Delivering Trusted and Transparent Fishing Vessel Standards … · 2019-10-02 · Delivering...
Transcript of Delivering Trusted and Transparent Fishing Vessel Standards … · 2019-10-02 · Delivering...
Delivering Trusted and Transparent Fishing Vessel Standards
through Cost Effective Audits - Learnings from the Quayside
and the Deck
Nigel Edwards, Technical & CSR Director, Icelandic Seachill
John Connelly, President, National Fisheries Institute
Bill DiMento, Vice President of Quality Assurance, Sustainability and Government Affairs,
High Liner Foods
Libby Woodhatch, Head of Advocacy, Seafish
John Connelly
National Fisheries Institute
June 2017
The Why
Labor Issues in Seafood Supply Chain
Labor in Seafood Supply Chain Overview
Most vessels operate in legal framework protective of labor rights
Some vessels have failed and abused workers
This is not solely about Thailand and aquaculture
Foundations, NGOs, and media see labor issues as the next aspect of sustainability
Governments are reacting, and their actions are not focused just on where abuse occurred …. looking at seafood from harvest through retail, globally
Companies are being sued for failing to warn consumers of “slave seafood”
Companies are acting, throughout the supply chain
Companies seek to avoid duplication, competing demands, and efficient and effective solutions
Labor in Seafood Supply Chain Examples of real, perceived, or alleged abuses
Crew held in cages (Indonesia)
Abuse on vessels (New Zealand)
Filipino crew not paid (Ireland)
Crew not allowed off vessels (United States)
Labor in Seafood Supply Chain Media blood in the water
AP Wins 2016 Pulitzer Prize Guardian Reports Garner Governments’ Attention
Media success breeds more stories, resulting in cycle of press reports
Labor in Seafood Supply Chain Government action
California Supply Chain Transparency Act: Explain to public actions taken to avoid slavery in supply chain
US State Department: Provided grants to NGOs working on trafficking
EU IUU Red Card System: Although not part of regulation, labor being included in reports
US Trade Enforcement Act: Allows public to make slavery allegations against seafood imports
UK Modern Slavery Act: Explain to public actions taken to avoid slavery in supply chain
Labor in Seafood Supply Chain Foundation and NGO action
Funded by owner of EBay. Fund NGOs and investigative journalists
Investigative NGO, with reach in Asia, Africa, and Europe
Sees as natural extension of their marine conservation work
2017: Fisheries: Self declaration free of “unacceptable” labor practices
Supply Chain: Auditable MSC labor standard or equivalent
2020: Fisheries: Auditable MSC labor standard or equivalent
Retained consultant to determine how to engage in social issues
Labor in Seafood Supply Chain Retailer and foodservice actions
RFS certification for sale in UK (2017 for UK vessels and 2019 for imports)
Mandating SMETA or similar audits
Helping lead development of tuna vessel labor standards in Seafood Task Force
Seafood Systems Is it time to rethink traditional approaches?
2000 2017
Libby Woodhatch, Head of Advocacy, Seafish
@libbywoodhatch
Global Risk Assessments and Audits
Agenda
• Setting the scene
– The Seafood Common Language Group (SECLG)
• Seafish/Seafish partnership tools to help identify challenges and mitigate risk
– Tools for Ethical Sourcing of Seafood (TESS)
– The Seafish Responsible Fishing Scheme (RFS)
– Human Rights Risk Tool for Seafood (HRRTS)
What are the
challenges?
Where are the
challenges?
How can I address the challenges?
Seafood Ethics Common Language
Group
INDUSTRY QUESTIONS
Update on ethics
What are the
challenges?
Where are the
challenges?
How can I address the challenges?
SECLG
15 Region / Country Profiles
HRRTS
SHORT TERM LONG TERM
TESS
OUTREACH
REDUCING RISK
WHAT DO WE DO?
INDUSTRY QUESTIONS
Update on ethics
www.seafish.org/tess
Seafish Responsible Fishing Scheme (RFS) update
Responsible Fishing Scheme
• The Seafish Responsible Fishing Scheme (RFS) is a voluntary vessel based programme certifying high standards of crew welfare and responsible catching practices on fishing vessels.
• Open to all types of fishing vessels.
• ‘Business- to-business’ tool with independent, third-party auditing
• ISO17065 compliant
• Aimed at the global marketplace
• Launched to UK vessels in 2016
Seafish Board
RFS Oversight Board
RFS Technical Committee
Expert Working Group
Expert Working Group
Expert Working Group
Public Review and Stakeholder Comment
Standard Holder
Standard Direction
Standard Development
Governance
Safety, Health and Welfare
The Vessel and its mission
Care of the Catch
Training, Professional development
Care for the Environment
RFS Standard Core Principle 1: Reduce accidents and fatalities. Promote decent working conditions, respect & integrity
Core Principle 3: demonstrate due diligence; seek to apply best practice
Core Principle 4: Focus on supply of safe, high quality, wholesome product with known provenance
Core Principle 2: improve skills, knowledge & understanding; raise standards & open up new opportunities
Core Principle 5:
behave responsibly,
respecting the environment
Supply Chain Supporters
“We have committed to incorporating the Responsible
Fishing Scheme certification into our sourcing policies”
March 2017 Seafish Board confirmed next steps
– Commitment to make RFS a global scheme focused on socially responsible fishing
– Appoint RFS International Working Group
• Conduct international fisheries pilots
• Proposals for revision of standard and audit methodology
– Design new RFS NewOrg governance structure • Initiating the process of commissioning an entity to run,
manage & govern RFS on a global scale
RFS International Working Group • An independent group of representatives of harvesting companies or organisations that will fund,
manage and run RFS pilots (Seafish oversight capacity)
• The pilots will reflect the geographic, species and harvest types of various fisheries and harvesters.
• Deliverables
– Completed international fisheries pilots via an established International Translation Process (Q2-4 2017)
– Providing input to RFS standard & audit methodology revision process (Q4 2017)
o Strengthening of crew voice
o Vessel and group certification options
o Burden/value of Principles 4 & 5
• First meeting Brussels 27/04/17
Background & Introduction to HRRTS
Human Rights Risk Tool for Seafood
Seafood Human Rights Risk Tool
• Collaboration to develop one risk assessment approach
• Identify and assess the risk of human rights abuses in fisheries worldwide
• Produce risk ratings of human rights abuses by country and fishery
• Incorporate measures implemented to mitigate such abuses
Accomplishments & Outputs To Date
• Conceptual Model, talking points & long-term vision
• Decision Tree developed
• Peer review; responses collated and implemented as appropriate
• 2 User-guides drafted
• Pilot fishery profiles developed
• Expert analyst w/ 15yrs experience w/ ILO hired
Critical
High
Medium
Low
Evidence of success of mitigation measures
KEY Fishery Level Country Level
The Concept
Risk Categories
• Critical risk - documented evidence by an internationally recognized government agency, peer-reviewed publication, media report, or credible NGO that forced labour is occurring in the profile fishery
• High Risk – documented evidence that human rights abuses are occurring in fishing in this country, but not pinpointed to the profile fishery
• Medium risk - no evidence of human rights abuses in fishing AND country may have limited or no protections for workers – is not in good standing (e.g. country may be cited by EU with a yellow or red card and may not have ratified all international agreements)
Risk Categories
• Low risk - no evidence of human rights abuses in fishing AND country is in good standing (i.e. ratified all global conventions AND not on Tier 3 or Tier 2 watch list or with yellow or red card)
• Low risk due to mitigation - if evidence is found of human rights abuses in fisheries in the country, there are implemented, robust measures that minimize any chance of slavery occurring in the profile fishery (e.g. the profile fishery is certified by the RFS)
Decision trees
Timeline of Development 2017-18
• Create a host website to house the tool and database – Consultation with users during summer
– Test and refine functionality
– Target launch Autumn ‘17
• Expert review of decision tree to refine methodology and complete the development of c.24 fishery profiles by end 2017
• Establish medium-long term funding and management strategy to ensure scalability, longevity and credibility
Keep up to date online…. • Ethics webpage
– http://www.seafish.org/responsible-sourcing/ethics-in-seafood
• TESS – www.seafish.org/tess
• Factsheet; Seafish role in ethics More to come from our ethics team… • Continue TESS development • Human Rights Risk Tool for Seafood (HRRTS) • Continue working with industry stakeholders;
outreach and SECLG • Promoting our activities • Developing our strategy
Our work on ethics
Update on ethics and TESS
Nigel Edwards Technical and CSR Director
Seaweb Seafood Summit - Seattle 5th June 2017
Social Risk Assessments
and Audits
Agenda
– Intro and context
– Tesco perspective
– Seachill approach
– Case study - vessel audits
– Summary
100% Grimsby
3 Sites Wet fish Coated Smoked
Bringing fresh quality fish to the freezer
Caution: Images may induce feelings of hunger
“Commercial fishing can be one of the most dangerous
and unregulated types of work there is.”
Reports of serious labour abuses
• Every worker should have freedom of
movement. The ability of workers to move freely
should not be inhibited by their employer.
• No worker should pay for a job. Fees and costs
associated with recruitment and employment
should be paid by the employer.
• No worker should be indebted or coerced to
work. Workers should work freely, aware of the
terms and conditions of their work and paid
regularly as agreed.
We need to identify and address the most serious issues…
Consumer Goods Forum (CGF) Commitments
45
A varied supply chain with different levels of risk…
46
Data Gathering
SEDEX Self-Assessment
Questionnaire?
Tesco Steps to Improvement
Risk assessment
In-depth investigation
Improvement and
remediation
Human Rights Risk Tool for
Seafood
FNET
NGOs,
Fisheries associations
Authorities
NGO collaboration
Progress monitoring
To assess our seafood supply chains for labour risks, and work with partners to address them
through credible improvement programmes.
Icelandic Seachill Approach • Responsible Sourcing – to SSC codes
• Risk Assessments / Mapping our supply chains to understand labour risks
• Registering suppliers (factories and vessels) and audits on Sedex
• Reassurance – Verification audits - direct and 3rd party
• RFS - UK oversight board and supporting RFS International pilots
• Reputation protection – Confidence in protection of fishers welfare
Social Assessments
Audits and Knowledge
Database
Seachill Risk Assessment HRRTS
Risk Assessment
RFS Audits
FNET Risk
Assessment
SeachillAudits
SMETA Audits
GSSI Audits
Reproduced from Stronger Together
Food Network for Ethical Trade (FNET)
Retailers and suppliers working to improve human rights in global supply chains
• To drive a consistent approach to managing ethical trade to identify, manage and
respond to global supply chain ethical trade risks
• To identify current and potential opportunities for collaborative approaches that
improve working conditions in food supply chains
• To promote trust and build a forum for sharing issues and challenges in confidence
Factory
Vessel
Fish Meal
1 2 3 4 5
Vessel name
Unique Vessel Identifier (UVI)/ IMO
number
Flag State Vessel owning
company
Nationality of vessel owning company
This will ideally be the name as it appears in RFMO
records.
Where vessels do not have IMO numbers, please provide the identifier
issued by the flag State where possible.
This is the state under whose flag registry the
vessel operates.
Where the owner is not known, please indicate
"unknown".
This will be the country of registration/incorporation.
Method of hiring of crew
Typical length of contracts of crew
Number of crew employed on vessel
Nationalities of crew
Where applicable, names of labour
brokers involved in hiring of crew
Indicate whether crew are hired directly or through a
labour broker.
Indicate if contracts are short-term e.g. for specific fishing voyages, or longer-
term
This may be an approximate number where the exact
number is not known.
Where specific information is not available, indicate
known nationalities of crew working on the vessel.
This is the name of the labour brokering
companies.
Supporting RFS International Development
• Hosted RFS feasibility study in Iceland - 2015
• Meetings in Ben Tre Province, Vietnam - Nov 2016 and May 2017
• Trained RFS auditor vessel inspections - eg Norway March 2017
• RFS International Pilot of Swordfish fleet in Brazil - planned for mid 2017
Fishing vessel approval Process
• Supplier Code Agreement • Self Assessment • Risk Assessment
Case Study – MSC Barents Sea Fishery
Vessel Standards
• Clean and hygienic
• Well invested and equipped
• Controlled with a focus on quality
• Often branded with a reputation to protect
• Convert large volumes into frozen fillets / H&G quickly
Crew Welfare Assessment
• HR / Training records
• Safety equipment
• Working hours
• Mess room / food
• Cabins
• Crew interviews
Fully document transparency on crew
• Nationality
• Age
• ID check
• Skills
• NOK records
• Wage shares
Barents Sea fleet - What have we learnt?
• Strong legal frameworks
• Economically successful fleet leading to desirable jobs
• Full crew records in place including safety training
• Joined up Inspection authorities – eg. Fishery Protection inspections will report any labour discrepancies
• Full program of H&S equipment inspection
• Working 6 hours on 6 Hours off – 50% rest
• En-suite cabins, Satellite TV, Good Food!
• Masters / captains welcome the engagement including crew interview, but are less warm to any additional paperwork
Summary
Transparency and Trust
• Registration and mapping
• Risk assessment and audit
• Identifying improvement needs and delivering actions
• Robust evidence that fishers rights and welfare are protected
Safe - Secure - Sustainable
Thank You
The role of ethical audits
“While we recognise that ethical audits can be successful at addressing on site risks such as health and safety, they are not necessarily the right tool to address more systemic problems like modern slavery, which are more complex.” Changes to Tesco’s Ethical Requirements for UK ROI Food and Non-Food Grocery Suppliers FAQs 10/05/2017