Facility/Network Management, and an Operations Facility.
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,4500301376N 13122
Mobile User Objective System
Installation
NAVY 2008FY
P131
NAVSUPPACT NORFOLK VA
CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
Adequate: Substandard:
N57095(NW)
(NORTHWEST CHESAPKE VA)
diesel generator with a fuel tank capable of supporting a single generator
for 14 days of operation. Provide automatic transfer switching between two
utility sources/emergency source of power, and ET automatic fire
suppression systems.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2571391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
(SPAWAR) has conducted a global study to determine the the most suitable
locations for the MUOS receiver stations. These locations are
strategically located around the globe to provide optimum coverage of
passing satellites and efficient/effective use of exiting communications
infrastructure and terrestrial communications network connections.
If this project is not provided in FY 08, significant delays to full
capability to the satellite system will result.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,4500301376N 13122
Mobile User Objective System
Installation
NAVY 2008FY
P131
NAVSUPPACT NORFOLK VA
CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Earth Trminals/ Support Equipment
Network Routing/Management Equip
Transmitter/Receiver
UPS & Support Equipment
RDT&E
RDT&E
RDT&E
RDT&E
2007
2007
2007
2007
30,000
10,000
15,000
5,000
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Installation Management Claimant certifies that this project has been
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
$400
$240
$160
02/2008
01/2008
09/2009
06/2006
12/2006
02/2008
5%
15%
$160
$240
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
N57095(NW)
(NORTHWEST CHESAPKE VA)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2581391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,4500301376N 13122
Mobile User Objective System
Installation
NAVY 2008FY
P131
NAVSUPPACT NORFOLK VA
CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
considered for joint use potential. Joint Use is recommended.
Forrest Garland 757-836-1995Activity POC: Phone No:
N57095(NW)
(NORTHWEST CHESAPKE VA)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2591390
Scope
17135
21105
Cost
($000)Start
E2/C2 Aircrew Training
Facility
MH-60S Hangar & Airfield
Improvements
Complete
2804 m2
10563 m2
11,510
53,850
Design Status
10/2006
10/2006
8. Projects Requested In This Program
03/2008
06/2008
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(3673 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 4,190,659
293,650
45,550
211,521
65,360
730,528
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 868,713
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:16510 Norfolk Harbor Channel Dredging 4146946 m3 45,550
TOTAL
TOTAL
NAVSTA NORFOLK VA
NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
3. Installation and Location: N62688
65,360
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
45,550
211,521
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
10. Mission or Major Functions:
Naval Station, Norfolk functions as the primary operating base of the
Atlantic Fleet. It provides port and airfield services, extensive
facilities to support the many functions performed on the base, and the
full range of services needed to enhance the quality of service and quality
of life of military personnel and their families. Naval Station, Norfolk
is homeport to over 63 ships, including five aircraft carriers, surface
escorts and other combatants, logistics support ships, and attack
submarines. It also maintains 15 fixed-wing and helicopter squadrons, a
contract Fleet Readiness Squadron (FRS) for C-12, and air cargo and air
passenger terminals. In addition, the airfield hosts transport aircraft
5,537,268
21105
15120
12430
61010
39364 SF
LS
LS
53809 SF
22,533
171,743
3,509
13,736
MH-60S Aircraft Maintenance Hangar
Pier 15
Piped Refueling Facility And Birdbath
Consolidated NCIS Regional Field Office
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.93
5. Area Const
Cost Index
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
63378
56570
4691
4389B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 48602
42254
9073
8915
0
0
1
1
0
0
320
320
691
691
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2601390
4. Command
NAVSTA NORFOLK VA
NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
3. Installation and Location: N62688
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
(C-9, C-5, C-130, B-757, DC-8, DC-5, L1011).
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
.93
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2611391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
E2/C2 AIRCREW TRAINING FACILITY
(30,182 SF)
OPERATIONAL TRAINER FACILITY
(29,881 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (301
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
2,804
2,776
28
1,910.22
3,500.57
6,680
(5,300)
(100)
(840)
(230)
(90)
(120)
3,330
(430)
(930)
(640)
(1,070)
(70)
(190)
10,010
500
10,510
600
11,110
400
11,510
11,510
(116,165)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
11,5100805976N 17135
E2/C2 Aircrew Training Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P014
NAVSTA NORFOLK VANORFOLK, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62688
This project will construct a multi-story operational training facility.
The building will include one high bay trainer, two weapons system
trainers, sensitive compartmented information facility (SCIF), debrief
spaces, classrooms, auditorium, administrative spaces and required support
spaces. This project will include a pile foundation, hydraulic pump room,
fire pump room, fire protection system, raised flooring system, exterior
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2621391C
A new version of the E-2 (E-2D or Advanced Hawkeye) is being introduced.
The requirement for this project is to provide adequate facilities to
support training of pilots and aircrew assigned to the E-2D aircraft.
VAW-120 is responsible for training the pilots and aircrew for the carrier
airborne early warning squadrons and the Fleet logistics support squadrons.
In 1994, NS Norfolk became the sole training site for all E-2C and C-2A
aircrew. The E-2D has now been added to VAW-120's training requirment.
The nature of this mission requires them to be collocated with E-2 trainers
and classrooms, and have access to secure storage.
CNO guidance for 2004 directed the development of "A Fleet Aviation
Simulator Training (FAST) Plan that maximizes the utility of simulator
effectiveness." This plan increases use of simulators rather than aircraft
flight hours. Funding for flight hours has been reduced as a part of this
plan.
REQUIREMENT:
This project will construct a new facility for two Weapons Systems Trainers
(WST), a full motion operational flight trainer (OFT), and all of the
support, training, instruction and administrative facilities required by
the training mission.
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
11,5100805976N 17135
E2/C2 Aircrew Training Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P014
NAVSTA NORFOLK VANORFOLK, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62688
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 2,804
doors adequate to allow installation and maintenance of high bay trainer,
windows that meet anti terrorism/force protection (AT/FP) requirements,
electrical distribution, mechanical system, heating, ventilation and air
conditioning (HVAC) systems. Building to include secret Internet protocol
routing network (SIPRNET), non-secure Internet routing network (NIPRNET),
uninterrupted power supply, electronic security system (ESS), Air Combat
Online (ACOL), and card reader/controlled access system. Project site
requirements to include demolition of trees, water main, storm drain, and
installation of new water main, hydrants, storm drains, additional vehicle
parking with lighting and various pavement and road repairs.
Sustainable principles will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and
other laws and Executive Orders.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2631391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
There are currently three pilot trainers and two Naval Flight Officer (NFO)
simulators at NS Norfolk. The Fleet Replacement Squadron (VAW-120) has two
classified Tactics Trainers (TT). However, all of these trainers meet the
requirements of existing E-2C aircraft only - not the E-2D. Training is
still required for E-2C (Group 0), E-2C (Group II) and E-2C (Hawkeye 2000).
The Group II aircraft is being phased out, but will be in service through
2017. There are no plans to phase out the Hawkeye 2000 aircraft. All of
the training facilities for these aircraft must remain in place.
The E-2D training mission is a new requirement, and no facilities are
available to accommodate it.
Training cannot be completed in the aircraft instead of simulators. Cost
and risk would be increased to the point where aircrew training
requirements for E-2D aircraft cannot be met, reducing aircraft available
to the Fleet.
Trainers worth $115 million will arrive in FY10 with nowhere to house them.
If this project is not completed, trainer delivery must be delayed, or
trainers must be stored until facility is complete.
One Operational Flight Trainer (OFT) and one Weapons Systems Trainer (WST)
are scheduled for delivery in FY10. Building setup/prep time (projected at
six months by activity) is required prior to installation of the equipment,
so construction must start NLT March 2008 to allow for an 18-month
construction period followed by the six-month setup period and three-month
shakedown.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
11,5100805976N 17135
E2/C2 Aircrew Training Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P014
NAVSTA NORFOLK VANORFOLK, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62688
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
10/2006
02/2007
09/2007
5%
15% (E) Percent completed as of
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2641391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
11,5100805976N 17135
E2/C2 Aircrew Training Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P014
NAVSTA NORFOLK VANORFOLK, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62688
Computer/office Equipment
Operational Flight Trainer #1
Weapons System Trainer #3
Weapons System Trainer #4
OPN
APN
APN
APN
2010
2007
2007
2012
965
27,200
46,700
41,300
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. Mission
requirements, operational considerations, and location are incompatible
with use by other components.
Jack Cox, P.E (757) 444-4155 ext. 3013Activity POC: Phone No:
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
$350
$225
$125
03/2008
12/2007
09/2009
$250
$100
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2651391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
MH-60S HANGAR & AIRFIELD
IMPROVEMENTS (113,699 SF)
HANGAR (78,340 SF)
TELECOMM ROOM (377 SF)
CONTROL TOWER (4,984 SF)
STORAGE BUILDING (29,999 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
10,563
7,278
35
463
2,787
2,213.06
3,500
9,047.87
934.33
26,000
(16,110)
(120)
(4,190)
(2,600)
(2,590)
(50)
(230)
(110)
20,840
(1,340)
(1,710)
(2,190)
(10,370)
(70)
(5,060)
(100)
46,840
2,340
49,180
2,800
51,980
1,870
53,850
53,850
(1,450)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
53,8500703676N 21105
MH-60S Hangar & Airfield
Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P767
NAVSTA NORFOLK VANORFOLK, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62688
This project constructs one two-module, Type I hangar on reinforced
concrete pile foundation. Construction features will include reinforced
concrete floors, steel frame, and insulated metal panel walls, header-truss
steel roof framing, built-up roofing, wet-pipe fire sprinkler system in
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2661391C
The Fleet is undergoing a transition which will replaces two of the four
predominant Navy helicopter airframes with the MH-60S Knighthawk. The MH-
60S requirement includes one Fleet replacement squadron (FRS), three
expeditionary squadrons (EXP) and five carrier based (CV) squadrons. Naval
Station will then have 136 helicopters and 3,650 personnel associated with
REQUIREMENT:
This project will construct one hangar with two Type I modules in the LF
area of Chambers Field for the third and fourth squadrons of carrier-based
(CV) MH-60S helicopters.
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
53,8500703676N 21105
MH-60S Hangar & Airfield
Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P767
NAVSTA NORFOLK VANORFOLK, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62688
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 10,563
administrative areas and hangar overhead supplemented by floor mounted
aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) sprinklers nozzles in the hangar bay, a
200,000 liter underground storage tank for AFFF discharge containment,
oil/water separator, and built-in equipment/rails for two 4.5 metric ton
bridge cranes.
Work necessary to make the hangar complete and usable includes construction
of a seven-story, 463 m2, four-position air traffic control tower with
elevator.
Demolition and relocation work includes the demolition of Buildings #LF34
(33,558 SF) and #LAG110 (obsolete tower 2,011 SF,)relocation of the Public
Works equipment yard to the SP area and a new storage building east of
Building #LF53 to accommodate the requirement in Building #LF34.
Horizontal work necessary to make the hangar complete and usable includes
demolition of old apron, construction of new parking apron and striping,
two helicopter maintenance pads, new access taxiway to helicopter landing
pads with lighting, taxiway guidance signs, one wash rack adjacent to
hangar with associated detergent mixing, metering and storage, aircraft
taxi-through, deluge rinse facility and apron restoration for 35 parked
aircraft with airfield pavement striping, tie-down pad eyes, grounding
points; access apron in front of hangar and parking for 210 vehicles plus
210 vehicles displaced by hangar.
Sustainable design will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2671391C
Chambers Field has three airfields: the LF, SP and LP areas. Currently,
the Navy operates four types/models of helicopter at Chambers Field. The
Helicopter Concept of Operations Plan derived from the Navy's Master
Helicopter Plan, (CONOPS) calls for the replacement of two older models
with the new, multi-purpose MH-60S Knighthawk. NAVSTA Norfolk was chosen
to be the home base for all MH-60S helicopters on the East Coast. The
transition to this new airframe has already commenced, and the number of
helicopters and squadrons at Chambers Field is expected to nearly double in
the next decade. The new helicopters bring new missions, equipment and
training requirements.
The CONOPS will bring six additional squadrons to Chambers Field. P767 is
the second of three hangar projects required to meet this requirement.
Implementation of the CONOPS also requires a two-module hangar for the
first two CV squadrons (P699 - FY06), and a single module hangar for the
fifth squadron (P747 - FY10.)
Naval Station Norfolk recently finished a major hangar recapitalization
plan, and all five hangars prescribed in the plan are complete. However,
these hangars are required for existing squadrons, and none are available
for MH-60 Helicopters. The FRS and two expeditionary squadrons are not new
squadrons. They had existing aircraft replaced with MH-60S helos and
remain in their current hangars. The third expeditionary squadron is a new
this program. The FRS and two expeditionary squadrons will replace
existing squadrons at Chambers Field, while one expeditionary squadron and
five CV squadrons will be new stand-up units at Chambers Field. The new CV
squadrons will have eight aircraft assigned, requiring a Type I hangar
module for each. The new expeditionary squadrons will have 10 aircraft but
will use existing hangars.
The current control tower, LAG 110, does not have line of sight to both
airfields. This is a major safety concern with the increased operations.
It is projected that rotary-wing components will add 29,568 operations
annually by 2015. This is a 26% increase over the 111,665 total operations
documented in 2000.
Aircraft for Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron Seven (HSC-7) are scheduled to
arrive in the first quarter of FY11, followed by HSC-11 in the third
quarter of the same year. HSC-7 will require set-up time in the hangar
prior to arrival of the aircraft. With an anticipated project contract
schedule of at least 24 months, this project is a must-fund in FY08.
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
53,8500703676N 21105
MH-60S Hangar & Airfield
Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P767
NAVSTA NORFOLK VANORFOLK, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62688
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2681391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
stand-up will be assigned to a hangar in the LP area upon the departure of
Fleet Logistics Support Squadron 56 (VR-56). The five new CV Squadrons
will require one new hangar module each, for a total of five.
If this hangar is not constructed, Chambers Field will experience the
following serious impacts:
- No facilities will be available for new aircraft with a total value of
approximately $288 million.
- Introduction of new, required capabilities to the Fleet will be delayed.
- New squadrons cannot stand up without maintenance, shop and
administrative facilities.
- With increased aircraft loading, safety will be compromised due to
inadequate tower facilities.
- Flight operations will be reduced below the level required to meet
training requirements.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
53,8500703676N 21105
MH-60S Hangar & Airfield
Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P767
NAVSTA NORFOLK VANORFOLK, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62688
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
$1,400
$300
$1,100
06/2008
02/2008
03/2010
10/2006
01/2007
07/2007
5%
15%
$1,000
$400
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2691391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
53,8500703676N 21105
MH-60S Hangar & Airfield
Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P767
NAVSTA NORFOLK VANORFOLK, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62688
Furniture
Overhead Cranes (2)
Ready Service Lockers (4)
UPS & B/U Generator for Tower
Electronics
OPN
OPN
OPN
OPN
2010
2010
2010
2009
800
300
200
150
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This Facility
can be used by other components on an as available basis; however, the
scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.
Jack Cox, Planner (Regional
Facilities Ops)
(757) 444-4155 Ex 3013Activity POC: Phone No:
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested
Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2701391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
53,8500703676N 21105
MH-60S Hangar & Airfield
Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P767
NAVSTA NORFOLK VANORFOLK, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62688
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2711390
Scope
72124
72411
Cost
($000)Start
MSGBN Headquarters & BEQ Phase
1
Student Officer Quarters, TBS
Phase 2
Complete
6004 m2
8661 m2
18,839
26,680
Design Status
05/2006
09/2005
8. Projects Requested In This Program
03/2008
09/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(60182 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 2,038,041
116,332
76,070
0
45,519
198,938
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 55,990
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:21105
72411
17120
Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, Type II
Student Barracks, The Basic School Phase 3
Instruction Facility, The Basic School, PH 1
60558 SF
95433 SF
61882 SF
25,460
25,410
25,200
TOTAL
TOTAL
MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
3. Installation and Location: M00264
45,519
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
76,070
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
The installation mission is to maintain and operate facilities and provide
services and material to support the Marine Corps Combat Development
Command, the Marine Corps Air Facility Quantico, and other activities and
units designated by the Commandant of the Marine Corps.
The mission of the Marine Corps Combat Development Command is to develop
Marine Corps warfighting concepts and to determine associated required
capabilities in the areas of doctrine, organization, training and
education, equipment, and support facilities to enable the Marine Corps to
field combat-ready forces; and to participate in and support other major
processes of the Combat Development System.
2,474,900
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.02
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
13862
19072
147
104B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 1187
638
906
813
1033
718
350
1402
1508
1876
1283
2652
2781
2402
4667
8467
Commandant of the
Marine Corps
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2721390
4. Command
MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
3. Installation and Location: M00264
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0 B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.02
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommandant of the
Marine Corps
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2731391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
MSGBN HQ & BEQ, PHASE 1 (64,627
SF)
BACH ENLS QTRS-MARINES CLASS A
STUDENTS (64,045 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (581
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SPECIAL COSTS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
6,004
5,950
54
1,978.36
3,722.68
12,990
(11,770)
(200)
(110)
(110)
(270)
(260)
(270)
3,390
(130)
(690)
(780)
(1,310)
(440)
(40)
16,380
820
17,200
980
18,180
660
18,840
18,839
(2,055)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
18,8390815796M 72124
MSGBN HQ & BEQ, Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P545
MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICOQUANTICO, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00264
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
QUANTICO.
This Project is Phase 1 of 3. Project constructs a secure multi-story
brick-faced, cast stone detailed Georgian-style BEQ providing 140 rooms or
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2741391C
REQUIREMENT:
Provides 280 living spaces for bachelor enlisted personnel (140, 2 person
rooms) using the 2+0 Quality of Life (QOL) standard room design for student
enlisted personnel attached to Marine Security Guard Battalion (MSG Bn).
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
18,8390815796M 72124
MSGBN HQ & BEQ, Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P545
MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICOQUANTICO, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00264
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 6,004
280 manspaces (MS) in the standard 2+0 room configuration (70 modules) with
semi-private bathrooms and walk-in closets. Built-in equipment includes
freight elevator. Community and service core areas consist of laundry
facilities, lounges, administrative offices, housekeeping areas and public
restrooms. Electrical systems include fire alarms, energy saving
electronic monitoring and control system (EMCS), and information systems.
Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire protection systems, heating
ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), and interior as well as exterior
lighting systems. Supporting facilities work includes site and building
utility connections (water, sanitary and storm sewers, electrical,
telephone, local area network (LAN), and cable television (CATV). Paving
and site improvements include paved parking for 250 cars, sidewalks,
roadway access and landscaping. Also includes OMSI manuals, fencing,
telephone, water, sewer, electrical utilities, and storm water management.
Project will match the Base Exterior Architecture Plan (BEAP).
Antiterrorism/Force Protection classifies this facility as a "Primary
Gathering Building-Billeting" in context to a controlled perimeter. AT/FP
measures will include blast resistant glazing, public announcement system,
HVAC intakes located at least 1 m above finished grade, surveillance CATV
monitoring, fenced site perimeter, and controlled site access. Sustainable
principles will be included into the design, development, and construction
of the project and will include low water usage landscaping, storm water
management, room occupancy sensors, electrical monitoring with Direct
Digital Controls, task lighting, LED exit signs, light switching to
segregate banks of lights, day lighting where possible, and use of
recyclable regional and non-toxic construction materials.
Rooms: 140 two person rooms.
Maximum utilization: 280 E1-E3.
Intended Grade mix: 164 E1-E4, 18 E5, 20 E6/E9.
Total 202 persons.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2751391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
Enlisted Marines attending training at MSGBN are currently billeted and
trained in Building 2007 circa 1931. The current BEQ violates AICUZ by
being in the flight path of MCAF. The facility HVAC system utilizes a
temporary chiller every summer to pickup the load from the existing
inadequate outdated chillers. Additionally, the facility is inadequate due
to the physical condition of the Roof and mechanical systems.
Deferral of this project will result in the continued use of an inadequate
and dangerous facility to house and train enlisted Marines. Lack of proper
facilities will negatively affect training. Proper training is crucial in
the wake of increased threats of terrorism. This will seriously affect the
morale of the enlisted Marines and make it more difficult for the Marine
Corps to motivate and retain these specially selected, highly skilled, and
experienced leaders. It will also impact their ability to complete their
mission of guarding United States Embassies throughout the world.
This project supports the Marine Corps' goal of achieving the 2X0 standard
by 2012. Adequate billeting that meets Quality of Life standards for
enlisted personnel attached to MSGBn at MCB Quantico, VA. This project
also provides state of the art facilities that replicate existing equipment
and facilities to allow for realistic training.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
18,8390815796M 72124
MSGBN HQ & BEQ, Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P545
MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICOQUANTICO, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00264
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
4. Contract award:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
Yes
MCB Quantico
$0
$0
$0
01/2008
05/2006
12/2007
03/2008
5%
15%
$
$
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2761391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
18,8390815796M 72124
MSGBN HQ & BEQ, Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P545
MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICOQUANTICO, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00264
BEQ Collateral Equipment
NMCI Connections
PMC
PMC
2008
2008
2,000
55
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
Richard A Reisch (703) 784-5490Activity POC: Phone No:
5. Construction start:
6. Construction complete:
04/2008
05/2009
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
2006 R&M Conducted ($000): 4,5982007 R&M Conducted ($000): 2,791
55,990
C. FY D. FY E. Future R&M Requirements ($000):
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2771391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
STUDENT OFFICER QUARTERS,TBS,
PHASE 2 (93,226 SF)
PRIMARY FACILITY (88,802 SF)
COMPANY ADMIN (3,466 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (958
SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
8,661
8,250
322
89
1,896.86
2,878.46
3,748.66
21,130
(15,650)
(930)
(330)
(2,640)
(400)
(430)
(750)
2,070
(150)
(60)
(660)
(1,100)
(100)
23,200
1,160
24,360
1,390
25,750
930
26,680
26,680
(8,055)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
26,6800815796M 72411
Student Officer Quarters,TBS,
Phase 2
NAVY 2008FY
P546
MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE
QUANTICO.
M00264(AB)
(CAMP BARRETT)
Phase 2 of a 8-Phase building replacement plan that will construct a
multistory reinforced concrete masonry unit (CMU) building with concrete
pile foundation and floors, Georgian style cast stone and brick veneer, and
standing seam metal roof over structural steel framing. Building provides
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2781391C
All Marine officers, regardless of accession source, are trained at The
Basic School. Each year, TBS conducts six (6) Basic Officer Courses (BOC)
consisting of 250 lieutenants each, and one (1) Warrant Officer (WO)
Company of 250 officers. In addition to the six BOC's and one WO course,
TBS billets and trains Naval Academy Midshipmen, Infantry Officer students,
and Reserve Officers each year. Average on Board (AOB) student loading is
1,415 with max loading by schedule method of 1,650 students.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Provide adequate housing for 250 officers undergoing initial training at
The Basic School (TBS), Quantico, Virginia.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
26,6800815796M 72411
Student Officer Quarters,TBS,
Phase 2
NAVY 2008FY
P546
MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 8,661
M00264(AB)
(CAMP BARRETT)
250 rooms in the 1+1 E room configuration (125 modules) with semi-private
bathrooms and walk-in closets. Community and service core areas consist of
laundry facilities, lounges, Company Administrative offices, housekeeping
areas and public restrooms. Built in equipment includes a service elevator
and closet organization system. Information Systems include wiring for
local area network (LAN), cable and television (CATV), and telephone.
Electrical systems include fire alarms and energy saving electronic
monitoring and control system (EMCS). Mechanical systems include plumbing,
fire protection systems, and heating ventilation and air conditioning
(HVAC). Supporting facilities work includes site and building utility
connections (water, sanitary and storm sewers, electrical, telephone, LAN,
CATV). Paving and site improvements include paved parking, sidewalks,
roadway access and landscaping. Sustainable design will be integrated into
the design, development, and construction of the project in accordance with
Executive Order 13123 and other directives. Also includes Technical
Operating Manuals and Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features consisting
of 8-inch R-CMU exterior walls, 25psi exterior doors, 1-inch blast
resistant polycarbonate windows, and 6-inch RC floors, ceilings, and roof.
Demolition of existing barracks wing, F-wing of B-24165 (3,840 m2), as well
as lead paint and asbestos abatement is included. Project will match
existing 2000 series barracks on base per the Base Exterior Architecture
Plan (BEAP). Sustainable principles will be integrated into the design,
development, and construction of the project in accordance with Executive
Order 13123 and other laws and Executive Orders.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2791391C
P546, Phase II of VIII, constructs a multistory BEQ with 250 rooms (125
Modules) in the 1x1 Marine Officer configuration to replace current
billeting in O'Bannon Hall and demolishes F-Wing of O'Bannon Hall.
P547, Phase III of VIII, constructs a multistory BEQ with 250 rooms (125
Modules) in the 1x1 Marine Officer configuration to replace current
billeting in O'Bannon Hall and demolishes A-Wing of O'Bannon Hall.
P565, Phase IV of VIII, constructs a multistory BEQ with 250 rooms (125
Modules) in the 1x1 Marine Officer configuration to replace current
billeting in O'Bannon Hall and demolishes B-Wing of O'Bannon Hall.
P566, Phase V of VIII, constructs a multistory BEQ with 250 rooms (125
Modules) in the 1x1 Marine Officer configuration to replace current
billeting in O'Bannon hall.
P567, Phase VI of VIII, constructs a multistory BEQ with 250 rooms (125
Modules) in the 1x1 Marine Officer configuration to replace current
billeting in O'Bannon Hall.
P562, Phase VII of VIII, constructs a multistory BEQ with 150 rooms (75
Modules) in the 1x1 Marine Officer configuration to replace current
billeting in O'Bannon Hall.
P563, Phase VIII of VIII, constructs a multistory BEQ with 150 rooms (75
Modules) in the 1x1 Marine Officer configuration to replace current
billeting to O'Bannon Hall.
O'Bannon Hall has major problems with plumbing, electrical, HAVC, and
structural problems due to settling of the building.
Currently, there is not enough living space for all of the students
enrolled in The Basic School. On average, TBS billets approximately 1,200
students per day resulting in an overcrowded situation. Normally three (3)
officers are billeted in a space (O'Bannon Hall) designed for two; and two
(2) officers in a space (Graves Hall) designed for one. During surge
periods, three months out of the year, an additional officer is billeted in
each room. Which does not meet the Minimum Standards of Adequacy set forth
in Marine Corps Order P11000.22. Sleeping/Living Area per module is 46
square meters (SM) or 23SM per person. Existing module in O'Bannon Hall is
42SM, which is below current standard for two persons. With three persons
assigned this provides 13SM per person vice the required 23SM.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
26,6800815796M 72411
Student Officer Quarters,TBS,
Phase 2
NAVY 2008FY
P546
MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00264(AB)
(CAMP BARRETT)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2801391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
Deferral of this project will cause overcrowding to continue, adversely
impacting on morale and the Marine Corps' ability to attract and retain
highly qualified officers. The Minimum Standards of Adequacy (MCO
P11000.22) will never be achieved without the construction of this
facility.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
26,6800815796M 72411
Student Officer Quarters,TBS,
Phase 2
NAVY 2008FY
P546
MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Colateral Equipment
NMCI Connection
O&MMC
PMC
2008
2008
8,000
55
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
$450
$350
$100
02/2008
11/2007
02/2010
09/2005
02/2006
09/2007
10%
15%
$250
$200
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
2006 R&M Conducted ($000): 4,5982007 R&M Conducted ($000): 2,791
55,990
C. FY D. FY E. Future R&M Requirements ($000):
M00264(AB)
(CAMP BARRETT)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2811391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
26,6800815796M 72411
Student Officer Quarters,TBS,
Phase 2
NAVY 2008FY
P546
MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other
components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is
based on Navy requirements.
Richard A. Reisch 703-784-5490Activity POC: Phone No:
M00264(AB)
(CAMP BARRETT)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2821391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
26,6800815796M 72411
Student Officer Quarters,TBS,
Phase 2
NAVY 2008FY
P546
MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:
Blank Page
M00264(AB)
(CAMP BARRETT)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2831390
Scope
72111
15250
21650
21250
Cost
($000)Start
BEQ Homeport Ashore Inc 2 of 2
CVN Maintenance Pier
Replacement
Limited Area Production/Strg
Cmplx Inc 4 of 5
Missile Assembly Building 3
Complete
63162 m2
15352 m2
16000 m2
3243 m2
47,240
91,070
39,750
28,690
Design Status
08/2002
06/2006
08/2002
06/2006
8. Projects Requested In This Program
01/2007
09/2007
06/2006
08/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(9335 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 5,786,927
6,814,920
50,700
315,701
206,750
1,568,480
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 855,381
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:21650 Limited Area Production/Strg Cmplx Inc 5 of 5 16000 m2 50,700
TOTAL
TOTAL
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WA
BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation and Location: N68436
206,750
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
50,700
315,701
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
10. Mission or Major Functions:
The Mission of Naval Base Kitsap is to serve as the host command for the
14,743,478
81159
14347
21410
16910
14347
87210
15210
15120
21365
21220
85230
LS
9500 SF
8170 SF
2 EA
4600 SF
10499 LF
40746 SY
5241 SY
17911 SF
6964 SF
3000 SY
12,282
6,237
4,879
7,383
4,688
8,309
211,243
35,152
7,169
3,319
15,040
Waterfront Restricted Area Emergency Power
EHW Security Force Facility
Armored Vehicle Support Facility
WRA Land/Water Interface
Reaction Force Facility Addition
Waterfront Security Barriers
Explosives Handling Wharf #2
Escort Support Facilities (OSVs)
NRMD Blast Hardening And Facility Modern
Equipment Maintenance Building Addition
Upgrade EHW Trestles For KDT Upgrade
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.18
5. Area Const
Cost Index
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
17516
17088
462
422B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 4450
4062
10217
10217
0
0
0
0
0
0
375
375
2012
2012
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2841390
4. Command
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WA
BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation and Location: N68436
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
Navy's fleet throughout West Puget Sound and to provide base operating
services, including support for both surface ships and submarines
homeported at Bremerton and Bangor. NB Kitsap also provides world-class
service, programs, and facilities that meet the needs of their hosted
warfighting commands, tenant activities, crew, and employees. NB Kitsap is
the largest naval organization in Navy Region Northwest and is composed of
installations in Bremerton, Bangor and Keyport.
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.18
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2851391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
BEQ HOMEPORT ASHORE INC 2 OF 2
(679,870 SF)
PARKING GARAGE (530,682 SF)
BEQ (149,188 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SPECIAL COSTS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
SITE PREPARATIONS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
LESS INCREMENT I FUNDING FY 2005
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
63,162
49,302
13,860
388.23
1,985.34
56,720
(19,140)
(27,520)
(1,720)
(520)
(460)
(2,460)
(4,900)
14,040
(5,400)
(2,390)
(1,420)
(1,560)
(50)
(3,220)
70,760
3,540
74,300
4,240
78,540
2,830
-34,125
47,245
47,240
(5,082)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 47,240
Auth for Approp 47,240
0203276N 72111
BEQ Homeport Ashore Inc 2 of 2
NAVY 2008FY
P305A
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
Project constructs 198 "1+1 Enhanced" modules with two private
sleeping/living room areas, a shared bathroom and kitchenette, with a
stacked washer/dryer in the common area. Market style housing units are an
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2861391C
PROJECT:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 47,240
Auth for Approp 47,240
0203276N 72111
BEQ Homeport Ashore Inc 2 of 2
NAVY 2008FY
P305A
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 63,162
alternative strategy to the "1+1 Enhanced" modules.
Intended Utilization: E1-E3 - 396 pn
Maximum Utilization: E1-E3 - 396 pn
The construction will include a multi-story reinforced concrete structure
with concrete masonry unit (CMU) centerline walls; metal stud partition
walls with brick veneer exterior; concrete foundations and floors; standing
seam metal roof; and double glazed, insulated, aluminum framed windows.
The building will contain a lobby, communal areas, and vending area.
Provide elevators, utilities, and fire protection system. A heating,
ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) system will be installed to include
air conditioning, continuous exhaust, and conditioned make up air. Finally
the building will contain cable TV, computer modem and telephone hook ups.
Technical operating manuals will be provided.
Anti-terrorism/Force Protection standards will be integrated into the
design, development, and construction of the project in accordance with
current standards.
Sustainable design will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and
other directives.
Special costs include energy adjustment, brick exterior walls, a sloping
metal roof, and a pedestrian bridge. Built-in equipment includes room and
parking access control systems and elevators. Information systems include
local area network (LAN), telephone and fiber optic wiring. Special
constuction features include contractor coordination, seismic construction,
traffic mitigation, and the use of tower cranes during construction.
This project will also construct an additional 1,494 automobile parking
spaces onto an existing multi-level parking garage, that was designed and
started by the first BEQ project. This is the second Bachelor Enlisted
Quarters (BEQ) of a planned complex of multiple BEQs and a shared parking
garage.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2871391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
The Bremerton Naval Complex currently has a housing deficit for 945
enlisted Sailors. To ease the shortage, the Bremerton Naval Complex has
leased rooms at various hotels and motels within a 50-mile radius of the
Bremerton Naval Complex. In addition, transportation must be provided from
these extended sites located in the Cities of Tacoma and Fife. A
comprehensive Bachelor Housing Plan was prepared for the Bremerton Naval
Complex.
The Bremerton Naval Complex's homeports one Attack Carrier Nuclear (CVN)
and four Fast Combat Support Ships (AOEs). The Chief of Naval Operations
(CNO) initiative to house single Sailors on shore vice onboard ship further
exacerbates an already critical shortfall in available berthing spaces and
cannot be met with the resources currently available.
The Bremerton Naval Complex will continue to have a shortage of BEQ space
available for the permanent party E1-E3 currently stationed onboard
homeported ships at Bremerton. The lack of facilities providing the
required living conditions essential to morale, quality of life, and
retention of trained personnel will be inadequate to meet the present and
future needs of Fleet personnel. With the current resources available the
Bremerton Naval Complex will be unable to comply with the CNO initiative to
house single Sailors on shore vice onboard ship.
Sufficient adequate and efficiently configured housing is required for
enlisted personnel attached to ships homeported at Naval Station Bremerton.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
This project provides Bachelor Enlisted Quarters for 396 E1-E3 and
associated parking structure.
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 47,240
Auth for Approp 47,240
0203276N 72111
BEQ Homeport Ashore Inc 2 of 2
NAVY 2008FY
P305A
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started 08/2002
09/2004
08/2007
3%
5% (E) Percent completed as of
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2881391C
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed Yes
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 47,240
Auth for Approp 47,240
0203276N 72111
BEQ Homeport Ashore Inc 2 of 2
NAVY 2008FY
P305A
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
Collateral Equipment
NMCI Seats
Physical Security Equipment
O&MNR
APN
OPN
2008
2008
2008
3,130
22
1,930
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This Facility
can be used by other components on an as available basis; however, the
scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.
Joseph Tomko (360) 396-5059Activity POC: Phone No:
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
No
N/A
$200
$100
$100
01/2008
09/2007
07/2009
$100
$100
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
2006 R&M Conducted ($000): 35,2282007 R&M Conducted ($000): 4,602
1,322
C. FY D. FY E. Future R&M Requirements ($000):
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2891391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
CVN MAINTENANCE PIER REPLACEMENT
(165,248 SF)
NEW SHIP REPAIR WHARF (165,248
SF)
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
UPLAND CRANE RAILS
PORTAL CRANE RAILS
REPLACE QUAY WALL
STRENGTHEN SHEET PILE WALL
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
15,352
15,352 3,214.29
49,720
(49,350)
(90)
(280)
29,480
(1,340)
(990)
(3,320)
(740)
(2,950)
(5,260)
(11,190)
(3,690)
79,200
3,960
83,160
4,740
87,900
3,170
91,070
91,070
(250)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
91,0700203176N 15250
CVN Maintenance Pier
Replacement
NAVY 2008FY
P356
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: PSNS & IMF BREMERTON
WA.
Construct a one-level concrete deck ship repair wharf (38 m x 404 m)
supported by concrete piles and concrete pile caps; precast concrete fender
piles with ultra-high molecular weight (UHMW) polyethylene wear strips;
bollards, cleats, and cathodic protection. Wharf design shall meet cold-
iron utilities for ship service, industrial support, and support craft per
Navy criteria.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2901391C
REQUIREMENT:
This project demolishes the existing Pier B and constructs a new ship
repair wharf, providing additional service and laydown area, contiguous
with Dry Dock 6, by decking over the space between Pier B and the west mole
of Dry Dock 6, supporting two Nimitz class carriers (4160 Volts), one at
Dry Dock 6 and one at Pier B, with full cold-iron upkeep and maintenance
requirements per applicable ship maintenance criteria.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
91,0700203176N 15250
CVN Maintenance Pier
Replacement
NAVY 2008FY
P356
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
11. Requirement:
Adequate: Substandard:m2 15,352
Project also provides high pressure (5,000 psig) and low pressure (125
psig) compressed air, oily waste collection system, minimum 50 gallons per
minute de-ionized pure water, and approximately 1,750 lineal feet of portal
crane rail, track switch, and supporting structures including approximately
2,650 lineal feet of crane beam, pony bents, and additional piles at bents.
Project also provides replacement of approximately 300 lineal feet of quay
wall (Structure 729) and strengthening the sheet pile wall west of the Dry
Dock 6 mole.
Project also includes fire alarm, industrial and physical security
lighting, storm water collection and transfer with oil water separation,
voice and data communications, CCTV and alarms, utility risers, new upland
primary electrical distribution and other upland utility distribution
capacity for services such as steam/condensate return, compressed air, and
sanitary sewer services. Special Construction features include electrical
upgrades and other utility reconfigurations to support two Nimitz class
carriers (4160 Volts), one at Dry Dock 6 and one at Pier B; recessed
utility trenches with removeable covers within the wharf deck to improve
traffic flow, safety and support for temporary structures; Realigns the
Controlled Industrial Area (CIA) fence and Wyckoff Avenue gate to
incorporate new Pier B within the CIA.
Digital technical operating manuals and record drawings are to be
delivered.
Demolishes 378 meters of inadequate berth, existing Pier B (Facility 722),
and Substation #78 concrete pad (Facility 749).
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2911391C
Adequate and efficiently configured facilities for upkeep, maintenance and
repair for CVN Class vessels associated with Docking Planned Incremental
Availabilities (DPIAs), which are vital to the CNO-directed Regional
Maintenance Center (RMC) ship repair mission at the Puget Sound Naval
Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PSNS & IMF). PSNS & IMF is
the primary West Coast maintenance and ship repair site for nuclear
aircraft carriers, having the only Dry Dock in the Pacific area of
responsibility capable of docking a NIMITZ Class (CVN 68) aircraft carrier.
This project modernizes ship maintenance capability for NIMITZ-Class
nuclear aircraft carriers providing in-water maintenance capability
contiguous with Dry Dock 6, prior to or following drydocking. The pier-
side/in-water maintenance phase typically begins one week to two months
prior to docking, depending on the ship's planned work package to
accomplish Early Start work. Early Start work normally consists of systems
layup, establishment of temporary services, internal access cuts, reactor
and propulsion plant preparations, and reactor plant cooldown, to be ready
for docking and work start on the first day of the dry docking.
Following a typical ten and one half (10 1/2) month drydocking (DPIA), for
approximately three months, the ship will complete its maintenance period
pier-side and perform propulsion plant and reactor plant criticality
testing, which must be done waterborne to allow normal intake and discharge
of seawater heat exchange cooling. A typical non-docking PIA requires
approximately six months pierside.
PSNS & IMF is responsible to the Commander, Fleet Forces Command, and to
Commander, Naval Sea Systems Command (COMNAVSEASYSCOM), Mission/Enterprise
Claimant, for providing logistic support for assigned CVN (NIMITZ Class)
ships and for performing authorized work in connection with ship
conversion, overhaul, repair, alteration, dry docking, and outfitting of
ships and craft, and for providing services and material support to other
Naval vessels. PSNS & IMF is home to approximately 9,518 permanent
employees and 912 military personnel.
This project creates the Pacific Fleet's first integrated NIMITZ Class (CVN
68) consolidated nuclear aircraft carrier maintenance complex capable of
both pier-side/in-water maintenance Planned Incremental Availabilities
(PIAs), and Dry Dock maintenance (Docking Planned Incremental Availability
(DPIA)) necessary for more complex maintenance involving hull penetration,
including propulsion maintenance, hull painting, rudder and propeller
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
91,0700203176N 15250
CVN Maintenance Pier
Replacement
NAVY 2008FY
P356
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2921391C
Pier B was constructed in 1946 as a berthing pier for inactive USS ESSEX
Class, conventionally-powered aircraft carriers (40,600 tons full load) and
subsequently used for homeported ships. It is inadequate for the current
use as a repair pier. Pier B is currently designated as a ship repair pier
for USS NIMITZ Class nuclear aircraft carriers (98,500 tons full load).
Dry Dock 6, adjacent to Pier B, is the Navy's largest Dry Dock in the
Pacific AOR and is the only Dry Dock on the West Coast capable of
supporting CVN DPIAs.
Following a dry docking, the aircraft carrier is moved to Pier B to
complete the DPIA. Cold iron services at this pier are limited for current
and future ship maintenance requirements, and crane service is limited to
light-capacity mobile cranes or floating cranes due to size and weight
limitations of the pier structure. These conditions severely limit the
amount of repair and maintenance work that can be performed.
Utility systems located below the pier deck are submerged during high tides
and are constantly being damaged by salt water corrosion and floating
debris. Utilities above the pier deck are exposed to both personnel and
vehicle traffic. In both cases, utility systems experience frequent
damage. The 60 foot width of Pier B, further restricted by surface-mounted
utilities to only 40 feet in width, restricts
safe movement of equipment, pedestrian traffic, and material/vehicle
movement while the ship is in pier-side overhaul/availability, upkeep or
homeport.
Pier B relies on creosote-impregnated fender piles. The State of
Washington Department of Ecology will not issue hydraulic permit
applications to replace damaged creosote fender piles due to toxicity of
creosote to marine life. PSNS & IMF currently has only one repair pier
(Pier 3) providing full cold iron utility and portal crane services, which
is one mile from Dry Dock 6.
Full service overlapping pier-side (Pier B) and drydocking (Dry Dock 6)
availabilities of two CVNs is not currently possible with the existing Pier
repairs. Creation of this consolidated CVN maintenance 'Hub' reduces
mobilization and demobilization of project management and production
resources and infrastructure currently necessary where in-water and
drydocking evolutions are necessary for an availability or maintenance
period.
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
91,0700203176N 15250
CVN Maintenance Pier
Replacement
NAVY 2008FY
P356
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2931391C
B repair capabilities.
This project must be programmed for funding in FY 2008 or PSNS & IMF will
be unable to perform the drydocking (Dry Dock 6) maintenance availability
of the USS NIMITZ scheduled for 2010 and subsequent docking availability at
Pier B. Delaying this project will force deferral of planned, CNO-directed
CVN maintenance periods. Commencing in November 2010 PSNS & IMF is
scheduled to begin a Super Docking Planned Incremental Availability (Super
DPIA) for USS NIMITZ in Drydock 6 adjacent to Pier B. Construction must be
substantially complete providing shore power to Drydock 6 and minimizing
construction impact by Pier B, affecting the west side of Drydock 6.
Delaying this project to FY2009 jeopardizes the scheduled 2010 USS NIMITZ
availability and subsequent docking availabilities currently scheduled in
2012 and 2013. Drydock 6 is the only dry dock in the Pacific AOR capable of
docking a NIMITZ-Class aircraft carrier.
Inefficiencies will continue to persist due to repetitive relocation of the
CVN maintenance team, with minimal flexibility to respond to ship
maintenance surge capacity required by the CNO's Fleet Response Plan. A
logistic and pedestrian bottleneck through the narrow traffic way at the
head of Pier B will continue to create personnel safety and productivity
inefficiencies between in-water PIAs at Pier B and drydocking (DPIA)
phases.
The CVN project team, consisting of approximately 4,500 project management
and production workers, will continue to be plagued by inefficiencies due
to repetitive mobilization and demobilization, and relocation of PIA and
DPIA production sites, between Dry Dock 6, Pier B and Pier 3, costing each
availability approximately five work days and impacting approximately 4,500
Shipyard production, contractor, ship's force, and specialty service
personnel during each relocation. Dry Dock 6 and Pier 3, currently the only
full-service in-water CVN maintenance site, are separated by approximately
1 mile travel distance. A typical CVN availability typically consists of
500,000 man-days of workload and is valued at approximately $500,000,000.
The risk of losing critical ship maintenance infrastructure will increase
in the event of potential structural failure of the aging Pier B, which is
essential to continuing CVN maintenance availabilities. The limited Pier B
functionality will continue to degrade and PSNS & IMF will be unable to
support the CNO's Fleet Response Plan, which potentially requires
scheduling of overlapping CVN availabilities. Savings per availability of
8,271 man-days and CVN Maintenance Hub efficiencies (logistic and Ship's
Force Quality of Life) will not be realized.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
91,0700203176N 15250
CVN Maintenance Pier
Replacement
NAVY 2008FY
P356
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2941391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
91,0700203176N 15250
CVN Maintenance Pier
Replacement
NAVY 2008FY
P356
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
Physical Security Equipment OPN 2008 250
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. Mission
requirements, operational considerations, and location are incompatible
with use by other components.
Kevin T. Gross, PE (360) 476-7986Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
N/A
$800
$700
$100
12/2008
01/2008
09/2010
06/2006
11/2006
09/2007
2%
5%
$700
$100
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2951391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
LIMITED AREA PROD & STRG COMPLEX
INC 4 OF 5 (172,223 SF)
PRODUCTION/STORAGE COMPLEX
(172,223 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SPECIAL COSTS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
LESS FUTURE YEAR FUNDING
LESS INCREMENT I, II, III FUNDING
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
16,000
16,000 4,265
114,000
(68,240)
(1,470)
(1,180)
(1,770)
(340)
(41,000)
54,130
(34,600)
(2,160)
(40)
(15,410)
(120)
(1,800)
168,130
8,410
176,540
10,060
186,600
-50,519
-96,331
39,750
39,750
(11,939)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 39,750
Auth for Approp 39,750
0203476N 21650
Limited Area Prod & Strg
Complex Inc 4 of 5
NAVY 2008FY
P973C
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
Construct a reinforced concrete, underground, multi-level re-entry body
processing and storage facility. This facility includes a reinforced
concrete foundation, hardened floors, and hardened load-bearing walls and
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2961391C
The Limited Area Production and Storage Complex is required for the
receipt/shipment, inspection, assembly, checkout, and maintenance and
storage of TRIDENT II tactical and instrumented re-entry bodies. The
construction of this facility is proposed for FY2005 in support of TRIDENT
REQUIREMENT:
This project provides a Limited Area Production and Storage Complex
(LAPSC).
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 39,750
Auth for Approp 39,750
0203476N 21650
Limited Area Prod & Strg
Complex Inc 4 of 5
NAVY 2008FY
P973C
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 16,000
roof. The existing Limited Area (LA) perimeter security zone and patrol
roads will be expanded to encompass the new LAPSC. Portions of the
existing LA perimeter will be demolished to provide new access roads. New
security guard towers will be constructed. Work will be conducted in the
very high security Strategic Weapons Facility Pacific (SWFPAC) Limited
Area. Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features are included.
Built-in equipment includes adjustable dock levelers, seven 2-ton bridge
crane supports and three elevators. Special costs include seismic
construction, structural excavation, special foundations and blast
features, earth cover, lightweight concrete weapons isolation component
separation wall storage areas and a thick slab-on-grade above the
underground structure.
Supporting facilities include special foundations, underground electrical
and mechanical systems, emergency generator in a hardened shelter,
lightning protection and communications. Special construction features
include the requirement to pass through security screening prior to
entrance and exit, the requirement to furnish escorts, the loss of time due
to security and operational drills, the need to construct temporary enclave
fencing, the requirement to keep the existing Limited Area in operation
during construction, and sustainable development features. Sustainable
principles will be intregated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and
other laws and Executive Orders.
Demolition includes 2,630 m2 of existing inadequate re-entry buildings
(buildings 6007 and 6595) and 5,450 m2 of existing inadequate re-entry body
magazines (buildings 6200 through 6220 inclusive, 21 magazines total).
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2971391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Bid Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
A TRIDENT II re-entry body receipt, shipping, processing, and storage
capability does not currently exist to meet projected deliveries and
processing requirements.
Strategic Weapons Facility Pacific will be incapable of providing adequate
re-entry body receipt, shipping, processing, and storage in support of the
Strategic Weapons Facility production operations. A single underground
protected structure provides the most robust protection for fulfilling this
mission against all threats.
II missile production.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 39,750
Auth for Approp 39,750
0203476N 21650
Limited Area Prod & Strg
Complex Inc 4 of 5
NAVY 2008FY
P973C
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
MAINTENANCE WORKSTATIONS
SECURITY SYSTEMS, SENSORS, TOOLS,
WPN
OMN
2005
2006
2,884
5,056
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
N/A
$9,423
$5,889
$3,534
07/2007
04/2006
12/2010
08/2002
01/2004
01/2006
100%
100%
$7,067
$2,356
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2981391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 39,750
Auth for Approp 39,750
0203476N 21650
Limited Area Prod & Strg
Complex Inc 4 of 5
NAVY 2008FY
P973C
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
TESTING EQUIP
SECURITY SYSTEMS, WEAPONS, INTRUSION
DETECTION SYS
OPN 2007 4,000
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This Facility
can be used by other components on an as available basis; however, the
scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.
Mel Rivera (703) 601-9244Activity POC: Phone No:
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 2991391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
MISSILE ASSEMBLY BUILDING 3
(34,910 SF)
MISSILE ASSEMBLY BUILDING
(34,802 SF)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SPECIAL COSTS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
3,243.21
3,233.21
10
4,382.91
3,719.15
15,540
(14,170)
(40)
(850)
(240)
(90)
(80)
(70)
10,310
(1,020)
(710)
(1,670)
(6,900)
(10)
25,850
1,290
27,140
1,550
28,690
28,690
28,690
(5,450)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
28,6900703676N 21250
Missile Assembly Building 3
NAVY 2008FY
P978
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
This project consists of a TRIDENT II D5-LE missile processing facility of
multi-height configuration, concrete foundation and floor, insulated walls
of concrete masonry units and metal siding, and sloped metal roof.
Supporting facilities include special foundations, underground electrical
distribution, lightning protection, cableway for checkout cables,
communications, security protection systems, access roads and aprons,
barricades, and storm drainage. Building provides space for missile
section buildup, horizontal assembly/disassembly, and checkout of the
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3001391C
12. Supplemental Data:
MAB-1 is the only facility at SWFPAC capable of performing missile build up
and checkout. The maximum production rate of MAB-1 is 24 missiles per
year. It is a single point failure facility for which all missile
production and fleet support is dependent. The facility has limited
capability to absorb unplanned work or equipment down time without
adversely impacting planned production rate and fleet support.
The Navy will not be able to support the technical program and fleet
requirements as a TRIDENT II D5-LE Missile Assembly Facility in support of
the Pacific Fleet deployment schedule. This would result in SSBNs deployed
with empty tubes starting in FY11 without the production capability
provided by the proposed project, MAB-3.
Adequate processing facilities are essential to maintain the required rate
for horizontal missile assembly/disassembly, section buildup and checkout
of TRIDENT II D5-LE missiles. The volume will increase from 24 to 27
missiles per year starting in FY11 and then again to 31 in FY12. The
activities include missile section buildup, missile assembly/disassembly,
nose fairing mate/demate, missile transfer to/from facility transporter,
missile systems testing, post-mate checkout, and final missile inspection.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Constructs a facility for the assembly and build-up of TRIDENT II, D5
missiles from components from missile sub-contractors. The assembled
missiles support the Pacific D5 SLBM deployments.
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
28,6900703676N 21250
Missile Assembly Building 3
NAVY 2008FY
P978
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
11. Requirement:
Adequate: Substandard:m2 3,243
A. Estimated Design Data:
TRIDENT II D5-LE missile, including equipment section buildup/missile
backshop processes and checkout/repair of missile motors. Additional space
is provided for offices and mechanical equipment room for building support
and environmental control equipment.
Sustainable design will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and
other directives.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3011391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Bid Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
28,6900703676N 21250
Missile Assembly Building 3
NAVY 2008FY
P978
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
Bridge Cranes (5 Ton & 10 Ton)
NMCI Workstations-10 Seats
Non-technical Collateral Equipment
Physical Security Equipment
Technical Collateral Equipment
OPN
OPN
OMN
APN
OMN
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
500
20
84
500
4,346
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Installation Management Claimant certifies that this project has been
considered for joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is
recommended. Mission requirements, operational considerations, and
location are incompatible with use by other components.
Mel Rivera (703) 601-9244Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
N/A
$2,325
$2,092
$233
03/2008
11/2007
03/2009
06/2006
09/2006
08/2007
35%
55%
$1,395
$930
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3021391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
28,6900703676N 21250
Missile Assembly Building 3
NAVY 2008FY
P978
NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68436
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3031390
Scope
21107
Cost
($000)Start
EA-18G Facility Improvements
Complete
11030 m2 23,910
Design Status
06/2006
8. Projects Requested In This Program
09/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(4362 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 1,456,495
14,550
0
27,725
23,910
259,902
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 149,309
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:
TOTAL
NAS WHIDBEY ISLAND WA
WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS, WASHINGTON
3. Installation and Location: N00620
23,910
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL 27,725
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
Maintain and operate facilities and provide services and material to
support operations of aviation activities of the Pacific Fleets. Homeport
to all of the Navy's electronic countermeasures aircraft, the EA-6B
Prowler, which are vital to our nation's defense. Also located at Whidbey
are the P-3C Orion patrol aircraft, the EP-3E Aries II fleet air
reconnaissance aircraft, and a Search and Rescue Unit flying the UH-3H
helicopter and the UC-12B aircraft for fleet logistic support.
1,782,582
74044
91110
83636 SF
48 AC
24,446
3,279
Fitness Center Whidbey
AICUZ Land Acquisition - Ault Field
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.27
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
9405
8699
1232
1217B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 7576
6729
291
291
0
0
150
150
0
0
54
108
102
204
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3041390
4. Command
NAS WHIDBEY ISLAND WA
WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS, WASHINGTON
3. Installation and Location: N00620
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.27
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommander Navy
Installations Command
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3051391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
EA-18G FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
(65,921 SF)
UPGRADE VAULT & SQUADRON
SPACES HANGAR 8 (52,800 SF)
UPGRADE MECH/ELEC HANGAR 8
UPGRADE MECH/ELEC POD BLDG
2818 (9,009 SF)
UPGRADE MECH/ELEC TECH
TRAINING BLDG 976 (1,356 SF)
UPGRADE SIMULATOR BLDG 2593
FOR TOFT 3 (2,476 SF)
UPGRADE SECURITY IN SUPPLY
BLDG 369 (280 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (5.7%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
m2
m2
LS
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
6,124.3
4,905.3
837
126
230
26
217.18
676.5
1,384.61
965
1,422.66
6,220
(1,070)
(3,870)
(570)
(170)
(220)
(40)
(10)
(40)
(160)
(70)
14,580
(280)
(11,380)
(50)
(1,880)
(990)
20,800
1,040
21,840
1,240
23,080
830
23,910
23,910
(22,294)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
23,9100703676N 21107
EA-18G Facility Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P193
NAS WHIDBEY ISLAND WAWHIDBEY ISLAND NAS, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00620
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3061391C
REQUIREMENT:
This project upgrades vault (secure) space; upgrades mechanical and
electrical utilities within Hangar 8 and other buildings; provides a new
flightline electrical distribution system (FLEDS) and other site
improvements required to support the new EA-18G aircraft, expected to begin
arriving at NAS Whidbey Island (the single U.S. Navy site) in 2008.
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
23,9100703676N 21107
EA-18G Facility Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P193
NAS WHIDBEY ISLAND WAWHIDBEY ISLAND NAS, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00620
11. Requirement:
Adequate: Substandard:m2 6,124
This project upgrades existing facilities and provides limited new
construction necessary to support the EA-18G aircraft, expected to begin
arriving at NAS Whidbey Island (the single U.S. Navy site) in 2008.
Existing space (4,600 SF) will be upgraded for a vault (secure) within
Hangar 8 (#2642) . Vault space will be used for administration and mission
planning space, a classified storage room and brief/debrief spaces. This
vault upgrade will require significant renovations throughout the existing
shop and admin spaces (52,800 SF).
Mechanical, electrical, and communication upgrades will be provided for
Hangar 8 (52,800 SF); POD Repair Building (#2818); and for the Maintenance
Training Building (#976) occupied by a Center for Naval Aviation Technical
Training Unit (CNATTU), which will be providing EA-18G unique maintenance
training.
The Flight Simulator Building (#2593) will be upgraded to support the
Tactical Operational Flight Trainer (TOFT 3). The Supply Building (#369)
will require upgrades to store EA-18G radar equipment.
Supporting facilities include Special Construction Features (Flightline
Traffic and FOD Controls), Electrical Utilities [a Flightline Electrical
Distribution System (FLEDS) and Low Pressure (LP) Air], and Paving and Site
Improvements [Pavement Striping, PADEYE Installation and Parking Apron
(Compass Rose)]. Contaminated soil removal will be required for FLEDS and
utility line improvements. Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection Measures include
Mass Notification and HVAC Shutoff for Hangar 8.
Demolish the 30 inadequate fixed point utility systems (FPUS) located at
the current aircraft parking spots.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3071391C
None of the following facilities have the capacity or capability within
their existing mechanical, electrical, or communications infrastructure to
support the state-of-the-art requirements of this new electronic attack
warfare aircraft: Hangar 8; POD Repair (2818); and Technical Training
(976).
The existing Supply Building does not provide secured storage space for the
sensitive and highly classified EA-18G radar equipment.
In order to properly train Naval aviators on the new EA-18G aircraft,
flight simulator training is required. EA-18G flight simulators will be
arriving in the next few years at NAS Whidbey Island. Upgrades to the
existing Flight Simulator Building (2593) are required to accommodate these
new EA-18G Tactical Operational Flight Trainers.
Adequate facilities are required to support nine EA-18G squadrons, each
with five aircraft, and one Fleet Replacement Squadron (FRS) with 14
aircraft. The first EA-18G aircraft is expected to begin arriving at NAS
Whidbey Island (the single U.S. Navy site) in 2008.
Three Tactical Operational Flight Trainers (TOFTs) are required to meet
Naval aviator training requirements for the new EA-18G aircraft.
Installation of the first two TOFTs are expected to be funded through Navy
Region Northwest in order to have them operational during FY 2007 and early
FY 2008. The third TOFT is expected to arrive after the first two and is
thus included in this project.
A new 400-Hz Flightline Electrical Distribution System (FLEDS) with Low
Pressure (LP) Air is required to support the onboard aircraft equipment in
this new electronic attack warfare aircraft. Commander Naval Air Force
(CNAF) determined FLEDS are required in order to allow maintenance of
aircraft without the need to turn on the aircraft auxillary power units
which conserves fuel, minimizes wear and tear on the auxillary power units,
reduces air pollution, and reduces noise.
To improve operations support for the new EA-18G aircraft, a new flightline
parking layout will be established, with new aircraft tie-downs (PADEYES)
meeting pull out strength and grounding requirements. The parking layout
will be coordinated with the new FLEDS locations to optimize operations.
Additionally, parking apron (compass rose) will be constructed to permit
calibration of aircraft compasses.
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
23,9100703676N 21107
EA-18G Facility Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P193
NAS WHIDBEY ISLAND WAWHIDBEY ISLAND NAS, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00620
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3081391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
The existing Fixed Point Utility Systems do not meet the voltage and
frequency standards necessary to provide 400 Hertz power for the Aircraft
Electrical Power Monitor in the new EA-18G aircraft.
Existing tie-downs do not meet the pull-out strength and grounding
requirements of this new aircraft. Existing apron area cannot be used to
calibrate EA-18G compasses due to metal within the concrete, therefore a
new "compass rose" calibration area is required.
The Navy will not be able to support the new EA-18G aircraft, which begin
arriving at NAS Whidbey Island (the single U.S. Navy site) in 2008.
Inadequate vault (secure) space would compromise EA-18G aircrew mission
data. Maintenance operations to support the new EA-18G aircraft would be
constrained or impossible without essential upgrades to existing
facilities. Training of Naval aviators on the new EA-18G aircraft would be
significantly degraded without installation of Tactical Operational Flight
Trainers (TOFTs). Without a Flightline Electrical Distribution System
(FLEDS), the new EA-18G aircraft would be restricted to either inefficient
use of limited Ground Support Equipment (GSE) or unnecessary wear and tear
upon aircraft electronic components. Additional operational
inefficiencies, including poor aircraft compass calibration, would occur
without necessary site improvements to various airfield pavements.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
23,9100703676N 21107
EA-18G Facility Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P193
NAS WHIDBEY ISLAND WAWHIDBEY ISLAND NAS, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00620
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
06/2006
09/2006
09/2007
5%
15%
$1,500
$500
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3091391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
23,9100703676N 21107
EA-18G Facility Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P193
NAS WHIDBEY ISLAND WAWHIDBEY ISLAND NAS, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00620
Collateral Equipment
Physical Security Equipment
Trainer TOFT 3 (TOFT 201)
OPN
OPN
APN
2008
2008
2010
228
66
22,000
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This
Facility can be used by other components on an as available basis;
however, the scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.
Mr. Steve Rothboeck 360-257-1001Activity POC: Phone No:
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
$2,000
$500
$1,500
03/2008
12/2007
12/2009
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3101391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
23,9100703676N 21107
EA-18G Facility Improvements
NAVY 2008FY
P193
NAS WHIDBEY ISLAND WAWHIDBEY ISLAND NAS, WASHINGTON
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N00620
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3111390
Scope
14320
Cost
($000)Start
Waterfront Development Phase 1
Complete
3821 m2 35,500
Design Status
12/2005
8. Projects Requested In This Program
04/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(66 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 269,189
18,030
38,360
30,721
35,500
89,938
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 91,494
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:14320 Waterfront Development Phase 2 0 LS 38,360
TOTAL
TOTAL
NAVSUPPACT BAHRAIN
BAHRAIN IS, BAHRAIN
3. Installation and Location: N63005
35,500
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
38,360
30,721
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
This unit is under the Commander, U. S. Naval Forces Central Command
(COMUSNAVCENT) who provides overall command and operational control of
naval forces assigned to the Commander, U. S. Central Command and
coordinates with naval forces operating in support of U. S. Central
Command's naval component. Its mission is to maintain and operate
facilities and to provide support for visiting units of the operating
forces, Department of Defense Dependent School, and to personnel, including
dependents, from commands and U.S. Department of Defense activities in the
Bahrain area. There are fifty full-time tenants that are supported in
addition to the DoD School and visiting operating forces. Also responsible
for operating and maintaining a communications facility to support the
Defense Communication System and Fleet requirements in the Persian Gulf to
include a message center.
481,738
61010 148004 m2 30,721Operations And Support Facilities
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.1
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
3235
3046
306
321B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 2185
1984
176
173
0
0
0
0
0
0
84
84
484
484
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3121390
4. Command
NAVSUPPACT BAHRAIN
BAHRAIN IS, BAHRAIN
3. Installation and Location: N63005
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0 B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.1
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3131391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1
(41,129 SF)
OPERATIONS BUILDING (3,584 SF)
HARBOR PATROL BUILDING (23,681
SF)
ENTRY CONTROL POINT (603 SF)
SMALL ARMS RANGE (13,261 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
OTHER SITE UTILITIES
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (6.5%)
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
3,821
333
2,200
56
1,232
4,186.21
1,980.34
4,393.14
2,116.01
9,330
(1,390)
(4,360)
(250)
(2,610)
(310)
(60)
(80)
(270)
22,420
(1,350)
(7,250)
(5,280)
(3,070)
(10)
(1,320)
(4,140)
31,750
1,590
33,340
2,170
35,510
35,510
35,500
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
35,5000203176N 14320
Waterfront Development Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P925
NAVSUPPACT BAHRAINBAHRAIN IS, BAHRAIN
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N63005
The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: NAVSUPPACT BAHRAIN.
This project provides the 65 acre leased site with Perimeter Security, Base
Utilities, Small Arms Range, Harbor Patrol Building, and Port Control and
Operations Facility.
Perimeter Security cosists of a CENTCOM-compliant Force Protection
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3141391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
35,5000203176N 14320
Waterfront Development Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P925
NAVSUPPACT BAHRAINBAHRAIN IS, BAHRAIN
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N63005
11. Requirement: Adequate: Substandard:m2 3,821
perimeter, including lighting, fencing, intrusion detection systems (IDS),
and vehicle and personnel Entry Control Points (ECP's).
Base utility infrastructure consists of a Main Switching Station, Reverse
Osmosis Water Plant, Pump House and Central Power/Chiller Plant and an
adjacent elevated water tank. A utility distribution system will be
provided and must allow for future expansion. Fuel Storage and Dispensing
will be provided. Sewer and communications will be provided pier side
(Existing Quay Wall) to support fleet operations which will reduce
significant fleet costs.
Small Arms Range provides a 16 firing point indoor small arms range for
rifle, pistol, and shotgun training and qualifications.
Harbor Patrol Building accomodates the Security Harbor Patrol Unit (HPU)
personnel and equipment to include an internal Armory. Facility is multi-
story and includes passenger/freight elevators.
Port Control and Operations (PCO) Facility housing the Port Control Office,
Ship Repair Unit, and Mine Countermeasures Unit. Facility is multi-story
and includes passenger/freight elevators. Operational facilities require
internal armories.
The Small Arms Range, Harbor Patrol Building, and PCO Facility require the
following: secure communications connected to Naval Support Activity
Bahrain by way of existing conduits, air conditioning, fire protection,
IDS, communications and computer links, personnel alert systems, and ATFP
features. These structures will be heavily reinforced concrete structures
on pile foundations. Hardening of structures is required due to Anti-
Terrorism/Force Protection (ATFP) requirements. Site challenges include a
high water table aproximately 3 meter's below grade.
Limited dredging and a small craft ramp will be constructed to provide
access for the small craft. Other site improvements include guard posts,
roads, sidewalks, and parking.
This project provides infrastructure capacity and support for SOCOM's FY08
P-926 MILCON which is located at this new site.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3151391C
The current Mina Sulman pier has been jointly-used by the US Navy, as well
as Bahrain Government and Bahrain commercial interests. The current pier
and port site condition has deteriorated significantly beyond economic
repair and is to be demolished and converted by the Government of Bahrain.
Structural repairs completed in 2003 were intended to last only 5 years.
The pier is mission-critical for the Fifth Fleet.
The security forces for the port are currently not located at Mina Sulman
where US Navy vessels berth; they are approximately one nautical mile away
by boat. The USS Cole attack has shown terrorist group's ability to
effectively strike US warships in port. Potentially over one thousand
sailors could be on the pier at any one time.
The port supports over 80 small craft, including Spec War Mark Five boats,
of which, half are deployed and half are in port. US Navy operational
forces, other service branches and the US Coast Guard do not have force-
protected areas to operate or to launch their vessels. Their total space
requirement to perform essential functions is grossly inadequate.
Facilities for SEALs, Mine Counter Measures, Port Control, and MARMC are
scattered on the NSA base. Most of these facilities are near or on the
perimeter of the base and consist of light construction. Other
scattered/not-consolidated functions are currently in relocatable
facilities. Relocatables are extremely vulnerable to terrorist attacks due
A US dedicated safe harbor for US Navy vessels in addition to various
tenants requiring waterfront facilities in Bahrain. These waterfront
facilities directly support US Navy's war fighting capability in CENTCOM
AOR for missions such as Operation Enduring Freedom. Pier space that can
handle Naval Vessels up to but not including Carriers. Support for the new
Littoral Class Ships. Rectify numerous CENTCOM AT/FP violations. Increase
security by co-locating waterfront functions. Provide installation support
for security personnel, Ship Repair 9MARMC), and utilities for FY08 MCON
P926 NSWU-3.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
This project is the initial development of a 65 acre leased site into a
Waterfront Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) facility for and adjacent to
the US Naval Support Activity in Bahrain. Includes perimeter security,
access control points, installation utility facilities and distribution,
small arms range, and a waterfront operations facility.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
35,5000203176N 14320
Waterfront Development Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P925
NAVSUPPACT BAHRAINBAHRAIN IS, BAHRAIN
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N63005
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3161391C
to their lightweight construction. Neither renovation nor modernization
would alter the location or safety of the existing facilities.
The Mine Counter Measure (MCM) mission has no waterfront facilities which
is inconsistent with their duties.
Small Arms training is conducted in a portable 3 firing-point facility that
cannot accommodate the required number of personnel resulting in a high
percentage of armed personnel not able to maintain required qualification
standards.
Personnel: Military and civilian workforce are located in non-force
protected, non-consolidated, cramped, and unsafe temporary facilities.
Designated Site: In late 2007, the Kingdom of Bahrain (KOB) is relocating
their port container-operations facilities to a newly developed modern port
complex and will vacate the proposed site currently used as a container
port. This is an opportunity for the US Navy to obtain a waterfront site
adjacent to its existing base. The lease will be with a ministry of the KOB
and will be the same type lease as the three leases for the current NSA
site on which more than $175M of MCON has been invested. Coordination of
this lease is currently underway. The site provides approximately 600
meters of quay wall. Only limited utilities and no substantial structures
occupy the site. Development of this site is the US Navy's only means of
sustaining waterfront operations. This new US Navy waterfront site is
separated from the existing primary Navy base by a newly constructed public
highway. NSA Bahrain coordinated with the Bahrain government to install
conduit under the new highway before construction of the highway.
SOCOM has an FY08 P-926 MILCON that relys on the utilities and security
provided by this project.
No alternative sites currently exist for Fifth Fleet mission requirements.
If these new facilities are not provided, COMUSNAVCENT / COMFIFTHFLT/NSA
Bahrain will continue to operate out of their temporary on-base trailers
and off-base with inadequate force protection, insufficient power, space,
and communications to properly manage the myriad of operations taking place
in the area of responsibility. In addition, resources and time will
continue to be required to compensate for the lack of suitable facilities
to accommodate this forward-deployed command. The Port Security Forces
will continue to operate one nautical mile away from the vessels that they
are supposed to protect in port reducing reaction time. The lack of a
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
35,5000203176N 14320
Waterfront Development Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P925
NAVSUPPACT BAHRAINBAHRAIN IS, BAHRAIN
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N63005
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3171391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Bid Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
range continues to significantly degrade mission readiness of NSA Security
Department, embarked security teams and other operational units in Bahrain.
Furthermore, the potential disruption of mission support due to terrorist
activity will continue to be a threat to the current facilities. Without
this project, utilities will not be available to support SOCCOM's FY08 P-
926 MILCON.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
35,5000203176N 14320
Waterfront Development Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P925
NAVSUPPACT BAHRAINBAHRAIN IS, BAHRAIN
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N63005
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
LCDR John Bennett, NRSWA Regional Engineer, certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. The infrastructure of this
project supports joint use, however, only buildings for US Navy use are
being constructed in this project. Therefore, unilateral construction is
recommended.
LCDR John Bennett DSN 318-439-4100Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
$3,588
$588
$3,000
01/2008
12/2007
07/2010
12/2005
06/2006
04/2007
40%
50%
$2,588
$1,000
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3181391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
35,5000203176N 14320
Waterfront Development Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P925
NAVSUPPACT BAHRAINBAHRAIN IS, BAHRAIN
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N63005
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3191390
Scope
83110
Cost
($000)Start
Wastewater Treatment Facility
Complete
0 LS 7,150
Design Status
06/2007
8. Projects Requested In This Program
03/2008
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(7000 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 2,544,439
0
0
11,962
7,150
0
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 204,309
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:
TOTAL
NAVSUPPFAC DIEGO GARCIA IO
DIEGO GARCIA
3. Installation and Location: N61078
7,150
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL 11,962
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
7,500
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
Provides waterfront, personnel and logistics support functions and
facilities for forward deployed Naval forces including surface combatants,
submarines and logistics ships. Will provide support to SSGN guided
missile submarines.
2,563,551
*
89050
21360
LS
LS
4,462
7,500#
Provide Scada System
Paint And Blasting Shop, Harbor Operations
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
2.56
5. Area Const
Cost Index
7,150
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
1100
1162
65
70B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 415
472
55
55
0
0
0
0
0
0
193
193
372
372
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3201390
4. Command
NAVSUPPFAC DIEGO GARCIA IO
DIEGO GARCIA
3. Installation and Location: N61078
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
2.56
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommander Navy
Installations Command
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3211391
PROJECT:
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
SEWAGE LAGOON (320' W X 360' L
X 10' D)
INLET / OUTLET STRUCTURES AND
MANHOLES
INSTALLATION OF PIPES ON
TRENCH
MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
COMMUNICATIONS
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (6.2%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
4,220
(3,330)
(200)
(150)
(540)
1,970
(220)
(870)
(150)
(730)
6,190
310
6,500
400
6,900
250
7,150
7,150
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
7,1500702776N 83110
Wastewater Treatment Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P158
NAVSUPPFAC DIEGO GARCIA IODIEGO GARCIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61078
11. Requirement:
Adequate: Substandard:
Construct a lined earthen sewage treatment cell, approximately 320-ft wide
x 360-ft long x 10-ft overall depth adjacent to the existing two-cell
sewage treatment lagoon located at the Air Operations Area. The proposed
project is complete with compacted coral fill and gravel bedding, liner
system, piping system, inlet/outlet box structures, and transition
manholes. Project includes clearing and grubbing, removal of existing
chain link fence, new perimeter fencing, new access road, re-routing and
re-installation of underground electrical cables and construction of new
manholes, removal and re-routing of concrete-lined drainage ditch, re-
routing of existing underground fiber optic cables, and all related
mechanical and electrical works.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3221391C
Two existing facultative lagoon treatment systems provide centralized
wastewater treatment for Diego Garcia: the Air Ops and R-Site sewage
lagoons. The Air Ops sewage lagoon services the area extending from the
Seabreeze Village, a housing area, to Point Marianne (Tent City). The R-
site sewage lagoon services the area extending from the Cantonment to
another housing area and the Palmsville Village. The effluent from these
treatment plants is discharged into the Indian Ocean through ocean
outfalls. Chapter 4, Wastewater, of the Final Governing Standards (FGS)
for Diego Garcia require that existing sources of pollutants meet the
standard limits for five-day Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Total
Suspended Solids (TSS) among other parameters. The 30-day average
discharge limitation for BOD and TSS is 45 mg/l. Both plants are in
compliance with the FGS except for TSS, which has a recorded average
reading exceeding the specified limit; the highest recorded reading was 56
mg/l.
The current treatment process at the Air Ops Two-Cell Sewage Lagoon is
maximized. As a short-term solution, surface aerators (4 each/cell) were
installed to increase the rate of treatment and reduce the detention time
needed to treat higher wastewater loads while still meeting the regulations
set forth in the FGS for Diego Garcia.
This project will provide a long-term solution to the current sewage
treatment problem in Diego Garcia brought about by the increased
operational tempo in the region by constructing a third sewage treatment
cell at the Air Ops Area. The expanded treatment plant will have adequate
capacity to support an additional military personnel loading of 2,500 at
the Tent City. The anticipated increase will generate a buffer of
An adequately sized and configured additional sewage treatment cell for
increased military personnel is required. The proposed project will be a
complementary back-up cell and will allow required repair and maintenance
to the other sewage treatment cells without compromising the treatment
process and regulatory compliance during normal periods; that is when there
is no unusual deployment of military contingents at the Tent City. The
current treatment lagoons cannot accommodate the anticipated contingency.
Therefore, the proposed additional sewage treatment cell is required.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
The proposed project will construct a third sewage treatment cell with
adequate capacity for additional military personnel loading of 2,500 at the
Tent City. (Current Mission)
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
7,1500702776N 83110
Wastewater Treatment Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P158
NAVSUPPFAC DIEGO GARCIA IODIEGO GARCIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61078
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3231391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
approximately 7,500 gallons per day.
NAVSUPPFAC, Diego Garcia is the only military activity that provides
services and materials in support of shore activities and fleet operations
in Diego Garcia.
Existing sewage lagoon at the Air Ops Area will continue to be used and
will result in violation of the Final Governing Standards for Diego Garcia.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
7,1500702776N 83110
Wastewater Treatment Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P158
NAVSUPPFAC DIEGO GARCIA IODIEGO GARCIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61078
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander or the Installation Management Claimant certifies
that this project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral
construction is recommended. Mission requirements, operational
considerations, and location are incompatible with use by other
components.
Butch Capili DSN 315-370-4513Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
$240
$100
$140
04/2008
03/2008
08/2009
06/2007
01/2008
03/2008
5%
15%
$100
$140
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3241391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
7,1500702776N 83110
Wastewater Treatment Facility
NAVY 2008FY
P158
NAVSUPPFAC DIEGO GARCIA IODIEGO GARCIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61078
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3251390
Scope
41120
11210
11210
Cost
($000)Start
Fuel Farm
Western Taxiway
Full Length Taxiway
Complete
0 LS
5110 m2
44000 m2
4,000
2,900
15,490
Design Status
01/2005
01/2005
01/2005
8. Projects Requested In This Program
07/2005
07/2005
07/2005
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..( Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 0
0
31,410
5,180
22,390
0
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 0
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:21105
11210
13140
Aircraft Maintenance Hangar
Aircraft Parking Apron
Telcom Facility
2150 m2
30839 m2
200 m2
12,830
15,270
3,310
TOTAL
TOTAL
CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTI
DJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI
3. Installation and Location: N3379A
22,390
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
TOTAL
31,410
5,180
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
Command center for the Combined Joint Task Force - Horn of Africa (CJTF-
HOA). The task force conducts operations and training to help host nations
establish a secure environment while enabling regional stability. The
primary purpose of the camp is to support CTF-HOA's anti-terrorism
operations in the Horn of Africa.
58,980
85110
85110
33824 SY
33332 SY
2,580
2,600
Pave External Roads
Interior Paved Roads Phase A
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
0
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3261390
4. Command
CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTI
DJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI
3. Installation and Location: N3379A
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
0
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommander Navy
Installations Command
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3271391
Fuel farm is required to safely transfer and store the fuel for aircraft
operations, electrical generation, and tactical vehicle operations. The
transfer station outside the camp is located at a distance to provide
REQUIREMENT:
Project constructs a series of fuel tanks and fuel tanker transfer pads
with all associated pumps, piping, and environmental protection.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
FUEL FARM
FUEL TANKAGE (790 CY)
DISTRIBUTION PIPING (2,953 LF)
TRUCK FILL STAND
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (6.2%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
LS
m3
m
EA
LS
LS
604
900
2
1,677.88
1,010.72
493,033.58
2,910
(1,010)
(910)
(990)
550
(410)
(140)
3,460
170
3,630
230
3,860
140
4,000
4,000
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
4,0000703976N 41120
FUEL FARM
NAVY 2008FY
P906
CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTIDJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N3379A
11. Requirement:
Adequate: Substandard:m3 604
Project constructs a permanent fuel tank farm. This facility includes four
prefabricated 40,000 gallon steel fuel tanks, with an additional area for
four more similar sized tanks. Two of the proposed tanks will contain
aviation fuel and two will contain diesel fuel. Each tank includes
foundations, earthwork berms capable of containing potential spills,
appropriate pumps, double walled piping and valves, and security fencing
around the exterior of the tank berms. A transfer facility for offloading
supply tanker trucks located outside the security fencing of the camp is
included. An additional transfer pad located within the camp adjacent to
the tank farm is included to load out tank trucks for aircraft refueling.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3281391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
The current mission is supported entirely through tanker truck deliveries
directly to aircraft and to an existing vehicular fueling station with an
underground storage tank of unknown condition.
Personnel and aircraft will remain vulnerable to quality of fuel provided
directly to aircraft. With little storage capacity, the quantity of fuel
arriving at the camp is directly proportional to operations, possibly
compromising operational security. Fuel trucks will continue to transit on
interior camp roads endangering personnel.
maximum protection to personnel and to prevent the need for fully loaded
tankers traversing on interior camp roads. This project provides two tanks
for each product. One will serve as a working tank and the other will
serve as a receiving tank allowing the appropriate fuel settling and
testing times.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
4,0000703976N 41120
FUEL FARM
NAVY 2008FY
P906
CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTIDJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N3379A
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
$240
$40
$200
08/2008
01/2008
09/2009
01/2006
05/2006
07/2006
5%
15%
$200
$40
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3291391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
4,0000703976N 41120
FUEL FARM
NAVY 2008FY
P906
CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTIDJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N3379A
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Joint Use is
recommended.
LCDR Jake Ellwood DSN 318-824-4064Activity POC: Phone No:
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3301391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
4,0000703976N 41120
FUEL FARM
NAVY 2008FY
P906
CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTIDJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N3379A
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3311391
The airfield has one runway to conduct air operations. Currently, aircraft
on the runway and aircraft exiting the refueling area must use the western
portion of the active runway in order to proceed to the parking apron.
Using the active runway for taxiing causes a delay in accommodating
arriving and departing aircraft. When the Operation Tempo (OPTEMPO) is
Provide an intermediate taxiway for egress from the runway to the aircraft
parking apron and a connection to the western end of the runway.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Construct a asphalt taxiway with all required stripage and airfield
lighting.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
WESTERN TAXIWAY (55,004 SF)
CONSTRUCT TAXIWAY (55,004 SF)
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (6.2%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
m2
m2
LS
5,110
5,110 436.82
2,510
(2,230)
(280)
2,510
130
2,640
160
2,800
100
2,900
2,900
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
2,9000203176N 11210
Western Taxiway
NAVY 2008FY
P908
CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTIDJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N3379A
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 5,110
Construct a asphalt taxiway to provide egress from runway and refueling
area to apron area. Special costs include permanent airfield markings,
temporary airfield perimeter lighting, box drainage culvert for drainage
under the new taxiway, and phased work at the taxiway and runway
intersection. Electrical utilities include taxiway edge and centerline
lights for the proposed taxiway as well as the existing taxiway to the
apron. Paving and site improvements include foreign object damage (FOD)
cleanup. Site preparations include site excavation.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3321391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
high, aircraft must exit the runway as soon as possible to ensure the
taxiway is available for operations. During these periods, some aircraft
are directed to taxi across dirt areas to the parking apron. This is a
major safety hazard, as the aircraft are at risk of foreign object damage
(FOD) because of rocks and other loose debris in the grass and drainage
areas.
If not provided, aircraft will continue to be at risk of foreign object
damage (FOD) as they are forced to transit over unimproved runway and apron
areas.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
2,9000203176N 11210
Western Taxiway
NAVY 2008FY
P908
CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTIDJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N3379A
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Joint Use is
recommended.
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
N/A
$549
$349
$200
07/2008
01/2008
10/2009
01/2006
05/2006
07/2006
5%
15%
$410
$139
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3331391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
2,9000203176N 11210
Western Taxiway
NAVY 2008FY
P908
CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTIDJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N3379A
LCDR Jake Ellwood DSN 318-824-4064Activity POC: Phone No:
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3341391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
2,9000203176N 11210
Western Taxiway
NAVY 2008FY
P908
CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTIDJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N3379A
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3351391
The airfield has one runway to conduct air operations. Currently, aircraft
on the runway and aircraft exiting the refueling area must use the eastern
portion of the active runway in order to proceed to the parking apron.
Using the active runway for taxiing causes a delay in accommodating
arriving and departing aircraft. When the Operation Tempo (OPTEMPO) is
Provide an intermediate taxiway for egress from the runway to the new
aircraft parking apron and proposed maintenance hanger.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Construct a asphalt taxiway with all required stripage and airfield
lighting.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
FULL LENGTH TAXIWAY (473,612 SF)
CONSTRUCT TAXIWAY (473,612 SF)
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (6.2%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
m2
m2
LS
LS
44,000
44,000 260.1
11,440
(11,440)
1,970
(1,350)
(620)
13,410
670
14,080
870
14,950
540
15,490
15,490
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
15,4900203176N 11210
FULL LENGTH TAXIWAY
NAVY 2008FY
P914
CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTIDJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N3379A
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 44,000
Construct a asphalt taxiway (1.861 m running length) to provide egress from
runway to exsiting and proposed apron areas. Special construction costs
include permanent airfield markings, temporary airfield perimeter lighting
and modified asphalt. Electrical utilities include taxiway edge and
centerline lights for the proposed taxiway.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3361391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
high, aircraft must exit the runway as soon as possible to ensure the
taxiway is available for operations. During these periods, some aircraft
are directed to taxi across dirt areas to the parking apron. This is a
major safety hazard, as the aircraft are at risk of foreign object damage
(FOD) because of rocks and other loose debris in the grass and drainage
areas.
If not provided, aircraft will continue to be at risk of foreign object
damage (FOD) as they are forced to transit over unimproved runway and apron
areas.
This project is in agreement with the master plan to build a maintenance
hanger in the expansion area.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
15,4900203176N 11210
FULL LENGTH TAXIWAY
NAVY 2008FY
P914
CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTIDJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N3379A
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and
Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this
project has been considered for joint use potential. Joint Use is
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
N/A
$549
$349
$200
07/2008
01/2008
10/2009
01/2006
05/2006
07/2006
5%
15%
$410
$139
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3371391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
15,4900203176N 11210
FULL LENGTH TAXIWAY
NAVY 2008FY
P914
CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTIDJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N3379A
recommended.
LCDR Jake Ellwood DSN 318-824-4064Activity POC: Phone No:
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3381391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
15,4900203176N 11210
FULL LENGTH TAXIWAY
NAVY 2008FY
P914
CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTIDJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N3379A
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3391390
Scope
83109
81230
15210
74044
84110
Cost
($000)Start
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Repairs & Upgrade
Harden Electrical System Phase
1
Kilo Wharf Extension
Fitness Center, Guam
Potable Water System Recap
Phase 1
Complete
0 LS
0 LS
0 LS
0 LS
0 LS
40,870
59,420
101,828
45,250
31,450
Design Status
08/2006
08/2006
02/2006
08/2006
08/2006
8. Projects Requested In This Program
09/2007
09/2007
05/2007
09/2007
09/2007
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(16993 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 5,283,711
55,473
88,430
0
278,818
1,014,151
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 555,983
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:72111
83210
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Main Base
Wstewtr Collection Sys Repairs & Upgr Phase 2
10044 m2
0 LS
62,360
26,070
TOTAL
TOTAL
NAVBASE GUAM
AGANA, GUAM
3. Installation and Location: N61755
278,818
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
88,430
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
Provide shoreside logistics and maintenance support to Pacific Fleet and
other U.S. and allied shipping. Homeport for submarine tender supporting
submarines operating in the western pacific and for Military Sealift
Command ships.
6,720,583
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
2.64
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
5343
4847
494
469B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 3717
3241
517
522
0
0
0
0
0
0
71
71
544
544
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3401390
4. Command
NAVBASE GUAM
AGANA, GUAM
3. Installation and Location: N61755
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
2.64
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommander Navy
Installations Command
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3411391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
WASTE WTR TREATMENT PLANT RPRS &
UPGRADE
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLT
PROCESS REPAIR
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLT
PROCESS UPGRADE
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLT
FACILITIES REPAIR
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLT
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLT
FACILITIES ALTERATIONS
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLT
EQULIZATION BASIN & HDWRK
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLT
INFLUENT WETWELL REPAIR
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLT SEWER
LIFT STATION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (6.2%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
30,330
(4,490)
(3,700)
(980)
(140)
(10)
(17,070)
(960)
(2,980)
5,050
(3,690)
(1,360)
35,380
1,770
37,150
2,300
39,450
1,420
40,870
40,870
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
40,8700702776N 83109
Waste Wtr Treatment Plant Rprs
& Upgrade
NAVY 2008FY
P262
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
This project will involve repairs and replacement of equipment and process
components of the existing Apra Harbor Wastewater Treatment Plant
facilities (headworks, control building, pre-aeration tank/grit chambers,
primary clarifier pump station, secondary clarifiers, sludge thickener,
biotowers and biotowers pump stations, digesters and digester
control/solids contactor buildings, chlorination and dechlorination
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3421391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
40,8700702776N 83109
Waste Wtr Treatment Plant Rprs
& Upgrade
NAVY 2008FY
P262
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
buildings and chlorine contact tanks, odor control building, and sludge
drying beds). Old, corroding and failing components such as influent and
effluent pumps, sludge and scum pumps, motors and motor controllers,
comminutors, defective grit conveyors, bypass valves, airlift and aerator
piping, section of sludge piping, sluice gates, sludge grinder, clarifier
mechanisms, sludge thickener rakes, sludge skimmer and troughs, flow meter
and odor control media of odor control facility will be replaced. The top
media layer of the biotowers will be cleaned.
The project will also involve replacement of valves and piping for the
digester control buildings. Drying bed space frame supports for tear away
plastic covers and covered drying bed ventilation fans will be provided for
sludge drying beds. Four new concrete pad-mounted blowers will be installed
for the biotowers. A plant-wide supervisory control and data acquisition
(SCADA) system will also be installed. Chlorine residual sensors and a
chlorine feedback loop control system will be provided for the chlorinator
buildings. Sulfur dioxide residual sensors and a sulfonator feedback loop
control system will also be provided for the dechlorinator building.
Generator quick connections for buildings 1794 (control building), 1806
(biotower control building), 1819 (blower building) and 1814 (secondary
clarifier control building) will be installed.
The project also involves replacement of the existing headworks with a new
inlet structure, 4.5MG equalization basin to address surge flows from
inflow and infiltration and ship surge and bypass piping. The headworks
shall include new flow measurement devices that meet the requirements of
the NPDES discharge permit and separately measure influent and plant return
flows, provide for upstream grit removal, solids collection and removal
area for large debris, and provide structural repairs, repair concrete,
valve system and provide liner for the influent wetwell.
Miscellaneous (structural, mechanical and electrical) repair and
maintenance works and minor alterations for the above facilities will also
be provided. Building walls, wall cracks and spalls will be repaired, and
structural anchor bolts will be replaced. Old and frequently
malfunctioning air conditioning and ventilating systems will be replaced as
a whole or in part. Old wiring, failing and corroded interior/exterior and
exit lighting fixtures, and corroded or defective electrical convenience
outlets will be replaced. Transient voltage suppressors will be provided
for surge protection of the electrical motors and other equipment to
prolong their life. Corrosion control and painting of the electrical
transformer enclosure will be performed. Walls and ceilings of these
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3431391C
This project is required to restore the wastewater treatment plant to its
original design capacity and operational capability, upgrade the process
components and equipment to provide reliability and efficiency of operation
for the entire plant in handling current load, current Enviromental
Protection Agency (EPA) wastewater treatment requirements, and to replace
SLS 16.
The wastewater treatment plant is a facility for treating Navy-generated
wastewater to an acceptable quality prior to discharging it into the sea
through an outfall. SLS 16 is a pumping facility for moving sewage from
the wharf, shipyard and maintenance areas of the base to the WWTP.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
This project will provide miscellaneous repairs, maintenance and some
upgrade for the wastewater treatment plant facilities and process equipment
and replacement of SLS 16.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
40,8700702776N 83109
Waste Wtr Treatment Plant Rprs
& Upgrade
NAVY 2008FY
P262
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
11. Requirement:
Adequate: Substandard:
facilities as welll as selected piping will be repainted. New explosion-
proof exit and area lighting will be provided. Lighting circuits for
selected buildings will be connected to standby generator, and new medium
voltages wiring in conduits will be installed for connection of existing
switchgear to transformer.
In addition, a 15 ft CMU wall facing Marine Drive Corps will be provided
around the wastewater treatment plant complex, with a perimeter berm
constructed of dredged material on the remaining three (3) sides of the
back Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) complex.
The project also involves replacement of Sewer Lift Station (SLS) 16.
Replacement includes installation of a larger wetwell and three 15HP
submersible type pumps. Replace the comminutors and bar screen and install
in new configuration. Utilize existing hardened structure to locate
controls and valves. Install new 100 HP generator in hardened structure.
Install Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system connected
to base station at Apra Harbor Waste Water Treatment Plant (AHWWTP).
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3441391C
Bypass valves for the primary clarifier and secondary clarifiers, influent
and effluent valves and pumps for the control building wet well, and pumps
for bio-tower are already old, badly corroded and can no longer be operated
efficiently because of frequent failures. The spacing of screws for the
conveyors used for grit removal are too wide, allowing removed grit to fall
back into the treated effluent, rendering the conveyors ineffective. In
addition, these conveyors are also corroded. The sluice gates for the
headwords are already corroded, with deteriorated seals, and because of the
location of these sluice gates, it becomes dangerous for a personnel to
operate the gates when the influent raw sewage flow exceeds the capacity of
a single channel. The biotower filter media have significant algae growth
and the biotower fans frequently break down. The center column of the
dissolved air flotation thickener, rakes and skimmers are badly corroded
and are inoperable. The aerators of pre-aeration facilities are also badly
corroded. A sludge grinder will be replaced to minimize clogging of pumps
due to re-entanglement of fibrous material and a new flow meter to be
installed to assist process control. The existing odor control media
(impregnated wood chip media) for the odor control facility is
progressively decreasing in effectiveness because of prolonged use.
Replacement of the odor control media is now several years overdue.
Controls for primary clarifier pumps do not automatically operate the pumps
as required. Automatic control system for the raw water pumps is broken or
not connected to the plant control system. Chlorination feed rate does not
automatically adjust to the amount of wastewater flow requirements,
resulting in potential waste of chemicals and excess discharge permit
limits. Controls for various pumps, dissolved air flotation and polymer
feed system are already ineffective and unreliable. Monitoring equipment
for the primary and secondary digesters are already old and remain un-
calibrated. The motor control centers for various process pumps are already
old, corroded and obsolete, with parts difficult to obtain. Exposed
electrical equipment, underground metallic piping and above-ground metal
structures of the wastewater treatment plant are already corroding because
of the corrosive island enviroment. Interior areas of some of these
facilities are not adequately lighted and lighting for some areas uses old
and inefficient lighting fixtures that are not connected to standby power
source. Existing number of sludge drying beds are frequently filled with
rainwater, rendering them marginally useful during rainy seasons. The
influent flow measurement device has only about 1/3 of the required
upstream straight-line flow required for reliable influent flow data, the
concrete for the flume and channel is severely spalled and cracked, and as
currently designed the headworks receives plant return flows upstream of
the flow measurement device which is a NPDES permit violation of the plant.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
40,8700702776N 83109
Waste Wtr Treatment Plant Rprs
& Upgrade
NAVY 2008FY
P262
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3451391C
The existing headworks is incapable of handling surge flows that occur
during a large storm event or ship surge, resulting in submerging of the
headworks and sewage backing up into the sewer system until it is
discharged untreated into the ocean. The existing protective lining has
worn off of much of the interior of the influent wetwell and the concrete
is severely spalled, allowing for significant inflow from surrounding
groundwater. Because the influent wetwell makes up half of the basement of
B1794, the building will not be stable or safe if the wetwell is
structurally unsound.
The existing chain link fence surrounding the wastewater treatment plant
complex does not provide sufficient protection from airborne debris during
typhoons.
Sewer lift station 16 is critically located, collecting all of the sewage
from the wharf areas, COMNAVMAR HQ, Supply, Supply, the USGC and the Orote
Power Plant. The station currently has two 10HP pumps which are frequently
both needed to pump down the wetwell. It is designed for 15HP pumps. Both
existing pumps are old, corroded and suffer from reduced flow rate and
power output well below the pumps and motors rating. The wetwell is pumped
down very quickly during high flow conditions, leading to short circuiting
and reduced life of the pumps. A third pump is needed to provide system
redundancy and allow for a pump to be off-line for maintenance and repair.
A larger wetwell is needed to prevent short-circuiting of pump run times.
Failure to provide the necessary repairs will result in unreliable
operation of the wastewater treatment plant because of continued unchecked
deterioration of water treatment plant components to the point where plant
components are beyond economical repair and eventual failure of the
wastewater treatment plant. Without the necessary repairs and upgrade,
efficient operation and maintenance of the wastewater treatment plant will
not be achieved and bypassing process components for maintenance or repair
without significantly affecting wastewater treatment process will also be
impossible. Acceptable level of treatment of sewage will also be
difficult, resulting in Environmental Protection Agency Notice of
Violations (NOVs) and fines being levied on the Navy. Without the new
equalization tank, there will be no temporary holding tank to contain
unexpected surges of sewage flowing into the wastewater treatment plant.
Without the proposed CMU fence and berm, wastewater treatment plant
facilities will be continually exposed to the debris that can be blown by
strong winds normally spawned by frequent super typhoons that lash Guam
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
40,8700702776N 83109
Waste Wtr Treatment Plant Rprs
& Upgrade
NAVY 2008FY
P262
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3461391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
periodically. The propose fence will provide aesthetics to the wastewater
treatment plant. . Failure to replace SLS 16 will result in station
breakdown that will cause sewage to back up into the main upstream of the
station and to discharge into Apra Harbor.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
40,8700702776N 83109
Waste Wtr Treatment Plant Rprs
& Upgrade
NAVY 2008FY
P262
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This
Facility can be used by other components on an as available basis;
however, the scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.
Brian Hess (671) 339-7084Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
Yes
$858
$780
$78
04/2008
01/2008
10/2009
08/2006
12/2006
09/2007
5%
15%
$343
$515
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3471391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
HARDEN ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, MAIN
BASE
MAIN BASE
DISTRIBUTION/SUBSTATION
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
DEMOLITION
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (6.2%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
16,650
(10,070)
(5,870)
(260)
(450)
34,790
(33,160)
(1,120)
(510)
51,440
2,570
54,010
3,350
57,360
2,060
59,420
59,420
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
59,4200702776N 81230
Harden Electrical System, Main
Base
NAVY 2008FY
P494
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
Project will harden the primary electrical distribution system components
serving the critical operational facilities on the main base to mitigate
damage caused by frequent typhoons. It will also improve the main power
substation on the base to handle the future loads due to increased
facilities for the 2010 ship and personnel base loading projections. The
project is the first of five projects intended to harden all of the Navy's
electrical systems under the cognizance of COMNAVMARIANAS. Other projects
will harden primary electrical distribution systems supporting fuel wharves
and storage, ordnance facilities, medical facilities, housing, and northern
area facilities.
Replace selected main base overhead 13.8kV primary electrical distribution
systems with underground 13.8kV primary electrical distribution systems to
include the removal of concrete and wood utility poles and associated
overhead electrical lines transformers and switchgear. Install underground
concrete encased duct lines, manholes, pad mounted transformers and
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3481391C
Existing Naval facilities, utilities, support systems, and other structures
were damaged by Supertyphoon Pongsona, which had sustained winds of 150 mph
and gusts over 180 mph. The extremely high winds caused roofing, siding,
exterior lights, A/C units, and roof insulation to be blown away and become
airborne. Flying debris hurled by the gale force wind bombards the
overhead lines and poles like projectiles. This results in downed lines
and fallen poles that in turn causes, in a domino effect, additional downed
lines and fallen poles. The resulting power failures have severely impacted
To provide the Navy with a reliable electrical distribution system that
will mitigate future storm effects and to accommodate programmed electrical
load increases.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
This project is the first of five and will harden the Navy's electrical
distribution system to withstand the effects of future supertyphoons by
placing the primary overhead distribution systems underground and increase
its capacity by replacing the Orote Substation.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
59,4200702776N 81230
Harden Electrical System, Main
Base
NAVY 2008FY
P494
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
11. Requirement:
Adequate: Substandard:
switchgear, 15kV cables and miscellaneous pavement and landscaping repairs
at areas that are disturbed by the construction. Replace overhead
secondary electrical service to selected facilities with underground
electrical service with concrete encased duct lines. Construct a concrete
enclosure to house two 25/30/40 mVA transformers, 34.5 kV and 13.8 kV
switchgear. Construct two remote switching stations (SS) with concrete
enclosures, to replace the deteriorated Cold Storage and SRF Substations.
Construct underground tie feeders from the Orote Substation to the remote
switching stations. Underground tie feeders will require 3x4 duct lines
and associated manholes. Tie feeders will be installed between the new SRF
SS and the Orote Substation, and between the new Cold Storage SS and Orote
Substation. Built-in equipment consists of the 34.5 kV and 13.8 kV
switchgear installed at Orote Substation, and 13.8 kV switchgear at Cold
Storage and SRF switching stations.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3491391C
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
mission critical facilities such as communications, port operations, and
utility systems such as the water treatment plant, wastewater treatment
plant as well as quality of life facilities such as housing and schools. A
lack of switching stations and long feeders on the main base, result in
widespread power outages to many facilities when short-circuits occur on a
primary feeder. This inflexibility is caused by the lack of sufficient
isolation switches and circuiting to operate the system during an
emergency. What emergency back-up capabilities there are, are done by
physically connecting the feeders at high labor costs. Supertyphoon
Pongsona was the most recent in a series of supertyphoons that have struck
Guam. Each typhoon has caused some form of electrical failure primarily
due to the exposed electrical system. The down time of the electrical
system has also impeded the recovery efforts. The base electrical system
capacity is 40 mVA. Base load is expected to exceed this capacity by 50%
in 2010 because of increases in load by programmed projects and by the
increase of ship berthing requirements.
Without this project, the Navy's electrical distribution system on Guam
will remain highly vulnerable to damage from future supertyphoons. This
will severely hamper the Navy's ability to perform its assigned missions.
Electrical outages caused by typhoons will continue, which in turn will
cause daily functions and operations to cease or to be conducted
inefficiently in unsafe and unhealthy work environments. Deferral of this
project will result in rapid and severe deterioration of facilities,
support systems, and mission accomplishment. The existing Orote Substation
will become extremely overloaded and will not be able to support mission
loads. In its current configuration the 40 mVA Orote Substation does not
have sufficient capacity to support additional electrical loads for support
of ships at the Kilo, Romeo, Sierra, Tango, Victor, and X-Ray Wharves based
on the 2010 Berthing Plan. Expected loading in 2010 will be between 60 and
70 mVA. This project will pave the way for all future electrical
improvement projects to be functional and reliable, as well as to
accommodate the future growth of the Naval base.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
59,4200702776N 81230
Harden Electrical System, Main
Base
NAVY 2008FY
P494
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started 08/2006
12/2006
09/2007
5%
15% (E) Percent completed as of
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3501391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
59,4200702776N 81230
Harden Electrical System, Main
Base
NAVY 2008FY
P494
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral construction is recommended. This
facility can be used by other components on an as available basis,
however, the scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.
CAPT Kenneth W. Branch (671) 339-5100Activity POC: Phone No:
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
Yes
NA
$858
$780
$78
03/2008
12/2007
03/2010
$343
$515
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3511391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
KILO WHARF EXTENSION
KILO WHARF
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
DREDGING
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (6.2%)
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
65,580
(64,980)
(160)
(390)
(50)
25,740
(2,820)
(10,820)
(2,880)
(4,920)
(4,300)
91,320
4,570
95,890
5,950
101,840
101,840
101,828
(2,050)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
101,8280203176N 15210
Kilo Wharf Extension
NAVY 2008FY
P502
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
1) Provide a new 121.92-meter (400 ft) extension to the west of existing
Kilo Wharf and perform all necessary dredging and miscellaneous demolition
within the harbor to enable the construction;
2) Provide 243.84 m (800 ft) reinforced concrete crane girders, cable
trenches, and supports at existing wharf and wharf extension.
3) Provide new asphalt concrete pavement and a reinforced concrete deck
for the existing Kilo Wharf and wharf extension;
4) Provide new primary and secondary electrical power to Kilo Wharf,
including new electrical generator and substation buildings.
Provide shore power outlet (2 each 4000 ampere)and industrial power outlet
assemblies at the wharf extension to support the T-AKE class ammunition
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3521391C
The mission of Commander U.S. Naval Forces, Marianas (COMNAVMARIANAS) is to
provide operational, fuel re-supply and ordnance, and other logistic
support to fleet units of the Pacific Region and operational forces of the
REQUIREMENT:
Provide a new 121.92 meter (400 ft) extension to the existing Kilo Wharf
and perform all necessary dredging and miscellaneous demolition within the
harbor to enable the construction.
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
101,8280203176N 15210
Kilo Wharf Extension
NAVY 2008FY
P502
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard: 0
ship including a double ended substation with related switchgear, housed in
the new substation building, underground secondary conductors and controls.
5) Extend the shore utilities infrastructure from the existing wharf to
the Kilo Wharf extension, including the providing of a fire protection
system, piping and piping supports (for potable freshwater, Bilge Oily
Water Treatment System (BOWTS) force main, sewer and fire protection) and
fire alarm systems, as well as upgrade and/or add lighting,
telecommunications systems, and lightning protection and grounding, as
necessary, along the existing wharf plus the extension to meet current
criteria and operational requirements. Provide potable freshwater, sewer
and BOWTS force main shore utility connections and piping for ship service
on the Kilo Wharf extension. Provide a new BOWT plant.
6) Lighting: Provide area lighting for the new wharf extensions to
support wharf work activities.
7) Use existing mooring islands, and temporary mooring islands, if
required, to enable berthing of ships during construction phasing.
8) Environmental Mitigation: Perform environmental mitigation, which may
include work at off-base locations, to improve the existing environment in
the area.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3531391C
Kilo Wharf has been, and continues to be, a critical infrastructure for the
berthing of ordnance supply ships in the Western Pacific Region making port
visits to Guam.
Ordnance is received on Guam at Kilo Wharf in the Outer Apra Harbor.
Historically, approximately 55 ships per year are on-loaded / off-loaded
with ordnance at the Kilo Wharf. Presently, most of the ships are Military
Sealift Command (MSC) TAE vessels.
PACFLT ordnance operating tempo (OPTEMPO) requires ordnance ships to remain
Fifth (5th) and Seventh (7th) Fleets. This project is required to improve
COMNAVMARIANAS ability to accomplish this mission.
COMNAVMARIANAS Guam is the primary and most strategically important
ordnance activity within the Pacific Fleet Area of Operations (PACFLT AOR).
The receipt and storage of ordnance at COMNAVMARIANAS Guam is essential to
the Navy's mission in the Western Pacific Region and Kilo Wharf is a vital
ammunition wharf that provides waterfront support services to the
COMNAVMARIANAS Ordnance Department. The COMNAVMARIANAS Ordnance Department
also supports the Air Force operations at Andersen Air Force Base (AAFB) by
providing for the loading and off-loading of ordnance materials at Kilo
Wharf and the necessary hauling of the materials between the wharf and
AAFB. An adequate ammunition wharf is essential to support the mission of
COMNAVMARIANAS, as well as that of AAFB.
The Kilo Wharf extension will support the new T-Class Combat Logistics
Force (CLF) ships (T-AKE) by increasing the available length of the Kilo
Wharf. The T-AKE is a new CLF Underway Replenishment Naval vessel intended
to replace the current capability of the Kilauea-Class (T-AE 26) Ammunition
Ship, Mars-Class (T-AFS 1) Combat Stores Ships and, when operating in
concert with a Henry J. Kaiser-Class (T-AO 187) Oiler ship, the Sacramento-
Class (AOE 1) Fast Combat Support Ship. The T-AKE Program is expected to
consist of twelve (12) ships. The first of these ships to is expected to
arrive in Guam in early 2010.
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
101,8280203176N 15210
Kilo Wharf Extension
NAVY 2008FY
P502
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3541391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Bid Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
berthed at the Kilo Wharf for only a short period of time (approx. 4- 5
days per visit). Ships must be off-loaded / on-loaded quickly, but safely
as to do so otherwise would jeopardize the overall Fleet ordnance
readiness.
Kilo Wharf is currently considered substandard for several reasons,
including its current length and ordnance handling area. Kilo Wharf is
currently only 121.92 meters (400 feet) in length. Kilo Wharf is limited
in capacity for conducting ship containerization ordnance operations and
staging due to the existing amount of available wharf area.
Due to the insufficient length of the Kilo Wharf at present, it will be
unable to provide proper support of the new T-AKE vessel. In order to
provide that support, it is necessary to extend the existing Kilo Wharf
structure and shore utilities infrastructure along the Kilo Wharf
extension.
If this project is not executed, the activity will fail to effectively
support the new T-AKE ship. The Navy will continue to be burdened with the
high costs of inefficient manpower and equipment operations, resulting in
longer ship-in-port times, and added labor and equipment costs to the Navy.
Consequently, the ability to sustain readiness of the fleet units of the
Pacific Region and to support shore activities, including those of Andersen
Air Force Base, may be seriously compromised.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
101,8280203176N 15210
Kilo Wharf Extension
NAVY 2008FY
P502
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started 02/2006
07/2006
05/2007
60%
80% (E) Percent completed as of
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3551391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
101,8280203176N 15210
Kilo Wharf Extension
NAVY 2008FY
P502
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
CCTV
FIRE EXTINGUISHERS
WHARF FENDERS
OPN
OMN
OPN
2009
2009
2008
50
10
1,990
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This
Facility can be used by other components on an as available basis;
however, the scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.
Rey Valdez 339-8457Activity POC: Phone No:
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
Yes
NOT APPLICABLE
$4,048
$3,680
$368
01/2008
12/2007
02/2010
$3,680
$368
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3561391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
101,8280203176N 15210
Kilo Wharf Extension
NAVY 2008FY
P502
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3571391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
FITNESS CENTER, GUAM
INDOOR FITNESS CENTER (52,689
SF)
LIGHTED SYNTHETIC FIELD
OUTDOOR TRACK
OUTDOOR SWIMMING POOL 50 M 10
LANES
MODIFICATIONS TO BLDG 1980
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
OUTSIDE COMMUNICATION LINES
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (6.2%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
LS
m2
EA
EA
EA
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
4,895
1
1
1
1,980.89
7,920,000
5,296,024.8
4,015,943.7
35,710
(9,700)
(7,920)
(5,300)
(4,020)
(7,920)
(350)
(250)
(250)
3,460
(340)
(150)
(1,610)
(10)
(70)
(1,230)
(50)
39,170
1,960
41,130
2,550
43,680
1,570
45,250
45,250
(3,000)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
45,2500805176N 74044
Fitness Center, Guam
NAVY 2008FY
P530
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
Project constructs a new consolidated indoor fitness facility, an outdoor
50-meter 10-lane swimming pool with change house, a lighted outdoor
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3581391C
An adequately sized and configured fitness facility is required to conduct
comprehensive and balanced programs for physical fitness. The new Naval
Based Fitness Center will provide mission support to permanent and
transient party personnel. that comprises of 786 officers and 5,733
enlisted personnel. Personnel requires safe fitness programs, including
aerobics, health and wellness training, nutritional programs, and indoor
recreational athletic activities at this remote overseas base. This
fitness center is the primary indoor physical recreation facility on Main
Naval Base and is within walking distance of the majority of housing and
barracks facilities and transient ships. The outdoor swimming pool shall
provide support training mission for COMNAVMARIANAS. Existing pool and
playing field are also substandard and will be replaced with this project.
REQUIREMENT:
This project will construct a consolidated fitness center, a 50-meter 10
lane outdoor swimming pool with change house, an outdoor synthetic playing
field, and new outdoor running/jogging track at the Naval Base, Guam.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
45,2500805176N 74044
Fitness Center, Guam
NAVY 2008FY
P530
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 4,895
synthetic playing field, and an outdoor running/jogging track. This
project also modifies the existing Charles King gymnasium (functional
rearrangements) and improves the existing electrical and mechanical
systems. The fitness facility will include: 1) lobby/reception; 2)
basketball/volleyball courts with spectator seating; 3) fitness equipment
spaces/group exercise area; 4) locker rooms; 5) support spaces to include
laundry, storage, and heads; 6) administrative spaces; and 7) activity
spaces to include snack/vending machines and a multipurpose room. The
construction of the consolidated fitness facility will consist of
reinforced concrete foundation, concrete floor slab, masonry walls and roof
system.
Sustainable design principles will be integrated into the design,
development and construction of this project in accordance with Executive
Order 13123 and other directives.
The existing Camp Covington Indoor Fitness Facility (Building No. 523) will
be converted to a Training Center by another project. Facility No. 2016,
Outdoor Swimming Pool shall be demolished due to its deteriorated
structural conditions that leads to loss of water and chemicals.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3591391C
12. Supplemental Data:
The existing gymnasium facility is a cramped and dilapidated facility.
Originally constructed in 1973, the facility is deteriorated, with marginal
conditions in floor, wall, and ceiling materials in the toilets, locker
rooms, and sauna. There is no space for warm-up of stretching exercises in
the facility; corridors are narrow and not code compliant, locker and
shower rooms are inadequate, and mechanical and electrical systems are
unreliable and cannot support modern exercise equipment. The existing
building structure limits development and expansion of exercise and health
and wellness programs.
The existing outdoor swimming pool has limited use during thunder storms,
which occur quite frequently during the typhoon season. Also the existing
condition of the facility is deteriorated that leads to loss of water and
chemicals. The outdoor track and field is substandard and will also be
replaced with this project.
If a new facility is not provided, sports and fitness programs will
continue to be critically hampered by the lack of adequate facilities. The
existing gymnasium will continue to deteriorate associated with a high
maintenance cost. If a new facility is not provided, quality of life of
the military personnel will be impacted. Military personnel will have to
seek other forms of recreation impacting their morale, retention,
readiness, and productivity to support the military mission in Guam.
The 50-meters 10 lane outdoor swimming pool will provide support training
for EOD personnel in conducting high risk MK 16 Underwater Breathing
Apparatus(UBA) emergency procedures, second class swimmer qualification and
EOD screening test and an individual or group physicall well fitness
training. Additionally, the 50-meter 10 lane outdoor swimming pool will
provide support for the training mission of Naval Special Warfare Unit One
(NSWU-1). The NSWU-1 will conduct Close Circuit Diving training, Open
Circuit Diving training, 1st/2nd/3rd class swimmer training, screen test
for Basic Underwater Demolition and Seals School(BUDSS) and Special Warfare
Combatant Crewman(SWCC) training.
The 50 meters outdoor swimming pool will be divided into three separate
areas and may be used simultaneously for recreational swimming, lap
swimmimg for fitnees training and other instructional training.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
45,2500805176N 74044
Fitness Center, Guam
NAVY 2008FY
P530
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started 08/2006
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3601391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
September 2006
January 2007
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
45,2500805176N 74044
Fitness Center, Guam
NAVY 2008FY
P530
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
Fitness Equipment OMN 2008 3,000
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This
Facility can be used by other components on an as available basis;
however, the scope of the project is based on Navy Requirements.
CDR Gary Wick DSN 339-3340Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
No
No
$858
$780
$78
04/2008
01/2008
10/2009
12/2006
09/2007
5%
15%
$343
$515
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3611391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
POTABLE WATER SYSTEM RECAP, PHASE
1
WATER SUPPLY, TRANSMISSSION,
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS
FENA LAKE PUMP STATION BLDG
FENA LAKE GENERATOR BLDG
OROTE WATER STORAGE TANK
RESERVOIR
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (6.2%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
27,230
(21,000)
(1,640)
(280)
(4,310)
27,230
1,360
28,590
1,770
30,360
1,090
31,450
31,450
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
31,4500702776N 84110
Potable Water System Recap,
Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P532
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
Provide new (or replace and upgrade existing) water transmission lines:
1) from Fena Water Pump Station (WPS) to Fena Water Treatment Plan (WTP)
and between the existing auxiliary waterline in water pipeline tunnel to
the suction manifold of Fena Pump Station;
2) along Harbor Road (PWC Maintenance Complex);
3) from Marine Drive to X-Ray Wharf and NAVFAC MAR complex:
4) along Romeo and Sierra Wharves;
5) at Camp Convington
6) from Almagosa Spring and Bona Spring, respectively, to Fena Water
Treatment Plant and upgrade the pump station;
Provide:
7) a water line connection between the Tupo water supply main and Apra View
Housing;
8) a pressure reducing valve (PRV) station for the water lines feeding the
Sasa Valley, X-Ray Wharf, and Polaris Point;
9) a concrete building enclosure for the generator for Fena Lake Raw Water
Pump Station
10) zone meters on water lines in the Apra Heights and Tupo Reservoir
areas;
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3621391C
Most of the existing water main and distribution lines are old, having been
installed in the 1950s, and are not sufficiently sized to accommodate
present requirements at some locations.
Raw Water Supply Main floor, Fena Reservoir to Fena Water Treatment Plant
(WTP) is the only U.S. Main Source of Water to supply to the Fena Water
Treatment Plant (WTP). Up to 13.5 million gallons of water from the
reservoir is processed daily for drinking water through Fena WTP. Source
A reliable and adequate water supply system is required to provide
sufficient amounts of potable water for domestic, operational flows, ship
service and fire protection requirements for the U.S. Navy main base.
This project aims to satisfy present and future Navy water supply
requirements for housing, shore facilities and ship services.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
This project will replace existing water lines with larger size lines,
provide miscellaneous water mains and line connections, construction of a
concrete enclosure for the Fena Lake Pump Station standby generator,
installation of zone meters for water reservoirs, replacement of vertical
pumps and the suction and discharge valves with upgrade to 500 HP of motors
equipped with variable frequency drives for the Fena Lake Pump Station, and
installation of pressure reducing valves for water lines feeding the Sasa
Valley, X-Ray Wharf and Polaris Point.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
31,4500702776N 84110
Potable Water System Recap,
Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P532
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
11. Requirement:
Adequate: Substandard:
Replace:
11) the four (4) existing vertical pumps of the Fena Lake Pump Station and
upgrade to 500 HP motors with variable frequency drives (VFDs);
12) the suction and discharge valves of 4 vertical pumps (24-inch gate, 12-
inch gate and 12-inch swing check, respectively, for each pump) of the Fena
Lake Pump Station.
Provide a one (1) million gallon water storage tank reservoir, complete
with a booster pump station, at Orote Peninsula. Reservoir shall include
valving and siting to allow the reservoir to be expandable for the future
construction of an additional one (1) million gallon cell or cells.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3631391C
water from the Fena reservoir passes through the intake tunnel, and then
funnels into a single 600 mm pipeline. The 600 mm pipeline supplies four
3,500 gpm water pumps at Fena Water Pump Station for conveyance through a
600 mm transmission pipe to the Fena WTP.
The existing 600 mm transmission pipe is 50 years old and nearing its
service life expectancy. Constructed of cast iron, the pipeline exhibits
advanced stages of internal and external corrosion, increasing the risk of
catastrophic structural damage from metal corrosion, hydraulic surge
pressures, and natural causes such as earthquake tremors. There is no other
pipeline that can serve as a conduit of raw water to the treatment plant if
the existing main transmission lines fail.
There have been instances when water main failure or faulty meter operation
have caused the water supply to the housing area from Maanot Reservoir to
be secured and the Apra Heights Reservoir auxiliary supply main was opened
to provide back up service. During these occasions, water supply service
falls substantially below 20 psi.
Currently, the 400 mm water mains located along Marine Drive and Sumay
Drive flank the PWC Maintenance Complex. Two 200 mm mains located north and
south of the Complex tap off of the 400 mm mains to provide water to PWC
Maintenance facilities. The current configuration of the water system is
not adequate for fire protection.
The Fena Lake Pump Station has a 1,750 KVA diesel engine-generator that
provides emergency power for the three (3) 450 Hp raw water pumps during
power outages. The generator is not protected from typhoon winds and the
harsh environment in the area. A hardened concrete enclosure is required to
protect/preserve the engine-generator set from harsh environment and
typhoons and provide a reliable emergency power for the raw water pumps.
Failure to provide the necessary replacement and upgrades to the potable
water system will result in inadequate water supply to some areas because
of old, corroding and insufficiently sized pumps, piping and water pressure
that is too high. With frequent super typhoons on Guam, exposure of the
generator to typhoon generated winds may unexpectedly render the generator
incapable of providing standby power for the Fena Water Pump Station, which
provides the main source of water for the Navy¿s main base and vicinity.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
31,4500702776N 84110
Potable Water System Recap,
Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P532
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3641391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
31,4500702776N 84110
Potable Water System Recap,
Phase 1
NAVY 2008FY
P532
NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61755
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This
Facility can be used by other components on an as available basis;
however, the scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.
Brian Hess (671) 339-7084Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
Yes
$850
$50
$800
04/2008
01/2008
10/2009
08/2006
12/2006
09/2007
5%
15%
$800
$50
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3651390
Scope
15210
Cost
($000)Start
Wharf Upgrades Inc 3 of 3
Complete
0 LS 8,750
Design Status
02/2004
8. Projects Requested In This Program
05/2006
A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(2938 Acres)
4. Command
Cat
Code Project Title
B. INVENTORY AS OF
C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................
D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................
E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............
F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................
G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................
H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................
............................30 SEP 2006 4,219,912
8,310
0
0
8,750
74,420
C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 519,164
9. Future Projects:
A. Included In The Following Program:
TOTAL
COMFLEACT YOKOSUKA JA
YOKOSUKA, JAPAN
3. Installation and Location: N61028
8,750
B. Major Planned Next Three Years:
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
0
10. Mission or Major Functions:
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):
A. Pollution Abatement(*):
B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):
Maintain and operate base facilities for the logistic, recreational,
administrative support and service of the U.S. Naval Forces Japan, U.S.
SEVENTH Fleet and other operating forces assigned in the Western Pacific.
4,311,392
1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.43
5. Area Const
Cost Index
0
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
TOTAL6. Personnel
Strength:
STUDENTS SUPPORT
OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV
PERMANENT
11086
10024
976
933B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 8178
8163
420
478
0
0
0
0
0
0
143
119
1369
331
0
0
Commander Navy
Installations Command
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3661390
4. Command
COMFLEACT YOKOSUKA JA
YOKOSUKA, JAPAN
3. Installation and Location: N61028
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component
NAVY
2. Date
05 FEB 2007
1.43
5. Area Const
Cost IndexCommander Navy
Installations Command
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3671391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
WHARF UPGRADES, INC 3 OF 3
PRODUCTION FACILITY (5,167 SF)
DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
FIRE ALARM
WHARF UPGRADES
60 HZ ELECTRICAL GENERATING
PLANT
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER
BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
MECHANICAL UTILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SITE PREPARATIONS
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (6.5%)
SUBTOTAL
FY06 APPROPRIATION
FY07 APPROPRIATION
LESS FORECASTED ESPC COST
AVOIDANCE
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
LS
m2
LS
LS
LS
kw
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
480
30,000
3,390
1,154.32
50,740
(1,630)
(1,140)
(120)
(2,330)
(34,630)
(2,510)
(7,150)
(600)
(630)
23,490
(360)
(6,240)
(8,260)
(5,900)
(1,140)
(340)
(1,250)
74,230
3,710
77,940
5,070
83,010
-13,907
-44,360
-15,993
8,750
8,750
(7,250)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 8,750
Auth for Approp 8,750
0203176N 15210
Wharf Upgrades, Inc 3 of 3
NAVY 2008FY
P998B
COMFLEACT YOKOSUKA JAYOKOSUKA, JAPAN
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61028
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3681391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 8,750
Auth for Approp 8,750
0203176N 15210
Wharf Upgrades, Inc 3 of 3
NAVY 2008FY
P998B
COMFLEACT YOKOSUKA JAYOKOSUKA, JAPAN
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61028
This project proposes to upgrade the existing structural and utilities
infrastructure at the U.S. Fleet Activities Yokosuka waterfront area to
support a Forward Deployed Naval Force (FDNF) nuclear powered aircraft
carrier (CVN) and its supporting workshop and supply barges. The project
includes the following waterfront related items of work.
1) To allow the USS George Washington to berth at the carrier pier, the
floating pier must be removed. A Host Nation funded project will remove
the existing floating pier (Berths 10 and 11) for submarines and dredge
Yokosuka Bay. This Military Construction project will reconstruct Berth 13
to provide a replacement submarine berth, including the fendering system.
Reconstruction includes providing the required utilities, installation of
piles to support the fendering system, and the installation of bollards and
cleats.
2) Structurally upgrade the seawall area adjacent to Berth 12 by providing
a concrete deck and beams supported by piles and barge mooring structures &
appurtenances.
3) Upgrade the existing waterfront seawater, steam, potable (also including
fire protection) water, and wastewater systems.
For the seawater system, provide a 5,700 liter/min (1,500 gpm) pump in Bldg
J-186, modify the manifold & distribution system piping to accept seawater
from the new pump, and provide an automatic digital control system that
interfaces with the existing control system.
For the steam system, replace the 200 mm (8 in) steam distribution line,
from the boiler plant Bldg A-43 to the steam manifold located in power
plant Bldg 1938, with a 250 mm (10 in) steam distribution line.
For the potable system, provide distribution laterals, backflow preventers,
water flow meters, and ship outlet connections.
For the wastewater system, provide additional wastewater collection lines
and lift stations.
4) Provide new utility systems, including a high quality water (HQW)
facility, high & low pressure compressed air systems, with associated
piping distribution systems, emergency generator backup, digital controls,
and waterfront outlets.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3691391C
PROJECT:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 8,750
Auth for Approp 8,750
0203176N 15210
Wharf Upgrades, Inc 3 of 3
NAVY 2008FY
P998B
COMFLEACT YOKOSUKA JAYOKOSUKA, JAPAN
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61028
11. Requirement:
0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 480
Demolish the hill and prepare the site for a one-story pre-engineered steel
HQW facility structure on a reinforced concrete foundation containing the
following major pieces of built-in equipment: stainless steel tanks &
piping, pumps, a reverse osmosis unit, a degasifier unit, and digital
controls. In addition, the low and high pressure air compressors and the
emergency generator for the low pressure freeze seal air compressors will
be located in this HQW production and storage facility.
5) Demolish buildings (B-49 and B-52), as required, and provide a new 60
Hertz (Hz) generating plant, consisting of a generating plant building;
multiple electrical power generating and/or frequency converting units with
a total capacity of 30 megawatts (mW); a Supervisory Control & Data
Acquisition (SCADA) system; all supporting utilities, including potable
water, sanitary sewer, and fire protection/hydrant water lines; a fire
protection/suppression system, including a radio alarm signal transmitting
system and fire hydrants; information system infrastructure for local area
network (LAN) and telephone; sidewalks, landscaping, and signs.
6) In addition to the waterfront related items of work, this project will
provide a new Command Center that can function as an Emergency Control
Center (ECC), with the required information systems infrastructure to allow
direct communication between the Command Center and the waterfront workshop
and support barges.
7) This project will also provide a security fence to enclose the
controlled industrial enclave and a security office building and gate to
facilitate the safeguarding of NOFORN Naval Nuclear Propulsion Information
(NNPI).
Anti-terrorism / Force Protection criteria are not applicable to these
uninhabited structures per Paragraph 1-6.7 of UFC 04-010-01.
Sustainable principles will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and
other laws and Executive Orders.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3701391C
Berthing. P-80 defines the spacing requirement between ships and berths.
Because the existing floating pier (Berths 10 and 11) encroaches into the
slip area identified for the USS George Washington (CVN 73) berthing, a
separate Host Nation project will remove the floating pier. This project
proposes to build a replacement submarine berth at Berth 13.
The supply and workshop barges supporting the USS George Washington need to
be located in the general vicinity of Berth 12. Since the seawall area is
ideally situated for this purpose, structural upgrades to the seawall area
are required to convert that area into satisfactory berthing for the
barges.
High Quality Water (HQW). Yokosuka Main Base does not have any facilities
to produce, store, and distribute the high quality water, which is a
requirement for supporting the maintenance and repair activities associated
with the forward deployed CVN. A HQW production, storage, and distribution
system is a prerequisite to forward deploying the CVN to Yokosuka.
Electricity. The NAVFAC Pacific Utility Study provided the following
information. The FY2004 Yokosuka waterfront 60 Hz connected load was
48,054 kVA. Applying a 0.75 coincident (i.e., diversity) factor resulted
in an electrical power requirement of 36,041 kVA. In FY2008, with the
planned change out of naval vessels, the connected load and electrical
power requirement are expected to grow to 67,225 kVA and 50,419 kVA,
respectively. Adding a 25% allowance (per UFC 4-150-02) for future growth,
results in a FY2008 electrical power requirement of 63,023 kVA. The
current Yokosuka Main Base 60 Hz generating capacity is 25,500 kVA. Thus
there is a deficit of 37,523 kVA; assuming an 80% power factor, this
corresponds to a 30,019 kW, (30,000 kW = 30 mW , rounded) deficit for 60 Hz
power.
REQUIREMENT:
This project provides: 1) waterfront structural upgrades; 2) new utility
systems, including high quality water (HQW) production, storage, and
distribution systems, high & low pressure compressed air systems, and a 30
mW 60 Hz electrical generating plant and electrical distribution system; 3)
upgrades to the existing electrical power distribution, seawater, steam,
potable (also fire protection) water, and wastewater utilities systems to
support active and repair berthing of FDNF vessels, including the USS
George Washington; and 4) a Command Center that could function as an
Emergency Control Center. (CURRENT AND NEW MISSION)
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 8,750
Auth for Approp 8,750
0203176N 15210
Wharf Upgrades, Inc 3 of 3
NAVY 2008FY
P998B
COMFLEACT YOKOSUKA JAYOKOSUKA, JAPAN
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61028
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3711391C
Steam. Yokosuka Main Base Boiler Plant A-43 has sufficient capacity to
provide the clean steam requirements of the waterfront, including the steam
requirements of the CVN. However, during times of peak consumption, the
200 mm (8 in) steam distribution line between the boiler plant and the
manifold header in Bldg 1938 becomes a bottleneck and reduces steam
pressure to less than the 10.55 kg/sq cm (= 150 psi) at Berth 12. To
remove the bottleneck, the 200 mm (8 in) line will be replaced with a 250
mm (10 in) line to interface with the 250 mm (10 in) line that goes from
Bldg 1938 to Berth 12.
Seawater. The NAVFAC Pacific Utility Study provided the following
information. The current Yokosuka waterfront seawater system is comprised
of five (5) pumps, each with a capacity of 11,400 liter/min (3,000 gpm).
Therefore the total capacity of that system is 57,000 liter/min (15,000
gpm). With the replacement of the current USS Kitty Hawk (CV63) with the
USS George Washington (CVN 73), the seawater demand will grow to 63,600
liter/min (16,800 gpm). Adding on a 10% future growth allowance, the
seawater demand will be 70,000 liter/min (63,600 gpm) and the deficit in
seawater production capacity will be 13,000 liter/min (3,400 gpm). Because
the Yokosuka seawater distribution system is a looped system which, at
times, operates at very low consumption rates, to avoid over pressurizing
the distribution system lines, the NAVFAC Pacific Utility Study recommended
installing a sixth pump with a capacity of 5,700 liter/min (1,500 gpm), as
opposed to the 13,000 liter/min (3,400 gpm) pump capacity required to
supply the full waterfront seawater requirement.
Compressed Air. The quality of the existing Yokosuka low pressure
compressed air system is not of sufficient quality to support active and
repair berthing of the CVN. In addition Yokosuka Main Base does not have a
high pressure compressed air system. Therefore, this project proposes to
provide both new high and low pressure compressed air systems, including
compressors, distribution system piping, filter dryers, unfired pressure
vessels (UPV), outlets, and other ancillary system components, which are
required to support the forward deployed CVN repair and maintenance
activities
Potable Water. The existing Yokosuka Main Base potable water system has
the capacity to support the projected FY2008 potable water demand at the
waterfront. Other than the piping, fittings, and valves, required to
connect the existing potable water system to the HQW production facility
and potable water outlets at Berths 12, 13, and the seawall, there are no
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 8,750
Auth for Approp 8,750
0203176N 15210
Wharf Upgrades, Inc 3 of 3
NAVY 2008FY
P998B
COMFLEACT YOKOSUKA JAYOKOSUKA, JAPAN
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61028
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3721391C
September 2006
12. Supplemental Data:
Existing facilities and utilities system infrastructure are non-existent,
or are of insufficient quality and/or capacity to support the active repair
and berthing requirements of the USS George Washington and other FDNF
vessels assigned to U.S. Fleet Activities Yokosuka.
Without the new facilities and improvements to existing facilities to be
provided by this project, U.S. Fleet Activities Yokosuka will not be able
to provide shore side facilities and required utilities to support the
active berthing and repair of the a CVN and other FDNF vessels assigned to
Yokosuka. The USS George Washington and other FDNF vessels will then be
required to utilize other (non-forward operating) locations to obtain the
necessary shore side support. The result will be an overall significantly
higher life cycle cost to the U.S. Government. Moreover, the USS George
Washington and other FDNF vessels, while in port at Yokosuka, will not be
able to shut down their shipboard operating systems and conduct the routine
repair and maintenance to those shipboard systems. The result will be an
associated decrease in shipboard systems state of mission readiness.
additional potable water requirements for this project.
Wastewater. The existing Yokosuka Main Base wastewater processing system
has the capacity to support the projected FY2008 wastewater load at the
waterfront. Therefore this project proposes to provide the infrastructure
required to accommodate the increased wastewater discharge pressure and
volume from the USS George Washington by providing additional piping. A
follow-on Host Nation funded project will be programmed to provide the
additional necessary lift stations.
Command Center. The facilities and infrastructure to conduct emergency
response operations are limitted at Yokosuka Main Base. This project
proposes to provide the facilities and information systems infrastructure
to support maintenance and emergency response operations.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 8,750
Auth for Approp 8,750
0203176N 15210
Wharf Upgrades, Inc 3 of 3
NAVY 2008FY
P998B
COMFLEACT YOKOSUKA JAYOKOSUKA, JAPAN
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61028
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started 02/2004
04/2005
05/2006
2%
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3731391C
(F) Type of design contract Other
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
Yes
Yes
January 2007
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 8,750
Auth for Approp 8,750
0203176N 15210
Wharf Upgrades, Inc 3 of 3
NAVY 2008FY
P998B
COMFLEACT YOKOSUKA JAYOKOSUKA, JAPAN
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61028
Command Center
Hoses and Assemblies
Ship Support Equipment
Waterfront Support Equipment
OMN
OMN
OPN
OPN
2006
2006
2006
2006
1,600
250
3,100
2,300
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. Mission
requirements, operational considerations, and location are incompatible
with use by other components.
Andre Lee 011-81-6160-43-9247Activity POC: Phone No:
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
No
N/A
$6,000
$3,800
$2,200
07/2006
05/2006
04/2008
10%
$4,000
$2,000
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3741391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 8,750
Auth for Approp 8,750
0203176N 15210
Wharf Upgrades, Inc 3 of 3
NAVY 2008FY
P998B
COMFLEACT YOKOSUKA JAYOKOSUKA, JAPAN
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N61028
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3751391
The Commandant of the Marine Corps has articulated the importance of being
able to adapt to broad strategic conditions and wide-ranging threats. To
meet the demands of the Long War and remain prepared for the inevitable
contingencies that will arise, our Corps must be sufficiently manned,
This project begins the construction efforts required to support the
increased end strength of 202k necessary for the Marine Corps to shape the
operational forces ability to fight the Long War. The low density, high
demand (LD/HD) capabilities that are consistently requested for Operation
Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom (OIF/OEF) employment are also
those capabilities that the joint force will need to support future Global
War on Terror (GWOT) requirements in other combatant command areas of
responsibilities (AORs). For the Marine Corps, Military Construction
(MILCON) projects will support the increase in critical intelligence,
reconnaissance, military police, engineer, aviation, ground mobility, and
infantry facility and training range requirements. Military construction
would include operational and training facilities, maintenance facilities,
bachelor housing facilities, community facilities, and utilities and ground
improvements.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Grow the Force.
PROJECT:
(New Mission)
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
GROW THE FORCE
GROW THE FORCE
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (0%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (0%)
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
LS
LS
361,120
(361,120)
361,120
0
361,120
0
361,120
361,120
361,120
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
361,12061010
Grow the Force
NAVY 2008FY
P108
VARIOUS LOCATIONSWORLDWIDE
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: NC1002
11. Requirement:
Included in the P&D 1391 is $21,792,000.00 to support Grow the Force.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3761391C
(F) Type of design contract
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
effectively trained, and properly equipped. Like the Cold War, the Long War
is a continuing struggle that will not be measured by the number of near-
term deployments or rotations. The Corps' personnel policies,
organizational construct, and training must be correctly sized and
resourced for three main reasons. First, to alleviate strain on the
individual by ensuring our structure supports adequate homestation dwell
time for our Marines. Second, to alleviate strain on units by allowing
adequate time for training and maintenance. Third, to ensure Marine Air
Ground Task Forces are prepared to support Combatant Commanders' efforts to
fight both irregular and conventional future threats.
The Marine Corps will continue to grow over the next five years. Failure
to provide these much needed projects will result in a shortage of training
ranges and inability to provide appropriate "Quality of Life" support to
the growing force. Also, operational facilities will not be properly
configured to accomodate expanded staffs and mission.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
361,12061010
Grow the Force
NAVY 2008FY
P108
VARIOUS LOCATIONSWORLDWIDE
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: NC1002
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
$0
04/2008
01/2008
04/2010
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3771391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
361,12061010
Grow the Force
NAVY 2008FY
P108
VARIOUS LOCATIONSWORLDWIDE
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: NC1002
The (CERTIFYING OFFICIAL) certifies that this project has been considered
for joint use potential. (TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDED)is recommended.
(UNILATERAL STATEMENT, if Unilateral Construction is selected)
LtCol Scalise (703)695-8202Activity POC: Phone No:
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3781391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
361,12061010
Grow the Force
NAVY 2008FY
P108
VARIOUS LOCATIONSWORLDWIDE
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: NC1002
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3791391
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
WHARF UTILITIES UPGRADES
POTABLE WATER UPGRADES
SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
UPGRADES
STEAM PLANT
OILY WASTEWATER TREATMENT
TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (6.2%)
SUBTOTAL
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
7,460
(3,150)
(2,550)
(530)
(840)
(50)
(340)
240
(210)
(30)
7,700
390
8,090
500
8,590
310
8,900
8,900
(3,687)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,9000203176N 15220
Wharf Utilities Upgrades
NAVY 2008FY
P180
VARIOUS LOCATIONSWORLDWIDE
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: NC1002
The project will improve the wharf and provide facilities to support the
relocation of the medium size surface ship due to closure of the current
ship homeport. This is the first of three projects to provide facilities
in three phases to support the ship at its new location in a timely manner.
The second project is P-181, Wharf Upgrades and Warehouse. The third
project is P-182, Wharf Upgrades and Recreation Facility.
The project provides minimum utilities to accommodate the ship in a normal
mooring position parallel to the wharf. Med-mooring provisions will be
provided in Phase III. Upon completion of this project, the medium size
ship will be able to accommodate one SSGN and one SSN outboard of the ship
for repair. The medium size ship will be berthed at Berth B, while it is
deployed to this new location.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3801391C
This project constructs the minimum number of facilities to support the
relocation of the medium size surface ship from its current homeport to the
new deployed location. This project will improve the berthing and mooring
capabilities at the wharf to immediately accommodate the ship.
WHARF IMPROVEMENTS:
The wharf utilities modifications will accommodate berthing of the medium
size ship adjacent to the wharf in a position parallel to the wharf. The
medium size ship will have at most, an SSGN and an SSN alongside for
repair.
UTILITIES:
Utilities at the wharf will be upgraded to accommodate the ship and
personnel loading. All personnel on the medium size ship and the boats
under repair will live aboard their respective ships, thereby requiring
upgrades to the electrical system, sewer systems, and water systems serving
the wharf. Fly away teams of repair personnel will also live aboard the
medium size ship unless space available BQ rooms ashore can accommodate
them.
PROJECT:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,9000203176N 15220
Wharf Utilities Upgrades
NAVY 2008FY
P180
VARIOUS LOCATIONSWORLDWIDE
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: NC1002
11. Requirement:
Adequate: Substandard:
SHORE SUPPORT FACILITIES:
Project will construct several new provisions at the wharf for utilities to
support the medium size ship. These provision include but are not limited
to: potable water treatment upgrades and connections, sewage treatment
upgrades and connections, a steam plant, and oily wastewater collection and
treatment. Site preparation will include clearing and grading. Site
improvements will include new concrete paving for access to the wharf where
necessary for efficient operation.
A water treatment plant addition for treating trihalomethanes in the well
water pumped for potable water and a demineralization plant will be
constructed as part of the project. The existing potable water
distribution system will continue to be used, but connections will need to
be provided at the wharf.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3811391C
The receiving base has one general purpose deep draft wharf that serves the
island. The wharf is 2,000 FT long and 150 FT wide. Currently, a T-AKR
brings supplies to the base once a month and berths at the wharf for about
a week at a time. A new mission to support an SSGN for a 21-day period two
to three times a year has been assigned to the base. MILCON project P-160,
Wharf Improvements and SSGN Support Facilities, will be mainly upgrading
one-half of the wharf, Berth B, for the SSGN while the other half, Berth A,
will still accommodate the T-AKR. In order for the wharf to be able to
support the deployed medium size ship, upgrades to the wharf and utilities
systems are needed.
Structural Systems - The existing wharf was constructed in 1983, and is the
only general berthing facility for ships at the base. The original timber
fender system was replaced with a foam-filled fender system in 1995. The
existing fender system does not address the berthing requirements of the
medium size ship or other associated vessels. The fender system is
suitable for the support of surface ships only. Additional fenders will be
provided to accommodate the berthing of SSN and SSGN submarines by an
earlier MILCON project. This project will provide provisions for mooring
the medium size surface ship alongside the wharf in a position parallel to
the wharf.
The mission of the receiving base is support of the strategic interests of
the United States in that area of the world. As such, the base supports
Navy, Marines, Air Force and Army personnel operating in the area.
The closure of the existing homeport location of the medium size surface
ship requires the relocation of the support provided by the ship. The
receiving base has been selected as a forward deployed location for the
ship. The medium size ship must move by 2008 due to the closure. Adequate
wharf accommodations, storage facilities for equipment and supplies, and
parking for servicing vehicles are required to support these operations.
The receiving base requires facility improvements to the wharf and
utilities systems in order to meet current and future fleet berthing
requirements, and to support regional logistics demands. This project
provides the minimum upgrades to the wharf and utilities systems to support
the immediate deployment of the medium size surface ship to the new
location.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
(New Mission)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,9000203176N 15220
Wharf Utilities Upgrades
NAVY 2008FY
P180
VARIOUS LOCATIONSWORLDWIDE
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: NC1002
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3821391C
Electrical Power System - The electrical utility system provides electrical
service to the western half of the island where most of the U.S. Forces are
accommodated. The electrical system consists of two main power plants,
North (NPP) and South (SPP), two 13.8 kV switching stations and a 13.8 kV
distribution system, which consists of overhead lines and underground
cables. The existing switchgear in the switching stations and power plants
are old and obsolete. The normal electrical capacity provided by the two
power plants is 15,000 kW. With the addition of the SSGN to the island,
the electrical load for the island is estimated to be 24,800 kW. This
project will provide minimum electrical improvements to be able to
expeditiously accommodate the medium size ship at its new deployed
location. Phase II (P-181) will provide additional generating capacity to
support the load required by the medium size ship servicing up to six boats
and other combatants.
Other utilities systems - The water system that provides water for the
whole base currently provides a potable water supply that is contaminated
with trihalomethanes (THMs). Drinking water for residents and visitors is
currently treated further by a nanofiltration plant. This project will
provide an addition to the nanofiltration drinking water treatment system
and connections to provide the necessary treatment capacity to service the
medium size ship. The sewage lagoon that services the island is marginally
treating the sewage from the existing island population and functions.
MILCON Project P-158 will add an additional lagoon and aerators to increase
the capacity of treatment for the existing sewage load. A previous MILCON
project must be accomplished to adequately support the existing loads on
the island. The loads from the medium size ship and boats under repair
will need to be treated by an addition to the sewage treatment system.
Summary - The existing facilities are barely adequate to support the
current mission requirements with the SSGN, and thus cannot support this
new mission without improvements and upgrades.
If this project is not provided, the Navy will not be able to move the
medium size ship out of its current homeport to the new location in a
timely manner. It will also not meet the mission to service boats and
surface ships in the new area.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,9000203176N 15220
Wharf Utilities Upgrades
NAVY 2008FY
P180
VARIOUS LOCATIONSWORLDWIDE
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: NC1002
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3831391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,9000203176N 15220
Wharf Utilities Upgrades
NAVY 2008FY
P180
VARIOUS LOCATIONSWORLDWIDE
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: NC1002
Bilge and Sewage Hoses
Hydro-Pneumatic Fenders
Mobile Utilities - Deminerlized Water
Mobile Utilities - LP & HP Air, HP
Nitrogen
Mobile Utilities - Potable Water
Shore Power Cables
OPN
OPN
OPN
OPN
OPN
OPN
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
73
2,789
248
256
248
73
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Equipment
Nomenclature
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for
joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This Facility
can be used by other components on an as available basis; however, the
scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.
Richard Soriano 011-246-370-4521Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
$3,000
$2,500
$500
04/2008
12/2007
04/2010
08/2006
12/2006
09/2007
5%
15%
$1,000
$2,000
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
Procuring
Approp
FY Approp
or Requested Cost ($000)
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3841391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
8,9000203176N 15220
Wharf Utilities Upgrades
NAVY 2008FY
P180
VARIOUS LOCATIONSWORLDWIDE
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: NC1002
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3851391
The Host Nation Infrastructure Support (HNIS) program provides a source of
U.S. funds for each NATO-funded project to pay host nation costs. This
authority is not used to increase the scope of a facility for U.S.
functions, such work is included through conjunctive funding in separate
MILCON projects.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Execute role as host nation and construction agent for NATO project,
Construct Addition to HQ SACT in Norfolk, Va, by upgrading electrical
utilities, specifically power supply, in accordance with DOD Directive.
The addition includes 4930.7 square meters of additional office and support
space to building NH-31, 492 square meters of support space to building NH-
31A, the construction of a new facility to replace NH-31B and the
construction of 3045 square meters of seperate office space to accomodate
the National Liasons Representatives (NLR).
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (0%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (0%)
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
LS
2,700
(2,700)
2,700
0
2,700
0
2,700
2,700
2,700
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
2,7000901376N 61010
Host Nation Infrastructure
NAVY 2008FY
P600
VARIOUS LOCATIONSWORLDWIDE
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: NC1002
11. Requirement:
This project provides upgrades to the existing electrical utilities in
support of NATO project 9HQ25004-0, Construct Additions to Supreme Allied
Commander Transformation (SACT) Headquarters, Norfolk. This is in
accordance with DoD Directive 2010.5. This directive states that funds
will be used to cover non-NATO eligible expenses such as host nation costs,
life safety, functional utility/livability, energy, administrative
expenses, design support, joint formal acceptance inspection, audit, and
currency fluctuation losses.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3861391C
(F) Type of design contract Design Bid Build
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
No
No
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
Navy is the construction agent for NATO Infrastructure projects at
locations where the United States is host nation. HNIS responsibilities
involve funding certain program costs, such as, land acquisition, source
utilities, roads and parking, administrative expenses, design support,
joint formal acceptance inspections (JFAI), audits, and currency
fluctuation losses. NATO eligibility criteria stipulates only Minimum
Military Requirement (MMR) for wartime occupancy and does not include
peacetime related features such as fire protection or energy conservation.
This request is based on approved NATO infrastructure projects.
Currently the electrical utilties are not adequate to sustain the building
upgrade projected for the SACT Headquarters.
Timely U.S. funding for the work will not be possible. Delays in executing
these projects for lack of HNIS funding will deprive operating units of
sorely needed facilities and may be a source of embarrassment for the U.S.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
2,7000901376N 61010
Host Nation Infrastructure
NAVY 2008FY
P600
VARIOUS LOCATIONSWORLDWIDE
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: NC1002
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
No
NA
$500
$500
$0
04/2009
01/2008
04/2010
05/2006
10/2006
05/2007
15%
35%
$350
$150
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3871391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
2,7000901376N 61010
Host Nation Infrastructure
NAVY 2008FY
P600
VARIOUS LOCATIONSWORLDWIDE
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: NC1002
The (CERTIFYING OFFICIAL) certifies that this project has been considered
for joint use potential. (TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDED)is recommended.
(UNILATERAL STATEMENT, if Unilateral Construction is selected)
Activity POC: Phone No:
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3881391C
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
2,7000901376N 61010
Host Nation Infrastructure
NAVY 2008FY
P600
VARIOUS LOCATIONSWORLDWIDE
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: NC1002
Blank Page
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3891391
12. Supplemental Data:
N/A
N/A
All projects in a military construction program presented for approval must
be based on sound engineering and the best cost data available. For this
reason, design is initiated to establish project estimates in advance of
program submittal to the Congress. Based on this preliminary design, final
plans and specifications are then prepared. These costs for architectural
and engineering services and construction design are not provided for in
the construction project cost estimates except in those where Design/Build
contracting method is used.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Planning and design funds.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
PLANNING AND DESIGN
DESIGN COSTS
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (0%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (0%)
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
LS
LS
110,170
(110,170)
110,170
0
110,170
0
110,170
110,170
110,167
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 110,167
Auth for Approp 110,167
Planning and Design
NAVY 2008FY
P218
PLANNING /DESIGNWASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N64482
11. Requirement:
Funds to be utilized under Title 10 USC 2807 for architectural and
engineering services and construction design in connection with military
construction projects including regular program projects, unspecified minor
construction, emergency construction, land appraisals, and special projects
as directed. Engineering investigations, such as field surveys and
foundation exploration, will be undertaken as necessary.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3901391C
(F) Type of design contract
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
September 2006
January 2007
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 110,167
Auth for Approp 110,167
Planning and Design
NAVY 2008FY
P218
PLANNING /DESIGNWASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N64482
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
N/A
Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
$0
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3911391
N/A
N/A
Title 10 USC 2805 provides authority to the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretaries of the Military Departments to acquire, construct, extend,
alter or install permanent facilities having an approved cost of $1,500,000
or less not otherwise authorized by law. Included are those items required
for which a need cannot reasonably be foreseen nor justified in time to be
included in an annual military construction program, but are so urgently
required that financing cannot be deferred until legislation in support of
a new program is enacted.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
Unspecified Minor Construction.
PROJECT:
(Current Mission)
10. Description of Proposed Construction:
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (0%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SIOH (0%)
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED
TOTAL REQUEST
LS
LS
10,000
(10,000)
10,000
0
10,000
0
10,000
10,000
10,000
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 10,000
Auth for Approp 10,000
Unspecified Minor Construction
NAVY 2008FY
P208
MINOR CONSTRUCTIONWASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N64481
11. Requirement:
Projects authorized by Title 10 USC 2805 not otherwise authorized by law
having an approved cost of $1,500,000 or less, including construction,
alteration, or conversion of permanent or temporary facilities. Projects
intended solely to correct a deficiency that is life-threatening, health-
threatening, or safety-threatening, may have an approved cost equal to or
less than $3,000,000. Total request includes funds for supervision,
inspection, and overhead.
Submitted to Congress
February 2007
DD Form
1 Dec 76Page No. 3921391C
(F) Type of design contract
(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost
(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed
September 2006
January 2007
12. Supplemental Data:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
05 FEB 2007
Auth 0
Approp 10,000
Auth for Approp 10,000
Unspecified Minor Construction
NAVY 2008FY
P208
MINOR CONSTRUCTIONWASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N64481
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
N/A
Activity POC: Phone No:
(D) Percent completed as of
(C) Date design completed
(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete
2. Basis:
(A) Standard or Definitive Design
(B) Where design was previously used
(C) Total
(D) Contract
(E) In-house
5. Construction start:
4. Contract award:
6. Construction complete:
A. Estimated Design Data:
1. Status:
(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started
$0
(E) Percent completed as of
3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):
(A) Production of plans and specifications
(B) All other design costs
NONE
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2008
BUDGET ESTIMATES
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND FAMILY HOUSING PROGRAMS
JUSTIFICATION DATA SUBMITTED TO
CONGRESS
FEBRUARY 2007
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY/MARINE CORPS MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET SUBMISSION FISCAL YEAR 2008
INDEX Page INDEX 1 SUMMARY PART Exhibit 3 DoN Program Summary 5 Navy Inadequate Unit Elimination Exhibits (FH-7/8) 7 Marine Corps Inadequate Unit Elimination Exhibits (FH-7/8) 17 LEGISLATIVE LANGUAGE 27 NEW CONSTRUCTION DoN New Construction Summary 29 Guam, NAVBASE Guam DD Form 1390 31 DD Form 1391 (H-481) 33 DD Form 1523 36 POST-ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION DoN Post-Acquisition Construction Summary 37 Navy Post-Acquisition Construction 39 Marine Corps Post-Acquisition Construction 53 ADVANCE PLANNING AND DESIGN DoN Advance Planning and Design Summary 63 INVENTORY AND FUNDING SUMMARY DoN Operations and Maintenance Summary 65 DoN O&M Reprogramming Report 67 Navy Reprogramming & Proposed Realignment (FH-10) 71 Marine Corps Reprogramming & Proposed Realignment (FH-10) 72 DoN Inventory Summary (FH-2) 73 Navy Inventory Summary (FH-2) 75 Marine Corps Inventory Summary (FH-2) 79 OPERATIONS Navy Operations Exhibits (OP-5) 83 Marine Corps Operations Exhibits (OP-5) 89 UTILITIES Navy Utilities Exhibit (OP-5) 99 Marine Corps Utilities Exhibit (OP-5) 101
1
MAINTENANCE Navy Maintenance Exhibit (OP-5) 103 Marine Corps Maintenance Exhibit (OP-5) 105 GFOQ MAINTENANCE & REPAIR OVER $35K DoN GFOQ M&R Over $35K Exhibit (FH-5) 107 GFOQ OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE OVER $35K Navy GFOQ O&M Over $35K Exhibit 113 Navy GFOQ Greater Than 6,000 NSF Exhibit 114 Marine Corps GFOQ O&M Over $35K Exhibit 115 Marine Corps GFOQ Greater Than 6,000 NSF Exhibit 116 REIMBURSABLES Navy Reimbursables Exhibit (OP-5) 117 Marine Corps Reimburseables Exhibit (OP-5) 119 LEASING DoN Leasing Summary 121 Navy Leasing Summary & Exhibits (FH-4) 123 Marine Corps Leasing Summary & Exhibits (FH-4) 129 PRIVATIZATION DON PPV Summary 133 Navy PPV Narrative & Detailed Summary (FH-6) 135 Navy Awarded Projects Summary 139 Navy Privatization Exhibit (OP-5) 141 Marine Corps PPV Narrative & Detailed Summary (FH-6) 143 Marine Corps Awarded Projects Summary 147 Marine Corps Privatization Exhibit (OP-5) 149 DEBT PAYMENT/FOREIGN CURRENCY Navy Debt Payment Summary 151 Marine Corps Debt Payment Summary 153 Navy Foreign Currency Exchange Data (PB-18) 155 Marine Corps Foreign Currency Exchange Data (PB-18) 157
2
PROGRAM View Assessment Details
Defense Housing DoD's housing program provides housing to military service members and their families. DoD does this in two ways -- by providing Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) to service members (who find housing in the community or in privatized housing) or by providing members DoD-owned housing.
RATING What This Rating Means
The purpose of the program is clearly defined - - to provide quality housing for our service members.
The program has clear and ambitious goals. At the end of 2006, DoD had eliminated over 145,000 inadequate units, fewer than projected. At the end of 2006, DoD owned approximately 35,000 inadequate housing units, higher than was projected. DoD continues to address the unique challenges of bringing private and public sectors together to meet the goals of the program.
DoD should reduce the federal role by privatizing more government-owned housing. DoD has reduced the federal role in housing by increasing allowances - - by eliminating service member's average out-of-pocket expenses for housing.
PERFORMING Moderately Effective
IMPROVEMENT PLAN
About Improvement Plans
We are taking the following actions to improve the performance of the program:
Working toward meeting yearly targets so that DoD can eliminate all inadequate housing in the U.S. by 2007.
Privatizing government-owned housing, where feasible, so that military service members and their families can live in quality housing and reduce the role of government in housing.
LEARN MORE View Similar Programs.
How all Federal programs are assessed.
Learn more about Defense Housing.
PROGRAM ASSESSMENT
gov: Defense Housin
3
BLANK PAGE
4
FY 2008 Program $669,733FY 2007 Program* $814,197
Purpose and Scope
Program Summary
Authorization is requested for:
(1) The performance of certain construction summarized hereafter; and
(2) The appropriation of $669,733
(a) to fund this construction; and
A summary of the funding program for Fiscal Year 2008 follows ($000):
Marine DONProgram Navy Corps Total
Construction
Appropriation Request 97,731 200,598 298,329Reimbursements 0 0 0
Total Program 97,731 200,598 298,329
Operations, Utilities, PPV Support,Maintenance, Leasing, and Debt Payment
Appropriation Request 332,401 39,003 371,404Reimbursements 8,000 1,000 9,000
Total Program 340,401 40,003 380,404
Total
Appropriation Request 430,132 239,601 669,733Reimbursements 8,000 1,000 9,000
Total Program 438,132 240,601 678,733
* This column reflects the FY 2007 President's Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $716,739.
(b) to fund partially certain other functions already authorized in existing legislation.
This program provides for the support of military family housing functions within the Department of the Navy.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING - FY 2008 BUDGET SUMMARY
PROGRAM SUMMARY
(In Thousands)
5
BLANK PAGE
6
FY 2
002
FY 2
003
FY 2
004
FY 2
005
FY 2
006
FY 2
007
FY 2
008
FY 2
009
FY 2
010
Beg
inni
ng F
isca
l Yea
r Inv
ento
ry57
,005
54,3
9148
,266
44,6
4130
,304
21,3
899,
987
9,98
710
,122
Ade
quat
e In
vent
ory
34,6
9934
,647
32,4
5031
,274
21,7
0116
,152
9,98
79,
987
10,1
22In
adeq
uate
Inve
ntor
y22
,306
19,7
4415
,816
13,3
678,
603
5,23
70
00
Per
cent
Inad
equa
te39
%36
%33
%30
%28
%24
%0%
0%0%
Bud
get I
mpa
ct*
2,86
35,
608
3,64
214
,695
9,22
611
,635
00
0In
adeq
uate
s R
educ
ed2,
562
3,92
82,
449
4,76
43,
366
5,23
70
00
M
ilcon
/O&
M1,
283
659
190
6952
224
90
00
P
PV
(Inc
lude
s D
emol
ition
)97
81,
670
1,40
34,
454
2,06
14,
786
00
0
Dem
oliti
on/D
ives
titur
e30
11,
599
823
266
1,15
530
00
00
Ade
quat
e U
nits
PP
V30
11,
680
1,19
39,
931
5,86
06,
398
00
0M
ILC
ON
Def
icit
Red
uctio
n16
00
00
00
00
0O
ther
Inve
ntor
y G
ains
/Los
ses
(1,0
34)
(69)
561
314
161
820
135
179
Est
imat
ed E
OY
Inad
equa
te In
vent
ory
19,7
4415
,816
13,3
678,
603
5,23
70
00
0E
stim
ated
EO
Y T
otal
Inve
ntor
y54
,391
48,2
6644
,641
30,3
0421
,389
9,98
79,
987
10,1
2210
,301
Not
e: I
nven
tory
adj
ustm
ents
are
bas
ed o
n es
timat
ed d
ate
the
units
are
priv
atiz
ed (N
o lo
nger
requ
iring
FH
O&
M fu
nds)
or y
ear i
n w
hich
bu
dget
ed fo
r tra
ditio
nal f
amily
hou
sing
con
stru
ctio
n.Sum
mar
y of
Inad
equa
te U
nit E
limin
atio
nFa
mily
Hou
sing
, Nav
y
Exh
ibit
FH-7
Sum
mar
y of
Inad
equa
te U
nit E
limin
atio
n
7
Total Inventory
TotalInadequateInventory
Total InadequateAddressed
Units at beginning of FY 2002 57,005 22,306
FY 2002 traditional projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 1,283H-02-98-3; Annapolis, MD 177 42H-1-01-2; Barking Sands, HI 69 69H-12-99; Sasebo, Japan 52 52H-13-95-4; Yokosuka, Japan 532 96H-03-98-2; Yokosuka, Japan 532 78H-13-95-5; Yokosuka, Japan 532 96H-8-98-2; Guam, Marianas Is. 1,532 44H-1-02; Keflavik, Iceland 793 95H-1-01-2; Keflavik, Iceland 793 65H-2-95-2; London, England 150 70H-1-95-2; London, England 150 80H-1-99-2; Meridian, MS 294 118H-02-02; Hampton Roads, VA 547 12H-1-95; Hampton Roads, VA 547 25H-01-04; Patuxent River, MD 686 28H-5-99; Pensacola, FL 139 36H-7-99; Pensacola, FL 139 14H-1-02; Wallops Island, VA 28 28H-1-97; Whiting Field, FL 452 155H-377; Pearl Harbor, HI 3,859 70H-588; Sigonella, Italy 10 10
FY 2002 Privatization Projects 1,279 978South Texas 781 680 680New Orleans, LA 498 299 298
Units Demolished/Divested 301 301Guam, Marianas Is. 106 1,532 106Jacksonville, FL 5 530 5Key West, FL 83 994 83Lakehurst, NJ 24 134 24Whiting Field, FL 83 452 83
MILCON Deficit Reduction 160 0 0H-595; Gulfport/Pascagoula, MS 160
Other Inventory Gains/Losses* (1,034) 0 0
Units at end of FY 2002 54,391 19,744 2,562
Inadequate Family Housing Units Eliminated in FY 2002
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Navy
* Other Inventory Gains/Losses refers to actions such as temporary & permanent diversions, conversions, adds from previously approved construction projects, etc. They do not address the backlog of inadequate units and simply impact the total Navy-owned Inventory.
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
8
Total Inventory
TotalInadequateInventory
Total InadequateAddressed
Units at beginning of FY 2003 54,391 19,744
FY 2003 traditional projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 659H-643; Lemoore, CA 368 178H-669; Brunswick, ME 26 26H-01-99-5; Ventura, CA 546 215H-08-03; Washington, DC 1 1H-03-03; New Orleans, LA 1 1H-01-01; Thurmont, MD 1 1H-01-02; Fallon, NV 1 1H-61-97; Hampton Roads, VA 510 1H-65-97; Hampton Roads, VA 510 1H-66-97; Hampton Roads, VA 510 1H-01-03; Keflavik, Iceland 633 1H-01-97; Naples, Italy 1 1H-03-98-3; Yokosuka, Japan 262 129H-08-98-02; Guam, Marianas Is. 1,382 102
FY 2003 Privatization Projects 3,350 1,670Beaufort, SC 53 53 53San Diego, CA 3,297 1,734 1,617
Units Demolished/Divested 2,706 1,599Annapolis, MD 43 135 0Earle, NJ 258 24 12East Sound, WA 3 0 0Great Lakes, IL 3 682 3Guam, Marianas Is. 64 1,382 64Hampton Roads, VA 6 510 6Jacksonville, FL 6 525 6Key West, FL 234 911 233Lakehurst, NJ 12 110 12Memphis, TN 54 512 0New London, CT 7 1,606 0Pearl Harbor, HI 2,016 3,789 1,263
MILCON Deficit Reduction 0 0 0
Other Inventory Gains/Losses (69) 0 0
Units at end of FY 2003 48,266 15,816 3,928
Inadequate Family Housing Units Eliminated in FY 2003
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Navy
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
9
Total Inventory
TotalInadequateInventory
Total InadequateAddressed
Units at beginning of FY 2004 48,266 15,816
FY 2004 traditional projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 190H-671; Lemoore, CA 190 187H-1-05; Lemoore, CA 190 3
FY 2004 Privatization Projects 2,596 1,403Monterey, CA 593 252 252Hawaii Region (PH I) 2,003 2,526 1,151
Units Demolished/Divested 1,590 823Earle, NJ 11 12 11Fallon, NV 8 0 0Great Lakes, IL 50 679 50Guam, Marianas Is. 418 1,216 418Hampton Roads, VA 10 501 10Indian Head, MD 2 161 2Mayport, FL 16 0 0Meridian, MS 19 176 19Newport, RI 78 269 0Pearl Harbor, HI 2 2,526 0Roosevelt Roads, PR 974 313 313Yokosuka, Japan 2 133 0
MILCON Deficit Reduction 0 0 0
Other Inventory Gains/Losses 561 0 33
Units at end of FY 2004 44,641 13,367 2,449
Inadequate Family Housing Units Eliminated in FY 2004
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Navy
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
10
Total Inventory
TotalInadequateInventory
Total InadequateAddressed
Units at beginning of FY 2005 44,641 13,367
FY 2005 traditional projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 69H-03-98-4; Yokosuka, Japan 0 133 69
FY 2005 Privatization Projects 14,385 4,454NE (East) 5,593 2,303 2,303NW (PH I) 3,098 708 708Mid-Atlantic 5,694 1,443 1,443
Units Demolished/Divested 266 241Atlanta, GA 10 0 0Crane, IN 1 0 0Earle, NJ 5 1 1Great Lakes, IL 8 629 4Guam, Marianas Is. 124 798 124Pearl Harbor, HI 57 1,375 56Portsmouth, NH 5 32 0Keflavik, Iceland 56 632 56
MILCON Deficit Reduction 0 0 0
Other Inventory Gains/Losses 314 0 0
Units at end of FY 2005 30,304 8,603 4,764
Inadequate Family Housing Units Eliminated in FY 2005
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Navy
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
11
Total Inventory
TotalInadequateInventory
Total InadequateAddressed
Units at beginning of FY 2006 30,304 8,603
FY 2006 traditional projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 522H-04-97; Atsugi, Japan 114 114H-649; Guam, Marianas Is. 674 126H-06-92; Guam, Marianas Is. 674 132H-12-00; Guam, Marianas Is. 674 22H-12-98; Guam, Marianas Is. 674 67H-03-98-5; Yokosuka, Japan 64 61
FY 2006 Privatization Projects 7,921 2,061Midwest Region 2,764 625 625San Diego, CA (PH III) 2,668 117 117Hawaii Region (PH II) 2,489 1,319 1,319
Units Demolished/Divested 1,155 783Guam, Marianas Is. 106 674 81Mid-South, TN 126 512 126Pearl Harbor, HI 34 1,319 0Keflavik, Iceland* 889 576 576
MILCON Deficit Reduction 0 0 0
Other Inventory Gains/Losses 161 0 0
Units at end of FY 2006 21,389 5,237 3,366
Inadequate Family Housing Units Eliminated in FY 2006
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Navy
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
12
Total Inventory
TotalInadequateInventory
Total InadequateAddressed
Units at beginning of FY 2007 21,389 5,237
FY 2007 traditional projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 249H-662; Guam, Marianas Is. 246 134H-15-00; Guam, Marianas Is. 246 4H-663; Guam, Marianas Is. 246 108H-16-01; Yokosuka, Japan 3 1H-14-01; Yokosuka, Japan 3 1H-15-01; Yokosuka, Japan 3 1
FY 2007 Privatization Projects 11,184 4,786SW Region 3,654 331 331SE Region 7,041 4,173 4,173Midwest Region PH II (Mid-South, TN) 489 386 282
Units Demolished/Divested 300 202El Centro, CA 8 0 0Mayport, FL 1 0 0Pensacola, FL 6 89 0Whiting Field, FL 1 214 0Kings Bay, GA 5 631 4Meridian, MS 12 157 0Fallon, NV 69 0 0Charleston, SC 94 94 94Mid-South, TN 104 386 104
MILCON Deficit Reduction 0 0 0
Other Inventory Gains/Losses 82 0 0Seal Beach, CA 2 0 0Key West, FL 57 0 0Sasebo, Japan 8 0 0Yokosuka, Japan 15 0 0
Units at end of FY 2007 9,987 0 5,237
Inadequate Family Housing Units Eliminated in FY 2007
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Navy
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
13
Total Inventory
TotalInadequateInventory
Total InadequateAddressed
Units at beginning of FY 2008 9,987 0
FY 2008 Traditional MILCON Recapitalization Projects 0 0 0H-481; Guam, Marianas Is. 0H-06-92-2; Guam, Marianas Is. 0H-01-03; Guam, Marianas Is. 0HRC-13-03; Atsugi, Japan 0H-14-02-1; Sasebo, Japan 0H-01-02; Chinhae, Korea 0H-08-02; Rota, Spain 0
FY 2008 Privatization Projects 0 0 0
Units Demolished/Divested 0 0 0
MILCON Deficit Reduction 0 0 0
Other Inventory Gains/Losses 0 0 0
Units at end of FY 2008 9,987 0 0
Inadequate Family Housing Units Eliminated in FY 2008
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Navy
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
14
Total Inventory
TotalInadequateInventory
Total InadequateAddressed
Units at beginning of FY 2009 9,987 0
FY 2009 Traditional MILCON Recapitalization Projects 0 0 0H-541; Guantanamo Bay, Cuba 0H-543; Guantanamo Bay, Cuba 0H-544; Guantanamo Bay, Cuba 0H-02-03; Guam, Marianas Is. 0HD-16-02; Sasebo, Japan 0H-15-02-1; Sasebo, Japan 0H-2-02; Sasebo, Japan 0
FY 2009 Privatization Projects 0 0 0
Units Demolished/Divested 0 0 0
MILCON Deficit Reduction 0 0 0
Other Inventory Gains/Losses 135 0 0Sasebo, Japan 135 0 0
Units at end of FY 2009 10,122 0 0
Inadequate Family Housing Units Eliminated in FY 2009
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Navy
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
15
Total Inventory
TotalInadequateInventory
Total InadequateAddressed
Units at beginning of FY 2010 10,122 0
FY 2010 Traditional MILCON Recapitalization Projects 0 0 0TBD; Atsugi, Japan 0TBD; Guam, Marianas Is. 0
FY 2010 Privatization Projects 0 0 0
Units Demolished/Divested 0 0 0
MILCON Deficit Reduction 0 0 0
Other Inventory Gains/Losses 179 0 0Sasebo, Japan 179 0 0
Units at end of FY 2010 10,301 0 0
Inadequate Family Housing Units Eliminated in FY 2010
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Navy
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
16
Fam
ily H
ousi
ng U
nite
d St
ates
Mar
ine
Cor
ps
Sum
mar
y of
Inad
equa
te U
nit E
limin
atio
n
FY 2
002
FY 2
003
FY 2
004
FY 2
005
FY 2
006
FY 2
007
FY 2
008
FY 2
009
FY 2
010
Beg
inni
ng F
isca
l Yea
r Inv
ento
ry23
,197
22,9
8716
,645
16,0
3710
,000
4,86
891
781
681
6A
dequ
ate
Inve
ntor
y6,
788
7,01
17,
542
8,68
55,
972
2,18
991
781
681
6In
adeq
uate
Inve
ntor
y16
,409
15,9
769,
103
7,35
24,
028
2,67
90
00
Perc
ent I
nade
quat
e71
%70
%55
%46
%40
%55
%0%
0%0%
Bud
get I
mpa
ct*
539
7,27
71,
751
6,33
45,
152
4,00
30
00
Inad
equa
tes R
educ
ed53
96,
902
1,75
13,
333
1,60
02,
679
00
0
Milc
on/O
&M
244
943
957
00
175
00
0
Priv
atiz
atio
n0
5,75
90
3,31
11,
582
2,49
10
00
D
emol
ition
/Dis
vest
iture
295
200
794
2218
130
00
Ade
quat
e un
its P
rivat
ized
037
50
3,00
13,
552
1,32
40
00
MIL
CO
N D
efic
it R
educ
tion
06
018
00
00
0O
ther
Inve
ntor
y G
ains
/Los
ses
35-1
419
127
920
-123
-101
00
Add
ition
al In
adeq
uate
Uni
ts Id
entif
ied
106
290
925
10
00
0
Estim
ated
EO
Y In
adeq
uate
Inve
ntor
y15
,976
9,10
37,
352
4,02
82,
679
00
00
Estim
ated
EO
Y T
otal
Inve
ntor
y22
,987
16,6
4516
,037
10,0
004,
868
917
816
816
816
Not
e: I
nven
tory
adj
ustm
ents
are
bas
ed o
n es
timat
ed d
ate
the
units
are
priv
atiz
ed (N
o lo
nger
requ
iring
FH O
&M
fund
s) o
r yea
r in
whi
ch b
udge
ted
for t
radi
tiona
l fam
ily h
ousi
ng c
onst
ruct
ion. E
xhib
it FH
-7 S
umm
ary
of In
adeq
uate
Uni
t Elim
inat
ion
17
Total Inventory
Total Inadequate Inventory
Total Inadequate Addressed
Total Units at beginning of FY 2002 23,197 16,409
FY 2002 total traditional military construction (Milcon) projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 242
H-635/MCAS Yuma, AZ 772 599 51H-546/MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA 1,608 1,148 74H-571/MCB Hawaii, HI ** 2,202 1,786 **PE-H-0522A-M2/MCB Camp Pendleton, CA 6,164 2,978 40EI-H-0201-R2/MARBRKS 8th&I Washington, DC 5 5 1EI-H-0202-R2/MARBRKS 8th&I Washington, DC 5 5 1EI-H-0402-R2/MARBRKS 8th&I Washington, DC 5 5 1LE-H-9906-R2/MCB Camp Lejeune, NC * 4,246 2,803 *LE-H-0202-M2/MCB Camp Lejeune, NC ** 4,246 2,803 **LE-H-0301-M2/MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 4,246 2,803 30IW-H-0301-R2/MCAS Iwakuni, JA 666 176 44
FY 2002 total units privatized (no longer required FH O&M) to eliminate inadequate housing 0 0
Phase II/MCB Camp Pendleton, CA * 6,164 2,943 *
FY 2002 total units demolished/divested or otherwise permanently removed from family housing inventory 295 295
MCLB Barstow, CA 363 289 11MCAS Cherry Point, NC 2,664 2,392 75MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 4,246 2,803 114MCAS Beaufort, SC 1,276 1,276 1MCB Quantico, VA 1,508 1,411 94
Projects added by Congress 0 2H-557/MCB Quantico, VA * 1,411 *EI-H-0501-R2/MARBRKS 8th&I Washington, DC 5 2CH-H-0001-R2/Westover ARB, Chicopee, MA ** 279 **
Additional inadequate units identified during FY 2002 4 -106MCB Camp Pendleton, CA 2,978 -5MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA 1,148 -1MCB Hawaii, HI 4 1,786 -4MCB Quantico, VA 1,411 -96
MILCON Deficit Reduction 46MCAS Iwakuni, JA (JFIP Construction) 46
Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## 35MCAS Cherry Point, NC (units on-/off line) -141MCB Camp Lejeune, NC (units on-/off line) 60MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA (units on-/off line) 114MCAS Yuma, AZ (units on-/off line) -2MCB Hawaii, HI (units on-/off line) 4
Total Units at end of FY 2002 22,987 15,976 433* Project used as seed funding for PPV in future Fiscal Year** Project executed in future Fiscal Year
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
Annual Inadequate Family Housing Units Elimination
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Marine Corps
## Other Inventory Gains/Losses refers to actions such as temporary and permanent diversions, conversions, add from previously approved construction projects. They do not address the backlog of inadequate units and simply impact the total Marine Corps-owned inventory.
18
Total Inventory
Total Inadequate Inventory
Total Inadequate Addressed
Total Units at beginning of FY 2003 22,987 15,976 433
FY 2003 total traditional military construction (Milcon) projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 943
H-547/MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA 1,722 1,075 76H-563/MCB Hawaii, HI # 2,210 1,790 10H-613/MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 4,192 2,659 317YU-H-0124-M2/MCAS Yuma, AZ 770 548 96IW-H-0302-R2/MCAS Iwakuni, JA 712 132 44IW-H-0304-R2/MCAS Iwakuni, JA 712 132 44CH-H-0001-R2/Westover JARB, Chicopee, MA * 279 279 124LE-H-0202-M2/MCB Camp Lejeune, NC * & # 4,192 2,659 60H-571/MCB Hawaii, HI * 2,210 1,790 172
FY 2003 total units privatized (no longer required FH O&M) to eliminate inadequate housing 6,134 5,759
Phase II/MCB Camp Pendleton, CA ** 6,164 2,943 2,939MCAS Beaufort, SC/MCRD Parris Island, SC ** 1,506 1,505 1,505H-620/MCB Quantico, VA ** 1,414 1,413 1,310MCRD San Diego, CA 5 5 5
FY 2003 total units demolished/divested or otherwise permanently removed from family housing inventory 201 200
MCLB Barstow, CA 352 352 74MCAS Cherry Point, NC 2,448 2,317 0MCSA Kansas City, MO 240 240 6MCB Quantico, VA 1,414 1,413 103MCB Camp Pendleton, CA (MWTC Bridgeport) 6,164 2,943 1MCB Camp Pendleton, CA 6,164 2,943 2Westover JARB, Chicopee, MA 279 279 14
Additional inadequate units identified during FY 2003 1 -29MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA 1,075 -28MCLB Barstow, CA (Single Family Unit Converted to Duplex) 1 -1
MILCON Deficit Reduction 6JFIP/MCAS Iwakuni, JA 6
Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## -14MCB Camp Lejeune, NC (units on-/off line) 136MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA (units on-/off line) -125MCAS Yuma, AZ (units on-/off-line) 51MCB Hawaii, HI (units on-/off-line) -76
Total Units at end of FY 2003 16,645 9,103 6,873* Project Authorized in previous Fiscal Year, executed in this Fiscal Year** Includes Prior Year PPV seed funding# Project partialy executed in future Fiscal Year
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
Annual Inadequate Family Housing Units Elimination
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Marine Corps
## Other Inventory Gains/Losses refers to actions such as temporary and permanent diversions, conversions, add from previously approved construction projects. They do not address the backlog of inadequate units and simply impact the total Marine Corps-owned inventory.
19
Total Inventory
Total Inadequate Inventory
Total Inadequate Addressed
Units at beginning of FY 2004 16,645 9,103
FY 2004 total traditional military construction (Milcon) projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 957
H-608/MCAS Cherry Point 2,447 2,317 339H-614/MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 4,328 2,282 358H-656/MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 4,328 2,282 161IW-H-0303-R2/MCAS Iwakuni, JA 718 44 44H-563/MCB Hawaii, HI * 2,134 1,608 55
FY 2004 total units privatized (no longer required FH O&M) to eliminate inadequate housing 0 0
FY 2004 total units demolished/divested or otherwise permanently removed from family housing inventory 799 794
Westover ARB, Chicopee, MA 265 141 133MCLB Albany, GA 669 419 419MCLB Barstow, CA 279 278 103MCAS Cherry Point, NC 2,447 2,317 0MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 4,328 2,282 2MCB Hawaii, HI 2,134 1,068 0MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA 1,597 1,027 136MCLB Barstow, CA (Duplex Converted to Single Family Unit) 279 1
Projects added by Congress 0 0
Additional inadequate units identified during FY 2004 0 0
MILCON Deficit Reduction 0 0
Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## 191 0MCAS Cherry Point, NC (units on-/off line) 140 0MCB Hawaii, HI 137 0MCB Camp Lejeune, NC (units on-/off line) -194 0MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA 108
Total Units at end of FY 2004 16,037 7,352 1,751* Project Authorized in previous Fiscal Year, partially executed in this fiscal year
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
## Other Inventory Gains/Losses refers to actions such as temporary and permanent diversions, conversions, add from previously approved construction projects. They do not address the backlog of inadequate units and simply impact the total Marine Corps-owned inventory.
Annual Inadequate Family Housing Units Elimination
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Marine Corps
20
Total Inventory
Total Inadequate Inventory
Total Inadequate Addressed
Units at beginning of FY 2005 16,037 7,352
FY 2005 total traditional military construction (Milcon) projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 0
FY 2005 total units privatized (no longer required FH O&M) to eliminate inadequate housing 6,312 3,311
MCAS Yuma, AZ PPV ** 821 452 452Phase III/MCB Camp Pendleton, CA ** 2,848 1 0H-609/MCAS Cherry Point, NC 2,585 1,978 400MCSA Kansas City, MO PPV 234 234 234MCB Camp Lejeune, NC PPV ** 4,132 1,761 1,035Stewart Army Subpost, New Windsor, NY 299 299 299MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA PPV 1,567 891 891
FY 2005 total units demolished/divested or otherwise permanently removed from family housing inventory 22 22
MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 4,132 1,761 22
Projects added by Congress 0 0
Additional inadequate units identified during FY 2005 0 -9MCB Hawaii, HI 2,335 1,553 -9
MILCON Deficit Reduction 18 0JFIP MCAS Iwakuni, JA 18 0
Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## 279 0MCAS Cherry Point, NC (units on-/off-line) 0MCB Camp Lejeune, NC (units on-/off line) 214MCB Hawaii, HI 65
Total Units at end of FY 2005 10,000 4,028 3,324** Includes Prior Year PPV seed funding
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
## Other Inventory Gains/Losses refers to actions such as temporary and permanent diversions, conversions, add from previously approved construction projects. They do not address the backlog of inadequate units and simply impact the total Marine Corps-owned inventory.
Annual Inadequate Family Housing Units Elimination
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Marine Corps
21
Total Inventory
Total Inadequate Inventory
Total Inadequate Addressed
Units at beginning of FY 2006 10,000 4,028
FY 2006 total traditional military construction (Milcon) projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 0
FY 2006 total units privatized (no longer required FH O&M) to eliminate inadequate housing 5,134 1,582
MCAS Cherry Point, NC 2,030 1,578 800MCB Hawaii Kaneohe Bay, HI PPV 2,335 1,562 614MCB Camp Lejeune, NC PPV 1,600 704 167MCB Camp Pendleton, CA PPV 2,772 1 1
FY 2006 total units demolished/divested or otherwise permanently removed from family housing inventory 18 18
Westover JARB Chicopee, MA 132 8 8MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 1,600 704 5MCB Hawaii Kaneohe Bay, HI 2,355 1,562 5
Projects added by Congress 0 0
Additional inadequate units identified during FY 2006 0 -251MCLB Albany, GA PPV 250 0 -250MCAS Cherry Point, NC 2,030 1,578 -1
MILCON Deficit Reduction 0 0
Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## 20 0MCAS Cherry Point, NC 20
Total Units at end of FY 2006 4,868 2,679 1,349
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
## Other Inventory Gains/Losses refers to actions such as temporary and permanent diversions, conversions, add from previously approved construction projects. They do not address the backlog of inadequate units and simply impact the total Marine Corps-owned inventory.
Annual Inadequate Family Housing Units Elimination
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Marine Corps
22
Total Inventory
Total Inadequate Inventory
Total Inadequate Addressed
Units at beginning of FY 2007 4,868 2,679
FY 2007 total traditional military construction (Milcon) projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 175
H-654/MCLB Barstow, CA 175 175 175
FY 2007 total units privatized (no longer required FH O&M) to eliminate inadequate housing 3,815 2,491
MCLB Albany, GA PPV 250 250 250MCAS Cherry Point, NC PPV 1,214 779 779MCB Hawaii Kaneohe Bay, HI PPV 1,155 943 930MCB Camp Lejeune, NC PPV 1,207 532 532Westover JARB Chicopee, MA 124 0 0
FY 2007 total units demolished/divested or otherwise permanently removed from family housing inventory 13 13
MCB Hawaii Kaneohe Bay, HI 1,155 943 13
Projects added by Congress 0 0
Additional inadequate units identified during FY 2007 0 0
MILCON Deficit Reduction 0 0
Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## -123 0MCAS Cherry Point, NC -122MCB Camp Pendleton, CA -1 0 0
Total Units at end of FY 2007 917 0 2,679
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
## Other Inventory Gains/Losses refers to actions such as temporary and permanent diversions, conversions, add from previously approved construction projects. They do not address the backlog of inadequate units and simply impact the total Marine Corps-owned inventory.
Annual Inadequate Family Housing Units Elimination
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Marine Corps
23
Total Inventory
Total Inadequate Inventory
Total Inadequate Addressed
Units at beginning of FY 2008 917 0
FY 2008 total traditional military construction (Milcon) projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 0
FY 2008 total units privatized (no longer required FH O&M) to eliminate inadequate housing 0 0
FY 2008 total units demolished/divested or otherwise permanently removed from family housing inventory 0 0
Projects added by Congress 0 0
Additional inadequate units identified during FY 2008 0 0
MILCON Deficit Reduction 0 0
Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## -101 0MCLB Barstow, CA -101 0
Total Units at end of FY 2008 816 0 0
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
## Other Inventory Gains/Losses refers to actions such as temporary and permanent diversions, conversions, add from previously approved construction projects. They do not address the backlog of inadequate units and simply impact the total Marine Corps-owned inventory.
Annual Inadequate Family Housing Units Elimination
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Marine Corps
24
Total Inventory
Total Inadequate Inventory
Total Inadequate Addressed
Units at beginning of FY 2009 816 0
FY 2009 total traditional military construction (Milcon) projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 0
FY 2009 total units privatized (no longer required FH O&M) to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 0
FY 2009 total units demolished/divested or otherwise permanently removed from family housing inventory 0 0
Projects added by Congress 0 0
Additional inadequate units identified during FY 2009 0 0
MILCON Deficit Reduction 0 0
Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## 0 00
Total Units at end of FY 2009 816 0 0
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
## Other Inventory Gains/Losses refers to actions such as temporary and permanent diversions, conversions, add from previously approved construction projects. They do not address the backlog of inadequate units and simply impact the total Marine Corps-owned inventory.
Annual Inadequate Family Housing Units Elimination
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Marine Corps
25
Total Inventory
Total Inadequate Inventory
Total Inadequate Addressed
Units at beginning of FY 2010 816 0
FY 2010 total traditional military construction (Milcon) projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 0
FY 2010 total units privatized (no longer required FH O&M) to eliminate inadequate housing 0 0
FY 2010 total units demolished/divested or otherwise permanently removed from family housing inventory 0 0
Projects added by Congress 0 0
Additional inadequate units identified during FY 2010 0 0
MILCON Deficit Reduction 0 0
Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## 0 0
Total Units at end of FY 2010 816 0 0
Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination
## Other Inventory Gains/Losses refers to actions such as temporary and permanent diversions, conversions, add from previously approved construction projects. They do not address the backlog of inadequate units and simply impact the total Marine Corps-owned inventory.
Annual Inadequate Family Housing Units Elimination
Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Marine Corps
26
FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS FISCAL YEAR 2008
FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION, NAVY AND MARINE COPRS
For expenses of family housing for the Navy and Marine Corps for construction, including acquisition, replacement, addition, expansion, and extension and alteration, as authorized by law, [$305,071,000] $298,329,000 to remain available until September 30, [2011] 2012. FAMILY HOUSING OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY AND MARINE
CORPS
For expenses of family housing for the Navy and Marine Corps for operation and maintenance, including debt payment, leasing, minor construction, principal and interest charges, and insurance premiums, as authorized by law, [$509,126,000]* $371,404,000. * Prior Year amount for FH O&M (shown in brackets) reflects the FY 2007 President's Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $499,986,000.
27
BLANK PAGE
28
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING - FY 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATE
CONSTRUCTION OF NEW HOUSING (In Thousands) FY 2008 Program $ 57,167 FY 2007 Program $ 126,025* Purpose and Scope This program provides for land acquisition, site preparation, acquisition and construction, and initial outfitting with fixtures and integral equipment of new and replacement family housing units and associated facilities such as roads, driveways, walks, and utility systems. Program Summary Authorization is requested for:
(1) Construction of 73 replacement homes; and, (2) Appropriation of $57,167,000 to fund this construction program.
No. of Activity Mission Homes Amount NAVY NAVBASE Guam Current 73 $ 57,167 TOTAL 73 $ 57,167 * This column reflects the FY 2007 President's Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $37,707.
29
BLANK PAGE
30
1
711 Family Housing 73 57,167 Turnkey
ScopeCost
($000) Start CompleteDesign Status
8. Projects Requested In This Program:
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
a. TOTAL ACREAGE ....... ( Acres) .....................
NAVY 2008
NAVBASE GUAM
GUAM, GUAM 2.64
09/30/06
2011
1,090
FY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. Installation and Location 4. Command 5. Area Const.
Cost Index
2. Date
Category
Code Project Title
6. Personnel
Strength:
PERMANENT SUPPORT
a.As Of
b.End FY
1. Component
b. INVENTORY TOTAL AS OF
c. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ........................
d. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM ...................
e. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM ...............
f. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .......................
g. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ......................................
h. GRAND TOTAL ..............................................
STUDENTS TOTAL
494
469
3,7173,241
517
522
0
0
0
0
0
0
71
71
544
544
0
0
5,343
4,847
OFFICER ENLISTED CIVILIAN OFFICER OFFICERENLISTED ENLISTED CIVILIANCIVILIAN
.....................30 Sep 06 922,232
98,174
57,167
0
0
0
1,077,573
9. Future Projects:
a. Included in the following program
b. Major planned next three years
c. Family housing revitalization backlog
(replacement, improvements, major repairs)
0
0
$0
Replacement Homes
Replacement Homes
M
10. Mission or Major Functions:To provide infrastructure, services, and support to Naval Forces, tenant
activities and other customers. U.S. Naval Forces Marianas oversees the
U.S. Navy's largest and most strategic island base located in the
Western Pacific. 160,000 residents and more than 12,000 military
members and their families. Guam is the most populated island in the
geographical area known as Micronesia. U.S. Naval Forces Marianas
serves as the representative to Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet. They
coordinate all shore-based Naval personnel and shore activities in Guam
as well as the Navy's representative to the Guam community.
03 JAN 2007
DD FORM 1390 PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED
INTERNALLY UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
31
BLANK PAGE
32
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2.Date
4. Project Title
5.Program Element 6.Category Code 7. Project Number
1.Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
DD Form
1 Dec 76
1391
03 JAN 2007
711
REPLACE 73 UNITS AT OLD APRA PHASE II
OF II
NAVY2008FY
3. Installation and Location:
NAVBASE GUAM
GUAM, GUAM
H-4810808741N
$57,167APPR:
$57,167AUTH:
Page 1
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
FA
GSM
73
12,868
437,562
2,482
Family Housing:
Buildings
Supporting Costs:
Lot Costs
Site Improvements
Utility Mains
Streets
Landscaping
Recreation
Environmental
Demolition
Other Site Work
Land Purchase
Subtotal
Contingency (5%)
Total Contract Cost
SIOH (6.2%)
DESIGN BUILD- DESIGN COSTS 4%
Project Cost
31,942
17,464
49,406
2,470
51,876
3,216
2,075
57,167
(31,942)
(1,418)
(2,928)
(7,463)
(1,425)
(909)
(1,057)
(1,426)
(0)
(838)
(0)
Single and duplex family housing units constructed of reinforced concrete footings,
floor slabs, walls, columns and roof slabs. Insulation will be at under side of roof
slabs. Each unit will include a single garage for enlisted and a dual garage for
officers, driveway, covered patio, privacy fencing, exterior storage and a trash bin
enclosure. Building features will include plumbing, air conditioning, electrical
lighting fixtures and power receptacles, telephone and internet outlets, cable TV pull
boxes, and radon mitigation systems. Units will include fire protection systems as
required by UFC 3-600-01. Special construction criteria will include provision for
withstanding typhoon wind speed of 170 MPH and Zone 4 seismic loading. Supporting
facilities will include new underground power, telephone, cable TV, potable water and
wastewater utilities; also, site improvements, drainage facilities, asphalt paved
roads, concrete sidewalks, covered bus stops, mail box kiosks and landscaping.
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
33
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2.Date
4. Project Title
5.Program Element 6.Category Code 7. Project Number
1.Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
DD Form
1 Dec 76
1391
03 JAN 2007
C
711
REPLACE 73 UNITS AT OLD APRA PHASE II
OF II
NAVY2008FY
3. Installation and Location:
NAVBASE GUAM
GUAM, GUAM
H-4810808741N
$57,167APPR:
$57,167AUTH:
Page 2
Recreation facilities will include common open spaces, jogging/ biking trails, playing
courts, playing fields, picnic shelter and tot lots. Project includes installation of
perforated conduit in gravel bed under floor slabs (and capped with electrical outlet
for blower for future radon testing). The actual square foot area of these dwellings
will be based on local market standards and may exceed those indicated herein below.
Contracting vehicle is intended to be design-build.
E1-E6
W1-O3
W1-O3
O4-O5
3
3
4
4
1,315
1,500
1,734
1,863
1,631
1,860
2,150
2,310
151
172
200
215
2.746
2.746
2.746
2.746
$904
$904
$904
$904
34
12
9
18
12,744
5,124
4,468
9,606
Paygrade Bedrooms NSF GSF GSM Project
Factor
Cost
Per GSM
No.
Units
($000)
Total
111,850 138,704 12,868 73 31,942Total Project Size:
11. REQUIREMENT
PROJECT:
This project constructs 73 replacement family housing units at Old Apra "Apra View",
for junior enlisted and officers supported by COMNAVMARIANAS, Guam. This project is
the second of two phases (Phase I was requested in FY07). Phase I included funds to
demolish all 134 Inadequate Units (in accordance with OSD Goal) and build back 68
units, based on requirements justification (DD 1523). Since then, revised
requirements justification shows that the remaining inventory, not previously planned
for replacement is now needed. In addtion, seven units from PH I were dropped from
the scope of the project, based on revised construction estimates, and will need to be
picked up in this project as well.
(Current Mission)
Adequate family housing is necessary for married junior enlisted personnel and Navy
officers and their families on Guam. Adequate community recreational facilities are
also required for Navy personnel and members of their families, including dependents
of various ages. Design and construction shall comply with current Navy policies as
outlined in NAVFACINST 11101.85H.1; MIL-HDBK 1003/3 Heating, Ventilating, Air
Conditioning, and Dehumidifying Systems; the Marianas Regional Architectural and
Construction Standards; UFC 3-600-01, Fire Protection Engineering for Facilities, and
current industry building codes. Special attention shall be directed toward energy
performance and sustainability requirements. ADA ramps will be incorporated in
pedestrian lanes. Five percent of housing units will be ADA compliant.
REQUIREMENT:
34
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2.Date
4. Project Title
5.Program Element 6.Category Code 7. Project Number
1.Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
DD Form
1 Dec 76
1391
03 JAN 2007
C
711
REPLACE 73 UNITS AT OLD APRA PHASE II
OF II
NAVY2008FY
3. Installation and Location:
NAVBASE GUAM
GUAM, GUAM
H-4810808741N
$57,167APPR:
$57,167AUTH:
Page 3
Old Apra, "Apra View", was developed in the mid 1950's as an off the main base
military family housing complex. Existing junior enlisted and officer family housing
units have been in service for more than 49 years. Four bedroom officer family housing
units have been in service for more than 28 years. Built with 1950's and 1970's space
criteria, these housing units are inadequate and outmoded in design and construction.
Existing buildings would require major and expensive structural modification to
achieve the new space and privacy criteria for military family housing units. In
addition, design options to provide structurally sound family housing units are
limited and constrained by the footprint of existing buildings. Because of age, the
buildings require a higher degree of maintenance than newer units. They are not fully
designed and built for the harsh tropical climate of the western Pacific region and
most sustain damage during each typhoon. Above-ground utilities also require
repetitive repair from damage sustained during typhoons. This project supports the
base wide initiative of placing all utilities underground. The current Guam
divestiture plan supports this project, calling for the retention of all 134 housing
units in Old Apra during a two phase reconstruction effort.
If this project were not implemented, some military officers and enlisted personnel
will be forced to choose between involuntary separation from their families or
accepting housing that is unsuitable while serving on Guam. Either choice will
understandably lead to poor morale and dissatisfaction with the Navy way of life.
Retention of quality personnel will be adversely impacted. Secondly, the cost of
sustaining the housing units that have deteriorated with age will progressively
increase.
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION: The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been
considered for joint use potential. This facility will be available for use by other
federal agency personnel.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
35
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION 1. DATE OF REPORT (YYMMDD) 060510
2. FISCAL YEAR 2008
REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL DD-A&L(AR)1716
3. DOD COMPONENT NAVY 4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
5. DATA AS OF
MARCH 2006
a. NAME PG
GUAM NAVBASE COMNAVMARIANAS
b. LOCATION
GUAM
ANALYSIS OF
REQUIREMENTS AND ASSETS
CURRENT (FY06) PROJECTED (to 2011)
OFFICER (a)
E9-E7 (b)
E6-E1 (c)
Total (d)
OFFICER (e)
E9-E7 (f)
E6-E1 (g)
Total (h)
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH 722 499 3762 4983 697 391 3394 4482
7. PERMANENT PARTY PERSONNEL 651 444 3273 4368 626 336 2905 3867
8. GROSS FAMILY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS 441 392 1531 2364 429 312 1335 2076
9. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY HOUSED (a + b + c) 143 146 612 901
a. INVOLUNTARILY SEPARATED 0 0 0 0
b. IN MILITARY HOUSING TO BE DISPOSED/REPLACED 0 0 0 0
c. UNACCEPTABLY HOUSED IN COMMUNITY 143 146 612 901
10. VOLUNTARY SEPARATIONS 19 27 110 156 16 23 93 132
11. EFFECTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS 422 365 1421 2208 413 289 1242 1944
12. ADEQUATE ASSETS (a + b) 327 288 1301 1916 366 299 1254 1919
a. UNDER MILITARY CONTROL 268 229 1114 1611 268 229 1008 1505
(1) Housed in Existing DOD Owned/Controlled 220 160 622 1002 268 229 1008 1505
(2) Under Contract/Approved 0 0 0 0
(3) Vacant 48 35 137 220
(4) Inactive 0 34 355 389
b. PRIVATE HOUSING 59 59 187 305 98 70 246 414
(1) Acceptably Housed 59 59 187 305
(2) Vacant Rental Housing
13. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DEFICIT (11-12) 95 77 120 292 47 -10 -12 25
14. PROPOSED PROJECT 0 0 0 0
15. REMARKS:
Programming decisions are to be based on projected data line 13 columns (e) through (h) only. Line 12.a. columns (e) through (h) reflect the planned divestiture of 106 units. Line 12.b. data is based on the results of the November 2005 Housing Requirements Market Analysis, as updated for baseloading.
DD Form 1523, NOV90 VERS: HQFINAL
36
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING - FY 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATE
POST ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION
(In Thousands) FY 2008 Program $ 237,990 FY 2007 Program $ 176,446* Purpose and Scope This program provides for improvements and/or major repairs to revitalize Navy family housing and the supporting neighborhood sites and facilities. This program is the primary vehicle for the Navy to ensure that our aging inventory of homes are kept suitable for occupancy; as such, this program has a major role in maintaining a high quality of life for Navy families. This program funds projects that will increase the useful life and livability of homes and neighborhoods, bring them up to Department of Defense standards, and make them more energy efficient and less costly to maintain. Program Summary Authorization is requested for: (1) Various improvements and/or major repairs to revitalize existing family housing; and (2) Appropriation of $237,990,000 ($37,543,000 for the Navy and $200,447,000 for the Marine Corps) to fund these revitalization projects. (3) We are continuing our emphasis on revitalization through whole-house projects, which will accomplish all required improvements and repairs at one time. This program also includes repair projects considered to be a major investment. (4) A separate DD 1391 is attached for all projects exceeding $50,000 per unit as adjusted by the area cost factor. * This represents the FY 2007 PB request, which is the same as the FY 2007 annualized CR amount.
37
DD FORM 1391 PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
1. COMPONENT 2. DATE
NAVY FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 10 Jan 2007
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE NAVAL AND MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS, FAMILY HOUSING POST ACQUISITION VARLOCS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE UNITED STATES CONSTRUCTION 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST
($000) IMPROVEMENTS 711 VARIES AUTH: $ 237,990
APPR: $ 237,990 9. COST ESTIMATES
UNIT COST ITEM U/M QUANTITY COST ($000)
POST ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION
AUTHORIZATION REQUEST L/S --- --- 237,990 TOTAL REQUEST 237,990
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Provides for the revitalization of family housing and neighborhood support facilities and infrastructure. Revitalization consists of alterations, additions, expansions, modernization, and major repairs. Typical work includes the revitalization of kitchens and bathrooms; upgrades and repairs to structural, electrical, and mechanical systems; repairs/replacements involving utility systems, streets and side walks, and other infrastructure; removal of hazardous materials; and enhancements to neighborhood support systems including landscaping and recreation. _______________________________________________________________________________ 11. REQUIREMENT: Major investments to the Navy’s family housing inventory are needed to achieve current DoD standards, extend the life of the homes by arresting and correcting deterioration, reduce maintenance and utility expenses, make the homes and surrounding neighborhoods quality places to live. IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: The Navy will have a large segment of the family housing inventory and supporting neighborhoods which fall below Department of Defense and Navy standards for quality housing, therefore creating a negative and adverse impact on the families who live in our homes. The Navy will miss a prime opportunity to reduce maintenance and utility costs and meet DoD standards in a more cost effective approach than replacing the existing homes and neighborhoods.
38
DD FORM 1391 PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
1. COMPONENT 2. DATE NAVY FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 10 Jan 2007 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION NAVAL INSTALLATIONS, VARLOCS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER FAMILY HOUSING POST-ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION
($000) INSTALLATION/LOCATION/PROJECT DESCRIPTION CURRENT WORKING ESTIMATE
INSIDE THE UNITED STATES
OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES GUAM NAVBASE Guam 9,475 (H-06-92-2)
This project provides wholehouse improvements to 33 homes in the S. Finegayan neighborhood of Guam. Work includes construction of new covered patios, exterior storage, trash enclosures, conversion of carports to garages, reconfiguration of laundry/utility rooms, relocation and replacement of air conditioning units, repairs to kitchens and bathrooms, exterior and interior doors, windows, walls and ceilings, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, smoke detectors, telephone, and cable TV repairs. (See separate DD Form 1391)
NAVBASE Guam 242 (H-01-03)
This project provides repairs and improvements features to the GFOQ located at #4 Flag Circle, in the Nimitz Hill neighborhood of Guam. Improvement work will reconfigure the interior spaces to provide interconnecting interior hallways between bedrooms and other floor areas, upgrade AC/duct systems, lighting/power and fire alarm system, and construct new concrete roof above existing patio and new concrete walkway in front of lanai. (See separate DD Form 1391)
JAPAN NAF Atsugi 13,563 (HRC-13-03)
This project will revitalize 72 townhomes including the following work: restore bathrooms, replace floor tiles and all fixtures, widening of stairways, expand kitchens to include new and additional shelving, sinks, garbage disposals, dishwashers, and original flooring will be replaced, roofs, gutters, and downspouts will be replaced, patios will be replaced, and new concrete storage units will be built. (See separate DD Form 1391)
39
DD FORM 1391 PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
1. COMPONENT 2. DATE NAVY FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 10 Jan 2007 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION NAVAL INSTALLATIONS, VARLOCS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER FAMILY HOUSING POST-ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION
($000) INSTALLATION/LOCATION/PROJECT DESCRIPTION CURRENT WORKING ESTIMATE
OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES
JAPAN CFA Sasebo 3,808 (H-14-02-1)
This project will revitalize 21 townhomes. Work involves complete replacement and expansion of kitchens, renovation of bathrooms, replacement of the electrical system, removal of sheet rock wall siding/ceiling that contains asbestos and replacement of wall siding/ceiling board with thick glass wool insulation in order to maintain room temperature and greatly increase efficiency of A/C and Heating systems. (See separate DD Form 1391)
KOREA CFA Chinhae 8,971 (H-01-02)
This project revitalizes all 50 units at CFA Chinhae, including architectural, mechanical, and electrical work. It will also remove the existing metal storage sheds and replace with a new concrete masonry unit to match housing unit. (See separate DD Form 1391)
SPAIN NS Rota 1,484 (H-08-02)
This project will convert 28 two-bedroom duplexes into 14 4BR single-family homes. Work will include a new hallway/front entrance, connecting rear patios, and modifying fencing to encompass both existing structures. Additionally, this project will convert 10 three-bedroom duplexes into five four-bedroom duplexes. Work will include combining the kitchen areas to include a breakfast area, including a bathroom in the master bedroom, larger closets and storage areas, a larger yard, and wall-to-wall carpeting throughout the house. (See separate DD Form 1391)
40
DD Form
1 Dec 76
1391Page 1
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
03 JAN 2007
$9,475711
WHOLE HOUSE REVITALIZATION, SO. FINEGAYAN
NAVY2008FY
3. Installation and Location: NAVBASE GUAM
GUAM, GUAM
H-06-92-20808742N
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
This project will provide repairs and improvements to 33 enlisted and officer housing
units at South Finegayan, Guam. Work entails the following:
a. Improvements include conversion of carports to garages, exterior storage, trash
enclosure, concrete roof slabs over new front and rear patios with light fixtures and
textured concrete floor, mirrored closet doors, ceramic floor tiles, separate switches
for bathroom lights and exhaust fans, ceiling fans with concealed wiring, additional
electrical outlets, computer data port/telephone, and upgraded cable TV jacks,
electrical generator connection , re-configuration of existing laundry/utility room,
refurbishing and removal/ replacement of existing concrete walk and restore ground
cover.
b. Repairs will replace worn-out architectural finishes, exterior and interior doors
and hardware, windows, closet doors and shelves, bathroom floor and wall finishes,
kitchen countertops, plumbing fixtures and accessories, hot and cold water piping,
waste and vent piping, toilet accessories, garbage disposals, range hoods, exhaust
fans, door chimes, power panels, wiring devices, light fixture and smoke detectors.
c. Additional scope of work includes painting, removal and disposal of hazardous
material, on-site encapsulation of chlordane-contaminated soils, clean-up, and related
miscellaneous work. Whole site improvement includes landscaping and cluster mail
boxes.
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
11. REQUIREMENT:
PROJECT:
Area Cost Factor: 2.64
947528733EAWHOLEHOUSE IMPROVEMENT
41
DD Form
1 Dec 76
1391 CPage 2
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
03 JAN 2007
$9,475711
WHOLE HOUSE REVITALIZATION, SO. FINEGAYAN
NAVY2008FY
3. Installation and Location: NAVBASE GUAM
GUAM, GUAM
H-06-92-20808742N
This project will provide wholehouse repair and improvement to 33 enlisted and officer
housing units in South Finegayan, Guam. These 33 units are dropped scope from H-06-
92-1, which was funded in FY06. These units were dropped due to an unexpected
increase in the Area Cost Factor at Guam from (from 2.02 to 2.64 or 31%) and the
corresponding increase in construction costs. FY08 was the soonest Fiscal Year that
these funds could be requested.
The units were built in 1972 and 1974, components are outdated and require
repairs/replacement, and have met their useful life. Interior and exterior improvement
includes; adding storage, providing Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant
requirement, and providing windows and doors to withstand 170 mph wind speed. Plumbing
fixtures are corroded, mechanical and electrical components are deteriorated and have
met their useful life.
Housing units will continue to deteriorate and incur high operating and maintenance
costs as a result of age and deterioration. The proposed project will enhance and
bring the units up to modern day standards.
This project is required to correct deficiencies, upgrade the existing homes, and
bring them to current standards.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
(Current Mission)
42
DD Form
1 Dec 76
1391Page 1
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
03 JAN 2007
$242711
RECONFIGURE INTERIOR - #4 FLAG CIRCLE
NAVY2008FY
3. Installation and Location: NAVBASE GUAM
GUAM, GUAM
H-01-030808742N
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
This project will provide repairs and improvement features to the GFOQ located at #4
Flag Circle, in the Nimitz Hill neighborhood. Improvement work will reconfigure the
interior spaces to provide inter-connecting interior hallways between bedrooms and
other floor areas. Work includes installing new glass doors, windows and glass blocks
at existing arch openings; installing new glass blocks at existing window openings;
installing new paver tiles and new drop ceiling at enclosed hallways; installing new
landscaping and resilient cushioned seamless flooring system at courtyard; upgrading
air-conditioning/duct systems, lighting/power and fire alarm system; painting all
affected areas and repair related incidental work; constructing new concrete roof
above existing patio to stabilize the structure during strong winds and reduce water
seepage into the house; new concrete walkway in front of lanai; replacing kitchen
cabinets, sink, faucet, garbage disposal, dishwasher and range hood; and installing
weather seals at windows/doors and exterior lights. Work includes restoration of
affected areas, clean-up, removal and disposal of debris; and restoration and
replacement of disturbed grounds and plants.
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
11. REQUIREMENT:
This project proposes to reconfigure the existing housing unit at #4 Flag Circle,
Nimitz Hill.
PROJECT:
Reconfigure the existing house so that the living area and the sleeping area are not
separated by an outdoor courtyard. Upgrade the mechanical, electrical and fire alarm
systems to meet the current building code. New walls, glass blocks, doors and windows
REQUIREMENT:
(Current Mission)
Area Cost Factor: 2.64
2422421EAIMPROVEMENT
43
DD Form
1 Dec 76
1391 CPage 2
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
03 JAN 2007
$242711
RECONFIGURE INTERIOR - #4 FLAG CIRCLE
NAVY2008FY
3. Installation and Location: NAVBASE GUAM
GUAM, GUAM
H-01-030808742N
The existing housing layout does not have direct connection between the bedrooms and
other floor areas. Housing residents must walk through a non-air-conditioned courtyard
from the bedrooms to the other living areas. The existing kitchen cabinets are old
and due for replacement. The weatherseals at existing doors and windows are
deteriorated and falling out. Construction of walkway will allow residents and guests
to walk from the house to the patio.
Failure to address stated deficiencies will result in failure to provide quality homes
for the Installation Commander and his family. The living quarters will continue to be
dysfunctional by separating the bedrooms from the other living areas in the house.
shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Marianas Region Architectural and
Construction Standards and shall be able to withstand typhoon wind speed of 170 mph.
Provide housing unit that is safe and secured, including protection from weather
elements. This project is required to bring the installation command quarters to the
commonly accepted American standard of comfort and convenience and to restore the
aesthetic and functional use of the housing unit.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
44
DD Form
1 Dec 76
1391Page 1
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
03 JAN 2007
$13,563711
REVITALIZATION OF FAMILY HOUSING
TOWNHOUSES
NAVY2008FY
3. Installation and Location: NAVAL AIR FACILITY
ATSUGI, JAPAN
HRC-13-030808742N
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
This project will revitalize 62 three bedroom and 10 four bedroom townhouse units,
including buildings 900-13 and 915-18. This revitalization will restore bathrooms
(tubs, showers, lavatories, etc.), replace floor tiles, and all fixtures. The current
stairways will be widened, kitchens will be expanded to include new and additional
shelving, sinks, and garbage disposals. Dishwashers and original flooring will be
replaced. Special attention will be focused on replacing the built up roofs, gutters,
and downspouts. The roofs were originally built in 1972 and have never been replaced.
The current condition has caused water leaks, damage to walls and supporting beams.
Concrete foundations will be repaired and exterior and interior walls will be
reconditioned. Patios will be replaced and new concrete storage units will be built.
New electrical panels and smoke detectors will be installed. Civil engineering efforts
include new sanitary aqueducts, hot and cold water lines, new sidewalks and storm
drains.
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
11. REQUIREMENT:
This project provides wholehouse revitalization of 62 three bedroom and 10 four
bedroom townhouse units.
PROJECT:
It is important to note that these homes were built in 1972. Japanese construction
criteria was not at the current standard that Navy families in Japan currently enjoy
today. The structual integrity and supporting infrastructure of these units have not
been revitalized since their original build.
REQUIREMENT:
(Current Mission)
Area Cost Factor: 1.42
1356318872EAWHOLEHOUSE IMPROVEMENT
45
DD Form
1 Dec 76
1391 CPage 2
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
03 JAN 2007
$13,563711
REVITALIZATION OF FAMILY HOUSING
TOWNHOUSES
NAVY2008FY
3. Installation and Location: NAVAL AIR FACILITY
ATSUGI, JAPAN
HRC-13-030808742N
Wood exterior siding is weather worn and cracked; there are no ground fault circuit
interrupters; CFGI receptacles around sinks and kitchens are undersized; roof erosion
has caused interior leakings and deteriorated walls from rebar erosion; existing
built-up roof surfaces show signs of blistering; the existing stairways are narrow and
binding; kitchen cabinets and countertops have severely deteriorated; and site utility
and sanitary lines have not been replaced in 32 years.
Failure to address stated deciciencies will result in the failure to provide these
quality homes for the service members and their families. Continued occupancy of
these units will accelerate deterioration and maintenance backlog costs.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
46
DD Form
1 Dec 76
1391Page 1
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
03 JAN 2007
$3,808711
WHOLE HOUSE REVITALIZATION, DRAGON VALE
NAVY2008FY
3. Installation and Location: COMMANDER FLEET ACTIVITIES
SASEBO, JAPAN
H-14-02-10808742N
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
This project will revitalize 16 2BR enlisted housing townhouse units (Bldg. 520, 538,
539, 541) and 5 4BR Senior Officer housing townhouse units (Bldg. 524, 540 and 542).
Work involves complete replacement and expansion of kitchens including replacement of
kitchen flooring, cabinets, countertops, sinks, gas stoves (with electrical stoves),
dishwashers, as well as expanding kitchen to accommodate additional cabinets;
renovation of bathrooms in 4BR units, to include bathtubs, shower sets, lavatories and
associated fittings; renovation of unit structure and complete replacement of the
electrical system. Sheet rock wall siding/ceiling that contains asbestos in the
kitchen and bathrooms will be replaced with non-asbestos wall board. This
revitalization also includes replacement of wall siding/ceiling board with thick glass
wool insulation and aluminum sliding windows and window frames in order to maintain
room temperature that will greatly increase the energy efficiency of the A/C and
heating systems.
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
11. REQUIREMENT:
This project revitalizes 16 2BR and 5 4BR townhouse units in the Dragon Vale
neighborhood at CFA Sasebo.
PROJECT:
This project is required to correct stated deficiencies, provide energy-efficient
components, and improve the functionality of the kitchens and bathrooms. The work
required, once accomplished, will extend the useful life of the units for another 20
years.
REQUIREMENT:
(Current Mission)
Area Cost Factor: 1.42
380818121EAWHOLEHOUSE IMPROVEMENT
47
DD Form
1 Dec 76
1391 CPage 2
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
03 JAN 2007
$3,808711
WHOLE HOUSE REVITALIZATION, DRAGON VALE
NAVY2008FY
3. Installation and Location: COMMANDER FLEET ACTIVITIES
SASEBO, JAPAN
H-14-02-10808742N
These townhouse units were built in 1968 and 1969. The units are two and four bedroom
units and are designated for occupancy by enlisted and senior officer personnel.
Components within the kitchens and baths are deteriorating with wear and tear and have
exceeded their life expectancy. There have been no major improvements to these homes
in the last 37 years.
These homes will continue to fall further and further away from DoD construction
standards, resulting in a significantly reduced quality of life and satisfaction for
our Navy families.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
48
DD Form
1 Dec 76
1391Page 1
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
03 JAN 2007
$8,971711
WHOLEHOUSE REVITALIZATION, CHINHAE
NAVY2008FY
3. Installation and Location: COMMANDER FLEET ACTIVITY
CHINHAE, SOUTH KOREA
H-01-020808742N
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
Revitalize existing 50 housing units including architectural, mechanical, and
electrical work. Also remove & dispose of existing metal storage sheds & install new
12x14 concrete masonry unit structure to match housing unit.
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
11. REQUIREMENT:
Whole house revitalization of all 50 housing units to include architectural,
mechanical, electrical, plumbing work, replace storage sheds, and build a retaining
wall.
PROJECT:
There has been no revitalization on these units since 1959/1962. Interior improvements
are needed to create master bedroom suites with bathroom. Interior water, drain, and
fuel oil lines are too old and need to be replaced. The metal storage sheds are
unsightly and poorly located in front or side yard of housing units. Interior
electrical improvements include more electrical outlets, telephone outlets, cable
lines, and new electrical wires.
Housing interior will continue to be in poor condition and inefficient. Maintenance
and repair costs will continue to escalate requiring more extensive repairs.
Each family housing unit requires revitalization in accordance with the proposed
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. This revitalization will affect the overall quality
of life of the residents of these housing units.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
(Current Mission)
Area Cost Factor: 1.06
897117950EAWHOLEHOUSE IMPROVEMENT
49
DD Form
1 Dec 76
1391Page 1
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
03 JAN 2007
$1,484711
DUPLEX CONVERSION
NAVY2008FY
3. Installation and Location: NAVAL STATION
ROTA, SPAIN
H-08-020808742N
9. COST ESTIMATES
Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)
This project will convert 28 2BR duplexes into 14 4BR Single Family Homes. One of the
duplexes will be converted to the bedroom area with one master bedroom, three bedrooms
and a full bathroom. The other duplex will be converted to the living space with a
larger kitchen, formal dining room, family room/den and bathroom. A new hallway/front
entrance will connect the two sides of the duplex to create a single family dwelling.
The rear patios will be connected and the fencing modified to encompass both existing
yards. This project will also convert 10 3BR enlisted duplexes into 5 4BR enlisted
duplexes. The central wall between the two units will be opened and structurally
braced. The combined kitchen will be modified to include a breakfast table area. The
master bedroom will include a private bath. The new unit will include larger
bedrooms, additional closets and storage areas, a larger yard, and wall-to-wall
carpeting throughout the house.
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
11. REQUIREMENT:
This project converts 38 2 & 3BR homes into 19 4BR homes to alleviate wait list times
at NS Rota.
PROJECT:
This project is required to decrease the existing four bedroom enlisted and officer
waiting lists from 12 months to 3 months.
CURRENT SITUATION:
REQUIREMENT:
(Current Mission)
Area Cost Factor: 1.20
14847819EAWHOLEHOUSE IMPROVEMENT
50
DD Form
1 Dec 76
1391 CPage 2
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. Date
4. Project Title
5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number
1. Component
8. Project Cost ($000)
03 JAN 2007
$1,484711
DUPLEX CONVERSION
NAVY2008FY
3. Installation and Location: NAVAL STATION
ROTA, SPAIN
H-08-020808742N
There are existing, vacant two bedroom enlisted and officer units in the Las Palmeras
Housing area and a shortage of four bedroom units. All four bedroom enlisted units
are currently in the Las Flores Housing area.
The enlisted and officer unit 2 bedroom surplus will remain and the Four Bedroom
waiting lists will continue to grow.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
51
BLANK PAGE
52
DD FORM 1391 PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION NAVAL AND MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS, VARLOCS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER FAMILY HOUSING POST-ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION ($000) INSTALLATION/LOCATION/PROJECT DESCRIPTION CURRENT WORKING ESTIMATE
INSIDE THE UNITED STATES
CALIFORNIA MCB Camp Pendleton 25,175 (PE-H-0801) Funds for this project will support the construction of 151 deficit reduction homes through privatization at MCB Camp Pendleton, CA resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. The deficit reduction units address additional housing requirements generated by the standup of the Marine Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC). In accordance with 10 United States Code, Section 2883, these funds will be transferred to the DoD Family Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) for use at Camp Pendleton. (See Separate DD Form 1391).
MCB Camp Pendleton 25,000 (PE-H-0802) Funds for this project will support the construction of 150 deficit reduction homes through privatization at MCB Camp Pendleton, CA resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. The deficit reduction units address additional housing requirements generated by the “Grow the Force” end-strength increase in support of the Global War on Terror. In accordance with 10 United States Code, Section 2883, these funds will be transferred to the DoD Family Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) for use at Camp Pendleton. (See Separate DD Form 1391).
MCAGCC Twentynine Palms 50,000 (TP-H-0801) Funds for this project will support the construction of 279 deficit reduction homes through privatization at MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. The deficit reduction units address additional housing requirements generated by the “Grow the Force” end-strength increase in support of the Global War on Terror. In accordance with 10 United States Code, Section 2883, these funds will be transferred to the DoD Family Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) for use at Twentynine Palms. (See Separate DD Form 1391).
53
DD FORM 1391 PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION NAVAL AND MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS, VARLOCS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER FAMILY HOUSING POST-ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION ($000) INSTALLATION/LOCATION/PROJECT DESCRIPTION CURRENT WORKING ESTIMATE
INSIDE THE UNITED STATES
NORTH CAROLINA
MCB Camp Lejeune 87,951 (LE-H-0801) Funds for this project will support the construction of 451 deficit reduction homes through privatization at MCB Camp Lejeune, NC resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces and a school. 204 of the deficit reduction units address additional housing requirements generated by the standup of the Marine Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC). In accordance with 10 United States Code, Section 2883, these funds will be transferred to the DoD Family Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) for use at Camp Lejeune. (See Separate DD Form 1391).
OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES
JAPAN MCAS Iwakuni 12,321 (IW-H-0602) This project revitalizes 96 enlisted family housing units located in the Monzen Housing Area at MCAS Iwakuni, Japan. Sustainment work includes repairing and painting/tiling all interior walls and ceilings, repairing cracked and broken areas of interior concrete sub-base, and replacing: deteriorating roofing and flashing; service court metal roof, drain and gutters; disfigured window and door screens; closet shelving; kitchen and bathroom cabinets, fixtures and hardware; all vinyl composition tile and sheet vinyl flooring; interior sewage/domestic drain piping; interior cold and hot water piping; interior sewage/domestic vent piping and associated hardware; exterior light fixtures and switches; all interior doors and hardware; all interior lighting fixtures, electrical outlets, switches and wiring to meet Electric Safety Code; and interior TV, telephone and internet access receptacles and wiring. Also includes replacing and upgrading existing direct buried CATV cable with new CATV cable and flexible duct in the Monzen Housing Area. Modernization work includes providing patio covers and additional lighting fixtures, electrical outlets and TV, telephone and internet access receptacles and wiring. No improvements or major repairs were accomplished on these units in the past three years, nor are any planned for the following three years. (See Separate DD Form 1391).
54
DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TILE MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON PUBLIC PRIVATE VENTURE CAMP PENDLETON, CA PHASE 6 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)
0808742 711 PE-H-0801 $25,175 9. COST ESTIMATES UNIT COST
ITEM U/M QUANTITY COST ($000) Total Project EA 151 166,722 25,175 Area Cost Factor 1.12 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Funds for this project will support the construction of 151 deficit reduction homes through privatization at MCB Camp Pendleton, CA resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. In accordance with 10 United States Code, Section 2883, these funds will be transferred to the DoD Family Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) for use at Camp Pendleton. 11. REQUIREMENT: PROJECT: This project represents the sixth phase of a Public Private Venture (PPV) initiative that privatized all Camp Pendleton, CA family housing. This project phase will construct an additional 151 deficit reduction units resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. The deficit reduction units address additional housing requirements generated by the standup of the Marine Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC). Additional phases are planned to complete deficit reduction. REQUIREMENT: Adequate family housing is needed for married personnel and their families. This project constructs 151 new units at Camp Pendleton. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. CURRENT SITUATION: A current deficit of 1,574 adequate housing units exists. All housing at Camp Pendleton has been privatized. IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Military members will be forced to choose between involuntary separations from their families, or accepting housing that is unsuitable. Either choice will likely lead to poor morale and dissatisfaction with the Marine Corps. Retention of quality personnel will be adversely impacted. Necessary coordination with the school district is in progress.
55
DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TILE MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON PUBLIC PRIVATE VENTURE CAMP PENDLETON, CA PHASE 6A 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)
0808742 711 PE-H-0802 $25,000 9. COST ESTIMATES UNIT COST
ITEM U/M QUANTITY COST ($000) Total Project EA 150 166,667 25,000 Area Cost Factor 1.12 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Funds for this project will support the construction of 150 deficit reduction homes through privatization at MCB Camp Pendleton, CA resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. In accordance with 10 United States Code, Section 2883, these funds will be transferred to the DoD Family Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) for use at Camp Pendleton. 11. REQUIREMENT: PROJECT: This project represents an augmentation to the sixth phase of a Public Private Venture (PPV) initiative that privatized all Camp Pendleton, CA family housing. This project will construct an additional 150 deficit reduction units resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. The deficit reduction units address additional housing requirements generated by the “Grow the Force” end-strength increase in support of the Global War on Terror. Additional phases are planned to complete deficit reduction. REQUIREMENT: Adequate family housing is needed for married personnel and their families. This project constructs 151 new units at Camp Pendleton. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. CURRENT SITUATION: A current deficit of 1,574 adequate housing units exists. All housing at Camp Pendleton has been privatized. IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Military members will be forced to choose between involuntary separations from their families, or accepting housing that is unsuitable. Either choice will likely lead to poor morale and dissatisfaction with the Marine Corps. Retention of quality personnel will be adversely impacted. Necessary coordination with the school district is in progress.
56
DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TILE MARINE CORPS AIR GROUND COMBAT TWENTYNINE PALMS PUBLIC PRIVATE VENTURE CENTER, TWENTYNING PALMS, CA PHASE 2 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)
0808742 711 TP-H-0801 $50,000 9. COST ESTIMATES UNIT COST
ITEM U/M QUANTITY COST ($000) Total Project EA 279 179,211 50,000 Area Cost Factor 1.29 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Funds for this project will support the construction of 279 deficit reduction homes through privatization at MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. In accordance with 10 United States Code, Section 2883, these funds will be transferred to the DoD Family Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) for use at Twentynine Palms. 11. REQUIREMENT: PROJECT: This project represents the second phase of a Public Private Venture (PPV) initiative that privatized all Twentynine Palms, CA family housing. This project phase will construct an additional 279 deficit reduction units resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. The deficit reduction units address additional housing requirements generated by the “Grow the Force” end-strength increase in support of the Global War on Terror. Additional phases are planned to complete deficit reduction. REQUIREMENT: Adequate family housing is needed for married personnel and their families. This project constructs 279 new units at Camp Pendleton. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. CURRENT SITUATION: A current deficit of 91 adequate housing units exists. Deficit will increase as a result of projected increases in base loading. All housing at Twentynine Palms has been privatized. IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Military members will be forced to choose between involuntary separations from their families, or accepting housing that is unsuitable. Either choice will likely lead to poor morale and dissatisfaction with the Marine Corps. Retention of quality personnel will be adversely impacted. Necessary coordination with the school district is in progress.
57
DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TILE MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE, NC CAMP LEJEUNE PUBLIC PRIVATE VENTURE PHASE 4 WITH SCHOOL 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)
0808742 711 LE-H-0801 $87,951 9. COST ESTIMATES UNIT COST
ITEM U/M QUANTITY COST ($000) WHOLEHOUSE IMPROVEMENT EA 451 146,233 65,951 SCHOOL SM 10,560 2,083 22,000 TOTAL 87,951 Area Cost Factor 0.95 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Funds for this project will support the construction of 451 deficit reduction homes through privatization at MCB Camp Lejeune, NC resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces and a school. In accordance with 10 United States Code, Section 2883, these funds will be transferred to the DoD Family Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) for use at Camp Lejeune. 11. REQUIREMENT: PROJECT: This project represents the fourth phase of a Public Private Venture (PPV) initiative that privatized all Camp Lejeune, NC family housing. This project phase will construct an additional 451 deficit reduction units resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units and will also construct a school. 204 of the deficit reduction units address additional housing requirements generated by the standup of the Marine Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC). Additional phases are planned to complete deficit reduction. REQUIREMENT: Adequate family housing is needed for married personnel and their families. This project constructs 451 new units at Camp Lejeune. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces and a school. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. CURRENT SITUATION: A current deficit of 2,830 adequate housing units exists. All housing at Camp Lejeune has been privatized. IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Military members will be forced to choose between involuntary separations from their families, or accepting housing that is unsuitable. Either choice will likely lead to poor morale and dissatisfaction with the Marine Corps. Retention of quality personnel will be adversely impacted. Necessary coordination with the school district is in progress.
58
DD FORM 1391 PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TILE MARINE CORPS AIR STATION IWAKUNI, JA REVITALIZE MONZEN TOWNHOUSES PHASE I 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)
0808742 711 IW-H-0602-R2 $12,321 9. COST ESTIMATES UNIT COST
ITEM U/M QUANTITY COST ($000) Family Housing Improvement EA 96 126,344 12,129 Sustainment EA 96 122,417 (11,752) Modernization EA 96 3,927 (377) Supporting Costs 192 Sustainment (192) Modernization (0) Total 12,321 Yen Exchange Rate 114.7781 Yen = $1 Area Cost Factor 1.40 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: This project revitalizes 96 enlisted family housing units located in the Monzen Housing Area at MCAS Iwakuni, Japan. Sustainment work includes repairing and painting/tiling all interior walls and ceilings, repairing cracked and broken areas of interior concrete sub-base, and replacing: deteriorating roofing and flashing; service court metal roof, drain and gutters; disfigured window and door screens; closet shelving; kitchen and bathroom cabinets, fixtures and hardware; all vinyl composition tile and sheet vinyl flooring; interior sewage/domestic drain piping; interior cold and hot water piping; interior sewage/domestic vent piping and associated hardware; exterior light fixtures and switches; all interior doors and hardware; all interior lighting fixtures, electrical outlets, switches and wiring to meet Electric Safety Code; and interior TV, telephone and internet access receptacles and wiring. Also includes replacing and upgrading existing direct buried CATV cable with new CATV cable and flexible duct in the Monzen Housing Area. Modernization work includes providing patio covers and additional lighting fixtures, electrical outlets and TV, telephone and internet access receptacles and wiring. 11. REQUIREMENT: PROJECT: This project provides the revitalization of 96 enlisted family homes and will removes, replaces and upgraded the existing direct-buried CATV cable with new CATV cable and flexible duct in the Monzen Housing Area, Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni. REQUIREMENT: The Phase 1 Monzen enlisted family homes consist of 24 two-bedroom units, 56 three-bedroom units and 16 four-bedroom units. Repair of the existing facilities is required to correct building code deficiencies and replace deteriorated and old, outdated equipment and fixtures, to modernize the interior design and enhance the quality of the facilities for the current generation of tenants, and extend the useful life of this facility another 20+ years. Improve quality of life for the occupants in the Monzen Housing Area by providing a high-quality CATV signal.
59
DD FORM 1391 PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION MARINE CORPS AIR STATION IWAKUNI, JAPAN 4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT
NUMBER REVITALIZE MONZEN TOWNHOUSES, PHASE I IW-H-0602-R2 CURRENT SITUATION: Constructed in 1982 thru 1985, the Monzen enlisted family housing units are showing their age and require extensive repairs to continue providing comfortable living quarters to its overseas tenants. When this project is awarded, the facilities will be 23 to 26 years into their 60-year life expectancy. To date, the only major improvement within these facilities is a Government of Japan (GOJ) Central Heating and Cooling System project completed in Dec. 2004. No other major improvements or repairs have been completed since its original construction. Most of the built-in furnishings, fixtures, hardware, piping, flooring and other items in the facility are either damaged or deteriorated beyond the point of being economically repaired and are in need of replacement. The Architectural requirements of this project are as follows:
The roof of each facility must be replaced since it is deteriorated beyond economical repair. The life expectancy of similar roofing systems is estimated at 10 years.
The exterior must be repainted at the time of this project, as it will be approximately 10 years since it was last painted. Ten years is the normal life expectancy of the exterior paint in this seaside and industrial environment. The paint has rapidly deteriorated and is peeling, fading and cracking.
Provide patio covers to protect the occupants from the weather when exiting and entering the facility. All the interior doors and associated hardware, including closet doors and shelving show considerable
damage from frequent turnover over the past 23 to 26 years of use and must be replaced. The interior must be completely repainted after the damaged and unsightly walls/ceilings are repaired
and replaced with new wall tile and other wall and ceiling materials. The new interior wall and ceiling surfaces paint will create a new and rejuvenated environment that will greatly appeal to its tenants.
The flooring materials in all areas of the building must be removed and replaced after 23 to 26 years of severe wear. Much of the existing flooring is cracked or broken, deteriorated or worn out, stained and spotted. The cracked concrete sub-surface must also be repaired. Color enhancing materials must be used to rejuvenate the appearance of the facility and create a warm and inviting living environment.
The substandard and outdated kitchen and bathroom cabinets must be replaced, due to 23 to 26 years of heavy use and already undergo continual repair. Due to their age, it is also more difficult to find matching replacement parts for built-in furnishings. The existing kitchen counter-tops are made of stainless steel and severely scarred from frequent use of cutting utensils. Extensive permanent rust stains are also common. The range hoods must be replaced, as they no longer adequately or effectively exhaust the air from the cooking area. The inadequate bathroom vanities and sinks are too small for modern toiletry essentials and must be replaced with more practical fixtures.
60
DD FORM 1391 PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION MARINE CORPS AIR STATION IWAKUNI, JAPAN 4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT
NUMBER REVITALIZE MONZEN TOWNHOUSES, PHASE I IW-H-0602-R2 CURRENT SITUATION: (Continued)
The Mechanical requirements of this project are as follows:
The roof top scuppers and drains must be replaced, as they are severely corroded and no longer functioning properly.
The exhaust and ventilation systems located in both the kitchen and bathroom areas must be replaced, as they are no longer effectively recycle the air at the required volume.
The existing toilet fixtures, bathtubs, showers, lavatories and kitchen sinks have not been replaced since the facility were constructed in 1982 thru 1985, and have exceeded their life expectancy. They are inefficient and in frequent need of repair due to their age.
All sewage and domestic drain piping, cold and hot water piping, heating and cooling piping, sewage and domestic vent piping must be replaced. Frequent service calls to unclog drains and stop leaks have indicated that the existing piping throughout the building is extremely corroded and deteriorating rapidly. The expected durable life of such piping is normally between 14 and 18 years.
The Electrical requirements of this project are as follows:
The existing lighting fixtures and switches must be replaced with new energy efficient lighting that will not only save on energy consumption, but provide better illumination of the interior spaces and enhance the overall aesthetics of the interior design.
The existing electrical outlets and wiring must be replaced to meet today’s equipment needs. The current outlets in the kitchen and bathroom areas are in violation of the Electrical Safety Code since none have Ground Fault protection.
The existing circuit breakers must be replaced, as they are no longer adequate for the building service needs.
Additional lighting must be provided since many areas within the individual housing units have no lighting. In areas where fixed lighting is provided, the lighting levels do not meet illumination standards.
The existing TV, Telephone and Internet Access receptacles and wiring must be replaced, since the current configuration does not provide adequate service or capacity to all the required areas of the facility.
Additional TV, Telephone and Internet Access receptacles and wiring is required to meet the current and future demand of family’s, appliances and personal computer devices.
Existing direct-buried CATV is the only means to get Armed Forces Network television programming and station information to the occupants in the Monzen Housing Area. The existing direct-buried CATV cable has become degraded from water and debris causing CATV signal loss for programming and station information to the occupants in the Monzen Housing Area.
61
DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION MARINE CORPS AIR STATION IWAKUNI, JAPAN 4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT
NUMBER REVITALIZE MONZEN TOWNHOUSES, PHASE I IW-H-0602-R2 IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: If this project is not provided, family housing units will continue to fall short of DOD construction standards. Military personnel and their families will continue to live in an old facility that violates safety code requirements and contains deteriorated or damaged furnishings and equipment that requires continuous repairs. The Air Station’s Housing Division will continue to perform minor maintenance while furnishings, equipment and building problems continue to escalate. Quality of life and comfort of living standards will continue to degrade and compromise the Air Stations vision of being the “Assignment of Choice”. Degradation of the existing direct buried CATV cable will continue with potential loss of all CATV signal to the occupants in the Monzen Housing Area. WORK ACCOMPLISHED PREVIOUS THREE YEARS: None. WORK PROGRAMMED FOR NEXT THREE YEARS: None. ADDITIONAL: An economic analysis has been prepared comparing the alternatives of replacement, improvement, direct compensation and status quo operation. Based on the net present values and benefits of the respective alternatives, improvement was found to be the only viable alternative to satisfy the requirement. The life cycle cost to improve these units is greater than for replacement; but, the initial cost to improve these units, at 64% of the replacement cost, does not exceed the 70 percent of replacement threshold. In addition, these facilities were built by the Government of Japan and have a life expectancy of 60 years and when this project is awarded these facilities will be 24 to 25 years old. This project is not eligible for Host Nation Funding. Sustainable principles will be integrated into the development, design and construction of this project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other applicable laws and executive orders. No anti-terrorism/force protection or physical security measures are required.
62
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING - FY 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATE
ADVANCE PLANNING AND DESIGN (In Thousands) FY 2008 Program $ 3,172 FY 2007 Program $ 2,600* Purpose and Scope This program provides for working drawings, specifications and estimates, project planning reports, and final design drawings for construction projects (authorized or not yet authorized). This includes the use of architectural and engineering services in connection with any family housing new construction or construction improvements. Program Summary The amount requested will enable full execution of the construction program. Authorization is requested for the appropriation of $3,172,000 ($3,021,000 for Navy and $151,000 for Marine Corps) to fund New Construction and Improvements design requirements. * This represents the FY 2007 PB request, which is the same as the FY 2007 annualized CR amount.
63
1. COMPONENT 2. DATE NAVY FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 10 Jan 2007 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE NAVAL AND MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS FAMILY HOUSING ADVANCE PLANNING VARLOCS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE UNITED STATES AND DESIGN 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST
VARIES VARIES VARIES $3,172
9. COST ESTIMATES UNIT COST
ITEM U/M QUANTITY COST ($000) ADVANCE PLANNING AND DESIGN --- --- NEW CONSTRUCTION L/S --- --- (1,115) IMPROVEMENTS L/S --- --- (2,057) TOTAL REQUEST $3,172 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: 10 USC 2807 authorizes funding for architectural and engineering services and construction design of military family housing new construction and construction improvement projects. _____________________________________________________________________________ 11. REQUIREMENT: VARIES All project estimates are based on sound engineering and the best cost data available. Design is initiated to establish project estimates authorized or not yet authorized in advance of program submittal to the Congress. At the preliminary design, final plans and specifications are then prepared. The request includes costs for architectural and engineering services, turnkey evaluation, and construction design. IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Project execution schedules for Fiscal Years 2009 and 2010 will not be met. This will result in costly change orders.
64
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATE
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ($000) FY 2008 Program $200,659 FY 2007 Program* $361,581 Purpose and Scope a. Operation. This portion of the program provides for expenses in the following sub-accounts: Management. Includes direct and indirect expenses incident to the administration of the family housing program such as housing office personnel and operations, administrative support, training, travel, programming and studies, and community liaison. All housing referral costs are also included, although the housing referral program assists personnel in locating housing in the private community, and is not related to the operation or management of military family housing units. Services. Includes direct and indirect expenses incident to providing basic support services such as refuse collection and disposal, fire and police protection, pest control, custodial services for common areas, snow removal and street cleaning. Furnishings. Includes the procurement for initial issue or replacement of household equipment (primarily stoves and refrigerators) and, in limited circumstances, furniture; the control, moving and handling of furnishings inventories; and the maintenance and repair of such items. Miscellaneous. Includes work or services performed for the benefit of family housing occupants, including mobile home hook-ups and disconnections, for which reimbursement will be received; payments to the U. S. Coast Guard for Navy occupancy of Coast Guard housing; and United Kingdom accommodation charges. b. Utilities. Includes all utility services provided to family housing, such as electricity, gas, fuel oil, water and sewage. Excludes telephone services. c. Maintenance. This portion of the program supports the upkeep of family housing real property, as follows: Maintenance/Repair of Dwelling. Includes service calls, change of occupancy rehabilitation, routine maintenance, preventative maintenance, and interior and exterior painting. Exterior Utilities. Includes maintenance, repair and replacement of electrical, gas, water, sewage and other utility distribution systems located within family housing areas, and the portion of activity utility rates attributable to distribution system maintenance when separately identified. Other Real Property. Includes maintenance and repair of any other family housing real property, such as grounds, surfaced areas and family housing community facilities.
65
Alterations and Additions. Includes major repairs and minor incidental improvements to dwellings or other real property performed under the authority of 10 USC 2805. Larger scope or higher dollar value items are funded in the construction program. Reimbursable Collections. This program includes collections received from rental of DoN family housing to foreign national, civilian and Coast Guard personnel; collections for rental of mobile home spaces; collections for burden sharing by the Government of Japan, and collections for occupant-caused damages. Program Summary Authorization is requested for an appropriation of $200,659,000. This amount, together with estimated reimbursements of $9,000,000, will fund the Fiscal Year 2008 program of $209,659,000. A summary of the funding program for Fiscal Year 2008 follows (in thousands): Appropriation Request Reimburse- Total Operations Utilities Maintenance Total ments Program Navy $ 80,475 39,337 66,649 186,461 8,000 194,461 Marine Corps $ 7,704 2,465 4,029 14,198 1,000 15,198 Total DoN $ 88,179 41,802 70,678 200,659 9,000 209,659 JUSTIFICATION: The Department of Navy family housing budget requests the minimum essential resources needed to provide military families with adequate housing either through the private community or in government quarters. Navy and Marine Corps installations are generally located in the high cost, coastal areas. Accordingly, the over-inflated cost of adequate housing in these areas cause many of our military families to reside in facilities that lack even the minimal amenities expected in a home. Therefore, emphasis is placed on the proper funding of the family housing Operations and Maintenance program. The Fiscal Year 2008 estimated program was formulated utilizing the Office of Management and Budget's published inflationary factors and foreign currency exchange rates. * This column reflects the FY 2007 Presidents Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $352,441 for Total Direct O&M and $143,831 for Maintenance.
66
FY 2006 Funds Percent FY 2006Appropriation* Reprogrammed Reprogrammed End of Year
Utilities 96,887,000 2,632,647 2.7% 99,519,647
Operations 141,096,000 (8,993,225) -6.4% 132,102,775Management 76,126,000 (3,534,933) -4.6% 72,591,067Services 44,978,000 (3,456,405) -7.7% 41,521,595Furnishings 19,992,000 (2,001,887) -10.0% 17,990,113Miscellaneous 0 0 0.0% 0
Leasing 142,388,000 (16,310,978) -11.5% 126,077,022
Maintenance 184,594,400 206,647,762Hurricane Supplemental** 48,915,000 48,915,000
Total Maintenance 233,509,400 22,053,362 9.4% 255,562,762
Interest/Debt 55,000 (2,000) -3.6% 53,000
Privatization Support 17,753,000 620,194 3.5% 18,373,194
Total 631,688,400 0 0.0% 631,688,400
Department of the NavyFamily Housing Operations and Maintenance Reprogramming Actions
Fiscal Year 2006
** Additional funding in the amount of $48.9M was added to cover costs associated with hurricane damage in the Southeast.
* Initial Appropriation Request of $588,660,000 (excluding Hurricane Supplemental funds) was reduced 1% or $5,886,600 in accordance with P.L. 109-148.
22,053,362 9.4%
67
FY 2006 Funds Percent FY 2006Appropriation Reprogrammed Reprogrammed End of Year
Utilities 70,615,000 7,131,623 10.1% 77,746,623
Operations 118,488,000 (8,564,630) -7.2% 109,923,370Management 63,098,000 (3,066,730) -4.9% 60,031,270Services 37,191,000 (3,390,980) -9.1% 33,800,020Furnishings 18,199,000 (2,106,920) -11.6% 16,092,080Miscellaneous 0 0 0.0% 0
Leasing 132,244,000 (18,615,752) -14.1% 113,628,248
Maintenance 140,842,400 160,891,159Hurricane Supplemental 48,915,000 48,915,000
Total Maintenance 189,757,400 20,048,759 10.6% 209,806,159
Interest/Debt 53,000 0 0.0% 53,000
Privatization Support 11,176,000 0 0.0% 11,176,000
Total 522,333,400 0 0.0% 522,333,400
Department of the NavyNavy Family Housing Operations and Maintenance Reprogramming Actions
Fiscal Year 2006
20,048,759 10.6%
68
FY 2006 Funds Percent FY 2006Appropriation Reprogrammed Reprogrammed End of Year
Utilities 26,272,000 (4,498,976) -17.1% 21,773,024
Operations 22,608,000 (428,595) -1.9% 22,179,405Management 13,028,000 (468,203) -3.6% 12,559,797Services 7,787,000 (65,425) -0.8% 7,721,575Furnishings 1,793,000 105,033 5.9% 1,898,033Miscellaneous 0 0 0.0% 0
Leasing 10,144,000 2,304,774 22.7% 12,448,774
Maintenance 43,752,000 2,004,603 4.6% 45,756,603Hurricane Supplemental 0 0 0.0% 0
Total Maintenance 43,752,000 2,004,603 4.6% 45,756,603
Interest/Debt 2,000 (2,000) 0.0% 0
Privatization Support 6,577,000 620,194 9.4% 7,197,194
Total 109,355,000 0 0.0% 109,355,000
Department of the NavyMarine Corps Family Housing Operations and Maintenance Reprogramming Actions
Fiscal Year 2006
69
BLANK PAGE
70
Account/Subaccount
FY 2007
FY 2008
Reason Action Taken/Proposed
Management
$0.0
$0.0
FY07 = None Anticipated
FY08 = None Anticipated
Services
$0.0
$0.0
FY07 = None Anticipated
FY08 = None Anticipated
Furnishings
$0.0
$0.0
FY07 = None Anticipated
FY08 = None Anticipated
Misc.
$0.0
$0.0
FY07 = None Anticipated
FY08 = None Anticipated
Utilities
$0.0
$0.0
FY07 = None Anticipated
FY08 = None Anticipated
Leasing
$0.0
$0.0
FY07 = None Anticipated
FY08 = None Anticipated
Maintenance
$0.0
$0.0
FY07 = None Anticipated
FY08 = None Anticipated
PPV Support
$0.0
$0.0
FY07 = None Anticipated
FY08 = None Anticipated
Totals
$0.0
$0.0
FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY
FY 2008
REPROGRAMMING AND PROPOSED FUNDING ALIGNMENT
($000)
FH-10
71
Account/Subaccount
FY 2007
FY 2008
Reason Action Taken/Proposed
Management
$0.0
$0.0
FY07 = None Anticipated
FY08 = None Anticipated
Services
$0.0
$0.0
FY07 = None Anticipated
FY08 = None Anticipated
Furnishings
$0.0
$0.0
FY07 = None Anticipated
FY08 = None Anticipated
Utilities
$0.0
$0.0
FY07 = None Anticipated
FY08 = None Anticipated
Leasing
$0.0
$0.0
FY07 = None Anticipated
FY08 = None Anticipated
Maintenance
$0.0
$0.0
FY07 = None Anticipated
FY08 = None Anticipated
PPV Support
$0.0
$0.0
FY07 = None Anticipated
FY08 = None Anticipated
Totals
$0.0
$0.0
FAMILY HOUSING, MARINE CORPS
FY 2008
REPROGRAMMING AND PROPOSED FUNDING ALIGNMENT
($000)
FH-10
72
A. INVENTORY DATA Units in Beginning of Year Units at End of Year Average Inventory for Year a. Average Historic Inventory for Year Requiring O&M Funding a. Conterminous U.S. b. U.S. Overseas c. Foreign d. Worldwide
Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit($000) Cost ($000) Cost ($000) Cost
B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses (1) Management 71,084 2,139 75,085 2,851 59,422 5,475 (2) Services 41,317 1,244 34,123 1,296 13,155 1,212 (3) Furnishings 16,464 496 18,036 685 14,962 1,378 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 595 23 640 59 Subtotal Direct Obligations 128,865 3,879 127,839 4,854 88,179 8,124 Anticipated Reimbursements 6,414 193 3,535 134 3,700 341 Estimated Gross Obligations 135,279 4,072 131,374 4,989 91,879 8,465 2. UTILITIES 98,775 2,973 80,751 3,066 41,802 3,851 Anticipated Reimbursements 7,416 223 5,377 204 1,200 111 Estimated Gross Obligations 106,191 3,196 86,128 3,270 43,002 3,962 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 166,741 5,019 131,896 5,008 51,201 4,717 b. Exterior Utilities 787 24 651 25 359 33 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 1,662 50 1,252 48 1,049 97 d. Alterations and Additions 84,879 2,555 19,192 729 18,070 1,665 Subtotal Direct Obligations 254,069 7,647 152,991 5,809 70,678 6,512 Anticipated Reimbursements 1,380 42 7,588 288 4,100 378 Estimated Gross Obligations 255,449 7,688 160,579 6,098 74,778 6,889 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligations 481,709 14,498 361,581 13,730 200,659 18,487 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 15,210 458 16,500 627 9,000 8296. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 496,919 14,956 378,081 14,357 209,659 19,316
FY 2006 FY 2007* FY 2008
10,90440,304 26,25710,80310,854
19,541
573 222 69
16,444
26,25733,225
10,904
10,854
2,1071,5056,394
33,225
2,6607,231
* This column reflects the FY 2007 Presidents Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $352,441 for Grand Total, O&M Direct Obligations and $143,831 for Subtotal Direct Obligations Maintenance.
GEOGRAPHIC - WORLDWIDE
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
FY 2008 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE(EXCLUDES LEASED UNITS AND COSTS)
26,335
26,335
7,2427,290
Exhibit FH-2
73
BLANK PAGE
74
A. INVENTORY DATA Units in Beginning of Year Units at End of Year Average Inventory for Year** a. Average Historic Inventory for Year Requiring O&M Funding a. Conterminous U.S. b. U.S. Overseas c. Foreign d. Worldwide
Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit($000) Cost ($000) Cost ($000) Cost
B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses (1) Management 58,549 2,521 63,180 2,935 53,387 5,346 (2) Services 33,605 1,447 29,587 1,374 12,275 1,229 (3) Furnishings 14,569 627 17,153 797 14,173 1,419 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 595 28 640 64 Subtotal Direct Obligations 106,723 4,594 110,515 5,134 80,475 8,058 Anticipated Reimbursements 5,814 250 3,135 146 3,500 350 Estimated Gross Obligations 112,537 4,845 113,650 5,279 83,975 8,408 2. UTILITIES 77,006 3,315 67,153 3,119 39,337 3,939 Anticipated Reimbursements 6,816 293 4,877 227 1,000 100 Estimated Gross Obligations 83,822 3,608 72,030 3,346 40,337 4,039 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 123,213 5,304 103,335 4,800 47,384 4,745 b. Exterior Utilities 350 15 350 16 311 31 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 350 15 350 16 932 93 d. Alterations and Additions 84,441 3,635 18,892 878 18,022 1,805 Subtotal Direct Obligations 208,354 8,970 122,927 5,710 66,649 6,674 Anticipated Reimbursements 580 25 6,988 325 3,500 350 Estimated Gross Obligations 208,934 8,995 129,915 6,035 70,149 7,024 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligations 392,083 16,879 300,595 13,964 186,461 18,670 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 13,210 569 15,000 697 8,000 8016. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 405,293 17,448 315,595 14,660 194,461 19,471
FY 2006 FY 2007* FY 2008
9,98730,304 21,3899,9879,987
12,616
481 180 63
13,527
21,38923,229
9,987
6,5549,987
1,9761,5054,059
23,229
1,5056,495
* This column reflects the FY 2007 Presidents Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $293,538 for Grand Total, O&M Direct Obligations and $115,850 for Subtotal Direct Obligations Maintenance.
** In order to accurately compare FY to FY, the "Average Inventory for Year" (which drives the Cost Per Unit metric) has not been changed from the PB06 and PB07 submissions (respectively) in order to maintain consistency with respect to calculating Per Unit Costs. However, BOY and EOY Inventories have been adjusted to accurately reflect the current state of inventory to match the FH-7 &
GEOGRAPHIC - WORLDWIDE
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING, NAVY
FY 2008 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE(EXCLUDES LEASED UNITS AND COSTS)
21,527
21,527
6,506
Exhibit FH-2
75
A. INVENTORY DATA Units in Beginning of Year Units at End of Year Average Inventory for Year a. Average Historic Inventory for Year Requiring O&M Funding a. Conterminous U.S. b. U.S. Overseas c. Foreign d. Worldwide
Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit($000) Cost ($000) Cost ($000) Cost
B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses (1) Management 44,720 3,545 49,089 3,629 38,106 19,284 (2) Services 10,846 860 13,187 975 1,545 782 (3) Furnishings 1,393 110 2,830 209 393 199 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 595 44 640 324 Subtotal Direct Obligations 56,959 4,515 65,701 4,857 40,684 20,589 Anticipated Reimbursements 4,242 336 2,250 166 1,000 506 Estimated Gross Obligations 61,201 4,851 67,951 5,023 41,684 21,095 2. UTILITIES 37,190 2,948 34,253 2,532 6,490 3,284 Anticipated Reimbursements 5,557 440 0 0 0 0 Estimated Gross Obligations 42,747 3,388 34,253 2,532 6,490 3,284 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 63,476 5,031 63,246 4,676 9,671 4,894 b. Exterior Utilities 350 28 350 26 183 93 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 350 28 350 26 16 8 d. Alterations and Additions 56,962 4,515 1,662 123 1,707 864 Subtotal Direct Obligations 121,138 9,602 65,608 4,850 11,577 5,859 Anticipated Reimbursements 0 0 4,508 333 1,000 506 Estimated Gross Obligations 121,138 9,602 70,116 5,183 12,577 6,365 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligations 215,287 17,065 165,562 12,239 58,751 29,732 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 9,799 777 6,758 500 2,000 1,0126. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 225,086 17,841 172,320 12,739 60,751 30,744
FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
0 0 0
0 0 0
213
0 0
1,976
0
180 63
12,616 13,527
12,616
18,828 13,401 1,97613,401 1,976 1,976
13,527 1,976
GEOGRAPHIC - CONUS
FY 2008 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCEFAMILY HOUSING, NAVY
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
(EXCLUDES LEASED UNITS AND COSTS)
Exhibit FH-2
76
A. INVENTORY DATA Units in Beginning of Year Units at End of Year Average Inventory for Year a. Average Historic Inventory for Year Requiring O&M Funding a. Conterminous U.S. b. U.S. Overseas c. Foreign d. Worldwide
Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit($000) Cost ($000) Cost ($000) Cost
B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses (1) Management 3,200 788 2,939 1,953 2,614 1,737 (2) Services 11,154 2,748 3,313 2,201 2,718 1,806 (3) Furnishings 2,496 615 1,871 1,243 1,891 1,256 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal Direct Obligations 16,850 4,151 8,123 5,397 7,223 4,799 Anticipated Reimbursements 170 42 753 500 1,000 664 Estimated Gross Obligations 17,020 4,193 8,876 5,898 8,223 5,464 2. UTILITIES 17,541 4,321 9,815 6,522 10,071 6,692 Anticipated Reimbursements 628 155 490 326 500 332 Estimated Gross Obligations 18,168 4,476 10,305 6,847 10,571 7,024 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 30,288 7,462 11,647 7,739 12,135 8,063 b. Exterior Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 0 0 0 0 143 95 d. Alterations and Additions 14,635 3,605 8,258 5,487 3,199 2,126 Subtotal Direct Obligations 44,923 11,068 19,905 13,226 15,477 10,284 Anticipated Reimbursements 561 138 2,480 1,648 1,000 664 Estimated Gross Obligations 45,484 11,206 22,385 14,874 16,477 10,948 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligations 79,313 19,540 37,843 25,145 32,771 21,775 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 1,359 335 3,723 2,474 2,500 1,6616. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 80,673 19,875 41,566 27,619 35,271 23,436
0 0
FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
1,5054,134 1,505
0
1,505
0
4,059 1,505 1,50500 0
0 0
1,505
268 0 04,0591,505 1,505
1,505
GEOGRAPHIC - US OVERSEAS
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING, NAVY
FY 2008 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE(EXCLUDES LEASED UNITS AND COSTS)
Exhibit FH-2
77
A. INVENTORY DATA Units in Beginning of Year Units at End of Year Average Inventory for Year a. Average Historic Inventory for Year Requiring O&M Funding a. Conterminous U.S. b. U.S. Overseas c. Foreign d. Worldwide
Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit($000) Cost ($000) Cost ($000) Cost
B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses (1) Management 10,629 1,622 11,152 1,717 12,667 1,947 (2) Services 11,605 1,771 13,087 2,015 8,012 1,231 (3) Furnishings 10,680 1,630 12,452 1,917 11,889 1,827 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal Direct Obligations 32,915 5,022 36,691 5,649 32,568 5,006 Anticipated Reimbursements 1,402 214 132 20 1,500 231 Estimated Gross Obligations 34,316 5,236 36,823 5,669 34,068 5,236 2. UTILITIES 22,276 3,399 23,085 3,554 22,776 3,501 Anticipated Reimbursements 631 96 4,387 675 500 77 Estimated Gross Obligations 22,907 3,495 27,472 4,230 23,276 3,578 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 29,449 4,493 28,442 4,379 25,578 3,931 b. Exterior Utilities 0 0 0 0 128 20 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 0 0 0 0 773 119 d. Alterations and Additions 12,844 1,960 8,972 1,381 13,116 2,016 Subtotal Direct Obligations 42,293 6,453 37,414 5,760 39,595 6,086 Anticipated Reimbursements 19 3 0 0 1,500 231 Estimated Gross Obligations 42,312 6,456 37,414 5,760 41,095 6,316 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligations 97,483 14,874 97,190 14,964 94,939 14,593 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 2,051 313 4,519 696 3,500 5386. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 99,535 15,187 101,709 15,660 98,439 15,130
0
0 00
6,4950
6,554
00
0
06,506
0
6,506
6,5060 0
6,554 6,4956,506 6,5066,483
GEOGRAPHIC - FOREIGNFY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
6,4837,342
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING, NAVY
FY 2008 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE(EXCLUDES LEASED UNITS AND COSTS)
Exhibit FH-2
78
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING, MARINE CORPS
FY 2008 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE(EXCLUDES LEASED UNITS AND COSTS)
GEOGRAPHIC - WORLDWIDEFY 2006 FY 2007 ** FY 2008
A. INVENTORY DATA Units in Beginning of Year Units at End of Year Average Inventory for Year a. Average Historic Inventory for Year Requiring O&M Funding a. Conterminous U.S. b. U.S. Overseas c. Foreign d. Worldwide
Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit($000) Cost ($000) Cost ($000) Cost
B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses (1) Management* 12,535 1,254 11,905 2,476 6,035 6,961 (2) Services 7,712 772 4,536 943 880 1,015 (3) Furnishings 1,895 190 883 184 789 910 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal Direct Obligations 22,142 2,215 17,324 3,603 7,704 8,886 Anticipated Reimbursements 600 60 400 83 200 231 Estimated Gross Obligations 23,205 2,321 17,724 3,686 7,904 9,116 2. UTILITIES 21,769 2,178 13,598 2,828 2,465 2,843 Anticipated Reimbursements 600 60 500 104 200 231 Estimated Gross Obligations 22,369 2,238 14,098 2,932 2,665 3,074 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 43,528 4,355 28,561 5,940 3,817 4,402 b. Exterior Utilities 437 44 301 63 48 55 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 1,312 131 902 188 117 134 d. Alterations and Additions 439 44 300 62 48 55 Subtotal Direct Obligations 45,715 4,573 30,064 6,253 4,029 4,647 Anticipated Reimbursements 800 80 600 125 600 692 Estimated Gross Obligations 44,545 4,456 30,664 6,378 4,629 5,339 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligation 89,626 8,966 60,986 12,684 14,198 16,376 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 2,000 200 1,500 312 1,000 1,1536. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 91,626 9,166 62,486 12,996 15,198 17,529
917816867
6,925
92 42 6
2,917
10,0004,8689,996
4,868917
4,808
13102,335
9,996
1,155736
4,808
** This column reflects the FY 2007 Presidents Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $58,903 for Grand Total, O&M Direct Obligations and $27,981 for Subtotal Direct Obligations Maintenance.
* Actual Per Unit Cost for Management in FY08 is 2,077 vice 6,961. The 6,035 cost includes program costs not associated with unit property management such as community housing referral, relocation assistance and housing market analyses which equate to 4,234 in non-unit management costs. See OP-5s for additional detail.
736736867
79
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING, MARINE CORPS
FY2008 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE(EXCLUDES LEASED UNITS AND COSTS)
GEOGRAPHIC - CONUSFY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
A. INVENTORY DATA Units in Beginning of Year Units at End of Year Average Inventory for Year a. Average Historic Inventory for Year Requiring O&M Funding a. Conterminous U.S. b. U.S. Overseas c. Foreign d. Worldwide
Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit($000) Cost ($000) Cost ($000) Cost
B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses (1) Management* 8,497 1,227 7,262 2,490 4,061 30,998 (2) Services 5,731 828 2,767 949 196 1,496 (3) Furnishings 1,064 154 246 84 51 389 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal Direct Obligations 15,292 2,208 10,275 3,522 4,308 32,883 Anticipated Reimbursements 530 77 330 113 105 802 Estimated Gross Obligations 16,285 2,352 10,605 3,635 4,413 33,685 2. UTILITIES 14,326 2,069 8,295 2,844 584 4,458 Anticipated Reimbursements 600 87 500 171 180 1,374 Estimated Gross Obligations 14,926 2,155 8,795 3,015 764 5,832 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 31,169 4,501 17,422 5,973 680 5,188 b. Exterior Utilities 301 43 183 63 15 113 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 905 131 550 189 17 133 d. Alterations and Additions 303 44 183 63 15 113 Subtotal Direct Obligations 32,678 4,719 18,339 6,287 727 5,548 Anticipated Reimbursements 716 103 526 180 570 4,351 Estimated Gross Obligations 31,424 4,538 18,865 6,467 1,297 9,899 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligation 62,297 8,996 36,908 12,653 5,618 42,889 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 1,846 267 1,356 465 855 6,5276. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 64,143 9,262 38,264 13,118 6,473 49,416
6,925
0 0 0
0 0 00 0 0
2,917 131
61 11 6
* Actual Per Unit Cost for Management in FY08 is 1,412 vice 30,998. The 4,061 cost includes program costs not associated with unit property management such as community housing referral, relocation assistance and housing market analyses which equate to 3,876 in non-unit management costs. See OP-5s for additional detail.
6,929 2,977 1812,977 181 80
2,917 131
6,925
80
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING, MARINE CORPS
FY 2008 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE(EXCLUDES LEASED UNITS AND COSTS)
GEOGRAPHIC - US OVERSEASFY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
A. INVENTORY DATA Units in Beginning of Year Units at End of Year Average Inventory for Year a. Average Historic Inventory for Year Requiring O&M Funding a. Conterminous U.S. b. U.S. Overseas c. Foreign d. Worldwide
Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit($000) Cost ($000) Cost ($000) Cost
B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses
(1) Management 3,126 1,339 2,857 2,474 151 0 (2) Services 1,436 615 1,089 943 0 0 (3) Furnishings 705 302 505 437 350 0 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal Direct Obligations 5,267 2,256 4,451 3,854 501 0 Anticipated Reimbursements 45 19 45 39 45 0 Estimated Gross Obligations 5,312 2,275 4,496 3,893 546 0 2. UTILITIES 5,604 2,400 3,264 2,826 0 0 Anticipated Reimbursements 0 0 0 0 0 0 Estimated Gross Obligations 5,604 2,400 3,264 2,826 0 0 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 9,450 4,047 6,855 5,935 0 0 b. Exterior Utilities 105 45 72 62 0 0 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 315 135 216 187 0 0 d. Alterations and Additions 105 45 72 62 0 0 Subtotal Direct Obligations 9,975 4,272 7,215 6,247 0 0 Anticipated Reimbursements 40 17 40 35 0 0 Estimated Gross Obligations 10,015 4,289 7,255 6,282 0 0 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligation 20,846 8,928 14,930 12,926 501 0 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 85 36 85 74 45 06. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 20,931 8,964 15,015 13,000 546 0
0 0 0
2,335 1,155 00 0 0
0 0 0
31 31 0
* The Management cost of 151 in FY08 includes program costs not associated with unit property management such as community housing referral, relocation assistance and housing market analyses which equate to 151 in non-unit management costs. See OP-5s for additional detail.
00
2,335
2,3351,155
1,1550
1,155 0
81
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING, MARINE CORPS
FY 2008 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE(EXCLUDES LEASED UNITS AND COSTS)
GEOGRAPHIC - FOREIGNFY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
A. INVENTORY DATA Units in Beginning of Year Units at End of Year Average Inventory for Year a. Average Historic Inventory for Year Requiring O&M Funding a. Conterminous U.S. b. U.S. Overseas c. Foreign d. Worldwide
Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit($000) Cost ($000) Cost ($000) Cost
B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses (1) Management* 912 1,239 1,786 2,426 1,823 2,477 (2) Services 545 741 680 924 684 929 (3) Furnishings 126 171 132 180 388 527 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal Direct Obligations 1,582 2,150 2,599 3,531 2,895 3,934 Anticipated Reimbursements 25 34 25 34 50 68 Estimated Gross Obligations 1,607 2,184 2,624 3,565 2,945 4,002 2. UTILITIES 1,839 2,498 2,040 2,772 1,881 2,556 Anticipated Reimbursements 0 0 0 0 20 27 Estimated Gross Obligations 1,839 2,498 2,040 2,772 1,901 2,583 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 2,909 3,953 4,284 5,821 3,137 4,262 b. Exterior Utilities 31 42 45 61 33 45 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 92 125 135 184 99 135 d. Alterations and Additions 31 42 45 61 33 45 Subtotal Direct Obligations 3,062 4,161 4,510 6,127 3,302 4,487 Anticipated Reimbursements 44 60 34 46 30 41 Estimated Gross Obligations 3,106 4,220 4,544 6,173 3,332 4,528 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligation 6,483 8,809 9,148 12,430 8,078 10,976 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 69 94 59 80 100 1366. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 6,552 8,903 9,207 12,510 8,178 11,112
736736736
73600
0736
07360
736736736736
* Actual Per Unit Cost for Management in FY08 is 2,196 vice 2,477. The 1,823 cost includes program costs not associated with unit property management such as community housing referral, relocation assistance and housing market analyses which equate to 207 in non-unit management costs. See OP-5s for additional detail.
736736
0 0 0
0
0 00
82
Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases
1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 63,1802. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 63,1803. FY 2007 Current Estimate 63,1804. Price Growth: 1,719
a. Civilian Personnel Compensation 1,101b. Inflation 584c. Working Capital Fund 34
5. Program Decreases (12,772)a. Program Efficiencies - PPV (1,366)b. Transfer of 110 FTEs to PPV Support (9,495)c. Reduction in Contractor Support (1,911)
6. Program Increases 1,260a. Execution Adjustment - Foreign 1,260
7. FY 2008 Budget Request 53,387
RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT
CALCULATIONS4a. 36,702 (CIVPERS estimate) x .030 (Civilian inflation rate) = 1,101 (Civilian Personnel Compensation)4b. 25,376 (Travel, Training, IT, Consulting, Programs & Studies, etc.) x .023 (inflation rate) = 584 (Inflation)4c. 1,102 (WCF Costs) x various pricing factors = 34 (Working Capital Fund)5a. Decreases at PPV locations associated with reduced requirements due to PPV.5b. Costs associated with the transfer of 110 FTEs to the PPV Support account (Avg. per FTE = $86K).5c. Navy-wide initiative to reduce contract support, while still providing the same level of service.6a. Increases at Foreign Locations are based on FY06 Actuals at Foreign Locations.
FY07Total Cost
PricingAdjustment Inc/Dec
FY08Total Cost
CONUS 49,089 1,384 (12,367) 38,106US OVERSEAS 2,939 80 (405) 2,614FOREIGN 11,152 255 1,260 12,667
FH-2 to OP-5 Crosswalk
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATES
JUSTIFICATIONNAVY
OPERATING EXPENSES
IMPACT OF PRIVATIZATION: A reduction in the Management account request for FY08 is included, based on the privatization of roughly 11,000 homes in FY07. Housing personnel reductions and associated administrative support reductions have been identified as property management functions will no longer be performed post-privatization. While Installations will continue to provide community housing referral services and waiting list management services (for Navy-owned units), beginning in FY08, all PPV-related functions will be paid out of the PPV Support account.
Pricing adjustments are proposed in the Management account for Civilian Personnel Compensation, Inflation, and Working Capital Fund. Program Decreases are for a reduction in staff and costs associated with the reduced requirements at PPV locations, as well as a transfer of 110 FTEs at CONUS and US Overseas locations from the Management account to the PPV Support account to more accurately account for costs associated with the Navy's Privatization initiatives. Program Increases are based on FY06 Actuals at foreign locations.
(Dollars in Thousands)
The FY 2008 estimated program represents the Navy Family Housing requirements using Office of Management and Budget inflation factors and foreign currency exchange rates. Reconciliation of estimates is provided for each program element as follows:
MANAGEMENT
Exhibit OP-5
83
A. POPULATION DATA Average Families for Year a. Conterminous U.S. b. U.S. Overseas c. Foreign
B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT ($000) Family ($000) Family ($000) Family (1) Welcome Center 20,000 89 18,054 85 11,457 54 (2) Administrative Support 5,851 26 5,509 26 3,129 15 (3) Housing Referral 19,078 85 21,670 102 22,740 107 (4) Programs & Studies 10,965 49 15,304 72 16,061 75 (5) PPV 2,655 12 2,643 12 0 0 TOTAL MANAGEMENT FUNDING 58,549 261 63,180 296 53,387 250
A. POPULATION DATA Average Families for Year
B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT ($000) Family ($000) Family ($000) Family (1) Welcome Center 13,202 76 11,184 68 4,274 26 (2) Administrative Support 4,471 26 4,105 25 1,569 9 (3) Housing Referral 13,502 78 15,853 96 16,202 98 (4) Programs & Studies 10,965 63 15,304 93 16,061 97 (5) PPV 2,580 15 2,643 16 0 0 TOTAL MANAGEMENT FUNDING 44,720 257 49,089 297 38,106 231
A. POPULATION DATA Average Families for Year
B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT ($000) Family ($000) Family ($000) Family (1) Welcome Center 2,191 160 2,022 155 1,677 129 (2) Administrative Support 346 25 316 24 323 25 (3) Housing Referral 588 43 601 46 614 47 (4) Programs & Studies 0 0 0 0 0 0 (5) PPV 75 5 0 0 0 0 TOTAL MANAGEMENT FUNDING 3,200 233 2,939 225 2,614 200
A. POPULATION DATA Average Families for Year
B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT ($000) Family ($000) Family ($000) Family (1) Welcome Center 4,607 125 4,848 139 5,506 157 (2) Administrative Support 1,034 28 1,088 31 1,237 35 (3) Housing Referral 4,988 136 5,216 149 5,924 169 (4) Programs & Studies 0 0 0 0 0 0 (5) PPV 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL MANAGEMENT FUNDING 10,629 289 11,152 319 12,667 362
36,774 34,990 34,990
FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
165,313 165,31313,715 13,050 13,050
36,774 34,990 34,990
GEOGRAPHIC - FOREIGNFY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
Additional Justification for Management Account(Amended FH-2 Exhibit by Cost Per Family vice Cost Per Unit)
13,715 13,050 13,050
GEOGRAPHIC - US OVERSEAS
173,742 165,313 165,313
GEOGRAPHIC - WORLDWIDE
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
GEOGRAPHIC - CONUS
FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY
224,231 213,353 213,353FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
173,742
84
Region FY06FTEs
FY07FTEs
FY08FTEs
FY09FTEs
FY10FTEs
FY11FTEs
FY12FTEs
FY13FTEs
CNIC HQ 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22- Unadjusted PPV FTE Reductions/Transfers* 0 33 137 145 145 145 145 145
Mid-Atlantic** 54 75 57 57 57 57 57 57Midwest 13 13 9 9 9 9 9 9NDW 27 25 23 23 23 23 23 23Northeast** 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Northwest 27 27 20 20 20 20 20 20Southeast 85 84 41 33 33 33 33 33Southwest 69 69 21 21 21 21 21 21CONUS Totals 330 348 330 330 330 330 330 330
Hawaii 22 17 14 14 14 14 14 14Guam 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6US Overseas Totals 28 23 20 20 20 20 20 20
Europe 99 101 101 101 101 101 101 101Japan 71 74 74 74 74 74 74 74Korea 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Southeast (Guantanamo Bay) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4SW Asia 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8Foreign Totals 184 189 189 189 189 189 189 189
Management Account Totals 542 560 539 539 539 539 539 539
** Effective FY07, Northeast Region has been consolidated with Mid-Atlantic Region.
Navy Family Housing Management Civilian Personnel Breakdown (FY06-13)
* The totals reflected above match the official Department of the Navy targets reported in other DoN appropriation exhibits. Although funding has been reduced due to the effects of Privatization and funding for 110 FTEs has already been transferred to the Privatization Support Account (See Management and PPV Support OP-5s), the reduction/movement of these FTEs has yet to be reflected in official figures. For tracking purposes, all of these Regional reductions/movements are consolidated under CNIC HQ. This update will occur during the next budget cycle. Accordingly, the actual FTEs funded in the FY08 request is 402 (539 - 137 = 402).
85
Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases
1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 29,5872. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 29,5873. FY 2007 Current Estimate 29,5874. Price Growth: 681
a. Civilian Personnel Compensation 2b. Inflation 582c. Working Capital Fund 97
5. Program Decreases (17,993)a. Inventory Reduction (8,057)b. Program Decrease - Fire Support (9,936)
6. FY 2008 Budget Request 12,275
RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE SERVICES ACCOUNT
CALCULATIONS4a. 53 (CIVPERS estimate) x .030 (Civilian inflation rate) = 2 (Civilian Personnel Compensation) 4b. 25,291 (Non-WCF Costs) x .023 (inflation rate) = 582 (Inflation)4c. 4,243 (WCF Costs) x various pricing factors = 97 (Working Capital Fund)5a. Inventory Reductions by Location/Region:
Avg. UnitsReduction
FundingReduction
Per Unit($000)
Mid-South PPV (Sep '07) (489) (354) $724Southeast Region PPV (Sep '07) (7,041) (5,063) $719Southwest Region PPV (Sep '07) (3,654) (2,465) $675Pre-PPV Inventory Reductions (241) (175) $726
5b. Reduction is based on removal of the majority of Fire Costs from the FH,N appropriation.
FY07Total Cost
PricingAdjustment Inc/Dec
FY08Total Cost
CONUS 13,187 304 (11,946) 1,545US OVERSEAS 3,313 76 (671) 2,718FOREIGN 13,087 301 (5,376) 8,012
FH-2 to OP-5 Crosswalk
(Dollars in Thousands)
Pricing adjustments are proposed in the Services account for Civilian Personnel Compensation, Inflation, and Working Capital Fund. The Program Decrease reflects those units being pulled offline primarily due to PPV execution and demolition and a reduction based on the Navy's decision to centrally-fund Fire Costs, vice fair-share out of the Family Housing Appropriation.IMPACT OF PRIVATIZATION: A reduction in the Services account request for FY08 is included, based on the privatization of roughly 11,000 homes in FY07. Detailed calculations below show the impact of these projects on this account.
FY07CarryoverReduction
SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATES
JUSTIFICATIONNAVY
Exhibit OP-5
86
Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases
1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 17,1532. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 17,1533. FY 2007 Current Estimate 17,1534. Price Growth: 395
a. Civilian Personnel Compensation 16b. Inflation 315c. Working Capital Fund 64
5. Program Decreases (3,375)a. Inventory Reduction (2,507)b. Execution Adjustment - Foreign (368)c. LaMaddalena - Base Closure (500)
6. FY 2008 Budget Request 14,173
RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT
CALCULATIONS4a. 548 (CIVPERS estimate) x .030 (Civilian inflation rate) = 16 (Civilian Personnel Compensation) 4b. 13,683 (Non-WCF Costs) x .023 (inflation rate) = 315 (Inflation)4c. 2,922 (WCF Costs) x various pricing factors = 64 (WCF)5a. Inventory Reductions by Location/Region:
Avg. UnitsReduction
FundingReduction
Per Unit($000)
Mid-South PPV (Sep '07) (489) (105) $215Southeast Region PPV (Sep '07) (7,041) (1,554) $221Southwest Region PPV (Sep '07) (3,654) (788) $216Pre-PPV Inventory Reductions (241) (60) $249
5b. Reduction is based on FY05 Actuals and FY06 Projected Furn. costs in Foreign Locations (primarily Japan).5c. Costs associated with the base closure of LaMaddalena, IT. Minor costs for closeout remain in FY08.
FY07Total Cost
PricingAdjustment Inc/Dec
FY08Total Cost
CONUS 2,830 70 (2,507) 393US OVERSEAS 1,871 20 0 1,891FOREIGN 12,452 305 (868) 11,889
(Dollars in Thousands)
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATES
JUSTIFICATIONNAVY
FURNISHINGS
FH-2 to OP-5 Crosswalk
Pricing adjustments are proposed in the Furnishings Account for Civilian Personnel Compensation, Inflation, and Working Capital Fund. The Program Decreases reflects those units being pulled offline primarily due to PPV execution and demolition, as well as base closure savings at LaMaddalena, IT, and execution adjustments for foreign locations (primarily Japan).IMPACT OF PRIVATIZATION: A reduction in the Furnishings account request for FY08 is included, based on the privatization of roughly 11,000 homes in FY07. Detailed calculations below show the impact of these projects on this account.
FY07CarryoverReduction
Exhibit OP-5
87
Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases
1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 595 2. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 595 3. FY 2007 Current Estimate 5954. Price Growth 14
a. Inflation 145. Program Increases 31
b. Additional Coast Guard Reimbursement 316. FY 2008 Budget Request 640
RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNTPricing adjustments are proposed in the Miscellaneous Account for Inflation and an additional increase associated with personnel staying in Coast Guard housing in Adak, Alaska.
MISCELLANEOUS
(Dollars in Thousands)
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATES
JUSTIFICATIONNAVY
Exhibit OP-5
88
FY2007 FY 2008$11,905,000 $6,035,000
Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases Dollars in Thousands
1. FY2007 President's Budget Request 11,9052. FY2007 Appropriated Amount 03. FY2007 Current Estimate 11,9054. Price Growth 157 a. Civilian Personnel Compensation 97 b. Inflation 60 5. Program Decreases (6,027) a. Inventory Reduction (1,867) b. Reduction in Electronic Housing System (ENH) (143) c. Privatization Support Labor Realignment (4,017)6. FY2008 President's Budget Request 6,035
RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT.
The management account funding adjustments reflect pricing and program changes associated with existing units and the community housing referral program. Prescribed inflation rates and civilian pay raise rates were utilized. A reduction in the management account request for FY08 is driven by the privatization of roughly 4000 homes at the end of FY07. Housing personnel reductions and associated administrative support reductions have been identified, as property management functions will no longer be performed post privatization. The reduction in ENH costs is a result of fewer users. Installations will continue to provide community housing referral services. The management account was further decreased as a result of realignment of labor costs associated with privatization liason and support functions from the management account to the privatization support account. Detailed calculations used to determine the FY08 requirement are provided below.
The management account provides for direct and indirect expenses in managing the family housing program and community housing referral program. Included in this account are costs associated with housing office and community referral office personnel payroll; civilian pay increases; community liaison, training and travel of housing personnel, vehicle leasing, costs associated with Electronic Navy Housing (ENH) and Navy and Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI); and administrative support provided to housing by other base offices such as human resources services, purchasing, contracting, facilities management departments, public affairs, and field headquarters offices. Also included in the management account are costs associated with environmental compliance studies and housing requirements determination market analyses.
MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATES
OPERATING EXPENSES
JUSTIFICATIONMARINE CORPS
Exhibit OP-5 89
CALCULATIONS
FY07 Request: 11,9055a. (1,867)
Housing Office labor and Admin Support (1,815)Travel/Training reduction @ 26 people (direct) * $2.0K per person (52)
5b. Program Reductions - (4160)ENH Reduction - Level of effort reduction - fewer users (143)Labor realignment to PPV Support 59 FTEs (4,017)
4a. Pay Raise 973,249 (CIVPERS estimate) X .03 (pay raise rate) = 97 97
4b. Inflation 6011905 (Estimate) - 1867 (Inventory Reductions 60- 144 (ENH Reduction) - 4017 (Labor Realignment) = 5878 (Adjusted Baseline)5878 - 3249 (Labor) = 2629 (non labor) x .023 (inflation rate) = 60 (inflation increase)
FY08 Request 6,035
Reduction breakdown from FY07 level:
Albany, Camp Lejeune, Cherry Point, Hawaii, Westover total reduction of 3951 units.3951 units require full service required FY07. Property management component not required post-PPV (30 Sep 07). Functions retained include community referral, PPV liaison, wait list management for full year.
Exhibit OP-5 90
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING, MARINE CORPS
FY 2008 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE(EXCLUDES LEASED UNITS AND COSTS)
GEOGRAPHIC - WORLDWIDEFY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
A. INVENTORY DATA Average Inventory for Year a. Conterminous U.S. b. U.S. Overseas c. Foreign FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT (Costs applicable to Inventory/Units) ($000) Unit ($000) Unit ($000) Unit (1) Welcome Center/Housing Office 5,922 592 5,132 1,067 1,801 2,077
B. FAMILY POPULATION DATA Average Families for Year a. Conterminous U.S. b. U.S. Overseas c. Foreign FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT (Costs Applicable to Families vs. Units) ($000) Family ($000) Family ($000) Family (2) Administrative Support 494 9 623 12 412 8 (3) Housing Referral * (See Footnote Below) 4,507 83 4,357 80 3,216 59 (4) Programs and Studies 581 11 702 13 419 8 (5) PPV 795 15 857 16 0 0 (6) Training and Travel 236 4 234 4 187 3Subtotal Management Costs Applicable to Families 6,613 122 6,773 125 4,234 78Total Management Costs 12,535 11,905 6,035
*Average Total Personnel for Year Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per
($000) Person ($000) Person ($000) Person (3) Housing Referral 4,707 36 4,357 33 3,216 24
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING, MARINE CORPS
FY 2008 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE(EXCLUDES LEASED UNITS AND COSTS)
GEOGRAPHIC - CONUSFY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
A. INVENTORY DATA Average Inventory for Year
Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per($000) Unit ($000) Unit ($000) Unit
FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. MANAGEMENT (Costs applicable to Inventory/Units) (1) Welcome Center/Housing Office 2,182 315 1,056 362 185 1,412B. FAMILY POPULATION DATA Average Families for Year
Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per($000) Family ($000) Family ($000) Family
FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. MANAGEMENT (Costs Applicable to Families vs. Units) (2) Administrative Support 406 8 552 12 335 7 (3) Housing Referral * (See Footnote Below) 4,348 91 3,981 83 2,985 62 (4) Programs and Studies 571 12 702 15 419 9 (5) PPV 795 17 786 16 0 0 (6) Training and Travel 195 4 185 4 137 3Subtotal Management Costs Applicable to Families 6,315 132 6,206 130 3,876 81Total Management Costs 8,497 7,262 4,061
*Average Total Personnel for Year Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per
($000) Person ($000) Person ($000) Person (3) Housing Referral 4,548 40 3,981 35 2,985 26
132,372
736 736 736
2,1522,152
47,7934,2084,208 4,208
2,335 1,155 02,9174,808
54,15347,793 47,79354,153
867
54,153
9,9966,925 131
Additional Justification for Management AccountAmended FH-2 Exhibit (Cost Per Family/Personnel vice Cost Per Unit)
115,030
2,917
47,79347,793
131
47,793
6,925
2,152
91
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING, MARINE CORPS
FY 2008 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE(EXCLUDES LEASED UNITS AND COSTS)
GEOGRAPHIC - OVERSEASFY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
A. INVENTORY DATA Average Inventory for Year FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT (Costs applicable to Inventory/Units) ($000) Unit ($000) Unit ($000) Unit (1) Welcome Center/Housing Office 3,028 1,297 2,493 2,158 0 0B. FAMILY POPULATION DATA Average Families for Year FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT (Costs Applicable to Families vs. Units) ($000) Family ($000) Family ($000) Family (2) Administrative Support 88 21 71 17 77 18 (3) Housing Referral * (See Footnote Below) 0 0 214 51 66 16 (4) Programs and Studies 10 2 0 0 0 0 (5) PPV 0 0 71 17 0 0 (6) Training and Travel 0 0 8 2 8 2Subtotal Management Costs Applicable to Families 98 23 364 87 151 36Total Management Costs 3,126 2,857 151
*Average Total Personnel for Year Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per
($000) Person ($000) Person ($000) Person (3) Housing Referral 0 0 214 20 66 6
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING, MARINE CORPS
FY 2008 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE(EXCLUDES LEASED UNITS AND COSTS)
GEOGRAPHIC - FOREIGNFY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
A. INVENTORY DATA Average Inventory for Year FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT (Costs applicable to Inventory/Units) ($000) Unit ($000) Unit ($000) Unit (1) Welcome Center/Housing Office 712 967 1,583 2,151 1,616 2,196B. FAMILY POPULATION DATA Average Families for Year FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT (Costs Applicable to Families vs. Units) ($000) Family ($000) Family ($000) Family (2) Administrative Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 (3) Housing Referral * (See Footnote Below) 159 74 162 75 165 77 (4) Programs and Studies 0 0 0 0 0 0 (5) PPV 0 0 0 0 0 0 (6) Training and Travel 41 19 41 19 42 19Subtotal Management Costs Applicable to Families 200 93 203 94 207 96Total Management Costs 912 1,786 1,823
*Average Total Personnel for Year Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per
($000) Person ($000) Person ($000) Person (3) Housing Referral 159 24 162 24 165 25
1,155
4,2084,208
0
4,208
2,335
Additional Justification for Management AccountAmended FH-2 Exhibit (Cost Per Family/Personnel vice Cost Per Unit)
6,675
736
2,1522,152
736
2,152
736
10,667
92
MARINE CORPS FAMILY HOUSING CIVILIAN PERSONNEL BREAKDOWN (FY'S 06-13)FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S
Albany BP11 Management 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2Subtotal 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Barstow BP11 Management 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Subtotal 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3
Kansas City BP11 Management 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2Subtotal 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
29 Palms BP11 Management 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4Subtotal 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13
Quantico BP11 Management 10 10 4 4 4 4 4 4BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 6 6 6 6 6 6Subtotal 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Beaufort BP11 Management 7 7 2 2 2 2 2 2BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4Subtotal 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6
Parris Island BP11 Management 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1Subtotal 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3
MARFORRES BP11 Management 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3Subtotal 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5
93
MARINE CORPS FAMILY HOUSING CIVILIAN PERSONNEL BREAKDOWN (FY'S 06-13)FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S
8th&I BP11 Management 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Iwakuni BP11 Management 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Subtotal 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Cherry Point BP11 Management 23 21 2 2 2 2 2 2BP12 Furnishings 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 54 32 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 6 6 6 6 6 6Subtotal 80 55 8 8 8 8 8 8
Camp Lejeune BP11 Management 27 23 13 13 13 13 13 13BP12 Furnishings 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 11 11 11 11 11 11Subtotal 74 24 24 24 24 24 24 24
Camp Pendleton BP11 Management 34 24 13 13 13 13 13 13BP12 Furnishings 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 11 11 11 11 11 11Subtotal 121 24 24 24 24 24 24 24
Hawaii BP11 Management 23 15 1 1 1 1 1 1BP12 Furnishings 6 5 4 4 4 4 4 4BP13 Services 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 15 7 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5Subtotal 48 29 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yuma BP11 Management 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4Subtotal 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
MARINE CORPS FAMILY HOUSING CIVILIAN PERSONNEL BREAKDOWN (FY'S 06-13)FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S
Totals BP11 Management 162 138 54 54 54 54 54 54BP12 Furnishings 11 7 4 4 4 4 4 4BP13 Services 35 3 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4BP21 Maintenance 171 40 1 1 1 1 1 1BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 59 59 59 59 59 59Totals 382 191 122 122 122 122 122 122
Direct 282 176 122 122 122 122 122 122Reimbursable 100 15 0 0 0 0 0 0
94
FY2007 FY 2008$883,000 $789,000
Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases Dollars in Thousands
1. FY2007 President's Budget Request 8832. FY2007 Appropriated Amount 03. FY2007 Current Estimate 8834. Price Growth 15 a. Civilian Pay Raise 7 b. Inflation 8 5. Program Decreases (109) a. Inventory Reduction (287)6. Program Increases a. Iwakuni Loaner Furniture Replacement 1787. FY2008 President's Budget Request 789
RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT. Furnishings subaccount includes the procurement of initial issue or replacement of household equipment(primarily stoves and refrigerators) and, in limited circumstances, furniture; the control, movingand handling of equipment and furnishings inventories; and the maintenance and repair of equipment and furnishings.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATES
JUSTIFICATIONMARINE CORPS
FURNISHINGS
The furnishings account funding adjustments reflect pricing and program changes associated with existing and new units and the overseas loaner furnishings program. Prescribed inflation rates and civilian pay raise rates were utilized. A reduction in the furnishings account request for FY08 is driven by the privatization of roughly 4000 homes at the end of FY07. The increase in the program is a result to fund loaner furniture replacement at Iwakuni. Detailed calculations used to determine the FY08 requirement are provided below.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Exhibit OP-5
95
CALCULATIONS
FY07 Request: 883
5a. Inventory Reductions - 3951 homes as detailed below privatized as of 30 Sep 07 (287)Albany 250 units x .14 (price per unit) (35)Camp Lejeune 1207 units X .037 (price per unit) (45)Cherry Point 1214 units X .035 (price per unit) (42)Hawaii 1155 units X .141 (price per unit) (163)Westover 124 units X .016 (price per unit) (2)Reductions include costs for in-house and contracted effort
4b. Inflation 8883 (Estimate) - 287 (Inventory Reductions) = 596 (Adjusted Baseline) 596 (Adjusted Baseline) - 232 (Labor) = 364 (non labor)364 (non labor) x .023 (inflation rate) = 8 ( inflation increase)
4a. Civilian Pay Raise 7232 (CIVPERS estimate) x .03 (pay raise rate) = 7 7
6a. Program Increases-Other 178
Iwakuni Loaner Furniture Replacement
FY08 Request 789
Exhibit OP-5
96
FY2007 FY 2008$4,536,000 $880,000
Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases Dollars in Thousands
1. FY2007 President's Budget Request 4,5362. FY2007 Appropriated Amount 03. FY2007 Current Estimate 4,5364. Price Growth 22 a. Inflation 22 5. Program Decreases (3,678) a. Inventory Reduction (3,678)6. FY2008 President's Budget Request 880
RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE SERVICES ACCOUNT. Includes direct and indirect expenses incident to providing basic support servicessuch as refuse collection and disposal, fire and police protection, pest control, custodial services,snow removal, street cleaning and entomological services.
CALCULATIONS
FY07 Request: 4,536
5a. Inventory Reductions - 3951 homes as detailed below privatized as of 30 Sep 07 (3,676)Albany 250 units X .824 (price per unit) (206)Camp Lejeune 1207 units X 1.062 (price per unit) (1,282)Cherry Point 1214 units X .849 (price per unit) (1,031)Hawaii 1155 units X .946 (price per unit) (1,093)Westover 124 units X .516 (price per unit) (64)Reductions include costs for in-house and contracted efforts
4a. Inflation 204536 (Estimate) - 3676 (Inventory Reductions) = 860 (Adjusted Baseline) 860 (Non labor) x .023 (inflation rate) = 20 Inflation
FY08 Request 880
The services account funding adjustments reflect pricing and program changes associated with existing units. Prescribed inflation rates and civilian pay raise rates were utilized. A reduction in the services account request for FY08 is driven by the privatization of roughly 4000 homes at the end of FY07. Detailed calculations used to determine the requirement are provided below.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OPERATING EXPENSES
SERVICES
FAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATESJUSTIFICATIONMARINE CORPS
Exhibit OP-5
97
BLANK PAGE
98
Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases
1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 67,1532. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 67,1533. FY 2007 Current Estimate 67,1534. Price Growth 1,475
a. Inflation 750b. Working Capital Fund 725
5. Program Decreases (29,291)a. Inventory Reduction (28,475)b. Execution Adjustment - Foreign (816)
6. FY 2008 Budget Request 39,337
RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE UTILITIES ACCOUNT
CALCULATIONS4a. 32,621 (Non-WCF Costs) x .023 (inflation rate) = 750 (Inflation)4b. 34,532 (WCF Costs) x various pricing factors = 725 (WCF)5a. Inventory Reductions by Location/Region:
Avg. UnitsReduction
FundingReduction
Per Unit($000)
Mid-South PPV (Sep '07) (489) (1,132) $2,315Southeast Region PPV (Sep '07) (7,041) (17,769) $2,524Southwest Region PPV (Sep '07) (3,654) (8,970) $2,455Pre-PPV Inventory Reductions (241) (604) $2,506
5b. Reduction is based on FY06 Actuals in Foreign Locations (primarily Japan).
FY07Total Cost
PricingAdjustment Inc/Dec
FY08Total Cost
CONUS 34,253 712 (28,475) 6,490US OVERSEAS 9,815 256 0 10,071FOREIGN 23,085 507 (816) 22,776
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATES
FY07CarryoverReduction
FH-2 to OP-5 Crosswalk
JUSTIFICATIONNAVY
UTILITIES
Pricing adjustments are proposed in the Utilities account for Inflation and Working Capital Fund. Program Decreases reflect those units being pulled offline primarily due to PPV execution and demolition, as well as an execution adjustment for foreign locations (primarily Japan) based on prior year execution.
(Dollars in Thousands)
IMPACT OF PRIVATIZATION: A reduction in the Utilities account request for FY08 is included, based on the privatization of roughly 11,000 homes in FY07. Detailed calculations below show the impact of these projects on this account.
Exhibit OP-5
99
BLANK PAGE
100
FY2007 FY 2008$13,598,000 $2,465,000
Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases Dollars in Thousands
1. FY2007 President's Budget Request 13,5982. FY2007 Appropriated Amount 03. FY2007 Current Estimate 13,5984. Price Growth 55 a. Inflation 55 5. Program Decreases (11,188) a. Inventory Reduction (11,188)6. FY2008 President's Budget Request 2,465
RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE UTILITIES ACCOUNT.
CALCULATIONS
FY07 Request: 13,598
5 Program Decreases (11,188)5a. Inventory Reductions- 3951 homes as detailed below privatized as of 30 Sep 07
Albany 250 units X 1.472 (price per unit) (368)Camp Lejeune 1207 units X 2.674 (price per unit) (3,227)Cherry Point 1214 units X 3.042 (price per unit) (3,693)Hawaii 1155 units X 2.826 (price per unit) (3,264)Westover 124 units X 5.129 (price per unit) (636)
4a. Inflation 5513598 (Estimate) - 11188 (Inventory Reduc.) = 2410 (Adjusted Baseline) 2410 (Adjusted Baseline) x Inflation Rate = 55 (Inflation Increase)
FY08 Request 2,465
The utilities account funding adjustments reflect pricing and program changes associated with existing and new units. Prescribed inflation rates were utilized. Previous program decreases reflected reduced consumption in accordance with Executive Order 12902 of 30% by 2004 and energy conservation. A reduction in the utilities account request for FY08 is driven by the privatization of roughly 4000 homes at the end of FY07. Detailed calculations used to determine the FY08 requirement are provided below.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
UTILITIES
Utilities account includes all utility services provided to family housing, such as electricity, gas, fuel oil, water and sewage, excluding telephone service.
FAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATESJUSTIFICATIONMARINE CORPS
OPERATING EXPENSES
Exhibit OP-5
101
BLANK PAGE
102
Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases
1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 122,9272. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 122,9273. FY 2007 Current Estimate 122,9274. Pricing Adjustments 2,909
a. Civilian Personnel Compensation 119b. Inflation 2,608c. Working Capital Fund 182
5. Program Decreases (63,376)a. Inventory Reduction (55,511)b. Execution Adjustment - Foreign (2,806)c. Major Repair Reductions - US Overseas (5,059)
6. Program Increases 4,189a. Major Repair Increases - CONUS and Foreign 4,189
7. FY 2008 Budget Request 66,649
RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT
CALCULATIONS4a. 3,961 (CIVPERS estimate) x .030 (Civilian inflation rate) = 119 (Civilian Personnel Compensation) 4b. 113,406 (Non-WCF Costs) x .023 (inflation rate) = 2,608 (Inflation)4c. 5,560 (WCF Costs) x various pricing factors = 182 (Working Capital Fund)5a. Inventory Reductions by Location/Region:
Avg. UnitsReduction
FundingReduction
Per Unit($000)
Mid-South PPV (Sep '07) (489) (2,467) $5,045Southeast Region PPV (Sep '07) (7,041) (34,023) $4,832Southwest Region PPV (Sep '07) (3,654) (17,787) $4,868Pre-PPV Inventory Reductions (241) (1,234) $5,120
5b. Reduction is based on FY05 Actuals and FY06 Projected Maint. costs in Foreign Locations (primarily Japan).
FY07Total Cost
PricingAdjustment Inc/Dec
FY08Total Cost
CONUS 65,608 1,435 (55,463) 11,580US OVERSEAS 19,905 631 (5,059) 15,477FOREIGN 37,414 843 1,338 39,595
MAINTENANCE
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATES
JUSTIFICATIONNAVY
* This column reflects the FY 2007 President's Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $115,850.
(Dollars in Thousands)
Pricing adjustments are proposed in the Maintenance account for Civilian Personnel Compensation, Inflation, and Working Capital Fund. The Program Decreases reflects those units being pulled offline due to PPV execution and reductions in the Major Repair account, as well as execution adjustments for foreign locations (primarily Japan).
FH-2 to OP-5 Crosswalk
5c. The Program Decrease for Major Repair Reductions is the net reduction on the FH-2 exhibit for the "Alterations and Additions" line for US Overseas Locations.
IMPACT OF PRIVATIZATION: A reduction in the Maintenance account request for FY08 is included, based on the privatization of roughly 11,000 homes in FY07. Detailed calculations below show the impact of these projects impact this account.
FY07CarryoverReduction
6a. The Program Increase for Major Repair Reductions is the net increase on the FH-2 exhibit for the "Alterations and Additions" line for CONUS and Foreign locations.
Exhibit OP-5
103
BLANK PAGE
104
FY2007* FY 2008$30,064,000 $4,029,000
Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases Dollars in Thousands
1. FY2007 President's Budget Request 30,0642. FY2007 Appropriated Amount 03. FY2007 Current Estimate 30,0644. Price Growth 92 a. Civilian Pay Raise 5 b. Inflation 87 5. Program Decreases (26,127) a. Inventory Reduction (26,127)6. FY2008 President's Budget Request 4,029
RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT.
Maintenance Subaccount includes the following areas:
Maintenance/Repair of Dwellings. Includes service calls, change of occupancy rehabilitation, routine maintenance, preventive maintenance, interior and exterior painting, and major repairswhen dollars associated with major repairs may be in alterations and additions.
Exterior Utilities. Includes maintenance, repair and replacement of electricity, gas, water, sewage and other utility distribution systems located within family housing areas, and the portionof activity utility rates attributable to distribution system maintenance when separately identified.
Other Real Property. Includes maintenance and repair of any other family housing realproperty, such as grounds, surfaced areas, and community facilities.
Alterations and Additions. Includes minor incidental improvements to dwellings or other realproperty performed with operation and maintenance funds under the authority of 10 USC 2805.
OPERATING EXPENSES
* This column reflects the FY 2007 President's Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $27,981,000.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
The maintenance account funding adjustments reflect pricing and program changes associated with existing units and to prevent increases in the backlog of maintenance and repair. This funding profile is necessary to prevent deterioration of the housing assets, which could result in the degradation of quality of life for military personnel and their families, the closure of units or greater financial outlays in the out years. Prescribed inflation rates and civilian pay rates were utilized. A reduction in the maintenance account requested for FY08 is driven by the privatization of roughly 4000 homes at the end of FY07. Detailed calculations used to determine the FY08 requirement are provided below.
FAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATES
MAINTENANCE
JUSTIFICATIONMARINE CORPS
Exhibit OP-5
105
CALCULATIONS
FY07 Request: 30,064
5a. Inventory Reductions -3951 homes as detailed below privatized as of 30 Sep 07 (26,127)Albany 250 units X 6.156 (price per unit) (1,539)Camp Lejeune 1207 units X 6.594 (price per unit) (7,836)Cherry Point 1214 units X 6.040 (price per unit) (7,333)Hawaii 1155 units X 6.247 (price per unit) (7,215)Westover 124 units X 17.774 (price per unit) (2,204)Reductions include costs for in-house and contracted effortsRepair projects reduction requirements reduced
4a. Pay Raise 5150 (CIVPERS estimate) x .03 (pay raise rate) = 5 (pay raise increase)
4b. Inflation 8730064 (Estimate) - 26127 (Inventory Reductions) = 3937 (Adjusted Baseline) - 150 (labor) =3787 (non labor)3787 (non labor) x .023 (inflation rate) = 87 (inflation increase)
4,029FY08 Request
Exhibit OP-5
106
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2008 BUDGET
GENERAL/FLAG OFFICERS QUARTERS (GFOQs) WHERE ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
WILL EXCEED $35,000 PER UNIT
This information is provided in accordance with the reporting requirement established by Section 124 of the Fiscal Year 2006 Military Construction Appropriation Act, Public Law 109-114. The information provides the details for those GFOQs where the maintenance and repair obligations in FY 2008 are expected to exceed $35,000 per unit. Operations include the prorated costs for management of family housing, services such as fire and police protection, refuse collection, entomology, snow removal, and furnishings. Utilities include applicable costs for energy (electricity, gas, fuel oil, steam, and geothermal), water and sewerage. Maintenance and repairs include recurring work such as service calls, preventive maintenance, routine change of occupancy work, and major repairs. This includes all operation and maintenance costs to the dwelling unit, appurtenant structures and other related area and facilities intended for the use of the general or flag officer. In those quarters designated as historical, major work is coordinated with the appropriate State Historic Preservation office. These quarters are identified as National Historic Register (NHR) or National Historic Landmark (NHL) or eligible to be on the National Historic Register (ELIG) or are in an Historical Thematic District (HTD).
107
1. COMPONENT NAVY/MARINE CORPS
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. DATE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION VARIOUS LOCATIONS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 4. PROJECT TITLE GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICER QUARTERS
5. PROJECT NUMBER
STATE/ INSTALLATION
QTRS ID
OPS
UTIL
MAINT & RPR
HIST PRES
TOTAL
IMPROVS
DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
INSIDE THE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NSA Washington DC
A-NAC 30,500 8,900 35,100 0 74,500 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. (Year built: 1922; NSF: 4,260; ELIG) NSA Washington DC
A Tingey House
28,500 24,900 50,400 0 103,800 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. (Year built: 1804; NSF: 8.940; NHL) NSA Washington DC
AA Potomac Annex
34,200 8,600 48,400 0 91,200 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. (Year built: 1910; NSF: 5,425; HTD) NSA Washington DC
B-NOBSY 27,500 5,600 70,700 0 103,800 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Major repairs include replacing the roof. (Year built: 1897; NSF: 2,333; NHL) NSA Washington DC
B-WNY 28,400 17,600 47,300 0 93,300 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairing interior walls, cleaning the ducts and miscellaneous minor repairs. (Year built: 1802; NSF: 4,459; NHL) NSA Washington DC
BB Potomac Annex
30,000 6,400 50,100 0 86,500 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes duct cleaning, repairing interior walls and miscellaneous minor repairs. (Year built: 1910; NSF: 3,949; HTD)
108
1. COMPONENT NAVY/MARINE CORPS
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. DATE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION VARIOUS LOCATIONS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 4. PROJECT TITLE GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICER QUARTERS
5. PROJECT NUMBER
STATE/ INSTALLATION
QTRS ID
OPS
UTIL
MAINT & RPR
HIST PRES
TOTAL
IMPROVS
DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
NSA Washington DC
C-NOBSY 27,500 8,700 69,400 0 105,600 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Major repairs include replacing the roof. (Year built: 1897; NSF: 1,844; NHL) NSA Washington DC
C-WNY 36,100 6,000 198,900 0 241,000 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairing interior walls, replacing the carpet on the second floor, cleaning the ducts and miscellaneous minor repairs. Major repairs include exterior painting with lead-based paint mitigation and repairs, repairs to the kitchen, interior painting, refinishing the hardwood floors, repairing the banister, repairing the fence, replacing the fire alarm system and replacing the front entry steps and handrail. (Year built: 1879; NSF: 3,200; NHL) NSA Washington DC
CC Potomac Annex
39,400 8,200 294,800 0 342,400 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Major repairs include replacing the roof, gutters and downspouts, mitigating exterior lead-based paint on the wood trim, replacing the windows, repairs to the kitchen and bathrooms, interior painting, refinishing the hardwood floors, repairing the sidewalks and patio, repairs to the garage, repairs to the deck, correcting the drainage and replacing the fences. (Year built: 1910; NSF: 5,252; HTD) NSA Washington DC
D-WNY 39,300 8,000 251,700 0 299,000 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairs to the interior walls, replacing the carpet on the second floor, duct cleaning and miscellaneous minor repairs. Major repairs include exterior painting and repairs, replacing the roof, repairs to the kitchen, repairs to the foundation, replacing the fire alarm system, replacing the front entry steps and handrail, refinishing the hardwood floors, complete interior painting and repairing the fence. (Year built: 1879; NSF: 3,220; NHL) NSA Washington DC
E-NNMC 25,700 5,700 133,000 0 164,400 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairs to the interior walls, duct cleaning, complete interior painting and miscellaneous minor repairs. Major repairs include repairs to the sidewalks and driveway, repairing the garage and shed, repairs to the kitchen and bathrooms, replacing the roof, exterior painting with lead-based paint mitigation and replacing the awnings. (Year built: 1941; NSF: 3,549; HTD)
109
1. COMPONENT NAVY/MARINE CORPS
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. DATE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION VARIOUS LOCATIONS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 4. PROJECT TITLE GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICER QUARTERS
5. PROJECT NUMBER
STATE/ INSTALLATION
QTRS ID
OPS
UTIL
MAINT & RPR
HIST PRES
TOTAL
IMPROVS
DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
NSA Washington DC
F-WNY 32,700 7,100 113,700 0 153,500 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairs to the interior walls, duct cleaning and miscellaneous minor repairs. Major repairs include a complete interior painting, refinishing the hardwood floors, repairs to the sidewalk, repairs to the fence, repairs to the bathrooms, refinishing doors and frames, replacing the furnace and replacing the front steps. (Year built: 1880; NSF: 3,880; NHL) NSA Washington DC
H-WNY 25,200 9,400 175,300 0 209,900 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy includes repairs to the interior walls, duct cleaning and miscellaneous minor repairs. Major repairs include a complete interior painting, replacing the roof, gutters and downspouts, exterior painting with lead-based paint mitigation, refinishing the hardwood floors, replacing the carpet on the second floor, repairing the sidewalk and driveway, repairs to the garage and shed and replacing the fence. (Year built: 1880; NSF: 4,030; NHL) NSA Washington DC
L-WNY 25,200 5,000 36,000 0 66,200 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairs to the interior walls, replacing the carpet, duct cleaning, miscellaneous minor repairs and interior painting. (Year built: 1868; NSF: 2,410; NHL) NSA Washington DC
L-1-WNY 28,600 6,800 36,400 0 71,800 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairs to the interior walls, replacing the carpet, duct cleaning and miscellaneous minor repairs. (Year built: 1868; NSF: 2,320; NHL) NSA Washington DC
R-WNY 28,100 7,300 38,200 0 73,600 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairs to the interior walls, duct cleaning and miscellaneous minor repairs. Major repairs include replacing the roof on the guest house. (Year built: 1857; NSF: 2,945; NHL)
110
1. COMPONENT NAVY/MARINE CORPS
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. DATE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION VARIOUS LOCATIONS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 4. PROJECT TITLE GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICER QUARTERS
5. PROJECT NUMBER
STATE/ INSTALLATION
QTRS ID
OPS
UTIL
MAINT & RPR
HIST PRES
TOTAL
IMPROVS
DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
NSA Washington DC
U-WNY 25,700 8,100 150,600 0 184,400 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairs to the interior walls, partial replacement of the carpet, duct cleaning and miscellaneous minor repairs. Major repairs include interior painting, repairs to the kitchen, replacing the fence, replacing the flat roofs, replacing the fire alarm system, refinishing the hardwood floors and repairing the sidewalk and patio. (Year built: 1937; NSF: 5,373) NSA Washington DC
V-WNY 29,600 4,800 58,100 0 92,500 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairs to the interior walls, repair the banister, duct cleaning and miscellaneous minor repairs. Major repairs include a complete interior painting and replacing the fire alarm system. (Year built: 1901; NSF: 3,020; NHL) MARYLAND USNA Annapolis 1 Buchanan 118,400 14,100 321,200 0 453,700 0 Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance. Major repairs include awning maintenance, replacing the roof and gutter system, painting the exterior, waterproofing the foundation, interior wall repairs and refinishing the hardwood floors. (Year built: 1906; NSF: 13,048; NHL) SOUTH CAROLINA MCRD Parris Island, SC
Qtrs. 1 12,200 5,700 42,200 0 60,100 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. (Year built: 1889; NSF: 5,929; NHR)
OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES
ITALY NSA Naples Villa Nike 22,800 66,000 52,900 0 141,700 0 Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. (Year built: 1949; NSF: 11,322)
111
1. COMPONENT NAVY/MARINE CORPS
FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. DATE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION VARIOUS LOCATIONS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 4. PROJECT TITLE GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICER QUARTERS
5. PROJECT NUMBER
STATE/ INSTALLATION
QTRS ID
OPS
UTIL
MAINT & RPR
HIST PRES
TOTAL
IMPROVS
DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED
JAPAN COMNAVFOR Japan
11 Nimitz 12,700 4,500 37,800 0 55,000 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. (Year built: 1992; NSF: 2,259) COMNAVFOR Japan
16 Halsey 13,600 9,700 51,200 0 74,500 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. (Year built: 1940; NSF: 3,223) COMNAVFOR Japan
17 Halsey 29,600 6,300 89,800 0 125,700 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Major repairs include a complete exterior and interior painting. (Year built: 1948; NSF: 4,140) COMNAVFOR Japan
18 Halsey 22,600 10,000 92,700 0 125,300 0
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Major repairs include a complete exterior and interior painting. (Year built: 1948; NSF: 4,216) MARIANAS ISLAND COMNAVFOR Guam
4 Flag Circle 9,200 13,600 42,000 0 64,800 242,000
Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls, grounds maintenance and exterior painting. Improvement project includes reconfiguring the interior of the home to provide access from the sleeping areas to the rest of the dwelling. (Year built: 1945; NSF: 3,448) UNITED KINGDOM COMNAVACTUK Romany House 24,500 24,900 82,300 0 131,700 0 Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. (Year built: 1932, NSF: 6,000)
112
Stat
e/C
ount
ryIn
stal
latio
nQ
uart
ers
IDYe
arB
uilt
Size
NSF
Ops
Cos
tM
aint
.C
ost
Rep
air
Cos
tTo
tal O
&M
> $3
5K C
ost
Util
ityC
ost
Leas
ing
Cos
tH
ist.
Pres
.C
ost
Tota
l FH
O&
M C
ost
Dis
tric
t of C
olum
bia
Was
hing
ton
DC
10-A
SC
1930
1,56
4$2
6.4
$29.
4$0
.0$5
5.8
$5.5
$0.0
$0.0
$61.
3A
-NN
MC
1941
3,06
4$2
7.5
$26.
0$0
.0$5
3.5
$7.8
$0.0
$0.0
$61.
3A
-NA
C19
224,
260
$30.
5$3
5.1
$0.0
$65.
6$8
.9$0
.0$0
.0$7
4.5
A T
inge
y H
ouse
1801
8,94
0$2
8.5
$50.
4$0
.0$7
8.9
$24.
9$0
.0$0
.0$1
03.8
AA
Pot
omac
Ann
ex19
105,
425
$34.
2$4
8.4
$0.0
$82.
6$8
.6$0
.0$0
.0$9
1.2
B-N
NM
C19
413,
805
$27.
5$2
5.7
$0.0
$53.
2$4
.4$0
.0$0
.0$5
7.6
B-N
OB
SY
1897
2,33
3$2
7.5
$25.
7$4
5.0
$98.
2$5
.6$0
.0$0
.0$1
03.8
B-W
NY
1802
4,45
9$2
8.4
$47.
3$0
.0$7
5.7
$17.
6$0
.0$0
.0$9
3.3
BB
Pot
omac
Ann
ex19
103,
949
$30.
0$5
0.1
$0.0
$80.
1$6
.4$0
.0$0
.0$8
6.5
C-N
OB
SY
1897
1,84
4$2
7.5
$24.
4$4
5.0
$96.
9$8
.7$0
.0$0
.0$1
05.6
C-W
NY
1879
3,20
0$3
6.1
$37.
1$1
61.8
$235
.0$6
.0$0
.0$0
.0$2
41.0
CC
Pot
omac
Ann
ex19
105,
252
$39.
4$3
4.3
$260
.5$3
34.2
$8.2
$0.0
$0.0
$342
.4D
-NO
BS
Y19
002,
450
$25.
2$3
2.2
$0.0
$57.
4$4
.2$0
.0$0
.0$6
1.6
D-W
NY
1879
3,22
0$3
9.3
$38.
4$2
13.3
$291
.0$8
.0$0
.0$0
.0$2
99.0
DD
Ana
cost
ia19
233,
825
$29.
8$3
1.6
$0.0
$61.
4$6
.3$0
.0$0
.0$6
7.7
E-N
NM
C19
413,
549
$25.
7$4
1.4
$91.
6$1
58.7
$5.7
$0.0
$0.0
$164
.4E
-WN
Y18
804,
130
$27.
8$2
7.0
$0.0
$54.
8$8
.5$0
.0$0
.0$6
3.3
F-N
OB
SY
1946
2,10
0$2
5.2
$27.
4$0
.0$5
2.6
$7.0
$0.0
$0.0
$59.
6F-
WN
Y18
803,
880
$32.
7$3
4.8
$78.
9$1
46.4
$7.1
$0.0
$0.0
$153
.5G
-WN
Y18
803,
690
$27.
4$2
7.6
$0.0
$55.
0$7
.2$0
.0$0
.0$6
2.2
H-W
NY
1880
4,03
0$2
5.2
$36.
8$1
38.5
$200
.5$9
.4$0
.0$0
.0$2
09.9
L-W
NY
1868
2,41
0$2
5.2
$33.
8$2
.2$6
1.2
$5.0
$0.0
$0.0
$66.
2L-
1-W
NY
1868
2,32
0$2
8.6
$31.
1$5
.3$6
5.0
$6.8
$0.0
$0.0
$71.
8M
-1-W
NY
1868
3,16
0$2
5.2
$24.
0$0
.0$4
9.2
$10.
0$0
.0$0
.0$5
9.2
M-W
NY
1868
2,32
0$2
5.2
$26.
7$0
.0$5
1.9
$6.7
$0.0
$0.0
$58.
6N
-WN
Y18
682,
720
$25.
2$2
4.5
$0.0
$49.
7$5
.2$0
.0$0
.0$5
4.9
O-W
NY
1866
2,68
0$2
5.2
$24.
2$0
.0$4
9.4
$6.0
$0.0
$0.0
$55.
4R
-WN
Y18
572,
945
$28.
1$3
2.6
$5.6
$66.
3$7
.3$0
.0$0
.0$7
3.6
U-W
NY
1937
5,37
3$2
5.7
$43.
6$1
07.0
$176
.3$8
.1$0
.0$0
.0$1
84.4
V-W
NY
1901
3,02
0$2
9.6
$34.
1$2
4.0
$87.
7$4
.8$0
.0$0
.0$9
2.5
Loui
sian
aN
ew O
rlean
sD
1907
3,20
5$1
0.7
$26.
8$0
.0$3
7.5
$5.9
$0.0
$0.0
$43.
4
Mar
ylan
dA
nnap
olis
1 B
ucha
nan
1906
13,0
48$1
18.4
$63.
5$2
57.7
$439
.6$1
4.1
$0.0
$0.0
$453
.7
Texa
sC
orpu
s C
hris
tiS
OQ
119
414,
584
$21.
6$3
2.0
$0.0
$53.
6$6
.9$0
.0$0
.0$6
0.5
SO
Q 1
119
363,
353
$22.
6$2
7.6
$0.0
$50.
2$5
.6$0
.0$0
.0$5
5.8
Cub
aG
uant
anam
o B
ayM
101
1941
4,70
4$1
8.7
$18.
3$0
.0$3
7.0
$22.
9$0
.0$0
.0$5
9.9
Italy
Nap
les
Vill
a N
ike
1949
11,3
22$2
2.8
$52.
9$0
.0$7
5.7
$66.
0$0
.0$0
.0$1
41.7
Japa
nY
okos
uka
11 N
imitz
1992
2,25
9$1
2.7
$37.
8$0
.0$5
0.5
$4.5
$0.0
$0.0
$55.
016
Hal
sey
1940
3,22
3$1
3.6
$51.
2$0
.0$6
4.8
$9.7
$0.0
$0.0
$74.
517
Hal
sey
1948
4,14
0$2
9.6
$52.
2$3
7.6
$119
.4$6
.3$0
.0$0
.0$1
25.7
18 H
alse
y19
484,
216
$22.
6$4
7.3
$45.
4$1
15.3
$10.
0$0
.0$0
.0$1
25.3
Mar
iana
Isla
nds
Gua
m4
Flag
Circ
le19
453,
448
$9.2
$42.
0$0
.0$5
1.2
$13.
6$0
.0$0
.0$6
4.8
Uni
ted
Kin
gdom
Lond
onR
oman
y19
326,
000
$24.
5$8
2.3
$0.0
$106
.8$2
4.9
$0.0
$0.0
$131
.7
Tota
ls G
FOQ
Uni
ts42
$1,1
86.8
$1,5
39.6
$1,5
19.4
$4,2
45.8
$426
.3$0
.0$0
.0$4
,672
.1
Dep
artm
ent o
f the
Nav
yN
avy
Gen
eral
and
Fla
g O
ffice
rs' Q
uart
ers
Ant
icip
ated
Ope
ratio
ns a
nd M
aint
enan
ce E
xpen
ditu
res
Exce
edin
g $3
5K p
er U
nit f
or F
isca
l Yea
r 200
8(D
olla
rs in
Tho
usan
ds)
113
Stat
e/C
ount
ryIn
stal
latio
nQ
uart
ers
IDYe
arB
uilt
Size
NSF
Tota
l FH
O&
M C
ost*
Alte
rnat
ive
Use
Cos
t to
Con
vert
Uni
t
If O
&M
or
Con
str.
> $1
00K
Dem
olis
h &
Reb
uild
Cos
tD
istr
ict o
f Col
umbi
aN
DW
Ting
ey H
ouse
1804
8,94
0$1
03.8
Pre
viou
sly
cons
ider
ed a
nd re
ject
ed1
N/A
N/A
Loui
sian
aN
ew O
rlean
sA
1844
6,48
3$3
9.5
Not
con
side
red2
N/A
N/A
Mar
ylan
dA
nnap
olis
Buc
hana
n H
ouse
1906
13,0
48$4
53.7
Not
con
side
red3
N/A
N/A
Italy
Nap
les
Vill
a N
ike
1949
11,3
22$1
41.7
Not
con
side
red4
N/A
N/A
Uni
ted
Kin
gdom
Lond
onR
oman
y19
326,
000
$131
.7N
ot c
onsi
dere
d5N
/AN
/A
TOTA
L:
5 G
FOQ
Uni
ts$8
70.4
$.$.
* O
&M
cos
ts in
clud
es U
tiliti
es.
Dep
artm
ent o
f the
Nav
y - N
avy
Gen
eral
and
Fla
g O
ffice
rs' Q
uart
ers
6,00
0NSF
Uni
ts fo
r Fis
cal Y
ear 2
008
(Dol
lars
in T
hous
ands
)
4 Vill
a N
ike
is h
ome
to th
e fo
ur-s
tar b
illet
, Com
man
der,
US
NA
VE
UR
/JFC
. Th
e go
vern
men
t of I
taly
tech
nica
lly o
wns
this
qua
rters
, alth
ough
the
agre
emen
t with
the
gove
rnm
ent o
f Ita
ly is
that
th
e U
S w
ill o
ccup
y an
d m
aint
ain
the
quar
ters
with
Nav
y FH
,N.
Con
sequ
ently
, alte
rnat
ive
uses
or d
emol
ition
are
not
opt
ions
. W
hen
ther
e ce
ases
to b
e a
need
to h
ouse
a fo
ur-s
tar F
lag
or
Gen
eral
Offi
cer i
n a
secu
re lo
catio
n in
Nap
les,
the
US
can
vac
ate
the
hous
e an
d re
turn
it to
Ital
y.
4 Rom
any
Hou
se, l
ocat
ed in
a s
ecur
e, s
ubur
ban
area
out
side
of L
ondo
n, is
cur
rent
ly b
eing
util
ized
by
the
Def
ense
Inte
llige
nce
Age
ncy.
An
Inte
r Ser
vice
Sup
port
Agr
eem
ent i
s be
ing
wor
ked
out b
y w
hich
DIA
will
reim
burs
e th
e N
avy
for t
he c
osts
to m
aint
ain
Rom
any
Hou
se.
Dem
oliti
on o
r alte
rnat
ive
uses
are
not
app
ropr
iate
for t
his
quar
ters
. Th
e N
avy
owns
the
hous
e an
d co
uld
cons
ider
sel
ling
it, s
houl
d it
be d
eter
min
ed th
at th
ere
will
be
no fu
rther
nee
d to
hou
se a
Fla
g or
NA
TO o
ffice
r in
the
Lond
on a
rea.
1 A re
cent
eva
luat
ion
of T
inge
y H
ouse
reve
aled
no
alte
rnat
ive
uses
for i
t on
the
Was
hing
ton
Nav
y Y
ard.
The
re is
a re
cent
ly-c
onst
ruct
ed c
onfe
renc
e ce
nter
on
the
base
and
tran
sfer
ring
the
quar
ters
to th
e ba
se m
erel
y sh
ifts
the
burd
en o
f its
sup
port
from
FH
,N to
O&
M,N
. D
emol
ition
was
con
side
red
and
reje
cted
due
to it
s lis
ting
as a
Nat
iona
l His
toric
Lan
dmar
k an
d lo
catio
n in
the
mid
dle
of a
Nat
iona
l His
toric
Dis
trict
. Th
e qu
arte
rs is
cur
rent
ly b
eing
ser
ious
ly c
onsi
dere
d fo
r inc
lusi
on in
the
seco
nd p
hase
of t
he C
NR
MA
PP
V d
eal;
disc
ussi
ons
are
unde
rway
with
the
PP
V
cont
ract
or.
2 Thi
s qu
arte
rs is
loca
ted
on N
SA
New
Orle
ans,
whi
ch is
cur
rent
ly s
ched
uled
to c
lose
und
er B
RA
C.
How
ever
, the
re e
xist
s a
poss
ibili
ty th
at a
Fed
eral
City
com
plex
will
be
deve
lope
d th
ere,
in
whi
ch c
ase,
the
four
Fla
g qu
arte
rs o
n N
SA
will
mos
t lik
ely
cont
inue
to b
e ut
ilize
d. I
f the
Fed
eral
City
com
plex
doe
s no
t hap
pen,
the
Nav
y w
ill c
onsi
der d
emol
ishi
ng a
ll fo
ur F
lag
quar
ters
(onl
y A
is
his
toric
) bec
ause
the
BR
AC
incl
udes
the
cons
truct
ion
of tw
o ne
w F
lag
quar
ters
on
the
NA
S N
ew O
rlean
s, th
e re
ceiv
ing
base
. A
t thi
s po
int i
n tim
e, d
emol
ition
or a
ltern
ativ
e us
es is
pr
emat
ure.
3 Buc
hana
n al
so is
a N
atio
nal H
isto
ric L
andm
ark.
For
that
reas
on, d
emol
ition
has
not
bee
n co
nsid
ered
. Li
ke T
inge
y H
ouse
, the
Nav
y is
in d
iscu
ssio
ns w
ith th
e P
PV
par
tner
to a
scer
tain
the
viab
ility
of i
nclu
ding
this
qua
rters
in th
e se
cond
pha
se o
f the
CN
RM
A P
PV
dea
l.
114
Stat
e/C
ount
ryIn
stal
latio
nQ
uart
ers
IDYe
arB
uilt
Size
NSF
Ops
Cos
tM
aint
.C
ost
Rep
air
Cos
tTo
tal O
&M
> $3
5K C
ost
Util
ityC
ost
Leas
ing
Cos
tH
ist.
Pres
.C
ost
Tota
l FH
O&
M C
ost
Sout
h C
arol
ina
Par
ris Is
land
118
895,
929
$12.
2$4
2.2
$54.
4$5
.7$6
0.1
TOTA
L:
$12.
2$4
2.2
$54.
4$5
.7$6
0.1
TOTA
L G
OVT
-OW
NED
GO
Q IN
VEN
TOR
Y IS
5
Dep
artm
ent o
f the
Nav
yM
arin
e C
orps
Gen
eral
and
Fla
g O
ffice
rs' Q
uart
ers
Ant
icip
ated
Ope
ratio
ns a
nd M
aint
enan
ce E
xpen
ditu
res
Exce
edin
g $3
5K p
er U
nit f
or fo
r Fis
cal Y
ear 2
008
(Dol
lars
in T
hous
ands
)
115
Stat
e/C
ount
ryIn
stal
latio
nQ
uart
ers
IDYe
arB
uilt
Size
NSF
Tota
l FH
O&
M C
ost*
Alte
rnat
ive
Use
Cos
t to
Con
vert
Uni
t
If O
&M
or
Con
str.
> $1
00K
Dem
olis
h &
Reb
uild
Cos
tD
istr
ict o
f Col
umbi
a8t
h &
I S
treet
s1
1908
7,37
6$4
1.3
Con
side
red
and
reje
cted
1N
/AN
/A
Dis
tric
t of C
olum
bia
8th
& I
Stre
ets
219
086,
084
$41.
3C
onsi
dere
d an
d re
ject
ed1
N/A
N/A
Dis
tric
t of C
olum
bia
8th
& I
Stre
ets
419
086,
084
$31.
3C
onsi
dere
d an
d re
ject
ed1
N/A
N/A
Dis
tric
t of C
olum
bia
8th
& I
Stre
ets
618
1015
,605
$60.
Con
side
red
and
reje
cted
1N
/AN
/A
TOTA
L:
4 G
FOQ
Uni
ts$1
73.8
$.$.
* O
&M
cos
ts in
clud
es U
tiliti
es.
1 Eva
luat
ion
of th
e fo
ur fa
mily
hou
sing
qua
rters
reve
al n
o al
tern
ativ
e us
es o
n th
e M
arin
e B
arra
cks.
Tra
nsfe
rrin
g th
e qu
arte
rs to
the
base
mer
ely
shift
s th
e bu
rden
of i
ts s
uppo
rt fro
m F
H,N
&M
C
to O
&M
,MC
. As
prev
ious
ly re
porte
d to
Con
gres
s, th
ere
is a
sho
rtage
of G
ener
al O
ffice
rs Q
uarte
rs fo
r the
Mar
ine
Cor
ps in
the
Nat
iona
l Cap
ital R
egio
n. W
ithou
t pur
chas
e of
add
ition
al la
nd
repl
acem
ent o
f the
exi
stin
g un
its c
ould
not
be
cons
truct
ed w
ithou
t the
dem
oliti
on o
f the
exi
stin
g un
its.
Dem
oliti
on is
reje
cted
due
to: t
he re
cent
ext
ensi
ve re
nova
tions
to a
ll fo
ur q
uarte
rs; t
he
listin
g of
all
four
hom
es, i
nclu
ding
the
Hom
e of
the
Com
man
dant
s, o
n th
e N
atio
nal R
egis
ter o
f His
toric
Pla
ces;
the
hom
es fo
rmin
g tw
o si
des
of th
e Q
uadr
angl
e th
at is
a N
atio
nal H
isto
ric
Land
mar
k; a
nd th
e H
ome
of th
e C
omm
anda
nt's
als
o be
ing
a N
atio
nal H
isto
ric L
andm
ark.
Priv
atiz
atio
n w
as c
onsi
dere
d an
d re
ject
ed d
ue to
: the
cos
t to
oper
ate,
mai
ntai
n an
d su
stai
n th
e ho
mes
due
to th
eir s
ize
and
hist
oric
nat
ure.
The
up-
front
see
d-pr
ivat
izat
ion
fund
ing
cost
was
det
erm
ined
at $
9 m
illio
n an
d th
e pr
ojec
t had
neg
ativ
e lif
e cy
cle
savi
ngs
of $
5 m
illio
n.
Dep
artm
ent o
f the
Nav
y - M
arin
e C
orps
Gen
eral
and
Fla
g O
ffice
rs' Q
uart
ers
6,00
0NSF
Uni
ts fo
r Fis
cal Y
ear 2
008
(Dol
lars
in T
hous
ands
)
116
Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases
1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 15,000 2. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 15,000 3. FY 2007 Current Estimate 15,000 4. Program Decreases (7,000)
a. Inventory Reduction (7,000)5. FY 2008 Budget Request 8,000
(Dollars in Thousands)
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATES
JUSTIFICATIONNAVY
REIMBURSABLE AUTHORITY
Exhibit OP-5
117
BLANK PAGE
118
FY2007 FY 2008$1,500,000 $1,000,000
Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases Dollars in Thousands
1. FY2007 President's Budget Request 1,5002. FY2007 Appropriated Amount 03. FY2007 Current Estimate 1,5004. FY2008 President's Budget Request 1,000
RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT.Includes collections received from rental of Marine Corps Family Housing to civilians, foreign nationals and Coast Guard personnel; collection for rental of mobile home parkspaces, and collections for occupant-caused damages. The Fiscal Year 2008 estimate reflects estimated collections for damages and rent.
OPERATING EXPENSES
REIMBURSEMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATES
JUSTIFICATIONMARINE CORPS
Exhibit OP-5
119
BLANK PAGE
120
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING - FY 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATE
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY LEASING
(In Thousands) FY 2008 Program $141,757 FY 2007 Program $132,282 Purpose and Scope This program provides payment for the costs incurred in leasing family housing units for assignment as public quarters. Program Summary
FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 Auth Avg Cost Auth Avg Cost Auth Avg Cost Units Units ($000) Units Units ($000) Units Units ($000)
Domestic 3,208 390 6,509 3,208 476 8,250 3,208 456 7,980
Navy 3,208 390 6,509 3,208 476 8,250 3,208 456 7,980
801 5,347 3,014 46,323 5,347 3,014 48,657 5,347 2,789 48,267
Navy 4,747 2,414 37,054 4,747 2,414 38,962 4,747 2,189 36,797
MarCps 600 600 9,269 600 600 9,695 600 600 11,470
802 276 276 872 276 276 906 276 276 1,303
MarCps 276 276 872 276 276 906 276 276 1,303
Foreign 4,229 2,289 69,887 4,229 2,323 74,469 4,346 2,556 84,207
Navy 4,229 2,289 69,887 4,229 2,323 74,469 4,346 2,556 84,207
DoN Total 13,060 5,969 123,591 13,060 6,089 132,282 13,177 6,077 141,757 JUSTIFICATION Domestic Leasing Program Summary: The domestic leasing program is authorized in 10 USC 2828 as amended, which limits the number of units authorized at any one time and specifies the maximum cost limitation. This program consists of leasing on an interim basis until Section 801, military construction (MILCON) units, and homes undergoing revitalization come on-line. Section 801 of the FY 1984 Military Construction Authorization Act (PL 98-115) authorized the Department of Defense to enter into agreements for the leasing of Military Family Housing units on or near military installations within the United States. This authorization was considered a test and would have expired upon execution of contracts no later than 1 October 1985. The Navy sites chosen for testing Section 801 were Norfolk, Virginia, and Earle, New Jersey. The Section 801 program was made permanent and codified as Section 2835 of Title 10, United States Code, in FY 1992. The Navy has awarded contracts for Section 801 projects at Norfolk, VA (300 units), Earle, NJ (300 units), Mayport, FL (200 units), Staten Island, NY (1,000 units), Washington, DC-Woodbridge (600 units), Washington, DC-Summerfield (414 units), Port Hueneme/Point Mugu, CA (300 units), Pensacola, FL (300 units), and Twentynine Palms, CA (600 Units). The Staten Island, NY (1,000 units) project was terminated due to base closure. Section 802 of the FY84 Military Construction Authorization Act (PL 98-115, 10 U.S.C. 2821 note) authorizes the Department of Defense to enter into agreements for the leasing of Military Family Housing units on or near military
121
installations within the United States. The Department of the Army awarded this project in 1992 under U.S. Army Garrison, Hawaii (USAG-HI). The authority transferred to the Marine Corps on 1 Oct 1998. The Marine Corps took over a Section 802 contract at MCB Hawaii for 276 units. Foreign Leasing: Leasing in foreign countries is authorized in 10 USC 2828, which limits the number of units authorized at any one time and specifies the maximum cost limitation.
122
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING - FY 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATE
NAVY LEASING
(In Thousands) FY 2008 Program $128,984 FY 2007 Program $121,681 Purpose and Scope This program provides payment for the costs incurred in leasing family housing units for assignment as public quarters. Program Summary
FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 Auth Avg Cost Auth Avg Cost Auth Avg Cost Units Units ($000) Units Units ($000) Units Units ($000)
Domestic 3,208 390 6,509 3,208 476 8,250 3,208 456 7,980
801 4,747 2,414 37,054 4,747 2,414 38,962 4,747 2,189 36,797
Foreign 4,229 2,289 69,887 4,229 2,323 74,469 4,346 2,556 84,207
Navy Total 12,184 5,093 113,450 12,184 5,213 121,681 12,301 5,201 128,984 JUSTIFICATION Domestic Leasing Program Summary: The domestic leasing program is authorized in 10 USC 2828 as amended, which limits the number of units authorized at any one time and specifies the maximum cost limitation. This program consists of leasing on an interim basis until Section 801, military construction (MILCON) units, and homes undergoing revitalization come on-line. Section 801 of the FY 1984 Military Construction Authorization Act (PL 98-115) authorized the Department of Defense to enter into agreements for the leasing of Military Family Housing units on or near military installations within the United States. This authorization was considered a test and would have expired upon execution of contracts no later than 1 October 1985. The Navy sites chosen for testing Section 801 were Norfolk, Virginia, and Earle, New Jersey. The Section 801 program was made permanent and codified as Section 2835 of Title 10, United States Code, in FY 1992. The Navy has awarded contracts for Section 801 projects at Norfolk, VA (300 units), Earle, NJ (300 units), Mayport, FL (200 units), Staten Island, NY (1,000 units), Washington, DC-Woodbridge (600 units), Washington, DC-Summerfield (414 units), Port Hueneme/Point Mugu, CA (300 units), and Pensacola, FL (300 units). The Staten Island, NY (1,000 units) project was terminated due to base closure. Domestic Leasing Fiscal Year Summary: FY 2006 – The Domestic Lease Program consists of 2,804 units requiring funding of $43.563 million. Funding of $37.054 million provides full funding for Section 801 projects at Earle, Norfolk, Mayport, Washington, DC, Pensacola, and Port Hueneme. The remaining $6.509 million is required to support 390 leases for recruiters at high-cost locations not supported by a military installation. FY 2007 – The Domestic Lease Program consists of 2,890 units requiring funding of $47.212 million. Funding in the amount of $38.962 million provides
123
full funding for Section 801 projects at Earle, Norfolk, Mayport, Washington, DC, Pensacola, and Port Hueneme. The remaining $8.250 million is required to support a domestic lease in Everett, WA ($0.022 million) and 475 leases for recruiters at high-cost locations not supported by a military installation ($8.228 million). FY 2008 – The Domestic Lease Program consists of 2,645 units requiring funding of $44.777 million. Funding in the amount of $36.797 million provides full funding for Section 801 projects at Earle, Norfolk, Mayport, Washington, DC, Pensacola, and Port Hueneme. The Norfolk 801 project will terminate in early FY08. The remaining $7.980 million is required to 456 leases for recruiters at high-cost locations not supported by a military installation.
Foreign Leasing: Leasing in foreign countries is authorized in 10 USC 2828, which limits the number of units authorized at any one time and specifies the maximum cost limitation. The FY 2006 unit authorization consists of 4,229 units and funding for 2,289 of those units. The authorization difference of 1,940 is for different cost limits to support lease initiatives at Naples, and Sigonella, IT. The FY 2007 unit authorization consists of 4,229 units and funding for 2,323 of those units. The authorization difference of 1,906 is for different cost limits to support lease initiatives at Naples, and Sigonella, IT. Increased cost per unit at Naples, IT is due to the interim lease construct lease payment. Decrease costs at Sigonella are the result of recapitalization of 205 units where a lease payment will not be due until the units come back online, as well as a decrease associated with the Navy withdrawing from LaMaddalena, IT. The FY 2008 unit authorization consists of 4,346 units and funding for 2,556 of those units. The authorization difference of 1,790 is for different cost limits to support lease initiatives at Naples, and Sigonella, IT as well as other potential foreign countries the Navy may be entering. Cost increases are for Air Force transfer of all leased units at Singapore and minor unit increases at various locations (primarily Sigonella and Naples, IT).
Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases: 1. FY 2007 President’s Budget Request 121,681 2. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 121,681 3. FY 2007 Current Estimate 121,681 4. Price Growth 2,818
a. Civilian Personnel Comp 143 b. Working Capital Fund 72
c. Inflation 2,603 5. Program Decreases (3,605) a. Section 801 (Norfolk) (3,605) 6. Program Increases 8,090
a. Transfer of Leases at Singapore from Air Force 3,627 b. Minor Increases at Various Locations 4,463
7. FY 2008 Budget Request 128,984
124
FY 2006
FY 2007
FY 2008
Location
Units
Authorized
Lease
Months
Cost
($000)
Units
Authorized
Lease
Months
Cost
($000)
Units
Authorized
Lease
Months
Cost
($000)
NS Everett, WA
10
00
10
12
22
10
00
Recruiters, Var Locs
700
4,680
6,509
700
5,700
8,228
700
5,472
7,980
Total Domestic Leases
710
4,680
6,509
710
5,712
8,250
710
5,472
7,980
FAMILY HOUSING - NAVY
(Other than Section 801 and Section 802 Units)
FY 2008
Domestic Leasing
FH-4 Analysis of Leased Units
125
FY 2006
FY 2007
FY 2008
Location
Units
Authorized
Lease
Months
Cost
($000)
Units
Authorized
Lease
Months
Cost
($000)
Units
Authorized
Lease
Months
Cost
($000)
Norfolk, VA1
300
3,600
4,091
300
3,600
4,342
300
900
737
Washington, DC2
1,014
12,168
16,717
1,014
12,168
17,553
1,014
12,168
17,543
Earle, NJ3
300
3,600
4,378
300
3,600
5,540
300
3,600
6,318
Pensacola, FL4
300
3,600
4,079
300
3,600
3,531
300
3,600
3,970
Mayport, FL5
200
2,400
1,945
200
2,400
2,518
200
2,400
2,100
Pt. Hueneme, CA6
300
3,600
5,844
300
3,600
5,478
300
3,600
6,129
Total 801 Leases
2,414
28,968
37,054
2,414
28,968
38,962
2,414
26,268
36,797
* Reflects all Operations & Maintenance Costs associated with the 801 Units
1 Norfolk 801 lease agreeement expires on 7 Dec 2007
2 Washington 801 lease agreements expire on 30 Sep 2011 (600 Units) and 25 Sep 2015 (414 Units)
3 Earle 801 lease agreeement expires on 30 Apr 2010
4 Pensacola 801 lease agreeement expires on 11 Oct 2013
5 Mayport 801 lease agreeement expires on 14 Feb 2009
6 Ventura 801 lease agreeement expires on 1 Feb 2014
FAMILY HOUSING - NAVY
Section 801 Units*
FY 2008
FH-4 Analysis of Leased Units
126
FY 2006
FY 2007
FY 2008
Location
Units
Authorized
Lease
Months
Cost
($000)
Units
Authorized
Lease
Months
Cost
($000)
Units
Authorized
Lease
Months
Cost
($000)
Bahrain
336
703
224
304
224
249
Cairo
30
228
800
30
228
800
30
276
990
Cambodia
112
57
112
59
10
0
Dubai
112
62
112
65
112
67
Gaeta
95
00
96
00
94
00
Hong Kong
336
390
336
365
448
498
Jakarta
14
96
540
14
72
463
14
156
1,025
LaMaddalena
484
2,076
5,022
484
00
484
00
Larissa
91
12
272
91
12
260
91
12
266
Lima
896
411
896
419
896
428
Lisbon
112
177
112
154
112
157
Laos
224
52
224
55
224
56
London
20
00
00
00
0
Malaysia
112
28
112
29
112
30
Manila
448
200
448
220
448
225
Naples
1,982
12,732
27,367
1,984
15,252
35,832
1,984
16,104
39,080
New Delhi
548
200
548
260
536
200
Oslo
112
43
112
42
112
43
Singapore
00
00
00
118
1,416
3,627
Sigonella
1,496
11,940
33,322
1,496
11,940
34,924
1,496
12,360
37,087
Souda Bay
112
157
112
127
112
130
Turkey
112
41
112
43
10
0
Vietnam
312
43
312
48
312
49
Total Foreign Leases
4,229
27,468
69,887
4,229
27,876
74,469
4,346
30,672
84,207
Foreign Leasing
FAMILY HOUSING - NAVY
(Other than Section 801 and Section 802 Units)
FY 2008
FH-4 Analysis of Leased Units
127
BLANK PAGE
128
DEPARTMENT OF NAVY Family Housing, Marine Corps
FY 2008 BUDGET
LEASING (In Thousands)
FY 2008 Program $ 12,773 FY 2007 Program $ 10,601
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This program provides payment for the costs incurred in leasing family housing units for assignment as public quarters. PROGRAM SUMMARY FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 Yr End
Units Costs ($000)
Auth Units
Costs ($000)
Auth Units
Costs ($000)
Domestic 0 0 0 0 0 0
Section 801 600 9,269 600 9,695 600 11,470Section 802 276 872 276 906 276 1,303
Foreign 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 876 10,141 876 10,601 876 12,773
JUSTIFICATION: Domestic Leasing Program Summary: The domestic leasing program is authorized in 10 USC 2828 as amended, which limits the number of units authorized at any one time and specifies the maximum costs limitation. This program consists of leasing on an interim basis until Section 801 and/or military construction (MILCON) units come on line. USMC has no domestic leases. Section 801 of the FY84 Military Construction Authorization Act (PL 98-115) authorizes the Department of Defense to enter into agreements for the leasing of Military Family Housing units on or near military installations within the United States. This authorization was granted in FY86. The Marine Corps awarded a Section 801 contract at MCAGCC, Twentynine Palms, CA, for 600 units. The costs for FY 2007 through FY 2009 include the lease and operation and maintenance costs for these units. Marine Corps intends to continue to lease these 801 units through the end of the lease term of 2013. Planned Military Housing Privatization Initiative Project at Twenty-nine Palms CA assumes Marine Corps will continue to utilize these homes. Section 802 of the FY84 Military Construction Authorization Act (PL 98-115, 10 U.S.C. 2821 note) authorizes the Department of Defense to enter into agreements for the leasing of Military Family Housing units on or near military installations within the United States. The Department of the Army awarded this project in 1992 under U.S. Army Garrison, Hawaii (USAG-HI). The authority transferred to the Marine Corps on 1 Oct 1998. The Marine Corps took over a Section 802 contract at MCB Hawaii for 276 units. The costs for FY 2006 through 2008 include the operations of these units. Marine Corps intends to continue to lease these 802 units through the end of the lease
129
term of 2017. Planned Military Housing Privatization Initiative Project at MCB Hawaii assumes Marine Corps will continue to utilize these homes. Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases: Increase due to inflation, civilian pay-raise adjustment and program growth due to increase in maintenance contract cost at Twentynine Palms and utility costs in Hawaii. 1. FY 2007 Budget Request 10,601 2. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 0 3. FY 2007 Current Estimate 10,601 4. Pricing Adjustment 2,172 a. Inflation 337 b. Civilian Pay Raise 7 c. Maintenance Contract Cost Increase 1,466 d. Utility Cost Increase 362 5. FY 2008 Budget Request 12,773
130
FAM
ILY
HO
USI
NG
- M
AR
INE
CO
RPS
Ana
lysi
s of
Lea
sed
Uni
ts *
FY 2
008
FY 2
006
FY 2
007
FY 2
008
Loca
tion
Uni
tsA
utho
rized
Leas
eM
onth
sC
osts
($00
0)U
nits
Aut
horiz
edLe
ase
Mon
ths
Cos
ts($
000)
Uni
tsA
utho
rized
Leas
eM
onth
sC
osts
($00
0)
Sect
ion
801
Leas
es
MC
AG
CC
Tw
enty
nine
Pla
ms,
CA
**
600
7,20
09,
269
600
7,20
09,
695
600
7,20
011
,470
Tota
l Sec
tion
801
Leas
es60
07,
200
9,26
960
07,
200
9,69
560
07,
200
11,4
70
Sect
ion
802
Leas
es
MC
B H
awai
i, H
I ***
276
3,31
287
227
63,
312
906
276
3,31
21,
303
Tota
l Sec
tion
802
Leas
es27
63,
312
872
276
3,31
290
627
63,
312
1,30
3
Tota
l Sec
tion
801
& 8
02 L
ease
s87
610
,512
10,1
4187
610
,512
10,6
0187
610
,512
12,7
73
*
Ref
lect
s al
l Ope
ratio
ns &
Mai
nten
ance
Cos
ts a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith th
e S
ectio
n 80
1 U
nits
, and
all
Ope
ratio
ns C
osts
Ass
ocia
ted
with
Sec
tion
802
units
.**
Aw
arde
d 09
/91;
Dat
e of
Ful
l Occ
upan
cy 0
9/94
***
Aw
arde
d 11
/92;
Dat
e of
Ful
l Occ
upan
cy 1
1/92
Exh
ibit
FH-4
Ana
lysi
s of L
ease
d un
its
131
BLANK PAGE
132
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY – FY 2008
DEPARTMENT OF NAVY PRIVATIZATION NARRATIVE SUMMARY ($000)
FY 2008 Program $28,988 FY 2007 Program $15,261
Purpose and Scope The Fiscal Year 1996 Military Housing Privatization Initiative (MHPI) included in Public Law 104-106 is an essential tool used by the Department of the Navy (DON) to meet its goal of eliminating inadequate housing by 2007. The purpose of the Privatization Initiative is to permit the Navy to enter into business agreements with the private sector to utilize private sector resources, leveraged by Navy assets (inventory, land, and funding), to improve, replace, and build family housing faster than could otherwise be accomplished through the traditional military construction approach. Private business entities will own, operate and maintain housing on behalf of the Navy and lease quality homes to military personnel and their families at affordable rates. Program Summary To date the Department of Navy has awarded 24 Public Private Venture (PPV) projects. The Department of the Navy (DON) took a deliberate, measured approach in evaluating which blend of authorities would provide the desired leverage of resources with sufficient protection of the Government’s resources and interests over the long-term. These 24 projects have been awarded through 2006, totaling 50,358 homes. This number reflects privatized housing end states. Total Department of Navy projects awarded are: FY 1996 Kingsville, TX (Kingsville I) 404 homes
FY 1997 Everett, WA (Everett I) 0 homes* FY 2001 Kingsville, TX (Kingsville II) 150 homes
Everett, WA (Everett II) 288 homes San Diego I 3,248 homes Camp Pendleton I 712 homes
FY 2002 New Orleans 941 homes South Texas 585 homes
FY 2003 San Diego II 3,217 homes Beaufort/Parris Island 1,718 homes Camp Pendleton II/Quantico 4,534 homes FY 2004 Hawaii I 1,948 homes FY 2005 Northeast Region 4,264 homes
Northwest Region 2,985 homes Mid-Atlantic Region 5,839 homes Camp Pendleton III/Yuma 897 homes Camp Lejeune/Cherry Pt./Stewart 3,405 homes Twentynine Palms/Kansas City 1,488 homes
FY 2006 Midwest Region 1,658 homes San Diego III 4,268 homes Hawaii II (Navy) 2,518 homes Hawaii II (Marine Corps) 1,175 homes
Camp Lejeune/Cherry Pt./Stewart II 954 homes Camp Pendleton IV 3,162 homes
* Project originally 185 homes, however all homes have since been sold.
133
BLANK PAGE
134
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY – FY 2008
NAVY PRIVATIZATION NARRATIVE SUMMARY ($000)
FY 2008 Program $16,956 FY 2007 Program $10,146
Purpose and Scope The Fiscal Year 1996 Military Housing Privatization Initiative (MHPI) included in Public Law 104-106 is an essential tool used by the Department of the Navy (DON) to meet its goal of eliminating inadequate housing by 2007. The purpose of the Privatization Initiative is to permit the Navy to enter into business agreements with the private sector to utilize private sector resources, leveraged by Navy assets (inventory, land, and funding), to improve, replace, and build family housing faster than could otherwise be accomplished through the traditional military construction approach. Private business entities will own, operate and maintain housing on behalf of the Navy and lease quality homes to military personnel and their families at affordable rates. Program Summary The Navy successfully awarded the first two Public Private Venture (PPV) projects in 1996 and 1997 at Corpus Christi/Ingleside/Kingsville, Texas, and Everett, Washington, respectively, under 1995 Limited Partnership legislative authority available only to the Navy. The Navy subsequently modified both projects to pay differential lease payments to reduce the rents paid by military members, eliminating out-of-pocket expenses. The Department of the Navy (DON) took a deliberate, measured approach in evaluating which blend of authorities would provide the desired leverage of resources with sufficient protection of the Government’s resources and interests over the long-term. With this approach in place, Navy has awarded thirteen additional projects, three in fiscal year 2001, two in fiscal year 2002, one in fiscal year 2003, one in fiscal year 2004, three in fiscal year 2005, and three in fiscal year 2006 for an overall total of 32,312 homes. This number reflects privatized housing end states. Total Navy projects awarded are: FY 1996 Kingsville, TX (Kingsville I) 404 homes FY 1997 Everett, WA (Everett I) 0 homes*
FY 2001 Kingsville, TX (Kingsville II) 150 homes Everett, WA (Everett II) 288 homes San Diego I 3,248 homes
FY 2002 New Orleans 941 homes South Texas 585 homes
FY 2003 San Diego II 3,217 homes FY 2004 Hawaii I 1,948 homes FY 2005 Northeast Region 4,264 homes
Northwest Region 2,985 homes Mid-Atlantic Region 5,839 homes
FY 2006 Midwest Region 1,658 homes San Diego III 4,268 homes Hawaii III 2,517 homes
* Project originally 185 homes, however all homes have since been sold.
135
There are an additional three Navy projects that are in procurement. Two are regional projects that include multiple locations and states within the project and one is for a single base. All three projects will award in fiscal year 2007. Details for all projects are included in the tables that follow. There are an additional 643 Navy homes that were privatized within another Service’s project, not included in the tables. There is an Army RCI project that includes the privatization of 593 Navy homes at Monterey, CA and a Marine Corps project that includes the privatization of 53 Navy homes at Beaufort, SC.
PPV is one of the approaches to eliminate inadequate homes. We are utilizing a three-pronged approach for eliminating inadequate homes including reliance on Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH), PPVs, and traditional construction funding.
136
FY 2
008
Bud
get E
stim
ate
Mili
tary
Hou
sing
Priv
atiz
atio
n In
itiat
ive
Am
ount
($M
)B
udge
t Yea
rTy
peP
roje
ct9.
500
FY96
FHIF
PL
104-
321.
800
FY95
FHN
CH
291
CM
P P
endl
eton
6.70
0FY
96FH
NC
H31
4 P
WC
San
Die
go3.
000
FY96
FHN
CH
314
PW
C S
an D
iego
2.90
0FY
97FH
NC
H31
5 P
WC
San
Die
go2.
600
FY99
PL
105-
237
6.20
0FY
97FH
NC
H40
0 N
AS
Kin
gsvi
lle
12.2
00FY
97FH
NC
H50
8 N
S P
uget
Sou
nd2.
800
FY97
FHN
CH
508
NS
Pug
et S
ound
3.40
0FY
99P
L 10
5-23
7 0.
500
FY99
FHIF
H37
9 N
PW
C P
earl
Har
bor
11.9
00FY
98FH
NC
H-5
71 P
WC
San
Die
go9.
000
FY99
PL
100-
202
6.20
0FY
97H
-365
FY
97 M
CA
S B
eauf
ort
11.9
00FY
98FH
NC
H-3
89 N
AS
JR
BA
SE
New
Orle
ans
5.00
0FY
01FH
NC
H-5
35 N
SA
New
Orle
ans
22.3
00FY
98FH
NC
H-5
81 N
AS
Cor
pus
Chr
isti
7.10
0N
/AFH
IFH
-365
FY
97 M
CA
S B
eauf
ort
24.7
42FY
03FH
IMP
H-1
-03
- Pea
rl H
arbo
r PP
V S
eed
0.25
8FY
03D
esig
n
10.1
12FY
01D
esig
n5.
762
FY02
FHIM
PH
-1-0
1-03
- S
an D
iego
, CA
24.0
79FY
03FH
NC
H-6
42 -
New
Lon
don,
CT
25.0
537
#2, #
4 &
10
US
C
2880
, 288
1, 2
882
(c)
May
-04
Haw
aii R
egio
n P
H I
Oah
u, H
I1,
948
498
#2, #
3, #
4 &
10
US
C
2880
, 288
1
May
-03
San
Die
go P
H II
San
Die
go, C
A3,
217
0.0
#2, #
3, #
4 &
10
US
C
2880
, 288
1
Feb-
02S
outh
Tex
asC
orpu
s C
hris
ti, T
X; K
ings
ville
, TX
585
Aug
-01
San
Die
go P
H I
San
Die
go, C
A3,
248
2,66
0
Sep
-99
Eve
rett
IE
vere
tt, W
A0
(Cur
rent
)18
5 (O
rigin
al)
8.5
#3 &
10
US
C 2
837
Nov
-00
Kin
gsvi
lle II
Kin
gsvi
lle, T
X
29.4
Nov
-04
Nor
thea
st R
egio
nal
Lake
hurs
t, N
J; N
ew L
ondo
n, C
T; N
ewpo
rt, R
I; P
orts
mou
th, N
H; S
arat
oga
Spr
ings
, NY
; M
itche
l, N
Y; B
runs
wic
k, M
E; E
arle
, NJ
4,26
40.
0#3
, #4
& 1
0 U
SC
28
72(a
), 28
80, 2
881,
28
82 (c
)
Jan-
06#3
, #4
& 1
0 U
SC
28
72(a
), 28
80, 2
881,
28
82 (c
)
0.0
150
20.9
#2, #
4 &
10
US
C
2880
, 288
1
Oct
-01
New
Orle
ans,
LA
941
23.1
#2, #
3, #
4 &
10
US
C
2880
, 288
1
Sep
-99
Kin
gsvi
lle I
Kin
gsvi
lle, T
X40
418
.0
#2, #
3 &
10
US
C
2880
, 288
1D
ec-0
0E
vere
tt II
Eve
rett,
WA
288
18.9
Priv
atiz
atio
n D
ate
Inst
alla
tion/
Proj
ect
End-
Stat
e U
nits
Sc
ored
Cos
t ($
M)
Con
veye
dU
nits
Aut
horit
ies
(Use
key
bel
ow)
#3 &
10
US
C 2
837
6.2
#1, #
2, #
4 &
10
US
C
2880
, 288
1
Expe
cted
Sou
rce
of F
unds
Mid
wes
t Reg
iona
l PH
IG
reat
Lak
es, I
L; C
rane
, IN
1,65
824
.1
#3, #
4 &
10
US
C
2872
(a),
2880
, 288
1,
2882
(c)
#3, #
4 &
10
US
C
2872
(a),
2880
, 288
1,
2882
(c)
5,69
4A
ug-0
5
Mid
-Atla
ntic
Reg
iona
lH
ampt
on R
oads
, VA
; Sug
ar G
rove
, WV
; D
ahlg
ren,
VA
; Pax
Riv
er, M
D; I
ndia
n H
ead,
M
D; A
nnap
olis
, MD
5,83
9
Feb-
05N
orth
wes
t Reg
iona
l PH
IE
vere
tt, W
A; W
hidb
ey Is
land
, WA
; Ban
gor/
Bre
mer
ton,
WA
2,98
515
.9
Sep
-06
Haw
aii R
egio
n P
H II
IO
ahu,
HI;
Kau
ai, H
I2,
517
0.0
#3, #
4 &
10
US
C
2872
(a),
2880
, 288
1,
2882
(c)
#3, #
4 &
10
US
C
2872
(a),
2880
, 288
1,
2882
(c)
May
-06
San
Die
go P
H II
IS
an D
iego
, CA
4,26
80.
0
0 0 244 0
3,30
2
2,00
3
5,59
3
3,09
8
2,76
4
2,66
7
2,48
9
Exh
ibit
FH-6
137
FY 2
008
Bud
get E
stim
ate
Mili
tary
Hou
sing
Priv
atiz
atio
n In
itiat
ive
Am
ount
($M
)B
udge
t Yea
rTy
peP
roje
ctPr
ivat
izat
ion
Dat
eIn
stal
latio
n/Pr
ojec
tEn
d-St
ate
Uni
ts
Scor
ed C
ost
($M
)C
onve
yed
Uni
tsA
utho
ritie
s(U
se k
ey b
elow
)Ex
pect
ed S
ourc
e of
Fun
ds
16.9
81FY
03FH
IMP
H-1
-97-
1 - C
harle
ston
, SC
3.87
4FY
03D
esig
n5.
059
FY06
FHIM
PH
-04-
97 -
Ats
ugi,
Japa
n6.
306
FY06
FHIM
PH
-06-
92 -
Gua
m, G
uam
19.9
00FY
07FH
IMP
H-0
1-07
- S
outh
east
Reg
ion
PP
V S
eed
7.86
7FY
03FH
NC
H-6
43 -
Lem
oore
, CA
0.88
8FY
03FH
NC
H-5
95 -
Pas
cago
ula,
MS
1.01
4FY
03D
esig
n12
.231
FY06
FHIM
PH
-04-
97 -
Ats
ugi,
Japa
n
Sep
-07
Sou
thea
st R
egio
nJa
ckso
nvill
e, F
L; K
ey W
est,
FL; M
aypo
rt, F
L;
Pan
ama
City
, FL;
Pen
saco
la, F
L; W
hitin
g Fi
eld,
FL;
Kin
gs B
ay, G
A; G
ulfp
ort,
MS
; M
erid
ian,
MS
; Cha
rlest
on, S
C;
Fort
Wor
th, T
X
5,50
152
.1#3
, #4
& 1
0 U
SC
28
72(a
), 28
80, 2
881,
28
82 (c
)
4) 2
878
"Con
veya
nce
or L
ease
of E
xist
ing
Pro
perty
and
Fac
ilitie
s"*
Aut
horit
ies
may
be
subj
ect t
o ch
ange
as
proj
ect i
s de
fined
2) 2
875
"Inve
stm
ents
in N
ongo
vern
men
tal E
ntiti
es"
Aut
horit
ies
1) 2
873
"Dire
ct L
oans
and
Loa
n G
uara
ntee
s"
3) 2
877
"Diff
eren
tial L
ease
Pay
men
ts"
#3, #
4 &
10
US
C
2872
(a),
2880
, 288
1,
2882
(c)
Sep
-07
San
Die
go P
H IV
Ven
tura
Cou
nty,
CA
; El C
entro
, CA
; S
eal B
each
, CA
; Chi
na L
ake,
CA
; Le
moo
re, C
A: F
allo
n, N
V
3,25
40.
03,
654
7,04
1
22.0
#3, #
4 &
10
US
C
2872
(a),
2880
, 288
1,
2882
(c)
Sep
-07
Mid
wes
t Reg
iona
l PH
IIM
emph
is, T
N48
932
6
Exh
ibit
FH-6
138
INST
AL
LA
TIO
NA
WA
RD
D
AT
ET
YPE
OF
FIN
AN
CIN
G
AM
OU
NT
USE
D P
ER
T
YPE
OF
FIN
AN
CIN
G
TE
RM
OF
TH
E
DE
AL
TO
TA
L N
UM
BE
R O
F U
NIT
S C
ON
VE
YE
DT
OT
AL
NU
MB
ER
OF
UN
ITS
RE
NO
VA
TE
DT
OT
AL
NU
MB
ER
OF
UN
ITS
RE
PLA
CE
D
TO
TA
L
NU
MB
ER
OF
NE
W /A
DD
ED
U
NIT
SPr
ivat
e D
ebt
Diff
eren
tial
$18.
4M
Lea
se P
aym
ent
$8.5
MN
avy
Equi
ty
Inve
stm
ent
$9.5
MPr
ivat
e D
ebt
$12.
8MD
iffer
entia
l
Le
ase
Paym
ent
$2.6
MN
avy
Equi
ty I
nves
tmen
tPr
ivat
e Eq
uity
In
vest
men
tPr
ivat
e D
ebt
$3.3
M15
Yrs
Dire
ct L
oan
$1.9
MN
avy
Equi
ty(w
/15
yr I
nves
tmen
top
tion)
Priv
ate
Equi
ty
Inve
stm
ent
$4.1
MPr
ivat
e D
ebt
Diff
eren
tial
$27.
8M
Lea
se P
aym
ent
$6.7
MN
avy
Equi
ty I
nves
tmen
t$1
2.2M
Priv
ate
Equi
ty
Inve
stm
ent
$1.8
MPr
ivat
e D
ebt
$235
.0M
Nav
y Eq
uity
Inv
estm
ent
Priv
ate
Equi
ty
Inve
stm
ent
Priv
ate
Deb
t$5
4.0M
Nav
y Eq
uity
Inv
estm
ent
Priv
ate
Equi
ty
Inve
stm
ent
Priv
ate
Deb
t$3
9.3M
Nav
y Eq
uity
In
vest
men
tPr
ivat
e Eq
uity
Inv
estm
ent
48
DE
PAR
TM
EN
T O
F T
HE
NA
VY
N
AV
Y F
AM
ILY
HO
USI
NG
PR
IVA
TIZ
AT
ION
PR
OJE
CT
S A
WA
RD
ED
Sout
h Te
xas
Feb-
0250
yrs
537
1442
2
588
New
Orle
ans,
LAO
ct-0
150
yrs
498
216
8244
3
015
00
1,05
881
2
Ever
ett I
IEv
eret
t, W
AD
ec-0
030
Yrs
Kin
gsvi
lle II
Kin
gsvi
lle, T
XN
ov-0
0
San
Die
go I
San
Die
go, C
AA
ug-0
150
yrs
2,66
0
$5.0
M
00
185
00
288
0 0 244 0
404
Kin
gsvi
lle I
Cor
pus C
hris
ti, T
X; K
ings
ville
, TX
Ju
l-96
15 Y
rs0
0
Ever
ett I
Ever
ett,
WA
Mar
-97
10 Y
rs
$5.9
M
$5.8
M
$4.3
M
$20.
9M
$23.
1M
$2.0
M
$29.
4M
$3.0
M
139
INST
AL
LA
TIO
NA
WA
RD
D
AT
ET
YPE
OF
FIN
AN
CIN
G
AM
OU
NT
USE
D P
ER
T
YPE
OF
FIN
AN
CIN
G
TE
RM
OF
TH
E
DE
AL
TO
TA
L N
UM
BE
R O
F U
NIT
S C
ON
VE
YE
DT
OT
AL
NU
MB
ER
OF
UN
ITS
RE
NO
VA
TE
DT
OT
AL
NU
MB
ER
OF
UN
ITS
RE
PLA
CE
D
TO
TA
L
NU
MB
ER
OF
NE
W /A
DD
ED
U
NIT
S
DE
PAR
TM
EN
T O
F T
HE
NA
VY
N
AV
Y F
AM
ILY
HO
USI
NG
PR
IVA
TIZ
AT
ION
PR
OJE
CT
S A
WA
RD
ED
Priv
ate
Deb
t$3
80.0
MN
avy
Equi
ty I
nves
tmen
tPr
ivat
e Eq
uity
In
vest
men
tPr
ivat
e D
ebt
$289
.0M
Nav
y Eq
uity
Inv
estm
ent
Priv
ate
Equi
ty
Inve
stm
ent
Priv
ate
Deb
t$4
64.1
MN
avy
Equi
ty I
nves
tmen
tPr
ivat
e Eq
uity
In
vest
men
tPr
ivat
e D
ebt
$226
.0M
Nav
y Eq
uity
Inv
estm
ent
Priv
ate
Equi
ty
Inve
stm
ent
Priv
ate
Deb
t$5
37.0
MN
avy
Equi
ty I
nves
tmen
tPr
ivat
e Eq
uity
In
vest
men
tPr
ivat
e D
ebt
$138
.9M
Nav
y Eq
uity
Inv
estm
ent
Priv
ate
Equi
ty
Inve
stm
ent
Priv
ate
Deb
t$8
19.5
MN
avy
Equi
ty I
nves
tmen
tPr
ivat
e Eq
uity
In
vest
men
tPr
ivat
e D
ebt
$510
.4M
Nav
y Eq
uity
Inv
estm
ent
Priv
ate
Equi
ty
Inve
stm
ent
$0.0
M
$2.5
M
949
824
0H
awai
i III
Pear
l Har
bor,
HI;
Kau
ai, H
ISe
p-06
48 y
rs2,
489
$0.0
M
$3.6
M
846
873
414
Mid
-Atla
ntic
Reg
iona
l H
ampt
on R
oads
, VA
; Dah
lgre
n, V
A;
Suga
r Gro
ve, W
V; P
ax R
iver
, MD
; In
dian
Hea
d, M
D; A
nnap
olis
, MD
Aug
-05
50 y
rs5,
694
190
906
0M
ay-0
4H
awai
i IPe
arl H
arbo
r, H
I50
yrs
2,00
3
1,07
246
00
San
Die
go II
San
Die
go, C
AM
ay-0
348
.5 y
rs3,
302
$0.0
M
$5.0
M
$25.
0M
$3.8
MN
orth
east
Reg
iona
lLa
kehu
rst,
NJ;
New
Lon
don,
CT;
N
ewpo
rt, R
I; Po
rtsm
outh
, NH
; Sa
rato
ga S
prin
gs, N
Y; M
itche
l, N
Y;
Bru
nsw
ick,
ME;
Ear
le, N
J
Nov
-04
50 y
rs5,
593
$0.0
M
$10.
6M
1,07
11,
251
0
Nor
thw
est R
egio
nal
Ever
ett,
WA
; Whi
dbey
Isla
nd, W
A;
Ban
gor/B
rem
erto
n, W
A
Feb-
0550
yrs
3,09
8
$15.
9M
$5.5
M
1,63
957
315
4
Mid
wes
t Reg
iona
l G
reat
Lak
es, I
L; C
rane
, IN
Jan-
0650
yrs
2,76
431
750
0
$24.
1M
$2.4
13M
San
Die
go II
ISa
n D
iego
, CA
M
ay-0
645
yrs
2,66
70
123
1,60
1
$0.0
M
$3.0
M
140
Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases
1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 10,1462. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 10,1463. FY 2007 Current Estimate 10,1464. Price Growth 238
a. Civilian Personnel Compensation 19b. Inflation 219
5. Program Decreases (2,923)a. Program Reduction (2,923)
6. Program Increases 9,495a. Transfer of 110 FTEs to PPV Support 9,495
7. FY 2008 Budget Request 16,956
RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT ACCOUNT
CALCULATIONS4a. 620 (CIVPERS estimate) x .030 (Civilian inflation rate) = 19 (Civilian Personnel Compensation) 4b. 9,526 (Non-WCF Costs) x .023 (inflation rate) = 219 (Inflation)5a. Reflects the delta between the (FY07 Estimate +/- Adjustments 4a, b) and revised HQ/Region requirement.6a. Costs associated with the transfer of 110 FTEs to the PPV Support account (Avg. per FTE = $86K).
PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS
(Dollars in Thousands)
This program includes all costs related to the development, evaluation, and oversight of family housing privatization projects. The request reflects estimated costs associated with both in-house and contractor support of housing privatization efforts within the Navy. The Program Reduction refers to the decrease in workload at Region and CNIC HQs associated with the eventual completion of all planned PPV projects. Program Increase is associated with the transfer of 110 FTEs at CONUS and US Overseas locations from the Management account to the PPV Support account to more accurately account for costs associated with the Navy's Privatization Initiatives.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATES
JUSTIFICATIONNAVY
Exhibit OP-5
141
BLANK PAGE
142
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING – FY 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATE
MARINE CORPS PRIVATIZATION NARRATIVE SUMMARY (In Thousands) FY 2008 Program $12,032 FY 2007 Program $5,115 Purpose and Scope The Fiscal Year 1996 Military Housing Privatization Initiative (MHPI) included in Public Law 104-106 is an essential tool used by the Department of the Navy (DON) to meet its goal of eliminating inadequate housing by 2007 and to reduce the shortfall of adequate and affordable private sector housing in the local community available for military members and their families. The purpose of the Privatization Initiative is to permit DON to enter into business agreements with the private sector to utilize private sector resources, leveraged by DON assets (inventory, land and funding), to improve, replace, and build family housing faster than could otherwise be accomplished through the traditional military construction approach. Private business entities will own, operate and maintain housing and lease quality homes to military personnel and their families at affordable rates. Accomplishments The Marine Corps initially took a deliberate, measured approach in evaluating which blend of authorities would provide the desired leverage of resources with sufficient protection of the Government’s resources and interests over the long term. With the Marine Corps subsequent aggressive pursuit of privatization, 80 percent of the Marine Corps housing inventory has now been privatized through the award of nine public-private venture projects:
- MCB Camp Pendleton, CA I (712 Units) Awarded Nov 01 - MCAS Beaufort, SC/MCRD Parris Island, SC/NH Beaufort, SC (1,718
Units) Awarded Mar 03 - MCB Camp Pendleton II/MCRD San Diego, CA/MWTC Bridgeport (Coleville
Housing), CA/MCB Quantico, VA (4,534 Units) Awarded Sep 03 - MCAS Yuma, AZ/MCB Camp Pendleton III (897 Units) Awarded Oct 04 - MCB Camp Lejeune, NC/MCAS New River, NC/MCAS Cherry Point,
NC/Stewart, NY (3,405 Units) Awarded Sep 05 - MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA/MOBCOM Kansas City, MO (1,488 Units)
Awarded Sep 05 - MCB Camp Lejeune, NC/MCAS Cherry Point, NC/Stewart, NY Phase II (954
Units) Awarded Sep 06 - MCB Camp Pendleton Phase III (3,162 Units) Awarded Sep 06 - Hawaii Regional Phase 2 (MCB Hawaii, Kaneohe Bay Phase 1) (1,175
Units) Awarded Sep 06
The Marine Corps’ has seven additional projects, totaling over 4,200 homes, under solicitation or in development with the following planned awards: Three in fiscal year 2007 and four in fiscal year 2008. When awarded, approximately 97 percent of Marine Corps’ worldwide inventory (99.7 percent of the Marine Corps’ United States inventory) will be privatized. Details for these projects are addressed in the tables that follow.
143
Progress The Marine Corps has continuously incorporated lessons learned from the expanding portfolio of Department of Navy awarded projects to refines its’ Privatization Program. Current plans include the expanded use and combination of legislative authorities to maximize project cost effectiveness. Projects are developed to ensure rents and reasonable utilities do not exceed a service member’s basic allowance for housing rate. Personnel from installations, including senior enlisted personnel, continue to be actively engaged in development of Public-Private Venture (PPV) projects which are structured to ensure sufficient cash flow exists to adequately operate, maintain and revitalize the inventory over the life of the 50-year business agreement. Feedback from residents of existing privatized housing continues to be positive in areas relating to quality of services and responsiveness of property management. The residents are pleased with the turnaround time on maintenance trouble calls and change of occupancy. For Camp Pendleton Phase I, the first newly constructed homes were occupied during October 2001 and initial construction was completed in February 2004. For Beaufort/Parris Island the first newly constructed units were occupied in February 2004. Initial construction is projected to be complete in May 2007. For Camp Pendleton Phase II/Quantico, the first newly constructed units were occupied in July 2004. The construction quality of the new and renovated units is excellent. At Camp Pendleton, renovations were completed at the San Luis Rey and South Mesa I neighborhoods. Initial construction is projected to be complete in April 2008. For MCAS Yuma, the first newly constructed units were occupied in December 2005 and initial construction to be completed in March 2007. Construction has commenced on the Camp Lejeune, Cherry Point, Stewart Phase I and the Twentynine Palms, Kansas City projects awarded in September 2005. For Twentynine Palms, the first newly constructed unit was occupied in June 2006, and the Initial Development Period is projected to be complete in September 2009. With the successful execution of our planned Privatization Program and selected Military Construction projects, the Marine Corps will have contracts in place by the end of Fiscal Year 2007 to eliminate all our remaining inadequate family housing.
144
FY 2
008
Bud
get E
stim
ate
Mili
tary
Hou
sing
Priv
atiz
atio
n In
itiat
ive
Am
ount
($M
)B
udge
t Yea
rTy
peP
roje
ct (S
ourc
e of
Fun
ds)
20FY
96C
onst
ruct
ion
MC
B C
amp
Pen
dlet
on
14FY
97C
onst
ruct
ion
MC
AS
Bea
ufor
t0.
2FY
02Im
prov
emen
tM
CA
S B
eauf
ort
7.88
6FY
02Im
prov
emen
tM
CR
D P
arris
Isla
nd4.
41FY
01C
onst
ruct
ion
Pea
rl H
arbo
r
0.62
1FY
00Im
prov
emen
tM
CA
S B
eauf
ort
0.88
5FY
00C
onst
ruct
ion
NP
WC
Pea
rl H
arbo
r0.
061
FY01
Impr
ovem
ent
MC
AS
Bea
ufor
t0.
307
FY01
Impr
ovem
ent
MC
B C
amp
Pen
dlet
on0.
332
FY01
Impr
ovem
ent
MC
AS
Che
rry
Poi
nt2.
72FY
01Im
prov
emen
tM
CA
S Iw
akun
i, JA
0.32
7FY
01Im
prov
emen
tM
CR
D P
arris
Isla
nd1.
014
FY01
Impr
ovem
ent
MC
AG
CC
Tw
enty
nine
Pal
ms
6.92
1FY
02C
onst
ruct
ion
MC
B Q
uant
ico
14.5
71FY
02Im
prov
emen
tM
CB
Cam
p P
endl
eton
41.5
15FY
03C
onst
ruct
ion
MC
B Q
uant
ico
1.38
8FH
IFC
onst
ruct
ion
MC
B C
amp
Pen
dlet
on0.
728
FY01
Des
ign
MC
B C
amp
Pen
dlet
on0.
96FY
01D
esig
nM
CB
Qua
ntic
o0.
728
FY02
Des
ign
MC
B Q
uant
ico
2.53
7FY
02D
esig
nM
CB
Cam
p Le
jeun
e0.
143
FY02
Impr
ovem
ent
NA
S P
ensa
cola
0.90
4FY
03D
esig
nM
CB
Cam
p Le
jeun
e12
.654
FY04
Impr
ovem
ent
MC
AS
Yum
a27
.002
FY05
Con
stru
ctio
nM
CA
S C
herr
y P
oint
56.1
65FY
05Im
prov
emen
tM
CB
Cam
p Le
jeun
e
25.7
02FY
05Im
prov
emen
tM
CA
GC
C T
wen
tyni
ne P
alm
s20
.238
FY05
Impr
ovem
ent
MC
RS
C K
ansa
s C
ity, M
O
65.1
24FY
06Im
prov
emen
tM
CB
Haw
aii
37.3
03FY
06Im
prov
emen
tM
CB
Cam
p Le
jeun
e0.
25FY
03D
esig
nM
CA
S C
herr
y P
oint
0.37
7FY
06Im
prov
emen
tM
CB
Haw
aii
512
1,55
8
4,63
1
897
Sep
-06
MC
B C
amp
Leje
une,
NC
MC
AS
Che
rry
Poi
nt, N
C(s
ee N
ote
2)95
437
.91,
188
2,4
Sep
-05
MC
AG
CC
Tw
enty
nine
Pal
ms,
CA
MO
BC
OM
Kan
sas
City
, MO
1,48
8
1,17
5
1,80
1
Sep
-06
MC
B H
awai
i, H
I1,
175
65.1
Sep
-05
MC
B C
amp
Leje
une,
NC
MC
AS
Che
rry
Poi
nt, N
CS
tew
art,
NY
3,42
683
.23,
614
45.9
2,4
2,4
897
18.7
2,4
Sep
-03
MC
B C
amp
Pen
dlet
on, C
A M
CB
Qua
ntic
o, V
AM
CR
D S
an D
iego
, CA
4,53
4
Oct
-04
MC
AS
Yum
a, A
ZM
CB
Cam
p P
endl
eton
, CA
Expe
cted
Sou
rce
of F
und s
70.7
1,4
Scor
ed C
ost
($M
)A
utho
ritie
s(U
se k
ey b
elow
)
26.5
2,4
19.4
2,4
Priv
atiz
atio
n D
ate
Inst
alla
tion/
Stat
eEn
d-St
ate
Uni
ts
Mar
-03
MC
AS
Bea
ufor
t, S
CM
CR
D P
arris
Isla
nd, S
CN
H B
eauf
ort,
SC
(see
Not
e 1)
1,71
8
Nov
-00
MC
B C
amp
Pen
dlet
on, C
A71
2
Con
veye
d U
nits
Sep
-06
MC
B C
amp
Leje
une,
NC
(MC
AS
New
Riv
er, N
C)
(see
Not
e 2)
0-2
10.
02,
4
2,4
Exhi
bit F
H-6
: Fa
mily
Hou
sing
Priv
atiz
atio
n
145
FY 2
008
Bud
get E
stim
ate
Mili
tary
Hou
sing
Priv
atiz
atio
n In
itiat
ive
Am
ount
($M
)B
udge
t Yea
rTy
peP
roje
ct (S
ourc
e of
Fun
ds)
Expe
cted
Sou
rce
of F
unds
Scor
ed C
ost
($M
)A
utho
ritie
s(U
se k
ey b
elow
)Pr
ivat
izat
ion
Dat
eIn
stal
latio
n/St
ate
End-
Stat
e U
nits
C
onve
yed
Uni
ts0.
069
FY03
Impr
ovem
ent
MC
AS
Yum
a0.
695
FY03
Impr
ovem
ent
MC
AS
Iwak
uni,
JA21
.724
FY03
Con
stru
ctio
nN
AS
Lem
oore
0.08
4FY
06Im
prov
emen
tM
CB
Haw
aii
8.31
6FY
06Im
prov
emen
tM
CB
Cam
p P
endl
eton
56.0
52FY
07Im
prov
emen
tM
CB
Haw
aii
78.9
51FY
07Im
prov
emen
tM
CB
Cam
p Le
jeun
e
19.5
64FY
07Im
prov
emen
tM
CB
Cam
p P
endl
eton
1.77
7FY
04C
onst
ruct
ion
MC
AS
Che
rry
Poi
nt0.
724
FY04
Impr
ovem
ent
MC
AS
Iwak
uni,
JA1.
666
FY04
Des
ign
87.9
51FY
08Im
prov
emen
tM
CB
Cam
p Le
jeun
e
50.1
75FY
08Im
prov
emen
tM
CB
Cam
p P
endl
eton
50.0
00FY
08Im
prov
emen
tM
CA
GC
C T
wen
tyni
ne P
alm
s
59.4
87FY
09Im
prov
emen
tM
CB
Cam
p Le
jeun
e
50.0
00FY
09Im
prov
emen
tM
CB
Cam
p P
endl
eton
14.9
23FY
10Im
prov
emen
tM
CB
Cam
p P
endl
eton
Sep
-08
MC
B C
amp
Pen
dlet
on, C
A0
301
56.1
2,4
Sep
-07
MC
B C
amp
Pen
dlet
on, C
A
MC
LB A
lban
y, G
A25
0up
to 2
94 u
nits
23.7
2,4
79.0
2,4
30.9
2,4
Sep
-07
MC
B H
awai
i, H
I (P
hase
2)
Sep
-06
MC
B C
amp
Pen
dlet
on, C
A(s
ee N
ote
3)2,
771
3,16
2
1,14
291
7
Aut
horit
ies
1) 2
873
"Dire
ct L
oans
and
Loa
n G
uara
ntee
s"2)
287
5 " I
nves
tmen
ts in
Non
gove
rnm
enta
l Ent
ities
"
Not
e 3:
Pha
ses
2 an
d 4
for C
amp
Pend
leto
n as
mod
ified
by
25 J
ul 2
006
Not
ifica
tion
Lette
r; c
onve
rts
641
Pend
leto
n (P
hase
2) r
emov
atio
n/m
inor
wor
k un
its to
repl
acem
ent u
nits
. N
ote
2: P
hase
s 1
and
2 fo
r MC
B C
amp
Leje
une
and
MC
AS
Che
rry
Poin
t as
mod
ified
by
25 J
ul 0
6 Ph
ase
2 N
otifi
catio
n Le
tter
Not
e 1:
Incl
udes
53
Nav
y U
nits
(Nav
al H
ospi
tal B
eauf
ort)
3) 2
877
"Diff
eren
tial L
ease
Pay
men
ts"
4) 2
878
" Con
veya
nce
or L
ease
of E
xist
ing
Pro
perty
and
Fac
ilitie
s"*
Aut
horit
ies
may
be
subj
ect t
o ch
ange
as
proj
ect i
s de
fined
086
039
4S
ep-0
9M
CB
Cam
p Le
jeun
e, N
C
Sep
-10
MC
B C
amp
Pen
dlet
on, C
A
2,4
50.2
2,4
14.9
2,4
Sep
-08
MC
B C
amp
Leje
une,
NC
045
1
Sep
-07
MC
B C
amp
Leje
une,
NC
MC
AS
Che
rry
Poi
nt, N
CW
esto
ver J
AR
B, C
hico
pee,
MA
2,42
31,
985
Sep
-06
MC
B C
amp
Pen
dlet
on, C
A(s
ee N
ote
3)0
0(s
ee N
ote
3)
030
0
0.0
2,4
88.0
2,4
59.5
50.0
2,4
Sep
-08
MC
AG
CC
Tw
enty
nine
Pal
ms,
CA
027
950
.02,
4
Sep
-09
MC
B C
amp
Pen
dlet
on, C
A
Exhi
bit F
H-6
: Fa
mily
Hou
sing
Priv
atiz
atio
n
146
D
EPA
RT
ME
NT
OF
TH
E N
AV
Y -
USM
C
FAM
ILY
HO
USI
NG
PR
IVA
TIZ
AT
ION
– P
RO
JEC
TS
AW
AR
DE
D
INST
AL
LA
TIO
N
A
WA
RD
D
AT
E
T
YPE
OF
FIN
AN
CIN
G
AM
OU
NT
U
SED
PE
R
TY
PE O
F FI
NA
NC
ING
TE
RM
O
F T
HE
D
EA
L
TO
TA
L
NU
MB
ER
O
F U
NIT
S C
ON
VE
YE
D
TO
TA
L
NU
MB
ER
OF
UN
ITS
RE
NO
VA
TE
D
TO
TA
L
NU
MB
ER
OF
UN
ITS
RE
PLA
CE
D
TO
TA
L
NU
MB
ER
OF
NE
W /A
DD
ED
U
NIT
S
MC
B C
amp
Pend
leto
n C
A
N
ov 0
0
Priv
ate
Deb
t*
DoN
Dire
ct L
oan
$54.
6M
$29.
4M L
oan
($19
.4M
Sc
ored
A
mou
nt)
50
Yrs
51
2
20
0
31
2
20
0 M
CA
S B
eauf
ort,
MC
RD
Par
ris Is
land
, an
d N
H B
eauf
ort,
SC
M
ar 0
3
Priv
ate
Deb
t**
DO
N E
quity
Inve
stm
ent
Priv
ate
Equi
ty
Inve
stm
ent
$111
.8M
$2
6.5M
$3
.3M
50
Yrs
1,
558*
**
1,
227
33
1*
16
0 M
CB
Cam
p Pe
ndle
ton,
CA
; MC
B
Qua
ntic
o, V
A a
nd M
CR
D S
an D
iego
, CA
Se
p 03
Priv
ate
Deb
t D
on E
quity
In
vest
men
t Pr
ivat
e Eq
uity
In
vest
men
t
$478
.0M
$7
0.7M
$1
0.7M
50
Yrs
4,
631
2,
535
1,
820
79
MC
AS
Yum
a, M
CB
Cam
p Pe
ndle
ton,
CA
O
ct 0
4
Priv
ate
Deb
t D
oN E
quity
In
vest
men
t Pr
ivat
e Eq
uity
In
vest
men
t
$79.
5M
$18.
7M
$1.2
5M
49
Yrs
89
7
25
7
25
3
0 M
CB
Cam
p Le
jeun
e, N
C; M
CA
S C
herr
y Po
int,
NC
; Ste
war
t, N
Y
Se
p 05
Priv
ate
Deb
t D
oN E
quity
In
vest
men
t Pr
ivat
e Eq
uity
In
vest
men
t
$285
.5M
$8
3.2M
$7
.5M
50
Yrs
3,
614
1,
626
1,
288
0 M
CA
GC
C T
wen
tyni
ne P
alm
s, C
A;
MO
BC
OM
Kan
sas C
ity, M
O
Se
p 05
Priv
ate
Deb
t D
oN E
quity
In
vest
men
t Pr
ivat
e Eq
uity
In
vest
men
t
$66.
4M
$45.
9M
$1.2
M
48
Yrs
1,
801
63
6
17
6
0
147
DE
PAR
TM
EN
T O
F T
HE
NA
VY
- U
SMC
FA
MIL
Y H
OU
SIN
G P
RIV
AT
IZA
TIO
N –
PR
OJE
CT
S A
WA
RD
ED
IN
STA
LL
AT
ION
AW
AR
D
DA
TE
T
YPE
OF
FIN
AN
CIN
G
AM
OU
NT
U
SED
PE
R
TY
PE O
F FI
NA
NC
ING
TE
RM
O
F T
HE
D
EA
L
TO
TA
L
NU
MB
ER
O
F U
NIT
S C
ON
VE
YE
D
TO
TA
L
NU
MB
ER
OF
UN
ITS
RE
NO
VA
TE
D
TO
TA
L
NU
MB
ER
OF
UN
ITS
RE
PLA
CE
D
TO
TA
L
NU
MB
ER
OF
NE
W /A
DD
ED
U
NIT
S
MC
B C
amp
Leje
une,
NC
; MC
AS
Che
rry
Poin
t, N
C
Se
p 06
Priv
ate
Deb
t D
oN E
quity
In
vest
men
t Pr
ivat
e Eq
uity
In
vest
men
t
$90.
0M
$37.
9M
$2.5
M
49
Yrs
1,
188
62
8
10
5
0 M
CB
Cam
p Le
jeun
e, N
C
(MC
AS
New
Riv
er, N
C)
Se
p 06
Priv
ate
Deb
t D
oN E
quity
In
vest
men
t Pr
ivat
e Eq
uity
In
vest
men
t
Fina
ncin
g in
form
atio
n in
clud
ed in
th
e pr
ojec
t ab
ove.
49
Yrs
0
-1
10
89
0 M
CB
Cam
p Pe
ndle
ton,
CA
Se
p 06
Priv
ate
Deb
t D
oN E
quity
In
vest
men
t Pr
ivat
e Eq
uity
In
vest
men
t
$382
.0M
$3
0.9M
$5
.0M
47
Yrs
2,
771
30
0
0
39
1 M
CB
Cam
p Pe
ndle
ton,
CA
Se
p 06
Priv
ate
Deb
t D
oN E
quity
In
vest
men
t Pr
ivat
e Eq
uity
In
vest
men
t
Fina
ncin
g in
form
atio
n in
clud
ed in
th
e pr
ojec
t ab
ove.
47
Yrs
0
-6
41
64
1
0 M
CB
Haw
aii,
HI
Se
p 06
Priv
ate
Deb
t D
oN E
quity
In
vest
men
t Pr
ivat
e Eq
uity
In
vest
men
t
$233
.5M
$6
5.1M
$1
.0M
48
Yrs
1,
175
53
8
53
7
0 *
T
here
was
add
ition
al d
ebt i
ssue
d in
the
amou
nts o
f $5M
in M
ay o
f 200
2 an
d $1
0M in
Dec
embe
r of
200
4.
** T
here
was
a r
efin
ance
of t
he B
eauf
ort p
roje
ct in
Aug
ust o
f 200
5. T
otal
deb
t iss
ued
was
$15
7.5M
. T
his r
esul
ted
in a
n in
crea
se o
f $45
.7 m
illio
n ov
er th
e or
igin
al d
ebt a
mou
nt.
**
* In
clud
es 5
3 N
avy
Uni
ts (N
aval
Hos
pita
l Bea
ufor
t)
148
FY2007 FY2008
$5,115,000 $12,032,000Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases (Dollars in Thousands)
1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 5,1152. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 03. FY 2007 Current Estimate 5,1154. Price Growth 324
a. Civilian Personnel Compensation 232b. Inflation 92
5. Program Adjustments 6,593a. Increased Level of Privatization Effort 2,576b. Privatization Support Labor Realignment from Management 4,017
6. FY 2008 Budget Request 12,032
RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT ACCOUNT. Privatization Support Costs:
(4) Privatization Support Labor Realignment. The privatization support account was increased as a result of the realignment of labor costs associated with privatization liason and support functions from the management account to the privatization support account.
(2) Project Costs. Includes all costs for contracts, labor, materials, supplies, services or travel required in direct support of the family housing privatization program for project development and execution. This includes costs associated with feasibility studies, concept development, consultant support, solicitation, procurement, contracting, execution, transition, construction management (supervision, inspection and overhead), and post award management/monitoring.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS
FAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATES
MARINE CORPS JUSTIFICATION
OPERATING EXPENSES
(3) Administrative Costs. Includes all costs for contracts, labor, materials, supplies, services or travel required in direct support of the family housing privatization program administration and portfolio
t
Includes the costs that the government incurs in direct support of the family housing privatization program under the authorities of 10 U.S.C., Chapter 169, Subchapter IV (Alternative Authority for Acquisition and Improvement of Military Housing) with the exception of those costs that will be included as part of the privatization project. These costs include all administrative, planning, development, solicitation, award, transition, construction oversight, and portfolio management activities associated with military housing privatization and specifically for:
(1) Site Assessment Costs. Includes all costs for contracts, labor, materials, supplies, services or travel required in direct support of family housing privatization program efforts for environmental baseline surveys, environmental impact statements, environmental assessments, and any efforts required to be accomplished by the government prior to privatization for, environmental mitigation, site surveys, or real estate costs.
The privatization support account funding adjustments reflect pricing and program changes associated with existing and new public-private venture initiatives. Prescribed inflation rates and civilian pay raise rates were utilized.
Exhibit OP-5
149
CALCULATIONSFY07 Request: 5,115
4a. Civilian Pay Raise 2322,670 (CIVPERS estimate) + 4,017 (CIVPERS transfer) = 6,698 (adjusted baseline)6698 (adjusted baseline) + 1,022 CIVPERS (program increase) = 7,709 (Revised estimate)7,709 (revised estimate) x .03 (pay raise rate) = 232
4b. Inflation 925,115 (estimate) - 2,670 (labor) + 1,574 (non-labor program increase) = 4000 (non-labor) 4,000 (Non-labor Costs) X .023 (inflation) = 92
5a. Program Adjustments 2,576Reflects the delta between the FY07 Estimate plus adjustments 4a, b, 5b and revised requirement
Account FY07 FY08Residual Consultants 1,325 1,558Privatization Consultants 1,120 2,533EFD Stage Costs 1,758 2,886HQ/EFD Fixed Costs 912 917Installation costs 0 4,138Totals 5,115 12,032
Reflects costs for 12 ongoing and 3 new initiatives. New initiatives include exclusive negotiationsfor projects to be awarded by end of FY08 (3 locations) which includes required environmental studies.
Ongoing Projects in FY08: Level of Effort/Status: Camp Pendleton I Portfolio Management/Monitoring only Beaufort/Parris Island Portfolio Management/Monitoring only Camp Pendleton II/Quantico/San Diego Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring Yuma/Pendleton III Portfolio Management/Monitoring only Camp Lejeune/Cherry Point/Stewart I Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring Twentynine Palms/Kansas City Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring Kaneohe Bay I Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring Camp Lejeune/Cherry Point II Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring Camp Pendleton 4 Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring Camp Lejuene/Cherry Point/Westover 3 Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring Kaneohe Bay II Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring Camp Pendleton 5/Albany Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring
New Projects to be executed in FY08: Camp Lejuene 4 Agreement Execution/Negotiation/Environmental Studies Camp Pendleton 6 & 6A Agreement Execution/Negotiation/Environmental Studies Twentynine Palms 2 Agreement Execution/Negotiation/Environmental Studies
5b. Privatization Support Labor Realignment (+59 FTEs) from Management 4,017
FY08 Request 12,032
Exhibit OP-5
150
DEPARTMENT OF NAVY FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY FY 2008 BUDGET DEBT PAYMENT (Thousands of Dollars) _________________________________________________________ FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 NAVY NAVY NAVY _________________________________________________________ TOA INTEREST & OTHER EXPENSES: SERVICEMEN'S MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS 0 0 0 TOTAL OBLIGATING AUTHORITY 53 0 0 BUDGET AUTHORITY 53 0 0
151
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY FY 2008 BUDGET SERVICEMEN'S MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS In accordance with authority contained in Section 222 of the Housing Act of 1954, as amended, this program provides for the payment of premiums due on mortgage insurance provided by the Federal Housing Administration for mortgages on housing purchased by military personnel on active duty and for continuing payments in those cases where a serviceman dies while on active duty and leaves a surviving widow as owner of the property. In the latter case, payments extend for a period of two years beyond the date of the serviceman's death or until the date the widow disposes of the property, whichever occurs first. With the discontinuance of Section 222 Mortgages as of 31 March 1980, the Department of Housing and Urban Development stopped processing applications for SMIP. No payments were made in FY 2006; therefore no funding for FY 2008 is requested. FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 NAVY NAVY NAVY Number of Mortgages 0 0 0 Average Payment $0 $0 $0 Total Payment $0 $0 $0
152
DEPARTMENT OF NAVY FAMILY HOUSING, MARINE CORPS FY 2008 BUDGET DEBT PAYMENT (Thousands of Dollars) _________________________________________________________ FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 MC MC MC _________________________________________________________ TOA INTEREST & OTHER EXPENSES: SERVICEMEN'S MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS 2 2 0 TOTAL OBLIGATING AUTHORITY 2 2 0 BUDGET AUTHORITY 2 2 0
153
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING, MARINE CORPS FY 2008 BUDGET SERVICEMEN'S MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS In accordance with authority contained in Section 222 of the Housing Act of 1954, as amended, this program provides for the payment of premiums due on mortgage insurance provided by the Federal Housing Administration for mortgages on housing purchased by military personnel on active duty and for continuing payments in those cases where a serviceman dies while on active duty and leaves a surviving widow as owner of the property. In the latter case, payments extend for a period of two years beyond the date of the serviceman's death or until the date the widow disposes of the property, whichever occurs first. With the discontinuance of Section 222 Mortgages as of 31 March 1980, the Department of Housing and Urban Development stopped processing applications for SMIP. No payments were made in FY 2006; therefore no funding for FY 2008 is requested. FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 MC MC MC Number of Mortgages 0 0 0 Average Payment $0 $0 $0 Total Payment $0 $0 $0
154
U.S. $
Budget
U.S. $
Budget
U.S. $
Budget
Requiring
Exchange
Requiring
Exchange
Requiring
Exchange
Country
Conversion
Rate Used
Conversion
Rate Used
Conversion
Rate Used
Bahrain (Dinar)
1,059.9
0.3770
465.4
0.3771
249.0
0.3769
Cambodia (Riel)
57.0
4,002.7000
59.0
3,995.5000
0.0
N/A
Egypt (Pound)
800.0
5.9754
800.0
5.7086
990.0
5.7684
Greece (Euro)*
1,081.7
0.8785
1,057.5
0.8530
1,130.7
0.8259
Hong Kong (Dollar)
390.0
7.7965
365.0
7.7560
498.0
7.7556
Iceland (Krona)*
11,867.2
82.1990
0.0
N/A
0.0
N/A
India (Rupee)
200.0
43.7500
260.0
44.1100
200.0
45.8761
Indonesia (Rupiah)
540.0
9,287.8000
463.0
9,417.0400
1,025.0
9311.8300
Italy (Euro)*
93,999.2
0.8785
82,638.1
0.8530
89,586.8
0.8259
Japan (Yen)*
69,564.3
115.0000
55,668.9
113.3000
61,511.9
114.7781
Laos (Kip)
52.0
8,224.3000
55.0
10,125.9500
56.0
10164.3500
Malaysia (Ringgits)
28.0
3.6435
29.0
3.6435
30.0
3.6435
Norway (Krone)*
43.0
6.7510
42.0
6.7680
43.0
6.5827
Peru (Nuevo Sol)
411.0
3.2690
419.0
3.3511
428.0
3.2672
Philippines (Peso)
200.0
56.3250
220.0
52.5500
225.0
52.8797
Portugal (Euro)*
341.8
0.8785
334.2
0.8530
314.2
0.8259
South Korea (Won)*
488.3
1,205.2000
1,231.2
1,151.0000
9,502.2
1025.6971
Singapore (Dollar)*
0.0
N/A
0.0
N/A
3,627.0
1.6202
Spain (Euro)*
11,490.3
0.8785
11,059.6
0.8530
17,416.7
0.8259
Turkey (Lira)*
41.0
1.5144
43.0
1.4918
0.0
N/A
United Arab Emirates (Dirham)
62.0
3.6727
65.0
3.6709
67.0
3.6725
United Kingdom (Pound)*
3,081.8
0.5930
3,109.7
0.5750
3,379.3
0.5528
Vietnam (Dong)
43.0
15,780.0000
48.0
15,786.5000
49.0
15,970.0000
TOTAL
195,841.5
158,432.6
190,328.8
* = Countries in the Foreign Currency Account.
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE DATA
($000)
Appropriation: Family Housing, Navy (Includes Family Housing, Construction)
FY 2006
FY 2007
FY 2008
FY 2008 BUDGET SUBMISSION
155
BLANK PAGE
156
FY 2006
FY 2007
FY 2008
U.S. $
Budget
U.S. $
Budget
U.S. $
Budget
Requiring
Exchange
Requiring
Exchange
Requiring
Exchange
Country
Conversion
Rate Used
Conversion
Rate Used
Conversion
Rate Used
Japan (Yen)*
6,483.0
115.0000
9,149.0
113.3000
20,550.0
114.7781
TOTAL
6,483.0
9,149.0
20,550.0
* = Countries in the Foreign Currency Account.
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE DATA
FY 2008 BUDGET SUBMISSION
($000)
Appropriation: Family Housing, Marine Corps (Includes Family Housing Construction)
Exh
ibit
PB-1
8 Fo
reig
n C
urre
ncy
Exc
hang
e D
ata
157
BLANK PAGE
158