Dell Precision R7610 - Samsung€¦ · · 2014-06-20Dell Precision R7610 delivers...
Transcript of Dell Precision R7610 - Samsung€¦ · · 2014-06-20Dell Precision R7610 delivers...
Dell Precision R7610High Security and Performance Regardless of Distance in the Form of a World-Leading Rack Workstation
Dell Precision R7610 keeps your intelligent property in your data center safely
Dell Precision R7610 delivers workstation-level performance remotely
It helps improve productivity of offsite contractors, shift workers or geographically scattered staff
It enables 1: 4 or 1: multiple solutions in virtualized environments to improve ROI
Resolution: 1900*1060; Graphics Accelerator: AMD FirePro W7000 (FireGL V), Graphics Driver Version: 12.104.2.0; Model: Precision R7610; Manufacturer: Dell Inc.; Processor Type: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2603 0 @ 1.80GHz; System Memory:64GB;OS: Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit; Test Date: 4/23/2014 8:08:47 PM; Submitted by Submitter company.
IOMeter benchmark:
Windows Experience Score:
Dell Precision R7610
RandRead – SSD:36460 、RandRW70 – SSD:18733 、RandWrite – SSD:26688
SeqRead - SSD:377MB/S 、SeqWrite - SSD:333MB/S
Samsung SSD 15K SAS HDD 7.2K SATA HDD
Windows Experience Score: 7.5Samsung SSD
testing reports reveal:
Secured Efficiency for You:
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
SeqRead - SATA HDD
SeqRead - SAS HDD
SeqRead - SSD
SeqWrite - SATA HDD
SeqWrite - SAS HDD
SeqWrite - SSD
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000
RandRead- SATA HDD
RandRead - SAS HDD
RandRead - SSD
RandRW70 - SATA HDD
RandRW70 - SAS HDD
RandRW70 - SSD
RandWrite - SATA HDD
RandWrite - SAS HDD
RandWrite - SSD
IOPS
MB/s
····
Samsung SSD’s Windows experience score is 7.5, better than that with SAS, SATA (6.1, 5.9 respectively), and its subscore of data transmission rate (as primary disk) is as high as 7.9.
R7610 with Samsung SSDs delivers up to 36460 IOPS in RandRead testing, 78 and 303 times faster than with SAS (459) and SATA (120) disk, demonstrating great advantage.
R7610 with Samsung SSDs delivers up to 377MB/S read rate, 1.62 and 3.65 times faster than with SAS(144MB/5) and SATA (81MB/S) respectively.