Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation -...

26
S. Marceglia Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics University ofMilan, Italy

Transcript of Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation -...

Page 1: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

DeepBrainStimulation- DBSTechnologicalinnovations

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 2: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

(Priori 2015)

INNOVATIVEFIELDS

AlbertoPrioriCenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 3: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

STEERINGSTIMULATION• Currentsteeringà basedonnewelectrodesallowingdirectingtheEFradiallyandlongitudinallywithmultiple contacts

• Stimulatingdeviceallwing independentcontroldifferentcontacts

Steigerwald etal,Mov Disord 2016

VERCISE (Boston Scientific)

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 4: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

STEERINGSTIMULATION

Steigerwald etal,Mov Disord 2016

Lasteeringstimulationconsentediavere una

maggiore finestra terapeutica

Verde=effetto terapeuticoRosso=effetto collaterale

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 5: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

INTERLEAVINGSTIMULATION

• Interleavingstimulationà apairofelectrodeseachdekivering adifferentamount ofchargeepulsesbutatthesamefrequency

• Forpatientsnotrespondingtoconventional DBS

• TestedinPD,ETanddystonia• Limitationà

• Timeconsumingprogramming• Relativelyshortbatteryduration

Miocinovic etal,Parkisonism RelatedDisrd 2014AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 6: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

INTERLEAVINGSTIMULATION

Programmingaccordingtoanatomical(electrodeposition)andclinical

Zhangetal,2016

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 7: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

DUALSTIMULATION• Delivered through asingle16-contactselectrode independentlystimulating twostructures

• Electrodeswithmorethan4contactswhichcanbeindependently controlled

Hollingworth etal,BrainSci,2017

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 8: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

ADAPTIVEDBSoCLOSEDLOOPDBSDBS

CONTROL VARIABLEANALYSIS

FEEDBACK ALGORITHM

NEW PARAMETERS

Thechoiceofthecontrolvariableiscrucial

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 9: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

(Arlotti 2016)

POSSIBLECONTROLVARIABLES• Areadjunctiveimplantsnecessary?

• Arechangesinsurgicalprocedure required?

• Isthenewdevice/implant welltoleratedbythepatient?

• Docontrolvariablescorrelatewiththeclinical state?

• Canthesystembepersonalised tothespecific cliniocalphenotype?

• Doesthesystemdecrease batteryduration?

• Isthereanyproof-of-concept?

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 10: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

CONTROLVARIABLESsEMG and accelerometers Cortical neurosignals Basal ganglia LFPs Neurotransmitters

Additional implant/equipment YES – external sensors required YES – implanted cortical electrodes required

NO – LFPs are recorded from the implanted DBS electrode YES – at least 4 additional CFM

Changes in the surgical procedures

NO – the additional implant is external and does not affect the

surgical procedure

YES – the surgery needs to include the implant of cortical

electrodes

NO – no additional implant during surgery

YES– the additional CFMs need to be implanted during surgery

Patient’s management/acceptability

NO – it may be difficult to manage the recording sensors and

the external equipment may be uncomfortable

YES – all the equipment is implanted

YES – the patient perceives the same system as for traditional

DBS

NO - CFMs have a time life of only a few months and have to be

replaced

Correlation with the clinical state

YES/NO – optimal correlation with tremor, but no correlations with rigidity and bradikinesia

YES – EcoG phase amplitude coupling and M1 action potentials correlate with main PD symptoms

and can be used to drive aDBS

YES – multiple LFP oscillations are modulated by levodopa

administration, DBS, movements, and non-motor tasks

even years after electrode implant

YES - the time duration of tremor-free period is comparable to the duration of increased levels of stimulation-induced dopamine

release after DBS pulse trains

Personalization and adaptability

NO – cannot be used if patients do not show tremor

YES/NO – it may encode patient specific information

YES – the presence of multiple rhythms correlating with

different patient’s characteristics may account for inter-subject

variability

NOT$YET$TESTED

Low battery consumptionYES/NO – the processing can be

done externally, but triggers should be sent via telemetry links

YES/NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$

the$feedback$algorithm

YES/NO – the IPG needs to include the sensing circuit and

the feedback algorithm

NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$the$

feedback$algorithm

Proof of conceptYES in humans (ET)

[Yamamoto et al., 2013]YES in animals [Rosin et al.,

2011]

YES in humans (PD) [Little et al., 2013; Rosa et al., 2015; Little

et al., 2015]NO

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 11: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

AccsEMG

IPG

Processingandcontrol

policy

(Shukla et al.2012, Shukla et al.2013, Basu et al.2013, Yamamoto et al. 2013)

Tremor onset prediction in 4 PD patients (Basu et. al 2013):100% sensitivity 80% accuracy

ACCELEROMETRY& EMG

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 12: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

(Cagnan etal.2017)

ACCELEROMETRY

PATIENTSWITHET

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 13: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

ACCELEROMETRYsEMG and accelerometers Cortical neurosignals Basal ganglia LFPs Neurotransmitters

Additional implant/equipment YES – external sensors required YES – implanted cortical electrodes required

NO – LFPs are recorded from the implanted DBS electrode YES – at least 4 additional CFM

Changes in the surgical procedures

NO – the additional implant is external and does not affect the

surgical procedure

YES – the surgery needs to include the implant of cortical

electrodes

NO – no additional implant during surgery

YES– the additional CFMs need to be implanted during surgery

Patient’s management/acceptability

NO – it may be difficult to manage the recording sensors and

the external equipment may be uncomfortable

YES – all the equipment is implanted

YES – the patient perceives the same system as for traditional

DBS

NO - CFMs have a time life of only a few months and have to be

replaced

Correlation with the clinical state

YES/NO – optimal correlation with tremor, but no correlations with rigidity and bradikinesia

YES – EcoG phase amplitude coupling and M1 action potentials correlate with main PD symptoms

and can be used to drive aDBS

YES – multiple LFP oscillations are modulated by levodopa

administration, DBS, movements, and non-motor tasks

even years after electrode implant

YES - the time duration of tremor-free period is comparable to the duration of increased levels of stimulation-induced dopamine

release after DBS pulse trains

Personalization and adaptability

NO – cannot be used if patients do not show tremor

YES/NO – it may encode patient specific information

YES – the presence of multiple rhythms correlating with

different patient’s characteristics may account for inter-subject

variability

NOT$YET$TESTED

Low battery consumptionYES/NO – the processing can be

done externally, but triggers should be sent via telemetry links

YES/NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$

the$feedback$algorithm

YES/NO – the IPG needs to include the sensing circuit and

the feedback algorithm

NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$the$

feedback$algorithm

Proof of conceptYES in humans (ET)

[Yamamoto et al., 2013]YES in animals [Rosin et al.,

2011]

YES in humans (PD) [Little et al., 2013; Rosa et al., 2015; Little

et al., 2015]NO

sEMG and accelerometers Cortical neurosignals Basal ganglia LFPs Neurotransmitters

Additional implant/equipment YES – external sensors required YES – implanted cortical electrodes required

NO – LFPs are recorded from the implanted DBS electrode YES – at least 4 additional CFM

Changes in the surgical procedures

NO – the additional implant is external and does not affect the

surgical procedure

YES – the surgery needs to include the implant of cortical

electrodes

NO – no additional implant during surgery

YES– the additional CFMs need to be implanted during surgery

Patient’s management/acceptability

NO – it may be difficult to manage the recording sensors and

the external equipment may be uncomfortable

YES – all the equipment is implanted

YES – the patient perceives the same system as for traditional

DBS

NO - CFMs have a time life of only a few months and have to be

replaced

Correlation with the clinical state

YES/NO – optimal correlation with tremor, but no correlations with rigidity and bradikinesia

YES – EcoG phase amplitude coupling and M1 action potentials correlate with main PD symptoms

and can be used to drive aDBS

YES – multiple LFP oscillations are modulated by levodopa

administration, DBS, movements, and non-motor tasks

even years after electrode implant

YES - the time duration of tremor-free period is comparable to the duration of increased levels of stimulation-induced dopamine

release after DBS pulse trains

Personalization and adaptability

NO – cannot be used if patients do not show tremor

YES/NO – it may encode patient specific information

YES – the presence of multiple rhythms correlating with

different patient’s characteristics may account for inter-subject

variability

NOT$YET$TESTED

Low battery consumptionYES/NO – the processing can be

done externally, but triggers should be sent via telemetry links

YES/NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$

the$feedback$algorithm

YES/NO – the IPG needs to include the sensing circuit and

the feedback algorithm

NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$the$

feedback$algorithm

Proof of conceptYES in humans (ET)

[Yamamoto et al., 2013]YES in animals [Rosin et al.,

2011]

YES in humans (PD) [Little et al., 2013; Rosa et al., 2015; Little

et al., 2015]NO

sEMG and accelerometers Cortical neurosignals Basal ganglia LFPs Neurotransmitters

Additional implant/equipment YES – external sensors required YES – implanted cortical electrodes required

NO – LFPs are recorded from the implanted DBS electrode YES – at least 4 additional CFM

Changes in the surgical procedures

NO – the additional implant is external and does not affect the

surgical procedure

YES – the surgery needs to include the implant of cortical

electrodes

NO – no additional implant during surgery

YES– the additional CFMs need to be implanted during surgery

Patient’s management/acceptability

NO – it may be difficult to manage the recording sensors and

the external equipment may be uncomfortable

YES – all the equipment is implanted

YES – the patient perceives the same system as for traditional

DBS

NO - CFMs have a time life of only a few months and have to be

replaced

Correlation with the clinical state

YES/NO – optimal correlation with tremor, but no correlations with rigidity and bradikinesia

YES – EcoG phase amplitude coupling and M1 action potentials correlate with main PD symptoms

and can be used to drive aDBS

YES – multiple LFP oscillations are modulated by levodopa

administration, DBS, movements, and non-motor tasks

even years after electrode implant

YES - the time duration of tremor-free period is comparable to the duration of increased levels of stimulation-induced dopamine

release after DBS pulse trains

Personalization and adaptability

NO – cannot be used if patients do not show tremor

YES/NO – it may encode patient specific information

YES – the presence of multiple rhythms correlating with

different patient’s characteristics may account for inter-subject

variability

NOT$YET$TESTED

Low battery consumptionYES/NO – the processing can be

done externally, but triggers should be sent via telemetry links

YES/NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$

the$feedback$algorithm

YES/NO – the IPG needs to include the sensing circuit and

the feedback algorithm

NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$the$

feedback$algorithm

Proof of conceptYES in humans (ET)

[Yamamoto et al., 2013]YES in animals [Rosin et al.,

2011]

YES in humans (PD) [Little et al., 2013; Rosa et al., 2015; Little

et al., 2015]NO

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 14: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

ECoGiEEG

sEEG

IPG

Processingandcontrol

policy

• Single and Multi-unit activity based on micro-electrode arrays (MEA)• Electrocorticography (ECoG)• Surface electroencephalography (sEEG)

(Rosin et al.2011)(Hemptinne et al.2015)

(Herron et al.2015)

CORTICALBIOPOTENTIAL

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 15: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

CORTICALBIOPOTENTIAL

sEMG and accelerometers Cortical neurosignals Basal ganglia LFPs Neurotransmitters

Additional implant/equipment YES – external sensors required YES – implanted cortical electrodes required

NO – LFPs are recorded from the implanted DBS electrode YES – at least 4 additional CFM

Changes in the surgical procedures

NO – the additional implant is external and does not affect the

surgical procedure

YES – the surgery needs to include the implant of cortical

electrodes

NO – no additional implant during surgery

YES– the additional CFMs need to be implanted during surgery

Patient’s management/acceptability

NO – it may be difficult to manage the recording sensors and

the external equipment may be uncomfortable

YES – all the equipment is implanted

YES – the patient perceives the same system as for traditional

DBS

NO - CFMs have a time life of only a few months and have to be

replaced

Correlation with the clinical state

YES/NO – optimal correlation with tremor, but no correlations with rigidity and bradikinesia

YES – EcoG phase amplitude coupling and M1 action potentials correlate with main PD symptoms

and can be used to drive aDBS

YES – multiple LFP oscillations are modulated by levodopa

administration, DBS, movements, and non-motor tasks

even years after electrode implant

YES - the time duration of tremor-free period is comparable to the duration of increased levels of stimulation-induced dopamine

release after DBS pulse trains

Personalization and adaptability

NO – cannot be used if patients do not show tremor

YES/NO – it may encode patient specific information

YES – the presence of multiple rhythms correlating with

different patient’s characteristics may account for inter-subject

variability

NOT$YET$TESTED

Low battery consumptionYES/NO – the processing can be

done externally, but triggers should be sent via telemetry links

YES/NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$

the$feedback$algorithm

YES/NO – the IPG needs to include the sensing circuit and

the feedback algorithm

NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$the$

feedback$algorithm

Proof of conceptYES in humans (ET)

[Yamamoto et al., 2013]YES in animals [Rosin et al.,

2011]

YES in humans (PD) [Little et al., 2013; Rosa et al., 2015; Little

et al., 2015]NO

sEMG and accelerometers Cortical neurosignals Basal ganglia LFPs Neurotransmitters

Additional implant/equipment YES – external sensors required YES – implanted cortical electrodes required

NO – LFPs are recorded from the implanted DBS electrode YES – at least 4 additional CFM

Changes in the surgical procedures

NO – the additional implant is external and does not affect the

surgical procedure

YES – the surgery needs to include the implant of cortical

electrodes

NO – no additional implant during surgery

YES– the additional CFMs need to be implanted during surgery

Patient’s management/acceptability

NO – it may be difficult to manage the recording sensors and

the external equipment may be uncomfortable

YES – all the equipment is implanted

YES – the patient perceives the same system as for traditional

DBS

NO - CFMs have a time life of only a few months and have to be

replaced

Correlation with the clinical state

YES/NO – optimal correlation with tremor, but no correlations with rigidity and bradikinesia

YES – EcoG phase amplitude coupling and M1 action potentials correlate with main PD symptoms

and can be used to drive aDBS

YES – multiple LFP oscillations are modulated by levodopa

administration, DBS, movements, and non-motor tasks

even years after electrode implant

YES - the time duration of tremor-free period is comparable to the duration of increased levels of stimulation-induced dopamine

release after DBS pulse trains

Personalization and adaptability

NO – cannot be used if patients do not show tremor

YES/NO – it may encode patient specific information

YES – the presence of multiple rhythms correlating with

different patient’s characteristics may account for inter-subject

variability

NOT$YET$TESTED

Low battery consumptionYES/NO – the processing can be

done externally, but triggers should be sent via telemetry links

YES/NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$

the$feedback$algorithm

YES/NO – the IPG needs to include the sensing circuit and

the feedback algorithm

NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$the$

feedback$algorithm

Proof of conceptYES in humans (ET)

[Yamamoto et al., 2013]YES in animals [Rosin et al.,

2011]

YES in humans (PD) [Little et al., 2013; Rosa et al., 2015; Little

et al., 2015]NO

sEMG and accelerometers Cortical neurosignals Basal ganglia LFPs Neurotransmitters

Additional implant/equipment YES – external sensors required YES – implanted cortical electrodes required

NO – LFPs are recorded from the implanted DBS electrode YES – at least 4 additional CFM

Changes in the surgical procedures

NO – the additional implant is external and does not affect the

surgical procedure

YES – the surgery needs to include the implant of cortical

electrodes

NO – no additional implant during surgery

YES– the additional CFMs need to be implanted during surgery

Patient’s management/acceptability

NO – it may be difficult to manage the recording sensors and

the external equipment may be uncomfortable

YES – all the equipment is implanted

YES – the patient perceives the same system as for traditional

DBS

NO - CFMs have a time life of only a few months and have to be

replaced

Correlation with the clinical state

YES/NO – optimal correlation with tremor, but no correlations

with rigidity and bradikinesia

YES – EcoG phase amplitude coupling and M1 action potentials correlate with main PD symptoms

and can be used to drive aDBS

YES – multiple LFP oscillations are modulated by levodopa

administration, DBS, movements, and non-motor tasks

even years after electrode implant

YES - the time duration of tremor-free period is comparable to the duration of increased levels of stimulation-induced dopamine

release after DBS pulse trains

Personalization and adaptability

NO – cannot be used if patients do not show tremor

YES/NO – it may encode patient specific information

YES – the presence of multiple rhythms correlating with

different patient’s characteristics may account for inter-subject

variability

NOT$YET$TESTED

Low battery consumptionYES/NO – the processing can be

done externally, but triggers should be sent via telemetry links

YES/NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$

the$feedback$algorithm

YES/NO – the IPG needs to include the sensing circuit and

the feedback algorithm

NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$the$

feedback$algorithm

Proof of conceptYES in humans (ET)

[Yamamoto et al., 2013]YES in animals [Rosin et al.,

2011]

YES in humans (PD) [Little et al., 2013; Rosa et al., 2015; Little

et al., 2015]NO

sEMG and accelerometers Cortical neurosignals Basal ganglia LFPs Neurotransmitters

Additional implant/equipment YES – external sensors required YES – implanted cortical electrodes required

NO – LFPs are recorded from the implanted DBS electrode YES – at least 4 additional CFM

Changes in the surgical procedures

NO – the additional implant is external and does not affect the

surgical procedure

YES – the surgery needs to include the implant of cortical

electrodes

NO – no additional implant during surgery

YES– the additional CFMs need to be implanted during surgery

Patient’s management/acceptability

NO – it may be difficult to manage the recording sensors and

the external equipment may be uncomfortable

YES – all the equipment is implanted

YES – the patient perceives the same system as for traditional

DBS

NO - CFMs have a time life of only a few months and have to be

replaced

Correlation with the clinical state

YES/NO – optimal correlation with tremor, but no correlations with rigidity and bradikinesia

YES – EcoG phase amplitude coupling and M1 action potentials correlate with main PD symptoms

and can be used to drive aDBS

YES – multiple LFP oscillations are modulated by levodopa

administration, DBS, movements, and non-motor tasks

even years after electrode implant

YES - the time duration of tremor-free period is comparable to the duration of increased levels of stimulation-induced dopamine

release after DBS pulse trains

Personalization and adaptability

NO – cannot be used if patients do not show tremor

YES/NO – it may encode patient specific information

YES – the presence of multiple rhythms correlating with

different patient’s characteristics may account for inter-subject

variability

NOT$YET$TESTED

Low battery consumptionYES/NO – the processing can be

done externally, but triggers should be sent via telemetry links

YES/NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$

the$feedback$algorithm

YES/NO – the IPG needs to include the sensing circuit and

the feedback algorithm

NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$the$

feedback$algorithm

Proof of conceptYES in humans (ET)

[Yamamoto et al., 2013]YES in animals [Rosin et al.,

2011]

YES in humans (PD) [Little et al., 2013; Rosa et al., 2015; Little

et al., 2015]NO

sEMG and accelerometers Cortical neurosignals Basal ganglia LFPs Neurotransmitters

Additional implant/equipment YES – external sensors required YES – implanted cortical electrodes required

NO – LFPs are recorded from the implanted DBS electrode YES – at least 4 additional CFM

Changes in the surgical procedures

NO – the additional implant is external and does not affect the

surgical procedure

YES – the surgery needs to include the implant of cortical

electrodes

NO – no additional implant during surgery

YES– the additional CFMs need to be implanted during surgery

Patient’s management/acceptability

NO – it may be difficult to manage the recording sensors and

the external equipment may be uncomfortable

YES – all the equipment is implanted

YES – the patient perceives the same system as for traditional

DBS

NO - CFMs have a time life of only a few months and have to be

replaced

Correlation with the clinical state

YES/NO – optimal correlation with tremor, but no correlations

with rigidity and bradikinesia

YES – EcoG phase amplitude coupling and M1 action potentials correlate with main PD symptoms

and can be used to drive aDBS

YES – multiple LFP oscillations are modulated by levodopa

administration, DBS, movements, and non-motor tasks

even years after electrode implant

YES - the time duration of tremor-free period is comparable to the duration of increased levels of stimulation-induced dopamine

release after DBS pulse trains

Personalization and adaptability

NO – cannot be used if patients do not show tremor

YES/NO – it may encode patient specific information

YES – the presence of multiple rhythms correlating with

different patient’s characteristics may account for inter-subject

variability

NOT$YET$TESTED

Low battery consumptionYES/NO – the processing can be

done externally, but triggers should be sent via telemetry links

YES/NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$

the$feedback$algorithm

YES/NO – the IPG needs to include the sensing circuit and

the feedback algorithm

NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$the$

feedback$algorithm

Proof of conceptYES in humans (ET)

[Yamamoto et al., 2013]YES in animals [Rosin et al.,

2011]

YES in humans (PD) [Little et al., 2013; Rosa et al., 2015; Little

et al., 2015]NO

sEMG and accelerometers Cortical neurosignals Basal ganglia LFPs Neurotransmitters

Additional implant/equipment YES – external sensors required YES – implanted cortical electrodes required

NO – LFPs are recorded from the implanted DBS electrode YES – at least 4 additional CFM

Changes in the surgical procedures

NO – the additional implant is external and does not affect the

surgical procedure

YES – the surgery needs to include the implant of cortical

electrodes

NO – no additional implant during surgery

YES– the additional CFMs need to be implanted during surgery

Patient’s management/acceptability

NO – it may be difficult to manage the recording sensors and

the external equipment may be uncomfortable

YES – all the equipment is implanted

YES – the patient perceives the same system as for traditional

DBS

NO - CFMs have a time life of only a few months and have to be

replaced

Correlation with the clinical state

YES/NO – optimal correlation with tremor, but no correlations with rigidity and bradikinesia

YES – EcoG phase amplitude coupling and M1 action potentials correlate with main PD symptoms

and can be used to drive aDBS

YES – multiple LFP oscillations are modulated by levodopa

administration, DBS, movements, and non-motor tasks

even years after electrode implant

YES - the time duration of tremor-free period is comparable to the duration of increased levels of stimulation-induced dopamine

release after DBS pulse trains

Personalization and adaptability

NO – cannot be used if patients do not show tremor

YES/NO – it may encode patient specific information

YES – the presence of multiple rhythms correlating with

different patient’s characteristics may account for inter-subject

variability

NOT$YET$TESTED

Low battery consumptionYES/NO – the processing can be

done externally, but triggers should be sent via telemetry links

YES/NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$

the$feedback$algorithm

YES/NO – the IPG needs to include the sensing circuit and

the feedback algorithm

NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$the$

feedback$algorithm

Proof of conceptYES in humans (ET)

[Yamamoto et al., 2013]YES in animals [Rosin et al.,

2011]

YES in humans (PD) [Little et al., 2013; Rosa et al., 2015; Little

et al., 2015]NO

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 16: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

LFPs

IPG

Processingandcontrol

policy

(Chang SY et al.2013; Graham et al, 2014)

NEUROCHEMICALSIGNALS

DBSCHANGESNEUROTRASMITTERCONCENTRATIONà CLOSEDLOOPWITHDOPAMINECONCENTRATION

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 17: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

NEUROCHEMICALSIGNALS

sEMG and accelerometers Cortical neurosignals Basal ganglia LFPs Neurotransmitters

Additional implant/equipment YES – external sensors required YES – implanted cortical electrodes required

NO – LFPs are recorded from the implanted DBS electrode YES – at least 4 additional CFM

Changes in the surgical procedures

NO – the additional implant is external and does not affect the

surgical procedure

YES – the surgery needs to include the implant of cortical

electrodes

NO – no additional implant during surgery

YES– the additional CFMs need to be implanted during surgery

Patient’s management/acceptability

NO – it may be difficult to manage the recording sensors and

the external equipment may be uncomfortable

YES – all the equipment is implanted

YES – the patient perceives the same system as for traditional

DBS

NO - CFMs have a time life of only a few months and have to be

replaced

Correlation with the clinical state

YES/NO – optimal correlation with tremor, but no correlations with rigidity and bradikinesia

YES – EcoG phase amplitude coupling and M1 action potentials correlate with main PD symptoms

and can be used to drive aDBS

YES – multiple LFP oscillations are modulated by levodopa

administration, DBS, movements, and non-motor tasks

even years after electrode implant

YES - the time duration of tremor-free period is comparable to the duration of increased levels of stimulation-induced dopamine

release after DBS pulse trains

Personalization and adaptability

NO – cannot be used if patients do not show tremor

YES/NO – it may encode patient specific information

YES – the presence of multiple rhythms correlating with

different patient’s characteristics may account for inter-subject

variability

NOT$YET$TESTED

Low battery consumptionYES/NO – the processing can be

done externally, but triggers should be sent via telemetry links

YES/NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$

the$feedback$algorithm

YES/NO – the IPG needs to include the sensing circuit and

the feedback algorithm

NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$the$

feedback$algorithm

Proof of conceptYES in humans (ET)

[Yamamoto et al., 2013]YES in animals [Rosin et al.,

2011]

YES in humans (PD) [Little et al., 2013; Rosa et al., 2015; Little

et al., 2015]NO

sEMG and accelerometers Cortical neurosignals Basal ganglia LFPs Neurotransmitters

Additional implant/equipment YES – external sensors required YES – implanted cortical electrodes required

NO – LFPs are recorded from the implanted DBS electrode YES – at least 4 additional CFM

Changes in the surgical procedures

NO – the additional implant is external and does not affect the

surgical procedure

YES – the surgery needs to include the implant of cortical

electrodes

NO – no additional implant during surgery

YES– the additional CFMs need to be implanted during surgery

Patient’s management/acceptability

NO – it may be difficult to manage the recording sensors and

the external equipment may be uncomfortable

YES – all the equipment is implanted

YES – the patient perceives the same system as for traditional

DBS

NO - CFMs have a time life of only a few months and have to be

replaced

Correlation with the clinical state

YES/NO – optimal correlation with tremor, but no correlations

with rigidity and bradikinesia

YES – EcoG phase amplitude coupling and M1 action potentials correlate with main PD symptoms

and can be used to drive aDBS

YES – multiple LFP oscillations are modulated by levodopa

administration, DBS, movements, and non-motor tasks

even years after electrode implant

YES - the time duration of tremor-free period is comparable to the duration of increased levels of stimulation-induced dopamine

release after DBS pulse trains

Personalization and adaptability

NO – cannot be used if patients do not show tremor

YES/NO – it may encode patient specific information

YES – the presence of multiple rhythms correlating with

different patient’s characteristics may account for inter-subject

variability

NOT$YET$TESTED

Low battery consumptionYES/NO – the processing can be

done externally, but triggers should be sent via telemetry links

YES/NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$

the$feedback$algorithm

YES/NO – the IPG needs to include the sensing circuit and

the feedback algorithm

NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$the$

feedback$algorithm

Proof of conceptYES in humans (ET)

[Yamamoto et al., 2013]YES in animals [Rosin et al.,

2011]

YES in humans (PD) [Little et al., 2013; Rosa et al., 2015; Little

et al., 2015]NO

sEMG and accelerometers Cortical neurosignals Basal ganglia LFPs Neurotransmitters

Additional implant/equipment YES – external sensors required YES – implanted cortical electrodes required

NO – LFPs are recorded from the implanted DBS electrode YES – at least 4 additional CFM

Changes in the surgical procedures

NO – the additional implant is external and does not affect the

surgical procedure

YES – the surgery needs to include the implant of cortical

electrodes

NO – no additional implant during surgery

YES– the additional CFMs need to be implanted during surgery

Patient’s management/acceptability

NO – it may be difficult to manage the recording sensors and

the external equipment may be uncomfortable

YES – all the equipment is implanted

YES – the patient perceives the same system as for traditional

DBS

NO - CFMs have a time life of only a few months and have to be

replaced

Correlation with the clinical state

YES/NO – optimal correlation with tremor, but no correlations with rigidity and bradikinesia

YES – EcoG phase amplitude coupling and M1 action potentials correlate with main PD symptoms

and can be used to drive aDBS

YES – multiple LFP oscillations are modulated by levodopa

administration, DBS, movements, and non-motor tasks

even years after electrode implant

YES - the time duration of tremor-free period is comparable to the duration of increased levels of stimulation-induced dopamine

release after DBS pulse trains

Personalization and adaptability

NO – cannot be used if patients do not show tremor

YES/NO – it may encode patient specific information

YES – the presence of multiple rhythms correlating with

different patient’s characteristics may account for inter-subject

variability

NOT$YET$TESTED

Low battery consumptionYES/NO – the processing can be

done externally, but triggers should be sent via telemetry links

YES/NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$

the$feedback$algorithm

YES/NO – the IPG needs to include the sensing circuit and

the feedback algorithm

NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$the$

feedback$algorithm

Proof of conceptYES in humans (ET)

[Yamamoto et al., 2013]YES in animals [Rosin et al.,

2011]

YES in humans (PD) [Little et al., 2013; Rosa et al., 2015; Little

et al., 2015]NO

sEMG and accelerometers Cortical neurosignals Basal ganglia LFPs Neurotransmitters

Additional implant/equipment YES – external sensors required YES – implanted cortical electrodes required

NO – LFPs are recorded from the implanted DBS electrode YES – at least 4 additional CFM

Changes in the surgical procedures

NO – the additional implant is external and does not affect the

surgical procedure

YES – the surgery needs to include the implant of cortical

electrodes

NO – no additional implant during surgery

YES– the additional CFMs need to be implanted during surgery

Patient’s management/acceptability

NO – it may be difficult to manage the recording sensors and

the external equipment may be uncomfortable

YES – all the equipment is implanted

YES – the patient perceives the same system as for traditional

DBS

NO - CFMs have a time life of only a few months and have to be

replaced

Correlation with the clinical state

YES/NO – optimal correlation with tremor, but no correlations

with rigidity and bradikinesia

YES – EcoG phase amplitude coupling and M1 action potentials correlate with main PD symptoms

and can be used to drive aDBS

YES – multiple LFP oscillations are modulated by levodopa

administration, DBS, movements, and non-motor tasks

even years after electrode implant

YES - the time duration of tremor-free period is comparable to the duration of increased levels of stimulation-induced dopamine

release after DBS pulse trains

Personalization and adaptability

NO – cannot be used if patients do not show tremor

YES/NO – it may encode patient specific information

YES – the presence of multiple rhythms correlating with

different patient’s characteristics may account for inter-subject

variability

NOT$YET$TESTED

Low battery consumptionYES/NO – the processing can be

done externally, but triggers should be sent via telemetry links

YES/NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$

the$feedback$algorithm

YES/NO – the IPG needs to include the sensing circuit and

the feedback algorithm

NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$the$

feedback$algorithm

Proof of conceptYES in humans (ET)

[Yamamoto et al., 2013]YES in animals [Rosin et al.,

2011]

YES in humans (PD) [Little et al., 2013; Rosa et al., 2015; Little

et al., 2015]NO

sEMG and accelerometers Cortical neurosignals Basal ganglia LFPs Neurotransmitters

Additional implant/equipment YES – external sensors required YES – implanted cortical electrodes required

NO – LFPs are recorded from the implanted DBS electrode YES – at least 4 additional CFM

Changes in the surgical procedures

NO – the additional implant is external and does not affect the

surgical procedure

YES – the surgery needs to include the implant of cortical

electrodes

NO – no additional implant during surgery

YES– the additional CFMs need to be implanted during surgery

Patient’s management/acceptability

NO – it may be difficult to manage the recording sensors and

the external equipment may be uncomfortable

YES – all the equipment is implanted

YES – the patient perceives the same system as for traditional

DBS

NO - CFMs have a time life of only a few months and have to be

replaced

Correlation with the clinical state

YES/NO – optimal correlation with tremor, but no correlations with rigidity and bradikinesia

YES – EcoG phase amplitude coupling and M1 action potentials correlate with main PD symptoms

and can be used to drive aDBS

YES – multiple LFP oscillations are modulated by levodopa

administration, DBS, movements, and non-motor tasks

even years after electrode implant

YES - the time duration of tremor-free period is comparable to the duration of increased levels of stimulation-induced dopamine

release after DBS pulse trains

Personalization and adaptability

NO – cannot be used if patients do not show tremor

YES/NO – it may encode patient specific information

YES – the presence of multiple rhythms correlating with

different patient’s characteristics may account for inter-subject

variability

NOT$YET$TESTED

Low battery consumptionYES/NO – the processing can be

done externally, but triggers should be sent via telemetry links

YES/NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$

the$feedback$algorithm

YES/NO – the IPG needs to include the sensing circuit and

the feedback algorithm

NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$the$

feedback$algorithm

Proof of conceptYES in humans (ET)

[Yamamoto et al., 2013]YES in animals [Rosin et al.,

2011]

YES in humans (PD) [Little et al., 2013; Rosa et al., 2015; Little

et al., 2015]NO

sEMG and accelerometers Cortical neurosignals Basal ganglia LFPs Neurotransmitters

Additional implant/equipment YES – external sensors required YES – implanted cortical electrodes required

NO – LFPs are recorded from the implanted DBS electrode YES – at least 4 additional CFM

Changes in the surgical procedures

NO – the additional implant is external and does not affect the

surgical procedure

YES – the surgery needs to include the implant of cortical

electrodes

NO – no additional implant during surgery

YES– the additional CFMs need to be implanted during surgery

Patient’s management/acceptability

NO – it may be difficult to manage the recording sensors and

the external equipment may be uncomfortable

YES – all the equipment is implanted

YES – the patient perceives the same system as for traditional

DBS

NO - CFMs have a time life of only a few months and have to be

replaced

Correlation with the clinical state

YES/NO – optimal correlation with tremor, but no correlations

with rigidity and bradikinesia

YES – EcoG phase amplitude coupling and M1 action potentials correlate with main PD symptoms

and can be used to drive aDBS

YES – multiple LFP oscillations are modulated by levodopa

administration, DBS, movements, and non-motor tasks

even years after electrode implant

YES - the time duration of tremor-free period is comparable to the duration of increased levels of stimulation-induced dopamine

release after DBS pulse trains

Personalization and adaptability

NO – cannot be used if patients do not show tremor

YES/NO – it may encode patient specific information

YES – the presence of multiple rhythms correlating with

different patient’s characteristics may account for inter-subject

variability

NOT$YET$TESTED

Low battery consumptionYES/NO – the processing can be

done externally, but triggers should be sent via telemetry links

YES/NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$

the$feedback$algorithm

YES/NO – the IPG needs to include the sensing circuit and

the feedback algorithm

NO$– the$IPG$needs$to$include$the$sensing$circuit$and$the$

feedback$algorithm

Proof of conceptYES in humans (ET)

[Yamamoto et al., 2013]YES in animals [Rosin et al.,

2011]

YES in humans (PD) [Little et al., 2013; Rosa et al., 2015; Little

et al., 2015]NO

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 18: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

LOCALFIELDPOTENTIALS(LFPs)

Neuronalpopulation

DBS electrode

Local fieldpotential

DEEPEEGACTIVITY

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 19: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

LFPs

IPG

Processingandcontrol

policy

LFPs CANBECAPTUREDBYTHESAMEELECTRODEDELIVERINGDBS à

1.Noadditional implant2.Nochanges insurgical procedure3. acceptable bythepatients asconventional DBS

LOCALFIELDPOTENTIALS

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 20: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

LFPs

IPG

Processingandcontrol

policy

(Priori et al 2004)

LFPscorrelatewiththeclinicalstateRisposta alla terapia dopaminergica

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 21: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

LFPs

IPG

Processingandcontrol

policy

(Foffani et al 2005)

(Kuhn et al 2009)

LFPscorrelatewiththeclinicalstateRisposta al movimento volontario Correlazione a rigidità e bradicinesia

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 22: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

LFPs

IPG

Processingandcontrol

policy

(Rodriguez-Oroz et al 2011)

LFPscorrelatewiththeclinicalstateDyskinesias

(Alonso-French et al 2006)

(Foffani et al, 2005)

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 23: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

LFPscorrelatewiththeclinicalstate

(Quinn et al, 2015)

Response to DBS

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 24: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

aDBS INHUMANS:APPROACH1A

B

Rosaetal.2015 e2017Arlottietal,2017

Voltagemodulationofstimulation infunctionoftheSTNbetapower

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 25: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

Littleetal.2013

Littleetal.2015

aDBS INHUMANS:APPROACH2

Off/onDBSinfunctionofagivenbetapowerlevel

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy

Page 26: Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS › MDS-Files1 › Private-Files › DB… · Deep Brain Stimulation - DBS Technological innovations Alberto Priori Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental

S.Marceglia

COORDINATED-RESETDBS• train of high frequency

through electrodes different from those implanted

• Tested in primate and humans à beta reduction and clinical improvement

Adamcich etal,Mov Disord,2014

AlbertoPriori

CenterforNeurotechnology andExperimental BrainTherapeutics

University ofMilan,Italy