Integrated Standards Based Approach Iveta Topalova Justice & Public Safety Architect

Delivering Real Time Crime Center Capabilities

The Information Challenge

• Information Underload

“Approximately 100,000 justice agencies have the critical need to share information across their various information systems, and this variety creates multiple layers of interoperability problems because hardware, software, networks, and business rules for data exchange are different.” *

• Information Overload

“Many local and State officials decry the multitude of systems that the local and State agencies must access to use and stay informed. Ultimately, it results in inefficiency and information overload.” **

**RUSSEL PORTER: A REPORT CARD ON HOMELAND SECURITY INFORMATION SHARING

*Global Justice Reference Architecture Framework

A RTCC Day in the Life Scenario Situational Awareness

Operational Deconfliction

Criminal Justice Information

Systems Automation

Automated Information

Dissemination

Situational Awareness

Notifications

Real Time Alerting and Analysis

Electronic Form Submission and

Workflow

Work Assignment &

Management Investigative Coordination and

Collaboration

Structured/Unstructured Data

Aggregation and Analysis

Community Outreach and

Collaboration

Cross Jurisdiction / Cross

Discipline Collaboration

Pattern Analysis

Executive Dashboards

Federated Query

911 Call

Complex Requirements and Data

Scalability, Agility, Sustainability

Police Data Courts Corrections Other

Local State Federal Public

Public Safety Integration Solution

Video

VMS

Existing Systems and Assets

Situational Awareness and

Operational Deconfliction

Investigative Coordination

and Collaboration

Executive Dashboards

and Pattern Analysis

Field, Patrol, Investigation, Analysts, Department …

…

The Interoperability Challenge

Security & Privacy

variety of

credentialing &

access rules

different

architectures

& technologies

Architecture

data stored &

interpreted

disparately

Data Model

Standardizing Information Exchanges with NIEM

Autonomous organizations use different

vocabularies to describe people, things,

places and events

NIEM creates a common semantic

understanding among participating

organizations

Standardizing architecture with the GRA

Existing systems are mostly custom built,

use custom integration, and exemplify silos

of data: it is costly to share information

SheriffJail

District

Attorney Courts

Jail Intake

JMS

ECEF

Booking

System

Jury

DMS

CMS

The GRA provides inherent agility and

scalability on multiple levels for federal,

state, local and tribal information sharing

Standardizing security with GFIPM

Globally understood user

metadata and trust across

federated systems enables

interoperability….

and enables integration of criminal

justice applications at the user level.

Integrated Standards Based Solution

Best

Practices

variety of

credentialing &

access rules

different

architectures

&

technologies

data stored &

interpreted

disparately

GFIPM

Privacy

Technology

GRA

NIEM

Governance

Situational Awareness and Operational Deconfliction

Real time unified and comprehensive visibility into information and events from disparate data sources

• Geospatial Visualization

• Video-monitoring Integration

• Correlation

• Alerting

• Resource Tracking

Investigative Coordination and Collaboration

Discover, Connect and Communicate Critical to the Investigation Information

• List View

• Map View

• Link View

• Card View

Executive Dashboards and Pattern Analysis

• Analyze performance and efficiency

• Discover patterns and trends

• Pre-created and ad-hoc reports

13

© 2010 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries.

The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market

conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation.

MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.